Fair Value Measurements

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurements

Note 8 — Fair Value Measurements

The authoritative guidance for fair value measurements establishes a hierarchy for observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value, into three broad levels, which are described below:

·Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.

·Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data.

·Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.

In determining fair value, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible as well as consider counterparty credit risk in our assessment of fair value.

We do not have any significant assets or liabilities that utilize Level 3 inputs. In addition, we have no assets or liabilities that utilize Level 1 inputs.  For derivative assets and liabilities that utilize Level 2 inputs, we prepare estimates of future cash flows of our derivatives, which are discounted to a net present value.  The estimated cash flows and the discount factors used in the valuation model are based on observable inputs, and incorporate non-performance risk (the credit standing of the counterparty when the derivative is in a net asset position, and the credit standing of Hexcel when the derivative is in a net liability position).  The fair value of these assets and liabilities was approximately $1.8 million and $9.3 million, respectively at June 30, 2012.  Below is a summary of valuation techniques for all Level 2 financial assets and liabilities:

·Interest rate swap — valued using LIBOR yield curves at the reporting date.  Fair value was a liability of $0.9 million at June 30, 2012.

·Foreign exchange derivative assets and liabilities — valued using quoted forward foreign exchange prices at the reporting date. Fair value of assets and liabilities at June 31, 2012 was $1.8 million and $8.4 million, respectively.

Counterparties to the above contracts are highly rated financial institutions, none of which experienced any significant downgrades in the three months ended June 30, 2012 that would reduce the receivable amount owed, if any, to the Company.

·Money market funds —are classified as cash equivalents. Fair value at June 31, 2012 was $11.0 million, the same as book value.

·Senior secured facility term loan - Fair value at June 30, 2012 was $90 million, the same as book value.