XML 30 R71.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Commitments and Contingencies (Details) (USD $)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified
12 Months Ended 1 Months Ended 3 Months Ended 1 Months Ended 3 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Dec. 31, 2011
Dec. 31, 2010
Jun. 30, 2012
Lower Passaic River Study Area
mile
Entity
Jun. 30, 2007
Lower Passaic River Study Area
option
mile
Oct. 31, 2005
Lower Passaic River Study Area
Entity
May 31, 2005
Lower Passaic River Study Area
Entity
Oct. 31, 2003
Lower Passaic River Study Area
Entity
Jun. 30, 2012
Lower Passaic River Study Area
Feb. 04, 2009
Lower Passaic River Study Area
Entity
Feb. 29, 2004
Lower Passaic River Study Area
Jun. 30, 2007
Lower Passaic River Study Area
Minimum
Jun. 30, 2007
Lower Passaic River Study Area
Maximum
Jun. 30, 2012
Lodi, New Jersey Site
Dec. 31, 2012
Kent, Washington Site
Dec. 31, 2012
Omega Chemical Corporation Superfund Site, Whittier, CA
Environmental costs                                
Accrued additional charges                 $ 0.5              
Number of entities, in addition to Hexcel, who received a directive from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection               66                
Estimated cost for study of environmental conditions by EPA                     10          
Number of participating entities financing the study of environmental conditions by EPA             43                  
Maximum amount of financing for the study of environmental conditions by EPA             10                  
Number of entities assuming responsibility for environmental study by EPA           73                    
Portion of the river for which interim remedial options are considered (in miles)         8                      
Number of interim remedial options         6                      
Estimated cost of the six interim remedial options for the lower eight miles of the river                       900 2,300      
Number of PRPs entered into environmental activities with EPA       69                        
Portion of the river for which remedial activities are considered (in miles)       10.9                        
Environmental remediation activity, Cash expenditures 3.4 5.7 4.8 20.0                        
Minimum number of entities against whom third party complaint was filed                   300            
Approximate contribution to waste tonnage (as a percent)                               1.07%
Environmental remediation reserve activity                                
Beginning remediation accrual balance 5.0 7.3 8.3                       1.1  
Current period expenses 5.0 3.4 3.8                     4.4    
Cash expenditures (3.4) (5.7) (4.8) (20.0)                        
Ending remediation accrual balance 6.6 5.0 7.3                     4.4 1.1  
Capital expenditure for environmental matters 2.4 4.1 1.7                          
Aggregate environmental accruals included in current other accrued liabilities 4.2 3.3                            
Remediation accrual balance if accrued at high end of the range of possible outcomes 9.2 6.8                            
Environmental remediation spending charged to reserve balance 3.4 5.7                            
Operating costs relating to environmental compliance 5.0 2.7 3.5                          
Changes in accrued product warranty cost                                
Balance at the beginning of the period 5.7 4.3 3.7                          
Warranty expense 2.2 2.0 1.9                          
Deductions and other (2.8) (0.6) (1.3)                          
Balance at the end of the period $ 5.1 $ 5.7 $ 4.3