UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act file number			811-3721
	Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund, Inc.
	(Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter)
	c/o The Dreyfus Corporation 200 Park Avenue New York, New York 10166
	(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
	Janette E. Farragher, Esq. 200 Park Avenue New York, New York 10166
	(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code:				(212) 922-6000
Date of fiscal year end:		5/31
Date of reporting period:		11/30/11

FORM N-CSR

Item 1.      Reports to Stockholders.

Dreyfus 

Intermediate Municipal 

Bond Fund, Inc. 

SEMIANNUAL REPORT November 30, 2011

Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it’s available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It’s simple and only takes a few minutes.

The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.

Not FDIC-Insured • Not Bank-Guaranteed • May Lose Value 

	Contents
	THE FUND
2	A Letter from the Chairman and CEO
3	Discussion of Fund Performance
6	Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses
6	Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses With Those of Other Funds
7	Statement of Investments
32	Statement of Assets and Liabilities
33	Statement of Operations
34	Statement of Changes in Net Assets
35	Financial Highlights
36	Notes to Financial Statements
44	Information About the Renewal of the Fund’s Management Agreement
	FOR MORE INFORMATION
	Back Cover

Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal
Bond Fund, Inc.

The Fund

A LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO

Dear Shareholder:

We are pleased to present this semiannual report for Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund, Inc., covering the six-month period from June 1, 2011, through November 30, 2011. For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as general market perspectives, we provide a Discussion of Fund Performance on the pages that follow.

Investors were encouraged by expectations of a more robust economic recovery into the first quarter of 2011, but sentiment subsequently deteriorated due to disappointing economic data, an escalating sovereign debt crisis in Europe and a contentious debate regarding taxes, spending and borrowing in the United States. Market volatility was particularly severe in August and September after a major credit rating agency downgraded long-term U.S. government debt. While most fixed-income securities proved volatile in this tumultuous environment, municipal bonds held up relatively well due to robust demand for a limited supply of newly issued securities.

The economic outlook currently remains clouded by uncertainty regarding the ability of European policymakers to contain the region’s debt crisis. However, conditions in the United States seem to be improving as inflationary pressures have receded, consumer confidence has strengthened and the unemployment rate has declined.To assess the potential impact of these and other developments on your investments, we encourage you, as always, to speak with your financial advisor.

Thank you for your continued confidence and support.

Jonathan R. Baum
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
The Dreyfus Corporation
December 15, 2011

2

DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE

For the period of June 1, 2011, through November 30, 2011, as provided by Steven Harvey, Portfolio Manager

Fund and Market Performance Overview

For the six-month period ended November 30, 2011, Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund achieved a total return of 3.60%.¹ The Barclays Capital 7-Year Municipal Bond Index (the “Index”), the fund’s benchmark, achieved a total return of 3.88% for the same period.²

Despite intensifying economic uncertainty during the reporting period, municipal bonds fared relatively well as a reduced supply of newly issued securities was met by robust investor demand.The fund’s returns were slightly lower than its benchmark due primarily to a higher allocation to bonds rated double-A and triple-A.

The Fund’s Investment Approach

The fund seeks the maximum amount of current income exempt from federal income tax as is consistent with the preservation of capital.To pursue its goal, the fund normally invests substantially all of its assets in municipal bonds that provide income exempt from federal personal income tax.

The fund invests at least 80% of its assets in municipal bonds rated A or higher, or the unrated equivalent as determined by Dreyfus. The fund may invest up to 20% of its assets in municipal bonds rated below A, including bonds rated below investment grade (“high yield” or “junk” bonds) or the unrated equivalent as determined by Dreyfus. The dollar-weighted average maturity of the fund’s portfolio ranges between three and 10 years.

We focus on identifying undervalued sectors and securities, and we minimize the use of interest rate forecasting. We select municipal bonds by using fundamental credit analysis to estimate the relative value and attractiveness of various sectors and securities and to exploit pricing inefficiencies in the municipal bond market.We actively trade among various sectors, such as pre-refunded, general obligation and revenue, based on their apparent relative values.

The Fund  3 

DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued)

Municipal Bonds Held Up Relatively Well Amid Uncertainty

Investor confidence generally was shaken in the spring of 2011 when Greece appeared headed for default on its sovereign debt, U.S. economic data disappointed and a contentious political debate regarding U.S. government spending and borrowing intensified. Consequently, investors shifted their focus to traditionally defensive investments, producing bouts of heightened volatility in many financial markets.Turbulence was particularly severe in August and September, after a major credit-rating agency downgraded its assessment of long-term U.S. debt securities. Securities that had been hard-hit in late summer rebounded to a degree in October and November as certain macroeconomic concerns eased.

Positive supply-and-demand forces helped intermediate-term municipal bonds gain some value despite these developments. New issuance volumes fell sharply in 2011 after a flood of new supply in late 2010 when issuers sought to lock in federal subsidies provided by the expiring Build America Bonds program. Political pressure to reduce spending and borrowing also led to fewer capital projects requiring financing during the reporting period.Yet, demand for municipal bonds remained steadily robust from individual and institutional investors seeking higher levels of tax-exempt income.

Although many states and municipalities continued to struggle with budget shortfalls, tax revenues generally have trended upwards, helping to relieve fiscal stresses.

Revenue Bonds Supported Relative Performance

Early in the reporting period, the fund established positions in the general obligation bonds of certain states—including California, Illinois and New Jersey—that we believed were punished too severely at the end of 2010.These securities subsequently rebounded, contributing positively to the fund’s relative performance. We also favored income-oriented bonds backed by dedicated revenues from municipal projects.The fund benefited during the reporting period from revenue bonds backed by health care facilities, airports and corporations. In addition, the fund’s relative results were buoyed by underweighted exposure to low yielding escrowed bonds, which fell out of favor among investors.

4

The fund also benefited during much of the reporting period from an average duration that was modestly longer than market averages. The fund’s duration posture enabled it to capture incrementally higher levels of income and to participate more fully in market rallies.We generally focused on bonds with eight- to 10-year maturities, and we maintained underweighted exposure to bonds maturing in three years or less.

On the other hand, the fund’s relative performance was mildly undermined by our ongoing efforts to improve its overall credit profile. A shift toward higher-rated bonds prevented the fund from benefiting more fully from relative strength among lower-rated securities. A small weighting in tobacco securitization bonds lagged on weaker-than-expected consumption trends.

Maintaining Credit Discipline

We believe the fund remains well positioned for an environment of subpar economic growth and heightened market volatility. We have maintained an emphasis on revenue bonds with strong credit characteristics, particularly those backed by essential services facilities.We also are encouraged by the market’s longer-term prospects. In our judgment, municipal bonds appear likely to be the focus of demand from investors seeking tax-advantaged income as they grow more concerned about persistently low interest rates and potential tax increases.

December 15, 2011

	Bond funds are subject generally to interest rate, credit, liquidity and market risks, to varying
	degrees, all of which are more fully described in the fund’s prospectus. Generally, all other factors
	being equal, bond prices are inversely related to interest-rate changes, and rate increases can cause
	price declines.
1	Total return includes reinvestment of dividends and any capital gains paid. Past performance is no
	guarantee of future results. Share price, yield and investment return fluctuate such that upon
	redemption, fund shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. Income may be subject
	to state and local taxes, and some income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax
	(AMT) for certain investors. Capital gains, if any, are fully taxable.
2	SOURCE: LIPPER INC. — Reflects reinvestment of dividends and, where applicable, capital
	gain distributions.The Barclays Capital 7-Year Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged total
	return performance benchmark for the investment-grade, geographically unrestricted 7-year tax-
	exempt bond market, consisting of municipal bonds with maturities of 6-8 years. Index returns do
	not reflect fees and expenses associated with operating a mutual fund.

The Fund  5 

UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)

As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.

Review your fund’s expenses

The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund, Inc. from June 1, 2011 to November 30, 2011. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.

Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment 

assuming actual returns for the six months ended November 30, 2011 

Expenses paid per $1,000†	$	3.92
Ending value (after expenses)	$	1,036.00

COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES
WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited)

Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.

Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment
assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended November 30, 2011

Expenses paid per $1,000†	$	3.89
Ending value (after expenses)	$	1,021.15

† Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of .77%, multiplied by the average account value over the 

period, multiplied by 183/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). 

6

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS 

November 30, 2011 (Unaudited) 

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments—98.2%	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)	Value ($)
Alabama—2.0%
Alabama Port Authority,
Docks Facilities Revenue
(Insured; National Public
Finance Guarantee Corp.)	5.00	10/1/22	5,000,000	5,099,650
Alabama Public School and
College Authority, Capital
Improvement Bonds	5.00	12/1/24	2,500,000	2,768,450
Birmingham Water Works Board,
Water Revenue (Insured;
Assured Guaranty
Municipal Corp.)	5.00	1/1/17	6,310,000	7,232,522
Jefferson County,
Limited Obligation
School Warrants	5.25	1/1/17	2,500,000	2,401,475
Alaska—.5%
Alaska Industrial Development and
Export Authority, Revolving
Fund Revenue	5.25	4/1/24	3,780,000	4,242,332
Arizona—3.8%
Arizona Transportation Board,
Highway Revenue	5.00	7/1/21	10,990,000	12,533,875
Arizona Transportation Board,
Transportation Excise Tax
Revenue (Maricopa County
Regional Area Road Fund)	5.00	7/1/17	6,000,000	7,114,080
Phoenix Civic Improvement
Corporation, Junior Lien Water
System Revenue	5.00	7/1/23	4,290,000	5,074,641
Pima County,
Sewer System Revenue
Obligations (Insured; Assured
Guaranty Municipal Corp.)	5.00	7/1/23	3,250,000	3,714,913
Pima County Industrial Development
Authority, Education Revenue
(American Charter Schools
Foundation Project)	5.13	7/1/15	2,680,000	2,628,383
Salt River Project Agricultural
Improvement and Power
District, Salt River Project
Electric System Revenue	5.00	12/1/27	2,500,000	2,833,375

The Fund  7 

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)		Value ($)
California—13.8%
ABAG Finance Authority for
Nonprofit Corporations,
Revenue (San Diego
Hospital Association)	5.13	3/1/18	200,000		208,604
Arcadia Unified School District,
GO (Insured; Assured Guaranty
Municipal Corp.)	0.00	8/1/20	1,635,000	a	1,111,898
Bay Area Toll Authority,
San Francisco Bay Area Toll
Bridge Revenue	5.25	4/1/24	6,000,000		6,801,660
California,
GO (Various Purpose)	5.25	10/1/20	18,060,000		20,901,380
California,
GO (Various Purpose)	5.25	3/1/22	1,250,000		1,427,588
California,
GO (Various Purpose)	5.63	4/1/25	3,500,000		3,906,595
California Department of Water
Resources, Power Supply Revenue	5.00	5/1/22	4,300,000		5,015,262
California Department of Water
Resources, Water System
Revenue (Central Valley Project)	5.00	12/1/24	2,500,000		2,810,675
California Health Facilities
Financing Authority, Revenue
(Providence Health and Services)	6.25	10/1/24	3,000,000		3,504,510
California Health Facilities
Financing Authority, Revenue
(Sutter Health)	5.25	8/15/22	3,000,000		3,286,530
California Housing Finance Agency,
Home Mortgage Revenue	4.55	8/1/21	3,810,000		3,578,390
California Housing Finance Agency,
Home Mortgage Revenue	4.60	8/1/21	2,580,000		2,449,994
California Housing Finance Agency,
Home Mortgage Revenue
(Insured; FGIC)	4.40	2/1/18	3,300,000		3,207,897
California Housing Finance Agency,
Home Mortgage Revenue
(Insured; FGIC)	4.40	8/1/18	3,310,000		3,206,728
California State University
Trustees, Systemwide Revenue	5.00	11/1/22	5,000,000		5,828,100

8

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)		Value ($)
California (continued)
Clovis Unified School District,
GO (Insured; National Public
Finance Guarantee Corp.)	0.00	8/1/22	10,415,000	a	6,480,213
Coast Community College District,
GO (Insured; National Public
Finance Guarantee Corp.)	0.00	8/1/20	1,855,000	a	1,299,576
Los Angeles Department of
Airports, Subordinate
Revenue (Los Angeles
International Airport)	5.25	5/15/25	1,845,000		2,000,755
Los Angeles Harbor Department,
Revenue	5.00	8/1/19	1,425,000		1,646,245
Sacramento City Unified School
District, GO (Insured; Assured
Guaranty Municipal Corp.)	0.00	7/1/23	5,065,000	a	2,861,370
San Diego County Water Authority,
Water Revenue	5.00	5/1/21	2,725,000		3,288,966
San Diego County Water Authority,
Water Revenue	5.00	5/1/28	5,000,000		5,527,500
San Diego Public Facilities
Financing Authority,
Water Revenue	5.00	8/1/24	7,560,000		8,568,126
San Francisco City and County
Airport Commission, Second
Series Revenue (San Francisco
International Airport)	5.00	5/1/17	5,000,000		5,515,600
Southern California Public Power
Authority, Revenue (Canyon
Power Project)	5.00	7/1/23	5,000,000		5,665,200
Southern California Public Power
Authority, Revenue (Windy
Point/Windy Flats Project)	5.00	7/1/23	5,000,000		5,697,050
Tobacco Securitization
Authority of Southern
California, Tobacco
Settlement Asset-Backed
Bonds (San Diego
County Tobacco Asset
Securitization Corporation)	4.75	6/1/25	1,860,000		1,574,062

The Fund  9 

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)		Value ($)
California (continued)
Tuolumne Wind Project Authority,
Revenue (Tuolumne
Company Project)	5.00	1/1/22	2,000,000		2,229,940
University of California Regents,
General Revenue	5.25	5/15/23	2,500,000		2,823,925
Colorado—.9%
Colorado Health Facilities
Authority, Revenue (Catholic
Health Initiatives)	6.00	10/1/23	5,355,000		6,171,156
E-470 Public Highway Authority,
Senior Revenue (Insured;
National Public Finance
Guarantee Corp.)	0.00	9/1/18	3,000,000	a	2,104,170
Connecticut—.3%
Connecticut Health and Educational
Facilities Authority, Revenue
(Wesleyan University Issue)	5.00	7/1/26	1,000,000		1,124,990
Connecticut Health and Educational
Facilities Authority, Revenue
(Wesleyan University Issue)	5.00	7/1/27	1,000,000		1,115,490
District of Columbia—1.8%
District of Columbia,
HR (Children’s Hospital
Obligated Group Issue)
(Insured; Assured Guaranty
Municipal Corp.)	5.25	7/15/18	2,000,000		2,300,620
District of Columbia,
Income Tax Secured Revenue	5.00	12/1/25	2,500,000		2,843,300
District of Columbia,
Revenue (Howard University
Issue) (Insured; AMBAC)
(Prerefunded)	5.00	10/1/16	2,545,000	b	3,012,491
District of Columbia,
Revenue (Howard University
Issue) (Insured; AMBAC)
(Prerefunded)	5.00	10/1/16	2,660,000	b	3,148,615
Washington Metropolitan Area
Transit Authority, Gross
Revenue Transit Bonds	5.25	7/1/23	3,725,000		4,255,850

10

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)	Value ($)
Florida—13.8%
Bay County,
Sales Tax Revenue
(Insured; AMBAC)	5.00	9/1/24	2,375,000	2,513,724
Brevard County,
Local Option Fuel Tax Revenue
(Insured; National Public
Finance Guarantee Corp.)	5.00	8/1/23	1,260,000	1,291,286
Broward County,
Port Facilities Revenue	5.00	9/1/21	4,340,000	4,653,999
Citizens Property Insurance
Corporation, Coastal Account
Senior Secured Revenue	5.00	6/1/19	3,000,000	3,264,960
Citizens Property Insurance
Corporation, High-Risk Account
Senior Secured Revenue	5.25	6/1/17	7,500,000	8,275,275
Collier County,
Gas Tax Revenue
(Insured; AMBAC)	5.25	6/1/19	2,190,000	2,267,964
Collier County School Board,
COP (Master Lease Program
Agreement) (Insured; Assured
Guaranty Municipal Corp.)	5.25	2/15/20	3,500,000	4,056,640
Collier County School Board,
COP (Master Lease Program
Agreement) (Insured; Assured
Guaranty Municipal Corp.)	5.25	2/15/22	2,000,000	2,306,520
Florida Education System,
University of Florida
Housing Revenue
(Insured; National Public
Finance Guarantee Corp.)	5.00	7/1/22	2,055,000	2,223,489
Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund
Finance Corporation, Revenue	5.00	7/1/16	2,250,000	2,489,175
Florida Municipal Power Agency,
Revenue (Stanton II Project)
(Insured; AMBAC)	5.50	10/1/15	3,635,000	3,765,678
Florida Water Pollution Control
Financing Corporation,
Water PCR	5.25	1/15/21	2,545,000	2,752,290

The Fund  11 

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)		Value ($)
Florida (continued)
Hillsborough County,
GO (Unincorporated Area Parks
and Recreation Program)
(Insured; National Public
Finance Guarantee Corp.)	5.00	7/1/22	1,155,000		1,419,668
Hillsborough County,
Junior Lien Utility Revenue
(Insured; AMBAC)	5.50	8/1/14	3,205,000		3,582,389
Indian River County,
GO (Insured; National Public
Finance Guarantee Corp.)	5.00	7/1/20	2,265,000		2,475,962
Jacksonville,
Guaranteed Entitlement
Improvement Revenue (Insured;
National Public Finance
Guarantee Corp.)	5.38	10/1/16	3,080,000		3,179,638
Jacksonville Aviation Authority,
Revenue (Insured; AMBAC)	5.00	10/1/19	3,220,000		3,425,661
Jacksonville Economic Development
Commission, Health Care
Facilities Revenue (Florida
Proton Therapy Institute Project)	6.00	9/1/17	2,545,000	c	2,681,030
Lakeland,
Energy System Revenue
(Insured; Assured Guaranty
Municipal Corp.)	5.00	10/1/18	6,250,000		7,342,750
Lee County,
Transportation Facilities
Revenue (Insured; AMBAC)	5.50	10/1/15	2,500,000		2,505,150
Martin County,
Utilities System Revenue
(Insured; National Public
Finance Guarantee Corp.)	5.50	10/1/12	1,065,000		1,106,663
Martin County,
Utilities System Revenue
(Insured; National Public
Finance Guarantee Corp.)	5.50	10/1/13	1,485,000		1,602,003
Miami-Dade County,
Aviation Revenue (Miami
International Airport)	5.50	10/1/25	2,500,000		2,756,125

12

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)		Value ($)
Florida (continued)
Miami-Dade County,
Transit System Sales Surtax
Revenue (Insured; XLCA)	5.00	7/1/24	2,330,000		2,459,641
Miami-Dade County,
Water and Sewer System Revenue	5.38	10/1/24	5,000,000		5,617,700
Miami-Dade County,
Water and Sewer System Revenue
(Insured; Assured Guaranty
Municipal Corp.)	5.25	10/1/17	5,000,000		5,887,150
Miami-Dade County School Board,
COP (Master Lease Purchase
Agreement) (Insured; FGIC)	5.25	10/1/17	5,000,000		5,405,150
Miami-Dade County School Board,
COP (Master Lease Purchase
Agreement) (Insured; National
Public Finance Guarantee Corp.)	5.00	8/1/15	5,000,000		5,234,150
Orlando Utilities Commission,
Utility System Revenue	5.00	10/1/23	2,500,000		2,836,125
Orlando-Orange County Expressway
Authority, Revenue (Insured;
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.)	5.00	7/1/17	2,105,000		2,428,749
Palm Bay,
Educational Facilities Revenue
(Patriot Charter School Project)	6.75	7/1/22	3,000,000	d	809,940
Palm Beach County School Board,
COP (Master Lease Purchase
Agreement) (Insured; AMBAC)	5.38	8/1/14	4,000,000		4,398,800
Pasco County,
Solid Waste Disposal and Resource
Recovery System Revenue	5.00	10/1/16	3,000,000		3,302,160
Polk County,
Constitutional Fuel Tax
Improvement Revenue (Insured;
National Public Finance
Guarantee Corp.)	5.00	12/1/19	580,000		629,056
Polk County,
Utility System Revenue
(Insured; National Public
Finance Guarantee Corp.)	5.25	10/1/18	2,000,000		2,125,960

The Fund  13 

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)		Value ($)
Florida (continued)
Sarasota County School Board,
COP (Master Lease Program
Agreement) (Insured; National
Public Finance Guarantee Corp.)	5.00	7/1/15	1,000,000		1,116,170
Seminole County,
Water and Sewer Revenue	5.00	10/1/21	1,050,000		1,154,748
Tampa,
Solid Waste System Revenue
(Insured; Assured Guaranty
Municipal Corp.)	5.00	10/1/16	2,690,000		2,958,381
Volusia County School Board,
Sales Tax Revenue
(Insured; Assured Guaranty
Municipal Corp.)	5.38	10/1/15	4,000,000		4,126,000
Georgia—3.6%
Athens Housing Authority,
Student Housing LR (University
of Georgia Real Estate
Foundation East Campus
Housing, LLC Project)
(Insured; AMBAC) (Prerefunded)	5.25	12/1/12	2,560,000	b	2,685,056
Athens Housing Authority,
Student Housing LR (University
of Georgia Real Estate
Foundation East Campus
Housing, LLC Project)
(Insured; AMBAC) (Prerefunded)	5.25	12/1/12	2,700,000	b	2,831,895
Atlanta,
Water and Wastewater Revenue	6.00	11/1/20	3,000,000		3,687,840
Atlanta,
Water and Wastewater Revenue
(Insured; Assured Guaranty
Municipal Corp.)	5.25	11/1/15	5,000,000		5,526,900
DeKalb County,
Water and Sewerage Revenue	5.25	10/1/25	4,000,000		4,430,440
Municipal Electric Authority of
Georgia, Combustion Turbine
Project Revenue (Insured;
National Public Finance
Guarantee Corp.)	5.25	11/1/16	5,000,000		5,187,950

14

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)	Value ($)
Georgia (continued)
Municipal Electric Authority of
Georgia, Revenue (Project One
Subordinated Bonds)	5.75	1/1/19	2,660,000	3,197,107
Private Colleges and Universities
Authority, Revenue
(Emory University)	5.00	9/1/16	3,235,000	3,792,035
Hawaii—1.1%
Hawaii,
Airports System Revenue	5.00	7/1/18	6,000,000	6,712,560
Honolulu City and County,
Wastewater System
Revenue (Second
Bond Resolution)	5.00	7/1/22	2,500,000	2,879,025
Idaho—.2%
Idaho Health Facilities Authority,
Revenue (Trinity Health
Credit Group)	6.13	12/1/28	1,450,000	1,627,639
Illinois—3.4%
Chicago,
General Airport Third Lien
Revenue (Chicago O’Hare
International Airport)	5.00	1/1/17	2,500,000	2,835,700
Chicago,
General Airport Third Lien
Revenue (Chicago O’Hare
International Airport)
(Insured; CIFG)	5.50	1/1/15	6,450,000	6,930,138
Chicago,
General Airport Third Lien
Revenue (Chicago O’Hare
International Airport)
(Insured; National Public
Finance Guarantee Corp.)	5.25	1/1/17	2,000,000	2,272,880
Chicago,
GO (Insured; Assured Guaranty
Municipal Corp.)	5.00	1/1/17	2,500,000	2,708,100
Chicago,
GO (Insured; National Public
Finance Guarantee Corp.)	5.00	1/1/20	1,450,000	1,577,788

The Fund  15 

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)		Value ($)
Illinois (continued)
Cook County Community High School
District Number 219, GO
(Insured; Assured Guaranty
Municipal Corp.)	5.00	12/1/24	2,020,000		2,144,553
Illinois,
Sales Tax Revenue	5.00	6/15/18	1,700,000		1,982,557
Illinois Toll Highway Authority,
Toll Highway Senior Revenue	5.00	1/1/25	5,000,000		5,448,700
Metropolitan Pier and Exposition
Authority, Dedicated State Tax
Revenue (McCormick Place
Expansion Project) (Insured;
National Public Finance
Guarantee Corp.)	0/5.55	6/15/21	2,500,000	e	2,647,450
Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement
Authority, Tobacco
Settlement Revenue	5.00	6/1/18	1,500,000		1,625,760
Indiana—1.9%
Indiana Finance Authority,
First Lien Wastewater Utility
Revenue (CWA Authority Project)	5.25	10/1/23	2,500,000		2,912,225
Indiana Health Facility Financing
Authority, Revenue (Ascension
Health Subordinate Credit Group)	5.00	5/1/13	1,000,000		1,060,300
Indianapolis,
Gas Utility Distribution
System Second Lien Revenue
(Insured; Assured Guaranty
Municipal Corp.)	5.00	8/15/23	3,500,000		3,867,465
Indianapolis,
Thermal Energy System First
Lien Revenue (Insured; Assured
Guaranty Municipal Corp.)	5.00	10/1/18	7,700,000		8,993,600
Kansas—1.2%
Wyandotte County/Kansas City
Unified Government,
Utility System Revenue
(Insured; AMBAC)	5.65	9/1/18	9,130,000		10,521,777

16

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)	Value ($)
Kentucky—.5%
Kentucky Municipal Power Agency,
Power System Revenue (Prairie
State Project) (Insured;
National Public Finance
Guarantee Corp.)	5.25	9/1/19	2,000,000	2,290,380
Pikeville,
Hospital Improvement
Revenue (Pikeville Medical
Center, Inc. Project)	6.25	3/1/23	2,195,000	2,487,352
Louisiana—.2%
Louisiana State University Board
of Supervisors and
Agricultural and Mechanical
College, Auxiliary Revenue	5.00	7/1/25	2,000,000	2,192,020
Maryland—1.6%
Maryland,
GO (State and Local
Facilities Loan)	5.00	8/1/16	4,340,000	5,125,627
Maryland,
GO (State and Local
Facilities Loan)	5.00	8/1/21	2,500,000	3,016,325
Maryland Economic Development
Corporation, EDR
(Transportation
Facilities Project)	5.38	6/1/25	1,500,000	1,492,605
Prince George’s County,
Consolidated Public
Improvement GO	5.00	9/15/22	3,340,000	4,107,098
Massachusetts—2.0%
Massachusetts,
Consolidated Loan	5.00	4/1/24	7,500,000	8,793,225
Massachusetts Development Finance
Agency, Revenue (Bentley
University Issue)	5.00	7/1/23	2,550,000	2,746,172
Massachusetts Development Finance
Agency, Revenue (Tufts Medical
Center Issue)	5.50	1/1/22	2,990,000	3,168,503

The Fund  17 

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)	Value ($)
Massachusetts (continued)
Massachusetts School Building
Authority, Senior Dedicated
Sales Tax Revenue	5.00	10/15/23	2,500,000	2,973,950
Michigan—2.8%
Detroit,
Sewage Disposal System
Senior Lien Revenue	6.50	7/1/24	4,765,000	5,396,077
Detroit,
Water Supply System Revenue
(Insured; Assured Guaranty
Municipal Corp.)	5.00	7/1/22	5,000,000	5,156,700
Detroit School District,
School Building and Site
Improvement Bonds (GO—
Unlimited Tax) (Insured; FGIC)	6.00	5/1/19	2,965,000	3,435,516
Michigan,
GO (Environmental Program)	5.00	11/1/19	2,000,000	2,369,180
Michigan Building Authority,
Revenue (State Police
Communications System)	5.25	10/1/13	1,945,000	2,114,565
Michigan Strategic Fund,
LOR (State of Michigan
Cadillac Place Office
Building Project)	5.00	10/15/15	1,040,000	1,151,862
Wayne County Airport Authority,
Airport Revenue (Detroit
Metropolitan Wayne
County Airport)	5.00	12/1/18	2,500,000	2,726,100
Wayne County Airport Authority,
Junior Lien Airport Revenue
(Detroit Metropolitan Wayne
County Airport) (Insured;
National Public Finance
Guarantee Corp.)	5.00	12/1/22	2,500,000	2,544,325
Minnesota—1.6%
Minneapolis-Saint Paul
Metropolitan Airports Commission,
Subordinate Airport Revenue
(Insured; National Public
Finance Guarantee Corp.)	5.00	1/1/25	5,000,000	5,224,350

18

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)		Value ($)
Minnesota (continued)
Minnesota Public Facilities
Authority, Clean Water
Revenue (Prerefunded)	5.00	3/1/17	7,500,000	b	8,947,725
Mississippi—.5%
Mississippi Development Bank,
Special Obligation Revenue
(Madison County Highway
Construction Project)
(Insured; National Public
Finance Guarantee Corp.)	5.00	1/1/22	3,875,000		4,242,040
Missouri—.4%
Missouri Development Finance
Board, Infrastructure
Facilities Revenue (Branson
Landing Project)	6.00	6/1/20	3,160,000		3,541,823
Nevada—1.6%
Clark County,
Airport System Revenue	5.00	7/1/22	3,300,000		3,706,428
Clark County School District,
Limited Tax GO	5.00	6/15/25	4,950,000		5,250,069
Director of the State of Nevada
Department of Business and
Industry, SWDR (Republic
Services, Inc. Project)	5.63	6/1/18	5,000,000		5,557,150
New Jersey—3.1%
Camden County Improvement
Authority, Health Care
Redevelopment Project
Revenue (The Cooper
Health System Obligated
Group Issue)	5.25	2/15/20	3,000,000		3,032,370
Casino Reinvestment Development
Authority, Revenue (Insured;
National Public Finance
Guarantee Corp.)	5.25	6/1/19	5,000,000		5,203,400
New Jersey Economic Development
Authority, Cigarette Tax Revenue	5.38	6/15/15	3,300,000		3,523,080
New Jersey Economic Development
Authority, Cigarette Tax Revenue	5.50	6/15/16	1,000,000		1,077,420

The Fund  19 

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)		Value ($)
New Jersey (continued)
New Jersey Economic Development
Authority, School Facilities
Construction Revenue (Insured;
National Public Finance
Guarantee Corporation)	5.00	9/1/18	5,500,000		6,046,425
New Jersey Health Care Facilities
Financing Authority, Revenue
(South Jersey Hospital Issue)	6.00	7/1/12	775,000		786,230
New Jersey Higher Education
Student Assistance Authority,
Student Loan Revenue (Insured;
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.)	5.88	6/1/21	4,070,000		4,460,232
New Jersey Transportation Trust
Fund Authority (Transportation
System) (Insured; National
Public Finance Guarantee Corp.)	5.25	12/15/18	2,930,000		3,267,976
New Mexico—1.2%
Jicarilla,
Apache Nation Revenue	5.00	9/1/13	1,840,000		1,910,674
New Mexico Hospital Equipment
Loan Council, Hospital System
Revenue (Presbyterian
Healthcare Services)	6.00	8/1/23	7,500,000		8,484,825
New York—7.1%
Long Island Power Authority,
Electric System General
Revenue (Insured; National
Public Finance Guarantee Corp.)	4.32	9/1/15	3,000,000	f	2,992,740
New York City,
GO	5.00	8/1/17	2,000,000		2,355,580
New York City,
GO	5.00	8/1/18	5,000,000		5,712,150
New York City,
GO	5.00	4/1/20	2,500,000		2,753,400
New York City,
GO	5.00	8/1/20	2,655,000		3,188,177
New York City,
GO	5.00	4/1/22	4,810,000		5,297,542
New York City,
GO	5.00	8/1/22	3,000,000		3,453,480

20

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)	Value ($)
New York (continued)
New York City Health and
Hospitals Corporation,
Health System Revenue	5.00	2/15/22	4,385,000	4,893,923
New York City Transitional Finance
Authority, Future Tax Secured
Subordinate Revenue	5.00	2/1/24	3,000,000	3,467,610
New York Local Government
Assistance Corporation, GO	5.25	4/1/16	3,425,000	3,885,183
New York State Dormitory
Authority, Mortgage Hospital
Revenue (The Long Island
College Hospital)
(Collateralized; FHA)	6.00	8/15/15	1,970,000	2,022,205
New York State Dormitory
Authority, Revenue (New York
University Hospitals Center)	5.25	7/1/24	700,000	728,805
New York State Dormitory
Authority, State Personal
Income Tax Revenue
(General Purpose)	5.25	2/15/21	2,500,000	2,956,425
New York State Dormitory
Authority, State Personal
Income Tax Revenue
(General Purpose)	5.00	3/15/22	3,340,000	3,992,001
New York State Thruway Authority,
Second General Highway and
Bridge Trust Fund Bonds
(Insured; AMBAC)	5.00	4/1/18	5,000,000	5,610,550
New York State Urban Development
Corporation, Corporate Purpose
Subordinate Lien	5.13	7/1/19	2,000,000	2,149,960
Niagara County Industrial
Development Agency, Solid
Waste Disposal Facility Revenue
(American Ref-Fuel Company
of Niagara, L.P. Facility)	5.45	11/15/12	2,000,000	2,022,320
Suffolk Tobacco Asset
Securitization Corporation,
Tobacco Settlement
Asset-Backed Bonds	5.38	6/1/28	2,815,000	2,350,919

The Fund  21 

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)	Value ($)
New York (continued)
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel
Authority, General Revenue
(MTA Bridges and Tunnels)	5.00	1/1/19	2,500,000	2,984,975
North Carolina—2.8%
North Carolina,
Limited Obligation Bonds	5.00	11/1/20	3,900,000	4,764,045
North Carolina Eastern Municipal
Power Agency, Power
System Revenue	5.13	1/1/14	3,000,000	3,129,810
North Carolina Eastern Municipal
Power Agency, Power
System Revenue	5.00	1/1/21	1,200,000	1,481,448
North Carolina Medical Care
Commission, Retirement
Facilities First Mortgage
Revenue (The United Methodist
Retirement Homes Project)	4.75	10/1/13	1,000,000	1,000,980
North Carolina Medical Care
Commission, Retirement
Facilities First Mortgage
Revenue (The United Methodist
Retirement Homes Project)	5.13	10/1/19	1,250,000	1,245,525
North Carolina Municipal Power
Agency Number 1, Catawba
Electric Revenue (Insured;
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.)	5.25	1/1/16	2,540,000	2,666,670
North Carolina Municipal Power
Agency Number 1, Catawba
Electric Revenue (Insured;
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.)	5.25	1/1/17	10,000,000	10,496,400
Ohio—3.1%
Cuyahoga County,
Revenue (Cleveland Clinic
Health System Obligated Group)	6.00	1/1/17	5,000,000	5,357,400
Knox County,
Hospital Facilities Revenue
(Knox Community Hospital)
(Insured; Radian)	5.00	6/1/12	405,000	409,819
Montgomery County,
Revenue (Miami Valley Hospital)	5.75	11/15/22	2,970,000	3,464,861

22

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)		Value ($)
Ohio (continued)
Ohio Higher Educational Facility
Commission, Higher Educational
Facility Revenue (Xavier
University Project) (Insured;
CIFG) (Prerefunded)	5.25	5/1/16	3,230,000	b	3,800,838
Ohio Water Development Authority,
PCR (Buckeye Power, Inc.
Project) (Insured; AMBAC)	5.00	5/1/22	4,030,000		4,302,750
Ohio Water Development Authority,
Water Pollution Control
Loan Fund Revenue
(Water Quality Series)	5.00	12/1/23	5,000,000		5,768,650
Ross County,
Hospital Facilities Revenue
(Adena Health System)	5.75	12/1/22	3,835,000		4,189,968
Pennsylvania—3.8%
Allegheny County Airport
Authority, Airport Revenue
(Pittsburgh International
Airport) (Insured; FGIC)	5.00	1/1/19	3,395,000		3,581,148
Chester County Industrial
Development Authority,
Revenue (Avon Grove
Charter School Project)	5.65	12/15/17	790,000		784,486
Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge
Commission, Bridge Revenue	5.25	7/1/13	2,500,000		2,657,975
Delaware Valley Regional
Finance Authority,
Local Government Revenue	5.75	7/1/17	6,830,000		7,751,640
Erie Higher Education Building
Authority, College Revenue
(Mercyhurst College Project)	5.13	3/15/23	2,045,000		2,176,146
Montgomery County Higher Education
and Health Authority, HR
(Abington Memorial Hospital)
(Insured; AMBAC)	6.10	6/1/12	1,750,000		1,796,165
Pennsylvania Intergovernmental
Cooperation Authority, Special
Tax Revenue (City of
Philadelphia Funding Program)	5.00	6/15/17	4,000,000		4,723,800

The Fund  23 

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)		Value ($)
Pennsylvania (continued)
Philadelphia,
GO (Insured; XLCA)	5.25	2/15/13	5,535,000		5,784,795
Philadelphia Authority for
Industrial Development,
Revenue (Independence
Charter School Project)	5.38	9/15/17	2,000,000		2,020,120
Philadelphia School District,
GO	5.00	9/1/17	1,160,000		1,312,981
Sayre Health Care Facilities
Authority, Revenue (Guthrie
Health Issue) (Prerefunded)	6.00	12/1/11	525,000	b	530,334
Rhode Island—.4%
Rhode Island Student Loan
Authority, Student Loan
Program Revenue
(Insured; AMBAC)	4.80	12/1/21	3,600,000		3,561,444
South Carolina—3.1%
Berkeley County School District,
Installment Purchase Revenue
(Securing Assets for Education)	5.25	12/1/21	9,395,000		9,951,184
Charleston Educational Excellence
Financing Corporation,
Installment Purchase Revenue
(Charleston County School
District, South Carolina Project)	5.25	12/1/21	4,500,000		5,016,555
Hilton Head Island Public
Facilities Corporation, COP
(Insured; AMBAC)	5.00	3/1/13	1,065,000		1,116,961
Piedmont Municipal Power Agency,
Electric Revenue	5.00	1/1/20	5,000,000		5,742,150
South Carolina Public Service
Authority, Revenue Obligations
(Santee Cooper)	5.00	12/1/21	3,600,000		4,347,180
Tobacco Settlement Revenue
Management Authority, Tobacco
Settlement Asset-Backed
Refunding Bonds	5.00	6/1/18	1,300,000		1,301,573

24

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)	Value ($)
Texas—4.9%
Austin,
Electric Utility System Revenue	5.00	11/15/23	1,550,000	1,753,546
Dallas and Fort Worth,
Joint Revenue (Dallas/Fort
Worth International Airport)
(Insured; XLCA)	6.13	11/1/18	4,580,000	4,588,565
Dallas-Fort Worth International
Airport Facility Improvement
Corporation, Revenue
(Learjet Inc. Project)	6.15	1/1/16	4,000,000	4,000,440
Fort Bend Independent School
District, Unlimited Tax School
Building Bonds (Permanent
School Fund Guarantee Program)	5.00	8/15/23	7,105,000	8,354,485
Gulf Coast Waste Disposal
Authority, Bayport Area System
Revenue (Insured; AMBAC)	5.00	10/1/14	2,065,000	2,224,377
Houston,
Combined Utility System First
Lien Revenue	5.00	11/15/20	2,725,000	3,280,355
North Texas Tollway Authority,
First Tier System Revenue	6.00	1/1/23	3,000,000	3,401,670
Port of Corpus Christi Industrial
Development Corporation,
Revenue (Valero Refining and
Marketing Company Project)	5.40	4/1/18	1,280,000	1,280,333
San Antonio,
Electric and Gas
Systems Revenue	5.00	2/1/23	5,000,000	5,561,450
Tarrant County Health Facilities
Development Corporation,
Health Resources System
Revenue (Insured; National
Public Finance Guarantee Corp.)	5.75	2/15/14	5,000,000	5,535,950
Texas Water Development Board,
State Revolving Fund
Subordinate Lien Revenue	5.00	7/15/23	2,000,000	2,370,720

The Fund  25 

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)		Value ($)
Texas (continued)
University of Texas System
Board of Regents,
Financing System Revenue	5.00	8/15/20	1,000,000		1,228,150
Utah—.4%
Utah Building Ownership Authority,
LR (State Facilities Master
Lease Program)	5.00	5/15/17	1,825,000		1,975,782
Utah Building Ownership Authority,
LR (State Facilities Master
Lease Program) (Prerefunded)	5.00	5/15/14	1,125,000	b	1,246,230
Virginia—.5%
Tobacco Settlement Financing
Corporation of Virginia,
Tobacco Settlement
Asset-Backed Bonds
(Prerefunded)	5.25	6/1/12	425,000	b	435,646
Virginia College Building
Authority, Educational
Facilities Revenue (21st
Century College and
Equipment Programs)	5.00	2/1/22	3,000,000		3,612,990
Washington—4.5%
Energy Northwest,
Columbia Generating Station
Electric Revenue	5.00	7/1/21	5,000,000		5,618,400
Energy Northwest,
Columbia Generating Station
Electric Revenue	5.00	7/1/23	5,000,000		5,494,650
Franklin County,
GO (Pasco School District
Number 1) (Insured; Assured
Guaranty Municipal Corp.)
(Prerefunded)	5.25	6/1/13	5,000,000	b	5,365,950
Goat Hill Properties,
LR (Government Office Building
Project) (Insured; National
Public Finance Guarantee Corp.)	5.25	12/1/20	2,360,000		2,542,286
Port of Seattle,
Intermediate Lien Revenue	5.00	2/1/18	2,500,000		2,815,725

26

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)	Value ($)
Virginia (continued)
Port of Seattle,
Limited Tax GO	5.75	12/1/25	1,000,000	1,166,040
Port of Seattle,
Limited Tax GO (Insured;
Assured Guaranty
Municipal Corp.)	5.00	11/1/16	5,000,000	5,347,350
Port of Tacoma,
Limited Tax GO (Insured;
Assured Guaranty
Municipal Corp.)	5.00	12/1/20	3,025,000	3,470,220
Washington,
GO	5.75	10/1/12	465,000	481,982
Washington,
GO	5.75	10/1/12	5,000	5,230
Washington,
GO (Various Purpose)	5.00	2/1/22	2,500,000	3,036,575
Washington,
GO (Various Purpose)
(Insured; AMBAC)	5.00	1/1/19	3,600,000	4,051,044
West Virginia—.2%
West Virginia University Board
of Governors, University
Improvement Revenue (West
Virginia University Projects)	5.00	10/1/22	1,475,000	1,710,292
Wisconsin—.4%
Wisconsin Public Power Inc.,
Power Supply System Revenue
(Insured; Assured Guaranty
Municipal Corp.)	5.00	7/1/19	2,950,000	3,224,852
U.S. Related—3.2%
Puerto Rico Commonwealth,
Public Improvement GO	5.25	7/1/23	1,500,000	1,530,510
Puerto Rico Electric Power
Authority, Power Revenue	5.00	7/1/22	2,500,000	2,682,900
Puerto Rico Highways and
Transportation Authority, Highway
Revenue (Insured; National Public
Finance Guarantee Corp.)	5.50	7/1/13	1,630,000	1,712,527

The Fund  27 

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)	Value ($)
U.S. Related (continued)
Puerto Rico Highways and
Transportation Authority,
Transportation Revenue	5.50	7/1/24	1,750,000	1,858,693
Puerto Rico Highways and
Transportation Authority,
Transportation Revenue
(Insured; National Public
Finance Guarantee Corp.)	5.25	7/1/12	2,440,000	2,448,198
Puerto Rico Infrastructure
Financing Authority, Special
Tax Revenue	5.00	7/1/16	510,000	548,969
Puerto Rico Infrastructure
Financing Authority, Special
Tax Revenue (Insured; AMBAC)	5.50	7/1/18	3,000,000	3,312,960
Puerto Rico Infrastructure
Financing Authority, Special
Tax Revenue (Insured; AMBAC)	5.50	7/1/23	2,670,000	2,841,841
Puerto Rico Public Buildings
Authority, Government Facilities
Revenue (Insured; XLCA)	5.25	7/1/20	2,000,000	2,129,960
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing
Corporation, Sales Tax Revenue
(First Subordinate Series)	5.50	8/1/21	8,000,000	9,083,200
Total Long-Term Municipal Investments
(cost $824,755,013)				866,594,664

28

Short-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments—.2%	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)		Value ($)
California—.2%
California,
GO Notes
(Kindergarten-University)
(LOC: California State
Teachers Retirement
System and Citibank NA)	0.09	12/1/11	1,400,000	g	1,400,000
New York—.0%
New York City,
GO Notes (LOC; JPMorgan
Chase Bank)	0.12	12/1/11	400,000	g	400,000
Total Short-Term Municipal Investments
(cost $1,800,000)					1,800,000
Total Investments (cost $826,555,013)			98.4	%	868,394,664
Cash and Receivables (Net)			1.6	%	13,782,239
Net Assets			100.0	%	882,176,903

a Security issued with a zero coupon. Income is recognized through the accretion of discount. 

b These securities are prerefunded; the date shown represents the prerefunded date. Bonds which are prerefunded are 

collateralized by U.S. Government securities which are held in escrow and are used to pay principal and interest on 

the municipal issue and to retire the bonds in full at the earliest refunding date. 

c Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.This security may be resold in 

transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers.At November 30, 2011, this security 

was valued at $2,681,030 or 0.3% of net assets. 

d Non-income producing—security in default. 

e Zero coupon until a specified date at which time the stated coupon rate becomes effective until maturity. 

f Variable rate security—interest rate subject to periodic change. 

g Variable rate demand note—rate shown is the interest rate in effect at November 30, 2011. Maturity date represents 

the next demand date, or the ultimate maturity date if earlier. 

The Fund  29 

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

Summary of Abbreviations
ABAG	Association of Bay Area Governments	ACA	American Capital Access
AGC	ACE Guaranty Corporation	AGIC	Asset Guaranty Insurance Company
AMBAC	American Municipal Bond	ARRN	Adjustable Rate Receipt Notes
	Assurance Corporation
BAN	Bond Anticipation Notes	BPA	Bond Purchase Agreement
CIFG	CDC Ixis Financial Guaranty	COP	Certificate of Participation
CP	Commercial Paper	EDR	Economic Development Revenue
EIR	Environmental Improvement Revenue	FGIC	Financial Guaranty Insurance
			Company
FHA	Federal Housing Administration	FHLB	Federal Home Loan Bank
FHLMC	Federal Home Loan Mortgage	FNMA	Federal National
	Corporation		Mortgage Association
GAN	Grant Anticipation Notes	GIC	Guaranteed Investment Contract
GNMA	Government National	GO	General Obligation
	Mortgage Association
HR	Hospital Revenue	IDB	Industrial Development Board
IDC	Industrial Development Corporation	IDR	Industrial Development Revenue
LOC	Letter of Credit	LOR	Limited Obligation Revenue
LR	Lease Revenue	MFHR	Multi-Family Housing Revenue
MFMR	Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue	PCR	Pollution Control Revenue
PILOT	Payment in Lieu of Taxes	PUTTERS	Puttable Tax-Exempt Receipts
RAC	Revenue Anticipation Certificates	RAN	Revenue Anticipation Notes
RAW	Revenue Anticipation Warrants	RRR	Resources Recovery Revenue
SAAN	State Aid Anticipation Notes	SBPA	Standby Bond Purchase Agreement
SFHR	Single Family Housing Revenue	SFMR	Single Family Mortgage Revenue
SONYMA	State of New York Mortgage Agency	SWDR	Solid Waste Disposal Revenue
TAN	Tax Anticipation Notes	TAW	Tax Anticipation Warrants
TRAN	Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes	XLCA	XL Capital Assurance

30

Summary of Combined Ratings (Unaudited)
Fitch	or	Moody’s	or	Standard & Poor’s	Value (%)†
AAA		Aaa		AAA	28.9
AA		Aa		AA	43.0
A		A		A	19.2
BBB		Baa		BBB	7.0
BB		Ba		BB	.5
B		B		B	.3
F1		MIG1/P1		SP1/A1	.2
Not Ratedh		Not Ratedh		Not Ratedh	.9
					100.0

†	Based on total investments.
h	Securities which, while not rated by Fitch, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s, have been determined by the Manager to
	be of comparable quality to those rated securities in which the fund may invest.
See notes to financial statements.

The Fund  31 

STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES 

November 30, 2011 (Unaudited) 

	Cost	Value
Assets ($):
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments	826,555,013	868,394,664
Cash		731,910
Interest receivable		12,185,714
Receivable for investment securities sold		1,518,267
Receivable for shares of Common Stock subscribed		224,116
Prepaid expenses		166,717
		883,221,388
Liabilities ($):
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(b)		524,430
Payable for shares of Common Stock redeemed		419,016
Accrued expenses		101,039
		1,044,485
Net Assets ($)		882,176,903
Composition of Net Assets ($):
Paid-in capital		840,290,386
Accumulated undistributed investment income—net		152,001
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments		(105,135	)
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation
(depreciation) on investments		41,839,651
Net Assets ($)		882,176,903
Shares Outstanding
(300 million shares of $.001 par value Common Stock authorized)		63,966,892
Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($)		13.79
See notes to financial statements.

32

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS 

Six Months Ended November 30, 2011 (Unaudited) 

Investment Income ($):
Interest Income	17,746,608
Expenses:
Management fee—Note 3(a)	2,610,075
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 3(b)	519,433
Directors’ fees and expenses—Note 3(c)	64,977
Professional fees	39,931
Custodian fees—Note 3(b)	33,332
Registration fees	17,071
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports	16,209
Loan commitment fees—Note 2	5,682
Miscellaneous	31,142
Total Expenses	3,337,852
Less—reduction in fees due to earnings credits—Note 3(b)	(187	)
Net Expenses	3,337,665
Investment Income—Net	14,408,943
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($):
Net realized gain (loss) on investments	4,465,966
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments	11,988,146
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments	16,454,112
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations	30,863,055
See notes to financial statements.

The Fund  33 

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

	Six Months Ended
	November 30, 2011		Year Ended
	(Unaudited)		May 31, 2011
Operations ($):
Investment income—net	14,408,943		30,635,816
Net realized gain (loss) on investments	4,465,966		4,221,440
Net unrealized appreciation
(depreciation) on investments	11,988,146		(5,269,250	)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Resulting from Operations	30,863,055		29,588,006
Dividends to Shareholders from ($):
Investment income—net	(14,256,942	)	(30,552,597	)
Capital Stock Transactions ($):
Net proceeds from shares sold	39,679,831		101,505,301
Dividends reinvested	10,842,896		23,223,511
Cost of shares redeemed	(43,103,963	)	(128,054,855	)
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
from Capital Stock Transactions	7,418,764		(3,326,043	)
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets	24,024,877		(4,290,634	)
Net Assets ($):
Beginning of Period	858,152,026		862,442,660
End of Period	882,176,903		858,152,026
Undistributed investment income—net	152,001		—
Capital Share Transactions (Shares):
Shares sold	2,894,889		7,509,367
Shares issued for dividends reinvested	791,494		1,726,097
Shares redeemed	(3,148,468	)	(9,586,589	)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding	537,915		(351,125	)
See notes to financial statements.

34

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The following table describes the performance for the fiscal periods indicated. Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the fund’s financial statements.

Six Months Ended
November 30, 2011					Year Ended May 31,
	(Unaudited)		2011		2010		2009		2008		2007
Per Share Data ($):
Net asset value,
beginning of period	13.53		13.52		13.06		13.12		13.21		13.18
Investment Operations:
Investment income—neta	.23		.48		.49		.51		.50		.49
Net realized and unrealized
gain (loss) on investments	.25		.00	b	.45		(.07	)	(.09	)	.03
Total from Investment Operations	.48		.48		.94		.44		.41		.52
Distributions:
Dividends from
investment income—net	(.22	)	(.47	)	(.48	)	(.50	)	(.50	)	(.49	)
Net asset value, end of period	13.79		13.53		13.52		13.06		13.12		13.21
Total Return (%)	3.60	c	3.65		7.42		3.44		3.16		4.03
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%):
Ratio of total expenses
to average net assets	.77	d	.75		.75		.78		.81		.80
Ratio of net expenses
to average net assets	.77	d	.75		.75		.77		.79		.80
Ratio of interest and expense
related to floating rates notes
issued to average net asstes	—		—		—		.02		.05		.06
Ratio of net investment income
to average net assets	3.31	d	3.53		3.68		3.94		3.81		3.72
Portfolio Turnover Rate	10.72	c	21.46		13.22		22.75		28.89		23.87
Net Assets, end of period
($ x 1,000)	882,177		858,152		862,443		785,392		831,359		734,048

a	Based on average shares outstanding at each month end.
b	Amount represents less than $.01 per share.
c	Not annualized.
d	Annualized.
See notes to financial statements.

The Fund  35 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:

Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund, Inc. (the “fund”) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as a diversified open-end management investment company. The fund’s investment objective is to seek the maximum amount of current income exempt from federal income tax as is consistent with the preservation of capital. The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”) serves as the fund’s investment adviser. MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the fund’s shares, which are sold to the public without a sales charge.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) is the exclusive reference of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions.Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown.The fund does not anticipate recognizing any loss related to these arrangements.

(a) Portfolio valuation: The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e. the exit price). GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs of valuation techniques used to measure fair value.This hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

36

(Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).

Additionally, GAAP provides guidance on determining whether the volume and activity in a market has decreased significantly and whether such a decrease in activity results in transactions that are not orderly. GAAP requires enhanced disclosures around valuation inputs and techniques used during annual and interim periods.

Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments relating to fair value measurements.These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:

Level 1—unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical investments.

Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).

Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).

The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers in or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy. Valuation techniques used to value the fund’s investments are as follows:

Investments in securities are valued each business day by an independent pricing service (the “Service”) approved by the Board of Directors. Investments for which quoted bid prices are readily available and are representative of the bid side of the market in the judgment of the Service are valued at the mean between the quoted bid prices (as obtained by the Service from dealers in such securities) and asked prices (as calculated by the Service based upon its evaluation of the market for such securities). Other investments (which constitute a

The Fund  37 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

majority of the portfolio securities) are carried at fair value as determined by the Service, based on methods which include consideration of: yields or prices of municipal securities of comparable quality, coupon, maturity and type; indications as to values from dealers; and general market conditions. All preceding securities are categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The Service’s procedures are reviewed by Dreyfus under the general supervision of the Board of Directors.

When market quotations or official closing prices are not readily available, or are determined not to reflect accurately fair value, such as when the value of a security has been significantly affected by events after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded (for example, a foreign exchange or market), but before the fund calculates its net asset value, the fund may value these investments at fair value as determined in accordance with the procedures approved by the Board of Directors. Certain factors may be considered when fair valuing investments such as: fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, an evaluation of the forces that influence the market in which the securities are purchased and sold, and public trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable issuers. These securities are either categorized as Level 2 or 3 depending on the relevant inputs used.

For restricted securities where observable inputs are limited, assumptions about market activity and risk are used and are categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The following is a summary of the inputs used as of November 30, 2011 in valuing the fund’s investments:

		Level 2—Other	Level 3—
	Level 1—	Significant	Significant
	Unadjusted	Observable	Unobservable
	Quoted Prices	Inputs	Inputs	Total
Assets ($)
Investments in Securities:
Municipal Bonds	—	867,584,724	809,940	868,394,664

38

The following is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value:

	Municipal Bonds ($)
Balance as of 5/31/2011	—
Realized gain (loss)	—
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)	(90,060	)
Purchases	—
Sales
Transfers into Level 3†	900,000
Transfers out of Level 3	—
Balance as of 11/30/2011	809,940
The amount of total gains (losses) for the
period included in earnings attributable
to the change in unrealized gains (losses)
relating to investments still held at 11/30/2011	(684,900	)

†	Transfers into Level 3 represents the value at the date of transfer.The transfer into Level 3 for the
	current period was due to the lack of observable inputs following the issuer’s default.

In May 2011, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-04 “Amendments to Achieve Common FairValue Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)” (“ASU 2011-04”). ASU 2011-04 includes common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to disclose the following information for fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy: quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement, the valuation processes used by the reporting entity and a narrative description of the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs and the interrelationships between those unobservable inputs. In addition, ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to make disclosures about amounts and reasons for all transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements.The new and revised disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of ASU 2011-04 and its impact on the financial statements.

The Fund  39 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Interest income, adjusted for accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is earned from settlement date and recognized on the accrual basis. Securities purchased or sold on a when issued or delayed delivery basis may be settled a month or more after the trade date.

(c) Dividends to shareholders: It is the policy of the fund to declare dividends daily from investment income-net. Such dividends are paid monthly. Dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gains. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP.

(d) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, which can distribute tax exempt dividends, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of income and net realized capital gain sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.

As of and during the period ended November 30, 2011, the fund did not have any liabilities for any uncertain tax positions.The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.

Each of the tax years in the three-year period ended May 31, 2011 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.

40

The fund has an unused capital loss carryover of $5,397,021 available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future net securities profits, if any, realized subsequent to May 31, 2011. If not applied, $1,169,736 of the carryover expires in fiscal 2016, $3,912,775 expires in fiscal 2017 and $314,510 expires in fiscal 2018.

Under the recently enacted Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “2010 Act”), the fund will be permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 (“post-enactment losses”) for an unlimited period. However, the 2010 Act requires post-enactment losses to be utilized before the utilization of losses incurred in taxable years prior to the effective date of the 2010 Act. As a result of this ordering rule, capital loss carryovers related to taxable years beginning prior to the effective date of the 2010 Act may be more likely to expire unused.

The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011 was as follows: tax exempt income $30,552,249 and ordinary income $348.The tax character of current year distributions will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year.

NOTE 2—Bank Lines of Credit:

The fund participates with other Dreyfus-managed funds in a $225 million unsecured credit facility led by Citibank, N.A. and a $300 million unsecured credit facility provided by The Bank of New York Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus (each, a “Facility”), each to be utilized primarily for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions. In connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay its pro rata portion of commitment fees for each Facility. Interest is charged to the fund based on rates determined pursuant to the terms of the respective Facility at the time of borrowing. During the period ended November 30, 2011, the fund did not borrow under the Facilities.

The Fund  41 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

NOTE 3—Management Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates:

(a) Pursuant to a management agreement with the Manager, the management fee is computed at the annual rate of .60% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly.

(b) Under the Shareholder Services Plan, the fund reimburses the Distributor an amount not to exceed an annual rate of .25% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets for certain allocated expenses of providing personal services and/or maintaining shareholder accounts.The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquires regarding the fund and providing reports and other information, and services related to the maintenance of shareholder accounts. During the period ended November 30, 2011, the fund was charged $296,874, pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.

The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the fund. During the period ended November 30, 2011, the fund was charged $102,249 pursuant to the transfer agency agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.

The fund has arrangements with the custodian and cash management bank whereby the fund may receive earnings credits when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset custody and cash management fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.

The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a cash management agreement for performing cash management services related to fund subscriptions and redemptions. During the period ended November 30, 2011, the fund was charged $12,650 pursuant to the cash management agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.These fees were partially offset by earnings credits of $187.

42

The fund also compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a custody agreement for providing custodial services for the fund. During the period ended November 30, 2011, the fund was charged $33,332 pursuant to the custody agreement.

During the period ended November 30, 2011, the fund was charged $2,981 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer.

The components of “Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: management fees $432,194, custodian fees $23,293, chief compliance officer fees $4,743 and transfer agency per account fees $64,200.

(c) Each Board member also serves as a Board member of other funds within the Dreyfus complex. Annual retainer fees and attendance fees are allocated to each fund based on net assets.

NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:

The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities, during the period ended November 30, 2011, amounted to $98,768,430 and $91,954,044, respectively.

At November 30, 2011, accumulated net unrealized appreciation on investments was $41,839,651, consisting of $45,729,814 gross unrealized appreciation and $3,890,163 gross unrealized depreciation.

At November 30, 2011, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (see the Statement of Investments).

The Fund  43 

INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE 

FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) 

At a meeting of the fund’s Board of Directors held on November 7-8, 2011, the Board considered the renewal of the fund’s Management Agreement with Dreyfus pursuant to which Dreyfus provides the fund with investment advisory and administrative services (the “Agreement”). The Board members, none of whom are “interested persons” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the fund, were assisted in their review by independent legal counsel and met with counsel in executive session separate from representatives of Dreyfus. In considering the renewal of the Agreement, the Board considered all factors that it believed to be relevant, including those discussed below.The Board did not identify any one factor as dispositive, and each Board member may have attributed different weights to the factors considered.

Analysis of Nature, Extent and Quality of Services Provided to the Fund.The Board considered information previously provided to them in a presentation from Dreyfus representatives regarding the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided to funds in the Dreyfus representative fund complex, and Dreyfus representatives confirmed that there had been no material changes in this information. Dreyfus provided the number of open accounts in the fund, the fund’s asset size and the allocation of fund assets among distribution channels. Dreyfus also had previously provided information regarding the diverse intermediary relationships and distribution channels of funds in the Dreyfus fund complex and Dreyfus’ corresponding need for broad, deep, and diverse resources to be able to provide ongoing shareholder services to each distribution channel, including the distribution channel(s) for the fund.

The Board also considered research support available to, and portfolio management capabilities of, the fund’s portfolio management personnel and that Dreyfus also provides oversight of day-to-day fund operations, including fund accounting and administration and assistance in meeting legal and regulatory requirements.The Board also considered Dreyfus’ extensive administrative, accounting, and compliance infrastructures.

44

Comparative Analysis of the Fund’s Performance and Management Fee and Expense Ratio.The Board reviewed reports prepared by Lipper, Inc. (“Lipper”), an independent provider of investment company data, which included information comparing (1) the fund’s performance with the performance of a group of comparable funds (the “Performance Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Performance Universe”), all for various periods ended September 30, 2011, and (2) the fund’s actual and contractual management fees and total expenses with those of a group of comparable funds (the “Expense Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Expense Universe”), the information for which was derived in part from fund financial statements available to Lipper as of September 30, 2011. Dreyfus previously had furnished the Board with a description of the methodology Lipper used to select the Performance Group and Performance Universe and the Expense Group and Expense Universe.

Dreyfus representatives stated that the usefulness of performance comparisons may be affected by a number of factors, including different investment limitations that may be applicable to the fund and comparison funds. The Board discussed the results of the comparisons and noted that the fund’s total return performance was variously at or below the Performance Group median and above the Performance Universe median in all but one of the various time periods.

The Board also noted that the fund’s yield performance was above the Performance Group median, in eight of the past ten 1-year periods, and above the Performance Universe median for each 1- year the various time periods. Dreyfus also provided a comparison of the fund’s calendar year total returns to the returns of the fund’s Lipper category average.

The Board received a presentation from the fund’s portfolio managers, who described how the dramatic changes to the municipal bond market over the prior several years, evidenced by historically high priced volatil-

The Fund  45 

INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S 

MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued) 

ity and liquidity challenges, suggest an increased focus on downside risk in the fund’s portfolio.The portfolio manager also discussed the strategy implemented for the fund in 2009, quantitative risk management tools applied to overseeing the fund, the fund’s current structure to defend against interest rate volatility, and credit review policies and strategies that seek to mitigate credit risk. The portfolio managers also explained the fund’s performance relative to its duration structure, credit structure, and the market and economic environment.The Board noted the generally compressed spread among the returns of the Performance Group funds and that 50 basis points or less (depending on the time period) separated the fund’s total return from the performance group median in periods where the fund achieved a total return that was below the median.

The Board also reviewed the range of actual and contractual management fees and total expenses of the Expense Group and Expense Universe funds and discussed the results of the comparisons. They noted that the fund’s contractual management fee was above the Expense Group median, the fund’s actual management fee was above the Expense Group median and the Expense Universe median, and the fund’s actual total expenses were above the Expense Group median and the Expense Universe median.

Dreyfus representatives reviewed with the Board members the management or investment advisory fees paid to Dreyfus or its affiliates by funds in the same Lipper category as the fund, or by separate accounts and/or other types of client portfolios managed by Dreyfus or Standish Mellon Asset Management Company, a Dreyfus affiliate and the primary employer of the fund’s primary portfolio managers, considered to have similar investment strategies and policies as the fund (the “Similar Accounts”), and explained the nature of the Similar Accounts. Dreyfus representatives noted that neither Dreyfus nor Standish advise any separate accounts and/or other types of client portfolios considered to have similar investment strategies and policies as the fund.They discussed differences in fees paid and the relationship of the fees paid in light of any differences in the services provided and other relevant

46

factors. The Board considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Accounts to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the fund’s management fee.

Analysis of Profitability and Economies of Scale. Dreyfus’ representatives reviewed the expenses allocated and profit received by Dreyfus and the resulting profitability percentage for managing the fund, and the method used to determine the expenses and profit. The Board concluded that the profitability results were not unreasonable given the services rendered and service levels provided by Dreyfus.The Board previously had been provided with information prepared by an independent consulting firm regarding Dreyfus’ approach to allocating costs to, and determining the profitability of, individual funds and the entire Dreyfus fund complex. The consulting firm also had analyzed where any economies of scale might emerge in connection with the management of a fund.

The Board’s counsel stated that the Board should consider the profitability analysis (1) as part of their evaluation of whether the fees under the Agreement bear a reasonable relationship to the mix of services provided by Dreyfus, including the nature, extent and quality of such services, and (2) in light of the relevant circumstances for the fund and the extent to which economies of scale would be realized if the fund grows and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of fund shareholders. Dreyfus representatives noted that a discussion of economies of scale is predicated on a fund having achieved a substantial size with increasing assets and that, if a fund’s assets had been stable or decreasing, the possibility that Dreyfus may have realized any economies of scale would be less. Dreyfus representatives also noted, as a result of shared and allocated costs among funds in the Dreyfus funds complex, the extent of economies of scale could depend substantially on the level of assets in the complex as a whole, so that increases and decreases in complex-wide assets can affect potential economies of scale in a manner that is disproportionate to, or even in the opposite direction from, changes in the fund’s asset level.The Board also considered potential benefits to Dreyfus

The Fund  47 

INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S 

MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued) 

from acting as investment adviser and noted that there were no soft dollar arrangements in effect for trading the fund’s investments.

At the conclusion of these discussions, the Board agreed that it had been furnished with sufficient information to make an informed business decision with respect to the renewal of the Agreement. Based on the discussions and considerations as described above, the Board concluded and determined as follows.

• The Board concluded that the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided by Dreyfus are adequate and appropriate.

• The Board generally was satisfied with the fund’s overall perfor- mance (particularly in recent periods), in light of the considerations described above.

• The Board concluded that the fee paid to Dreyfus was reasonable in light of the considerations described above.

• The Board determined that the economies of scale which may accrue to Dreyfus and its affiliates in connection with the management of the fund had been adequately considered by Dreyfus in connection with the fee rate charged to the fund pursuant to the Agreement and that, to the extent in the future it were determined that material economies of scale had not been shared with the fund, the Board would seek to have those economies of scale shared with the fund.

The Board considered these conclusions and determinations, along with information received on a routine and regular basis throughout the year. In addition, it should be noted that the Board’s consideration of the contractual fee arrangements for this fund had the benefit of a number of years of reviews of prior or similar agreements during which lengthy discussions took place between the Board and Dreyfus representatives. Certain aspects of the arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and the Board’s conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of the same or similar arrangements in prior years.The Board determined that renewal of the Agreement was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.

48

For More Information

Ticker Symbol: DITEX

Telephone 1-800-DREYFUS

Mail The Dreyfus Family of Funds, 144 Glenn Curtiss Boulevard, Uniondale, NY 11556-0144 E-mail Send your request to info@dreyfus.com Internet Information can be viewed online or downloaded at: http://www.dreyfus.com

The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund's Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.

Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-DREYFUS.

Item 2.      Code of Ethics.

                  Not applicable.

Item 3.      Audit Committee Financial Expert.

                  Not applicable.

Item 4.      Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

                  Not applicable.

Item 5.      Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.

                  Not applicable.

Item 6.      Investments.

(a)Not applicable.

Item 7.      Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

                  Not applicable.

Item 8.      Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable.

Item 9.      Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and Affiliated Purchasers.

Not applicable.  [CLOSED END FUNDS ONLY]

Item 10.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

                  There have been no material changes to the procedures applicable to Item 10.

Item 11.    Controls and Procedures.

(a)        The Registrant's principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded, based on their evaluation of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant on Form N-CSR is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in the reports that it files or submits on Form N-CSR is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b)        There were no changes to the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Item 12.    Exhibits.

(a)(1)   Not applicable.

(a)(2)   Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

(a)(3)   Not applicable.

(b)        Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund, Inc.

By: /s/ Bradley J. Skapyak
Bradley J. Skapyak, President
Date:	January 17, 2012
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: /s/ Bradley J. Skapyak
Bradley J. Skapyak, President
Date:	January 17, 2012
By: /s/ James Windels
James Windels, Treasurer
Date:	January 17, 2012

EXHIBIT INDEX

(a)(2)   Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.  (EX-99.CERT)

(b)        Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.  (EX-99.906CERT)