XML 54 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Mar. 25, 2012
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Disclosures
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid upon transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The transaction would be in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability, based on assumptions that a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.
The fair value hierarchy consists of three levels:
Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date;
Level 2 – inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and
Level 3 – unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
Assets Measured and Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table summarizes our financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 25, 2012:
(In thousands)
 
As of March 25, 2012
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2

Level 3
Available-for-sale security
 
$
14,016

 
$
14,016

 
$

 
$

Certain financial assets are valued using market prices on the active markets. Level 1 instrument valuations are obtained from real-time quotes for transactions in active exchange markets involving identical assets. In the first quarter of 2012, the common stock of Brightcove, Inc. (available-for-sale security) began to trade on an active market (see Note 5).
Assets Measured and Recorded at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
Certain non-financial assets, such as goodwill, other intangible assets, property, plant and equipment and certain investments, are only recorded at fair value if an impairment charge is recognized. The following table presents non-financial assets that were measured and recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis and the total impairment losses recorded during 2012 on those assets:
(In thousands)
 
Carrying Value
 
Fair Value Measured and Recorded Using
 
Impairment Loss
 
as of March 25, 2012
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
2012
Cost method investments
 
$
600

 
$

 
$

 
$
600

 
$
4,900

Total impairment loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
4,900

The impairment charge, which was primarily related to our investment in Ongo Inc., was due to events that reduced the fair value of our investments (see Note 5). We determine the fair value of these investments using the market and income approaches. The market approach includes the use of financial metrics and ratios of comparable companies. The income approach includes the use of a discounted cash flow model. We classified these measurements as Level 3, as we used unobservable inputs within the valuation methodologies.
Financial Instruments Disclosed, But Not Recorded, at Fair Value
Our short-term investments, which include U.S. Treasury securities and commercial paper, are recorded at amortized cost (see Note 3). As of March 25, 2012, the amortized cost approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity and highly liquid nature of these investments. We classified these investments as Level 1.
The carrying value of our long-term debt was approximately $693 million as of March 25, 2012 and $692 million as of December 25, 2011. The fair value of our long-term debt was approximately $818 million as of March 25, 2012 and $800 million as of December 25, 2011.
We estimate the fair value of our debt utilizing market quotations for debt that have quoted prices in active markets. Since our debt does not trade on a daily basis in an active market, the fair value estimates are based on market observable inputs based on borrowing rates currently available for debt with similar terms and average maturities (Level 2).