UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2013

Commission File No. 001-34453

HUDSON VALLEY HOLDING CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

NEW YORK	13-3148745
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

21 Scarsdale Road, Yonkers, NY 10707

(Address of principal executive office with zip code)

914-961-6100

(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.)    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	x
Non-accelerated filer	¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class	Outstanding at May 1, 2013
Common stock, par value $0.20 per share	19,878,633

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page No.
PART I:	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1	CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		2
ITEM 2	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS		31
ITEM 3	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK		46
ITEM 4	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		47
PART II:	OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A	RISK FACTORS		48
ITEM 6	EXHIBITS		48
SIGNATURES			49

1

PART 1 — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Financial Statements

HUDSON VALLEY HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)

Dollars in thousands, except per share data

	Three Months Ended March 31
	2013		2012
Interest Income:
Loans, including fees	$	19,259	$	28,915
Securities:
Taxable		2,195		3,313
Exempt from Federal income taxes		768		986
Federal funds sold		11		8
Deposits in banks		448		56
Total interest income		22,681		33,278
Interest Expense:
Deposits		1,247		1,750
Securities sold under repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings		9		51
Other borrowings		179		181
Total interest expense		1,435		1,982
Net Interest Income		21,246		31,296
Provision for loan losses		772		1,359
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		20,474		29,937
Non Interest Income:
Service charges		1,739		1,867
Investment advisory fees		1,933		2,398
Other-than-temporary impairment loss
Total impairment loss		—		(500	)
Loss recognized in other comprehensive income		—		22
Net impairment loss recognized in earnings		—		(478	)
Gains on sales and revaluation of loans held for sale and other real estate owned, net		17		15,935
Other income		828		632
Total non interest income		4,517		20,354
Non Interest Expense:
Salaries and employee benefits		11,282		10,818
Occupancy		2,109		2,232
Professional services		1,505		1,867
Equipment		1,056		1,068
Business development		452		517
FDIC assessment		944		628
Other operating expenses		2,263		3,746
Total non interest expense		19,611		20,876
Income Before Income Taxes		5,380		29,415
Income Tax Expense		1,729		11,402
Net Income	$	3,651	$	18,013
Basic Earnings Per Common Share	$	0.18	$	0.92
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share	$	0.18	$	0.92

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

2

HUDSON VALLEY HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)

Dollars in thousands

	Three Months Ended March 31
	2013			2012
Net Income	$	3,651		$	18,013
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Net change in unrealized gains (losses):
Other-than-temporarily impaired securities available for sale:
Total gains (losses)		196			(500	)
Losses recognized in earnings		—			478
Gains (losses) recognized in comprehensive income		196			(22	)
Income tax effect		(80	)		9
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on other-than-temporarily impaired securities available for sale, net of tax		116			(13	)
Securities available for sale not other-than-temporarily impaired:
Losses arising during the year		(1,543	)		(2,381	)
Income tax effect		594			791
		(949	)		(1,590	)
Gains recognized in earnings		—			—
Income tax effect		—			—
		—			—
Unrealized holding losses on securities available for sale not other-than-temporarily-impaired, net of tax		(949	)		(1,590	)
Unrealized holding loss on securities, net		(833	)		(1,603	)
Accrued benefit liability adjustment:
Net gain during the year		—			34
Reclassification adjustment for amortization of prior service cost and net gain/loss included in net period pension cost		155			110
Tax effect		(62	)		(58	)
Net of tax		93			86
Other comprehensive loss		(740	)		(1,517	)
Comprehensive Income	$	2,911		$	16,496

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

3

HUDSON VALLEY HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data

	Mar 31 2013			Dec 31 2012
ASSETS
Cash and non interest earning due from banks	$	26,427		$	57,836
Interest earning deposits in banks		765,815			769,687
Total cash and cash equivalents		792,242			827,523
Federal funds sold		28,410			19,251
Securities available for sale, at estimated fair value (amortized cost of $474,671 in 2013 and $444,243 in 2012)		474,151			445,070
Securities held to maturity, at amortized cost (estimated fair value of $10,164 in 2013 and $10,825 in 2012)		9,641			10,225
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (FHLB) stock		4,826			4,826
Loans (net of allowance for loan losses of $26,088 in 2013 and $26,612 in 2012)		1,386,694			1,440,760
Loans held for sale		2,286			2,317
Accrued interest and other receivables		14,727			24,826
Premises and equipment, net		23,416			23,996
Other real estate owned		—			250
Deferred income tax, net		19,853			19,263
Bank owned life insurance		39,804			39,257
Goodwill		23,842			23,842
Other intangible assets		855			903
Other assets		8,062			8,937
TOTAL ASSETS	$	2,828,809		$	2,891,246
LIABILITIES
Deposits:
Non interest bearing	$	986,853		$	1,035,847
Interest bearing		1,477,344			1,484,114
Total deposits		2,464,197			2,519,961
Securities sold under repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings		29,169			34,624
Other borrowings		16,418			16,428
Accrued interest and other liabilities		26,130			29,262
TOTAL LIABILITIES		2,535,914			2,600,275
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 15,000,000 shares; no shares outstanding in 2013 and 2012, respectively		—			—
Common stock, $0.20 par value; authorized 25,000,000 shares: outstanding 19,880,657 and 19,761,426 shares in 2013 and 2012, respectively		4,236			4,212
Additional paid-in capital		348,818			348,643
Retained deficit		(1,006	)		(3,471	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,589	)		(849	)
Treasury stock, at cost; 1,299,414 shares in 2013 and 2012		(57,564	)		(57,564	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		292,895			290,971
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	2,828,809		$	2,891,246

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

4

HUDSON VALLEY HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)

Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 and 2012

Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data

	Number of Shares Outstanding		Common Stock		Treasury Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital		Retained Earnings (Deficit)			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total
Balance at January 1, 2012		19,516,490	$	4,163	$	(57,564	)	$	347,764	$	(18,527	)	$	1,726		$	277,562
Net income											18,013						18,013
Other comprehensive loss														(1,517	)		(1,517	)
Vesting and exercise of stock options, net of tax		13,064		3					210								213
Restricted stock awards and related expense		100,427		20					109								129
Cash dividends ($0.18 per share)											(3,516	)					(3,516	)
Balance at March 31, 2012		19,629,981	$	4,186	$	(57,564	)	$	348,083	$	(4,030	)	$	209		$	290,884
Balance at January 1, 2013		19,761,426	$	4,212	$	(57,564	)	$	348,643	$	(3,471	)	$	(849	)	$	290,971
Net income											3,651						3,651
Other comprehensive loss														(740	)		(740	)
Common stock issued for dividend reinvestment		440							7								7
Restricted stock awards and related expense		118,791		24					168								192
Cash dividends ($0.06 per share)											(1,186	)					(1,186	)
Balance at March 31, 2013		19,880,657	$	4,236	$	(57,564	)	$	348,818	$	(1,006	)	$	(1,589	)	$	292,895

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

5

HUDSON VALLEY HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

Dollars in thousands

	Three Months Ended March 31
	2013			2012
Operating Activities:
Net Income	$	3,651		$	18,013
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		772			1,359
Depreciation and amortization		922			962
Recognized impairment charge on securities available for sale		—			478
Amortization of premiums on securities, net		537			607
Realized gain on sale and revaluation of OREO		(17	)		—
Increase in cash value of bank owned life insurance		(346	)		(354	)
Amortization of other intangible assets		48			187
Share-based payment expense		192			12
Realized gain on sale of loans held-for-sale		—			(15,935	)
Deferred taxes (benefit)		(137	)		772
Decrease in deferred loan fees, net		(224	)		(158	)
Decrease in accrued interest and other receivables		10,099			11,240
Decrease in other assets		875			2,177
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements		4			—
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest and other liabilities		(2,978	)		2,437
Net cash provided by Operating Activities		13,398			21,797
Investing Activities:
Net (increase) decrease in short term investments		(9,159	)		4,547
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale		69,272			60,137
Proceeds from maturities of securities held to maturity		586			745
Purchases of securities available for sale		(100,239	)		(3,527	)
Proceeds from sales and payments of loans held for sale		31			487,217
Net decrease (increase) in loans		53,518			(68,996	)
Proceeds from sales of OREO		267			—
Premiums paid on bank owned life insurance		(201	)		(209	)
Net purchases of premises and equipment		(342	)		(648	)
Net cash provided by Investing Activities		13,733			479,266
Financing Activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		7			201
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements		(4	)		—
Net decrease in deposits		(55,764	)		(1,381	)
Cash dividends paid		(1,186	)		(3,516	)
Repayment of other borrowings		(10	)		(9	)
Net decrease in securities sold under repurchase agreements and short-term borrowings		(5,455	)		(6,719	)
Net cash used in by Financing Activities		(62,412	)		(11,424	)
(Decrease) increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(35,281	)		489,639
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period		827,523			78,104
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period	$	792,242		$	567,743
Supplemental disclosures:
Interest paid	$	1,333		$	2,312
Income tax payments		1,150			19
Change in unrealized loss on securities available for sale, net of tax		(833	)		(1,603	)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

6

HUDSON VALLEY HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data

1. Description of Operations

Hudson Valley Holding Corp. (“Hudson Valley” or the “Company”) is a New York corporation founded in 1982. The Company is registered as a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956.

The Company provides financial services through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Hudson Valley Bank, N.A. (“HVB” or “the Bank”), a national banking association established in 1972, with operational headquarters in Westchester County, New York. HVB has 18 branch offices in Westchester County, New York, 5 in Manhattan, New York, 4 in Bronx County, New York, 2 in Rockland County, New York, 1 in Kings County, New York, 5 in Fairfield County, Connecticut and 1 in New Haven County, Connecticut. On January 31, 2013, the Company announced its intention to consolidate or divest all of its Connecticut branch locations by the middle of 2013, as these branch offices have not met the Company’s expectations for growth or profitability. The Company also announced that it would be closing one branch in Manhattan and one branch in Westchester by the middle of 2013.

The Company provides investment management services through a wholly-owned subsidiary of HVB, A.R. Schmeidler & Co., Inc. (“ARS”), a money management firm, thereby generating fee income. ARS has offices at 500 Fifth Avenue in Manhattan, New York.

We derive substantially all of our revenue and income from providing banking and related services to businesses, professionals, municipalities, not-for-profit organizations and individuals within our market area, primarily Westchester County and Rockland County, New York and portions of New York City.

Our principal executive offices are located at 21 Scarsdale Road, Yonkers, New York 10707.

Our principal customers are businesses, professionals, municipalities, not-for-profit organizations and individuals. Our strategy is to operate community-oriented banking institutions dedicated to providing personalized service to customers and focusing on products and services for selected segments of the market. We believe that our ability to attract and retain customers is due primarily to our focused approach to our markets, our personalized and professional services, our product offerings, our experienced staff, our knowledge of our local markets and our ability to provide responsive solutions to customer needs. We provide these products and services to a diverse range of customers and do not rely on a single large depositor for a significant percentage of deposits.

2. Basis of Presentation

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, these financial statements do not contain all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for annual financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

The accounting and reporting policies followed in the presentation of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are consistent with those described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Management has evaluated all significant events and transactions that occurred after March 31, 2013, for potential recognition or disclosure in these consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, these consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary to present fairly such information for the periods and dates indicated. Such adjustments are normal and recurring in nature. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation. Reclassifications had no effect on prior period net income or stockholders’ equity.

In preparing such financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the dates of the consolidated balance sheets and statements of income for the periods reported. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the determination of the fair value of securities available for sale, the determination of other-than-temporary impairment of investments and the carrying amounts of goodwill and deferred tax assets. In connection with the determination of the allowance for loan losses, management utilizes the work of professional appraisers for significant properties.

7

3. Securities

The following tables set forth the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and the estimated fair value of securities classified as available for sale and held to maturity at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands):

	March 31, 2013
	Amortized		Gross Unrealized				Estimated
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
Classified as Available for Sale
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	73,485	$	140	$	1	$	73,624
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		302,477		4,134		418		306,193
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		77,471		2,656		10		80,117
Other debt securities		11,212		3		7,379		3,836
Total debt securities		464,645		6,933		7,808		463,770
Mutual funds and other equity securities		10,026		469		114		10,381
Total	$	474,671	$	7,402	$	7,922	$	474,151

	Amortized		Gross Unrecognized				Estimated
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
Classified as Held to Maturity
Mortgage-backed securities - residential	$	4,497	$	373		—	$	4,870
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		5,144		150		—		5,294
Total	$	9,641	$	523		—	$	10,164

	December 31, 2012
	Amortized		Gross Unrealized				Estimated
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
Classified as Available for Sale
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	53,197	$	36	$	10	$	53,223
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		290,063		5,337		312		295,088
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		79,638		2,974		10		82,602
Other debt securities		11,319		1		7,572		3,748
Total debt securities		434,217		8,348		7,904		434,661
Mutual funds and other equity securities		10,026		507		124		10,409
Total	$	444,243	$	8,855	$	8,028	$	445,070

	Amortized		Gross Unrecognized				Estimated
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
Classified as Held to Maturity
Mortgage-backed securities - residential	$	5,083	$	415		—	$	5,498
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		5,142		185		—		5,327
Total	$	10,225	$	600		—	$	10,825

Included in other debt securities are investments in five pooled trust preferred securities with an aggregate amortized cost and estimated fair value of $10,416 and $3,038, respectively, at March 31, 2013, and $10,521 and $2,950, respectively, at December 31, 2012. These investments represent trust preferred obligations of banking industry companies. The value of these investments has been severely negatively affected by the continued weakness in the economy and elevated investor concerns about recent and potential future losses in the financial services industry. These investments are rated below investment grade by both Moody’s Investor

8

Services and Fitch Ratings, Ltd at March 31, 2013 with ratings ranging from Caa2 to C. All of the Company’s pooled trust preferred securities are mezzanine class issues, four of which are subordinate to certain other classes of securities within their pools. In light of these conditions, these investments were reviewed for other-than-temporary impairment.

In estimating OTTI losses, the Company considers: (1) the length of time and extent that fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuers, (3) whether the Company intends to sell or whether it is more likely than not that the Company would be required to sell the investments prior to recovery of cost and (4) evaluation of cash flows to determine if they have been adversely affected.

The Company uses a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) analysis to provide an estimate of an OTTI loss. Inputs to the discount model included known defaults and interest deferrals, projected additional default rates, projected additional deferrals of interest, over-collateralization tests, interest coverage tests and other factors. Additional expected default and deferral rates were weighted toward the near future to reflect the current adverse economic environment affecting the banking industry. All known and projected defaults are applied a loss severity of 100%. All known and expected deferrals are assigned a loss severity between 25% and 100% based on an individual review of the related issuers’ financial information. The review is focused on capital adequacy, earnings performance and various asset quality measurements. An additional factor for potential defaults/deferrals is included in each DCF at 1% of performing collateral in year 1 and 0.25% annually thereafter, at a loss severity rate of 85%. A 1% annual prepayment factor is also applied to each DCF. The discount rate used in the DCF was based upon the original yield expected from the related securities.

Significant specific inputs to the cash flow models used in determining credit related OTTI losses on pooled trust preferred securities as of March 31, 2013 included the following:

	PreTSL			PreTSL			PreTSL			PreTSL			PreTSL			PreTSL
	IV			VII			VIII			VIII			X			XI
Discount rate index		3m LIBOR			3m LIBOR			3m LIBOR			3m LIBOR			3m LIBOR			3m LIBOR
Discount rate spread		2.25	%		1.80	%		1.90	%		1.90	%		1.70	%		1.60	%
Projected specific defaults and deferrals as % of original Collateral		57	%		56	%		54	%		54	%		36	%		33	%
Projected severity of loss as % of specific defaults/deferrals		84	%		92	%		93	%		93	%		88	%		82	%
Projected additional defaults/deferrals as % of performing collateral:
Year 1		1.00	%		1.00	%		1.00	%		1.00	%		1.00	%		1.00	%
Thereafter		0.25	%		0.25	%		0.25	%		0.25	%		0.25	%		0.25	%
Severity of loss		85	%		85	%		85	%		85	%		85	%		85	%

Additional information related to the Company’s pooled trust preferred securities as of March 31, 2013 is presented below:

	PreTSL			PreTSL			PreTSL			PreTSL			PreTSL			PreTSL
	IV			VII			VIII			VIII			X			XI
Class		Mezz			B			B-1			B-2			B-2			B-2
Seniority		Mezzanine			Mezzanine			Mezzanine			Mezzanine			Mezzanine			Mezzanine
Amortized cost	$	61		$	869		$	742		$	1,113		$	5,570		$	2,061
Fair value		15			422			204			306			1,696			395
Unrealized loss		(46	)		(447	)		(538	)		(807	)		(3,874	)		(1,666	)
OTTI recognized in earnings - three months ended March 31, 2013		—			—			—			—			—			—
OTTI recognized in earnings - life to date		—			(1,122	)		(1,418	)		(2,127	)		(4,863	)		(472	)
Moody’s / Fitch		Caa2/CCC			Ca/C			C/C			C/C			Ca/C			Ca/C
Number of institutions currently performing		4			9			16			16			33			41
Actual defaults/deferrals as % of original collateral		27	%		46	%		54	%		54	%		35	%		32	%
Excess subordination as % of performing collateral (1)		20	%		(69	)%		(94	)%		(94	)%		(32	)%		(29	)%

(1) The excess subordination as % of performing collateral is calculated by taking total performing collateral and dividing it by the sum of all class balances with seniority senior to and equal to the class for which the measurement is applicable. A negative percentage is indicative of a cash flow shortfall which could result in credit component OTTI. The severity of a current negative excess subordination is not necessarily indicative of the severity of the credit component OTTI as actual cash flow results realized with respect to future defaults and deferrals, default and deferral timing, loss severities, recovery timing, redirections of payments in other classes and other factors could act to increase or decrease an indicated deficiency at a future date.

9

The following table summarizes the change in pretax OTTI credit related losses on securities available for sale for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	Mar 31 2013		Mar 31 2012
Balance at beginning of period:
Total OTTI credit related impairment charges beginning of period	$	10,002	$	9,478
Increase to the amount related to the credit loss for which other-than-temporary impairment was previously recognized		—		478
Credit related impairment dispositions		—		—
Credit related impairment not previously recognized		—		—
Balance at end of period:	$	10,002	$	9,956

There were no OTTI losses recognized for the three month period ended March 31, 2013. During the three month period ended March 31, 2012, pretax OTTI losses of $2, $25, $3, $447 and $1 were recognized on five pooled trust preferred securities which prior to the 2012 charges had book values of $2,088, $5,696, $919, $2,228 and $662, respectively. These OTTI losses resulted from adverse changes in the expected cash flows of these securities which indicated that the Company may not recover the entire cost basis of these investments. Continuation or worsening of current adverse economic conditions may result in further impairment charges in the future.

At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, securities having a stated value of approximately $199,155 and $195,142, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and for other purposes as required or permitted by law.

The following tables reflect the Company’s investment’s fair value and gross unrealized loss, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands):

March 31, 2013	Duration of Unrealized Loss
	Less Than 12 Months				Greater than 12 Months				Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss
Classified as Available for Sale
U.S. Treasuries and government agencies	$	999	$	1		—		—	$	999	$	1
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		105,595		418		—		—		105,595		418
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		2,092		10		—		—		2,092		10
Other debt securities		100		1	$	1,021	$	7,378		1,121		7,379
Total debt securities		108,786		430		1,021		7,378		109,807		7,808
Mutual funds and other equity securities		—		—		98		114		98		114
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	108,786	$	430	$	1,119	$	7,492	$	109,905	$	7,922

There were no securities classified as held to maturity in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2013.

10

December 31, 2012	Duration of Unrealized Loss
	Less Than 12 Months				Greater than 12 Months				Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss
Classified as Available for Sale
U.S. Treasuries and government agencies	$	8,048	$	10		—		—	$	8,048	$	10
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		47,211		312		—		—		47,211		312
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		2,963		10		—		—		2,963		10
Other debt securities		367		1	$	2,950	$	7,571		3,317		7,572
Total debt securities		58,589		333		2,950		7,571		61,539		7,904
Mutual funds and other equity securities		12		1		96		123		108		124
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	58,601	$	334	$	3,046	$	7,694	$	61,647	$	8,028

There were no securities classified as held to maturity in an unrealized loss position at December 31, 2012.

The total number of securities in the Company’s portfolio that were in an unrealized loss position was 106 and 88, respectively, at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The Company has determined that it does not intend to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell, its securities that are in an unrealized loss position prior to the recovery of its amortized cost basis. With the exception of the investment in pooled trust preferred securities discussed above, the Company believes that its securities continue to have satisfactory ratings, are readily marketable and that current unrealized losses are primarily a result of changes in interest rates. Therefore, management does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2013. With regard to the investments in pooled trust preferred securities, the Company has decided to hold these securities as it believes that current market quotes for these securities are not necessarily indicative of their value. The Company has recognized impairment charges on five of the pooled trust preferred securities. Management believes that the remaining impairment in the value of these securities to be primarily related to illiquidity in the market and therefore not credit related at March 31, 2013.

The contractual maturity of all debt securities held at March 31, 2013 is shown below (in thousands). Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because some issuers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	Available for Sale				Held to Maturity
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Contractual Maturity
Within 1 year	$	11,385	$	11,423		—		—
After 1 year but within 5 years		106,170		107,610	$	5,144	$	5,294
After 5 year but within 10 years		34,197		35,506		—		—
After 10 years		10,416		3,038		—		—
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		302,477		306,193		4,497		4,870
Total	$	464,645	$	463,770	$	9,641	$	10,164

11

4. Loans

The loan portfolio, excluding loans held for sale, is comprised of the following (in thousands):

	March 31 2013			December 31 2012
Real Estate:
Commercial	$	576,409		$	550,786
Construction		70,212			74,727
Residential Multi-Family		195,016			196,199
Residential Other		294,798			325,774
Commercial & Industrial		249,794			288,809
Individuals & lease financing		28,739			33,488
Total loans		1,414,968			1,469,783
Deferred loan fees		(2,186	)		(2,411	)
Allowance for loan losses		(26,088	)		(26,612	)
Loans, net	$	1,386,694		$	1,440,760

Risk characteristics of the Company’s loan portfolio segments include the following:

Commercial Real Estate Loans — In underwriting commercial real estate loans, the Company evaluates both the prospective borrower’s ability to make timely payments on the loan and the value of the property securing the loan. Repayment of such loans may be negatively impacted should the borrower default or should there be a substantial decline in the value of the property securing the loan, or a decline in general economic conditions. Where the owner occupies the property, the Company also evaluates the business’s ability to repay the loan on a timely basis. In addition, the Company may require personal guarantees, lease assignments and/or the guarantee of the operating company when the property is owner occupied. These types of loans may involve greater risks than other types of lending, because payments on such loans are often dependent upon the successful operation of the business involved, therefore, repayment of such loans may be negatively impacted by adverse changes in economic conditions affecting the borrowers’ business.

Construction Loans — Construction loans are short-term loans (generally up to 18 months) secured by land for both residential and commercial development. The loans are generally made for acquisition and improvements. Funds are disbursed as phases of construction are completed. Most non-residential construction loans require pre-approved permanent financing or pre-leasing by the company or another bank providing the permanent financing. The Company funds construction of single family homes and commercial real estate, when no contract of sale exists, based upon the experience of the builder, the financial strength of the owner, the type and location of the property and other factors. Construction loans are generally personally guaranteed by the principal(s). Repayment of such loans may be negatively impacted by the builders’ inability to complete construction, by a downturn in the new construction market, by a significant increase in interest rates or by a decline in general economic conditions. The Bank’s primary regulator considers construction loans to be part of commercial real estate for concentration risk measurement purposes.

Residential Real Estate Loans — Various loans secured by residential real estate properties are offered by the Company, including 1-4 family residential mortgages, multi-family residential loans and a variety of home equity line of credit products. Repayment of such loans may be negatively impacted should the borrower default, should there be a significant decline in the value of the property securing the loan or should there be decline in general economic conditions. The Company offers multi-family loans up to $7.5 million per transaction. These loans are available for 7 or 10 year terms with one 5 year extension option. A 7 year term with no extension option is also offered. Pricing is typically based on a spread over the corresponding Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) rate. Amortization of up to 30 years, a maximum loan to value ratio of 75% and a debt service coverage ratio of 1.2 to 1 are generally required. The Bank’s primary regulator considers multi-family residential loans to be part of commercial real estate for concentration risk measurement purposes.

Commercial and Industrial Loans — The Company’s commercial and industrial loan portfolio consists primarily of commercial business loans and lines of credit to businesses and professionals. These loans are usually made to finance the purchase of inventory, new or used equipment or other short or long-term working capital purposes. These loans are generally secured by corporate assets, often with real estate as secondary collateral, but are also offered on an unsecured basis. In granting this type of loan, the Company primarily looks to the borrower’s cash flow as the source of repayment with collateral and personal guarantees,

12

where obtained, as a secondary source. Commercial loans are often larger and may involve greater risks than other types of loans offered by the Company. Payments on such loans are often dependent upon the successful operation of the underlying business involved and, therefore, repayment of such loans may be negatively impacted by adverse changes in economic conditions, management’s inability to effectively manage the business, claims of others against the borrower’s assets which may take priority over the Company’s claims against assets, death or disability of the borrower or loss of market for the borrower’s products or services.

Lease Financing and Other Loans — The Company originates lease financing transactions which are primarily conducted with businesses, professionals and not-for-profit organizations and provide financing principally for office equipment, telephone systems, computer systems, energy saving improvements and other special use equipment. Payments on such loans are often dependent upon the successful operation of the underlying business involved and, therefore, repayment of such loans may be negatively impacted by adverse changes in economic conditions, and management’s inability to effectively manage the business. The Company also offers installment loans and reserve lines of credit to individuals. Repayment of such loans are often dependent on the personal income of the borrower which may be negatively impacted by adverse changes in economic conditions. The Company does not place an emphasis on originating these types of loans.

The following table presents the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the three month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):

	Three months ended March 31, 2013
	Total			Commercial Real Estate			Construction			Residential Real  Estate			Commercial  & Industrial			Lease Financing & Other
Balance at beginning of period	$	26,612		$	10,090		$	3,949		$	8,119		$	4,077		$	377
Charge-offs		(1,725	)		(368	)		(390	)		(548	)		(419	)		—
Recoveries		429			1			3			249			3			173
Net Charge-offs		(1,296	)		(367	)		(387	)		(299	)		(416	)		173
Provision for loan losses		772			1,547			997			(1,400	)		(237	)		(135	)
Net change during the period		(524	)		1,180			610			(1,699	)		(653	)		38
Balance at end of period	$	26,088		$	11,270		$	4,559		$	6,420		$	3,424		$	415

	Three months ended March 31, 2012
	Total			Commercial Real Estate			Construction		Residential Real  Estate			Commercial  & Industrial			Lease Financing & Other
Balance at beginning of period	$	30,685		$	12,776		$	6,470	$	8,093		$	2,650		$	696
Charge-offs		(1,125	)		(398	)		—		(558	)		(125	)		(44	)
Recoveries		937			298			1		534			89			15
Net Charge-offs		(188	)		(100	)		1		(24	)		(36	)		(29	)
Provision for loan losses		1,359			373			97		717			147			25
Net change during the period		1,171			273			98		693			111			(4	)
Balance at end of period	$	31,856		$	13,049		$	6,568	$	8,786		$	2,761		$	692

The following tables present the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment based on impairment method as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands):

13

	March 31, 2013
	Total		Commercial Real  Estate		Construction		Residential Real  Estate		Commercial  & Industrial		Lease Financing & Other
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending balance attributed to loans:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	26,088	$	11,270	$	4,559	$	6,420	$	3,424	$	415
Individually evaluated for impairment		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total ending balance of allowance	$	26,088	$	11,270	$	4,559	$	6,420	$	3,424	$	415
Total loans:
Ending balance of loans:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	1,358,246	$	551,456	$	67,386	$	472,702	$	237,963	$	28,739
Individually evaluated for impairment		56,722		24,953		2,826		17,112		11,831		—
Total ending balance of loans	$	1,414,968	$	576,409	$	70,212	$	489,814	$	249,794	$	28,739

	December 31, 2012
	Total		Commercial Real Estate		Construction		Residential Real  Estate		Commercial  & Industrial		Lease Financing & Other
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending balance attributed to loans:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	26,612	$	10,090	$	3,949	$	8,119	$	4,077	$	377
Individually evaluated for impairment		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total ending balance of allowance	$	26,612	$	10,090	$	3,949	$	8,119	$	4,077	$	377
Total loans:
Ending balance of loans:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	1,415,035	$	525,579	$	70,007	$	509,297	$	276,664	$	33,488
Individually evaluated for impairment		54,748		25,207		4,720		12,676		12,145		—
Total ending balance of loans	$	1,469,783	$	550,786	$	74,727	$	521,973	$	288,809	$	33,488

14

The following table presents the recorded investment in non-accrual loans and loans past due 90 days and still accruing by class of loans as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands):

	March 31, 2013				December 31, 2012
	Non-Accrual		Past Due 90 Days and Still Accruing		Non-Accrual		Past Due 90 Days and Still Accruing
Loans:
Commercial Real Estate:
Owner occupied	$	15,431		—	$	15,670		—
Non owner occupied		2,778		—		2,717		—
Construction:
Commercial		974		—		2,478		—
Residential		1,852		—		2,242		—
Residential:
Multifamily		327		—		—		—
1-4 family		8,324		—		8,470		—
Home equity		463		—		1,212		—
Commercial & Industrial		1,991		—		2,019		—
Other:
Lease financing and other		—		—		—		—
Overdrafts		—		—		—		—
Total	$	32,140		—	$	34,808		—

The following table presents the aging of loans (including past due and non-accrual loans) as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 by class of loans (in thousands):

	March 31, 2013
	Total		31-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days Or More Past Due		Total Past  Due		Current
Loans:
Commercial Real Estate:
Owner occupied	$	177,533	$	1,134		—	$	9,462	$	10,596	$	166,937
Non owner occupied		398,876		587		—		2,778		3,365		395,511
Construction:
Commercial		43,025		2,186	$	485		974		3,645		39,380
Residential		27,187		311		—		1,852		2,163		25,024
Residential:
Multifamily		195,016		748		—		327		1,075		193,941
1-4 family		188,836		1,580		384		8,325		10,289		178,547
Home equity		105,962		3,986		3,342		462		7,790		98,172
Commercial & Industrial		249,794		3,791		423		1,475		5,689		244,105
Other:
Lease financing and other		27,394		833		—		—		833		26,561
Overdrafts		1,345		—		—		—		—		1,345
Total	$	1,414,968	$	15,156	$	4,634	$	25,655	$	45,445	$	1,369,523

15

	December 31, 2012
	Total		31-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days Or More Past Due		Total Past  Due		Current
Loans:
Commercial Real Estate:
Owner occupied	$	181,541	$	472		—	$	9,464	$	9,936	$	171,605
Non owner occupied		369,245		802		—		2,717		3,519		365,726
Construction:
Commercial		40,708		1,421		—		—		1,421		39,287
Residential		34,019		455		—		2,242		2,697		31,322
Residential:
Multifamily		196,199		—		—		—		—		196,199
1-4 family		215,771		4,506	$	91		8,470		13,067		202,704
Home equity		110,003		3,411		321		1,212		4,944		105,059
Commercial & Industrial		288,809		1,938		170		1,479		3,587		285,222
Other:
Lease financing and other		32,104		431		1		—		432		31,672
Overdrafts		1,384		—		—		—		—		1,384
Total	$	1,469,783	$	13,436	$	583	$	25,584	$	39,603	$	1,430,180

Impaired loans and the recorded investment in impaired loans as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were as follows (in thousands):

	March 31, 2013						December 31, 2012
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Allowance for Loan  Losses Allocated		Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Allowance for Loan  Losses Allocated
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial Real Estate:
Owner occupied	$	25,976	$	21,763		—	$	26,235	$	22,022		—
Non owner occupied		4,228		3,189		—		4,292		3,185		—
Construction:
Commercial		1,231		975		—		2,735		2,478		—
Residential		3,242		1,852		—		3,242		2,242		—
Residential:
Multifamily		3,301		3,301		—		2,994		2,994		—
1-4 family		14,795		13,349		—		9,726		8,470		—
Home equity		980		462		—		2,220		1,212		—
Commercial & Industrial		12,904		11,831		—		13,218		12,145		—
Total loans	$	66,657	$	56,722		—	$	64,662	$	54,748		—

The carrying value of impaired loans was determined using either the fair value of the underlying collateral of the loan or by an analysis of the expected cash flows related to the loan. At March 31, 2013, and December 31, 2012, the Company had no specific reserves allocated as partial charge-offs were recorded for all identified impairments. Impaired loans as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 included $31,561 and $27,183, respectively, of loans considered to be troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”). There were four additional loan modifications classified as TDRs during the three month period ended March 31, 2013. There were no loans modified as TDRs during the three months ended March 31, 2012. The Company is not committed to extend any additional credit to borrowers whose loans are classified as TDRs. For the three month period ended March 31, 2013, eleven TDRs with carrying amounts of $24,582 were on accrual status and performing in accordance with their modified terms. All other TDRs for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 were on nonaccrual status. For the three month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no TDRs in which there were payment defaults within twelve months following the

16

modification. The Company’s policy states that a loan is considered to be in payment default once it is 45 days contractually past due under the modified terms.

The following table presents the average recorded investment in impaired loans by portfolio segment and interest recognized on impaired loans for the three month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2013				2012
	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income
Loans:
Commercial Real Estate:
Owner occupied	$	21,891	$	3	$	20,700	$	178
Non owner occupied		3,187		71		9,005		—
Construction:
Commercial		1,727		—		4,897		—
Residential		2,047		11		—		—
Residential:
Multifamily		3,148		40		672		—
1-4 family		10,910		—		1,904		9
Home equity		837		—		1,776		—
Commercial & Industrial		11,988		112		7,767		—
Lease Financing & Other		—		—		—		—
Total	$	55,735	$	237	$	46,721	$	187

Gross interest income that would have been recorded if these borrowers had been current in accordance with their original loan terms was $528 and $303, respectively, for the three month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012. There was no interest income recorded on non accrual loans during the three month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012.

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the terms of certain loans were modified as troubled debt restructurings. The modification of the terms of such loans included one or a combination of the following: a reduction of the stated interest rate of the loan; an extension of the maturity date at a stated rate of interest lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk; or a permanent reduction of the recorded investment in the loan.

Modifications involving a reduction of the stated interest rate of the loan were for periods ranging from 6 months to 15 years. Modifications involving an extension of the maturity date were for periods ranging from 6 months to 3 years.

The following table presents loans by class modified as troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2013 (in thousands):

17

	For the Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2013
	Number of Loans		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
Loans:
Commercial Real Estate:
Owner occupied		—		—		—
Non owner occupied		—		—		—
Construction:
Commercial		—		—		—
Residential		—		—		—
Residential:
Multifamily		—		—		—
1-4 family		4	$	5,211	$	5,025
Home equity		—		—		—
Commercial & Industrial		—		—		—
Other:
Lease financing and other		—		—		—
Overdrafts		—		—		—
Total		4	$	5,211	$	5,025

The TDRs described above resulted in charge-offs of $186 during the three months ended March 31, 2013.

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of the borrowers to service their debt such as: value of underlying collateral, current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes non-homogeneous loans individually and classifies them as to credit risk. This analysis is performed on a quarterly basis. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

Special Mention — Loans classified as special mention have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of repayment prospects for the asset or in the institution’s credit position at some future date.

Substandard — Loans classified as substandard asset are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified must have a well-defined weakness, or weaknesses, that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful — Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in one classified as substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently known facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable.

Loans not meeting the above criteria that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be pass rated loans.

18

The following table presents the risk category by class of loans as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 of non-homogeneous loans individually classified as to credit risk as of the most recent analysis performed (in thousands):

	March 31, 2013
	Total		Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful
Commercial Real Estate:
Owner occupied	$	177,533	$	131,756	$	6,668	$	39,109		—
Non owner occupied		398,876		387,596		3,394		7,886		—
Construction:
Commercial		43,025		32,852		5,349		4,824		—
Residential		27,187		24,103		886		2,198		—
Residential:
Multifamily		195,016		190,656		2,740		1,620		—
1-4 family		77,948		56,482		469		20,997		—
Home equity		499		36		—		463		—
Commercial & Industrial		249,794		232,909		2,222		14,663		—
Lease Financing & Other		26,277		25,880		—		397		—
Total loans	$	1,196,155	$	1,082,270	$	21,728	$	92,157		—

	December 31, 2012
	Total		Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful
Commercial Real Estate:
Owner occupied	$	181,541	$	132,181	$	6,447	$	42,913		—
Non owner occupied		369,245		356,960		4,438		7,847		—
Construction:
Commercial		40,708		29,303		5,349		6,056		—
Residential		34,019		28,936		891		4,192		—
Residential:
Multifamily		196,199		193,083		—		3,116		—
1-4 family		89,246		58,480		20,439		10,327		—
Home equity		1,212		—		—		1,212		—
Commercial & Industrial		288,809		270,362		3,368		15,079		—
Lease Financing & Other		31,015		29,842		846		327		—
Total loans	$	1,231,994	$	1,099,147	$	41,778	$	91,069		—

Loans not individually rated, primarily consisting of certain 1-4 family residential mortgages and home equity lines of credit, are evaluated for risk in groups of homogeneous loans. The primary risk characteristic evaluated on these pools is delinquency.

19

The following table presents the delinquency categories by class of loans as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 for loans evaluated for risk in groups of homogeneous loans (in thousands):

	March 31, 2013
	Total		31-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days Or More Past Due		Total Past Due		Current
Residential:
1-4 family	$	110,888	$	610	$	384		—	$	994	$	109,894
Home equity		105,463		3,986		3,342		—		7,328		98,135
Other:
Other loans		1,117		100		—		—		100		1,017
Overdrafts		1,345		—		—		—		—		1,345
Total loans	$	218,813	$	4,696	$	3,726		—	$	8,422	$	210,391
	December 31, 2012
	Total		31-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days Or More Past Due		Total Past Due		Current
Residential:
1-4 family	$	126,525		—	$	91		—	$	91	$	126,434
Home equity		108,791	$	3,411		321		—		3,732		105,059
Other:						—		—		—
Other loans		1,089		30		1		—		31		1,058
Overdrafts		1,384		—		—		—		—		1,384
Total loans	$	237,789	$	3,441	$	413		—	$	3,854	$	233,935

5. Earnings Per Share

FASB ASC 260-10-45 addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share (“EPS”). The restricted stock awards and restricted stock units granted by the Company contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends and therefore are considered participating securities. The two-class method for calculating basic EPS excludes dividends paid to participating securities and any undistributed earnings attributable to participating securities.

The following table presents the calculation of earnings per share for the periods indicated:

20

	Three Months Ended
	March 31
	2013		2012
	(000’s except share data)
Net income	$	3,651	$	18,013
Less: Dividends paid on and earnings allocated to participating securities		43		7
Income attributable to common stock	$	3,608	$	18,006
Weighted average common shares outstanding, including participating securities		19,810,845		19,538,334
Less: Weighted average participating securities		247,762		9,512
Weighted average common shares outstanding		19,563,083		19,528,822
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.18	$	0.92
Income attributable to common stock	$	3,608	$	18,006
Weighted average common shares outstanding		19,563,083		19,528,822
Weighted average common equivalent shares outstanding		—		19,762
Weighted average common and equivalent shares outstanding		19,563,083		19,548,584
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.18	$	0.92
Dividends per common share	$	0.06	$	0.18

There were 361,744 and 370,038 options outstanding at March 31, 2013, and 2012, respectively, that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of common stock and were, therefore, antidilutive.

6. Benefit Plans

In addition to defined contribution pension and savings plans which cover substantially all employees, the Company provides additional retirement benefits to certain officers and directors pursuant to unfunded supplemental defined benefit plans. The following table summarizes the components of the net periodic pension cost of the defined benefit plans (in thousands).

	Three Months Ended
	March 31
	2013			2012
Service cost	$	131		$	110
Interest cost		151			153
Amortization of prior service cost		(54	)		(58	)
Amortization of net loss		209			168
Net periodic pension cost	$	437		$	373

The Company makes contributions to the unfunded defined benefit plans only as benefit payments become due. The Company disclosed in its 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K that it expected to contribute $923 to the unfunded defined benefit plans during 2013. For the three month period ended March 31, 2013, the Company contributed $225 to these plans.

7. Stock-Based Compensation

In accordance with the provisions of the Hudson Valley Holding Corp. 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the Company may grant eligible employees, including directors, consultants and advisors, incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance awards and other types of awards. The 2010 Plan provides for the issuance of up to 1,331,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Prior to the 2010 Plan, the Company had stock option plans that provided for the granting of options to directors, officers, eligible employees, and certain advisors common stock at an exercise price not less than the market value of the stock on the date of grant subject to various eligibility and vesting requirements. There will be no further grants under any plans prior to the 2010 plan.

21

Compensation costs relating to stock-based payment transactions are recognized in the financial statements with measurement based upon the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. Stock-based payments are expensed over their respective vesting periods.

The following table summarizes stock-based compensation activity for the three month period ended March 31, 2013:

	Shares			Weighted Average Grant or Exercise Price		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (2) ($000’s)		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term
Prior Option Plans (1):
Outstanding at December 31, 2012		428,111		$	20.21
Granted		—			—
Exercised		—			—
Cancelled or Expired		(66,367	)		16.28
Outstanding at March 31, 2013		361,744			20.93		—		2.0
Exercisable at March 31, 2013		361,452			20.92		—		2.0
Nonvested at March 31, 2013		292			36.13
2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan (1):
Nonvested at December 31, 2012		202,005		$	16.25
Granted at fair value		133,353			15.73
Restriction released		(31,824	)		16.39
Cancelled		(1,269	)		17.10
Nonvested at March 31, 2013		302,265			16.00
Available for grant at December 31, 2012		1,121,322
Restricted stock awards		(133,353	)	$	15.73
Unissued or cancelled		1,269			17.10
Available for future grant		989,238

(1) 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan includes restricted stock awards while Prior Option Plans do not.

(2) The aggregate intrinsic value of a stock option in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the amount by which the current fair value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on March 31, 2013. This amount changes based on changes in the fair value of the Company’s stock.

The fair value (present value of the estimated future benefit to the option holder) of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. There were no stock options granted in the three month period ended March 31, 2013 or the year ended December 31, 2012.

There was no net compensation expense related to stock options included in net income for the three month period ended March 31, 2013. Net compensation expense of $12 related to the Company’s stock options was included in net income for the three month period ended March 31, 2012. The tax effect related thereto was ($2). There was no remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options at March 31, 2013.

Compensation expense of $202 and $139 related to the Company’s restricted stock awards was included in net income for the three month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The tax effect related thereto was $83 and $58, respectively. Unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock awards totaled $4,024 at March 31, 2013. This expense is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted average period of 3.0 years.

22

8. Fair Value

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

A description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below. While management believes the Company’s valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other financial institutions, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.

Investment Securities — The fair values of investment securities are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges, if available (Level 1), or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities, which is a Level 2 input. The Company’s available for sale securities at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 include several pooled trust preferred instruments. The downturn in the overall economy and, in particular, in the financial services industry has created a situation where significant observable inputs (Level 2) are not readily available for these instruments. As an alternative, the Company combined Level 2 input of market yield requirements of similar instruments together with certain Level 3 assumptions addressing the impact of current market illiquidity to estimate the fair value of these instruments. The fair values of Level 3 investment securities are determined by the Company’s Controller and Investment Officer who report to the Chief Financial Officer. See Note 3 “Securities” for further discussion of pooled trust preferred securities.

Impaired Loans — At the time a loan is considered impaired, it is valued at lower of cost or fair value. Impaired loans carried at fair value generally are partially charged off or receive specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses. For collateral dependent loans, fair value is commonly based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the independent appraiser to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and the income data available. Management may apply additional discounts based on changes in the market from the time of valuation. Such adjustments are usually significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining value. Non real estate collateral may be valued using an appraisal, net book value per the borrower’s financial statements, or aging reports, adjusted or discounted based on management’s historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of the valuation, and management’s expertise and knowledge of the client and the client’s business, resulting in a Level 3 fair value classification. Impaired loans are evaluated on a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly.

Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”) — Real estate properties acquired through loan foreclosure are recorded at estimated fair value, net of estimated selling costs, at time of foreclosure establishing a new cost basis. Fair value is commonly based on real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the independent appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are usually significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs used in determining fair value.

Loans Held for Sale — Loans held for sale are carried at lower of cost or fair value. The fair value of loans held for sale is determined using average bid indicators from third parties expected to participate in the loan sales, in some cases adjusted for specific attributes of that loan or other observable market data. Such bids and adjustments often vary significantly and typically result in Level 3 classification of the inputs used in determining fair value.

23

The following table presents quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands):

Asset	Fair Value at March 31, 2013		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range (Weighted Average)
Impaired loans - commercial real estate	$	5,722	Sales comparison or income approach	Discounts to appraisals for market conditions	0%-62% (8%)
Capitalization rate					8%
Impaired loans - construction	$	2,826	Sales comparison approach	Discounts to appraisals for market conditions	0%-21% (6%)
Impaired loans - residential real estate	$	7,764	Sales comparison or income approach	Discounts to appraisals for market conditions	0%-47% (4%)
Impaired loans - commercial and industrial	$	1,713	Sales comparison approach - secondary collateral	Discounts to appraisals for market conditions	7% (7%)
Loans held for sale	$	2,286	Third party bids	Bids from interested third parties	60%-65% (64%)
Asset	Fair Value at December 31, 2012		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range (Weighted Average)
Impaired loans - commercial real estate	$	6,835	Sales comparison or income approach	Discounts to appraisals for market conditions	0%-62% (8%)
Capitalization rate					8%
Impaired loans - construction	$	3,219	Sales comparison approach	Discounts to appraisals for market conditions	0%-21% (6%)
Impaired loans - residential real estate	$	8,514	Sales comparison or income approach	Discounts to appraisals for market conditions	0%-47% (4%)
Impaired loans - commercial and industrial	$	1,737	Sales comparison approach - secondary collateral	Discounts to appraisals for market conditions	7% (7%)
Other real estate owned	$	250	Sales comparison approach	Discounts to appraisals for market conditions	0% (0%)
Loans held for sale	$	2,317	Third party bids	Bids from interested third parties	60%-65% (64%)

24

The following table presents quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands):

Asset	Fair Value at March 31, 2013		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range (Weighted Average)
Trust preferred securities	$	3,038	Discounted cash flow	Specific issuer default rates	33%-57% (45%)
				Specific issuer default severity	82%-93% (89%)
				Annual prepayment rate	1%
				Projected annual nonspecific issuer default rates	0.25%-1.00%
				Projected annual nonspecific issuer default severity	85%
				Present value discount rate	22.5%
Asset	Fair Value at December 31, 2012		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range (Weighted Average)
Trust preferred securities	$	2,950	Discounted cash flow	Specific issuer default rates	34%-61% (45%)
				Specific issuer default severity	83%-92% (89%)
				Annual prepayment rate	1%
				Projected annual nonspecific issuer default rates	0.25%-1.00%
				Projected annual nonspecific issuer default severity	85%
				Present value discount rate	22.5%

25

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are summarized below:

	Fair Value Measurements at
	March 31, 2013
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable  Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
	(000’s)
Measured on a recurring basis:
Available for sale securities:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies		—	$	73,624		—	$	73,624
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		—		306,193		—		306,193
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		—		80,117		—		80,117
Other debt securities		—		798	$	3,038		3,836
Mutual funds and other equity securities		—		10,381		—		10,381
Total assets at fair value		—	$	471,113	$	3,038	$	474,151
Measured on a non-recurring basis:
Impaired loans: (1)
Commercial Real Estate		—		—	$	5,722	$	5,722
Construction		—		—		2,826		2,826
Residential		—		—		7,764		7,764
Commercial & Industrial		—		—		1,713		1,713
Loans held for sale (2)		—		—		2,286		2,286
Total assets at fair value		—		—	$	20,311	$	20,311

(1) Impaired loans are reported at the fair value of the underlying collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Collateral values are estimated using Level 2 and Level 3 inputs which include independent appraisals and internally customized discounting criteria. The recorded investment in impaired loans subject to fair value reporting on March 31, 2013 was $18,025 for which no specific allowance has been established within the allowance for loan losses. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, $390 of charge-offs were recorded related to these loans. The level of charge-offs has a direct impact on the determination of the provision for loan losses. The fair values were based on internally customized discounting criteria of the collateral and thus classified as Level 3 fair values.

(2) Loans held for sale are reported at lower of cost or fair value. Fair value is based on average bid indicators received from third parties expected to participate in the loan sales.

26

	December 31, 2012
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable  Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
	(000’s)
Measured on a recurring basis:
Available for sale securities:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies		—	$	53,223		—	$	53,223
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		—		295,088		—		295,088
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		—		82,602		—		82,602
Other debt securities		—		798	$	2,950		3,748
Mutual funds and other equity securities		—		10,409		—		10,409
Total assets at fair value		—	$	442,120	$	2,950	$	445,070
Measured on a non-recurring basis:
Impaired loans: (1)
Commercial Real Estate		—		—	$	6,835	$	6,835
Construction		—		—		3,219		3,219
Residential		—		—		8,514		8,514
Commercial & Industrial		—		—		1,737		1,737
Loans held for sale (2)		—		—		2,317		2,317
Other real estate owned (3)		—		—		250		250
Total assets at fair value		—		—	$	22,872	$	22,872

(1) Impaired loans are reported at the fair value of the underlying collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Collateral values are estimated using Level 2 and Level 3 inputs which include independent appraisals and internally customized discounting criteria. The recorded investment in impaired loans subject to fair value reporting on December 31, 2012 was $20,305 for which no specific allowance has been established within the allowance for loan losses. During 2012, $7,344 of charge-offs were recorded related to these loans. The level of charge-offs has a direct impact on the determination of the provision for loan losses. The fair values were based on internally customized discounting criteria of the collateral and thus classified as Level 3 fair values.

(2) Loans held for sale are reported at lower of cost or fair value. Fair value is based on average bid indicators received from third parties expected to participate in the loan sales.

(3) Other real estate owned is reported at fair value less anticipated costs to sell. Fair value is based on third party or internally developed appraisals which, considering the assumptions in the valuation, are considered Level 2 or Level 3 inputs. The fair value of other real estate owned at December 31, 2012 was derived by management from appraisals which used various assumptions and were discounted as necessary, resulting in a Level 3 classification.

The table below presents a reconciliation and income statement classification of gains and losses for securities available for sale measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

	Level 3 Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis
	Three Months Ended
	Mar 31
	2013			2012
	(000’s)
Balance at beginning of period	$	2,950		$	2,816
Additions to Level 3		96			106
Net unrealized gain (loss) included in other comprehensive income (1)		196			(22	)
Principal payments		(204	)		—
Recognized impairment charge included in the statement of income (2)		—			(478	)
Balance at end of period	$	3,038		$	2,422

(1) Reported under “Gains (losses) recognized in comprehensive income”

(2) Reported under “Net impairment loss recognized in earnings”

27

9. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows the “Financial Instruments” topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification which requires the disclosure of the estimated fair value of certain financial instruments. These estimated fair values as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 have been determined using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop estimates of fair value. The estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of amounts the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of alternative market assumptions and estimation methodologies could have had a material effect on these estimates of fair value.

Carrying amount and estimated fair value of financial instruments, not previously presented, at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were as follows (in millions):

March 31, 2013					Fair Value Measurements
	Carrying Amount		Total Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Financial assets for which carrying value approximates fair value	$	820.7	$	820.7	$	820.7
Held to maturity securities and accrued interest		9.6		10.2			$	10.2
FHLB Stock		4.8		N/A		N/A
Loans and accrued interest		1,400.1		1,432.6					$	1,432.6
Liabilities:
Deposits with no stated maturity and accrued interest		2,339.4		2,339.4		2,339.4
Time deposits and accrued interest		125.0		125.3				125.3
Securities sold under repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowing and accrued interest		29.2		29.2		29.2
Other borrowings and accrued interest		16.5		14.3				14.3
December 31, 2012					Fair Value Measurements
	Carrying Amount		Total Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Financial assets for which carrying value approximates fair value	$	846.8	$	846.8	$	846.8
Held to maturity securities and accrued interest		10.2		10.8			$	10.8
FHLB Stock		4.8		N/A		N/A
Loans and accrued interest		1,453.2		1,490.2					$	1,490.2
Liabilities:
Deposits with no stated maturity and accrued interest		2,387.7		2,387.7		2,387.7
Time deposits and accrued interest		132.4		132.7				132.7
Securities sold under repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowing and accrued interest		34.6		34.6		34.6
Other borrowings and accrued interest		16.5		14.2				14.2

The estimated fair value of the indicated items was determined as follows:

Financial assets for which carrying value approximates fair value — The estimated fair value approximates carrying amount because of the immediate availability of these funds or based on the short maturities and current rates for similar deposits. Cash and due from banks as well as Federal funds sold are reported in this line item.

28

Held to maturity securities and accrued interest — The fair value of securities held to maturity was estimated based on quoted market prices or dealer quotations. Accrued interest is stated at its carrying amounts which approximates fair value.

FHLB Stock — It is not practicable to determine its fair value due to restrictions placed on its transferability.

Loans and accrued interest — The fair value of loans was estimated by discounting projected cash flows at the reporting date using current rates for similar loans. Accrued interest is stated at its carrying amount which approximates fair value. The methods utilized to estimate the fair value of loans do not necessarily represent an exit price.

Deposits with no stated maturity and accrued interest — The estimated fair value of deposits with no stated maturity and accrued interest, as applicable, are considered to be equal to their carrying amounts.

Time deposits and accrued interest — The fair value of time deposits has been estimated by discounting projected cash flows at the reporting date using current rates for similar deposits. Accrued interest is stated at its carrying amount which approximates fair value.

Securities sold under repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings and accrued interest — The estimated fair value of these instruments approximate carrying amount because of their short maturities and variable rates. Accrued interest is stated at its carrying amount which approximates fair value.

Other borrowings and accrued interest — The fair value of callable FHLB advances was estimated by discounting projected cash flows at the reporting date using the rate applicable to the projected call date option. Accrued interest is stated at its carrying amount which approximates fair value.

10. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income includes unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale and changes in the funded status of the pension plan which are also recognized as separate components of equity. Activity in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, was as follows (in thousands):

	Securities Available For Sale			Defined Benefit Plans			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Balance at January 1, 2013	$	624		$	(1,473	)	$	(849	)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassification		(833	)		—			(833	)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income		—			93			93
Net other comprehensive (loss) income during period		(833	)		93			(740	)
Balance at March 31, 2013	$	(209	)	$	(1,380	)	$	(1,589	)
Balance at January 1, 2012	$	2,924		$	(1,198	)	$	1,726
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassification		(1,885	)		20			(1,865	)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income		282			66			348
Net other comprehensive (loss) income during period		(1,603	)		86			(1,517	)
Balance at March 31, 2012	$	1,321		$	(1,112	)	$	209

The following table represents the reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

29

	Three Months Ended March 31
	2013			2012
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale:
Realized gains (losses) on securities transactions		—			—
Other-than-temporary impairment charges		—		$	(478	)
Income tax expense		—			196
Net of tax		—			(282	)
Amortization of pension and post-retirement benefit items:
Amortization of net actuarial loss	$	(209	)		(168	)
Amortization of prior service cost		54			58
Income tax expense		62			44
Net of tax		(93	)		(66	)
Total reclassifications, net of tax	$	(93	)	$	(348	)

The income statement line items impacted by the reclassification of unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale are net impairment loss recognized in earnings and income tax expense. The income statement line items impacted by the reclassification of amortization of pension and post-retirement benefit items are salaries and employee benefits and income tax expense.

11. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income,” which amended existing guidance to require an entity to provide information about amounts reclassified out of other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the income statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For all other amounts, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures that provide additional details about these amounts. The guidance is effective for public companies for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of the guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operation or financial position but did require expansion of the Company’s disclosures.

30

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This section presents discussion and analysis of the Company’s consolidated financial condition at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and the consolidated results of operations for the three month periods ended March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012. The Company is consolidated with its wholly owned subsidiaries Hudson Valley Bank, N.A. and its subsidiaries (collectively “HVB” or “the Bank”) and HVHC Risk Management Corp. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and supplementary financial information contained in the Company’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview of Management’s Discussion and Analysis

This overview is intended to highlight selected information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. It does not contain sufficient information for a complete understanding of the Company’s financial condition and operating results and, therefore, should be read in conjunction with this entire Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the Company’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The Company derives substantially all of its revenue from providing banking and related services to businesses, professionals, municipalities, not-for profit organizations and individuals within its market area, primarily Westchester County and Rockland County, New York and portions of New York City. The Company’s assets consist primarily of loans and investment securities, which are funded by deposits, borrowings and capital. The primary source of revenue is net interest income, the difference between interest income on loans and investments, and interest expense on deposits and borrowed funds. The Company’s strategy includes investigation of opportunities for expansion within our market area, as well as an ongoing review of our existing branch system to evaluate if our current locations have or have not met expectations for growth and profitability. Considering current economic conditions, the Company’s primary market risk exposures are interest rate risk, the risk of deterioration of market values of collateral supporting the Company’s loan portfolio, particularly commercial and residential real estate, and potential risks associated with the impact of regulatory changes that have occurred and may continue to take place in reaction to current conditions in the financial system. Interest rate risk is the exposure of net interest income to changes in interest rates. Commercial and residential real estate are the primary collateral for the majority of the Company’s loans.

The Company recorded net income for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 of $3.7 million or $0.18 per diluted share, a decrease of $14.3 million compared to net income of $18.0 million or $0.92 per diluted share for the same period in the prior year.

The decrease in earnings for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to the same period in the prior year, was a result of lower net interest income, and lower noninterest income, partially offset by lower noninterest expenses. The decrease in net interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to the prior year period primarily resulted from a significant decrease in the net interest margin to 3.18 percent for the first quarter of 2013 from 4.75 percent for the same period in the prior year. This decrease resulted from significant changes in the composition of interest earning assets resulting from the combined effects of previously reported loan sales in the first quarter of 2012, generally weak new loan demand and continued low interest rates. Noninterest income in the first quarter of 2012 included a pretax gain of $15.9 million resulting from the successful completion of approximately $470 million of loan sales announced in the fourth quarter of 2011 as part of the Company’s efforts to reduce the levels of nonperforming and other classified loans, and also to reduce the overall concentration in commercial real estate loans.

Total loans, excluding loans held for sale, decreased $54.6 million during the three month period ended March 31, 2013 compared to the prior year end. This decrease was primarily due to weak loan demand, which has resulted in new loan production well below the combined impact of payoffs and pay downs of existing loans. The Company continues to provide lending availability to both new and existing customers.

Nonperforming assets decreased to $32.1 million at March 31, 2013, compared to $35.1 million at December 31, 2012. Overall asset quality continued to be adversely affected by the current state of the economy and the real estate market. Although there is evidence that the current economic downturn may have begun to slowly turn around, higher than normal levels of delinquent and nonperforming loans, slowdowns in repayments and declines in the loan-to-value ratios on existing loans continued during the first quarter of 2013. Despite overall reductions in classified and nonperforming loans, the Company’s loan portfolio continued to be adversely impacted by the lagging effects of declines in the demand for and values of virtually all commercial and residential real estate properties. These declines, together with the limited availability of residential mortgage financing, resulted in some continuing weakness in the overall asset quality of the Company’s loan portfolio. As a result of these factors, the Company has continued to follow aggressive strategies for resolving problem assets and has maintained the allowance for loan losses at a higher than normal level. The allowance for loan losses totaled $26.1 million or 1.84 percent of total loans at March 31, 2013, compared to $26.6 million or 1.81 percent of total loans at December 31, 2012. The provision for loan losses totaled $0.8 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to $1.4 million for the same period in the prior year, reflecting improvements achieved in the

31

resolutions of classified and nonperforming loans, partially offset by continued weakness in the overall economy, and the related effects of this weakness on the Company’s overall asset quality.

Total deposits decreased $55.8 million during the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to the prior year end. The decrease resulted from seasonal decreases in certain deposit balances and an expected outflow of certain temporary deposits received in late 2012. The Company continued to emphasize its core deposit growth, while placing less emphasis on non core deposits including deposits which are obtained on a bid basis.

Liquidity from excess loan and investment repayments over new production was retained in the Company’s short-term liquidity portfolios, available to fund future loan growth and investment purchases. With interest rates remaining at historical low levels, this continuation of higher than normal liquidity levels has contributed to significant margin compression. The net interest margin was 3.18 percent for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to 4.75 percent for the same period in the prior year. The Company expects some additional net interest margin compression in future quarters due to maturing loans and investments being reinvested at lower interest rates and until redeployment of the excess liquidity can be completed in a manner consistent with both the Company’s risk management policies and its commitment to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”). Regardless of the timing of the aforementioned redeployment, if interest rates continue at current levels, it is expected that additional downward pressure on the net interest margin will continue.

As a result of the aforementioned activity in the Company’s core businesses of loans and deposits and other asset/liability management activities, tax equivalent basis net interest income decreased by $10.1 million or 31.8 percent to $21.7 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to $31.8 million for the same period in the prior year. The effect of the adjustment to a tax equivalent basis was $0.4 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to $0.5 million for the same period in the prior year.

The Company’s noninterest income was $4.5 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to $20.4 million for the same period in the prior year. The decrease resulted primarily from a $15.9 million pretax gain on sales of loans included in noninterest income in the first quarter of 2012, and decreases in investment advisory fees and service charges, partially offset by a decrease in pre-tax impairment charges on securities available for sale and an increase in other income. Advisory fee income decreased primarily as a result of lower balances resulting from the departure to a competitor of a manger of ARS and continued fluctuation in both domestic and international equity markets. Service charges decreased slightly due to decreased activity. There were no pre-tax impairment charges on securities available for sale for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, and $0.5 million for the same period in the prior year. The impairment charges were related to the Company’s investments in pooled trust preferred securities. The Company has continued to hold its investments in pooled trust preferred securities as it does not believe that the current market value estimates for these investments are indicative of their underlying value. The pooled trust preferred securities are primarily backed by various U.S. financial institutions, many of which are experiencing severe financial difficulties as a result of the economic downturn. Continuation of these conditions may result in additional impairment charges on these securities in the future.

Non interest expense was $19.6 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2013. This represented a decrease of $1.3 million or 6.2 percent compared to $20.9 million for the same period in the prior year. Noninterest expenses for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to the same period in the prior year reflected decreases in costs associated with problem loan resolution and decreases in occupancy expenses, partially offset by an increase in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance premiums and increases related to the investment in technology and personnel to accommodate growth, expansion of services and products available to new and existing customers and expansion of the Company’s regulatory compliance capabilities. The decrease also resulted from a previously reported $1.3 million provision in the first quarter of 2012 for legal and settlement costs.

On April 24, 2012, the Board of Directors of Hudson Valley Bank signed a formal written agreement with the OCC. With this agreement, the Bank committed to adopt best practices modeled on those of the nation’s larger financial institutions, as well as evolving expectations of regulatory agencies on community banks. Included in the agreed-upon commitments were enhancements to the HVB’s procedures, systems, policies, programs, plans, training and resources. The written agreement imposed no specific capital ratio mandates or other quantitative conditions or obligations on HVB and did not impose any limit on the HVB board’s ability to pay dividends to its parent, except those imposed by the law. During the second quarter of 2012, the Bank submitted a capital plan to the OCC, which included provisions regarding the payment of dividends by HVB, as required under the written agreement. The Bank is operating in accordance with its capital plan without supervisory objection from the OCC.

32

Critical Accounting Policies

Application of Critical Accounting Policies — The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). Certain accounting policies require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and assumptions, and the effects of revisions are reflected in the financial statements in the period in which they are determined to be necessary. The critical accounting policies discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, are those that most frequently require management to make estimates and judgments, and therefore, are critical to understanding the Company’s results of operations. Senior management has discussed the development and selection of these accounting estimates and the related disclosures with the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. There have been no changes to the Company’s critical accounting policies during the three months ended March 31, 2013.

Results of Operations for the Three Month Periods Ended March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012

Summary of Results

The Company recorded net income of $3.7 million or $0.18 per diluted share for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to net income of $18.0 million or $0.92 per diluted share for the same period in the prior year. The decrease in net income for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to the same period in the prior year, was a result of lower net interest income, and lower noninterest income, partially offset by lower noninterest expenses. The decrease in net interest income for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 compared to the prior year period primarily resulted from a significant decrease in the net interest margin to 3.18 percent for the first quarter of 2013 from 4.75 percent for the same period in the prior year. This decrease resulted from significant changes in the composition of interest earning assets resulting from the combined effects of previously reported loan sales in the first quarter of 2012, generally weak new loan demand and continued low interest rates. Noninterest income in the first quarter of 2012 included a pretax gain of $15.9 million resulting from the loan sales. The provision for loan losses totaled $0.8 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to $1.4 million for the same period in the prior year, reflecting improvements achieved in the resolutions of classified and nonperforming loans, partially offset by continued weakness in the overall economy, and the continued effects of this weakness on the Company’s overall asset quality.

Annualized returns on average stockholders’ equity and average assets were 5.0 percent and 0.5 percent for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to 25.5 percent and 2.5 percent for the same period in the prior year. Returns on adjusted average stockholders’ equity were 5.0 percent and 25.8 percent, respectively, for the three month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012. Adjusted average stockholders’ equity excludes the effects of an average net unrealized loss, net of tax of $0.1 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, and an average net unrealized gain of $2.9 million for the same period in the prior year, on securities available for sale. The annualized return on adjusted average stockholders’ equity is, under SEC regulations, a non-GAAP financial measure. Management believes that this non-GAAP financial measure more closely reflects actual performance, as it is more consistent with the Company’s stated asset/liability management strategies, which do not contemplate significant realization of market gains or losses on securities available for sale which were primarily related to changes in interest rates or illiquidity in the marketplace.

Average Balances and Interest Rates

The following table sets forth the average balances of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities for the periods indicated, as well as total interest and corresponding yields and rates.

33

	(Dollars in thousands)
	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2013							2012
	Average Balance		Interest (3)		Yield/ Rate			Average Balance		Interest (3)		Yield/ Rate
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Interest earning assets:
Deposits in Banks	$	753,296	$	448		0.24	%	$	122,635	$	56		0.18	%
Federal funds sold		25,562		11		0.17	%		16,636		8		0.19	%
Securities: (1)
Taxable		385,790		2,195		2.28	%		394,994		3,313		3.35	%
Exempt from federal income taxes		83,889		1,182		5.64	%		100,659		1,517		6.03	%
Loans, net (2)		1,422,132		19,259		5.42	%		1,997,391		28,915		5.79	%
Total interest earning assets		2,670,669		23,095		3.46	%		2,632,315		33,809		5.14	%
Non interest earning assets:
Cash & due from banks		52,252							49,420
Other assets		136,630							159,252
Total non interest earning assets		188,882							208,672
Total assets	$	2,859,551						$	2,840,987
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Interest bearing liabilities:
Deposits:
Money market	$	861,737	$	841		0.39	%	$	982,858	$	1,239		0.50	%
Savings		130,327		92		0.28	%		115,795		113		0.39	%
Time		129,011		163		0.51	%		144,942		254		0.70	%
Checking with interest		367,671		151		0.16	%		300,673		144		0.19	%
Securities sold under repo & other s/t borrowings		29,945		9		0.12	%		53,584		51		0.38	%
Other borrowings		16,422		179		4.36	%		16,460		181		4.40	%
Total interest bearing liabilities		1,535,113		1,435		0.37	%		1,614,312		1,982		0.49	%
Non interest bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		1,004,275							921,891
Other liabilities		29,266							25,198
Total non interest bearing liabilities		1,033,541							947,089
Stockholders’ equity (1)		290,897							279,586
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	2,859,551						$	2,840,987
Net interest earnings			$	21,660						$	31,827
Net yield on interest earning assets						3.24	%						4.84	%

(1) Excludes unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale. Management believes that this presentation more closely reflects actual performance, as it is more consistent with the Company’s stated asset/liability management strategies, which have not resulted in significant realization of temporary market gains or losses on securities available for sale which were primarily related to changes in interest rates. Effects of these adjustments are presented in the table below. Also, see the non-GAAP financial disclosures and reconciliation to GAAP table below.

(2) Includes loans classified as non-accrual.

(3) The data contained in this table has been adjusted to a tax equivalent basis, based on the Company’s federal statutory rate of 35 percent. Management believes that this presentation provides comparability of net interest income and net interest margin arising from both taxable and tax-exempt sources and is consistent with industry practice and SEC rules. Effects of these adjustments are presented in the table below. Also, see the non-GAAP financial disclosures and reconciliation to GAAP table below.

34

Non-GAAP Reconciliation to GAAP

	Three Months Ended March 31
	2013			2012
	(000’s)
Total average interest earning assets:
As reported	$	2,670,561		$	2,636,551
Unrealized (loss) gain on securities available for sale (1)		(108	)		4,236
Adjusted total average interest earning assets	$	2,670,669		$	2,632,315
Net interest earnings:
As reported	$	21,246		$	31,296
Adjustment to tax equivalency basis (2)		414			531
Adjusted net interest earnings	$	21,660		$	31,827
Net yield on interest earning assets:
As reported		3.18	%		4.75	%
Effects of (1) and (2) above		0.06	%		0.09	%
Adjusted net yield on interest earning assets		3.24	%		4.84	%
Average stockholders’ equity:
As reported	$	290,950		$	282,459
Effects of (1) and (2) above		53			2,873
Adjusted average stockholders’ equity	$	290,897		$	279,586

35

Interest Differential

The following table sets forth the dollar amount of changes in interest income, interest expense and net interest income between the three month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

	(000’s)
	Three Month Period Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in
	Volume			Rate			Total (1)
Interest income:
Deposits in Banks	$	288		$	104		$	392
Federal funds sold		4			(1	)		3
Securities:
Taxable		(77	)		(1,041	)		(1,118	)
Exempt from federal income taxes (2)		(253	)		(82	)		(335	)
Loans, net		(8,328	)		(1,328	)		(9,656	)
Total interest income		(8,366	)		(2,348	)		(10,714	)
Interest expense:
Deposits:
Money market		(153	)		(245	)		(398	)
Savings		14			(35	)		(21	)
Time		(28	)		(63	)		(91	)
Checking with interest		32			(25	)		7
Securities sold under repo & other s/t borrowings		(22	)		(20	)		(42	)
Other borrowings		—			(2	)		(2	)
Total interest expense		(157	)		(390	)		(547	)
Decrease in interest differential	$	(8,209	)	$	(1,958	)	$	(10,167	)

(1) Changes attributable to both rate and volume are allocated between the rate and volume variances based upon their absolute relative weight to the total change.

(2) Equivalent yields on securities exempt from federal income taxes are based on a federal statutory rate of 35 percent in 2013 and 2012.

Net Interest Income

For purposes of the financial information included in this section, the Company adjusts average interest earning assets to exclude the effects of unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale and adjusts net interest income to a tax equivalent basis. Management believes that this alternate presentation more closely reflects actual performance, as it is consistent with the Company’s stated asset/liability management strategies. The effects of these non-GAAP adjustments to tax equivalent basis net interest income and adjusted average assets are included in the table presented in “Average Balances and Interest Rates” section herein.

Net interest income, the difference between interest income and interest expense, is the most significant component of the Company’s consolidated earnings. As previously noted in the Company’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company has experienced an extended period of severe negative economic conditions and historically low interest rates. These conditions have resulted in sharp declines in the value of collateral securing many of the Company’s loans, elevated levels of classified and nonperforming loans, weak loan demand and declining margins. In addition, a dynamically changing regulatory landscape has resulted in greater scrutiny of the historic business models of smaller community-based institutions. This has resulted in greater pressure on many community banks to reduce loan concentrations, particularly commercial real estate loans, and to accelerate the reduction of levels of nonperforming and classified loans. During this period of economic difficulty and low interest rates, the Company took various steps to address these issues. These steps included repositioning its securities portfolio, reducing higher cost term borrowings and, during the first half of 2012, executing significant loan sales for the purpose of reducing commercial real estate concentrations and overall levels of classified and nonperforming loans. These actions have resulted in significant margin compression, as a result of the impact of only partial redeployment of proceeds from loan sales completed in the first quarter of 2012 together with the continuation of historically low interest rate levels. As a result of these differentials in redeployment and average yields, together with the current historically low interest rate environment, the Company expects additional margin compression will result in the near term, particularly during the period of redeployment of the remaining proceeds from the loan sales. The Company is in the process of implementing new lending initiatives designed to address both near and long term redeployment of available liquidity and

36

diversification of the balance sheet. These initiatives include asset purchases, loan participations with other institutions and the development of internal ability to originate, underwrite and service leasing and other non commercial real estate credits. Management believes that the results of these efforts will enable the Company, given the difficulties encountered during the recent financial crisis, to maximize its net interest income, address regulatory concerns, and effectively reposition its portfolios from both asset composition and interest rate risk perspectives.

Net interest income, on a tax equivalent basis, decreased by $10.2 million or 31.9 percent to $21.7 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to $31.8 million for the same period in the prior year. Net interest income was lower partially due to decreases in the tax equivalent basis net interest margin to 3.24 percent for the first quarter of 2013 compared to 4.84 percent for the same period in the prior year and generally lower interest rates. The decrease in net interest income was also partially due to the increase in adjusted average interest earning assets over average interest bearing liabilities of $117.6 million or 11.6 percent to $1,135.6 million, for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to $1,018.0 million for the same period in the prior year. Net interest income in accordance with GAAP decreased by $10.1 million or 32.3 percent to $21.2 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to $31.3 million for the same period in the prior year.

The Company’s overall asset quality has improved as a result of actions taken by management to reduce concentrations and classified assets. However, asset quality has continued to be adversely affected by the current state of the economy and it has continued to experience elevated levels of delinquent and nonperforming loans, and declines in the loan-to-value ratios on existing loans. Changes in the levels of nonperforming loans have a direct impact on net interest income.

The Company’s short-term liquidity remains at elevated levels, resulting from continued deposit growth, soft loan demand and proceeds from loan sales which have not yet been redeployed. This excess liquidity contributed to margin compression. The Company has made efforts throughout the extended period of severe economic uncertainty and fluctuating interest rates to minimize the impact on its net interest income by appropriately repositioning its securities portfolio and funding sources while maintaining prudence and awareness of the potential consequences that the current economic crisis could have on its asset quality and interest rate risk profiles. The Company continues to increase the number of loans originated with interest rate floors and exercise caution in reinvestment of excess liquidity provided from continued strong deposit growth and proceeds from loan sales. These actions are being conducted partially to maintain flexibility in reaction to the continuation of historically low interest rates. The Company’s ability to make changes in its asset mix allows management to capitalize on more desirable yields, as available, on various interest earning assets.

Interest income is determined by the volume of, and related rates earned on, interest earning assets. Volume decreases in loans, investments, and a lower average yield on interest earning assets, partially offset by a volume increase in interest bearing deposits and federal funds sold resulted in lower interest income for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to the same period in the prior year. Adjusted average interest earning assets for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 increased $38.4 million or 1.5 percent to $2,670.7 million from $2,632.3 million for the same period in the prior year.

Loans are the largest component of interest earning assets. Average net loans decreased $575.3 million or 28.8 percent to $1,422.1 million, for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to $1,997.4 million for the same period in the prior year. The reduction in average loans resulted from only partial redeployment of proceeds from the previously reported loan sales completed at the end of the first quarter of 2012 and payoffs and pay downs in excess of production. The average yield on loans was 5.42 percent for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to 5.79 percent for the same period in the prior year. This reduction resulted primarily from continued historically low interest rates and their effect on the yield of new and renewing loans. As a result, interest income on loans was lower for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to the same period in the prior year, due to lower volume and lower average interest rates.

Average total securities, including FHLB stock and excluding net unrealized gains and losses, decreased $26.0 million or 5.2 percent to $469.7 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to $495.7 million for the same period in the prior year. The decrease in average total securities resulted primarily from a planned reduction in the portfolio conducted by the Company as part of its ongoing asset/liability management efforts. The average tax equivalent basis yield on securities was 2.88 percent for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to 3.90 percent for the same period in the prior year. As a result, tax equivalent basis interest income on securities decreased for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to the same period in the prior year, due to lower volume and lower interest rates. Increases or decreases in average FHLB stock result from purchases or redemptions of stock in order to maintain required levels to support FHLB borrowings.

Interest expense is a function of the volume of, and rates paid for, interest bearing liabilities, comprised of deposits and borrowings. Interest expense decreased $0.6 million or 30.0 percent to $1.4 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to $2.0 million for the same period in the prior year. Average interest bearing liabilities decreased $79.2 million or 4.9 percent to $1,535.1 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to $1,614.3 million for the same period in the prior year. The decrease in average interest bearing liabilities for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to the same period in

37

the prior year, was due to volume decreases in interest bearing deposits and securities sold under repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings and other borrowings. There were increases in average noninterest bearing demand deposits. The decrease in average short-term and other borrowings for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to the same period in the prior year, resulted from management’s decision to utilize cash flow from deposit growth and maturing investment securities to reduce borrowings as part of the Company’s ongoing asset/liability management efforts. The average interest rate paid on interest bearing liabilities was 0.37 percent for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to 0.49 percent for the same period in the prior year. As a result of these factors, interest expense on average interest bearing liabilities was lower for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to the same period in the prior year due to lower interest rates.

Average non interest bearing demand deposits increased $82.4 million or 8.9 percent to $1,004.3 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to $921.9 million for the same period in the prior year. Non interest bearing demand deposits are an important component of the Company’s ongoing asset liability management, and also have a direct impact on the determination of net interest income.

The interest rate spread on a tax equivalent basis for the three month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:

	Three Months
	Ended
	March 31
	2013			2012
Average interest rate on:
Total average interest earning assets		3.46	%		5.14	%
Total average interest bearing liabilities		0.37	%		0.49	%
Total interest rate spread		3.09	%		4.65	%

Interest rate spreads increase or decrease as a result of the relative change in average interest rates on interest earning assets compared to the change in average interest rates on interest bearing liabilities. Management cannot predict what impact market conditions will have on its interest rate spread and future compression of net interest spread may occur.

Provision for Loan Losses

The Company recorded a provision for loan losses of $0.8 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to $1.4 million for the same period in the prior year, reflecting improvements achieved in the resolutions of classified and nonperforming loans, partially offset by continued weakness in the overall economy, and the related effects of this weakness on the Company’s overall asset quality. The provision for loan losses is charged to income to bring the Company’s allowance for loan losses to a level deemed appropriate by management. See “Allowance for Loan Losses” for further discussion.

Non Interest Income

The Company’s non interest income was $4.5 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2013. This represented a decrease of $15.9 million or 77.9 percent compared to $20.4 million for the same period in the prior year. This decrease was primarily due to the $15.9 million pretax gain on sales of loans completed in the first quarter of 2012. Investment management fees declined to $1.9 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to $2.4 million for the same period in the prior year, on lower balances resulting from the departure to a competitor of a manager of ARS and continued volatility in equity markets.

Non Interest Expense

Non interest expense was $19.6 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2013. This represented a decrease of $1.3 million or 6.2 percent compared to $20.9 million for the same period in the prior year. Non interest expenses for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to the same period in the prior year also reflected decreases in costs associated with problem loan resolution and decreases in occupancy expenses, partially offset by an increase in FDIC insurance premiums and increases related to the investment in technology and personnel to accommodate growth, expansion of services and products available to new and existing customers and expansion of the Company’s regulatory compliance capabilities. The decrease also resulted from a $1.3 million provision in the first quarter of 2012 for legal and settlement costs related to the previously reported investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) relating to issues surrounding the brokerage practices and policies and disclosures about such practices of the Company’s investment advisory subsidiary, A.R. Schmeidler & Co., Inc. The Company believes it has substantially provided for any penalties and related costs anticipated in the final resolution of this matter although, until final agreement is reached, the exact result cannot be determined.

38

Salaries and employee benefits expense, the largest component of non interest expense, increased $0.5 million or 4.6 percent to $11.3 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 compared to $10.8 million for the same period in the prior year. The increase in salaries and employee benefits expense was due to personnel hired to accommodate growth, expansion of services and products available to new and existing customers and the expansion of the Company’s regulatory compliance requirements.

Occupancy expense for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 decreased $0.1 million or 4.5 percent to $2.1 million compared to $2.2 million for the same period in the prior year. The slight decrease reflected lower maintenance costs during the current period.

Professional service fees for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 decreased $0.4 million or 21.0 percent to $1.5 million compared to $1.9 million for the same period in the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to costs related to the engagement of consultants to assist with new systems implementations in 2012 and legal costs related to the aforementioned SEC investigation of A.R. Schmeidler & Co., Inc.

Equipment expense for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 was unchanged at $1.1 million compared to the same period in the prior year.

Business development expense for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 was unchanged at $0.5 million compared to the same period in the prior year.

The FDIC assessment for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 increased $0.3 million or 50.0 percent to $0.9 million compared to $0.6 million for the same period in the prior year. The increase is reflective of changes in the Bank’s premium calculation base and assessment rate.

Significant changes in other components of non interest expense for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 compared to March 31, 2012, were due to the following:

• Increase of $76,000 (40.9%) in stationary and printing costs, due to higher consumption levels,

• Increase of $46,000 (28.0%) in courier expenses due to increased utilization in 2013,

• Decrease of $41,000 (22.3%) in communication expense, due to outsourcing of several data processing functions,

• Decrease of $198,000 (48.8%) in other loan expense, due to lower problem loans resolution expenses,

• Decrease of $18,000 (19.1%) in dues and meeting expense, due to lower participation in such events,

• Decrease of $1,399,000 (82.1%) in other expenses, resulting from the additional contingency provision of $1.3 million, recorded during the first quarter of 2012, related to the aforementioned SEC investigation of A.R. Schmeidler & Co., Inc.

Income Taxes

Income taxes of $1.7 million were recorded in the three month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to $11.4 million for the same period in the prior year. The overall effective tax rate of 32.1 percent for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 was lower compared to 38.8 percent for the same period in the prior year. The 2013 effective rate was lower primarily due to the fact that the tax effect of the $15.9 million gain on loan sales, recorded in 2012 resulted in tax-exempt income representing a higher percentage of pretax income in 2013 compared to 2012. The Company is subject to a Federal statutory tax rate of 35 percent, a New York State tax rate of 7.1 percent plus a 17 percent surcharge, a Connecticut State tax rate of 7.5 percent and a New York City tax rate of 9.0 percent.

Financial Condition

Assets

The Company had total assets of $2,828.8 million at March 31, 2013, a decrease of $62.4 million or 2.2 percent from $2,891.2 million at December 31, 2012.

39

Cash and Due from Banks

Cash and due from banks was $792.2 million at March 31, 2013, a decrease of $35.3 million or 4.3 percent from $827.5 million at December 31, 2012. Included in cash and due from banks is interest earning deposits of $765.8 million at March 31, 2013 and $769.7 million at December 31, 2012.

Federal Funds Sold

Federal funds sold totaled $28.4 million at March 31, 2013, an increase of $9.1 million or 47.2 percent from $19.3 million at December 31, 2012.

Securities Portfolio

Securities are selected to provide safety of principal, liquidity, pledging capabilities (to collateralize certain deposits and borrowings), income and to leverage capital. The Company’s investment strategy focuses on maximizing income while providing for safety of principal, maintaining appropriate utilization of capital, providing adequate liquidity to meet loan demand or deposit outflows and to manage overall interest rate risk. The Company selects individual securities whose credit, cash flow, maturity and interest rate characteristics, in the aggregate, affect the stated strategies.

Securities are classified as either available for sale, representing securities the Company may sell in the ordinary course of business, or as held to maturity, representing securities the Company has the ability and positive intent to hold until maturity. Securities available for sale are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses (net of tax) excluded from operations and reported in other comprehensive income. Securities held to maturity are stated at amortized cost.

The available for sale portfolio totaled $474.2 million at March 31, 2013 which was an increase of $29.1 million or 6.5 percent from $445.1 million at December 31, 2012. The increase resulted from a $20.4 million increase in U.S. Treasury and agency securities, an $11.1 million increase in mortgage-backed securities, and a $0.1 million increase in other debt securities, partially offset by a $2.5 million decrease of obligations of state political subdivisions. Included in other debt securities are pooled trust preferred securities, which had an aggregate cost basis of $10.4 million at March 31, 2013 and $10.5 million at December 31, 2012.

The held to maturity portfolio totaled $9.6 million at March 31, 2013, which was a decrease of $0.6 million or 5.9 percent from $10.2 million at December 31, 2012. The decrease was due to a decrease in mortgage-backed securities.

The Bank, as a member of the FHLB, invests in stock of the FHLB as a prerequisite to obtaining funding under various programs offered by the FHLB. The Bank must purchase additional shares of FHLB stock to obtain increases in such borrowings. Shares in excess of required amounts for outstanding borrowings are generally redeemed by the FHLB. The investment in FHLB stock totaled $4.8 million at both March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

The Company continues to exercise a conservative approach to investing by purchasing high credit quality investments with various maturities and cash flows to provide for liquidity needs and prudent asset liability management. The Company’s securities portfolio provides for a significant source of income, liquidity and is utilized in managing Company-wide interest rate risk. These securities are used to collateralize borrowings and deposits to the extent required or permitted by law. Therefore, the securities portfolio is an integral part of the Company’s funding strategy.

There were no obligations of any single issuer which exceeded ten percent of stockholders’ equity at March 31, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

Loan Portfolio

Net loans totaled $1,386.7 million at March 31, 2013, a decrease of $54.1 million or 3.8 percent from $1,440.8 million at December 31, 2012. The overall decrease in loans included $19.0 million of paydowns and payoffs of problem credits resulting from the Company’s ongoing efforts to reduce the level of classified loans. The decrease also included $31.0 million of residential real estate loans paid off or refinanced with other institutions. The remaining net reduction reflected net runoff with which new originations of $28.9 million was unable to keep pace.

40

The loan portfolio, excluding loans held for sale, is comprised of the following:

	March 31 2013			December 31 2012
Real Estate:
Commercial	$	576,409		$	550,786
Construction		70,212			74,727
Residential Multi-Family		195,016			196,199
Residential Other		294,798			325,774
Commercial & Industrial		249,794			288,809
Individuals & lease financing		28,739			33,488
Total loans		1,414,968			1,469,783
Deferred loan fees		(2,186	)		(2,411	)
Allowance for loan losses		(26,088	)		(26,612	)
Loans, net	$	1,386,694		$	1,440,760

The following table illustrates the trend in nonperforming assets from March 2012 to March 2013 (in thousands):

	Mar 31 2013			Dec 31 2012			Sep 30 2012			Jun 30 2012			Mar 31 2012
Loans Past Due 90 Days or More and Still Accruing:
Real Estate:
Commercial		—			—			—			—			—
Construction		—			—			—			—			—
Residential		—			—			—			—			—
Total Real Estate		—			—			—			—			—
Commercial & Industrial		—			—			—			—			—
Lease Financing and Individuals		—			—			—			—			—
Total Loans Past Due 90 Days or More and Still Accruing		—			—			—			—			—
Non-Accrual Loans:
Real Estate:
Commercial	$	18,209		$	18,387		$	18,180		$	12,222		$	11,372
Construction		2,826			4,720			2,201			2,659			4,317
Residential		9,114			9,682			9,557			11,888			4,440
Total Real Estate		30,149			32,789			29,938			26,769			20,129
Commercial & Industrial		1,991			2,019			12,367			12,535			7,730
Lease Financing and Other		—			—			—			—			—
Total Non-Accrual Loans		32,140			34,808			42,305			39,304			27,859
Other Real Estate Owned		—			250			250			250			1,174
Nonperforming Assets excluding loans held for sale		32,140			35,058			42,555			39,554			29,033
Nonperforming loans held for sale		—			—			—			—			—
Total Nonperforming Assets including loans held for sale	$	32,140		$	35,058		$	42,555		$	39,554		$	29,033
Net charge-offs during quarter	$	1,296		$	3,026		$	4,349		$	5,018		$	187
Nonperforming assets to total assets:
Excluding loans held for sale		1.14	%		1.21	%		1.45	%		1.40	%		1.03	%
Including loans held for sale		1.14	%		1.21	%		1.45	%		1.40	%		1.03	%

Non-accrual loans decreased $2.7 million to $32.1 million at March 31, 2013 from $34.8 million at December 31, 2012. There was no interest income on non-accrual loans included in net income for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012. Gross interest income that would have been recorded if these borrowers had been current in accordance with their original loan terms was $0.5 million and $1.4 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012, respectively.

41

Net income is adversely impacted by the level of nonperforming assets caused by the deterioration of the borrowers’ ability to meet scheduled interest and principal payments. In addition to forgone revenue, the Company must increase the level of provision for loan losses, incur higher collection costs and other costs associated with the management and disposition of foreclosed properties.

The high level of nonperforming assets has primarily resulted from the current severe economic slowdown, which has had negative effects on real estate values, sales and available financing, particularly in the commercial and residential real estate sectors. Continuation of this condition could result in additional increases in nonperforming assets and charge-offs in the future.

During the three month period ended March 31, 2013:

• Non-accrual commercial real estate loans decreased $0.2 million resulting from principal payments of $1.1 million and the charge-off of one loan totaling $0.2 million, which was partially offset by the transfer of two loan totaling $1.1 million due to changes in collateral.

• Non-accrual construction loans decreased $1.9 million, resulting from the transfer of one loan totaling $1.5 million due to changes in collateral and the partial charge-off of one loan totaling $0.4 million.

• Non-accrual residential loans decreased $0.6 million resulting from principal payments of $0.7 million and the transfer of one loan totaling $0.2 million back to accrual, which was partially offset by the addition of two loans totaling $0.3 million.

• Non-accrual commercial and industrial loans remained unchanged at $2.0 million.

There were no loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. In addition, the Company had $19.3 million and $12.6 million of loans that were 31-89 days delinquent and still accruing at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Loans considered by the Company to be impaired totaled $56.7 million and $54.7 million at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, for which no specific reserves had been established.

There were sixteen loans totaling $31.6 million at March 31, 2013 and twelve loans totaling $27.2 million at December 31, 2012 that were considered troubled debt restructurings. There were eleven loans totaling $24.6 million at March 31, 2013 and seven loans totaling $19.9 million at December 31, 2012 that were performing in accordance with their restructured terms. The remaining loans which totaled $7.0 million and $7.2 million at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, were on non-accrual status. At March 31, 2013, the Company had no commitments to lend additional funds to non-accrual or restructured loans.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses to absorb probable losses incurred in the loan portfolio based on ongoing quarterly assessments of the estimated losses. The Company’s methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance consists of a specific component for identified problem loans and a formula component to consider historical loan loss experience and additional risk factors affecting the portfolio.

A summary of the components of the allowance for loan losses, changes in the components and the impact of charge-offs/recoveries on the resulting provision for loan losses for the dates indicated is as follows:

42

	(000’s)									(000’s)
	Mar 31 2013			Change During 2013			Dec 31 2012			Mar 31 2012			Change During 2012			Dec 31 2011
Components
Specific:
Real Estate:
Commercial		—			—			—			—			—			—
Construction		—			—			—		$	2,241		$	(133	)	$	2,374
Residential		—			—			—			—			—			—
Commercial and Industrial		—			—			—			—			—			—
Lease Financing and other		—			—			—			—			—			—
Total Specific Component		—			—			—			2,241			(133	)		2,374
Formula:
Real Estate:
Commercial	$	11,270		$	1,180		$	10,090			13,049			273			12,776
Construction		4,559			610			3,949			4,327			231			4,096
Residential		6,420			(1,699	)		8,119			8,786			693			8,093
Commercial and Industrial		3,424			(653	)		4,077			2,761			111			2,650
Lease Financing and other		415			38			377			692			(4	)		696
Total Formula Component		26,088			(524	)		26,612			29,615			1,304			28,311
Total Allowance	$	26,088					$	26,612		$	31,856					$	30,685
Net Change					(524	)								1,171
Net Charge-offs (1)					1,296									188
Provision for loan losses				$	772								$	1,359
Coverage Ratio (2)		81	%					76	%		114	%					103	%
Coverage Ratio excluding partial chargeoffs		86	%					82	%		113	%					102	%

(1) Net charge-offs include partial charge-offs of $580 and $398 related nonperforming and impaired loans for the three month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

(2) Coverage Ratio is the allowance for loan losses divided by total nonperforming loans.

The specific component of the allowance for loan losses is the result of our analysis of impaired loans and our determination of the amount required to reduce the carrying amount of such loans to estimated fair value. Accordingly, such allowance is dependent on the particular loans and their characteristics at each measurement date, not necessarily the total amount of such loans. The Company usually records partial charge-offs as opposed to specific reserves for impaired loans that are real estate collateral dependent and for which independent appraisals have determined the fair value of the collateral to be less than the carrying amount of the loan. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company recorded $1.7 million of charge-offs, of which $0.4 million were partial charge-offs related to non-accrual loans. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had no specific reserves allocated as partial charge-offs were recorded for all identified impairments. The Company’s analyses as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 indicated that impaired loans were principally real estate collateral dependent and that there was sufficient underlying collateral value or guarantees to indicate expected recovery of the carrying amount of the loans.

The changes in the formula component of the allowance for loan losses are the result of the application of historical loss experience to outstanding loans by type. Loss experience for each year is based upon average charge-off experience for the prior three year period by loan type. The formula component is then adjusted to reflect changes in other relevant factors affecting loan collectability. Management periodically adjusted the formula component to an amount that, when considered with the specific component, represented its best estimate of probable losses in the loan portfolio as of each balance sheet date.

Actual losses can vary significantly from the estimated amounts. The Company’s methodology permits adjustments to the allowance in the event that, in management’s judgment, significant factors which affect the collectibility of the loan portfolio as of the evaluation date have changed. By assessing the estimated losses inherent in the loan portfolio on a quarterly basis, the Bank is able to adjust specific and inherent loss estimates based upon any more recent information that has become available. Additional information related to the Company’s allowance for loan losses is contained in Note 4 to the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements presented in this Form 10-Q.

43

Management believes the allowance for loan losses is the best estimate of probable losses which have been incurred as of March 31, 2013. There is no assurance that the Company will not be required to make future adjustments to the allowance in response to changing economic conditions or regulatory examinations.

Deposits

Deposits totaled $2,464.2 million at March 31, 2013, a decrease of $55.8 million or 2.2 percent from $2,520.0 million at December 31, 2012. The decrease resulted primarily from seasonal decreases in certain deposit balances. The Company continued to emphasize its core deposit growth, while placing less emphasis on non core deposits including deposits which are obtained on a bid basis. The following table presents a summary of deposits at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

	(000’s)
	Mar 31 2013		Dec 31 2012		Increase (Decrease)
Demand deposits	$	986,853	$	1,035,847	$	(48,994	)
Money market accounts		862,871		843,224		19,647
Savings accounts		132,327		126,885		5,442
Time deposits of $100,000 or more		90,654		97,704		(7,050	)
Time deposits of less than $100,000		34,296		34,603		(307	)
Checking with interest		357,196		381,698		(24,502	)
Total Deposits	$	2,464,197	$	2,519,961	$	(55,764	)

Borrowings

Total borrowings were $45.6 million at March 31, 2013, a decrease of $5.4 million or 10.6 percent from $51.0 million at December 31, 2012. The decrease resulted from a $5.4 million decrease in short-term repurchase agreements. Borrowings are utilized as part of the Company’s continuing efforts to effectively leverage its capital and to manage interest rate risk.

Stockholders’ Equity

Stockholders’ equity totaled $292.9 million at March 31, 2013, an increase of $1.9 million or 0.7 percent from $291.0 million at December 31, 2012. The increase in stockholders’ equity resulted from net income of $3.7 million, which was partially offset by a cash dividends paid on common stock of $1.2 million and a decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income of $0.6 million.

The Company’s and the Bank’s capital ratios at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were as follows:

	Mar 31 2013			Dec 31 2012			Minimum to be Considered Well Capitalized			Enhanced Capitalized Requirement
Leverage ratio:
Company		9.5	%		9.3	%		5.0	%		N/A
HVB		9.3	%		9.2	%		5.0	%		8.0	%
Tier 1 capital:
Company		17.1	%		16.5	%		6.0	%		N/A
HVB		16.8	%		16.2	%		6.0	%		10.0	%
Total capital:
Company		18.3	%		17.7	%		10.0	%		N/A
HVB		18.0	%		17.4	%		10.0	%		12.0	%

Since the fourth quarter of 2009, the OCC required HVB to maintain a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 12.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.0%, and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 8.0%. These capital levels are in excess of “well capitalized” levels generally applicable to banks under current regulations.

Liquidity

The Asset/Liability Strategic Committee (“ALSC”) of the Board of Directors of HVB establishes specific policies and operating procedures governing the Company’s liquidity levels and develops plans to address future liquidity needs, including contingent sources of liquidity. The primary functions of asset liability management are to provide safety of depositor and investor funds, assure adequate liquidity and maintain an appropriate balance between interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. Liquidity management involves the ability to meet the cash flow requirement of depositors wanting to withdraw funds or borrowers needing

44

assurance that sufficient funds will be available to meet their credit needs. Interest rate sensitivity management seeks to manage fluctuating net interest margins and to enhance consistent growth of net interest income through periods of changing interest rates.

The Company’s liquid assets at March 31, 2013 include cash and due from banks of $26.4 million, $765.8 million of interest earning deposits and Federal funds sold of $28.4 million. Interest earning deposits and Federal funds sold represent the Company’s excess liquid funds which are invested with other financial institutions and are available daily.

Other sources of liquidity include maturities and principal and interest payments on loans and securities. The loan and securities portfolios are of high credit quality and of mixed maturity, providing a constant stream of maturing and re-investable assets, which can be converted into cash should the need arise. The ability to redeploy these funds is an important source of medium to long term liquidity. The amortized cost of securities having contractual maturities, expected call dates or average lives of one year or less amounted to $147.1 million at March 31, 2013. This represented 30.4 percent of the amortized cost of the securities portfolio. Excluding installment loans to individuals, real estate loans other than construction loans and lease financing, $143.5 million, or 10.1 percent of loans at March 31, 2013, mature in one year or less. The Company may increase liquidity by selling certain residential mortgages, or exchanging them for mortgage-backed securities that may be sold in the secondary market.

Non interest bearing demand deposits and interest bearing deposits from businesses, professionals, not-for-profit organizations and individuals are relatively stable, low-cost sources of funds. The deposits of the Bank generally have shown a steady growth trend as well as a generally consistent deposit mix. However, there can be no assurance that deposit growth will continue or that the deposit mix will not shift to higher rate products.

HVB is a member of the FHLB. As a member, HVB is able to participate in various FHLB borrowing programs which require certain investments in FHLB common stock as a prerequisite to obtaining funds. As of March 31, 2013, HVB had short-term borrowing lines with the FHLB of $200 million with no amounts outstanding. These and various other FHLB borrowing programs available to members are subject to availability of qualifying loan and/or investment securities collateral and other terms and conditions.

HVB also has unsecured overnight borrowing lines totaling $70 million with three major financial institutions which were all unused and available at March 31, 2013. In addition, HVB has approved lines under Retail Certificate of Deposit Agreements with three major financial institutions totaling $1.0 billion of which no balances were outstanding as at March 31, 2013. Utilization of these lines is subject to product availability and other restrictions.

Additional liquidity is also provided by the Company’s ability to borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank’s discount window. In response to the current economic crisis, the Federal Reserve Bank has increased the ability of banks to borrow from this source through its Borrower-in-Custody (“BIC”) program, which expanded the types of collateral which qualify as security for such borrowings. HVB has been approved to participate in the BIC program. There were no balances outstanding with the Federal Reserve at March 31, 2013.

As of March 31, 2013, the Company had qualifying loan and investment securities totaling approximately $448 million which could be utilized under available borrowing programs thereby increasing liquidity.

Management considers the Company’s sources of liquidity to be adequate to meet any expected funding needs and to be responsive to changing interest rate markets.

Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has outstanding, at any time, a significant number of commitments to extend credit and provide financial guarantees to third parties. These arrangements are subject to strict credit control assessments. Guarantees specify limits to the Company’s obligations. Because many commitments and almost all guarantees expire without being funded in whole or in part, the contract amounts are not estimates of future cash flows. The Company is also obligated under leases or license agreements for certain of its branches and equipment. There have been no material changes to those obligations or arrangements outside the ordinary course of business since the most recent fiscal year end.

Forward-Looking Statements

The Company has made, and may continue to make, various forward-looking statements with respect to earnings, credit quality and other financial and business matters for periods subsequent to March 31, 2013. The Company cautions that these forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties, and that statements relating to subsequent periods increasingly are subject to greater uncertainty because of the increased likelihood of changes in underlying factors and assumptions. Actual results could differ materially from forward-looking statements.

45

Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements, in addition to those risk factors disclosed in the Hudson Valley’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 include, but are not limited to, statements regarding:

• our ability to comply with the formal agreement entered into with the OCC and any additional restrictions placed on us as a result of future regulatory exams or changes in regulatory policy implemented by the OCC or other bank regulators;

• the OCC and other bank regulators may require us to further modify or change our mix of assets, including our concentration in certain types of loans, or require us to take further remedial actions;

• the results of the investigation of A.R. Schmeidler & Co., Inc. by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the Department of Labor (the “DOL”) and the possibility that our management’s attention will be diverted to the SEC and DOL investigations and settlement discussions and we will incur further costs and legal expenses;

• the adverse affects on the business of A.R. Schmeidler & Co., Inc. and our trust department arising from a settlement with the SEC and DOL investigations;

• our inability to pay quarterly cash dividends to shareholders in light of our earnings, the current and future economic environment, Federal Reserve Board guidance, our Bank’s capital plan and other regulatory requirements applicable to Hudson Valley or Hudson Valley Bank;

• the possibility that we may need to raise additional capital in the future and our ability to raise such capital on terms that are favorable to us;

• further increases in our non-performing loans and allowance for loan losses;

• ineffectiveness in managing our commercial real estate portfolio;

• lower than expected future performance of our investment portfolio;

• a lack of opportunities for growth, plans for expansion (including opening new branches) and increased or unexpected competition in attracting and retaining customers;

• continued poor economic conditions generally and in our market area in particular, which may adversely affect the ability of borrowers to repay their loans and the value of real property or other property held as collateral for such loans;

• lower than expected demand for our products and services;

• possible impairment of our goodwill and other intangible assets;

• our inability to manage interest rate risk;

• increased expense and burdens resulting from the regulatory environment in which we operate and our inability to comply with existing and future regulatory requirements;

• our inability to maintain regulatory capital above the minimum levels Hudson Valley Bank has set as its minimum capital levels in its capital plan provided to the OCC, or such higher capital levels as may be required;

• proposed legislative and regulatory action may adversely affect us and the financial services industry;

• future increased Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, special assessments or changes to regular assessments;

• potential liabilities under federal and state environmental laws.

Hudson Valley does not undertake to update or revise any of its forward-looking statements even if experience shows that the indicated results or events will not be realized.

Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto presented herein have been prepared in accordance with GAAP, which requires the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollar amounts or estimated fair value without considering the changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The impact of inflation is reflected in the increased cost of the Company’s operations. Unlike industrial companies, nearly all of the assets and liabilities of the Company are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a greater impact on the Company’s performance than do the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the price of goods and services.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk at December 31, 2012 were previously reported in the Company’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have been no material changes in the Company’s market risk exposure at March 31, 2013 compared to December 31, 2012.

The Company’s primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk since substantially all transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars with no direct foreign exchange or changes in commodity price exposure.

46

All market risk sensitive instruments are classified either as available for sale or held to maturity with no financial instruments entered into for trading purposes. The Company from time to time uses derivative financial instruments to manage risk. The Company did not enter into any new derivative financial instruments during the three month period ended March 31, 2013. The Company had no derivative financial instruments in place at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

The Company uses a simulation analysis to evaluate market risk to changes in interest rates. The simulation analysis at March 31, 2013 shows the Company’s net interest income increasing slightly if interest rates rise and decreasing slightly if interest rates fall, considering a continuation of the current yield curve. A change in the shape or steepness of the yield curve will impact our market risk to change in interest rates.

The Company also prepares a static gap analysis which, at March 31, 2013, shows a positive cumulative static gap of $540.4 million in the one year time frame.

The following table illustrates the estimated exposure under a rising rate scenario and a declining rate scenario calculated as a percentage change in estimated net interest income assuming a gradual shift in interest rates for the next 12 month measurement period, beginning March 31, 2013.

Gradual Change in Interest Rates	Percentage Change Percentage Change in Estimated Net Interest  Income from March 31, 2013			Policy Limit
+200 basis points		6.8	%		(5.0	)%
-100 basis points		(2.6	)%		(5.0	)%

Beginning on March 31, 2008, a 100 basis point downward change was substituted for the 200 basis point downward scenario previously used, as management believes that a 200 basis point downward change is not a meaningful analysis in light of current interest rate levels. The percentage change in estimated net income in the +200 and -100 basis points scenario is within the Company’s policy limits.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Hudson Valley’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), with the assistance of other members of the Company’s management, have evaluated the effectiveness of Hudson Valley’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s CEO and CFO have concluded that Hudson Valley’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

The Company’s CEO and CFO have also concluded that there have not been any changes in Hudson Valley’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Hudson Valley’s internal control over financial reporting.

The Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, provides reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. The design of a control system reflects resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because there are inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within Hudson Valley have been or will be detected.

These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. There can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

47

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our business is subject to various risks. These risks are included in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K under “Risk Factors”.

There has been no material changes in such risk factors since the date of such report.

Item 6. Exhibits

(A) Exhibits

3.1	Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Hudson Valley Holding Corp. (1)
3.2	Amended and Restated By-Laws of Hudson Valley Holding Corp. (2)
10.16	Hudson Valley Holding Corp. 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan: Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (4)
13.16	Hudson Valley Bank 2011 Senior Officer Incentive Program (3)
31.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (4)
31.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (4)
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (4)
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (4)
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document (5)
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema (5)
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase (5)
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase (5)
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase (5)
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase (5)

(1) Incorporated herein by reference in this document to the Form 10-Q filed on October 20, 2009.

(2) Incorporated herein by reference in this document to the Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2010.

(3) Incorporated herein by reference in this document to the Form 10-Q filed on November 9, 2012.

(4) Filed herewith.

(5) Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or section 34(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

48

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

HUDSON VALLEY HOLDING CORP.
By:	/s/    ANDREW J. REINHART
	Andrew J. Reinhart
	First Senior Vice President,
	Controller and Interim Chief Financial Officer

May 10, 2013

49