XML 25 R40.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Commitments and Contingencies (Details) (USD $)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified
3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended 1 Months Ended 3 Months Ended 1 Months Ended 3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Mar. 31, 2012
Jun. 30, 2011
Jun. 30, 2012
Jun. 30, 2011
Jun. 30, 2012
Lower Passaic River Study Area
entity
mile
Jun. 30, 2007
Lower Passaic River Study Area
mile
option
Oct. 31, 2005
Lower Passaic River Study Area
entity
May 31, 2005
Lower Passaic River Study Area
entity
Feb. 29, 2004
Lower Passaic River Study Area
entity
Oct. 31, 2003
Lower Passaic River Study Area
entity
Jun. 30, 2012
Lower Passaic River Study Area
Feb. 04, 2009
Lower Passaic River Study Area
entity
Jun. 30, 2007
Lower Passaic River Study Area
Minimum
Jun. 30, 2007
Lower Passaic River Study Area
Maximum
Jun. 30, 2012
Lodi, New Jersey Site
Jun. 30, 2012
Kent, Washington Site
Jun. 30, 2012
Omega Chemical Corporation Superfund Site, Whittier, CA
Environmental costs                                    
Accrued additional charges $ 5.0                     $ 0.5       $ 4.4    
Accrual for environmental remediation 7.7     7.7                       5.3 1.3  
Number of entities, in addition to Hexcel, who received a directive from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection                     66              
Number of entities who received notice from Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)                   42                
Estimated cost for study of environmental conditions by EPA                   10                
Number of participating entities financing the study of environmental conditions by EPA                 43                  
Maximum amount of financing for the study of environmental conditions by EPA                 10                  
Number of entities assuming responsibility for environmental study by EPA               73                    
Portion of the river for which interim remedial options are considered (in miles)             8                      
Number of interim remedial options             6                      
Estimated cost of the six interim remedial options for the lower eight miles of the river                           900 2,300      
Number of PRPs entered into environmental activities with EPA           69                        
Portion of the river for which remedial activities are considered (in miles)           10.9                        
Environmental remediation activity, Cash expenditures           20                        
Minimum number of entities against whom third party complaint was filed                         300          
Approximate contribution to waste tonnage (as a percent)                                   1.07%
Aggregate environmental accruals included in current other accrued liabilities 6.7     6.7                            
Remediation accrual balance if accrued at high end of the range of possible outcomes 1.5     1.5                            
Environmental remediation spending charged to reserve balance 0.8   2.1 2.4 3.5                          
Operating costs relating to environmental compliance 3.7   2.5 6.5 4.8                          
Capital Expenditure for Environmental Matters 0.4   0.1 0.8 0.3                          
Changes in accrued product warranty cost                                    
Balance at the beginning of the period 6.0 5.7   5.7                            
Warranty expense 2.7 1.3                                
Deductions and other (2.5) (1.0)                                
Balance at the end of the period $ 6.2 $ 6.0   $ 6.2