SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10–Q

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

of the Securities Act of 1934

For the Quarter Ended June 27, 2014

Commission File No. 0–23018

PLANAR SYSTEMS, INC.

(exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Oregon	93-0835396
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

1195 NW Compton Dr., Beaverton, Oregon	97006
(Address of principal executive offices)	(zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (503) 748-1100

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” “non-accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.):    Yes  ¨    No  x

Number of common stock outstanding as of July 30, 2014

21,928,279 shares, no par value per share

PLANAR SYSTEMS, INC.

INDEX

		Page
Part I.	Financial Information		3
Item 1.	Financial Statements		3
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 27, 2014 (unaudited) and September 27, 2013		3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013 (unaudited)		4
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three and Nine Months Ended June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013 (unaudited)		5
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013 (unaudited)		6
	Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)		7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		13
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		25
Part II.	Other Information		26
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		26
Item 1a.	Risk Factors		26
Item 6.	Exhibits		35
	Signatures		36

2

Part 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

PLANAR SYSTEMS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	Jun. 27, 2014			Sept. 27, 2013
	(unaudited)
	(In thousands, except share data)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	11,517		$	11,971
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $359 at June 27, 2014 and $498 at September 27, 2013		25,175			22,821
Inventories (Note 2)		26,247			30,003
Other current assets (Note 9)		4,602			2,426
Total current assets		67,541			67,221
Property, plant and equipment, net		5,313			6,434
Other assets (Note 9)		7,582			6,230
	$	80,436		$	79,885
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	16,156		$	17,042
Current portion of capital leases		443			759
Deferred revenue		1,638			1,685
Other current liabilities (Notes 5 and 6)		13,455			12,848
Total current liabilities		31,692			32,334
Capital leases, less current portion		—			394
Other long-term liabilities (Note 5)		4,396			5,390
Total liabilities		36,088			38,118
Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 10,000,000 shares, no shares issued		—			—
Common stock, no par value. Authorized 30,000,000 shares; 21,541,779 and 21,036,278 issued shares at June 27, 2014 and September 27, 2013, respectively		187,517			186,202
Retained deficit		(140,612	)		(141,735	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(2,557	)		(2,700	)
Total shareholders’ equity		44,348			41,767
	$	80,436		$	79,885

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

PLANAR SYSTEMS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

	Three months ended						Nine months ended
	Jun. 27, 2014			Jun. 28, 2013			Jun. 27, 2014			Jun. 28, 2013
Sales	$	43,853		$	37,485		$	125,385		$	121,101
Cost of sales		33,188			29,359			95,325			93,954
Gross profit		10,665			8,126			30,060			27,147
Operating expenses:
Research and development, net		1,560			1,620			4,273			5,475
Sales and marketing		5,187			4,819			14,914			14,923
General and administrative		3,158			2,833			9,614			9,159
Amortization of intangible assets		—			147			—			442
Restructuring (Note 5)		10			2,407			31			2,601
Loss on sale of assets (Note 9)		—			—			—			1,314
Total operating expenses		9,915			11,826			28,832			33,914
Income (loss) from operations		750			(3,700	)		1,228			(6,767	)
Non-operating income (expense):
Interest, net		99			39			234			104
Foreign exchange, net		(1	)		(1	)		(54	)		(14	)
Other, net		(27	)		166			422			462
Net non-operating income		71			204			602			552
Income (loss) before income taxes		821			(3,496	)		1,830			(6,215	)
Provision for income taxes (Note 7)		115			71			266			114
Net income (loss)		706			(3,567	)		1,564			(6,329	)
Net income (loss) per share
Basic (Note 3)	$	0.03		$	(0.17	)	$	0.07		$	(0.31	)
Diluted (Note 3)	$	0.03		$	(0.17	)	$	0.07		$	(0.31	)
Average shares outstanding—basic (Note 3)		21,491			20,899			21,302			20,672
Average shares outstanding—diluted (Note 3)		21,623			20,899			21,506			20,672

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

PLANAR SYSTEMS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(Unaudited)

	Three months ended						Nine months ended
	Jun. 27, 2014			Jun. 28, 2013			Jun. 27, 2014		Jun. 28, 2013
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Net income (loss)	$	706		$	(3,567	)	$	1,564	$	(6,329	)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(121	)		190			143		119
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss		—			—			—		—
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	585		$	(3,377	)	$	1,707	$	(6,210	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

PLANAR SYSTEMS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	Nine months ended
	Jun. 27, 2014			Jun. 28, 2013
	(In thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$	1,564		$	(6,329	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities
Depreciation and amortization		1,331			1,457
Restructuring charges		31			2,601
Loss on sale of assets		—			1,314
Share based compensation		1,144			1,160
Net reduction in carrying amounts of certain assets and liabilities		—			(491	)
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable, net		(2,310	)		168
(Increase) decrease in inventories		3,795			(6,081	)
Increase in other assets		(91	)		(449	)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable		(896	)		3,771
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue		(53	)		126
Decrease in other liabilities		(520	)		(3,001	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		3,995			(5,754	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment		(247	)		(2,819	)
Acquisition of Beneq component device receivable (Note 9)		(3,981	)		—
Proceeds from Beneq receivables (Note 9)		612			—
Proceeds from sale of assets (Note 9)		—			4,145
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(3,616	)		1,326
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from capital lease		—			1,017
Payments of capital lease obligations		(710	)		(771	)
Value of shares withheld for tax liability		(441	)		(392	)
Net proceeds from issuance of capital stock		171			184
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(980	)		38
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		147			34
Net decrease in cash		(454	)		(4,356	)
Cash at beginning of period		11,971			17,768
Cash at end of period	$	11,517		$	13,412

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

6

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. However, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in such financial statements have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, the statements include all adjustments necessary (which are of a normal and recurring nature) for the fair presentation of the results of the periods presented. These financial statements should be read in connection with the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended September 27, 2013. All references to a year or a quarter in these notes are to the Company’s fiscal year or quarter in the period stated.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of sales and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates.

The accompanying financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The results of operations from the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for any subsequent interim period or for the year ending September 26, 2014.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2013-02, “Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income,” (“ASU 2013-02”) which adds additional disclosure requirements for items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. ASU 2013-02 effectively replaces the requirements previously included in ASU 2011-05 and 2011-12. ASU 2013-02 is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2012. Accordingly, the Company adopted this standard on September 28, 2013. The Company did not have any reclassifications during the first nine months of 2014 that would require additional disclosure under this ASU, and as such the adoption of this ASU did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

NOTE 2 – INVENTORIES

Inventories, stated at the lower of cost or market, consist of:

	Jun. 27, 2014		Sept. 27, 2013
Raw materials	$	15,390	$	15,911
Work in process		178		59
Finished goods		10,679		14,033
	$	26,247	$	30,003

NOTE 3 – EARNINGS PER SHARE

Weighted average basic shares outstanding for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2014 were 21,491,000 and 21,302,000, respectively. Diluted shares outstanding for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2014 were 21,623,000 and 21,506,000, respectively. Weighted average basic and diluted shares outstanding for the three and nine months ended June 28, 2013 were 20,899,000 and 20,672,000, respectively. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification^TM (“ASC”) Topic 260, “Earnings per Share,” requires that employee equity share options, nonvested shares and similar equity instruments granted by the Company be treated as potential common shares in computing diluted earnings per share. Diluted shares outstanding includes the dilutive effect of in-the-money options and nonvested shares, which is calculated based on the average closing share price for each fiscal period using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the amount that the employee must pay for exercising stock options, the amount of compensation cost for future service that the Company has not yet recognized, and the amount of tax benefits or deficiencies that would be recorded in additional paid-in capital when the award becomes deductible are assumed to be used to repurchase shares. For the three and nine months ended June 27, 2014 the dilutive effect of nonvested stock awards was approximately 132,000 and 204,000, respectively. There was no dilutive effect of in-the-money employee stock options for the three or nine months ended June 27, 2014. For the three and nine months ended June 27, 2014 options and nonvested stock awards amounting to approximately 605,000 shares and 682,000 shares, respectively, were excluded from the calculation as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. There was no dilutive effect of in-the-money employee stock options or nonvested shares as of June 28, 2013 due to the Company incurring a net loss for each of the three and nine months then ended.

7

NOTE 4 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

In the first quarter of fiscal 2010 the Company adopted the 2009 Incentive Plan (the “2009 Plan”). This plan replaced the Company’s 1993 Stock Incentive Plan, the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, the 1999 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, the 2007 New Hire Incentive Plan, the Clarity Visual Systems, Inc. 1995 Plan and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan as well as any individual inducement awards, which are collectively referred to as the “Prior Plans.” The 2009 Plan authorizes the issuance of 1,300,000 shares of common stock. In addition, up to 2,963,375 shares subject to awards outstanding under the Prior Plans at the time the 2009 Plan was approved became available for issuance under the 2009 Plan to the extent that these shares cease to be subject to the original awards (such as by expiration, cancellation or forfeiture of the awards). In the fourth quarter of 2012, shareholders approved an amendment to the 2009 Plan, authorizing the issuance of an additional 1,700,000 shares of common stock. The maximum number of shares that may be issued under the 2009 Plan is 5,963,375 shares, including shares available from the Prior Plans.

Stock Options

The 2009 Plan provides for the granting of stock options, which generally vest and become exercisable over a three-year period and expire seven to ten years after the date of grant. Options were last granted in the third quarter of fiscal 2008.

Information regarding outstanding options is as follows:

	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Options outstanding at September 27, 2013		787,674		$	9.35
Granted		—			—
Exercised		—			—
Forfeited		—			—
Expired		(212,908	)		11.45
Options outstanding at June 27, 2014		574,766		$	8.57

All options outstanding at June 27, 2014 were exercisable. As of June 27, 2014, the total pretax intrinsic value of options outstanding and options exercisable was $0 and the options had a weighted average remaining contractual term of 1.2 years.

Restricted Stock

The 2009 Plan provides for the issuance of restricted stock (“nonvested shares” per ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation”). Shares issued generally vest over a one to three year period upon the passage of time, or upon meeting objective performance conditions.

Information regarding outstanding restricted stock awards is as follows:

	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Grant  Date Fair Value
Restricted stock outstanding at September 27, 2013		1,417,509		$	1.86
Granted		943,000			2.17
Vested		(589,135	)		1.78
Forfeited		(38,533	)		1.87
Restricted stock outstanding at June 27, 2014		1,732,841		$	2.05

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“the Plan”) provides that eligible employees may contribute, through payroll deductions, up to 10% of their earnings toward the purchase of the Company’s Common Stock at 85% of the fair market value at specific dates. The fair value of the purchase rights is estimated on the first day of the offering period using the Black-Scholes model. As of June 27, 2014, approximately 500,000 shares remained available for purchase under the Plan.

8

Valuation and Expense Information

The following table summarizes share based compensation expense related to share based payment awards and employee stock purchases for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013. The expense was allocated as follows:

	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	Jun. 27, 2014		Jun. 28, 2013		Jun. 27, 2014		Jun. 28, 2013
Cost of sales	$	27	$	22	$	73	$	75
Research and development, net	$	15	$	—	$	34	$	82
Sales and marketing		55		61		141		212
General and administrative		259		208		896		791
Share based compensation expense included in operating expenses	$	329	$	269	$	1,071	$	1,085
Share based compensation expense related to employee stock options, restricted stock awards and employee stock purchase plan	$	356	$	291	$	1,144	$	1,160

The Company recognizes compensation expense for all share based payment awards made to its employees and directors including employee stock options, restricted stock awards and employee stock purchases related to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, based on estimated fair values. The Company calculates the value of employee stock options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model. This model is also used to estimate the fair value of employee stock purchases related to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The Company values restricted stock awards at the closing price of the Company’s shares on the date of grant. As share based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures were estimated based on historical and anticipated future experience.

NOTE 5 – RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

In the third quarter of 2013, the Company consolidated its two assembly and integration facilities in the United States into a single facility. This action resulted in a net restructuring charge of $2,407 and a liability of $2,649 related to the estimated present value of the remaining lease payments on the vacated facility less an assumption for sublease income. The $2,649 liability was comprised of $546 of existing lease related liabilities and restructuring charges of $2,103. The remaining $304 of net restructuring charges related to reductions in the carrying amounts of leasehold improvements and other property, plant, and equipment disposed of as part of the consolidation. For the three and nine months ended June 27, 2014, the Company recorded $10 and $31, respectively, in accretion of interest expense related to the liability recorded in the third quarter of 2013 for this action. In the first quarter of 2013, the Company recorded $194 in charges related to severance benefits estimated for the termination of certain employees who performed manufacturing and general and administrative functions at the Company’s facility in Finland.

Restructuring charges related to previously recorded charges affected the Company’s financial position as follows:

	Accrued Compensation			Other  Current Liabilities			Other Long-term Liabilities
Balance as of September 27, 2013	$	483		$	823		$	1,651
Accretion of interest expense		—			31			—
Cash paid		(456	)		(594	)		—
Reclassifications from other long-term liabilities to other current liabilities		—			347			(347	)
Balance as of June 27, 2014	$	27		$	607		$	1,304

9

NOTE 6 – OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

Other current liabilities consist of:

	Jun. 27, 2014		Sept. 27, 2013
Warranty reserve	$	3,203	$	3,611
Accrued compensation		3,493		3,193
Other		6,759		6,044
Total	$	13,455	$	12,848

The Company provides a warranty for its products and establishes an allowance at the time of sale which the Company believes, based on its best estimates, is sufficient to cover costs during the warranty period. The warranty period is generally between 12 and 36 months. This reserve is included in other current liabilities.

A reconciliation of the changes in the warranty reserve is as follows:

	Jun. 27, 2014
	Three months ended			Nine months ended
Balance at beginning of period	$	3,180		$	3,611
Cash paid for warranty repairs		(676	)		(2,275	)
Provision for current period sales		699			1,867
Balance at end of period	$	3,203		$	3,203

NOTE 7 – INCOME TAXES

The provision for income taxes for the third quarter of 2014 was recorded based upon the current estimate of the Company’s annual effective tax rate. Generally, the provision for income taxes is the result of a mix of profits and losses the Company and its subsidiaries earn in tax jurisdictions with a broad range of income tax rates. The tax provisions of $115 and $266 for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2014, respectively, were generated by a mix of tax expense in foreign jurisdictions and state taxes. The tax provision of $71 for the three months ended June 28, 2013 was driven by expense in certain foreign jurisdictions and state taxes. The tax provision of $114 for the nine months ended June 28, 2013 was generated by a mix of tax expense in foreign jurisdictions and state taxes, partially offset by a benefit in certain foreign jurisdictions.

For the three months ended June 27, 2014 the effective tax rate of 14.0% differs from the federal statutory rate due to the valuation allowance on Finnish losses, and by generating U.S. income that can make use of NOL’s which previously had valuation allowances recorded against them. The effective tax rate of negative 2.0% for the three months ended June 28, 2013 differed from the federal statutory rate due to the effects of the Company’s operations in foreign jurisdictions and to the valuation allowance on U.S. and Finnish losses.

Each quarter the Company assesses and evaluates a number of factors in determining whether the weight of available evidence supports the recognition of some or all of the deferred tax assets. The Company establishes a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that such deferred tax assets will not be realized. In fiscal 2007 the Company determined that a valuation allowance should be recorded against all of its U.S. deferred tax assets, and in the third quarter of fiscal 2012 the Company recorded a valuation allowance against its Finnish deferred tax assets due to its cumulative three year operating loss in Finland.

As of June 27, 2014 the Company continued to place a valuation allowance against its U.S. and Finnish deferred tax assets. While a valuation allowance was still in place for financial statement purposes as of June 27, 2014, the valuation allowance does not limit the Company’s ability to utilize the loss-carryforwards or other deferred tax assets on future tax returns.

During the three and nine months ended June 27, 2014 there were no material changes to the amount of unrecognized tax benefits under ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes.” The Company is subject to taxation primarily in the United States, Finland, and France, as well as in certain states (including Oregon and California) and other foreign jurisdictions. The Company’s larger jurisdictions generally provide for statutes of limitations from three to five years. The Company has settled with the Internal Revenue Service on their examination of all United States federal income tax matters through fiscal year 2008. The Company has also settled examinations of both its Finnish tax returns for all tax years through 2007, as well as its French tax returns through fiscal year 2010. It is reasonably possible that the Company’s uncertain tax positions could decrease by approximately $386 in the next twelve months due to settlement of foreign items and state taxes.

10

The Company has not provided for U.S. income taxes on the undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries because they are considered permanently invested outside of the United States. If repatriated, these earnings would generate foreign tax credits, which may reduce the federal tax liability associated with any future foreign dividend. As of June 27, 2014 the undistributed earnings of these foreign operations were approximately $1,600 and the unrecognized deferred tax liability related to these undistributed earnings was $100.

NOTE 8 – BORROWINGS

The Company entered into a new credit agreement with Silicon Valley Bank on November 21, 2013, resulting in the termination of its prior credit agreement with Bank of America. The Company’s credit agreement with Silicon Valley Bank allows for borrowing up to 80% of its eligible accounts receivable with a maximum borrowing capacity of $12.0 million. The credit agreement has interest rates ranging from LIBOR + 2.25% to Prime + 0.75%, expires on November 21, 2015, and is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company. The Company’s current borrowing capacity is $12.0 million, of which approximately $0.8 million is committed through standby letters of credit related to the Company’s capital lease obligations. There were no amounts outstanding under the Company’s credit agreement as of June 27, 2014 and September 27, 2013. The credit agreement contains certain financial covenants, with which the Company was in compliance as of June 27, 2014.

NOTE 9 – LOSS ON SALE OF ASSETS

In the first quarter of 2013 the Company sold the assets and liabilities associated with its electroluminescent (“EL”) product line to Beneq Products Oy (“Beneq”) for a base sale price of $6.5 million, of which $3.9 million was paid in cash at closing, with the remaining $2.6 million held as two promissory notes (collectively, “Purchase Price Note”) and included in other current assets and other assets as of June 27, 2014. The term of the Purchase Price Note is five years with principal payments due annually beginning on November 30, 2014. The Purchase Price Note accrued interest at 8% annually in the first year, after which the interest rate increased to 15% annually. In the third quarter of 2014, in connection with the Settlement Agreement described below, the interest rate applicable to the Purchase Price Note was reduced to 10% annually, with interest payments now due in advance on the first day of each month. The transaction terms also provide for up to $3.5 million in additional cash consideration, which may be earned based upon the EL business achieving certain financial results in calendar years 2013 through 2015. As a result of this transaction the Company recorded a loss on sale of $1.3 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2013. The loss recognized included transaction costs that were comprised primarily of legal and other professional services fees. The sale of these assets and liabilities did not constitute a disposal of a component of the Company as defined by ASC Topic 205, “Presentation of Financial Statements.”

Under the terms of the sale of assets agreement entered into by the Company in conjunction with the sale of the assets and liabilities associated with the EL product line, the Company transferred to Beneq certain non-cancelable component purchase commitments with third party vendors. Subsequent to the closing of the transaction, the Company learned that a vendor would not cooperate in the transfer to Beneq of such purchase commitments and demanded performance by Planar. In the third quarter of 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with this vendor (“Vendor Agreement”) related to such purchase commitments. As a part of the Vendor Agreement, the Company agreed to take delivery and ownership of €2.9 million ($3.9 million based on the EUR to USD exchange rate as of the agreement date) of electronic component devices. Delivery of these components and payment to the vendor were both completed in the third quarter of 2014. In the third quarter of 2014, the Company also entered into a settlement agreement with Beneq (“Settlement Agreement”) establishing the terms under which the components will be transferred to and paid for by Beneq (“Component Device Receivable”).

As a result of the Vendor and Settlement Agreements, the Company’s financial position was impacted by a reduction in cash, an increase in other current assets, and an increase in other assets.

Other current assets consist of:

	Jun. 27, 2014		Sept. 27, 2013
Purchase Price Note Receivable from Beneq, current portion	$	650	$	—
Component Device Receivable from Beneq, current portion		409		—
Other		3,543		2,426
Total	$	4,602	$	2,426

Other assets consist of:

	Jun. 27, 2014		Sept. 27, 2013
Purchase Price Note Receivable from Beneq, non-current portion	$	1,950	$	2,600
Component Device Receivable from Beneq, non-current portion		2,932		—
Other		2,700		3,630
Total	$	7,582	$	6,230

11

Management has reviewed the total $5.9 million due from Beneq and determined that as of June 27, 2014 the total receivables due from Beneq were collectible and appropriately valued on the Company’s balance sheet as of that date. Accordingly, no allowance has been recorded against these receivables.

12

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated interim financial statements and the notes thereto in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report and with the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 27, 2013.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other sections of this Report include “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements, which may be identified by the inclusion of words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “goal”, “possible” and variations of such words and other similar expressions, are based on current expectations, estimates, assumptions and projections that are subject to change, and actual results may differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements include, among others: expectations about the growth of the digital signage display market; beliefs about and continued focus on digital signage products and efforts to transition the Company’s focus, strategic direction and resources; work to diversify the Company’s supplier base; expectations regarding the future impact of accounting measures; the possibility (and timing) of decreases in the Company’s uncertain tax positions; and the collectability of the promissory notes and component device receivable due from Beneq. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Many factors, including the risk factors included in Part II, Item 1A of this Report and the following, could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements: poor or further weakened domestic and international business and economic conditions; changes or continued reductions in the demand or order rates for products in the various display markets served by the Company; any delay in the timing of customer orders or the Company’s ability to ship product upon receipt of a customer order; the extent and timing of any additional expenditures by the Company to address business growth opportunities; any inability to reduce costs or to do so quickly enough, in either case, in response to reductions in revenue; the ability of the Company to successfully implement any cost reduction initiatives or generally cause ongoing operating expenses to be maintained at levels permitting Company profitability; adverse impacts on the Company or its operations relating to or arising from any inability to fund desired expenditures, including due to difficulties in obtaining necessary financing; changes in the flat-panel monitor industry; changes in customer demand or ordering patterns; changes in the competitive environment including pricing pressures or the ability to keep pace with technological changes; technological advances; shortages of manufacturing capacity from the Company’s third-party manufacturing partners or other interruptions in the supply of components the Company incorporates in its finished goods including as a result of natural disasters and future production variables resulting in excess inventory. The forward-looking statements contained in this Report speak only as of the date on which they are made, and the Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Report. If the Company does update one or more forward-looking statements, it should not be concluded that the Company will make additional updates with respect thereto or with respect to other forward-looking statements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The Company reaffirms the critical accounting policies and use of estimates reported in its Form 10-K for the year ended September 27, 2013.

INTRODUCTION

Planar Systems, Inc. is a global leader in display and digital signage technology, providing premier solutions for the world’s most demanding environments. Retailers, educational institutions, government agencies, businesses, utilities and energy firms, and home theater enthusiasts all depend on Planar to provide superior performance when image experience is of the highest importance. Planar tiled liquid crystal display (“LCD”) systems, signage monitors, interactive touch screen monitors and many other solutions are used by the world’s leading organizations in applications ranging from digital signage to simulation and from interactive kiosks to large-scale data visualization. The Company has a global reach with sales offices in North America, Europe, and Asia and manufacturing facilities in the United States and France.

The electronic specialty display industry is driven by the proliferation of display products, from both the increase in functionality in “smart” devices and the availability and versatility of LCD flat panel displays at increasingly lower costs; the ongoing need for system providers and integrators to rely on display experts to provide customized solutions; and from the growth in the market for targeted marketing and messaging to consumers using digital signage in a variety of form factors in both indoor and outdoor applications.

13

Unless context otherwise requires, or as otherwise indicated, “we,” “us,” “our” and similar terms, as well as references to the “Company” and “Planar,” refer to Planar Systems, Inc. and, unless the context requires otherwise, include all of the Company’s consolidated subsidiaries.

14

The Company’s Strategy

For over 30 years, Planar has been designing and bringing to market innovative display solutions. The Company has historically focused on customized or specialty display products and systems, generally in niche display markets where requirements are more stringent, innovation is valued, and the customer is not served or is underserved by the mass-market, commodity display providers. In recent years, the Company has been transitioning its focus, strategic direction, and resources to target the larger and faster-growing market for digital signage displays, where a variety of its customers use the Company’s tiled LCD systems and large format stand-alone signage monitors for digital signage applications in retail, airport, sports arena and stadium, hospitality, corporate and higher-education venues, as well as in applications that have traditionally used customized or specialty display products and systems.

The Company’s Markets and Products

Planar delivers display products and related solutions for a wide variety of applications and vertical markets. It categorizes its products into two areas, “Digital Signage” and “Commercial and Industrial.”

Digital Signage

The Digital Signage display market has experienced growth in recent years and the Company expects that the Digital Signage display market will continue to grow in the future. Digital Signage solutions are being installed in many environments including retail locations, airports, and sports arenas, as well as emerging applications and in applications historically served by Commercial and Industrial products, including rear-projection cubes. Planar provides solutions for a number of display applications for the digital signage market utilizing a variety of technologies and products.

• Tiled LCD Systems (Matrix and Mosaic): Planar’s super narrow bezel LCD display systems allow customers to create flat, large video walls for a number of applications including ambience, advertising, architectural and brand promotion, and are being deployed in a large range of markets including retail, hospitality, commercial, sports venues and airports, as well as in markets traditionally served by rear-projection cubes, such as control rooms. Solutions utilize specialized LCD panels and “tile” them together using video processing to create large video wall displays. Products offered are well suited to these applications as they are designed for simple installation, easy and cost effective maintenance and off-boarding of power and video processing. The Company offers and supports a growing number of sizes and resolutions of super narrow bezel displays, including touch panels, which can be utilized in creating a wide variety of video wall solutions.

• Signage Monitors: Planar provides a line-up of commercial-grade LCD displays, including the recently launched zero bezel “UltraLux” and Ultra HD “UltraRes” product offerings, suitable for a wide range of digital signage uses. Included in this category are outdoor signage displays, transparent displays, and customized LCD signage solutions for customers with requirements which go beyond those available from off the shelf products.

Commercial and Industrial

The Commercial and Industrial display markets that the Company addresses are varied and numerous. Some of these markets are relatively mature, and others offer unique opportunities to grow based on new technology enhancements and other factors. The Company serves these markets with a wide range of solutions including standard as well as highly differentiated custom display products and systems.

• Rear-Projection Cube Displays: The market for control room video wall solutions is driven by the development, expansion, and upgrade of industrial infrastructure such as power plants, transportation systems, communication systems, and security monitoring. Planar provides premium quality rear-projection displays and video processing solutions that meet the customer’s needs for virtually seamless video walls that support 24x7 operations.

• Touch Monitor Displays: Planar markets a wide variety of desktop touch LCD products for use in kiosks, point of sale applications, and other applications.

• Desktop Monitor Displays: Planar capitalizes on its strong supply chain, logistics and distribution partnerships to sell a variety of primarily LCD based displays principally to the United States marketplace.

• Custom Commercial and Industrial Displays: Planar designs and manufactures custom LCD products that are generally targeted toward the transportation, military and natural resource exploration vertical markets. These displays are typically ruggedized to withstand extreme weather, direct sunlight, moisture, dust, vibration and other extreme conditions.

• High-End Home Displays: Planar offers a wide variety of high-performance home theater front-projection systems, video processing equipment, and accessories, largely aimed at the high-end home market and certain commercial installations. The Company has sold these products under the Runco brand since May 2007 when it acquired Runco International, an industry leader in high-end, luxury video products. Planar’s Runco products are primarily sold to its established network of custom home installation dealers in the United States.

• Electroluminescent (“EL”) Displays: Planar previously leveraged its proprietary intellectual property and historical core competency in EL technologies to focus on providing customized, embedded and ruggedized displays to Original Equipment Manufacturers (“OEMs”) and other system suppliers for use in instrumentation, medical equipment, vehicle dashboards and military applications. In the first quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company sold the assets and liabilities associated with the EL product line and no sales of EL displays are expected in future periods. See further discussion in Note 9—Loss on Sale of Assets.

15

Overview of Results

In the three and nine months ended June 27, 2014, the Company continued to experience strong demand for its digital signage products as the Company achieved significant growth in its digital signage product offerings, including UltraRes, and a portfolio of LCD commercial flat panel displays. The Company believes the overall market for digital signage products is currently growing and will continue to grow in the future.

The Company recorded sales of $43.9 million in the three months ended June 27, 2014 (the “third quarter of 2014”), which was an increase of $6.4 million or 17.0% as compared to sales of $37.5 million in the three months ended June 28, 2013 (the “third quarter of 2013”). The increase in sales in the third quarter of 2014 as compared to the third quarter of 2013 was primarily the result of a $7.3 million or 52.6% increase in sales of digital signage products to $21.4 million in the third quarter of 2014 from $14.1 million in the third quarter of 2013. This increase was partially offset by a $0.9 million or 4.3% decrease in sales of commercial and industrial products to $22.5 million in the third quarter of 2014 from $23.4 million in the third quarter of 2013. In the nine months ended June 27, 2014 (the “first nine months of 2014”), sales were $125.4 million, which was an increase of $4.3 million or 3.5% as compared to sales of $121.1 million in the nine months ended June 28, 2013 (the “first nine months of 2013”). The increase in sales in the first nine months of 2014 as compared to the first nine months of 2013 was primarily due to a $14.9 million or 33.7% increase in sales of digital signage products to $59.3 million from $44.4 million. This increase was partially offset by a $10.6 million or 13.9% decrease in sales of commercial and industrial products to $66.1 million in the first nine months of 2014 from $76.7 million in the first nine months of 2013.

Income from operations was $0.8 million in the third quarter of 2014 as compared to a $3.7 million loss from operations in the third quarter of 2013. For the first nine months of 2014 income from operations was $1.2 million as compared to a loss from operations of $6.8 million in the first nine months of 2013. The improvement in income from operations in the three months ended June 27, 2014 was primarily due to an increase in gross profit of $2.6 million or 31.2% and a decrease in operating expenses of $1.9 million or 16.2%. The increase in gross profit was primarily the result of a change in the mix of products sold towards higher margin digital signage products, as the Company continued to execute its strategy to focus on the market for digital signage products. Additionally, higher sales of digital signage products and higher gross profit rates on these sales contributed to the gross profit improvement. The decrease in operating expenses was primarily driven by a decrease in restructuring charges as a result of charges that were recorded in the third quarter of 2013 that were not repeated in the third quarter of 2014. The improvement in income from operations in the nine months ended June 27, 2014 was primarily due to a decrease in operating expenses of $5.1 million or 15.0% and an increase in gross profit of $3.0 million or 10.7%. The decrease in operating expenses was primarily due to a $2.6 million decrease in restructuring charges, a $1.2 million decrease in research and development expenses as well as a $1.3 million decrease in the loss on sale of assets. The loss on sale of assets in the first nine months of 2013 resulted from the sale of the assets and liabilities related to the Company’s EL product line. The increase in gross profit in the first nine months of 2014 was due to the same reasons discussed above for the gross profit improvement in the third quarter of 2014 as compared to the third quarter of 2013.

Net income was $0.7 million or $0.03 per basic and diluted share in the third quarter of 2014 as compared to a net loss of $3.6 million or $0.17 per basic and diluted share in the third quarter of 2013. For the first nine months of 2014 net income was $1.6 million or $0.07 per basic and diluted share as compared to a net loss of $6.3 million or $0.31 per basic and diluted share in the first nine months of 2013. The improvement in net income for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2014 was due primarily to the improvement in income (loss) from operations in both periods.

Sales

Sales for the Three Months Ended June 27, 2014

For the three months ended June 27, 2014, the Company’s sales increased $6.4 million or 17.0% to $43.9 million from $37.5 million for the three months ended June 28, 2013. The increase was due to an increase in sales of digital signage products, which was partially offset by a decrease in sales of commercial and industrial products. The increase in sales of digital signage products of $7.3 million or 52.6% was due primarily to an increase in the sales volume of tiled LCD video wall systems and an increase in the average selling prices (“ASPs”) of signage monitors, which was driven by a shift in the mix of products sold towards new higher priced large format displays. The decrease in sales of commercial and industrial products of $0.9 million or 4.3% was due primarily to a decrease in sales of touch monitors and high-end home products, which were partially offset by an increase in sales of rear-projection cubes and custom displays. A summary of the major components of sales for the third quarter of 2014, including changes in sales from the third quarter of 2013 due to changes in volumes and ASPs is as follows:

16

Sales for the Three Months Ended June 27, 2014

	Three months ended							%			% Change in			% Change in
	Jun. 27, 2014		Jun. 28, 2013		$ Change			Change			Volumes(1)			ASPs(1)
	(In millions, except percentages)
Digital Signage Product Sales
Tiled LCD systems	$	15.7	$	9.5	$	6.2			65.0	%		64.0	%		0.6	%
Signage monitors		5.7		4.6		1.1			26.8	%		-25.4	%		68.7	%
Total Digital Signage Product Sales		21.4		14.1		7.3			52.6	%		—			—
Commercial & Industrial Sales
High-end home		1.2		2.2		(1.0	)		-44.3	%		-46.8	%		3.0	%
Custom commercial & industrial		4.2		3.3		0.9			26.5	%		-19.7	%		64.1	%
Desktop monitors		9.3		9.2		0.1			0.7	%		2.4	%		-4.1	%
Rear-projection cubes		4.6		3.5		1.1			29.2	%		18.5	%		26.1	%
Touch monitors		3.2		5.0		(1.8	)		-36.9	%		-30.2	%		-7.7	%
Other		—		0.2		(0.2	)		-100.0	%		—			—
Total Commercial & Industrial Sales		22.5		23.4		(0.9	)		-4.3	%		—			—
Total Sales	$	43.9	$	37.5	$	6.4			17.0	%		—			—

⁽¹⁾  Due to the significant differences in volumes and ASPs for each product category, changes in volumes and ASPs have not been included for the “Other” categories or subtotals.

For the three months ended June 27, 2014 the increase in sales of tiled LCD video wall systems, including Matrix and Mosaic, was due primarily to increased demand for indoor video wall systems as customers continue to transition toward digital signage products. The increase in ASPs of signage monitors was due primarily to changes in the mix of products sold towards higher priced large format UltraRes products. The increase in ASPs of rear-projection cubes was due primarily to a shift in the mix of products sold towards higher priced product offerings. The increase in volumes sold of rear-projection cubes in the third quarter of 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 was primarily due to a lower volume of rear-projection cubes sold in the third quarter of 2013 which was the result of lower sales order volume and the timing of customer demand for received orders in that period. The volume of rear-projection cubes sold in the third quarter of 2014 remained at a consistent level with the volumes of rear-projection cubes sold in the first and second quarter of 2014. The increase in ASPs of custom commercial and industrial products was due to changes in product mix primarily in certain custom products with higher ASPs during the third quarter of 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013. The decrease in volumes of custom commercial and industrial products sold was due to lower customer demand for certain custom products in the third quarter of 2014 as compared to the third quarter of 2013. The decrease in sales of touch monitors was primarily due to a decrease in the sales volume of these products during the third quarter of 2014 which was primarily the result of lower overall customer demand. The decrease in high-end home product volumes sold was the result of ongoing declines in demand for high-end home theater systems.

17

Sales for the Nine Months Ended June 27, 2014

For the nine months ended June 27, 2014, the Company’s sales increased $4.3 million or 3.5% to $125.4 million from sales of $121.1 million for the nine months ended June 28, 2013. The increase was due to an increase in sales of digital signage products, which was partially offset by a decrease in sales of commercial and industrial products. The increase in sales of digital signage products of $14.9 million or 33.7% was primarily due to an increase in sales of tiled LCD video wall systems and signage monitors. The decrease in sales of commercial and industrial products of $10.6 million or 13.9% was primarily due to a decrease in sales of touch monitors, high-end home products, rear-projection cubes, desktop monitors and also due to the Company no longer selling EL displays. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in sales of custom displays. A summary of the major components of sales for the first nine months of 2014, including changes in sales from the first nine months of 2013 due to changes in volumes and ASPs is as follows:

Sales for the Nine Months Ended June 27, 2014

	Nine months ended							%			% Change in			% Change in
	Jun. 27, 2014		Jun. 28, 2013		$ Change			Change			Volumes(1)			ASPs(1)
	(In millions, except percentages)
Digital Signage Product Sales
Tiled LCD systems	$	42.1	$	32.7	$	9.4			28.7	%		21.4	%		6.0	%
Signage monitors		17.2		11.7		5.5			47.6	%		7.3	%		37.4	%
Total Digital Signage Product Sales		59.3		44.4		14.9			33.7	%		—			—
Commercial & Industrial Sales
High-end home		4.6		7.7		(3.1	)		-40.5	%		-45.3	%		7.3	%
Custom commercial & industrial		12.2		7.9		4.3			54.3	%		9.4	%		46.8	%
Desktop monitors		25.1		26.9		(1.8	)		-6.7	%		-3.0	%		-4.0	%
Rear-projection cubes		13.7		15.9		(2.2	)		-13.9	%		-22.5	%		21.7	%
Touch monitors		10.1		15.2		(5.1	)		-33.9	%		-27.8	%		-9.7	%
Electroluminescent(2)		—		2.3		(2.3	)		-100.0	%		—			—
Other		0.4		0.8		(0.4	)		-45.2	%		—			—
Total Commercial & Industrial Sales		66.1		76.7		(10.6	)		-13.9	%		—			—
Total Sales	$	125.4	$	121.1	$	4.3			3.5	%		—			—

⁽¹⁾  Due to the significant differences in volumes and ASPs for each product category, changes in volumes and ASPs have not been included for the “Other” categories or subtotals.

⁽²⁾  In the first quarter of 2013, the Company sold the assets and liabilities related to its EL product line. See Note 9-Loss on Sale of Assets.

For the nine months ended June 27, 2014, the increase in volumes sold of tiled LCD video wall systems, including Matrix and Mosaic, was due primarily to increased demand for indoor video wall systems as customers continue to transition toward digital signage products, while the increase in ASPs of tiled LCD video wall systems was primarily due to a change in the mix of products sold towards higher priced larger format Matrix products. The increase in ASPs of signage monitors was due to changes in product mix towards higher priced large format UltraRes products partially offset by a large order for certain touch signage products with lower ASPs in the second quarter of 2014. The increase in volumes sold and ASPs of custom commercial and industrial products were primarily due to higher custom orders and changes in product mix as certain custom products with higher ASPs had larger shipments in the first nine months of 2014 as compared to the first nine months of 2013. The decrease in volumes sold of touch monitors was primarily due to lower overall customer demand, while the decrease in touch monitor ASPs was primarily due to increased competition and industry wide decreases in pricing. The decrease in high-end home product volumes sold was due to continued declines in demand for high-end projection home theater systems. The increase in high-end home ASPs was due primarily to a change in product mix toward higher priced product offerings. The decrease in volumes of rear-projection cubes sold was the result of continued customer transition from rear-projection cube formats to tiled LCD systems. The increase in ASPs of rear-projection cubes was due primarily to a shift in the mix of products sold toward higher priced product offerings. The decrease in volumes sold and ASPs of desktop monitors was due to lower customer demand and changes in product mix. The decrease in volumes of EL displays sold was due to the sale of the Company’s EL related assets and liabilities during the first quarter of 2013, resulting in no sales of these products after the first quarter of 2013.

18

Sales by Geographic Region

										% of Total Sales
	Three months ended									Three months ended
	Jun. 27, 2014		Jun. 28, 2013		$ Change		% Change			Jun. 27, 2014			Jun. 28, 2013
	(In millions, except percentages)
Domestic sales (United States)	$	35.0	$	30.3	$	4.7		16.1	%		79.7	%		80.8	%
International sales		8.9		7.2		1.7		20.6	%		20.3	%		19.2	%
Total sales	$	43.9	$	37.5	$	6.4		17.0	%

International sales increased $1.7 million or 20.6% to $8.9 million in the third quarter of 2014 from $7.2 million in the third quarter of 2013. The increase in international sales for the three months ended June 27, 2014 was primarily due to an increase in sales of digital signage products, rear-projection cubes, and custom commercial and industrial products sold outside of the United States, which were partially offset by a decrease in sales of high-end home theater products. As a percentage of sales, international sales increased to 20.3% in the third quarter of 2014 from 19.2% in the third quarter of 2013. Domestic (United States) sales increased $4.7 million or 16.1% to $35.0 million in the third quarter of 2014 from $30.3 million in the third quarter of 2013. The increase in domestic sales for the three months ended June 27, 2014 was due primarily to an increase in sales of digital signage products, which was partially offset by a decrease in sales of commercial and industrial products. The increase in domestic digital signage product sales and the decrease in domestic commercial and industrial product sales were primarily due to the reasons as discussed above in Sales for the Three Months Ended June 27, 2014. As a percentage of sales, domestic sales decreased to 79.7% in the third quarter of 2014 from 80.8% in the third quarter of 2013. The Company does not have material sales to any particular country outside the United States.

										% of Total Sales
	Nine months ended									Nine months ended
	Jun. 27, 2014		Jun. 28, 2013		$ Change		% Change			Jun. 27, 2014			Jun. 28, 2013
	(In millions, except percentages)
Domestic sales (United States)	$	96.8	$	92.7	$	4.1		4.5	%		77.2	%		76.6	%
International sales		28.6		28.4		0.2		0.4	%		22.8	%		23.4	%
Total sales	$	125.4	$	121.1	$	4.3		3.5	%

International sales increased $0.2 million or 0.4% to $28.6 million in the first nine months of 2014 from $28.4 million in the first nine months of 2013. The increase in international sales for the nine months ended June 27, 2014 was primarily due to an increase in sales of digital signage products and custom commercial and industrial products. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in international sales of rear-projection cubes, a decrease in sales of high-end home theater products, and a the decrease in sales of EL products as the result of the sale of the EL assets and liabilities in the first quarter of 2013. As a percentage of sales, international sales decreased to 22.8% in the first nine months of 2014 from 23.4% in the first nine months of 2013. Domestic (United States) sales increased $4.1 million or 4.5% to $96.8 million in the first nine months of 2014 from $92.7 million in the first nine months of 2013. The increase in domestic sales for the nine months ended June 27, 2014 was due primarily to an increase in domestic sales of digital signage products, custom commercial and industrial products, and rear-projection cubes. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in domestic sales of touch monitors, desktop monitors, high-end projection home theater systems, and EL products due to the sale of the EL assets and liabilities in the first quarter of 2013.

Gross Profit

	Three months ended											Nine months ended
	Jun. 27, 2014			Jun. 28, 2013			$ Change		% Change			Jun. 27, 2014			Jun. 28, 2013			$ Change		% Change
	(In millions, except percentage and basis point changes)
Gross profit	$	10.7		$	8.1		$	2.6		31.2	%	$	30.1		$	27.1		$	3.0		10.7	%
Gross profit margin		24.3	%		21.7	%		—		260 bps			24.0	%		22.4	%		—		160 bps

Gross profit as a percentage of sales increased to 24.3% in the third quarter of 2014 from 21.7% in the third quarter of 2013. Total gross profit increased $2.6 million or 31.2% to $10.7 million in the third quarter of 2014 as compared to $8.1 million in the third quarter of 2013. In the first nine months of 2014 gross profit as a percentage of sales increased to 24.0% from 22.4% in the first nine months of 2013. Total gross profit increased $3.0 million or 10.7% to $30.1 million in the first nine months of 2014 as compared to $27.1 million in the first nine months of 2013. The increase for both the three month and nine month periods was due primarily to a change in the mix of products sold towards higher margin digital signage products, as the Company continued to execute its strategy to focus on the market for digital signage products. The improvement in gross profit was also due to higher sales of digital signage products and higher gross profit rates on these sales as compared to the same periods of the prior year. These higher gross profit rates were primarily the result of lower material costs, increases in ASPs, and changes in the mix of digital signage product sold towards products with higher margins.

19

Research and Development, Net

	Three months ended											Nine months ended
	Jun. 27, 2014			Jun. 28, 2013			$ Change		% Change			Jun. 27, 2014			Jun. 28, 2013			$ Change			% Change
	(In millions, except percentage and basis point changes)
Research and development, net	$	1.6		$	1.6		$	—		-3.7	%	$	4.3		$	5.5		$	(1.2	)		-22.0	%
% of sales		3.6	%		4.3	%		—		(70) bps			3.4	%		4.5	%		—			(110) bps

Net research and development expenses in the third quarter of 2014 remained at a consistent level as compared to net research and development expenses in the third quarter of 2013. For the first nine months of 2014 net research and development expenses decreased $1.2 million or 22.0% to $4.3 million from $5.5 million in the first nine months of 2013. The decrease for the nine months ended June 27, 2014 was primarily due to lower headcount as well as efforts to reduce expenditures for project related expenses.

As a percentage of sales, net research and development expenses decreased to 3.6% in the third quarter of 2014 as compared to 4.3% in the third quarter of 2013. The decrease in net research and development expenses as a percentage of sales for the third quarter of 2014 was due to increased sales in the quarter. As a percentage of sales, net research and development expenses decreased to 3.4% in the first nine months of 2014 as compared to 4.5% in the first nine months of 2013. The decrease in net research and development expenses as a percentage of sales for the first nine months of 2014 was due to both lower expenses and increased sales in that period.

Sales and Marketing

	Three months ended											Nine months ended
	Jun. 27, 2014			Jun. 28, 2013			$ Change		% Change			Jun. 27, 2014			Jun. 28, 2013			$ Change		% Change
	(In millions, except percentage and basis point changes)
Sales and marketing	$	5.2		$	4.8		$	0.4		7.6	%	$	14.9		$	14.9		$	—		-0.1	%
% of sales		11.8	%		12.9	%		—		(110) bps			11.9	%		12.3	%		—		(40) bps

Sales and marketing expenses increased $0.4 million or 7.6% to $5.2 million in the third quarter of 2014 as compared to $4.8 million in the third quarter of 2013. The increase for the three months ended June 27, 2014 was primarily due to increased program spending and increased headcount as compared to the three months ended June 28, 2013. Sales and marketing expenses remained at a consistent level in the first nine months of 2014 as compared to the first nine months of 2013.

As a percentage of sales, sales and marketing expenses decreased to 11.8% in the third quarter of 2014 as compared to 12.9% in the same period of the prior year. The decrease in sales and marketing expenses, as a percentage of sales, was primarily the result of sales and marketing expenses increasing at a slower rate than sales. In the first nine months of 2014, sales and marketing expenses decreased to 11.9% as a percentage of sales from 12.3% in the first nine months of 2013. The decrease in sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of sales in the first nine months of 2014 was the result of increased sales in that period.

General and Administrative

	Three months ended											Nine months ended
	Jun. 27, 2014			Jun. 28, 2013			$ Change		% Change			Jun. 27, 2014			Jun. 28, 2013			$ Change		% Change
	(In millions, except percentage and basis point changes)
General and administrative	$	3.2		$	2.8		$	0.4		11.5	%		9.6		$	9.2		$	0.4		5.0	%
% of sales		7.2	%		7.6	%		—		(40) bps			7.7	%		7.6	%		—		10 bps

General and administrative expenses increased $0.4 million or 11.5% to $3.2 million in the third quarter of 2014 from $2.8 million in the third quarter of 2013. General and administrative expenses increased $0.4 million or 5.0% to $9.6 million in the first nine months of 2014 as compared to $9.2 million in the first nine months of 2013. The increase in general and administrative expenses in the third quarter of 2014 was due primarily to increased compensation related expenses, expenditures for professional services, and operating expenses related to the new enterprise resource planning system (“ERP”) that was implemented in the third quarter of 2013. In the first nine months of 2014 the increase in general and administrative expenses was due primarily to an increase in expenditures for professional services and increased depreciation and operating expenses related to the new ERP system. These increases were partially offset by lower compensation related expenses due to an effort to control costs.

As a percentage of sales, general and administrative expenses decreased to 7.2% in the third quarter of 2014 as compared to 7.6% in the third quarter of 2013. The decrease in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales in the third quarter of 2014 was primarily the result of general and administrative expenses increasing at a slower rate than sales. For the first nine months of 2014, general and administrative expenses increased to 7.7% as a percentage of sales from 7.6% in the first nine months of 2013. The increases in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales in the nine months ended June 27, 2014 were the result of general and administrative expenses increasing at a faster rate than sales.

20

Amortization of Intangible Assets

	Three months ended											Nine months ended
	Jun. 27, 2014		Jun. 28, 2013			$ Change			% Change			Jun. 27, 2014		Jun. 28, 2013			$ Change			% Change
	(In millions, except percentage and basis point changes)
Amortization	$	—	$	0.1		$	(0.1	)		-100.0	%	$	—	$	0.4		$	(0.4	)		-100.0	%
% of sales		—		0.4	%		—			(40) bps			—		0.4	%		—			(40) bps

All intangible assets were fully amortized as of September 27, 2013 and as such there were no expenses for the amortization of intangible assets for the three and nine month periods ended June 27, 2014.

Restructuring Charges

	Three months ended											Nine months ended
	Jun. 27, 2014		Jun. 28, 2013			$ Change			% Change			Jun. 27, 2014		Jun. 28, 2013			$ Change			% Change
	(In millions, except percentage and basis point changes)
Restructuring charges	$	—	$	2.4		$	(2.4	)		-99.6	%	$	—	$	2.6		$	(2.6	)		-98.8	%
% of sales		—		6.4	%		—			(640) bps			—		2.1	%		—			(210) bps

During the three and nine months ended June 27, 2014, the Company recorded $10 thousand and $31 thousand, respectively, in restructuring charges. As discussed in Note 5 – Restructuring Charges, the charges were the result of accretion of interest expense related to the liability recorded in the third quarter of 2013 associated with the consolidation of the Company’s two assembly and integration facilities in the United States into a single facility. In the third quarter of 2013 the Company recorded $2.4 million in restructuring charges as a result of this action. In the first quarter of 2013, the Company recorded $0.2 million in net restructuring charges consisting primarily of severance benefits estimated for the termination of certain employees who performed manufacturing and general and administrative functions for the Company in Finland.

Loss on Sale of Assets

	Three months ended								Nine months ended
	Jun. 27, 2014		Jun. 28, 2013		$ Change		% Change		Jun. 27, 2014		Jun. 28, 2013			$ Change			% Change
	(In millions, except percentage and basis point changes)
Loss on sale of assets	$	—	$	—	$	—		—	$	—	$	1.3		$	(1.3	)		-100.0	%
% of sales		—		—		—		—		—		1.1	%		—			(110) bps

During the first quarter of 2013, the Company sold the assets and liabilities associated with the EL product line. As discussed in Note 9—Loss on Sale of Assets, the Company recorded a $1.3 million loss on the sale during the first nine months of 2013.

Total Operating Expenses

	Three months ended												Nine months ended
	Jun. 27, 2014			Jun. 28, 2013			$ Change			% Change			Jun. 27, 2014			Jun. 28, 2013			$ Change			% Change
	(In millions, except percentage and basis point changes)
Total operating expenses	$	9.9		$	11.8		$	(1.9	)		-16.2	%	$	28.8		$	33.9		$	(5.1	)		-15.0	%
% of sales		22.6	%		31.5	%		—			(890) bps			23.0	%		28.0	%		—			(500) bps

Total operating expenses decreased $1.9 million or 16.2% to $9.9 million in the third quarter of 2014 from $11.8 million in the same period of the prior year. In the first nine months of 2014, total operating expenses decreased $5.1 million or 15.0% to $28.8 million as compared to $33.9 million in the same period of 2013. The decrease in total operating expenses in the third quarter of 2014 was primarily due to decreases in restructuring charges and amortization of intangible assets, partially offset by increases in sales and marketing and general administrative expenses due to the reasons discussed above. For the first nine months of 2014 the decrease in total operating expenses was primarily due to decreases in research and development expenses, the amortization of intangible assets, restructuring charges, and the loss on sale of assets due to the reasons discussed above.

As a percentage of sales, total operating expenses decreased to 22.6% in the third quarter of 2014 from 31.5% in the third quarter of 2013. As a percentage of sales, total operating expenses were 23.0% in the first nine months of 2014 compared to 28.0% in the first nine months of 2013. The decrease in total operating expenses as a percentage of sales for both the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 was primarily the result of the decrease in operating expenses and an increase in sales as compared to the same periods of the prior year.

21

Non-operating Income and Expense

	Three months ended							Nine months ended
	Jun. 27, 2014		Jun. 28, 2013		$ Change			Jun. 27, 2014		Jun. 28, 2013		$ Change
	(In millions)
Interest, net	$	0.1	$	—	$	0.1		$	0.2	$	0.1	$	0.1
Foreign exchange, net		—		—		—			—		—		—
Other, net		—		0.2		(0.2	)		0.4		0.5		(0.1	)
Net non-operating income	$	0.1	$	0.2	$	(0.1	)	$	0.6	$	0.6	$	—

Non-operating income and expense includes interest income, interest expense, net foreign exchange gain or loss and other income or expense. Net interest income in the third quarter of 2014 was $0.1 million as compared to $39 thousand in the third quarter of 2013. Net interest income was $0.2 million in the first nine months of 2014 as compared to $0.1 million in the first nine months of 2013.

Foreign currency exchange gains and losses are related to timing differences in the receipt and payment of funds in various currencies and the conversion of cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable denominated in foreign currencies to the applicable functional currency. Foreign exchange gains and losses amounted to a net loss of $1 thousand in both the third quarter of 2014 and the third quarter of 2013. For the first nine months of 2014, foreign currency exchange gains and losses amounted to a net loss of $54 thousand as compared to a net loss of $14 thousand in the same period of the prior year.

Net other non-operating expense was $27 thousand in the third quarter of 2014 as compared to net other income of $0.2 million in the third quarter of 2013. Net other income was $0.4 million in the first nine months of 2014 and $0.5 million in the same period of 2013.

Provision for Income Taxes

In the third quarter of 2014 the Company recorded an income tax expense of $0.1 million on pretax income of $0.8 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 14.0%. Comparatively, the Company recorded an income tax expense of $0.1 million on a pretax loss of $3.5 million in the third quarter of 2013, resulting in an effective tax rate of negative 2.0%. The tax expense recorded in both the third quarter of 2014 and the third quarter of 2013 was generated by tax expense in certain foreign jurisdictions and state taxes.

As discussed in Note 7 – Income Taxes, the Company evaluates a number of factors in determining whether the weight of available evidence supports the recognition of some or all of the Company’s deferred tax assets, and the need for a valuation allowance. Factors considered when determining the likelihood of realization of the tax assets include, among others, future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, future taxable income projections, taxable income in carryback years, and tax planning strategies.

The financial results in the United States during the first nine months of 2014 were positive and available U.S. NOL’s permitted the Company not to record U.S. income tax expense against those earnings. Although the Company experienced positive U.S. income in the current quarter, the Company’s assessment of all the positive and negative evidence lead it to conclude that it is more likely than not that the U.S. deferred tax assets will not be realized, and the valuation allowance against those U.S. tax assets are still necessary. Accordingly, as of June 27, 2014, the Company continued to place a valuation allowance against its U.S. deferred tax assets. There were no material changes to the Company’s Finnish operations and the Company continued to maintain a full valuation allowance against the Finnish deferred tax assets.

22

Net Income (Loss)

	Three months ended											Nine months ended
	Jun. 27, 2014			Jun. 28, 2013			$ Change		% Change			Jun. 27, 2014			Jun. 28, 2013			$ Change		% Change
	(In millions, except percentage and basis point changes)
Net income (loss)	$	0.7		$	(3.6	)	$	4.3		119.8	%	$	1.6		$	(6.3	)	$	7.9		124.7	%
% of sales		1.6	%		-9.5	%		—		1,110 bps			1.2	%		-5.2	%		—		640 bps
Net income (loss) per share—basic	$	0.03		$	(0.17	)						$	0.07		$	(0.31	)
Net income (loss) per share—diluted	$	0.03		$	(0.17	)						$	0.07		$	(0.31	)

In the third quarter of 2014 net income was $0.7 million or $0.03 per basic and diluted share, as compared to a net loss of $3.6 million or $0.17 per basic and diluted share in the third quarter of 2013. In the first nine months of 2014, net income was $1.6 million or $0.07 per basic and diluted share, as compared to a net loss of $6.3 million or $0.31 per basic and diluted share in the first nine months of 2013.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Net cash provided by operating activities was $4.0 million in the first nine months of 2014 as compared to cash used in operating activities of $5.8 million in the first nine months of 2013. Net cash provided by operating activities in the first nine months of 2014 primarily relates to net income incurred in the period, a decrease in inventories, and non-cash charges including depreciation, and share-based compensation. These sources of cash were partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable and decreases in accounts payable and other liabilities. Comparatively, net cash used in operating activities in the first nine months of 2013 primarily related to the net loss incurred in that period, increases in inventories and other assets, as well as a decrease in other liabilities. These uses of cash were partially offset by an increase in accounts payable and non-cash charges including restructuring charges, depreciation and amortization, share-based compensation, and the loss on the sale of the assets and liabilities associated with the Company’s EL product line, which did not result in a current cash outlay.

Working capital increased $0.9 million to $35.8 million at June 27, 2014 from $34.9 million at September 27, 2013. The increase in working capital was primarily due to increases in accounts receivable and other current assets, and decreases in accounts payable, which were partially offset by decreases in inventories and cash as well as an increase in other current liabilities. Current assets increased $0.3 million to $67.5 million at June 27, 2014 as compared to $67.2 million at September 27, 2013 primarily due to increases in accounts receivable and other current assets which were partially offset by decreases in inventories and cash. The increase in accounts receivable was due primarily to the timing of sales in the third quarter of 2014 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2013, as well as the timing of collections from customers. Other current assets increased $2.2 million due primarily to the component device receivable from Beneq that was entered into during the third quarter of 2014 as discussed in Note 9 – Loss on Sale of Assets. The increase in other current assets was also due to the reclassification of a portion of the Purchase Price Note receivable from Beneq and the reclassification of certain French tax receivables from long-term to current. Inventories decreased $3.8 million primarily due to a decrease in touch monitor, Matrix, and desktop monitor inventories as a result of the Company’s efforts to reduce inventory levels. Cash decreased $0.5 million due to cash used in investing activities of $3.6 million and cash used in financing activities of $1.0 million. These decreases were partially offset by cash provided by operating activities of $4.0 million due to the factors discussed above. The $3.6 million cash used in investing activities was due primarily to a $4.0 million payment made in the third quarter of 2014 to a third party vendor for component devices related to the sale of the EL assets and liabilities for which the buyer of the EL assets and liabilities, Beneq, will repay the Company over time as discussed in Note 9 – Loss on Sale of Assets. Current liabilities decreased $0.6 million to $31.7 million at June 27, 2014 from $32.3 million at September 27, 2013 due primarily to a decrease in accounts payable, partially offset by an increase in other current liabilities. Accounts payable decreased $0.9 million due to lower inventory purchases as a result of the Company’s efforts to reduce inventory levels and also due to the timing of payments to vendors. Other current liabilities increased $0.6 million due to an increase in accrued liabilities.

In the first quarter of 2014 the Company entered into a new credit agreement with Silicon Valley Bank, resulting in the termination of its prior credit agreement with Bank of America. The Company’s credit agreement with Silicon Valley Bank allows for borrowing up to 80% of its eligible accounts receivable with a maximum borrowing capacity of $12.0 million. The credit agreement has interest rates ranging from LIBOR + 2.25% to Prime + 0.75%, expires on November 21, 2015, and is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company. The Company’s current borrowing capacity is $12.0 million, of which approximately $0.8 million is committed through standby letters of credit related to the Company’s capital lease obligations. There were no amounts outstanding under the Company’s credit agreement as of June 27, 2014 and September 27, 2013. The credit agreement contains certain financial covenants, with which the Company was in compliance as of June 27, 2014.

23

The Company’s position on indefinite reinvestment of unremitted earnings from foreign operations may limit its ability to transfer cash between or across foreign and U.S. operations.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-11, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists,” (“ASU 2013-11”) which provides guidance on the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. ASU 2013-11 is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. As this ASU relates only to disclosure requirements, the Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” (“ASU 2014-09”), which provides guidance on when an entity should recognize revenue in connection with the transfer of goods or services to customers and supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition.” ASU 2014-09 will be effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and early adoption is not permitted. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method upon adoption of the provisions of this ASU. The Company is currently evaluating which transition method it expects to use and the impacts that adoption of this standard will have on our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

24

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There were no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors during the quarter ended June 27, 2014 that could significantly affect the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

25

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

There are no material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business, to which the Company is a party or to which any of its property is subject.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The following issues, risks, and uncertainties, among others, should be considered in evaluating the Company’s future financial performance and prospects for growth.

The Company’s operating results can fluctuate significantly.

In addition to the variability resulting from the short-term nature of commitments from the Company’s customers, other factors can contribute to significant periodic fluctuations in its results of operations. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

• the receipt and timing of orders and the timing of receipt of components and products from vendors and the timing of delivery of orders;

• the inability to adjust expense levels or delays in adjusting expense levels, in either case in response to lower than expected revenues or gross margins;

• the volume of orders relative to the Company’s capacity;

• product introductions and market acceptance of new products or new generations of products;

• evolution in the lifecycles of customers’ products;

• changes in cost and availability of labor and components;

• variations in revenue and gross margins relating to the mix of products available for sale and the mix of products sold from period to period;

• availability of sufficient quantities of the components of the Company’s products on a timely basis or at all;

• variation in operating expenses;

• expenses arising from the vesting of restricted stock based upon achievement of certain performance measures;

• pricing and availability of competitive products and services;

• general economic conditions and changes—whether or not anticipated—in economic conditions; and

• the ability to use cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, development projects, acquisitions, and other general corporate purposes, which could be limited by any Company indebtedness and the covenants of the Company’s existing credit facility.

Accordingly, the results of any past periods should not be relied upon as an indication of the Company’s future performance. It is possible that, in some future period, the Company’s operating results may be below expectations of public market analysts and/or investors. If this occurs, the Company’s stock price may decrease.

The Company faces intense competition.

Each of the markets served by the Company is highly competitive, and the Company expects this to continue and even intensify. The Company believes that over time this competition will have the effect of reducing average selling prices of its products. Certain of the Company’s competitors have substantially greater name recognition and financial, technical, manufacturing, marketing and other resources than does the Company. There is no assurance that the Company will not face additional competitors or that the Company’s competitors will not succeed in developing or marketing products that would render the Company’s products obsolete or noncompetitive. To the extent the Company is unable to compete effectively, its business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. The Company’s ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, both within and outside its control. These factors include, but are not limited to:

• the Company’s ability to anticipate and address the needs of its customers;

• the Company’s ability to develop innovative, new and value-added products and technologies and the extent to which such technologies can be protected as proprietary to the Company;

• the quality, performance, reliability, features, ease of use, pricing and diversity of the Company’s product solutions;

26

• foreign currency fluctuations, which may cause competitors’ products to be priced significantly lower than the Company’s product solutions;

• the quality of the Company’s customer services;

• the effectiveness of the Company’s supply chain management;

• the Company’s ability to identify new markets and develop attractive products to address the needs of such markets;

• the Company’s ability to develop and maintain effective and financially viable sales channels;

• the rate at which customers incorporate the Company’s product solutions into their own products; and

• product or technology introductions by the Company’s competitors.

The Company’s success depends on the development of new products and technologies.

Future results of operations will partly depend on the Company’s ability to improve and successfully market its existing products, while also successfully developing and marketing new value-added products and developing new markets for existing products and technologies. If the Company fails to do this, its products or technologies could become obsolete or noncompetitive. Additionally, if the Company is unable to successfully execute its transition from existing products to new offerings or technologies, it could result in the Company holding excess or obsolete inventory, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations. In the past, the Company has reduced its spending on research and development projects as a part of overall cost reductions. The Company may be required to further reduce research and development expenditures in future periods as a part of cost reduction programs. These reductions could impact the Company’s ability to improve its existing products and to successfully develop new products.

The Company may have challenges with new products, markets, and customers.

New products and markets, by their nature, present significant risks and even if the Company is successful in developing new products, they typically result in pressure on gross margins during the initial phases as start-up activities are spread over lower initial sales volumes. The Company has experienced lower margins from new products and processes in the past, which have negatively impacted overall gross margins. In addition, customer relationships can be negatively impacted due to production and product performance problems and late delivery of shipments. Future operating results will depend on the Company’s ability to continue to provide new product solutions that compare favorably on the basis of cost and performance with competitors. The Company’s success in attracting new customers and developing new business depends on various factors, including, but not limited to, the following:

• developing and/or deploying advances in technology;

• developing innovative products for new markets;

• offering efficient and cost-effective services;

• timely completing the design and manufacture of new product solutions; and

• developing proprietary technology positions and adequately protecting the Company’s proprietary property.

The Company must continue to add value to its portfolio of offerings.

Traditional display components are subject to increasing competition to the point of commoditization. In addition, advances in LCD technology make standard displays effective in an increasing breadth of applications. An increasing proportion of the Company’s business is based on commercially available components rather than proprietary technology. The Company must add additional value to its products and services for which customers are willing to pay. The Company may not be successful at developing products that add sufficient value beyond commodity products and failure to do so could adversely affect the Company’s revenue levels, margins, and its results of operations and financial condition.

The Company’s reliance on third parties for its products creates risks over control of timing, quality and delivery of products.

The Company relies on third party manufacturers or suppliers for substantially all of its products and product components. The Company does not have sufficient market power to exercise significant influence over its suppliers, some of whom are substantially larger than the Company and most of whom are located in Asia. The Company’s reliance on these third parties involves risks, including, but not limited to the following:

• lack of control over production capacity and delivery schedules;

• unanticipated interruptions in transportation and logistics;

• limited control over quality assurance, manufacturing yields and production costs;

• potential termination by suppliers of agreements to supply materials to the Company, which would necessitate the Company’s contracting of alternative suppliers, which may not be possible;

27

• risks associated with international commerce, including unexpected changes in legal and regulatory requirements, foreign currency fluctuations and changes in duties and tariffs; and

• trade policies and political and economic instability.

The Company’s supply of products and profitability can be adversely affected by each of these risks.

The Company’s dependence on a limited number of key suppliers in foreign countries could result in delayed or more costly products.

The Company obtains much of the material it uses in the manufacture of its products from a limited number of suppliers and in some cases from a single or sole source supplier. It generally does not have long-term supply contracts and the Company does not generally have a guaranteed alternative source of supply. Any one of its suppliers could, among other things:

• encounter constraints in its supply chain, for example due to the unavailability of certain natural resources used in the manufacturing process;

• encounter a natural disaster or other physical act disrupting supply or transportation;

• be unwilling to extend the Company credit to purchase supplies on terms acceptable to the Company;

• be subject to foreign or other local regulations or trade policies applicable to sales of components to the Company;

• choose to prioritize another more significant customer over the Company in periods of high demand;

• discontinue manufacturing the products the Company needs; or

• fail to maintain suitable manufacturing facilities, train manufacturing employees, manage its supply chain effectively, manufacture a quality product, or provide spare parts in support of the Company’s warranty and customer service obligations.

Examples of these risks include, without limitation:

• Asia experiencing several earthquakes, tsunamis, typhoons, and interruptions to power supplies, resulting in business interruptions. In particular, the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan caused some of the Company’s suppliers and some of the vendors of the Company’s suppliers to halt, delay or reduce production of displays, display components and other materials used in the Company’s products;

• in fiscal 2010, in connection with an intellectual property dispute among two LCD panel manufacturers, the U.S. International Trade Commission issued an exclusion order banning the import of certain LCD panels incorporated by the Company into certain of its specialty display products (this matter was resolved); and

• certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act requiring reports on “conflict minerals,” possibly resulting in increased costs or constrained supply as contract manufacturers attempt to assess and possibly avoid the purchase of conflict minerals from the Democratic Republic of the Congo and adjoining countries.

Any of these risks could result in, among other things, the Company having:

• the inability to timely obtain sufficient quantities of components and other materials necessary to produce the Company’s displays and products to meet customer demand, resulting in reduced, delayed or cancelled sales and the loss of customers;

• an increase in the costs for supplies and components, resulting in decreased margins and profits;

• excess or obsolete inventory, because of a failure to timely obtain all of the components for a product, resulting in write-offs and additional expenditures; and

• poor quality components, resulting in increased costs for replacements and returns, cancellation of orders and loss of customers.

Any significant interruption in the supply of displays, components and contract manufacturing capacity necessary to produce and sell the Company’s products would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Continued customer demands to shorten delivery times along with supplier constraints in meeting lead time schedules could result in the Company not meeting customer demands and excess or obsolete inventory.

The Company is subject to supply lead times that can vary considerably depending on capacity fluctuations and other manufacturing constraints of the Company’s suppliers. These lead times can be significant when suppliers operate with diminished capacity or experience other restrictions that limit their ability to produce products in a timely manner. For most of the Company’s products, supplier lead times significantly exceed the Company’s customers’ required delivery time, causing the Company to order based on a forecast rather than order based on actual demand. Competition for the Company’s products continues to reduce the period of time customers will wait for product delivery. Ordering raw materials and building finished goods based on the Company’s forecast rather than actual demand exposes the Company to numerous risks including its inability to service customer demand in an acceptable timeframe, holding excess and obsolete inventory or having unabsorbed manufacturing overhead.

28

The risks inherent in the Company’s operations could be heightened by general economic weakness and potential lack of credit availability.

In recent years, disruptions in global credit and financial markets and the general decline in worldwide economic conditions have resulted in diminished liquidity and credit availability, a decline in consumer confidence, increased unemployment, a decline in economic growth and uncertainty about economic stability. These conditions make it extremely difficult for the Company and its customers and vendors to accurately forecast and plan future business activities. In this time of economic uncertainties, the Company’s financial performance and prospects for growth are subject to heightened risks including, but not limited to, the risk that the poor economic conditions and uncertainties in the credit and financial markets could adversely affect the amount, timing and stability of the demand for the Company’s products, the financial strength of the Company’s customers and vendors and their ability or willingness to do business with the Company, the ability of the Company’s customers and/or vendors to fulfill their obligations to the Company, and the ability of the Company’s customers and/or vendors to obtain credit in amounts and on terms acceptable to them. Each of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company has taken a number of measures to reduce costs in response to the worldwide economic downturn over the past several years. However, in connection with the execution of the growth strategy adopted during fiscal 2011 the Company has refocused sales and marketing resources to better position it for sales growth. If the economic recovery were to slow or cease and dip back into recession, or if customer demand for the Company’s products were to otherwise not improve or slow down, the Company might be unable to adjust expense levels rapidly enough in response to falling demand or adequately reduce expenses without changing the way in which it operates in a manner that adversely affects its business, financial condition, or results of operations. If revenues were to decrease further and the Company was unable to adequately reduce expense levels, it might incur significant losses that could potentially adversely affect the Company’s overall financial performance and the market price of the Company’s common stock.

A significant slowdown in the demand for the products of certain of the Company’s customers would adversely affect its business.

The Company designs and manufactures custom display solutions that its customers incorporate into their products. As a result, the Company’s success partly depends upon the market acceptance of its customers’ products. Accordingly, the Company must identify industries that have significant growth potential and establish relationships with customers who are successful in those industries. Failure to identify potential growth opportunities or establish relationships with customers who are successful in those industries would adversely affect the Company’s business. Dependence on the success of products of the Company’s customers exposes the Company to a variety of risks, including, but not limited to, the following:

• the Company’s ability to match its design and manufacturing capacity with customer demand and to maintain satisfactory delivery schedules;

• customer order patterns, changes in order mix and the level and timing of orders that the Company can manufacture and ship in a quarter; and

• the cyclical nature of the industries and markets served by the Company’s customers.

These risks could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company faces risks associated with operations outside the United States.

The Company’s manufacturing, sales and distribution operations in Europe and Asia create a number of logistical, systems and communications challenges. The Company’s international operations also expose the Company to various economic, political and other risks, including, but not limited to, the following:

• management of a multi-national organization;

• compliance with local laws and regulatory requirements as well as changes in those laws and requirements;

• employment and severance issues;

• complexity of tax issues;

• tariffs and duties;

• employee turnover or labor unrest;

• lack of developed infrastructure;

• difficulties protecting intellectual property;

29

• difficulties repatriating funds without adverse tax effects;

• risks associated with outbreaks of infectious diseases;

• burdens and costs of compliance with a variety of foreign laws;

• political or economic instability throughout the world;

• effects of doing business in currencies other than the Company’s functional currency;

• effects of doing business in countries where the local currency is pegged to the currency of another country (For instance the exchange rate of the Chinese RMB to the U.S. Dollar is closely monitored by the Chinese government and there have been recent increases in the value of the RMB relative to the U.S. Dollar. The Company purchases a significant amount of goods from Chinese suppliers and, while those purchases are typically denominated in U.S. Dollars, increases in the RMB relative to the U.S. Dollar would tend to cause the cost of such goods to increase); and

• effects of foreign currency fluctuations on overall financial results.

Changes in policies by the United States or foreign governments resulting in, among other things, increased duties, higher taxation, currency conversion limitations, restrictions on the transfer or repatriation of funds, limitations on imports or exports, changes in environmental standards or regulations, or the expropriation of private enterprises also could have a materially adverse effect. Any actions by the Company’s host countries to curtail or reverse policies that encourage foreign investment or foreign trade also could adversely affect its operating results. In addition, U.S. trade policies, such as “most favored nation” status and trade preferences for certain Asian nations, could affect the attractiveness of the Company’s services to its U.S. customers.

The Company may be unable to attract and retain key personnel.

The Company’s success depends in part upon the services of its executive officers and key personnel. The loss of key personnel, or the Company’s inability to attract and retain qualified personnel, could inhibit the Company’s ability to operate and grow its business and otherwise have a material adverse effect on its business, financial position and results of operations. The Company has previously had to, and may in the future have to, impose salary freezes and reductions in force in an effort to maintain its financial position. These actions may have an adverse effect on employee loyalty and may make it more difficult for the Company to attract and retain key personnel. Competition for qualified personnel in the businesses in which the Company competes is intense, and the Company may not be successful in attracting and retaining qualified personnel. The Company may incur significant costs in its efforts to recruit and retain key personnel, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company may encounter difficulties in the implementation or operation of its new enterprise resource planning system.

During the third fiscal quarter of 2013, the Company began operating a new enterprise resource planning system (“ERP system”) that is integral to the Company’s ability to accurately and efficiently maintain its books and records, record its materials purchase transactions, manufacturing activities, account for and manage inventory and product sale transactions, provide critical business information to management, and prepare its financial statements. The development and implementation of the new ERP system has caused, and will continue to cause, the Company to incur costs, expend employee (including Company management) time and attention and otherwise burden the Company’s internal resources, and could detract from the Company’s various on-going business objectives. The implementation and early-stage operation of the new ERP system is a complex process that is subject to a variety of difficulties and uncertainties. In addition, in the first quarter of 2014 the Company transitioned processing of certain transactions from its Finnish office to other locations in the United States and Europe. This requires system modifications to accommodate the changes in the transaction workflow. Any difficulties the Company encounters with the successful operation of the new ERP system, or modification of the system to meet changing business needs, including the example of the Finnish transition could damage the effectiveness of the Company’s business processes and controls and could adversely impact the Company’s ability to accurately and effectively forecast and manage sales demand, manage the Company’s supply chain, identify and implement actions that improve the Company’s operational effectiveness, and report financial and management information on an accurate and timely basis, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Future financial results of the Company could be adversely affected by changes in currency exchange rates.

While the Company is for the most part naturally hedged due to approximately equal foreign denominated sales and expenses, the Company is exposed to certain risks relating to U.S. Dollar denominated assets primarily held in Europe. The Company does not hedge foreign currency risk through forward exchange contracts. As a result the Company may experience non-cash GAAP income statement losses due to changes in the U.S. Dollar versus the Euro exchange rate.

30

Future indebtedness could reduce the Company’s ability to use cash flow for purposes other than debt service or otherwise restrict the Company’s activities.

If the Company incurred a significant amount of debt under its current secured credit facility or otherwise, the leverage would reduce the Company’s ability to use cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, development projects, acquisitions, and other general corporate purposes. High leverage would also limit flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in business and increases vulnerability to a downturn in the business and general adverse economic and industry conditions. Substantially all of the assets of the Company are pledged as security for the performance of the Company’s obligations under its credit agreement, which includes certain financial covenants. The Company may not generate sufficient profitability to meet these covenants. If the Company fails to comply with applicable covenants under its debt agreements, the Company may be unable to borrow amounts under the agreements or may have to repay all amounts outstanding at that time, which, in turn could lead to the Company’s inability to pay its debts and the loss of control of its assets. If the Company is unable to borrow amounts under the agreements or is unable to extend or renew the agreements upon expiration, the Company may need to pursue other sources of financing. Other sources of credit may not be available at all or on terms that are acceptable to the Company. If credit is not available to fully satisfy the Company’s liquidity needs, the Company may need to dispose of additional assets. In addition, the Company’s position on indefinite reinvestment of unremitted earnings from foreign operations may limit its ability to transfer cash between or across foreign and U.S. operations as may be required to service its debt.

The Company may experience losses selling certain desktop monitors or other low margin products.

The market for the Company’s desktop monitor products is highly competitive and subject to rapid changes in prices and demand. The Company’s failure to successfully manage inventory levels or quickly respond to changes in pricing, technology or consumer tastes and demand could result in lower than expected revenue, lower gross margin and excess, obsolete and devalued inventories of its desktop monitor products which could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Past market conditions have been characterized by rapid declines in end user pricing. Such declines caused the Company’s inventory to lose value and triggered price protection obligations for channel inventory. Supply and pricing of LCD panels has been volatile in the past and may be in the future. This volatility, combined with lead times of five to eight weeks, may cause the Company to pay too much for products or suffer inadequate product supply.

The Company does not have long-term agreements with its resellers, who generally may terminate their relationship with the Company with little or no notice. Such action by the Company’s resellers could substantially harm the Company’s operating results. In addition, strategic changes made by the Company’s management to invest greater resources in specialty display markets could result in reduced revenue from desktop monitors.

The sale, disposal or elimination of one or more business or product lines could result in unabsorbed overhead costs that must be absorbed by the Company’s remaining product lines.

From time to time the Company disposes of product lines. For instance, in the first fiscal quarter of 2013 the Company sold the assets and liabilities related to the EL product line. The Company may consider selling, disposing or discontinuing business or product lines or reducing its staffing and efforts to sell particular product lines. If the Company were to sell, dispose or discontinue one or more business or product lines or substantially reduce its efforts to sell products to any of its targeted end-markets, for the purpose of reducing costs or losses or changing strategic direction or otherwise, the Company might not be able to eliminate all, or even a substantial portion of, fixed overhead costs, including those associated with those products. Not reducing or eliminating overhead costs in these circumstances could cause a decrease in the Company’s gross profit margins for its remaining products or result in losses.

The sale of the Company’s EL display assets and liabilities involves significant risks.

        In November 2012, the Company completed a transaction in which Beneq Products Oy (“Beneq”) purchased from the Company substantially all of the assets, and assumed certain liabilities, used or necessary in the Company’s EL display business (the “EL Transaction”). As a result of the EL Transaction with Beneq, the Company may incur future liabilities, costs, expenses, and losses, including those relating to (i) claims by Beneq for losses incurred by Beneq as a result of breaches of representations and warranties given by the Company, (ii) claims against the Company by third parties associated with the EL display business (e.g. vendors, customers, etc.) based upon, or payments made or further credit granted by the Company in respect of, non-performance by Beneq of obligations assumed by Beneq in the EL transaction, (iii) liabilities relating to the EL display business that the Company retained as part of the EL Transaction, or (iv) default by Beneq on promissory notes made to the Company by Beneq in connection with the EL Transaction and related transactions, or the agreement made by Beneq in the third quarter of 2014 to repay the Company funds advanced for certain electronic component devices as discussed below. Any material liabilities, costs or expenses incurred by the Company as a result of the foregoing or other matters arising in connection with the EL Transaction could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. As discussed in Note 9 – Loss on Sale of Assets to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in April 2014 the Company entered into an agreement with a vendor related to a purchase commitment that was transferred to Beneq under the sale of assets agreement entered into with Beneq in connection with the EL Transaction. As a part of the April 2014 agreement, the Company agreed to take delivery and ownership of €2.9 million of electronic component devices. The Company also entered into a Settlement Agreement with Beneq establishing the terms under which the component devices will be transferred to and paid for by Beneq. A default by Beneq on the payments due under the promissory notes and signed settlement agreement to repay funds advanced for certain component devices could materially and adversely affect the Company’s assets, financial condition, and results of operations.

31

Variability of customer requirements or losses of key customers may adversely affect the Company’s operating results.

The Company must provide increasingly rapid product turnaround and respond to ever-shorter lead times, while at the same time meeting its customers’ product specifications and quality expectations. A variety of conditions, including bankruptcy and other conditions both specific to individual customers and generally affecting the demand for their products, may cause customers to cancel, reduce, or delay orders. These actions by a significant customer or by a set of customers could adversely affect the Company’s business. On occasion, customers require rapid increases in production, which can strain the Company’s resources and reduce margins. The Company may lack sufficient capacity at any given time to meet customers’ demands. Sales to a significant customer, if lost, could have a material, adverse impact on the results of operations. If accounts receivable from a significant customer or set of customers became uncollectible, a resulting charge could have a material adverse effect on operations.

The Company may lose key licensors, sales representatives, foundries, licensees, vendors, other business partners and employees due to uncertainties regarding the future results of the Company or the worldwide economic condition, which could seriously harm the Company.

Sales representatives, vendors, resellers, distributors, and others doing business with the Company may experience uncertainty about their future role with the Company, may elect not to continue doing business with the Company, may seek to modify the terms under which they do business in ways that are less attractive, more costly, or otherwise damaging to the business of the Company, or may declare bankruptcy or otherwise cease operations. Loss of relationships with these business partners could adversely affect its business, financial condition, and results of operations. Similarly, the Company’s employees may experience uncertainty about their future role with the Company to the extent that its operations are unsuccessful or its strategies are changed significantly. This may adversely affect its ability to attract and retain key management, marketing and technical personnel. The loss of a significant group of key technical personnel would seriously harm the Company’s product development efforts. The loss of key sales personnel could cause the Company to lose relationships with existing customers, which could cause a decline in the sales of the Company’s products.

The Company does not have long-term purchase commitments from its customers.

The Company’s business is generally characterized by short-term purchase orders and contracts that specify certain sales terms but do not require that purchases be made. The Company typically plans its production and inventory levels based on internal forecasts of customer demand which rely in part on nonbinding forecasts provided by its customers. As a result, the Company’s backlog generally does not exceed three months, which makes forecasting its sales difficult. Inaccuracies in the Company’s forecast as a result of changes in customer demand or otherwise may result in its inability to service customer demand in an acceptable timeframe, the Company holding excess and obsolete inventory, or having unabsorbed manufacturing overhead. The failure to obtain anticipated orders and deferrals or cancellations of purchase commitments because of changes in customer requirements, or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company has experienced such problems in the past and may experience such problems in the future.

The Company must protect its intellectual property, and others could infringe on or misappropriate its rights.

The Company believes that its business success depends, in part, on developing proprietary intellectual property and protecting its proprietary technology. The Company relies on a combination of patent, trade secret, and trademark laws, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect its intellectual property. The Company seeks to protect some of its technology under trade secret laws, which afford only limited protection. The Company faces risks associated with its intellectual property, including, but not limited to, the following:

• pending patent and copyright applications may not be issued or may be significantly limited in scope prior to issuance;

• patent and copyright applications are filed only in a limited number of countries;

• intellectual property laws may not protect the Company’s intellectual property rights;

• others may challenge, invalidate, or circumvent any patent or copyright issued to the Company;

• rights granted under patents or copyrights issued to the Company may not provide competitive advantages to the Company;

• unauthorized parties may attempt to obtain and use information that the Company regards as proprietary despite its efforts to protect its proprietary rights; and

• others may independently develop similar technology or design around any patents issued to the Company.

The Company has to defend against infringement claims.

In recent fiscal years, the Company has been made party to lawsuits (among many other defendants) alleging infringement of certain U.S. patents relating to certain products marketed and sold by the Company, including stands for multiple displays, the

32

Company’s Indisys image processing products and certain projector products. While each of these matters has been resolved, the Company is currently a party to patent infringement litigation brought by the Trustees of Boston University related to LED Technology and a separate infringement suit relating to the Company’s sale of multi-monitor stands. Intellectual property litigation can be very expensive and can divert management’s time and attention, which could adversely affect the Company’s business. In addition, the Company may not be able to obtain a favorable outcome in any intellectual property litigation.

In the event of an allegation that the Company is infringing on another’s rights, the Company may seek to obtain a license to the intellectual property at issue or refuse the claim. The Company may not be able to obtain licenses on commercially reasonable terms, if at all, and the party alleging infringement may commence litigation against the Company. The failure to obtain necessary licenses or other rights or the institution of litigation arising out of such claims could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company will vigorously defend itself against the assertion of any future claims for infringement and will, as a matter of course, seek indemnification from third-party suppliers, where available. While the Company would, in each instance, seek indemnification from the manufacturer of an accused product if it were found to be liable, a determination of liability against the Company could have an adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The market price of the Company’s common stock may be volatile.

The market price of the Company’s common stock has been subject to wide fluctuations. During the Company’s four most recently completed fiscal quarters, the closing price of the Company’s stock ranged from $1.66 to $2.82. The market price of the Company’s common stock in the future is likely to continue to be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, including, but not limited to, the following:

• variations in the Company’s operating results and financial condition;

• variations in trading volumes of the Company’s stock;

• public announcements by the Company as to its expectations of future sales and net income or loss;

• actual or anticipated announcements of technical innovations or new product developments by the Company or its competitors;

• changes in analysts’ estimates of the Company’s financial performance;

• general conditions in the electronics industry; and

• worldwide economic and financial conditions.

In addition, the public stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have particularly affected the market prices for many technology companies and that often have been unrelated to the operating performance of these companies. These broad market fluctuations and other factors may continue to adversely affect the market price of the Company’s common stock.

The Company faces risks in connection with potential acquisitions.

The Company has made several acquisitions during its history. Not all of these acquisitions have been successful. It is possible that the Company will make additional acquisitions in the future. The Company’s ability to effectively integrate any future acquisitions will depend on, among other things, the adequacy of its implementation plans, the ability of management to oversee and effectively operate the combined operations and the Company’s ability to achieve desired operational efficiencies. The integration of businesses, personnel, product lines and technologies is often difficult, time consuming and subject to significant risks. For example, the Company could lose key personnel from companies that it acquires, incur unanticipated costs, lose major sources of revenue, fail to integrate critical technologies, suffer business disruptions, fail to capture anticipated synergies, or fail to establish satisfactory internal controls. Any of these difficulties could disrupt the Company’s ongoing business, distract management and employees, increase expenses and decrease revenues. Furthermore, the Company might assume or incur additional debt or issue additional equity securities to pay for future acquisitions. Additional debt may negatively impact the Company’s financial results and increase its financial risk, and the issuance of any additional equity securities could dilute the Company’s then existing shareholders’ ownership. In addition, in connection with any future acquisitions, the Company could:

• incur amortization expense related to intangible assets;

• uncover previously unknown liabilities; or

• incur large and immediate write-offs that would reduce net income.

Acquisitions are inherently risky, and any acquisition may not be successful. If the Company is unable to successfully integrate the operations of any businesses that it may acquire in the future, its business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

33

Changes in internal controls or accounting guidance could cause volatility in the Company’s stock price.

The Company’s internal controls over financial reporting are not currently required to be audited by its independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 404”). If, in future periods, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting are required to be audited by its independent registered public accounting firm significant additional expenditures could be incurred which could adversely impact the Company’s results of operations. Additionally, an audit by the independent public accounting firm could identify a material weakness which would result in the Company receiving an adverse opinion on its internal controls over financial reporting from its independent registered public accounting firm. This could result in additional expenditures responding to the Section 404 internal control audit, heightened regulatory scrutiny and potentially an adverse effect on the price of the Company’s stock.

The Company cannot provide any assurance that current environmental laws and product quality specification standards, or any laws or standards enacted in the future, will not have a material adverse effect on its business.

The Company’s operations are subject to environmental and various other regulations in each of the jurisdictions in which it conducts business. Some of the Company’s products use substances, such as lead, that are highly regulated or will not be allowed in certain jurisdictions in the future. The Company has redesigned certain products to eliminate such substances in its products. In addition, regulations have been enacted in certain jurisdictions which impose restrictions on waste disposal of electronic products and electronics recycling obligations. If the Company fails to comply with applicable rules and regulations in connection with the use and disposal of such substances or other environmental or recycling legislation, it could be subject to significant liability or loss of future sales.

34

Item 6. Exhibits

(a)

31.1	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

35

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	PLANAR SYSTEMS, INC. (Registrant)
DATE: August 7, 2014	/S/    RYAN GRAY
	Ryan Gray
	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

36