10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013

or

[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________to _________

Commission file number 0-11723

CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/2, LP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	94-2883067
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

80 International Drive, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X] Yes  [ ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). [X] Yes  [ ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [ ]	Accelerated filer [ ]
Non-accelerated filer [ ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/2, LP

BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

 (in thousands)

	March 31,	December 31,
	2013	2012
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$     54	$    143
Receivables and deposits	116	126
Other assets	91	85
Investment property:
Land	3,660	3,660
Buildings and related personal property	10,188	10,158
Total investment property	13,848	13,818
Less accumulated depreciation	(5,217)	(5,053)
Investment property, net	8,631	8,765
Total assets	$  8,892	$  9,119
Liabilities and Partners' Deficit
Liabilities
Accounts payable	$     28	$     34
Tenant security deposit liabilities	68	63
Distributions payable	141	141
Due to affiliates	506	593
Accrued property taxes	440	324
Other liabilities	137	190
Mortgage note payable	10,346	10,391
Total liabilities	11,666	11,736
Partners' Deficit
General partner	(481)	(479)
Limited partners	(2,293)	(2,138)
Total partners’ deficit	(2,774)	(2,617)
Total liabilities and partners’ deficit	$  8,892	$  9,119

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/2, LP

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per unit data)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2013	2012
Revenues:
Rental income	$   536	$   532
Other income	109	70
Total revenues	645	602
Expenses:
Operating	278	257
General and administrative	65	83
Depreciation	164	161
Interest	179	179
Property taxes	116	81
Total expenses	802	761
Loss before income from merger of affiliated partnership	(157)	(159)
Income from merger of affiliated partnership	--	24
Net loss	$  (157)	$  (135)
Net loss allocated to general partner (1%)	$    (2)	$    (1)
Net loss allocated to limited partners (Series A) (99%)	$  (155)	$  (134)
Net loss per Series A unit	$ (0.17)	$ (0.15)

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/2, LP

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' DEFICIT

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)

		Limited
	General	Partners
	Partner	Series A	Total
Partners’ deficit at December 31, 2012	$ (479)	$(2,138)	$(2,617)
Net loss for the three months ended
March 31, 2013	(2)	(155)	(157)
Partners’ deficit at March 31, 2013	$ (481)	$(2,293)	$(2,774)

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/2, LP

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2013	2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$  (157)	$  (135)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Depreciation	164	161
Amortization of loan costs	10	10
Bad debt expense	27	7
Income from merger of affiliated partnership	--	(24)
Change in accounts:
Other assets	(16)	(34)
Receivables and deposits	(17)	8
Accounts payable	3	3
Accrued property taxes	116	81
Due to affiliates	(65)	57
Tenant security deposit liabilities	5	5
Other liabilities	(53)	(19)
Net cash provided by operating activities	17	120
Cash flows from investing activities:
Property improvements and replacements	(39)	(90)
Proceeds from merger of affiliated partnership	--	24
Net cash used in investing activities	(39)	(66)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Principal payments on mortgage note payable	(45)	(42)
Repayment of advances from affiliate	(22)	--
Net cash used in financing activities	(67)	(42)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(89)	12
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	143	79
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$    54	$    91
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$   175	$   163
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity:
Property improvements and replacements included in
accounts payable	$     4	$    10

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/2, LP

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note A – Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited financial statements of Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties/2, LP (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8-03 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of ConCap Equities, Inc. (the "General Partner"), all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring items) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The General Partner is a subsidiary of Apartment Investment and Management Company ("Aimco"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust. Operating results for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. The balance sheet at December 31, 2012 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Partnership had outstanding 907,143.60 limited partnership units.

The Partnership’s management evaluated subsequent events through the time this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was filed.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2012 balances to conform to the 2013 presentation.

Going Concern

The Partnership Agreement provides that the Partnership is to terminate on December 31, 2013 unless terminated prior to such date. Since the Partnership’s term will expire on December 31, 2013 and the term cannot be extended, the General Partner began marketing the Partnership’s investment property for sale in 2013. However, there can be no assurance that the General Partner will be successful in its attempt to sell the property during 2013. The 2013 financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Note B – Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The Partnership has no employees and depends on the General Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership activities.  The Partnership Agreement provides for certain payments to affiliates for services and reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership. 

Affiliates of the General Partner receive 5% of gross receipts from the Partnership’s property as compensation for providing property management services. The Partnership paid to such affiliates approximately $32,000 and $29,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which are included in operating expenses.

An affiliate of the General Partner charged the Partnership for reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $40,000 and $62,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which is included in general and administrative expenses and investment property. The portion of these reimbursements included in investment property for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 are construction management services provided by an affiliate of the General Partner of approximately $2,000 and $12,000, respectively. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Partnership owed approximately $276,000 and $344,000, respectively, for accountable administrative expenses, which is included in due to affiliates.

Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the General Partner, advanced the Partnership approximately $110,000 during the year ended December 31, 2012 to fund real estate taxes at Highcrest Townhomes. No such advances were made during the three months ended March 31, 2013 or 2012.  AIMCO Properties, L.P. charges interest on advances under the terms permitted by the Partnership Agreement. The interest rates charged on the outstanding advances made to the Partnership range from the prime rate plus 2% to a variable rate based on the prime rate plus a market rate adjustment for similar type loans. Affiliates of the General Partner review the market rate adjustment quarterly. The interest rate on the outstanding advances at March 31, 2013 was 10.08%. Interest expense was approximately $6,000 and $5,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Partnership repaid advances and accrued interest of approximately $25,000. No such payments were made during the three months ended March 31, 2012. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the amount of outstanding advances and accrued interest due to AIMCO Properties, L.P. was approximately $230,000 and $249,000, respectively, and is included in due to affiliates. The Partnership may receive additional advances of funds from AIMCO Properties, L.P., although AIMCO Properties, L.P. is not obligated to provide such advances. For more information on AIMCO Properties, L.P., including copies of its audited balance sheet, please see its reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Partnership insures its property up to certain limits through coverage provided by Aimco which is generally self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to workers’ compensation, property casualty, general liability, and vehicle liability.  The Partnership insures its property above the Aimco limits through insurance policies obtained by Aimco from insurers unaffiliated with the Managing General Partner.  During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Partnership was charged by Aimco and its affiliates approximately $12,000 for hazard insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration. Additional charges will be incurred by the Partnership during 2013 as other insurance policies renew later in the year. The Partnership was charged by Aimco and its affiliates approximately $29,000 for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration during the year ended December 31, 2012.

Note C – Investment in Affiliated Partnership

The Partnership had an investment as a special limited partner in an affiliated partnership, Consolidated Capital Properties IV.  This investment was accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Distributions from the affiliated partnership were accounted for as a reduction of the investment balance. When the investment balance had been reduced to zero, subsequent distributions received would be recognized as income.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the affiliated partnership merged with affiliates of the General Partner.  As a result of the completion of the merger, the Partnership received approximately $24,000 as consideration for its special limited partnership interest, which is reflected as income from merger of affiliated partnership for the three months ended March 31, 2012 as the Partnership’s investment in the affiliated partnership was zero at the time of the merger.

Note D – Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 825, “Financial Instruments”, requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. Fair value is defined as the amount at which the instruments could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. The Partnership is required to classify these fair value measurements into one of three categories, based on the nature of the inputs used in the fair value measurement.  Level 1 of the hierarchy includes fair value measurements based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities the Partnership can access at the measurement date.  Level 2 includes fair value measurements based on inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.  Level 3 includes fair value measurements based on unobservable inputs.  The classification of fair value measurements is subjective and generally accepted accounting principles requires the Partnership to disclose more detailed information regarding those fair value measurements classified within the lower levels of the hierarchy.  The Partnership believes that the carrying amount of its financial instruments (except for the mortgage note payable) approximates its fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. The Partnership estimates the fair value of its mortgage note payable by discounting future cash flows using a discount rate commensurate with that currently believed to be available to the Partnership for similar term, mortgage notes payable. The Partnership has classified this fair value measurement within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. At March 31, 2013, the fair value of the Partnership's mortgage note payable at the Partnership's incremental borrowing rate was approximately $11,444,000.

Note E – Contingencies

The Partnership is unaware of any pending or outstanding litigation matters involving it or its investment property that are not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation, of certain potentially hazardous materials present on a property, including lead-based paint, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum-based fuels, and other miscellaneous materials. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of such materials. The presence of, or the failure to manage or remedy properly, these materials may adversely affect occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by government agencies, and potential fines or penalties imposed by such agencies in connection therewith, the improper management of these materials on a property could result in claims by private plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of removal, remediation or disposal of these materials through a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges for the disposal or treatment of these materials is potentially liable under such laws for the proper operation of the disposal facility. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of its property, the Partnership could potentially be responsible for environmental liabilities or costs associated with its property.

ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements in certain circumstances. Certain information included in this Quarterly Report contains or may contain information that is forward-looking within the meaning of the federal securities laws, including, without limitation, statements regarding the Partnership’s ability to maintain current or meet projected occupancy, rental rates and property operating results and the effect of redevelopments. Actual results may differ materially from those described in these forward-looking statements and, in addition, will be affected by a variety of risks and factors, some of which are beyond the Partnership’s control, including, without limitation: financing risks, including the availability and cost of financing and the risk that the Partnership’s cash flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest; natural disasters and severe weather such as hurricanes; national and local economic conditions, including the pace of job growth and the level of unemployment; energy costs; the terms of governmental regulations that affect the Partnership’s property and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment in which the Partnership operates; real estate risks, including fluctuations in real estate values and the general economic climate in local markets and competition for residents in such markets; insurance risk, including the cost of insurance; litigation, including costs associated with prosecuting or defending claims and any adverse outcomes; and possible environmental liabilities, including costs, fines or penalties that may be incurred due to necessary remediation of contamination of properties presently owned or previously owned by the Partnership. Readers should carefully review the Partnership’s financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the other documents the Partnership files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Partnership's investment property consists of one apartment complex. The following table sets forth the average occupancy of the property for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

	Average Occupancy
Property	2013	2012
Highcrest Townhomes	94%	93%
Wood Ridge, Illinois

The Partnership’s financial results depend upon a number of factors including the ability to attract and maintain tenants at the investment property, interest rates on mortgage loans, costs incurred to operate the investment property, general economic conditions and weather. As part of the ongoing plan of the Partnership, the General Partner monitors the rental market environment of its investment property to assess the feasibility of increasing rents, maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and protecting the Partnership from increases in expense. As part of this plan, the General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from the burden of inflation-related increases in expenses by increasing rents and maintaining a high overall occupancy level. However, the General Partner may use rental concessions and rental rate reductions to offset softening market conditions; accordingly, there is no guarantee that the General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan. Further, a number of factors which are outside the control of the Partnership such as the local economic climate and weather can adversely or positively impact the Partnership’s financial results.

Results of Operations

The Partnership recognized net losses of approximately $157,000 and $135,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  The increase in net loss is due to an increase in total expenses and a decrease in income from the merger of an affiliated partnership, partially offset by an increase in total revenues.

Total revenues increased for the three months ended March 31, 2013 primarily due to an increase in other income. Rental income remained relatively constant for the comparable periods.  The increase in other income is primarily due to an increase in resident utility reimbursements.

Total expenses increased for the three months ended March 31, 2013 due to increases in operating and property tax expenses, partially offset by a decrease in general and administrative expenses. Depreciation and interest expenses remained relatively constant for the comparable periods. The increase in operating expenses is due to increases in personnel costs and utility expenses at Highcrest Townhomes.  The increase in property tax expense is primarily due to an increase in the tax rate at Highcrest Townhomes.

The decrease in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to decreases in management reimbursements charged by the General Partner as allowed under the Partnership Agreement and costs associated with the quarterly and annual communications with investors and regulatory agencies.  Also included in general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 are costs associated with the annual audit required by the Partnership Agreement.

The Partnership had an investment as a special limited partner in an affiliated partnership.  During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the affiliated partnership merged with affiliates of the General Partner. As a result of the completion of the merger, the Partnership received approximately $24,000 as consideration for its special limited partnership interest, which is reflected as income from merger of affiliated partnership for the three months ended March 31, 2012 as the Partnership’s investment in the affiliated partnership was zero at the time of the merger.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At March 31, 2013, the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $54,000, compared with approximately $143,000 at December 31, 2012.  The decrease in cash and cash equivalents of approximately $89,000 is due to approximately $67,000 and $39,000 of cash used in financing and investing activities, respectively, partially offset by approximately $17,000 of cash provided by operating activities. Cash used in financing activities consisted of principal payments made on the mortgage note payable encumbering the Partnership’s investment property and repayment of advances from AIMCO Properties, L.P.  Cash used in investing activities consisted of property improvements and replacements.

Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the General Partner, advanced the Partnership approximately $110,000 during the year ended December 31, 2012 to fund real estate taxes at Highcrest Townhomes. No such advances were made during the three months ended March 31, 2013 or 2012.  AIMCO Properties, L.P. charges interest on advances under the terms permitted by the Partnership Agreement. The interest rates charged on the outstanding advances made to the Partnership range from the prime rate plus 2% to a variable rate based on the prime rate plus a market rate adjustment for similar type loans. Affiliates of the General Partner review the market rate adjustment quarterly. The interest rate on the outstanding advances at March 31, 2013 was 10.08%. Interest expense was approximately $6,000 and $5,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Partnership repaid advances and accrued interest of approximately $25,000. No such payments were made during the three months ended March 31, 2012. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the amount of outstanding advances and accrued interest due to AIMCO Properties, L.P. was approximately $230,000 and $249,000, respectively, and is included in due to affiliates. The Partnership may receive additional advances of funds from AIMCO Properties, L.P., although AIMCO Properties, L.P. is not obligated to provide such advances. For more information on AIMCO Properties, L.P., including copies of its audited balance sheet, please see its reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The sufficiency of existing liquid assets to meet future liquidity and capital expenditure requirements is directly related to the level of capital expenditures required at the property to adequately maintain the physical assets and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal, state and local legal and regulatory requirements. The General Partner monitors developments in the area of legal and regulatory compliance.  Capital improvements planned for the Partnership's property are detailed below.

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Partnership completed approximately $30,000 of capital improvements at Highcrest Townhomes, consisting primarily of floor covering and appliance replacements. These improvements were funded from operations. The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property. While the Partnership has no material commitments for property improvements and replacements, certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during the remainder of 2013. Such capital expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Capital expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available from operations or Partnership reserves. To the extent that capital improvements are completed, the Partnership's distributable cash flow, if any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

The Partnership's assets are thought to be generally sufficient for any near-term needs (exclusive of capital improvements and amounts due to affiliates) of the Partnership. The mortgage indebtedness encumbering Highcrest Townhomes of approximately $10,346,000 is being amortized over 360 months and requires a balloon payment of approximately $9,414,000 in 2017. Since the Partnership’s term will expire on December 31, 2013 and the term cannot be extended, the General Partner began marketing the Partnership’s investment property for sale in 2013.  There can be no assurance that the General Partner will be successful in its attempt to sell the property during 2013.

There were no distributions made to the partners during the three months ended March 31, 2013 or 2012. Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of cash generated from operations, and the timing of the debt maturity, property sale and/or refinancing. The Partnership's cash available for distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. There can be no assurance, however, that the Partnership will generate sufficient funds from operations, after planned capital expenditures, to permit any distributions to its partners in 2013 or subsequent periods.

Other

In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interest in the Partnership, Aimco and its affiliates owned 574,447.25 limited partnership units (the "Units") in the Partnership representing 63.32% of the outstanding Units at March 31, 2013. A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by Aimco or its affiliates. It is possible that Aimco or its affiliates will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of Aimco, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, Unit holders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 63.32% of the outstanding Units, Aimco and its affiliates are in a position to control all such voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to Aimco as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the General Partner, as general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the General Partner to Aimco as its sole stockholder.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require the Partnership to make estimates and assumptions. The Partnership believes that of its significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Asset

Investment property is stated at its fair market value at the time of foreclosure in 2002, less accumulated depreciation, unless the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable.  If events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the property may not be recoverable, the Partnership will make an assessment of its recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to the Partnership’s estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest charges, of the property. If the carrying amount exceeds the estimated aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, the Partnership would recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the property.

Real property investment is subject to varying degrees of risk.  Several factors may adversely affect the economic performance and value of the Partnership’s investment property.  These factors include, but are not limited to, general economic climate; competition from other apartment communities and other housing options; local conditions, such as loss of jobs or an increase in the supply of apartments that might adversely affect apartment occupancy or rental rates; changes in governmental regulations and the related cost of compliance; increases in operating costs (including real estate taxes) due to inflation and other factors, which may not be offset by increased rents; changes in tax laws and housing laws, including the enactment of rent control laws or other laws regulating multi-family housing; and changes in interest rates and the availability of financing. Any adverse changes in these and other factors could cause an impairment of the Partnership’s asset.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.  The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or in response to heavy competition from other similar complexes in the area.  Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.  The Partnership evaluates all accounts receivable from residents and establishes an allowance, after the application of security deposits, for accounts greater than 30 days past due on current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants. 

ITEM 3.     QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable.

ITEM 4.     CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a)   Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

The Partnership’s management, with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

(b)   Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

There has been no change in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS

See Exhibit Index.

The agreements included as exhibits to this Form 10-Q contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the applicable agreement and:

• should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate;

• have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreement;

• may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material to an investor; and

• were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments.

Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time. The Partnership acknowledges that, notwithstanding the inclusion of the foregoing cautionary statements, it is responsible for considering whether additional specific disclosures of material information regarding material contractual provisions are required to make the statements in this Form 10-Q not misleading. Additional information about the Partnership may be found elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and the Partnership’s other public filings, which are available without charge through the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/2, LP
	By:   ConCap Equities, Inc.
	General Partner
Date: May 15, 2013	By:   /s/Steven D. Cordes
	Steven D. Cordes
	Senior Vice President
Date: May 15, 2013	By:   /s/Stephen B. Waters
	Stephen B. Waters
	Senior Director of Partnership Accounting

CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/2, LP

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number    Description of Exhibit

3.1           Certificates of Limited Partnership, as amended to date.

3.2           Fourth Amendment to the amended and restated limited partnership agreement of CCIP/2 dated January 8, 2002 (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004).

3.3           Fifth Amendment to the amended and restated limited partnership agreement of Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties/2, LP, dated March 19, 2008. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 30, 2008.

3.4           Sixth Amendment to the amended and restated limited partnership agreement of Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties/2, LP, dated April 30, 2008. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 30, 2008.

3.5           Seventh Amendment to the amended and restated limited partnership agreement of Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties/2, LP, dated May 8, 2008, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009.

3.6           Eighth Amendment to the amended and restated limited partnership agreement of Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties/2, LP, dated December 30, 2008. (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2008).

10.33         Assignment of Partnership Rights and Distributions between Consolidated Capital Equity Partners/Two, L.P., a California limited partnership and 

 Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties/2, a California limited partnership (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report

 on Form 8-K dated August 22, 2002).

10.34         Agreement for Conveyance of Real Property, including exhibits thereto, between Consolidated Capital Equity Partners/Two, L.P., a California 

 limited partnership and Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties/2, a California limited partnership (Incorporated by reference to the

 Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 22, 2002).

10.37         Multifamily Note, dated September 28, 2007 between CCIP/2 Highcrest L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, and Capmark Bank, a Utah industrial bank. (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 28, 2007).

10.38         Multifamily Mortgage, Assignment of Rents and Security Agreement, dated September 28, 2007 between CCIP/2 Highcrest, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, and Capmark Bank, a Utah industrial bank. (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 28, 2007).

31.1          Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2          Certification of equivalent of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1          Certification of the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101           XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language). The following materials from Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties/2, LP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013, formatted in XBRL: (i) balance sheets, (ii) statements of operations, (iii) statement of changes in partners’ deficit, (iv) statements of cash flows, and (v) notes to financial statements (1).

(1)As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Steven D. Cordes, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties/2, LP;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 15, 2013

/s/Steven D. Cordes

Steven D. Cordes

Senior Vice President of ConCap Equities Inc., equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties/2, LP;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties/2, LP (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

      /s/Steven D. Cordes

Name: Steven D. Cordes

Date: May 15, 2013

      /s/Stephen B. Waters

Name: Stephen B. Waters

Date: May 15, 2013

This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

XML

Note D - Fair Value of Financial Instruments

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2013

Notes

Note D - Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Note D – Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 825, “Financial Instruments”, requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. Fair value is defined as the amount at which the instruments could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. The Partnership is required to classify these fair value measurements into one of three categories, based on the nature of the inputs used in the fair value measurement.  Level 1 of the hierarchy includes fair value measurements based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities the Partnership can access at the measurement date.  Level 2 includes fair value measurements based on inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.  Level 3 includes fair value measurements based on unobservable inputs.  The classification of fair value measurements is subjective and generally accepted accounting principles requires the Partnership to disclose more detailed information regarding those fair value measurements classified within the lower levels of the hierarchy.  The Partnership believes that the carrying amount of its financial instruments (except for the mortgage note payable) approximates its fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. The Partnership estimates the fair value of its mortgage note payable by discounting future cash flows using a discount rate commensurate with that currently believed to be available to the Partnership for similar term, mortgage notes payable. The Partnership has classified this fair value measurement within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. At March 31, 2013, the fair value of the Partnership's mortgage note payable at the Partnership's incremental borrowing rate was approximately $11,444,000.

XML

Note C - Investment in Affiliated Partnership

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2013

Notes

Note C - Investment in Affiliated Partnership

Note C – Investment in Affiliated Partnership

The Partnership had an investment as a special limited partner in an affiliated partnership, Consolidated Capital Properties IV.  This investment was accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Distributions from the affiliated partnership were accounted for as a reduction of the investment balance. When the investment balance had been reduced to zero, subsequent distributions received would be recognized as income.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the affiliated partnership merged with affiliates of the General Partner.  As a result of the completion of the merger, the Partnership received approximately $24,000 as consideration for its special limited partnership interest, which is reflected as income from merger of affiliated partnership for the three months ended March 31, 2012 as the Partnership’s investment in the affiliated partnership was zero at the time of the merger.

XML

Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 54	$ 143
Receivables and deposits	116	126
Other assets	91	85
Investment property:
Land	3,660	3,660
Buildings and related personal property	10,188	10,158
Total investment property	13,848	13,818
Less accumulated depreciation	(5,217)	(5,053)
Investment property, net	8,631	8,765
Total assets	8,892	9,119
Liabilities
Accounts payable	28	34
Tenant security deposit liabilities	68	63
Distributions payable	141	141
Due to affiliates	506	593
Accrued property taxes	440	324
Other liabilities	137	190
Mortgage note payable	10,346	10,391
Total liabilities	11,666	11,736
Partners' Deficit
General partner	(481)	(479)
Limited partners	(2,293)	(2,138)
Total partners' deficit	(2,774)	(2,617)
Total liabilities and partners' deficit	$ 8,892	$ 9,119

XML

Note A - Basis of Presentation

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2013

Notes

Note A - Basis of Presentation

Note A – Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited financial statements of Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties/2, LP (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8-03 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of ConCap Equities, Inc. (the "General Partner"), all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring items) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The General Partner is a subsidiary of Apartment Investment and Management Company ("Aimco"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust. Operating results for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. The balance sheet at December 31, 2012 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Partnership had outstanding 907,143.60 limited partnership units.

The Partnership’s management evaluated subsequent events through the time this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was filed.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2012 balances to conform to the 2013 presentation.

Going Concern

The Partnership Agreement provides that the Partnership is to terminate on December 31, 2013 unless terminated prior to such date. Since the Partnership’s term will expire on December 31, 2013 and the term cannot be extended, the General Partner began marketing the Partnership’s investment property for sale in 2013. However, there can be no assurance that the General Partner will be successful in its attempt to sell the property during 2013. The 2013 financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

XML

Note B - Transactions With Affiliated Parties

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2013

Notes

Note B - Transactions With Affiliated Parties

Note B – Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The Partnership has no employees and depends on the General Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership activities.  The Partnership Agreement provides for certain payments to affiliates for services and reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership. 

Affiliates of the General Partner receive 5% of gross receipts from the Partnership’s property as compensation for providing property management services. The Partnership paid to such affiliates approximately $32,000 and $29,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which are included in operating expenses.

An affiliate of the General Partner charged the Partnership for reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $40,000 and $62,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which is included in general and administrative expenses and investment property. The portion of these reimbursements included in investment property for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 are construction management services provided by an affiliate of the General Partner of approximately $2,000 and $12,000, respectively. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Partnership owed approximately $276,000 and $344,000, respectively, for accountable administrative expenses, which is included in due to affiliates.

Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the General Partner, advanced the Partnership approximately $110,000 during the year ended December 31, 2012 to fund real estate taxes at Highcrest Townhomes. No such advances were made during the three months ended March 31, 2013 or 2012.  AIMCO Properties, L.P. charges interest on advances under the terms permitted by the Partnership Agreement. The interest rates charged on the outstanding advances made to the Partnership range from the prime rate plus 2% to a variable rate based on the prime rate plus a market rate adjustment for similar type loans. Affiliates of the General Partner review the market rate adjustment quarterly. The interest rate on the outstanding advances at March 31, 2013 was 10.08%. Interest expense was approximately $6,000 and $5,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Partnership repaid advances and accrued interest of approximately $25,000. No such payments were made during the three months ended March 31, 2012. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the amount of outstanding advances and accrued interest due to AIMCO Properties, L.P. was approximately $230,000 and $249,000, respectively, and is included in due to affiliates. The Partnership may receive additional advances of funds from AIMCO Properties, L.P., although AIMCO Properties, L.P. is not obligated to provide such advances. For more information on AIMCO Properties, L.P., including copies of its audited balance sheet, please see its reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Partnership insures its property up to certain limits through coverage provided by Aimco which is generally self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to workers’ compensation, property casualty, general liability, and vehicle liability.  The Partnership insures its property above the Aimco limits through insurance policies obtained by Aimco from insurers unaffiliated with the Managing General Partner.  During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Partnership was charged by Aimco and its affiliates approximately $12,000 for hazard insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration. Additional charges will be incurred by the Partnership during 2013 as other insurance policies renew later in the year. The Partnership was charged by Aimco and its affiliates approximately $29,000 for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration during the year ended December 31, 2012.

XML

Statements of Operations (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012
Revenues:
Rental income	$ 536	$ 532
Other income	109	70
Total revenues	645	602
Expenses:
Operating	278	257
General and administrative	65	83
Depreciation	164	161
Interest	179	179
Property taxes	116	81
Total expenses	802	761
Loss before income from merger of affiliated partnership	(157)	(159)
Income from merger of affiliated partnership	0	24
Net loss	(157)	(135)
Net loss allocated to general partner (1%)	(2)	(1)
Net loss allocated to limited partners (Series A) (99%)	$ (155)	$ (134)
Net loss per Series A limited partnership unit	$ (0.17)	$ (0.15)

XML

Document and Entity Information	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2013
Document and Entity Information:
Entity Registrant Name	CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES 2
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Mar. 31, 2013
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Central Index Key	0000719184
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	907,143.6
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2013
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1

XML

Statement of Shareholders Deficit (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands	General Partner	Limited Partners Series A	Total
Partners' deficit, beginning balance at Dec. 31, 2012	$ (479)	$ (2,138)	$ (2,617)
Net loss	(2)	(155)	(157)
Partners' deficit, ending balance at Mar. 31, 2013	$ (481)	$ (2,293)	$ (2,774)

XML

Note A - Basis of Presentation (Details)	Mar. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Details
Outstanding Limited Partnership Units	907,143.60	907,143.60

XML

Note A - Basis of Presentation: Going Concern (Policies)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2013

Policies

Going Concern

Going Concern

The Partnership Agreement provides that the Partnership is to terminate on December 31, 2013 unless terminated prior to such date. Since the Partnership’s term will expire on December 31, 2013 and the term cannot be extended, the General Partner began marketing the Partnership’s investment property for sale in 2013. However, there can be no assurance that the General Partner will be successful in its attempt to sell the property during 2013. The 2013 financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

XML

Note D - Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Details) (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2013
Details
Fair value mortgage notes - Level 2	$ 11,444,000

XML

Note B - Transactions With Affiliated Parties (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012
Details
Property management fees - Related Party	$ 32,000	$ 29,000
Accountable administrative expense reimbursement - Related Party	40,000	62,000
Construction management service reimbursements capitalized - Related Party	2,000	12,000
Unpaid reimbursements owed - Related Party	276,000		344,000
Advances received from affiliates - Related Party			110,000
Interest expense on advances - Related Party	6,000	5,000
Repayment of advances & accrued interest - Related Party	25,000
Unpaid advances & accrued interest - Related Party	230,000		249,000
Insurance expense - Related Party	$ 12,000		$ 29,000

XML

Note C - Investment in Affiliated Partnership (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012
Details
Income from merger of affiliated partnership	$ 24,000

XML

Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$ (157)	$ (135)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation	164	161
Amortization of loan costs	10	10
Bad debt expense	27	7
Income from merger of affiliated partnership	0	(24)
Change in accounts:
Other assets	(16)	(34)
Receivables and deposits	(17)	8
Accounts payable	3	3
Accrued property taxes	116	81
Due to affiliates	(65)	57
Tenant security deposit liabilities	5	5
Other liabilities	(53)	(19)
Net cash provided by operating activities	17	120
Cash flows from investing activities:
Property improvements and replacements	(39)	(90)
Proceeds from merger of affiliated partnership	0	24
Net cash used in investing activities	(39)	(66)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Principal payments on mortgage note payable	(45)	(42)
Repayment of advances from affiliate	(22)	0
Net cash used in financing activities	(67)	(42)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(89)	12
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	143	79
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	54	91
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	175	163
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity:
Property improvements and replacements included in accounts payable	$ 4	$ 10

XML

Note E - Contingencies

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2013

Notes

Note E - Contingencies

Note E – Contingencies

The Partnership is unaware of any pending or outstanding litigation matters involving it or its investment property that are not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation, of certain potentially hazardous materials present on a property, including lead-based paint, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum-based fuels, and other miscellaneous materials. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of such materials. The presence of, or the failure to manage or remedy properly, these materials may adversely affect occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by government agencies, and potential fines or penalties imposed by such agencies in connection therewith, the improper management of these materials on a property could result in claims by private plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of removal, remediation or disposal of these materials through a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges for the disposal or treatment of these materials is potentially liable under such laws for the proper operation of the disposal facility. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of its property, the Partnership could potentially be responsible for environmental liabilities or costs associated with its property.