N-CSR 1 acctfmf83114n-csr.htm FORM N-CSR ACCTFMF 8/31/14 N-CSR


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES


Investment Company Act file number
811-03706
 
 
AMERICAN CENTURY CALIFORNIA TAX-FREE AND MUNICIPAL FUNDS
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
 
 
4500 MAIN STREET, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI
64111
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
 
 
CHARLES A. ETHERINGTON
4500 MAIN STREET, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64111
(Name and address of agent for service)
 
 
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
816-531-5575
 
 
Date of fiscal year end:
08-31
 
 
Date of reporting period:
08-31-2014





ITEM 1.  REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS.




 
 
ANNUAL REPORT
AUGUST 31, 2014

 
 


California Long-Term Tax-Free Fund









Table of Contents
 
President’s Letter
Performance
Portfolio Commentary
Fund Characteristics
Shareholder Fee Example
Schedule of Investments
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
Statement of Operations
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
Notes to Financial Statements
Financial Highlights
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Management
Approval of Management Agreement
Additional Information




















Any opinions expressed in this report reflect those of the author as of the date of the report, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of American Century Investments® or any other person in the American Century Investments organization. Any such opinions are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and American Century Investments disclaims any responsibility to update such opinions. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions made by American Century Investments funds are based on numerous factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any American Century Investments fund. Security examples are used for representational purposes only and are not intended as recommendations to purchase or sell securities. Performance information for comparative indices and securities is provided to American Century Investments by third party vendors. To the best of American Century Investments’ knowledge, such information is accurate at the time of printing.




President’s Letter

Dear Investor:

Thank you for reviewing this annual report for the 12 months ended August 31, 2014. It provides investment performance and portfolio information for the reporting period, plus longer-term historical performance data.

Annual reports remain important vehicles for conveying information about fund returns, including market and economic factors that affected performance during the reporting period. For additional, updated investment and market insights, we encourage you to visit our website, americancentury.com.


Jonathan Thomas

Favorable Fiscal Year for Municipal Bond (Muni) Returns

Stimulative monetary policies and expectations of longer-term economic improvement, interspersed with concerns about nearer-term weaker-than-expected economic data and geopolitical conflicts, helped drive financial market returns during the reporting period. We believe the combination of longer-term optimism about global economic growth, low costs of capital, and central bank purchases of fixed-income securities helped persuade investors to seek risk and yield, which benefited both stocks and bonds during the period. The S&P 500 Index gained 25.25%. The 30-year U.S. Treasury bond returned 15.96%, according to Barclays.

After selling off in 2013, munis rallied strongly in 2014. The muni market rebounded from the ripple effects of Detroit’s bankruptcy, Puerto Rico’s fiscal struggles, and the mid-year “Taper Tantrum” interest rate increase in 2013 to post some of its strongest 12-month returns of the past 10 years. The rally resulted from a favorable combination of constrained inflation, improving economic and credit conditions, strong demand for yield, relatively low muni issuance, and the unexpected U.S. Treasury market rally. The Barclays Municipal Bond Index returned 10.14%, compared with 5.66% for the Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The Barclays California Tax-Exempt Bond Index and the Barclays Municipal High Yield Bond Index performed even better, returning 11.85% and 14.74%, respectively.

As is typically the case after such a strong fiscal year, we try to temper expectations for future returns. It’s unlikely that the muni market will perform again at that level in consecutive years. That said, favorable conditions do remain in place for munis, including economic growth and solid credit conditions in the U.S., contained inflation in the near term, and continuing investor demand for yield. Global economic and geopolitical uncertainties also help increase the relative attractiveness of U.S. bonds. In this environment, we continue to believe in a disciplined, diversified, long-term investment approach, using professionally managed stock and bond portfolios for meeting financial goals. We appreciate your continued trust in us.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Thomas
President and Chief Executive Officer
American Century Investments



2



Performance
 
Total Returns as of August 31, 2014
 
 
 
Average Annual Returns
 
 
Ticker
Symbol
1 year
5 years
10 years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
Investor Class
BCLTX
11.10%
5.93%
4.58%
6.53%
11/9/83
Barclays Municipal Bond Index
10.14%
5.39%
4.77%
7.19%(1)
Institutional Class
BCLIX
11.42%
6.03%
3/1/10
A Class
ALTAX
 
 
 
 
9/28/07
No sales charge*
 
10.83%
5.67%
4.77%
 
With sales charge*
 
5.80%
4.70%
4.08%
 
C Class
ALTCX
10.00%
4.88%
3.99%
9/28/07
 
*Sales charges include initial sales charges and contingent deferred sales charges (CDSCs), as applicable. A Class shares have a 4.50% maximum initial sales charge and may be subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. C Class shares redeemed within 12 months of purchase are subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. The SEC requires that mutual funds provide performance information net of maximum sales charges in all cases where charges could be applied.

(1)
Since October 31, 1983, the date nearest the Investor Class’s inception for which data are available.












Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. As interest rates rise, bond values will decline. The fund concentrates its investments in a single state and therefore may have more exposure to credit risk related to the state of California than a fund with a broader geographical diversification. Investment income may be subject to certain state and local taxes and, depending on your tax status, the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT). Capital gains are not exempt from state and federal income tax. 
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses(such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.

3



Growth of $10,000 Over 10 Years
$10,000 investment made August 31, 2004
 
Value on August 31, 2014
 
Investor Class — $15,651
 
 
Barclays Municipal Bond Index — $15,935
 

Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses
Investor Class
Institutional Class
A Class
C Class
0.47%
0.27%
0.72%
1.47%
The total annual fund operating expenses shown is as stated in the fund’s prospectus current as of the date of this report. The prospectus may vary from the expense ratio shown elsewhere in this report because it is based on a different time period, includes acquired fund fees and expenses, and, if applicable, does not include fee waivers or expense reimbursements.






Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. As interest rates rise, bond values will decline. The fund concentrates its investments in a single state and therefore may have more exposure to credit risk related to the state of California than a fund with a broader geographical diversification. Investment income may be subject to certain state and local taxes and, depending on your tax status, the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT). Capital gains are not exempt from state and federal income tax. 
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.

4



Portfolio Commentary

Portfolio Managers: Joseph Gotelli, Alan Kruss, and Steven Permut

Performance Summary

California Long-Term Tax-Free Bond returned 11.10%* for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2014. By comparison, the Barclays Municipal Bond Index returned 10.14%. Fund returns reflect operating expenses, while index returns do not. (See pages 3 and 4 for additional performance comparisons.)

The fund’s absolute return reflected the positive overall performance of municipal bonds (munis), despite some challenges early in the reporting period. After struggling in 2013 with rising interest rates, negative credit-related events, and steady muni fund outflows, the muni market rebounded throughout the first eight months of 2014. Investor optimism regarding munis improved as fears about sharp rate hikes and widespread municipal credit challenges subsided. In addition, higher federal tax rates made the taxable-equivalent yields of munis more attractive for many yield-hungry investors. Meanwhile, growing demand for munis was met with declining issuance, providing a positive supply/demand backdrop.

The portfolio’s single-state bias (California munis generally outperformed national muni benchmarks) was among the main contributors to the fund’s outperformance relative to its benchmark. In addition, security selection and overweight positions among longer-maturity securities boosted relative results.

Fiscal and Credit Fundamentals

The muni market faced—but generally overcame—some notable negative headlines during the 12-month period. Detroit’s bankruptcy filing, which occurred in July 2013, prior to the start of the current reporting period, continued to taint market sentiment, particularly early in the period. Additionally, Puerto Rico, which is one of the largest issuers of municipal debt, captured headlines as the Commonwealth struggled with a stubbornly weak economy, mounting debt, and persistent budget deficits, which ultimately prompted Puerto Rico’s government to draft a controversial debt-restructuring plan.

Despite these high-profile challenges, overall credit trends in the muni market were stable to improving throughout the period. State and local tax revenues generally increased, due to improving local economies and/or higher tax rates. And that trend may continue. According to the National Association of State Budget Officers, 42 states plan to increase spending in fiscal 2015 (which began July 1, 2014, for most states). In California, employment and housing market gains helped improve the state’s fiscal landscape. California’s fiscal 2015 spending plan pays down debt, builds a rainy day fund, and provides additional money for schools and health care. Citing California’s “rapidly improving financial position,” Moody’s Investors Service upgraded the state’s general obligation (GO) credit rating to its highest level since 2001 (to Aa3). California state GOs remained rated “A” by Fitch and Standard & Poor’s.









*All fund returns referenced in this commentary are for Investor Class shares. Performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structures; when Investor Class performance exceeds that of the fund’s benchmark, other share classes may not. See page 3 for returns for all share classes.

5



Nationwide, muni credit-rating downgrades continued to outpace upgrades, but at a narrowing pace. Furthermore, the national muni default rate remained low at approximately 0.02% through the first seven months of 2014, compared with 0.08% for the full year of 2013, according to Bank of America. We continue to believe it’s unlikely any states will default, but select, isolated state and commonwealth credit ratings are likely to remain under downward pressure, and court decisions on bondholder versus debtor rights in current muni bankruptcy proceedings could produce more ripples. Overall, we still believe the events in Puerto Rico and Detroit reflect well-documented idiosyncratic credit risks that are particular to their situations and are not indicative of underlying municipal market credit trends.

Portfolio Positioning

In addition to the portfolio’s California bias compared with the benchmark, security selection contributed to the fund’s relative outperformance. Overall, we continued to favor revenue bonds, which generally outperformed GO bonds during the period. Among the fund’s specific holdings, our selections in the lease revenue, school district, public power, and toll road sectors made the greatest contributions to relative results.

Yield curve and duration (price sensitivity to interest rate changes) positioning also contributed to the fund’s relative outperformance. Specifically, we positioned the fund with overweight positions relative to the benchmark in longer-maturity securities. After rising early in the reporting period, longer-term interest rates fell sharply during the first eight months of 2014, causing the yield curve to flatten. This downward shift in rates more than offset the earlier effects of higher rates, and returns on longer-maturity munis significantly outperformed their shorter-maturity counterparts.

The fund owned Treasury futures as part of its duration positioning strategy. This particular position detracted from performance, but overall the portfolio’s duration and yield curve positioning contributed positively to performance. In addition, security selection within the airport, solid waste/resource recovery, prerefunded, and water/sewer (a small Puerto Rico position) sectors weighed somewhat on the fund’s relative performance, though security selection overall was a contributor.

Outlook

Near term, we expect the muni market’s supply/demand imbalance to continue to drive performance. Although we expect muni supply to increase in the months ahead, we also expect demand to remain strong. We believe interest rates may slowly climb to more “normal” levels as the economy gradually improves and the Federal Reserve's quantitative easing program concludes. We therefore expect to add securities we believe should perform well in a rising rate environment, including higher-yielding munis. Additionally, we expect fundamental credit research, active management, and security selection to become increasingly important as rates normalize.





6



Fund Characteristics 
 
AUGUST 31, 2014
Portfolio at a Glance
 
Weighted Average Maturity
15.6 years
Average Duration (Modified)
4.8 years
 
Top Five Sectors
% of fund investments
General Obligation (GO) - State
14%
General Obligation (GO) - Local
13%
Hospital
11%
Lease Revenue
10%
Public Power
9%
 
Types of Investments in Portfolio
% of net assets
Municipal Securities
99.0%
Other Assets and Liabilities
1.0%

7



Shareholder Fee Example 

Fund shareholders may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and redemption/exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing cost of investing in other mutual funds.

The example is based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from March 1, 2014 to August 31, 2014.

Actual Expenses

The table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses for each class. You may use the information, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. First, identify the share class you own. Then simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

If you hold Investor Class shares of any American Century Investments fund, or Institutional Class shares of the American Century Diversified Bond Fund, in an American Century Investments account (i.e., not a financial intermediary or retirement plan account), American Century Investments may charge you a $12.50 semiannual account maintenance fee if the value of those shares is less than $10,000. We will redeem shares automatically in one of your accounts to pay the $12.50 fee. In determining your total eligible investment amount, we will include your investments in all personal accounts (including American Century Investments Brokerage accounts) registered under your Social Security number. Personal accounts include individual accounts, joint accounts, UGMA/UTMA accounts, personal trusts, Coverdell Education Savings Accounts and IRAs (including traditional, Roth, Rollover, SEP-, SARSEP- and SIMPLE-IRAs), and certain other retirement accounts. If you have only business, business retirement, employer-sponsored or American Century Investments Brokerage accounts, you are currently not subject to this fee. If you are subject to the Account Maintenance Fee, your account value could be reduced by the fee amount.

Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes

The table also provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio of each class of your fund and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of a fund’s share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption/exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

8





Beginning
Account Value
3/1/14
Ending
Account Value
8/31/14
Expenses Paid
During Period(1)
3/1/14 - 8/31/14

Annualized
Expense Ratio(1)
Actual
 
 
 
 
Investor Class
$1,000
$1,043.80
$2.42
0.47%
Institutional Class
$1,000
$1,045.70
$1.39
0.27%
A Class
$1,000
$1,043.40
$3.71
0.72%
C Class
$1,000
$1,038.60
$7.55
1.47%
Hypothetical
 
 
 
 
Investor Class
$1,000
$1,022.84
$2.40
0.47%
Institutional Class
$1,000
$1,023.84
$1.38
0.27%
A Class
$1,000
$1,021.58
$3.67
0.72%
C Class
$1,000
$1,017.80
$7.48
1.47%
(1)
Expenses are equal to the class's annualized expense ratio listed in the table above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184, the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, divided by 365, to reflect the one-half year period.


9



Schedule of Investments
 

AUGUST 31, 2014
 
Principal
Amount
Value
MUNICIPAL SECURITIES  99.0%
 
 
California  96.7%
 
 
ABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corps. Rev., (Sharp HealthCare), 6.25%, 8/1/39
$
1,200,000

$
1,402,620

ABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corps. Rev., Series 2011 A, (Sharp HealthCare), 6.00%, 8/1/30
1,000,000

1,229,390

ABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corps. Rev., Series 2014 A, (Sharp HealthCare), 5.00%, 8/1/43
500,000

554,210

Adelanto Public Utility Authority Rev., Series 2009 A, (Utility System), 6.25%, 7/1/26
500,000

565,450

Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority Rev., Capital Appreciation, Series 1999 A, 0.00%, 10/1/32 (NATL-RE)(1)
1,000,000

460,750

Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority Rev., Capital Appreciation, Series 1999 A, 0.00%, 10/1/35 (NATL-RE)(1)
3,750,000

1,488,412

Alum Rock Union Elementary School District GO, Series 2013 A, (Election of 2012), 6.00%, 8/1/39
1,000,000

1,247,040

Anaheim Public Financing Authority Rev., (Electric System Distribution), 5.25%, 10/1/39
2,500,000

2,837,500

Anaheim Public Financing Authority Rev., Series 2011 A, (Electric System Distribution Facilities), 5.375%, 10/1/36
300,000

352,827

Bay Area Toll Authority Toll Bridge Rev., Series 2001 A, (San Francisco Bay Area), VRDN, 1.30%, 9/4/14
1,000,000

1,009,150

Bay Area Toll Authority Toll Bridge Rev., Series 2006 F, (San Francisco Bay Area), 5.00%, 4/1/16, Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)
3,000,000

3,224,820

Bay Area Toll Authority Toll Bridge Rev., Series 2007 A1, (San Francisco Bay Area), VRDN, 0.75%, 9/4/14
725,000

725,355

Bay Area Toll Authority Toll Bridge Rev., Series 2008 F1, (San Francisco Bay Area), 5.00%, 4/1/18, Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)
1,500,000

1,733,130

Bay Area Toll Authority Toll Bridge Rev., Series 2008 F1, (San Francisco Bay Area), 5.00%, 4/1/18, Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)
2,135,000

2,466,822

Bay Area Toll Authority Toll Bridge Rev., Series 2008 G1, (San Francisco Bay Area), VRDN, 1.15%, 9/4/14
1,250,000

1,258,962

Bay Area Toll Authority Toll Bridge Rev., Series 2009 F1, (San Francisco Bay Area), 5.25%, 4/1/27
1,500,000

1,763,235

Bay Area Toll Authority Toll Bridge Rev., Series 2013 S4, (San Francisco Bay Area), 5.00%, 4/1/43
2,500,000

2,777,025

Brea Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., 4.00%, 8/1/16
1,245,000

1,330,531

California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., Series 2005 G4, 5.00%, 5/1/16
1,450,000

1,565,159

California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., Series 2008 H, 5.00%, 5/1/21
2,500,000

2,881,625

California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., Series 2010 L, 5.00%, 5/1/15
2,000,000

2,065,960

California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., Series 2010 L, 5.00%, 5/1/18
2,000,000

2,312,460

California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., Series 2010 L, 5.00%, 5/1/22
1,275,000

1,518,984

California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., Series 2010 M, 5.00%, 5/1/15
1,525,000

1,575,294

California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., Series 2011 N, 5.00%, 5/1/21
3,250,000

3,997,825


10



 
Principal
Amount
Value
California Economic Recovery GO, Series 2009 A, 5.00%, 7/1/16
$
1,700,000

$
1,847,237

California Educational Facilities Authority Rev., (Harvey Mudd College), 5.25%, 12/1/41
2,000,000

2,227,180

California Educational Facilities Authority Rev., (Santa Clara University), 5.625%, 4/1/37
5,000,000

5,647,350

California Educational Facilities Authority Rev., (University of the Pacific), 5.25%, 11/1/14, Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)
420,000

423,725

California Educational Facilities Authority Rev., Series 2009 A, (University of Southern California), 5.00%, 10/1/39
2,000,000

2,244,240

California Educational Facilities Authority Rev., Series 2010 B, (Loyola Marymount University), VRN, 0.85%, 9/4/14
2,455,000

2,457,332

California GO, 4.00%, 10/1/14
1,750,000

1,756,160

California GO, 5.00%, 9/1/15
4,560,000

4,783,942

California GO, 5.00%, 2/1/27
3,000,000

3,542,010

California GO, 5.00%, 2/1/28
1,000,000

1,175,090

California GO, 5.25%, 9/1/32
2,000,000

2,314,560

California GO, 5.00%, 11/1/32
1,500,000

1,654,890

California GO, 6.50%, 4/1/33
5,000,000

6,115,750

California GO, 5.00%, 4/1/38
2,500,000

2,764,400

California GO, 6.00%, 4/1/38
2,500,000

2,978,075

California GO, 6.00%, 11/1/39
5,000,000

6,072,550

California GO, 5.50%, 3/1/40
3,000,000

3,471,090

California GO, 5.00%, 10/1/41(3)
2,000,000

2,230,020

California GO, Series 2004 A3, (Kindergarten), VRDN, 0.03%, 9/2/14 (LOC: State Street Bank & Trust Co.)
7,100,000

7,100,000

California GO, Series 2012 B, VRN, 0.95%, 9/4/14
2,000,000

2,024,940

California GO, Series 2012 B, VRN, 1.05%, 9/4/14
800,000

811,944

California GO, Series 2012 B, VRN, 1.20%, 9/4/14
960,000

978,000

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center), 5.00%, 8/15/19
740,000

875,450

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center), 5.00%, 8/15/21
1,000,000

1,209,700

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2007 A, (Sutter Health), 5.25%, 11/15/46
1,500,000

1,617,420

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2008 A, (Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital), VRDN, 1.45%, 3/15/17
150,000

153,461

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2008 C, (Providence Health & Services), 6.50%, 10/1/18, Prerefunded at 100%
of Par(2)
1,000,000

1,233,140

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2009 A, (Catholic Healthcare West), 6.00%, 7/1/39
3,400,000

3,858,524

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2009 A, (Children's Hospital of Orange County), 6.50%, 11/1/38
4,500,000

5,306,985

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2009 A, (St. Joseph Health System), 5.75%, 7/1/39
1,000,000

1,166,340

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2009 B, (Providence Health & Services), 5.50%, 10/1/39
1,000,000

1,160,910

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2010 A, (Scripps Memorial Hospital), 5.00%, 11/15/19
1,000,000

1,180,300

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2011 B, (Sutter Health), 6.00%, 8/15/42
1,500,000

1,807,965

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2011 D, (Sutter Health), 5.25%, 8/15/31
1,000,000

1,145,460


11



 
Principal
Amount
Value
California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, (Stanford Hospital & Clinics), 5.00%, 8/15/51
$
500,000

$
554,830

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2013 A, (St. Joseph Health System), 5.00%, 7/1/37
180,000

199,283

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2013 A, (Sutter Health), 5.00%, 8/15/52
2,000,000

2,195,940

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2014 A, (Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital), 5.00%, 8/15/43
1,000,000

1,128,360

California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev., Series 2012 A1, (J. Paul Getty Trust), 4.00%, 10/1/15
325,000

338,735

California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev., Series 2013 A, (Los Angeles County Museum of Art Project), VRDN, 1.86%, 9/4/14
1,000,000

1,020,600

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., Series 2010 A, (Chevron USA, Inc.), VRDN, 0.01%, 9/2/14
2,500,000

2,500,000

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., Series 2010 A, (University of La Verne), 6.25%, 6/1/40
1,000,000

1,124,690

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., Series 2011 B, (Azusa Pacific University), 8.00%, 4/1/41
665,000

792,653

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., Series 2011, (Emerson College), 6.00%, 1/1/42
2,000,000

2,333,000

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., Series 2014 A, (Touro College and University System), 5.25%, 1/1/34
300,000

333,606

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., Series 2014 A, (Touro College and University System), 5.25%, 1/1/40
1,000,000

1,099,130

California Pollution Control Financing Authority Rev., 5.00%, 11/21/45(4)
1,000,000

1,024,370

California Pollution Control Financing Authority Rev., Series 1996 C, (Pacific Gas & Electric Company), VRDN, 0.02%, 9/2/14 (LOC: JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.)
800,000

800,000

California Pollution Control Financing Authority Rev., Series 1996 E, (Pacific Gas & Electric Company), VRDN, 0.02%, 9/2/14 (LOC: JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.)
2,700,000

2,700,000

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2009 G1, (Various Capital Projects), 5.75%, 10/1/30
2,000,000

2,355,300

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2009 H, (Department of Correction and Rehabilitation), 5.75%, 11/1/29
1,685,000

1,990,153

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2011 D, (Judicial Council Projects), 5.25%, 12/1/26
1,000,000

1,212,550

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2011 G, (University of California), 5.00%, 12/1/21, Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)
2,000,000

2,457,840

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2012 A, (Various Capital Projects), 5.00%, 4/1/25
1,700,000

1,996,293

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2012 A, (Various Capital Projects), 5.00%, 4/1/37
2,170,000

2,405,814

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2012 D, 5.00%, 9/1/36
500,000

553,255

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2013 H, (California State University Project), 5.00%, 9/1/38
1,865,000

2,072,649

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2013 I, (Various Capital Projects), 5.00%, 11/1/38
1,500,000

1,685,805

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., (Cottage Health Obligation Group), 5.25%, 11/1/30
1,000,000

1,101,000

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., (Trinity Health Corp.), 5.00%, 12/1/41
500,000

546,825

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2001 C, (Kaiser Permanente), 5.25%, 8/1/31
3,000,000

3,152,970

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2005 A, (Thomas Jefferson School of Law), 4.875%, 10/1/15, Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)
900,000

938,313


12



 
Principal
Amount
Value
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, (Kaiser Permanente), 5.00%, 4/1/42
$
2,780,000

$
3,055,720

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2014 A, (Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital), 5.25%, 10/1/43 (AGM)
750,000

827,175

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2014 A, (Los Angeles Jewish Home), 5.00%, 8/1/44 (GA: Jewish Home Foundation)
800,000

890,400

California University Systemwide Rev., Series 2009 A, 5.25%, 11/1/34
2,230,000

2,558,702

Capistrano Unified School District Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 88-1), 6.50%, 9/1/14 (AGM)
1,330,000

1,330,439

Carson Redevelopment Agency Successor Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, (Project Area No. 1), 5.00%, 10/1/19 (AGM)
485,000

564,749

Carson Redevelopment Agency Successor Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, (Project Area No. 1), 5.00%, 10/1/20 (AGM)
785,000

919,596

City of Irvine Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Special Assessment Rev., (Assessment District No. 13-3), 5.00%, 9/1/49
1,000,000

1,078,370

City of Irvine Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Special Assessment Rev., (Assessment District No. 87-8), VRDN, 0.02%, 9/2/14 (LOC: State Street Bank & Trust Co.)
2,300,000

2,300,000

City of Irvine Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Special Assessment Rev., (Assessment District No. 12-1), 4.00%, 9/2/17
365,000

396,244

City of Irvine Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Special Assessment Rev., (Assessment District No. 12-1), 4.00%, 9/2/18
375,000

413,134

City of Irvine Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Special Assessment Rev., (Assessment District No. 12-1), 4.00%, 9/2/19
600,000

666,600

Coalinga Public Financing Authority Local Obligation Rev., Series 1998 A, (Senior Lien), 6.375%, 9/15/21 (Ambac)
1,320,000

1,550,406

East Bay Municipal Utility District Rev., Series 2012 B, 4.00%, 6/1/15
4,000,000

4,118,600

Eastern Municipal Water District Water & Sewer Rev., Series 2011 A, 5.00%, 7/1/15
400,000

416,516

Eastern Municipal Water District Water & Sewer Rev., Series 2011 A, 4.00%, 7/1/16
400,000

427,388

Fairfield Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., 3.00%, 8/1/15
1,460,000

1,497,215

Folsom Cordova Unified School District No. 2 Facilities Improvement GO, 4.00%, 10/1/14
375,000

376,313

Folsom Cordova Unified School District No. 2 Facilities Improvement GO, 4.00%, 10/1/15
245,000

255,368

Folsom Cordova Unified School District No. 4 Facilities Improvement GO, Series 2014 A, (Election of 2012), 4.00%, 10/1/15
250,000

260,300

Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency Toll Road Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.75%, 1/15/46
1,000,000

1,140,720

Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency Toll Road Rev., Series 2014 A, 6.00%, 1/15/49
3,250,000

3,743,512

Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency Toll Road Rev., Series 2014 B3, VRDN, 5.50%, 1/15/23
1,000,000

1,160,130

Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency Toll Road Rev., Series 2014 C, 6.50%, 1/15/43
500,000

587,505

Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency Toll Road Rev., Capital Appreciation, Series 2014 A, 0.00%, 1/15/24(5)
700,000

441,406

Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency Toll Road Rev., Capital Appreciation, Series 2014 A, 0.00%, 1/15/42(1)
1,250,000

262,238

Fresno Sewer Rev., Series 1993 A1, 6.25%, 9/1/14 (Ambac)
90,000

90,029

Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Settlement Rev., Series 2005 A, 5.00%, 6/1/38 (FGIC)
1,000,000

1,022,770

Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Settlement Rev., Series 2005 A, 5.00%, 6/1/45
1,000,000

1,019,200


13



 
Principal
Amount
Value
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Settlement Rev., Series 2007 A-1, 5.00%, 6/1/33
$
750,000

$
619,650

Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Settlement Rev., Series 2007 A1, 4.50%, 6/1/27
480,000

439,469

Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Settlement Rev., Series 2013 A, 5.00%, 6/1/30
1,100,000

1,236,246

Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Settlement Rev., Capital Appreciation, Series 2005 A, 0.00%, 6/1/25 (AGM)(1)
1,000,000

709,310

Grossmont Healthcare District GO, Series 2011 B, (Election of 2006), 6.00%, 7/15/34
1,000,000

1,199,240

Grossmont Union High School District GO, Series 2013 E, (Election of 2008), 5.00%, 8/1/43
1,000,000

1,122,630

Hayward Area Recreation and Park District COP, 5.125%, 1/1/39
1,000,000

1,117,890

Inland Valley Development Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.25%, 9/1/37
555,000

626,972

Inland Valley Development Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/44
590,000

642,846

Irvine Ranch Water District Rev., Series 2009 B, VRDN, 0.02%, 9/2/14 (LOC: Bank of America N.A.)
1,300,000

1,300,000

La Verne COP, (Brethren Hillcrest Homes), 5.00%, 5/15/29
635,000

676,192

Long Beach Bond Finance Authority Natural Gas Purchase Rev., Series 2007 A, 5.00%, 11/15/35
330,000

376,867

Long Beach Bond Finance Authority Natural Gas Purchase Rev., Series 2007 A, 5.50%, 11/15/37
695,000

845,669

Los Alamitos Unified School District COP, Capital Appreciation, (Capital Projects), 0.00%, 8/1/24(5)
1,100,000

751,267

Los Angeles Community College District GO, Series 2007 A, (Election of 2001), 5.00%, 8/1/32 (NATL-RE/FGIC)
1,425,000

1,577,104

Los Angeles County COP, (Disney Concert Hall), 5.00%, 3/1/22
1,000,000

1,193,440

Los Angeles County COP, (Disney Concert Hall), 5.00%, 9/1/22
500,000

599,335

Los Angeles County Regional Financing Authority Rev., Series 2014 B-1, (MonteCedro Inc.), 2.50%, 11/15/20
625,000

637,125

Los Angeles County Regional Financing Authority Rev., Series 2014 B-1, (MonteCedro Inc.), 3.00%, 11/15/20
275,000

281,399

Los Angeles County Regional Financing Authority Rev., Series 2014 B-1, (MonteCedro Inc.), 3.00%, 11/15/21
355,000

361,138

Los Angeles Department of Airports Rev., Series 2008 C, (Los Angeles International Airport), 5.25%, 5/15/21
2,120,000

2,467,553

Los Angeles Department of Airports Rev., Series 2010 A, (Los Angeles International Airport), 5.00%, 5/15/40
1,000,000

1,131,510

Los Angeles Department of Airports Rev., Series 2010 B, (Los Angeles International Airport), 5.00%, 5/15/40
2,000,000

2,256,200

Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Waterworks Rev., Series 2008 A1, (Power System), 5.25%, 7/1/38
4,000,000

4,512,800

Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Waterworks Rev., Series 2011 A, (Power System), 5.00%, 7/1/19
1,000,000

1,191,870

Los Angeles Harbor Department Rev., Series 2009 A, 5.00%, 8/1/27
500,000

583,855

Los Angeles Harbor Department Rev., Series 2011 B, 5.00%, 8/1/24
525,000

638,132

Los Angeles Unified School District COP, Series 2010 A, (Multiple Properties), 5.00%, 12/1/15
1,000,000

1,060,420

Los Angeles Unified School District COP, Series 2012 A, (Headquarters Building Project), 5.00%, 10/1/21
1,000,000

1,200,640

Los Angeles Unified School District COP, Series 2012 B, (Headquarters Building Project), 5.00%, 10/1/30
3,000,000

3,438,450


14



 
Principal
Amount
Value
Los Angeles Unified School District GO, Series 2006 F, (Election of 2004), 5.00%, 7/1/16, Prerefunded at 100% of Par (FGIC)(2)
$
2,000,000

$
2,173,220

Los Angeles Unified School District GO, Series 2007 H, (Election of 2004), 5.00%, 7/1/32 (AGM)
1,020,000

1,118,246

Los Angeles Unified School District GO, Series 2009 I, (Election of 2004), 5.00%, 7/1/29
2,000,000

2,321,000

Los Angeles Unified School District GO, Series 2010 KRY, 5.25%, 7/1/26
1,000,000

1,188,560

Los Angeles Unified School District GO, Series 2011 A1, 4.00%, 7/1/17
1,000,000

1,098,380

Los Angeles Unified School District GO, Series 2011 A1, 5.00%, 7/1/18
1,280,000

1,485,197

Los Angeles Unified School District GO, Series 2014 B, 5.00%, 7/1/18
2,000,000

2,320,620

Los Angeles Unified School District GO, Series 2014 C, 5.00%, 7/1/30
690,000

822,025

Los Angeles Wastewater System Rev., Series 2012 C, 5.00%, 6/1/26
1,000,000

1,193,110

M-S-R Energy Authority Rev., Series 2009 A, 7.00%, 11/1/34
1,000,000

1,400,450

M-S-R Energy Authority Rev., Series 2009 B, 7.00%, 11/1/34 (GA: Citigroup, Inc.)
880,000

1,232,396

Manhattan Beach Unified School District GO, Capital Appreciation, Series 2009 A, (Election of 2008), 0.00%, 9/1/29(1)
5,905,000

3,474,915

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Rev., Series 2012 B2, VRDN, 0.40%, 9/4/14
3,895,000

3,899,440

Modesto Irrigation District COP, Series 2009 A, 5.75%, 10/1/34
2,500,000

2,863,600

Mount San Antonio Community College District GO, Series 2013 A, (Election of 2008), 5.00%, 8/1/34
1,000,000

1,148,350

New Haven Unified School District GO, 12.00%, 8/1/18 (AGM)
880,000

1,256,772

Newport Beach Rev., Series 2011 A, (Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian), 6.00%, 12/1/21, Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)
1,000,000

1,289,150

North Lake Tahoe Public Financing Authority Rev., 5.00%, 12/1/21
500,000

609,015

Oakland Unified School District Alameda County GO, Series 2012 A, (Election of 2006), 5.50%, 8/1/32
1,000,000

1,120,770

Oakland Unified School District Alameda County GO, Series 2013, (Election of 2012), 6.625%, 8/1/38
460,000

554,424

Ontario Public Financing Authority Rev., 5.00%, 7/1/43
1,000,000

1,120,010

Orange County Transportation Authority Rev., (Senior Lien), 5.00%, 8/15/25
1,000,000

1,188,690

Palomar Pomerado Health Care District COP, 6.75%, 11/1/39
500,000

540,250

Palomar Pomerado Health Care District COP, 6.00%, 11/1/41
750,000

780,465

Palomar Pomerado Health GO, Capital Appreciation, Series 2009 A, (Election of 2004), 0.00%, 8/1/19 (AGC)(5)
1,670,000

1,570,835

Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District GO, Series 2009 R, (Election of 2005), 0.00%, 8/1/33(1)
2,600,000

1,305,304

Paramount Unified School District GO, Capital Appreciation, (Election of 2006), 0.00%, 8/1/51 (BAM)(1)
7,500,000

655,200

Pomona Unified School District GO, Series 2000 A, 6.55%, 8/1/29 (NATL-RE)
1,000,000

1,342,400

Pomona Unified School District GO, Series 2001 A, 6.15%, 8/1/30 (NATL-RE)
855,000

1,052,488

Porterville Public Financing Authority Sewer Rev., 5.625%, 10/1/36
1,500,000

1,729,545

Poway Unified School District GO, Capital Appreciation, (School Facilities Improvement), 0.00%, 8/1/41(1)
2,110,000

643,487

Poway Unified School District Public Financing Authority Rev., 7.875%, 9/15/39
1,010,000

1,156,299

Riverside County Asset Leasing Corp. Rev., Series 2013 A, (Public Defender and Probation Building), 5.00%, 11/1/43
1,000,000

1,099,880

Riverside County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2010 E, (Interstate 215 Corridor), 6.50%, 10/1/40
625,000

705,975

Sacramento County Airport System Rev., Series 2009 D, (Grant Revenue Bonds), 5.625%, 7/1/29
1,000,000

1,150,480


15



 
Principal
Amount
Value
Sacramento County Sanitation Districts Financing Authority Rev., Series 2007 B, VRN, 0.68%, 9/2/14 (NATL-RE/FGIC)
$
1,500,000

$
1,324,755

Saddleback Valley Unified School District Public Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., Series 1997 A, 6.00%, 9/1/16 (AGM)
1,000,000

1,103,210

San Bernardino Community College District GO, Capital Appreciation, Series 2009 B, (Election of 2008), 0.00%, 8/1/19(5)
7,400,000

6,918,408

San Buenaventura Rev., (Community Memorial Health System), 7.50%, 12/1/41
1,350,000

1,581,255

San Diego Community College District GO, (Election of 2002), 5.00%, 8/1/25
500,000

613,570

San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Rev., Series 2010 A, 5.00%, 7/1/40
1,500,000

1,662,405

San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Rev., Series 2013 A, 5.00%, 7/1/43
1,000,000

1,092,860

San Diego County Water Authority Rev., Series 2011 S1, (Subordinate Lien), 5.00%, 7/1/16
1,665,000

1,803,595

San Diego Public Facilities Financing Authority Sewer Rev., Series 2009 A, 5.25%, 5/15/34
2,000,000

2,296,700

San Diego Public Facilities Financing Authority Water Rev., Series 2012 A, 5.00%, 8/1/30
2,000,000

2,326,840

San Diego Unified Port District Rev., Series 2013 A, 5.00%, 9/1/24
500,000

592,185

San Diego Unified School District GO, Capital Appreciation, Series 2010 C, (Election of 2008), 0.00%, 7/1/36(1)
5,000,000

1,974,500

San Diego Unified School District GO, Capital Appreciation, Series 2010 C, (Election of 2008), 0.00%, 7/1/44(1)
2,880,000

741,370

San Diego Unified School District GO, Capital Appreciation, Series 2012 E, (Election of 2008), 0.00%, 7/1/49(1)
1,000,000

199,010

San Francisco City and County Airports Commission Rev., Series 2009 E, (San Francisco International Airport), 5.25%, 5/1/23
3,000,000

3,524,100

San Francisco City and County Airports Commission Rev., Series 2010 F, (San Francisco International Airport), 5.00%, 5/1/40
2,150,000

2,312,798

San Francisco City and County COP, Series 2009 A, (Multiple Capital Improvement Projects), 5.00%, 4/1/29
1,170,000

1,348,987

San Francisco City and County Public Utilities Commission Rev., Series 2011 A, 5.00%, 11/1/41
1,000,000

1,134,100

San Francisco City and County Redevelopment Financing Authority Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2011 D, (Mission Bay South Redevelopment), 6.625%, 8/1/27
500,000

585,705

San Francisco City and County Successor Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, (Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project), 5.00%, 8/1/43
500,000

549,415

San Francisco City and County Successor Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, (Mission Bay South Redevelopment), 5.00%, 8/1/31
400,000

447,604

San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency Rev., (Senior Lien), 5.00%, 1/1/33
1,200,000

1,199,352

San Mateo Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 2008-1-Bay Meadows), 5.50%, 9/1/44
750,000

825,878

San Mateo Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 2008-1-Bay Meadows), 5.875%, 9/1/32
685,000

779,948

San Mateo Union High School District GO, Capital Appreciation, 0.00%, 2/15/15(1)(2)
2,665,000

2,663,641

Santa Clara Electric Rev., Series 2011 A, 5.00%, 7/1/30
500,000

556,980

Santa Monica Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation, (Earthquake Recovery Redevelopment), 5.00%, 7/1/42
400,000

435,304

Santa Monica Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation, (Earthquake Recovery Redevelopment), 5.875%, 7/1/42
400,000

461,652

Santa Rosa Wastewater Rev., Capital Appreciation, Series 2002 B, 0.00%, 9/1/24 (Ambac)(1)
2,000,000

1,501,360


16



 
Principal
Amount
Value
South Placer Wastewater Authority Rev., VRN, 0.38%, 9/4/14
$
1,650,000

$
1,650,231

Southern California Public Power Authority Rev., Series 2013 A, (Southern Transmission), 5.00%, 7/1/17
1,050,000

1,184,127

Stockton Public Financing Authority Rev., Series 2010 A, (Delta Water Supply Project), 6.25%, 10/1/40
750,000

871,958

Stockton Unified School District GO, Series 2014 A, (Election of 2012), 5.00%, 8/1/42 (AGM)
430,000

478,513

Successor Agency to the Richmond County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/19 (BAM)
110,000

127,928

Successor Agency to the Richmond County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/20 (BAM)
70,000

81,934

Successor Agency to the Richmond County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/21 (BAM)
50,000

58,966

Successor Agency to the Richmond County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/22 (BAM)
70,000

83,249

Successor Agency to the Richmond County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/23 (BAM)
60,000

71,433

Successor Agency to the Richmond County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/24 (BAM)
65,000

76,914

Successor Agency to the Richmond County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 4.50%, 9/1/25 (BAM)
25,000

28,209

Successor Agency to the Richmond County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/25 (BAM)
25,000

29,282

Susanville Public Financing Authority Rev., Series 2010 B, (Utility Enterprises), 6.00%, 6/1/45
1,000,000

1,084,070

Taft Public Financing Authority Lease Rev., Series 1997 A, (Community Correctional Facility Acquisition), 6.05%, 1/1/17
1,085,000

1,089,253

Tobacco Securitization Authority of Southern California Settlement Rev., Series 2006 A1, 5.00%, 6/1/37
500,000

401,550

Tuolumne Wind Project Authority Rev., Series 2009 A, 5.625%, 1/1/29
1,200,000

1,409,088

Turlock Health Facility COP, (Emanuel Medical Center, Inc.), 5.50%, 10/15/14, Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)
465,000

468,060

Tustin Unified School District Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 06-1), 6.00%, 9/1/40
2,000,000

2,228,040

University of California Rev., Series 2013 AF, 5.00%, 5/15/25
1,000,000

1,217,550

University of California Rev., Series 2013 AK, VRDN, 5.00%, 5/15/23
2,000,000

2,464,040

Ventura County Community College District GO, Series 2008 C, (Election of 2002), 5.50%, 8/1/33
3,000,000

3,466,470

Yosemite Community College District GO, Capital Appreciation, Series 2010 D, (Election of 2004), 0.00%, 8/1/38(1)
3,000,000

1,044,360

 
 
347,244,264

Guam — 0.9%
 
 
Guam Government GO, Series 2009 A, 6.75%, 11/15/29
900,000

1,012,203

Guam Power Authority Rev., Series 2010 A, 5.50%, 10/1/40
2,150,000

2,408,796

 
 
3,420,999

Puerto Rico — 1.4%
 
 
Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, (Senior Lien), 5.00%, 7/1/17
1,910,000

1,539,556

Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, (Senior Lien), 5.00%, 7/1/19
665,000

526,653

Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority Rev., Series 2010 XX, 5.25%, 7/1/40
75,000

41,235

Puerto Rico GO, Series 2009 B, (Public Improvement), 6.00%, 7/1/39
1,000,000

789,340

Puerto Rico GO, Series 2011 A, (Public Improvement), 5.75%, 7/1/41
500,000

389,660

Puerto Rico GO, Series 2012 A, (Public Improvement), 5.00%, 7/1/41
300,000

221,811


17



 
Principal
Amount
Value
Puerto Rico GO, Series 2014 A, 8.00%, 7/1/35
$
1,520,000

$
1,395,330

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp. Rev., Capital Appreciation, Series 2011 A1, 0.00%, 8/1/41(1)
1,145,000

123,408

 
 
5,026,993

TOTAL INVESTMENT SECURITIES — 99.0%
(Cost $321,891,809)
 
355,692,256

OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES — 1.0%
 
3,577,954

TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0%
 
$
359,270,210



FUTURES CONTRACTS
Contracts Sold
Expiration Date
Underlying Face
Amount at Value
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)
22

U.S. Treasury 10-Year Notes
December 2014
$
2,767,187

$
(7,268
)
57

U.S. Treasury Long Bonds
December 2014
7,985,344

(48,222
)
 
 
 
$
10,752,531

$
(55,490
)
NOTES TO SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
AGC
-
Assured Guaranty Corporation
AGM
-
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corporation
BAM
-
Build America Mutual Assurance Company
COP
-
Certificates of Participation
FGIC
-
Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
GA
-
Guaranty Agreement
GO
-
General Obligation
LOC
-
Letter of Credit
NATL-RE
-
National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation – Reinsured
VRDN
-
Variable Rate Demand Note. Interest reset date is indicated. Rate shown is effective at the period end.
VRN
-
Variable Rate Note. Interest reset date is indicated. Rate shown is effective at the period end.
(1)
Security is a zero-coupon bond. Zero-coupon securities are issued at a substantial discount from their value at maturity.
(2)
Escrowed to maturity in U.S. government securities or state and local government securities.
(3)
Security, or a portion thereof, has been pledged at the custodian bank or with a broker for margin requirements on futures contracts. At the period end, the aggregate value of securities pledged was $423,704.
(4)
Restricted security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold without restriction to qualified institutional investors and have been deemed liquid under policies approved by the Board of Trustees. The aggregate value of these securities at the period end was $1,024,370, which represented 0.3% of total net assets.
(5)
Coupon rate adjusts periodically based upon a predetermined schedule. Interest reset date is indicated. Rate shown is effective at the period end.
See Notes to Financial Statements.




18



Statement of Assets and Liabilities
 
AUGUST 31, 2014
Assets
Investment securities, at value (cost of $321,891,809)
$
355,692,256

Cash
118,211

Receivable for investments sold
15,450

Receivable for capital shares sold
82,270

Receivable for variation margin on futures contracts
17,638

Interest receivable
3,991,402

 
359,917,227

 
 

Liabilities
Payable for investments purchased
156,683

Payable for capital shares redeemed
133,849

Accrued management fees
141,443

Distribution and service fees payable
7,578

Dividends payable
207,464

 
647,017

 
 

Net Assets
$
359,270,210

 
 

Net Assets Consist of:
Capital paid in
$
326,822,713

Accumulated net realized loss
(1,297,460
)
Net unrealized appreciation
33,744,957

 
$
359,270,210

 
 
Net Assets
Shares Outstanding
Net Asset Value Per Share
Investor Class

$344,356,049

29,274,149

$11.76
Institutional Class

$32,528

2,764

$11.77
A Class

$7,778,094

661,293

$11.76*
C Class

$7,103,539

603,820

$11.76
*Maximum offering price $12.31 (net asset value divided by 0.955).



See Notes to Financial Statements.

19



Statement of Operations
 
YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2014
Investment Income (Loss)
Income:
 
Interest
$
13,608,047

 
 

Expenses:
 

Management fees
1,672,872

Distribution and service fees:
 

A Class
19,179

C Class
71,754

Trustees’ fees and expenses
20,206

Other expenses
311

 
1,784,322

 
 

Net investment income (loss)
11,823,725

 
 

Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)
Net realized gain (loss) on:
 

Investment transactions
1,240,256

Futures contract transactions
(1,648,588
)
 
(408,332
)
 
 

Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:
 

Investments
26,566,568

Futures contracts
(36,984
)
 
26,529,584

 
 

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
26,121,252

 
 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations
$
37,944,977



See Notes to Financial Statements.

20



Statement of Changes in Net Assets
 
YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2014 AND AUGUST 31, 2013
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
August 31, 2014
August 31, 2013
Operations
Net investment income (loss)
$
11,823,725

$
13,407,251

Net realized gain (loss)
(408,332
)
3,355,902

Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
26,529,584

(30,027,092
)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations
37,944,977

(13,263,939
)
 
 
 
Distributions to Shareholders
From net investment income:
 

 

Investor Class
(11,420,347
)
(12,700,407
)
Institutional Class
(1,087
)
(1,037
)
A Class
(235,820
)
(468,059
)
C Class
(166,471
)
(236,886
)
Decrease in net assets from distributions
(11,823,725
)
(13,406,389
)
 
 
 
Capital Share Transactions
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share
transactions (Note 5)
(29,319,234
)
(51,139,417
)
 
 
 
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
(3,197,982
)
(77,809,745
)
 
 
 
Net Assets
Beginning of period
362,468,192

440,277,937

End of period
$
359,270,210

$
362,468,192



See Notes to Financial Statements.

21



Notes to Financial Statements
 
AUGUST 31, 2014

1. Organization

American Century California Tax-Free and Municipal Funds (the trust) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company and is organized as a Massachusetts business trust. California Long-Term Tax-Free Fund (the fund) is one fund in a series issued by the trust. The fund is diversified as defined under the 1940 Act. The fund’s investment objectives are to seek safety of principal and high current income that is exempt from federal and California income taxes.

The fund offers the Investor Class, the Institutional Class, the A Class and the C Class. The A Class may incur an initial sales charge. The A Class and C Class may be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge. The share classes differ principally in their respective sales charges and distribution and shareholder servicing expenses and arrangements. The Institutional Class is made available to institutional shareholders or through financial intermediaries whose clients do not require the same level of shareholder and administrative services as shareholders of other classes. As a result, the Institutional Class is charged a lower unified management fee.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the fund in preparation of its financial statements. The financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which may require management to make certain estimates and assumptions at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Management evaluated the impact of events or transactions occurring through the date the financial statements were issued that would merit recognition or disclosure.

Investment Valuations — The fund determines the fair value of its investments and computes its net asset value per share at the close of regular trading (usually 4 p.m. Eastern time) on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on each day the NYSE is open. The Board of Trustees has adopted valuation policies and procedures to guide the investment advisor in the fund’s investment valuation process and to provide methodologies for the oversight of the fund’s pricing function.

Fixed income securities maturing in greater than 60 days at the time of purchase are valued at the evaluated mean as provided by independent pricing services or at the mean of the most recent bid and asked prices as provided by investment dealers. Fixed income securities maturing within 60 days at the time of purchase may be valued at cost, plus or minus any amortized discount or premium or at the evaluated mean as provided by an independent pricing service. Evaluated mean prices are commonly derived through utilization of market models, which may consider, among other factors: trade data, quotations from dealers and active market makers, relevant yield curve and spread data, related sector levels, creditworthiness, trade data or market information on comparable securities, and other relevant security specific information.
 
Exchange-traded futures contracts are valued at the settlement price as provided by the appropriate clearing corporation.

If the fund determines that the market price for an investment is not readily available or the valuation methods mentioned above do not reflect an investment’s fair value, such investment is valued as determined in good faith by the Board of Trustees or its delegate, in accordance with policies and procedures adopted by the Board of Trustees. In its determination of fair value, the fund may review several factors including, but not limited to, market information regarding the specific investment or comparable investments and correlation with other investment types, futures indices or general market indicators. Circumstances that may cause the fund to use these procedures to value an investment include, but are not limited to: an investment has been declared in default or is distressed; trading in a security has been suspended during the trading day or a security is not actively trading on its principal exchange; prices received from a regular pricing source are deemed unreliable; or there is a foreign market holiday and no trading occurred.

The fund monitors for significant events occurring after the close of an investment’s primary exchange but before the fund’s net asset value per share is determined. Significant events may include, but are not limited to: corporate announcements and transactions; governmental action and political unrest that could impact a

22



specific investment or an investment sector; or armed conflicts, natural disasters and similar events that could affect investments in a specific country or region.
 
Security Transactions — Security transactions are accounted for as of the trade date. Net realized gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is also used for federal income tax purposes.

Investment Income — Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.

Segregated Assets — In accordance with the 1940 Act, the fund segregates assets on its books and records to cover certain types of investments, including, but not limited to, futures contracts and when-issued securities. American Century Investment Management, Inc. (ACIM) (the investment advisor) monitors, on a daily basis, the securities segregated to ensure the fund designates a sufficient amount of liquid assets, marked-to-market daily. The fund may also receive assets or be required to pledge assets at the custodian bank or with a broker for margin requirements on futures contracts.

Income Tax Status — It is the fund’s policy to distribute substantially all net investment income and net realized gains to shareholders and to otherwise qualify as a regulated investment company under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Accordingly, no provision has been made for income taxes. The fund files U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax returns as applicable. The fund's tax returns are subject to examination by the relevant taxing authority until expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, which is generally three years from the date of filing but can be longer in certain jurisdictions. At this time, management believes there are no uncertain tax positions which, based on their technical merit, would not be sustained upon examination and for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months.

Multiple Class — All shares of the fund represent an equal pro rata interest in the net assets of the class to which such shares belong, and have identical voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights and the same terms and conditions, except for class specific expenses and exclusive rights to vote on matters affecting only individual classes. Income, non-class specific expenses, and realized and unrealized capital gains and losses of the fund are allocated to each class of shares based on their relative net assets.

Distributions to Shareholders — Distributions from net investment income, if any, are declared daily and paid monthly. Distributions from net realized gains, if any, are generally declared and paid annually.

Indemnifications — Under the trust’s organizational documents, its officers and trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against a fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered by management to be remote.

3. Fees and Transactions with Related Parties

Certain officers and trustees of the trust are also officers and/or directors of American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC). The trust's investment advisor, ACIM, the trust's distributor, American Century Investment Services, Inc. (ACIS), and the trust's transfer agent, American Century Services, LLC, are wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by ACC.
 
Management Fees — The trust has entered into a management agreement with ACIM, under which ACIM provides the fund with investment advisory and management services in exchange for a single, unified management fee (the fee) per class. The agreement provides that all expenses of managing and operating the fund, except distribution and service fees, brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, fees and expenses of the independent trustees (including legal counsel fees), and extraordinary expenses, will be paid by ACIM. The fee is computed and accrued daily based on each class’s daily net assets and paid monthly in arrears. The fee consists of (1) an Investment Category Fee based on the daily net assets of the fund and certain other accounts managed by the investment advisor that are in the same broad investment category as the fund and (2) a Complex Fee based on the assets of all the funds in the American Century Investments family of funds. The rates for the Investment Category Fee range from 0.1625% to 0.2800%. The rates for the Complex Fee range from 0.2500% to 0.3100% for the Investor Class, A Class and C Class. The rates for the Complex Fee range from 0.0500% to 0.1100% for the Institutional Class. The effective annual management fee for each class for the year ended August 31, 2014 was 0.47% for the Investor Class, A Class and C Class and 0.27% for the Institutional Class.
 

23



Distribution and Service Fees — The Board of Trustees has adopted a separate Master Distribution and Individual Shareholder Services Plan for each of the A Class and C Class (collectively the plans), pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act. The plans provide that the A Class will pay ACIS an annual distribution and service fee of 0.25%. The plans provide that the C Class will pay ACIS an annual distribution and service fee of 1.00%, of which 0.25% is paid for individual shareholder services and 0.75% is paid for distribution services. The fees are computed and accrued daily based on each class’s daily net assets and paid monthly in arrears. The fees are used to pay financial intermediaries for distribution and individual shareholder services. Fees incurred under the plans during the year ended August 31, 2014 are detailed in the Statement of Operations.

Trustees’ Fees and Expenses — The Board of Trustees is responsible for overseeing the investment advisor’s management and operations of the fund. The trustees receive detailed information about the fund and its investment advisor regularly throughout the year, and meet at least quarterly with management of the investment advisor to review reports about fund operations. Fees and expenses incurred in conjunction with the trustees during the year ended August 31, 2014 are detailed in the Statement of Operations. The fund’s officers do not receive compensation from the fund.

4. Investment Transactions

Purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term investments, for the year ended August 31, 2014 were $164,499,882 and $192,644,643, respectively.

5. Capital Share Transactions

Transactions in shares of the fund were as follows (unlimited number of shares authorized):
 
Year ended August 31, 2014
Year ended August 31, 2013
 
Shares
Amount
Shares
Amount
Investor Class
 
 
 
 
Sold
810,047

$
9,260,925

1,330,085

$
15,587,725

Issued in reinvestment of distributions
748,186

8,549,754

798,978

9,279,060

Redeemed
(3,957,261
)
(44,883,445
)
(5,728,161
)
(66,173,957
)
 
(2,399,028
)
(27,072,766
)
(3,599,098
)
(41,307,172
)
Institutional Class
 
 
 
 
Issued in reinvestment of distributions
94

1,087

89

1,037

A Class
 
 
 
 
Sold
65,096

758,402

346,831

4,084,031

Issued in reinvestment of distributions
19,845

226,631

37,846

441,181

Redeemed
(207,496
)
(2,337,854
)
(986,595
)
(11,113,459
)
 
(122,555
)
(1,352,821
)
(601,918
)
(6,588,247
)
C Class
 
 
 
 
Sold
66,577

752,167

103,527

1,214,337

Issued in reinvestment of distributions
8,434

96,390

10,191

118,247

Redeemed
(154,263
)
(1,743,291
)
(398,074
)
(4,577,619
)
 
(79,252
)
(894,734
)
(284,356
)
(3,245,035
)
Net increase (decrease)
(2,600,741
)
$
(29,319,234
)
(4,485,283
)
$
(51,139,417
)


24



6. Fair Value Measurements

The fund’s investments valuation process is based on several considerations and may use multiple inputs to determine the fair value of the investments held by the fund. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the inputs used to determine a valuation are classified into three broad levels.

Level 1 valuation inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in an active market for identical investments.

Level 2 valuation inputs consist of direct or indirect observable market data (including quoted prices for comparable investments, evaluations of subsequent market events, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.). These inputs also consist of quoted prices for identical investments initially expressed in local currencies that are adjusted through translation into U.S. dollars.

Level 3 valuation inputs consist of unobservable data (including a fund’s own assumptions).

The level classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair valuation measurement. The valuation inputs are not necessarily an indication of the risks associated with investing in these securities or other financial instruments.

As of period end, the fund’s investment securities and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures contracts were classified as Level 2 and Level 1, respectively. The Schedule of Investments provides additional information on the fund’s portfolio holdings.

7. Derivative Instruments

Interest Rate Risk — The fund is subject to interest rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. The value of bonds generally declines as interest rates rise. A fund may enter into futures contracts based on a bond index or a specific underlying security. A fund may purchase futures contracts to gain exposure to increases in market value or sell futures contracts to protect against a decline in market value. Upon entering into a futures contract, a fund will segregate cash, cash equivalents or other appropriate liquid securities on its records in amounts sufficient to meet requirements. Subsequent payments (variation margin) are made or received daily, in cash, by a fund. The variation margin is equal to the daily change in the contract value and is recorded as unrealized gains and losses. A fund recognizes a realized gain or loss when the futures contract is closed or expires. Net realized and unrealized gains or losses occurring during the holding period of futures contracts are a component of net realized gain (loss) on futures contract transactions and change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures contracts, respectively. One of the risks of entering into futures contracts is the possibility that the change in value of the contract may not correlate with the changes in value of the underlying securities. The futures contracts sold as disclosed on the Schedule of Investments are indicative of the fund’s typical volume during the period.

The value of interest rate risk derivative instruments as of August 31, 2014, is disclosed on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as an asset of $17,638 in receivable for variation margin on futures contracts.* For the year ended August 31, 2014, the effect of interest rate risk derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations was $(1,648,588) in net realized gain (loss) on futures contract transactions and $(36,984) in change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures contracts.

*
Included in the unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures contracts as reported in the Schedule of Investments.

8. Risk Factors

The fund concentrates its investments in a single state and therefore may have more exposure to credit risk related to the state of California than a fund with a broader geographical diversification.


25



9. Federal Tax Information

The tax character of distributions paid during the years ended August 31, 2014 and August 31, 2013 were as follows:
 
2014
2013
Distributions Paid From
 
 
Exempt income
$
11,823,725

$
13,396,037

Taxable ordinary income

$
10,352

Long-term capital gains



The book-basis character of distributions made during the year from net investment income or net realized gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. These differences reflect the differing character of certain income items and net realized gains and losses for financial statement and tax purposes, and may result in reclassification among certain capital accounts on the financial statements.

As of August 31, 2014, the federal tax cost of investments and the components of distributable earnings on a tax-basis were as follows:
Federal tax cost of investments
$
321,891,809

Gross tax appreciation of investments
$
34,636,314

Gross tax depreciation of investments
(835,867
)
Net tax appreciation (depreciation) of investments
33,800,447

Net tax appreciation (depreciation) on derivatives

Net tax appreciation (depreciation)
$
33,800,447

Other book-to-tax adjustments
$
(50,646
)
Undistributed tax-exempt income

Accumulated short-term capital losses
$
(457,823
)
Post-October capital loss deferral
$
(844,481
)

The cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes. The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable primarily to the realization for tax purposes of unrealized gains (losses) on futures contracts. Other book-to-tax adjustments are attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on straddle positions.

Accumulated capital losses represent net capital loss carryovers that may be used to offset future realized capital gains for federal income tax purposes. Future capital loss carryover utilization in any given year may be subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. Capital loss carryovers expire in 2019.

Loss deferrals represent certain qualified losses that the fund has elected to treat as having been incurred in the following fiscal year for federal income tax purposes.



26



Financial Highlights
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended August 31 (except as noted)
Per-Share Data
Ratios and Supplemental Data
 
 
Income From Investment Operations:
Distributions From:
 
 
Ratio to Average Net Assets of:
 
 
 
Net Asset
Value,
Beginning
of Period
Net
Investment
Income (Loss)(1)
Net
Realized and
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
Total From Investment Operations
Net
Investment Income
Net
Realized
Gains
Total Distributions
Net Asset
Value, End
of Period
Total
Return(2)
Operating Expenses
Net
Investment Income
(Loss)
Portfolio Turnover
Rate
Net Assets,
End of Period (in thousands)
Investor Class
2014
$10.94
0.38
0.82
1.20
(0.38)
(0.38)
$11.76
11.10%
0.47%
3.32%
46%

$344,356

2013
$11.70
0.37
(0.76)
(0.39)
(0.37)
(0.37)
$10.94
(3.45)%
0.47%
3.19%
44%

$346,396

2012
$10.94
0.41
0.77
1.18
(0.42)
(0.42)
$11.70
10.92%
0.47%
3.65%
76%

$412,713

2011
$11.20
0.47
(0.27)
0.20
(0.46)
(0.46)
$10.94
2.02%
0.48%
4.38%
63%

$379,586

2010
$10.67
0.49
0.54
1.03
(0.49)
(0.01)
(0.50)
$11.20
9.90%
0.48%
4.51%
25%

$426,044

Institutional Class
2014
$10.94
0.40
0.83
1.23
(0.40)
(0.40)
$11.77
11.42%
0.27%
3.52%
46%

$33

2013
$11.70
0.40
(0.76)
(0.36)
(0.40)
(0.40)
$10.94
(3.26)%
0.27%
3.39%
44%

$29

2012
$10.94
0.44
0.76
1.20
(0.44)
(0.44)
$11.70
11.14%
0.27%
3.85%
76%

$30

2011
$11.20
0.49
(0.26)
0.23
(0.49)
(0.49)
$10.94
2.22%
0.28%
4.58%
63%

$27

2010(3)
$10.79
0.26
0.41
0.67
(0.26)
(0.26)
$11.20
6.28%
0.28%(4)
4.69%(4)
25%(5)

$27


27



For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended August 31 (except as noted)
Per-Share Data
Ratios and Supplemental Data
 
 
Income From Investment Operations:
Distributions From:
 
 
Ratio to Average Net Assets of:
 
 
 
Net Asset
Value,
Beginning
of Period
Net
Investment
Income (Loss)(1)
Net
Realized and
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
Total From Investment Operations
Net
Investment Income
Net
Realized
Gains
Total Distributions
Net Asset
Value, End
of Period
Total
Return(2)
Operating Expenses
Net
Investment Income
(Loss)
Portfolio Turnover
Rate
Net Assets,
End of Period (in thousands)
A Class
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014
$10.94
0.35
0.82
1.17
(0.35)
(0.35)
$11.76
10.83%
0.72%
3.07%
46%

$7,778

2013
$11.70
0.34
(0.76)
(0.42)
(0.34)
(0.34)
$10.94
(3.70)%
0.72%
2.94%
44%

$8,572

2012
$10.94
0.38
0.77
1.15
(0.39)
(0.39)
$11.70
10.64%
0.72%
3.40%
76%

$16,214

2011
$11.20
0.44
(0.26)
0.18
(0.44)
(0.44)
$10.94
1.77%
0.73%
4.13%
63%

$11,044

2010
$10.67
0.47
0.54
1.01
(0.47)
(0.01)
(0.48)
$11.20
9.63%
0.73%
4.26%
25%

$15,173

C Class
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014
$10.94
0.26
0.82
1.08
(0.26)
(0.26)
$11.76
10.00%
1.47%
2.32%
46%

$7,104

2013
$11.70
0.26
(0.76)
(0.50)
(0.26)
(0.26)
$10.94
(4.41)%
1.47%
2.19%
44%

$7,471

2012
$10.94
0.30
0.76
1.06
(0.30)
(0.30)
$11.70
9.82%
1.47%
2.65%
76%

$11,321

2011
$11.20
0.36
(0.26)
0.10
(0.36)
(0.36)
$10.94
1.01%
1.48%
3.38%
63%

$7,120

2010
$10.67
0.38
0.54
0.92
(0.38)
(0.01)
(0.39)
$11.20
8.81%
1.48%
3.51%
25%

$10,641

 
Notes to Financial Highlights

(1)
Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period.
(2)
Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day and do not reflect applicable sales charges, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized.
(3)
March 1, 2010 (commencement of sale) through August 31, 2010.
(4)
Annualized.
(5)
Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the year ended August 31, 2010.

See Notes to Financial Statements.

28



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Trustees of the American Century California Tax-Free and Municipal Funds and Shareholders of the California Long-Term Tax-Free Fund:

In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the California Long-Term Tax-Free Fund (one of the four funds in the American Century California Tax-Free and Municipal Funds, hereafter referred to as the "Fund") at August 31, 2014, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as "financial statements") are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities at August 31, 2014 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
October 21, 2014



29



Management

Board of Trustees
The individuals listed below serve as trustees of the funds. Each trustee will continue to serve in this capacity until death, retirement, resignation or removal from office. The board has adopted a mandatory retirement age for trustees who are not “interested persons,” as that term is defined in the Investment Company Act (independent trustees). Independent trustees shall retire on December 31 of the year in which they reach their 75th birthday; provided, however, that on or after January 1, 2022, independent trustees shall retire on December 31 of the year in which they reach their 76th birthday.
Mr. Thomas is an “interested person” because he currently serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent company of American Century Investment Management, Inc. (ACIM or the advisor). The other trustees (more than three-fourths of the total number) are independent. They are not employees, directors or officers of, and have no financial interest in, ACC or any of its wholly owned, direct or indirect, subsidiaries, including ACIM, American Century Investment Services, Inc. (ACIS) and American Century Services, LLC (ACS), and do not have any other affiliations, positions or relationships that would cause them to be considered “interested persons” under the Investment Company Act. The trustees serve in this capacity for eight (in the case of Mr. Thomas, 15) registered investment companies in the American Century Investments family of funds.
The following table presents additional information about the trustees. The mailing address for each trustee other than Mr. Thomas is 1665 Charleston Road, Mountain View, California 94043. The mailing address for Mr. Thomas is 4500 Main Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64111.

Name
(Year of Birth)
Position(s)
Held with
Funds
Length of
Time Served
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past 5 Years
Number of
American
Century
Portfolios
Overseen by Trustee
Other
Directorships
Held During
Past 5 Years
Independent Trustees
 
 
 
 
Tanya S. Beder
(1955)
Trustee
Since 2011
Chairman, SBCC Group Inc. (independent advisory services) (2006 to present)
45
CYS Investments, Inc. (specialty finance company)
Jeremy I. Bulow
(1954)
Trustee
Since 2011
Professor of Economics, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business (1979 to present)
45
None
Ronald J. Gilson
(1946)
Trustee and Chairman of the Board
Since 1995
(Chairman since 2005)
Charles J. Meyers Professor of Law and Business, Stanford Law School (1979 to present); Marc and Eva Stern Professor of Law and Business, Columbia University School of Law (1992 to present)
45
None
Frederick L. A. Grauer
(1946)
Trustee
Since 2008
Senior Advisor, BlackRock, Inc. (investment management firm) (2010 to 2011); Senior Advisor, Barclays Global Investors (investment management firm) (2003 to 2009)
45
None
Peter F. Pervere
(1947)
Trustee
Since 2007
Retired
45
Intraware, Inc. (2003 to 2009)

30



Name
(Year of Birth)
Position(s)
Held with
Funds
Length of
Time Served
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past 5 Years
Number of
American
Century
Portfolios
Overseen by Trustee
Other
Directorships
Held During
Past 5 Years
Independent Trustee
 
 
 
 
John B. Shoven
(1947)
Trustee
Since 2002
Professor of Economics, Stanford University (1973 to present)
45
Cadence Design Systems; Exponent; Financial Engines
Interested Trustee
 
 
 
 
Jonathan S. Thomas
(1963)
Trustee and President
Since 2007
President and Chief Executive Officer, ACC (March 2007 to present). Also serves as Chief Executive Officer, ACS; Executive Vice President, ACIM; Director, ACC, ACIM and other ACC subsidiaries
118
BioMed Valley Discoveries, Inc.

The Statement of Additional Information has additional information about the fund's trustees and is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021.


31



Officers
The following table presents certain information about the executive officers of the funds. Each officer serves as an officer for each of the 15 investment companies in the American Century family of funds, unless otherwise noted. No officer is compensated for his or her service as an officer of the funds. The listed officers are interested persons of the funds and are appointed or re-appointed on an annual basis. The mailing address for each of the officers listed below is 4500 Main Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64111.
Name
(Year of Birth)
Offices with the Funds
Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years
Jonathan S.
Thomas
(1963)
Trustee and
President
since 2007
President and Chief Executive Officer, ACC (March 2007 to present). Also serves as Chief Executive Officer, ACS; Executive Vice President, ACIM; Director, ACC, ACIM and other ACC subsidiaries
Amy D. Shelton
(1964)
Chief Compliance
Officer since 2014
Chief Compliance Officer, American Century funds, (March 2014 to present); Chief Compliance Officer, ACIM (February 2014 to present); Chief Compliance Officer, ACIS (October 2009 to present); Vice President, Client Interactions and Marketing, ACIS (February 2013 to January 2014); Director, Client Interactions and Marketing, ACIS (June 2007 to January 2013). Also serves as Vice President, ACIS
Charles A.
Etherington
(1957)
General Counsel
since 2007 and
Senior Vice
President since 2006
Attorney, ACC (February 1994 to present); Vice President, ACC (November 2005 to present); General Counsel, ACC (March 2007 to present). Also serves as General Counsel, ACIM, ACS, ACIS and other ACC subsidiaries; and Senior Vice President, ACIM and ACS
C. Jean Wade
(1964)
Vice President,
Treasurer and
Chief Financial
Officer since 2012
Vice President, ACS (February 2000 to present)
Robert J.
Leach
(1966)
Vice President
since 2006 and
Assistant Treasurer
since 2012
Vice President, ACS (February 2000 to present)
David H.
Reinmiller
(1963)
Vice President
since 2001
Attorney, ACC (January 1994 to present); Associate General Counsel, ACC (January 2001 to present). Also serves as Vice President, ACIM and ACS
Ward D.
Stauffer
(1960)
Secretary
since 2005
Attorney, ACC (June 2003 to present)


32



Approval of Management Agreement

At a meeting held on June 13, 2014, the Fund’s Board of Trustees unanimously approved the renewal of the management agreement pursuant to which American Century Investment Management, Inc. (the “Advisor”) acts as the investment advisor for the Fund. Under Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act, contracts for investment advisory services are required to be reviewed, evaluated, and approved by a majority of a fund’s directors/trustees, including a majority of the independent Trustees, each year. The Board regards this annual evaluation and renewal as one of its most important responsibilities.

The independent Trustees have memorialized a statement regarding the relationship between their ongoing obligations to oversee and evaluate the performance of the Advisor and their annual consideration of renewal of the management agreement. In that statement, the independent Trustees noted that their assessment of the Advisor’s performance is an ongoing process that takes place over the entire year and is informed by all of the extensive information that the Board and its committees receive and consider over time. This information, together with the materials provided in connection with the review, are central to the Board’s assessment of the Advisor’s performance and its determination whether to renew the Fund’s management agreement.

Prior to its consideration of the renewal of the management agreement, the Board requested and reviewed extensive data and analysis relating to the proposed renewal. This information and analysis was compiled by the Advisor and certain independent providers of evaluation data concerning the Fund and the services provided to the Fund by the Advisor.

In connection with its consideration of the renewal of the management agreement, the Board’s review and evaluation of the services provided by the Advisor included, but was not limited to, the following:

the nature, extent, and quality of investment management, shareholder services, and other services provided by the Advisor to the Fund;
the wide range of other programs and services the Advisor provides to the Fund and its shareholders on a routine and non-routine basis;
the investment performance of the Fund, including data comparing the Fund’s performance to appropriate benchmarks and/or a peer group of other mutual funds with similar investment objectives and strategies;
the cost of owning the Fund compared to the cost of owning similar funds;
the Advisor’s compliance policies, procedures, and regulatory experience;
financial data showing the cost of services provided to the Fund, the profitability of the Fund to the Advisor, and the overall profitability of the Advisor;
possible economies of scale associated with the Advisor’s management of the Fund and other accounts under its management;
data comparing services provided and charges to other investment management clients of the Advisor; and
any collateral benefits derived by the Advisor from the management of the Fund.

In keeping with its practice, the Board held two in-person meetings to review and discuss the information provided. The independent Trustees also had the benefit of the advice of their independent counsel throughout the process.

Factors Considered

The Trustees considered all of the information provided by the Advisor, the independent data providers, and the independent Trustees’ independent counsel in connection with the review, and evaluated such information for the Fund. In connection with their review, the Trustees did not identify any single factor as being all-important or controlling and each Trustee may have attributed

33



different levels of importance to different factors. In deciding to renew the management agreement, the Board based its decision on a number of factors, including the following:

Nature, Extent and Quality of Services — Generally. Under the management agreement, the Advisor is responsible for providing or arranging for all services necessary for the operation of the Fund. The Board noted that under the management agreement, the Advisor provides or arranges at its own expense a wide variety of services including:

constructing and designing the Fund
portfolio research and security selection
initial capitalization/funding
securities trading
Fund administration
custody of Fund assets
daily valuation of the Fund’s portfolio
shareholder servicing and transfer agency, including shareholder confirmations, recordkeeping, and communications
legal services
regulatory and portfolio compliance
financial reporting
marketing and distribution

The Board noted that many of these services have expanded over time both in terms of quantity and complexity in response to shareholder demands, competition in the industry, changing distribution channels, and the changing regulatory environment.

Investment Management Services. The nature of the investment management services provided to the Fund is quite complex and allows Fund shareholders access to professional money management, instant diversification of their investments within an asset class, the opportunity to easily diversify among asset classes by investing in or exchanging among various American Century Investments funds, and liquidity. In evaluating investment performance, the Board expects the Advisor to manage the Fund in accordance with its investment objectives and approved strategies. Further, the Trustees recognize that the Advisor has an obligation to seek the best execution of fund trades. In providing these services, the Advisor utilizes teams of investment professionals (portfolio managers, analysts, research assistants, and securities traders) who require extensive information technology, research, training, compliance and other systems to conduct their business. The Board, directly and through its Portfolio Committee, regularly reviews investment performance information for the Fund, together with comparative information for appropriate benchmarks and/or peer groups of similarly-managed funds, over different time horizons. The Trustees also review detailed performance information during the management agreement approval process. If performance concerns are identified, the Fund receives special reviews until performance improves, during which the Board discusses with the Advisor the reasons for such results (e.g., market conditions, security selection) and any efforts being undertaken to improve performance. The Fund’s performance was above its benchmark for the one, three-, and five-year periods and below its benchmark for the ten-year period reviewed by the Board. The Board found the investment management services provided by the Advisor to the Fund to be satisfactory and consistent with the management agreement.

Shareholder and Other Services. Under the management agreement, the Advisor provides the Fund with a comprehensive package of transfer agency, shareholder, and other services. The Board, directly and through various committees of the Board, regularly reviews reports and evaluations of such services at its regular meetings. These reports include, but are not limited to, information regarding the operational efficiency and accuracy of the shareholder and transfer agency services provided, staffing levels, shareholder satisfaction (as measured by external as well as internal sources), technology support, new products and services offered to Fund shareholders, securities trading activities, portfolio valuation services, auditing services, and legal and operational compliance activities. Certain aspects of shareholder and transfer agency service level efficiency

34



and the quality of securities trading activities are measured by independent third party providers and are presented in comparison to other fund groups not managed by the Advisor. The Board found the services provided by the Advisor to the Fund under the management agreement to be competitive and of high quality.

Costs of Services and Profitability. The Advisor provides detailed information concerning its cost of providing various services to the Fund, its profitability in managing the Fund, its overall profitability, and its financial condition. The Trustees have reviewed with the Advisor the methodology used to prepare this financial information. The financial information regarding the Advisor is considered in evaluating the Advisor’s financial condition, its ability to continue to provide services under the management agreement, and the reasonableness of the current management fee. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.

Ethics. The Board generally considers the Advisor’s commitment to providing quality services to shareholders and to conducting its business ethically. They noted that the Advisor’s practices generally meet or exceed industry best practices.

Economies of Scale. The Board also reviewed information provided by the Advisor regarding the possible existence of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund. The Board concluded that economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict with precision, especially on a fund-by-fund basis. The Board concluded that the Advisor is appropriately sharing economies of scale through its competitive fee structure, offering competitive fees from fund inception, and through reinvestment in its business to provide shareholders additional content and services.

Comparison to Other Funds’ Fees. The management agreement provides that the Fund pays the Advisor a single, all-inclusive (or unified) management fee for providing all services necessary for the management and operation of the Fund, other than brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, extraordinary expenses, and the fees and expenses of the Fund’s independent Trustees (including their independent legal counsel) and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of shareholder services and distribution services under a plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the unified fee structure, the Advisor is responsible for providing all investment advisory, custody, audit, administrative, compliance, recordkeeping, marketing and shareholder services, or arranging and supervising third parties to provide such services. By contrast, most other funds are charged a variety of fees, including an investment advisory fee, a transfer agency fee, an administrative fee, distribution charges and other expenses. Other than their investment advisory fees and any applicable Rule 12b-1 distribution fees, all other components of the total fees charged by these other funds may be increased without shareholder approval. The Board believes the unified fee structure is a benefit to Fund shareholders because it clearly discloses to shareholders the cost of owning Fund shares, and, since the unified fee cannot be increased without a vote of Fund shareholders, it shifts to the Advisor the risk of increased costs of operating the Fund and provides a direct incentive to minimize administrative inefficiencies. Part of the Board’s analysis of fee levels involves reviewing certain evaluative data compiled by an independent provider and comparing the Fund’s unified fee to the total expense ratio of peer funds. The unified fee charged to shareholders of the Fund was below the median of the total expense ratios of the Fund’s peer universe. The Board concluded that the management fee paid by the Fund to the Advisor under the management agreement is reasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.

Comparison to Fees and Services Provided to Other Clients of the Advisor. The Board also requested and received information from the Advisor concerning the nature of the services, fees, costs and profitability of its advisory services to advisory clients other than the Fund. They observed that these varying types of client accounts require different services and involve different regulatory and entrepreneurial risks than the management of the Fund. The Board analyzed this information and concluded that the fees charged and services provided to the Fund were reasonable by comparison.

35




Collateral or “Fall-Out” Benefits Derived by the Advisor. The Board considered the existence of collateral benefits the Advisor may receive as a result of its relationship with the Fund. They concluded that the Advisor’s primary business is managing mutual funds and it generally does not use fund or shareholder information to generate profits in other lines of business, and therefore does not derive any significant collateral benefits from them. The Board noted that the Advisor receives proprietary research from broker-dealers that execute fund portfolio transactions and concluded that this research is likely to benefit Fund shareholders. The Board also determined that the Advisor is able to provide investment management services to certain clients other than the Fund, at least in part, due to its existing infrastructure built to serve the fund complex. The Board concluded, however, that the assets of those other clients are not material to the analysis and, where applicable, may be included with the assets of the Fund to determine breakpoints in the management fee schedule.

Existing Relationship. The Board also considered whether there was any reason for not continuing the existing arrangement with the Advisor. In this regard, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund’s operations and various risks, uncertainties, and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision not to continue such relationship. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Advisor’s industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Advisor will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund.

Conclusion of the Trustees. As a result of this process, the Board, including all of the independent Trustees and assisted by the advice of independent legal counsel, taking into account all of the factors discussed above and the information provided by the Advisor and others, concluded that the management agreement between the Fund and the Advisor is fair and reasonable in light of the services provided and should be renewed.


36



Additional Information
 
Proxy Voting Policies
Descriptions of the principles and policies that the fund’s investment advisor uses in exercising the voting rights associated with the securities purchased and/or held by the fund are available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021 or visiting the “About Us” page of American Century Investments’ website at americancentury.com. A description of the policies is also available on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the investment advisor voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the “About Us” page at americancentury.com. It is also available at sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website at sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund also makes its complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the most recent quarter of its fiscal year avail­able on its website at americancentury.com and, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021.

Other Tax Information
The following information is provided pursuant to provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.
The fund designates $11,826,391 as exempt interest dividends for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2014.


37



Notes


38



Notes

39



Notes


40









 
 
 
 
Contact Us
americancentury.com
 
Automated Information Line
1-800-345-8765
 
Investor Services Representative
1-800-345-2021
or 816-531-5575
 
Investors Using Advisors
1-800-378-9878
 
Business, Not-For-Profit, Employer-Sponsored Retirement Plans
1-800-345-3533
 
Banks and Trust Companies, Broker-Dealers, Financial Professionals, Insurance Companies
1-800-345-6488
 
Telecommunications Relay Service for the Deaf
711
 
 
 
 
American Century California Tax-Free and Municipal Funds
 
 
 
 
Investment Advisor:
American Century Investment Management, Inc.
Kansas City, Missouri
 
 
 
 
This report and the statements it contains are submitted for the general information of our shareholders. The report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus.
 
 
 
 
©2014 American Century Proprietary Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.
CL-ANN-83159   1410
 




 
 
ANNUAL REPORT
AUGUST 31, 2014
 
  



California Tax-Free Money Market Fund









Table of Contents
 
President’s Letter
Performance
Fund Characteristics
Shareholder Fee Example
Schedule of Investments
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
Statement of Operations
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
Notes to Financial Statements
Financial Highlights
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Management
Approval of Management Agreement
Additional Information






















Any opinions expressed in this report reflect those of the author as of the date of the report, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of American Century Investments® or any other person in the American Century Investments organization. Any such opinions are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and American Century Investments disclaims any responsibility to update such opinions. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions made by American Century Investments funds are based on numerous factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any American Century Investments fund. Security examples are used for representational purposes only and are not intended as recommendations to purchase or sell securities. Performance information for comparative indices and securities is provided to American Century Investments by third party vendors. To the best of American Century Investments’ knowledge, such information is accurate at the time of printing.




President’s Letter

Dear Investor:

Thank you for reviewing this annual report for the 12 months ended August 31, 2014. It provides investment performance and portfolio information for the reporting period, plus longer-term historical performance data.

Annual reports remain important vehicles for conveying information about fund returns, including market and economic factors that affected performance during the reporting period. For additional, updated investment and market insights, we encourage you to visit our website, americancentury.com.


Jonathan Thomas

Favorable Fiscal Year for Municipal Bond (Muni) Returns

Stimulative monetary policies and expectations of longer-term economic improvement, interspersed with concerns about nearer-term weaker-than-expected economic data and geopolitical conflicts, helped drive financial market returns during the reporting period. We believe the combination of longer-term optimism about global economic growth, low costs of capital, and central bank purchases of fixed-income securities helped persuade investors to seek risk and yield, which benefited both stocks and bonds during the period. The S&P 500 Index gained 25.25%. The 30-year U.S. Treasury bond returned 15.96%, according to Barclays.

After selling off in 2013, munis rallied strongly in 2014. The muni market rebounded from the ripple effects of Detroit’s bankruptcy, Puerto Rico’s fiscal struggles, and the mid-year “Taper Tantrum” interest rate increase in 2013 to post some of its strongest 12-month returns of the past 10 years. The rally resulted from a favorable combination of constrained inflation, improving economic and credit conditions, strong demand for yield, relatively low muni issuance, and the unexpected U.S. Treasury market rally. The Barclays Municipal Bond Index returned 10.14%, compared with 5.66% for the Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The Barclays California Tax-Exempt Bond Index and the Barclays Municipal High Yield Bond Index performed even better, returning 11.85% and 14.74%, respectively.

As is typically the case after such a strong fiscal year, we try to temper expectations for future returns. It’s unlikely that the muni market will perform again at that level in consecutive years. That said, favorable conditions do remain in place for munis, including economic growth and solid credit conditions in the U.S., contained inflation in the near term, and continuing investor demand for yield. Global economic and geopolitical uncertainties also help increase the relative attractiveness of U.S. bonds. In this environment, we continue to believe in a disciplined, diversified, long-term investment approach, using professionally managed stock and bond portfolios for meeting financial goals. We appreciate your continued trust in us.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Thomas
President and Chief Executive Officer
American Century Investments




2



Performance
 
Total Returns as of August 31, 2014
 
 
 
Average Annual Returns
 
 
Ticker
Symbol
1 year
5 years
10 years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
Investor Class
BCTXX
0.01%(1)
0.01%(1)
1.06%(1)
2.53%(1)
11/9/83
(1)
Returns would have been lower if a portion of the management fee had not been waived.
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses
Investor Class      0.50%
The total annual fund operating expenses shown is as stated in the fund’s prospectus current as of the date of this report. The prospectus may vary from the expense ratio shown elsewhere in this report because it is based on a different time period, includes acquired fund fees and expenses, and, if applicable, does not include fee waivers or expense reimbursements.















Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. The fund concentrates its investments in a single state and therefore may have more exposure to credit risk related to the state of California than a fund with a broader geographical diversification. Investment income may be subject to certain state and local taxes and, depending on your tax status, the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT). Capital gains are not exempt from state and federal income tax. 
An investment in the fund is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund. 
The 7-day current yield more closely reflects the current earnings of the fund than the total return.

3



Fund Characteristics
 
AUGUST 31, 2014
 
7-Day Current Yield
 
After waiver(1)
0.01%
Before waiver
(0.37)%
7-Day Effective Yield
 
After waiver(1)
0.01%
(1) Yields would have been lower if a portion of the management fee had not been waived.
 
 
Portfolio at a Glance
 
Weighted Average Maturity
7 days
Weighted Average Life
42 days
 
 
Portfolio Composition by Maturity
% of fund investments
1-30 days
100%
31-90 days
91-180 days
More than 180 days

4



Shareholder Fee Example

Fund shareholders may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and redemption/exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing cost of investing in other mutual funds.

The example is based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from March 1, 2014 to August 31, 2014.

Actual Expenses

The table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses for each class. You may use the information, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. First, identify the share class you own. Then simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

If you hold Investor Class shares of any American Century Investments fund, or Institutional Class shares of the American Century Diversified Bond Fund, in an American Century Investments account (i.e., not a financial intermediary or retirement plan account), American Century Investments may charge you a $12.50 semiannual account maintenance fee if the value of those shares is less than $10,000. We will redeem shares automatically in one of your accounts to pay the $12.50 fee. In determining your total eligible investment amount, we will include your investments in all personal accounts (including American Century Investments Brokerage accounts) registered under your Social Security number. Personal accounts include individual accounts, joint accounts, UGMA/UTMA accounts, personal trusts, Coverdell Education Savings Accounts and IRAs (including traditional, Roth, Rollover, SEP-, SARSEP- and SIMPLE-IRAs), and certain other retirement accounts. If you have only business, business retirement, employer-sponsored or American Century Investments Brokerage accounts, you are currently not subject to this fee. If you are subject to the Account Maintenance Fee, your account value could be reduced by the fee amount.

Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes

The table also provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio of each class of your fund and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of a fund’s share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption/exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.


5



 
Beginning
Account Value
3/1/14
Ending
Account Value
8/31/14
Expenses Paid
During Period
(1)3/1/14 - 8/31/14
Annualized
Expense Ratio
(1)
Actual
 
 
 
 
Investor Class (after waiver)
$1,000
$1,000.10
$0.76
0.15%
Investor Class (before waiver)
$1,000
$1,000.10(2)
$2.52
0.50%
Hypothetical
 
 
 
Investor Class (after waiver)
$1,000
$1,024.45
$0.77
0.15%
Investor Class (before waiver)
$1,000
$1,022.69
$2.55
0.50%
(1)
Expenses are equal to the class's annualized expense ratio listed in the table above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184, the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, divided by 365, to reflect the one-half year period.
(2)
Ending account value assumes the return earned after waiver and would have been lower if a portion of the management fee had not been waived.

6



Schedule of Investments
 

AUGUST 31, 2014
 
Principal Amount
Value
MUNICIPAL SECURITIES — 96.8%
 
 
California — 96.8%
 
 
ABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corps. Rev., (899 Charleston Project), VRDN, 0.03%, 9/2/14 (LOC: Bank of America N.A.)
$
3,665,000

$
3,665,000

California GO, Series 2004 A3, (Kindergarten), VRDN, 0.03%, 9/2/14 (LOC: State Street Bank & Trust Co.)
600,000

600,000

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 1988 B, (Catholic Healthcare), VRDN, 0.06%, 9/3/14 (NATL-RE)(LOC: JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.)
3,200,000

3,200,000

California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev., (Bay Area Toll Bridges), VRDN, 0.08%, 9/4/14 (LOC: Union Bank N.A.)
2,030,000

2,030,000

California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev., (Catalina Museum Project), VRDN, 0.08%, 9/4/14 (LOC: Bank of the West)
1,000,000

1,000,000

California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev., (Columbia College), VRDN, 0.05%, 9/4/14 (LOC: Rabobank Nederland N .V.)
3,365,000

3,365,000

California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev., (Goodwill Industries of Orange County), VRDN, 0.10%, 9/4/14 (LOC: Wells Fargo Bank N.A.)
2,625,000

2,625,000

California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev., (Kennfoods USA), VRDN, 0.07%, 9/4/14 (LOC: Bank of the West)
1,390,000

1,390,000

California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev., (SRI International), VRDN, 0.06%, 9/4/14 (LOC: Wells Fargo Bank N.A.)
6,400,000

6,400,000

California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev., Series 2008 A, (iWorks, Inc.), VRDN, 0.09%, 9/4/14 (LOC: City National Bank and FHLB)
1,335,000

1,335,000

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., Series 2008 A, (Central Coast YMCA), VRDN, 0.04%, 9/4/14 (LOC: Pacific Capital Bank N.A. and FHLB)
3,135,000

3,135,000

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., Series 2010 A, (Southwest Community Health Center), VRDN, 0.06%, 9/4/14 (LOC: Comerica Bank)
3,970,000

3,970,000

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, (High Desert Partnership in Academic Excellence Foundation), VRDN, 0.08%, 9/4/14 (LOC: Union Bank N.A.)
2,000,000

2,000,000

California Pollution Control Financing Authority Rev., (Musco Family Olive), VRDN, 0.17%, 9/4/14 (LOC: Bank of the West)
3,200,000

3,200,000

California Pollution Control Financing Authority Rev., Series 2010 A, (Alameda Country Industries), VRDN, 0.07%, 9/3/14 (LOC: Bank of the West)
2,460,000

2,460,000

California State Enterprise Development Authority Rev., (Community Hospice Inc.), VRDN, 0.05%, 9/4/14 (LOC: Bank of Stockton and FHLB)
3,795,000

3,795,000

California State Enterprise Development Authority Rev., (Humane Society Silicon Valley), VRDN, 0.05%, 9/4/14 (LOC: First Republic Bank and FHLB)
6,695,000

6,695,000

California State Enterprise Development Authority Rev., (LBM Partnership LP), VRDN, 0.06%, 9/4/14 (LOC: Wells Fargo Bank N.A.)
2,825,000

2,825,000

California State University PUTTERs Rev., Series 2008-2646Z, VRDN, 0.13%, 9/4/14 (AGM) (LIQ FAC: JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.)(1)
4,670,000

4,670,000

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., (Goodwill of Santa Cruz), VRDN, 0.10%, 9/4/14 (LOC: Wells Fargo Bank N.A.)
2,200,000

2,200,000


7



 
Principal Amount
Value
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., (Livermore Valley Arts Center Project), VRDN, 0.06%, 9/3/14 (LOC: Bank of New York Mellon)
$
10,000,000

$
10,000,000

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., (Trinity Children & Family), VRDN, 0.10%, 9/3/14 (LOC: Citizens Business Bank and California State Teacher's Retirement System)
3,920,000

3,920,000

California Statewide Communities Development Authority COP, VRDN, 0.06%, 9/3/14 (LOC: Union Bank N.A.)
1,520,000

1,520,000

City of Hanford Sewer System Rev., Series 1996 A, VRDN, 0.08%, 9/4/14 (LOC: Union Bank N.A.)
760,000

760,000

City of Irvine Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Special Assessment Rev., (Assessment District No. 87-8), VRDN, 0.02%, 9/2/14 (LOC: State Street Bank & Trust Co.)
2,100,000

2,100,000

City of Irvine Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Special Assessment Rev., (Assessment District No. 94-15), VRDN, 0.02%, 9/2/14 (LOC: State Street Bank & Trust Co.)
1,900,000

1,900,000

City of Oroville Rev., Series 2012 A, (Oroville Hospital), VRDN, 0.08%, 9/4/14 (LOC: Comerica Bank)
6,600,000

6,600,000

City of Reedley COP, (Mennonite Brethren Homes), VRDN, 0.06%, 9/4/14 (LOC: Bank of the Sierra and FHLB)
7,500,000

7,500,000

City of Riverside Water Rev., Series 2011 A, VRN, 0.07%, 9/4/14
10,800,000

10,800,000

County of San Bernardino Rev., Series 2004 A, (WLP Parkview Place Apartments), VRDN, 0.10%, 9/4/14 (LOC: FNMA)
3,420,000

3,420,000

County of Yolo Rev., (Beckett Hall, Inc.), VRDN, 0.13%, 9/4/14 (LOC: Bank of the West and California State Teacher's Retirement System)
6,850,000

6,850,000

Eastern Municipal Water District Water & Sewer Rev., (Flexible Index Mode), VRN, 0.07%, 9/4/14
6,000,000

6,000,000

Eastern Municipal Water District Water & Sewer Rev., Series 2012 A, VRN, 0.06%, 9/4/14
5,000,000

5,000,000

Hesperia Public Financing Authority Rev., (1993 Street Improvement Project), VRDN, 0.11%, 9/3/14 (LOC: Bank of the West)
500,000

500,000

Hesperia Public Financing Authority Rev., Series 1998 B, (Water Administration Facilities), VRDN, 0.11%, 9/3/14 (LOC: Bank of the West)
810,000

810,000

Irvine Ranch Water District Rev., Series 2009 B, VRDN, 0.02%, 9/2/14 (LOC: Bank of America N.A.)
600,000

600,000

Irvine Ranch Water District Rev., Series 2011 A1, VRN, 0.06%, 9/4/14
2,000,000

2,000,000

Irvine Ranch Water District Rev., Series 2011 A2, VRN, 0.06%, 9/4/14
4,000,000

4,000,000

Irvine Unified School District Special Tax Rev., Series 2012 B, (Community Facilities District No. 09-1), VRDN, 0.04%, 9/2/14 (LOC: Bank of America N.A.)
2,150,000

2,150,000

JP Morgan Chase PUTTERs/DRIVERs Trust, Series 2011-4005Z, VRDN, 0.13%, 9/4/14 (AGM) (LIQ FAC: JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.)(1)
6,590,000

6,590,000

Los Angeles County Community Development Commission COP, (Willowbrook Partnership), VRDN, 0.10%, 9/3/14 (LOC: Wells Fargo Bank N.A.)
2,300,000

2,300,000

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Rev., Series 2009 A-2, VRN, 0.06%, 9/4/14
5,000,000

5,000,000

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Rev., Series 2010 B, 2.25%, 7/1/15
200,000

203,398

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Rev., Series 2010 B, 4.00%, 7/1/15
200,000

206,300

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Rev., Series 2011 A-1, VRN, 0.07%, 9/4/14
7,500,000

7,500,000

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Rev., VRN, 0.07%, 9/4/14
4,220,000

4,220,000

Monterey Peninsula Water Management District COP, (Wastewater Reclamation), VRDN, 0.06%, 9/4/14 (LOC: Wells Fargo Bank N.A.)
3,000,000

3,000,000


8



 
Principal Amount
Value
Pittsburg Public Financing Authority Rev., VRDN, 0.06%, 9/4/14 (LOC: Bank of the West)
$
3,080,000

$
3,080,000

Pittsburg Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2004 A, (Los Medanos Community), VRDN, 0.04%, 9/2/14 (LOC: State Street Bank & Trust Co. and California State Teacher's Retirement System)
3,945,000

3,945,000

San Bernardino County Housing Authority Rev., Series 2005 A, (Raintree Apartments), VRDN, 0.06%, 9/4/14 (LOC: East West Bank and FHLB)
3,800,000

3,800,000

Santa Clara County Housing Authority Rev., Series 2003 A, VRDN, 0.07%, 9/4/14 (LOC: Citibank N.A.)
1,515,000

1,515,000

State of California Puttable Floating Options Rev., VRDN, 0.12%, 9/4/14 (AGM) (LIQ FAC: Bank of America N.A.)(1)
3,480,000

3,480,000

State of California Puttable Floating Options Rev., VRDN, 0.18%, 9/4/14 (LIQ FAC: Bank of America N.A.)(1)
5,000,000

5,000,000

Three Valleys Municipal Water District COP, (Miramar Water Treatment), VRDN, 0.07%, 9/3/14 (LOC: Wells Fargo Bank N.A.)
1,100,000

1,100,000

Town of Apple Valley COP, (Public Facilities Financing), VRDN, 0.08%, 9/4/14 (LOC: Union Bank N.A.)
1,830,000

1,830,000

Town of Hillsborough COP, Series 2003 A, (Water & Sewer System), VRDN, 0.11%, 9/4/14 (SBBPA: JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.)
2,895,000

2,895,000

Town of Hillsborough COP, Series 2006 A, (Water & Sewer System), VRDN, 0.11%, 9/4/14 (SBBPA: JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.)
7,945,000

7,945,000

University of California Rev., Series 2013 AL-3, VRN, 0.04%, 9/4/14
1,000,000

1,000,000

Victorville Joint Powers Finance Authority Lease Rev., Series 2007 A, (Cogeneration Facility), VRDN, 1.05%, 9/4/14 (LOC: BNP Paribas)
12,475,000

12,475,000

TOTAL MUNICIPAL SECURITIES
 
214,074,698

COMMERCIAL PAPER(2) — 2.3%
 
 
San Diego County Water Authority, 0.06%, 9/3/14
5,000,000

5,000,000

TOTAL INVESTMENT SECURITIES — 99.1%
 
219,074,698

OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES — 0.9%
 
1,967,193

TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0%
 
$
221,041,891

 
NOTES TO SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
AGM
-
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corporation
COP
-
Certificates of Participation
DRIVERs
-
Derivative Inverse Tax-Exempt Receipts
FHLB
-
Federal Home Loan Bank
FNMA
-
Federal National Mortgage Association
GO
-
General Obligation
LIQ FAC
-
Liquidity Facilities
LOC
-
Letter of Credit
NATL-RE
-
National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation - Reinsured
PUTTERs
-
Puttable Tax-Exempt Receipts
SBBPA
-
Standby Bond Purchase Agreement
VRDN
-
Variable Rate Demand Note. Interest reset date is indicated. Rate shown is effective at the period end.
VRN
-
Variable Rate Note. Interest reset date is indicated. Rate shown is effective at the period end.
 
(1)
Restricted security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold without restriction to qualified institutional investors and have been deemed liquid under policies approved by the Board of Trustees. The aggregate value of these securities at the period end was $19,740,000, which represented 8.9% of total net assets.
(2)
The rate indicated is the yield to maturity at purchase.

See Notes to Financial Statements.

9



Statement of Assets and Liabilities
 
AUGUST 31, 2014
Assets
Investment securities, at value (amortized cost and cost for federal income tax purposes)
$
219,074,698

Cash
548,076

Receivable for investments sold
1,334,000

Receivable for capital shares sold
203,512

Interest receivable
33,343

 
221,193,629

 
 

Liabilities
 

Payable for capital shares redeemed
129,558

Accrued management fees
22,180

 
151,738

 
 

Net Assets
$
221,041,891

 
 

Investor Class Capital Shares
 

Shares outstanding (unlimited number of shares authorized)
221,043,878

 
 

Net Asset Value Per Share
$
1.00

 
 

Net Assets Consist of:
 

Capital paid in
$
221,043,884

Accumulated net realized loss
(1,993
)
 
$
221,041,891


 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

10



Statement of Operations
 
YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2014
Investment Income (Loss)
Income:
 
Interest
$
388,678

 
 

Expenses:
 

Management fees
1,134,516

Trustees' fees and expenses
13,027

Other expenses
473

 
1,148,016

Fees waived
(782,174
)
 
365,842

 
 

Net investment income (loss)
22,836

 
 
Net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions
5,114

 
 
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations
$
27,950


 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

11



Statement of Changes in Net Assets
 
YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2014 AND AUGUST 31, 2013
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
August 31, 2014
August 31, 2013
Operations
 
 
Net investment income (loss)
$
22,836

$
24,704

Net realized gain (loss)
5,114


Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations
27,950

24,704

 
 
 
Distributions to Shareholders
 

 

From net investment income
(22,836
)
(24,704
)
 
 
 
Capital Share Transactions
 

 

Proceeds from shares sold
67,371,636

77,817,102

Proceeds from reinvestment of distributions
22,032

23,561

Payments for shares redeemed
(87,438,069
)
(100,156,625
)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions
(20,044,401
)
(22,315,962
)
 
 
 
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
(20,039,287
)
(22,315,962
)
 
 
 
Net Assets
 

 

Beginning of period
241,081,178

263,397,140

End of period
$
221,041,891

$
241,081,178

 
 
 
Transactions in Shares of the Fund
 

 

Sold
67,371,636

77,817,102

Issued in reinvestment of distributions
22,032

23,561

Redeemed
(87,438,069
)
(100,156,635
)
Net increase (decrease) in shares of the fund
(20,044,401
)
(22,315,972
)

 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

12



Notes to Financial Statements
 
AUGUST 31, 2014

1. Organization

American Century California Tax-Free and Municipal Funds (the trust) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company and is organized as a Massachusetts business trust. California Tax-Free Money Market Fund (the fund) is one fund in a series issued by the trust. The fund is diversified as defined under Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act. The fund’s investment objectives are to seek safety of principal and high current income that is exempt from federal and California income taxes.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the fund in preparation of its financial statements. The financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which may require management to make certain estimates and assumptions at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Management evaluated the impact of events or transactions occurring through the date the financial statements were issued that would merit recognition or disclosure.

Investment Valuations — The fund determines the fair value of its investments and computes its net asset value per share at the close of regular trading (usually 4 p.m. Eastern time) on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on each day the NYSE is open. Investments are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. If the fund determines that the amortized cost does not reflect an investment’s fair value, such investment is valued as determined in good faith by the Board of Trustees or its delegate, in accordance with policies and procedures adopted by the Board of Trustees.
    
Security Transactions — Security transactions are accounted for as of the trade date. Net realized gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is also used for federal income tax purposes.

Investment Income — Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.

Income Tax Status — It is the fund’s policy to distribute substantially all net investment income and net realized gains to shareholders and to otherwise qualify as a regulated investment company under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Accordingly, no provision has been made for income taxes. The fund files U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax returns as applicable. The fund's tax returns are subject to examination by the relevant taxing authority until expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, which is generally three years from the date of filing but can be longer in certain jurisdictions. At this time, management believes there are no uncertain tax positions which, based on their technical merit, would not be sustained upon examination and for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months.

Distributions to Shareholders — Distributions from net investment income, if any, are declared daily and paid monthly. The fund may make short-term capital gains distributions to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code. The fund does not expect to realize any long-term capital gains, and accordingly, does not expect to pay any long-term capital gains distributions.

Indemnifications — Under the trust’s organizational documents, its officers and trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against a fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered by management to be remote.


13



3. Fees and Transactions with Related Parties

Certain officers and trustees of the trust are also officers and/or directors of American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC). The trust's investment advisor, American Century Investment Management, Inc. (ACIM), the trust's distributor, American Century Investment Services, Inc., and the trust's transfer agent, American Century Services, LLC, are wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by ACC.

Management Fees — The trust has entered into a management agreement with ACIM, under which ACIM provides the fund with investment advisory and management services in exchange for a single, unified management fee (the fee). The agreement provides that all expenses of managing and operating the fund, except distribution and service fees, brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, fees and expenses of the independent trustees (including legal counsel fees), and extraordinary expenses, will be paid by ACIM. The fee is computed and accrued daily based on the daily net assets of the fund and paid monthly in arrears. The fee consists of (1) an Investment Category Fee based on the daily net assets of the fund and certain other accounts managed by the investment advisor that are in the same broad investment category as the fund and (2) a Complex Fee based on the assets of all the funds in the American Century Investments family of funds. The rates for the Investment Category Fee range from 0.1570% to 0.2700%. The rates for the Complex Fee range from 0.2500% to 0.3100%. In order to maintain a positive yield, ACIM may voluntarily waive a portion of its management fee on a daily basis. The fee waiver may be revised or terminated at any time without notice. The effective annual management fee for the year ended August 31, 2014 was 0.49% before waiver and 0.15% after waiver.

Trustees’ Fees and Expenses — The Board of Trustees is responsible for overseeing the investment advisor’s management and operations of the fund. The trustees receive detailed information about the fund and its investment advisor regularly throughout the year, and meet at least quarterly with management of the investment advisor to review reports about fund operations. Fees and expenses incurred in conjunction with the trustees during the year ended August 31, 2014 are detailed in the Statement of Operations. The fund’s officers do not receive compensation from the fund.

4. Fair Value Measurements

The fund’s investments valuation process is based on several considerations and may use multiple inputs to determine the fair value of the investments held by the fund. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the inputs used to determine a valuation are classified into three broad levels.

Level 1 valuation inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in an active market for identical investments.

Level 2 valuation inputs consist of direct or indirect observable market data (including quoted prices for comparable investments, evaluations of subsequent market events, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.). These inputs also consist of quoted prices for identical investments initially expressed in local currencies that are adjusted through translation into U.S. dollars.

Level 3 valuation inputs consist of unobservable data (including a fund’s own assumptions).

The level classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair valuation measurement. The valuation inputs are not necessarily an indication of the risks associated with investing in these securities or other financial instruments.

As of period end, the fund’s investment securities were classified as Level 2. The Schedule of Investments provides additional information on the fund’s portfolio holdings.

5. Risk Factors

The fund concentrates its investments in a single state and therefore may have more exposure to credit risk related to the state of California than a fund with a broader geographical diversification.


14



6. Federal Tax Information

The tax character of distributions paid during the years ended August 31, 2014 and August 31, 2013 were as follows:
 
2014
2013
Distributions Paid From
 
 
Exempt income
$
22,836

$
24,704

Long-term capital gains



The book-basis character of distributions made during the year from net investment income or net realized gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. These differences reflect the differing character of certain income items and net realized gains and losses for financial statement and tax purposes, and may result in reclassification among certain capital accounts on the financial statements.

As of August 31, 2014, the fund had accumulated short-term capital losses of $(1,993), which represent net capital loss carryovers that may be used to offset future realized capital gains for federal income tax purposes. The capital loss carryovers may be carried forward for an unlimited period. Future capital loss carryover utilization in any given year may be subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations.


15



Financial Highlights
 
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended August 31 (except as noted)
Per-Share Data
Ratios and Supplemental Data
 
 
 
Distributions From:
 
 
Ratio to Average Net Assets of:
 
 
Net Asset
Value,
Beginning
of Period
Income From Investment Operations:
Net Investment Income (Loss)
Net Investment Income
Net
Realized
Gains
Total
Distributions
Net Asset
Value,
End of Period
Total
Return(1)
Operating Expenses
Operating Expenses
(before expense waiver)
Net
Investment Income
(Loss)
Net
Investment Income
(Loss)
(before
expense
waiver)
Net Assets,
End of Period
(in thousands)
Investor Class
2014
$1.00
(2)
(2)
(2)
$1.00
0.01%
0.16%
0.50%
0.01%
(0.33)%

$221,042

2013
$1.00
(2)
(2)
(2)
$1.00
0.01%
0.28%
0.50%
0.01%
(0.21)%

$241,081

2012
$1.00
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
$1.00
0.01%
0.40%
0.50%
0.01%
(0.09)%

$263,397

2011
$1.00
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
$1.00
0.01%
0.38%
0.50%
0.01%
(0.11)%

$299,366

2010
$1.00
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
$1.00
0.03%
0.34%
0.50%
0.01%
(0.15)%

$345,565

Notes to Financial Highlights

(1)
Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized.
(2)
Per-share amount was less than $0.005.

 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

16



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Trustees of the American Century California Tax-Free and Municipal Funds and Shareholders of the California Tax-Free Money Market Fund:

In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the California Tax-Free Money Market Fund (one of the four funds in the American Century California Tax-Free and Municipal Funds, hereafter referred to as the "Fund") at August 31, 2014, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as "financial statements") are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities at August 31, 2014 by correspondence with the custodian, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
October 21, 2014


17



Management

Board of Trustees

The individuals listed below serve as trustees of the funds. Each trustee will continue to serve in this capacity until death, retirement, resignation or removal from office. The board has adopted a mandatory retirement age for trustees who are not “interested persons,” as that term is defined in the Investment Company Act (independent trustees). Independent trustees shall retire on December 31 of the year in which they reach their 75th birthday; provided, however, that on or after January 1, 2022, independent trustees shall retire on December 31 of the year in which they reach their 76th birthday.
Mr. Thomas is an “interested person” because he currently serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent company of American Century Investment Management, Inc. (ACIM or the advisor). The other trustees (more than three-fourths of the total number) are independent. They are not employees, directors or officers of, and have no financial interest in, ACC or any of its wholly owned, direct or indirect, subsidiaries, including ACIM, American Century Investment Services, Inc. (ACIS) and American Century Services, LLC (ACS), and do not have any other affiliations, positions or relationships that would cause them to be considered “interested persons” under the Investment Company Act. The trustees serve in this capacity for eight (in the case of Mr. Thomas, 15) registered investment companies in the American Century Investments family of funds.
The following table presents additional information about the trustees. The mailing address for each trustee other than Mr. Thomas is 1665 Charleston Road, Mountain View, California 94043. The mailing address for Mr. Thomas is 4500 Main Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64111.

Name
(Year of Birth)
Position(s)
Held with
Funds
Length of
Time Served
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past 5 Years
Number of
American
Century
Portfolios
Overseen by Trustee
Other
Directorships
Held During
Past 5 Years
Independent Trustees
 
 
 
 
Tanya S. Beder
(1955)
Trustee
Since 2011
Chairman, SBCC Group Inc. (independent advisory services) (2006 to present)
45
CYS Investments, Inc. (specialty finance company)
Jeremy I. Bulow
(1954)
Trustee
Since 2011
Professor of Economics, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business (1979 to present)
45
None
Ronald J. Gilson
(1946)
Trustee and Chairman of the Board
Since 1995
(Chairman since 2005)
Charles J. Meyers Professor of Law and Business, Stanford Law School (1979 to present); Marc and Eva Stern Professor of Law and Business, Columbia University School of Law (1992 to present)
45
None
Frederick L. A. Grauer
(1946)
Trustee
Since 2008
Senior Advisor, BlackRock, Inc. (investment management firm) (2010 to 2011); Senior Advisor, Barclays Global Investors (investment management firm) (2003 to 2009)
45
None
Peter F. Pervere
(1947)
Trustee
Since 2007
Retired
45
Intraware, Inc. (2003 to 2009)

18



Name
(Year of Birth)
Position(s)
Held with
Funds
Length of
Time Served
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past 5 Years
Number of
American
Century
Portfolios
Overseen by Trustee
Other
Directorships
Held During
Past 5 Years
Independent Trustee
 
 
 
 
John B. Shoven
(1947)
Trustee
Since 2002
Professor of Economics, Stanford University (1973 to present)
45
Cadence Design Systems; Exponent; Financial Engines
Interested Trustee
 
 
 
 
Jonathan S. Thomas
(1963)
Trustee and President
Since 2007
President and Chief Executive Officer, ACC (March 2007 to present). Also serves as Chief Executive Officer, ACS; Executive Vice President, ACIM; Director, ACC, ACIM and other ACC subsidiaries
118
BioMed Valley Discoveries, Inc.

The Statement of Additional Information has additional information about the fund's trustees and is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021.


19



Officers

The following table presents certain information about the executive officers of the funds. Each officer serves as an officer for each of the 15 investment companies in the American Century family of funds, unless otherwise noted. No officer is compensated for his or her service as an officer of the funds. The listed officers are interested persons of the funds and are appointed or re-appointed on an annual basis. The mailing address for each of the officers listed below is 4500 Main Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64111.
Name
(Year of Birth)
Offices with the Funds
Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years
Jonathan S.
Thomas
(1963)
Trustee and
President
since 2007
President and Chief Executive Officer, ACC (March 2007 to present). Also serves as Chief Executive Officer, ACS; Executive Vice President, ACIM; Director, ACC, ACIM and other ACC subsidiaries
Amy D. Shelton
(1964)
Chief Compliance
Officer since 2014
Chief Compliance Officer, American Century funds, (March 2014 to present); Chief Compliance Officer, ACIM (February 2014 to present); Chief Compliance Officer, ACIS (October 2009 to present); Vice President, Client Interactions and Marketing, ACIS (February 2013 to January 2014); Director, Client Interactions and Marketing, ACIS (June 2007 to January 2013). Also serves as Vice President, ACIS
Charles A.
Etherington
(1957)
General Counsel
since 2007 and
Senior Vice
President since 2006
Attorney, ACC (February 1994 to present); Vice President, ACC (November 2005 to present); General Counsel, ACC (March 2007 to present). Also serves as General Counsel, ACIM, ACS, ACIS and other ACC subsidiaries; and Senior Vice President, ACIM and ACS
C. Jean Wade
(1964)
Vice President,
Treasurer and
Chief Financial
Officer since 2012
Vice President, ACS (February 2000 to present)
Robert J.
Leach
(1966)
Vice President
since 2006 and
Assistant Treasurer
since 2012
Vice President, ACS (February 2000 to present)
David H.
Reinmiller
(1963)
Vice President
since 2001
Attorney, ACC (January 1994 to present); Associate General Counsel, ACC (January 2001 to present). Also serves as Vice President, ACIM and ACS
Ward D.
Stauffer
(1960)
Secretary
since 2005
Attorney, ACC (June 2003 to present)


20



Approval of Management Agreement

At a meeting held on June 13, 2014, the Fund’s Board of Trustees unanimously approved the renewal of the management agreement pursuant to which American Century Investment Management, Inc. (the “Advisor”) acts as the investment advisor for the Fund. Under Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act, contracts for investment advisory services are required to be reviewed, evaluated, and approved by a majority of a fund’s directors/trustees, including a majority of the independent Trustees, each year. The Board regards this annual evaluation and renewal as one of its most important responsibilities.

The independent Trustees have memorialized a statement regarding the relationship between their ongoing obligations to oversee and evaluate the performance of the Advisor and their annual consideration of renewal of the management agreement. In that statement, the independent Trustees noted that their assessment of the Advisor’s performance is an ongoing process that takes place over the entire year and is informed by all of the extensive information that the Board and its committees receive and consider over time. This information, together with the materials provided in connection with the review, are central to the Board’s assessment of the Advisor’s performance and its determination whether to renew the Fund’s management agreement.

Prior to its consideration of the renewal of the management agreement, the Board requested and reviewed extensive data and analysis relating to the proposed renewal. This information and analysis was compiled by the Advisor and certain independent providers of evaluation data concerning the Fund and the services provided to the Fund by the Advisor.

In connection with its consideration of the renewal of the management agreement, the Board’s review and evaluation of the services provided by the Advisor included, but was not limited to, the following:

the nature, extent, and quality of investment management, shareholder services, and other services provided by the Advisor to the Fund;
the wide range of other programs and services the Advisor provides to the Fund and its shareholders on a routine and non-routine basis;
the investment performance of the Fund, including data comparing the Fund’s performance to appropriate benchmarks and/or a peer group of other mutual funds with similar investment objectives and strategies;
the cost of owning the Fund compared to the cost of owning similar funds;
the Advisor’s compliance policies, procedures, and regulatory experience;
financial data showing the cost of services provided to the Fund, the profitability of the Fund to the Advisor, and the overall profitability of the Advisor;
possible economies of scale associated with the Advisor’s management of the Fund and other accounts under its management;
data comparing services provided and charges to other investment management clients of the Advisor; and
any collateral benefits derived by the Advisor from the management of the Fund.

In keeping with its practice, the Board held two in-person meetings to review and discuss the information provided. The independent Trustees also had the benefit of the advice of their independent counsel throughout the process.

Factors Considered

The Trustees considered all of the information provided by the Advisor, the independent data providers, and the independent Trustees’ independent counsel in connection with the review, and evaluated such information for the Fund. In connection with their review, the Trustees did not identify any single factor as being all-important or controlling and each Trustee may have attributed different levels of importance to different factors. In deciding to renew the management agreement, the Board based its decision on a number of factors, including the following:

21



Nature, Extent and Quality of Services — Generally. Under the management agreement, the Advisor is responsible for providing or arranging for all services necessary for the operation of the Fund. The Board noted that under the management agreement, the Advisor provides or arranges at its own expense a wide variety of services including:

constructing and designing the Fund
portfolio research and security selection
initial capitalization/funding
securities trading
Fund administration
custody of Fund assets
daily valuation of the Fund’s portfolio
shareholder servicing and transfer agency, including shareholder confirmations, recordkeeping, and communications
legal services
regulatory and portfolio compliance
financial reporting
marketing and distribution

The Board noted that many of these services have expanded over time both in terms of quantity and complexity in response to shareholder demands, competition in the industry, changing distribution channels, and the changing regulatory environment.

Investment Management Services. The nature of the investment management services provided to the Fund is quite complex and allows Fund shareholders access to professional money management, instant diversification of their investments within an asset class, the opportunity to easily diversify among asset classes by investing in or exchanging among various American Century Investments funds, and liquidity. In evaluating investment performance, the Board expects the Advisor to manage the Fund in accordance with its investment objectives and approved strategies. Further, the Trustees recognize that the Advisor has an obligation to seek the best execution of fund trades. In providing these services, the Advisor utilizes teams of investment professionals (portfolio managers, analysts, research assistants, and securities traders) who require extensive information technology, research, training, compliance and other systems to conduct their business. The Board, directly and through its Portfolio Committee, regularly reviews investment performance information for the Fund, together with comparative information for appropriate benchmarks and/or peer groups of similarly-managed funds, over different time horizons. The Trustees also review detailed performance information during the management agreement approval process. If performance concerns are identified, the Fund receives special reviews until performance improves, during which the Board discusses with the Advisor the reasons for such results (e.g., market conditions, security selection) and any efforts being undertaken to improve performance. The Fund’s performance was in the first quartile of its peer universe for the one-, three-, five-, and ten-year periods reviewed by the Board. The Board found the investment management services provided by the Advisor to the Fund to be satisfactory and consistent with the management agreement.

Shareholder and Other Services. Under the management agreement, the Advisor provides the Fund with a comprehensive package of transfer agency, shareholder, and other services. The Board, directly and through various committees of the Board, regularly reviews reports and evaluations of such services at its regular meetings. These reports include, but are not limited to, information regarding the operational efficiency and accuracy of the shareholder and transfer agency services provided, staffing levels, shareholder satisfaction (as measured by external as well as internal sources), technology support, new products and services offered to Fund shareholders, securities trading activities, portfolio valuation services, auditing services, and legal and operational compliance activities. Certain aspects of shareholder and transfer agency service level efficiency and the quality of securities trading activities are measured by independent third party providers and are presented in comparison to other fund groups not managed by the Advisor. The Board

22



found the services provided by the Advisor to the Fund under the management agreement to be competitive and of high quality.

Costs of Services and Profitability. The Advisor provides detailed information concerning its cost of providing various services to the Fund, its profitability in managing the Fund, its overall profitability, and its financial condition. The Trustees have reviewed with the Advisor the methodology used to prepare this financial information. The financial information regarding the Advisor is considered in evaluating the Advisor’s financial condition, its ability to continue to provide services under the management agreement, and the reasonableness of the current management fee. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.

Ethics. The Board generally considers the Advisor’s commitment to providing quality services to shareholders and to conducting its business ethically. They noted that the Advisor’s practices generally meet or exceed industry best practices.

Economies of Scale. The Board also reviewed information provided by the Advisor regarding the possible existence of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund. The Board concluded that economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict with precision, especially on a fund-by-fund basis. The Board concluded that the Advisor is appropriately sharing economies of scale through its competitive fee structure, offering competitive fees from fund inception, and through reinvestment in its business to provide shareholders additional content and services.

Comparison to Other Funds’ Fees. The management agreement provides that the Fund pays the Advisor a single, all-inclusive (or unified) management fee for providing all services necessary for the management and operation of the Fund, other than brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, extraordinary expenses, and the fees and expenses of the Fund’s independent Trustees (including their independent legal counsel) and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of shareholder services and distribution services under a plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the unified fee structure, the Advisor is responsible for providing all investment advisory, custody, audit, administrative, compliance, recordkeeping, marketing and shareholder services, or arranging and supervising third parties to provide such services. By contrast, most other funds are charged a variety of fees, including an investment advisory fee, a transfer agency fee, an administrative fee, distribution charges and other expenses. Other than their investment advisory fees and any applicable Rule 12b-1 distribution fees, all other components of the total fees charged by these other funds may be increased without shareholder approval. The Board believes the unified fee structure is a benefit to Fund shareholders because it clearly discloses to shareholders the cost of owning Fund shares, and, since the unified fee cannot be increased without a vote of Fund shareholders, it shifts to the Advisor the risk of increased costs of operating the Fund and provides a direct incentive to minimize administrative inefficiencies. Part of the Board’s analysis of fee levels involves reviewing certain evaluative data compiled by an independent provider and comparing the Fund’s unified fee to the total expense ratio of peer funds. Given the industry-wide proliferation of fee waivers to support positive money market fund yields, the Board recognized that net fee comparisons may be less statistically relevant than in prior years. With that in mind, the Board reviewed peer data both on a gross basis and net of applicable waivers. The Board concluded that the management fee paid by the Fund to the Advisor under the management agreement is reasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.

Comparison to Fees and Services Provided to Other Clients of the Advisor. The Board also requested and received information from the Advisor concerning the nature of the services, fees, costs and profitability of its advisory services to advisory clients other than the Fund. They observed that these varying types of client accounts require different services and involve different regulatory and entrepreneurial risks than the management of the Fund. The Board analyzed this information and concluded that the fees charged and services provided to the Fund were reasonable by comparison.

23



Collateral or “Fall-Out” Benefits Derived by the Advisor. The Board considered the existence of collateral benefits the Advisor may receive as a result of its relationship with the Fund. They concluded that the Advisor’s primary business is managing mutual funds and it generally does not use fund or shareholder information to generate profits in other lines of business, and therefore does not derive any significant collateral benefits from them. The Board noted that the Advisor receives proprietary research from broker-dealers that execute fund portfolio transactions and concluded that this research is likely to benefit Fund shareholders. The Board also determined that the Advisor is able to provide investment management services to certain clients other than the Fund, at least in part, due to its existing infrastructure built to serve the fund complex. The Board concluded, however, that the assets of those other clients are not material to the analysis and, where applicable, may be included with the assets of the Fund to determine breakpoints in the management fee schedule.

Existing Relationship. The Board also considered whether there was any reason for not continuing the existing arrangement with the Advisor. In this regard, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund’s operations and various risks, uncertainties, and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision not to continue such relationship. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Advisor’s industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Advisor will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund.

Conclusion of the Trustees. As a result of this process, the Board, including all of the independent Trustees and assisted by the advice of independent legal counsel, taking into account all of the factors discussed above and the information provided by the Advisor and others, concluded that the management agreement between the Fund and the Advisor is fair and reasonable in light of the services provided and should be renewed.


24



Additional Information

Proxy Voting Policies
Descriptions of the principles and policies that the fund’s investment advisor uses in exercising the voting rights associated with the securities purchased and/or held by the fund are available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021 or visiting the “About Us” page of American Century Investments’ website at americancentury.com. A description of the policies is also available on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the investment advisor voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the “About Us” page at americancentury.com. It is also available at sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website at sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund also makes its complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the most recent quarter of its fiscal year available on its website at americancentury.com and, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021.

Other Tax Information
The following information is provided pursuant to provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.

The fund designates $22,836 as exempt interest dividends for the fiscal year ended
August 31, 2014.


25



Notes

26



Notes

27



Notes


28








 
 
 
 
Contact Us
americancentury.com
 
Automated Information Line
1-800-345-8765
 
Investor Services Representative
1-800-345-2021
or 816-531-5575
 
Investors Using Advisors
1-800-378-9878
 
Business, Not-For-Profit, Employer-Sponsored Retirement Plans
1-800-345-3533
 
Banks and Trust Companies, Broker-Dealers, Financial Professionals, Insurance Companies
1-800-345-6488
 
Telecommunications Relay Service for the Deaf
711
 
 
 
 
American Century California Tax-Free and Municipal Funds
 
 
 
 
Investment Advisor:
American Century Investment Management, Inc.
Kansas City, Missouri
 
 
 
 
This report and the statements it contains are submitted for the general information of our shareholders. The report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus.
 
 
 
 
©2014 American Century Proprietary Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.
CL-ANN-83161   1410
 




 
 
ANNUAL REPORT
AUGUST 31, 2014
 
  



California Intermediate-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund









Table of Contents
 
President’s Letter
Performance
Portfolio Commentary
Fund Characteristics
Shareholder Fee Example
Schedule of Investments
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
Statement of Operations
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
Notes to Financial Statements
Financial Highlights
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Management
Approval of Management Agreement
Additional Information




















Any opinions expressed in this report reflect those of the author as of the date of the report, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of American Century Investments® or any other person in the American Century Investments organization. Any such opinions are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and American Century Investments disclaims any responsibility to update such opinions. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions made by American Century Investments funds are based on numerous factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any American Century Investments fund. Security examples are used for representational purposes only and are not intended as recommendations to purchase or sell securities. Performance information for comparative indices and securities is provided to American Century Investments by third party vendors. To the best of American Century Investments’ knowledge, such information is accurate at the time of printing.




President’s Letter

Dear Investor:

Thank you for reviewing this annual report for the 12 months ended August 31, 2014. It provides investment performance and portfolio information for the reporting period, plus longer-term historical performance data.

Annual reports remain important vehicles for conveying information about fund returns, including market and economic factors that affected performance during the reporting period. For additional, updated investment and market insights, we encourage you to visit our website, americancentury.com.


Jonathan Thomas

Favorable Fiscal Year for Municipal Bond (Muni) Returns

Stimulative monetary policies and expectations of longer-term economic improvement, interspersed with concerns about nearer-term weaker-than-expected economic data and geopolitical conflicts, helped drive financial market returns during the reporting period. We believe the combination of longer-term optimism about global economic growth, low costs of capital, and central bank purchases of fixed-income securities helped persuade investors to seek risk and yield, which benefited both stocks and bonds during the period. The S&P 500 Index gained 25.25%. The 30-year U.S. Treasury bond returned 15.96%, according to Barclays.

After selling off in 2013, munis rallied strongly in 2014. The muni market rebounded from the ripple effects of Detroit’s bankruptcy, Puerto Rico’s fiscal struggles, and the mid-year “Taper Tantrum” interest rate increase in 2013 to post some of its strongest 12-month returns of the past 10 years. The rally resulted from a favorable combination of constrained inflation, improving economic and credit conditions, strong demand for yield, relatively low muni issuance, and the unexpected U.S. Treasury market rally. The Barclays Municipal Bond Index returned 10.14%, compared with 5.66% for the Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The Barclays California Tax-Exempt Bond Index and the Barclays Municipal High Yield Bond Index performed even better, returning 11.85% and 14.74%, respectively.

As is typically the case after such a strong fiscal year, we try to temper expectations for future returns. It’s unlikely that the muni market will perform again at that level in consecutive years. That said, favorable conditions do remain in place for munis, including economic growth and solid credit conditions in the U.S., contained inflation in the near term, and continuing investor demand for yield. Global economic and geopolitical uncertainties also help increase the relative attractiveness of U.S. bonds. In this environment, we continue to believe in a disciplined, diversified, long-term investment approach, using professionally managed stock and bond portfolios for meeting financial goals. We appreciate your continued trust in us.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Thomas
President and Chief Executive Officer
American Century Investments



2



Performance
 
Total Returns as of August 31, 2014
 
 
 
Average Annual Returns
 
 
Ticker
Symbol
1 year
5 years
10 years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
Investor Class
BCITX
7.68%
4.85%
4.09%
5.58%
11/9/83
Barclays 7 Year Municipal Bond Index
7.52%
4.95%
4.70%
N/A(1)
Institutional Class
BCTIX
7.90%
4.76%
3/1/10
A Class
BCIAX 
 
 
 
 
3/1/10
No sales charge*
 
7.41%
4.29%
 
With sales charge*
 
2.54%
3.22%
 
C Class
BCIYX
6.71%
3.53%
3/1/10
*
Sales charges include initial sales charges and contingent deferred sales charges (CDSCs), as applicable. A Class shares have a 4.50% maximum initial sales charge and may be subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. C Class shares redeemed within 12 months of purchase are subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. The SEC requires that mutual funds provide performance information net of maximum sales charges in all cases where charges could be applied.

(1)
Benchmark data first available January 1990.









Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. As interest rates rise, bond values will decline. The fund concentrates its investments in a single state and therefore may have more exposure to credit risk related to the state of California than a fund with a broader geographical diversification. Investment income may be subject to certain state and local taxes and, depending on your tax status, the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT). Capital gains are not exempt from state and federal income tax.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.

3



Growth of $10,000 Over 10 Years
$10,000 investment made August 31, 2004
 
Value on August 31, 2014
 
Investor Class — $14,932
 
 
Barclays 7 Year Municipal Bond Index — $15,841
 

Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses
Investor Class
Institutional Class
A Class
C Class
0.47%
0.27%
0.72%
1.47%
The total annual fund operating expenses shown is as stated in the fund’s prospectus current as of the date of this report. The prospectus may vary from the expense ratio shown elsewhere in this report because it is based on a different time period, includes acquired fund fees and expenses, and, if applicable, does not include fee waivers or expense reimbursements.






Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. As interest rates rise, bond values will decline. The fund concentrates its investments in a single state and therefore may have more exposure to credit risk related to the state of California than a fund with a broader geographical diversification. Investment income may be subject to certain state and local taxes and, depending on your tax status, the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT). Capital gains are not exempt from state and federal income tax.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.

4



Portfolio Commentary

Portfolio Managers: Joseph Gotelli, Alan Kruss, and Steven Permut

Performance Summary

California Intermediate-Term Tax-Free Bond returned 7.68%* for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2014. By comparison, the Barclays 7 Year Municipal Bond Index returned 7.52%. Fund returns reflect operating expenses, while index returns do not. (See pages 3 and 4 for additional performance comparisons.)

The fund’s absolute return reflected the positive overall performance of municipal bonds (munis), despite some challenges early in the reporting period. After struggling in 2013 with rising interest rates, negative credit-related events, and steady muni fund outflows, the muni market rebounded throughout the first eight months of 2014. Investor optimism regarding munis improved as fears about sharp rate hikes and widespread municipal credit challenges subsided. In addition, higher federal tax rates made the taxable-equivalent yields of munis more attractive for many yield-hungry investors. Meanwhile, growing demand for munis was met with declining issuance, providing a positive supply/demand backdrop.

The portfolio’s single-state bias was a main contributor to the fund’s outperformance relative to its benchmark. California munis generally outperformed the national muni benchmarks. In addition, overweight positions among longer-maturity securities contributed favorably to the fund’s relative results.

Fiscal and Credit Fundamentals

The muni market faced—but generally overcame—some notable negative headlines during the 12-month period. Detroit’s bankruptcy filing, which occurred in July 2013, prior to the start of the current reporting period, continued to taint market sentiment, particularly early in the period. Additionally, Puerto Rico, which is one of the largest issuers of municipal debt, captured headlines as the Commonwealth struggled with a stubbornly weak economy, mounting debt, and persistent budget deficits, which ultimately prompted Puerto Rico’s government to draft a controversial debt-restructuring plan.

Despite these high-profile challenges, overall credit trends in the muni market were stable to improving throughout the period. State and local tax revenues generally increased, due to improving local economies and/or higher tax rates. And that trend may continue. According to the National Association of State Budget Officers, 42 states plan to increase spending in fiscal 2015 (which began July 1, 2014, for most states). In California, employment and housing market gains helped improve the state’s fiscal landscape. California’s fiscal 2015 spending plan pays down debt, builds a rainy day fund, and provides additional money for schools and health care. Citing California’s “rapidly improving financial position,” Moody’s Investors Service upgraded the state’s general obligation (GO) credit rating to its highest level since 2001 (to Aa3). California state GOs remained rated “A” by Fitch and Standard & Poor’s.








*  
All fund returns referenced in this commentary are for Investor Class shares. Performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structures; when Investor Class performance exceeds that of the fund’s benchmark, other share classes may not. See page 3 for returns for all share classes.

5



Nationwide, muni credit-rating downgrades continued to outpace upgrades, but at a narrowing pace. Furthermore, the national muni default rate remained low at approximately 0.02% through the first seven months of 2014, compared with 0.08% for the full year of 2013, according to Bank of America. We continue to believe it’s unlikely any states will default, but select, isolated state and commonwealth credit ratings are likely to remain under downward pressure, and court decisions on bondholder versus debtor rights in current muni bankruptcy proceedings could produce more ripples. Overall, we still believe the events in Puerto Rico and Detroit reflect well-documented idiosyncratic credit risks that are particular to their situations and are not indicative of underlying municipal market credit trends.

Portfolio Positioning

In addition to the portfolio’s California bias compared with the benchmark, yield curve and duration (price sensitivity to interest rate changes) positioning contributed to the fund’s relative outperformance. Specifically, we positioned the fund with overweight positions relative to the benchmark in longer-maturity securities. After rising early in the reporting period, longer-term interest rates fell sharply during the first eight months of 2014, causing the yield curve to flatten. This downward shift in rates more than offset the earlier effects of higher rates, and returns on longer-maturity munis significantly outperformed their shorter-maturity counterparts.

Overall, we continued to favor revenue bonds, which generally outperformed GO bonds during the period. However, our specific security selections detracted from relative performance. In particular, our holdings in the public power and water and sewer sectors weighed on results. Small positions in Puerto Rico electric and water/sewer bonds primarily accounted for the underperformance in these sectors. Meanwhile, security selection among lease revenue and toll road bonds contributed positively to relative performance.

The fund owned Treasury futures as part of its duration positioning strategy. This particular position detracted from performance, but overall the portfolio’s duration and yield curve positioning contributed positively to performance.

Outlook

Near term, we expect the muni market’s supply/demand imbalance to continue to drive performance. Although we expect muni supply to increase in the months ahead, we also expect demand to remain strong. We believe interest rates may slowly climb to more “normal” levels as the economy gradually improves and the Federal Reserve's quantitative easing program concludes. We therefore expect to add securities we believe should perform well in a rising rate environment, including higher-yielding munis. Additionally, we expect fundamental credit research, active management, and security selection to become increasingly important as rates normalize.





6



Fund Characteristics
 
AUGUST 31, 2014
Portfolio at a Glance
 
Weighted Average Maturity
8.8 years
Average Duration (Modified)
4.1 years
 
 
Top Five Sectors
% of fund investments
Public Power
16%
General Obligation (GO) - State
12%
Lease Revenue
10%
General Obligation (GO) - Local
9%
Prerefunded
8%
 
 
Types of Investments in Portfolio  
% of net assets
Municipal Securities
99.1%
Other Assets and Liabilities
0.9%

7



Shareholder Fee Example
 
Fund shareholders may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and redemption/exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing cost of investing in other mutual funds.

The example is based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from March 1, 2014 to August 31, 2014.

Actual Expenses

The table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses for each class. You may use the information, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. First, identify the share class you own. Then simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

If you hold Investor Class shares of any American Century Investments fund, or Institutional Class shares of the American Century Diversified Bond Fund, in an American Century Investments account (i.e., not a financial intermediary or retirement plan account), American Century Investments may charge you a $12.50 semiannual account maintenance fee if the value of those shares is less than $10,000. We will redeem shares automatically in one of your accounts to pay the $12.50 fee. In determining your total eligible investment amount, we will include your investments in all personal accounts (including American Century Investments Brokerage accounts) registered under your Social Security number. Personal accounts include individual accounts, joint accounts, UGMA/UTMA accounts, personal trusts, Coverdell Education Savings Accounts and IRAs (including traditional, Roth, Rollover, SEP-, SARSEP- and SIMPLE-IRAs), and certain other retirement accounts. If you have only business, business retirement, employer-sponsored or American Century Investments Brokerage accounts, you are currently not subject to this fee. If you are subject to the Account Maintenance Fee, your account value could be reduced by the fee amount.

Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes

The table also provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio of each class of your fund and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of a fund’s share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption/exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.


8





Beginning
Account Value
3/1/14
Ending
Account Value
8/31/14
Expenses Paid
During Period(1)
3/1/14 - 8/31/14

Annualized
Expense Ratio(1)
Actual
 
 
 
 
Investor Class
$1,000
$1,026.70
$2.40
0.47%
Institutional Class
$1,000
$1,027.80
$1.38
0.27%
A Class
$1,000
$1,025.40
$3.68
0.72%
C Class
$1,000
$1,021.60
$7.49
1.47%
Hypothetical
 
 
 
 
Investor Class
$1,000
$1,022.84
$2.40
0.47%
Institutional Class
$1,000
$1,023.84
$1.38
0.27%
A Class
$1,000
$1,021.58
$3.67
0.72%
C Class
$1,000
$1,017.80
$7.48
1.47%
(1)
Expenses are equal to the class's annualized expense ratio listed in the table above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184, the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, divided by 365, to reflect the one-half year period.


9



Schedule of Investments

AUGUST 31, 2014
 
Principal
Amount
Value
MUNICIPAL SECURITIES — 99.1%
 
 
California — 97.6%
 
 
ABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corps. Rev., (Jackson Laboratory), 4.00%, 7/1/15
$
280,000

$
288,347

ABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corps. Rev., (Jackson Laboratory), 4.00%, 7/1/16
270,000

286,683

ABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corps. Rev., (Jackson Laboratory), 5.00%, 7/1/17
1,000,000

1,115,100

ABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corps. Rev., (Jackson Laboratory), 5.00%, 7/1/18
500,000

570,765

ABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corps. Rev., Series 2011 A, (Sharp HealthCare), 6.00%, 8/1/30
2,500,000

3,073,475

ABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corps. Rev., Series 2014 A, (Sharp HealthCare), 5.00%, 8/1/33
1,450,000

1,635,556

Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority Rev., Series 2013 A, 5.00%, 10/1/24
2,000,000

2,390,740

Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority Rev., Series 2013 A, (Senior Lien), 5.00%, 10/1/20
3,010,000

3,598,997

Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority Rev., Capital Appreciation, Series 1999 A, 0.00%, 10/1/35 (NATL-RE)(1)
9,000,000

3,572,190

Alum Rock Union Elementary School District GO, Series 2013 A, (Election of 2012), 6.00%, 8/1/39
1,500,000

1,870,560

Anaheim Public Financing Authority Rev., Series 2011 A, (Electric System Distribution Facilities), 5.375%, 10/1/36
700,000

823,263

Anaheim Public Financing Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, (Electric System Distribution Facilities), 5.00%, 10/1/23
1,200,000

1,455,132

Anaheim Public Financing Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, (Electric System Distribution Facilities), 5.00%, 10/1/24
2,275,000

2,732,935

Bay Area Toll Authority Toll Bridge Rev., Series 2001 A, (San Francisco Bay Area), VRDN, 1.30%, 9/4/14
5,000,000

5,045,750

Bay Area Toll Authority Toll Bridge Rev., Series 2007 A1, (San Francisco Bay Area), VRDN, 0.75%, 9/4/14
1,450,000

1,450,710

Bay Area Toll Authority Toll Bridge Rev., Series 2007 F, (San Francisco Bay Area), 5.00%, 4/1/17, Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)
2,000,000

2,235,340

Bay Area Toll Authority Toll Bridge Rev., Series 2008 F1, (San Francisco Bay Area), 5.00%, 4/1/18, Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)
5,000,000

5,777,100

Bay Area Toll Authority Toll Bridge Rev., Series 2008 G1, (San Francisco Bay Area), VRDN, 1.15%, 9/4/14
2,500,000

2,517,925

Bay Area Toll Authority Toll Bridge Rev., Series 2009 F1, (San Francisco Bay Area), 5.25%, 4/1/27
5,000,000

5,877,450

Bay Area Toll Authority Toll Bridge Rev., Series 2012 F1, (San Francisco Bay Area), 5.00%, 4/1/24
1,500,000

1,815,990

Bay Area Toll Authority Toll Bridge Rev., Series 2012 F1, (San Francisco Bay Area), 5.00%, 4/1/25
3,500,000

4,231,815

Bay Area Toll Authority Toll Bridge Rev., Series 2012 F1, (San Francisco Bay Area), 5.00%, 4/1/28
7,185,000

8,480,743

Bay Area Toll Authority Toll Bridge Rev., Series 2013 S4, (San Francisco Bay Area), 5.00%, 4/1/43
5,610,000

6,231,644

California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., Series 2005 F5, 5.00%, 5/1/22
1,800,000

2,069,118

California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., Series 2005 G4, 5.00%, 5/1/16
3,230,000

3,486,527


10



 
Principal
Amount
Value
California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., Series 2008 H, 5.00%, 5/1/21
$
5,000,000

$
5,763,250

California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., Series 2009 AG, (Central Valley), 5.00%, 12/1/25
1,000,000

1,192,120

California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., Series 2010 L, 4.00%, 5/1/15
2,290,000

2,350,135

California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., Series 2010 L, 5.00%, 5/1/15
1,000,000

1,032,980

California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., Series 2010 L, 5.00%, 5/1/16
5,000,000

5,397,100

California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., Series 2010 L, 5.00%, 5/1/17
5,000,000

5,605,250

California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., Series 2010 L, 5.00%, 5/1/18
3,000,000

3,468,690

California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., Series 2010 L, 5.00%, 5/1/19
7,000,000

8,316,700

California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., Series 2010 L, 5.00%, 5/1/21
3,000,000

3,590,820

California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., Series 2010 L, 5.00%, 5/1/22
18,000,000

21,444,480

California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., Series 2010 M, 4.00%, 5/1/15
7,275,000

7,466,041

California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., Series 2010 M, 5.00%, 5/1/15
4,000,000

4,131,920

California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., Series 2010 M, 5.00%, 5/1/16
2,000,000

2,158,840

California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., Series 2011 N, 5.00%, 5/1/20(3)
14,215,000

17,216,213

California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., Series 2011 N, 5.00%, 5/1/21
13,300,000

16,360,330

California Economic Recovery GO, Series 2004 C4, VRDN, 0.02%, 9/2/14 (LOC: JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.)
2,905,000

2,905,000

California Economic Recovery GO, Series 2009 A, 5.00%, 7/1/18
7,000,000

8,142,400

California Economic Recovery GO, Series 2009 A, 5.00%, 7/1/19
4,505,000

5,366,987

California Economic Recovery GO, Series 2009 A, 5.00%, 7/1/20
5,000,000

5,941,050

California Economic Recovery GO, Series 2009 A, 5.00%, 7/1/22
2,000,000

2,171,520

California Educational Facilities Authority Rev., (Chapman University), 5.00%, 4/1/31
1,455,000

1,608,983

California Educational Facilities Authority Rev., (San Francisco University), 5.00%, 10/1/16
1,200,000

1,315,896

California Educational Facilities Authority Rev., (San Francisco University), 5.00%, 10/1/21
750,000

902,678

California Educational Facilities Authority Rev., (Santa Clara University), 5.00%, 4/1/18
500,000

573,290

California Educational Facilities Authority Rev., (Santa Clara University), 5.00%, 4/1/19
700,000

805,343

California Educational Facilities Authority Rev., (Santa Clara University), 5.25%, 4/1/23
2,000,000

2,281,960

California Educational Facilities Authority Rev., (University of the Pacific), 5.00%, 11/1/15, Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)
70,000

73,984

California Educational Facilities Authority Rev., (University of the Pacific), 5.00%, 11/1/36
975,000

989,869

California Educational Facilities Authority Rev., Series 2009 A, (Pomona College), 5.00%, 1/1/24
2,100,000

2,447,508

California Educational Facilities Authority Rev., Series 2009 A, (University of Southern California), 5.00%, 10/1/39
2,950,000

3,310,254


11



 
Principal
Amount
Value
California Educational Facilities Authority Rev., Series 2010 A, (Loyola Marymount University), 5.00%, 10/1/30
$
1,365,000

$
1,525,770

California Educational Facilities Authority Rev., Series 2010 B, (Loyola Marymount University), VRN, 0.85%, 9/4/14
3,675,000

3,678,491

California Educational Facilities Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, (University of the Pacific), 4.50%, 11/1/15
1,240,000

1,300,661

California Educational Facilities Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, (University of the Pacific), 4.50%, 11/1/17
1,000,000

1,115,360

California GO, 4.00%, 10/1/14
3,000,000

3,010,560

California GO, 5.00%, 9/1/15
9,115,000

9,562,638

California GO, 5.00%, 11/1/16 (Ambac)
1,575,000

1,733,996

California GO, 5.00%, 10/1/17
2,170,000

2,463,189

California GO, 5.50%, 4/1/18
2,535,000

2,966,508

California GO, 5.00%, 8/1/18
2,260,000

2,504,871

California GO, 5.00%, 9/1/18
1,000,000

1,165,860

California GO, 5.00%, 9/1/19
7,645,000

9,116,968

California GO, 5.00%, 3/1/20
1,690,000

1,909,210

California GO, 5.00%, 8/1/20
5,000,000

5,521,250

California GO, 5.25%, 10/1/20
5,000,000

6,050,350

California GO, 5.00%, 3/1/22
5,000,000

5,351,850

California GO, 5.00%, 9/1/22
2,000,000

2,458,120

California GO, 5.50%, 4/1/24
4,600,000

5,470,320

California GO, 5.00%, 8/1/24
1,260,000

1,384,942

California GO, 5.00%, 12/1/26
1,045,000

1,260,510

California GO, 5.00%, 2/1/27
14,000,000

16,529,380

California GO, 5.00%, 2/1/28
5,795,000

6,809,647

California GO, 5.75%, 4/1/28
5,000,000

5,981,800

California GO, 5.00%, 11/1/29
2,625,000

3,102,015

California GO, 5.75%, 4/1/31
5,000,000

5,947,400

California GO, 5.00%, 11/1/32
1,890,000

2,085,161

California GO, 6.50%, 4/1/33
5,000,000

6,115,750

California GO, 6.00%, 4/1/38
3,000,000

3,573,690

California GO, Series 2003 A1, VRDN, 0.03%, 9/2/14 (LOC: JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.)
3,700,000

3,700,000

California GO, Series 2004 A1, VRDN, 0.02%, 9/2/14 (LOC: Citibank N.A.)
800,000

800,000

California GO, Series 2004 A3, (Kindergarten), VRDN, 0.03%, 9/2/14 (LOC: State Street Bank & Trust Co.)
7,300,000

7,300,000

California GO, Series 2004 B2, (Kindergarten), VRDN, 0.02%, 9/2/14 (LOC: Citibank N.A.)
1,900,000

1,900,000

California GO, Series 2012 B, VRN, 0.95%, 9/4/14
2,000,000

2,024,940

California GO, Series 2012 B, VRN, 1.05%, 9/4/14
800,000

811,944

California GO, Series 2012 B, VRN, 1.20%, 9/4/14
960,000

978,000

California GO, VRDN, 4.00%, 12/1/16
3,000,000

3,191,280

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center), 5.00%, 8/15/18
1,000,000

1,161,750

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center), 5.00%, 8/15/19
735,000

869,534

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., (NCROC Paradise Valley Estates), 5.70%, 12/1/24 (Ambac/California Mortgage Insurance)
1,455,000

1,709,712


12



 
Principal
Amount
Value
California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2008 A, (Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital), VRDN, 1.45%, 3/15/17
$
2,000,000

$
2,046,140

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2008 A, (Scripps Health), 5.00%, 10/1/17
1,400,000

1,587,530

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2008 A, (Sutter Health), 5.50%, 8/15/17
1,000,000

1,147,200

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2008 A, (Sutter Health), 5.25%, 8/15/22
3,335,000

3,878,505

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2008 B, (Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital), VRDN, 1.45%, 3/15/17
2,200,000

2,250,754

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2008 C, (Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital), VRDN, 1.45%, 3/15/17
1,500,000

1,534,605

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2008 C, (Providence Health & Services), 5.00%, 10/1/14
500,000

502,195

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2008 C, (Providence Health & Services), 6.25%, 10/1/18, Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)
3,250,000

3,975,010

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2008 C, (Providence Health & Services), 6.50%, 10/1/18, Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)
40,000

49,289

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2008 C, (Providence Health & Services), 6.50%, 10/1/18, Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)
2,085,000

2,566,364

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2008 H, (Catholic Healthcare West), 5.125%, 7/1/22
355,000

368,281

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2009 A, (Catholic Healthcare West), 5.00%, 7/1/18
3,000,000

3,419,130

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2009 A, (Children's Hospital of Orange County), 6.25%, 11/1/29
5,000,000

5,879,000

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2009 A, (St. Joseph Health System), 5.50%, 7/1/29
1,500,000

1,747,395

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2009 A, (St. Joseph Health System), 5.75%, 7/1/39
1,000,000

1,166,340

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2010 A, (Stanford Hospital), 5.00%, 11/15/25
2,000,000

2,307,840

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2011 B, (St. Joseph Health System), VRDN, 0.04%, 9/2/14 (LOC: U.S. Bank N.A.)
4,750,000

4,750,000

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2011 B, (Sutter Health), 6.00%, 8/15/42
1,000,000

1,205,310

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2011 C, (St. Joseph Health System), VRDN, 0.02%, 9/2/14 (LOC: Allied Irish Bank plc)
6,685,000

6,685,000

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2011 D, (Sutter Health), 5.00%, 8/15/18
1,305,000

1,518,733

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2011 D, (Sutter Health), 5.00%, 8/15/22
1,650,000

1,967,245

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, (Stanford Hospital & Clinics), 5.00%, 8/15/51
1,000,000

1,109,660

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2013 A, (St. Joseph Health System), 5.00%, 7/1/37
890,000

985,346

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2013 A, (Sutter Health), 5.00%, 8/15/52
4,500,000

4,940,865

California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev., (Columbia College), VRDN, 0.05%, 9/4/14 (LOC: Rabobank Nederland N.V.)
1,555,000

1,555,000

California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev., (Pacific Gas & Electric Co.), VRDN, 0.03%, 9/2/14 (LOC: Union Bank N.A.)
12,300,000

12,300,000

California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev., Series 2000 A, (Scripps Research Institute), 5.625%, 7/1/20
790,000

793,381


13



 
Principal
Amount
Value
California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev., Series 2003 A, (Bay Area Toll Bridges Seismic Retrofit 1st Lien), 5.125%, 7/1/26, Prerefunded at 100% of Par (Ambac)(2)
$
5,000,000

$
6,538,300

California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev., Series 2010 A, (University of California, San Francisco Neuroscience Building), 5.00%, 5/15/22
3,735,000

4,446,928

California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev., Series 2012 A1, (J. Paul Getty Trust), 4.00%, 10/1/15
975,000

1,016,204

California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev., Series 2012 B1, (J. Paul Getty Trust), VRDN, 0.35%, 9/4/14
7,500,000

7,500,975

California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev., Series 2013 A, (Los Angeles County Museum of Art Project), VRDN, 1.86%, 9/4/14
3,000,000

3,061,800

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., (Biola University), 5.00%, 10/1/18
1,000,000

1,126,830

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., (Community Hospitals Central), 5.00%, 2/1/17
2,000,000

2,176,420

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., Series 2007, (Loma Linda University), 5.00%, 4/1/23
1,145,000

1,217,421

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., Series 2007, (Loma Linda University), 5.00%, 4/1/28
2,000,000

2,094,540

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., Series 2010 A, (Eisenhower Medical Center), 5.00%, 7/1/19
605,000

668,858

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., Series 2010 A, (Eisenhower Medical Center), 5.25%, 7/1/21
1,760,000

1,948,267

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., Series 2010 A, (University of Louisiana Verne), 5.00%, 6/1/17
2,290,000

2,499,878

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., Series 2011, (Emerson College), 5.75%, 1/1/33
2,250,000

2,601,022

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., Series 2011, (Emerson College), 6.00%, 1/1/42
1,000,000

1,166,500

California Pollution Control Financing Authority Rev., Series 1996 E, (Pacific Gas & Electric Company), VRDN, 0.02%, 9/2/14 (LOC: JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.)
1,400,000

1,400,000

California Pollution Control Financing Authority Rev., Series 1996 F, (Pacific Gas & Electric Company), VRDN, 0.02%, 9/2/14 (LOC: JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.)
4,600,000

4,600,000

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2005 A, (Department of General Services - Butterfield), 5.00%, 6/1/15
1,450,000

1,503,606

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2006 A, (California State University), 5.00%, 10/1/16 (NATL-RE/FGIC)
1,500,000

1,645,200

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2009 A, (Department of General Services - Building 8 & 9), 6.25%, 4/1/34
2,435,000

2,889,517

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2009 B, (Department of Education - Riverside Campus), 6.00%, 4/1/27
2,130,000

2,516,297

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2009 I1, (Various Capital Projects), 6.375%, 11/1/34
2,500,000

3,036,850

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2011 D, (Judicial Council Projects), 5.00%, 12/1/15
4,000,000

4,242,120

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2011 D, (Judicial Council Projects), 5.00%, 12/1/16
1,820,000

2,009,007

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2011 D, (Judicial Council Projects), 5.25%, 12/1/26
2,000,000

2,425,100

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2011 G, (University of California), 5.00%, 12/1/21, Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)(3)
3,700,000

4,547,004

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2012 A, (Various Capital Projects), 5.00%, 4/1/15
4,000,000

4,115,360


14



 
Principal
Amount
Value
California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2012 A, (Various Capital Projects), 5.00%, 4/1/21
$
3,000,000

$
3,627,150

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2012 A, (Various Capital Projects), 5.00%, 4/1/22
2,100,000

2,551,878

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2012 A, (Various Capital Projects), 5.00%, 4/1/23
2,000,000

2,402,200

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2012 A, (Various Capital Projects), 5.00%, 4/1/25
1,800,000

2,113,722

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2012 A, (Various Capital Projects), 5.00%, 4/1/37
4,545,000

5,038,905

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2012 D, 5.00%, 9/1/36
1,000,000

1,106,510

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2012 G, (Various Capital Projects), 4.00%, 11/1/17
1,250,000

1,382,138

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2013 H, (California State University Project), 5.00%, 9/1/38
4,500,000

5,001,030

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2013 I, (Various Capital Projects), 5.00%, 11/1/38
2,400,000

2,697,288

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/25
5,000,000

6,097,950

California School Cash Reserve Program Authority Rev., Series 2014 G, 2.00%, 2/27/15
5,000,000

5,042,900

California State University Systemwide Rev., Series 2011 A, 5.00%, 11/1/20
1,250,000

1,516,925

California State University Systemwide Rev., Series 2011 A, 5.00%, 11/1/24
5,000,000

5,964,800

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., (Cottage Health Obligation Group), 5.00%, 11/1/16
750,000

821,498

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., (Cottage Health Obligation Group), 5.00%, 11/1/17
815,000

918,611

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., (Cottage Health Obligation Group), 5.00%, 11/1/18
515,000

591,668

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., (John Muir Health), 5.00%, 7/1/20
2,225,000

2,562,977

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., (Southern California Edison Co.), VRDN, 1.375%, 4/2/18
1,775,000

1,785,543

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., (St. Joseph Remarketing), 5.125%, 7/1/24 (NATL-RE)
2,000,000

2,271,780

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., (Trinity Health Corp.), 5.00%, 12/1/41
1,570,000

1,717,030

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2002 B, (Pooled Financing Program), 5.20%, 10/1/18 (AGM)
440,000

441,729

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2007 A, (California Baptist University), 5.30%, 11/1/18
1,655,000

1,799,515

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2007 A, (California Baptist University), 5.40%, 11/1/27
1,000,000

1,038,530

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2007 A, (Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital), 5.00%, 10/1/17, Prerefunded at 100% of Par (California Mortgage Insurance)(2)
1,000,000

1,137,250

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2007 A, (Valleycare Health System), 4.80%, 7/15/17
1,980,000

2,103,493

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2007 A, (Valleycare Health System), 5.00%, 7/15/22
2,460,000

2,527,478

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2008 A, (John Muir Health), VRDN, 0.01%, 9/2/14 (LOC: Wells Fargo Bank N.A.)
1,600,000

1,600,000

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2008 C, (John Muir Health), VRDN, 0.03%, 9/2/14 (LOC: Wells Fargo Bank N.A.)
1,100,000

1,100,000


15



 
Principal
Amount
Value
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2009 A, (Kaiser Permanente), 5.00%, 4/1/19
$
1,450,000

$
1,703,097

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, (Kaiser Permanente), 5.00%, 4/1/42
8,400,000

9,233,112

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2014 B, (Los Angeles Jewish Home), 3.00%, 8/1/21 (GA: Jewish Home Foundation)
3,900,000

4,010,370

Calleguas-Las Virgenes Public Financing Authority Rev., Series 2007 A, (Municipal Water District), 5.00%, 7/1/16, Prerefunded at 100% of Par (NATL-RE/FGIC)(2)
1,000,000

1,085,830

Capistrano Unified School District Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 87-1), 5.00%, 9/1/18 (Ambac)
3,115,000

3,361,801

Carson Redevelopment Agency Successor Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, (Merged and Amended Project Area), 4.00%, 10/1/15
625,000

650,400

Carson Redevelopment Agency Successor Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, (Merged and Amended Project Area), 4.00%, 10/1/16
525,000

563,477

Carson Redevelopment Agency Successor Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, (Merged and Amended Project Area), 4.00%, 10/1/17
675,000

742,608

Carson Redevelopment Agency Successor Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, (Project Area No. 1), 5.00%, 10/1/19 (AGM)
315,000

366,795

Chaffey Joint Union High School District GO, Series 2013 A, (Election of 2012), 5.00%, 8/1/30
3,125,000

3,636,250

Chaffey Joint Union High School District GO, Series 2013 A, (Election of 2012), 5.00%, 8/1/32
1,220,000

1,408,185

Chula Vista Rev., Series 2006 A, (San Diego Gas and Electric), 1.65%, 7/1/18
8,165,000

8,233,423

City of Fontana Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 22), 4.00%, 9/1/18
740,000

803,729

City of Fontana Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 22), 4.00%, 9/1/19
390,000

424,897

City of Fontana Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 22), 5.00%, 9/1/20
545,000

621,289

City of Fontana Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 22), 5.00%, 9/1/22
520,000

597,381

City of Fontana Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 22), 5.00%, 9/1/24
575,000

662,297

City of Irvine Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Special Assessment Rev., (Assessment District No. 13-3), 5.00%, 9/1/39
1,000,000

1,083,790

City of Irvine Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Special Assessment Rev., (Assessment District No. 87-8), VRDN, 0.02%, 9/2/14 (LOC: State Street Bank & Trust Co.)
3,900,000

3,900,000

City of Irvine Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Special Assessment Rev., (Assessment District No. 12-1), 4.00%, 9/2/17
850,000

922,760

City of Irvine Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Special Assessment Rev., (Assessment District No. 12-1), 4.00%, 9/2/18
875,000

963,979

City of Irvine Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Special Assessment Rev., (Assessment District No. 12-1), 4.00%, 9/2/19
1,400,000

1,555,400

City of La Verne COP, (Brethren Hillcrest Homes), 5.00%, 5/15/20
640,000

721,536

City of La Verne COP, (Brethren Hillcrest Homes), 5.00%, 5/15/21
315,000

355,777

City of La Verne COP, (Brethren Hillcrest Homes), 5.00%, 5/15/22
225,000

254,329

Clovis Unified School District GO, Capital Appreciation, Series 2004 A, (Election of 2004), 0.00%, 8/1/24 (NATL-RE)(1)
5,935,000

4,366,676

East Bay Municipal Utility District Rev., Series 2012 B, 4.00%, 6/1/15
1,185,000

1,220,135

East Side Union High School District GO, Series 2012, 5.00%, 8/1/25
1,405,000

1,661,820

East Side Union High School District GO, Series 2013, 5.00%, 8/1/29
2,450,000

2,850,820


16



 
Principal
Amount
Value
Eastern Municipal Water District Water & Sewer COP, Series 2008 H, 5.00%, 7/1/24
$
1,000,000

$
1,142,510

Eastern Municipal Water District Water & Sewer Rev., Series 2011 A, 5.00%, 7/1/15
600,000

624,774

Eastern Municipal Water District Water & Sewer Rev., Series 2011 A, 4.00%, 7/1/16
600,000

641,082

Fairfield Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., 4.00%, 8/1/16
1,525,000

1,628,944

Folsom Cordova Unified School District No. 2 Facilities Improvement GO, 4.00%, 10/1/14
925,000

928,238

Folsom Cordova Unified School District No. 2 Facilities Improvement GO, 4.00%, 10/1/15
570,000

594,122

Folsom Cordova Unified School District No. 4 Facilities Improvement GO, Series 2014 A, (Election of 2012), 4.00%, 10/1/15
605,000

629,926

Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency Toll Road Rev., Series 2014 A, 6.00%, 1/15/49
3,000,000

3,455,550

Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency Toll Road Rev., Series 2014 B1, VRDN, 5.00%, 1/15/18
3,750,000

4,115,737

Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency Toll Road Rev., Series 2014 B2, VRDN, 5.00%, 1/15/20
5,000,000

5,599,150

Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency Toll Road Rev., Series 2014 B3, VRDN, 5.50%, 1/15/23
2,750,000

3,190,357

Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency Toll Road Rev., Series 2014 C, 6.25%, 1/15/33
3,000,000

3,518,220

Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency Toll Road Rev., Capital Appreciation, Series 1995 A, (Senior Lien), 0.00%, 1/1/26(1)(2)
10,000,000

7,578,800

Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency Toll Road Rev., Capital Appreciation, Series 2014 A, 0.00%, 1/15/24(4)
1,600,000

1,008,928

Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency Toll Road Rev., Capital Appreciation, Series 2014 A, 0.00%, 1/15/42(1)
4,820,000

1,011,188

Franklin-McKinley School District GO, Series 2005 A, (Election of 2004), 5.00%, 8/1/15, Prerefunded at 100% of Par (FGIC)(2)
1,150,000

1,201,785

Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Settlement Rev., Series 2007 A-1, 5.00%, 6/1/33
1,250,000

1,032,750

Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Settlement Rev., Series 2007 A1, 4.50%, 6/1/27
1,365,000

1,249,739

Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Settlement Rev., Series 2013 A, 5.00%, 6/1/21
1,000,000

1,198,350

Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Settlement Rev., Series 2013 A, 5.00%, 6/1/29
2,000,000

2,260,680

Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Settlement Rev., Series 2013 A, 5.00%, 6/1/30
3,015,000

3,388,438

Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Settlement Rev., Capital Appreciation, Series 2005 A, 0.00%, 6/1/25 (AGM)(1)
2,000,000

1,418,620

Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District GO, Series 2013 A, (Election of 2012), 5.00%, 8/1/25
680,000

819,162

Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District GO, Series 2013 A, (Election of 2012), 5.00%, 8/1/26
685,000

814,547

Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District GO, Series 2013 A, (Election of 2012), 5.25%, 8/1/27
750,000

901,988

Hayward Area Recreation and Park District COP, 5.125%, 1/1/39
1,750,000

1,956,307

Huntington Beach Union High School District GO, 5.00%, 8/1/26
3,030,000

3,670,148

Inland Valley Development Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.25%, 9/1/37
1,110,000

1,253,945

Inland Valley Development Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/44
1,175,000

1,280,245


17



 
Principal
Amount
Value
Irvine Ranch Water District Rev., Series 2009 B, VRDN, 0.02%, 9/2/14 (LOC: Bank of America N.A.)
$
700,000

$
700,000

Irvine Unified School District Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., Series 2006 A, (Group II), 4.75%, 9/1/16
600,000

622,500

Irvine Unified School District Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., Series 2006 A, (Group II), 5.00%, 9/1/20
745,000

768,676

Jurupa Public Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/23
625,000

739,144

Jurupa Public Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/24
680,000

804,637

Jurupa Public Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/25
1,000,000

1,176,010

La Quinta Redevelopment Successor Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2013 A, (La Quinta Redevelopment Project Areas 1&2), 5.00%, 9/1/19
1,150,000

1,342,246

La Quinta Redevelopment Successor Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2013 A, (La Quinta Redevelopment Project Areas 1&2), 5.00%, 9/1/20
1,045,000

1,223,162

Long Beach Bond Finance Authority Natural Gas Purchase Rev., Series 2007 A, 5.00%, 11/15/35
1,215,000

1,387,554

Long Beach Harbor Rev., Series 2014 C, 5.00%, 11/15/18
22,000,000

25,833,720

Los Alamitos Unified School District COP, Capital Appreciation, (Capital Projects), 0.00%, 8/1/24(4)
2,100,000

1,434,237

Los Altos Elementary School District GO, 5.00%, 8/1/16, Prerefunded at 100% of Par (Ambac)(2)
1,045,000

1,139,343

Los Altos Elementary School District GO, 5.00%, 8/1/19 (Ambac)
1,455,000

1,581,920

Los Angeles Community College District GO, Series 2007 A, (Election of 2001), 5.00%, 8/1/32 (NATL-RE/FGIC)
2,000,000

2,213,480

Los Angeles County COP, (Disney Concert Hall), 5.00%, 3/1/21
1,195,000

1,418,202

Los Angeles County COP, (Disney Concert Hall), 5.00%, 3/1/22
1,000,000

1,193,440

Los Angeles County COP, (Disney Concert Hall), 5.00%, 3/1/23
1,955,000

2,345,687

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Sales Tax Rev., Series 2008 B, (Proposition A), 5.00%, 7/1/31
1,000,000

1,121,340

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Sales Tax Rev., Series 2010 A, (General Union Station), 5.00%, 7/1/20
3,000,000

3,583,050

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Sales Tax Rev., Series 2013 A, (Proposition A), 5.00%, 7/1/21
2,470,000

3,041,681

Los Angeles County Redevelopment Authority Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2013 D, (Redevelopment Project Areas), 4.00%, 9/1/15
2,000,000

2,070,560

Los Angeles County Redevelopment Authority Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2013 D, (Redevelopment Project Areas), 5.00%, 9/1/16
2,000,000

2,173,400

Los Angeles County Redevelopment Authority Tax Allocation Rev., Capital Appreciation, Series 2013 E, (Covina Revitalization Redevelopment Project No. 1), 0.00%, 12/1/19 (AGM)(1)
1,500,000

1,342,035

Los Angeles County Regional Financing Authority Rev., Series 2014 B-1, (MonteCedro Inc.), 2.50%, 11/15/20
2,000,000

2,038,800

Los Angeles County Regional Financing Authority Rev., Series 2014 B-1, (MonteCedro Inc.), 3.00%, 11/15/20
950,000

972,107

Los Angeles County Regional Financing Authority Rev., Series 2014 B-1, (MonteCedro Inc.), 3.00%, 11/15/21
1,170,000

1,190,229

Los Angeles Department of Airports Rev., Series 2008 C, (Los Angeles International Airport), 5.00%, 5/15/18
750,000

867,218

Los Angeles Department of Airports Rev., Series 2010 A, (Los Angeles International Airport), 5.00%, 5/15/40
3,000,000

3,394,530

Los Angeles Department of Airports Rev., Series 2010 D, (Los Angeles International Airport), 5.00%, 5/15/24
3,040,000

3,561,482

Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Rev., Series 2001 B2, VRDN, 0.02%, 9/2/14 (SBBPA: Royal Bank of Canada)
1,300,000

1,300,000


18



 
Principal
Amount
Value
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Rev., Series 2008 A2, (Power System), 5.25%, 7/1/32
$
3,535,000

$
4,016,361

Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Rev., Series 2011 A, (Power System), 4.00%, 7/1/16
1,000,000

1,070,000

Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Rev., Series 2011 A, (Power System), 5.00%, 7/1/18
780,000

908,591

Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Rev., Series 2012 A, (Power System), 5.00%, 7/1/26
1,000,000

1,190,270

Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Rev., Series 2012 C, (Power System), 5.00%, 1/1/16
8,750,000

9,216,025

Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Rev., Series 2013 B, (Power System), 5.00%, 7/1/27
6,470,000

7,756,818

Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Rev., Series 2014 B, (Power System), 5.00%, 7/1/25
700,000

863,639

Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Rev., Series 2014 B, (Power System), 5.00%, 7/1/26
1,300,000

1,589,783

Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Waterworks Rev., Series 2008 A1, (Power System), 5.25%, 7/1/38
5,000,000

5,641,000

Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Waterworks Rev., Series 2012 C, (Power System), 5.00%, 7/1/24
1,500,000

1,823,145

Los Angeles Harbor Department Rev., Series 2011 B, 5.00%, 8/1/24
1,225,000

1,488,975

Los Angeles Municipal Improvement Corp. Rev., Series 2012 C, 5.00%, 3/1/25
3,000,000

3,474,870

Los Angeles Unified School District COP, Series 2012 A, (Headquarters Building Project), 5.00%, 10/1/21
2,820,000

3,385,805

Los Angeles Unified School District COP, Series 2012 B, (Headquarters Building Project), 5.00%, 10/1/29
1,700,000

1,960,355

Los Angeles Unified School District GO, Series 2006 F, (Election of 2004), 5.00%, 7/1/16, Prerefunded at 100% of Par (FGIC)(2)
4,000,000

4,346,440

Los Angeles Unified School District GO, Series 2006 F, (Election of 2004), 5.00%, 7/1/16, Prerefunded at 100% of Par (FGIC)(2)
175,000

190,157

Los Angeles Unified School District GO, Series 2006 F, (Election of 2004), 5.00%, 7/1/18 (FGIC)
1,055,000

1,146,226

Los Angeles Unified School District GO, Series 2007 H, (Election of 2004), 5.00%, 7/1/32 (AGM)
2,000,000

2,192,640

Los Angeles Unified School District GO, Series 2009 I, (Election of 2004), 5.00%, 7/1/29
4,000,000

4,642,000

Los Angeles Unified School District GO, Series 2010 KRY, 5.25%, 7/1/26
3,000,000

3,565,680

Los Angeles Unified School District GO, Series 2011 A1, 4.00%, 7/1/17
1,000,000

1,098,380

Los Angeles Unified School District GO, Series 2011 A1, 5.00%, 7/1/18
2,565,000

2,976,195

Los Angeles Unified School District GO, Series 2011 A1, 5.00%, 7/1/24
5,140,000

6,124,567

Los Angeles Unified School District GO, Series 2011 A2, 5.00%, 7/1/21
3,000,000

3,660,480

Los Angeles Unified School District GO, Series 2014 B, 5.00%, 7/1/18
6,665,000

7,733,466

Los Angeles Unified School District GO, Series 2014 C, 5.00%, 7/1/30
1,155,000

1,375,998

Los Angeles Wastewater System Rev., Series 2009 A, 5.75%, 6/1/34
2,975,000

3,522,400

M-S-R Energy Authority Rev., Series 2009 B, 7.00%, 11/1/34 (GA: Citigroup, Inc.)
5,000,000

7,002,250

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Rev., Series 2011 A2, VRDN, 0.20%, 9/4/14
2,000,000

2,000,040

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Rev., Series 2011 A4, VRDN, 0.20%, 9/4/14
2,000,000

2,000,040

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Rev., Series 2012 B2, VRDN, 0.40%, 9/4/14
13,755,000

13,770,681


19



 
Principal
Amount
Value
Mount San Antonio Community College District GO, Capital Appreciation, Series 2005 A, (Election of 2001), 0.00%, 8/1/16 (NATL-RE)(1)(2)
$
5,000,000

$
4,982,050

Mount San Antonio Community College District GO, Series 2013 A, (Election of 2008), 5.00%, 8/1/34
2,000,000

2,296,700

Murrieta Public Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., 5.00%, 9/1/17
1,000,000

1,100,450

Murrieta Public Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., 5.00%, 9/1/21
1,200,000

1,360,740

Murrieta Valley Unified School District Public Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., Series 2006 A, 4.00%, 9/1/14 (AGC)
1,085,000

1,085,217

Natomas Unified School District GO, 5.00%, 9/1/26 (BAM)
1,785,000

2,068,190

Newport Beach Rev., Series 2009 A, (Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian), 5.00%, 12/1/18(2)
1,505,000

1,771,325

Newport Beach Rev., Series 2011 A, (Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian), 6.00%, 12/1/21, Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)
1,000,000

1,289,150

North Lake Tahoe Public Financing Authority Rev., 4.00%, 12/1/19
1,000,000

1,138,340

Northern California Power Agency Rev., Series 2010 A, 5.00%, 7/1/16
1,000,000

1,088,150

Northern California Power Agency Rev., Series 2010 A, 5.00%, 8/1/19
2,000,000

2,326,060

Northern California Power Agency Rev., Series 2010 A, 5.00%, 8/1/20
1,515,000

1,762,718

Northern California Power Agency Rev., Series 2010 A, 5.00%, 8/1/21
2,050,000

2,345,425

Northern California Power Agency Rev., Series 2010 A, 5.25%, 8/1/22
4,250,000

4,928,342

Northern California Power Agency Rev., Series 2012 A, 5.00%, 7/1/26
1,750,000

2,054,220

Northern California Power Agency Rev., Series 2012 A, 5.00%, 7/1/27
2,000,000

2,330,660

Oakland Sewer Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 6/15/26
1,200,000

1,460,592

Oakland Unified School District Alameda County GO, (Election of 2000), 5.00%, 8/1/15 (NATL-RE)
1,000,000

1,039,580

Oakland Unified School District Alameda County GO, Series 2012 A, (Election of 2006), 5.00%, 8/1/22
750,000

846,083

Oakland Unified School District Alameda County GO, Series 2012 A, (Election of 2006), 5.50%, 8/1/32
2,150,000

2,409,655

Oakland Unified School District Alameda County GO, Series 2013, (Election of 2012), 6.625%, 8/1/38
1,410,000

1,699,431

Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum Authority Lease Rev., Series 2012 A, 4.00%, 2/1/15
1,350,000

1,371,600

Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum Authority Lease Rev., Series 2012 A, 5.00%, 2/1/18
3,145,000

3,575,645

Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum Authority Lease Rev., Series 2012 A, 5.00%, 2/1/25
4,065,000

4,656,783

Ontario Public Financing Authority Rev., 5.00%, 7/1/43
2,000,000

2,240,020

Orange County Community Facilities District Special Tax Rev., Series 2014 A, (Ladera Ranch), 5.00%, 8/15/28
1,960,000

2,235,792

Orange County Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Special Assessment Rev., (Newport Coast Phase IV Assessment District No. 01-1), 4.45%, 9/2/15
280,000

287,944

Orange County Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Special Assessment Rev., (Newport Coast Phase IV Assessment District No. 01-1), 4.55%, 9/2/16
210,000

215,792

Orange County Sanitation District COP, Series 2007 B, 5.00%, 2/1/17, Prerefunded at 100% of Par (AGM)(2)
2,750,000

3,055,167

Orange County Transportation Authority Rev., (Senior Lien 91 Express Lanes), 5.00%, 8/15/24
1,000,000

1,201,280

Orange County Water District Rev., Series 2013 A, 5.00%, 8/15/33
4,000,000

4,701,800

Palm Springs Financing Authority Lease Rev., Series 2012 B, (Downtown Revitalization Project), 4.00%, 6/1/16
1,335,000

1,412,003


20



 
Principal
Amount
Value
Palm Springs Financing Authority Lease Rev., Series 2012 B, (Downtown Revitalization Project), 5.00%, 6/1/23
$
1,230,000

$
1,454,979

Palomar Pomerado Health Care District COP, 5.25%, 11/1/21
1,000,000

1,060,970

Palomar Pomerado Health Care District COP, 6.00%, 11/1/41
1,120,000

1,165,494

Palomar Pomerado Health GO, Capital Appreciation, 0.00%, 8/1/18 (NATL-RE)(1)
3,615,000

3,417,549

Palomar Pomerado Health GO, Capital Appreciation, Series 2009 A, (Election of 2004), 0.00%, 8/1/19 (AGC)(4)
1,660,000

1,561,429

Peralta Community College District GO, 5.00%, 8/1/17
2,085,000

2,342,998

Peralta Community College District GO, 5.00%, 8/1/22
2,145,000

2,616,921

Port of Oakland Rev., Series 2007 C, 5.00%, 11/1/16 (NATL-RE)
1,270,000

1,398,981

Port of Oakland Rev., Series 2007 C, (Intermediate Lien), 5.00%, 11/1/17 (NATL-RE)
2,375,000

2,707,524

Porterville Public Financing Authority Sewer Rev., 5.625%, 10/1/36
2,500,000

2,882,575

Poway Unified School District GO, Capital Appreciation, (School Facilities Improvement), 0.00%, 8/1/41(1)
2,780,000

847,817

Poway Unified School District Public Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., 5.00%, 9/15/19 (Ambac)
1,155,000

1,263,478

Poway Unified School District Public Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., 5.00%, 9/15/20 (Ambac)
1,210,000

1,308,313

Rancho Mirage Joint Powers Financing Authority Rev., Series 2007 A, (Eisenhower Medical Center), 5.00%, 7/1/15
1,505,000

1,554,891

Rancho Mirage Joint Powers Financing Authority Rev., Series 2007 A, (Eisenhower Medical Center), 5.00%, 7/1/21
1,000,000

1,058,350

Rancho Santa Fe Community Services District Special Tax Rev., Series 2011 A, (Superior Lien), 5.125%, 9/1/22
790,000

915,262

Rancho Santa Fe Community Services District Special Tax Rev., Series 2011 A, (Superior Lien), 5.25%, 9/1/23
1,300,000

1,505,946

Rancho Santa Fe Community Services District Special Tax Rev., Series 2011 A, (Superior Lien), 5.375%, 9/1/24
1,410,000

1,624,151

Riverside County Asset Leasing Corp. Rev., Series 2013 A, (Public Defender and Probation Building), 5.00%, 11/1/43
1,000,000

1,099,880

Riverside County COP, Series 2007 A, (Public Safety Communication), 5.00%, 11/1/14 (Ambac)
50,000

50,391

Riverside County COP, Series 2007 A, (Public Safety Communication), 5.00%, 11/1/15 (Ambac)
3,035,000

3,190,635

Riverside County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2010 E, (Interstate 215 Corridor), 6.50%, 10/1/40
935,000

1,056,139

Riverside County Transportation Commission Rev., Series 2013 A, (Limited Tax), 5.25%, 6/1/39
1,335,000

1,555,222

Sacramento City Financing Authority Lease Rev., Series 1993 A, 5.40%, 11/1/20 (Ambac)
3,000,000

3,376,170

Sacramento City Financing Authority Rev., 5.00%, 12/1/16 (NATL-RE/FGIC)
2,500,000

2,647,525

Sacramento County Airport System Rev., 5.00%, 7/1/20
1,000,000

1,173,270

Sacramento County Airport System Rev., 5.00%, 7/1/23
1,000,000

1,154,400

Sacramento County Airport System Rev., 5.00%, 7/1/24
1,000,000

1,161,250

Sacramento County Airport System Rev., Series 2009 B, 4.25%, 7/1/16
1,000,000

1,067,880

Sacramento County Sanitation Districts Financing Authority Rev., Series 2007 A, 5.25%, 12/1/21 (NATL-RE/FGIC)
1,000,000

1,246,540

Sacramento County Sanitation Districts Financing Authority Rev., Series 2007 B, VRN, 0.68%, 9/2/14 (NATL-RE/FGIC)
2,500,000

2,207,925

Sacramento Municipal Utility District Electric Rev., Series 1997 K, 5.70%, 7/1/17 (Ambac)
3,105,000

3,568,763


21



 
Principal
Amount
Value
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Electric Rev., Series 1997 K, 5.25%, 7/1/24 (Ambac)
$
3,000,000

$
3,602,430

Sacramento Municipal Utility District Electric Rev., Series 2012 Y, 5.00%, 8/15/24
1,500,000

1,829,535

Sacramento Municipal Utility District Electric Rev., Series 2012 Y, 5.00%, 8/15/25
5,000,000

6,022,900

Sacramento Regional Transit District Rev., (Farebox Revenue), 3.00%, 3/1/15
840,000

851,584

Sacramento Regional Transit District Rev., (Farebox Revenue), 4.00%, 3/1/16
440,000

462,198

Sacramento Regional Transit District Rev., (Farebox Revenue), 4.00%, 3/1/17
1,000,000

1,076,860

Sacramento Regional Transit District Rev., (Farebox Revenue), 5.00%, 3/1/18
250,000

282,693

San Bernardino Community College District GO, Series 2008 A, (Election of 2002), 5.25%, 8/1/18
350,000

408,219

San Bernardino Community College District GO, Series 2008 A, (Election of 2002), 5.50%, 8/1/18, Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)
300,000

356,058

San Bernardino Community College District GO, Series 2008 A, (Election of 2002), 6.25%, 8/1/18, Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)
8,000,000

9,726,800

San Bernardino Community College District GO, Capital Appreciation, Series 2009 B, (Election of 2008), 0.00%, 8/1/19(4)
9,840,000

9,199,613

San Buenaventura Rev., (Community Memorial Health System), 8.00%, 12/1/26
2,000,000

2,470,900

San Buenaventura Rev., (Community Memorial Health System), 7.50%, 12/1/41
1,200,000

1,405,560

San Diego Community College District GO, (Election of 2002), 5.00%, 8/1/30
3,000,000

3,558,180

San Diego Convention Center Expansion Financing Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, 4.00%, 4/15/17
1,250,000

1,355,963

San Diego Convention Center Expansion Financing Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, 4.00%, 4/15/18
1,160,000

1,276,336

San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Rev., Series 2010 A, 5.00%, 7/1/19
1,290,000

1,510,151

San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Rev., Series 2010 A, 5.00%, 7/1/21
2,000,000

2,334,500

San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Rev., Series 2010 A, 5.00%, 7/1/34
750,000

834,480

San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Rev., Series 2010 A, 5.00%, 7/1/40
740,000

820,120

San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Rev., Series 2013 A, 4.00%, 7/1/18
300,000

335,796

San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Rev., Series 2013 A, 4.00%, 7/1/19
400,000

453,804

San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission Rev., Series 2012 A, 5.00%, 4/1/21
5,940,000

7,273,233

San Diego County Water Authority Rev., Series 2011 S1, (Subordinate Lien), 5.00%, 7/1/16
2,780,000

3,011,407

San Diego Public Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2009 A, 5.00%, 8/1/21
1,000,000

1,157,910

San Diego Public Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2009 B, 5.00%, 5/15/22
3,680,000

4,330,219

San Diego Public Facilities Financing Authority Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2007 B, (Southcrest and Central Imperial Redevelopment), 5.125%, 10/1/22 (Radian)
1,230,000

1,291,869

San Diego Public Facilities Financing Authority Water Rev., Series 2012 A, 5.00%, 8/1/21
2,000,000

2,450,880


22



 
Principal
Amount
Value
San Diego Public Facilities Financing Authority Water Rev., Series 2012 A, 5.00%, 8/1/24
$
2,000,000

$
2,431,400

San Diego Public Facilities Financing Sewer Authority Rev., Series 2010 A, 5.25%, 5/15/24
3,400,000

4,031,176

San Diego Unified Port District Rev., Series 2013 A, 5.00%, 9/1/23
250,000

299,933

San Diego Unified Port District Rev., Series 2013 A, 5.00%, 9/1/26
750,000

870,278

San Diego Unified School District GO, Capital Appreciation, Series 2010 C, (Election of 2008), 0.00%, 7/1/36(1)
7,895,000

3,117,735

San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Rev., Series 2012 A, 5.00%, 7/1/24
500,000

604,085

San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Rev., Series 2012 A, 5.00%, 7/1/25
500,000

599,690

San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Rev., Series 2012 A, 5.00%, 7/1/26
1,000,000

1,192,640

San Francisco City and County Airports Commission Rev., Series 2008-34D, (San Francisco International Airport), 5.00%, 5/1/17 (AGC)
3,375,000

3,788,370

San Francisco City and County Airports Commission Rev., Series 2008-34D, (San Francisco International Airport), 5.00%, 5/1/18 (AGC)
2,000,000

2,314,020

San Francisco City and County Airports Commission Rev., Series 2009 D, (San Francisco International Airport), 4.00%, 5/1/24
1,625,000

1,839,451

San Francisco City and County Airports Commission Rev., Series 2009 E, (San Francisco International Airport), 5.25%, 5/1/23
3,500,000

4,111,450

San Francisco City and County Airports Commission Rev., Series 2010 C, (San Francisco International Airport), (Governmental Purpose), 5.00%, 5/1/19
1,500,000

1,768,350

San Francisco City and County Airports Commission Rev., Series 2011 D, (San Francisco International Airport), 5.00%, 5/1/24
4,025,000

4,751,392

San Francisco City and County Airports Commission Rev., Series 2011 D, (San Francisco International Airport), 5.00%, 5/1/29
6,270,000

7,069,362

San Francisco City and County Airports Commission Rev., Series 2012 B, (San Francisco International Airport), 5.00%, 5/1/26
1,250,000

1,453,500

San Francisco City and County COP, Series 2009 A, (Multiple Capital Improvement Projects), 5.00%, 4/1/17
2,440,000

2,723,772

San Francisco City and County COP, Series 2009 A, (Multiple Capital Improvement Projects), 5.00%, 4/1/29
1,170,000

1,348,987

San Francisco City and County COP, Series 2010 A, 5.00%, 10/1/19
2,930,000

3,482,774

San Francisco City and County Public Utilities Water Commission Rev., Series 2010 A, 5.00%, 10/1/21
5,000,000

6,134,950

San Francisco City and County Public Utilities Water Commission Rev., Series 2010 A, 5.00%, 11/1/28
2,780,000

3,248,597

San Francisco City and County Redevelopment Financing Authority Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2011 D, (Mission Bay South Redevelopment), 5.00%, 8/1/15
420,000

434,696

San Francisco City and County Redevelopment Financing Authority Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2011 D, (Mission Bay South Redevelopment), 5.00%, 8/1/16
440,000

469,555

San Francisco City and County Redevelopment Financing Authority Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2011 D, (Mission Bay South Redevelopment), 5.00%, 8/1/17
465,000

507,975

San Francisco City and County Redevelopment Financing Authority Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2011 D, (Mission Bay South Redevelopment), 5.50%, 8/1/18
485,000

547,507

San Francisco City and County Redevelopment Financing Authority Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2011 D, (Mission Bay South Redevelopment), 6.00%, 8/1/19
510,000

611,337

San Francisco City and County Redevelopment Financing Authority Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2011 D, (Mission Bay South Redevelopment), 6.00%, 8/1/20
515,000

623,840


23



 
Principal
Amount
Value
San Francisco City and County Successor Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, (Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project), 5.00%, 8/1/21
$
460,000

$
534,134

San Francisco City and County Successor Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, (Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project), 5.00%, 8/1/26
425,000

488,193

San Francisco City and County Successor Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, (Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project), 5.00%, 8/1/27
550,000

628,639

San Francisco City and County Successor Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, (Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project), 5.00%, 8/1/28
370,000

420,664

San Francisco City and County Successor Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, (Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project), 5.00%, 8/1/43
1,000,000

1,098,830

San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency Rev., (Senior Lien), 5.00%, 1/1/33
2,000,000

1,998,920

San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency Rev., Capital Appreciation, 0.00%, 1/1/17(1)(2)
1,000,000

989,540

San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency Rev., Capital Appreciation, 0.00%, 1/1/25(1)(2)
3,290,000

2,602,554

San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency Rev., Capital Appreciation, 0.00%, 1/1/26(1)(2)
1,400,000

1,061,032

San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency Rev., Capital Appreciation, (Senior Lien), 0.00%, 1/1/16(1)(2)
15,000,000

14,976,900

San Mateo County Transportation District Sales Tax Rev., Series 1993 A, 5.25%, 6/1/18 (NATL-RE)
2,680,000

3,113,651

San Mateo Joint Powers Financing Authority Rev., (Maple Street Correctional Center), 5.00%, 6/15/17
860,000

969,426

San Mateo Joint Powers Financing Authority Rev., (Maple Street Correctional Center), 5.00%, 6/15/18
1,000,000

1,160,550

San Mateo Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 2008-1-Bay Meadows), 5.875%, 9/1/32
690,000

785,641

San Mateo Union High School District GO, Capital Appreciation, 0.00%, 2/15/15(1)(2)
7,090,000

7,086,384

San Ramon Valley Unified School District GO, (Election of 2002), 5.00%, 8/1/16, Prerefunded at 100% of Par (NATL-RE)(2)
1,000,000

1,088,660

Santa Clara County Financing Authority Lease Rev., Series 2012 A, (Capital Projects), 4.00%, 2/1/17
2,055,000

2,231,997

Santa Clara Electric Rev., Series 2011 A, 5.00%, 7/1/30
1,000,000

1,113,960

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Sales Tax Rev., Series 2010 B, 5.00%, 4/1/20
4,000,000

4,807,280

Santa Fe Springs Community Development Commission Tax Allocation Rev., 5.375%, 9/1/16 (NATL-RE)
430,000

431,754

Santa Maria Joint Union High School District GO, 5.00%, 8/1/25
1,585,000

1,881,522

Santa Monica Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation, (Earthquake Recovery Redevelopment), 5.00%, 7/1/42
600,000

652,956

Santa Monica Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation, (Earthquake Recovery Redevelopment), 5.875%, 7/1/42
600,000

692,478

Santa Rosa Wastewater Rev., Capital Appreciation, Series 2002 B, 0.00%, 9/1/24 (Ambac)(1)
7,000,000

5,254,760

Shasta Lake Public Finance Authority Rev., 4.50%, 4/1/15
495,000

507,340

Shasta Lake Public Finance Authority Rev., 5.00%, 4/1/19
2,400,000

2,449,608

Shasta Lake Public Finance Authority Rev., 5.00%, 4/1/22
2,130,000

2,184,805

South Orange County Public Financing Authority Rev., (Juvenile Justice Center), 4.25%, 6/1/17
2,000,000

2,194,180


24



 
Principal
Amount
Value
South Orange County Public Financing Authority Rev., (Juvenile Justice Center), 4.50%, 6/1/18
$
2,700,000

$
3,050,433

South Placer Wastewater Authority Rev., VRN, 0.38%, 9/4/14
3,350,000

3,350,469

South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority Rev., Series 2005 A, (Redevelopment Project Area No. 1), 5.00%, 10/1/19 (Ambac)
50,000

51,473

Southern California Public Power Authority Rev., Series 2008 A, (Southern Transmission), 5.00%, 7/1/22
2,875,000

3,332,844

Southern California Public Power Authority Rev., Series 2008 B, (Southern Transmission), 6.00%, 7/1/27
2,000,000

2,376,420

Southern California Public Power Authority Rev., Series 2011 A, (Southern Transmission), 5.00%, 7/1/21
2,780,000

3,381,981

Southern California Public Power Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, 4.00%, 7/1/16
2,055,000

2,196,877

Southern California Public Power Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, 5.00%, 7/1/18
1,880,000

2,184,485

Southern California Public Power Authority Rev., Series 2013 A, (Southern Transmission), 5.00%, 7/1/18
2,000,000

2,323,920

Southern California Public Power Authority Rev., Series 2013 A, (Southern Transmission), 5.00%, 7/1/20
4,000,000

4,847,120

Stockton Public Financing Authority Rev., Series 2010 A, (Delta Water Supply Project), 6.25%, 10/1/38
1,500,000

1,737,990

Stockton Unified School District GO, Series 2014 A, (Election of 2012), 4.00%, 8/1/15 (AGM)
700,000

724,626

Stockton Unified School District GO, Series 2014 A, (Election of 2012), 5.00%, 8/1/27 (AGM)
530,000

621,367

Stockton Unified School District GO, Series 2014 A, (Election of 2012), 5.00%, 8/1/28 (AGM)
255,000

296,460

Stockton Unified School District GO, Series 2014 A, (Election of 2012), 5.00%, 8/1/42 (AGM)
865,000

962,589

Successor Agency to the Richmond County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/19 (BAM)
400,000

465,192

Successor Agency to the Richmond County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/20 (BAM)
260,000

304,327

Successor Agency to the Richmond County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/21 (BAM)
170,000

200,484

Successor Agency to the Richmond County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/22 (BAM)
250,000

297,318

Successor Agency to the Richmond County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/23 (BAM)
220,000

261,921

Successor Agency to the Richmond County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/24 (BAM)
250,000

295,823

Successor Agency to the Richmond County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 4.50%, 9/1/25 (BAM)
90,000

101,552

Successor Agency to the Richmond County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/25 (BAM)
80,000

93,703

Tobacco Securitization Authority of Southern California Settlement Rev., Series 2006 A1, 5.00%, 6/1/37
1,750,000

1,405,425

Tri-Dam Power Authority Rev., 4.00%, 11/1/14
1,260,000

1,265,657

Tri-Dam Power Authority Rev., 4.00%, 11/1/15
1,310,000

1,347,387

Tuolumne Wind Project Authority Rev., Series 2009 A, 5.625%, 1/1/29
1,000,000

1,174,240

Turlock Health Facility COP, (Emanuel Medical Center, Inc.), 5.50%, 10/15/14, Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)
690,000

694,540

Turlock Health Facility COP, (Emanuel Medical Center, Inc.), 5.50%, 10/15/14, Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)
940,000

946,185

Twin Rivers Unified School District COP, (School Facilities Bridge Funding Program), VRDN, 3.45%, 7/1/18 (AGM)
3,000,000

3,005,040


25



 
Principal
Amount
Value
Twin Rivers Unified School District COP, (School Facilities Bridge Funding Program), VRDN, 3.20%, 6/1/20 (AGM)
$
3,750,000

$
3,753,150

Twin Rivers Unified School District COP, (School Facilities Bridge Funding Program), VRDN, 3.20%, 6/1/20 (AGM)
2,500,000

2,502,100

University of California Regents Medical Center Pooled Rev., Series 2008 D, 5.00%, 5/15/27
1,000,000

1,081,130

University of California Rev., Series 2009 Q, 5.25%, 5/15/23
2,000,000

2,265,360

University of California Rev., Series 2010 S, 5.00%, 5/15/20
1,405,000

1,639,551

University of California Rev., Series 2010 S, 5.00%, 5/15/40
1,250,000

1,407,388

University of California Rev., Series 2012 G, (Limited Project), 5.00%, 5/15/26
1,000,000

1,182,510

University of California Rev., Series 2012 G, (Limited Project), 5.00%, 5/15/42
1,640,000

1,833,700

University of California Rev., Series 2013 AF, 5.00%, 5/15/25
7,250,000

8,827,237

University of California Rev., Series 2013 AK, VRDN, 5.00%, 5/15/23
7,935,000

9,776,079

Val Verde Unified School District COP, 5.25%, 1/1/15, Prerefunded at 100% of Par (FGIC)(2)
1,145,000

1,164,751

Val Verde Unified School District COP, 5.25%, 1/1/15, Prerefunded at 100% of Par (FGIC)(2)
2,505,000

2,548,211

Val Verde Unified School District COP, 5.25%, 1/1/15, Prerefunded at 100% of Par (FGIC)(2)
2,640,000

2,685,540

Val Verde Unified School District COP, 5.25%, 1/1/15, Prerefunded at 100% of Par (FGIC)(2)
1,415,000

1,439,409

Val Verde Unified School District COP, 5.25%, 1/1/15, Prerefunded at 100% of Par (FGIC)(2)
1,000,000

1,017,250

Val Verde Unified School District COP, 5.25%, 1/1/15, Prerefunded at 100% of Par (FGIC)(2)
2,980,000

3,031,405

West Contra Costa Unified School District GO, Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 8/1/33
3,000,000

3,410,790

West Contra Costa Unified School District GO, Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 8/1/34
1,200,000

1,357,824

West Contra Costa Unified School District GO, Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 8/1/35
1,500,000

1,691,895

West Sacramento Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., Series 2006 A, 5.00%, 9/1/18 (XLCA)
1,500,000

1,674,285

West Sacramento Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., Series 2006 A, 5.00%, 9/1/19 (XLCA)
1,000,000

1,132,080

West Sacramento Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., Series 2006 A, 5.00%, 9/1/20 (XLCA)
1,200,000

1,360,692

Yosemite Community College District GO, Capital Appreciation, Series 2010 D, (Election of 2004), 0.00%, 8/1/38(1)
6,000,000

2,088,720

 
 
1,290,912,158

Guam — 0.2%
 
 
Guam Government GO, Series 2009 A, 6.00%, 11/15/19
1,000,000

1,102,060

Guam Power Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, 5.00%, 10/1/19 (AGM)
1,000,000

1,159,930

 
 
2,261,990

Puerto Rico — 1.2%
 
 
Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, (Senior Lien), 5.00%, 7/1/17
2,860,000

2,305,303

Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, (Senior Lien), 5.00%, 7/1/19
1,000,000

791,960

Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority Rev., Series 2010 XX, 5.25%, 7/1/40
310,000

170,438


26



 
Principal
Amount
Value
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority Rev., Series 2010 ZZ, 5.25%, 7/1/22
$
4,950,000

$
2,722,698

Puerto Rico GO, Series 2009 B, (Public Improvement), 6.00%, 7/1/39
3,500,000

2,762,690

Puerto Rico GO, Series 2011 A, (Public Improvement), 5.75%, 7/1/41
1,500,000

1,168,980

Puerto Rico GO, Series 2012 A, (Public Improvement), 5.00%, 7/1/41
1,000,000

739,370

Puerto Rico GO, Series 2014 A, 8.00%, 7/1/35
5,310,000

4,874,474

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp. Rev., Capital Appreciation, Series 2011 A1, 0.00%, 8/1/41(1)
2,280,000

245,738

 
 
15,781,651

U.S. Virgin Islands — 0.1%
 
 
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority Rev., Series 2004 A, (Virgin Islands Matching Fund Loan Note and Senior Lien), 5.00%, 10/1/14
500,000

501,800

Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority Rev., Series 2004 A, (Virgin Islands Matching Fund Loan Note and Senior Lien), 5.25%, 10/1/14, Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)
170,000

170,775

Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority Rev., Series 2004 A, (Virgin Islands Matching Fund Loan Note and Senior Lien), 5.25%, 10/1/14, Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)
500,000

502,280

Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority Rev., Series 2004 A, (Virgin Islands Matching Fund Loan Note and Senior Lien), 5.25%, 10/1/14, Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)
1,000,000

1,004,560

 
 
2,179,415

TOTAL INVESTMENT SECURITIES — 99.1%
(Cost $1,228,111,058)
 
1,311,135,214

OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES — 0.9%
 
11,704,127

TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0%
 
$
1,322,839,341



FUTURES CONTRACTS
Contracts Sold
Expiration Date
Underlying Face Amount at Value
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)
80

U.S. Treasury 10-Year Notes
December 2014
$
10,062,500

$
(26,430
)
371

U.S. Treasury Long Bonds
December 2014
51,974,781

(313,866
)
 
 
 
$
62,037,281

$
(340,296
)

27



NOTES TO SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
AGC
-
Assured Guaranty Corporation
AGM
-
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corporation
BAM
-
Build America Mutual Assurance Company
COP
-
Certificates of Participation
FGIC
-
Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
GA
-
Guaranty Agreement
GO
-
General Obligation
LOC
-
Letter of Credit
NATL-RE
-
National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation – Reinsured
SBBPA
-
Standby Bond Purchase Agreement
VRDN
-
Variable Rate Demand Note. Interest reset date is indicated. Rate shown is effective at the period end.
VRN
-
Variable Rate Note. Interest reset date is indicated. Rate shown is effective at the period end.
XLCA
-
XL Capital Ltd. 

(1)
Security is a zero-coupon bond. Zero-coupon securities are issued at a substantial discount from their value at maturity.
(2)
Escrowed to maturity in U.S. government securities or state and local government securities.
(3)
Security, or a portion thereof, has been pledged at the custodian bank or with a broker for margin requirements on futures contracts. At the period end, the aggregate value of securities pledged was $1,596,891.
(4)
Coupon rate adjusts periodically based upon a predetermined schedule. Interest reset date is indicated. Rate shown is effective at the period end.

See Notes to Financial Statements.

28



Statement of Assets and Liabilities

AUGUST 31, 2014
Assets
Investment securities, at value (cost of $1,228,111,058)
$
1,311,135,214

Cash
89,123

Receivable for capital shares sold
921,822

Receivable for variation margin on futures contracts
85,993

Interest receivable
13,290,846

 
1,325,522,998

 
 

Liabilities
 

Payable for capital shares redeemed
1,809,901

Accrued management fees
483,553

Distribution and service fees payable
21,909

Dividends payable
368,294

 
2,683,657

 
 
Net Assets
$
1,322,839,341

 
 

Net Assets Consist of:
 

Capital paid in
$
1,247,266,170

Distributions in excess of net investment income
(1,918
)
Accumulated net realized loss
(7,108,771
)
Net unrealized appreciation
82,683,860

 
$
1,322,839,341

 
 
Net Assets
Shares Outstanding
Net Asset Value Per Share
Investor Class

$1,064,223,783

89,144,645

$11.94
Institutional Class

$207,978,435

17,419,229

$11.94
A Class

$32,898,650

2,755,511

$11.94*
C Class

$17,738,473

1,484,926

$11.95
*Maximum offering price $12.50 (net asset value divided by 0.955).
 

See Notes to Financial Statements.

29



Statement of Operations
 
YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2014
Investment Income (Loss)
Income:
 
Interest
$
37,884,088

 
 

Expenses:
 

Management fees
5,532,711

Distribution and service fees:
 

A Class
86,391

C Class
182,298

Trustees’ fees and expenses
71,277

Other expenses
1,130

 
5,873,807

 
 

Net investment income (loss)
32,010,281

 
 

Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)
 

Net realized gain (loss) on:
 

Investment transactions
(1,359,846
)
Futures contract transactions
(5,499,638
)
 
(6,859,484
)
 
 

Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:
 

Investments
69,138,776

Futures contracts
(277,378
)
 
68,861,398

 
 

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
62,001,914

 
 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations
$
94,012,195


 
See Notes to Financial Statements.

30



Statement of Changes in Net Assets
 
YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2014 AND AUGUST 31, 2013
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
August 31, 2014
August 31, 2013
Operations
Net investment income (loss)
$
32,010,281

$
31,255,731

Net realized gain (loss)
(6,859,484
)
557,948

Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
68,861,398

(66,599,733
)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations
94,012,195

(34,786,054
)
 
 
 
Distributions to Shareholders
 

 

From net investment income:
 

 

Investor Class
(25,864,125
)
(26,616,058
)
Institutional Class
(5,083,283
)
(3,438,121
)
A Class
(785,120
)
(922,269
)
C Class
(277,753
)
(276,403
)
From net realized gains:
 

 

Investor Class

(286,816
)
Institutional Class

(30,906
)
A Class

(11,424
)
C Class

(4,604
)
Decrease in net assets from distributions
(32,010,281
)
(31,586,601
)
 
 
 
Capital Share Transactions
 

 

Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share
transactions (Note 5)
43,859,066

118,684,084

 
 
 
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
105,860,980

52,311,429

 
 
 
Net Assets
 

 

Beginning of period
1,216,978,361

1,164,666,932

End of period
$
1,322,839,341

$
1,216,978,361

 
 
 
Distributions in excess of net investment income
$
(1,918
)
$
(1,918
)


See Notes to Financial Statements.

31



Notes to Financial Statements
 
AUGUST 31, 2014

1. Organization

American Century California Tax-Free and Municipal Funds (the trust) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company and is organized as a Massachusetts business trust. California Intermediate-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund (the fund) is one fund in a series issued by the trust. The fund is diversified as defined under the 1940 Act. The fund’s investment objectives are to seek safety of principal and high current income that is exempt from federal and California income taxes.

The fund offers the Investor Class, the Institutional Class, the A Class and the C Class. The A Class may incur an initial sales charge. The A Class and C Class may be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge. The share classes differ principally in their respective sales charges and distribution and shareholder servicing expenses and arrangements. The Institutional Class is made available to institutional shareholders or through financial intermediaries whose clients do not require the same level of shareholder and administrative services as shareholders of other classes. As a result, the Institutional Class is charged a lower unified management fee.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the fund in preparation of its financial statements. The financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which may require management to make certain estimates and assumptions at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Management evaluated the impact of events or transactions occurring through the date the financial statements were issued that would merit recognition or disclosure.

Investment Valuations — The fund determines the fair value of its investments and computes its net asset value per share at the close of regular trading (usually 4 p.m. Eastern time) on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on each day the NYSE is open. The Board of Trustees has adopted valuation policies and procedures to guide the investment advisor in the fund’s investment valuation process and to provide methodologies for the oversight of the fund’s pricing function.

Fixed income securities maturing in greater than 60 days at the time of purchase are valued at the evaluated mean as provided by independent pricing services or at the mean of the most recent bid and asked prices as provided by investment dealers. Fixed income securities maturing within 60 days at the time of purchase may be valued at cost, plus or minus any amortized discount or premium or at the evaluated mean as provided by an independent pricing service. Evaluated mean prices are commonly derived through utilization of market models, which may consider, among other factors: trade data, quotations from dealers and active market makers, relevant yield curve and spread data, related sector levels, creditworthiness, trade data or market information on comparable securities, and other relevant security specific information.
 
Exchange-traded futures contracts are valued at the settlement price as provided by the appropriate clearing corporation.

If the fund determines that the market price for an investment is not readily available or the valuation methods mentioned above do not reflect an investment’s fair value, such investment is valued as determined in good faith by the Board of Trustees or its delegate, in accordance with policies and procedures adopted by the Board of Trustees. In its determination of fair value, the fund may review several factors including, but not limited to, market information regarding the specific investment or comparable investments and correlation with other investment types, futures indices or general market indicators. Circumstances that may cause the fund to use these procedures to value an investment include, but are not limited to: an investment has been declared in default or is distressed; trading in a security has been suspended during the trading day or a security is not actively trading on its principal exchange; prices received from a regular pricing source are deemed unreliable; or there is a foreign market holiday and no trading occurred.


32



The fund monitors for significant events occurring after the close of an investment’s primary exchange but before the fund’s net asset value per share is determined. Significant events may include, but are not limited to: corporate announcements and transactions; governmental action and political unrest that could impact a specific investment or an investment sector; or armed conflicts, natural disasters and similar events that could affect investments in a specific country or region.
 
Security Transactions — Security transactions are accounted for as of the trade date. Net realized gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is also used for federal income tax purposes.

Investment Income — Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.

Segregated Assets — In accordance with the 1940 Act, the fund segregates assets on its books and records to cover certain types of investments, including, but not limited to, futures contracts and when-issued securities. American Century Investment Management, Inc. (ACIM) (the investment advisor) monitors, on a daily basis, the securities segregated to ensure the fund designates a sufficient amount of liquid assets, marked-to-market daily. The fund may also receive assets or be required to pledge assets at the custodian bank or with a broker for margin requirements on futures contracts.

Income Tax Status — It is the fund’s policy to distribute substantially all net investment income and net realized gains to shareholders and to otherwise qualify as a regulated investment company under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Accordingly, no provision has been made for income taxes. The fund files U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax returns as applicable. The fund's tax returns are subject to examination by the relevant taxing authority until expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, which is generally three years from the date of filing but can be longer in certain jurisdictions. At this time, management believes there are no uncertain tax positions which, based on their technical merit, would not be sustained upon examination and for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months.

Multiple Class — All shares of the fund represent an equal pro rata interest in the net assets of the class to which such shares belong, and have identical voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights and the same terms and conditions, except for class specific expenses and exclusive rights to vote on matters affecting only individual classes. Income, non-class specific expenses, and realized and unrealized capital gains and losses of the fund are allocated to each class of shares based on their relative net assets.

Distributions to Shareholders — Distributions from net investment income, if any, are declared daily and paid monthly. Distributions from net realized gains, if any, are generally declared and paid annually.

Indemnifications — Under the trust’s organizational documents, its officers and trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against a fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered by management to be remote.

3. Fees and Transactions with Related Parties

Certain officers and trustees of the trust are also officers and/or directors of American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC). The trust's investment advisor, ACIM, the trust's distributor, American Century Investment Services, Inc. (ACIS), and the trust's transfer agent, American Century Services, LLC, are wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by ACC.
 
Management Fees — The trust has entered into a management agreement with ACIM, under which ACIM provides the fund with investment advisory and management services in exchange for a single, unified management fee (the fee) per class. The agreement provides that all expenses of managing and operating the fund, except distribution and service fees, brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, fees and expenses of the independent trustees (including legal counsel fees), and extraordinary expenses, will be paid by ACIM. The fee is computed and accrued daily based on each class’s daily net assets and paid monthly in arrears. The fee consists of (1) an Investment Category Fee based on the daily net assets of the fund and certain other accounts managed by the investment advisor that are in the same broad investment category as the fund and (2) a Complex Fee based on the assets of all the funds in the American Century Investments family of funds. The rates for the Investment Category Fee range from 0.1625% to 0.2800%. The rates for the Complex Fee range from 0.2500% to 0.3100% for the Investor Class, A Class and C Class. The rates for the Complex Fee range from 0.0500% to 0.1100% for the Institutional Class. The effective annual management fee for each

33



class for the year ended August 31, 2014 was 0.47% for the Investor Class, A Class and C Class and 0.27% for the Institutional Class.

Distribution and Service Fees — The Board of Trustees has adopted a separate Master Distribution and Individual Shareholder Services Plan for each of the A Class and C Class (collectively the plans), pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act. The plans provide that the A Class will pay ACIS an annual distribution and service fee of 0.25%. The plans provide that the C Class will pay ACIS an annual distribution and service fee of 1.00%, of which 0.25% is paid for individual shareholder services and 0.75% is paid for distribution services. The fees are computed and accrued daily based on each class’s daily net assets and paid monthly in arrears. The fees are used to pay financial intermediaries for distribution and individual shareholder services. Fees incurred under the plans during the year ended August 31, 2014 are detailed in the Statement of Operations.

Trustees’ Fees and Expenses — The Board of Trustees is responsible for overseeing the investment advisor’s management and operations of the fund. The trustees receive detailed information about the fund and its investment advisor regularly throughout the year, and meet at least quarterly with management of the investment advisor to review reports about fund operations. Fees and expenses incurred in conjunction with the trustees during the year ended August 31, 2014 are detailed in the Statement of Operations. The fund’s officers do not receive compensation from the fund.

4. Investment Transactions

Purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term investments, for the year ended August 31, 2014 were $694,793,155 and $651,621,606, respectively.

5. Capital Share Transactions

Transactions in shares of the fund were as follows (unlimited number of shares authorized):
 
Year ended August 31, 2014
Year ended August 31, 2013
 
Shares
Amount
Shares
Amount
Investor Class
 
 
 
 
Sold
24,531,130

$
286,984,446

26,249,346

$
313,038,806

Issued in reinvestment of distributions
1,661,821

19,494,941

1,630,412

19,349,421

Redeemed
(25,078,750
)
(293,064,366
)
(25,700,665
)
(303,605,745
)
 
1,114,201

13,415,021

2,179,093

28,782,482

Institutional Class
 
 
 
 
Sold
7,699,496

89,816,972

8,911,433

105,871,837

Issued in reinvestment of distributions
426,353

5,003,950

293,583

3,469,027

Redeemed
(4,812,425
)
(56,223,255
)
(2,386,988
)
(28,170,291
)
 
3,313,424

38,597,667

6,818,028

81,170,573

A Class
 
 
 
 
Sold
985,147

11,535,307

1,783,525

21,301,969

Issued in reinvestment of distributions
61,146

716,986

67,419

800,039

Redeemed
(1,514,835
)
(17,686,371
)
(1,665,121
)
(19,619,173
)
 
(468,542
)
(5,434,078
)
185,823

2,482,835

C Class
 
 
 
 
Sold
373,398

4,376,131

979,409

11,647,450

Issued in reinvestment of distributions
18,937

222,074

16,818

199,276

Redeemed
(626,960
)
(7,317,749
)
(476,627
)
(5,598,532
)
 
(234,625
)
(2,719,544
)
519,600

6,248,194

Net increase (decrease)
3,724,458

$
43,859,066

9,702,544

$
118,684,084



34



6. Fair Value Measurements

The fund’s investments valuation process is based on several considerations and may use multiple inputs to determine the fair value of the investments held by the fund. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the inputs used to determine a valuation are classified into three broad levels.

Level 1 valuation inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in an active market for identical investments.

Level 2 valuation inputs consist of direct or indirect observable market data (including quoted prices for comparable investments, evaluations of subsequent market events, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.). These inputs also consist of quoted prices for identical investments initially expressed in local currencies that are adjusted through translation into U.S. dollars.

Level 3 valuation inputs consist of unobservable data (including a fund’s own assumptions).

The level classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair valuation measurement. The valuation inputs are not necessarily an indication of the risks associated with investing in these securities or other financial instruments.

As of period end, the fund’s investment securities and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures contracts were classified as Level 2 and Level 1, respectively. The Schedule of Investments provides additional information on the fund’s portfolio holdings.

7. Derivative Instruments

Interest Rate Risk — The fund is subject to interest rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. The value of bonds generally declines as interest rates rise. A fund may enter into futures contracts based on a bond index or a specific underlying security. A fund may purchase futures contracts to gain exposure to increases in market value or sell futures contracts to protect against a decline in market value. Upon entering into a futures contract, a fund will segregate cash, cash equivalents or other appropriate liquid securities on its records in amounts sufficient to meet requirements. Subsequent payments (variation margin) are made or received daily, in cash, by a fund. The variation margin is equal to the daily change in the contract value and is recorded as unrealized gains and losses. A fund recognizes a realized gain or loss when the futures contract is closed or expires. Net realized and unrealized gains or losses occurring during the holding period of futures contracts are a component of net realized gain (loss) on futures contract transactions and change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures contracts, respectively. One of the risks of entering into futures contracts is the possibility that the change in value of the contract may not correlate with the changes in value of the underlying securities. The futures contracts sold as disclosed on the Schedule of Investments are indicative of the fund’s typical volume during the period.

The value of interest rate risk derivative instruments as of August 31, 2014, is disclosed on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as an asset of $85,993 in receivable for variation margin on futures contracts.* For the year ended August 31, 2014, the effect of interest rate risk derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations was $(5,499,638) in net realized gain (loss) on futures contract transactions and $(277,378) in change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures contracts.

*
Included in the unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures contracts as reported in the Schedule of Investments.

8. Risk Factors

The fund concentrates its investments in a single state and therefore may have more exposure to credit risk related to the state of California than a fund with a broader geographical diversification.


35



9. Federal Tax Information

The tax character of distributions paid during the years ended August 31, 2014 and August 31, 2013 were as follows:
 
2014
2013
Distributions Paid From
 
 
Exempt income
$
32,010,281

$
31,237,679

Taxable ordinary income

$
15,172

Long-term capital gains

$
333,750


The book-basis character of distributions made during the year from net investment income or net realized gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. These differences reflect the differing character of certain income items and net realized gains and losses for financial statement and tax purposes, and may result in reclassification among certain capital accounts on the financial statements.

As of August 31, 2014, the federal tax cost of investments and the components of distributable earnings on a tax-basis were as follows:
Federal tax cost of investments
$
1,228,111,058

Gross tax appreciation of investments
$
86,940,374

Gross tax depreciation of investments
(3,916,218
)
Net tax appreciation (depreciation) of investments
83,024,156

Net tax appreciation (depreciation) on derivatives

Net tax appreciation (depreciation)
$
83,024,156

Other book-to-tax adjustments
$
(91,714
)
Undistributed tax-exempt income

Accumulated short-term capital losses
$
(4,271,469
)
Accumulated long-term capital losses
$
(3,087,802
)

The cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes. The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable primarily to the realization for tax purposes of unrealized gains (losses) on futures contracts. Other book-to-tax adjustments are attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on straddle positions.

Accumulated capital losses represent net capital loss carryovers that may be used to offset future realized capital gains for federal income tax purposes. The capital loss carryovers may be carried forward for an unlimited period. Future capital loss carryover utilization in any given year may be subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations.

36



Financial Highlights
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended August 31 (except as noted)
Per-Share Data
Ratios and Supplemental Data
 
 
Income From Investment Operations:
Distributions From:
 
 
Ratio to Average Net Assets of:
 
 
 
Net Asset
Value,
Beginning
of Period
Net
Investment Income
(Loss)(1)
Net
Realized and Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
Total From Investment Operations
Net
Investment Income
Net
Realized Gains
Total Distributions
Net Asset
Value,
End of Period
Total
Return(2)
Operating Expenses
Net
Investment Income
(Loss)
Portfolio Turnover
Rate
Net Assets,
End of Period (in thousands)
Investor Class
2014
$11.36
0.29
0.58
0.87
(0.29)
(0.29)
$11.94
7.68%
0.47%
2.52%
52%

$1,064,224

2013
$11.96
0.30
(0.60)
(0.30)
(0.30)
(3)
(0.30)
$11.36
(2.51)%
0.47%
2.48%
46%

$1,000,450

2012
$11.41
0.36
0.55
0.91
(0.36)
(0.36)
$11.96
8.06%
0.47%
3.04%
55%

$1,026,796

2011
$11.56
0.40
(0.15)
0.25
(0.40)
(0.40)
$11.41
2.27%
0.48%
3.57%
49%

$814,078

2010
$10.98
0.41
0.59
1.00
(0.42)
(0.42)
$11.56
9.26%
0.48%
3.70%
11%

$814,105

Institutional Class
2014
$11.37
0.32
0.57
0.89
(0.32)
(0.32)
$11.94
7.90%
0.27%
2.72%
52%

$207,978

2013
$11.96
0.32
(0.59)
(0.27)
(0.32)
(3)
(0.32)
$11.37
(2.32)%
0.27%
2.68%
46%

$160,329

2012
$11.41
0.38
0.55
0.93
(0.38)
(0.38)
$11.96
8.28%
0.27%
3.24%
55%

$87,170

2011
$11.57
0.42
(0.16)
0.26
(0.42)
(0.42)
$11.41
2.39%
0.28%
3.77%
49%

$37,381

2010(4)
$11.18
0.22
0.39
0.61
(0.22)
(0.22)
$11.57
5.50%
0.28%(5)
3.76%(5)
11%(6)

$1,683


37



For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended August 31 (except as noted)
Per-Share Data
Ratios and Supplemental Data
 
 
Income From Investment Operations:
Distributions From:
 
 
Ratio to Average Net Assets of:
 
 
 
Net Asset
Value,
Beginning
of Period
Net
Investment Income
(Loss)(1)
Net
Realized and Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
Total From Investment Operations
Net
Investment Income
Net
Realized Gains
Total Distributions
Net Asset
Value,
End of Period
Total
Return(2)
Operating Expenses
Net
Investment Income
(Loss)
Portfolio Turnover
Rate
Net Assets,
End of Period (in thousands)
A Class
2014
$11.37
0.27
0.57
0.84
(0.27)
(0.27)
$11.94
7.41%
0.72%
2.27%
52%

$32,899

2013
$11.96
0.27
(0.59)
(0.32)
(0.27)
(3)
(0.27)
$11.37
(2.76)%
0.72%
2.23%
46%

$36,644

2012
$11.41
0.32
0.56
0.88
(0.33)
(0.33)
$11.96
7.79%
0.72%
2.79%
55%

$36,341

2011
$11.57
0.37
(0.16)
0.21
(0.37)
(0.37)
$11.41
1.93%
0.73%
3.32%
49%

$15,077

2010(4)
$11.18
0.19
0.39
0.58
(0.19)
(0.19)
$11.57
5.27%
0.73%(5)
3.37%(5)
11%(6)

$2,556

C Class
2014
$11.37
0.18
0.58
0.76
(0.18)
(0.18)
$11.95
6.71%
1.47%
1.52%
52%

$17,738

2013
$11.97
0.18
(0.60)
(0.42)
(0.18)
(3)
(0.18)
$11.37
(3.56)%
1.47%
1.48%
46%

$19,555

2012
$11.42
0.23
0.56
0.79
(0.24)
(0.24)
$11.97
6.99%
1.47%
2.04%
55%

$14,361

2011
$11.57
0.29
(0.15)
0.14
(0.29)
(0.29)
$11.42
1.27%
1.48%
2.57%
49%

$4,157

2010(4)
$11.18
0.15
0.39
0.54
(0.15)
(0.15)
$11.57
4.87%
1.48%(5)
2.65%(5)
11%(6)

$2,076

 
Notes to Financial Highlights

(1)
Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period.
(2)
Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day and do not reflect applicable sales charges, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized.
(3)
Per-share amount was less than $0.005.
(4)
March 1, 2010 (commencement of sale) through August 31, 2010.
(5)
Annualized.
(6)
Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the year ended August 31, 2010.
See Notes to Financial Statements.

38



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Trustees of the American Century California Tax-Free and Municipal Funds and Shareholders of the California Intermediate-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund:

In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the California Intermediate-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund (one of the four funds in the American Century California Tax-Free and Municipal Funds, hereafter referred to as the "Fund") at August 31, 2014, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as "financial statements") are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities at August 31, 2014 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
October 21, 2014



39



Management

Board of Trustees
The individuals listed below serve as trustees of the funds. Each trustee will continue to serve in this capacity until death, retirement, resignation or removal from office. The board has adopted a mandatory retirement age for trustees who are not “interested persons,” as that term is defined in the Investment Company Act (independent trustees). Independent trustees shall retire on December 31 of the year in which they reach their 75th birthday; provided, however, that on or after January 1, 2022, independent trustees shall retire on December 31 of the year in which they reach their 76th birthday.
Mr. Thomas is an “interested person” because he currently serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent company of American Century Investment Management, Inc. (ACIM or the advisor). The other trustees (more than three-fourths of the total number) are independent. They are not employees, directors or officers of, and have no financial interest in, ACC or any of its wholly owned, direct or indirect, subsidiaries, including ACIM, American Century Investment Services, Inc. (ACIS) and American Century Services, LLC (ACS), and do not have any other affiliations, positions or relationships that would cause them to be considered “interested persons” under the Investment Company Act. The trustees serve in this capacity for eight (in the case of Mr. Thomas, 15) registered investment companies in the American Century Investments family of funds.
The following table presents additional information about the trustees. The mailing address for each trustee other than Mr. Thomas is 1665 Charleston Road, Mountain View, California 94043. The mailing address for Mr. Thomas is 4500 Main Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64111.

Name
(Year of Birth)
Position(s)
Held with
Funds
Length of
Time Served
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past 5 Years
Number of
American
Century
Portfolios
Overseen by Trustee
Other
Directorships
Held During
Past 5 Years
Independent Trustees
 
 
 
 
Tanya S. Beder
(1955)
Trustee
Since 2011
Chairman, SBCC Group Inc. (independent advisory services) (2006 to present)
45
CYS Investments, Inc. (specialty finance company)
Jeremy I. Bulow
(1954)
Trustee
Since 2011
Professor of Economics, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business (1979 to present)
45
None
Ronald J. Gilson
(1946)
Trustee and Chairman of the Board
Since 1995
(Chairman since 2005)
Charles J. Meyers Professor of Law and Business, Stanford Law School (1979 to present); Marc and Eva Stern Professor of Law and Business, Columbia University School of Law (1992 to present)
45
None
Frederick L. A. Grauer
(1946)
Trustee
Since 2008
Senior Advisor, BlackRock, Inc. (investment management firm) (2010 to 2011); Senior Advisor, Barclays Global Investors (investment management firm) (2003 to 2009)
45
None
Peter F. Pervere
(1947)
Trustee
Since 2007
Retired
45
Intraware, Inc. (2003 to 2009)

40



Name
(Year of Birth)
Position(s)
Held with
Funds
Length of
Time Served
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past 5 Years
Number of
American
Century
Portfolios
Overseen by Trustee
Other
Directorships
Held During
Past 5 Years
Independent Trustee
 
 
 
 
John B. Shoven
(1947)
Trustee
Since 2002
Professor of Economics, Stanford University (1973 to present)
45
Cadence Design Systems; Exponent; Financial Engines
Interested Trustee
 
 
 
 
Jonathan S. Thomas
(1963)
Trustee and President
Since 2007
President and Chief Executive Officer, ACC (March 2007 to present). Also serves as Chief Executive Officer, ACS; Executive Vice President, ACIM; Director, ACC, ACIM and other ACC subsidiaries
118
BioMed Valley Discoveries, Inc.

The Statement of Additional Information has additional information about the fund's trustees and is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021.


41



Officers
The following table presents certain information about the executive officers of the funds. Each officer serves as an officer for each of the 15 investment companies in the American Century family of funds, unless otherwise noted. No officer is compensated for his or her service as an officer of the funds. The listed officers are interested persons of the funds and are appointed or re-appointed on an annual basis. The mailing address for each of the officers listed below is 4500 Main Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64111.
Name
(Year of Birth)
Offices with the Funds
Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years
Jonathan S.
Thomas
(1963)
Trustee and
President
since 2007
President and Chief Executive Officer, ACC (March 2007 to present). Also serves as Chief Executive Officer, ACS; Executive Vice President, ACIM; Director, ACC, ACIM and other ACC subsidiaries
Amy D. Shelton
(1964)
Chief Compliance
Officer since 2014
Chief Compliance Officer, American Century funds, (March 2014 to present); Chief Compliance Officer, ACIM (February 2014 to present); Chief Compliance Officer, ACIS (October 2009 to present); Vice President, Client Interactions and Marketing, ACIS (February 2013 to January 2014); Director, Client Interactions and Marketing, ACIS (June 2007 to January 2013). Also serves as Vice President, ACIS
Charles A.
Etherington
(1957)
General Counsel
since 2007 and
Senior Vice
President since 2006
Attorney, ACC (February 1994 to present); Vice President, ACC (November 2005 to present); General Counsel, ACC (March 2007 to present). Also serves as General Counsel, ACIM, ACS, ACIS and other ACC subsidiaries; and Senior Vice President, ACIM and ACS
C. Jean Wade
(1964)
Vice President,
Treasurer and
Chief Financial
Officer since 2012
Vice President, ACS (February 2000 to present)
Robert J.
Leach
(1966)
Vice President
since 2006 and
Assistant Treasurer
since 2012
Vice President, ACS (February 2000 to present)
David H.
Reinmiller
(1963)
Vice President
since 2001
Attorney, ACC (January 1994 to present); Associate General Counsel, ACC (January 2001 to present). Also serves as Vice President, ACIM and ACS
Ward D.
Stauffer
(1960)
Secretary
since 2005
Attorney, ACC (June 2003 to present)


42



Approval of Management Agreement

At a meeting held on June 13, 2014, the Fund’s Board of Trustees unanimously approved the renewal of the management agreement pursuant to which American Century Investment Management, Inc. (the “Advisor”) acts as the investment advisor for the Fund. Under Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act, contracts for investment advisory services are required to be reviewed, evaluated, and approved by a majority of a fund’s directors/trustees, including a majority of the independent Trustees, each year. The Board regards this annual evaluation and renewal as one of its most important responsibilities.

The independent Trustees have memorialized a statement regarding the relationship between their ongoing obligations to oversee and evaluate the performance of the Advisor and their annual consideration of renewal of the management agreement. In that statement, the independent Trustees noted that their assessment of the Advisor’s performance is an ongoing process that takes place over the entire year and is informed by all of the extensive information that the Board and its committees receive and consider over time. This information, together with the materials provided in connection with the review, are central to the Board’s assessment of the Advisor’s performance and its determination whether to renew the Fund’s management agreement.

Prior to its consideration of the renewal of the management agreement, the Board requested and reviewed extensive data and analysis relating to the proposed renewal. This information and analysis was compiled by the Advisor and certain independent providers of evaluation data concerning the Fund and the services provided to the Fund by the Advisor.

In connection with its consideration of the renewal of the management agreement, the Board’s review and evaluation of the services provided by the Advisor included, but was not limited to, the following:

the nature, extent, and quality of investment management, shareholder services, and other services provided by the Advisor to the Fund;
the wide range of other programs and services the Advisor provides to the Fund and its shareholders on a routine and non-routine basis;
the investment performance of the Fund, including data comparing the Fund’s performance to appropriate benchmarks and/or a peer group of other mutual funds with similar investment objectives and strategies;
the cost of owning the Fund compared to the cost of owning similar funds;
the Advisor’s compliance policies, procedures, and regulatory experience;
financial data showing the cost of services provided to the Fund, the profitability of the Fund to the Advisor, and the overall profitability of the Advisor;
possible economies of scale associated with the Advisor’s management of the Fund and other accounts under its management;
data comparing services provided and charges to other investment management clients of the Advisor; and
any collateral benefits derived by the Advisor from the management of the Fund.

In keeping with its practice, the Board held two in-person meetings to review and discuss the information provided. The independent Trustees also had the benefit of the advice of their independent counsel throughout the process.

Factors Considered

The Trustees considered all of the information provided by the Advisor, the independent data providers, and the independent Trustees’ independent counsel in connection with the review, and evaluated such information for the Fund. In connection with their review, the Trustees did not identify any single factor as being all-important or controlling and each Trustee may have attributed

43



different levels of importance to different factors. In deciding to renew the management agreement, the Board based its decision on a number of factors, including the following:

Nature, Extent and Quality of Services — Generally. Under the management agreement, the Advisor is responsible for providing or arranging for all services necessary for the operation of the Fund. The Board noted that under the management agreement, the Advisor provides or arranges at its own expense a wide variety of services including:

constructing and designing the Fund
portfolio research and security selection
initial capitalization/funding
securities trading
Fund administration
custody of Fund assets
daily valuation of the Fund’s portfolio
shareholder servicing and transfer agency, including shareholder confirmations, recordkeeping, and communications
legal services
regulatory and portfolio compliance
financial reporting
marketing and distribution

The Board noted that many of these services have expanded over time both in terms of quantity and complexity in response to shareholder demands, competition in the industry, changing distribution channels, and the changing regulatory environment.

Investment Management Services. The nature of the investment management services provided to the Fund is quite complex and allows Fund shareholders access to professional money management, instant diversification of their investments within an asset class, the opportunity to easily diversify among asset classes by investing in or exchanging among various American Century Investments funds, and liquidity. In evaluating investment performance, the Board expects the Advisor to manage the Fund in accordance with its investment objectives and approved strategies. Further, the Trustees recognize that the Advisor has an obligation to seek the best execution of fund trades. In providing these services, the Advisor utilizes teams of investment professionals (portfolio managers, analysts, research assistants, and securities traders) who require extensive information technology, research, training, compliance and other systems to conduct their business. The Board, directly and through its Portfolio Committee, regularly reviews investment performance information for the Fund, together with comparative information for appropriate benchmarks and/or peer groups of similarly-managed funds, over different time horizons. The Trustees also review detailed performance information during the management agreement approval process. If performance concerns are identified, the Fund receives special reviews until performance improves, during which the Board discusses with the Advisor the reasons for such results (e.g., market conditions, security selection) and any efforts being undertaken to improve performance. The Fund’s performance was equal to its benchmark for the one-year period, above its benchmark for the three- and five-year periods, and below its benchmark for the ten-year period reviewed by the Board. The Board found the investment management services provided by the Advisor to the Fund to be satisfactory and consistent with the management agreement.

Shareholder and Other Services. Under the management agreement, the Advisor provides the Fund with a comprehensive package of transfer agency, shareholder, and other services. The Board, directly and through various committees of the Board, regularly reviews reports and evaluations of such services at its regular meetings. These reports include, but are not limited to, information regarding the operational efficiency and accuracy of the shareholder and transfer agency services provided, staffing levels, shareholder satisfaction (as measured by external as well as internal sources), technology support, new products and services offered to Fund shareholders, securities trading activities, portfolio valuation services, auditing services, and legal and operational

44



compliance activities. Certain aspects of shareholder and transfer agency service level efficiency and the quality of securities trading activities are measured by independent third party providers and are presented in comparison to other fund groups not managed by the Advisor. The Board found the services provided by the Advisor to the Fund under the management agreement to be competitive and of high quality.

Costs of Services and Profitability. The Advisor provides detailed information concerning its cost of providing various services to the Fund, its profitability in managing the Fund, its overall profitability, and its financial condition. The Trustees have reviewed with the Advisor the methodology used to prepare this financial information. The financial information regarding the Advisor is considered in evaluating the Advisor’s financial condition, its ability to continue to provide services under the management agreement, and the reasonableness of the current management fee. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.

Ethics. The Board generally considers the Advisor’s commitment to providing quality services to shareholders and to conducting its business ethically. They noted that the Advisor’s practices generally meet or exceed industry best practices.

Economies of Scale. The Board also reviewed information provided by the Advisor regarding the possible existence of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund. The Board concluded that economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict with precision, especially on a fund-by-fund basis. The Board concluded that the Advisor is appropriately sharing economies of scale through its competitive fee structure, offering competitive fees from fund inception, and through reinvestment in its business to provide shareholders additional content and services.

Comparison to Other Funds’ Fees. The management agreement provides that the Fund pays the Advisor a single, all-inclusive (or unified) management fee for providing all services necessary for the management and operation of the Fund, other than brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, extraordinary expenses, and the fees and expenses of the Fund’s independent Trustees (including their independent legal counsel) and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of shareholder services and distribution services under a plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the unified fee structure, the Advisor is responsible for providing all investment advisory, custody, audit, administrative, compliance, recordkeeping, marketing and shareholder services, or arranging and supervising third parties to provide such services. By contrast, most other funds are charged a variety of fees, including an investment advisory fee, a transfer agency fee, an administrative fee, distribution charges and other expenses. Other than their investment advisory fees and any applicable Rule 12b-1 distribution fees, all other components of the total fees charged by these other funds may be increased without shareholder approval. The Board believes the unified fee structure is a benefit to Fund shareholders because it clearly discloses to shareholders the cost of owning Fund shares, and, since the unified fee cannot be increased without a vote of Fund shareholders, it shifts to the Advisor the risk of increased costs of operating the Fund and provides a direct incentive to minimize administrative inefficiencies. Part of the Board’s analysis of fee levels involves reviewing certain evaluative data compiled by an independent provider and comparing the Fund’s unified fee to the total expense ratio of peer funds. The unified fee charged to shareholders of the Fund was below the median of the total expense ratios of the Fund’s peer group. The Board concluded that the management fee paid by the Fund to the Advisor under the management agreement is reasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.

Comparison to Fees and Services Provided to Other Clients of the Advisor. The Board also requested and received information from the Advisor concerning the nature of the services, fees, costs and profitability of its advisory services to advisory clients other than the Fund. They observed that these varying types of client accounts require different services and involve different regulatory and entrepreneurial risks than the management of the Fund. The Board analyzed this

45



information and concluded that the fees charged and services provided to the Fund were reasonable by comparison.

Collateral or “Fall-Out” Benefits Derived by the Advisor. The Board considered the existence of collateral benefits the Advisor may receive as a result of its relationship with the Fund. They concluded that the Advisor’s primary business is managing mutual funds and it generally does not use fund or shareholder information to generate profits in other lines of business, and therefore does not derive any significant collateral benefits from them. The Board noted that the Advisor receives proprietary research from broker-dealers that execute fund portfolio transactions and concluded that this research is likely to benefit Fund shareholders. The Board also determined that the Advisor is able to provide investment management services to certain clients other than the Fund, at least in part, due to its existing infrastructure built to serve the fund complex. The Board concluded, however, that the assets of those other clients are not material to the analysis and, where applicable, may be included with the assets of the Fund to determine breakpoints in the management fee schedule.

Existing Relationship. The Board also considered whether there was any reason for not continuing the existing arrangement with the Advisor. In this regard, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund’s operations and various risks, uncertainties, and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision not to continue such relationship. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Advisor’s industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Advisor will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund.

Conclusion of the Trustees. As a result of this process, the Board, including all of the independent Trustees and assisted by the advice of independent legal counsel, taking into account all of the factors discussed above and the information provided by the Advisor and others, concluded that the management agreement between the Fund and the Advisor is fair and reasonable in light of the services provided and should be renewed.


46



Additional Information
 
Proxy Voting Policies
Descriptions of the principles and policies that the fund’s investment advisor uses in exercising the voting rights associated with the securities purchased and/or held by the fund are available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021 or visiting the “About Us” page of American Century Investments’ website at americancentury.com. A description of the policies is also available on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the investment advisor voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the “About Us” page at americancentury.com. It is also available at sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website at sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund also makes its complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the most recent quarter of its fiscal year available on its website at americancentury.com and, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021.

Other Tax Information
The following information is provided pursuant to provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.
The fund designates $32,086,091 as exempt interest dividends for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2014.


47



Notes

48









 
 
 
 
Contact Us
americancentury.com
 
Automated Information Line
1-800-345-8765
 
Investor Services Representative
1-800-345-2021
or 816-531-5575
 
Investors Using Advisors
1-800-378-9878
 
Business, Not-For-Profit, Employer-Sponsored Retirement Plans
1-800-345-3533
 
Banks and Trust Companies, Broker-Dealers, Financial Professionals, Insurance Companies
1-800-345-6488
 
Telecommunications Relay Service for the Deaf
711
 
 
 
 
American Century California Tax-Free and Municipal Funds
 
 
 
 
Investment Advisor:
American Century Investment Management, Inc.
Kansas City, Missouri
 
 
 
 
This report and the statements it contains are submitted for the general information of our shareholders. The report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus.
 
 
 
 
©2014 American Century Proprietary Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.
CL-ANN-83160   1410
 




ANNUAL REPORT
AUGUST 31, 2014
 
  



California High-Yield Municipal Fund









Table of Contents
 
President’s Letter
Performance
Portfolio Commentary
Fund Characteristics
Shareholder Fee Example
Schedule of Investments
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
Statement of Operations
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
Notes to Financial Statements
Financial Highlights
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Management
Approval of Management Agreement
Additional Information
 



















Any opinions expressed in this report reflect those of the author as of the date of the report, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of American Century Investments® or any other person in the American Century Investments organization. Any such opinions are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and American Century Investments disclaims any responsibility to update such opinions. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions made by American Century Investments funds are based on numerous factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any American Century Investments fund. Security examples are used for representational purposes only and are not intended as recommendations to purchase or sell securities. Performance information for comparative indices and securities is provided to American Century Investments by third party vendors. To the best of American Century Investments’ knowledge, such information is accurate at the time of printing.




President’s Letter

Dear Investor:

Thank you for reviewing this annual report for the 12 months ended August 31, 2014. It provides investment performance and portfolio information for the reporting period, plus longer-term historical performance data.

Annual reports remain important vehicles for conveying information about fund returns, including market and economic factors that affected performance during the reporting period. For additional, updated investment and market insights, we encourage you to visit our website, americancentury.com.


Jonathan Thomas

Favorable Fiscal Year for Municipal Bond (Muni) Returns

Stimulative monetary policies and expectations of longer-term economic improvement, interspersed with concerns about nearer-term weaker-than-expected economic data and geopolitical conflicts, helped drive financial market returns during the reporting period. We believe the combination of longer-term optimism about global economic growth, low costs of capital, and central bank purchases of fixed-income securities helped persuade investors to seek risk and yield, which benefited both stocks and bonds during the period. The S&P 500 Index gained 25.25%. The 30-year U.S. Treasury bond returned 15.96%, according to Barclays.

After selling off in 2013, munis rallied strongly in 2014. The muni market rebounded from the ripple effects of Detroit’s bankruptcy, Puerto Rico’s fiscal struggles, and the mid-year “Taper Tantrum” interest rate increase in 2013 to post some of its strongest 12-month returns of the past 10 years. The rally resulted from a favorable combination of constrained inflation, improving economic and credit conditions, strong demand for yield, relatively low muni issuance, and the unexpected U.S. Treasury market rally. The Barclays Municipal Bond Index returned 10.14%, compared with 5.66% for the Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The Barclays California Tax-Exempt Bond Index and the Barclays Municipal High Yield Bond Index performed even better, returning 11.85% and 14.74%, respectively.

As is typically the case after such a strong fiscal year, we try to temper expectations for future returns. It’s unlikely that the muni market will perform again at that level in consecutive years. That said, favorable conditions do remain in place for munis, including economic growth and solid credit conditions in the U.S., contained inflation in the near term, and continuing investor demand for yield. Global economic and geopolitical uncertainties also help increase the relative attractiveness of U.S. bonds. In this environment, we continue to believe in a disciplined, diversified, long-term investment approach, using professionally managed stock and bond portfolios for meeting financial goals. We appreciate your continued trust in us.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Thomas
President and Chief Executive Officer
American Century Investments




2



Performance
Total Returns as of August 31, 2014
 
 
 
Average Annual Returns
 
 
Ticker
Symbol
1 year
5 years
10 years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
Investor Class
BCHYX
14.50%
7.72%
5.23%
6.03%
12/30/86
Barclays Municipal Bond Index
10.14%
5.39%
4.77%
6.25%(1)
Institutional Class
BCHIX
14.73%
7.15%
3/1/10
A Class
CAYAX 
 
 
 
 
1/31/03
No sales charge*
 
14.21%
7.45%
4.97%
5.12%
 
With sales charge*
 
9.07%
6.46%
4.48%
4.70%
 
C Class
CAYCX
 
 
13.37%
6.65%
4.18%
4.36%
1/31/03
* Sales charges include initial sales charges and contingent deferred sales charges (CDSCs), as applicable. A Class shares have a 4.50% maximum initial sales charge and may be subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. C Class shares redeemed within 12 months of purchase are subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. The SEC requires that mutual funds provide performance information net of maximum sales charges in all cases where charges could be applied.

(1)
Since December 31, 1986, the date nearest the Investor Class's inception for which data are available.









Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. As interest rates rise, bond values will decline. The fund concentrates its investments in a single state and therefore may have more exposure to credit risk related to the state of California than a fund with a broader geographical diversification. In addition, the lower-rated securities in which the fund invests are subject to greater liquidity risk and credit risk. Investment income may be subject to certain state and local taxes and, depending on your tax status, the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT). Capital gains are not exempt from state and federal income tax.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses(such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.

3



Growth of $10,000 Over 10 Years
$10,000 investment made August 31, 2004
 
Value on August 31, 2014
 
Investor Class — $16,649
 
 
Barclays Municipal Bond Index — $15,935
 

Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses
Investor Class
Institutional Class
A Class
C Class
0.50%
0.30%
0.75%
1.50%
The total annual fund operating expenses shown is as stated in the fund’s prospectus current as of the date of this report. The prospectus may vary from the expense ratio shown elsewhere in this report because it is based on a different time period, includes acquired fund fees and expenses, and, if applicable, does not include fee waivers or expense reimbursements.





Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. As interest rates rise, bond values will decline. The fund concentrates its investments in a single state and therefore may have more exposure to credit risk related to the state of California than a fund with a broader geographical diversification. In addition, the lower-rated securities in which the fund invests are subject to greater liquidity risk and credit risk. Investment income may be subject to certain state and local taxes and, depending on your tax status, the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT). Capital gains are not exempt from state and federal income tax.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses(such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.

4



Portfolio Commentary

Portfolio Managers: Alan Kruss, Joseph Gotelli, and Steven Permut

Performance Summary

California High-Yield Municipal returned 14.50%* for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2014. By comparison, its benchmark, the Barclays Municipal Bond Index (representing investment-grade municipal bonds), returned 10.14%, while a supplemental index, the Barclays Municipal High Yield Bond Index (representing non-investment-grade municipal bonds), returned 14.74%.** Fund returns reflect operating expenses, while index returns do not. (See pages 3 and 4 and footnotes below for additional performance comparisons.)

The fund’s absolute return reflected the positive overall performance of high-yield municipal bonds (high-yield munis), despite some challenges early in the reporting period. After struggling in 2013 with rising interest rates, negative credit-related events, and steady muni fund outflows, the muni market rebounded throughout the first eight months of 2014. Investor optimism regarding munis improved as fears about sharp rate hikes and widespread municipal credit challenges subsided. In addition, higher federal tax rates made the taxable-equivalent yields of munis more attractive for many yield-hungry investors. Meanwhile, growing demand for munis was met with declining issuance, providing a positive supply/demand backdrop.

The main contributors to the fund’s outperformance relative to the non-state-specific investment-grade benchmark were the portfolio’s greater focus on lower-quality securities (which outpaced investment-grade munis during the period) and its single-state bias (California munis generally outperformed the broad national muni benchmark). Compared with the non-state-specific high-yield supplemental index, the portfolio was more conservatively positioned, with a greater emphasis on higher-rated bonds and lower weightings in riskier sectors, which led to weaker relative performance.

Fiscal and Credit Fundamentals

The muni market faced—but generally overcame—some notable negative headlines during the 12-month period. Detroit’s bankruptcy filing, which occurred in July 2013, prior to the start of the current reporting period, continued to taint market sentiment, particularly early in the period. Additionally, Puerto Rico, which is one of the largest issuers of municipal debt, captured headlines as the Commonwealth struggled with a stubbornly weak economy, mounting debt, and persistent budget deficits, which ultimately prompted Puerto Rico’s government to draft a controversial debt-restructuring plan.

Despite these high-profile challenges, overall credit trends in the muni market were stable to improving throughout the period. State and local tax revenues generally increased, due to improving local economies and/or higher tax rates. And that trend may continue. According to the National Association of State Budget Officers, 42 states plan to increase spending in fiscal 2015 (which began July 1, 2014, for most states). In California, employment and housing market gains helped improve the state’s fiscal landscape. California’s fiscal 2015 spending plan pays down debt, builds a rainy day fund, and provides additional money for schools and health care. Citing California’s “rapidly improving financial position,” Moody’s Investors Service upgraded the state’s general obligation (GO) credit rating to its highest level since 2001 (to Aa3). California state GOs remained rated “A” by Fitch and Standard & Poor’s.

*
All fund returns referenced in this commentary are for Investor Class shares. Performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structures; when Investor Class performance exceeds that of the fund’s benchmark, other share classes may not. See page 3 for returns for all share classes.
**
The Barclays Municipal High Yield Bond Index’s average returns were 9.94% and 5.80% for the five- and 10-year periods, respectively, ended August 31, 2014.

5



Nationwide, muni credit-rating downgrades continued to outpace upgrades, but at a narrowing pace. Furthermore, the national muni default rate remained low at approximately 0.02% through the first seven months of 2014, compared with 0.08% for the full year of 2013, according to Bank of America. We continue to believe it’s unlikely any states will default, but select, isolated state and commonwealth credit ratings are likely to remain under downward pressure, and court decisions on bondholder versus debtor rights in current muni bankruptcy proceedings could produce more ripples. Overall, we still believe the events in Puerto Rico and Detroit reflect well-documented idiosyncratic credit risks that are particular to their situations and are not indicative of underlying municipal market credit trends.

Portfolio Positioning

In addition to the portfolio’s California and high-yield biases compared with the benchmark, yield curve and duration (price sensitivity to interest rate changes) positioning contributed to the fund’s relative outperformance. Specifically, we positioned the fund with overweight positions relative to the benchmark in longer-maturity securities. After rising early in the reporting period, longer-term interest rates fell sharply during the first eight months of 2014, causing the yield curve to flatten. This downward shift in rates more than offset the earlier effects of higher rates, and returns on longer-maturity munis significantly outperformed their shorter-maturity counterparts.

Security selection also contributed positively to fund performance. Overall, we continued to favor revenue bonds, which generally outperformed GO bonds during the period. In particular, our selections among toll road, special tax, and local GO bonds contributed strongly to relative performance. Meanwhile, security selection detracted from relative results in the state GO, public power (primarily due to a small position in Puerto Rico electric bonds), and hospital sectors.

The fund owned Treasury futures as part of its duration positioning strategy. This particular position detracted from performance, but overall the portfolio’s duration and yield curve positioning contributed positively to performance.

Outlook

Near term, we expect the muni market’s supply/demand imbalance to continue to drive performance. Although we expect muni supply to increase in the months ahead, we also expect demand to remain strong. We believe interest rates may slowly climb to more “normal” levels as the economy gradually improves and the Federal Reserve's quantitative easing program concludes. We therefore expect to add securities we believe should perform well in a rising rate environment, including lower-quality, higher-yielding munis. Additionally, we expect fundamental credit research, active management, and security selection to become increasingly important as rates normalize.





6



Fund Characteristics
 
AUGUST 31, 2014
Portfolio at a Glance
Weighted Average Maturity
19.2 years
Average Duration (Modified)
5.3 years
 
 
Top Five Sectors
% of fund investments
Special Tax
21%
Tollroads
10%
Hospital
9%
General Obligation (GO) - Local
9%
Lease Revenue
8%
 
 
Types of Investments in Portfolio
% of net assets
Municipal Securities
98.8%
Other Assets and Liabilities
1.2%

7



Shareholder Fee Example

Fund shareholders may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and redemption/exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing cost of investing in other mutual funds.

The example is based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from March 1, 2014 to August 31, 2014.

Actual Expenses

The table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses for each class. You may use the information, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. First, identify the share class you own. Then simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

If you hold Investor Class shares of any American Century Investments fund, or Institutional Class shares of the American Century Diversified Bond Fund, in an American Century Investments account (i.e., not a financial intermediary or retirement plan account), American Century Investments may charge you a $12.50 semiannual account maintenance fee if the value of those shares is less than $10,000. We will redeem shares automatically in one of your accounts to pay the $12.50 fee. In determining your total eligible investment amount, we will include your investments in all personal accounts (including American Century Investments Brokerage accounts) registered under your Social Security number. Personal accounts include individual accounts, joint accounts, UGMA/UTMA accounts, personal trusts, Coverdell Education Savings Accounts and IRAs (including traditional, Roth, Rollover, SEP-, SARSEP- and SIMPLE-IRAs), and certain other retirement accounts. If you have only business, business retirement, employer-sponsored or American Century Investments Brokerage accounts, you are currently not subject to this fee. If you are subject to the Account Maintenance Fee, your account value could be reduced by the fee amount.

Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes

The table also provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio of each class of your fund and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of a fund’s share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption/exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.



8



 
Beginning
Account Value
3/1/14
Ending
Account Value
8/31/14
Expenses Paid
During Period(1)
3/1/14 - 8/31/14
Annualized
Expense Ratio(1)
Actual
Investor Class
$1,000
$1,058.10
$2.59
0.50%
Institutional Class
$1,000
$1,059.20
$1.56
0.30%
A Class
$1,000
$1,056.80
$3.89
0.75%
C Class
$1,000
$1,051.70
$7.76
1.50%
Hypothetical
Investor Class
$1,000
$1,022.69
$2.55
0.50%
Institutional Class
$1,000
$1,023.69
$1.53
0.30%
A Class
$1,000
$1,021.43
$3.82
0.75%
C Class
$1,000
$1,017.64
$7.63
1.50%
(1)
Expenses are equal to the class's annualized expense ratio listed in the table above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184, the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, divided by 365, to reflect the one-half year period.

9



Schedule of Investments
 

AUGUST 31, 2014
 
Principal
Amount
Value
MUNICIPAL SECURITIES — 98.8%
 
 
California — 94.8%
 
 
ABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corps. Rev., (899 Charleston Project), VRDN, 0.03%, 9/2/14 (LOC: Bank of America N.A.)
$
2,995,000

$
2,995,000

ABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corps. Rev., (Jackson Laboratory), 5.00%, 7/1/37
2,000,000

2,150,760

ABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corps. Rev., Series 2012 C1, (Episcopal Senior Communities), 3.00%, 7/1/19
1,835,000

1,836,376

ABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corps. Rev., Series 2012 C2, (Episcopal Senior Communities), 2.50%, 7/1/19
2,625,000

2,625,630

ABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corps. Rev., Series 2014 A, (Sharp HealthCare), 5.00%, 8/1/43
3,500,000

3,879,470

ABC Unified School District GO, Capital Appreciation, Series 2000 B, 0.00%, 8/1/21 (NATL-RE/FGIC)(1)
1,000,000

860,940

Adelanto Public Utility Authority Rev., Series 2009 A, (Utility System), 6.75%, 7/1/39
5,225,000

5,881,678

Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority Rev., Series 2013 A, 5.00%, 10/1/26
2,000,000

2,340,380

Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority Rev., Series 2013 A, 5.00%, 10/1/27 (AGM)
2,000,000

2,320,840

Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority Rev., Series 2013 A, 5.00%, 10/1/29 (AGM)
1,000,000

1,145,630

Alhambra Rev., Series 2010 A, (Atherton Baptist Homes), 7.50%, 1/1/30
1,590,000

1,704,877

Bay Area Toll Authority Toll Bridge Rev., Series 2001 A, (San Francisco Bay Area), VRDN, 1.30%, 9/4/14
1,000,000

1,009,150

Bay Area Toll Authority Toll Bridge Rev., Series 2007 A1, (San Francisco Bay Area), VRDN, 0.75%, 9/4/14
1,450,000

1,450,710

Bay Area Toll Authority Toll Bridge Rev., Series 2008 G1, (San Francisco Bay Area), VRDN, 1.15%, 9/4/14
2,500,000

2,517,925

Bay Area Toll Authority Toll Bridge Rev., Series 2012 F1, (San Francisco Bay Area), 5.00%, 4/1/31
8,500,000

9,853,455

Bay Area Toll Authority Toll Bridge Rev., Series 2013 S4, (San Francisco Bay Area), 5.00%, 4/1/43
1,000,000

1,110,810

Beaumont Financing Authority Local Agency Special Tax Rev., Series 2004 D, 5.80%, 9/1/35
2,875,000

2,935,720

Beaumont Financing Authority Local Agency Special Tax Rev., Series 2005 B, 5.40%, 9/1/35
1,390,000

1,432,075

Beaumont Financing Authority Local Agency Special Tax Rev., Series 2005 C, 5.50%, 9/1/29
855,000

873,032

Beaumont Financing Authority Local Agency Special Tax Rev., Series 2005 C, 5.50%, 9/1/35
4,000,000

4,003,800

Beaumont Financing Authority Local Agency Special Tax Rev., Series 2006 A, (Improvement Area No. 19C), 5.35%, 9/1/36
2,700,000

2,703,321

Beaumont Financing Authority Local Agency Special Tax Rev., Series 2008 A, (Improvement Area No. 19C), 6.875%, 9/1/36
1,050,000

1,112,160

Beaumont Unified School District GO, Capital Appreciation, Series 2011 C, (Election of 2008), 0.00%, 8/1/40 (AGM)(1)
2,000,000

594,060

Berryessa Union School District GO, Capital Appreciation, Series 2000 A, 0.00%, 8/1/21 (AGM)(1)
1,190,000

985,070

Berryessa Union School District GO, Capital Appreciation, Series 2000 A, 0.00%, 8/1/22 (AGM)(1)
1,220,000

963,202


10



 
Principal
Amount
Value
Berryessa Union School District GO, Capital Appreciation, Series 2000 A, 0.00%, 8/1/23 (AGM)(1)
$
1,000,000

$
754,110

California County Tobacco Securitization Agency Rev., 5.65%, 6/1/41
1,500,000

1,217,265

California Economic Recovery GO, Series 2004 C4, VRDN, 0.02%, 9/2/14 (LOC: JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.)
2,650,000

2,650,000

California Educational Facilities Authority Rev., (Chapman University), 5.00%, 4/1/31
1,820,000

2,012,611

California Educational Facilities Authority Rev., (Pepperdine University), 5.00%, 9/1/33
2,000,000

2,311,280

California GO, 5.00%, 11/1/19
10,000,000

11,967,200

California GO, 5.25%, 2/1/30
5,000,000

5,854,050

California GO, 6.00%, 4/1/38
5,000,000

5,956,150

California GO, 5.00%, 2/1/43
5,650,000

6,326,870

California GO, Series 2003 A1, VRDN, 0.03%, 9/2/14 (LOC: JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.)
1,100,000

1,100,000

California GO, Series 2004 A3, (Kindergarten), VRDN, 0.03%, 9/2/14 (LOC: State Street Bank & Trust Co.)
1,000,000

1,000,000

California GO, Series 2004 B2, (Kindergarten), VRDN, 0.02%, 9/2/14 (LOC: Citibank N.A.)
3,700,000

3,700,000

California GO, Series 2004 B3, (Kindergarten), VRDN, 0.02%, 9/2/14 (LOC: Citibank N.A.)
1,200,000

1,200,000

California GO, Series 2012 B, VRN, 0.95%, 9/4/14
2,000,000

2,024,940

California GO, Series 2012 B, VRN, 1.05%, 9/4/14
800,000

811,944

California GO, Series 2012 B, VRN, 1.20%, 9/4/14
960,000

978,000

California GO, Series 2013, 5.00%, 2/1/38
4,635,000

5,222,857

California GO, VRDN, 4.00%, 12/1/16
2,000,000

2,127,520

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center), 5.00%, 8/15/39
2,000,000

2,182,600

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2008 A, (Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital), VRDN, 1.45%, 3/15/17
1,910,000

1,954,064

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2008 A, (Scripps Health), 5.50%, 10/1/20
1,500,000

1,774,425

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2008 C, (Providence Health & Services), 6.50%, 10/1/18,
Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)
1,000,000

1,233,140

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2009 A, (Catholic Healthcare West), 6.00%, 7/1/39
4,300,000

4,879,898

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2009 A, (Children's Hospital of Orange County), 6.50%, 11/1/38
3,000,000

3,537,990

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2011 B, (St. Joseph Health System), VRDN, 0.04%, 9/2/14 (LOC: U.S. Bank N.A.)
2,200,000

2,200,000

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2011 D, (Sutter Health), 5.25%, 8/15/31
2,030,000

2,325,284

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2011 D, (Sutter Health), 5.00%, 8/15/35
2,000,000

2,200,100

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, (City of Hope), 5.00%, 11/15/39
1,910,000

2,122,908

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, (Stanford Hospital & Clinics), 5.00%, 8/15/51
2,500,000

2,774,150

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2012 B, (Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital), 5.00%, 8/15/26
1,020,000

1,186,454

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2013 A, (St. Joseph Health System), 5.00%, 7/1/37
445,000

492,673

California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2013 A, (Sutter Health), 5.00%, 8/15/52
5,000,000

5,489,850


11



 
Principal
Amount
Value
California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev., Series 2014 A, (Providence Health and Services), 5.00%, 10/1/38
$
2,000,000

$
2,268,560

California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev., (Pacific Gas & Electric Co.), VRDN, 0.03%, 9/2/14 (LOC: Union Bank N.A.)
1,700,000

1,700,000

California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev., Series 2008 A, (Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History Foundation), VRDN, 0.02%, 9/2/14 (LOC: Wells Fargo Bank N.A.)
145,000

145,000

California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev., Series 2008 B, (Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History Foundation), VRDN, 0.02%, 9/2/14 (LOC: Wells Fargo Bank N.A.)
1,800,000

1,800,000

California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev., Series 2013 A, (Los Angeles County Museum of Art Project), VRDN, 1.86%, 9/4/14
1,000,000

1,020,600

California Mobilehome Park Financing Authority Rev., Series 2003 B, (Palomar Estates E&W), 7.00%, 9/15/36
6,345,000

6,404,960

California Mobilehome Park Financing Authority Rev., Series 2006 B, (Union City Tropics), 5.50%, 12/15/41
2,000,000

2,028,840

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., (Biola University), 5.875%, 10/1/34
1,000,000

1,110,880

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., Series 2008 A, (Central Coast YMCA), VRDN, 0.04%, 9/4/14 (LOC: Pacific Capital Bank N.A. and FHLB)
2,060,000

2,060,000

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., Series 2011 B, (Azusa Pacific University), 8.00%, 4/1/41
3,335,000

3,975,187

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., Series 2014 A, (Caritas Affordable Housing, Inc. Project), 5.00%, 8/15/20
600,000

696,444

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., Series 2014 A, (Caritas Affordable Housing, Inc. Project), 5.00%, 8/15/22
360,000

418,169

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., Series 2014 A, (Touro College and University System), 5.25%, 1/1/34
950,000

1,056,419

California Municipal Finance Authority Rev., Series 2014 A, (Touro College and University System), 5.25%, 1/1/40
1,750,000

1,923,477

California Municipal Finance Authority COP, (Community Hospitals of Central California Obligated Group), 5.50%, 2/1/39
1,450,000

1,522,920

California Pollution Control Financing Authority Rev., 5.00%, 11/21/45(3)
3,165,000

3,242,131

California Pollution Control Financing Authority Rev., Series 1996 C, (Pacific Gas & Electric Company), VRDN, 0.02%, 9/2/14 (LOC: JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.)
1,300,000

1,300,000

California Pollution Control Financing Authority Rev., Series 1996 E, (Pacific Gas & Electric Company), VRDN, 0.02%, 9/2/14 (LOC: JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.)
5,800,000

5,800,000

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 1993 D, (Department of Corrections), 5.25%, 6/1/15 (AGM)
550,000

565,494

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2009 G1, (Various Capital Projects), 5.75%, 10/1/30
2,000,000

2,355,300

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2010 A-1, (Various Capital Projects), 5.00%, 3/1/17
1,000,000

1,110,900

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2010 A1, (Various Capital Projects), 6.00%, 3/1/35
1,250,000

1,496,825

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2011 C, (State Prisons), 5.75%, 10/1/31
1,000,000

1,208,100

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2011 D, (Judicial Council Projects), 5.00%, 12/1/15
3,335,000

3,536,868

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2011 D, (Judicial Council Projects), 5.00%, 12/1/31
975,000

1,113,196

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2012 A, (Various Capital Projects), 5.00%, 4/1/25
1,500,000

1,761,435

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2012 A, (Various Capital Projects), 5.00%, 4/1/37
5,465,000

6,058,882


12



 
Principal
Amount
Value
California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2012 D, 5.00%, 9/1/36
$
500,000

$
553,255

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2012 G, (Various Capital Projects), 4.00%, 11/1/17
1,235,000

1,365,552

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2013 H, (California State University Project), 5.00%, 9/1/38
1,500,000

1,667,010

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2013 I, (Various Capital Projects), 5.00%, 11/1/38
2,350,000

2,641,094

California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Series 2014 A, (Various Capital Projects), 5.00%, 9/1/39
7,000,000

7,920,990

California School Finance Authority Rev., Series 2014 A, (Klare Holdings Projects), 4.125%, 7/1/24
475,000

489,545

California School Finance Authority Rev., Series 2014 A, (Klare Holdings Projects), 5.00%, 7/1/34
500,000

521,305

California School Finance Authority Rev., Series 2014 A, (Klare Holdings Projects), 5.125%, 7/1/44
700,000

723,765

California State University Rev., Series 2005 C, 5.00%, 11/1/15, Prerefunded at 100% of Par (NATL-RE)(2)
3,680,000

3,888,104

California State University Rev., Series 2005 C, 5.00%, 11/1/30 (NATL-RE)
1,320,000

1,377,790

California State University Systemwide Rev., Series 2011 A, 5.00%, 11/1/42
3,000,000

3,296,070

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., (Cottage Health Obligation Group), 5.25%, 11/1/30
1,250,000

1,376,250

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., (Episcopal Communities and Services), 5.00%, 5/15/42
1,500,000

1,597,575

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., (Lancer Educational Student Housing), 5.625%, 6/1/33
2,500,000

2,553,525

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., (Southern California Presbyterian Homes), 7.25%, 11/15/41
2,500,000

2,898,950

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., (Trinity Health Corp.), 5.00%, 12/1/41
1,100,000

1,203,015

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2001 C, (Kaiser Permanente), 5.25%, 8/1/31
4,000,000

4,203,960

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2004 D, (Sutter Health), 5.05%, 8/15/38 (AGM)
1,650,000

1,744,116

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2007 A, (California Baptist University), 5.50%, 11/1/38
7,000,000

7,166,880

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2008 C, (John Muir Health), VRDN, 0.03%, 9/2/14 (LOC: Wells Fargo Bank N.A.)
2,800,000

2,800,000

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, (Kaiser Permanente), 5.00%, 4/1/42
6,000,000

6,595,080

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2013 A, (American Baptist Homes of the West), 5.00%, 10/1/43
1,200,000

1,234,524

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2014 A, (Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital), 5.25%, 10/1/43 (AGM)
1,000,000

1,102,900

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2014 A, (Los Angeles Jewish Home), 5.00%, 8/1/44 (GA: Jewish Home Foundation)
1,600,000

1,780,800

California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev., Series 2014 B, (Los Angeles Jewish Home), 3.00%, 8/1/21 (GA: Jewish Home Foundation)
1,300,000

1,336,790

Carson Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2009 A, (Project Area No. 1), 7.00%, 10/1/36
2,000,000

2,321,100

Chaffey Joint Union High School District GO, Series 2013 A, (Election of 2012), 5.00%, 8/1/32
2,000,000

2,308,500

Chula Vista Industrial Development Rev., Series 2004 D, (San Diego Gas), 5.875%, 1/1/34
1,000,000

1,176,670

City of Irvine Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Rev., (Assessment District No. 13-1), 5.00%, 9/2/29
700,000

763,371


13



 
Principal
Amount
Value
City of Irvine Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Rev., (Assessment District No. 13-1), 5.00%, 9/2/30
$
350,000

$
380,573

City of Irvine Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Special Assessment Rev., (Assessment District No. 13-3), 5.00%, 9/1/49
3,500,000

3,774,295

City of Irvine Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Special Assessment Rev., (Assessment District No. 12-1), 5.00%, 9/2/24
700,000

805,525

City of Irvine Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Special Assessment Rev., (Assessment District No. 12-1), 5.00%, 9/2/26
600,000

676,884

City of La Verne COP, (Brethren Hillcrest Homes), 5.00%, 5/15/36
1,100,000

1,146,156

City of Whittier Health Facilities Rev., (Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital), 5.00%, 6/1/44
3,500,000

3,869,565

Clovis Unified School District GO, Series 2013 B, (Election of 2012), 5.00%, 8/1/38
3,000,000

3,385,140

Contra Costa Water District Rev., Series 2013 R, 5.00%, 10/1/43
1,025,000

1,162,996

Corcoran COP, 8.75%, 6/1/16 (Acquired 4/28/92, Cost $200,000)(4)
200,000

217,974

Duarte Unified School District GO, Capital Appreciation, Series 1999 B, 0.00%, 11/1/23 (AGM)(1)
1,150,000

858,429

East Side Union High School District GO, Series 2013, 5.00%, 8/1/29
1,050,000

1,221,780

Eastern Municipal Water District Water and Sewer COP, Series 2008 H, 5.00%, 7/1/33
4,000,000

4,485,360

El Dorado County Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 Special Tax Rev., (Promontory Specific), 6.30%, 9/1/31
2,500,000

2,520,025

El Rancho Unified School District GO, Capital Appreciation, (Election of 2003), 0.00%, 8/1/32 (NATL-RE)(1)
4,400,000

1,817,376

Emeryville Redevelopment Agency Successor Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/31 (AGM)
590,000

681,680

Emeryville Redevelopment Agency Successor Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/34 (AGM)
1,000,000

1,140,660

Escondido Joint Powers Financing Authority Rev., (Water Systems Financing), 5.00%, 9/1/31
1,355,000

1,507,519

Fairfield Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., 4.00%, 8/1/16
1,000,000

1,068,160

Foothill-De Anza Community College District GO, Capital Appreciation, 0.00%, 8/1/21 (NATL-RE)(1)
3,000,000

2,582,820

Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency Toll Road Rev., Series 2014 A, 6.00%, 1/15/49
27,500,000

31,675,875

Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency Toll Road Rev., Series 2014 B3, VRDN, 5.50%, 1/15/23
3,750,000

4,350,487

Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency Toll Road Rev., Series 2014 C, 6.50%, 1/15/43
4,000,000

4,700,040

Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency Toll Road Rev., Capital Appreciation, Series 2014 A, 0.00%, 1/15/24(5)
2,200,000

1,387,276

Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency Toll Road Rev., Capital Appreciation, Series 2014 A, 0.00%, 1/15/42(1)
6,000,000

1,258,740

Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Settlement Rev., Series 2007 A-1, 5.00%, 6/1/33
2,000,000

1,652,400

Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Settlement Rev., Series 2007 A1, 4.50%, 6/1/27
5,000,000

4,577,800

Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Settlement Rev., Series 2007 A1, 5.125%, 6/1/47
5,000,000

3,743,600

Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Settlement Rev., Series 2007 A1, 5.75%, 6/1/47
8,000,000

6,572,240

Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Settlement Rev., Series 2007 A2, 5.30%, 6/1/37
3,000,000

2,376,120

Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Settlement Rev., Series 2013 A, 5.00%, 6/1/29
1,500,000

1,695,510


14



 
Principal
Amount
Value
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Settlement Rev., Series 2013 A, 5.00%, 6/1/30
$
2,500,000

$
2,809,650

Grossmont Union High School District GO, Series 2013 E, (Election of 2008), 5.00%, 8/1/43
1,225,000

1,375,222

Hayward Area Recreation and Park District COP, 5.125%, 1/1/39
1,500,000

1,676,835

Hemet Unified School District Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 2005-2), 5.25%, 9/1/30
2,670,000

2,687,141

Hesperia Public Financing Authority Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2007 A, (Redevelopment and Housing), 5.50%, 9/1/32 (XLCA)
3,000,000

3,091,380

Hesperia Public Financing Authority Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2007 A, (Redevelopment and Housing), 5.50%, 9/1/37 (XLCA)
2,025,000

2,076,759

Huntington Beach Community Facilities District Special Tax Rev., (Huntington Center), 5.375%, 9/1/33
1,700,000

1,878,908

Independent Cities Finance Authority Mobile Home Park Rev., (Rancho Feliz and Las Casitasde Sonoma), 5.00%, 10/15/47
5,000,000

5,242,150

Independent Cities Finance Authority Mobile Home Park Rev., Series 2011 A, (Castle Mobile Estates), 6.75%, 8/15/46
2,500,000

2,820,250

Independent Cities Finance Authority Mobile Home Park Rev., Series 2012 A, (Augusta Communities), 5.00%, 5/15/39
2,500,000

2,639,700

Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority Rev., Series 2004 A, (Morgan Hill - Hacienda Valley Mobile Estates), 5.90%, 11/15/34
2,235,000

2,239,783

Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority Rev., Series 2006 B, (San Juan Mobile Estates), 5.55%, 5/15/31
500,000

506,010

Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority Rev., Series 2006 B, (San Juan Mobile Estates), 5.85%, 5/15/41
1,150,000

1,165,341

Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority Rev., Series 2007 A, (Santa Rosa Leisure Mobilehome Park), 5.70%, 11/15/47
3,430,000

3,508,821

Inland Valley Development Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.25%, 9/1/37
1,110,000

1,253,945

Inland Valley Development Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/44
1,180,000

1,285,693

Irvine Ranch Water District Rev., Series 2009 B, VRDN, 0.02%, 9/2/14 (LOC: Bank of America N.A.)
600,000

600,000

Irvine Unified School District Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 06-1), 6.70%, 9/1/35
515,000

590,061

Jurupa Community Services District Special Tax Rev., Series 2008 A, (Community Facilities District No. 25), 8.875%, 9/1/18, Prerefunded at 100% of Par(2)
2,000,000

2,617,300

Jurupa Community Services District Special Tax Rev., Series 2013 A, (Community Facilities District No. 31), 5.00%, 9/1/37
250,000

266,628

Jurupa Community Services District Special Tax Rev., Series 2013 A, (Community Facilities District No. 31), 5.00%, 9/1/42
1,000,000

1,060,420

Jurupa Public Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/31
1,100,000

1,241,746

Jurupa Public Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/42
1,000,000

1,096,920

Kern High School District GO, 5.00%, 8/1/25
1,145,000

1,360,123

Lake Elsinore Unified School District Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 2005-1, Improvement Area A), 5.40%, 9/1/14, Prerefunded at 102% of Par(2)
2,245,000

2,290,551

Lammersville Joint Unified School District Special Tax Rev., (Mountain House), 6.00%, 9/1/43
1,250,000

1,406,287

Liberty Union High School District GO, 5.00%, 8/1/29
1,000,000

1,154,940

Long Beach Bond Finance Authority Natural Gas Purchase Rev., Series 2007 A, 5.50%, 11/15/37
1,150,000

1,399,308

Los Alamitos Unified School District COP, Capital Appreciation, (Capital Projects), 0.00%, 8/1/24(5)
1,300,000

887,861


15



 
Principal
Amount
Value
Los Angeles Community College District GO, Series 2008 F1, (Election of 2003), 5.00%, 8/1/27
$
2,000,000

$
2,290,000

Los Angeles Community Facilities District No. 3 Special Tax Rev., (Cascades Business Park & Golf Course), 6.40%, 9/1/22
1,110,000

1,127,593

Los Angeles County COP, (Disney Concert Hall), 5.00%, 3/1/23
1,000,000

1,199,840

Los Angeles County Regional Financing Authority Rev., Series 2014 B-1, (MonteCedro Inc.), 2.50%, 11/15/20
875,000

891,975

Los Angeles County Regional Financing Authority Rev., Series 2014 B-1, (MonteCedro Inc.), 3.00%, 11/15/20
400,000

409,308

Los Angeles County Regional Financing Authority Rev., Series 2014 B-1, (MonteCedro Inc.), 3.00%, 11/15/21
475,000

483,213

Los Angeles Department of Airports Rev., Series 2010 A, (Los Angeles International Airport), 5.00%, 5/15/40(6)
2,000,000

2,263,020

Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Rev., Series 2002 A2, (Power System), VRDN, 0.04%, 9/4/14 (SBBPA: Citibank N.A.)
13,000,000

13,000,000

Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Rev., Series 2013 B, 5.00%, 7/1/30
3,500,000

4,115,580

Los Angeles Unified School District COP, Series 2012 B, (Headquarters Building Project), 5.00%, 10/1/29
350,000

403,603

Los Angeles Unified School District COP, Series 2012 B, (Headquarters Building Project), 5.00%, 10/1/31
3,500,000

3,984,540

Los Angeles Unified School District GO, Series 2011 A1, 5.00%, 7/1/24
3,430,000

4,087,016

Los Angeles Unified School District GO, Series 2014 B, 5.00%, 7/1/18
3,335,000

3,869,634

Los Angeles Unified School District GO, Series 2014 C, 5.00%, 7/1/30
1,155,000

1,375,998

Los Angeles Wastewater System Rev., Series 2012 B, 5.00%, 6/1/32
3,000,000

3,458,250

M-S-R Energy Authority Rev., Series 2009 A, 7.00%, 11/1/34
1,700,000

2,380,765

M-S-R Energy Authority Rev., Series 2009 B, 6.50%, 11/1/39 (GA: Citigroup, Inc.)
2,000,000

2,702,740

Milpitas Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Special Assessment Rev., Series 1996 A, (Local Improvement District No. 18), 6.75%, 9/2/16
495,000

506,355

Modesto Irrigation District COP, Series 2009 A, (Capital Improvements), 6.00%, 10/1/39
3,000,000

3,470,130

Montebello Community Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2009 A, (Montebello Hills Redevelopment), 8.10%, 3/1/27
2,000,000

2,370,340

Moorpark Mobile Home Park Rev., Series 2011 A, (Villa Delaware Arroyo), 6.50%, 5/15/41
4,000,000

4,501,760

Murrieta Community Facilities District No. 2002-2 Special Tax Rev., Series 2004 A, (The Oaks Improvement Area), 6.00%, 9/1/34
1,880,000

1,882,801

Murrieta Public Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., 5.00%, 9/1/31
1,735,000

1,854,698

Northern California Power Agency Rev., Series 2012 A, (Hydroelectric Project No. 1), 5.00%, 7/1/31
1,090,000

1,238,382

Norwalk-La Mirada Unified School District GO, Capital Appreciation, Series 2009 E, (Election of 2002), 0.00%, 8/1/38 (AGC)(1)
10,000,000

3,337,700

Oakland Redevelopment Agency Rev., 5.00%, 9/1/36 (Ambac)
5,000,000

5,249,050

Oakland Unified School District Alameda County GO, Series 2009 A, (Election of 2006), 6.125%, 8/1/29
2,500,000

2,879,050

Oakland Unified School District Alameda County GO, Series 2012 A, (Election of 2006), 5.50%, 8/1/32
2,150,000

2,409,655

Oakland Unified School District Alameda County GO, Series 2013, (Election of 2012), 6.625%, 8/1/38
770,000

928,058

Oceanside Community Development Commission Tax Allocation Rev., (Downtown Redevelopment), 5.70%, 9/1/25
3,500,000

3,503,570

Ohlone Community College District GO, Series 2011 A, (Election of 2010), 5.00%, 8/1/31
3,000,000

3,393,480


16



 
Principal
Amount
Value
Orange County Community Facilities District Special Tax Rev., (No. 06-1-Delaware Rio Public Improvements), 6.00%, 10/1/40
$
1,375,000

$
1,418,024

Orange County Transportation Authority Rev., (Senior Lien), 5.00%, 8/15/30
2,400,000

2,731,224

Orange County Water District Rev., Series 2013 A, 5.00%, 8/15/33
1,900,000

2,233,355

Palm Springs Financing Authority Lease Rev., Series 2012 B, (Downtown Revitalization Project), 5.00%, 6/1/35
4,000,000

4,402,800

Palomar Pomerado Health Care District COP, 6.75%, 11/1/39
2,750,000

2,971,375

Paramount Unified School District GO, Capital Appreciation, (Election of 2006), 0.00%, 8/1/51 (BAM)(1)
12,500,000

1,092,000

Perris Public Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., Series 2004 A, 6.125%, 9/1/34
2,995,000

3,062,717

Perris Public Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., Series 2008 A, (Community Facilities District No. 2005-4), 6.60%, 9/1/38
2,140,000

2,219,608

Pittsburg Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2004 A, (Los Medanos Community), VRDN, 0.04%, 9/2/14 (LOC: State Street Bank & Trust Co. and California State Teacher's Retirement System)
3,985,000

3,985,000

Pleasant Valley School District/Ventura County GO, Series 2002 A, 5.85%, 8/1/31 (NATL-RE)
4,835,000

5,852,139

Poway Unified School District Public Financing Authority Rev., 7.875%, 9/15/39
3,760,000

4,304,636

Poway Unified School District Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 6-4S), 5.00%, 9/1/36
600,000

643,944

Redwood City Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Capital Appreciation, Series 2003 A, (Redevelopment Project Area 2), 0.00%, 7/15/28 (Ambac)(1)
3,405,000

1,791,847

Rio Elementary School District Community Facilities District No. 1 Special Tax Rev., Series 2013, 5.50%, 9/1/39
2,000,000

2,212,780

Riverside County Community Facilities Districts Special Tax Rev., (Tax No. 04-2-Lake Hills Crest), 5.00%, 9/1/30
1,035,000

1,124,248

Riverside County Community Facilities Districts Special Tax Rev., (Tax No. 04-2-Lake Hills Crest), 5.00%, 9/1/35
2,520,000

2,664,623

Riverside County Community Facilities Districts Special Tax Rev., (Tax No. 05-8 Scott Road), 5.00%, 9/1/42
3,000,000

3,160,350

Riverside County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2010 E, (Interstate 215 Corridor), 6.25%, 10/1/30
2,200,000

2,500,058

Riverside County Transportation Commission Rev., Series 2013 A, (Limited Tax), 5.25%, 6/1/39
800,000

931,968

Riverside County Transportation Commission Rev., Series 2013 A, (Senior Lien), 5.75%, 6/1/44
500,000

570,210

Riverside County Transportation Commission Rev., Capital Appreciation, Series 2013 B, (Senior Lien), 0.00%, 6/1/43(1)
5,000,000

1,075,600

Riverside Unified School District Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 13, Improvement Area 1), 5.375%, 9/1/34
2,000,000

2,016,560

Riverside Unified School District Special Tax Rev., Series 2005 A, (Community Facilities School District No. 15, Improvement Area 2), 5.25%, 9/1/30
1,000,000

1,012,660

Romoland School District Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 1, Improvement Area 1), 5.40%, 9/1/36
4,000,000

4,051,240

Romoland School District Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 1, Improvement Area 3), 5.00%, 9/1/43
2,640,000

2,815,349

Roseville Community Facilities District No. 1 Special Tax Rev., (The Fountains), 6.125%, 9/1/38
2,600,000

2,752,958

Roseville Finance Authority Electric System Rev., 5.00%, 2/1/37
925,000

994,144

Sacramento Airport System Rev., Series 2009 D, (Grant Revenue Bonds), 6.00%, 7/1/35
4,000,000

4,617,200

Sacramento Municipal Utility District Electric Rev., Series 2012 Y, 5.00%, 8/15/31
625,000

724,200


17



 
Principal
Amount
Value
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Electric Rev., Series 2012 Y, 5.00%, 8/15/33
$
1,000,000

$
1,151,010

Sacramento Regional Transit District Rev., (Farebox Revenue), 5.00%, 3/1/42
1,300,000

1,400,776

Sacramento Transportation Authority Sales Tax Rev., (Measure A), 5.00%, 10/1/24
1,055,000

1,279,736

San Buenaventura Rev., (Community Memorial Health System), 7.50%, 12/1/41
9,350,000

10,951,655

San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Rev., Series 2013 A, 5.00%, 7/1/24
300,000

360,987

San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Rev., Series 2013 A, 5.00%, 7/1/25
500,000

594,650

San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Rev., Series 2013 A, 5.00%, 7/1/26
500,000

587,520

San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Rev., Series 2013 A, 5.00%, 7/1/43
2,500,000

2,732,150

San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Rev., Series 2014 A, (Rental Car Facility), 5.00%, 7/1/44
1,500,000

1,670,655

San Diego County Water Authority Rev., 5.00%, 5/1/33
1,500,000

1,743,675

San Diego Public Facilities Financing Authority Lease Rev., Series 2012 A, (Capital Improvement Projects), 5.00%, 4/15/37
2,000,000

2,173,420

San Diego Public Facilities Financing Authority Water Rev., Series 2012 A, 5.00%, 8/1/30
2,000,000

2,326,840

San Diego Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2009 A, (North Park Redevelopment), 7.00%, 11/1/39
3,000,000

3,487,230

San Diego Unified Port District Rev., Series 2013 A, 5.00%, 9/1/26
750,000

870,277

San Francisco City and County Airports Commission Rev., Series 2008 34D, (San Francisco International Airport), 5.25%, 5/1/26
3,000,000

3,439,200

San Francisco City and County Airports Commission Rev., Series 2011 D, 5.00%, 5/1/31
5,390,000

6,032,057

San Francisco City and County Redevelopment Financing Authority Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2009 D, (Mission Bay South Redevelopment), 6.625%, 8/1/39
2,000,000

2,328,920

San Francisco City and County Redevelopment Financing Authority Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2011 C, (Mission Bay South Redevelopment), 6.75%, 8/1/41
1,000,000

1,207,480

San Francisco City and County Redevelopment Financing Authority Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2011 D, (Mission Bay South Redevelopment), 7.00%, 8/1/41
1,250,000

1,439,862

San Francisco City and County Successor Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, (Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project), 5.00%, 8/1/33
780,000

867,313

San Francisco City and County Successor Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, (Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project), 5.00%, 8/1/43
1,000,000

1,098,830

San Gorgonio Memorial Health Care District GO, 4.00%, 8/1/17
435,000

473,097

San Gorgonio Memorial Health Care District GO, 4.00%, 8/1/18
515,000

568,514

San Gorgonio Memorial Health Care District GO, 5.00%, 8/1/20
1,000,000

1,176,060

San Gorgonio Memorial Health Care District GO, 5.00%, 8/1/21
275,000

325,399

San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency Rev., (Senior Lien), 5.00%, 1/1/33
3,000,000

2,998,380

San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency Rev., Capital Appreciation, Series 1997 A, 0.00%, 1/15/25 (NATL-RE)(1)
3,090,000

1,906,066

San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency Rev., Capital Appreciation, Series 1997 A, 0.00%, 1/15/29 (NATL-RE)(1)
165,000

79,317

San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency Rev., Capital Appreciation, Series 1997 A, 0.00%, 1/15/31 (NATL-RE)(1)
16,000,000

6,728,160

San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency Rev., Capital Appreciation, Series 1997 A, 0.00%, 1/15/32 (NATL-RE)(1)
290,000

114,689


18



 
Principal
Amount
Value
San Jose Airport Rev., Series 2011 A2, 5.25%, 3/1/34
$
2,605,000

$
2,868,965

San Mateo Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 2008-1-Bay Meadows), 6.00%, 9/1/42
500,000

567,680

San Mateo Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 2008-1-Bay Meadows), 5.50%, 9/1/44
2,250,000

2,477,632

Santa Barbara Secondary High School District GO, Series 2011 A, (Election of 2010), 0.00%, 8/1/36(1)
10,000,000

3,878,900

Santa Barbara Secondary High School District GO, Series 2011 A, (Election of 2010), 0.00%, 8/1/40(1)
3,795,000

1,196,677

Santa Cruz County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2009 A, (Live Oak/Soquel Community Improvement), 7.00%, 9/1/36
3,000,000

3,522,660

Santa Margarita Water District Special Tax Rev., Series 2011 B, (Community Facilities District No. 99-1), 5.875%, 9/1/38
650,000

669,701

Santa Margarita Water District Special Tax Rev., Series 2013, (Communities Facilities District No. 2013-1, Village of Sendero), 5.625%, 9/1/43
1,250,000

1,361,875

Santaluz Community Facilities District No. 2 Special Tax Rev., Series 2011 A, (Improvement Area No. 1), 5.10%, 9/1/30
465,000

509,812

Saugus-Castaic School Facilities Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 2006-1C), 6.00%, 9/1/43
1,500,000

1,638,390

Southern California Public Power Authority Rev., (Southern Transmission), 0.00%, 7/1/15 (NATL-RE-IBC)(1)
1,250,000

1,245,350

Southern California Public Power Authority Rev., Series 2007 A, 5.00%, 11/1/33
3,755,000

4,121,526

Southern Mono Health Care District GO, Capital Appreciation, Series 2002 A, (Election of 2001), 0.00%, 8/1/26 (NATL-RE)(1)
1,800,000

1,032,516

Southwestern Community College District GO, Capital Appreciation, Series 2011 C, (Election of 2008), 0.00%, 8/1/46(1)
5,425,000

1,151,782

Stockton Public Financing Authority Rev., Series 2010 A, (Delta Water Supply Project), 6.25%, 10/1/40
1,750,000

2,034,567

Stockton Unified School District GO, Series 2014 A, (Election of 2012), 5.00%, 8/1/42 (AGM)
705,000

784,538

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City & County of San Francisco Communities Facilities District No. 6 Special Tax Rev., Capital Appreciation, Series 2013 C, (Mission Bay South Public Improvements), 0.00%, 8/1/43 (BAM)(1)
5,500,000

1,039,995

Successor Agency to the Richmond County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/19 (BAM)
215,000

250,041

Successor Agency to the Richmond County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/20 (BAM)
140,000

163,869

Successor Agency to the Richmond County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/21 (BAM)
90,000

106,139

Successor Agency to the Richmond County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/22 (BAM)
130,000

154,605

Successor Agency to the Richmond County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/23 (BAM)
120,000

142,866

Successor Agency to the Richmond County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/24 (BAM)
135,000

159,744

Successor Agency to the Richmond County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 4.50%, 9/1/25 (BAM)
45,000

50,776

Successor Agency to the Richmond County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/1/25 (BAM)
45,000

52,708

Sunnyvale Community Facilities District No. 1 Special Tax Rev., 7.75%, 8/1/32
6,500,000

6,509,880

Susanville Public Financing Authority Rev., Series 2010 B, (Utility Enterprises), 6.00%, 6/1/45
3,000,000

3,252,210

Tahoe-Truckee Unified School District GO, Capital Appreciation, Series 1999 A, (Improvement District No. 2), 0.00%, 8/1/22 (NATL-RE/FGIC)(1)
2,690,000

2,172,417


19



 
Principal
Amount
Value
Tahoe-Truckee Unified School District GO, Capital Appreciation, Series 1999 A, (Improvement District No. 2), 0.00%, 8/1/23 (NATL-RE/FGIC)(1)
$
2,220,000

$
1,709,800

Tobacco Securitization Authority of Northern California Settlement Rev., Series 2005 A1, 5.50%, 6/1/45
2,000,000

1,588,320

Tobacco Securitization Authority of Southern California Settlement Rev., Series 2006 A1, 5.00%, 6/1/37
2,250,000

1,806,975

Tracy Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 Special Tax Rev., (NEI Phase II), 5.75%, 9/1/36
3,105,000

3,127,418

Tracy Public Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., Series 2014 A, 4.00%, 9/2/18
1,900,000

2,081,032

Tracy Public Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/2/19
2,285,000

2,632,937

Tracy Public Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., Series 2014 A, 5.00%, 9/2/20
2,100,000

2,427,180

Tri-Dam Power Authority Rev., 4.00%, 5/1/16
2,165,000

2,249,089

Tri-Dam Power Authority Rev., 4.00%, 11/1/16
2,165,000

2,271,561

Tuolumne Wind Project Authority Rev., Series 2009 A, 5.875%, 1/1/29
2,000,000

2,383,360

Turlock Public Financing Authority Tax Allocation Rev., 7.50%, 9/1/39
2,770,000

3,280,456

Tustin Community Facilities District No. 06-1 Special Tax Rev., Series 2007 A, (Tustin Legacy/Columbus Villages), 6.00%, 9/1/36
4,945,000

5,258,711

Tustin Community Facilities District No. 07-1 Special Tax Rev., (Tustin Legacy/Retail Center), 6.00%, 9/1/37
1,300,000

1,357,213

Tustin Public Financing Authority Rev., 5.00%, 4/1/43
1,000,000

1,107,970

Tustin Unified School District Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 06-1), 5.75%, 9/1/30
1,000,000

1,120,630

Tustin Unified School District Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 06-1), 6.00%, 9/1/40
1,500,000

1,671,030

Twin Rivers Unified School District COP, (School Facilities Bridge Funding Program), VRDN, 3.20%, 6/1/20 (AGM)
1,750,000

1,751,470

Twin Rivers Unified School District COP, (School Facilities Bridge Funding Program), VRDN, 3.20%, 6/1/20 (AGM)
1,000,000

1,000,840

University of California Rev., Series 2013 AL-3, VRN, 0.04%, 9/4/14
3,000,000

3,000,000

University of California System Rev., Series 2012 G, 5.00%, 5/15/37
5,000,000

5,623,200

Val Verde Unified School District Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 1, Improvement Area A), 5.40%, 9/1/30
2,500,000

2,580,850

Val Verde Unified School District Special Tax Rev., (Community Facilities District No. 1, Improvement Area A), 5.45%, 9/1/36
2,600,000

2,679,274

Ventura County Community College District GO, Series 2008 C, (Election of 2002), 5.50%, 8/1/33
1,600,000

1,848,784

Yosemite Community College District GO, Capital Appreciation, (Election of 2004), 0.00%, 8/1/16 (AGM)(1)
3,545,000

3,483,530

Yuba City Unified School District GO, Capital Appreciation, 0.00%, 3/1/25 (NATL-RE/FGIC)(1)
1,500,000

1,014,090

 
 
746,454,602

Guam — 1.3%
 
 
Guam Government Business Privilege Tax Rev., Series 2011 A, 5.125%, 1/1/42
1,000,000

1,072,530

Guam Government GO, Series 2009 A, 7.00%, 11/15/39
7,230,000

8,202,796

Guam Power Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, 5.00%, 10/1/34
850,000

929,909

 
 
10,205,235


20



 
Principal
Amount
Value
Puerto Rico — 2.2%
 
 
Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, (Senior Lien), 5.25%, 7/1/42
$
1,045,000

$
781,441

Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, (Senior Lien), 6.00%, 7/1/47
5,000,000

3,876,650

Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority Rev., Series 2010 XX, 5.25%, 7/1/40
465,000

255,657

Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority Rev., Series 2012 A, 5.00%, 7/1/42
4,000,000

2,199,360

Puerto Rico GO, Series 2008 A, 6.00%, 7/1/38
2,500,000

1,976,300

Puerto Rico GO, Series 2009 C, (Public Improvement), 6.00%, 7/1/39
1,250,000

986,675

Puerto Rico GO, Series 2011 A, (Public Improvement), 5.75%, 7/1/41
500,000

389,660

Puerto Rico GO, Series 2014 A, 8.00%, 7/1/35
2,275,000

2,088,404

Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority Rev., Series 2009 Q, 5.625%, 7/1/39
3,700,000

2,772,262

Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority Rev., Series 2012 U, 5.25%, 7/1/42
2,500,000

1,829,475

 
 
17,155,884

U.S. Virgin Islands — 0.5%
 
 
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority Rev., Series 2009 A, (Diageo Matching Fund Bonds), 6.75%, 10/1/37
2,000,000

2,300,620

Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority Rev., Series 2010 B, (Subordinated Lien), 5.25%, 10/1/29
1,500,000

1,661,415

 
 
3,962,035

TOTAL INVESTMENT SECURITIES — 98.8%
(Cost $729,873,543)
 
777,777,756

OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES — 1.2%
 
9,446,213

TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0%
 
$
787,223,969


FUTURES CONTRACTS
Contracts Sold
Expiration Date
Underlying Face
Amount at Value
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)
142

U.S. Treasury 10-Year Notes
December 2014
$
17,860,938

$
(46,913
)
74

U.S. Treasury Long Bonds
December 2014
10,366,937

(62,604
)
 
 
 
$
28,227,875

$
(109,517
)
 

21



NOTES TO SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
AGC
-
Assured Guaranty Corporation
AGM
-
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corporation
BAM
-
Build America Mutual Assurance Company
COP
-
Certificates of Participation
FGIC
-
Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FHLB
-
Federal Home Loan Bank
GA
-
Guaranty Agreement
GO
-
General Obligation
LOC
-
Letter of Credit
NATL-RE
-
National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation - Reinsured
NATL-RE-IBC
-
National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation - Reinsured - Insured Bond Certificates
SBBPA
-
Standby Bond Purchase Agreement
VRDN
-
Variable Rate Demand Note. Interest reset date is indicated. Rate shown is effective at the period end.
VRN
-
Variable Rate Note. Interest reset date is indicated. Rate shown is effective at the period end.
XLCA
-
XL Capital Ltd.
(1)
Security is a zero-coupon bond. Zero-coupon securities are issued at a substantial discount from their value at maturity.
(2)
Escrowed to maturity in U.S. government securities or state and local government securities.
(3)
Restricted security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold without restriction to qualified institutional investors and have been deemed liquid under policies approved by the Board of Trustees. The aggregate value of these securities at the period end was $3,242,131, which represented 0.4% of total net assets.
(4)
Restricted security that may not be offered for public sale without being registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and/or may be subject to resale, redemption or transferability restrictions. The aggregate value of these securities at the period end was $217,974, which represented less than 0.05% of total net assets.
(5)
Coupon rate adjusts periodically based upon a predetermined schedule. Interest reset date is indicated. Rate shown is effective at the period end.
(6)
Security, or a portion thereof, has been pledged at the custodian bank or with a broker for margin requirements on futures contracts. At the period end, the aggregate value of securities pledged was $957,257.



See Notes to Financial Statements.

22



Statement of Assets and Liabilities
 
AUGUST 31, 2014
 
Assets
 
Investment securities, at value (cost of $729,873,543)
$
777,777,756

Cash
75,625

Receivable for investments sold
546,950

Receivable for capital shares sold
1,272,520

Receivable for variation margin on futures contracts
31,579

Interest receivable
9,861,061

 
789,565,491

 
 
Liabilities
 
Payable for investments purchased
542,796

Payable for capital shares redeemed
1,124,496

Accrued management fees
314,084

Distribution and service fees payable
44,284

Dividends payable
315,862

 
2,341,522

 
 
Net Assets
$
787,223,969

 
 
Net Assets Consist of:
 
Capital paid in
$
778,752,914

Accumulated net realized loss
(39,323,641
)
Net unrealized appreciation
47,794,696

 
$
787,223,969

 
 
Net Assets
Shares Outstanding
Net Asset Value Per Share
Investor Class

$571,924,334

55,784,704

$10.25
Institutional Class

$76,561,389

7,470,217

$10.25
A Class

$114,877,795

11,204,393

$10.25*
C Class

$23,860,451

2,326,931

$10.25
*Maximum offering price $10.73 (net asset value divided by 0.955).
 

See Notes to Financial Statements.

23



Statement of Operations
 
YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2014
Investment Income (Loss)
Income:
 
Interest
$
31,940,722

 
 

Expenses:
 

Management fees
3,304,007

Distribution and service fees:
 

A Class
259,444

C Class
228,391

Trustees’ fees and expenses
38,622

Other expenses
3,214

 
3,833,678

 
 

Net investment income (loss)
28,107,044

 
 

Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)
Net realized gain (loss) on:
 

Investment transactions
(5,599,958
)
Futures contract transactions
(3,291,869
)
 
(8,891,827
)
 
 

Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:
Investments
72,831,000

Futures contracts
(43,638
)
 
72,787,362

 
 

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
63,895,535

 
 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations
$
92,002,579



See Notes to Financial Statements.

24



Statement of Changes in Net Assets
 
YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2014 AND AUGUST 31, 2013
 
 
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
August 31, 2014
August 31, 2013
Operations
 
 
Net investment income (loss)
$
28,107,044

$
28,301,415

Net realized gain (loss)
(8,891,827
)
6,450,391

Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
72,787,362

(65,751,006
)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations
92,002,579

(30,999,200
)
 
 
 
Distributions to Shareholders
 
 
From net investment income:
 

 

Investor Class
(21,039,865
)
(21,644,951
)
Institutional Class
(2,298,420
)
(1,118,657
)
A Class
(4,046,008
)
(4,615,365
)
C Class
(722,751
)
(920,249
)
Decrease in net assets from distributions
(28,107,044
)
(28,299,222
)
 
 
 
Capital Share Transactions
 
 
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions (Note 5)
95,617,869

11,772,125

 
 
 
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
159,513,404

(47,526,297
)
 
 
 
Net Assets
 
 
Beginning of period
627,710,565

675,236,862

End of period
$
787,223,969

$
627,710,565



See Notes to Financial Statements.

25



Notes to Financial Statements
 
AUGUST 31, 2014

1. Organization

American Century California Tax-Free and Municipal Funds (the trust) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company and is organized as a Massachusetts business trust. California High-Yield Municipal Fund (the fund) is one fund in a series issued by the trust. The fund is nondiversified as defined under the 1940 Act. The fund’s investment objective is to seek high current income that is exempt from federal and California income taxes.

The fund offers the Investor Class, the Institutional Class, the A Class and the C Class. The A Class may incur an initial sales charge. The A Class and C Class may be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge. The share classes differ principally in their respective sales charges and distribution and shareholder servicing expenses and arrangements. The Institutional Class is made available to institutional shareholders or through financial intermediaries whose clients do not require the same level of shareholder and administrative services as shareholders of other classes. As a result, the Institutional Class is charged a lower unified management fee.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the fund in preparation of its financial statements. The financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which may require management to make certain estimates and assumptions at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Management evaluated the impact of events or transactions occurring through the date the financial statements were issued that would merit recognition or disclosure.

Investment Valuations — The fund determines the fair value of its investments and computes its net asset value per share at the close of regular trading (usually 4 p.m. Eastern time) on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on each day the NYSE is open. The Board of Trustees has adopted valuation policies and procedures to guide the investment advisor in the fund’s investment valuation process and to provide methodologies for the oversight of the fund’s pricing function.

Fixed income securities maturing in greater than 60 days at the time of purchase are valued at the evaluated mean as provided by independent pricing services or at the mean of the most recent bid and asked prices as provided by investment dealers. Fixed income securities maturing within 60 days at the time of purchase may be valued at cost, plus or minus any amortized discount or premium or at the evaluated mean as provided by an independent pricing service. Evaluated mean prices are commonly derived through utilization of market models, which may consider, among other factors: trade data, quotations from dealers and active market makers, relevant yield curve and spread data, related sector levels, creditworthiness, trade data or market information on comparable securities, and other relevant security specific information.
 
Exchange-traded futures contracts are valued at the settlement price as provided by the appropriate clearing corporation.

If the fund determines that the market price for an investment is not readily available or the valuation methods mentioned above do not reflect an investment’s fair value, such investment is valued as determined in good faith by the Board of Trustees or its delegate, in accordance with policies and procedures adopted by the Board of Trustees. In its determination of fair value, the fund may review several factors including, but not limited to, market information regarding the specific investment or comparable investments and correlation with other investment types, futures indices or general market indicators. Circumstances that may cause the fund to use these procedures to value an investment include, but are not limited to: an investment has been declared in default or is distressed; trading in a security has been suspended during the trading day or a security is not actively trading on its principal exchange; prices received from a regular pricing source are deemed unreliable; or there is a foreign market holiday and no trading occurred.

The fund monitors for significant events occurring after the close of an investment’s primary exchange but before the fund’s net asset value per share is determined. Significant events may include, but are not limited to: corporate announcements and transactions; governmental action and political unrest that could impact a

26



specific investment or an investment sector; or armed conflicts, natural disasters and similar events that could affect investments in a specific country or region.
 
Security Transactions — Security transactions are accounted for as of the trade date. Net realized gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is also used for federal income tax purposes.

Investment Income — Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.

Segregated Assets — In accordance with the 1940 Act, the fund segregates assets on its books and records to cover certain types of investments, including, but not limited to, futures contracts and when-issued securities. American Century Investment Management, Inc. (ACIM) (the investment advisor) monitors, on a daily basis, the securities segregated to ensure the fund designates a sufficient amount of liquid assets, marked-to-market daily. The fund may also receive assets or be required to pledge assets at the custodian bank or with a broker for margin requirements on futures contracts.

Income Tax Status — It is the fund’s policy to distribute substantially all net investment income and net realized gains to shareholders and to otherwise qualify as a regulated investment company under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Accordingly, no provision has been made for income taxes. The fund files U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax returns as applicable. The fund's tax returns are subject to examination by the relevant taxing authority until expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, which is generally three years from the date of filing but can be longer in certain jurisdictions. At this time, management believes there are no uncertain tax positions which, based on their technical merit, would not be sustained upon examination and for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months.

Multiple Class — All shares of the fund represent an equal pro rata interest in the net assets of the class to which such shares belong, and have identical voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights and the same terms and conditions, except for class specific expenses and exclusive rights to vote on matters affecting only individual classes. Income, non-class specific expenses, and realized and unrealized capital gains and losses of the fund are allocated to each class of shares based on their relative net assets.

Distributions to Shareholders — Distributions from net investment income, if any, are declared daily and paid monthly. Distributions from net realized gains, if any, are generally declared and paid annually.

Indemnifications — Under the trust’s organizational documents, its officers and trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against a fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered by management to be remote.

3. Fees and Transactions with Related Parties

Certain officers and trustees of the trust are also officers and/or directors of American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC). The trust's investment advisor, ACIM, the trust's distributor, American Century Investment Services, Inc. (ACIS), and the trust's transfer agent, American Century Services, LLC, are wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by ACC.
 
Management Fees — The trust has entered into a management agreement with ACIM, under which ACIM provides the fund with investment advisory and management services in exchange for a single, unified management fee (the fee) per class. The agreement provides that all expenses of managing and operating the fund, except distribution and service fees, brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, fees and expenses of the independent trustees (including legal counsel fees), and extraordinary expenses, will be paid by ACIM. The fee is computed and accrued daily based on each class’s daily net assets and paid monthly in arrears. The fee consists of (1) an Investment Category Fee based on the daily net assets of the fund and certain other accounts managed by the investment advisor that are in the same broad investment category as the fund and (2) a Complex Fee based on the assets of all the funds in the American Century Investments family of funds. The rates for the Investment Category Fee range from 0.1925% to 0.3100%. The rates for the Complex Fee range from 0.2500% to 0.3100% for the Investor Class, A Class and C Class. The rates for the Complex Fee range from 0.0500% to 0.1100% for the Institutional Class. The effective annual management fee for each class for the year ended August 31, 2014 was 0.50% for the Investor Class, A Class and C Class and 0.30% for the Institutional Class.


27



Distribution and Service Fees — The Board of Trustees has adopted a separate Master Distribution and Individual Shareholder Services Plan for each of the A Class and C Class (collectively the plans), pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act. The plans provide that the A Class will pay ACIS an annual distribution and service fee of 0.25%. The plans provide that the C Class will pay ACIS an annual distribution and service fee of 1.00%, of which 0.25% is paid for individual shareholder services and 0.75% is paid for distribution services. The fees are computed and accrued daily based on each class’s daily net assets and paid monthly in arrears. The fees are used to pay financial intermediaries for distribution and individual shareholder services. Fees incurred under the plans during the year ended August 31, 2014 are detailed in the Statement of Operations.

Trustees’ Fees and Expenses — The Board of Trustees is responsible for overseeing the investment advisor’s management and operations of the fund. The trustees receive detailed information about the fund and its investment advisor regularly throughout the year, and meet at least quarterly with management of the investment advisor to review reports about fund operations. Fees and expenses incurred in conjunction with the trustees during the year ended August 31, 2014 are detailed in the Statement of Operations. The fund’s officers do not receive compensation from the fund.

4. Investment Transactions

Purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term investments, for the year ended August 31, 2014 were $478,535,159 and $390,098,396, respectively.

5. Capital Share Transactions

Transactions in shares of the fund were as follows (unlimited number of shares authorized):
 
Year ended August 31, 2014
Year ended August 31, 2013
 
Shares
Amount
Shares
Amount
Investor Class
 
 
 
 
Sold
15,882,335

$
156,596,677

17,005,122

$
173,008,166

Issued in reinvestment of distributions
1,714,004

16,912,464

1,714,688

17,237,511

Redeemed
(12,405,479
)
(120,628,325
)
(18,118,654
)
(180,259,798
)
 
5,190,860

52,880,816

601,156

9,985,879

Institutional Class
 
 
 
 
Sold
5,728,096

55,538,884

1,934,362

19,361,935

Issued in reinvestment of distributions
228,973

2,272,854

111,151

1,117,155

Redeemed
(1,189,921
)
(11,672,509
)
(1,542,955
)
(15,082,812
)
 
4,767,148

46,139,229

502,558

5,396,278

A Class
 
 
 
 
Sold
3,825,431

37,763,518

4,163,256

42,379,719

Issued in reinvestment of distributions
371,960

3,668,495

390,551

3,923,157

Redeemed
(4,275,743
)
(41,490,768
)
(4,837,063
)
(47,976,198
)
 
(78,352
)
(58,755
)
(283,256
)
(1,673,322
)
C Class
 
 
 
 
Sold
551,061

5,440,645

687,746

7,024,022

Issued in reinvestment of distributions
50,962

502,244

52,873

530,930

Redeemed
(959,654
)
(9,286,310
)
(956,949
)
(9,491,662
)
 
(357,631
)
(3,343,421
)
(216,330
)
(1,936,710
)
Net increase (decrease)
9,522,025

$
95,617,869

604,128

$
11,772,125




28



6. Fair Value Measurements

The fund’s investments valuation process is based on several considerations and may use multiple inputs to determine the fair value of the investments held by the fund. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the inputs used to determine a valuation are classified into three broad levels.

Level 1 valuation inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in an active market for identical investments.

Level 2 valuation inputs consist of direct or indirect observable market data (including quoted prices for comparable investments, evaluations of subsequent market events, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.). These inputs also consist of quoted prices for identical investments initially expressed in local currencies that are adjusted through translation into U.S. dollars.

Level 3 valuation inputs consist of unobservable data (including a fund’s own assumptions).

The level classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair valuation measurement. The valuation inputs are not necessarily an indication of the risks associated with investing in these securities or other financial instruments.

As of period end, the fund’s investment securities and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures contracts were classified as Level 2 and Level 1, respectively. The Schedule of Investments provides additional information on the fund’s portfolio holdings.

7. Derivative Instruments

Interest Rate Risk — The fund is subject to interest rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. The value of bonds generally declines as interest rates rise. A fund may enter into futures contracts based on a bond index or a specific underlying security. A fund may purchase futures contracts to gain exposure to increases in market value or sell futures contracts to protect against a decline in market value. Upon entering into a futures contract, a fund will segregate cash, cash equivalents or other appropriate liquid securities on its records in amounts sufficient to meet requirements. Subsequent payments (variation margin) are made or received daily, in cash, by a fund. The variation margin is equal to the daily change in the contract value and is recorded as unrealized gains and losses. A fund recognizes a realized gain or loss when the futures contract is closed or expires. Net realized and unrealized gains or losses occurring during the holding period of futures contracts are a component of net realized gain (loss) on futures contract transactions and change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures contracts, respectively. One of the risks of entering into futures contracts is the possibility that the change in value of the contract may not correlate with the changes in value of the underlying securities. The futures contracts sold as disclosed on the Schedule of Investments are indicative of the fund’s typical volume during the period.

The value of interest rate risk derivative instruments as of August 31, 2014, is disclosed on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as an asset of $31,579 in receivable for variation margin on futures contracts.* For the year ended August 31, 2014, the effect of interest rate risk derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations was $(3,291,869) in net realized gain (loss) on futures contract transactions and $(43,638) in change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures contracts.

* Included in the unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures contracts as reported in the Schedule of Investments.

8. Risk Factors

The fund concentrates its investments in a single state and therefore may have more exposure to credit risk related to the state of California than a fund with a broader geographical diversification. The fund invests in lower-rated debt securities, which are subject to substantial risks including liquidity risk and credit risk.


29



9. Federal Tax Information

The tax character of distributions paid during the years ended August 31, 2014 and August 31, 2013 were as follows:
 
2014
2013
Distributions Paid From
 
 
Exempt income
$
28,094,462

$
28,205,721

Taxable ordinary income
$
12,582

$
93,501

Long-term capital gains



The book-basis character of distributions made during the year from net investment income or net realized gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. These differences reflect the differing character of certain income items and net realized gains and losses for financial statement and tax purposes, and may result in reclassification among certain capital accounts on the financial statements.

As of August 31, 2014, the federal tax cost of investments and the components of distributable earnings on a tax-basis were as follows:
Federal tax cost of investments
$
729,873,543

Gross tax appreciation of investments
$
52,208,898

Gross tax depreciation of investments
(4,304,685
)
Net tax appreciation (depreciation) of investments
47,904,213

Net tax appreciation (depreciation) on derivatives

Net tax appreciation (depreciation)
$
47,904,213

Other book-to-tax adjustments
$
(135,407
)
Undistributed tax-exempt income
$

Accumulated short-term capital losses
$
(32,429,815
)
Accumulated long-term capital losses
$
(1,891,140
)
Post-October capital loss deferral
$
(4,976,796
)
 
 
The cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes. The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable primarily to the realization for tax purposes of unrealized gains (losses) on futures contracts. Other book-to-tax adjustments are attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on straddle positions.

Accumulated capital losses represent net capital loss carryovers that may be used to offset future realized capital gains for federal income tax purposes. Any unlimited losses will be required to be utilized prior to the losses which carry an expiration date. Future capital loss carryover utilization in any given year may be subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. Capital loss carryovers expire as follows:
2017
2018
2019
Unlimited (Short-Term)
Unlimited (Long-Term)
$(9,518,848)
$(12,885,340)
$(6,203,529)
$(3,822,098)
$(1,891,140)

Loss deferrals represent certain qualified losses that the fund has elected to treat as having been incurred in the following fiscal year for federal income tax purposes.



30



Financial Highlights
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended August 31 (except as noted)
Per-Share Data
Ratios and Supplemental Data
 
 
Income From Investment Operations:
 
 
 
Ratio to Average Net Assets of:
 
 
 
Net Asset
Value,
Beginning
of Period
Net
Investment Income (Loss)(1)
Net
Realized and Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
Total
From Investment Operations
Distributions From Net Investment Income
Net Asset
Value, End
of Period
Total
Return(2)
Operating Expenses
Operating Expenses
(before
expense
waiver)
Net
Investment Income
(Loss)
Net Investment Income (Loss)
(before
expense waiver)
Portfolio Turnover
Rate
Net Assets,
End of Period
(in thousands)
Investor Class
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014
$9.33
0.41
0.92
1.33
(0.41)
$10.25
14.50%
0.50%
0.50%
4.14%
4.14%
57%

$571,924

2013
$10.13
0.40
(0.80)
(0.40)
(0.40)
$9.33
(4.14)%
0.50%
0.50%
3.99%
3.99%
81%

$472,141

2012
$9.40
0.45
0.73
1.18
(0.45)
$10.13
12.79%
0.50%
0.50%
4.55%
4.55%
48%

$506,399

2011
$9.69
0.47
(0.29)
0.18
(0.47)
$9.40
2.07%
0.49%
0.51%
5.10%
5.08%
37%

$374,467

2010
$8.88
0.47
0.81
1.28
(0.47)
$9.69
14.78%
0.49%
0.51%
5.08%
5.06%
17%

$417,503

Institutional Class
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014
$9.33
0.43
0.92
1.35
(0.43)
$10.25
14.73%
0.30%
0.30%
4.34%
4.34%
57%

$76,561

2013
$10.13
0.42
(0.80)
(0.38)
(0.42)
$9.33
(3.94)%
0.30%
0.30%
4.19%
4.19%
81%

$25,217

2012
$9.40
0.46
0.74
1.20
(0.47)
$10.13
13.01%
0.30%
0.30%
4.75%
4.75%
48%

$22,287

2011
$9.69
0.49
(0.29)
0.20
(0.49)
$9.40
2.27%
0.29%
0.31%
5.30%
5.28%
37%

$9,784

2010(3)
$9.28
0.25
0.41
0.66
(0.25)
$9.69
7.16%
0.29%(4)
0.31%(4)
5.24%(4)
5.22%(4)
17%(5)

$27


31



For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended August 31 (except as noted)
Per-Share Data
Ratios and Supplemental Data
 
 
Income From Investment Operations:
 
 
 
Ratio to Average Net Assets of:
 
 
 
Net Asset
Value,
Beginning
of Period
Net
Investment Income (Loss)(1)
Net
Realized and Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
Total
From Investment Operations
Distributions From Net Investment Income
Net Asset
Value, End
of Period
Total
Return(2)
Operating Expenses
Operating Expenses
(before
expense
waiver)
Net
Investment Income
(Loss)
Net Investment Income (Loss)
(before
expense waiver)
Portfolio Turnover
Rate
Net Assets,
End of Period
(in thousands)
A Class
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014
$9.33
0.38
0.92
1.30
(0.38)
$10.25
14.21%
0.75%
0.75%
3.89%
3.89%
57%

$114,878

2013
$10.13
0.38
(0.80)
(0.42)
(0.38)
$9.33
(4.38)%
0.75%
0.75%
3.74%
3.74%
81%

$105,296

2012
$9.40
0.42
0.73
1.15
(0.42)
$10.13
12.51%
0.75%
0.75%
4.30%
4.30%
48%

$117,162

2011
$9.69
0.45
(0.29)
0.16
(0.45)
$9.40
1.82%
0.74%
0.76%
4.85%
4.83%
37%

$89,028

2010
$8.88
0.45
0.81
1.26
(0.45)
$9.69
14.50%
0.74%
0.76%
4.83%
4.81%
17%

$106,577

C Class
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014
$9.33
0.31
0.92
1.23
(0.31)
$10.25
13.37%
1.50%
1.50%
3.14%
3.14%
57%

$23,860

2013
$10.13
0.30
(0.80)
(0.50)
(0.30)
$9.33
(5.09)%
1.50%
1.50%
2.99%
2.99%
81%

$25,056

2012
$9.40
0.35
0.73
1.08
(0.35)
$10.13
11.67%
1.50%
1.50%
3.55%
3.55%
48%

$29,388

2011
$9.69
0.38
(0.29)
0.09
(0.38)
$9.40
1.06%
1.49%
1.51%
4.10%
4.08%
37%

$23,917

2010
$8.88
0.38
0.81
1.19
(0.38)
$9.69
13.64%
1.49%
1.51%
4.08%
4.06%
17%

$30,286

 
Notes to Financial Highlights

(1)
Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period.
(2)
Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day and do not reflect applicable sales charges, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized.
(3)
March 1, 2010 (commencement of sale) through August 31, 2010.
(4)
Annualized.
(5)
Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the year ended August 31, 2010.
See Notes to Financial Statements.

32



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Trustees of the American Century California Tax-Free and Municipal Funds and Shareholders of the California High-Yield Municipal Fund:

In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the California High-Yield Municipal Fund (one of the four funds in the American Century California Tax-Free and Municipal Funds, hereafter referred to as the "Fund") at August 31, 2014, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as "financial statements") are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities at August 31, 2014 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
October 21, 2014


33



Management

Board of Trustees
The individuals listed below serve as trustees of the funds. Each trustee will continue to serve in this capacity until death, retirement, resignation or removal from office. The board has adopted a mandatory retirement age for trustees who are not “interested persons,” as that term is defined in the Investment Company Act (independent trustees). Independent trustees shall retire on December 31 of the year in which they reach their 75th birthday; provided, however, that on or after January 1, 2022, independent trustees shall retire on December 31 of the year in which they reach their 76th birthday.
Mr. Thomas is an “interested person” because he currently serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent company of American Century Investment Management, Inc. (ACIM or the advisor). The other trustees (more than three-fourths of the total number) are independent. They are not employees, directors or officers of, and have no financial interest in, ACC or any of its wholly owned, direct or indirect, subsidiaries, including ACIM, American Century Investment Services, Inc. (ACIS) and American Century Services, LLC (ACS), and do not have any other affiliations, positions or relationships that would cause them to be considered “interested persons” under the Investment Company Act. The trustees serve in this capacity for eight (in the case of Mr. Thomas, 15) registered investment companies in the American Century Investments family of funds.
The following table presents additional information about the trustees. The mailing address for each trustee other than Mr. Thomas is 1665 Charleston Road, Mountain View, California 94043. The mailing address for Mr. Thomas is 4500 Main Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64111.

Name
(Year of Birth)
Position(s)
Held with
Funds
Length of
Time Served
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past 5 Years
Number of
American
Century
Portfolios
Overseen by Trustee
Other
Directorships
Held During
Past 5 Years
Independent Trustees
 
 
 
 
Tanya S. Beder
(1955)
Trustee
Since 2011
Chairman, SBCC Group Inc. (independent advisory services) (2006 to present)
45
CYS Investments, Inc. (specialty finance company)
Jeremy I. Bulow
(1954)
Trustee
Since 2011
Professor of Economics, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business (1979 to present)
45
None
Ronald J. Gilson
(1946)
Trustee and Chairman of the Board
Since 1995
(Chairman since 2005)
Charles J. Meyers Professor of Law and Business, Stanford Law School (1979 to present); Marc and Eva Stern Professor of Law and Business, Columbia University School of Law (1992 to present)
45
None
Frederick L. A. Grauer
(1946)
Trustee
Since 2008
Senior Advisor, BlackRock, Inc. (investment management firm) (2010 to 2011); Senior Advisor, Barclays Global Investors (investment management firm) (2003 to 2009)
45
None
Peter F. Pervere
(1947)
Trustee
Since 2007
Retired
45
Intraware, Inc. (2003 to 2009)

34



Name
(Year of Birth)
Position(s)
Held with
Funds
Length of
Time Served
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past 5 Years
Number of
American
Century
Portfolios
Overseen by Trustee
Other
Directorships
Held During
Past 5 Years
Independent Trustee
 
 
 
 
John B. Shoven
(1947)
Trustee
Since 2002
Professor of Economics, Stanford University (1973 to present)
45
Cadence Design Systems; Exponent; Financial Engines
Interested Trustee
 
 
 
 
Jonathan S. Thomas
(1963)
Trustee and President
Since 2007
President and Chief Executive Officer, ACC (March 2007 to present). Also serves as Chief Executive Officer, ACS; Executive Vice President, ACIM; Director, ACC, ACIM and other ACC subsidiaries
118
BioMed Valley Discoveries, Inc.

The Statement of Additional Information has additional information about the fund's trustees and is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021.


35



Officers
The following table presents certain information about the executive officers of the funds. Each officer serves as an officer for each of the 15 investment companies in the American Century family of funds, unless otherwise noted. No officer is compensated for his or her service as an officer of the funds. The listed officers are interested persons of the funds and are appointed or re-appointed on an annual basis. The mailing address for each of the officers listed below is 4500 Main Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64111.
Name
(Year of Birth)
Offices with the Funds
Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years
Jonathan S.
Thomas
(1963)
Trustee and
President
since 2007
President and Chief Executive Officer, ACC (March 2007 to present). Also serves as Chief Executive Officer, ACS; Executive Vice President, ACIM; Director, ACC, ACIM and other ACC subsidiaries
Amy D. Shelton
(1964)
Chief Compliance
Officer since 2014
Chief Compliance Officer, American Century funds, (March 2014 to present); Chief Compliance Officer, ACIM (February 2014 to present); Chief Compliance Officer, ACIS (October 2009 to present); Vice President, Client Interactions and Marketing, ACIS (February 2013 to January 2014); Director, Client Interactions and Marketing, ACIS (June 2007 to January 2013). Also serves as Vice President, ACIS
Charles A.
Etherington
(1957)
General Counsel
since 2007 and
Senior Vice
President since 2006
Attorney, ACC (February 1994 to present); Vice President, ACC (November 2005 to present); General Counsel, ACC (March 2007 to present). Also serves as General Counsel, ACIM, ACS, ACIS and other ACC subsidiaries; and Senior Vice President, ACIM and ACS
C. Jean Wade
(1964)
Vice President,
Treasurer and
Chief Financial
Officer since 2012
Vice President, ACS (February 2000 to present)
Robert J.
Leach
(1966)
Vice President
since 2006 and
Assistant Treasurer
since 2012
Vice President, ACS (February 2000 to present)
David H.
Reinmiller
(1963)
Vice President
since 2001
Attorney, ACC (January 1994 to present); Associate General Counsel, ACC (January 2001 to present). Also serves as Vice President, ACIM and ACS
Ward D.
Stauffer
(1960)
Secretary
since 2005
Attorney, ACC (June 2003 to present)


36



Approval of Management Agreement

At a meeting held on June 13, 2014, the Fund’s Board of Trustees unanimously approved the renewal of the management agreement pursuant to which American Century Investment Management, Inc. (the “Advisor”) acts as the investment advisor for the Fund. Under Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act, contracts for investment advisory services are required to be reviewed, evaluated, and approved by a majority of a fund’s directors/trustees, including a majority of the independent Trustees, each year. The Board regards this annual evaluation and renewal as one of its most important responsibilities.

The independent Trustees have memorialized a statement regarding the relationship between their ongoing obligations to oversee and evaluate the performance of the Advisor and their annual consideration of renewal of the management agreement. In that statement, the independent Trustees noted that their assessment of the Advisor’s performance is an ongoing process that takes place over the entire year and is informed by all of the extensive information that the Board and its committees receive and consider over time. This information, together with the materials provided in connection with the review, are central to the Board’s assessment of the Advisor’s performance and its determination whether to renew the Fund’s management agreement.

Prior to its consideration of the renewal of the management agreement, the Board requested and reviewed extensive data and analysis relating to the proposed renewal. This information and analysis was compiled by the Advisor and certain independent providers of evaluation data concerning the Fund and the services provided to the Fund by the Advisor.

In connection with its consideration of the renewal of the management agreement, the Board’s review and evaluation of the services provided by the Advisor included, but was not limited to, the following:

the nature, extent, and quality of investment management, shareholder services, and other services provided by the Advisor to the Fund;
the wide range of other programs and services the Advisor provides to the Fund and its shareholders on a routine and non-routine basis;
the investment performance of the Fund, including data comparing the Fund’s performance to appropriate benchmarks and/or a peer group of other mutual funds with similar investment objectives and strategies;
the cost of owning the Fund compared to the cost of owning similar funds;
the Advisor’s compliance policies, procedures, and regulatory experience;
financial data showing the cost of services provided to the Fund, the profitability of the Fund to the Advisor, and the overall profitability of the Advisor;
possible economies of scale associated with the Advisor’s management of the Fund and other accounts under its management;
data comparing services provided and charges to other investment management clients of the Advisor; and
any collateral benefits derived by the Advisor from the management of the Fund.

In keeping with its practice, the Board held two in-person meetings to review and discuss the information provided. The independent Trustees also had the benefit of the advice of their independent counsel throughout the process.

Factors Considered

The Trustees considered all of the information provided by the Advisor, the independent data providers, and the independent Trustees’ independent counsel in connection with the review, and evaluated such information for the Fund. In connection with their review, the Trustees did not identify any single factor as being all-important or controlling and each Trustee may have attributed

37



different levels of importance to different factors. In deciding to renew the management agreement, the Board based its decision on a number of factors, including the following:

Nature, Extent and Quality of Services — Generally. Under the management agreement, the Advisor is responsible for providing or arranging for all services necessary for the operation of the Fund. The Board noted that under the management agreement, the Advisor provides or arranges at its own expense a wide variety of services including:

constructing and designing the Fund
portfolio research and security selection
initial capitalization/funding
securities trading
Fund administration
custody of Fund assets
daily valuation of the Fund’s portfolio
shareholder servicing and transfer agency, including shareholder confirmations, recordkeeping, and communications
legal services
regulatory and portfolio compliance
financial reporting
marketing and distribution

The Board noted that many of these services have expanded over time both in terms of quantity and complexity in response to shareholder demands, competition in the industry, changing distribution channels, and the changing regulatory environment.

Investment Management Services.    The nature of the investment management services provided to the Fund is quite complex and allows Fund shareholders access to professional money management, instant diversification of their investments within an asset class, the opportunity to easily diversify among asset classes by investing in or exchanging among various American Century Investments funds, and liquidity. In evaluating investment performance, the Board expects the Advisor to manage the Fund in accordance with its investment objectives and approved strategies. Further, the Trustees recognize that the Advisor has an obligation to seek the best execution of fund trades. In providing these services, the Advisor utilizes teams of investment professionals (portfolio managers, analysts, research assistants, and securities traders) who require extensive information technology, research, training, compliance and other systems to conduct their business. The Board, directly and through its Portfolio Committee, regularly reviews investment performance information for the Fund, together with comparative information for appropriate benchmarks and/or peer groups of similarly-managed funds, over different time horizons. The Trustees also review detailed performance information during the management agreement approval process. If performance concerns are identified, the Fund receives special reviews until performance improves, during which the Board discusses with the Advisor the reasons for such results (e.g., market conditions, security selection) and any efforts being undertaken to improve performance. The Fund’s performance was in the second quartile of its peer universe for the one- and ten-year periods, the third quartile for the three-year period, and in the first quartile for the five-year period reviewed by the Board. The Board found the investment management services provided by the Advisor to the Fund to be satisfactory and consistent with the management agreement.

Shareholder and Other Services. Under the management agreement, the Advisor provides the Fund with a comprehensive package of transfer agency, shareholder, and other services. The Board, directly and through various committees of the Board, regularly reviews reports and evaluations of such services at its regular meetings. These reports include, but are not limited to, information regarding the operational efficiency and accuracy of the shareholder and transfer agency services provided, staffing levels, shareholder satisfaction (as measured by external as well as internal sources), technology support, new products and services offered to Fund shareholders, securities trading activities, portfolio valuation services, auditing services, and legal and operational

38



compliance activities. Certain aspects of shareholder and transfer agency service level efficiency and the quality of securities trading activities are measured by independent third party providers and are presented in comparison to other fund groups not managed by the Advisor. The Board found the services provided by the Advisor to the Fund under the management agreement to be competitive and of high quality.

Costs of Services and Profitability. The Advisor provides detailed information concerning its cost of providing various services to the Fund, its profitability in managing the Fund, its overall profitability, and its financial condition. The Trustees have reviewed with the Advisor the methodology used to prepare this financial information. The financial information regarding the Advisor is considered in evaluating the Advisor’s financial condition, its ability to continue to provide services under the management agreement, and the reasonableness of the current management fee. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.

Ethics. The Board generally considers the Advisor’s commitment to providing quality services to shareholders and to conducting its business ethically. They noted that the Advisor’s practices generally meet or exceed industry best practices.

Economies of Scale. The Board also reviewed information provided by the Advisor regarding the possible existence of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund. The Board concluded that economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict with precision, especially on a fund-by-fund basis. The Board concluded that the Advisor is appropriately sharing economies of scale through its competitive fee structure, offering competitive fees from fund inception, and through reinvestment in its business to provide shareholders additional content and services.

Comparison to Other Funds’ Fees. The management agreement provides that the Fund pays the Advisor a single, all-inclusive (or unified) management fee for providing all services necessary for the management and operation of the Fund, other than brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, extraordinary expenses, and the fees and expenses of the Fund’s independent Trustees (including their independent legal counsel) and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of shareholder services and distribution services under a plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the unified fee structure, the Advisor is responsible for providing all investment advisory, custody, audit, administrative, compliance, recordkeeping, marketing and shareholder services, or arranging and supervising third parties to provide such services. By contrast, most other funds are charged a variety of fees, including an investment advisory fee, a transfer agency fee, an administrative fee, distribution charges and other expenses. Other than their investment advisory fees and any applicable Rule 12b-1 distribution fees, all other components of the total fees charged by these other funds may be increased without shareholder approval. The Board believes the unified fee structure is a benefit to Fund shareholders because it clearly discloses to shareholders the cost of owning Fund shares, and, since the unified fee cannot be increased without a vote of Fund shareholders, it shifts to the Advisor the risk of increased costs of operating the Fund and provides a direct incentive to minimize administrative inefficiencies. Part of the Board’s analysis of fee levels involves reviewing certain evaluative data compiled by an independent provider and comparing the Fund’s unified fee to the total expense ratio of peer funds. The unified fee charged to shareholders of the Fund was below the median of the total expense ratios of the Fund’s peer group. The Board concluded that the management fee paid by the Fund to the Advisor under the management agreement is reasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.

Comparison to Fees and Services Provided to Other Clients of the Advisor. The Board also requested and received information from the Advisor concerning the nature of the services, fees, costs and profitability of its advisory services to advisory clients other than the Fund. They observed that these varying types of client accounts require different services and involve different regulatory and entrepreneurial risks than the management of the Fund. The Board analyzed this

39



information and concluded that the fees charged and services provided to the Fund were reasonable by comparison.

Collateral or “Fall-Out” Benefits Derived by the Advisor. The Board considered the existence of collateral benefits the Advisor may receive as a result of its relationship with the Fund. They concluded that the Advisor’s primary business is managing mutual funds and it generally does not use fund or shareholder information to generate profits in other lines of business, and therefore does not derive any significant collateral benefits from them. The Board noted that the Advisor receives proprietary research from broker-dealers that execute fund portfolio transactions and concluded that this research is likely to benefit Fund shareholders. The Board also determined that the Advisor is able to provide investment management services to certain clients other than the Fund, at least in part, due to its existing infrastructure built to serve the fund complex. The Board concluded, however, that the assets of those other clients are not material to the analysis and, where applicable, may be included with the assets of the Fund to determine breakpoints in the management fee schedule.

Existing Relationship. The Board also considered whether there was any reason for not continuing the existing arrangement with the Advisor. In this regard, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund’s operations and various risks, uncertainties, and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision not to continue such relationship. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Advisor’s industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Advisor will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund.

Conclusion of the Trustees. As a result of this process, the Board, including all of the independent Trustees and assisted by the advice of independent legal counsel, taking into account all of the factors discussed above and the information provided by the Advisor and others, concluded that the management agreement between the Fund and the Advisor is fair and reasonable in light of the services provided and should be renewed.


40



Additional Information
 
Proxy Voting Policies
Descriptions of the principles and policies that the fund’s investment advisor uses in exercising the voting rights associated with the securities purchased and/or held by the fund are available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021 or visiting the “About Us” page of American Century Investments’ website at americancentury.com. A description of the policies is also available on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the investment advisor voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the “About Us” page at americancentury.com. It is also available at sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website at sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund also makes its complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the most recent quarter of its fiscal year available on its website at americancentury.com and, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021.

Other Tax Information
The following information is provided pursuant to provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.
The fund designates $28,061,114 as exempt interest dividends for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2014.

41



Notes

42



Notes

43



Notes


44








 
 
 
 
Contact Us
americancentury.com
 
Automated Information Line
1-800-345-8765
 
Investor Services Representative
1-800-345-2021
or 816-531-5575
 
Investors Using Advisors
1-800-378-9878
 
Business, Not-For-Profit, Employer-Sponsored Retirement Plans
1-800-345-3533
 
Banks and Trust Companies, Broker-Dealers, Financial Professionals, Insurance Companies
1-800-345-6488
 
Telecommunications Relay Service for the Deaf
711
 
 
 
 
American Century California Tax-Free and Municipal Funds
 
 
 
 
Investment Advisor:
American Century Investment Management, Inc.
Kansas City, Missouri
 
 
 
 
This report and the statements it contains are submitted for the general information of our shareholders. The report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus.
 
 
 
 
©2014 American Century Proprietary Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.
CL-ANN-83158    1410
 




ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS.

(a)
The registrant has adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, and persons performing similar functions.

(b)
No response required.

(c)
None.

(d)
None.

(e)
Not applicable.

(f)
The registrant’s Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers was filed as Exhibit 12 (a)(1) to American Century Asset Allocation Portfolios, Inc.’s Annual Certified Shareholder Report on Form N-CSR, File No. 811-21591, on September 29, 2005, and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.

(a)(1)
The registrant's board has determined that the registrant has at least one audit committee financial expert serving on its audit committee.

(a)(2)
Tanya S. Beder, Peter F. Pervere and Ronald J. Gilson are the registrant's designated audit committee financial experts. They are "independent" as defined in Item 3 of Form N-CSR.

(a)(3)
Not applicable.

(b)
No response required.

(c)
No response required.

(d)
No response required.


ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
        
(a)
Audit Fees.

The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years were as follows:

FY 2013:    $106,714
FY 2014:    $110,736

(b)
Audit-Related Fees.

The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by the principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrant’s financial statements and are not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item were as follows:

For services rendered to the registrant:

FY 2013:    $0
FY 2014:    $0






Fees required to be approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X (relating to certain engagements for non-audit services with the registrant’s investment adviser and its affiliates):

FY 2013:    $0
FY 2014:    $0

(c)
Tax Fees.

The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning were as follows:

For services rendered to the registrant:

FY 2013:    $0
FY 2014:    $0

Fees required to be approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X (relating to certain engagements for non-audit services with the registrant’s investment adviser and its affiliates):

FY 2013:    $0
FY 2014:    $0

(d)
All Other Fees.

The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for products and services provided by the principal accountant, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this Item were as follows:

For services rendered to the registrant:

FY 2013:    $0
FY 2014:    $0

Fees required to be approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X (relating to certain engagements for non-audit services with the registrant’s investment adviser and its affiliates):

FY 2013:    $0
FY 2014:    $0

(e)(1)
In accordance with paragraph (c)(7)(i)(A) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, before the accountant is engaged by the registrant to render audit or non-audit services, the engagement is approved by the registrant’s audit committee. Pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, the registrant’s audit committee also pre-approves its accountant’s engagements for non-audit services with the registrant’s investment adviser, its parent company, and any entity controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant, if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the registrant.

(e)(2)
All services described in each of paragraphs (b) through (d) of this Item were pre-approved before the engagement by the registrant’s audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(A) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X. Consequently, none of such services were required to be approved by the audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C).

(f)
The percentage of hours expended on the principal accountant’s engagement to audit the registrant’s financial statements for the most recent fiscal year that were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees was less than 50%.

(g)
The aggregate non-audit fees billed by the registrant’s accountant for services rendered to the registrant, and rendered to the registrant’s investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily




portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant for each of the last two fiscal years of the registrant were as follows:

FY 2013:    $155,250
FY 2014:    $108,075

(h)
The registrant’s investment adviser and accountant have notified the registrant’s audit committee of all non-audit services that were rendered by the registrant’s accountant to the registrant’s investment adviser, its parent company, and any entity controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides services to the registrant, which services were not required to be pre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X. The notification provided to the registrant’s audit committee included sufficient details regarding such services to allow the registrant’s audit committee to consider the continuing independence of its principal accountant.


ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.

Not applicable.


ITEM 6. INVESTMENTS.

(a)
The schedule of investments is included as part of the report to stockholders filed under Item 1 of this Form.

(b)
Not applicable.


ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

Not applicable.


ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

Not applicable.


ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.

Not applicable.


ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

During the reporting period, there were no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant’s board.


ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

(a)
The registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940)




are effective based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report.

(b)
There were no changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) that occurred during the registrant's second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 12. EXHIBITS.

(a)(1)
Registrant’s Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, which is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2 of Form N-CSR, was filed as Exhibit 12(a)(1) to American Century Asset Allocation Portfolios, Inc.’s Certified Shareholder Report on Form N-CSR, File No. 811-21591, on September 29, 2005.

(a)(2)
Separate certifications by the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, are filed and attached hereto as EX-99.CERT.

(a)(3)
Not applicable.

(b)
A certification by the registrant’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, is furnished and attached hereto as EX-99.906CERT.





SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Registrant:
American Century California Tax-Free and Municipal Funds
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Jonathan S. Thomas
 
 
Name:
Jonathan S. Thomas
 
 
Title:
President
 
 
 
 
 
Date:
October 29, 2014
 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By:
/s/ Jonathan S. Thomas
 
Name:
Jonathan S. Thomas
 
Title:
President
 
 
(principal executive officer)
 
 
 
Date:
October 29, 2014


By:
/s/ C. Jean Wade
 
Name:
C. Jean Wade
 
Title:
Vice President, Treasurer, and
 
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
 
(principal financial officer)
 
 
 
Date:
October 29, 2014