Contingent Liabilities	9 Months Ended
Sep. 28, 2014
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Contingent Liabilities	CONTINGENT LIABILITIES Restricted Cash We were required to maintain $29.2 million of restricted cash as of September 28, 2014 and $28.1 million as of December 29, 2013, primarily to collateralize obligations under our workers’ compensation programs. Restricted cash is included in “Miscellaneous assets” in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Other We are involved in various legal actions incidental to our business that are now pending against us. These actions are generally for amounts greatly in excess of the payments, if any, that may be required to be made. It is the opinion of management after reviewing these actions with our legal counsel that the ultimate liability that might result from these actions would not have a material adverse effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements. Newspaper and Mail Deliverers – Publishers’ Pension Fund On September 13, 2013, we received a notice and demand for payment in the amount of approximately $26.0 million from the Newspaper and Mail Deliverers’ - Publishers’ Pension Fund. We participate in the fund, which covers drivers employed by The New York Times. City & Suburban, a retail and newsstand distribution subsidiary and the largest contributor to the fund, ceased operations in 2009. The fund claims that the Company partially withdrew from the fund in the plan years ending May 31, 2013 and 2012, as a result of a more than 70% decline in contribution base units. We disagree with the plan determination and are disputing the claim vigorously. We do not believe that a loss is probable on this matter and have not recorded a loss contingency for the period ended September 28, 2014. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation In February 2014, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) notified us that it believed that the Company has had a triggering event under Section 4062(e) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), with respect to The Boston Globe Retirement Plan for Employees Represented by the Boston Newspaper Guild (the “BNG” Plan) and The New York Times Companies Pension Plan on account of our sale of the New England Media Group. Under Section 4062(e), the PBGC may be entitled to protection if, as a result of a cessation of operations at a facility, more than 20% of the active participants in a plan are separated from employment. The Company, which retained all pension assets and liabilities related to New England Media Group employees, maintains that an asset sale is not a triggering event for purposes of Section 4062(e). Additionally, with respect to The New York Times Companies Pension Plan, we believe that the 20% threshold was not met. In June 2014, the PBGC notified the Company that it had concluded there was no Section 4062(e) event with respect to The New York Times Companies Pension Plan as a result of the sale of the New England Media Group. In July 2014, the PBGC announced a moratorium until the end of 2014 on the enforcement of all Section 4062(e) cases. During this moratorium, the PBGC will cease all enforcement actions on pending matters, including the Company’s, while it engages in a reevaluation of its enforcement efforts under this provision. If a triggering event under Section 4062(e) with respect to the BNG Plan is determined to have occurred, we would be required to place funds into an escrow account or to post a surety bond, with the escrowed funds or the bond proceeds available to the BNG Plan if it were to terminate in a distress or involuntary termination within five years of the date of the New England Media Group sale. We do not expect such a termination to occur. If the BNG Plan did not so terminate within the five-year period, any escrowed funds for that plan would be returned to the Company or the bond would be cancelled. The amount of any required escrow or bond would be based on a percentage of the BNG Plan’s unfunded benefit liabilities, computed under Section 4062(e) on a “termination basis,” which would be higher than that computed under GAAP. In lieu of establishing an escrow account with the PBGC or posting a bond, we and the PBGC can negotiate an alternate resolution of the liability, which could include making cash contributions to the BNG Plan in excess of minimum requirements. At this time, we cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter, but we do not expect that the resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on our earnings or financial condition.

CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Restricted Cash

We were required to maintain $29.2 million of restricted cash as of September 28, 2014 and $28.1 million as of December 29, 2013, primarily to collateralize obligations under our workers’ compensation programs. Restricted cash is included in “Miscellaneous assets” in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Other

We are involved in various legal actions incidental to our business that are now pending against us. These actions are generally for amounts greatly in excess of the payments, if any, that may be required to be made. It is the opinion of management after reviewing these actions with our legal counsel that the ultimate liability that might result from these actions would not have a material adverse effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Newspaper and Mail Deliverers – Publishers’ Pension Fund

On September 13, 2013, we received a notice and demand for payment in the amount of approximately $26.0 million from the Newspaper and Mail Deliverers’ - Publishers’ Pension Fund. We participate in the fund, which covers drivers employed by The New York Times. City & Suburban, a retail and newsstand distribution subsidiary and the largest contributor to the fund, ceased operations in 2009. The fund claims that the Company partially withdrew from the fund in the plan years ending May 31, 2013 and 2012, as a result of a more than 70% decline in contribution base units. We disagree with the plan determination and are disputing the claim vigorously. We do not believe that a loss is probable on this matter and have not recorded a loss contingency for the period ended September 28, 2014.

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

In February 2014, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) notified us that it believed that the Company has had a triggering event under Section 4062(e) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), with respect to The Boston Globe Retirement Plan for Employees Represented by the Boston Newspaper Guild (the “BNG” Plan) and The New York Times Companies Pension Plan on account of our sale of the New England Media Group. Under Section 4062(e), the PBGC may be entitled to protection if, as a result of a cessation of operations at a facility, more than 20% of the active participants in a plan are separated from employment. The Company, which retained all pension assets and liabilities related to New England Media Group employees, maintains that an asset sale is not a triggering event for purposes of Section 4062(e). Additionally, with respect to The New York Times Companies Pension Plan, we believe that the 20% threshold was not met.

In June 2014, the PBGC notified the Company that it had concluded there was no Section 4062(e) event with respect to The New York Times Companies Pension Plan as a result of the sale of the New England Media Group. In July 2014, the PBGC announced a moratorium until the end of 2014 on the enforcement of all Section 4062(e) cases. During this moratorium, the PBGC will cease all enforcement actions on pending matters, including the Company’s, while it engages in a reevaluation of its enforcement efforts under this provision.

If a triggering event under Section 4062(e) with respect to the BNG Plan is determined to have occurred, we would be required to place funds into an escrow account or to post a surety bond, with the escrowed funds or the bond proceeds available to the BNG Plan if it were to terminate in a distress or involuntary termination within five years of the date of the New England Media Group sale. We do not expect such a termination to occur. If the BNG Plan did not so terminate within the five-year period, any escrowed funds for that plan would be returned to the Company or the bond would be cancelled. The amount of any required escrow or bond would be based on a percentage of the BNG Plan’s unfunded benefit liabilities, computed under Section 4062(e) on a “termination basis,” which would be higher than that computed under GAAP. In lieu of establishing an escrow account with the PBGC or posting a bond, we and the PBGC can negotiate an alternate resolution of the liability, which could include making cash contributions to the BNG Plan in excess of minimum requirements.

At this time, we cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter, but we do not expect that the resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on our earnings or financial condition.