UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.  )      

Filed by the Registrant x

Filed by a party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o Preliminary Proxy Statement

o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

x Definitive Proxy Statement

o Definitive Additional Materials

o Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x No fee required.

o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11

620 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
tel 212-556-1234

Invitation to 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

DATE:	Wednesday, April 27, 2022
TIME:	11:00 a.m. (Eastern Time)
PLACE:	Virtual meeting only at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NYT2022

March 11, 2022

Dear Fellow Stockholder:

Please join me at our Annual Meeting on Wednesday, April 27, 2022, which will be held at 11:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) in a virtual-only format, through a virtual meeting platform available at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NYT2022. At the meeting, you will be asked to vote on the election of the Board of Directors and the ratification of the selection of auditors. In addition, our Class B stockholders will be asked to vote on an advisory resolution on executive compensation.

I am very pleased that we have a new nominee for election at this year’s Annual Meeting, Manuel Bronstein. Manuel, who joined our Board in October 2021, is the chief product officer of Roblox Corporation. He is a deeply experienced product leader with expertise gained from a range of digital and consumer-facing companies and he provides the Board and the Company with valuable insight as the Company continues to expand and grow its digital offerings.

In light of ongoing public health concerns related to the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic, and to help protect the health and well-being of our stockholders, employees and communities, we have determined to conduct the Annual Meeting in a virtual-only format again this year. In the event we subsequently determine for any reason to instead hold the Annual Meeting partially or solely in-person or to otherwise take additional steps regarding how we conduct our meeting, we will announce this decision in advance, and details will be posted on our website and filed with the SEC.

You will have an opportunity at the meeting to ask questions and express your views to the senior management of the Company. Members of the Board of Directors will also be present.

Whether or not you are able to attend the Annual Meeting, it is important that your shares be represented. Please vote your shares (i) electronically, (ii) by phone or (iii) by mail. Instructions on each of these voting methods are outlined in the enclosed Proxy Statement. Please vote as soon as possible.

Thank you for your ongoing support and continued interest in The New York Times Company.

A.G. SULZBERGER

Chairman of the Board

620 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
tel 212-556-1234

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders

To be held Wednesday, April 27, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time

To the Holders of Class A and Class B

Common Stock of The New York Times Company:

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of The New York Times Company will be held at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, April 27, 2022, conducted through a live audio webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NYT2022, in a virtual-only format.

Items to be Voted

1.To elect a Board of 13 members;

2.To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022;

3.To hold an advisory vote to approve executive compensation; and

4.To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

Record Date and Eligibility to Vote

Holders of the Class A and Class B common stock as of the close of business on March 1, 2022, are entitled to notice of, and to attend, this meeting as set forth in the Proxy Statement. Class A stockholders are entitled to vote for the election of four of the 13 directors. Class B stockholders are entitled to vote for the election of nine of the 13 directors and on the advisory resolution to approve executive compensation. Class A and Class B stockholders, voting together as a single class, are entitled to vote on the proposal to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as auditors for the 2022 fiscal year. Class B stockholders are entitled to vote on any other matters presented at the meeting.

Attending the Annual Meeting

To attend, vote, and submit questions during the Annual Meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NYT2022 and enter your 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. Those without a control number may also attend the Annual Meeting as guests by logging in to the same virtual meeting platform and following the instructions on the website for guest access. Guests will not have the option to vote shares or ask questions. The Annual Meeting will begin promptly at 11:00 a.m. ET. Online check-in will begin at 10:45 a.m. ET, and you should allow ample time for the online check-in procedures. Technical support will be available beginning at 10:45 a.m. ET and will remain available until the meeting has ended.

Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please vote as promptly as possible using the internet or the designated toll-free telephone number, or by requesting a printed copy of the proxy materials and returning by mail the proxy card you receive in response to your request.

New York, NY

March 11, 2022

By Order of the Board of Directors

DIANE BRAYTON

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Table of Contents

	Page
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY	1
INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING	5
GLOSSARY OF CERTAIN TERMS	9
WHERE TO FIND MORE INFORMATION ON THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY	10
GENERAL INFORMATION	11
The Ochs-Sulzberger Trust	11
PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK	13
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND DIRECTORS	16
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS	17
PROPOSAL NUMBER 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS	18
PROFILES OF NOMINEES FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS	19
Class A Nominees	19
Class B Nominees	20
RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS	23
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	24
BOARD MEETINGS AND ATTENDANCE	30
BOARD COMMITTEES	31
NOMINATING & GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE	33
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE	34
Compensation Committee Procedures	34
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation	35
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT	35
PROPOSAL NUMBER 2—SELECTION OF AUDITORS	37
DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION	38
2021 Compensation of Non-Employee Directors	38
Non-Employee Director Compensation Table	39
DIRECTORS’ AND OFFICERS’ LIABILITY INSURANCE	41
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS	42
Compensation Committee Report	42
Compensation Discussion and Analysis	42
Summary Compensation Table	58
Grants of Plan-Based Awards	61
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End	62
Option Exercises and Stock Vested	63
Pension Benefits	64
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation	67
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control	68
CEO Pay Ratio	72
PROPOSAL NUMBER 3—ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	73
OTHER MATTERS	74
Stockholder Proposals for the 2023 Annual Meeting	74
Certain Matters Relating to Proxy Materials	74
APPENDIX A—COMPUTATION OF ADJUSTED OPERATING PROFIT	A-1

Proxy Statement Summary

This summary highlights certain information contained in this proxy statement. You should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting.

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Date:	April 27, 2022
Time:	11:00 a.m. (Eastern Time)
Location:	Virtual meeting only at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NYT2022 For further information about participating in the Annual Meeting, please see “Information About the Annual Meeting” beginning on page 5.

VOTING MATTERS

Proposal		Board Recommendation	More Information
1. Election of Board of Directors of the Company		For	p. 18
Class A stockholders	Class B stockholders
Amanpal S. Bhutani Manuel Bronstein Doreen Toben Rebecca Van Dyck	Beth Brooke Rachel Glaser Arthur Golden Hays N. Golden Meredith Kopit Levien Brian P. McAndrews David Perpich John W. Rogers, Jr. A.G. Sulzberger
2. Ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022(Class A and B stockholders)		For	p. 37
3. Advisory vote to approve executive compensation (Class B stockholders)		For	p. 73

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 1

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

Name	Age	Position with The New York Times Company	Director Since
Class A Nominees (4)
Amanpal S. Bhutani	45	Independent Director	2018
Manuel Bronstein	46	Independent Director	2021
Doreen Toben	72	Independent Director	2004
Rebecca Van Dyck	52	Independent Director	2015
Class B Nominees (9)
Beth Brooke	62	Independent Director	2021
Rachel Glaser	60	Independent Director	2018
Arthur Golden	65	Non-Employee Director	2021
Hays N. Golden	37	Non-Employee Director	2017
Meredith Kopit Levien	50	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director	2020
Brian P. McAndrews	63	Independent Director	2012
David Perpich	44	Publisher, The Athletic and Wirecutter, and Director	2019
John W. Rogers, Jr.	63	Independent Director	2018
A.G. Sulzberger	41	Chairman of the Board and Publisher of The New York Times	2018

Our Board is composed of directors with a mix of tenure, with longer serving directors providing important experience and institutional knowledge, and newer directors providing fresh perspective to deliberations. The Nominating & Governance Committee regularly assesses our directors’ mix of skills, experience, tenure and diversity in light of the Company’s business and long-term strategy and advises the Board of its determinations with respect to Board composition and short- and long-term director refreshment and succession planning.

P. 2 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

We believe strong corporate governance is a critical component of our corporate culture. Central to our governance is our dual-class capital structure that includes Class A stock, which is publicly traded, and Class B stock, which is controlled by the Ochs-Sulzberger family trust. The primary objective of this trust is to maintain the editorial independence and the integrity of The New York Times and to perpetuate it “as an independent newspaper, entirely fearless, free of ulterior influence and unselfishly devoted to the public welfare.”

Below are certain highlights of our governance practices that are designed to safeguard the interests of both Class A and Class B stockholders. More information can be found beginning on page 11.

l	Majority independent Board (notwithstanding NYSE “controlled company” exception) elected annually and with fiduciary duties to Class A and Class B stockholders	l	Independent Committees (notwithstanding NYSE “controlled company” exception)
l	Commitment to Board refreshment, with a robust director nominee selection process and six new non-employee directors (five independent) since 2018	l	Annual rotation of independent directors elected by Class A stockholders
l	Active lead independent director as Presiding Director	l	Regular executive sessions of non-employee directors and independent directors
l	Regular outreach to significant Class A stockholders on various matters	l	Director/executive stock ownership requirements
l	Annual Board and Committee self-evaluation process	l	Comprehensive director orientation
l	Ethics policies for all directors and employees	l	Retirement policy for non-employee directors of the earlier of age 75 and 20 years of service
l	No hedging/pledging of Company stock	l	Clawback policy that applies to performance-based cash and equity compensation

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 3

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

The Company’s executive compensation program is designed to support business performance and drive long-term stockholder value. Below are certain highlights of our 2021 executive compensation program. More information can be found beginning on page 42.

Pay for Performance
l	Significant portion of named executive officers’ target compensation is performance-based – Approximately 82% for CEO – Approximately 68% for other NEOs	l	Under financial metric of annual incentive compensation, above-target compensation paid only for above-target Company performance
l	Significant portions of annual and long-term incentive compensation tied to performance against pre-established, measurable financial performance goals	l	Under total stockholder return metric of long-term incentive compensation, above-target compensation paid only for above-median Company performance and no payout for lower quartile performance

Executive Compensation Governance
What We Do
ü	Align pay and performance (see above)	ü	Set meaningful stock ownership guidelines for executive officers (2-5x annual base salary)
ü	Engage with significant Class A stockholders periodically on executive compensation matters	ü	Have a clawback policy that applies to performance-based cash and equity compensation paid to executive officers
ü	Annual Compensation Committee benchmarking review of compensation of Company executives with the Committee’s independent compensation consultant	ü	Perform annual risk assessment of executive compensation program
ü	Hold an annual “say-on-pay” advisory vote
What We Do Not Do
û	No tax “gross-ups” for executive officers	û	No hedging/pledging of Company stock
û	No significant perks for executive officers	û	No individual change in control agreements

P. 4 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

The New York Times Company

Proxy Statement

Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on April 27, 2022

INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

VOTING ON MATTERS BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING

Q:    What am I voting on?

A:    Stockholders are asked to vote on three items at the 2022 Annual Meeting:

•Proposal 1: Election of the Board of Directors of The New York Times Company (the “Board”).

•Proposal 2: Ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022.

•Proposal 3: Advisory vote to approve executive compensation (the “say-on-pay” vote).

Q:    How does the Board of Directors recommend voting?

A:    The Board of Directors recommends voting:

•FOR each nominee to the Board;

•FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the executive compensation of our named executive officers; and

The Audit Committee of the Board recommends voting:

•FOR ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022.

Q:    Who is entitled to vote?

A:    The New York Times Company has two classes of outstanding voting securities: Class A common stock, $.10 par value per share (“Class A stock”) and Class B common stock, $.10 par value per share (“Class B stock”). Stockholders of record of Class A stock or Class B stock as of the close of business on March 1, 2022, may vote at the 2022 Annual Meeting. As of March 1, 2022, there were 166,698,908 shares of Class A stock and 781,724 shares of Class B stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each share of stock is entitled to one vote.

•Proposal 1: Class A stockholders vote for the election of four of the 13 director nominees. Class B stockholders vote for the election of nine of the 13 director nominees.

•Proposal 2: Class A and B stockholders, voting together as a single class, vote on this proposal.

•Proposal 3: Class B stockholders vote on this proposal.

Q:    Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding the internet availability of the proxy materials instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials?

A:    The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) that we mail to our stockholders (other than those who previously requested printed copies or electronic delivery) directs you to a website where you can access our proxy materials and view instructions on how to vote. By furnishing this Proxy Statement and our 2021 Annual Report to our stockholders by providing access to these documents on the internet rather than mailing printed copies, we save natural resources and reduce printing and distribution costs, while providing a convenient way to access the materials and vote. If you would prefer to receive a paper copy of these materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 5

Q:    How do I get electronic access to the proxy materials?

A:    The Notice provides instructions on how to view the proxy materials for our Annual Meeting on the internet. In addition, this Proxy Statement is available at http://investors.nytco.com/investors/financials/proxy-statements, and the 2021 Annual Report is available at http://investors.nytco.com/investors/financials/annual-reports.

You can elect to receive all future stockholder communications (i.e., notices of internet availability of proxy materials and other correspondence) electronically by email instead of in print, by choosing this delivery method in the “Investors” section of our website at http://investors.nytco.com/investors/investor-resources/annual-meeting-information. If you choose to receive future stockholder communications electronically, and we encourage you to do so, you will receive an email next year with instructions containing links to those materials and to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive stockholder communications by email will remain in effect until you terminate it or for as long as the email address you provided is valid.

Q:    How do I cast my vote?

A:    You can vote your shares either by proxy or at the virtual Annual Meeting. If you choose to vote by proxy, you may do so by using the internet or the designated toll-free telephone number, or if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials, by mail. Whichever method you use, for your proxy to be counted, it must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 26, 2022. Each of these procedures is more fully explained below.

•Vote by Internet

You can vote your shares by internet on the voting website, http://www.proxyvote.com. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Follow the instructions and have your Notice, proxy card or voting instruction form in hand, as you will need to reference your assigned 16-digit control number(s) included on your proxy card, notice of internet availability or voting instruction form that you have received.

•Vote by Telephone

You can also vote your shares by calling the toll-free telephone number provided on the voting website, http://www.proxyvote.com, and on the proxy card. Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

•Vote by Mail

If you received a printed copy of the proxy materials, you can vote by completing and returning the proxy card or voting instruction form in the envelope provided. If you received a Notice, you can request a printed copy of the proxy materials by following the instructions in the Notice. If you voted by internet or telephone, you do not need to return your proxy card or voting instruction form.

Even if you plan to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, you may still cast your vote in advance using any of the methods described above. If you wish to vote at the virtual Annual Meeting, shortly before the start of the Annual Meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NYT2022, enter the 16-digit control number included on your Notice, proxy card, voting instruction form or other instructions that you received with your proxy materials, and follow the instructions for voting.

If you are a registered holder and submit a proxy without giving instructions, your shares will be voted as recommended by the Board.

If you are a beneficial owner of shares, voting your shares is critical due to a New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rule that prohibits your broker from voting your shares on Proposals 1 and 3 without your instructions. See “What is a broker non-vote?”

If you have any questions about this NYSE rule or the proxy voting process in general, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) has a website (http://www.sec.gov/spotlight/proxymatters.shtml) with more information about your rights as a stockholder.

P. 6 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

Q:    What is the difference between holding shares as a registered holder and as a beneficial owner of shares held in street name?

A:    Registered Holder. If your shares are registered directly in your name on the books of the Company maintained with the Company’s transfer agent, Computershare, Inc., you are considered the “registered holder” of those shares, and the Notice is sent directly to you by the Company.

Beneficial Owner of Shares Held in Street Name. If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the “beneficial owner of shares held in street name” (also called a “street name holder”), and the Notice is forwarded to you by your broker, bank or other nominee. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote the shares held in your account.

Q:    How will my stock be voted on other business brought up at the Annual Meeting?

A:    By submitting your proxy, you authorize the persons named as proxies to use their discretion in voting on any other matter brought before the Annual Meeting. The Company does not know of any other business that will be voted upon at the Annual Meeting.

Q:    Can I change my vote or revoke my proxy?

A:    Yes. If you are a registered holder, you can change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting, subject to the voting deadlines that are described on the proxy card or voting instruction form, as applicable, by submitting a later-dated proxy (either by mail, telephone or Internet) or by voting by ballot at the Annual Meeting.

If you are a beneficial owner of shares, you can submit new voting instructions by contacting your broker, bank or other nominee. You can also vote in person at the Annual Meeting if you obtain a legal proxy as described above.

Q:    What is the quorum requirement for the Annual Meeting?

A:    The holders of record of a majority of the Company’s shares of stock issued and outstanding on the record date and entitled to vote, in person or by proxy, constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. However, the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company provides that Class A stockholders, voting separately, are entitled to elect 30% of the Board of Directors (or the nearest larger whole number) and Class B stockholders, voting separately, are entitled to elect the balance of the Board of Directors. Accordingly, with respect to the election of directors, the holders of a majority of the shares of each of the Class A and Class B stock, respectively, constitute a quorum for the election of the Board of Directors. In addition, only Class B stockholders are entitled to vote on the advisory say-on-pay vote to approve executive compensation. Accordingly, the holders of a majority of the shares of Class B stock constitute a quorum for this proposal. Broker non-votes and abstentions (as described below) are counted as present for establishing a quorum.

Q:    What is the voting requirement to elect the directors and to approve each of the other proposals?

A:    The voting requirements are as follows:

•Proposal 1: Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast. However, please see our policy described on page 25 regarding directors who do not receive more “for” votes than “withheld” votes.

•Proposal 2: Ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022, requires, pursuant to the Company’s By-laws, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Class A and Class B stock represented at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal, voting together as a single class.

•Proposal 3: The advisory say-on-pay vote to approve executive compensation requires, pursuant to the Company’s By-laws, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Class B stock represented at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal.

Q:    What is a broker non-vote?

A:    If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held by a broker, bank or other nominee, you must instruct the broker, bank or other nominee how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted on proposals on which brokers do not have discretionary authority, namely: Proposal 1 (election

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 7

of the Board of Directors) and Proposal 3 (advisory vote to approve executive compensation). This is called a “broker non-vote.” Your shares will be counted as present at the meeting for quorum purposes but not present and entitled to vote for purposes of these specific proposals. Therefore, it is very important that beneficial owners instruct their broker, bank or other nominee how they wish to vote their shares.

If you do not provide your broker, bank or other nominee with voting instructions with respect to Proposal 2 (ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022), your broker, bank or other nominee has discretion to vote your shares on this proposal, which is considered a “routine” management proposal.

Q:    How will broker non-votes, withheld votes and abstentions affect the voting results?

A:    Pursuant to the Company’s By-laws, withheld votes and broker non-votes will have no effect on the election of directors; abstentions will have the same effect as votes against Proposal 2 and advisory Proposal 3; and broker non-votes will have no effect on advisory Proposal 3.

Q:    Who pays for the solicitation of proxies and how are they solicited?

A:    Proxies are solicited by our Board of Directors. The Company bears the costs of the solicitation of the proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors. Our directors, officers or employees may solicit proxies in person or by mail, telephone, facsimile or electronic transmission. The costs associated with the solicitation of proxies include the cost of preparing, printing and mailing our proxy materials, the Notice and any other information we send to stockholders.

We also pay banks, brokers and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares held in street name certain fees associated with forwarding our proxy materials and obtaining beneficial owners’ voting instructions. We reimburse those firms for their reasonable expenses in accordance with applicable rules. In addition, we have engaged Alliance Advisors, LLC to assist in soliciting proxies for an estimated fee of $11,500, plus out-of-pocket expenses and certain administrative fees.

Q:    Who will serve as inspector of election?

A:    We have engaged Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. as the independent inspector of election to tabulate stockholder votes at the Annual Meeting.

PARTICIPATING IN THE ANNUAL MEETING

Q:    What are the procedures for attending the Annual Meeting?

A:    All stockholders as of the record date or holders of valid proxies are entitled to attend and participate in the virtual Annual Meeting. To attend the Annual Meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NYT2022 and enter your 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. Those without a control number may also attend the Annual Meeting as guests by logging in to the same virtual meeting platform and following the instructions on the website for guest access. Guests will not have the option to vote shares or ask questions.

The Annual Meeting will begin promptly at 11:00 a.m. ET. Online check-in will begin at 10:45 a.m. ET, and you should allow ample time for the online check-in procedures. Technical support will be available beginning at 10:45 a.m. ET on April 27, 2022, and will remain available until the meeting has ended.

You do not need to attend the Annual Meeting to vote. See “How do I cast my vote?” above.

Q:    Can I ask questions at the Annual Meeting?

A:    Stockholders as of the record date or holders of valid proxies may submit questions online on the day of the Annual Meeting, beginning shortly before the start of the Annual Meeting at 10:45 a.m. ET and during the 2022 Annual Meeting, by logging in with the 16-digit control number at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NYT2022.

Our moderators will review questions received. We will answer questions during the 2022 Annual Meeting that are pertinent to the Company as time permits; questions and answers may be grouped by topic and substantially similar questions may be grouped and answered at once.

P. 8 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

GLOSSARY OF CERTAIN TERMS

To improve the readability of this Proxy Statement, we use certain shortened “defined terms” to refer to various terms that are used frequently. These defined terms are generally provided the first time the longer term appears in the text and, for your convenience, certain defined terms are also set forth below.

“2010 Incentive Plan” means The New York Times Company 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan;

“2020 Incentive Plan” means The New York Times Company 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan (which replaced the 2010 Incentive Plan upon its approval by stockholders in 2020);

“Class A stock” means the Company’s Class A Common Stock, $.10 par value per share;

“Class B stock” means the Company’s Class B Common Stock, $.10 par value per share;

“Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” means The New York Times Company;

“Company 401(k) Plan” means The New York Times Companies Supplemental Retirement and Investment Plan;

“Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;

“NYSE” means the New York Stock Exchange;

“Ochs-Sulzberger Trust” means the trust created in 1997 by the four children of Iphigene Ochs Sulzberger (Marian S. Heiskell, Ruth S. Holmberg, Judith P. Sulzberger and Arthur Ochs Sulzberger (the “Grantors”)) for the benefit of each of the Grantors and his or her family;

“say-on-pay vote” means the advisory vote to approve executive compensation under Proposal 3;

“SEC” means the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; and

“Trustees” means the current trustees of the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust: Theresa Dryfoos, Arthur Golden, David Golden, Hays N. Golden, Leah Keith, David Perpich, A.G. Sulzberger and Margot Golden Tishler; and their successors.

_________________________________________________________

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR

THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON APRIL 27, 2022.

This Proxy Statement is available at http://investors.nytco.com/investors/financials/proxy-statements, and the 2021 Annual Report is available at http://investors.nytco.com/investors/financials/annual-reports.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 9

WHERE TO FIND MORE INFORMATION ON THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

Documents Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission

This Proxy Statement is accompanied by our 2021 Annual Report, which includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2021, which we have previously filed with the SEC and which includes audited financial statements.

You can obtain any of the documents we file with the SEC (including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2021). To obtain documents from us, please direct requests in writing, by telephone or by email to:

The New York Times Company

Attention: Corporate Secretary

620 Eighth Avenue

New York, NY 10018

Phone: (212) 556-8092

nytsecretary@nytimes.com

We will send you the requested documents without charge, excluding exhibits.

Additional Information

There are a number of other sources for additional information on The New York Times Company:

SEC. We file reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC, which can be accessed through the SEC’s website (http://www.sec.gov).

The New York Times Company website. Our website at http://www.nytco.com provides ongoing information about the Company and its performance, including documents filed with the SEC. In addition, printable versions of the following materials can be found on the Corporate Governance section of our website at http://www.nytco.com/investors/corporate-governance:

— Corporate Governance Principles

— Board Committee Charters:

•Audit Committee

•Compensation Committee

•Finance Committee

•Nominating & Governance Committee

— Code of Ethics for the Executive Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers

— Code of Ethics for Directors

— Business Ethics Policy

— Policy on Transactions with Related Persons

— Procedures Regarding Communications by Security Holders and Other Interested Parties to the Board of Directors

Please note that information contained on our website does not constitute part of this Proxy Statement.

IMPORTANT NOTE:

This Proxy Statement is dated March 11, 2022. You should not assume that the information contained in this Proxy Statement is accurate as of any date other than such date, and the furnishing of this Proxy Statement to stockholders shall not create any implication to the contrary.

P. 10 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

GENERAL INFORMATION

The Ochs-Sulzberger Trust

Since the purchase of The New York Times newspaper by Adolph S. Ochs in 1896, control of The New York Times and related properties has rested with his family. Family members have taken an active role in the stewardship and management of The New York Times Company. The position of Publisher of The New York Times has been held by various family members, from Adolph S. Ochs to the current Publisher, A.G. Sulzberger, who also serves as the Chairman of the Company’s Board.

In February 1990, on the death of Adolph S. Ochs’s daughter, Iphigene Ochs Sulzberger (“Mrs. Sulzberger”), control passed to her four children through the automatic termination of a trust established by Mr. Ochs. That trust held 83.7% of the Class B stock of the Company, which is not publicly traded. Holders of Class B stock have the right to elect approximately 70% of the Board of Directors. Mrs. Sulzberger’s four children, all of whom are deceased, were: Marian S. Heiskell, Ruth S. Holmberg, Judith P. Sulzberger and Arthur Ochs Sulzberger (each, a “Grantor,” and collectively, the “Grantors”).

In 1997, the Grantors executed an indenture creating a trust (the “Ochs-Sulzberger Trust”) for the benefit of each Grantor and his or her family, and entered into a first amendment to the indenture on December 14, 2000 (the indenture and first amendment thereto are collectively referred to as the “Trust Indenture”). The Grantors transferred to the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust all shares of Class B stock previously held by the trust established by Adolph S. Ochs, together with a number of shares of Class A stock. The Ochs-Sulzberger Trust currently holds 738,810 shares of Class B stock and 1,400,000 shares of Class A stock. The primary objective of the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust is to maintain the editorial independence and the integrity of The New York Times and to perpetuate it “as an independent newspaper, entirely fearless, free of ulterior influence and unselfishly devoted to the public welfare” (the “primary objective of the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust”) in accordance with the wishes of Adolph S. Ochs as expressed in his will.

The current trustees of the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust are Theresa Dryfoos, Arthur Golden, David Golden, Hays N. Golden, Leah Keith, David Perpich, A.G. Sulzberger and Margot Golden Tishler (each, a “Trustee,” and collectively, together with their successors, the “Trustees”).

The Trust Indenture is subject to the terms and provisions of a 1986 shareholders agreement (the “Shareholders Agreement”) among the Grantors, their children and the Company, which restricts the transfer of Class B stock that is held by the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust by requiring, prior to any sale or transfer, the offering of those shares among the other family stockholders and then to the Company at the Class A stock market price then prevailing (or if the Company is the purchaser, at the option of the selling stockholder, in exchange for Class A stock on a share-for-share basis). The Shareholders Agreement provides for the conversion of such shares into Class A stock if the purchase rights are not exercised by the family stockholders or the Company, and such shares of Class A stock are to be transferred to a person or persons other than family stockholders or the Company. There are certain exceptions for gifts and other transfers among the descendants of Adolph S. Ochs, provided that the recipients become parties to the Shareholders Agreement.

In addition, the Shareholders Agreement provides that, if the Company is a party to a merger (other than a merger solely to change the Company’s jurisdiction of incorporation), consolidation or plan of liquidation in which such Class B stock is exchanged for cash, stock, securities or any other property of the Company or of any other corporation or entity, each signing stockholder will convert his or her shares of such Class B stock into Class A stock prior to the effective date of such transaction so that a holder of such shares will receive the same cash, stock or other consideration that a holder of Class A stock would receive in such a transaction. Except for the foregoing, each signing stockholder has agreed not to convert any shares of such Class B stock received from a trust created under the will of Adolph S. Ochs into Class A stock. The Shareholders Agreement will terminate upon the expiration of 21 years after the death of the last remaining survivor of all descendants of Mrs. Sulzberger living on August 5, 1986.

The Trustees, subject to the limited exceptions described below, are directed to retain the Class B stock held in the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust and not to sell, distribute or convert such shares into Class A stock and to vote such Class B stock against any merger, sale of assets or other transaction pursuant to which control of The New York Times passes from the Trustees, unless they determine that the primary objective of the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust can be best achieved by the sale, distribution or conversion of such stock or by the implementation of such transaction. If, upon such determination, any Class B stock is distributed to the beneficiaries of the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust, it must be distributed

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 11

only to descendants of Mrs. Sulzberger, subject to the provisions of the Shareholders Agreement (if it is still in effect). Similarly, any sale by the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust of Class B stock upon such determination can be made only in compliance with the Shareholders Agreement.

The Trustees are granted various powers and rights, including among others: (i) to vote all of the shares of Class A and Class B stock held by the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust; (ii) to nominate the successor Trustees who may also serve on the Company’s Board of Directors; and (iii) to amend certain provisions of the Trust Indenture, but not the provisions relating to retaining the Class B stock or the manner in which such shares may be distributed, sold or converted. The Trust Indenture provides for eight Trustees. All actions of the Trustees require the affirmative vote of six of the eight Trustees. Any Trustee may be removed without cause by a vote of six Trustees. In general, the Trustees will appoint four of the Trustees and the beneficiaries of the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust will elect the remaining four Trustees.

The Ochs-Sulzberger Trust will continue in existence until the expiration of 21 years after the death of the last survivor of all of the descendants of Mrs. Sulzberger then living on December 14, 2000. Upon the termination of the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust at the end of the stated term thereof, all of the trust property, including the shares of Class A and Class B stock held by the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust, will be distributed to the descendants of Mrs. Sulzberger then living.

The Company has been informed by representatives of the Ochs-Sulzberger family that, as of March 1, 2022, the aggregate holdings of the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust and an additional entity controlled by descendants of Mrs. Sulzberger represented approximately 94.5 percent of the Company’s Class B stock and 3.4 percent of the Company’s Class A stock. These amounts do not include the personal holdings of the more than 80 individual members of the Ochs-Sulzberger family, many of which are sizable.

P. 12 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK

The following table sets forth the only persons who, to the knowledge of management, owned beneficially on March 1, 2022, more than 5% of the outstanding shares of either Class A stock or Class B stock:

Name and Address	Shares of Class A Stock	Percent of Class A Stock		Shares of Class B Stock	Percent of Class B Stock
Ochs-Sulzberger Trust1,2 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018	2,138,810	1.3	%	738,810	94.5	%
Theresa Dryfoos1,2,3 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018	2,151,254	1.3	%	739,800	94.6	%
Arthur Golden1,2,4 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018	2,257,149	1.4	%	739,928	94.7	%
David Golden1,2,5 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018	2,145,857	1.3	%	738,810	94.5	%
Hays N. Golden1,2,6 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018	2,297,757	1.4	%	738,810	94.5	%
Leah Keith1,2,7 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018	2,176,622	1.3	%	740,490	94.7	%
David Perpich1,2,8 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018	2,364,593	1.4	%	741,615	94.9	%
A.G. Sulzberger1,2,9 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018	2,339,122	1.4	%	738,810	94.5	%
Margot Golden Tishler1,2,10 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018	2,196,130	1.3	%	738,810	94.5	%
The Vanguard Group11 100 Vanguard Boulevard Malvern, PA 19355	15,880,017	9.5	%
BlackRock, Inc.12 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055	13,896,606	8.3	%
Jackson Square Partners, LLC13 One Letterman Drive Building A, Suite A3-200 San Francisco, CA 94129	10,855,052	6.5	%
Darsana Capital Partners LP14 40 West 57th Street, 15th Floor New York, NY 10019	8,500,000	5.1	%
	Footnotes appear on following pages.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 13

1.Includes 1,400,000 shares of Class A stock and 738,810 shares of Class A stock issuable upon the conversion of 738,810 shares of Class B stock directly owned by the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust. Each of the Trustees of the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust shares voting and investment power with respect to the shares owned by the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust. Therefore, under SEC regulations, each may be deemed a beneficial owner of the shares held by the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust. Such shares are therefore included in the amounts listed in this table for each Trustee. As a result of this presentation, there are substantial duplications in the number of shares and percentages shown in the table. By virtue of their being Trustees of the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust, the Trustees could be deemed to comprise a “group” within the meaning of SEC regulations. Such group is the beneficial owner in the aggregate of 2,942,499 shares of Class A stock, representing approximately 1.8% of the outstanding shares of Class A stock. This amount includes those shares directly held by the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust, as well as (i) 772,614 shares of Class A stock directly or indirectly held by individual Trustees; (ii) 4,913 shares of Class A stock issuable upon the conversion of 4,913 shares of Class B stock held directly or indirectly by individual Trustees; and (iii) 26,162 shares of Class A stock underlying restricted stock units awarded under the Company’s 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2010 Incentive Plan”) and the Company’s 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2020 Incentive Plan”) that have vested or will vest within 60 days.

2.Class B stock is convertible into Class A stock on a share-for-share basis. Ownership of Class B stock is therefore deemed to be beneficial ownership of Class A stock under SEC regulations. For purposes of the presentation of ownership of Class A stock in this table, it has been assumed that each person listed therein as holding Class B stock has converted into Class A stock all shares of Class B stock of which that person is deemed the beneficial owner. Thus, all shares of Class B stock held by the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust and by the Trustees have been included in the calculation of the total amount of Class A stock owned by each such person as well as in the calculation of the total amount of Class B stock owned by each such person. As a result of this presentation, there are substantial duplications in the number of shares and percentages shown in the table.

3.In addition to the amounts of Class A stock and Class B stock described in footnotes 1 and 2, the holdings reported for Ms. Dryfoos include (a) 1,454 shares of Class A stock held by two trusts, of which she is a co-trustee, (b) 10,000 shares of Class A stock held by a trust of which her husband is a trustee, and (c) 990 shares of Class B stock held by a trust of which her husband is a co-trustee. Ms. Dryfoos disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares described in (a) above.

4.In addition to the amounts of Class A stock and Class B stock described in footnotes 1 and 2, the holdings of Arthur Golden include (a) 3,995 restricted stock units for Class A stock (which will be distributed upon his cessation of service on the Board), including 3,278 unvested restricted stock units for Class A stock that will vest within 60 days, on the date of the 2022 Annual Meeting, (b) 1,118 shares of Class B stock held through a family trust of which Mr. Golden is a co-trustee, (c) 42,073 shares of Class A stock held by a family trust of which Mr. Golden is the sole trustee, (d) 69,518 shares of Class A stock held by a trust of which Mr. Golden’s wife is a trustee, and (e) 1,635 shares of Class A stock held by two trusts of which Mr. Golden is a co-trustee. Mr. Golden disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares described in (e) above. Subject to such disclaimer, Mr. Golden shares beneficial ownership of the 1,635 shares of Class A stock included in (e) with Leah Keith as co-trustees.

5.In addition to the amounts of Class A stock and Class B stock described in footnotes 1 and 2, the holdings of David Golden include 7,047 shares of Class A stock held by a trust of which Mr. Golden is the sole trustee.

6.In addition to the amounts of Class A stock and Class B stock described in footnotes 1 and 2, the holdings of Hays N. Golden include (a) 19,563 shares of Class A stock held solely, (b) 22,167 restricted stock units for Class A stock (which will be distributed upon his cessation of service on the Board), including 3,278 unvested restricted stock units for Class A stock that will vest within 60 days, on the date of the 2022 Annual Meeting, and (c) 117,217 shares of Class A stock held by a trust, of which he is a co-trustee. The holdings of Class A stock reported for Dr. Golden exclude 3,450 shares of Class A stock held by a trust, of which his wife is the sole trustee and for which Dr. Golden disclaims beneficial ownership.

7.In addition to the amounts of Class A stock and Class B stock described in footnotes 1 and 2, the holdings of Ms. Keith include (a) 36,132 shares of Class A stock held by five family trusts for which Ms. Keith serves as a co-trustee, and (b) 1,680 shares of Class B stock held by one of such family trusts. Of the shares of Class A stock and Class B stock reported in (a) and (b) above, Ms. Keith shares beneficial ownership of (i) 11,000 shares of Class A stock and 1,680 shares of Class B stock with David Perpich through one family trust for which they serve as co-trustees, and (ii) 1,635 shares of Class A stock with Arthur Golden through two family trusts for which they serve as co-trustees.

P. 14 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

8.In addition to the amounts of Class A stock and Class B stock described in footnotes 1 and 2, the holdings of Mr. Perpich include (a) 24,094 shares of Class A stock held solely, (b) 11,000 shares of Class A stock and 1,680 shares of Class B stock held by a family trust for which Mr. Perpich serves as co-trustee, (c) 186,901 shares of Class A stock and 1,125 shares of Class B stock held by a family trust for which Mr. Perpich serves as co-trustee, and (d) 983 shares of Class A stock held in two custodial accounts created for the benefit of his children for which Mr. Perpich serves as custodian. Mr. Perpich disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares described in (b) above. Subject to such disclaimer, Mr. Perpich shares beneficial ownership of 11,000 shares of Class A stock and 1,680 shares of Class B stock included in (b) above with Leah Keith as co-trustees. The amounts reported exclude 2,083 stock-settled restricted stock units for Class A stock granted under the 2020 Incentive Plan that are subject to vesting conditions.

9.In addition to the amounts of Class A stock and Class B stock described in footnotes 1 and 2, the holdings of Mr. Sulzberger include (a) 73,288 shares of Class A stock held solely, (b) 120,645 shares of Class A stock held by a trust of which Mr. Sulzberger is the sole trustee, (c) 4,825 shares of Class A stock held by a trust of which Mr. Sulzberger is a trustee, and (d) 1,554 shares of Class A stock held in a custodial account for which Mr. Sulzberger serves as a custodian. The amounts reported exclude 8,704 stock-settled restricted stock units for Class A stock granted under the 2020 Incentive Plan that are subject to vesting conditions.

10.In addition to the amounts of Class A stock and Class B stock described in footnotes 1 and 2, the holdings of Ms. Tishler include (a) 16,820 shares of Class A stock held by a trust of which she is the sole trustee and (b) 40,500 shares of Class A stock held by a trust of which she is the sole trustee. Ms. Tishler disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares described in (b) above.

11.According to information contained in a filing with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act, as of December 31, 2021, The Vanguard Group beneficially owned 15,880,017 shares of Class A stock. The filing states that, to the best of the holder’s knowledge, the shares were acquired in the ordinary course of such holder’s business and were not acquired for the purpose of or with the effect of changing or influencing the control of the Company.

12.According to information contained in a filing with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act, as of December 31, 2021, BlackRock, Inc. beneficially owned 13,896,606 shares of Class A stock. The filing states that, to the best of the holder’s knowledge, the shares were acquired in the ordinary course of such holder’s business and were not acquired for the purpose of or with the effect of changing or influencing the control of the Company.

13.According to information contained in a filing with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act, as of December 31, 2021, Jackson Square Partners, LLC beneficially owned 10,855,052 shares of Class A stock. The filing states that, to the best of the holder’s knowledge, the shares were acquired in the ordinary course of such holder’s business and were not acquired for the purpose of or with the effect of changing or influencing the control of the Company.

14.According to information contained in a filing with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act, as of December 31, 2021, Darsana Capital Partners LP beneficially owned 8,500,000 shares of Class A stock. The filing states that, to the best of the holder’s knowledge, the shares were acquired in the ordinary course of such holder’s business and were not acquired for the purpose of or with the effect of changing or influencing the control of the Company.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 15

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND DIRECTORS

The following table shows the beneficial ownership, reported to the Company as of March 1, 2022, of Class A stock and Class B stock, including shares as to which a right to acquire ownership exists (by the exercise of stock options, the vesting of restricted stock units or the conversion of Class B stock into Class A stock) within the meaning of Rule 13d-3(d)(1) under the Exchange Act, of each director named in this Proxy Statement, each named executive officer identified in the 2021 Summary Compensation Table on page 58 of this Proxy Statement, and all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. A portion of the shares reported below are held by the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust, whose Trustees share voting and investment power with respect thereto. See “General Information—The Ochs-Sulzberger Trust.” The table also shows, under “Class A Stock Units,” in the case of non-employee directors, cash-settled phantom stock units credited under the Company’s Non-Employee Directors Deferral Plan (“Directors’ Deferral Plan”).

	Class A Stock	Percent of Class A  Stock		Class A Stock Units	Class B Stock	Percent of Class B  Stock
Amanpal S. Bhutani1 Director	12,790	*		—	—
Diane Brayton2 Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary	31,786	*		—	—
Manuel Bronstein1 Director	1,604	*		—	—
Beth Brooke1 Director	3,278	*		—	—
Roland A. Caputo2 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	75,353	*		—	—
Rachel Glaser1 Director	16,348	*		—	—
Arthur Golden1,3,4 Director	2,257,149	1.4	%	—	739,928	94.7	%
Hays N. Golden1,3,4 Director	2,297,757	1.4	%	—	738,810	94.5	%
Meredith Kopit Levien2 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director	79,211	*		—	—
Brian P. McAndrews1 Director	39,619	*		16,508	—
David Perpich2, 3,4 Publisher, The Athletic and Wirecutter, and Director	2,364,593	1.4	%	—	741,615	94.9	%
John W. Rogers, Jr.1 Director	35,121	*		—	—
A.G. Sulzberger2, 3,4 Chairman of the Board and Publisher of The New York Times	2,339,122	1.4	%	—	738,810	94.5	%
Doreen Toben1 Director	36,459	*		80,948	—
Rebecca Van Dyck1 Director	36,459	*		—	—
Jacqueline Welch2 Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer	—	*		—	—
All Directors and Executive Officers3 (17 Individuals)	3,255,683	1.9	%	97,456	742,733	95.0	%
*Indicates beneficial ownership of less than 1%.				Footnotes continue on following page.

P. 16 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

1.The amounts reported for the directors, except for Mr. Bronstein, include (a) 3,278 unvested restricted stock units for Class A stock that will vest within 60 days, on the date of the 2022 Annual Meeting, and (b) vested restricted stock units for Class A stock (which will be distributed upon cessation of service on the Board) as follows: Mr. Bhutani, 9,512; Ms. Glaser, 13,070; Arthur Golden, 717; Hays N. Golden, 18,889; Mr. McAndrews, 33,181; Mr. Rogers, 11,843; Ms. Toben, 33,181; and Ms. Van Dyck, 33,181. The amount reported for Mr. Bronstein includes 1,604 of unvested restricted stock units for Class A stock that will vest within 60 days, on the date of the 2022 Annual Meeting (which will be distributed upon cessation of service on the Board).

2.The amounts reported exclude stock-settled restricted stock units granted under the 2010 and 2020 Incentive Plans that are subject to vesting conditions: Ms. Brayton, 3,510; Mr. Caputo, 17,153; Ms. Kopit Levien, 30,951; Mr. Perpich, 2,083; Mr. Sulzberger, 8,704; and Ms. Welch, 2,132.

3.Class B stock is convertible into Class A stock on a share-for-share basis. Therefore, ownership of Class B stock is deemed to be beneficial ownership of Class A stock under SEC regulations. For purposes of the presentation of ownership of Class A stock in this table, it has been assumed that each individual has converted into Class A stock all shares of Class B stock of which that person is deemed the beneficial owner. Thus, all shares of Class B stock held by each individual, including shares held by the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust, have been included in the calculation of the total amount of Class A stock owned by such person, as well as in the calculation of the total amount of Class B stock owned by such person. As a result of this presentation, there are duplications in the number of shares and percentages shown in this table.

4.See “Principal Holders of Common Stock” and “General Information—The Ochs-Sulzberger Trust” for a discussion of this person’s holdings.

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS

The Company’s directors and executive officers and beneficial owners of more than 10% of the Class A stock are required to file reports with the SEC of changes in their ownership of Company stock. Based on its review of such reports, the Company believes that all such filing requirements were met during 2021. On February 23, 2022, a report on Form 4 that was filed for Mr. Perpich disclosed a gift of Class A stock in 2020 to an account in the name of a trust for which he serves as a trustee that was inadvertently omitted from previous reports.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 17

PROPOSAL NUMBER 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Thirteen directors will be elected to the Board of The New York Times Company at the 2022 Annual Meeting. Nominees proposed for election as directors are listed below. Directors will hold office until the next annual meeting and until their successors are elected and qualified.

Each of the nominees is now a member of the Board of Directors, and other than Manuel Bronstein, each current director was elected at the 2021 Annual Meeting for which proxies were solicited. Mr. Bronstein was appointed to the Board on October 12, 2021. He had been recommended for consideration by the Nominating & Governance Committee by a global executive recruiting firm retained by the Committee that helps identify, evaluate and conduct due diligence on potential director candidates.

The Certificate of Incorporation of the Company provides that Class A stockholders have the right to elect 30% of the Board of Directors (or the nearest larger whole number). Accordingly, Class A stockholders will elect four of the 13 directors; Class B stockholders will elect nine directors. Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast. (Please see our policy described on page 25 regarding directors who do not receive more “for” votes than “withheld” votes.) Once elected, our directors have no ongoing status as “Class A” or “Class B” directors and have the same duties and responsibilities to all stockholders. Our Board serves as one Board with fiduciary responsibilities to all stockholders of the Company.

Proxies will be used to vote for the election of the nominees named below unless you withhold the authority to do so when you vote your proxy. Each person nominated for election has consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and has agreed to serve if elected. If any of the nominees become unavailable for election, all uninstructed proxies will be voted for such other person or persons designated by the Board. The Board has no reason to anticipate that this will occur.

Name	Age	Position with The New York Times Company	Director Since
Class A Nominees (4)
Amanpal S. Bhutani	45	Independent Director	2018
Manuel Bronstein	46	Independent Director	2021
Doreen Toben	72	Independent Director	2004
Rebecca Van Dyck	52	Independent Director	2015
Class B Nominees (9)
Beth Brooke	62	Independent Director	2021
Rachel Glaser	60	Independent Director	2018
Arthur Golden1	65	Non-Employee Director	2021
Hays N. Golden2	37	Non-Employee Director	2017
Meredith Kopit Levien	50	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director	2020
Brian P. McAndrews	63	Independent Director	2012
David Perpich2	44	Publisher, The Athletic and Wirecutter, and Director	2019
John W. Rogers, Jr.	63	Independent Director	2018
A.G. Sulzberger2	41	Chairman of the Board and Publisher of The New York Times	2018

1.Arthur Golden is a fourth-generation member of the Ochs-Sulzberger family.

2.Hays N. Golden, David Perpich and A.G. Sulzberger are each a fifth-generation member of the Ochs-Sulzberger family.

P. 18 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

Skills, Experience and Qualifications

Consistent with the Company’s Corporate Governance Principles, the Nominating & Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing with the Board, on an annual basis, the requisite skills and characteristics of director nominees, as well as the composition of the Board as a whole. This assessment includes consideration of directors’ independence, character, judgment and business experience, as well as their appreciation of the Company’s mission and values. The Nominating & Governance Committee also considers the diversity of Board candidates, which may include diversity of skills and experience, as well as race/ethnicity, gender identity, sexual orientation, age and geographic diversity. Eight of the Company’s 13 directors, including all four Board Committee Chairs, self-identify as female, LGBTQ+ or from racially/ethnically underrepresented groups.

We believe that the combination of backgrounds, skills and experiences represented by the 13 director nominees will enable the Board and each of its committees to continue to provide sound judgment and leadership in the context of an evolving business environment and the Company’s long-term strategy, and to function effectively as a group. The biographical information for each director nominee includes a summary of the specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led the Board to conclude that the person should serve as a director of the Company. While it is not possible to detail all of the experience, qualifications, attributes or skills possessed by each director, we have set out those unique and important professional characteristics that each person would bring to the Board.

Director Tenure

Our Board is composed of directors with a mix of tenure, with longer serving directors providing important experience and institutional knowledge, and newer directors providing fresh perspective to deliberations. Of the eight currently serving independent director nominees this year, five have joined in the last four years. The other five non-independent directors were appointed to the Board in the last five years. The average tenure of all our director nominees is 4.8 years.

Director Retirement Policy

Under the Company’s director retirement policy, which is set forth in our Corporate Governance Principles, a non-employee director may not stand for re-election following the earlier of (a) his or her 75th birthday or (b) 20 years of service on the Board, unless the Board determines otherwise.

PROFILES OF NOMINEES FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Class A Nominees

Amanpal S. Bhutani has served as a member of our Board of Directors since 2018. Mr. Bhutani is the chief executive officer and a member of the Board of GoDaddy Inc., an internet domain registrar and web hosting company (since 2019). Prior to this, he served in senior leadership roles at Expedia Group, Inc., including as president of the Brand Expedia Group from 2015 to 2019 and senior vice president of Expedia Worldwide Engineering from 2010 to 2015. From 2008 to 2010, he was a technology senior director at JPMorgan Chase and Co. From 2002 to 2008, Mr. Bhutani was at Washington Mutual, Inc., including most recently as senior vice president of ecommerce technology, when JPMorgan Chase and Co. acquired it in 2008. Prior to that, Mr. Bhutani was the founder and technical lead at a startup, and a senior engineer at a consultancy.

Mr. Bhutani brings to the Company and the Board extensive technological and international business expertise, as well as human capital management experience, gained from his senior leadership roles at digital and consumer-facing public companies, including as chief executive officer of GoDaddy. This experience provides the Board and the Company with a valuable perspective highly relevant to the Company’s innovation efforts as the Company positions itself for further global growth.

Manuel Bronstein has served as a member of our Board of Directors since October 2021. Mr. Bronstein is the chief product officer of Roblox Corporation, an online gaming and entertainment platform (since March 2021). Prior to this, he served in senior product roles at Alphabet, including as vice president of product at Google, leading Google Assistant from 2018 to 2021, and at YouTube, as director of product management from 2014 to 2016 and vice president of product management from 2016 to 2018. From 2010 to 2014, he served as vice president of product at Zynga Inc., and from 2003 to 2010, he served in various product leadership roles for Xbox at Microsoft.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 19

Mr. Bronstein is a deeply experienced product leader who brings to the Board extensive product, design and data science expertise, as well as human capital management experience, gained from senior leadership roles at digital and consumer-facing public companies. This experience provides the Board and the Company with valuable insight as the Company continues to expand and grow its digital offerings.

Doreen Toben has served as a member of our Board of Directors since 2004. Ms. Toben was executive vice president and chief financial officer of Verizon Communications, Inc. from 2002 to 2009. From 2000 to 2002, she was senior vice president and chief financial officer of Telecom Group, Verizon Communications, Inc. From 1999 to 2000, she was vice president and controller, and from 1997 to 1999 she was vice president and chief financial officer, of Telecom/Network, Bell Atlantic Inc. Ms. Toben was a director of ARRIS International plc from 2013 to 2019, Tapestry, Inc. from 2017 to 2018, and Kate Spade & Company from 2009 to 2017.

Ms. Toben has over 25 years of experience in the communications industry, including as executive vice president and chief financial officer of Verizon Communications, Inc., where she was responsible for Verizon’s finance and strategic planning efforts. In addition to her deep communications industry experience, Ms. Toben’s financial and accounting expertise is a valuable asset to the Company, the Board and the Audit Committee. In addition, through her experience at Verizon and her service on the boards of other public companies, Ms. Toben provides the Board and the Company with a highly valuable strategic perspective, as well as extensive corporate governance and human capital management experience.

Rebecca Van Dyck has served as a member of our Board of Directors since 2015. Ms. Van Dyck has served as chief operating officer for Reality Labs at Meta Platforms, Inc. (formerly Facebook, Inc.) since 2020, having previously served as chief marketing officer for AR/VR from 2017 to 2020, and as vice president of consumer and brand marketing from 2012 to 2017. From 2011 to 2012, she was senior vice president and global chief marketing officer of Levi Strauss & Co. From 2007 to 2011, she was senior director, worldwide marketing and communications, of Apple Inc., and from 1994 to 2006, she held various positions at Wieden + Kennedy, Inc., including as global account director for Nike International, from 2002 to 2006. From 1992 to 1994, she held various positions at TBWA Worldwide Inc.

Ms. Van Dyck brings to the Company and the Board extensive knowledge of digital consumer brand marketing and management, gained from her experience in senior executive roles at large digital and consumer-focused companies and in the advertising industry. Ms. Van Dyck’s brand expertise, as well as her international experience, provide the Board with a valuable perspective highly relevant to the Company’s digital strategy.

Class B Nominees

Beth Brooke has served as a member of our Board of Directors since April 2021. Ms. Brooke served as the global vice chair of public policy for Ernst & Young LLP from 2007 to 2019, where she was a member of the firm’s global executive board and global sponsor of the firm’s diversity and inclusiveness efforts. Prior to this, she served as Ernst & Young’s vice chair of public policy, sustainability and stakeholder engagement in the Americas from 2000 to 2007, and held various roles in tax practice management from 1981 to 2000. From 1993 to 1995, Ms. Brooke served in the U.S. Department of the Treasury and was responsible for tax policy matters related to insurance and managed care, including working on healthcare and superfund legislative reform efforts. Ms. Brooke has been a director of eHealth, Inc. since 2019.

Ms. Brooke brings to the Company and the Board extensive financial and strategic expertise, as well as risk management, public policy and international experience, gained from nearly 40 years of service at Ernst & Young. In addition, she provides the Board and the Company with meaningful insight gained from both her past experience as a global sponsor of Ernst & Young’s diversity and inclusiveness efforts and her service on various private and nonprofit boards, including as co-chair of the steering committee of The Partnership for Global LGBTI Equality, in conjunction with the World Economic Forum.

Rachel Glaser has served as a member of our Board of Directors since 2018. Ms. Glaser is the chief financial officer of Etsy, Inc., a global creative commerce platform (since 2017). From 2015 to 2017, she was the chief financial officer of Leaf Group Ltd., a company that owns and operates consumer media and marketplaces. From 2012 to 2015, she was the chief financial officer of Move, Inc., the parent company of Realtor.com. From 2008 to 2011, she was the chief operating and financial officer of MyLife.com, a subscription-based search business, and from 2005 to 2008, she was the senior vice president of finance at Yahoo! Inc. Prior to these roles, Ms. Glaser held various finance and operations positions at The Walt Disney Company from 1986 to 2005.

P. 20 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

Ms. Glaser brings to the Company and the Board extensive financial and strategic expertise, as well as human capital management experience, gained from serving in key roles at digitally focused, consumer-facing public companies. This experience provides the Board and the Company with a valuable perspective as the Company continues to expand its digital and subscription-first strategy. In addition, Ms. Glaser’s deep financial and accounting expertise is a valuable asset to the Company, the Board and the Audit Committee, which she chairs.

Arthur Golden has served as a member of our Board of Directors since January 2021. Mr. Golden is a best-selling author. He attended Harvard College, where he received a degree in art history. He also earned a master’s degree in East Asian languages and culture from Columbia University and a master’s degree in English from Boston University.

Mr. Golden is a fourth-generation member of the Ochs-Sulzberger family and brings to the Board a deep appreciation of the values and societal contributions of The New York Times and the Company throughout their history. His alignment with stockholder interests makes Mr. Golden an important part of the Board’s decision-making process.

Hays N. Golden has served as a member of our Board of Directors since 2017. Dr. Golden is the managing director of the University of Chicago Crime Lab and Education Lab (since 2019), and previously served as the senior director for science and strategy at the Crime Lab New York (from 2018 to 2019). Prior to this, Dr. Golden served in various roles at American International Group, Inc. (“AIG”), including as vice president of commercial underwriting from 2017 to 2018, senior manager of commercial underwriting from 2016 to 2017 and in several positions of increasing responsibility at AIG Science, a division of AIG with a focus on data science and analytics, from 2013 to 2016.

Dr. Golden is a fifth-generation member of the Ochs-Sulzberger family and brings to the Board a deep appreciation of the values and societal contributions of The New York Times and the Company throughout their history. His alignment with stockholder interests makes Dr. Golden an important part of the Board’s decision-making process.

Meredith Kopit Levien has served as our president and chief executive officer and as a member of our Board of Directors since 2020. She previously served in the Company as executive vice president and chief operating officer (2017 to 2020), executive vice president and chief revenue officer (2015 to 2017) and executive vice president, advertising (2013 to 2015). Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Kopit Levien served in various roles at Forbes Media LLC, including as chief revenue officer from 2011 to 2013, and in various advertising and publishing roles at The Atlantic.

As the Company’s president and chief executive officer, Ms. Kopit Levien has primary responsibility for overseeing and coordinating all of the Company’s strategy, operations and businesses. She brings to the Company and the Board extensive business and management experience in the media industry, gained from her nearly 20 years spent in a variety of senior operational and executive roles at the Company, Forbes Media and The Atlantic. Her deep understanding of the Company and her strategic and operational leadership experience from her various roles at the Company, including most recently as chief operating officer, overseeing all major commercial operations, provides the Company and the Board with a highly valuable perspective as the Company continues to expand its businesses digitally and globally.

Brian P. McAndrews has served as a member of our Board of Directors since 2012 and as Presiding Director since 2019. Mr. McAndrews was president, chief executive officer and chairman of Pandora Media, Inc. from 2013 to 2016. From 2012 to 2013, he was a venture partner, and from 2009 to 2011, he was managing director, of Madrona Venture Group, LLC. From 2007 to 2008, he was senior vice president, advertiser and publisher solutions, of Microsoft Corporation. From 2000 to 2007, he was president and chief executive officer, and from 1999 to 2000 he served as chief executive officer, of aQuantive, Inc. From 1990 to 1999, he held various positions of increasing responsibility at ABC, Inc., including executive vice president and general manager of ABC Sports. Mr. McAndrews has been a director of Frontdoor, Inc. since 2018. He previously served as a director of Chewy, Inc. from 2019 to 2021, Grubhub Inc. from 2011 to 2021 (including as chairman of its board of directors from 2014 to 2021), and Teladoc Health, Inc. from 2017 to 2020.

Mr. McAndrews brings to the Company and the Board extensive digital expertise gained through his experience as a chief executive officer of public companies in the technology industry. His background in both traditional and digital media has also given him an understanding of digital advertising and the integration of

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 21

emerging technologies, which is highly valued by the Company and the Board as the Company continues to expand its digital businesses. His extensive understanding of the Company’s business, his experience as a chief executive officer of a public company in the technology industry, as well as his prior service as chairman of the board of two public companies, make him uniquely positioned as the Company’s Presiding Director to work collaboratively with our Chairman and our Chief Executive Officer. In addition, through his experience leading a public company and his service on the boards of other public companies, Mr. McAndrews provides the Board and the Company with a highly valuable strategic perspective, as well as extensive corporate governance, human capital management and succession planning experience.

David Perpich has served as the publisher of The Athletic and Wirecutter, which are standalone subscription products of the Company, since February 2022, and he has served as a member of our Board of Directors since 2019. Mr. Perpich previously served as head of standalone products at the Company from 2020 to February 2022, president and general manager of Wirecutter from 2017 to 2020 and senior vice president of product for the Company from 2015 to 2017, during which time he was responsible for overseeing The Times’s digital product portfolio across mobile and web products. In addition, Mr. Perpich served as general manager, new digital products, at the Company from 2013 to 2015, and as vice president, product management, from 2011 to 2013. Mr. Perpich joined the Company in 2010 as executive director, NYTimes.com paid products.

Mr. Perpich is a fifth-generation member of the Ochs-Sulzberger family and brings a deep appreciation of the values and societal contributions of The New York Times and the Company throughout their history to his role as director. In addition, through his service in a variety of critical executive positions that have provided him with extensive knowledge of our Company and operations, Mr. Perpich brings a deep understanding and unique perspective to the Board about the Company’s business strategy and industry opportunities and challenges.

John W. Rogers, Jr. has served as a member of our Board of Directors since 2018. Mr. Rogers is the founder, chairman, co-chief executive officer and chief investment officer of Ariel Investments, LLC, an institutional money management and mutual fund firm, as well as a trustee of Ariel Investment Trust, an investment company. He has been a director of Nike, Inc. since 2018, Ryan Specialty Group (which became public in 2021) since 2014 and McDonald’s Corporation since 2003. Mr. Rogers was a director of Exelon Corporation from 2000 to 2019.

Mr. Rogers brings to the Company and the Board extensive business, financial and risk-management experience gained as the founder and long-serving chief executive officer (co-chief executive officer since 2019) and chief investment officer of a firm with over $16 billion in assets under management. In addition, through service on the boards (and several board committees) of large public companies, he provides the Board and the Company a highly valuable strategic perspective, as well as extensive corporate governance, human capital management and succession planning experience.

A.G. Sulzberger has served as chairman of the Company since January 2021 and as publisher of The New York Times and a member of our Board of Directors since 2018. Mr. Sulzberger previously served as deputy publisher of The New York Times from 2016 to 2017. He joined The New York Times as a reporter in 2009, after serving in various reporting roles at other publications. From 2010 to 2012, he served as head of the Kansas City bureau, and he later served as an assistant editor (from 2012 to 2015) and associate editor (from 2015 to 2016) of The Times, before he was appointed deputy publisher.

Mr. Sulzberger is a fifth-generation member of the Ochs-Sulzberger family and brings a deep appreciation of the values and societal contributions of The New York Times and the Company to his role as chairman and publisher of The New York Times. In addition, as one of the driving forces behind the Company’s digital transformation and subscription-first focus, Mr. Sulzberger brings a deep understanding and unique perspective to the Board about the Company’s business strategy and industry opportunities and challenges.

P. 22 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

Policy on Transactions with Related Persons.The Board of Directors recognizes that transactions with related persons may present actual or apparent conflicts of interest and has approved a policy governing the review and approval or ratification of these transactions.

Under this policy, any transaction (or series of transactions) in which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a participant and a director, director nominee, executive officer or beneficial holder of more than 5% of any class of the Company’s voting securities, or any immediate family member of the foregoing (each, a “related person”) has a direct or indirect material interest, and where the amount involved exceeds $120,000, is subject to reasonable prior review and oversight by the Nominating & Governance Committee, or in the discretion of the Board, such other independent committee to which such matter has been delegated for review. If it is impractical or undesirable to defer consideration of the matter until a Board or committee meeting, the policy allows the Chair of the Nominating & Governance Committee (or, if he or she is not disinterested, by the Presiding Director) to review and approve the transaction, and report any such approval to the Nominating & Governance Committee at the next regularly scheduled meeting.

The policy provides that the Company or any of its subsidiaries may employ a related person in the ordinary course of business consistent with the Company’s policies and practices with respect to the employment of non-related persons in similar positions.

Under the policy, if the transaction involves a related person who is a director or an immediate family member of a director, that director may not participate in the deliberations or vote. In approving a transaction under this policy, the committee or director considering the matter must conduct a reasonable prior review of such transaction for potential conflicts of interest and will prohibit such a transaction if such committee or director determined it to be inconsistent with the interests of the Company and its stockholders. In addition, the committee or director must determine that the transaction is fair and reasonable to the Company.

A printable version of this policy is available on our website, as described on page 10.

Code of Ethics and Business Ethics Policy. Our Code of Ethics applicable to directors discourages directors from engaging in transactions that present a conflict of interest or the appearance of one. Our Business Ethics Policy applicable to employees, including executive officers and others who may be “related persons,” similarly discourages transactions where there is or could be an appearance of a conflict of interest. In addition, that policy requires specific approval by designated members of management of Company transactions in which employees have an interest. These provisions are intended to operate in addition to, and independently of, the policy on transactions with related persons described above.

Interests of Directors in Certain Transactions of the Company. In the ordinary course of our business, the Company and its subsidiaries from time to time engage in transactions with other corporations whose officers or directors are also directors of the Company. In 2021, these included, among other things, a licensing arrangement with Meta Platforms, Inc. (formerly Facebook, Inc.) and the running of advertising in Company properties for products and services of Etsy, Inc., GoDaddy Inc., McDonald’s Corporation, Meta Platforms, Inc., Nike, Inc. and other director-affiliated companies. All of these arrangements were conducted on an arm’s-length basis on customary terms, and the relevant non-employee director did not participate in these business relationships or profit from them.

Certain Members of the Ochs-Sulzberger Family Employed by the Company during our 2021 Fiscal Year. A.G. Sulzberger was employed as Chairman and Publisher of The New York Times during 2021. See “Compensation of Executive Officers” for a description of his compensation. David Perpich, who was employed as head of the Company’s standalone products group in 2021, was paid $924,698 in 2021 and received a grant under the 2021-2023 long-term performance award program with a target value of $200,000. James Dryfoos, who was employed as executive director, technology compliance, was paid $290,408 in 2021 and received time-vested restricted stock units with a grant date fair value of $5,700. Pamela Dryfoos, who was employed as executive director of finance for the Company’s standalone products group, was paid $286,080 in 2021 and received time-vested restricted stock units with a grant date fair value of $5,700.

Mr. Dryfoos, Ms. Dryfoos, Mr. Perpich and Mr. Sulzberger are all fifth-generation members of the Ochs-Sulzberger family.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 23

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing the direction, affairs and management of the Company to ensure that they are aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders. In exercising its oversight role, the Board recognizes its fiduciary duty to both Class A and Class B stockholders.

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Principles that serve as a framework for the way in which the Board conducts its business and that are intended to promote the long-term interests of stockholders. A copy of the Corporate Governance Principles is available on our website, as described on page 10.

The Board’s leadership structure and key corporate governance policies and practices applicable to the Board are summarized below.

Board Leadership Structure

The Company has separated the positions of Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer. In his role as Chairman, Mr. Sulzberger:

•presides over meetings of stockholders and directors;

•works with the Chief Executive Officer to develop agendas for all Board meetings;

•with the Presiding Director, serves as a liaison between the Board and management;

•with the other Ochs-Sulzberger family directors, serves as a liaison between the family and the Board;

•facilitates communication among Board members between meetings; and

•makes himself available for consultation with stockholders and other interested bodies as a representative of the Board and the Company.

Given the demanding nature of these positions, and taking into account that our Chairman, Mr. Sulzberger, is also the Publisher of The New York Times and an executive officer of the Company, the Board believes that it is appropriate to continue to have a lead independent director to serve as Presiding Director who, among other things, chairs all executive sessions of our non-employee and independent directors and generally provides leadership to, and fosters coordination among, our independent directors, enabling them to better fulfill their role of bringing expert outside perspectives to the Board. Mr. McAndrews has served as our Presiding Director since 2019.

In addition to chairing all executive sessions of our non-employee and independent directors, our Presiding Director:

•serves as a liaison between our Chairman and our Chief Executive Officer, on the one hand, and our independent directors, on the other;

•reviews proposed Board meeting agendas;

•consults with senior executives of the Company as to any concerns the executives might have;

•has the authority to call meetings of the non-employee and independent directors in his or her discretion; and

•makes himself or herself available for direct consultation with major stockholders.

To assist the Board in the fulfillment of its responsibilities, Mr. McAndrews, as the Presiding Director, has also performed additional duties over the past few years, including:

•leading the recent Chief Executive Officer succession planning process, together with Mr. Sulzberger, to Meredith Kopit Levien’s appointment in 2020;

•regularly speaking with our Chairman and our Chief Executive Officer between Board meetings to discuss any matters of concern, often in consultation with other independent directors; and

•meeting with other members of senior management.

The Presiding Director is selected annually by the Board from the independent directors upon the recommendation of the Nominating & Governance Committee. Consistent with the Company’s Corporate

P. 24 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

Governance Principles, no director shall serve more than five consecutive one-year terms as Presiding Director, unless the Board determines otherwise.

Executive Sessions of Non-Employee Directors

The NYSE rules require that, at the listed company’s option, either non-employee directors or independent directors of such company meet periodically in executive sessions without management participation. The Company’s non-employee directors meet separately at the end of each regular meeting of the Board. Additionally, at least once a year the independent directors meet in executive session. Arthur Golden and Hays Golden are non-employee directors who, as members of the Ochs-Sulzberger family, are not considered independent. As noted above, all executive sessions of independent directors are led by our Presiding Director.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Risk is an integral part of the Board’s deliberations throughout the year and the Board exercises its oversight responsibility both directly and through its committees.

The Company has an enterprise risk management program designed to identify, prioritize and assess a broad range of risks (e.g., strategic, operational, financial, human capital, legal/regulatory and reputational) that may affect our ability to execute our corporate strategy and fulfill our business objectives, and to formulate plans to mitigate their effects. The Audit Committee reviews the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. The Board also reviews an annual assessment prepared by management of the critical risks facing the Company, their relative magnitude and management’s actions to mitigate them.

The Board also actively oversees risks related to information security, including cybersecurity risks. The Audit Committee receives regular updates on information security and technology matters from the Company’s head of information security, who also provides updates to the Board.

In addition, the Board has delegated certain risk management oversight responsibilities to specific committees, each of which reports regularly to the full Board. The Audit Committee oversees risks related to, among others, financial reporting, internal controls and information security. The Compensation Committee oversees risks related to the Company’s executive compensation program. The Nominating & Governance Committee reviews risks related to the Company’s corporate governance structure, policies and practices. The Finance Committee reviews risks related to the Company’s significant financial policies and practices.

Annual Director Election and Nominee Rotation

All directors stand for election annually. Voting is not cumulative. Under our Certificate of Incorporation, 30% (or the nearest larger whole number) of the directors are elected by the holders of the Company’s Class A stock and the remaining directors are elected by the holders of the Company’s Class B stock. Under the New York Business Corporation Law and our Corporate Governance Principles, once elected, our directors have no ongoing status as “Class A” or “Class B” directors and serve as one Board with the same fiduciary duties and responsibilities to all stockholders.

If, in an uncontested election, a nominee is elected to the Board but fails to receive a majority of the votes cast, our Corporate Governance Principles provide that such nominee must agree to resign upon the request of the Board. In determining whether to require the director to resign, the Board, with such person not participating, will consider all relevant facts and circumstances. The Board must make a decision as to whether to request such resignation within 60 days of the certification of the stockholder vote and disclose its decision within 65 days.

Our Corporate Governance Principles provide that it is the policy of the Company to have an annual rotation of the nominees for election to the Board by holders of the publicly traded Class A stock. It is intended that each of the independent directors be nominated for election by the Class A stockholders at least once every three years and that the annual slate of Class A nominees includes at least one member of each of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating & Governance Committees. This policy reinforces the principle that, once elected, our directors have no ongoing status as “Class A” or “Class B” directors. All directors owe fiduciary duties and responsibilities to all of our stockholders.

Director Orientation and Ongoing Education

The Company has a comprehensive orientation program for all new non-employee directors with respect to their role as directors and as members of the particular Board committees on which they will serve. It includes one-

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 25

on-one meetings with members of senior management and newsroom leaders and extensive written materials to familiarize new directors with the Company’s structure, operations, financial performance, strategic plans, executive compensation program and corporate governance policies and practices, as well as the key responsibilities of the Board committees to which new directors have been appointed. Additional orientation is also provided when a director assumes a leadership role, such as becoming a Committee Chair.

From time to time, the Company provides directors with educational materials and presentations from Company and/or third-party experts on subjects that enable directors to enhance their skills and knowledge to better perform their duties and to recognize and deal appropriately with issues that arise. The Company pays reasonable expenses for any director to attend a director continuing education program. In addition, members of the Board are regularly invited to attend Times events, which provide the directors with an opportunity to engage with senior leaders and staff and to deepen their understanding of The Times, as well as the Company’s business, strategy and corporate culture.

Board and Committee Evaluations

Our Board has an annual Board and committee evaluation process to examine and discuss whether the Board and its committees are functioning effectively as groups and with senior management of the Company, and to identify any areas for improvement. Under this process, each director completes a written Board/committee assessment and then participates in a one-on-one interview with the Presiding Director. The results of the evaluation are then discussed with the Board and respective committee.

The Nominating & Governance Committee annually reviews the format of the evaluation process. In recent years, the evaluation process has led to a broader scope of topics covered in Board meetings, as well as refinements to various Board processes and Board materials. The process has also informed decisions about Board composition, including criteria for director candidate skills and qualifications.

Board Refreshment

The Board and committee evaluation process has also informed Board and Committee composition, succession planning and refreshment, which has been particularly active in recent years. Since 2018, five of our eight currently serving independent director nominees have joined the Board (Mr. Bhutani, Mr. Bronstein, Ms. Brooke, Ms. Glaser and Mr. Rogers). In 2020, the Board elected a new Chairman and a new President and Chief Executive Officer. This refreshment demonstrates the Board’s focus on ensuring that the members of the Board bring the necessary attributes and areas of expertise to contribute to discussions around the Company’s long-term strategy and to oversee the risks that the Company is facing and as they evolve.

Board Composition

Our Board is composed of directors with a mix of tenure, with longer serving directors providing important experience and institutional knowledge, and newer directors providing fresh perspective to deliberations.

The Nominating & Governance Committee regularly assesses our directors’ mix of skills, experience, tenure and diversity in light of the Company’s long-term strategy and advises the Board of its determinations with respect to Board composition and short- and long-term director refreshment and succession planning. As needed, the Committee identifies and evaluates potential director nominees, taking into consideration the overall needs, composition and size of the Board, as well as the criteria described more fully on page 33 under “Nominating & Governance Committee.”

Under the Board’s director retirement policy, which is set forth in our Corporate Governance Principles, a non-employee director may not stand for re-election following the earlier of (a) his or her 75th birthday or (b) 20 years of service on the Board, unless the Board determines otherwise.

Independence of Directors

The NYSE rules require listed companies to have a board of directors with at least a majority of independent directors, as well as independent compensation and nominating/corporate governance committees. Exceptions to these requirements are available to companies of which more than 50% of the voting power for the election of directors is held by a single entity (a “controlled company”). Because of the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust’s holdings of Class B stock, the Company qualifies as a controlled company and is exempt from these NYSE requirements. However, as a

P. 26 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

matter of good corporate governance, the Board has determined not to take advantage of these exceptions and, for many years, has been composed of a majority of independent directors.

In making independence determinations, the Board adheres to the specific tests for independence included in the NYSE rules. In addition, to assist in its independence assessment, the Board has adopted guidelines with respect to “material relationships.” Under these guidelines, the Board has determined that the following relationships—provided they are not required to be disclosed in the Company’s public filings by SEC rules—are categorically immaterial to a determination of independence:

•if the director does business with the Company, or is affiliated with an entity with which the Company does business, so long as payments by or to the Company do not exceed the greater of $1 million or, in the case of an affiliated entity, 2% of the annual revenues of such entity; or

•if the director serves as an officer or director of a charitable organization to which the Company or The New York Times Neediest Cases Fund makes a donation, so long as the aggregate annual donations do not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of that organization’s annual charitable receipts.

In conducting its annual director independence determination, the Board considers all of the relevant facts and circumstances, including certain transactions, relationships and arrangements with other corporations whose officers or directors are also directors of the Company. In 2021, these included, among other things, a licensing arrangement with Meta Platforms, Inc. (formerly Facebook, Inc.) and the running of advertising in Company properties for the products and services of Etsy, Inc., GoDaddy, Inc., McDonald’s Corporation, Meta Platforms, Inc., Nike, Inc. and other director-affiliated companies. All of these arrangements were conducted on an arm’s-length basis and in each case resulted in payments within the permitted amounts described above. See “Related Person Transactions—Interests of Directors in Certain Transactions of the Company.”

Based on the foregoing, the Board affirmatively determined that each of Mr. Bhutani, Mr. Bronstein, Ms. Brooke, Ms. Glaser, Mr. McAndrews, Mr. Rogers, Ms. Toben and Ms. Van Dyck has no direct or indirect material relationships with the Company, and each is independent pursuant to applicable NYSE rules. In addition, the Board affirmatively determined that, during the time he served as a director in 2021, Robert E. Denham had no direct or indirect material relationships with the Company, and was independent pursuant to applicable NYSE rules. The remaining directors are not considered independent. Mr. Sulzberger and Ms. Kopit Levien are executive officers of the Company and Mr. Perpich is an employee of the Company. Each of Arthur Golden and Hays Golden (along with Mr. Sulzberger and Mr. Perpich) is a member of the Ochs-Sulzberger family and accordingly, is not considered independent.

Board Committees and Audit Committee Financial Experts

The Board has four standing committees: Audit, Compensation, Finance and Nominating & Governance.

In accordance with applicable NYSE requirements, the Board has determined that all members of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating & Governance Committees are independent and satisfy the relevant independence standards of the Company, the SEC (in the case of the Audit Committee) and the NYSE. See “Board Committees” for committee descriptions and membership.

The Company must disclose annually whether our Audit Committee has one or more “audit committee financial experts,” as defined by the SEC. The Board has determined that Mss. Brooke, Glaser and Toben each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC and satisfy the “financial management expertise” standard of the NYSE. In addition, the Board has determined that every member of the Audit Committee meets the “financial literacy” standard of the NYSE.

Director and Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines

To encourage alignment of the interests of our directors and stockholders, all non-employee directors are expected to own stock in the Company equal in value to at least four times the annual Board cash retainer as set from time to time by the Board. Each non-employee director is expected to accumulate this stock over an approximately five-year period. Stock units held by a director under any director compensation arrangement are included in calculating the value of ownership to determine whether this minimum ownership has been accumulated. All of our directors are in compliance with these guidelines.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 27

In addition, our executive officers are subject to minimum stock ownership guidelines. These guidelines require that the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer own shares of Class A stock equal in value to five times his or her annual base salary. All other executive officers are required to own shares of Class A stock equal in value to two times their annual base salary. Ownership calculations include restricted stock units. Potential share payments under long-term performance awards are not included. An executive officer’s stock holdings are valued at the greater of the fair market value or the officer’s tax basis in the shares (or in the case of restricted stock units, the grant date fair market value). Each executive officer has five years from becoming subject to the guidelines to attain the full holding requirements. The Compensation Committee reviews executive officers’ compliance (or progress towards compliance) annually. In its sole discretion, the Committee may impose such conditions, restrictions or limitations on an executive officer as it determines to be necessary or appropriate to achieve the purposes of the guidelines. The Compensation Committee, and the Company’s General Counsel as its delegate, has the authority to determine matters that might arise under the terms of the guidelines, including the discretion to waive the ownership guidelines upon a showing of good reason. All of our executive officers are in compliance with these guidelines.

Under our insider trading policy, directors, executive officers and employees generally may not engage in short-term, speculative trading in Company stock, such as entering into short sales, buying, selling or writing puts or calls, or engaging in hedging or other derivative transactions; hold Company stock in a margin account; or pledge Company stock as collateral for a loan.

The Board’s Role in Human Capital Management

Recognizing the critical importance of executive leadership to the success of the Company, the Board works with senior management to ensure that effective plans are in place for both short-term and long-term executive succession at the Company. On an annual basis, management reviews with the Board the Company’s leadership pipeline and succession plans for key senior leadership roles. In addition, in consultation with all non-employee directors, the Compensation Committee annually evaluates the performance of the Chairman and Publisher and the Chief Executive Officer. After a deliberate succession planning process, led by Mr. Sulzberger and Mr. McAndrews, the Presiding Director, the Board appointed Ms. Kopit Levien from within the organization to be the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, effective September 2020 upon the retirement of her predecessor, Mark Thompson.

Beyond succession planning and leadership development, the Board and its committees review and discuss with management matters related to human capital management, including diversity, equity and inclusion, talent development, workplace culture and compensation and benefits. In addition, during 2020 and 2021, the Board and its committees regularly reviewed and discussed with management the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the Company’s employees and return to office planning and business and management’s strategies and initiatives to respond to, and mitigate, adverse impacts, including measures to support the health, safety and well-being of employees.

Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Oversight

We believe a healthy and sustainable environment, a diverse, equitable and inclusive workplace, and strong governance practices are each critically important to the long-term success of our business and our stakeholders. The Board is focused on helping identify and address environmental, social and governance risks and opportunities where the Company can be most impactful and/or that are material to our business. Our Board has ultimate responsibility overseeing our ESG practices, policies and initiatives, and receives regular updates from members of management who have the day-to-day responsibility for these matters.

Oversight is handled at the Board level or by the standing committees, each of which reports regularly to the Board:

•Environmental — As part of its oversight of the Company’s enterprise risk management program, the Audit Committee reviews environmental-related risks impacting the Company.

•Social — Diversity, equity and inclusion and succession planning are overseen by the full Board, while the Compensation Committee is responsible for issues such as compensation structure and pay equity.

P. 28 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

•Governance — The Nominating & Governance Committee oversees corporate governance matters, including advising on board structure and composition and key policies, as well as making recommendations to the Board regarding board diversity and board succession planning.

Clawback Policy

In the event of a restatement of the Company’s financial statements due to fraud or intentional misconduct, the Board will review performance-based cash and equity compensation to executive officers whose fraud or intentional misconduct caused the restatement, and the Company will seek to recoup such awards for performance during the period or periods that are the subject of the restatement.

Codes of Ethics and Employee Hotline

The Company has adopted a Business Ethics Policy applicable to all employees, a code of ethics that applies to the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers, and a code of ethics for directors. A printable version of each of these documents is available on our website, as described on page 10.

The Company maintains an employee hotline and online reporting tool to allow employees to lodge complaints, confidentially and anonymously, about any accounting, internal control or auditing matter, any potential securities law violation, or any human resources issue.

Independent Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee has directly engaged an independent compensation consultant, Exequity LLP (“Exequity”). In preparation for the Committee’s decision-making regarding 2021 compensation, Exequity reported on its review of target total compensation for executive officers in relation to a peer group of companies operating in the journalism, media and digital industries, and survey data where applicable. More generally, an Exequity representative regularly attended Compensation Committee meetings and provided general advice on executive and director compensation trends and programs. During the Company’s 2021 fiscal year, Exequity did not provide any services to the Company other than those relating to its role as compensation adviser to the Committee. See “Compensation Committee—Compensation Committee Procedures.”

Communications with Directors

Stockholders may communicate with the Board of Directors by mail care of the Corporate Secretary, The New York Times Company, 620 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018, or by email at nytsecretary@nytimes.com. Stockholders and other interested parties may also express their concerns to the Company’s non-employee directors or the independent directors by contacting the Presiding Director by mail, care of the Corporate Secretary, The New York Times Company, 620 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018, or by email at nytsecretary@nytimes.com.

All such correspondence is handled in accordance with our procedures regarding communications by security holders and other interested parties to the Board of Directors, available on our website, as described on page 10. Such correspondence will be relayed to the appropriate director or directors, unless the Corporate Secretary determines it is primarily commercial in nature, is related to an improper or irrelevant topic or requests general information about the Company.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 29

BOARD MEETINGS AND ATTENDANCE

Total Board Meetings in 2021:  9

Total Committee Meetings in 2021:21

2021 Board and Committee Meeting Attendance:All directors attended 75% or more of the total meetings of the Board and of the committees on which they served.

Annual Meeting Attendance: All directors are generally expected to attend the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders. All directors attended the Company’s 2021 Annual Meeting.

P. 30 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

BOARD COMMITTEES

The Board has four standing committees: Audit, Compensation, Finance and Nominating & Governance.

The following chart sets out the membership and summarizes the principal functions of each standing committee under its charter.

Name of Committee and Members	Principal Functions of the Committee	Meetings in 2021
Audit Rachel Glaser, Chair Amanpal S. Bhutani Beth Brooke Doreen Toben	•Engages the Company’s independent auditors, subject to ratification by the stockholders, and receives periodic reports from the auditors and management regarding the auditors’ independence and other matters. Recommends appropriate action to ensure the auditors’ independence. •Reviews with management and the independent auditors the Company’s quarterly and annual financial statements and other financial disclosures, the adequacy of internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures and major issues regarding accounting principles and practices, including any changes resulting from amendments to the rules of any authoritative body affecting the Company’s financial disclosure. •Meets regularly with the Company’s senior internal audit executive, representatives of management and the independent auditors in separate executive sessions. •Reviews and approves the scope of the audit at the outset and reviews the performance of the independent auditors and any audit problems or difficulties encountered. •Reviews the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies and oversees risks related to, among others, financial reporting, internal controls and information security. •Reviews the scope of the annual audit plan of the Company’s internal audit department, its progress and results. Reviews the responsibility, organization, resources, competence and performance of the Company’s internal audit department. •Prepares the report to stockholders included in the annual Proxy Statement.	6

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 31

Name of Committee and Members	Principal Functions of the Committee	Meetings in 2021
Compensation Doreen Toben, Chair Rachel Glaser Brian P. McAndrews Rebecca Van Dyck	•In consultation with all non-employee directors, evaluates the performance of the Chairman and Publisher and the Chief Executive Officer, and together with the other independent directors, approves their compensation arrangements. •Approves compensation arrangements for the Company’s other executive officers, including base salaries, salary increases, participation in incentive compensation plans and equity awards. •Reviews and approves and, when appropriate, recommends to the Board for approval, incentive compensation plans for all executive officers and broad-based equity-based plans, subject to stockholder approval if required. •Advises the Board on the reasonableness and appropriateness of executive compensation plans and levels generally, including whether these effectively serve the interests of the Company and its stockholders by creating appropriate incentives for high levels of individual and Company performance. •Has such responsibilities for administration of the Company’s employee benefit plans as may be delegated by the Board from time to time, and carries out such responsibilities in part by establishing and delegating responsibilities and authority to an ERISA Management Committee. •Has sole authority to engage an executive compensation consultant. •Reviews and approves the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, considers the results of the most recent stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation and prepares the report to stockholders included in the annual Proxy Statement.	5
Finance John W. Rogers, Jr., Chair Amanpal S. Bhutani Beth Brooke Arthur Golden Hays N. Golden	•Reviews, and makes recommendations to the Board regarding, the Company’s material financial policies, practices and matters, including, without limitation, its dividend policy, investment of cash, stock repurchases and issuances, short- and long-term financings, foreign currency, hedging and derivative transactions, material acquisitions and dispositions, capital expenditures and long-term commitments. •Has such responsibilities for the management and investment of the Company’s employee benefit plan assets as may be delegated to it by the Board from time to time, and carries out such responsibilities in part by establishing and delegating responsibilities and authority to a Pension Investment Committee.	3
Nominating & Governance Rebecca Van Dyck, Chair Manuel Bronstein Brian P. McAndrews John W. Rogers, Jr.	•Recommends director nominees for election to the Board. •Makes recommendations to the Board regarding the structure and composition of the Board Committees, including size and qualifications for membership, director independence, and the designation of a presiding director. •Advises the Board on appropriate compensation for non-employee directors. Assesses periodically the Company’s director stock ownership guidelines and the directors’ ownership relative to such guidelines, and makes recommendations as appropriate. •Advises the Board on corporate governance matters. •Reviews and approves or ratifies transactions with related persons if required in accordance with the Company’s policy. •Oversees annual evaluation of the Board. •Has sole authority to engage a search firm to identify director candidates.	7

P. 32 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

NOMINATING & GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

Our Nominating & Governance Committee consists of four non-employee directors: Rebecca Van Dyck, Chair; Brian P. McAndrews; John W. Rogers, Jr.; and Manuel Bronstein, who joined the Committee upon his appointment to the Board in October 2021. Our Board has determined that each Committee member is “independent” under the corporate governance listing standards of the NYSE.

The Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The principal functions of the Committee include making recommendations to the Board regarding the composition of the Board and its Committees, including size and qualifications for membership, and the designation of a presiding director; recommending nominees to the Board for election; advising the Board on corporate governance matters; and overseeing the evaluation of the Board. The chart set forth in “Board Committees” beginning on page 31 describes the principal functions of the Committee under its charter. A printable version of the charter is available on our website, as described on page 10.

The Committee assesses the Board’s composition each year and, as needed, identifies and evaluates potential director nominees. The Committee considers recommendations of management, stockholders and others. The Committee has sole authority to retain and terminate any search firm used to identify director candidates, including approving its fees and other retention terms. In this regard, from time to time, the Committee has retained a global executive recruiting firm, whose function is to bring specific director candidates to the attention of the Committee.

Consistent with the Company’s Corporate Governance Principles, the Committee considers various criteria in Board candidates, including, among others, independence, character, judgment and business experience, as well as their appreciation of the Company’s mission and values, and whether they have time available to devote to Board responsibilities.

Although the Committee does not have a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying Board candidates, it also considers, as one factor among many, the diversity of Board candidates, which may include diversity of skills and experience, as well as race/ethnicity, gender identity, sexual orientation, age and geographic diversity.

The Committee also considers whether a potential nominee would satisfy:

•the NYSE’s criteria of director “independence;”

•the NYSE’s “financial literacy” and “financial management expertise” standards; and

•the SEC’s definition of “audit committee financial expert.”

Director candidates are evaluated in light of the then-existing composition of the Board, including its overall size and structure, the backgrounds and areas of expertise of existing directors and the relative mix of independent and management directors. The Committee also considers the specific needs of the various Board committees. The Committee recommends potential director nominees to the Board, and final approval of a candidate is determined by the Board.

Manuel Bronstein was appointed as a director by the Board on October 12, 2021, and is standing for election by the stockholders for the first time at the 2022 Annual Meeting. He was identified by a global executive recruiting firm retained by the Committee. After Mr. Bronstein met with members of the Committee, including the Chair, and various other members of the Board, the Committee recommended to the Board that it appoint him as a director.

Each other individual who is standing for election to the Board at the 2022 Annual Meeting is currently a director and was elected by stockholders at the 2021 Annual Meeting.

As discussed elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust, as holder of a majority of our Class B stock, has the right to elect 70% of our Board. The Committee considers, among other potential nominees, recommendations of the trustees of the Ochs-Sulzberger Trust for nominees to be elected by the holders of the Class B stock.

In addition, the Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders. Stockholders wishing to recommend director candidates for consideration by the Committee may do so by writing to the Corporate Secretary, The New York Times Company, 620 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018, and providing the recommended nominee’s name, biographical data and qualifications, accompanied by the written consent of the

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 33

recommended nominee. The evaluation process for director nominees who are recommended by our stockholders is the same as for any nominee.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Compensation Committee Procedures

Our Board of Directors has established a Compensation Committee and charged it with the responsibility to review and either act on behalf of the Board or make recommendations to the Board concerning executive compensation and employee benefits. The Compensation Committee consists of four non-employee directors: Doreen Toben, Chair; Rachel Glaser; Brian P. McAndrews; and Rebecca Van Dyck. Our Board has determined that each Committee member is “independent” under the corporate governance listing standards of the NYSE.

The Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. A printable version of the charter is available on our website, as described on page 10. The chart set forth in “Board Committees” beginning on page 31 describes the principal functions of the Committee under its charter.

Under its charter, the Committee has sole authority to retain and terminate a consulting firm to assist in its evaluation of executive compensation. In accordance with this authority, in preparation for its decision-making regarding 2021 compensation, the Committee directly engaged an independent compensation consultant, Exequity. Exequity reported on its review of target total compensation for executive officers in relation to a peer group of companies operating in the journalism, media and digital industries, and survey data where applicable. Exequity also provided general advice on executive and director compensation trends and programs. In the course of advising the Committee, Exequity occasionally is asked to provide guidance and support to management in connection with matters that are reviewed by the Committee. These matters may pertain to, among other things, competitive analysis, program design recommendations, technical support and cost modeling.

During the Company’s 2021 fiscal year, Exequity did not provide any services to the Company other than those relating to its role as compensation adviser to the Committee. After considering the factors required by NYSE rules, the Committee is satisfied that Exequity is independent.

The Committee generally consults with management regarding executive compensation matters, and our Chief Executive Officer makes compensation recommendations for the executive officers who report to her. The Company’s human resources, legal, controller and treasury departments support the Committee in its work.

Throughout the year, the Committee meets to discuss the Company’s executive compensation and benefits programs and related matters. Each year, the Committee generally takes the following actions:

•together with the other independent directors of the Board, approves the compensation of the Chairman and Publisher and the Chief Executive Officer, including setting salaries and approving annual and long-term incentive potentials;

•approves compensation for the other executive officers;

•sets financial targets for annual incentive and long-term performance awards;

•approves awards of equity-based compensation for eligible employees; and

•determines the achievement of performance goals for the recently completed annual and long-term performance periods and approves the payment of those awards.

The Committee has delegated the authority to make equity grants in limited circumstances, such as to newly hired or recently promoted employees, to a three-member management committee authorized to grant a limited number of equity awards under specified parameters.

The Committee has reviewed and discussed with Company management the section of this Proxy Statement titled “Compensation of Executive Officers—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” and its report to stockholders stating that it has recommended the inclusion of such discussion and analysis appears below under “Compensation of Executive Officers” on page 42.

P. 34 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No member of the Committee is now, or was during 2021 or any time prior thereto, an officer or employee of the Company. No member of the Committee had any relationship with the Company during 2021 pursuant to which disclosure would be required under applicable SEC rules about the disclosure of transactions with related persons. None of our executive officers currently serves or ever has served as a member of the board of directors, the compensation committee, or any similar body, of any entity one of whose executive officers serves or served on our Board or the Committee.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

To the Stockholders of The New York Times Company:

The Audit Committee consists of four non-employee directors: Rachel Glaser, Chair; Amanpal S. Bhutani; Beth Brooke and Doreen Toben. The Board of Directors has determined that:

•each Committee member is “independent” under the listing standards of the NYSE and is “financially literate” as defined by the NYSE;

•Mss. Glaser, Brooke and Toben satisfy the “financial management expertise” standard, as required by the NYSE; and

•Mss. Glaser, Brooke and Toben are “audit committee financial experts” as defined by the SEC.

The Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors and reviewed annually by the Committee. A printable version of the charter is available on our website, as described on page 10. The chart set forth in “Board Committees” beginning on page 31 describes the principal functions of the Committee under its charter.

Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the financial reporting process, including the system of internal control over financial reporting. Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”), the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, is responsible for performing an independent integrated audit of (i) the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (the “PCAOB”), and (ii) the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, and for issuing its reports thereon.

The Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in monitoring (i) the integrity of the Company’s financial statements; (ii) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (iii) the qualifications and independence of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm; (iv) the performance of the Company’s internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm; and (v) the Company’s systems of disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting.

In addition, the Committee’s charter requires that the Committee review the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. As part of its responsibilities for oversight of the Company’s enterprise risk management program, the Committee annually reviews and discusses an assessment prepared by management of the critical risks facing the Company, their relative magnitude and management’s actions to mitigate them.

The Committee has also established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters or potential securities law violations, and the confidential and anonymous submission by Company employees of concerns regarding such matters.

The Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of Ernst & Young. As part of its oversight function, the Committee has adopted certain policies to ensure that Ernst & Young’s provision of services does not impair the firm’s independence. Each year, the Committee considers whether to reappoint Ernst & Young, subject to stockholder ratification, to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. As part of this process, the Committee considers, among other things, the continued independence of Ernst & Young, the depth of the firm’s and audit team’s experience, and the quality and efficiency of the services provided by Ernst & Young.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 35

During 2021, the Committee met six times and held separate discussions with management, the Company’s internal auditors and Ernst & Young. The full Committee reviews with management and Ernst & Young the earnings announcements and quarterly financial statements for each of the first three quarters. The Committee’s Chair, as the representative of the Committee, discusses the Company’s fourth-quarter and full-year earnings announcement with the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, its Chief Accounting Officer and Ernst & Young prior to public release; other members of the Committee also generally participate in this discussion. In addition, the Committee reviews with management and Ernst & Young the Company’s annual financial statements. The Committee also reviews and discusses the Company’s compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act with respect to internal control over financial reporting.

Management has represented to the Committee that the Company’s 2021 annual consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Committee reviewed and discussed with management, the Company’s internal auditors and Ernst & Young the Company’s 2021 annual consolidated financial statements and Ernst & Young’s audit report thereon, and Ernst & Young’s audit report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. In addition, the Committee reviewed and discussed with management the annual report of management on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

The Committee has also discussed with Ernst & Young the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standard No. 1301 (formerly No. 16), Communication with Audit Committees, as adopted by the PCAOB, including, among other items, matters related to the conduct of the audit of the Company’s 2021 annual consolidated financial statements.

In addition, the Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young required by the PCAOB regarding Ernst & Young’s communications with the Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with Ernst & Young their firm’s independence from the Company and management.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board has approved, that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2021, for filing with the SEC.

The Committee also has recommended, subject to stockholder ratification, the selection of Ernst & Young as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022.

Rachel Glaser, Chair

Amanpal S. Bhutani

Beth Brooke

Doreen Toben

P. 36 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

PROPOSAL NUMBER 2—SELECTION OF AUDITORS

The Audit Committee has selected the firm of Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as our auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022, subject to ratification of such selection by the Class A and Class B stockholders voting together as one class.

Ernst & Young has informed us that the firm has no direct financial interest nor any material indirect financial interest in us or any of our affiliated companies. Ernst & Young has not had any connection during the past three years with us or any of our affiliated companies in the capacity of promoter, underwriter, voting trustee, director, officer or employee.

A representative of Ernst & Young will be present at the Annual Meeting and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders. The representative will also have the opportunity to make a statement if she or he decides to do so.

Recommendation and Vote Required

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the following resolution, which will be presented at the Annual Meeting:

RESOLVED,that the selection, by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, of Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as auditors of The New York Times Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022, is hereby ratified, confirmed and approved.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Class A stock and Class B stock represented at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal, voting together as a single class, is required pursuant to the Company’s By-laws for approval of this resolution. As a result, abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.

Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Our Audit Committee Charter requires the Audit Committee to pre-approve the rendering by our independent registered public accounting firm of all auditing services, internal control-related services and permitted non-audit services. The Chair of the Audit Committee may pre-approve the rendering of such services (other than internal control-related services) on behalf of the Committee, provided the matter is then presented to the full Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

Audit and Other Fees

The following table presents the aggregate fees incurred for audit and other services rendered by Ernst & Young during fiscal years 2021 and 2020, all of which services were approved by the Audit Committee.

Service Type	Fiscal 2021		Fiscal 2020
Audit Fees	$	2,535,700	$	2,717,900
Audit-Related Fees	—		—
Tax Fees	297,200		312,400
All Other Fees	—		—
Total Fees Billed	$	2,832,900	$	3,030,300

Audit Fees ($2,535,700; $2,717,900).This category includes the aggregate fees billed by Ernst & Young for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements, the reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, consents related to documents filed with the SEC and services normally provided by the independent auditor in connection with statutory and regulatory filings. Audit fees also include fees for professional services rendered for the audit of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

Audit-Related Fees.No audit-related fees were paid in 2021 or 2020.

Tax Fees ($297,200; $312,400).This category includes the aggregate fees billed by Ernst & Young for services in connection with tax advice and planning, tax returns, claims for refunds and tax payment planning.

All Other Fees.No other fees were paid in 2021 or 2020.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 37

DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION

2021 Compensation of Non-Employee Directors

Our goal in setting compensation for our non-employee directors is to remain competitive in attracting and retaining high-quality directors. Compensation for our non-employee directors for 2021 had the following components: cash compensation, consisting of annual retainers for non-employee Board members, Committee Chairs, Committee members and the Presiding Director; and equity compensation in the form of restricted stock units for all non-employee Board members.

Each year, management reports to the Nominating & Governance Committee on non-employee director compensation and makes recommendations with respect to the amount and form of compensation for non-employee directors. In 2020, the Nominating & Governance Committee received a report from Exequity, the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, analyzing prevailing trends in director compensation. Based on this review, the Nominating & Governance Committee recommended and the Board approved an increase in the grant date fair value of the annual grant of restricted stock units for Class A stock to $150,000, effective April 28, 2021. This adjustment was made to maintain the competitiveness of our director compensation program and to further align the directors’ interests with our stockholders.

The Nominating & Governance Committee and the Board believe that our non-employee director compensation program is appropriately aligned with long-term stockholder interests because directors are subject to stock ownership guidelines (four times the annual Board cash retainer), and the shares of Class A stock payable in respect of vested restricted stock units are not delivered until a director leaves the Board. Non-employee directors have five years from their appointment to meet their stock ownership requirement and all of our non-employee directors have met or are on track to do so within the five-year period.

Cash Compensation.In 2021, we paid an annual cash retainer (in quarterly installments) to non-employee Board members, Committee Chairs and Committee members and the Presiding Director as follows:

•Annual cash Board retainer of $60,000;

•Annual cash Committee Chair retainer of $10,000;

•Annual cash Committee retainers in the following amounts:

— Audit—$20,000

— Compensation—$10,000

— Finance—$10,000

— Nominating & Governance—$6,000; and

•Annual cash Presiding Director retainer of $25,000.

Restricted Stock Units. On the date of the 2021 Annual Meeting, the Company granted 3,264 restricted stock units for Class A stock (with a grant date fair value of $150,000) to each non-employee director. These restricted stock units will vest on the date of the 2022 Annual Meeting (assuming continued service on the Board of Directors until that date), and the underlying shares of Class A stock will be distributed to each non-employee director within 90 days following his or her cessation of service from the Board. Each non-employee director’s account is credited with additional restricted stock units with a value equal to the amount of all dividends paid on the Company’s Class A stock.

Expenses.We reimburse reasonable expenses incurred for attendance at Board and Committee meetings and director orientation or other relevant educational programs.

P. 38 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

Non-Employee Director Compensation Table

The total 2021 compensation of our non-employee directors is shown in the following table.        

Name (a)	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash1 ($) (b)	Stock  Awards2,3 ($) (c)	Option  Awards ($) (d)	All Other Compensation ($) (g)	Total ($) (h)
Amanpal S. Bhutani	90,000	150,000	—	—	240,000
Manuel Bronstein	14,527	81,000	—	—	95,527
Beth Brooke	60,824	150,000	—	—	210,824
Robert E. Denham4	29,423	—	—	10,000	39,423
Rachel Glaser	96,758	150,000	—	—	246,758
Arthur Golden	66,758	186,000	—	—	252,758
Hays N. Golden	70,000	150,000	—	—	220,000
Brian P. McAndrews	104,296	150,000	—	—	254,296
John W. Rogers, Jr.	86,000	150,000	—	—	236,000
Doreen Toben	100,000	150,000	—	—	250,000
Rebecca Van Dyck	86,000	150,000	—	—	236,000

1.Includes a Presiding Director retainer for Mr. McAndrews and a Committee Chair retainer for each of Mr. Denham, Ms. Glaser, Mr. Rogers, Ms. Toben and Ms. Van Dyck. The cash retainers for Ms. Brooke, Mr. Bronstein and Mr. Denham were prorated for partial year service, as applicable.

2.Included in the “Stock Awards” column is the aggregate grant date fair value of the discretionary grant of restricted stock units made to each non-employee director on April 28, 2021, under the 2020 Incentive Plan, computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Stock Compensation (“FASB ASC Topic 718”). The grant date fair value of such awards is estimated as $150,000. In addition to this award, Arthur Golden received a grant of 714 restricted stock units (valued at $36,000), a pro rata amount reflecting his Board services from January 1, 2021 to the date of the 2021 Annual Meeting, and Mr. Bronstein received a grant of 1,602 restricted stock units (valued at $81,000), a pro rata amount reflecting his Board service from October 12, 2021 to the date of the 2022 Annual Meeting.

3.The following table shows the aggregate unvested restricted stock units and phantom stock units outstanding at December 26, 2021, for each non-employee director:

Name	Aggregate Unvested Restricted Stock Units Outstanding at December 26, 2021 (#)a	Aggregate Phantom Stock Units Outstanding at December 26, 2021 (#)b
Amanpal S. Bhutani	3,273	—
Manuel Bronstein	1,602	—
Beth Brooke	3,273	—
Rachel Glaser	3,273	—
Arthur Golden	3,273	—
Hays N. Golden	3,273	—
Brian P. McAndrews	3,273	16,508
John W. Rogers, Jr.	3,273	—
Doreen Toben	3,273	80,948
Rebecca Van Dyck	3,273	—

(a)Includes aggregate number of unvested restricted stock units, including unvested restricted stock units credited to each non-employee director’s account in respect of cash dividends paid on the Class A stock in

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 39

2021. Additional unvested restricted stock units were credited to each non-employee director’s account in January 2022 in respect of the Company’s fourth quarter cash dividend.

(b)    Prior to 2015, a discretionary grant of phantom Class A stock units was credited to each non-employee director’s account under the Directors’ Deferral Plan on the date of the Company’s annual meeting. Aggregate phantom stock units outstanding reflect grants prior to the termination of the Directors’ Deferral Plan in December 2014, and include amounts credited in 2021 in connection with dividend equivalents, which are initially held as cash and converted to phantom stock units as of the date of the Company’s next succeeding annual meeting. Cash accounts are also credited with interest at a market rate. Subsequent to a non-employee director’s resignation, we pay him or her the cash value of amounts accumulated in his or her account.

4. The amount for Mr. Denham includes a one-time $10,000 donation made in his honor to a nonprofit organization upon his retirement from the Board.

P. 40 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

DIRECTORS’ AND OFFICERS’ LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Company maintains directors’ and officers’ liability insurance effective July 1, 2021, with an expiration date of July 1, 2022. The program was purchased at an annual cost of approximately $1.4 million. The insurance companies providing directors’ and officers’ liability insurance are Zurich American Insurance Company, Chubb - ACE American Insurance Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, Sompo - Endurance Assurance Corporation, Swiss Re - North American Specialty Insurance Company, CNA - Continental Casualty Company, Nationwide - National Casualty Company, Allied World Assurance Company (U.S.), Inc., Great American Insurance Company, Berkley - Berkley Professional Liability, LLC and Beazley Insurance Company, Inc.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 41

COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with Company management the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” appearing below, and based on this review and discussions, the Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into the Company’s 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Doreen Toben, Chair

Rachel Glaser

Brian P. McAndrews

Rebecca Van Dyck

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

We believe that our executive officers are critical to our success and to the creation of long-term stockholder value. We structure compensation for our executive officers based on the following objectives:

•to drive performance through the achievement of short-term and long-term objectives;

•to link our executives’ total compensation to the interests of our stockholders and to drive the creation of value for stockholders over the long term; and

•to enable us to attract, retain and motivate the highest caliber of executives by offering competitive compensation and rewarding superior performance.

The discussion below analyzes 2021 executive compensation for the following executive officers whose compensation is set out in the Summary Compensation Table (our “named executive officers”):

•A.G. Sulzberger, Chairman of the Board and Publisher, The New York Times;

•Meredith Kopit Levien, President and Chief Executive Officer;

•Roland Caputo, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer;

•Diane Brayton, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary; and

•Jacqueline Welch, Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer (effective January 11, 2021).

Executive Summary

Executive Compensation Governance

Key executive compensation practices are summarized below. We believe these practices promote good governance and align the interests of our executive officers with the interests of our stockholders.

What We DO:

☑ The Compensation Committee consists solely of independent directors, notwithstanding an exemption from NYSE rules available to us as a controlled company.

☑ Each year, the Compensation Committee approves the compensation for the Company’s executive officers. For the Chairman and Publisher and the Chief Executive Officer, final compensation decisions are approved by the independent members of our Board of Directors.

☑ The Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, Exequity, is retained directly by the Committee and performs services in support of the Committee. The Compensation Committee’s charter authorizes it to engage such consultants and advisors as it determines to be appropriate.

P. 42 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

☑ At the direction of the Compensation Committee, management reaches out to significant stockholders periodically to solicit comments on executive compensation matters, and the Committee takes this stockholder feedback into account in designing executive compensation.

☑ Each year the Compensation Committee conducts a review of the Company’s executive compensation program to ensure that it does not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

☑ Performance-based cash and equity awards to executives are made under the Company’s current stockholder-approved incentive plan, which:

◦requires a one-year minimum vesting schedule for awards, with limited exceptions;

◦prohibits the repricing of any stock option or stock appreciation right without stockholder approval;

◦prohibits dividend-equivalent rights with respect to stock options and stock appreciation rights, and prohibits the payment of dividends and dividend equivalents with respect to unvested share-based awards;

◦does not provide for automatic vesting of awards in the event of a change in control; and

◦does not contain an “evergreen” share reserve, meaning that the shares of Class A stock reserved for awards are fixed by number rather than by reference to a percentage of the Company’s total outstanding shares.

☑ The Company has in place meaningful stock ownership guidelines for its executive officers to further align their interests with those of our stockholders.

☑ The Company’s executive officers are subject to a compensation recoupment or “clawback” policy that applies to performance-based cash and equity compensation.

What We Do Not Do:

☒ The Company’s executive officers may not engage in short-term, speculative trading in Company stock, including hedging or other derivative transactions, hold Company stock in a margin account or pledge Company stock as collateral for a loan.

☒ The Company does not provide so-called tax “gross-ups” for its executive officers.

☒ The Company does not provide significant perquisites for executive officers.

Compensation Highlights

In 2021, we continued to focus on strategic goals intended to enhance long-term stockholder value, including further growth of our digital subscriber base and innovation of our products.

Our paid digital subscription model, launched in 2011, had its second best year ever for net subscription additions, surpassed only by 2020. At year-end 2021, we had approximately 7.6 million paid subscribers and approximately 8.8 million total paid subscriptions to our products, and 2021 revenues from our digital-only subscriptions increased 29.4% year-over-year to approximately $774 million. We believe that the significant growth over the last several years in subscriptions to The Times’s products demonstrates the success of our “subscription-first” strategy and willingness of our readers to pay for high-quality journalism and other products.

In 2021, our revenue growth was also driven by a recovering advertising market: digital advertising revenues grew 35.0% compared with the prior year and 18.5% compared with 2019, an important point of comparison given the impact that the global pandemic had on 2020 advertising revenues.

Total revenues increased 16.3% to just over $2 billion in 2021, and the Company recorded its strongest operating profit and adjusted operating profit in many years. The profit growth in 2021 led to another year of strong cash flow that added to a robust balance sheet, which has improved meaningfully over the past decade. Our strong

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 43

balance sheet and our confidence in the continued cash-generative nature of our business model enabled our all-cash acquisition of The Athletic, a transaction announced in January 2022 and completed in early February 2022. The Athletic is a global digital subscription-based sports media business that provides national and local coverage of more than 200 clubs and teams in the United States and around the world, and its acquisition is a strategic move intended to further accelerate our subscriber growth.

In early 2019, we established a goal of reaching 10 million subscriptions by 2025, a target we have now surpassed. In February 2022, we announced a new target: at least 15 million total subscribers by year-end 2027.

In February 2022, we also announced that our Board of Directors authorized a $150 million share repurchase and a 29% increase in the quarterly dividend.

During the year, we continued to make significant investments in our journalism, brand and products, while taking steps to position our organization for further growth. These efforts took place while we continued to maintain the highest standards of journalism, highlighted by numerous awards and accolades.

Details of our 2021 financial results appear in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2021.

Key highlights with respect to the Company’s executive compensation program are as follows:

•Salaries: For 2021, annual salary levels for the named executive officers were unchanged from the prior year. See “—Executive Compensation—Salaries.”

•Annual Incentive Compensation: For 2021, the Company’s performance exceeded the maximum financial performance targets set by the Compensation Committee for annual incentive awards (based on adjusted operating profit). Based on that performance, as well as its consideration of certain other factors, the Committee approved payouts of the portion of 2021 annual incentive awards based on Company performance at 175% for the Chairman and Publisher and the Chief Executive Officer and at 185% for the other named executive officers. See “—Executive Compensation—Annual Incentive Compensation.”

•Long-Term Performance Award Program:

◦Compensation for 2021 included a payout under the 2019-2021 long-term performance award program. The portion of the award based on cumulative adjusted operating profit (60% of the executives’ target award; half paid in Class A stock and half paid in cash) was earned at 200% of target, and the portion based on relative total stockholder return (40% of the executives’ target; payable in Class A stock) was earned at 176% of the target. See “—Executive Compensation—Long-Term Incentive Compensation.”

◦In February 2022, the Compensation Committee approved various changes to the Company’s long-term incentive compensation program, including to provide that all payouts would be in Class A stock only rather than a mix of cash and stock, to add digital subscription revenue targets to the long-term financial metrics and to award time-based restricted stock units as one component of executives’ long-term equity compensation. See “—Executive Compensation—Long-Term Incentive Compensation—Changes to Long-Term Incentive Compensation for 2022” for more information.

Stockholder Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation and Stockholder Outreach

At our 2021 Annual Meeting, we held an advisory vote on executive compensation (“say-on-pay” vote). Under our Certificate of Incorporation, the say-on-pay vote is an item on which our Class B stockholders vote, and the Class B stockholders overwhelmingly supported the say-on-pay proposal in 2021.

Although Class A stockholders are not able to vote on the say-on-pay proposal, management engages in regular outreach to representatives of significant holders of our Class A common stock to solicit their feedback on executive compensation matters.

The Committee considers the results of the say-on-pay vote as well as the views of significant Class A stockholders in designing executive compensation.

P. 44 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

Compensation-Setting Process

The Compensation Committee, which consists solely of independent directors, is primarily responsible for overseeing compensation for our executive officers, including the named executive officers. Each year, the Committee approves the compensation for the Company’s executive officers other than the Chairman and Publisher and the Chief Executive Officer, for whom final compensation decisions are made by the independent members of our Board of Directors, in consultation with the other non-employee directors.

The Committee generally reviews employee compensation matters with management. Our human resources, legal, controller and treasury departments support the Committee in its work and help administer our compensation programs. The members of the Committee also familiarize themselves with compensation trends and competitive conditions through periodic consultations with compensation experts, including Exequity, and the review of market data and other information about relevant market practices. In addition, the Committee has directed management to meet with representatives of significant stockholders to solicit their feedback on executive compensation matters.

A discussion of the composition and procedures of the Committee, including the role of Exequity, is set forth above under “Compensation Committee—Compensation Committee Procedures” on page 34.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 45

Components of Compensation

To achieve our compensation objectives, the Compensation Committee structured 2021 executive compensation to have the following components, each of which is discussed in more detail below. The compensation structure is performance-oriented, with “at risk” compensation consisting of annual and long-term incentive programs designed to link the compensation of our named executive officers to the overall success of the Company and support the Company’s business strategy and performance.

In addition to these components of compensation, executives participate in employee benefit plans that are generally available to the Company’s employees, including medical, life insurance and disability plans, and a Company 401(k) Plan that provides a match on employee contributions and discretionary profit-sharing contributions. Certain executives are also participants in two unfunded non-qualified defined contribution plans, one of which was frozen as of December 31, 2013, and two unfunded nonqualified defined benefit plans that were frozen as of December 31, 2009. See “—Executive Compensation—Other Elements of Executive Compensation” for more information.

P. 46 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

The following charts show the components of 2021 target compensation established for Ms. Kopit Levien, our CEO, and our other named executive officers, as well as the percentage of total variable or “at risk” compensation:

Key Factors in Setting Compensation

In setting or recommending an executive’s compensation, the Committee evaluates each of the following factors:

•Benchmarking—Each year, the Committee reviews an analysis of executive compensation levels and practices for each executive prepared by Exequity. In December 2020, in preparation for its decision-making regarding 2021 compensation levels, the Committee reviewed each element of target total compensation in relation to a peer group of 25 companies listed below that operate in the journalism, media and digital industries. The peer group reflects the inclusion of six additional companies with a focus on technology and/or subscriptions. The new companies added are marked with an asterisk in the table below. Where peer group data was unavailable due to limited matches or lack of comparability, the Committee reviewed data provided from the Willis Towers Watson 2020 Media Executive Compensation Survey, which included 55 companies that fit within an all-media industry category.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 47

Compensation Peer Group for Benchmarking
AMC Networks	J2 Global, Inc.2	Tribune Publishing Company
Discovery, Inc.	Meredith Corporation	TripAdvisor, Inc.*
Entercom Communication Corp.1*	News Corporation	Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.3
Gannett Co., Inc.	Nexstar Media Group, Inc.	Twitter, Inc.*
Gray Television, Inc.*	Scholastic Corporation	Yelp Inc.
Hearst Communication, Inc.	Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc.	Zillow Group, Inc.
IAC/InterActiveCorp	TEGNA Inc.	Zynga Inc.*
iHeartMedia, Inc.*	The E.W. Scripps Company
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.	Tribune Media Company3

1.Entercom Communication Corp. was renamed Audacy, Inc. in April 2021.

2.J2 Global, Inc. was renamed Ziff Davis, Inc. in October 2021.

3.Tribune Media Company and Turner Broadcasting, private companies, did not participate in the Willis Towers Watson 2020 Media Executive Compensation Survey, and therefore, were not included in the review.

In setting compensation for executives, the Committee reviews, among other factors, target total compensation for the Company’s executives in relation to the peer group’s 50th percentile. Individual total target compensation may be higher or lower than the 50th percentile based on a number of factors, including experience and tenure, retention and succession planning considerations, challenges in matching a particular role at the Company to market data and year-to-year swings in the benchmark data. 

•Performance—The Committee ties a substantial portion of each named executive officer’s compensation to Company performance, as well as a portion to individual performance. All executive officers, including the named executive officers, are eligible for annual and long-term incentive compensation that reinforces the relationship between pay and performance by linking compensation to the achievement of important short- and long-term Company performance targets. These targets are set by the Committee in advance based on the Company’s objectives as set out in its operating budget and three-year plan. Executives with a greater responsibility for the development of the Company’s strategic plan and its successful execution have a greater portion of their total compensation delivered in variable, performance-based compensation.

For those executives who report to the Chief Executive Officer, the Committee takes into consideration Ms. Kopit Levien’s review of their performance during the year.

•Internal Pay Equity—The Committee’s approach to compensation is that executives holding comparable positions of responsibility should have similar compensation opportunities, adjusted to reflect their responsibilities and role within the Company and recognizing that actual rewards earned should reflect personal performance and achievement of individual objectives.

•Tally Sheets—The Committee also reviewed tally sheets detailing the total compensation of the named executive officers. These tally sheets identified all components of compensation for these executives, including the compensation such executives would be eligible to receive under different termination scenarios, as described in “—Payment Upon Termination or Change in Control Table.”

At the completion of this review, the Committee concluded that the compensation to be paid to executives in 2021 was appropriate and reasonable in light of the factors discussed above.

P. 48 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

Setting Performance Goals

A substantial portion of each named executive officer’s compensation depends on the achievement of specific incentive targets that are directly linked to short- or long-term performance objectives. Performance is measured against the Company’s annual operating budget and three-year plan, which are developed and submitted to the Board by management at the beginning of each year and are based on an assessment of the state of the business and the industry at that time, as well as expectations regarding annual and long-term performance. The annual operating budget and three-year plan set financial performance objectives that management believes are aggressive but achievable based on the underlying strategic and operating assumptions regarding revenue, expense projections and investment initiatives.

Historically, the Committee has set a target performance level for a 100% payout at the same level as the relevant objective. While future results cannot be predicted, the Committee believes that these performance targets are set at levels such that achievement of the target levels would reflect a strong performance on the part of the executive officers and that payment of the maximum amounts would occur only upon the achievement of results substantially in excess of internal and market expectations at the time the targets are set.

The Company’s annual operating budget and three-year plan are created independent of, and therefore the financial performance targets generally exclude, the effect of certain non-recurring or non-operational events.

Executive Compensation

Salaries

Salaries for executive officers are reviewed annually and are intended to provide competitive compensation to each executive based on position, scope of responsibility, business and leadership experience, performance and market positioning. For 2021, the Committee reviewed executive officer salaries and recommended no changes based on its consideration of these factors.

Annual Incentive Compensation

The Committee grants awards under an annual incentive compensation program that provides executives the opportunity to earn cash based on the achievement of financial and individual performance goals.

In February 2021, the Committee set 2021 annual incentive targets for all executives, including the named executive officers, as a percentage of salary. The target percentages were set taking into account a number of factors, including prevailing external practices, the Committee’s consideration of the nature of the position and internal pay equity concerns. Generally, the more responsible the executive officer’s position, the higher the target percentage. For the named executive officers, target amounts ranged from 55% to 100% of base salary.

The Committee structured 2021 annual incentive compensation, payable in cash, for executives, including the named executive officers, as follows:

2021 Annual Incentive Compensation
Component	Measure	Percentage
Financial target	Adjusted Operating Profit1	75%
Individual target	Assessment of achievement measured against predetermined operational and strategic goals	25%

1.Adjusted Operating Profit is defined as (i) revenues less (ii) total operating costs (excluding severance, depreciation and amortization and multiemployer pension plan withdrawal costs), adjusted to exclude the effect of any acquisitions and dispositions.

Financial Component

The Committee believes that adjusted operating profit is a valuable measure of our performance for compensation purposes because it facilitates comparisons with historical operating performance on a consistent basis. In addition, adjusted operating profit is a measure often used by investors, analysts and others to assess Company performance, and thus serves to align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 49

For 2021, the performance level for a 100% payout of the financial component was set at the operating budget objective, with potential payouts ranging from zero to 200% of target based upon a predetermined performance scale. The following table sets out the 2021 adjusted operating profit targets and achievement level.

2021 Financial Performance Component
(dollars in thousands)	Threshold (10%) Payout ($)	Target (100%) Payout ($)	Maximum (200%) Potential Payout ($)	2021 Actual ($)
Adjusted operating profit1	220,472	263,472	306,472	335,399

1.See Appendix A for the calculation of 2021 adjusted operating profit.

As noted in the table, for 2021, the Company’s financial performance exceeded the maximum adjusted operating profit target set by the Committee based on the Company’s 2021 operating budget by a significant amount. This outperformance was driven principally by a combination of stronger than budgeted advertising revenues and lower than budgeted costs, primarily lower than budgeted compensation expense due to a slowness in hiring and increased employee attrition in 2021, partially offset by higher than budgeted marketing and other costs. Based on an analysis of the components of actual 2021 adjusted operating profit compared with the 2021 operating budget, in particular, the impact of the lower compensation expense compared to the operating budget, management recommended and, the Committee approved, a downward adjustment in the payout percentages of the portion of 2021 annual incentive awards based on Company performance from the maximum potential 200% payout to 175% for the Chairman and Publisher and the Chief Executive Officer, and 185% for the other named executive officers.

Individual Component

As noted above, 25% of the annual incentive award was based upon an assessment of the executive’s individual achievement with respect to operational and strategic goals. In its review, the Committee took into account each executive’s responsibility for the Company’s overall performance, as well as, for Mr. Caputo and Mss. Brayton and Welch, Ms. Kopit Levien’s recommendation. In particular, the Committee took into account (i) for Mr. Sulzberger and Ms. Kopit Levien, their leadership and effective partnership during a year of strong financial results, journalistic coverage and innovation; (ii) for Mr. Caputo, his continued substantial contributions as chief financial officer as the Company’s operations grew and became more complex; (iii) for Ms. Brayton, her significant contributions leading a legal team that advised on a range of critical matters, including the acquisition of The Athletic, litigation management and labor relations; and (iv) for Ms. Welch, her effective leadership of the Company’s human resources function during her first year, including the development and execution of the Company’s diversity, equity and inclusion strategy and her vision for human capital management more broadly.

The Committee assessed the individual achievement of each of the named executive officers as follows:

Name	Individual Achievement
A.G. Sulzberger	120%
Meredith Kopit Levien	120%
Roland Caputo	120%
Diane Brayton	130%
Jacqueline Welch	130%

Resulting 2021 Annual Incentive Payouts

The following table sets out, for each named executive officer, the 2021 base annual salary and the 2021 target, potential maximum and actual annual incentive amounts, in dollars and as a percentage of the executive’s 2021 base salary.

P. 50 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

Name	Target ($)1 (% of base salary)			Potential Maximum ($) (% of base salary)			Actual ($) (% of base salary)
A.G. Sulzberger	$	612,001	100%	$	1,224,002	200%	$	986,852	161%
Meredith Kopit Levien	$	900,000	100%	$	1,800,000	200%	$	1,451,250	161%
Roland Caputo	$	635,076	100%	$	1,270,152	200%	$	1,071,691	169%
Diane Brayton	$	410,630	70%	$	821,260	140%	$	703,203	120%
Jacqueline Welch	$	267,466	55%	$	534,932	110%	$	458,035	92%

1.For Ms. Welch, who joined the Company on January 11, 2021, the incentive target amount has been prorated.

2022 Annual Incentive Compensation

Annual cash incentive compensation for executives in 2022 will be based on financial and individual goals. Performance targets will include the results of The Athletic from February 1, 2022, the date of its acquisition.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

The Committee grants awards annually under a long-term incentive compensation program that has historically provided executives the opportunity to earn cash and shares of Class A stock at the end of three-year performance cycles based on the achievement of specified performance goals. The Committee believes this program aligns the interest of executives with the fulfillment of our long-term strategic objectives and rewards them in relation to the achievement of these goals.

In 2021, long-term incentive compensation consisted of the grant of long-term performance-based awards for the 2021-2023 performance cycle and the payout of the 2019-2021 long-term performance-based awards.

Long-Term Performance Awards for 2021-2023

For the 2021-2023 performance cycle, long-term awards are based on the achievement of specified goals under two performance measures:

•Cumulative adjusted operating profit: represents 60% of an executive’s target award, with half paid in Class A stock and half paid in cash; and

•Relative total stockholder return, or “TSR,” of the Company: represents 40% of an executive’s target award and is paid entirely in Class A stock. This metric, referred to as “Relative TSR,” compares the Company’s TSR over the three-year period relative to the TSR of the companies in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index as of the beginning of the performance period.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 51

The components of the long-term performance awards are illustrated below:

Adjusted Operating Profit Component

The Committee believes that adjusted operating profit is a strong reflection of the Company’s underlying operating performance. The selection of this financial measure for the three-year performance cycle is intended to focus management on normalized operating profit, which allows the Company to make critical investments in its long-term growth strategy. This metric is a valuable measure of performance for compensation purposes because it facilitates comparisons of historical operating performance on a consistent basis and is often used by investors, analysts and others.

For the adjusted operating profit component, the performance level for a 100% payout was set in connection with the Company’s three-year plan, which is developed and submitted to the Board by management at the beginning of each year and based on an assessment of the state of the business and the industry at that time, as well as expectations regarding the Company’s long-term adjusted operating profit performance.

Potential payouts for this component of the awards range from zero to 200% of target based upon a predetermined performance scale.

Relative TSR Component

The Committee believes that the Relative TSR metric encourages management to focus on the Company’s overall performance and value creation for its stockholders over a longer-term (three-year) period and provides an appropriate balance to the internally focused adjusted operating profit metric. In selecting a performance peer group for the Company’s Relative TSR metric, the Committee considered several criteria, including the importance of measurement against companies that compete with the Company, the size and number of companies within the benchmarking group, the reputation and credibility of companies in the group, and the relevance of those companies to the Company’s business. The Committee concluded that the use of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index satisfies key criteria: the index itself is highly reputable, including the largest U.S. companies by market capitalization; information about index performance is widely available; it includes competitor companies; and the number of companies is large enough as to minimize the possibility that relative performance would be distorted by consolidation or unusual performance by a small number of companies.

For the Relative TSR component of the awards, potential payouts range from zero to 200% of the target amount of shares based on the percentile ranking of the Company’s TSR compared with that of each company in the index, as follows:

P. 52 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

TSR	Payout as Percentage of Target
75th percentile or above	200%
50th percentile	100%
25th percentile	30%
Below 25th percentile	0%

Payout percentages are interpolated between performance levels. If the Company’s TSR for the three-year performance period is below the 25th percentile, the participating executives will not receive any portion of the award based on TSR.

Notwithstanding the schedule above, the maximum payout cannot exceed 100% of the target number of shares if the Company’s TSR is negative over the performance period, regardless of the Company’s percentile ranking. Further, the total value of the award to be paid in Class A stock (i.e., the number of shares earned multiplied by the fair market value of the Class A stock on the date of the distribution) cannot exceed 400% of the dollar amount of the target award opportunity related to such share-based award.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 53

Potential Awards

The following table shows the target and maximum potential awards of cash and shares of Class A stock for the 2021-2023 performance cycle for each of the named executive officers. The target share amounts were calculated by dividing the target dollar value by a fair value estimated using the average stock price over the 20 trading days up to and including the grant date ($50.83 in the case of the Adjusted Operating Profit metric and $48.60 in the case of the Relative TSR metric, except for Ms. Welch whose Relative TSR target shares were calculated based on a $49.77 share price).

		Target			Maximum
Name	Metric	Shares (#)	Cash Value ($)	Total Target Value ($)	Shares (#)	Cash Value ($)	Total Target Value ($)
A.G. Sulzberger	Adjusted Operating Profit (Cash)		532,800	532,800		1,065,600	1,065,600
	Adjusted Operating Profit (Shares)	10,482		532,800	20,964		1,065,600
	Relative TSR (Shares)	14,616		710,400	29,232		1,420,800
	Total $ Value			1,776,000			3,552,000
Meredith Kopit Levien	Adjusted Operating Profit (Cash)		960,000	960,000		1,920,000	1,920,000
	Adjusted Operating Profit (Shares)	18,887		960,000	37,774		1,920,000
	Relative TSR (Shares)	26,336		1,280,000	52,672		2,560,000
	Total $ Value			3,200,000			6,400,000
Roland Caputo	Adjusted Operating Profit (Cash)		300,000	300,000		600,000	600,000
	Adjusted Operating Profit (Shares)	5,902		300,000	11,804		600,000
	Relative TSR (Shares)	8,230		400,000	16,460		800,000
	Total $ Value			1,000,000			2,000,000
Diane Brayton	Adjusted Operating Profit (Cash)		160,500	160,500		321,000	321,000
	Adjusted Operating Profit (Shares)	3,158		160,500	6,316		321,000
	Relative TSR (Shares)	4,403		214,000	8,806		428,000
	Total $ Value			535,000			1,070,000
Jacqueline Welch	Adjusted Operating Profit (Cash)		130,500	130,500		261,000	261,000
	Adjusted Operating Profit (Shares)	2,567		130,500	5,134		261,000
	Relative TSR (Shares)	3,496		174,000	6,992		348,000
	Total $ Value			435,000			870,000

Long-Term Performance Awards for 2019-2021

For the 2019-2021 long-term performance cycle, potential payouts were based on the achievement of specified goals under the same two performance measures described above with respect to the 2021-2023 awards:

•Cumulative adjusted operating profit: represented 60% of an executive’s target award, with half paid in Class A stock and half paid in cash; and

•Relative TSR: represented 40% of an executive’s target award and payable in Class A stock.

P. 54 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

Cumulative Adjusted Operating Profit Component

For this component, potential payouts could range from zero to 200% based upon performance against predetermined targets. The following table sets out the cumulative adjusted operating profit targets and achievement level for the 2019-2021 long-term performance cycle:

Measure	Cumulative ($) (in thousands)
Threshold adjusted operating profit (0% payout below threshold)	629,600
Target adjusted operating profit (100% payout)	729,600
Maximum adjusted operating profit (200% payout)	829,600
Actual adjusted operating profit1	834,384

1.See Appendix A for the calculation of adjusted operating profit for 2019-2021.

The Company’s achievement of 2019-2021 cumulative adjusted operating profit resulted in a payout of the portion of the award based on adjusted operating profit at 200% of target.

Relative TSR Component

The Company’s TSR for 2019-2021 was 94.45%, which ranked in the 69th percentile relative to the companies in Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index at the beginning of the period. As a result, the payout of the portion of the 2019-2021 award based on Relative TSR was at 176% of target.

2019-2021 Long-Term Performance Payout

The following table shows the target potential payments and the actual awards earned based on results over the 2019-2021 long-term performance cycle.

		Target			Actual
Name	Metric	Shares1 (#)	Cash Value ($)	Total Target Value1 ($)	Shares (#)	Cash Value ($)	Total Award Value2 ($)
A.G. Sulzberger	Adjusted Operating Profit (Cash)		225,000	225,000		450,000	450,000
	Adjusted Operating Profit (Shares)	7,738		225,000	15,476		644,111
	Relative TSR (Shares)	11,705		300,000	20,601		857,414
	Total	19,443	225,000	750,000	36,077	450,000	1,951,525
Meredith Kopit Levien	Adjusted Operating Profit (Cash)		300,000	300,000		600,000	600,000
	Adjusted Operating Profit (Shares)	10,317		300,000	20,634		858,787
	Relative TSR (Shares)	16,533		400,000	29,098		1,211,059
	Total	26,850	300,000	1,000,000	49,732	600,000	2,669,846
Roland Caputo	Adjusted Operating Profit (Cash)		225,000	225,000		450,000	450,000
	Adjusted Operating Profit (Shares)	7,738		225,000	15,476		644,111
	Relative TSR (Shares)	12,400		300,000	21,824		908,315
	Total	20,138	225,000	750,000	37,300	450,000	2,002,426
Diane Brayton	Adjusted Operating Profit (Cash)		138,000	138,000		276,000	276,000
	Adjusted Operating Profit (Shares)	4,746		138,000	9,492		395,057
	Relative TSR (Shares)	7,605		184,000	13,385		557,084
	Total	12,351	138,000	460,000	22,877	276,000	1,228,141

1.The target share amounts were calculated by dividing the target dollar value by a fair value estimated using the average stock price over the 20 trading days up to and including the grant date, which was $29.08 in the case of the Adjusted Operating Profit metric and $24.19 in the case of the Relative TSR metric. Mr. Sulzberger’s TSR shares also include an additional grant awarded on February 21, 2019, with a 20-day average share price of $29.08.

2.The “Total Award Value” reflects the value of the Adjusted Operating Profit Shares and Relative TSR Shares at vesting (calculated using $41.62, the closing price on February 17, 2022).

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 55

Changes to Long-Term Incentive Compensation for 2022

In February 2022, taking into account stockholder input and an analysis of predominant market practice, the Committee approved the following changes to the Company’s long-term incentive compensation program:

•Incorporating the use of time-vested restricted stock units.

•Providing for stock settlement of all long-term performance awards in line with market practice.

•Incorporating a digital subscription revenue performance target to align with our subscription-first strategy.

•Eliminating the payout cap of 400% of the dollar amount of target awards in line with market practice.

The following is an overview of the changes made beginning with the 2022-2024 performance cycle:

2021 Long-Term Incentive Compensation		2022 Long-Term Incentive Compensation
100% of long-term incentive compensation in the form of a three-year performance award program	→	Long-term incentive compensation comprising:        • 80% performance-based awards        • 20% time-based restricted stock units
Payout under three-year performance award program that is 30% in cash and 70% in shares	→	Payout under three-year performance award program that is 100% in shares
Three-year performance award program under which performance is measured under following two metrics:     • cumulative three-year adjusted operating        profit (60%)     • relative TSR (40%)	→	The 80% of the three-year award consisting of performance-based awards will be measured under the following three metrics:        • digital subscription revenue (20%)        • cumulative three-year adjusted operating           profit (40%)        • relative TSR (40%)

Other Elements of Executive Compensation

All executives are eligible to participate in the Company 401(k) Plan, a defined contribution plan for non-unionized employees that provides a match on employee contributions and discretionary profit-sharing contributions. Executives, including the named executive officers, participate in The New York Times Company Savings Restoration Plan (the “Restoration Plan”), an unfunded non-qualified defined contribution plan intended to supplement retirement income for certain employees whose contributions to the Company 401(k) Plan are subject to limitation under the Internal Revenue Code. Mr. Caputo is a participant in The New York Times Company Supplemental Executive Savings Plan (the “SESP”), an unfunded non-qualified defined contribution plan frozen effective December 31, 2013. He is also a participant in The New York Times Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP I”), and Ms. Brayton is a participant in The New York Times Company Executive Unfunded Plan II (“SERP II,” and collectively with SERP I, the “SERPs”), non-qualified defined benefit plans intended to supplement the retirement income payable under The New York Times Companies Pension Plan (the “Pension Plan”). Effective December 31, 2009, the Pension Plan and the SERPs, as well as several other defined benefit plans, were frozen. Finally, Mr. Sulzberger participated in the Newspaper Guild of New York—The New York Times Pension Plan (the “Guild Pension Plan”), which was frozen effective December 31, 2012. Effective December 31, 2018, the Guild Pension Plan was merged into the Pension Plan. For a further discussion of these plans, please see “—Pension Benefits” and “—Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.”

We provide certain limited perquisites to our executive officers. Perquisites provided in 2021 consisted of financial planning services to certain executive officers.

P. 56 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

Recoupment of Compensation

The Company has a policy on recoupment of performance-based cash and equity compensation awards in the event of certain restatements of financial results arising due to an executive officer’s fraud or intentional misconduct. This policy is described above under “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance—Clawback Policy.”

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The named executive officers are subject to minimum stock ownership guidelines. These guidelines require that the Chairman and Publisher and the Chief Executive Officer own shares of the Company’s Class A stock equal in value to five times his or her annual base salary, and the other named executive officers own shares of Class A stock equal in value to two times their annual base salary. These guidelines are described above under “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance—Director and Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines.”

In addition, the Company’s executive officers may not engage in short-term, speculative trading in Company stock, including hedging or other derivative transactions, hold Company stock in a margin account or pledge Company stock as collateral for a loan.

Tax Matters

The Internal Revenue Code limits the deductibility for the Company’s income tax purposes of compensation in excess of $1 million per year paid to “covered employees” (generally, the executive officers named in the “Summary Compensation Table”).

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 57

Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides information concerning the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and the three other most highly compensated executive officers. For a complete understanding of the table, please read the footnotes that accompany the table as well as the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

Name and Principal Position	Fiscal Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)1	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)2	Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)3	All Other Compensation ($)4	Total ($)
(a)	(b)	(c)	(d)	(e)	(f)	(g)	(h)	(i)	(j)
A.G. Sulzberger, Chairman and Publisher, The New York Times	2021	612,001	—	1,478,598	—	1,436,852	2,603	84,502	3,614,556
	2020	609,924	—	945,871	—	775,338	7,562	84,391	2,423,086
	2019	590,693	—	616,029	—	792,605	7,489	68,497	2,075,313
Meredith Kopit Levien, President and Chief Executive Officer	2021	900,000	—	2,664,222	—	2,051,250	7,698	132,356	5,755,526
	2020	832,968	—	2,232,818	—	1,146,647	4,653	155,104	4,372,190
	2019	787,909	—	737,634	—	1,455,085	3,255	128,010	3,111,893
Roland Caputo, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	2021	635,076	—	832,559	—	1,521,691	5,525	87,674	3,082,525
	2020	628,659	—	769,492	—	823,480	323,794	74,481	2,619,906
	2019	584,800	—	553,239	—	677,702	616,372	65,576	2,497,689
Diane Brayton, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary	2021	586,614	—	445,439	—	979,203	3,410	87,268	2,101,934
	2020	584,623	—	411,652	—	547,404	37,801	123,287	1,704,767
	2019	562,417	—	339,313	—	632,369	43,264	64,068	1,641,431
Jacqueline Welch, Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer5	2021	480,769	200,000	317,730	—	458,035	—	13,447	1,469,981

1.In accordance with SEC proxy disclosure rules, included in the “Stock Awards” column for 2021 are the grant date fair values of the stock-settled portion of the 2021-2023 performance awards made during 2021.

For a discussion of the assumptions used in computing the valuations reflected in this table, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 14 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2021.

The grant date fair value of the stock-settled awards is estimated for purposes of the accounting expense and may not represent the actual value of the shares that will be realized upon payout of the award at the end of the three-year performance period.

The grant date fair value of the stock-settled portion of long-term performance awards included in the table is based upon the achievement of target-level performance. As described in “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation—Long-Term Incentive Compensation,” payouts for long-term performance awards can range from 0% to 200%. Assuming the achievement of maximum-level performance, the grant date fair value of the portion of the performance awards based on adjusted operating profit (but not the portion based

P. 58 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

on Relative TSR) would be as follows: Mr. Sulzberger, $1,065,600; Ms. Kopit Levien, $1,920,000; Mr. Caputo, $600,000; Ms. Brayton, $321,000; and Ms. Welch, $261,000.

See “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation—Long-Term Incentive Compensation” for further information on the performance awards.

2.The “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column for 2021 reflects payments in connection with our 2021 annual incentive awards and the cash-settled portion of the 2019-2021 long-term performance awards as follows:

Name	Annual Incentive Awards (2021)		Long-Term Performance Cash Award (2019-2021 Cycle)
A.G. Sulzberger	$	986,852	$	450,000
Meredith Kopit Levien	$	1,451,250	$	600,000
Roland Caputo	$	1,071,691	$	450,000
Diane Brayton	$	703,203	$	276,000
Jacqueline Welch	$	458,035	$	—

3.The “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column represents the above-market interest credited to each named executive officer’s account for calendar year 2021 under the terms of the Restoration Plan as follows: Mr. Sulzberger, $2,603; Ms. Kopit Levien, $7,698; Mr. Caputo, $5,525; and Ms. Brayton, $3,410.

Under the terms of the Restoration Plan, participants’ accounts are credited with interest based on the yield of the Barclays Capital Long Credit Index, or a successor index. The interest rate for 2021 was 3.12%, which is considered above-market under SEC proxy disclosure rules as it is greater than 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate. Only the portion of the credited interest consisting of above-market payments is included in the above table. See “—Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” below for a discussion of the terms of the Restoration Plan. The same interest rate as applied to the Restoration Plan applied to Mr. Caputo’s account under the SESP, but for the reasons discussed below in footnote 4, this column does not reflect any portion of the interest credited to his SESP account.

For 2021, Mr. Caputo had a negative change in the actuarial present value of accumulated benefit under the Pension Plan and SERP I of $(208,431). For 2021, Mr. Sulzberger had a negative change in the actuarial present value of accumulated benefit under the Guild Pension Plan formula of $(1,802). For 2021, Ms. Brayton had a negative change in the actuarial present value of accumulated benefit under the Pension Plan and SERP II of $(8,255). Accordingly, no amounts were included in this column for 2021 in respect of a change in pension value. Mss. Kopit Levien and Welch do not participate in the Pension Plan, the Guild Pension Plan formula or the SERPs, which were frozen before they joined the Company.

The calculation of the actuarial present value of accumulated benefits assumes a discount rate as of December 31, 2021, of 2.93% for the Pension Plan and 2.82% and 2.81%, respectively, for SERP I and SERP II, and a discount rate as of December 31, 2020, of 2.61% for the Pension Plan and 2.40% and 2.39% respectively, for SERP I and SERP II. For a discussion of the assumptions used in calculating the actuarial present value, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2021.

4.    The table below shows the 2021 components of the “All Other Compensation” column, which include perquisites, Company contributions to the Company 401(k) Plan and the Company credit to each named executive officer’s account under the Restoration Plan (together with the Company 401(k) Plan, the “Savings Plans”) and life insurance premiums.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 59

Name	Perquisitesa		Contributions to Savings Plansb		Life Insurance Premiumsc		Otherd
A.G. Sulzberger	$	—	$	82,965	$	1,537	$	—
Meredith Kopit Levien	$	15,000	$	115,099	$	2,257	$	—
Roland Caputo	$	—	$	86,079	$	1,595	$	—
Diane Brayton	$	10,000	$	71,925	$	1,472	$	3,871
Jacqueline Welch	$	—	$	12,338	$	1,109	$	—

(a)Amounts for Mss. Kopit Levien and Brayton consist of the incremental cost to the Company of financial planning services in 2021.

(b)Amounts represent Company matching contributions (up to Internal Revenue Service limits) with respect to named executive officers’ deferrals to the Company 401(k) Plan, a discretionary profit-sharing contribution to the Company 401(k) Plan and our credits to the named executive officers’ accounts under the Restoration Plan. See “—Nonqualified Deferred Compensation—Restoration Plan.”

(c)We pay premiums for basic life insurance for eligible employees, including our executive officers. Coverage is equal to an employee’s annual salary, with a minimum of $20,000 and a maximum of $1 million.

(d)On August 8, 2020, following the departure of an executive, and in addition to her existing role, Ms. Brayton was appointed Interim Executive Vice President, Talent & Inclusion. Ms. Brayton received a cash payment calculated at the rate of $10,000 per month for her service in this additional interim role. The payment above reflects the prorated portion for her interim service from December 28, 2020 to January 8, 2021.

The “All Other Compensation” column does not reflect credits to Mr. Caputo for his participation in the SESP. The SESP was frozen effective December 31, 2013. Under the terms of the SESP, each participant’s notional account is credited with interest annually. The SESP provides that in no event may the sum of the benefits payable under the SESP and the frozen SERP I exceed the value of the SERP I benefit that the participant would have received had SERP I not been frozen as of December 31, 2009. As a result, until a SESP participant with a SERP I benefit retires, it is not possible to calculate the amount of such participant’s notional SESP account that would be actually payable to the participant, and accordingly, the Company has not reflected such notional credits in column (i). See “—Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” for a description of the SESP and for the amount credited to Mr. Caputo during 2021, and in total. In addition, see “—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” for a description of amounts payable to the named executive officers under the Pension Plan, the SERPs and the SESP, assuming a retirement on December 26, 2021, the last day of our 2021 fiscal year.

5.    Ms. Welch joined the Company as Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer effective January 11, 2021. The amount in column (d) reflects the value of a cash sign-on bonus provided to Ms. Welch upon her hire, and is subject to clawback in full or in part if she voluntarily resigns within two years of her employment.

P. 60 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The table below summarizes grants of annual incentive awards and long-term performance awards to our named executive officers during the 2021 fiscal year. The footnotes below the table provide additional detail on these awards.

								All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) (i)	Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) (l)5
		Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards			Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards
Name (a)	Grant Date (b)1	Threshold ($) (c)	Target ($) (d)	Maximum ($) (e)	Threshold (#) (f)	Target (#) (g)	Maximum (#) (h)
A.G. Sulzberger	2/23/212	45,900	612,001	1,224,002
	2/23/213	266,400	532,800	1,065,600
	12/28/204				4,385	14,616	29,232
	2/23/214				5,241	10,482	20,964
	Total				9,626	25,098	50,196		1,478,598
Meredith Kopit Levien	2/23/212	67,500	900,000	1,800,000
	2/23/213	480,000	960,000	1,920,000
	12/28/204				7,901	26,336	52,672
	2/23/214				9,444	18,887	37,774
	Total				17,345	45,223	90,446		2,664,222
Roland Caputo	2/23/212	47,631	635,076	1,270,152
	2/23/213	150,000	300,000	600,000
	12/28/204				2,469	8,230	16,460
	2/23/214				2,951	5,902	11,804
	Total				5,420	14,132	28,264		832,559
Diane Brayton	2/23/212	30,797	410,630	821,260
	2/23/213	80,250	160,500	321,000
	12/28/204				1,321	4,403	8,806
	2/23/214				1,579	3,158	6,316
	Total				2,900	7,561	15,122		445,439
Jacqueline Welch	2/23/212	20,060	267,466	534,932
	2/23/213	65,250	130,500	261,000
	1/11/214				1,049	3,496	6,992
	2/23/214				1,284	2,567	5,134
	Total				2,333	6,063	12,126		317,730

1.The portion of the 2021-2023 performance award based on total stockholder return was approved by the Compensation Committee (for Mr. Caputo, Ms. Brayton and Ms. Welch (subject to her commencing employment on January 11, 2021) and by the independent members of the full Board (for Mr. Sulzberger and Ms. Kopit Levien) at their December 14 and December 17, 2020, meetings, respectively, effective the first day of the 2021 fiscal year (December 28, 2020) for each named executive officer other than Ms. Welch for whom the grant was effective on her January 11, 2021 employment date.

The 2021 annual incentive award, and the portion of the 2021-2023 performance award based on adjusted operating profit, were approved by the Compensation Committee (for all named executive officers other than Mr. Sulzberger and Ms. Kopit Levien) and by the independent members of the full Board (for Mr. Sulzberger and Ms. Kopit Levien), at their February 22 and 23, 2021, meetings, respectively.

2.Annual incentive award: Threshold, target and maximum amounts in connection with our 2021 annual incentive award program. Threshold amounts reflect the minimum amount payable under the financial component of this award. The actual amounts that were paid are included in the Summary Compensation Table under column

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 61

(g) for 2021. See “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for a description of the targets and the level of achievement for 2021.

3.2021-2023 performance award (cash-settled): Threshold, target and maximum amounts in connection with cash-settled performance awards for the 2021-2023 cycle. Threshold amounts reflect the minimum amount payable for a certain level of performance. No payment is made for performance below such enumerated level. The actual amount that will be paid will depend on cumulative adjusted operating profit over the three-year period and will range from $0 to the maximum amount, depending on performance. See “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for a description of the performance measure.

4.2021-2023 performance award (stock-settled): Threshold, target and maximum amounts in connection with stock-settled performance awards for the 2021-2023 cycle. Threshold amounts reflect the minimum amount payable for a certain level of performance. No payment is made for performance below such enumerated level. The actual number of shares that will be issued will depend on two performance measures, cumulative adjusted operating profit and total stockholder return relative to companies in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index, over the three-year period. The aggregate grant date fair value of this award, as set out in column (l), is included in the Summary Compensation Table under column (e) for 2021. See “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for a description of the performance measures.

5.Column (l) shows the grant date fair values of stock-settled 2021-2023 performance awards, as estimated for financial reporting purposes. The grant date fair value for the performance awards measured against the cumulative adjusted operating profit metric is calculated based on the average of the high and the low stock prices on the grant date and was $51.49. The grant date fair value for the performance awards measured against the relative total stockholder return metric is calculated on the grant date using a Monte Carlo valuation by an independent third party and was $64.24 for the December 28, 2020, grant date and $53.08 for the January 11, 2021, grant date for Ms. Welch.

The reported amounts may not represent the actual value that will be realized.

Employment Agreement of Meredith Kopit Levien

Ms. Kopit Levien and the Company are party to an Employment Agreement. The Employment Agreement has a current term through January 1, 2025, with an “evergreen” renewal provision whereby, on each January 1, an additional one year will be added to the term so that it will always be at least two to three years in duration.

Under the terms of her Employment Agreement, Ms. Kopit Levien is entitled to base salary, annual and long-term incentive compensation, and participation in our employee welfare and benefits plans in accordance with their terms, in each case, on the same terms applicable to other senior executive officers.

In addition, she is entitled to severance as follow, in the event Ms. Kopit Levien’s employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” or she resigns for “good reason,” in each case, as defined in the Employment Agreement, or if the term of her employment expires following a notice on non-extension from the Company, she will generally be entitled to receive (i) an amount equal to 1.25 times the sum of her base salary and target annual incentive award, and (ii) reimbursements for the actual cost of COBRA coverage in excess of the amount that similarly situated active employees pay for the same levels of coverage as elected by her for up to 15 months after termination.

Ms. Kopit Levien does not participate in the Pension Plan or the SERP, which were frozen effective December 31, 2009.

The Employment Agreement provides for a 15-month non-compete and non-solicitation period following any termination of Ms. Kopit Levien’s employment, as well as a customary non-disparagement covenant.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

As of December 26, 2021, there were no outstanding stock options held by the executive officers. The following table shows outstanding restricted stock units and performance awards as of December 26, 2021.

P. 62 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

	Stock Awards
Name (a)	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested1 (#) (g)	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested1 ($) (h)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested2 (#) (i)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested3 ($) (j)
A.G. Sulzberger			73,742	3,493,896
Meredith Kopit Levien	11,348	537,668	137,503	6,514,892
Roland Caputo			55,144	2,612,723
Diane Brayton			29,501	1,397,757
Jacqueline Welch			6,063	287,265

1.Market value at December 23, 2021 ($47.38 per share), the last trading day of our 2021 fiscal year. Ms. Kopit Levien received a grant of restricted stock units on June 7, 2017, which vests ratably over five years from the grant date.

2.Represents the number of shares of Class A stock subject to outstanding stock-settled performance awards for the 2020-2022 and 2021-2023 performance cycles. In accordance with SEC requirements, values for these awards in columns (d) and (e) are reported at the maximum (200%) level for the 2020-2022 award and target (100%) level for the 2021-2023 award. The actual number of shares that will be issued will depend on two performance measures, a financial measure tied to cumulative adjusted operating profit, and total stockholder return relative to companies in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index, over the three-year period.

3.Market value of the shares included in column (i) at December 23, 2021 ($47.38 per share), the last trading day of our 2021 fiscal year.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

During the 2021 fiscal year, no options were exercised by the executive officers. The following table shows amounts received upon vesting of restricted stock units during the fiscal year ended December 26, 2021, as well as shares of Class A stock paid out with respect to stock-settled 2019-2021 performance award.

	Stock Awards1
Name (a)	Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) (d)	Value Realized on Vesting ($) (e)
A.G. Sulzberger	36,077	$	1,501,525
Meredith Kopit Levien	61,079	$	2,544,264
Roland Caputo	37,300	$	1,552,426
Diane Brayton	22,877	$	952,141
Jacqueline Welch	—	$	—

1.     “Stock Awards” include, for executives, shares of Class A stock paid out in early 2022 with respect to stock-settled 2019-2021 long-term performance awards. See “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Incentive Compensation.” “Stock Awards” also include shares of Class A stock delivered during 2021 upon the vesting of restricted stock units for Ms. Kopit Levien (11,347). The dollar amounts presented in column (e) represent the market value of those shares of Class A stock as of the respective vesting dates.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 63

Pension Benefits

The following table shows the number of years of credited service and the actuarial present value of accumulated benefit under the Pension Plan, SERP I and SERP II, as applicable, as of December 31, 2021, the measurement date for each plan. The present value amounts are estimates only, and do not necessarily reflect the actual amounts that will be paid to the named executive officers. Mss. Kopit Levien and Welch do not participate in the Pension Plan, SERP I or SERP II, which were frozen effective December 31, 2009, prior to their joining the Company.

Name (a)	Plan Name (b)	Number of Years Credited Service  (#)1 (c)	Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($)2 (d)	Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($) (e)
A.G. Sulzberger	Pension Plan	2	24,114	—
Roland Caputo	Pension Plan	24	1,251,149	—
	SERP I	24	1,826,238	—
Diane Brayton	Pension Plan	6	170,718	—
	SERP II	6	3,474	—

1.Because the Pension Plan, SERP I and SERP II were frozen effective December 31, 2009, years of credited service for purposes of calculating benefits for Mr. Caputo and Ms. Brayton are determined as of that date.

Prior to its merger with the Pension Plan, the Guild Pension Plan froze accruals effective December 31, 2012. For Mr. Sulzberger, years of credited service for purposes of calculating benefits under the Guild Pension Plan formula are determined as of that date.

2.The assumed retirement age used to calculate the actuarial present value of each named executive officer’s accumulated benefit is the age at which the named executive officer would be eligible to receive unreduced benefits. Under the Pension Plan, Mr. Caputo would be eligible to receive unreduced benefits at age 62, and Mr. Sulzberger and Ms. Brayton would each be eligible to receive unreduced benefits at age 65.

Under SERP I, Mr. Caputo would be eligible to receive unreduced benefits at age 60. Under SERP II, Ms. Brayton would be eligible to receive unreduced benefits at age 65.

For a discussion of the assumptions used in calculating the valuation, see footnote 4 to the Summary Compensation Table above and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2021.

Pension Plan

The Pension Plan is a defined benefit pension plan that is intended to qualify for favorable tax treatment under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. Employees who were hired prior to January 1, 2009, were at least 21 years old and were not covered by a collective bargaining agreement became eligible to participate in the Pension Plan after completing one year of service, during which they rendered at least 1,000 hours of service. Effective December 31, 2009, the Company froze the Pension Plan, meaning no additional benefits accrue after that date. Mr. Caputo and Ms. Brayton are participants. Mr. Sulzberger is a participant in the Pension Plan whose benefit is determined under the Guild Pension Plan formula.

Computation of Pension Plan Benefits

Previously accrued benefits are determined under a formula that provides an annuity benefit at normal retirement age (65). This amount is the sum of:

•1 1/2% of final average earnings (as of December 31, 2008) times years of service up to 25 years (as of December 31, 2008), plus

•5/8% of final average earnings (as of December 31, 2008) times years of service in excess of 25 years up to 40 years (as of December 31, 2008), plus

P. 64 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

•5/8% of final average earnings (as of December 31, 2009) times years of service after December 31, 2008, and prior to January 1, 2010;

provided no more than 40 years of service in total may be used in the formula. However, if greater, the annual annuity benefit at normal retirement age is 1.1% of final average earnings (as of December 31, 2009) times years of service (as of December 31, 2009) up to 40 years.

“Final average earnings” are based on the highest 60 consecutive calendar months of earnings during the 120 consecutive months before December 31, 2008 or December 31, 2009, as applicable. For this purpose, earnings include total earnings from base salary, annual cash bonuses, and sales commissions, if any, but are limited each year in accordance with Internal Revenue Service rules ($245,000 in 2009, the last relevant year).

Payment of Benefits

Benefits are payable at age 65 (unless the participant is eligible for early retirement and elects to commence payment before age 65). The normal payment form is a straight life annuity for unmarried participants and a subsidized joint and 50% spouse’s annuity for married participants. A variety of other payment forms are available. A participant generally may not elect to receive retirement benefits in a single lump-sum payment. Reduced benefits are available to participants retiring after age 55 with at least five years of service (early retirement).

Guild Pension Plan Formula

Effective December 31, 2018, the Guild Pension Plan was merged into the Pension Plan. Mr. Sulzberger is a participant in the Pension Plan whose benefits are computed in accordance with the Guild Pension Plan formula described below.

Guild Pension Plan Formula

The Guild Pension Plan formula provides benefits based on 1/10% of average monthly compensation times years of credited service. “Average monthly compensation” is based on the highest 60 consecutive calendar months of earnings during the 120 consecutive months before December 31, 2012. For this purpose, earnings include total earnings from base salary, overtime, merit increases and shift differential, if any, but are limited each year in accordance with Internal Revenue Service rules ($250,000 in 2012, the last relevant year).

Payment of Benefits

Benefits are payable at age 65 (unless the participant is eligible for early retirement and elects to commence payment before age 65). The normal payment form is a straight life annuity for unmarried participants and a joint and 50% spouse’s annuity for married participants. A variety of other payment forms are available. A participant may elect to receive 50% of retirement benefits in a single lump-sum payment. Reduced benefits are available to participants retiring between ages 51-60 with 30 years of service, or ages 60-65 with 10 years of service.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP I)

SERP I is a frozen nonqualified defined benefit pension plan. Like the Pension Plan, SERP I was amended effective December 31, 2009, to discontinue future benefit accruals. Mr. Caputo is a participant in SERP I.

SERP I Benefits

SERP I retirement benefits are based on a participant’s years of service with the Company and final average earnings, both determined as of December 31, 2009. Final average earnings for purposes of SERP I are computed the same way as under the Pension Plan, except that there is no annual limit on the amount of earnings that can be taken into account when computing SERP I benefits. A participant vests in his or her SERP I benefit upon attaining age 55 and completing 10 years of service. The normal payment form is the straight life annuity for unmarried participants and subsidized joint and 50% spouse’s annuity for married participants. A variety of other payment forms are available, all actuarially equivalent in value. A participant generally may not elect to receive a lump-sum payment. Distributions are subject to compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. All participants are subject to non-competition restrictions for the duration of the period during which the participant is receiving benefits under SERP I.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 65

Normal Retirement

The annual SERP I retirement benefit payable at normal retirement age (age 65) to a participant with at least 20 years of service as of December 31, 2009, is equal to 50% of final average earnings as of December 31, 2009, minus the benefits payable under the Pension Plan at age 65. Mr. Caputo had at least 20 years of service as of December 31, 2009.

Participants with less than 20 years of service as of December 31, 2008, receive an annual SERP I retirement benefit payable at normal retirement age (age 65) equal to (i) 2.5% of final average earnings as of December 31, 2009, for each year of service as of December 31, 2008, plus (ii) 2.2% of final average earnings as of December 31, 2009, for each year of service after December 31, 2008, and prior to December 31, 2009, provided that the aggregate years of service shall not exceed 20 years of service, minus (iii) benefits under the Pension Plan at age 65.

Early Retirement

A SERP I participant who retires between the ages of 60 and 65 with 10 or more years of service will receive a benefit based on the participant’s service and final average earnings at December 31, 2009. This benefit will not be reduced because of early commencement. However, the benefit of a SERP I participant who retires with 10 or more years of service between ages 55 and 60 will be reduced by 1/3 of 1% for each month benefits commence prior to age 60.

Executive Unfunded Pension Plan II (SERP II)

SERP II is a frozen nonqualified defined benefit pension plan. Like the Pension Plan and SERP I, SERP II was amended effective December 31, 2009, to discontinue further benefit accruals. SERP II was designed to provide participants with the additional benefits they would have received under the Pension Plan but for the limitations on the amount of earnings that could be taken into account under that plan. The annual SERP II retirement benefit payable at normal retirement age (age 65) is equal to the excess of (a) the annual normal retirement benefit as of December 31, 2009, under the terms of the Pension Plan calculated without taking into account the annual limit under Section 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code on the amount of earnings that can be taken into account under the Pension Plan and by including in earnings the amounts deferred by the participant under the Company’s Deferred Executive Compensation Plan (the “DEC”), over (b) the annual normal retirement benefit as of December 31, 2009, under the terms of the Pension Plan.

Ms. Brayton is a participant in SERP II and is vested in her benefit. Under plan terms, the benefit is to be paid following the later of either separation from service or attainment of age 55, and is expected to be payable in a lump sum. Distributions are subject to compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

P. 66 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

The following table shows Company and participant contributions, earnings and balances as of year-end under the Restoration Plan, SESP and DEC, as applicable.

Name (a)	Plan	Executive Contributions in Last FY ($)1 (b)	Registrant Contributions in Last FY ($)2 (c)	Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($)3 (d)	Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions in Last FY4 ($) (e)	Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($) (f)
A.G. Sulzberger	Restoration Plan	—	62,934	4,538	—	162,064
Meredith Kopit Levien	Restoration Plan	—	95,170	13,439	—	461,774
Roland Caputo	Restoration Plan	—	53,031	9,648	—	328,466
	SESP	—	—	9,459	—	311,663
	DEC	—	—	5,577	(9,091)	24,895
	Total	—	53,031	24,684	(9,091)	665,024
Diane Brayton	Restoration Plan	—	47,698	5,952	—	205,622
Jacqueline Welch	Restoration Plan	—			—

1.Participants are not permitted to make contributions under the Restoration Plan or the SESP.

2.The Company’s contributions to the named executive officers’ accounts under the Restoration Plan are included in column (i), and the portion of earnings credited to such account that are above-market earnings under SEC rules are included in column (h), of the Summary Compensation Table. See footnotes 3 and 4 to the Summary Compensation Table.

3.Participants’ accounts under the Restoration Plan and the SESP are credited with interest on a daily basis at a rate based on the yield of the Barclays Long Credit Index, or a successor index, as of the last business day in October of the preceding plan year. For 2021, the interest rate was 3.12%.

4.The amounts included in the table for the SESP represent notional credits to Mr. Caputo’s account during 2021 for interest and the account balances as of the end of the year. Under the terms of the SESP, in no event may the sum of the benefits payable under the SESP and the frozen SERP I exceed the value of the SERP I benefit that the participant would have received had the SERP I not been frozen as of December 31, 2009. As a result, until a SESP participant retires, it is not possible to calculate the amount of such participant’s notional SESP account that would actually be payable to the participant.

See “—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” for a description of amounts that would have been payable to Mr. Caputo under the Pension Plan, SERP I and the SESP, assuming a retirement on December 26, 2021, the last day of our 2021 fiscal year.

Restoration Plan

Effective January 1, 2014, participants in the Company 401(k) Plan receive a 100% Company matching contribution on their deferrals up to 6% of earnings each pay period (up to applicable limits under the Internal Revenue Code). Under the Restoration Plan, participants, including executive officers, receive a contribution of 6% of a participant’s earnings in excess of the amount of compensation that can be taken into account under the Company 401(k) Plan.

The Company credits participants’ accounts with interest daily based on the yield of the Barclays Long Credit Index, or a successor index.

Participants vest in their accounts pursuant to a five-year graded vesting schedule or, upon a change in control, death, disability, retirement or attainment of age 65 while employed, become 100% vested. Upon termination of employment, participants will receive a lump-sum payment of their vested account balances under the Restoration Plan. Distributions are subject to compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

Supplemental Executive Savings Plan

Mr. Caputo is a participant in the SESP, which was frozen effective for plan years commencing after December 31, 2013. For plan years through 2013, a SESP participant’s account was credited each year with a “supplemental

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 67

contribution” equal to (i) 10% of his or her compensation for those who were SERP I participants on December 31, 2009, or (ii) 5% for those who were not SERP I participants on December 31, 2009. Effective for plan years commencing after December 31, 2013, the Company has amended the SESP to discontinue all future supplemental contributions and transition credits. No other executive may be designated as a participant in the now frozen plan.

Participants vest in their benefit upon attaining age 55 and completing 10 years of service or upon a change in control. Upon termination of employment, participants receive a lump-sum payment of their vested account balances under the SESP. Distributions are subject to compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

Deferred Executive Compensation Plan

The Company maintains a Deferred Executive Compensation Plan, which allowed executives to defer portions of their salary and annual incentive and long-term performance awards. This plan, in which Mr. Caputo participates, was frozen to new deferrals effective January 1, 2016.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

This section describes the compensation for the named executive officers assuming (i) a termination of the executive’s employment as a result of a termination, resignation, or death, disability or retirement; (ii) a change in control; or (iii) a termination of employment following a change in control, in all cases, as of December 26, 2021, the last day of our 2021 fiscal year. Ms. Kopit Levien’s Employment Agreement provides for severance in the case of termination of employment and the table below reflects the terms of such agreement. None of the other named executive officers have employment agreements. Certain elements of executive compensation are treated differently under various termination of employment scenarios or upon a change in control, as follows:

•Current Compensation Components—Our current executive compensation consists primarily of a base salary and performance-based annual and long-term incentive compensation. Base salary is paid through the last day worked, regardless of the reason for termination of employment. In the case of a termination of employment due to death, disability or retirement, an executive would be entitled to prorated portions of existing annual and long-term performance awards, based on the period worked, as and when they are paid to other executives. In all other circumstances, except as described in the footnotes in the table below in the case of a change in control, the executive must be employed by the Company on the date of payment in order to receive payout of the applicable award.

•Equity Awards—Ms. Kopit Levien holds unvested restricted stock units. In the case of a termination of employment due to death or disability, all such unvested restricted stock units would immediately vest. In all other circumstances (including retirement), restricted stock units would be forfeited upon termination. Upon the occurrence of a change in control, restricted stock units would vest if not assumed by any successor entity, and if so assumed, would vest upon a termination under certain circumstances within 12 months.

•Retirement benefits (Pension Plan and SERPs)—Benefits will be paid out as described above under “—Pension Benefits.”

•Nonqualified deferred compensation (Restoration Plan and SESP)—The Restoration Plan has a five-year graded vesting schedule. As of December 26, 2021, each named executive officer is fully vested in his or her interests under the Plan. Upon termination of employment for any reason, participants in the Restoration Plan and the SESP (or their beneficiaries, in the event of death) receive a lump-sum payment of their vested account balance, reduced, in the case of the SESP, so that the sum of the benefits payable under the SESP and SERP I do not exceed the value of the SERP I benefit that would have been received had SERP I not been frozen as of December 31, 2009. Participants’ accounts under these plans would vest upon a change in control.

The following table and footnotes quantify, for each named executive officer, the payments and benefits that would be required to be paid under the Company’s compensation programs upon various scenarios for termination of employment or a change in control of the Company as of December 26, 2021, the last day of our 2021 fiscal year. Mr. Caputo was eligible to retire as of December 26, 2021, and accordingly, the payments and benefits to him in the case of a termination or resignation would be the same as in the case of retirement.

P. 68 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

Payment Upon Termination or Change in Control Table

Name	Termination ($)	Resignation ($)	Death, Disability  or Retirement ($)	Change in Control1 ($)	Termination Upon Change in Control1 ($)
A.G. Sulzberger
Salary	—	—	—	—	—
Annual and long-term performance awards2	—	—	4,330,377	1,392,000	1,392,000
Restricted stock units3	—	—	—	—	—
Present value of Pension Plan and SERP benefits4	24,114	24,114	24,114	—	24,114
Nonqualified deferred compensation5	162,064	162,064	221,829	—	162,064
Meredith Kopit Levien6
Salary	1,125,000	1,125,000	—	—	—
Annual and long-term performance awards2	1,125,000	1,125,000	6,921,096	2,800,000	2,800,000
Restricted stock units3	—	—	537,668	—	537,668
Present value of Pension Plan and SERP benefits4	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Nonqualified deferred compensation5	461,774	461,774	553,673	—	461,774
Roland Caputo
Salary	—	—	—	—	—
Annual and long-term performance awards2	4,074,117	4,074,117	4,074,117	1,000,000	1,000,000
Restricted stock units3	—	—	—	—	—
Present value of Pension Plan and SERP benefits4	3,077,387	3,077,387	3,077,387	—	3,077,387
Nonqualified deferred compensation5	727,903	727,903	727,903	—	727,903
Diane Brayton
Salary	—	—	—	—	—
Annual and long-term performance awards2	—	—	2,466,344	535,000	535,000
Restricted stock units3	—	—	—	—	—
Present value of Pension Plan and SERP benefits4	174,192	174,192	174,192	—	174,192
Nonqualified deferred compensation5	205,622	205,622	254,347	—	205,622
Jacqueline Welch
Salary	—	—	—	—	—
Annual and long-term performance awards2	—	—	603,035	145,000	145,000
Restricted stock units3	—	—	—	—	—
Present value of Pension Plan and SERP benefits4	—	—	—	—	—
Nonqualified deferred compensation5	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

1.Amounts included under “Change in Control” include the incremental compensation that the named executive officers would receive as a result of a change in control and do not include compensation under existing programs they would receive as a result of their continued employment following a change in control. Amounts included under “Termination Upon a Change in Control” include the aggregate amount the named executive officer would receive as a result of the change in control and a termination in connection therewith.

Under the terms and conditions of the outstanding long-term performance awards, upon the occurrence of a change in control:

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 69

•Under the 2010 Incentive Plan, upon the occurrence of a change in control, the performance period for existing long-term performance awards would be deemed to have ended and payouts would be made in accordance with performance over the shortened performance period. The amounts shown under the “Change in Control” column represent a prorated portion of the target amounts of long-term performance awards payable in future years.

•Under the 2020 Incentive Plan, upon the occurrence of a change in control, any performance-based awards will be deemed earned at the greater of target level and the actual performance level as of the date of the change in control with respect to all open performance periods, and will continue to be subject to time-based vesting following the change in control.

Under the Restoration Plan and the SESP, participants vest in their accounts upon a change in control.

A change in control will generally be deemed to occur:

•if a person or group (other than defined permitted holders) obtains the right or ability to elect or designate for election at least a majority of the Board; or

•upon the consummation of any share exchange, consolidation or merger of the Company pursuant to which the Company’s common stock will be converted into cash, securities or other property or any sale, lease or other transfer of the consolidated assets of the Company and its subsidiaries substantially as an entirety; provided, however, that any such share exchange, consolidation or merger will not be a change in control if holders of the Company’s common stock immediately prior to such transaction collectively own, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of all classes of common equity of the continuing or surviving corporation or transferee or the parent thereof immediately after such transaction in substantially the same proportion as such ownership immediately prior to such share exchange, consolidation or merger.

2.The amounts shown under each column other than “Change in Control,” represent, in the case of annual and long-term awards paid in February 2022, the actual amounts paid, and in the case of long-term performance awards payable in future years, a prorated portion of the target amounts (two-thirds of target for the 2020-2022 cycle and one-third of target for the 2021-2023 cycle). Actual payouts of such ongoing long-term performance awards would be made at the end of the relevant performance period and would depend on the Company’s achievement of the applicable targets.

3.The amounts shown for “Restricted stock units” represent the value of restricted stock units that would become deliverable in shares, based on the Company’s closing stock price on December 23, 2021 ($47.38), the last trading day of our 2021 fiscal year. In the case of a termination of employment due to death or disability, all unvested restricted stock units held by Ms. Kopit Levien would immediately vest. In all other circumstances (including retirement), restricted stock units would be forfeited upon termination. Upon the occurrence of a change in control, restricted stock units would vest if not assumed by any successor entity, and if so assumed, would vest upon a termination under certain circumstances within 12 months.

4.The amounts shown above represent the actuarial present value of the aggregate anticipated annual payments under (a) the Pension Plan, (b) the SERP I in the case of Mr. Caputo and (c) the SERP II in the case of Ms. Brayton, assuming retirement at December 26, 2021. The present values in each case are based on the following anticipated annual payments pursuant to the terms of the Pension Plan and SERPs Plan:

A.G. Sulzberger	$	2,239
Roland Caputo	$	180,080
Diane Brayton	$	14,765

Although the total present value of retirement benefits is shown in the Payment Upon Termination or Change in Control Table, lump-sum payments are generally not permitted, except in very limited circumstances. Ms. Brayton and Mr. Sulzberger are not yet eligible for retirement, and Ms. Kopit Levien and Ms. Welch do not participate in the Company-sponsored Pension Plan, which was frozen effective December 31, 2009.

P. 70 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

5.The amounts shown represent the sum of the named executive officer’s vested Restoration Plan and SESP account balances. In the case of the Restoration Plan, the account balance of Mr. Caputo reflects a credit for 2021 through December 26, 2021, to be made in 2022. Because Mr. Sulzberger and Mss. Kopit Levien and Brayton are not yet eligible to retire, they would not be entitled to this Restoration Plan credit in the event of a termination on December 26, 2021, other than in the case of death.

SESP participants vest in their benefit upon attaining age 55 and completing 10 years of service or upon a change in control. Mr. Caputo participates in the SESP, which was frozen effective December 31, 2013.

6.Amounts included under “Termination” and “Resignation” for Ms. Kopit Levien reflect payments to which Ms. Levien would be entitled under her Employment Agreement in the event her employment is terminated by the Company without cause or she resigns for good reason, in each case, as defined in the Employment Agreement, or if the term of her employment expires following a notice on non-extension from the Company. In these circumstances, Ms. Kopit Levien would be entitled to receive an amount equal to 1.25 times the sum of her base salary and target annual incentive award.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 71

CEO Pay Ratio

Pursuant to rules adopted by the SEC, we are providing the information below regarding the ratio of the 2021 annual total compensation of Meredith Kopit Levien, our President and Chief Executive Officer to that of our median compensated employee (the “CEO Pay Ratio”)

CEO Pay Ratio
CEO annual total compensation	$	5,755,526
Median employee annual total compensation	$	143,071
CEO to median employee pay ratio	41:1

Methodology

Our CEO pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules. Our methodology and process is explained below:

•Determined employee population. To calculate the CEO pay ratio, we first identified our median compensated employee for 2021. We began with our global employee population as of October 1, 2021 (approximately 5,300 employees), which included all full-time, part-time, casual and temporary workers, but did not include Ms. Kopit Levien. Applying the de minimis exemption under the SEC rules, we excluded 185 employees from 27 countries identified below, which together comprised less than 5% of our total employee population.

Country	Employees	Country	Employees	Country	Employees
Afghanistan	16	India	10	Netherlands	2
Australia	3	Iraq	10	Philippines	1
Belgium	2	Israel	6	Poland	2
Brazil	3	Italy	12	Russian Federation	4
Canada	24	Japan	6	Senegal	5
China	22	Kenya	6	Singapore	7
Colombia	1	Korea, Republic of	18	South Africa	2
Egypt	4	Lebanon	2	Taiwan	1
Germany	9	Mexico	6	Turkey	1

•Identified the median employee. We then used total 2021 taxable wages for all non-excluded employees to identify the median compensated employee. We did not make any other assumptions, adjustments or estimates with respect to compensation. For this purpose, we did not annualize the wages of any individuals who were employed less than the full calendar year.

•Calculated CEO pay ratio. We calculated our median employee’s total 2021 annual compensation using the same methodology we use to calculate total compensation for the President and Chief Executive Officer as it appears in the Summary Compensation Table.

P. 72 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

PROPOSAL NUMBER 3—ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Public companies in the United States are required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act to provide stockholders a non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of the company’s named executive officers disclosed in the annual proxy statement (a “say-on-pay” vote). Under our Certificate of Incorporation, an advisory vote to approve compensation is not among the expressly enumerated items as to which the Class A stock has a vote. As a result, for the Company, the say-on-pay vote is reserved for a vote of the Class B stockholders. At the Company’s 2021 Annual Meeting, the Class B stockholders overwhelmingly supported the say-on-pay proposal. At the 2022 Annual Meeting, the Company is again providing Class B stockholders a non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.

Say-on-Pay Vote

Executive compensation is an important matter for the Company. We structure compensation for our executive officers:

•to drive performance through the achievement of short-term and long-term objectives;

•to link our executives’ total compensation to the interests of our stockholders and to drive the creation of value for stockholders over the long term; and

•to enable us to attract, retain and motivate the highest caliber of executives by offering competitive compensation and rewarding superior performance.

We believe our compensation program, as currently structured and as implemented for 2021, is strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders. We urge you to read “Compensation of Executive Officers,” including the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the compensation tables and the narrative discussion, beginning on page 42 of this Proxy Statement, for details on our executive compensation.

Recommendation and Vote Required

The Board of Directors recommends that the Class B stockholders vote FOR the following resolution, which will be presented at the Annual Meeting:

RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby approved.

As an advisory vote, the result is non-binding on the Company and the Board of Directors. However, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our named executive officers.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Class B stock represented at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal, is required pursuant to the Company’s By-laws for approval of this advisory proposal. Accordingly, broker non-votes will have no effect on this proposal and abstentions will have the same effect as votes against this proposal.

We expect that the next say-on-pay vote will occur at the Company’s 2023 Annual Meeting.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. 73

OTHER MATTERS

Stockholder Proposals for the 2023 Annual Meeting

Stockholder Proposals for Inclusion in the Proxy Materials for the 2023 Annual Meeting

Stockholders who intend to present proposals at the 2023 Annual Meeting under SEC Rule 14a-8 must ensure that such proposals are received by the Secretary of the Company not later than November 11, 2022. Such proposals must meet the requirements of the SEC to be eligible for inclusion in the Company’s 2023 proxy materials.

Director Nominations or Other Stockholder Proposals for the 2023 Annual Meeting

The Company’s By-laws provide that the nomination of persons for election to the Board and the proposal of business to be considered by stockholders may be made at the annual meeting as set out in the Company’s notice of such meeting, by or at the direction of the Board or by any stockholder of the Company who is entitled to vote at the meeting on such nomination or other proposal, and who, in the case of a holder of Class A stock, complies with certain notice procedures. Generally, any holder of Class A stock proposing to nominate an individual for election to the Board by the Class A holders or proposing business to be considered by the Class A holders at an annual meeting must give written notice and certain information specified in the By-laws to the Secretary of the Company not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days before the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting. As a result, stockholders who intend to present proposals at the 2023 Annual Meeting under these provisions must give written notice to the Secretary, and otherwise comply with the By-law requirements, no earlier than December 28, 2022, and no later than January 27, 2023.

Certain Matters Relating to Proxy Materials

We have adopted a procedure approved by the SEC called householding. Under this procedure, certain stockholders who have the same address and last name and do not participate in electronic delivery of proxy materials will receive only one copy of our annual report and proxy statement, unless one or more of these stockholders notifies us that they would like to continue to receive individual copies. This delivery method can result in meaningful cost savings for the Company. Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards.

We undertake to deliver promptly upon written or oral request a separate copy of the proxy statement and annual report or Notice in a separate envelope, as applicable, to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of these documents was delivered. If you prefer to receive separate copies of the Proxy Statement, Annual Report or Notice in a separate envelope, either now or in the future, please contact Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. at (866) 540-7095 or in writing at Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

If you are currently receiving separate copies and wish to receive only one copy of future proxy materials for your household, in one envelope, please contact Broadridge at the above phone number or address.

By Order of the Board of Directors.

DIANE BRAYTON

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

New York, NY

March 11, 2022

P. 74 - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

APPENDIX A—COMPUTATION OF ADJUSTED OPERATING PROFIT

The following provides additional information on the computation of adjusted operating profit used to determine executive compensation paid in connection with the 2021 annual incentive awards and the long-term performance awards for 2019-2021. Adjusted operating profit is a non-GAAP financial measure.

Adjusted operating profit is defined as (i) revenues less (ii) total operating costs (excluding depreciation and amortization, severance and multiemployer pension plan withdrawal costs), adjusted to exclude the effect of acquisitions and dispositions. The Committee believes that adjusted operating profit is a useful measure of our performance for compensation purposes because it facilitates comparisons with historical operating performance on a consistent basis. In addition, adjusted operating profit is a measure often used by investors, analysts and others to assess Company performance, and thus serves to align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders.

2021 Annual Incentive Award

The following table shows the computation of adjusted operating profit for our 2021 fiscal year, as defined above, for purposes of the financial component of the 2021 annual incentive compensation.

	(in thousands)
Total revenues		$	2,074,877
Total operating costs		1,803,012
Less:
Depreciation and amortization		57,502
Severance		882
Multiemployer pension plan withdrawal costs		5,150
Adjusted operating costs excluding depreciation and amortization, severance and multiemployer pension plan withdrawal costs		1,739,478
Adjusted operating profit (as reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2021)		335,399

2019-2021 Long-Term Performance Award

The following table shows the computation of adjusted operating profit for the 2019-2021 fiscal years, as defined above, for purposes of the adjusted operating profit component of the 2019-2021 long-term performance awards.

(in thousands)	2019		2020		2021		Cumulative
Total revenues	$	1,812,184	$	1,783,639	$	2,074,877	$	5,670,700
Total operating costs	1,634,639		1,607,383		1,803,012		5,045,034
Less:
Depreciation and amortization	60,661		62,136		57,502		180,299
Severance	3,979		6,675		882		11,536
Multiemployer pension plan withdrawal costs	6,183		5,550		5,150		16,883
Adjusted operating costs excluding depreciation and amortization, severance and multiemployer pension plan withdrawal costs	1,563,816		1,533,022		1,739,478		4,836,316
Adjusted operating profit (as reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the applicable fiscal year)	$	248,368	$	250,617	$	335,399	$	834,384

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY - P. A-1

620 EIGHTH AVENUE NEW YORK, NY 10018 ATTENTION: CORPORATE SECRETARY	VOTE BY INTERNET Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.comor scan the QR Barcode above Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 26, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
	During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NYT2022
	You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.
	VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 26, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
	VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
	If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.
	Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes the named proxies to vote the shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.
	You can change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the meeting by mailing a later-dated proxy card, executing a later-dated proxy by Internet or telephone or by voting by ballot at the meeting. If you execute more than one proxy, whether by mail, Internet or telephone, and/or vote by ballot at the meeting, only the latest dated proxy or ballot will be counted.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
	KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
	DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY			For All	Withhold All	For All Except	To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.
	The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:
	1.	Election of Directors	o	o	o
		Class A Nominees:
		01) Amanpal S. Bhutani
		02) Manuel Bronstein
		03) Doreen Toben
		04) Rebecca Van Dyck
	The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal:						For	Against	Abstain
	2.	Ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022					o	o	o
	NOTE: In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote on such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
	IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST DATE, SIGN AND RETURN THIS CARD IN ORDER FOR THE SHARES TO BE VOTED.
	Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer, giving full title as such.
	Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]			Date		Signature (Joint Owners)		Date

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

APRIL 27, 2022

11:00 a.m. Eastern Time

via the Internet

www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NYT2022

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on April 27, 2022: The Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY Proxy Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on April 27, 2022
	The undersigned hereby appoints A.G. Sulzberger, Meredith Kopit Levien and Diane Brayton, and each of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his or her substitute, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote, as designated on all matters coming before said meeting, including the matters on the reverse side of this card, all of the shares of CLASS A COMMON STOCK of THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2022, virtually at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NYT2022, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and revokes any proxies previously given.
	This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned. If no direction is given, this proxy will be voted FOR the election of each of the Class A director nominees and FOR proposal 2. In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote on such other matters that may properly come before this meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
Continued and to be dated and signed on reverse side.

620 EIGHTH AVENUE NEW YORK, NY 10018 ATTENTION: CORPORATE SECRETARY	VOTE BY INTERNET Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 26, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
	During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NYT2022
	You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.
	VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 26, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
	VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
	If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.
	Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes the named proxies to vote the shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.
	You can change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the meeting by mailing a later-dated proxy card, executing a later-dated proxy by Internet or telephone or by voting by ballot at the meeting. If you execute more than one proxy, whether by mail, Internet or telephone, and/or vote by ballot at the meeting, only the latest dated proxy or ballot will be counted.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
	KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
	DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY			For All	Withhold All	For All Except	To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.
	The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:
	1.	Election of Directors	o	o	o
		Class B Nominees:
		01) Beth Brooke	06) Brian P. McAndrews
		02) Rachel Glaser	07) David Perpich
		03) Arthur Golden	08) John W. Rogers, Jr.
		04) Hays N. Golden	09) A.G. Sulzberger
		05) Meredith Kopit Levien
	The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal:						For	Against	Abstain
	2.	Ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022					o	o	o
	The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal:						For	Against	Abstain
	3.	Advisory vote to approve executive compensation					o	o	o
	NOTE: In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote on such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
	IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST DATE, SIGN AND RETURN THIS CARD IN ORDER FOR THE SHARES TO BE VOTED.
	Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer, giving full title as such.
	Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]			Date		Signature (Joint Owners)		Date

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

APRIL 27, 2022

11:00 a.m. Eastern Time

via the Internet

www.virtualshareholdermeeting/com/NYT2022

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on April 27, 2022: The Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY Proxy Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on April 27, 2022
	The undersigned hereby appoints A.G. Sulzberger, Meredith Kopit Levien and Diane Brayton, and each of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his or her substitute, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote, as designated on all matters coming before said meeting, including the matters on the reverse side of this card, all of the shares of CLASS B COMMON STOCK of THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2022, virtually at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NYT2022, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and revokes any proxies previously given.
	This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned. If no direction is given, this proxy will be voted FOR the election of each of the Class B director nominees and FOR proposals 2 and 3. In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote on such other matters that may properly come before this meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
Continued and to be dated and signed on reverse side.