XML 49 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2012
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities [Abstract]  
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Note 5.  Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
 
Objective and Strategies for Using Derivative Instruments   In order to mitigate the effect of commodity price uncertainty and enhance the predictability of cash flows relating to the marketing of our crude oil and natural gas, we enter into crude oil and natural gas price hedging arrangements with respect to a portion of our expected production. The derivative instruments we use include variable to fixed price commodity swaps, two-way and three-way collars and basis swaps.
 
The fixed price swap, two-way collar, and basis swap contracts entitle us (floating price payor) to receive settlement from the counterparty (fixed price payor) for each calculation period in amounts, if any, by which the settlement price for the scheduled trading days applicable for each calculation period is less than the fixed strike price or floor price. We would pay the counterparty if the settlement price for the scheduled trading days applicable for each calculation period is more than the fixed strike price or ceiling price. The amount payable by us, if the floating price is above the fixed or ceiling price, is the product of the notional quantity per calculation period and the excess of the floating price over the fixed or ceiling price in respect of each calculation period. The amount payable by the counterparty, if the floating price is below the fixed or floor price, is the product of the notional quantity per calculation period and the excess of the fixed or floor price over the floating price in respect of each calculation period.
 
A three-way collar consists of a two-way collar contract combined with a put option contract sold by us with a strike price below the floor price of the two-way collar.  We receive price protection at the purchased put option floor price of the two-way collar if commodity prices are above the sold put option strike price. If commodity prices fall below the sold put option strike price, we receive the cash market price plus the delta between the two put option strike prices. This type of instrument allows us to capture more value in a rising commodity price environment, but limits our benefits in a downward commodity price environment.
 
We also may enter into forward contracts to hedge anticipated exposure to interest rate risk associated with public debt financing.
 
While these instruments mitigate the cash flow risk of future reductions in commodity prices or increases in interest rates, they may also curtail benefits from future increases in commodity prices or decreases in interest rates.
 
See Note 6. Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures for a discussion of methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair values of our derivative instruments.
 
Counterparty Credit Risk   Derivative instruments expose us to counterparty credit risk. Our commodity derivative instruments are currently with a diversified group of highly rated major banks or market participants, and we monitor and manage our level of financial exposure. Our commodity derivative contracts are executed under master agreements which allow us, in the event of default, to elect early termination of all contracts with the defaulting counterparty. If we choose to elect early termination, all asset and liability positions with the defaulting counterparty would be net settled at the time of election.
 
We monitor the creditworthiness of our counterparties. However, we are not able to predict sudden changes in counterparties' creditworthiness. In addition, even if such changes are not sudden, we may be limited in our ability to mitigate an increase in counterparty credit risk. Possible actions would be to transfer our position to another counterparty or request a voluntary termination of the derivative contracts resulting in a cash settlement. Should one of these financial counterparties not perform, we may not realize the benefit of some of our derivative instruments under lower commodity prices or higher interest rates, and could incur a loss.
 
Interest Rate Derivative Instrument   In January 2010, we entered into an interest rate forward starting swap to effectively fix the cash flows related to interest payments on our anticipated March 2011 debt issuance. During first quarter 2011, the fair value of the swap increased and we recognized a gain of $23 million, net of tax, in AOCL. On February 15, 2011 we settled the interest rate swap, which had a net liability position of $40 million at the time of settlement. Approximately $26 million, net of tax, was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL) and is being reclassified to interest expense over the term of the notes. The ineffective portion of the interest rate swap was de minimis.
 
Unsettled Derivative Instruments   As of March 31, 2012, we had entered into the following crude oil derivative instruments:
 
          
Swaps
  
Collars
 
Settlement
Period
Type of Contract
Index
 
Bbls Per
Day
  
Weighted
Average
Fixed
Price
  
Weighted
Average
 Short Put
 Price
  
Weighted
Average
Floor
Price
  
Weighted
Average
 Ceiling
Price
 
Instruments Entered Into as of March 31, 2012
             
2012
Swaps
NYMEX WTI  (1)
  5,000  $91.84  $-  $-  $- 
2012
Swaps
Dated Brent
  8,000   89.06   -   -   - 
2012
Three-Way Collars
 NYMEX WTI
  23,000   -   61.09   83.04   101.66 
2012
Three-Way Collars
 Dated Brent
  3,000   -   70.00   95.83   105.00 
2013
Swaps
 Dated Brent
  3,000   98.03   -   -   - 
2013
Two-Way Collars
 NYMEX WTI
  5,000   -   -   95.00   115.00 
2013
Three-Way Collars
 NYMEX WTI
  5,000   -   65.00   85.00   113.63 
2013
Three-Way Collars
 Dated Brent
  26,000   -   82.88   100.86   127.32 
2014
Swaps
Dated Brent
  3,000   107.15   -   -   - 
2014
Three-Way Collars
 Dated Brent
  10,000   -   85.00   98.50   129.24 
 
(1)
West Texas Intermediate
 
As of March 31, 2012, we had entered into the following natural gas derivative instruments:
 
          
Swaps
  
Collars
 
Settlement
Period
Type of Contract
Index
 
MMBtu
Per Day
  
Weighted
Average
Fixed
Price
  
Weighted
Average
Short Put
 Price
  
Weighted
Average
Floor
Price
  
Weighted
Average
Ceiling
Price
 
Instruments Entered Into as of March 31, 2012
               
2012
Swaps
NYMEX HH (1)
  30,000  $5.10  $-  $-  $- 
2012
Two-Way Collars
NYMEX HH
  40,000   -   -   3.25   5.14 
2012
Three-Way Collars
NYMEX HH
  110,000   -   4.44   5.25   6.66 
2013
Swaps
NYMEX HH
  30,000   5.25   -   -   - 
2013
Two-Way Collars
NYMEX HH
  40,000   -   -   3.25   5.14 
2013
Three-Way Collars
NYMEX HH
  100,000   -   3.88   4.75   5.63 
 
(1)
Henry Hub
 
As of March 31, 2012, we had entered into the following natural gas basis swaps:
 
Settlement
Period
Index
Index Less Differential
 
MMBtu Per Day
  
Weighted Average
Differential
 
2012
IFERC CIG (1)
 NYMEX HH
  150,000  $(0.52)

(1)
Colorado Interstate Gas – Northern System
 
Fair Value Amounts and Gains and Losses on Derivative Instruments   The fair values of derivative instruments in our consolidated balance sheets were as follows:
 
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
 
   
Asset Derivative Instruments
 
Liability Derivative Instruments
 
   
March 31,
 
December 31,
 
March 31,
 
December 31,
 
   
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
 
 
 
Balance
Sheet
Location
 
Fair
Value
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
Fair
 Value
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
Fair
Value
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
Fair
Value
 
(millions)
           
 
        
Commodity Derivative Instruments
 
Current
Assets
 $17 
Current Assets
 $10 
Current Liabilities
 $119 
Current Liabilities
 $76 
  
Noncurrent Assets
  22 
Noncurrent Assets
  37 
Noncurrent Liabilities
  29 
Noncurrent Liabilities
  7 
Total
 
 
 $39 
 
 $47 
 
 $148 
 
 $83 
 
The effect of derivative instruments on our consolidated statements of operations was as follows:
 
 
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
 
 
2012
  
2011
 
(millions)
      
Realized Mark-to-Market (Gain) Loss
 $23  $(17)
Unrealized Mark-to-Market Loss
  73   303 
Total Loss on Commodity Derivative Instruments
 $96  $286 
 
AOCL at March 31, 2012 included deferred losses of $26 million, net of tax, related to interest rate derivative instruments. This amount will be reclassified to earnings as an adjustment to interest expense over the terms of our senior notes due April 2014 and March 2041.  Approximately $2 million of deferred losses (net of tax) will be reclassified to earnings during the next 12 months and will be recorded as an increase in interest expense.