XML 56 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS:
6 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS:  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS:

4.                                     FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS:

 

Fair value measurements are categorized into one of three levels based on the lowest level of significant input used: Level 1 (unadjusted quoted prices in active markets); Level 2 (observable market inputs available at the measurement date, other than quoted prices included in Level 1); and Level 3 (unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated by observable market data).

 

Assets and Liabilities that are Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

 

The fair value hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. In instances in which the inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the fair value measurement has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular item to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, including the consideration of inputs specific to the asset or liability.

 

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument:

 

Derivative instruments.  The Company’s derivative instrument assets and liabilities historically have consisted of cash flow hedges represented by forward foreign currency contracts. Derivative instruments are classified as Level 2 as the fair value is obtained using observable inputs available for similar liabilities in active markets at the measurement date that are reviewed by the Company. There were no derivative instruments as of December 31, 2012.  The fair value of derivative instruments as of June 30, 2012 was $0.1 million.

 

Equity put option—Provalliance.  The Company’s merger of the European franchise salon operations with the operations of the Franck Provost Salon Group on January 31, 2008 contained an equity put (Provalliance Equity Put) and an equity call. The instruments were classified as Level 3 as the fair value was determined based on unobservable inputs that could not be corroborated by observable market data.  See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of the share purchase agreement. On September 27, 2012 the share purchase agreement closed in which the Company sold its 46.7 percent equity interest in Provolliance. The fair value of the Provalliance Equity Put decreased from $0.6 million as of June 30, 2012 to zero during the three months ended September 30, 2012 as it automatically terminated upon closing of the share purchase agreement.

 

Equity put and call options—Roosters.  The purchase agreement for the Company’s acquisition of a 60.0 percent ownership interest in Roosters MGC International LLC (Roosters) on July 1, 2011 contained an equity put (Roosters Equity Put) and an equity call (Roosters Equity Call). The instruments are classified as Level 3 as the fair value is determined based on unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated by observable market data.   See further discussion within Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Roosters Equity Put and Roosters Equity Call are valued using binomial lattice models that incorporate assumptions including the business enterprise value at that date and future estimates of volatility and earnings before interest, taxes, and depreciation and amortization multiples. The sensitivity of the underlying assumptions to the Roosters Equity Put and Roosters Equity Call is not material to the consolidated financial statements. At December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012, the fair value of the Roosters Equity Put and Roosters Equity Call were $0.2 and $0.1 million, respectively, and are classified within noncurrent liabilities and other assets, respectively, on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

 

Financial Instruments.  In addition to the financial instruments listed above, the Company’s financial instruments also include cash, cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable and debt.

 

The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, receivables and accounts payable approximated the carrying values as of December 31, 2012 and 2011. At December 31, 2012, the estimated fair values and carrying amounts of debt were $285.4 and $269.0 million, respectively. At June 30, 2012, the estimated fair values and carrying amounts of debt were $307.5 and $287.7 million, respectively. The estimated fair value of debt was determined based on internal valuation models, which utilize quoted market prices and interest rates for the same or similar instruments (Level 2).

 

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

 

We measure certain assets, including the Company’s equity method investments, tangible fixed assets and goodwill, at fair value on a nonrecurring basis when they are deemed to be other than temporarily impaired. The fair values of our investments are determined based on valuation techniques using the best information available, and may include quoted market prices, market comparables, and discounted cash flow projections.