-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----
Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR
Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov
Originator-Key-Asymmetric:
MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen
TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB
MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA,
C1olM1d2TZ63U4uaXNvg6+uPH4WsKITMe53Icb65S8YKrCyreOtn75XKvtqEAlzl
CzZYC//QPk0pSGHUBY9W9g==
__________________________________________________________________________________________ UNITED STATES (Mark One) X QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2005 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 For the transition period from ____________ to ____________
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission |
Registrant, State of Incorporation, |
I.R.S. Employer |
|
|
|
1-11299 |
ENTERGY CORPORATION |
72-1229752 |
1-10764 |
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. |
71-0005900 |
1-27031 |
ENTERGY GULF STATES, INC. |
74-0662730 |
1-8474 |
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, INC. |
72-0245590 |
1-31508 |
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC. |
64-0205830 |
0-5807 |
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. |
72-0273040 |
1-9067 |
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. |
72-0752777 |
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes |
X |
No |
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
Yes |
No |
|
Entergy Corporation |
Ö |
|
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. |
Ö |
|
Entergy Gulf States, Inc. |
Ö |
|
Entergy Louisiana, Inc. |
Ö |
|
Entergy Mississippi, Inc. |
Ö |
|
Entergy New Orleans, Inc. |
Ö |
|
System Energy Resources, Inc. |
Ö |
Common Stock Outstanding |
Outstanding at July 29, 2005 |
|
Entergy Corporation |
($0.01 par value) |
207,579,330 |
Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States, Inc., Entergy Louisiana, Inc., Entergy Mississippi, Inc., Entergy New Orleans, Inc., and System Energy Resources, Inc. separately file this combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Information contained herein relating to any individual company is filed by such company on its own behalf. Each company reports herein only as to itself and makes no other representations whatsoever as to any other company. This combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q supplements and updates the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the calendar year ended December 31, 2004, and the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, filed by the individual registrants with the SEC, and should be read in conjunction therewith.
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
June 30, 2005
Page Number |
|||
Definitions |
1 |
||
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries |
|||
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis |
|||
Results of Operations |
4 |
||
Liquidity and Capital Resources |
8 |
||
Significant Factors and Known Trends |
11 |
||
Critical Accounting Estimates |
19 |
||
Consolidated Statements of Income |
21 |
||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
22 |
||
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
24 |
||
Consolidated Statements of Retained Earnings, Comprehensive Income, and |
26 |
||
Selected Operating Results |
27 |
||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
28 |
||
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. |
|||
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis |
|||
Results of Operations |
42 |
||
Liquidity and Capital Resources |
44 |
||
Significant Factors and Known Trends |
46 |
||
Critical Accounting Estimates |
50 |
||
Income Statements |
52 |
||
Statements of Cash Flows |
53 |
||
Balance Sheets |
54 |
||
Selected Operating Results |
56 |
||
Entergy Gulf States, Inc. |
|||
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis |
|||
Results of Operations |
57 |
||
Liquidity and Capital Resources |
60 |
||
Significant Factors and Known Trends |
61 |
||
Critical Accounting Estimates |
68 |
||
Income Statements |
69 |
||
Statements of Cash Flows |
71 |
||
Balance Sheets |
72 |
||
Statements of Retained Earnings and Comprehensive Income |
74 |
||
Selected Operating Results |
75 |
||
Entergy Louisiana, Inc. |
|||
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis |
|||
Results of Operations |
76 |
||
Liquidity and Capital Resources |
79 |
||
Significant Factors and Known Trends |
80 |
||
Critical Accounting Estimates |
86 |
||
Income Statements |
87 |
||
Statements of Cash Flows |
89 |
||
Balance Sheets |
90 |
||
Selected Operating Results |
92 |
||
Entergy Mississippi, Inc. |
|||
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis |
|||
Results of Operations |
93 |
||
Liquidity and Capital Resources |
95 |
||
Significant Factors and Known Trends |
96 |
||
Critical Accounting Estimates |
100 |
||
Income Statements |
102 |
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
June 30, 2005
Page Number |
|||
Statements of Cash Flows |
103 |
||
Balance Sheets |
104 |
||
Selected Operating Results |
106 |
||
Entergy New Orleans, Inc. |
|||
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis |
|||
Results of Operations |
107 |
||
Liquidity and Capital Resources |
109 |
||
Significant Factors and Known Trends |
110 |
||
Critical Accounting Estimates |
114 |
||
Income Statements |
115 |
||
Statements of Cash Flows |
117 |
||
Balance Sheets |
118 |
||
Selected Operating Results |
120 |
||
System Energy Resources, Inc. |
|||
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis |
|||
Results of Operations |
121 |
||
Liquidity and Capital Resources |
121 |
||
Significant Factors and Known Trends |
122 |
||
Critical Accounting Estimates |
123 |
||
Income Statements |
124 |
||
Statements of Cash Flows |
125 |
||
Balance Sheets |
126 |
||
Notes to Respective Financial Statements |
128 |
||
Item 4. Controls and Procedures |
140 |
||
Part II. Other Information |
|||
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
141 |
||
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
142 |
||
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
142 |
||
Item 5. Other Information |
144 |
||
Item 6. Exhibits |
146 |
||
Signature |
149 |
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
In this filing and from time to time, Entergy makes statements concerning its expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, and future events or performance. Such statements are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although Entergy believes that these forward-looking statements and the underlying assumptions are reasonable, it cannot provide assurance that they will prove correct. Except to the extent required by the federal securities laws, Entergy undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, and there are factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the statements. Some of those factors (in addition to others described elsewhere in this report and in subsequent securities filings) include:
(Page left blank intentionally)
DEFINITIONS
Certain abbreviations or acronyms used in the text are defined below:
Abbreviation or Acronym |
Term |
AFUDC |
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction |
ALJ |
Administrative Law Judge |
ANO 1 and 2 |
Units 1 and 2 of Arkansas Nuclear One Steam Electric Generating Station (nuclear), owned by Entergy Arkansas |
APSC |
Arkansas Public Service Commission |
Board |
Board of Directors of Entergy Corporation |
Cajun |
Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. |
capacity factor |
Actual plant output divided by maximum potential plant output for the period |
City Council or Council |
Council of the City of New Orleans, Louisiana |
CPI-U |
Consumer Price Index - Urban |
DOE |
United States Department of Energy |
domestic utility companies |
Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans, collectively |
EITF |
FASB's Emerging Issues Task Force |
Energy Commodity Services |
Entergy's business segment that includes Entergy-Koch, LP and Entergy's non-nuclear wholesale assets business |
Entergy |
Entergy Corporation and its direct and indirect subsidiaries |
Entergy Corporation |
Entergy Corporation, a Delaware corporation |
Entergy-Koch |
Entergy-Koch, LP, a joint venture equally owned by subsidiaries of Entergy and Koch Industries, Inc. |
EPA |
United States Environmental Protection Agency |
EPDC |
Entergy Power Development Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Entergy Corporation |
FASB |
Financial Accounting Standards Board |
FEMA |
Federal Emergency Management Agency |
FERC |
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
firm liquidated damages |
Transaction that requires receipt or delivery of energy at a specified delivery point (usually at a market hub not associated with a specific asset); if a party fails to deliver or receive energy, the defaulting party must compensate the other party as specified in the contract |
FSP |
FASB Staff Position |
Grand Gulf |
Unit No. 1 of Grand Gulf Steam Electric Generating Station (nuclear), 90% owned or leased by System Energy |
GWh |
Gigawatt-hour(s), which equals one million kilowatt-hours |
Independence |
Independence Steam Electric Station (coal), owned 16% by Entergy Arkansas, 25% by Entergy Mississippi, and 7% by Entergy Power |
IRS |
Internal Revenue Service |
ISO |
Independent System Operator |
kV |
Kilovolt |
kW |
Kilowatt |
kWh |
Kilowatt-hour(s) |
LDEQ |
Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality |
LPSC |
Louisiana Public Service Commission |
Mcf |
One thousand cubic feet of gas |
MMBtu |
One million British Thermal Units |
MPSC |
Mississippi Public Service Commission |
DEFINITIONS (Continued)
Abbreviation or Acronym |
Term |
MW |
Megawatt(s), which equals one thousand kilowatt(s) |
MWh |
Megawatt-hour(s) |
Nelson Unit 6 |
Unit No. 6 (coal) of the Nelson Steam Electric Generating Station, owned 70% by Entergy Gulf States |
Net debt ratio |
Gross debt less cash and cash equivalents divided by total capitalization less cash and cash equivalents |
Net MW in operation |
Installed capacity owned or operated |
Net revenue |
Operating revenue net of fuel, fuel-related, and purchased power expenses; and other regulatory credits |
Non-Utility Nuclear |
Entergy's business segment that owns and operates five nuclear power plants and sells electric power produced by those plants to wholesale customers |
NRC |
Nuclear Regulatory Commission |
NYPA |
New York Power Authority |
PPA |
Purchased power agreement |
production cost |
Cost in $/MMBtu associated with delivering gas, excluding the cost of the gas |
PRP |
Potentially responsible party (a person or entity that may be responsible for remediation of environmental contamination) |
PUCT |
Public Utility Commission of Texas |
PUHCA |
Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended |
PURPA |
Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 |
Ritchie Unit 2 |
Unit 2 of the R.E. Ritchie Steam Electric Generating Station (gas/oil) |
River Bend |
River Bend Steam Electric Generating Station (nuclear), owned by Entergy Gulf States |
SEC |
Securities and Exchange Commission |
SFAS |
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards as promulgated by the FASB |
SMEPA |
South Mississippi Electric Power Agency, which owns a 10% interest in Grand Gulf |
spark spread |
Dollar difference between electricity prices per unit and natural gas prices after assuming a conversion ratio for the number of natural gas units necessary to generate one unit of electricity |
System Agreement |
Agreement, effective January 1, 1983, as modified, among the domestic utility companies relating to the sharing of generating capacity and other power resources |
System Energy |
System Energy Resources, Inc. |
System Fuels |
System Fuels, Inc. |
TWh |
Terawatt-hour(s), which equals one billion kilowatt-hours |
unit-contingent |
Transaction under which power is supplied from a specific generation asset; if the specified generation asset is unavailable as a result of forced outage or unanticipated event or circumstance, the seller is not liable to the buyer for any damages resulting from the seller's failure to deliver power |
unit-contingent with |
Transaction under which power is supplied from a specific generation asset; if the specified generation asset is unavailable as a result of forced outage or unanticipated event or circumstance, the seller is not liable to the buyer for any damages resulting from the seller's failure to deliver power unless the actual availability over a specified period of time is below an availability threshold specified in the contract |
DEFINITIONS (Concluded)
Abbreviation or Acronym |
Term |
Unit Power Sales Agreement |
Agreement, dated as of June 10, 1982, as amended and approved by FERC, among Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and System Energy, relating to the sale of capacity and energy from System Energy's share of Grand Gulf |
UK |
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
U.S. Utility |
Entergy's business segment that generates, transmits, distributes, and sells electric power, with a small amount of natural gas distribution |
Waterford 3 |
Unit No. 3 (nuclear) of the Waterford Steam Electric Generating Station, 100% owned or leased by Entergy Louisiana |
weather-adjusted usage |
Electric usage excluding the effects of deviations from normal weather |
White Bluff |
White Bluff Steam Electric Generating Station, 57% owned by Entergy Arkansas |
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of Operations
Entergy's consolidated earnings applicable to common stock for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
Second Quarter |
Six Months Ended |
|||||||
Operating Segment |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
2005 |
2004 |
||
(In Thousands) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
U.S. Utility |
|
$211,717 |
|
$194,964 |
$302,216 |
$310,621 |
||
Non-Utility Nuclear |
|
58,277 |
|
62,994 |
136,242 |
131,828 |
||
Parent Company & Other Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total |
|
$286,150 |
|
$265,182 |
$458,146 |
$472,343 |
Entergy's income before taxes is discussed below according to the operating segments listed above. See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements herein for more information concerning Entergy's operating segments and their financial results in 2005 and 2004.
Refer to ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES - SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS for further information with respect to operating statistics.
U.S. UTILITY
The decrease in earnings for the U.S. Utility for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004 from $310.6 million to $302.2 million was primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses and higher depreciation and amortization expenses, partially offset by higher net revenue and lower interest expenses.
Net Revenue
Second Quarter 2005 Compared to Second Quarter 2004
Net revenue, which is Entergy's measure of gross margin, consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related, and purchased power expenses and 2) other regulatory credits. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the second quarter of 2005 to the second quarter of 2004.
|
|
Amount |
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
|
|
2004 net revenue |
|
$1,100.6 |
Price applied to unbilled sales |
|
71.0 |
Volume/weather |
|
10.8 |
Other |
|
(1.6) |
2005 net revenue |
|
$1,180.8 |
The price applied to unbilled sales variance resulted from an increase in the fuel cost component included in the price applied to unbilled sales. The increase in the fuel cost component is attributable to an increase in the price of natural gas, the nuclear refueling outage at Waterford 3, and the nuclear maintenance outages at River Bend. See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K and Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues.
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase in electricity usage totaling 161 GWh in the residential and commercial sectors. Industrial sales volume declined primarily due to the loss to cogeneration, which had been expected, of one large customer.
Gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses
Gross operating revenues increased from $2.0 billion for the second quarter 2004 to $2.2 billion for the second quarter 2005. The increase includes an increase in fuel cost recovery revenues of $81.7 million resulting primarily from increases in the market prices of natural gas and purchased power. As such, this revenue increase is offset by increased fuel and purchased power expenses. The increases in the price applied to unbilled sales and volume/weather variances, discussed above, also contributed to the increase in gross operating revenues.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Net revenue, which is Entergy's measure of gross margin, consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related, and purchased power expenses and 2) other regulatory credits. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the six months ended June 30, 2005 to the six months ended June 30, 2004.
|
|
Amount |
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
|
|
2004 net revenue |
|
$2,025.4 |
Price applied to unbilled sales |
|
55.5 |
Deferred fuel cost revisions |
|
15.5 |
Rate refund provisions |
7.5 |
|
Volume/weather |
|
(15.8) |
Other |
|
2.3 |
2005 net revenue |
|
$2,090.4 |
The price applied to unbilled sales variance resulted from an increase in the fuel cost component included in the price applied to unbilled sales. The increase in the fuel cost component is attributable to an increase in the price of natural gas, the nuclear refueling outage at Waterford 3, and the nuclear maintenance outages at River Bend. See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K and Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues.
The deferred fuel cost revisions variance is due to a revised estimate of fuel costs filed for recovery at Entergy Arkansas in the March 2004 energy cost recovery rider, which reduced net revenue in the first quarter of 2004 by $11.5 million. The remainder of the variance is due to the 2004 energy cost recovery true-up, made in the first quarter of 2005, which increased net revenue by $4.0 million.
The rate refund provisions variance is due primarily to accruals recorded in 2004 for potential rate action at Entergy New Orleans and Entergy Gulf States. Included in the current period variance are provisions recorded at Entergy Louisiana in 2005 as a result of LPSC-approved settlements in March 2005 and May 2005. The settlements are discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
The volume/weather variance resulted from decreased usage by residential customers and a decrease in usage during the unbilled sales period. Industrial sales volume was relatively unchanged as the loss to cogeneration, which had been expected, of one large customer was offset by an increase in usage by other customers, primarily in the chemical industry. See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K and Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues.
Gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses
Gross operating revenues increased from $3.8 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2004 to $4.0 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The increase includes an increase in fuel cost recovery revenues of $151 million resulting primarily from increases in the market prices of natural gas and purchased power. As such, this revenue increase is offset by increased fuel and purchased power expenses. The increase in the price applied to unbilled sales, discussed above, also contributed to the increase in gross operating revenues.
Other Income Statement Variances
Second Quarter 2005 Compared to Second Quarter 2004
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased from $391.7 million for the second quarter 2004 to $432.6 million for the second quarter 2005 primarily due to:
Other income decreased from $30.5 million for the second quarter 2004 to $20.1 million for the second quarter 2005 primarily due to:
The decrease was partially offset by an increase of $6.2 million in interest and dividend income primarily due to higher interest on temporary cash investments.
Interest on long-term debt decreased from $97.6 million for the second quarter 2004 to $91.2 million for the second quarter 2005 primarily due to the net retirement of $319 million of long-term debt at the domestic utility companies in 2004. Refer to Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K and Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements herein for details of long-term debt.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased from $723 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 to $798 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 primarily due to:
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased from $385.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 to $398.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 due primarily to an increase in plant in service.
Other income, which was $45.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and $45.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, includes the following:
Interest on long-term debt decreased from $199.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 to $184.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 primarily due to the net retirement of $319 million of long-term debt at the domestic utility companies in 2004. Refer to Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K and Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements herein for details of long-term debt.
NON-UTILITY NUCLEAR
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
Six Months Ended |
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net MW in operation at June 30 |
|
4,105 |
|
4,001 |
|
4,105 |
|
4,001 |
Generation in GWh for the period |
|
8,156 |
|
8,196 |
|
16,422 |
|
16,882 |
Capacity factor for the period |
|
90.9% |
|
93.6% |
|
92.1% |
|
96.3% |
Average realized price per MWh |
|
$42.63 |
|
$41.33 |
|
$42.09 |
|
$40.49 |
Second Quarter 2005 Compared to Second Quarter 2004
The decrease in earnings for Non-Utility Nuclear from $63.0 million to $58.3 million was primarily due to higher operation and maintenance expenses resulting primarily from increased benefits costs and the effects of lower generation associated with planned and unplanned refueling and maintenance outages. Partially offsetting the decrease was an increase in revenues due to higher contract pricing.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
The increase in earnings for Non-Utility Nuclear from $131.8 million to $136.2 million was primarily due to miscellaneous income of $15.8 million net-of-tax resulting from a reduction in the decommissioning liability for a plant, as discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. Also contributing to the increase in earnings was higher contract pricing. The increase in earnings was partially offset by the effects of lower generation associated with planned and unplanned refueling and maintenance outages and higher operation and maintenance expenses resulting primarily from increased benefits costs.
PARENT COMPANY & OTHER BUSINESS SEGMENTS
Second Quarter 2005 Compared to Second Quarter 2004
The increase in earnings for Parent Company & Other Business Segments from $7.2 million to $16.2 million was primarily due to $14.4 million of tax benefits in 2005 from the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 and an increase of $5.5 million from the non-nuclear wholesale assets business primarily due to lower operation and maintenance expenses and proceeds from the sale of SO2 allowances. The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $13.9 million due to the absence of earnings from Entergy's investment in Entergy-Koch because of the sale of Entergy-Koch's energy trading and pipeline businesses in the fourth quarter of 2004, as discussed in the Form 10-K.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
The decrease in earnings for Parent Company & Other Business Segments from $29.9 million to $19.7 million was primarily due to a decrease of $30.1 million due to the absence of earnings from Entergy's investment in Entergy-Koch due to the sale of Entergy-Koch's energy trading and pipeline businesses in the fourth quarter of 2004, as discussed in the Form 10-K. Also contributing to the decrease in earnings was the favorable settlement of a tax issue, which increased earnings by $11 million in the first quarter of 2004. The decrease was partially offset by $14.4 million of tax benefits in 2005 from the American Job Creations Act of 2004 and an increase of $14.1 million from the non-nuclear wholesale assets business primarily due to lower operation and maintenance expenses and proceeds from the sale of SO2 allowances.
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rates for the second quarters of 2005 and 2004 were 34.8% and 38.0%, respectively. The effective income tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were 34.8% and 36.0%, respectively. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the second quarter and the six months ended June 30, 2005 versus the federal statutory rate of 35.0% is primarily due to tax benefits from the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 and investment tax credit amortization, partially offset by state income taxes and regulatory plant differences on utility plant items. Also contributing to the difference for the six months ended June 30, 2005 is a downward revision in the estimate of federal income tax expense related to tax depreciation. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the second quarter and the six months ended June 30, 2004 versus the federal statutory rate of 35.0% is primarily due to state income taxes and regulatory plant differences on utility plant items, partially offset by the favorable settlement of a tax audit issue and investment tax credit amortization.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy's capital structure, capital expenditure plans and other uses of capital, and sources of capital. Following are updates to that discussion.
The Form 10-K reported that Entergy expected to contribute $185.9 million in 2005 to its pension plans. Entergy has elected to make additional contributions, and now expects to contribute $253.3 million to its pension plans in 2005. Entergy contributed $117.7 million to its pension plans during the six months ended June 30, 2005.
Capital Structure
Entergy's capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table. The increase in the debt to capital percentage as of June 30, 2005 is primarily the result of increased debt outstanding due to additional borrowings on Entergy Corporation's revolving credit facility along with a decrease in shareholders' equity, primarily due to repurchases of common stock, both of which are discussed below.
|
|
June 30, |
December 31, 2004 |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net debt to net capital |
|
48.7% |
45.3% |
|
45.6% |
|
45.9% |
|
Effect of subtracting cash from debt |
|
1.9% |
2.1% |
|
1.8% |
|
1.6% |
|
Debt to capital |
|
50.6% |
47.4% |
|
47.4% |
|
47.5% |
Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of notes payable, capital lease obligations, preferred stock with sinking fund, and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt, common shareholders' equity, and preferred stock without sinking fund. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents. Entergy uses the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy's financial condition.
In May 2005, Entergy Corporation terminated its two, separate, revolving credit facilities, a $500 million five-year credit facility and a $965 million three-year credit facility. At that time Entergy Corporation entered into a $2 billion, five-year credit facility, which expires in May 2010. As of June 30, 2005, $635 million in borrowings were outstanding on this facility. Entergy also has the ability to issue letters of credit against the borrowing capacity of the credit facility, and letters of credit totaling $83.5 million had been issued against this facility at June 30, 2005. The total unused capacity for this facility as of June 30, 2005 was approximately $1.3 billion. The commitment fee for this facility is currently 0.13% per annum of the unused amount. Commitment fees and interest rates on loans under the credit facility can fluctuate depending on the senior debt ratings of the domestic utility companies.
Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans each have 364-day credit facilities available as follows:
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
Amount Drawn as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entergy Arkansas |
|
April 2006 |
|
$85 million (a) |
|
- |
Entergy Louisiana |
|
April 2006 |
|
$85 million (a) |
|
- |
Entergy Louisiana |
|
May 2006 |
|
$15 million (b) |
|
- |
Entergy Mississippi |
|
May 2006 |
|
$25 million |
|
- |
Entergy New Orleans |
May 2006 |
$15 million (b) |
- |
(a) |
The combined amount borrowed by Entergy Arkansas and Entergy Louisiana under these facilities at any one time cannot exceed $85 million. |
(b) |
The combined amount borrowed by Entergy Louisiana and Entergy New Orleans under these facilities at any one time cannot exceed $15 million. |
See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for additional discussion of Entergy's short-term credit facilities.
Capital Expenditure Plans and Other Uses of Capital
See the table in the Form 10-K under "Liquidity and Capital Resources - Capital Expenditure Plans and Other Uses of Capital," which sets forth the amounts of Entergy's planned construction and other capital investments by operating segment for 2005 through 2007.
In March 2005, Entergy Mississippi signed an agreement to purchase for $88 million the Attala power plant, a 480 MW natural gas-fired, combined-cycle generating facility owned by Central Mississippi Generating Company (CMGC). Entergy Mississippi plans to invest approximately $20 million in facility upgrades at the Attala plant plus $3 million in other costs, bringing the total capital cost of the project to approximately $111 million. The Attala plant will be 100 percent owned by Entergy Mississippi, and the acquisition is expected to close in late 2005 or early 2006. The purchase of the plant is contingent upon obtaining necessary approvals from various federal agencies, state permitting agencies, and the MPSC, including MPSC approval of investment cost recovery. In May and June 2005, Entergy Mississippi made filings at the MPSC to commence proceedings for MPSC approval both of the acquisition and of the investment cost recovery for the plant. Entergy Mississippi and CMGC had pre viously executed a purchased power agreement in July 2004 for 100 percent of the plant's output, and this agreement will expire upon the close of the acquisition or in March 2008, whichever occurs earlier. The planned construction and other capital investments table in the Form 10-K includes the estimated cost of the Attala acquisition as a 2006 capital commitment.
Cash Flow Activity
As shown in Entergy's Statements of Cash Flows, cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
$620 |
|
$507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
767 |
|
929 |
|
Investing activities |
|
(698) |
|
(484) |
|
Financing activities |
|
(74) |
|
(392) |
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
|
- |
|
(2) |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(5) |
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$615 |
|
$558 |
Operating Activities
Entergy's cash flow provided by operating activities decreased by $162 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004 primarily due a decrease at the U.S. Utility. The U.S. Utility provided $535 million in cash from operating activities in 2005 compared to providing $669 million in 2004. The decrease resulted primarily from an increase of $80 million in pension plan contributions, the $90 million refund to customers in the Louisiana jurisdiction made as a result of the global settlement, an increase of $72 million in income tax payments, and changes in the timing of fuel cost recovery compared to the prior period. These increased uses of cash were partially offset by various items, including the timing of receivable collections and vendor payments compared to the prior period. The Non-Utility Nuclear segment also contributed to the decrease. The Non-Utility Nuclear segment provided $235 million in cash from operating activities i n 2005 compared to providing $265 million in 2004. This decrease was caused primarily by nuclear refueling outage costs, as this business had one more refueling outage in the first half of 2005 than in the first half of 2004.
Investing Activities
Investing activities used $698 million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to using $484 million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2004 primarily due to the following activity:
Financing Activities
Financing activities used $74 million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to using $392 million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2004 primarily due to the following activity:
Significant Factors and Known Trends
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Significant Factors and Known Trends" in the Form 10-K for discussions of rate regulation, federal regulation, market and credit risks, utility restructuring, and nuclear matters. Following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
State and Local Rate Regulation
See the Form 10-K for the chart summarizing material rate proceedings. Following are updates to that chart.
The settlement includes the establishment of a three-year formula rate plan for Entergy Gulf States that, among other provisions, establishes an ROE mid-point of 10.65% for the initial three-year term of the plan and permits Entergy Gulf States to recover incremental capacity costs outside of a traditional base rate proceeding. Under the formula rate plan, over- and under-earnings outside an allowed range of 9.9% to 11.4% will be allocated 60% to customers and 40% to Entergy Gulf States. In addition, there is the potential to extend the formula rate plan beyond the initial three-year effective period by mutual agreement of the LPSC and Entergy Gulf States. Under the settlement, there was no change to Entergy Gulf States' retail rates at that time.
In June 2005, Entergy Gulf States made its formula rate plan filing with the LPSC for the test year ending December 31, 2004. The filing shows a net revenue deficiency of $2.58 million indicating that no refund liability exists. The filing also indicates that a prospective rate increase of $23.8 million is required in order for Entergy Gulf States to earn the authorized ROE mid-point of 10.65%. Subject to the consideration of comments expected to be filed by the LPSC staff and intervenors in the third quarter 2005, rate changes associated with the formula rate plan are scheduled to take effect with the first billing cycle in October 2005. Any disputed issues will be subject to further investigation by the LPSC, with any resolution of such issues being made effective October 2005.
Regarding Entergy Louisiana's January 2004 rate filing, in March 2005, the LPSC staff and Entergy Louisiana filed a proposed settlement that includes an annual base rate increase of approximately $18.3 million that was implemented, subject to refund, effective with May 2005 billings. In May 2005, the LPSC approved a modified settlement which, among other things, reduces depreciation and decommissioning expense due to assuming a life extension of Waterford 3 and results in no change in rates. Subsequently, in June 2005, Entergy Louisiana made a revised compliance filing with the LPSC supporting a revised depreciation rate for Waterford 3, which reflects the removal of interim additions, and a rate increase from the purchase of the Perryville power plant, which results in a net $0.8 million annual rate reduction. Entergy Louisiana reduced rates effective with the first billing cycle in June 2005 and expects to refund excess revenue collected during May 2005, including interest, in the third quarter of 2005.
The May 2005 rate settlement with the LPSC includes the adoption of a three-year formula rate plan for Entergy Louisiana, the terms of which include an ROE mid-point of 10.25% for the initial three-year term of the plan and permit Entergy Louisiana to recover incremental capacity costs outside of a traditional base rate proceeding. Under the formula rate plan, over- and under-earnings outside an allowed regulatory earnings range of 9.45% to 11.05% will be allocated 60% to customers and 40% to Entergy Louisiana. The initial formula rate plan filing will be in May 2006 based on a 2005 test year with rates effective September 2006. In addition, there is the potential to extend the formula rate plan beyond the initial three-year effective period by mutual agreement of the LPSC and Entergy Louisiana.
In July 2004, Entergy Gulf States filed with the LPSC an application for a change in its rates and charges seeking an increase of $9.1 million in gas base rates in order to allow Entergy Gulf States an opportunity to earn a fair and reasonable rate of return. In June 2005, the LPSC unanimously approved Entergy Gulf States' proposed settlement that includes a $5.8 million gas base rate increase effective the first billing cycle of July 2005 and a rate stabilization plan with an ROE mid-point of 10.5%.
Entergy Gulf States filed with the PUCT in July 2005 a request for implementation of an incremental purchased capacity recovery rider, consistent with the recently passed Texas legislation discussed below under "Utility Restructuring." The rider requests $23.1 million annually in incremental revenues on a Texas retail basis which represents the incremental purchased capacity costs, including Entergy Gulf States' obligation to purchase power from Entergy Louisiana's recently acquired Perryville plant, over what is already in Entergy Gulf States' base rates. Entergy Gulf States has reached an agreement with parties with respect to the date upon which cost recovery and cost reconciliation would begin. The parties have agreed that Entergy Gulf States will implement the rider after approval by the PUCT which could be up to 185 days from the date of filing but will reconcile and recover incremental purchased capacity costs incurred beginn ing September 1, 2005. The September 1, 2005 agreed upon date for the beginning of the cost recovery and cost reconciliation as well as the requested amount and the processes for implementing the rider are subject to PUCT action and approval. If approved by the PUCT, the rider would be subject to semi-annual modifications and reconciliation in conjunction with Entergy Gulf States' fuel reconciliation proceedings. Also see "Utility Restructuring" below for discussion of the provisions in the Texas legislation regarding Entergy Gulf States' ability to file a general rate case and for recovery of transition to competition costs.
In May 2005, Entergy New Orleans filed with the City Council a request for continuation of the formula rate plan and generation performance-based rate plan for an additional three years. The filing requests a target equity component of the capital structure of 45%, an increase from the current target of 42%.
Federal Regulation
System Agreement Litigation
On June 1, 2005, the FERC issued a decision in the System Agreement litigation. The domestic utility companies historically have engaged in the coordinated planning, construction, and operation of generating and bulk transmission facilities under the terms of the System Agreement, which has been approved by the FERC. The System Agreement litigation proceedings are described in the Form 10-K.
The FERC decision concluded, among other things, that:
The FERC's June 2005 order would reallocate production costs of the domestic utility companies whose relative total production costs expressed as a percentage of Entergy System average production costs are outside an upper or lower bandwidth. This would be accomplished by payments from domestic utility companies whose production costs are below Entergy System average production costs to domestic utility companies whose production costs are above Entergy System average production costs. An assessment of the potential effects of the FERC's June 2005 order requires assumptions regarding the future total production cost of each domestic utility company, which assumptions include the mix of solid fuel and gas-fired generation available to each company and the costs of natural gas and purchased power. Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States are more dependent upon gas-fired generation than Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Mississippi, or Entergy New Orleans. Of these, Entergy Arkansas is the l east dependent upon gas-fired generation. Therefore, increases in natural gas prices likely will increase the amount by which Entergy Arkansas' total production costs are below the average production costs of the domestic utility companies. Considerable uncertainty exists regarding future gas prices. Annual average Henry Hub gas prices have varied significantly over recent years, ranging from $1.72/mmBtu to $5.85/mmBtu for the 1995-2004 period, and averaging $3.43/mmBtu during the ten-year period 1995-2004 and $4.58/mmBtu during the five-year period 2000-2004. Recent market conditions have resulted in gas prices that have averaged $5.85/mmBtu for the twelve months ended December 2004. During the 12 month period July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2005 forward gas contracts for each of the next four years based on daily NYMEX close averaged $6.68/mmBtu (2006), $6.25/mmBtu (2007), $5.88/mmBtu (2008) and $5.58/mmBtu (2009). If the FERC's June 2005 order becomes final and if these gas prices occur as assumed, the following potential annual production cost reallocations among the domestic utility companies could result during the 2007-2010 period:
Range of Annual Payments |
Average Annual |
||
(In Millions) |
|||
Entergy Arkansas |
$143 to $210 |
$166 |
|
Entergy Gulf States |
($134) to ($87) |
($113) |
|
Entergy Louisiana |
($71) to ($10) |
($38) |
|
Entergy Mississippi |
($28) to $0 |
($11) |
|
Entergy New Orleans |
($10) to $0 |
($4) |
If natural gas prices deviate by $1/mmBtu up or down, it is expected that Entergy Arkansas' annual payments will change in the same direction by approximately $60 to $70 million.
Management believes that any changes in the allocation of production costs resulting from the FERC's June 2005 order and related retail proceedings should result in similar rate changes for retail customers. The timing of recovery of these costs in rates could be the subject of additional proceedings before Entergy's retail regulators. Although the outcome and timing of the FERC and other proceedings cannot be predicted at this time, Entergy does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these proceedings will have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
See the Form 10-K for discussion of the proceeding that the LPSC commenced before itself regarding the System Agreement. As noted above in "State and Local Rate Regulation," the settlement of various issues involving Entergy Gulf States and Entergy Louisiana that was approved by the LPSC has resolved the System Agreement proceeding before the LPSC, which has been dismissed without prejudice.
Transmission
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the petition for declaratory order that Entergy filed with the FERC in January 2005 regarding Entergy's Independent Coordinator of Transmission (ICT) proposal. On March 22, 2005, the FERC issued a declaratory order concluding that: (1) because the Southwest Power Pool (SPP) was the only entity identified as potentially being selected as the ICT and because the SPP is already a "public utility" there was no need to rule on the question of whether the functions of the ICT, alone, would serve to make the ICT a "public utility;" (2) Entergy will continue to be the "transmission provider" for transmission service across its system and that "the presence of SPP as the ICT will not change the existing balance of jurisdiction between [the FERC] and Entergy's retail regulators;" and (3) the FERC "is prepared to grant Entergy's proposed transmission pricing proposal on a two-year experimental basis, subject to certain enhancement and monitoring and reporting co nditions." The enhancements referred to by the FERC involve more fully specifying the responsibilities and duties of the ICT, including defining the ICT's role in the preparation of various transmission expansion plans and the performance of studies related to the granting of transmission or interconnection service. Before Entergy's ICT proposal can be implemented, however, Entergy is required to submit further filings with the FERC regarding the modifications and clarifications to the ICT proposal.
On April 8, 2005 several intervenors filed an Emergency Request for Clarification and Request for Expedited Commission Action seeking to have the FERC: (1) clarify the ICT's role in administering the Available Flowgate Capacity (AFC) methodology; (2) clarify the ICT's role in developing the transmission base plan; (3) clarify what the FERC meant when it required Entergy to provide firm transmission rights to customers that pay for supplemental transmission upgrades; and (4) clarify and confirm following Entergy's filing that the FERC will assess SPP's status as being independent of Entergy.
On April 21, 2005 Entergy filed a request for clarification or rehearing of the FERC's March 22 declaratory order requesting that the FERC clarify the respective role of Entergy and the ICT in developing the inputs or criteria used to create the base plan and in preparing certain studies regarding system expansion. The request for clarification further requests that the FERC clarify that the initial two-year period will commence with the actual start date of ICT operations. In the event that the FERC denies Entergy's request for clarification, then Entergy will seek rehearing on these issues. However, in its request, Entergy requested that FERC not rule on these issues at this time but, instead, that the FERC wait to evaluate these issues until such time as Entergy has filed the more detailed tariff sheets and protocols in its subsequent filing to implement the ICT. Separately, Entergy submitted a letter advising the FERC that it intended to submit on or about May 27, 2005 the filing t o implement the ICT proposal. A joint request for rehearing of the ICT declaratory order was also filed by the City Council, the LPSC, and the MPSC in which the retail regulators expressed their concerns that the findings reached in the declaratory order may result in an expansion of authority of the ICT "that is unnecessary to achieve the [FERC's] goals and is very likely to result in significant increases in the start-up and operational costs of the ICT." The retail regulators request that the FERC not act on their request for rehearing until Entergy has submitted its filing to implement the ICT. The intervenors filed a separate request for rehearing on April 21, 2005 urging the FERC to impose additional conditions on the approval of the ICT and also re-urging the FERC to reject the pricing proposal contained in the ICT proposal.
On May 12, 2005 the FERC issued an order clarifying certain aspects of its March 22 order. In the May 12 order, the FERC indicated that (1) Entergy is to work with the ICT and Entergy's stakeholders to develop procedures by which the ICT will calculate AFCs; (2) Entergy must specifically define the transmission rights that a customer that pays for supplemental upgrades will receive for such payments; (3) the FERC will review the ICT's contract to ensure that the ICT can perform its functions in an independent manner even if SPP is chosen as the ICT; and (4) the initial two-year period will start once the ICT becomes operational.
On May 27, 2005, the domestic utility companies filed the enhanced ICT proposal with the FERC. Entergy believes that the filing is consistent with the FERC guidance received in both the FERC's March 22 and May 12 orders on the ICT. Among other things, the enhanced ICT filing states that the ICT will (1) grant or deny transmission service on the domestic utility companies' transmission system; (2) administer the domestic utility companies' OASIS node for purposes of processing and evaluating transmission service requests and ensuring compliance with the domestic utility companies' obligation to post transmission-related information; (3) develop a base plan for the domestic utility companies' transmission system that will result in the ICT making the determination on whether something should be rolled into the domestic utility companies' transmission rates or directly assigned to the customer requesting or causing an upgrade to be constructed; (4) serve as the reliability coordinator for t he Entergy transmission system; and (5) oversee the operation of the weekly procurement process. The enhanced ICT proposal clarifies the rights that customers receive when they fund a supplemental upgrade and also contains a detailed methodology describing the process by which the ICT will evaluate interconnection-related investments already made on the Entergy System for purposes of determining the future allocation of the uncredited portion of these investments.
On June 3, 2005 a group of generators filed with the FERC a request that the FERC schedule a technical conference on the enhanced ICT proposal in order for Entergy to provide additional information on the enhanced ICT proposal. In response, a stakeholder meeting was held in New Orleans on June 30, 2005. Interventions and comments on the filing are due by August 5, 2005.
In addition, as discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States have filed an application with the LPSC requesting that the LPSC find that the ICT proposal is a prudent and appropriate course of action. An LPSC hearing on the ICT proposal is currently scheduled for August 2005, however certain intervenors have recently requested that the hearing be delayed until mid-September 2005.
FERC's Supply Margin Assessment
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the FERC's supply margin assessment and, in particular, the order issued by the FERC in December 2004 pursuant to Section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA). On June 30, 2005, the FERC issued an order addressing Entergy's delivered price test (DPT) analysis. The FERC found that material questions of fact exist that may affect the results of the DPT submitted by Entergy. These issues include, for example, whether the entire Entergy control area is the appropriate relevant geographic market or whether there exist binding transmission constraints such that it is more appropriate to define more than one geographic market within the Entergy control area. Accordingly, the FERC initiated an evidentiary hearing to address the impact of any transmission constraints on the appropriate scope of the relevant market; which information will be required prior to the FERC making a determination on whether Entergy has market power within its con trol area. On July 22, 2005, Entergy notified the FERC that it was withdrawing its request for market-based rate authority for sales within its control area. Instead, the domestic utility companies and their affiliates will transact at cost-based rates for wholesale sales within the Entergy control area. Entergy indicated that it will file the proposed cost-based rate schedules within 60 days.
Additionally, Entergy reserves its right to request market-based rate authority for sales within its control area in the future. The FERC ALJ in the proceeding issued an order that cancelled a pre-hearing conference set for July 26, 2005, set a deadline of August 8, 2005 for objections to Entergy's notice of withdrawal, and stated that if no objections were filed by August 8, 2005 Entergy's withdrawal notice will have disposed of all pending issues in the proceeding. The relinquishment of market-based rates for sales within the Entergy control area is not expecte d to have a material effect on the financial results of Entergy.
Additionally, on May 5, 2005, the FERC issued an order addressing the remaining prongs in the market-based rate proceeding: transmission market power, barriers to entry/reciprocal dealing, and affiliate abuse. The FERC granted rehearing in part and instituted a proceeding under Section 206 of the FPA to investigate whether Entergy satisfies the FERC's transmission market power and affiliate abuse/reciprocal dealing standards for the granting of market-based rate authority, and established a refund effective date pursuant to the provisions of Section 206, for purposes of the additional issues set for hearing. However, the FERC decided to hold that investigation in abeyance pending the outcomes of the ICT proceeding and the affiliate purchased power agreements proceeding. The FERC declined to require a hearing on the remaining prong regarding barriers to entry. On June 6, 2005, Entergy sought rehearing of the May 5 Order and that request for rehearing is pending .
Interconnection Orders
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the ALJ Initial Decision and FERC order directing Entergy Louisiana to refund, in the form of transmission credits, approximately $15 million in expenses and tax obligations previously paid by a generator. Entergy's request for rehearing was denied by the FERC.
Available Flowgate Capacity Proceedings
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of proceedings at the FERC involving Entergy's Available Flowgate Capacity (AFC) methodology. On March 22, 2005, the FERC issued an order contemporaneously with the ICT declaratory order discussed above that holds the AFC hearing in abeyance pending action on Entergy's upcoming ICT filing. The order holding the hearing in abeyance further indicated that it would cancel the hearing when the ICT begins to perform its functions. On April 8, 2005 several intervenors filed Emergency Motions for Interim Relief and Expedited Commission Action requesting that, during the interim period before the implementation of the ICT, the FERC (1) institute an audit process to examine and modify Entergy's current AFC process; and (2) require SPP to become involved in the AFC stakeholder process and order certain modifications to Entergy's stakeholder process. The audit process being proposed by the intervenors would not involve an independent auditor, but instead wou ld be an investigation performed by a representative from the intervenors, Entergy, and possibly SPP. On April 25, 2005, Entergy filed its response to the emergency motion urging the FERC to reject the intervenors' request for the "audit" because the type of investigation proposed by the intervenors would be neither independent nor fair and would only distract from the implementation of the ICT. Instead, Entergy has proposed that the ICT conduct an independent review of the AFC process and procedures as part of its transition to assuming the identified ICT responsibilities, including the calculation of the AFCs. Entergy further indicated that it would welcome SPP's participation in the current stakeholder process. On April 21, 2005, the intervenors filed a separate request for rehearing arguing that the FERC must allow the AFC hearing to proceed in parallel with the establishment of the ICT. See "Transmission" above for further discussion of AFC.
Utility Restructuring
Previous developments and information related to electric industry restructuring are presented in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K. The following are updates to the Form 10-K.
Retail-Texas
In June 2005, a Texas law was enacted which provides that:
Retail-Louisiana
In November 2001, the LPSC decided not to move forward with retail open access for any customers at this time. The LPSC instead directed its staff to hold collaborative group meetings concerning open access from time to time, and to have the LPSC staff monitor developments in neighboring states and to report to the LPSC regarding the progress of retail access developments in those states. In September 2004, in response to a study performed by the Louisiana State University Center for Energy Studies that evaluated a limited industrial-only retail choice program, the LPSC asked the LPSC staff to solicit comments and obtain information from utilities, customers, and other interested parties concerning the potential costs and benefits of a limited choice program, the impact of such a program on other customers, as well as issues such as
stranded costs and transmission service. Comments from interested parties were filed with the LPSC in Janua ry 2005. A technical conference was held in April 2005 and in May 2005 interested parties filed reply comments to arguments made at the technical conference. Entergy stated that it believes that there is no new information or credible evidence that would justify altering the LPSC's previous conclusion that retail access is not in the public interest.Federal Legislation
In late July 2005 the U.S. Congress passed broad new energy legislation, the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The legislation contains electricity provisions that, among other things:
The President is expected to sign the Energy Policy Act in August 2005. The Energy Power Act requires several rulemakings by the FERC and other government agencies in order to implement its provisions. Therefore, it will be some time before a full assessment of its effect on Entergy and the energy industry can be completed.
Market and Credit Risks
Commodity Price Risk
As discussed in the Form 10-K, some of the agreements to sell the power produced by Entergy's Non-Utility Nuclear power plants and the wholesale supply agreements entered into by Entergy's Competitive Retail business contain provisions that require an Entergy subsidiary to provide collateral to secure its obligations under the agreements. The Entergy subsidiary may be required to provide collateral based upon the difference between the current market and contracted power prices in the regions where the Non-Utility Nuclear and Competitive Retail businesses sell power. The primary form of the collateral to satisfy these requirements would be an Entergy Corporation guaranty. Cash and letters of credit are also acceptable forms of collateral. At June 30, 2005, based on power prices at that time, Entergy had in place as collateral $922.7 million of Entergy Corporation guarantees, $81.0 million of which support letters of credit. In the event of a decrease in Entergy Corpo ration's credit rating to specified levels below investment grade, Entergy may be required to replace Entergy Corporation guarantees with cash or letters of credit under some of the agreements.
Central States Compact Claim
The Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act of 1980 holds each state responsible for disposal of low-level radioactive waste originating in that state, but allows states to participate in regional compacts to fulfill their responsibilities jointly. Arkansas and Louisiana participate in the Central Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Compact (Central States Compact or Compact). Commencing in 1998, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, and Entergy Louisiana made a series of contributions to the Central States Compact to fund the Central States Compact's development of a low-level radioactive waste disposal facility to be located in Boyd County, Nebraska. In December 1998, Nebraska, the host state for the proposed Central States Compact disposal facility, denied the compact's license application for the proposed disposal facility. Several parties, including the commission that governs the compact (the Compact Commission), filed a lawsuit against Nebraska seeking damages resulting from Nebraska's denial of the proposed facility's license. After a trial, the U.S. District Court concluded that Nebraska violated its good faith obligations regarding the proposed waste disposal facility and rendered a judgment against Nebraska in the amount of $151 million. In August 2004, Nebraska agreed to pay the Compact $141 million in settlement of the judgment. In July 2005, the Compact Commission decided to distribute a substantial portion of the proceeds from the settlement to the nuclear power generators that had contributed funding for the Boyd County facility, including Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, and Entergy Louisiana. On August 1, 2005, Nebraska paid the full amount of the settlement to the Compact, and the Compact distributed from the settlement proceeds $23.6 million to Entergy Arkansas, $19.9 million to Entergy Gulf States, and $18.4 million to Entergy Louisiana. Management is still analyzing the accounting treatment of the receip ts, but expects that some portion of the receipts could result in income for Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, and Entergy Louisiana.
Critical Accounting Estimates
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy's accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, unbilled revenue, impairment of long-lived assets, pension and other postretirement benefits, and other contingencies. The following is an update to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
Nuclear Decommissioning Costs
In the first quarter of 2005, Entergy's Non-Utility Nuclear business recorded a reduction of $26.0 million in its decommissioning cost liability in conjunction with a new decommissioning cost study as a result of revised decommissioning costs and changes in assumptions regarding the timing of when the decommissioning of a plant will begin. The revised estimate resulted in miscellaneous income of $26.0 million ($15.8 million net-of-tax), reflecting the excess of the reduction in the liability over the amount of undepreciated asset retirement cost.
In the second quarter of 2005, Entergy Louisiana recorded a revision to its estimated decommissioning cost liability in accordance with a new decommissioning cost study for Waterford 3 that reflected an expected life extension for the plant. The revised estimate resulted in a $153.6 million reduction in its decommissioning liability, along with a $49.2 million reduction in utility plant and a $104.4 million reduction in the related regulatory asset.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In the first quarter 2005, FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143" (FIN 47). FIN 47 requires companies to recognize at fair value a liability for a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred, which is generally upon an asset's acquisition, construction, development, or through its normal operation. A conditional asset retirement obligation is generally a legal obligation to incur costs to remove an asset or part of an asset, such as an obligation to comply with environmental regulations and requirements. The obligation is conditional because there is currently no legal requirement to retire or remove the facility that the affected asset is a part of. FIN 47 requires that uncertainty about the timing or method of settlement of a conditional asset retirement obligation be factored into the measurement of the liability when sufficient information becomes available. FIN 4 7 will be effective for Entergy no later than December 31, 2005. Entergy does not believe that the adoption of FIN 47 will be material to its financial position or results of operations because it estimates that any conditional asset retirement obligations required to be recognized under FIN 47 would be offset by a regulatory asset because of the expected recovery of these future costs in rates.
(Page left blank intentionally)
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES | ||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME | ||||||||
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||
(In Thousands, Except Share Data) | ||||||||
OPERATING REVENUES | ||||||||
Domestic electric | $2,124,134 | $1,952,049 | $3,868,516 | $3,653,377 | ||||
Natural gas | 43,660 | 38,146 | 130,610 | 121,962 | ||||
Competitive businesses | 541,725 | 494,902 | 1,033,806 | 961,307 | ||||
TOTAL | 2,709,519 | 2,485,097 | 5,032,932 | 4,736,646 | ||||
OPERATING EXPENSES | ||||||||
Operating and Maintenance: | ||||||||
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and | ||||||||
gas purchased for resale | 474,203 | 488,368 | 1,054,284 | 1,038,495 | ||||
Purchased power | 739,786 | 555,439 | 1,239,565 | 1,004,959 | ||||
Nuclear refueling outage expenses | 39,150 | 39,099 | 78,960 | 80,706 | ||||
Other operation and maintenance | 599,575 | 567,746 | 1,134,239 | 1,068,997 | ||||
Decommissioning | 36,525 | 37,098 | 73,524 | 75,446 | ||||
Taxes other than income taxes | 107,465 | 103,283 | 210,454 | 200,585 | ||||
Depreciation and amortization | 213,902 | 215,640 | 438,079 | 426,289 | ||||
Other regulatory credits - net | (30,697) | (15,888) | (47,462) | (31,977) | ||||
TOTAL | 2,179,909 | 1,990,785 | 4,181,643 | 3,863,500 | ||||
OPERATING INCOME | 529,610 | 494,312 | 851,289 | 873,146 | ||||
OTHER INCOME | ||||||||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | 11,164 | 8,016 | 24,049 | 15,479 | ||||
Interest and dividend income | 34,756 | 25,823 | 65,646 | 54,074 | ||||
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated equity affiliates | 2,158 | 20,288 | (35) | 40,107 | ||||
Miscellaneous - net | (11,333) | 13,571 | 14,469 | 18,740 | ||||
TOTAL | 36,745 | 67,698 | 104,129 | 128,400 | ||||
INTEREST AND OTHER CHARGES | ||||||||
Interest on long-term debt | 109,299 | 116,211 | 220,052 | 235,672 | ||||
Other interest - net | 14,058 | 13,563 | 26,222 | 19,778 | ||||
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction | (6,181) | (4,970) | (13,690) | (10,124) | ||||
TOTAL | 117,176 | 124,804 | 232,584 | 245,326 | ||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | 449,179 | 437,206 | 722,834 | 756,220 | ||||
Income taxes | 156,390 | 166,195 | 251,425 | 272,192 | ||||
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME | 292,789 | 271,011 | 471,409 | 484,028 | ||||
Preferred dividend requirements and other | 6,639 | 5,829 | 13,263 | 11,685 | ||||
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO | ||||||||
COMMON STOCK | $286,150 | $265,182 | $458,146 | $472,343 | ||||
Earnings per average common share: | ||||||||
Basic | $1.36 | $1.16 | $2.15 | $2.06 | ||||
Diluted | $1.33 | $1.14 | $2.11 | $2.02 | ||||
Dividends declared per common share | $0.54 | $0.45 | $1.08 | $0.90 | ||||
Average number of common shares outstanding: | ||||||||
Basic | 211,134,467 | 228,714,654 | 212,622,976 | 229,489,646 | ||||
Diluted | 215,568,534 | 232,775,049 | 217,091,580 | 234,007,635 | ||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. | ||||||||
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES | ||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | ||||
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||
(Unaudited) | ||||
2005 | 2004 | |||
(In Thousands) | ||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||
Consolidated net income | $471,409 | $484,028 | ||
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash flow | ||||
provided by operating activities: | ||||
Reserve for regulatory adjustments | (73,803) | 2,407 | ||
Other regulatory credits - net | (47,462) | (31,977) | ||
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning | 511,603 | 501,735 | ||
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits | 95,985 | 138,574 | ||
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated equity affiliates - net of dividends | 35 | (13,824) | ||
Changes in working capital: | ||||
Receivables | (129,074) | (184,375) | ||
Fuel inventory | 13,246 | (22,592) | ||
Accounts payable | (25,284) | 33,120 | ||
Taxes accrued | 74,540 | 111,393 | ||
Interest accrued | (18,118) | (18,811) | ||
Deferred fuel | (97,100) | 1,911 | ||
Other working capital accounts | (54,588) | 23,352 | ||
Provision for estimated losses and reserves | 10,272 | (2,239) | ||
Changes in other regulatory assets | 25,234 | 4,217 | ||
Other | 10,176 | (97,849) | ||
Net cash flow provided by operating activities | 767,071 | 929,070 | ||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||
Construction/capital expenditures | (639,651) | (595,618) | ||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | 24,049 | 15,479 | ||
Nuclear fuel purchases | (184,445) | (100,229) | ||
Proceeds from sale/leaseback of nuclear fuel | 125,680 | 61,694 | ||
Proceeds from sale of assets and businesses | - | 21,978 | ||
Payment for purchase of plant | (162,075) | - | ||
Investment in non-utility properties | - | (8,442) | ||
Decrease (increase) in other investments | 63,193 | (11,071) | ||
Purchases of other temporary investments | (1,591,025) | (376,100) | ||
Liquidation of other temporary investments | 1,778,975 | 583,600 | ||
Decommissioning trust contributions and realized change in trust assets | (48,527) | (44,588) | ||
Other regulatory investments | (63,800) | (30,696) | ||
Net cash flow used in investing activities | (697,626) | (483,993) | ||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. | ||||
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES | ||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | ||||
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||
(Unaudited) | ||||
2005 | 2004 | |||
(In Thousands) | ||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||
Proceeds from the issuance of: | ||||
Long-term debt | 637,215 | 272,977 | ||
Preferred stock | 30,000 | - | ||
Common stock and treasury stock | 89,868 | 107,840 | ||
Retirement of long-term debt | (531,919) | (539,779) | ||
Repurchase of common stock | (639,820) | (271,237) | ||
Redemption of preferred stock | (2,250) | (2,250) | ||
Changes in credit line borrowings - net | 584,850 | 255,000 | ||
Dividends paid: | ||||
Common stock | (229,353) | (202,349) | ||
Preferred stock | (13,261) | (11,913) | ||
Net cash flow used in financing activities | (74,670) | (391,711) | ||
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents | 129 | (2,401) | ||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (5,096) | 50,965 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 619,786 | 507,433 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $614,690 | $558,398 | ||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | ||||
Cash paid during the period for: | ||||
Interest - net of amount capitalized | $250,302 | $259,674 | ||
Income taxes | $83,688 | $25,729 | ||
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES | ||||
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | ||||
ASSETS | ||||
June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 | ||||
(Unaudited) | ||||
2005 | 2004 | |||
(In Thousands) | ||||
CURRENT ASSETS | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents: | ||||
Cash | $104,992 | $79,136 | ||
Temporary cash investments - at cost, | ||||
which approximates market | 509,698 | 540,650 | ||
Total cash and cash equivalents | 614,690 | 619,786 | ||
Other temporary investments | - | 187,950 | ||
Notes receivable | 2,051 | 3,092 | ||
Accounts receivable: | ||||
Customer | 415,382 | 435,191 | ||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | (21,979) | (23,758) | ||
Other | 368,400 | 342,289 | ||
Accrued unbilled revenues | 597,361 | 460,039 | ||
Total receivables | 1,359,164 | 1,213,761 | ||
Deferred fuel costs | 223,980 | 85,911 | ||
Accumulated deferred income taxes | 8,303 | 76,899 | ||
Fuel inventory - at average cost | 114,005 | 127,251 | ||
Materials and supplies - at average cost | 579,375 | 569,407 | ||
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs | 159,484 | 107,782 | ||
Prepayments and other | 117,862 | 116,279 | ||
TOTAL | 3,178,914 | 3,108,118 | ||
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS | ||||
Investment in affiliates - at equity | 168,040 | 231,779 | ||
Decommissioning trust funds | 2,543,275 | 2,453,406 | ||
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation) | 224,545 | 219,717 | ||
Other | 76,158 | 90,992 | ||
TOTAL | 3,012,018 | 2,995,894 | ||
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT | ||||
Electric | 29,710,868 | 29,053,340 | ||
Property under capital lease | 732,583 | 738,554 | ||
Natural gas | 276,874 | 262,787 | ||
Construction work in progress | 1,082,681 | 1,197,551 | ||
Nuclear fuel under capital lease | 268,193 | 262,469 | ||
Nuclear fuel | 339,446 | 320,813 | ||
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT | 32,410,645 | 31,835,514 | ||
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization | 13,431,269 | 13,139,883 | ||
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT - NET | 18,979,376 | 18,695,631 | ||
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS | ||||
Regulatory assets: | ||||
SFAS 109 regulatory asset - net | 737,906 | 746,413 | ||
Other regulatory assets | 1,381,259 | 1,429,261 | ||
Long-term receivables | 29,884 | 39,417 | ||
Goodwill | 377,172 | 377,172 | ||
Other | 884,622 | 918,871 | ||
TOTAL | 3,410,843 | 3,511,134 | ||
TOTAL ASSETS | $28,581,151 | $28,310,777 | ||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. | ||||
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES | ||||
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||
June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 | ||||
(Unaudited) | ||||
2005 | 2004 | |||
(In Thousands) | ||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||
Currently maturing long-term debt | $375,286 | $492,564 | ||
Notes payable | 43 | 193 | ||
Accounts payable | 871,244 | 896,528 | ||
Customer deposits | 234,223 | 222,320 | ||
Taxes accrued | 237,239 | 224,011 | ||
Nuclear refueling outage costs | 6,021 | - | ||
Interest accrued | 126,360 | 144,478 | ||
Obligations under capital leases | 135,262 | 133,847 | ||
Other | 260,706 | 218,442 | ||
TOTAL | 2,246,384 | 2,332,383 | ||
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued | 5,097,025 | 5,067,381 | ||
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits | 389,468 | 399,228 | ||
Obligations under capital leases | 170,322 | 146,060 | ||
Other regulatory liabilities | 378,485 | 329,767 | ||
Decommissioning and retirement cost liabilities | 1,959,346 | 2,066,277 | ||
Transition to competition | 79,101 | 79,101 | ||
Regulatory reserves | 20,174 | 103,061 | ||
Accumulated provisions | 560,478 | 549,914 | ||
Long-term debt | 7,843,705 | 7,016,831 | ||
Preferred stock with sinking fund | 15,150 | 17,400 | ||
Other | 1,475,720 | 1,541,331 | ||
TOTAL | 17,988,974 | 17,316,351 | ||
Commitments and Contingencies | ||||
Preferred stock without sinking fund | 395,683 | 365,356 | ||
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 500,000,000 | ||||
shares; issued 248,174,087 shares in 2005 and in 2004 | 2,482 | 2,482 | ||
Paid-in capital | 4,845,037 | 4,835,375 | ||
Retained earnings | 5,212,985 | 4,984,302 | ||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (147,007) | (93,453) | ||
Less - treasury stock, at cost (38,226,127 shares in 2005 and | ||||
31,345,028 shares in 2004) | 1,963,387 | 1,432,019 | ||
TOTAL | 7,950,110 | 8,296,687 | ||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | $28,581,151 | $28,310,777 | ||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. | ||||
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES | ||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF RETAINED EARNINGS, COMPREHENSIVE INCOME, AND PAID-IN CAPITAL | ||||||||||
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||
RETAINED EARNINGS | ||||||||||
Retained Earnings - Beginning of period | $5,040,655 | $4,605,907 | ||||||||
Add - Earnings applicable to common stock | 286,150 | $286,150 | 265,182 | $265,182 | ||||||
Deduct: | ||||||||||
Dividends declared on common stock | 113,820 | 102,458 | ||||||||
Capital stock and other expenses | - | 295 | ||||||||
Total | 113,820 | 102,753 | ||||||||
Retained Earnings - End of period | $5,212,985 | $4,768,336 | ||||||||
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE | ||||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) (Net of Taxes): | ||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | ||||||||||
Accumulated derivative instrument fair value changes | ($161,446) | ($41,997) | ||||||||
Other accumulated comprehensive income items | 44,649 | 48,490 | ||||||||
Total | (116,797) | 6,493 | ||||||||
Net derivative instrument fair value changes | ||||||||||
arising during the period | (46,621) | (46,621) | (77,544) | (77,544) | ||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments | (85) | (85) | 693 | 693 | ||||||
Net unrealized investment gains (losses) | 16,496 | 16,496 | (24,843) | (24,843) | ||||||
Balance at end of period: | ||||||||||
Accumulated derivative instrument fair value changes | ($208,067) | ($119,541) | ||||||||
Other accumulated comprehensive income items | 61,060 | 24,340 | ||||||||
Total | ($147,007) | ($95,201) | ||||||||
Comprehensive Income | $255,940 | $163,488 | ||||||||
PAID-IN CAPITAL | ||||||||||
Paid-in Capital - Beginning of period | $4,826,797 | $4,792,171 | ||||||||
Add: Common stock issuances related to stock plans | 18,240 | 26,873 | ||||||||
Paid-in Capital - End of period | $4,845,037 | $4,819,044 | ||||||||
Six Months Ended | ||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||
RETAINED EARNINGS | ||||||||||
Retained Earnings - Beginning of period | $4,984,302 | $4,502,508 | ||||||||
Add - Earnings applicable to common stock | 458,146 | $458,146 | 472,343 | $472,343 | ||||||
Deduct: | ||||||||||
Dividends declared on common stock | 229,448 | 206,220 | ||||||||
Capital stock and other expenses | 15 | 295 | ||||||||
Total | 229,463 | 206,515 | ||||||||
Retained Earnings - End of period | $5,212,985 | $4,768,336 | ||||||||
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE | ||||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) (Net of Taxes): | ||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | ||||||||||
Accumulated derivative instrument fair value changes | ($141,411) | ($25,811) | ||||||||
Other accumulated comprehensive income items | 47,958 | 18,016 | ||||||||
Total | (93,453) | (7,795) | ||||||||
Net derivative instrument fair value changes | ||||||||||
arising during the period | (66,655) | (66,655) | (93,730) | (93,730) | ||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments | (129) | (129) | 2,401 | 2,401 | ||||||
Minimum pension liability adjustment | (2,054) | (2,054) | - | - | ||||||
Net unrealized investment gains | 15,284 | 15,284 | 3,923 | 3,923 | ||||||
Balance at end of period: | ||||||||||
Accumulated derivative instrument fair value changes | ($208,066) | ($119,541) | ||||||||
Other accumulated comprehensive income items | 61,059 | 24,340 | ||||||||
Total | ($147,007) | ($95,201) | ||||||||
Comprehensive Income | $404,592 | $384,937 | ||||||||
PAID-IN CAPITAL | ||||||||||
Paid-in Capital - Beginning of period | $4,835,375 | $4,767,615 | ||||||||
Add: Common stock issuances related to stock plans | 9,662 | 51,429 | ||||||||
Paid-in Capital - End of period | $4,845,037 | $4,819,044 | ||||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. | ||||||||||
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES | ||||||||
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS | ||||||||
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Increase/ | |||||||
Description | 2005 | 2004 | (Decrease) | % | ||||
(Dollars In Millions) | ||||||||
U.S. Utility Electric Operating Revenues: | ||||||||
Residential | $607 | $603 | $4 | 1 | ||||
Commercial | 480 | 479 | 1 | - - | ||||
Industrial | 560 | 558 | 2 | - - | ||||
Governmental | 48 | 48 | - | - - | ||||
Total retail | 1,695 | 1,688 | 7 | - - | ||||
Sales for resale | 105 | 104 | 1 | 1 | ||||
Other | 324 | 160 | 164 | 103 | ||||
Total | $2,124 | $1,952 | $172 | 9 | ||||
U.S. Utility Billed Electric Energy | ||||||||
Sales (GWh): | ||||||||
Residential | 7,005 | 6,911 | 94 | 1 | ||||
Commercial | 6,287 | 6,220 | 67 | 1 | ||||
Industrial | 9,810 | 9,922 | (112) | (1) | ||||
Governmental | 620 | 609 | 11 | 2 | ||||
Total retail | 23,722 | 23,662 | 60 | - - | ||||
Sales for resale | 1,938 | 2,367 | (429) | (18) | ||||
Total | 25,660 | 26,029 | (369) | (1) | ||||
Six Months Ended | Increase/ | |||||||
Description | 2005 | 2004 | (Decrease) | % | ||||
(Dollars In Millions) | ||||||||
U.S. Utility Electric Operating Revenues: | ||||||||
Residential | $1,229 | $1,212 | $17 | 1 | ||||
Commercial | 942 | 914 | 28 | 3 | ||||
Industrial | 1,116 | 1,072 | 44 | 4 | ||||
Governmental | 93 | 92 | 1 | 1 | ||||
Total retail | 3,380 | 3,290 | 90 | 3 | ||||
Sales for resale | 200 | 203 | (3) | (1) | ||||
Other | 288 | 160 | 128 | 80 | ||||
Total | $3,868 | $3,653 | $215 | 6 | ||||
U.S. Utility Billed Electric Energy | ||||||||
Sales (GWh): | ||||||||
Residential | 14,575 | 14,637 | (62) | - - | ||||
Commercial | 12,277 | 12,107 | 170 | 1 | ||||
Industrial | 19,406 | 19,412 | (6) | - - | ||||
Governmental | 1,229 | 1,209 | 20 | 2 | ||||
Total retail | 47,487 | 47,365 | 122 | - - | ||||
Sales for resale | 3,670 | 4,785 | (1,115) | (23) | ||||
Total | 51,157 | 52,150 | (993) | (2) | ||||
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Nuclear Insurance
See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on nuclear liability and property and replacement power insurance associated with Entergy's nuclear power plants.
Nuclear Decommissioning and Other Retirement Costs
See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on nuclear decommissioning costs. In the first quarter of 2005, Entergy's Non-Utility Nuclear business recorded a reduction of $26.0 million in its decommissioning cost liability in conjunction with a new decommissioning cost study as a result of revised decommissioning costs and changes in assumptions regarding the timing of when the decommissioning of a plant will begin. The revised estimate resulted in miscellaneous income of $26.0 million ($15.8 million net-of-tax), reflecting the excess of the reduction in the liability over the amount of undepreciated asset retirement cost.
In the second quarter of 2005, Entergy Louisiana recorded a revision to its estimated decommissioning cost liability in accordance with a new decommissioning cost study for Waterford 3 that reflected an expected life extension for the plant. The revised estimate resulted in a $153.6 million reduction in its decommissioning liability, along with a $49.2 million reduction in utility plant and a $104.4 million reduction in the related regulatory asset.
Income Taxes
See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding certain material income tax audit matters involving Entergy. Following is an update to that disclosure.
Mark to Market of Certain Power Contracts
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in 2001, Entergy Louisiana changed its method of accounting for income tax purposes related to its wholesale electric power contracts. The most significant of these is the contract to purchase power from the Vidalia hydroelectric project. On audit of Entergy Louisiana's 2001 tax return, the IRS made an adjustment reducing the amount of the deduction associated with this method change. The adjustment had no material impact on Entergy Louisiana's earnings and required no additional cash payment of 2001 income tax. The Vidalia contract method change has resulted in cumulative cash flow benefits of approximately $790 million through June 30, 2005. This benefit is expected to reverse in the years 2005 through 2031. The tax accounting election has had no effect on book income tax expense. The timing of the reversal of this benefit depends on several variables, including the price of power.
CashPoint Bankruptcy
See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding the bankruptcy of CashPoint, which managed a network of payment agents for the domestic utility companies.
Harrison County Plant Fire
On May 13, 2005, an explosion and fire damaged the non-nuclear wholesale assets business's Harrison County power plant. A catastrophic failure and subsequent natural gas escape from a nearby 36-inch interstate pipeline owned and operated by a third party is believed to have caused the damage. Current estimates are that the cost to clean-up the site and reconstruct the damaged portions of the plant could be at least $50 million and take until
second quarter 2006 to be completed. The plant's property insurer has acknowledged coverage, subject to a $200 thousand deductible. Entergy does not expect the damage caused to the Harrison County plant to have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.
Employment Litigation
Entergy Corporation and certain subsidiaries are defendants in numerous lawsuits filed by former employees asserting that they were wrongfully terminated and/or discriminated against on the basis of age, race, sex, or other protected characteristics. The defendant companies deny any liability to the plaintiffs.
NOTE 2. RATE AND REGULATORY MATTERS
Retail Rate Proceedings
See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding retail rate proceedings involving the domestic utility companies. The following are updates to the Form 10-K.
Filings with the LPSC
Global Settlement (Entergy Gulf States and Entergy Louisiana)
In March 2005, the LPSC approved a settlement proposal to resolve various dockets covering a range of issues for Entergy Gulf States and Entergy Louisiana. The settlement resulted in credits totaling $76 million for retail electricity customers in Entergy Gulf States' Louisiana service territory and credits totaling $14 million for retail electricity customers of Entergy Louisiana. The settlement dismissed Entergy Gulf States' fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth annual earnings reviews, Entergy Gulf States' ninth post-merger earnings review and revenue requirement analysis, the continuation of a fuel review for Entergy Gulf States, dockets established to consider issues concerning power purchases for Entergy Gulf States and Entergy Louisiana for the summers of 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004, all prudence issues associated with decisions made through May 2005 related to the nuclear plant uprates at issue in these cases, and an LPSC docket concerning retail issues arising under the S ystem Agreement. The settlement does not include the System Agreement case at FERC. In addition, Entergy Gulf States agreed not to seek recovery from customers of $2 million of excess refund amounts associated with the fourth through the eighth annual earnings reviews and Entergy Louisiana agreed to forgo recovery of $3.5 million of deferred 2003 capacity costs associated with certain power purchase agreements. The credits were issued in connection with April 2005 billings. Entergy Gulf States and Entergy Louisiana reserved for the approximate refund amounts.
The settlement includes the establishment of a three-year formula rate plan for Entergy Gulf States that, among other provisions, establishes an ROE mid-point of 10.65% for the initial three-year term of the plan and permits Entergy Gulf States to recover incremental capacity costs outside of a traditional base rate proceeding. Under the formula rate plan, over- and under-earnings outside an allowed range of 9.9% to 11.4% will be allocated 60% to customers and 40% to Entergy Gulf States. In addition, there is the potential to extend the formula rate plan beyond the initial three-year effective period by mutual agreement of the LPSC and Entergy Gulf States. Under the settlement, there was no change to Entergy Gulf States' retail rates at that time.
Retail Rates - Electric
(Entergy Louisiana)
See Note 2 to consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of Entergy Louisiana's rate filing with the LPSC requesting a base rate increase. In March 2005, the LPSC staff and Entergy Louisiana filed a proposed settlement that included an annual base rate increase of approximately $18.3 million which was implemented, subject to refund, effective with May 2005 billings. In May 2005, the LPSC approved a modified settlement which, among other things, reduces depreciation and decommissioning expense due to assuming a life extension of Waterford 3 and results in no change in rates. Subsequently, in June 2005, Entergy Louisiana made a revised compliance filing with the LPSC supporting a revised depreciation rate for Waterford 3, which reflects the removal of interim additions, and a rate increase from the purchase of the Perryville power plant, which results in a net $0.8 million annual rate reduction. Entergy Louisiana reduced rates effective with the first billi ng cycle in June 2005 and expects to refund excess revenue collected during May 2005, including interest, in the third quarter of 2005.
The May 2005 rate settlement includes the adoption of a three-year formula rate plan, the terms of which include an ROE mid-point of 10.25% for the initial three-year term of the plan and permit Entergy Louisiana to recover incremental capacity costs outside of a traditional base rate proceeding. Under the formula rate plan, over- and under-earnings outside an allowed regulatory earnings range of 9.45% to 11.05% will be allocated 60% to customers and 40% to Entergy Louisiana. The initial formula rate plan filing will be in May 2006 based on a 2005 test year with rates effective September 2006. In addition, there is the potential to extend the formula rate plan beyond the initial three-year effective period by mutual agreement of the LPSC and Entergy Louisiana.
(Entergy Gulf States)
In June 2005, Entergy Gulf States made its formula rate plan filing with the LPSC for the test year ending December 31, 2004. The filing shows a net revenue deficiency of $2.58 million indicating that no refund liability exists. The filing also indicates that a prospective rate increase of $23.8 million is required in order for Entergy Gulf States to earn the authorized ROE mid-point of 10.65%. Subject to the consideration of comments expected to be filed by the LPSC staff and intervenors in the third quarter 2005, rate changes associated with the formula rate plan are scheduled to take effect with the first billing cycle in October 2005. Any disputed issues will be subject to further investigation by the LPSC, with any resolution of such issues being made effective October 2005.
Retail Rates - Gas (Entergy Gulf States)
In July 2004, Entergy Gulf States filed with the LPSC an application for a change in its rates and charges seeking an increase of $9.1 million in gas base rates in order to allow Entergy Gulf States an opportunity to earn a fair and reasonable rate of return. In June 2005, the LPSC unanimously approved Entergy Gulf States' proposed settlement that includes a $5.8 million gas base rate increase effective the first billing cycle of July 2005 and a rate stabilization plan with an ROE mid-point of 10.5%.
Filings with the PUCT (Entergy Gulf States)
Entergy Gulf States filed with the PUCT in July 2005 a request for implementation of an incremental purchased capacity recovery rider, consistent with the recently passed Texas legislation discussed below under "Electric Industry Restructuring and the Continued Application of SFAS 71." The rider requests $23.1 million annually in incremental revenues on a Texas retail basis which represents the incremental purchased capacity costs, including Entergy Gulf States' obligation to purchase power from Entergy Louisiana's recently acquired Perryville plant, over what is already in Entergy Gulf States' base rates. Entergy Gulf States has reached an agreement with parties with respect to the date upon which cost recovery and cost reconciliation would begin. The parties have agreed that Entergy Gulf States will implement the rider after approval by the PUCT which could be up to 185 days from the date of filing but will reconci le and recover incremental purchased capacity costs incurred beginning September 1, 2005. The September 1, 2005 agreed upon date for the beginning of the cost recovery and cost reconciliation as well as the requested amount and the processes for implementing the rider are subject to PUCT action and approval. If approved by the PUCT, the rider would be subject to semi-annual modifications and reconciliation in conjunction with Entergy Gulf States' fuel reconciliation proceedings. Also see "Electric Industry Restructuring and the Continued Application of SFAS 71" below for discussion of the provisions in the Texas legislation regarding Entergy Gulf States' ability to file a general rate case and for recovery of transition to competition costs.
Filings with the City Council (Entergy New Orleans)
In April 2005, Entergy New Orleans made its annual scheduled formula rate plan filings with the City Council. The filings show that a decrease of $0.2 million in electric revenues is warranted and an increase of $3.9 million in gas revenues is warranted. The filings triggered the prescribed period for review by the City Council's Advisors and other parties, and rate adjustments, if any, could be implemented as soon as September 2005.
In May 2005, Entergy New Orleans filed with the City Council a request for continuation of the formula rate plan and generation performance-based rate plan for an additional three years. The filing requests a target equity component of the capital structure of 45%, an increase from the current target of 42%.
Deferred Fuel Costs
See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding fuel proceedings involving the domestic utility companies. The following are updates to the Form 10-K.
In March 2005, Entergy Arkansas filed with the APSC its energy cost recovery rider for the period April 2005 through March 2006. The filed energy cost rate, which accounts for 15 percent of a typical residential customer's bill using 1,000 kWh per month, increased 31 percent primarily attributable to a true-up adjustment for an under-recovery balance of $11.2 million and a nuclear refueling adjustment resulting from outages scheduled in 2005 at ANO 1 and 2.
In March 2004, Entergy Gulf States filed with the PUCT a fuel reconciliation case covering the period September 2000 through August 2003. Entergy Gulf States is reconciling $1.43 billion of fuel and purchased power costs on a Texas retail basis. This amount includes $8.6 million of under-recovered costs that Entergy Gulf States is asking to reconcile and roll into its fuel over/under-recovery balance to be addressed in the next appropriate fuel proceeding. This case involves imputed capacity and River Bend payment issues similar to those decided adversely in a January 2001 proceeding that is now on appeal. On January 31, 2005, the ALJ issued a Proposal for Decision that recommended disallowing $10.7 million (excluding interest) related to these two issues. In April 2005, the PUCT issued an order reversing in part the ALJ's Proposal for Decision and allowing Entergy Gulf States to recover a part of its request related to the imputed capacity and River Bend payme nt issues. The PUCT's order reduced the disallowance in the case to $8.3 million. Both Entergy Gulf States and certain cities served by Entergy Gulf States filed motions for rehearing on these issues which were denied by the PUCT. Entergy Gulf States and certain Cities filed appeals to the Travis County District Court. The appeals are pending. Any disallowance will be netted against Entergy Gulf States' under-recovered costs and will be included in its deferred fuel costs balance.
In January 2001, Entergy Gulf States filed with the PUCT a fuel reconciliation case covering the period from March 1999 through August 2000. Entergy Gulf States was reconciling approximately $583 million of fuel and purchased power costs. As part of this filing, Entergy Gulf States requested authority to collect $28 million, plus interest, of under-recovered fuel and purchased power costs. In August 2002, the PUCT reduced Entergy Gulf States' request to approximately $6.3 million, including interest through July 31, 2002. Approximately $4.7 million of the total reduction to the requested surcharge relates to nuclear fuel costs that the PUCT deferred ruling on at that time. In October 2002, Entergy Gulf States appealed the PUCT's final order in Texas District Court. In its appeal, Entergy Gulf States is challenging the PUCT's disallowance of approximately $4.2 million related to imputed capacity costs and its disallowance related to costs for energy delivered from the 30% non-regu lated share of River Bend. The case was argued before the Travis County Texas District Court in August 2003 and the Travis County District Court judge affirmed the PUCT's order. In October 2003, Entergy Gulf States appealed this decision to the Court of Appeals. Oral argument before the appellate court occurred in September 2004 and in May 2005, the appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision affirming the PUCT's disallowance. Entergy Gulf States has filed a motion for rehearing with the appellate court in this case.
In August 2000, the LPSC authorized its staff to initiate a proceeding to audit the fuel adjustment clause filings of Entergy Louisiana pursuant to a November 1997 LPSC general order. The time period that is the subject of the audit is January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2001. In September 2003, the LPSC staff issued its audit report and recommended a disallowance with regard to one item. The issue relates to the alleged failure to uprate Waterford 3 in a timely manner, a claim that also has been raised in the summer 2001, 2002, and 2003 purchased power proceedings. The settlement approved by the LPSC in March 2005, discussed above, resolves the uprate imprudence disallowance and is no longer at issue in this proceeding. Subsequent to the issuance of the audit report, the scope of this docket was expanded to include a review of annual reports on fuel and purchased power transactions with affiliates and a prudence review of transmission planning issues. Also, in July 2005, the LP SC expanded the audit to include the years 2002 through 2004. A procedural schedule has been established and LPSC staff and intervenor testimony is due in November 2005.
In January 2003, the LPSC authorized its staff to initiate a proceeding to audit the fuel adjustment clause filings of Entergy Gulf States and its affiliates pursuant to a November 1997 LPSC general order. The audit will include a review of the reasonableness of charges flowed by Entergy Gulf States through its fuel adjustment clause in Louisiana for the period January 1, 1995 through December 31, 2002. Discovery is underway, but a detailed procedural schedule extending beyond the discovery stage has not yet been established, and the LPSC staff has not yet issued its audit report. In June 2005, the LPSC expanded the audit to include the years through 2004.
In January 2005, the MPSC approved a change in Entergy Mississippi's energy cost recovery rider. Entergy Mississippi's fuel over-recoveries for the third quarter of 2004 of $21.3 million will be deferred from the first quarter 2005 energy cost recovery rider adjustment calculation. The deferred amount of $21.3 million plus carrying charges is being refunded through the energy cost recovery rider in the second and third quarters of 2005 at a rate of 45% and 55%, respectively.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K, the City Council passed resolutions implementing a package of measures developed by Entergy New Orleans and the Council Advisors to protect customers from potential gas price spikes during the 2004 - 2005 winter heating season including the deferral of collection of up to $6.2 million of gas costs associated with a cap on the purchased gas adjustment in November and December 2004 and in the event that the average residential customer's gas bill were to exceed a threshold level. The deferrals of $1.7 million resulting from these caps will receive accelerated recovery over a seven-month period that began in April 2005.
In November 2004, the City Council directed Entergy New Orleans to confer with the City Council Advisors regarding possible modification of the current gas cost collection mechanism in order to address concerns regarding its fluctuations particularly during the winter heating season. In June 2005, Entergy New Orleans filed a new purchased gas adjustment tariff with the City Council. If approved by the City Council, the tariff would be effective in the fourth quarter of 2005.
Fuel Adjustment Clause Litigation
See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the complaint filed by a group of ratepayers with the City Council alleging that Entergy New Orleans and certain affiliates engaged in fuel procurement and power purchasing practices and included certain costs in its fuel adjustment charges that could have resulted in its customers being overcharged by more than $100 million over a period of years. In May 2005, the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans affirmed the City Council resolution that resulted in a refund to customers of $11.3 million, including interest, during the months of June through September 2004, finding no support for the plaintiffs' claim that the refund amount should be higher. In June 2005, the plaintiffs appealed the Civil District Court decision to the Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal.
Electric Industry Restructuring and the Continued Application of SFAS 71
Previous developments and information related to electric industry restructuring are presented in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K. The following are updates to the Form 10-K.
Louisiana
In November 2001, the LPSC decided not to move forward with retail open access for any customers at this time. The LPSC instead directed its staff to hold collaborative group meetings concerning open access from time to time, and to have the LPSC staff monitor developments in neighboring states and to report to the LPSC regarding the progress of retail access developments in those states. In September 2004, in response to a study performed by the Louisiana State University Center for Energy Studies that evaluated a limited industrial-only retail choice program, the LPSC asked the LPSC staff to solicit comments and obtain information from utilities, customers, and other interested parties concerning the potential costs and benefits of a limited choice program, the impact of such a program on other customers, as well as issues such as
stranded costs and transmission service. Comments from interested parties were file d with the LPSC in January 2005. A technical conference was held in April 2005 and in May 2005 interested parties filed reply comments to arguments made at the technical conference. Entergy stated that it believes that there is no new information or credible evidence that would justify altering the LPSC's previous conclusion that retail access is not in the public interest.Texas
See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the status of retail open access in Entergy Gulf States' Texas service territory and Entergy Gulf States' independent organization request.
In June 2005, a Texas law was enacted which provides that:
NOTE 3. COMMON EQUITY
Common Stock
Earnings per Share
The following tables present Entergy's basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) calculations included on the consolidated income statement:
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|||||
|
|
(In Millions, Except Per Share Data) |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
$/share |
|
|
|
$/share |
|
Earnings applicable to common stock |
|
$286.2 |
|
|
|
$265.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Average number of common shares outstanding - basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average dilutive effect of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Stock Options |
|
4.2 |
|
(0.027) |
3.6 |
|
(0.018) |
|
Equity Awards |
- |
- |
0.3 |
(0.002) |
|||||
|
Deferred Units |
|
0.2 |
|
(0.001) |
0.2 |
|
(0.001) |
|
Average number of common shares outstanding - diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|||||
|
|
(In Millions, Except Per Share Data) |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
$/share |
|
|
|
$/share |
|
Earnings applicable to common stock |
|
$458.1 |
|
|
|
$472.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of common shares outstanding - basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average dilutive effect of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options |
|
4.3 |
|
(0.042) |
|
4.0 |
|
(0.035) |
Equity Awards |
- |
- |
0.3 |
(0.003) |
|||||
|
Deferred Units |
|
0.2 |
|
(0.002) |
|
0.2 |
|
(0.002) |
Average number of common shares outstanding - diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entergy's stock option and other equity compensation plans are discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K.
Treasury Stock
For the six months ended June 30, 2005, Entergy Corporation issued 2,266,901 shares of its previously repurchased common stock to satisfy stock option exercises and other stock-based awards and repurchased 9,148,000 shares of common stock for a total purchase price of $639.8 million.
Retained Earnings
On July 29, 2005, Entergy Corporation's Board of Directors declared a common stock dividend of $0.54 per share, payable on September 1, 2005, to holders of record as of August 12, 2005.
NOTE 4. LINES OF CREDIT, RELATED SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS, AND LONG-TERM DEBT
In May 2005, Entergy Corporation terminated its two, separate, revolving credit facilities, a $500 million five-year credit facility and a $965 million three-year credit facility. At that time Entergy Corporation entered into a $2 billion, five-year credit facility, which expires in May 2010. As of June 30, 2005, $635 million in borrowings were outstanding on this facility. Entergy also has the ability to issue letters of credit against the borrowing capacity of the credit facility, and letters of credit totaling $83.5 million had been issued against this facility at June 30, 2005. The total unused capacity for this facility as of June 30, 2005 was approximately $1.3 billion. The commitment fee for this facility is currently 0.13% per annum of the unused amount. Commitment fees and interest rates on loans under the credit facility can fluctuate depending on the senior debt ratings of the domestic utility companies.
The short-term borrowings of Entergy's subsidiaries are limited to amounts authorized by the SEC. The current limits authorized are effective through November 30, 2007. In addition to borrowing from commercial banks, Entergy's subsidiaries are authorized to borrow from Entergy's money pool. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce Entergy's subsidiaries' dependence on external short-term borrowings. Borrowings from the money pool and external borrowings combined may not exceed the SEC authorized limits. As of June 30, 2005, Entergy's subsidiaries' aggregate authorized limit was $1.6 billion and the outstanding borrowings from the money pool were $365.6 million.
Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans each have 364-day credit facilities available as follows:
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
Amount Drawn as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entergy Arkansas |
|
April 2006 |
|
$85 million (a) |
|
- |
Entergy Louisiana |
|
April 2006 |
|
$85 million (a) |
|
- |
Entergy Louisiana |
|
May 2006 |
|
$15 million (b) |
|
- |
Entergy Mississippi |
|
May 2006 |
|
$25 million |
|
- |
Entergy New Orleans |
May 2006 |
$15 million (b) |
- |
(a) |
The combined amount borrowed by Entergy Arkansas and Entergy Louisiana under these facilities at any one time cannot exceed $85 million. |
(b) |
The combined amount borrowed by Entergy Louisiana and Entergy New Orleans under these facilities at any one time cannot exceed $15 million. |
The 364-day credit facilities have variable interest rates and the average commitment fee is 0.13%. The $85 million Entergy Arkansas and Entergy Louisiana credit facilities each require the respective company to maintain total shareholders' equity of at least 25% of its total assets. In July 2005, Entergy New Orleans granted the lender a security interest in its customer accounts receivables to secure its borrowings under its facility. Under the terms of the security agreement, Entergy New Orleans has the option to withdraw the security interest at any time.
The following long-term debt has been issued by Entergy in 2005:
|
Issue Date |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
U.S. Utility |
|
|
|
Mortgage Bonds: |
|
|
|
5.66% Series due February 2025 - Entergy Arkansas |
January 2005 |
|
$175,000 |
6.18% Series due March 2035 - Entergy Gulf States |
February 2005 |
$85,000 |
|
5.70% Series due June 2015 - Entergy Gulf States |
May 2005 |
$200,000 |
|
4.50% Series due June 2010 - Entergy Arkansas |
May 2005 |
$100,000 |
|
4.67% Series due June 2010 - Entergy Louisiana |
May 2005 |
|
$55,000 |
4.98% Series due July 2010 - Entergy New Orleans |
June 2005 |
|
$30,000 |
Issuance after balance sheet date: |
|||
5.12% Series due August 2010 - Entergy Gulf States |
July 2005 |
$100,000 |
|
Other Long-Term Debt: |
|
|
|
5.00% Series due January 2021, Independence County - Arkansas |
|
|
|
Bank term loan due June 2010, avg rate 4.26% |
|
|
The following long-term debt was retired by Entergy thus far in 2005:
|
Retirement Date |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
U.S. Utility |
|
|
|
Mortgage Bonds: |
|
|
|
7.00% Series due October 2023 - Entergy Arkansas |
February 2005 |
$175,000 |
|
Retirements after balance sheet date: |
|||
6.125% Series due July 2005 - Entergy Arkansas |
July 2005 |
$100,000 |
|
8.125% Series due July 2005 - Entergy New Orleans |
July 2005 |
$30,000 |
|
6.77% Series due August 2005 - Entergy Gulf States |
August 2005 |
$98,000 |
|
Other Long-term Debt: |
|
|
|
Grand Gulf Lease Obligation payment (System Energy) |
N/A |
|
$28,790 |
8.75% Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures |
|
|
|
6.25% Series due January 2021, Independence County - Arkansas |
|
|
|
9.0% Series due May 2015, West Feliciana Parish - Louisiana |
|
|
|
7.5% Series due May 2015, West Feliciana Parish - Louisiana |
|
|
|
7.7% Series due December 2014, West Feliciana Parish - |
|
|
|
Bank term loan due June 2005, avg rate 2.98% |
|
|
In June 2005, Entergy Louisiana purchased its $55 million of 4.9% Series St. Charles Parish bonds from the holders, pursuant to a mandatory tender provision, and has not remarketed the bonds at this time.
NOTE 5. PREFERRED STOCK
In June 2005, Entergy Mississippi issued 1,200,000 shares of $25 par value 6.25% Series Preferred Stock, all of which are outstanding as of June 30, 2005. The dividends are cumulative and will be payable quarterly beginning November 1, 2005. The preferred stock is redeemable on or after July 1, 2010, at Entergy Mississippi's option, at the call price of $25 per share. The proceeds from this issuance were used in the third quarter of 2005 to redeem all $20 million of Entergy Mississippi's $100 par value 8.36% Series Preferred Stock and all $10 million of Entergy Mississippi's $100 par value 7.44% Series Preferred Stock.
NOTE 6. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
Entergy grants stock options, which are described more fully in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K. Effective January 1, 2003, Entergy prospectively adopted the fair value based method of accounting for stock options prescribed by SFAS 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." Prior to 2003, Entergy applied the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related Interpretations in accounting for those plans. Awards under Entergy's plans vest over three years. Therefore, the cost related to stock-based employee compensation included in the determination of net income for 2004 is less than that which would have been recognized if the fair value based method had been applied to all awards since the original effective date of SFAS 123. There is no pro forma effect for the second quarter 2005 and the six months ended June 30, 2005 because all non-vested awards are accounted for at fair val ue. Stock-based compensation expense included in earnings applicable to common stock, net of related tax effects, for the second quarter 2005 and six months ended June 30, 2005 is $2.0 million and $3.8 million, respectively. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share for 2004 if Entergy would have historically applied the fair value based method of accounting to stock-based employee compensation.
Three Months |
Six Months |
|||||
Earnings applicable to common stock |
$265,182 |
$472,343 |
||||
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included |
|
|
||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee |
|
|
||||
Pro forma earnings applicable to common stock |
$262,300 |
$466,579 |
||||
Earnings per average common share: |
||||||
Basic |
$1.16 |
$2.06 |
||||
Basic - pro forma |
$1.15 |
$2.03 |
||||
Diluted |
$1.14 |
$2.02 |
||||
Diluted - pro forma |
$1.13 |
$1.99 |
NOTE 7. RETIREMENT AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
Components of Net Pension Cost
Entergy's pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for the second quarters of 2005 and 2004, included the following components:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(In Thousands) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost - benefits earned during the period |
|
$21,447 |
|
$18,527 |
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
|
38,632 |
|
35,979 |
Expected return on assets |
|
(39,513) |
|
(38,580) |
Amortization of transition asset |
|
(165) |
|
(190) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
1,362 |
|
1,413 |
Amortization of loss |
|
7,457 |
|
4,407 |
Net pension costs |
|
$29,220 |
|
$21,556 |
Entergy's pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, included the following components:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(In Thousands) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost - benefits earned during the period |
|
$42,894 |
|
$37,262 |
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
|
77,264 |
|
71,994 |
Expected return on assets |
|
(79,026) |
|
(77,304) |
Amortization of transition asset |
|
(330) |
|
(382) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
2,724 |
|
2,826 |
Amortization of loss |
|
14,914 |
|
8,808 |
Net pension costs |
|
$58,440 |
|
$43,204 |
Components of Net Other Postretirement Benefit Cost
Entergy's other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts capitalized, for the second quarters of 2005 and 2004, included the following components:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(In Thousands) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost - benefits earned during the period |
|
$9,400 |
|
$8,145 |
Interest cost on APBO |
|
14,290 |
|
13,436 |
Expected return on assets |
|
(4,942) |
|
(4,625) |
Amortization of transition obligation |
|
175 |
|
205 |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
(1,979) |
|
(609) |
Amortization of loss |
|
7,083 |
|
5,474 |
Net other postretirement benefit cost |
|
$24,027 |
|
$22,026 |
Entergy's other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts capitalized, for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, included the following components:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(In Thousands) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost - benefits earned during the period |
|
$18,800 |
|
$17,853 |
Interest cost on APBO |
|
28,580 |
|
27,733 |
Expected return on assets |
|
(9,884) |
|
(9,327) |
Amortization of transition obligation |
|
350 |
|
1,447 |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
(3,958) |
|
(1,498) |
Amortization of loss |
|
14,166 |
|
11,427 |
Net other postretirement benefit cost |
|
$48,054 |
|
$47,635 |
Employer Contributions
Entergy previously disclosed in the Form 10-K that it expected to contribute $185.9 million to its pension plans in 2005. Entergy has elected to make additional contributions of $67.4 million to the plan for a total of $253.3 million in 2005. As of June 30, 2005, Entergy contributed $117.7 million to its pension plans. The July 2005 contribution was $28.5 million. Therefore, Entergy presently anticipates contributing an additional $107.1 million to fund its pension plans in 2005.
Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (Medicare Act)
Based on actuarial analysis, the estimated impact of future Medicare subsidies reduced the December 31, 2004 Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation by $161 million, and reduced the second quarter 2005 and 2004 other postretirement benefit cost by $6.8 million and $4.5 million, respectively. It reduced the six months ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004 other postretirement benefit cost by $13.6 million and $7 million, respectively. Refer to Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion.
NOTE 8. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
Entergy's reportable segments as of June 30, 2005 are U.S. Utility and Non-Utility Nuclear. "All Other" includes the parent company, Entergy Corporation, and other business activity, including the Energy Commodity Services segment, the Competitive Retail Services business, and earnings on the proceeds of sales of previously-owned businesses. The Energy Commodity Services segment was presented as a reportable segment prior to 2005, but it did not meet the quantitative thresholds for a reportable segment in 2004 and, with the sale of Entergy-Koch's businesses in 2004, management does not expect the Energy Commodity Services segment to meet the quantitative thresholds in the foreseeable future. The 2004 information in the table below has been restated to include the Energy Commodity Services segment in the All Other column.
Entergy's segment financial information for the second quarters of 2005 and 2004 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|||||||||
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenues |
$2,168,122 |
|
$347,706 |
|
$212,624 |
|
($18,933) |
|
$2,709,519 |
Equity in earnings of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unconsolidated equity affiliates |
- |
|
- |
|
2,158 |
|
- |
|
2,158 |
Income Taxes (Benefit) |
138,136 |
|
34,978 |
|
(16,724) |
|
- |
|
156,390 |
Net Income |
217,501 |
|
58,277 |
|
16,984 |
|
27 |
|
292,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenues |
$1,990,644 |
|
$338,745 |
|
$173,114 |
|
($17,406) |
|
$2,485,097 |
Equity in earnings of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unconsolidated equity affiliates |
- |
|
- |
|
20,288 |
|
- |
|
20,288 |
Income Taxes |
123,852 |
|
40,638 |
|
1,705 |
|
- |
|
166,195 |
Net Income |
200,793 |
|
62,994 |
|
7,224 |
|
- |
|
271,011 |
Entergy's segment financial information for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|||||||||
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenues |
$3,999,922 |
|
$691,281 |
|
$377,722 |
|
($35,993) |
|
$5,032,932 |
Equity in earnings (loss) of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unconsolidated equity affiliates |
- |
|
- |
|
(35) |
|
- |
|
(35) |
Income Taxes (Benefit) |
187,185 |
|
86,146 |
|
(21,906) |
|
- |
|
251,425 |
Net Income |
313,769 |
|
136,242 |
|
21,444 |
|
(46) |
|
471,409 |
Total Assets |
23,099,834 |
|
4,733,230 |
|
3,260,502 |
|
(2,512,415) |
|
28,581,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenues |
$3,776,162 |
|
$683,593 |
|
$309,667 |
|
($32,776) |
|
$4,736,646 |
Equity in earnings of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unconsolidated equity affiliates |
- |
|
- |
|
40,107 |
|
- |
|
40,107 |
Income Taxes (Benefit) |
196,530 |
|
84,333 |
|
(8,671) |
|
- |
|
272,192 |
Net Income |
322,306 |
|
131,828 |
|
29,894 |
|
- |
|
484,028 |
Total Assets |
22,578,669 |
|
4,402,482 |
|
3,370,325 |
|
(1,481,908) |
|
28,869,568 |
Businesses marked with * are sometimes referred to as the "competitive businesses," with the exception of the parent company, Entergy Corporation. Eliminations are primarily intersegment activity.
NOTE 9. OTHER TEMPORARY INVESTMENTS
The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004 reflects a reclassification from cash and cash equivalents to other temporary investments of $188 million of instruments used in Entergy's cash management program. A corresponding change was made to the consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2004 resulting in reductions of $27 million and $185 million in the amounts presented as cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003. This reclassification is to present certain highly-liquid auction rate securities as short-term investments rather than as cash equivalents due to the stated tenor of the maturities of these investments. Entergy actively invests its available cash balance in financial instruments, which prior to June 2005 included auction rate securities that have stated maturities of 20 years or more. The auction rate securities provided a high degree of liquidity through features such as 7 and 28 day auctions that allow for the redemption of the securities at their face amount plus earned interest. Because Entergy intended to sell these instruments within one year or less, typically within 28 days of the balance sheet date, they are classified as current assets. As of June 30, 2005, Entergy no longer holds any of these auction rate securities.
__________________________________
In the opinion of the management of Entergy Corporation, the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals and reclassification of previously reported amounts to conform to current classifications) necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. The business of the U.S. Utility segment, however, is subject to seasonal fluctuations with the peak periods occurring during the third quarter. The results for the interim periods presented should not be used as a basis for estimating results of operations for a full year.
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC.
MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of Operations
Net Income
Second Quarter 2005 Compared to Second Quarter 2004
Net income increased $5.0 million primarily due to higher net revenue and other income, partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and a higher effective income tax rate.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Net income increased $17.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue and other income, partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses.
Net Revenue
Second Quarter 2005 Compared to Second Quarter 2004
Net revenue, which is Entergy Arkansas' measure of gross margin, consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related, and purchased power expenses and 2) other regulatory credits. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the second quarter of 2005 to the second quarter of 2004.
|
|
Amount |
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
|
|
2004 net revenue |
|
$248.2 |
Volume/weather |
|
8.9 |
Net wholesale revenue |
4.8 |
|
Late payment charges |
1.8 |
|
Other |
|
2.5 |
2005 net revenue |
|
$266.2 |
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased usage during the unbilled sales period and a total increase of 74 GWh in weather-adjusted usage, primarily in the residential and commercial sectors. See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K and Note 1 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues.
The net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to higher wholesale market prices and improved results related to co-owner contracts.
The late payment charges variance is primarily due to late payment charges which Entergy Arkansas began collecting from customers in July 2004.
Gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses
Gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $15.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to an increase in the energy cost recovery rider effective April 2005. The increases in volume/weather, wholesale revenue, and late payment charges, as discussed above, also contributed to the increase.
Fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in the market price of purchased power and increased deferred fuel expense resulting primarily from higher fuel revenue as a result of an increase in the energy cost recovery rider effective April 2005.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Net revenue, which is Entergy Arkansas' measure of gross margin, consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related, and purchased power expenses and 2) other regulatory credits. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the six months ended June 30, 2005 to the six months ended June 30, 2004.
|
|
Amount |
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
|
|
2004 net revenue |
|
$455.0 |
Deferred fuel cost revisions |
|
15.5 |
Net wholesale revenue |
11.0 |
|
Volume/weather |
7.9 |
|
Late payment charges |
3.6 |
|
Other |
|
(3.1) |
2005 net revenue |
|
$489.9 |
The deferred fuel cost revisions variance is primarily due to a revised estimate of fuel costs filed for recovery at Entergy Arkansas in the March 2004 energy cost recovery rider, which reduced net revenue in the first quarter of 2004 by $11.5 million. The remainder of the variance is due to the 2004 energy cost recovery true-up, made in the first quarter of 2005, which increased net revenue by $4.0 million.
The net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to higher wholesale market prices and improved results related to co-owner contracts.
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to a total increase of 195 GWh in weather-adjusted usage, primarily in the residential and commercial sectors, and increased usage during the unbilled sales period, partially offset by milder weather in 2005. See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K and Note 1 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues.
The late payment charges variance is primarily due to late payment charges which Entergy Arkansas began collecting from customers in July 2004.
Gross operating revenues
Gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $23 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to an increase in the energy cost recovery rider effective April 2005. The increases in volume/weather, wholesale revenue, and late payment charges, as discussed above, also contributed to the increase.
Other Income Statement Variances
Second Quarter 2005 Compared to Second Quarter 2004
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to higher payroll and benefits costs.
Other income increased primarily due to:
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to higher payroll and benefits costs.
Other income increased primarily due to:
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rates for the second quarters of 2005 and 2004 were 37.0% and 34.4%, respectively. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the second quarter of 2005 versus the federal statutory rate of 35.0% is primarily due to state income taxes and book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by the amortization of investment tax credits and book and tax differences related to the allowance for funds used during construction. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the second quarter of 2004 versus the federal statutory rate of 35.0% is primarily due to the amortization of investment tax credits and book and tax differences related to the allowance for funds used during construction, partially offset by state income taxes and book and tax differences related to utility plant items.
The effective income tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were 36.3% and 36.4%, respectively. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2005 versus the federal statutory rate of 35.0% is primarily due to state income taxes and book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by a downward revision in the estimate of federal income tax expense related to tax depreciation, the amortization of investment tax credits, and book and tax differences related to the allowance for funds used during construction. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2004 versus the federal statutory rate of 35.0% is primarily due to state income taxes and book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by the amortization of investment tax credits and book and tax differences related to the allowance for funds used during construction.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
Cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
$89,744 |
|
$8,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
101,516 |
|
78,212 |
|
Investing activities |
|
(137,478) |
|
(115,838) |
|
Financing activities |
|
57,634 |
|
65,412 |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
21,672 |
|
27,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$111,416 |
|
$36,620 |
Operating Activities
Cash flow from operations increased $23.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004 primarily due to the timing of the collection of receivables from customers and an increase in net income. The increase was partially offset by money pool activity and higher income tax payments.
Entergy Arkansas' receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In Thousands) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$132,315 |
|
$23,561 |
|
$23,370 |
|
($69,153) |
Money pool activity used $108.8 million of Entergy Arkansas' operating cash flows in the six months ended June 30, 2005 and used $92.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2004. See Note 4 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.
Investing Activities
Net cash flow used in investing activities increased $21.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004 primarily due to $16.1 million used for other regulatory investments as a result of fuel cost under-recovery and increased construction expenditures of $7.8 million resulting from the steam generator and reactor vessel head replacement at ANO 1.
Financing Activities
Net cash flow provided by financing activities decreased $7.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004 primarily due to an $85 million borrowing made on Entergy Arkansas' 364-day credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2004, which provided cash in 2004, and the payment of $15.7 million more in common stock dividends. The decrease was almost entirely offset by the net issuance of $92.9 million of long-term debt in 2005. See Note 3 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements for details of Entergy Arkansas' long-term debt activity in 2005.
Uses and Sources of Capital
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Arkansas' uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
In April 2005, Entergy Arkansas renewed its 364-day credit facility through April 30, 2006. In May 2005, Entergy Louisiana entered into a separate credit facility with the same lender. Entergy Arkansas and Entergy Louisiana can each borrow up to $85 million under their respective credit facilities, but at no time can the total amount borrowed under these facilities by the two companies combined exceed $85 million. There were no outstanding borrowings under either credit facility as of June 30, 2005.
Entergy Arkansas issued long-term debt in 2005 as follows:
Issue Date |
Description |
Maturity |
Amount |
|||
(In Thousands) |
||||||
January 2005 |
5.66% Series |
February 2025 |
$175,000 |
|||
March 2005 |
5.00% Series |
January 2021 |
$45,000 |
|||
May 2005 |
4.50% Series |
June 2010 |
$100,000 |
Entergy Arkansas redeemed long-term debt in 2005 as follows:
Retirement Date |
|
|
|
|||
(In Thousands) |
||||||
February 2005 |
7.00% Series |
October 2023 |
$175,000 |
|||
April 2005 |
6.25% Series |
January 2021 |
$45,000 |
|||
July 2005 |
6.125% Series |
July 2005 |
$100,000 |
The March 2005 issuance and the April 2005 retirement are not shown on the cash flow statement because the proceeds from the issuance were placed in a trust and never held as cash by Entergy Arkansas.
Significant Factors and Known Trends
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Significant Factors and Known Trends" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of utility restructuring, federal regulation and proceedings, market and credit risks, state and local rate regulatory risks, nuclear matters, and environmental risks. Following are updates to the information presented in the Form 10-K.
Federal Regulation
System Agreement Litigation
On June 1, 2005, the FERC issued a decision in the System Agreement litigation. The domestic utility companies historically have engaged in the coordinated planning, construction, and operation of generating and bulk transmission facilities under the terms of the System Agreement, which has been approved by the FERC. The System Agreement litigation proceedings are described in the Form 10-K.
The FERC decision concluded, among other things, that:
The FERC's June 2005 order would reallocate production costs of the domestic utility companies whose relative total production costs expressed as a percentage of Entergy System average production costs are outside an upper or lower bandwidth. This would be accomplished by payments from domestic utility companies whose production costs are below Entergy System average production costs to domestic utility companies whose production costs are above Entergy System average production costs. An assessment of the potential effects of the FERC's June 2005 order requires assumptions regarding the future total production cost of each domestic utility company, which assumptions include the mix of solid fuel and gas-fired generation available to each company and the costs of natural gas and purchased power. Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States are more dependent upon gas-fired generation than Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Mississippi, or Entergy New Orleans. Of these, Entergy Arkansas is the l east dependent upon gas-fired generation. Therefore, increases in natural gas prices likely will increase the amount by which Entergy Arkansas' total production costs are below the average production costs of the domestic utility companies. Considerable uncertainty exists regarding future gas prices. Annual average Henry Hub gas prices have varied significantly over recent years, ranging from $1.72/mmBtu to $5.85/mmBtu for the 1995-2004 period, and averaging $3.43/mmBtu during the ten-year period 1995-2004 and $4.58/mmBtu during the five-year period 2000-2004. Recent market conditions have resulted in gas prices that have averaged $5.85/mmBtu for the twelve months ended December 2004. During the 12 month period July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2005 forward gas contracts for each of the next four years based on daily NYMEX close averaged $6.68/mmBtu (2006), $6.25/mmBtu (2007), $5.88/mmBtu (2008) and $5.58/mmBtu (2009). If the FERC's June 2005 order becomes final and if these gas prices occur as assumed, the following potential annual production cost reallocations among the domestic utility companies could result during the 2007-2010 period:
Range of Annual Payments |
Average Annual |
||
(In Millions) |
|||
Entergy Arkansas |
$143 to $210 |
$166 |
|
Entergy Gulf States |
($134) to ($87) |
($113) |
|
Entergy Louisiana |
($71) to ($10) |
($38) |
|
Entergy Mississippi |
($28) to $0 |
($11) |
|
Entergy New Orleans |
($10) to $0 |
($4) |
If natural gas prices deviate by $1/mmBtu up or down, it is expected that Entergy Arkansas' annual payments will change in the same direction by approximately $60 to $70 million.
Various pending motions for rehearing and clarification of the FERC's June 2005 order were filed by parties to the proceeding, including the LPSC, the APSC, the MPSC, and the City Council, and by Entergy Services, Inc., on behalf of the domestic utility companies. Among other things, the LPSC's motion urged the FERC to "clarify" that the FERC's order requires the payments and receipts, to the extent any are required, to be made in 2006 based on production costs incurred in 2004 and 2005. Entergy does not believe that this request for "clarification" is consistent with the FERC order and submitted a response urging the FERC to reject this interpretation and instead find that the annual remedy order by the FERC would be evaluated based on calendar year 2006 production costs, with the first potential payments/receipts, if any were required, made in 2007.
Management believes that any changes in the allocation of production costs resulting from the FERC's June 2005 order and related retail proceedings should result in similar rate changes for retail customers. The timing of recovery of these costs in rates could be the subject of additional proceedings before the APSC and Entergy's other retail regulators. Although the outcome and timing of the FERC, APSC, and other proceedings cannot be predicted at this time, Entergy Arkansas does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these proceedings will have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
Transmission
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the petition for declaratory order that Entergy filed with the FERC in January 2005 regarding Entergy's Independent Coordinator of Transmission (ICT) proposal. On March 22, 2005, the FERC issued a declaratory order concluding that: (1) because the Southwest Power Pool (SPP) was the only entity identified as potentially being selected as the ICT and because the SPP is already a "public utility" there was no need to rule on the question of whether the functions of the ICT, alone, would serve to make the ICT a "public utility;" (2) Entergy will continue to be the "transmission provider" for transmission service across its system and that "the presence of SPP as the ICT will not change the existing balance of jurisdiction between [the FERC] and Entergy's retail regulators;" and (3) the FERC "is prepared to grant Entergy's proposed transmission pricing proposal on a two-year experimental basis, subject to certain enhancement and monitoring and reportin g conditions." The enhancements referred to by the FERC involve more fully specifying the responsibilities and duties of the ICT, including defining the ICT's role in the preparation of various transmission expansion plans and the performance of studies related to the granting of transmission or interconnection service. Before Entergy's ICT proposal can be implemented, however, Entergy is required to submit further filings with the FERC regarding the modifications and clarifications to the ICT proposal.
On April 8, 2005 several intervenors filed an Emergency Request for Clarification and Request for Expedited Commission Action seeking to have the FERC: (1) clarify the ICT's role in administering the Available Flowgate Capacity (AFC) methodology; (2) clarify the ICT's role in developing the transmission base plan; (3) clarify what the FERC meant when it required Entergy to provide firm transmission rights to customers that pay for supplemental transmission upgrades; and (4) clarify and confirm following Entergy's filing that the FERC will assess SPP's status as being independent of Entergy.
On April 21, 2005 Entergy filed a request for clarification or rehearing of the FERC's March 22 declaratory order requesting that the FERC clarify the respective role of Entergy and the ICT in developing the inputs or criteria used to create the base plan and in preparing certain studies regarding system expansion. The request for clarification further requests that the FERC clarify that the initial two-year period will commence with the actual start date of ICT operations. In the event that the FERC denies Entergy's request for clarification, then Entergy will seek rehearing on these issues. However, in its request, Entergy requested that FERC not rule on these issues at this time but, instead, that the FERC wait to evaluate these issues until such time as Entergy has filed the more detailed tariff sheets and protocols in its subsequent filing to implement the ICT. Separately, Entergy submitted a letter advising the FERC that it intended to submit on or about May 27, 2005 the filing t o implement the ICT proposal. A joint request for rehearing of the ICT declaratory order was also filed by the City Council, the LPSC, and the MPSC in which the retail regulators expressed their concerns that the findings reached in the declaratory order may result in an expansion of authority of the ICT "that is unnecessary to achieve the [FERC's] goals and is very likely to result in significant increases in the start-up and operational costs of the ICT." The retail regulators request that the FERC not act on their request for rehearing until Entergy has submitted its filing to implement the ICT. The intervenors filed a separate request for rehearing on April 21, 2005 urging the FERC to impose additional conditions on the approval of the ICT and also re-urging the FERC to reject the pricing proposal contained in the ICT proposal.
On May 12, 2005 the FERC issued an order clarifying certain aspects of its March 22 order. In the May 12 order, the FERC indicated that (1) Entergy is to work with the ICT and Entergy's stakeholders to develop procedures by which the ICT will calculate AFCs; (2) Entergy must specifically define the transmission rights that a customer that pays for supplemental upgrades will receive for such payments; (3) the FERC will review the ICT's contract to ensure that the ICT can perform its functions in an independent manner even if SPP is chosen as the ICT; and (4) the initial two-year period will start once the ICT becomes operational.
On May 27, 2005, the domestic utility companies filed the enhanced ICT proposal with the FERC. Entergy believes that the filing is consistent with the FERC guidance received in both the FERC's March 22 and May 12 orders on the ICT. Among other things, the enhanced ICT filing states that the ICT will (1) grant or deny transmission service on the domestic utility companies' transmission system; (2) administer the domestic utility companies' OASIS node for purposes of processing and evaluating transmission service requests and ensuring compliance with the domestic utility companies' obligation to post transmission-related information; (3) develop a base plan for the domestic utility companies' transmission system that will result in the ICT making the determination on whether something should be rolled into the domestic utility companies' transmission rates or directly assigned to the customer requesting or causing an upgrade to be constructed; (4) serve as the reliability coordinator for t he Entergy transmission system; and (5) oversee the operation of the weekly procurement process. The enhanced ICT proposal clarifies the rights that customers receive when they fund a supplemental upgrade and also contains a detailed methodology describing the process by which the ICT will evaluate interconnection-related investments already made on the Entergy System for purposes of determining the future allocation of the uncredited portion of these investments.
On June 3, 2005 a group of generators filed with the FERC a request that the FERC schedule a technical conference on the enhanced ICT proposal in order for Entergy to provide additional information on the enhanced ICT proposal. In response, a stakeholder meeting was held in New Orleans on June 30, 2005. Interventions and comments on the filing are due by August 5, 2005.
In addition, as discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States have filed an application with the LPSC requesting that the LPSC find that the ICT proposal is a prudent and appropriate course of action. An LPSC hearing on the ICT proposal is currently scheduled for August 2005, however certain intervenors have recently requested that the hearing be delayed until mid-September 2005.
Available Flowgate Capacity Proceeding
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of proceedings at the FERC involving Entergy's Available Flowgate Capacity (AFC) methodology. On March 22, 2005, the FERC issued an order contemporaneously with the ICT declaratory order discussed above that holds the AFC hearing in abeyance pending action on Entergy's upcoming ICT filing. The order holding the hearing in abeyance further indicated that it would cancel the hearing when the ICT begins to perform its functions. On April 8, 2005 several intervenors filed Emergency Motions for Interim Relief and Expedited Commission Action requesting that, during the interim period before the implementation of the ICT, the FERC (1) institute an audit process to examine and modify Entergy's current AFC process; and (2) require SPP to become involved in the AFC stakeholder process and order certain modifications to Entergy's stakeholder process. The audit process being proposed by the intervenors would not involve an independent audi tor, but instead would be an investigation performed by a representative from the intervenors, Entergy, and possibly SPP. On April 25, 2005, Entergy filed its response to the emergency motion urging the FERC to reject the intervenors' request for the "audit" because the type of investigation proposed by the intervenors would be neither independent nor fair and would only distract from the implementation of the ICT. Instead, Entergy has proposed that the ICT conduct an independent review of the AFC process and procedures as part of its transition to assuming the identified ICT responsibilities, including the calculation of the AFCs. Entergy further indicated that it would welcome SPP's participation in the current stakeholder process. On April 21, 2005, the intervenors filed a separate request for rehearing arguing that the FERC must allow the AFC hearing to proceed in parallel with the establishment of the ICT. See "Transmission" above for further discussion of AFC.
Federal Legislation
In late July 2005 the U.S. Congress passed broad new energy legislation, the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The legislation contains electricity provisions that, among other things:
The President is expected to sign the Energy Policy Act in August 2005. The Energy Power Act requires several rulemakings by the FERC and other government agencies in order to implement its provisions. Therefore, it will be some time before a full assessment of its effect on Entergy and the energy industry can be completed.
Central States Compact Claim
The Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act of 1980 holds each state responsible for disposal of low-level radioactive waste originating in that state, but allows states to participate in regional compacts to fulfill their responsibilities jointly. Arkansas and Louisiana participate in the Central Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Compact (Central States Compact or Compact). Commencing in 1998, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, and Entergy Louisiana made a series of contributions to the Central States Compact to fund the Central States Compact's development of a low-level radioactive waste disposal facility to be located in Boyd County, Nebraska. In December 1998, Nebraska, the host state for the proposed Central States Compact disposal facility, denied the compact's license application for the proposed disposal facility. Several parties, including the commission that governs the compact (the Compact Commission), filed a lawsuit against Nebraska seeking damages resulting from Nebraska's denial of the proposed facility's license. After a trial, the U.S. District Court concluded that Nebraska violated its good faith obligations regarding the proposed waste disposal facility and rendered a judgment against Nebraska in the amount of $151 million. In August 2004, Nebraska agreed to pay the Compact $141 million in settlement of the judgment. In July 2005, the Compact Commission decided to distribute a substantial portion of the proceeds from the settlement to the nuclear power generators that had contributed funding for the Boyd County facility, including Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, and Entergy Louisiana. On August 1, 2005, Nebraska paid the full amount of the settlement to the Compact, and the Compact distributed from the settlement proceeds $23.6 million to Entergy Arkansas, $19.9 million to Entergy Gulf States, and $18.4 million to Entergy Louisiana. Management is still analyzing the accounting treatment of the r eceipts, but expects that some portion of the receipts could result in income for Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, and Entergy Louisiana.
Critical Accounting Estimates
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy Arkansas' accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, unbilled revenue, and pension and other postretirement benefits.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In the first quarter 2005, FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143" (FIN 47). FIN 47 requires companies to recognize at fair value a liability for a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred, which is generally upon an asset's acquisition, construction, development, or through its normal operation. A conditional asset retirement obligation is generally a legal obligation to incur costs to remove an asset or part of an asset, such as an obligation to comply with environmental regulations and requirements. The obligation is conditional because there is currently no legal requirement to retire or remove the facility that the affected asset is a part of. FIN 47 requires that uncertainty about the timing or method of settlement of a conditional asset retirement obligation be factored into the measurement of the liability when sufficient information becom es available. FIN 47 will be effective for Entergy no later than December 31, 2005. Entergy does not believe that the adoption of FIN 47 will be material to its financial position or results of operations because it estimates that any conditional asset retirement obligations required to be recognized under FIN 47 would be offset by a regulatory asset because of the expected recovery of these future costs in rates.
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. | ||||||||
INCOME STATEMENTS | ||||||||
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||
(In Thousands) | (In Thousands) | |||||||
OPERATING REVENUES | ||||||||
Domestic electric | $450,097 | $405,509 | $817,457 | $768,969 | ||||
OPERATING EXPENSES | ||||||||
Operation and Maintenance: | ||||||||
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and | ||||||||
gas purchased for resale | 46,612 | 35,316 | 83,415 | 95,103 | ||||
Purchased power | 139,899 | 127,828 | 247,531 | 230,156 | ||||
Nuclear refueling outage expenses | 7,019 | 5,453 | 13,336 | 11,790 | ||||
Other operation and maintenance | 105,727 | 94,215 | 191,556 | 178,656 | ||||
Decommissioning | 8,246 | 7,725 | 16,359 | 17,069 | ||||
Taxes other than income taxes | 10,051 | 9,898 | 19,888 | 18,294 | ||||
Depreciation and amortization | 48,023 | 50,269 | 99,800 | 99,937 | ||||
Other regulatory credits - net | (2,589) | (5,864) | (3,384) | (11,270) | ||||
TOTAL | 362,988 | 324,840 | 668,501 | 639,735 | ||||
OPERATING INCOME | 87,109 | 80,669 | 148,956 | 129,234 | ||||
OTHER INCOME | ||||||||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | 3,491 | 2,454 | 7,450 | 4,647 | ||||
Interest and dividend income | 5,078 | 2,989 | 9,370 | 5,011 | ||||
Miscellaneous - net | (47) | (497) | (679) | (1,547) | ||||
TOTAL | 8,522 | 4,946 | 16,141 | 8,111 | ||||
INTEREST AND OTHER CHARGES | ||||||||
Interest on long-term debt | 19,968 | 19,769 | 40,750 | 39,517 | ||||
Other interest - net | 798 | 1,166 | 2,224 | 2,049 | ||||
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction | (1,725) | (1,279) | (3,736) | (2,580) | ||||
TOTAL | 19,041 | 19,656 | 39,238 | 38,986 | ||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | 76,590 | 65,959 | 125,859 | 98,359 | ||||
Income taxes | 28,300 | 22,682 | 45,638 | 35,807 | ||||
NET INCOME | 48,290 | 43,277 | 80,221 | 62,552 | ||||
Preferred dividend requirements and other | 1,944 | 1,944 | 3,888 | 3,888 | ||||
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO | ||||||||
COMMON STOCK | $46,346 | $41,333 | $76,333 | $58,664 | ||||
See Notes to Respective Financial Statements. | ||||||||
(Page left blank intentionally)
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. | ||||
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | ||||
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||
(Unaudited) | ||||
2005 | 2004 | |||
(In Thousands) | ||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||
Net income | $80,221 | $62,552 | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities: | ||||
Other regulatory credits - net | (3,384) | (11,270) | ||
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning | 116,159 | 117,006 | ||
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits | 17,049 | 54,552 | ||
Changes in working capital: | ||||
Receivables | (75,186) | (47,755) | ||
Fuel inventory | (773) | (2,586) | ||
Accounts payable | (13,773) | (64,605) | ||
Taxes accrued | 11,418 | (12,123) | ||
Interest accrued | 1,196 | (357) | ||
Deferred fuel costs | (720) | (1,794) | ||
Other working capital accounts | (10,700) | (7,342) | ||
Provision for estimated losses and reserves | (3,645) | (6,517) | ||
Changes in other regulatory assets | 25,435 | 7,634 | ||
Other | (41,781) | (9,183) | ||
Net cash flow provided by operating activities | 101,516 | 78,212 | ||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||
Construction expenditures | (123,690) | (115,882) | ||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | 7,450 | 4,647 | ||
Nuclear fuel purchases | (62,307) | (8,101) | ||
Proceeds from sale/leaseback of nuclear fuel | 62,248 | 8,101 | ||
Decommissioning trust contributions and realized | ||||
change in trust assets | (5,085) | (4,603) | ||
Other regulatory investments | (16,094) | - - | ||
Net cash flow used in investing activities | (137,478) | (115,838) | ||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt | 272,817 | - - | ||
Retirement of long-term debt | (179,895) | - - | ||
Changes in short-term borrowings | - - | 85,000 | ||
Dividends paid: | ||||
Common stock | (31,400) | (15,700) | ||
Preferred stock | (3,888) | (3,888) | ||
Net cash flow provided by financing activities | 57,634 | 65,412 | ||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 21,672 | 27,786 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 89,744 | 8,834 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $111,416 | $36,620 | ||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | ||||
Cash paid/(received) during the period for: | ||||
Interest - net of amount capitalized | $37,395 | $38,999 | ||
Income taxes | $19,450 | ($5,400) | ||
See Notes to Respective Financial Statements. | ||||
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. | ||||
BALANCE SHEETS | ||||
ASSETS | ||||
June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 | ||||
(Unaudited) | ||||
2005 | 2004 | |||
(In Thousands) | ||||
CURRENT ASSETS | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents: | ||||
Cash | $1,956 | $7,133 | ||
Temporary cash investments - at cost, | ||||
which approximates market | 109,460 | 82,611 | ||
Total cash and cash equivalents | 111,416 | 89,744 | ||
Accounts receivable: | ||||
Customer | 74,227 | 87,131 | ||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | (11,225) | (11,039) | ||
Associated companies | 155,179 | 72,472 | ||
Other | 58,737 | 72,425 | ||
Accrued unbilled revenues | 90,900 | 71,643 | ||
Total accounts receivable | 367,818 | 292,632 | ||
Deferred fuel costs | 24,182 | 7,368 | ||
Accumulated deferred income taxes | 13,408 | 27,306 | ||
Fuel inventory - at average cost | 5,071 | 4,298 | ||
Materials and supplies - at average cost | 85,391 | 85,076 | ||
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs | 28,485 | 16,485 | ||
Prepayments and other | 6,509 | 6,154 | ||
TOTAL | 642,280 | 529,063 | ||
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS | ||||
Investment in affiliates - at equity | 11,208 | 11,208 | ||
Decommissioning trust funds | 393,482 | 383,784 | ||
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation) | 1,452 | 1,453 | ||
Other | 2,976 | 2,976 | ||
TOTAL | 409,118 | 399,421 | ||
UTILITY PLANT | ||||
Electric | 6,165,950 | 6,124,359 | ||
Property under capital lease | 15,664 | 17,500 | ||
Construction work in progress | 253,268 | 226,172 | ||
Nuclear fuel under capital lease | 102,586 | 93,855 | ||
Nuclear fuel | 20,259 | 12,201 | ||
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT | 6,557,727 | 6,474,087 | ||
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization | 2,823,727 | 2,753,525 | ||
UTILITY PLANT - NET | 3,734,000 | 3,720,562 | ||
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS | ||||
Regulatory assets: | ||||
SFAS 109 regulatory asset - net | 87,774 | 101,658 | ||
Other regulatory assets | 433,374 | 400,174 | ||
Other | 46,611 | 42,514 | ||
TOTAL | 567,759 | 544,346 | ||
TOTAL ASSETS | $5,353,157 | $5,193,392 | ||
See Notes to Respective Financial Statements. | ||||
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. | ||||
BALANCE SHEETS | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||
June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 | ||||
(Unaudited) | ||||
2005 | 2004 | |||
(In Thousands) | ||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||
Currently maturing long-term debt | $147,000 | $147,000 | ||
Accounts payable: | ||||
Associated companies | 50,366 | 68,829 | ||
Other | 94,586 | 89,896 | ||
Customer deposits | 44,449 | 41,639 | ||
Taxes accrued | 32,580 | 35,874 | ||
Interest accrued | 22,572 | 21,376 | ||
Obligations under capital leases | 51,232 | 49,816 | ||
Other | 18,808 | 19,648 | ||
TOTAL | 461,593 | 474,078 | ||
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued | 1,127,155 | 1,121,623 | ||
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits | 66,226 | 68,452 | ||
Obligations under capital leases | 66,960 | 61,538 | ||
Other regulatory liabilities | 71,975 | 67,362 | ||
Decommissioning | 509,103 | 492,745 | ||
Accumulated provisions | 31,332 | 34,977 | ||
Long-term debt | 1,296,071 | 1,191,763 | ||
Other | 234,403 | 237,447 | ||
TOTAL | 3,403,225 | 3,275,907 | ||
Commitments and Contingencies | ||||
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||
Preferred stock without sinking fund | 116,350 | 116,350 | ||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 325,000,000 | ||||
shares; issued and outstanding 46,980,196 shares in 2005 | ||||
and 2004 | 470 | 470 | ||
Paid-in capital | 591,126 | 591,127 | ||
Retained earnings | 780,393 | 735,460 | ||
TOTAL | 1,488,339 | 1,443,407 | ||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | $5,353,157 | $5,193,392 | ||
See Notes to Respective Financial Statements. | ||||
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. | ||||||||
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS | ||||||||
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Increase/ | |||||||
Description | 2005 | 2004 | (Decrease) | % | ||||
(Dollars In Millions) | ||||||||
Electric Operating Revenues: | ||||||||
Residential | $ 124 | $ 115 | $ 9 | 8 | ||||
Commercial | 80 | 73 | 7 | 10 | ||||
Industrial | 84 | 77 | 7 | 9 | ||||
Governmental | 4 | 4 | - | - - | ||||
Total retail | 292 | 269 | 23 | 9 | ||||
Sales for resale | ||||||||
Associated companies | 64 | 55 | 9 | 16 | ||||
Non-associated companies | 50 | 47 | 3 | 6 | ||||
Other | 44 | 35 | 9 | 26 | ||||
Total | $ 450 | $ 406 | $ 44 | 11 | ||||
Billed Electric Energy | ||||||||
Sales (GWh): | ||||||||
Residential | 1,481 | 1,431 | 50 | 3 | ||||
Commercial | 1,305 | 1,273 | 32 | 3 | ||||
Industrial | 1,720 | 1,714 | 6 | - - | ||||
Governmental | 66 | 67 | (1) | (1) | ||||
Total retail | 4,572 | 4,485 | 87 | 2 | ||||
Sales for resale | ||||||||
Associated companies | 1,622 | 1,513 | 109 | 7 | ||||
Non-associated companies | 1,065 | 1,248 | (183) | (15) | ||||
Total | 7,259 | 7,246 | 13 | - - | ||||
Six Months Ended | Increase/ | |||||||
Description | 2005 | 2004 | (Decrease) | % | ||||
(Dollars In Millions) | ||||||||
Electric Operating Revenues: | ||||||||
Residential | $ 259 | $ 246 | $ 13 | 5 | ||||
Commercial | 149 | 138 | 11 | 8 | ||||
Industrial | 156 | 145 | 11 | 8 | ||||
Governmental | 9 | 8 | 1 | 13 | ||||
Total retail | 573 | 537 | 36 | 7 | ||||
Sales for resale | ||||||||
Associated companies | 105 | 109 | (4) | (4) | ||||
Non-associated companies | 100 | 92 | 8 | 9 | ||||
Other | 39 | 31 | 8 | 26 | ||||
Total | $ 817 | $ 769 | $ 48 | 6 | ||||
Billed Electric Energy | ||||||||
Sales (GWh): | ||||||||
Residential | 3,371 | 3,320 | 51 | 2 | ||||
Commercial | 2,554 | 2,486 | 68 | 3 | ||||
Industrial | 3,384 | 3,361 | 23 | 1 | ||||
Governmental | 134 | 131 | 3 | 2 | ||||
Total retail | 9,443 | 9,298 | 145 | 2 | ||||
Sales for resale | ||||||||
Associated companies | 2,977 | 3,185 | (208) | (7) | ||||
Non-associated companies | 2,172 | 2,533 | (361) | (14) | ||||
Total | 14,592 | 15,016 | (424) | (3) | ||||
ENTERGY GULF STATES, INC.
MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of Operations
Net Income
Second Quarter 2005 Compared to Second Quarter 2004
Net income decreased $11.3 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses and lower miscellaneous income, partially offset by higher net revenue.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Net income decreased $29.7 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses, lower net revenue, and lower miscellaneous income, partially offset by lower interest expense and a lower effective income tax rate.
Net Revenue
Second Quarter 2005 Compared to Second Quarter 2004
Net revenue, which is Entergy Gulf States' measure of gross margin, consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related, and purchased power expenses and 2) other regulatory credits. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the second quarter of 2005 to the second quarter of 2004.
|
|
Amount |
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
|
|
2004 net revenue |
|
$296.4 |
Price applied to unbilled electric sales |
|
14.2 |
Fuel recovery revenues |
(9.5) |
|
Other |
|
1.7 |
2005 net revenue |
|
$302.8 |
The price applied to unbilled electric sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel cost component of the price applied to unbilled sales in 2005. The fuel cost component is higher because of an increase in natural gas costs and nuclear maintenance outages at River Bend. See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K and Note 1 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues.
Fuel recovery revenues represent an under-recovery of fuel charges that are recovered in base rates.
Gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses
Gross operating revenues increased primarily due to:
Fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in the market prices of natural gas and purchased power.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Net revenue, which is Entergy Gulf States' measure of gross margin, consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related, and purchased power expenses and 2) other regulatory credits. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the six months ended June 30, 2005 to the six months ended June 30, 2004.
|
|
Amount |
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
|
|
2004 net revenue |
|
$559.1 |
Fuel recovery revenues |
|
(7.9) |
Volume/weather |
|
(7.8) |
Net wholesale revenue |
|
(4.9) |
Rate refund provisions |
|
6.8 |
Other |
|
(0.8) |
2005 net revenue |
|
$544.5 |
Fuel recovery revenues represent an under-recovery of fuel charges that are recovered in base rates.
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to decreased usage during the unbilled sales period. See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K and Note 1 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues.
The net wholesale revenue variance resulted from an increase in the average price of energy allocated to municipal and co-op customers.
The rate refund provisions variance is due to additional provisions recorded in 2004 for potential rate actions and refunds.
Gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses
Gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $97.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and an increase in wholesale revenue of $12.7 million due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co-op customers.
Fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in the market prices of natural gas and purchased power.
Other Income Statement Variances
Second Quarter 2005 Compared to Second Quarter 2004
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased $12.6 million primarily due to increases of:
Miscellaneous income - net decreased primarily due to a reduction in 2004 in the loss provision of $10.1 million for an environmental clean-up site.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased $29.5 million primarily due to increases of:
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $5 million primarily due to an increase in plant in service as well as an adjustment in 2004 to the salvage value of certain depreciable assets.
Miscellaneous income - net decreased primarily due to a reduction in 2004 in the loss provision of $10.1 million for an environmental clean-up site.
Interest and other charges decreased $8.2 million primarily due to the retirement of $292 million of First Mortgage Bonds in 2004.
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rates for the second quarters of 2005 and 2004 were 38% and 38.2%, respectively. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the second quarter of 2005 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% is primarily due to state income taxes and book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by the amortization of investment tax credits and book and tax differences related to the allowance of funds used during construction. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the second quarter of 2004 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% is primarily due to state income taxes partially offset by the amortization of investment tax credits.
The effective income tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were 32.7% and 35.6%, respectively. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2005 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% is primarily due to amortization of investment tax credits, book and tax differences related to the allowance for funds used during construction, and a downward revision in the estimate of federal income tax expense related to tax depreciation, partially offset by state income taxes and book and tax differences related to utility plant items.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
Cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
$6,974 |
|
$206,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
186,084 |
|
291,317 |
|
Investing activities |
|
(175,285) |
|
(152,709) |
|
Financing activities |
|
(15,446) |
|
(327,410) |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(4,647) |
|
(188,802) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$2,327 |
|
$17,228 |
Operating Activities
Cash flow from operations decreased $105.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004 primarily due to the refund of $76 million to retail electricity customers per the March 2005 settlement approved by the LPSC, a decrease of $18.8 million in the recovery of fuel costs, increased pension contributions of $12.4 million, and tax payments of $14.5 million.
Entergy Gulf States' receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In Thousands) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($149,447) |
|
($59,720) |
|
($27,126) |
|
$69,354 |
See Note 4 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities increased $22.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004 primarily due to the maturity in 2004 of $23.6 million of other investments that provided cash in 2004.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities decreased $312 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004 primarily due to the retirement of $292 million of First Mortgage Bonds in 2004.
Uses and Sources of Capital
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Gulf States' uses and sources of capital. Following is an update to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
The following table lists First Mortgage Bonds issued by Entergy Gulf States in 2005:
Issue Date |
Description |
Maturity |
Amount |
|||
(In Thousands) |
||||||
February 2005 |
6.18% Series |
March 2035 |
$85,000 |
|||
May 2005 |
5.7% Series |
June 2015 |
200,000 |
|||
July 2005 |
5.12% Series |
August 2010 |
100,000 |
The following table lists long-term debt retired by Entergy Gulf States thus far in 2005:
Retirement Date |
Description |
Maturity |
Amount |
|||
(In Thousands) |
||||||
March 2005 |
8.75% Series Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures |
March 2046 |
$87,629 |
|||
May 2005 |
9.0% West Feliciana Parish bonds |
May 2015 |
45,000 |
|||
May 2005 |
7.5% West Feliciana Parish bonds |
May 2015 |
41,600 |
|||
June 2005 |
7.7% West Feliciana Parish bonds |
December 2014 |
94,000 |
|||
August 2005 |
6.77% Series First Mortgage Bonds |
August 2005 |
98,000 |
Significant Factors and Known Trends
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Significant Factors and Known Trends" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of transition to retail competition, federal regulation and proceedings, state and local rate regulatory risk, industrial, commercial, and wholesale customers, market and credit risks, nuclear matters, environmental risks, and litigation risks. Following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
State and Local Rate Regulation
In March 2005, the LPSC approved a settlement proposal to resolve various dockets covering a range of issues for Entergy Gulf States and Entergy Louisiana. The settlement resulted in credits of $76 million to retail electricity customers in Entergy Gulf States' Louisiana service territory. The settlement dismissed Entergy Gulf States' fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth annual earnings reviews, Entergy Gulf States' ninth post-merger earnings review and revenue requirement analysis, the continuation of a fuel review for Entergy Gulf States, dockets established to consider issues concerning power purchases for the summers of 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004, all prudence issues associated with decisions made through May 2005 related to the nuclear plant uprates at issue in these cases, and an LPSC docket concerning retail issues arising under the System Agreement. The settlement does not include the System Agreement case at FERC. In addition, Entergy Gulf States agreed not to see k recovery from customers of $2 million of excess refund amounts associated with the fourth through the eighth annual earnings reviews. The credits were issued in connection with April 2005 billings. Entergy Gulf States previously reserved for the approximate refund amounts.
The settlement includes the establishment of a three-year formula rate plan for Entergy Gulf States that, among other provisions, establishes an ROE mid-point of 10.65% for the initial three-year term of the plan and permits Entergy Gulf States to recover incremental capacity costs outside of a traditional base rate proceeding. Under the formula rate plan, over- and under-earnings outside the allowed range of 9.9% to 11.4% will be allocated 60% to the customers and 40% to Entergy Gulf States. In addition, there is the potential to extend the formula rate plan beyond the initial three-year effective period by mutual agreement of the LPSC and Entergy Gulf States. Under the settlement, there was no change to Entergy Gulf States' retail rates at that time.
In June 2005, the Alliance for Affordable Energy and an individual plaintiff filed an appeal in the 19th Judicial District Court for the parish of East Baton Rouge, Louisiana. The plaintiffs allege that neither Entergy Gulf States nor the LPSC published notice that a formula rate plan was to be considered as part of the settlement and that the LPSC order should be set aside as null and void and without effect because the Louisiana Constitution requires that notice be published when a utility files a proposed rate schedule that would result in a change in rates. Management believes the plaintiffs' claim is without merit and expects to intervene in the proceeding to oppose the appeal.
In June 2005, Entergy Gulf States made its formula rate plan filing with the LPSC for the test year ending December 31, 2004. The filing shows a net revenue deficiency of $2.58 million indicating that no refund liability exists. The filing also indicates that a prospective rate increase of $23.8 million is required in order for Entergy Gulf States to earn the authorized ROE mid-point of 10.65%. Subject to the consideration of comments expected to be filed by the LPSC staff and intervenors in the third quarter 2005, rate changes associated with the formula rate plan are scheduled to take effect with the first billing cycle in October 2005. Any disputed issues will be subject to further investigation by the LPSC, with any resolution of such issues being made effective October 2005.
Entergy Gulf States filed with the PUCT in July 2005 a request for implementation of an incremental purchased capacity recovery rider, consistent with the recently passed Texas legislation discussed below under "Transition to Retail Competition." The rider requests $23.1 million annually in incremental revenues on a Texas retail basis which represents the incremental purchased capacity costs, including Entergy Gulf States' obligation to purchase power from Entergy Louisiana's recently acquired Perryville plant, over what is already in Entergy Gulf States' base rates. Entergy Gulf States has reached an agreement with parties with respect to the date upon which cost recovery and cost reconciliation would begin. The parties have agreed that Entergy Gulf States will implement the rider after approval by the PUCT which could be up to 185 days from the date of filing but will reconcile and recover incremental purchased capacity costs incurred beginning September 1, 2005. The September 1, 2005 agreed upon date for the beginning of the cost recovery and cost reconciliation as well as the requested amount and the processes for implementing the rider are subject to PUCT action and approval. If approved by the PUCT, the rider would be subject to semi-annual modifications and reconciliation in conjunction with Entergy Gulf States' fuel reconciliation proceedings. Also see "Transition to Retail Competition" below for discussion of the provisions in the Texas legislation regarding Entergy Gulf States' ability to file a general rate case and for recovery of transition to competition costs.
In July 2004, Entergy Gulf States filed with the LPSC an application for a change in its rates and charges seeking an increase of $9.1 million in gas base rates in order to allow Entergy Gulf States an opportunity to earn a fair and reasonable rate of return. In June 2005, the LPSC unanimously approved Entergy Gulf States' proposed settlement that includes a $5.8 million gas base rate increase effective the first billing cycle of July 2005 and a rate stabilization plan with an ROE mid-point of 10.5%.
Federal Regulation
System Agreement Litigation
On June 1, 2005, the FERC issued a decision in the System Agreement litigation. The domestic utility companies historically have engaged in the coordinated planning, construction, and operation of generating and bulk transmission facilities under the terms of the System Agreement, which has been approved by the FERC. The System Agreement litigation proceedings are described in the Form 10-K.
The FERC decision concluded, among other things, that:
The FERC's June 2005 order would reallocate production costs of the domestic utility companies whose relative total production costs expressed as a percentage of Entergy System average production costs are outside an upper or lower bandwidth. This would be accomplished by payments from domestic utility companies whose production costs are below Entergy System average production costs to domestic utility companies whose production costs are above Entergy System average production costs. An assessment of the potential effects of the FERC's June 2005 order requires assumptions regarding the future total production cost of each domestic utility company, which assumptions include the mix of solid fuel and gas-fired generation available to each company and the costs of natural gas and purchased power. Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States are more dependent upon gas-fired generation than Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Mississippi, or Entergy New Orleans. Of these, Entergy Arkansas is the l east dependent upon gas-fired generation. Therefore, increases in natural gas prices likely will increase the amount by which Entergy Arkansas' total production costs are below the average production costs of the domestic utility companies. Considerable uncertainty exists regarding future gas prices. Annual average Henry Hub gas prices have varied significantly over recent years, ranging from $1.72/mmBtu to $5.85/mmBtu for the 1995-2004 period, and averaging $3.43/mmBtu during the ten-year period 1995-2004 and $4.58/mmBtu during the five-year period 2000-2004. Recent market conditions have resulted in gas prices that have averaged $5.85/mmBtu for the twelve months ended December 2004. During the 12 month period July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2005 forward gas contracts for each of the next four years based on daily NYMEX close averaged $6.68/mmBtu (2006), $6.25/mmBtu (2007), $5.88/mmBtu (2008) and $5.58/mmBtu (2009). If the FERC's June 2005 order becomes final and if these gas prices occur as assumed, the following potential annual production cost reallocations among the domestic utility companies could result during the 2007-2010 period:
Range of Annual Payments |
Average Annual |
||
(In Millions) |
|||
Entergy Arkansas |
$143 to $210 |
$166 |
|
Entergy Gulf States |
($134) to ($87) |
($113) |
|
Entergy Louisiana |
($71) to ($10) |
($38) |
|
Entergy Mississippi |
($28) to $0 |
($11) |
|
Entergy New Orleans |
($10) to $0 |
($4) |
If natural gas prices deviate by $1/mmBtu up or down, it is expected that Entergy Arkansas' annual payments will change in the same direction by approximately $60 to $70 million.
Various pending motions for rehearing and clarification of the FERC's June 2005 order were filed by parties to the proceeding, including the LPSC, the APSC, the MPSC, and the City Council, and by Entergy Services, Inc., on behalf of the domestic utility companies. Among other things, the LPSC's motion urged the FERC to "clarify" that the FERC's order requires the payments and receipts, to the extent any are required, to be made in 2006 based on production costs incurred in 2004 and 2005. Entergy does not believe that this request for "clarification" is consistent with the FERC order and submitted a response urging the FERC to reject this interpretation and instead find that the annual remedy order by the FERC would be evaluated based on calendar year 2006 production costs, with the first potential payments/receipts, if any were required, made in 2007.
Management believes that any changes in the allocation of production costs resulting from the FERC's June 2005 order and related retail proceedings should result in similar rate changes for retail customers. The timing of recovery of these costs in rates could be the subject of additional proceedings before Entergy's retail regulators. Although the outcome and timing of the FERC and other proceedings cannot be predicted at this time, Entergy Gulf States does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these proceedings will have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
See the Form 10-K for discussion of the proceeding that the LPSC commenced before itself regarding the System Agreement. As noted above in "State and Local Rate Regulation", the settlement of various issues involving Entergy Gulf States and Entergy Louisiana that was approved by the LPSC has resolved the System Agreement proceeding before the LPSC, which has been dismissed without prejudice.
Transmission
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the petition for declaratory order that Entergy filed with the FERC in January 2005 regarding Entergy's Independent Coordinator of Transmission (ICT) proposal. On March 22, 2005, the FERC issued a declaratory order concluding that: (1) because the Southwest Power Pool (SPP) was the only entity identified as potentially being selected as the ICT and because the SPP is already a "public utility" there was no need to rule on the question of whether the functions of the ICT, alone, would serve to make the ICT a "public utility;" (2) Entergy will continue to be the "transmission provider" for transmission service across its system and that "the presence of SPP as the ICT will not change the existing balance of jurisdiction between [the FERC] and Entergy's retail regulators;" and (3) the FERC "is prepared to grant Entergy's proposed transmission pricing proposal on a two-year experimental basis, subject to certain enhancement and monitoring and reportin g conditions." The enhancements referred to by the FERC involve more fully specifying the responsibilities and duties of the ICT, including defining the ICT's role in the preparation of various transmission expansion plans and the performance of studies related to the granting of transmission or interconnection service. Before Entergy's ICT proposal can be implemented, however, Entergy is required to submit further filings with the FERC regarding the modifications and clarifications to the ICT proposal.
On April 8, 2005 several intervenors filed an Emergency Request for Clarification and Request for Expedited Commission Action seeking to have the FERC: (1) clarify the ICT's role in administering the Available Flowgate Capacity (AFC) methodology; (2) clarify the ICT's role in developing the transmission base plan; (3) clarify what the FERC meant when it required Entergy to provide firm transmission rights to customers that pay for supplemental transmission upgrades; and (4) clarify and confirm following Entergy's filing that the FERC will assess SPP's status as being independent of Entergy.
On April 21, 2005 Entergy filed a request for clarification or rehearing of the FERC's March 22 declaratory order requesting that the FERC clarify the respective role of Entergy and the ICT in developing the inputs or criteria used to create the base plan and in preparing certain studies regarding system expansion. The request for clarification further requests that the FERC clarify that the initial two-year period will commence with the actual start date of ICT operations. In the event that the FERC denies Entergy's request for clarification, then Entergy will seek rehearing on these issues. However, in its request, Entergy requested that FERC not rule on these issues at this time but, instead, that the FERC wait to evaluate these issues until such time as Entergy has filed the more detailed tariff sheets and protocols in its subsequent filing to implement the ICT. Separately, Entergy submitted a letter advising the FERC that it intended to submit on or about May 27, 2005 the filing t o implement the ICT proposal. A joint request for rehearing of the ICT declaratory order was also filed by the City Council, the LPSC, and the MPSC in which the retail regulators expressed their concerns that the findings reached in the declaratory order may result in an expansion of authority of the ICT "that is unnecessary to achieve the [FERC's] goals and is very likely to result in significant increases in the start-up and operational costs of the ICT." The retail regulators request that the FERC not act on their request for rehearing until Entergy has submitted its filing to implement the ICT. The intervenors filed a separate request for rehearing on April 21, 2005 urging the FERC to impose additional conditions on the approval of the ICT and also re-urging the FERC to reject the pricing proposal contained in the ICT proposal.
On May 12, 2005 the FERC issued an order clarifying certain aspects of its March 22 order. In the May 12 order, the FERC indicated that (1) Entergy is to work with the ICT and Entergy's stakeholders to develop procedures by which the ICT will calculate AFCs; (2) Entergy must specifically define the transmission rights that a customer that pays for supplemental upgrades will receive for such payments; (3) the FERC will review the ICT's contract to ensure that the ICT can perform its functions in an independent manner even if SPP is chosen as the ICT; and (4) the initial two-year period will start once the ICT becomes operational.
On May 27, 2005, the domestic utility companies filed the enhanced ICT proposal with the FERC. Entergy believes that the filing is consistent with the FERC guidance received in both the FERC's March 22 and May 12 orders on the ICT. Among other things, the enhanced ICT filing states that the ICT will (1) grant or deny transmission service on the domestic utility companies' transmission system; (2) administer the domestic utility companies' OASIS node for purposes of processing and evaluating transmission service requests and ensuring compliance with the domestic utility companies' obligation to post transmission-related information; (3) develop a base plan for the domestic utility companies' transmission system that will result in the ICT making the determination on whether something should be rolled into the domestic utility companies' transmission rates or directly assigned to the customer requesting or causing an upgrade to be constructed; (4) serve as the reliability coordinator for t he Entergy transmission system; and (5) oversee the operation of the weekly procurement process. The enhanced ICT proposal clarifies the rights that customers receive when they fund a supplemental upgrade and also contains a detailed methodology describing the process by which the ICT will evaluate interconnection-related investments already made on the Entergy System for purposes of determining the future allocation of the uncredited portion of these investments.
On June 3, 2005 a group of generators filed with the FERC a request that the FERC schedule a technical conference on the enhanced ICT proposal in order for Entergy to provide additional information on the enhanced ICT proposal. In response, a stakeholder meeting was held in New Orleans on June 30, 2005. Interventions and comments on the filing are due by August 5, 2005.
In addition, as discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States have filed an application with the LPSC requesting that the LPSC find that the ICT proposal is a prudent and appropriate course of action. An LPSC hearing on the ICT proposal is currently scheduled for August 2005, however certain intervenors have recently requested that the hearing be delayed until mid-September 2005.
Available Flowgate Capacity Proceedings
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of proceedings at the FERC involving Entergy's Available Flowgate Capacity (AFC) methodology. On March 22, 2005, the FERC issued an order contemporaneously with the ICT declaratory order discussed above that holds the AFC hearing in abeyance pending action on Entergy's upcoming ICT filing. The order holding the hearing in abeyance further indicated that it would cancel the hearing when the ICT begins to perform its functions. On April 8, 2005 several intervenors filed Emergency Motions for Interim Relief and Expedited Commission Action requesting that, during the interim period before the implementation of the ICT, the FERC (1) institute an audit process to examine and modify Entergy's current AFC process; and (2) require SPP to become involved in the AFC stakeholder process and order certain modifications to Entergy's stakeholder process. The audit process being proposed by the intervenors would not involve an independent auditor, but instead wou ld be an investigation performed by a representative from the intervenors, Entergy, and possibly SPP. On April 25, 2005, Entergy filed its response to the emergency motion urging the FERC to reject the intervenors' request for the "audit" because the type of investigation proposed by the intervenors would be neither independent nor fair and would only distract from the implementation of the ICT. Instead, Entergy has proposed that the ICT conduct an independent review of the AFC process and procedures as part of its transition to assuming the identified ICT responsibilities, including the calculation of the AFCs. Entergy further indicated that it would welcome SPP's participation in the current stakeholder process. On April 21, 2005, the intervenors filed a separate request for rehearing arguing that the FERC must allow the AFC hearing to proceed in parallel with the establishment of the ICT. See "Transmission" above for further discussion of AFC.
Transition to Retail Competition
Texas
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Significant Factors and Known Trends" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the status of retail open access in Entergy Gulf States' Texas service territory and Entergy Gulf States' independent organization request.
In June 2005, a Texas law was enacted which provides that:
Jurisdictional Separation Plan
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Significant Factors and Known Trends" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the LPSC proceedings regarding the proposed separation of Entergy Gulf States business into a Louisiana-based vertically integrated utility company and a Texas-based vertically integrated utility company. The hearing before the LPSC scheduled for late June 2005 has been postponed.
Federal Legislation
In late July 2005 the U.S. Congress passed broad new energy legislation, the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The legislation contains electricity provisions that, among other things:
The President is expected to sign the Energy Policy Act in August 2005. The Energy Power Act requires several rulemakings by the FERC and other government agencies in order to implement its provisions. Therefore, it will be some time before a full assessment of its effect on Entergy and the energy industry can be completed.
Central States Compact Claim
The Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act of 1980 holds each state responsible for disposal of low-level radioactive waste originating in that state, but allows states to participate in regional compacts to fulfill their responsibilities jointly. Arkansas and Louisiana participate in the Central Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Compact (Central States Compact or Compact). Commencing in 1998, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, and Entergy Louisiana made a series of contributions to the Central States Compact to fund the Central States Compact's development of a low-level radioactive waste disposal facility to be located in Boyd County, Nebraska. In December 1998, Nebraska, the host state for the proposed Central States Compact disposal facility, denied the compact's license application for the proposed disposal facility. Several parties, including the commission that governs the compact (the Compact Commission), filed a lawsuit against Nebraska seeking damages resulting from Nebraska's denial of the proposed facility's license. After a trial, the U.S. District Court concluded that Nebraska violated its good faith obligations regarding the proposed waste disposal facility and rendered a judgment against Nebraska in the amount of $151 million. In August 2004, Nebraska agreed to pay the Compact $141 million in settlement of the judgment. In July 2005, the Compact Commission decided to distribute a substantial portion of the proceeds from the settlement to the nuclear power generators that had contributed funding for the Boyd County facility, including Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, and Entergy Louisiana. On August 1, 2005, Nebraska paid the full amount of the settlement to the Compact, and the Compact distributed from the settlement proceeds $23.6 million to Entergy Arkansas, $19.9 million to Entergy Gulf States, and $18.4 million to Entergy Louisiana. Management is still analyzing the accounting treatment of the r eceipts, but expects that some portion of the receipts could result in income for Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, and Entergy Louisiana.
Critical Accounting Estimates
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy Gulf States' accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, SFAS 143, the application of SFAS 71, unbilled revenue, and pension and other postretirement benefits.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In the first quarter 2005, FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143" (FIN 47). FIN 47 requires companies to recognize at fair value a liability for a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred, which is generally upon an asset's acquisition, construction, development, or through its normal operation. A conditional asset retirement obligation is generally a legal obligation to incur costs to remove an asset or part of an asset, such as an obligation to comply with environmental regulations and requirements. The obligation is conditional because there is currently no legal requirement to retire or remove the facility that the affected asset is a part of. FIN 47 requires that uncertainty about the timing or method of settlement of a conditional asset retirement obligation be factored into the measurement of the liability when sufficient information becomes available. FIN 4 7 will be effective for Entergy no later than December 31, 2005. Entergy does not believe that the adoption of FIN 47 will be material to its financial position or results of operations because it estimates that any conditional asset retirement obligations required to be recognized under FIN 47 would be offset by a regulatory asset because of the expected recovery of these future costs in rates.
ENTERGY GULF STATES, INC. | ||||||||
INCOME STATEMENTS | ||||||||
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||
(In Thousands) | (In Thousands) | |||||||
OPERATING REVENUES | ||||||||
Domestic electric | $746,987 | $674,283 | $1,399,383 | $1,286,654 | ||||
Natural gas | 12,532 | 11,030 | 39,387 | 37,655 | ||||
TOTAL | 759,519 | 685,313 | 1,438,770 | 1,324,309 | ||||
OPERATING EXPENSES | ||||||||
Operation and Maintenance: | ||||||||
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and | ||||||||
gas purchased for resale | 147,889 | 131,961 | 367,845 | 309,674 | ||||
Purchased power | 314,372 | 260,402 | 532,108 | 462,056 | ||||
Nuclear refueling outage expenses | 4,525 | 3,172 | 8,596 | 6,365 | ||||
Other operation and maintenance | 124,428 | 111,805 | 233,121 | 203,634 | ||||
Decommissioning | 2,346 | 3,798 | 4,644 | 7,528 | ||||
Taxes other than income taxes | 28,937 | 27,335 | 59,475 | 57,057 | ||||
Depreciation and amortization | 50,605 | 48,461 | 99,341 | 94,329 | ||||
Other regulatory credits - net | (5,581) | (3,453) | (5,702) | (6,477) | ||||
TOTAL | 667,521 | 583,481 | 1,299,428 | 1,134,166 | ||||
OPERATING INCOME | 91,998 | 101,832 | 139,342 | 190,143 | ||||
OTHER INCOME | ||||||||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | 4,207 | 2,526 | 9,006 | 5,047 | ||||
Interest and dividend income | 3,415 | 3,172 | 6,850 | 7,021 | ||||
Miscellaneous - net | (24) | 10,614 | 624 | 12,495 | ||||
TOTAL | 7,598 | 16,312 | 16,480 | 24,563 | ||||
INTEREST AND OTHER CHARGES | ||||||||
Interest on long-term debt | 28,214 | 29,152 | 56,438 | 64,539 | ||||
Other interest - net | 2,397 | 906 | 4,382 | 2,720 | ||||
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction | (2,499) | (1,853) | (5,505) | (3,768) | ||||
TOTAL | 28,112 | 28,205 | 55,315 | 63,491 | ||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | 71,484 | 89,939 | 100,507 | 151,215 | ||||
Income taxes | 27,197 | 34,348 | 32,871 | 53,896 | ||||
NET INCOME | 44,287 | 55,591 | 67,636 | 97,319 | ||||
Preferred dividend requirements and other | 1,063 | 1,123 | 2,126 | 2,273 | ||||
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO | ||||||||
COMMON STOCK | $43,224 | $54,468 | $65,510 | $95,046 | ||||
See Notes to Respective Financial Statements. | ||||||||
ENTERGY GULF STATES, INC. | ||||
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | ||||
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||
(Unaudited) | ||||
2005 | 2004 | |||
(In Thousands) | ||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||
Net income | $67,636 | $97,319 | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities: | ||||
Reserve for regulatory adjustments | (62,423) | 7,236 | ||
Other regulatory credits - net | (5,702) | (6,477) | ||
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning | 103,985 | 101,857 | ||
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits | 25,014 | 20,490 | ||
Changes in working capital: | ||||
Receivables | (28,123) | 19,209 | ||
Fuel inventory | (259) | (442) | ||
Accounts payable | 89,218 | 18,459 | ||
Taxes accrued | 3,395 | 52,369 | ||
Interest accrued | 266 | (6,144) | ||
Deferred fuel costs | (3,267) | 15,505 | ||
Other working capital accounts | 5,914 | 8,057 | ||
Provision for estimated losses and reserves | 345 | (11,298) | ||
Changes in other regulatory assets | (7,960) | (849) | ||
Other | (1,955) | (23,974) | ||
Net cash flow provided by operating activities | 186,084 | 291,317 | ||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||
Construction expenditures | (153,136) | (144,767) | ||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | 9,006 | 5,047 | ||
Nuclear fuel purchases | (371) | (6,672) | ||
Proceeds from sale/leaseback of nuclear fuel | 438 | 6,672 | ||
Decommissioning trust contributions and realized | ||||
change in trust assets | (5,945) | (5,872) | ||
Changes in other investments - net | 2,629 | 23,579 | ||
Other regulatory investments | (27,906) | (30,696) | ||
Net cash flow used in investing activities | (175,285) | (152,709) | ||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt | 282,772 | - | ||
Retirement of long-term debt | (268,229) | (292,000) | ||
Redemption of preferred stock | (2,250) | (2,250) | ||
Dividends paid: | ||||
Common stock | (25,600) | (30,900) | ||
Preferred stock | (2,139) | (2,260) | ||
Net cash flow used in financing activities | (15,446) | (327,410) | ||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (4,647) | (188,802) | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 6,974 | 206,030 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $2,327 | $17,228 | ||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | ||||
Cash paid during the period for: | ||||
Interest - net of amount capitalized | $56,788 | $69,897 | ||
Income taxes | $14,450 | - - | ||
See Notes to Respective Financial Statements. |
ENTERGY GULF STATES, INC. | ||||||
BALANCE SHEETS | ||||||
ASSETS | ||||||
June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 | ||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||
CURRENT ASSETS | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents: | ||||||
Cash | $2,244 | $5,627 | ||||
Temporary cash investments - at cost, | ||||||
which approximates market | 83 | 1,347 | ||||
Total cash and cash equivalents | 2,327 | 6,974 | ||||
Accounts receivable: | ||||||
Customer | 114,496 | 124,801 | ||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | (1,791) | (2,687) | ||||
Associated companies | 24,182 | 13,980 | ||||
Other | 49,092 | 40,697 | ||||
Accrued unbilled revenues | 156,654 | 137,719 | ||||
Total accounts receivable | 342,633 | 314,510 | ||||
Deferred fuel costs | 118,265 | 90,124 | ||||
Accumulated deferred income taxes | 1,301 | 14,339 | ||||
Fuel inventory - at average cost | 49,917 | 49,658 | ||||
Materials and supplies - at average cost | 104,156 | 101,922 | ||||
Prepayments and other | 17,128 | 20,556 | ||||
TOTAL | 635,727 | 598,083 | ||||
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS | ||||||
Decommissioning trust funds | 301,271 | 290,952 | ||||
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation) | 94,203 | 94,052 | ||||
Other | 20,616 | 22,012 | ||||
TOTAL | 416,090 | 407,016 | ||||
UTILITY PLANT | ||||||
Electric | 8,593,692 | 8,418,119 | ||||
Natural gas | 83,684 | 78,627 | ||||
Construction work in progress | 272,345 | 331,703 | ||||
Nuclear fuel under capital lease | 60,703 | 71,279 | ||||
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT | 9,010,424 | 8,899,728 | ||||
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization | 4,115,750 | 4,047,182 | ||||
UTILITY PLANT - NET | 4,894,674 | 4,852,546 | ||||
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS | ||||||
Regulatory assets: | ||||||
SFAS 109 regulatory asset - net | 457,090 | 444,799 | ||||
Other regulatory assets | 285,935 | 285,017 | ||||
Long-term receivables | 18,651 | 23,228 | ||||
Other | 33,082 | 44,713 | ||||
TOTAL | 794,758 | 797,757 | ||||
TOTAL ASSETS | $6,741,249 | $6,655,402 | ||||
See Notes to Respective Financial Statements. | ||||||
ENTERGY GULF STATES, INC. | ||||||
BALANCE SHEETS | ||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||
June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 | ||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||||
Currently maturing long-term debt | $98,000 | $98,000 | ||||
Accounts payable: | ||||||
Associated companies | 261,800 | 153,069 | ||||
Other | 127,824 | 147,337 | ||||
Customer deposits | 56,476 | 53,229 | ||||
Taxes accrued | 31,020 | 22,882 | ||||
Nuclear refueling outage costs | 6,021 | - - | ||||
Interest accrued | 33,008 | 32,742 | ||||
Obligations under capital leases | 33,516 | 33,518 | ||||
Other | 18,513 | 19,912 | ||||
TOTAL | 666,178 | 560,689 | ||||
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||||
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued | 1,555,524 | 1,533,804 | ||||
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits | 135,762 | 138,616 | ||||
Obligations under capital leases | 27,187 | 37,711 | ||||
Other regulatory liabilities | 36,947 | 34,009 | ||||
Decommissioning and retirement cost liabilities | 158,859 | 152,095 | ||||
Transition to competition | 79,098 | 79,098 | ||||
Regulatory reserves | 15,871 | 81,455 | ||||
Accumulated provisions | 69,645 | 66,875 | ||||
Long-term debt | 1,908,013 | 1,891,478 | ||||
Preferred stock with sinking fund | 15,150 | 17,400 | ||||
Other | 200,269 | 229,408 | ||||
TOTAL | 4,202,325 | 4,261,949 | ||||
Commitments and Contingencies | ||||||
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||
Preferred stock without sinking fund | 47,327 | 47,327 | ||||
Common stock, no par value, authorized 200,000,000 | ||||||
shares; issued and outstanding 100 shares in 2005 and 2004 | 114,055 | 114,055 | ||||
Paid-in capital | 1,157,486 | 1,157,486 | ||||
Retained earnings | 553,092 | 513,182 | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 786 | 714 | ||||
TOTAL | 1,872,746 | 1,832,764 | ||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | $6,741,249 | $6,655,402 | ||||
See Notes to Respective Financial Statements. | ||||||
ENTERGY GULF STATES, INC. | ||||||||||
STATEMENTS OF RETAINED EARNINGS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | ||||||||||
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||
RETAINED EARNINGS | ||||||||||
Retained Earnings - Beginning of period | $531,068 | $453,368 | ||||||||
Add: Net Income | 44,287 | $44,287 | 55,591 | $55,591 | ||||||
Deduct: | ||||||||||
Dividends declared on common stock | 21,200 | 24,000 | ||||||||
Preferred dividend requirements and other | 1,063 | 1,063 | 1,123 | 1,123 | ||||||
22,263 | 25,123 | |||||||||
Retained Earnings - End of period | $553,092 | $483,836 | ||||||||
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE | ||||||||||
INCOME (Net of Taxes): | ||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period: | ||||||||||
Accumulated derivative instrument fair value changes | $722 | $3,369 | ||||||||
Net derivative instrument fair value changes | ||||||||||
arising during the period | 64 | 64 | 799 | 799 | ||||||
Balance at end of period: | ||||||||||
Accumulated derivative instrument fair value changes | $786 | $4,168 | ||||||||
Comprehensive Income | $43,288 | $55,267 | ||||||||
Six Months Ended | ||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||
RETAINED EARNINGS | ||||||||||
Retained Earnings - Beginning of period | $513,182 | $419,690 | ||||||||
Add: Net Income | 67,636 | $67,636 | 97,319 | $97,319 | ||||||
Deduct: | ||||||||||
Dividends declared on common stock | 25,600 | 30,900 | ||||||||
Preferred dividend requirements and other | 2,126 | 2,126 | 2,273 | 2,273 | ||||||
27,726 | 33,173 | |||||||||
Retained Earnings - End of period | $553,092 | $483,836 | ||||||||
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE | ||||||||||
INCOME (Net of Taxes): | ||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period: | ||||||||||
Accumulated derivative instrument fair value changes | $714 | $3,912 | ||||||||
Net derivative instrument fair value changes | ||||||||||
arising during the period | 72 | 72 | 256 | 256 | ||||||
Balance at end of period: | ||||||||||
Accumulated derivative instrument fair value changes | $786 | $4,168 | ||||||||
Comprehensive Income | $65,582 | $95,302 | ||||||||
See Notes to Respective Financial Statements. | ||||||||||
ENTERGY GULF STATES, INC. | ||||||||
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS | ||||||||
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Increase/ | |||||||
Description | 2005 | 2004 | (Decrease) | % | ||||
(Dollars In Millions) | ||||||||
Electric Operating Revenues: | ||||||||
Residential | $174 | $185 | ($11) | (6) | ||||
Commercial | 146 | 155 | (9) | (6) | ||||
Industrial | 223 | 233 | (10) | (4) | ||||
Governmental | 9 | 9 | - - | - - | ||||
Total retail | 552 | 582 | (30) | (5) | ||||
Sales for resale | ||||||||
Associated companies | 21 | 8 | 13 | 163 | ||||
Non-associated companies | 43 | 47 | (4) | (9) | ||||
Other | 131 | 37 | 94 | 254 | ||||
Total | $747 | $674 | $73 | 11 | ||||
Billed Electric Energy | ||||||||
Sales (GWh): | ||||||||
Residential | 2,124 | 2,068 | 56 | 3 | ||||
Commercial | 2,013 | 1,985 | 28 | 1 | ||||
Industrial | 3,879 | 4,049 | (170) | (4) | ||||
Governmental | 109 | 103 | 6 | 6 | ||||
Total retail | 8,125 | 8,205 | (80) | (1) | ||||
Sales for resale | ||||||||
Associated companies | 729 | 239 | 490 | 205 | ||||
Non-associated companies | 726 | 984 | (258) | (26) | ||||
Total | 9,580 | 9,428 | 152 | 2 | ||||
Six Months Ended | Increase/ | |||||||
Description | 2005 | 2004 | (Decrease) | % | ||||
(Dollars In Millions) | ||||||||
Electric Operating Revenues: | ||||||||
Residential | $370 | $369 | $1 | - - | ||||
Commercial | 305 | 297 | 8 | 3 | ||||
Industrial | 467 | 445 | 22 | 5 | ||||
Governmental | 19 | 18 | 1 | 6 | ||||
Total retail | 1,161 | 1,129 | 32 | 3 | ||||
Sales for resale | ||||||||
Associated companies | 47 | 21 | 26 | 124 | ||||
Non-associated companies | 75 | 92 | (17) | (18) | ||||
Other | 116 | 45 | 71 | 158 | ||||
Total | $1,399 | $1,287 | $112 | 9 | ||||
Billed Electric Energy | ||||||||
Sales (GWh): | ||||||||
Residential | 4,279 | 4,256 | 23 | 1 | ||||
Commercial | 3,927 | 3,847 | 80 | 2 | ||||
Industrial | 7,860 | 7,972 | (112) | (1) | ||||
Governmental | 214 | 214 | - - | - - | ||||
Total retail | 16,280 | 16,289 | (9) | - - | ||||
Sales for resale | ||||||||
Associated companies | 1,294 | 550 | 744 | 135 | ||||
Non-associated companies | 1,265 | 2,006 | (741) | (37) | ||||
Total | 18,839 | 18,845 | (6) | - - | ||||
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, INC.
MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of Operations
Net Income
Second Quarter 2005 Compared to Second Quarter 2004
Net income increased $30.5 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower depreciation and amortization expenses, partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and lower other income.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Net income increased $11.0 million primarily due to higher net revenue partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses.
Net Revenue
Second Quarter 2005 Compared to Second Quarter 2005
Net revenue, which is Entergy Louisiana's measure of gross margin, consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related, and purchased power expenses and 2) other regulatory credits. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the second quarter of 2005 to the second quarter of 2004.
|
|
Amount |
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
|
|
2004 net revenue |
|
$253.1 |
Price applied to unbilled sales |
|
56.6 |
Other |
|
1.1 |
2005 net revenue |
|
$310.8 |
The price applied to unbilled sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel cost component of the price applied to unbilled sales in 2005. The fuel cost component is higher because of an increase in natural gas costs and a Waterford 3 refueling outage. See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K and Note 1 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues.
Gross operating revenues, fuel and purchased power expenses, and other regulatory credits
Gross operating revenues increased primarily due to:
Fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to a shift to higher priced gas and purchased power generation from lower priced nuclear generation due to a refueling outage. The increase was also due to an increase in the market price of natural gas.
Other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the deferral as allowed by the LPSC of capacity charges related to generation resource planning.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Net revenue, which is Entergy Louisiana's measure of gross margin, consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related, and purchased power expenses and 2) other regulatory credits. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the six months ended June 30, 2005 to the six months ended June 30, 2004.
|
|
Amount |
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
|
|
2004 net revenue |
|
$450.4 |
Price applied to unbilled sales |
|
55.9 |
Volume/weather |
(12.6) |
|
Rate refund provisions |
|
(8.4) |
Other |
|
10.2 |
2005 net revenue |
|
$495.5 |
The price applied to unbilled sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel cost component of the price applied to unbilled sales in 2005. The fuel cost component is higher because of an increase in natural gas costs and a Waterford 3 refueling outage. #9; See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K and Note 1 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues.
The volume/weather variance is due to decreased usage primarily during the unbilled sales period.
The rate refund provisions variance is primarily due to additional provisions recorded in 2005 related to LPSC-approved settlements in March 2005 and May 2005.
Gross operating revenues, fuel and purchased power expenses, and other regulatory credits
Gross operating revenues increased primarily due to:
The increase was partially offset by the volume/weather variance and the rate refund provisions variance discussed above.
Fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to a shift from lower priced nuclear generation to higher priced gas and purchased power generation as a result of a refueling outage. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs.
Other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the deferral as allowed by the LPSC of capacity charges related to generation resource planning.
Other Income Statement Variances
Second Quarter 2005 Compared to Second Quarter 2004
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:
The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $4.1 million in contract costs as a result of maintenance outages at fossil plants in 2004.
Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased primarily due to a change in the depreciation rate for Waterford 3 as approved by the LPSC effective April 2005.
Other income decreased primarily due to the write-off of $7.1 million in June 2005 of a portion of the customer care system investment and the related allowance for equity funds used during construction pursuant to an LPSC-approved settlement. The decrease was partially offset by an increase of $2.1 million in interest income earned primarily on deferred fuel and capacity charges.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:
Other income decreased primarily due to the write-off of $7.1 million in June 2005 of a portion of the customer care system investment and the related allowance for equity funds used during construction pursuant to an LPSC-approved settlement. The decrease was substantially offset by the following:
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rates for the second quarters of 2005 and 2004 were 40.0% and 38.5%, respectively. The effective income tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were 39.8% and 38.1%, respectively. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the second quarter 2005 versus the federal statutory rate of 35.0% is primarily due to state income taxes, book and tax differences related to utility plant items, and a federal tax reserve estimate revision necessary to appropriately provide for prior tax periods. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2005 versus the federal statutory rate of 35.0% is primarily due to state income taxes and book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by the amortization of investment tax credits and book and tax differences related to the allowance for funds used during construction. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the second quarter 2 004 and the six months ended June 30, 2004 versus the federal statutory rate of 35.0% is primarily due to book and tax differences related to utility plant items and state income taxes, partially offset by the amortization of investment tax credits.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
Cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
$146,049 |
|
$8,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
220,270 |
|
89,012 |
|
Investing activities |
|
(335,554) |
|
(98,594) |
|
Financing activities |
|
(28,246) |
|
53,144 |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(143,530) |
|
43,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$2,519 |
|
$52,349 |
Operating Activities
Cash flow from operations increased $131.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004 primarily due to money pool activity, which provided $151.2 million of Entergy Louisiana's operating cash flows in the first six months of 2005 and used $84.9 million in the first six months of 2004. The increase was partially offset by decreased recovery of deferred fuel costs. Entergy Louisiana's receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In Thousands) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($110,658) |
|
$40,549 |
|
$43,577 |
|
($41,317) |
See Note 4 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.
Investing Activities
The increase of $237.0 million in net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004 is primarily due to:
Financing Activities
Entergy Louisiana used $28.2 million of cash for financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to providing $53.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 primarily due to the issuance of $100 million of 5.5% Series First Mortgage Bonds in March 2004, partially offset by a principal payment of $14.8 million in 2004 on the Waterford 3 Lease Obligation. See Note 3 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements for the details of Entergy Louisiana's long-term debt activity in 2005.
Uses and Sources of Capital
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Louisiana's uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
In May 2005, Entergy Louisiana entered into a credit facility for $85 million and Entergy Arkansas renewed its $85 million credit facility with the same lender. Either company can borrow up to the full amount on its respective facility, but at no time can the combined amount of outstanding borrowings on the two facilities exceed $85 million. There were no outstanding borrowings under either credit facility as of June 30, 2005.
In July 2005, Entergy Louisiana and Entergy New Orleans renewed their 364-day credit facilities with the same lender through May 2006. Entergy New Orleans increased the amount of its credit facility to $15 million, the same amount as Entergy Louisiana's facility. Either company can borrow up to the full amount on its respective facility, but at no time can the combined amount of outstanding borrowings on the two facilities exceed $15 million. There were no outstanding borrowings under either credit facility as of June 30, 2005.
Significant Factors and Known Trends
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Significant Factors and Known Trends" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of utility restructuring, state rate regulation, federal regulation and proceedings, industrial and commercial customers, market and credit risks, nuclear matters, environmental risks, and litigation risks. Following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
State and Local Rate Regulation
In March 2005, the LPSC approved a settlement proposal to resolve various dockets covering a range of issues for Entergy Gulf States and Entergy Louisiana. The settlement resulted in credits of $14 million for retail electricity customers of Entergy Louisiana. The settlement dismissed, among other dockets, dockets established to consider issues concerning power purchases for Entergy Louisiana for the summers of 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004, all prudence issues associated with decisions made through May 2005 related to the nuclear plant uprates at issue in these cases, and an LPSC docket concerning retail issues arising under the System Agreement. The settlement does not include the System Agreement case at FERC. In addition, Entergy Louisiana agreed to forgo recovery of $3.5 million of deferred 2003 capacity costs associated with certain power purchase agreements. The credits were issued in connection with April 2005 billings. Entergy Louisiana reserved for the approximate refund amoun ts.
Refer to "State Rate Regulation" in the Form 10-K for discussion of Entergy Louisiana's rate filing with the LPSC requesting a base rate increase. In March 2005, the LPSC staff and Entergy Louisiana filed a proposed settlement that included an annual base rate increase of approximately $18.3 million which was implemented, subject to refund, effective with May 2005 billings. In May 2005, the LPSC approved a modified settlement which, among other things, reduces depreciation and decommissioning expense due to assuming a life extension of Waterford 3 and results in no change in rates. Subsequently, in June 2005, Entergy Louisiana made a revised compliance filing with the LPSC supporting a revised depreciation rate for Waterford 3, which reflects the removal of interim additions, and a rate increase from the purchase of the Perryville power plant, which results in a net $0.8 million annual rate reduction. Entergy Louisiana reduced rates effective with the first billing cycle in June 2005 and expects to refund excess revenue collected during May 2005, including interest, in the third quarter of 2005.
The May 2005 rate settlement includes the adoption of a three-year formula rate plan, the terms of which include an ROE mid-point of 10.25% for the initial three-year term of the plan and permit Entergy Louisiana to recover incremental capacity costs outside of a traditional base rate proceeding. Under the formula rate plan, over- and under-earnings outside an allowed regulatory earnings range of 9.45% to 11.05% will be allocated 60% to customers and 40% to Entergy Louisiana. The initial formula rate plan filing will be in May 2006 based on a 2005 test year with rates effective September 2006. In addition, there is the potential to extend the formula rate plan beyond the initial three-year effective period by mutual agreement of the LPSC and Entergy Louisiana.
Federal Regulation
System Agreement Litigation
On June 1, 2005, the FERC issued a decision in the System Agreement litigation. The domestic utility companies historically have engaged in the coordinated planning, construction, and operation of generating and bulk transmission facilities under the terms of the System Agreement, which has been approved by the FERC. The System Agreement litigation proceedings are described in the Form 10-K.
The FERC decision concluded, among other things, that:
The FERC's June 2005 order would reallocate production costs of the domestic utility companies whose relative total production costs expressed as a percentage of Entergy System average production costs are outside an upper or lower bandwidth. This would be accomplished by payments from domestic utility companies whose production costs are below Entergy System average production costs to domestic utility companies whose production costs are above Entergy System average production costs. An assessment of the potential effects of the FERC's June 2005 order requires assumptions regarding the future total production cost of each domestic utility company, which assumptions include the mix of solid fuel and gas-fired generation available to each company and the costs of natural gas and purchased power. Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States are more dependent upon gas-fired generation than Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Mississippi, or Entergy New Orleans. Of these, Entergy Arkansas is the l east dependent upon gas-fired generation. Therefore, increases in natural gas prices likely will increase the amount by which Entergy Arkansas' total production costs are below the average production costs of the domestic utility companies. Considerable uncertainty exists regarding future gas prices. Annual average Henry Hub gas prices have varied significantly over recent years, ranging from $1.72/mmBtu to $5.85/mmBtu for the 1995-2004 period, and averaging $3.43/mmBtu during the ten-year period 1995-2004 and $4.58/mmBtu during the five-year period 2000-2004. Recent market conditions have resulted in gas prices that have averaged $5.85/mmBtu for the twelve months ended December 2004. During the 12 month period July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2005 forward gas contracts for each of the next four years based on daily NYMEX close averaged $6.68/mmBtu (2006), $6.25/mmBtu (2007), $5.88/mmBtu (2008) and $5.58/mmBtu (2009). If the FERC's June 2005 order becomes final and if these gas prices occur as assumed, the following potential annual production cost reallocations among the domestic utility companies could result during the 2007-2010 period:
Range of Annual Payments |
Average Annual |
||
(In Millions) |
|||
Entergy Arkansas |
$143 to $210 |
$166 |
|
Entergy Gulf States |
($134) to ($87) |
($113) |
|
Entergy Louisiana |
($71) to ($10) |
($38) |
|
Entergy Mississippi |
($28) to $0 |
($11) |
|
Entergy New Orleans |
($10) to $0 |
($4) |
If natural gas prices deviate by $1/mmBtu up or down, it is expected that Entergy Arkansas' annual payments will change in the same direction by approximately $60 to $70 million.
Various pending motions for rehearing and clarification of the FERC's June 2005 order were filed by parties to the proceeding, including the LPSC, the APSC, the MPSC, and the City Council, and by Entergy Services, Inc., on behalf of the domestic utility companies. Among other things, the LPSC's motion urged the FERC to "clarify" that the FERC's order requires the payments and receipts, to the extent any are required, to be made in 2006 based on production costs incurred in 2004 and 2005. Entergy does not believe that this request for "clarification" is consistent with the FERC order and submitted a response urging the FERC to reject this interpretation and instead find that the annual remedy order by the FERC would be evaluated based on calendar year 2006 production costs, with the first potential payments/receipts, if any were required, made in 2007.
Management believes that any changes in the allocation of production costs resulting from the FERC's June 2005 order and related retail proceedings should result in similar rate changes for retail customers. The timing of recovery of these costs in rates could be the subject of additional proceedings before Entergy's retail regulators. Although the outcome and timing of the FERC and other proceedings cannot be predicted at this time, Entergy Louisiana does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these proceedings will have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
See the Form 10-K for discussion of the proceeding that the LPSC commenced before itself regarding the System Agreement. As noted above in "State and Local Rate Regulation," the settlement of various issues involving Entergy Gulf States and Entergy Louisiana that was approved by the LPSC has resolved the System Agreement proceeding before the LPSC, which has been dismissed without prejudice.
Transmission
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the petition for declaratory order that Entergy filed with the FERC in January 2005 regarding Entergy's Independent Coordinator of Transmission (ICT) proposal. On March 22, 2005, the FERC issued a declaratory order concluding that: (1) because the Southwest Power Pool (SPP) was the only entity identified as potentially being selected as the ICT and because the SPP is already a "public utility" there was no need to rule on the question of whether the functions of the ICT, alone, would serve to make the ICT a "public utility;" (2) Entergy will continue to be the "transmission provider" for transmission service across its system and that "the presence of SPP as the ICT will not change the existing balance of jurisdiction between [the FERC] and Entergy's retail regulators;" and (3) the FERC "is prepared to grant Entergy's proposed transmission pricing proposal on a two-year experimental basis, subject to certain enhancement and monitoring and reportin g conditions." The enhancements referred to by the FERC involve more fully specifying the responsibilities and duties of the ICT, including defining the ICT's role in the preparation of various transmission expansion plans and the performance of studies related to the granting of transmission or interconnection service. Before Entergy's ICT proposal can be implemented, however, Entergy is required to submit further filings with the FERC regarding the modifications and clarifications to the ICT proposal.
On April 8, 2005 several intervenors filed an Emergency Request for Clarification and Request for Expedited Commission Action seeking to have the FERC: (1) clarify the ICT's role in administering the Available Flowgate Capacity (AFC) methodology; (2) clarify the ICT's role in developing the transmission base plan; (3) clarify what the FERC meant when it required Entergy to provide firm transmission rights to customers that pay for supplemental transmission upgrades; and (4) clarify and confirm following Entergy's filing that the FERC will assess SPP's status as being independent of Entergy.
On April 21, 2005 Entergy filed a request for clarification or rehearing of the FERC's March 22 declaratory order requesting that the FERC clarify the respective role of Entergy and the ICT in developing the inputs or criteria used to create the base plan and in preparing certain studies regarding system expansion. The request for clarification further requests that the FERC clarify that the initial two-year period will commence with the actual start date of ICT operations. In the event that the FERC denies Entergy's request for clarification, then Entergy will seek rehearing on these issues. However, in its request, Entergy requested that FERC not rule on these issues at this time but, instead, that the FERC wait to evaluate these issues until such time as Entergy has filed the more detailed tariff sheets and protocols in its subsequent filing to implement the ICT. Separately, Entergy submitted a letter advising the FERC that it intended to submit on or about May 27, 2005 the filing t o implement the ICT proposal. A joint request for rehearing of the ICT declaratory order was also filed by the City Council, the LPSC, and the MPSC in which the retail regulators expressed their concerns that the findings reached in the declaratory order may result in an expansion of authority of the ICT "that is unnecessary to achieve the [FERC's] goals and is very likely to result in significant increases in the start-up and operational costs of the ICT." The retail regulators request that the FERC not act on their request for rehearing until Entergy has submitted its filing to implement the ICT. The intervenors filed a separate request for rehearing on April 21, 2005 urging the FERC to impose additional conditions on the approval of the ICT and also re-urging the FERC to reject the pricing proposal contained in the ICT proposal.
On May 12, 2005 the FERC issued an order clarifying certain aspects of its March 22 order. In the May 12 order, the FERC indicated that (1) Entergy is to work with the ICT and Entergy's stakeholders to develop procedures by which the ICT will calculate AFCs; (2) Entergy must specifically define the transmission rights that a customer that pays for supplemental upgrades will receive for such payments; (3) the FERC will review the ICT's contract to ensure that the ICT can perform its functions in an independent manner even if SPP is chosen as the ICT; and (4) the initial two-year period will start once the ICT becomes operational.
On May 27, 2005, the domestic utility companies filed the enhanced ICT proposal with the FERC. Entergy believes that the filing is consistent with the FERC guidance received in both the FERC's March 22 and May 12 orders on the ICT. Among other things, the enhanced ICT filing states that the ICT will (1) grant or deny transmission service on the domestic utility companies' transmission system; (2) administer the domestic utility companies' OASIS node for purposes of processing and evaluating transmission service requests and ensuring compliance with the domestic utility companies' obligation to post transmission-related information; (3) develop a base plan for the domestic utility companies' transmission system that will result in the ICT making the determination on whether something should be rolled into the domestic utility companies' transmission rates or directly assigned to the customer requesting or causing an upgrade to be constructed; (4) serve as the reliability coordinator for t he Entergy transmission system; and (5) oversee the operation of the weekly procurement process. The enhanced ICT proposal clarifies the rights that customers receive when they fund a supplemental upgrade and also contains a detailed methodology describing the process by which the ICT will evaluate interconnection-related investments already made on the Entergy System for purposes of determining the future allocation of the uncredited portion of these investments.
On June 3, 2005 a group of generators filed with the FERC a request that the FERC schedule a technical conference on the enhanced ICT proposal in order for Entergy to provide additional information on the enhanced ICT proposal. In response, a stakeholder meeting was held in New Orleans on June 30, 2005. Interventions and comments on the filing are due by August 5, 2005.
In addition, as discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States have filed an application with the LPSC requesting that the LPSC find that the ICT proposal is a prudent and appropriate course of action. An LPSC hearing on the ICT proposal is currently scheduled for August 2005, however certain intervenors have recently requested that the hearing be delayed until mid-September 2005.
Interconnection Orders
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the ALJ Initial Decision and FERC order directing Entergy Louisiana to refund, in the form of transmission credits, approximately $15 million in expenses and tax obligations previously paid by a generator. Entergy's request for rehearing was denied by the FERC.
Available Flowgate Capacity Proceedings
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of proceedings at the FERC involving Entergy's Available Flowgate Capacity (AFC) methodology. On March 22, 2005, the FERC issued an order contemporaneously with the ICT declaratory order discussed above that holds the AFC hearing in abeyance pending action on Entergy's upcoming ICT filing. The order holding the hearing in abeyance further indicated that it would cancel the hearing when the ICT begins to perform its functions. On April 8, 2005 several intervenors filed Emergency Motions for Interim Relief and Expedited Commission Action requesting that, during the interim period before the implementation of the ICT, the FERC (1) institute an audit process to examine and modify Entergy's current AFC process; and (2) require SPP to become involved in the AFC stakeholder process and order certain modifications to Entergy's stakeholder process. The audit process being proposed by the intervenors would not involve an independent auditor, but instead wou ld be an investigation performed by a representative from the intervenors, Entergy, and possibly SPP. On April 25, 2005, Entergy filed its response to the emergency motion urging the FERC to reject the intervenors' request for the "audit" because the type of investigation proposed by the intervenors would be neither independent nor fair and would only distract from the implementation of the ICT. Instead, Entergy has proposed that the ICT conduct an independent review of the AFC process and procedures as part of its transition to assuming the identified ICT responsibilities, including the calculation of the AFCs. Entergy further indicated that it would welcome SPP's participation in the current stakeholder process. On April 21, 2005, the intervenors filed a separate request for rehearing arguing that the FERC must allow the AFC hearing to proceed in parallel with the establishment of the ICT. See "Transmission" above for further discussion of AFC.
Federal Legislation
In late July 2005 the U.S. Congress passed broad new energy legislation, the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The legislation contains electricity provisions that, among other things:
The President is expected to sign the Energy Policy Act in August 2005. The Energy Power Act requires several rulemakings by the FERC and other government agencies in order to implement its provisions. Therefore, it will be some time before a full assessment of its effect on Entergy and the energy industry can be completed.
Central States Compact Claim
The Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act of 1980 holds each state responsible for disposal of low-level radioactive waste originating in that state, but allows states to participate in regional compacts to fulfill their responsibilities jointly. Arkansas and Louisiana participate in the Central Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Compact (Central States Compact or Compact). Commencing in 1998, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, and Entergy Louisiana made a series of contributions to the Central States Compact to fund the Central States Compact's development of a low-level radioactive waste disposal facility to be located in Boyd County, Nebraska. In December 1998, Nebraska, the host state for the proposed Central States Compact disposal facility, denied the compact's license application for the proposed disposal facility. Several parties, including the commission that governs the compact (the Compact Commission), filed a lawsuit against Nebraska seeking damages resulting from Nebraska's denial of the proposed facility's license. After a trial, the U.S. District Court concluded that Nebraska violated its good faith obligations regarding the proposed waste disposal facility and rendered a judgment against Nebraska in the amount of $151 million. In August 2004, Nebraska agreed to pay the Compact $141 million in settlement of the judgment. In July 2005, the Compact Commission decided to distribute a substantial portion of the proceeds from the settlement to the nuclear power generators that had contributed funding for the Boyd County facility, including Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, and Entergy Louisiana. On August 1, 2005, Nebraska paid the full amount of the settlement to the Compact, and the Compact distributed from the settlement proceeds $23.6 million to Entergy Arkansas, $19.9 million to Entergy Gulf States, and $18.4 million to Entergy Louisiana. Management is still analyzing the accounting treatment of the r eceipts, but expects that some portion of the receipts could result in income for Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, and Entergy Louisiana.
Entergy Louisiana Corporate Restructuring
On July 13, 2005, Entergy Louisiana filed with the LPSC an application for authorization to implement a plan of internal restructuring that would, in effect, result in the conversion of its form of business organization from a corporation to a limited liability company. The proposed restructuring is intended to reduce Entergy Louisiana's corporate franchise taxes. The proposed restructuring implements a recommendation from the LPSC staff and, if successfully completed, will result in a decrease in Entergy Louisiana's rates to Louisiana retail customers.
In accordance with the terms of the proposed restructuring, Entergy Louisiana will be converted to a Texas corporation and will hold all the common membership interests in Entergy Louisiana, LLC ("ELL"), a newly organized Texas limited liability company that will be allocated substantially all the assets and liabilities, including debt and lease obligations, of Entergy Louisiana immediately prior to the proposed restructuring. ELL's utility operations would remain subject to the jurisdiction of the LPSC and the FERC to the same extent that they were subject to the jurisdiction of the LPSC and the FERC when they were held by Entergy Louisiana. The proposed restructuring may not be implemented without various authorizations by certain governmental regulatory agencies, including the LPSC, the SEC, the FERC, and the NRC.
In its application to the LPSC, Entergy Louisiana noted that it may redeem a portion of the Entergy Louisiana preferred stock prior to the proposed restructuring and that, if the proposed restructuring is implemented, it anticipates redeeming any remaining Entergy Louisiana preferred stock within three to six months following the implementation of the proposed restructuring.
Any redemption of Entergy Louisiana preferred stock by Entergy Louisiana in connection with the proposed restructuring will be made at the following respective redemption prices as provided in the Entergy Louisiana amended and restated articles of incorporation, whether the redemption occurs before or after the implementation of the proposed restructuring:
Series of Entergy Louisiana Preferred Stock |
Redemption Price Per Share |
4.96% Preferred Stock, Cumulative, $100.00 par value |
$104.25 |
4.16% Preferred Stock, Cumulative, $100.00 par value |
$104.21 |
4.44% Preferred Stock, Cumulative, $100.00 par value |
$104.06 |
5.16% Preferred Stock, Cumulative, $100.00 par value |
$104.18 |
5.40% Preferred Stock, Cumulative, $100.00 par value |
$103.00 |
6.44% Preferred Stock, Cumulative, $100.00 par value |
$102.92 |
7.84% Preferred Stock, Cumulative, $100.00 par value |
$103.78 |
7.36% Preferred Stock, Cumulative, $100.00 par value |
$103.36 |
8% Preferred Stock, Cumulative, $25.00 par value |
$ 25.00 |
Critical Accounting Estimates
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy Louisiana's accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, unbilled revenue, and pension and other postretirement costs. The following is an update to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
Nuclear Decommissioning Costs
In the second quarter of 2005, Entergy Louisiana recorded a revision to its estimated decommissioning cost liability in accordance with a new decommissioning cost study for Waterford 3 that assumes a life extension for the plant. The revised estimate resulted in a $153.6 million reduction in its decommissioning liability, along with a $49.2 million reduction in utility plant and a $104.4 million reduction in the related regulatory asset.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In the first quarter 2005, FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143" (FIN 47). FIN 47 requires companies to recognize at fair value a liability for a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred, which is generally upon an asset's acquisition, construction, development, or through its normal operation. A conditional asset retirement obligation is generally a legal obligation to incur costs to remove an asset or part of an asset, such as an obligation to comply with environmental regulations and requirements. The obligation is conditional because there is currently no legal requirement to retire or remove the facility that the affected asset is a part of. FIN 47 requires that uncertainty about the timing or method of settlement of a conditional asset retirement obligation be factored into the measurement of the liability when sufficient information becomes available. FIN 47 wi ll be effective for Entergy no later than December 31, 2005. Entergy does not believe that the adoption of FIN 47 will be material to its financial position or results of operations because it estimates that any conditional asset retirement obligations required to be recognized under FIN 47 would be offset by a regulatory asset because of the expected recovery of these future costs in rates.
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, INC. | ||||||||
INCOME STATEMENTS | ||||||||
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||
(In Thousands) | (In Thousands) | |||||||
OPERATING REVENUES | ||||||||
Domestic electric | $647,748 | $555,511 | $1,128,421 | $1,043,557 | ||||
OPERATING EXPENSES | ||||||||
Operation and Maintenance: | ||||||||
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and | ||||||||
gas purchased for resale | 127,564 | 129,885 | 265,341 | 267,664 | ||||
Purchased power | 226,690 | 178,102 | 397,996 | 335,832 | ||||
Nuclear refueling outage expenses | 3,397 | 3,455 | 6,821 | 6,632 | ||||
Other operation and maintenance | 99,518 | 93,671 | 188,156 | 171,369 | ||||
Decommissioning | 5,155 | 5,443 | 10,872 | 10,799 | ||||
Taxes other than income taxes | 18,300 | 18,259 | 36,657 | 34,333 | ||||
Depreciation and amortization | 43,645 | 47,951 | 95,453 | 94,537 | ||||
Other regulatory credits - net | (17,323) | (5,612) | (30,407) | (10,284) | ||||
TOTAL | 506,946 | 471,154 | 970,889 | 910,882 | ||||
OPERATING INCOME | 140,802 | 84,357 | 157,532 | 132,675 | ||||
OTHER INCOME | ||||||||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | 1,840 | 1,519 | 4,377 | 2,869 | ||||
Interest and dividend income | 5,074 | 1,931 | 8,140 | 3,658 | ||||
Miscellaneous - net | (6,481) | 1,282 | (6,848) | 144 | ||||
TOTAL | 433 | 4,732 | 5,669 | 6,671 | ||||
INTEREST AND OTHER CHARGES | ||||||||
Interest on long-term debt | 16,852 | 17,878 | 34,691 | 34,336 | ||||
Other interest - net | 1,804 | 1,074 | 4,823 | 2,058 | ||||
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction | (990) | (905) | (2,489) | (1,881) | ||||
TOTAL | 17,666 | 18,047 | 37,025 | 34,513 | ||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | 123,569 | 71,042 | 126,176 | 104,833 | ||||
Income taxes | 49,406 | 27,329 | 50,242 | 39,908 | ||||
NET INCOME | 74,163 | 43,713 | 75,934 | 64,925 | ||||
Preferred dividend requirements and other | 1,678 | 1,678 | 3,357 | 3,357 | ||||
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO | ||||||||
COMMON STOCK | $72,485 | $42,035 | $72,577 | $61,568 | ||||
See Notes to Respective Financial Statements. |
(Page left blank intentionally)
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, INC. | ||||
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | ||||
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||
(Unaudited) | ||||
2005 | 2004 | |||
(In Thousands) | ||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||
Net income | $75,934 | $64,925 | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities: | ||||
Reserve for regulatory adjustments | (11,724) | - - | ||
Other regulatory credits - net | (30,407) | (10,284) | ||
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning | 106,325 | 105,336 | ||
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits | 38,961 | 30,803 | ||
Changes in working capital: | ||||
Receivables | (52,011) | (50,835) | ||
Accounts payable | 119,141 | (58,301) | ||
Taxes accrued | 23,337 | 32,834 | ||
Interest accrued | (715) | (3,503) | ||
Deferred fuel costs | (80,330) | (17,039) | ||
Other working capital accounts | (22,957) | (6,575) | ||
Provision for estimated losses and reserves | 2,179 | 2,953 | ||
Changes in other regulatory assets | 17,229 | (11,137) | ||
Other | 35,308 | 9,835 | ||
Net cash flow provided by operating activities | 220,270 | 89,012 | ||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||
Construction expenditures | (151,902) | (93,864) | ||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | 4,377 | 2,869 | ||
Nuclear fuel purchases | (54,158) | - - | ||
Proceeds from the sale/leaseback of nuclear fuel | 54,158 | - - | ||
Payment for purchase of plant | (162,075) | - - | ||
Decommissioning trust contributions and realized | ||||
change in trust assets | (6,153) | (7,599) | ||
Other regulatory investments | (19,801) | - - | ||
Net cash flow used in investing activities | (335,554) | (98,594) | ||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt | 54,611 | 99,210 | ||
Retirement of long-term debt | (55,000) | (14,809) | ||
Dividends paid: | ||||
Common stock | (24,500) | (27,900) | ||
Preferred stock | (3,357) | (3,357) | ||
Net cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities | (28,246) | 53,144 | ||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (143,530) | 43,562 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 146,049 | 8,787 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $2,519 | $52,349 | ||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | ||||
Cash paid during the period for: | ||||
Interest - net of amount capitalized | $38,574 | $38,446 | ||
Income taxes | $11,114 | - - | ||
See Notes to Respective Financial Statements. | ||||
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, INC. | ||||
BALANCE SHEETS | ||||
ASSETS | ||||
June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 | ||||
(Unaudited) | ||||
2005 | 2004 | |||
(In Thousands) | ||||
CURRENT ASSETS | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents: | ||||
Cash | $2,519 | $3,875 | ||
Temporary cash investments - at cost, | ||||
which approximates market | - - | 142,174 | ||
Total cash and cash equivalents | 2,519 | 146,049 | ||
Accounts receivable: | ||||
Customer | 102,973 | 88,154 | ||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | (2,486) | (3,135) | ||
Associated companies | 10,425 | 43,121 | ||
Other | 13,684 | 13,070 | ||
Accrued unbilled revenues | 212,078 | 143,453 | ||
Total accounts receivable | 336,674 | 284,663 | ||
Deferred fuel costs | 88,984 | 8,654 | ||
Accumulated deferred income taxes | - - | 12,712 | ||
Materials and supplies - at average cost | 74,501 | 77,665 | ||
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs | 23,246 | 5,605 | ||
Prepayments and other | 12,497 | 6,861 | ||
TOTAL | 538,421 | 542,209 | ||
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS | ||||
Investment in affiliates - at equity | 14,230 | 14,230 | ||
Decommissioning trust funds | 180,999 | 172,083 | ||
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation) | 21,110 | 21,176 | ||
Other | 4 | 4 | ||
TOTAL | 216,343 | 207,493 | ||
UTILITY PLANT | ||||
Electric | 6,264,851 | 5,985,889 | ||
Property under capital lease | 246,853 | 250,964 | ||
Construction work in progress | 111,383 | 188,848 | ||
Nuclear fuel under capital lease | 75,353 | 31,655 | ||
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT | 6,698,440 | 6,457,356 | ||
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization | 2,829,721 | 2,799,936 | ||
UTILITY PLANT - NET | 3,868,719 | 3,657,420 | ||
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS | ||||
Regulatory assets: | ||||
SFAS 109 regulatory asset - net | 124,252 | 132,686 | ||
Other regulatory assets | 215,051 | 302,456 | ||
Long-term receivables | 8,222 | 10,736 | ||
Other | 27,267 | 25,994 | ||
TOTAL | 374,792 | 471,872 | ||
TOTAL ASSETS | $4,998,275 | $4,878,994 | ||
See Notes to Respective Financial Statements. | ||||
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, INC. | ||||
BALANCE SHEETS | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||
June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 | ||||
(Unaudited) | ||||
2005 | 2004 | |||
(In Thousands) | ||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||
Currently maturing long-term debt | $ - | $55,000 | ||
Accounts payable: | ||||
Associated companies | 174,522 | 57,681 | ||
Other | 130,823 | 128,523 | ||
Customer deposits | 67,558 | 66,963 | ||
Taxes accrued | 34,718 | 7,268 | ||
Accumulated deferred income taxes | 24,967 | - - | ||
Interest accrued | 17,723 | 18,438 | ||
Obligations under capital leases | 22,753 | 22,753 | ||
Other | 10,827 | 10,428 | ||
TOTAL | 483,891 | 367,054 | ||
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued | 1,795,528 | 1,805,410 | ||
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits | 94,081 | 96,130 | ||
Obligations under capital leases | 52,600 | 8,903 | ||
Other regulatory liabilities | 59,702 | 51,260 | ||
Decommissioning | 204,497 | 347,255 | ||
Accumulated provisions | 94,832 | 92,653 | ||
Long-term debt | 985,707 | 930,695 | ||
Other | 106,541 | 106,815 | ||
TOTAL | 3,393,488 | 3,439,121 | ||
Commitments and Contingencies | ||||
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||
Preferred stock without sinking fund | 100,500 | 100,500 | ||
Common stock, no par value, authorized 250,000,000 | ||||
shares; issued 165,173,180 shares in 2005 | ||||
and 2004 | 1,088,900 | 1,088,900 | ||
Capital stock expense and other | (1,718) | (1,718) | ||
Retained earnings | 53,214 | 5,137 | ||
Less - treasury stock, at cost (18,202,573 shares in 2005 and 2004) | 120,000 | 120,000 | ||
TOTAL | 1,120,896 | 1,072,819 | ||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | $4,998,275 | $4,878,994 | ||
See Notes to Respective Financial Statements. |
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, INC. | ||||||||
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS | ||||||||
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Increase/ | |||||||
Description | 2005 | 2004 | (Decrease) | % | ||||
(Dollars In Millions) | ||||||||
Electric Operating Revenues: | ||||||||
Residential | $172 | $162 | $10 | 6 | ||||
Commercial | 122 | 116 | 6 | 5 | ||||
Industrial | 198 | 191 | 7 | 4 | ||||
Governmental | 10 | 9 | 1 | 11 | ||||
Total retail | 502 | 478 | 24 | 5 | ||||
Sales for resale | ||||||||
Associated companies | 32 | 28 | 4 | 14 | ||||
Non-associated companies | 3 | 3 | - | - - | ||||
Other | 111 | 47 | 64 | 136 | ||||
Total | $648 | $556 | $92 | 17 | ||||
Billed Electric Energy | ||||||||
Sales (GWh): | ||||||||
Residential | 1,894 | 1,888 | 6 | - - | ||||
Commercial | 1,361 | 1,357 | 4 | - - | ||||
Industrial | 3,341 | 3,274 | 67 | 2 | ||||
Governmental | 108 | 104 | 4 | 4 | ||||
Total retail | 6,704 | 6,623 | 81 | 1 | ||||
Sales for resale | ||||||||
Associated companies | 285 | 316 | (31) | (10) | ||||
Non-associated companies | 31 | 28 | 3 | 11 | ||||
Total | 7,020 | 6,967 | 53 | 1 | ||||
Six Months Ended | Increase/ | |||||||
Description | 2005 | 2004 | (Decrease) | % | ||||
(Dollars In Millions) | ||||||||
Electric Operating Revenues: | ||||||||
Residential | $337 | $332 | $5 | 2 | ||||
Commercial | 237 | 230 | 7 | 3 | ||||
Industrial | 387 | 377 | 10 | 3 | ||||
Governmental | 20 | 18 | 2 | 11 | ||||
Total retail | 981 | 957 | 24 | 3 | ||||
Sales for resale | ||||||||
Associated companies | 47 | 38 | 9 | 24 | ||||
Non-associated companies | 5 | 7 | (2) | (29) | ||||
Other | 95 | 42 | 53 | 126 | ||||
Total | $1,128 | $1,044 | $84 | 8 | ||||
Billed Electric Energy | ||||||||
Sales (GWh): | ||||||||
Residential | 3,823 | 3,895 | (72) | (2) | ||||
Commercial | 2,647 | 2,640 | 7 | - - | ||||
Industrial | 6,457 | 6,406 | 51 | 1 | ||||
Governmental | 226 | 213 | 13 | 6 | ||||
Total retail | 13,153 | 13,154 | (1) | - - | ||||
Sales for resale | ||||||||
Associated companies | 430 | 422 | 8 | 2 | ||||
Non-associated companies | 45 | 122 | (77) | (63) | ||||
Total | 13,628 | 13,698 | (70) | (1) | ||||
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of Operations
Net Income
Second Quarter 2005 Compared to Second Quarter 2004
Net income decreased $3.1 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses, higher depreciation and amortization expense, and higher taxes other than income taxes, partially offset by lower interest expense.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Net income decreased $4.5 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses, higher depreciation and amortization expense, and higher taxes other than income taxes, partially offset by higher net revenue and lower interest expense.
Net Revenue
Second Quarter 2005 Compared to Second Quarter 2004
Net revenue, which is Entergy Mississippi's measure of gross margin, consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related, and purchased power expenses and 2) other regulatory credits. Net revenue was relatively unchanged comparing the second quarter of 2005 to the second quarter of 2004.
Amount |
||
(In Millions) |
||
2004 net revenue |
$116.5 |
|
Miscellaneous items |
(0.1) |
|
2005 net revenue |
$116.4 |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Net revenue, which is Entergy Mississippi's measure of gross margin, consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related, and purchased power expenses and 2) other regulatory credits. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the six months ended June 30, 2005 to the six months ended June 30, 2004.
Amount |
||
(In Millions) |
||
2004 net revenue |
$204.0 |
|
Reserve equalization |
3.8 |
|
Other |
0.1 |
|
2005 net revenue |
$207.9 |
The reserve equalization variance is primarily due to purchase power agreement contracts during 2005 which were not in place during 2004.
Other Income Statement Variances
Second Quarter 2005 Compared to Second Quarter 2004
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:
The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $1.1 million in customer service support costs.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service.
Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to higher assessment of ad valorem and franchise taxes.
Interest expense decreased primarily due to net redemption of $35 million of First Mortgage Bonds during 2004.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:
The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $1.0 million in customer service support costs.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service.
Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to higher assessment of ad valorem and franchise taxes.
Interest expense decreased primarily due to net redemption of $35 million of First Mortgage Bonds during 2004.
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rates for the second quarters of 2005 and 2004 were 34.9% and 37.0%, respectively. The difference in the effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2004 versus the federal statutory rate of 35.0% is primarily due to state income taxes and book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by the amortization of investment tax credits and book and tax differences related to the allowance of equity funds used during construction. The effective income tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were 33.5% and 35.8%, respectively. The difference in the effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2005 versus the federal statutory rate of 35.0% is primarily due to book and tax differences related to the allowance of equity funds used during construction and the amortization of investment tax credits, partially offset by state income taxes.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
Cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
$80,396 |
|
$63,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
16,495 |
|
51,564 |
|
Investing activities |
|
(67,416) |
|
(69,180) |
|
Financing activities |
|
16,255 |
|
(28,296) |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(34,666) |
|
(45,912) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$45,730 |
|
$17,926 |
Operating Activities
Cash flow from operations decreased $35.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004 primarily due to money pool activity.
Entergy Mississippi's receivables from the money pool were as follows:
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In Thousands) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$53,488 |
|
$21,584 |
|
$12,000 |
|
$22,076 |
Money pool activity used $31.9 million of Entergy Mississippi's operating cash flow for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and provided $10.1 million of Entergy Mississippi's operating cash flow for the six months ended June 30, 2004. See Note 4 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities decreased $1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004. Decreased capital expenditures as a result of decreased spending on transmission and fossil plant projects was offset by the maturity in 2004 of $7.5 million of other temporary investments that had been made in 2003, which provided cash in 2004.
Financing Activities
Financing activities provided $16.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to using $28.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 primarily due to a $30 million issuance of preferred stock in 2005 and the net retirement of $39.5 million of long-term debt during 2004, partially offset by cash provided by a $25 million draw on Entergy Mississippi's short term bank credit facility in 2004. See Note 4 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements for the details of Entergy Mississippi's preferred stock activity in 2005.
Uses and Sources of Capital
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Mississippi's uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to the information presented in the Form 10-K.
See the table in the Form 10-K under "Uses of Capital" which sets forth the amounts of Entergy Mississippi's planned construction and other capital investments for 2005 through 2007. In March 2005, Entergy Mississippi signed an agreement to purchase for $88 million the Attala power plant, a 480 MW natural gas-fired, combined-cycle generating facility owned by Central Mississippi Generating Company (CMGC). Entergy Mississippi plans to invest approximately $20 million in facility upgrades at the Attala plant plus $3 million in other costs, bringing the total capital cost of the project to approximately $111 million. The Attala plant will be 100 percent owned by Entergy Mississippi, and the acquisition is expected to close in late 2005 or early 2006. The purchase of the plant is contingent upon obtaining necessary approvals from various federal agencies, state permitting agencies, and the MPSC, including MPSC approval of investment cost recovery. In May and June 2005, Entergy Mississippi made filings at the MPSC to commence proceedings for MPSC approval both of the acquisition and of the investment cost recovery for the plant. Entergy Mississippi and CMGC had previously executed a purchased power agreement in July 2004 for 100 percent of the plant's output, and this agreement will expire upon the close of the acquisition or in March 2008, whichever occurs earlier. The planned construction and other capital investments line in the table in the Form 10-K includes the estimated cost of the Attala acquisition as a 2006 capital commitment.
In June 2005, Entergy Mississippi issued 1,200,000 shares of $25 par value 6.25% Series Preferred Stock, all of which are outstanding as of June 30, 2005. The dividends are cumulative and will be payable quarterly beginning November 1, 2005. The preferred stock is redeemable on or after July 1, 2010, at Entergy Mississippi's option, at the call price of $25 per share. The proceeds from this issuance were used in the third quarter of 2005 to redeem $20 million of Entergy Mississippi's $100 par value 8.36% Series Preferred Stock and $10 million of Entergy Mississippi's $100 par value 7.44% Series Preferred Stock.
In April 2005, Entergy Mississippi renewed its 364-day credit facility through May 31, 2006. The amount available under the credit facility is $25 million, of which none was drawn at June 30, 2005.
Significant Factors and Known Trends
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Significant Factors and Known Trends" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of utility restructuring, state and local rate regulation, federal regulation and proceedings, market and credit risks, state and local regulatory risks, and litigation risks. The following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
State and Local Rate Regulation
In May 2005, the MPSC approved a joint stipulation entered into between the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff and Entergy Mississippi regarding Entergy Mississippi's annual formula rate plan filing that provides for no change in rates based on a performance-adjusted ROE mid-point of 10.50%, establishing an allowed regulatory earnings range of 9.1% to 11.9%.
Federal Regulation
System Agreement Litigation
On June 1, 2005, the FERC issued a decision in the System Agreement litigation. The domestic utility companies historically have engaged in the coordinated planning, construction, and operation of generating and bulk transmission facilities under the terms of the System Agreement, which has been approved by the FERC. The System Agreement litigation proceedings are described in the Form 10-K.
The FERC decision concluded, among other things, that:
The FERC's June 2005 order would reallocate production costs of the domestic utility companies whose relative total production costs expressed as a percentage of Entergy System average production costs are outside an upper or lower bandwidth. This would be accomplished by payments from domestic utility companies whose production costs are below Entergy System average production costs to domestic utility companies whose production costs are above Entergy System average production costs. An assessment of the potential effects of the FERC's June 2005 order requires assumptions regarding the future total production cost of each domestic utility company, which assumptions include the mix of solid fuel and gas-fired generation available to each company and the costs of natural gas and purchased power. Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States are more dependent upon gas-fired generation than Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Mississippi, or Entergy New Orleans. Of these, Entergy Arkansas is the l east dependent upon gas-fired generation. Therefore, increases in natural gas prices likely will increase the amount by which Entergy Arkansas' total production costs are below the average production costs of the domestic utility companies. Considerable uncertainty exists regarding future gas prices. Annual average Henry Hub gas prices have varied significantly over recent years, ranging from $1.72/mmBtu to $5.85/mmBtu for the 1995-2004 period, and averaging $3.43/mmBtu during the ten-year period 1995-2004 and $4.58/mmBtu during the five-year period 2000-2004. Recent market conditions have resulted in gas prices that have averaged $5.85/mmBtu for the twelve months ended December 2004. During the 12 month period July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2005 forward gas contracts for each of the next four years based on daily NYMEX close averaged $6.68/mmBtu (2006), $6.25/mmBtu (2007), $5.88/mmBtu (2008) and $5.58/mmBtu (2009). If the FERC's June 2005 order becomes final and if these gas prices occur as assumed, the following potential annual production cost reallocations among the domestic utility companies could result during the 2007-2010 period:
Range of Annual Payments |
Average Annual |
||
(In Millions) |
|||
Entergy Arkansas |
$143 to $210 |
$166 |
|
Entergy Gulf States |
($134) to ($87) |
($113) |
|
Entergy Louisiana |
($71) to ($10) |
($38) |
|
Entergy Mississippi |
($28) to $0 |
($11) |
|
Entergy New Orleans |
($10) to $0 |
($4) |
If natural gas prices deviate by $1/mmBtu up or down, it is expected that Entergy Arkansas' annual payments will change in the same direction by approximately $60 to $70 million.
Various pending motions for rehearing and clarification of the FERC's June 2005 order were filed by parties to the proceeding, including the LPSC, the APSC, the MPSC, and the City Council, and by Entergy Services, Inc., on behalf of the domestic utility companies. Among other things, the LPSC's motion urged the FERC to "clarify" that the FERC's order requires the payments and receipts, to the extent any are required, to be made in 2006 based on production costs incurred in 2004 and 2005. Entergy does not believe that this request for "clarification" is consistent with the FERC order and submitted a response urging the FERC to reject this interpretation and instead find that the annual remedy order by the FERC would be evaluated based on calendar year 2006 production costs, with the first potential payments/receipts, if any were required, made in 2007.
Management believes that any changes in the allocation of production costs resulting from the FERC's June 2005 order and related retail proceedings should result in similar rate changes for retail customers. The timing of recovery of these costs in rates could be the subject of additional proceedings before Entergy's retail regulators. Although the outcome and timing of the FERC and other proceedings cannot be predicted at this time, Entergy Mississippi does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these proceedings will have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
Transmission
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the petition for declaratory order that Entergy filed with the FERC in January 2005 regarding Entergy's Independent Coordinator of Transmission (ICT) proposal. On March 22, 2005, the FERC issued a declaratory order concluding that: (1) because the Southwest Power Pool (SPP) was the only entity identified as potentially being selected as the ICT and because the SPP is already a "public utility" there was no need to rule on the question of whether the functions of the ICT, alone, would serve to make the ICT a "public utility;" (2) Entergy will continue to be the "transmission provider" for transmission service across its system and that "the presence of SPP as the ICT will not change the existing balance of jurisdiction between [the FERC] and Entergy's retail regulators;" and (3) the FERC "is prepared to grant Entergy's proposed transmission pricing proposal on a two-year experimental basis, subject to certain enhancement and mon itoring and reporting conditions." The enhancements referred to by the FERC involve more fully specifying the responsibilities and duties of the ICT, including defining the ICT's role in the preparation of various transmission expansion plans and the performance of studies related to the granting of transmission or interconnection service. Before Entergy's ICT proposal can be implemented, however, Entergy is required to submit further filings with the FERC regarding the modifications and clarifications to the ICT proposal.
On April 8, 2005 several intervenors filed an Emergency Request for Clarification and Request for Expedited Commission Action seeking to have the FERC: (1) clarify the ICT's role in administering the Available Flowgate Capacity (AFC) methodology; (2) clarify the ICT's role in developing the transmission base plan; (3) clarify what the FERC meant when it required Entergy to provide firm transmission rights to customers that pay for supplemental transmission upgrades; and (4) clarify and confirm following Entergy's filing that the FERC will assess SPP's status as being independent of Entergy.
On April 21, 2005 Entergy filed a request for clarification or rehearing of the FERC's March 22 declaratory order requesting that the FERC clarify the respective role of Entergy and the ICT in developing the inputs or criteria used to create the base plan and in preparing certain studies regarding system expansion. The request for clarification further requests that the FERC clarify that the initial two-year period will commence with the actual start date of ICT operations. In the event that the FERC denies Entergy's request for clarification, then Entergy will seek rehearing on these issues. However, in its request, Entergy requested that FERC not rule on these issues at this time but, instead, that the FERC wait to evaluate these issues until such time as Entergy has filed the more detailed tariff sheets and protocols in its subsequent filing to implement the ICT. Separately, Entergy submitted a letter advising the FERC that it intended to submit on or about May 27, 2005 the filing t o implement the ICT proposal. A joint request for rehearing of the ICT declaratory order was also filed by the City Council, the LPSC, and the MPSC in which the retail regulators expressed their concerns that the findings reached in the declaratory order may result in an expansion of authority of the ICT "that is unnecessary to achieve the [FERC's] goals and is very likely to result in significant increases in the start-up and operational costs of the ICT." The retail regulators request that the FERC not act on their request for rehearing until Entergy has submitted its filing to implement the ICT. The intervenors filed a separate request for rehearing on April 21, 2005 urging the FERC to impose additional conditions on the approval of the ICT and also re-urging the FERC to reject the pricing proposal contained in the ICT proposal.
On May 12, 2005 the FERC issued an order clarifying certain aspects of its March 22 order. In the May 12 order, the FERC indicated that (1) Entergy is to work with the ICT and Entergy's stakeholders to develop procedures by which the ICT will calculate AFCs; (2) Entergy must specifically define the transmission rights that a customer that pays for supplemental upgrades will receive for such payments; (3) the FERC will review the ICT's contract to ensure that the ICT can perform its functions in an independent manner even if SPP is chosen as the ICT; and (4) the initial two-year period will start once the ICT becomes operational.
On May 27, 2005, the domestic utility companies filed the enhanced ICT proposal with the FERC. Entergy believes that the filing is consistent with the FERC guidance received in both the FERC's March 22 and May 12 orders on the ICT. Among other things, the enhanced ICT filing states that the ICT will (1) grant or deny transmission service on the domestic utility companies' transmission system; (2) administer the domestic utility companies' OASIS node for purposes of processing and evaluating transmission service requests and ensuring compliance with the domestic utility companies' obligation to post transmission-related information; (3) develop a base plan for the domestic utility companies' transmission system that will result in the ICT making the determination on whether something should be rolled into the domestic utility companies' transmission rates or directly assigned to the customer requesting or causing an upgrade to be constructed; (4) serve as the reliability coordinator for t he Entergy transmission system; and (5) oversee the operation of the weekly procurement process. The enhanced ICT proposal clarifies the rights that customers receive when they fund a supplemental upgrade and also contains a detailed methodology describing the process by which the ICT will evaluate interconnection-related investments already made on the Entergy System for purposes of determining the future allocation of the uncredited portion of these investments.
On June 3, 2005 a group of generators filed with the FERC a request that the FERC schedule a technical conference on the enhanced ICT proposal in order for Entergy to provide additional information on the enhanced ICT proposal. In response, a stakeholder meeting was held in New Orleans on June 30, 2005. Interventions and comments on the filing are due by August 5, 2005.
In addition, as discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States have filed an application with the LPSC requesting that the LPSC find that the ICT proposal is a prudent and appropriate course of action. An LPSC hearing on the ICT proposal is currently scheduled for August 2005, however certain intervenors have recently requested that the hearing be delayed until mid-September 2005.
Available Flowgate Capacity Proceedings
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of proceedings at the FERC involving Entergy's Available Flowgate Capacity (AFC) methodology. On March 22, 2005, the FERC issued an order contemporaneously with the ICT declaratory order discussed above that holds the AFC hearing in abeyance pending action on Entergy's upcoming ICT filing. The order holding the hearing in abeyance further indicated that it would cancel the hearing when the ICT begins to perform its functions. On April 8, 2005 several intervenors filed Emergency Motions for Interim Relief and Expedited Commission Action requesting that, during the interim period before the implementation of the ICT, the FERC (1) institute an audit process to examine and modify Entergy's current AFC process; and (2) require SPP to become involved in the AFC stakeholder process and order certain modifications to Entergy's stakeholder process. The audit process being proposed by the intervenors would not involve an independent auditor, but instead wou ld be an investigation performed by a representative from the intervenors, Entergy, and possibly SPP. On April 25, 2005, Entergy filed its response to the emergency motion urging the FERC to reject the intervenors' request for the "audit" because the type of investigation proposed by the intervenors would be neither independent nor fair and would only distract from the implementation of the ICT. Instead, Entergy has proposed that the ICT conduct an independent review of the AFC process and procedures as part of its transition to assuming the identified ICT responsibilities, including the calculation of the AFCs. Entergy further indicated that it would welcome SPP's participation in the current stakeholder process. On April 21, 2005, the intervenors filed a separate request for rehearing arguing that the FERC must allow the AFC hearing to proceed in parallel with the establishment of the ICT. See "Transmission" above for further discussion of AFC.
Federal Legislation
In late July 2005 the U.S. Congress passed broad new energy legislation, the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The legislation contains electricity provisions that, among other things:
The President is expected to sign the Energy Policy Act in August 2005. The Energy Power Act requires several rulemakings by the FERC and other government agencies in order to implement its provisions. Therefore, it will be some time before a full assessment of its effect on Entergy and the energy industry can be completed.
Critical Accounting Estimates
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy Mississippi's accounting for pension and other retirement costs.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In the first quarter 2005, FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143" (FIN 47). FIN 47 requires companies to recognize at fair value a liability for a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred, which is generally upon an asset's acquisition, construction, development, or through its normal operation. A conditional asset retirement obligation is generally a legal obligation to incur costs to remove an asset or part of an asset, such as an obligation to comply with environmental regulations and requirements. The obligation is conditional because there is currently no legal requirement to retire or remove the facility that the affected asset is a part of. FIN 47 requires that uncertainty about the timing or method of settlement of a conditional asset retirement obligation be factored into the measurement of the liability when sufficient information becomes available. FIN 47 wi ll be effective for Entergy no later than December 31, 2005. Entergy does not believe that the adoption of FIN 47 will be material to its financial position or results of operations because it estimates that any conditional asset retirement obligations required to be recognized under FIN 47 would be offset by a regulatory asset because of the expected recovery of these future costs in rates.
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC. | ||||||||
INCOME STATEMENTS | ||||||||
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||
(In Thousands) | (In Thousands) | |||||||
OPERATING REVENUES | ||||||||
Domestic electric | $288,244 | $289,573 | $539,490 | $526,402 | ||||
OPERATING EXPENSES | ||||||||
Operation and Maintenance: | ||||||||
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and | ||||||||
gas purchased for resale | 29,924 | 73,171 | 73,291 | 132,345 | ||||
Purchased power | 144,226 | 100,591 | 260,284 | 193,293 | ||||
Other operation and maintenance | 47,750 | 44,835 | 88,731 | 81,883 | ||||
Taxes other than income taxes | 14,900 | 13,764 | 28,666 | 26,562 | ||||
Depreciation and amortization | 17,982 | 15,716 | 35,919 | 30,625 | ||||
Other regulatory credits - net | (2,331) | (661) | (1,966) | (3,188) | ||||
TOTAL | 252,451 | 247,416 | 484,925 | 461,520 | ||||
OPERATING INCOME | 35,793 | 42,157 | 54,565 | 64,882 | ||||
OTHER INCOME | ||||||||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | 1,060 | 867 | 2,061 | 1,634 | ||||
Interest and dividend income | 690 | 830 | 1,328 | 1,546 | ||||
Miscellaneous - net | (322) | 162 | (691) | (478) | ||||
TOTAL | 1,428 | 1,859 | 2,698 | 2,702 | ||||
INTEREST AND OTHER CHARGES | ||||||||
Interest on long-term debt | 9,839 | 11,047 | 19,673 | 21,976 | ||||
Other interest - net | 828 | 540 | 1,445 | 940 | ||||
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction | (681) | (596) | (1,344) | (1,203) | ||||
TOTAL | 9,986 | 10,991 | 19,774 | 21,713 | ||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | 27,235 | 33,025 | 37,489 | 45,871 | ||||
Income taxes | 9,516 | 12,217 | 12,548 | 16,425 | ||||
NET INCOME | 17,719 | 20,808 | 24,941 | 29,446 | ||||
Preferred dividend requirements and other | 858 | 842 | 1,700 | 1,685 | ||||
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO | ||||||||
COMMON STOCK | $16,861 | $19,966 | $23,241 | $27,761 | ||||
See Notes to Respective Financial Statements. | ||||||||
(Page left blank intentionally)
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC. | ||||
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | ||||
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||
(Unaudited) | ||||
2005 | 2004 | |||
(In Thousands) | ||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||
Net income | $24,941 | $29,446 | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities: | ||||
Other regulatory credits - net | (1,966) | (3,188) | ||
Depreciation and amortization | 35,919 | 30,625 | ||
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits | (499) | 61,417 | ||
Changes in working capital: | ||||
Receivables | (30,332) | (8,986) | ||
Fuel inventory | (776) | 1,072 | ||
Accounts payable | (8,553) | 486 | ||
Taxes accrued | (8,091) | (60,754) | ||
Interest accrued | 525 | (1,528) | ||
Deferred fuel costs | 8,056 | 15,042 | ||
Other working capital accounts | (9) | 3,427 | ||
Provision for estimated losses and reserves | 319 | (771) | ||
Changes in other regulatory assets | (4,326) | (3,448) | ||
Other | 1,287 | (11,276) | ||
Net cash flow provided by operating activities | 16,495 | 51,564 | ||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||
Construction expenditures | (69,477) | (78,320) | ||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | 2,061 | 1,634 | ||
Changes in other temporary investments - net | - | 7,506 | ||
Net cash flow used in investing activities | (67,416) | (69,180) | ||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt | - | 178,625 | ||
Proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock | 29,340 | - - | ||
Retirement of long-term debt | - | (218,136) | ||
Changes in short-term borrowings | - | 25,000 | ||
Dividends paid: | ||||
Common stock | (11,400) | (12,100) | ||
Preferred stock | (1,685) | (1,685) | ||
Net cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities | 16,255 | (28,296) | ||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (34,666) | (45,912) | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 80,396 | 63,838 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $45,730 | $17,926 | ||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | ||||
Cash paid during the period for: | ||||
Interest - net of amount capitalized | $19,549 | $21,843 | ||
Income taxes | $4,446 | $2,950 | ||
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC. | ||||
BALANCE SHEETS | ||||
ASSETS | ||||
June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 | ||||
(Unaudited) | ||||
2005 | 2004 | |||
(In Thousands) | ||||
CURRENT ASSETS | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents: | ||||
Cash | $1,482 | $4,716 | ||
Temporary cash investment - at cost, | ||||
which approximates market | 44,248 | 75,680 | ||
Total cash and cash equivalents | 45,730 | 80,396 | ||
Accounts receivable: | ||||
Customer | 59,790 | 68,821 | ||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | (761) | (1,126) | ||
Associated companies | 57,323 | 22,616 | ||
Other | 8,121 | 12,133 | ||
Accrued unbilled revenues | 42,651 | 34,348 | ||
Total accounts receivable | 167,124 | 136,792 | ||
Accumulated deferred income taxes | 27,438 | 27,924 | ||
Fuel inventory - at average cost | 4,913 | 4,137 | ||
Materials and supplies - at average cost | 18,444 | 18,414 | ||
Prepayments and other | 11,246 | 15,413 | ||
TOTAL | 274,895 | 283,076 | ||
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS | ||||
Investment in affiliates - at equity | 5,531 | 5,531 | ||
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation) | 6,259 | 6,465 | ||
TOTAL | 11,790 | 11,996 | ||
UTILITY PLANT | ||||
Electric | 2,431,311 | 2,385,465 | ||
Property under capital lease | 73 | 95 | ||
Construction work in progress | 97,967 | 89,921 | ||
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT | 2,529,351 | 2,475,481 | ||
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization | 893,450 | 870,188 | ||
UTILITY PLANT - NET | 1,635,901 | 1,605,293 | ||
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS | ||||
Regulatory assets: | ||||
SFAS 109 regulatory asset - net | 19,009 | 17,628 | ||
Other regulatory assets | 88,529 | 82,674 | ||
Long-term receivable | 3,270 | 4,510 | ||
Other | 31,813 | 31,009 | ||
TOTAL | 142,621 | 135,821 | ||
TOTAL ASSETS | $2,065,207 | $2,036,186 | ||
See Notes to Respective Financial Statements. | ||||
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC. | ||||
BALANCE SHEETS | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||
June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 | ||||
(Unaudited) | ||||
2005 | 2004 | |||
(In Thousands) | ||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||
Accounts payable: | ||||
Associated companies | $ 42,469 | $ 65,806 | ||
Other | 40,327 | 25,543 | ||
Customer deposits | 40,232 | 37,333 | ||
Taxes accrued | 28,261 | 40,106 | ||
Interest accrued | 13,012 | 12,487 | ||
Deferred fuel costs | 30,849 | 22,793 | ||
Obligations under capital leases | 46 | 43 | ||
Other | 2,001 | 8,341 | ||
TOTAL | 197,197 | 212,452 | ||
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued | 443,158 | 438,321 | ||
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits | 13,023 | 13,687 | ||
Obligations under capital leases | 27 | 52 | ||
Accumulated provisions | 13,037 | 12,718 | ||
Long-term debt | 695,109 | 695,073 | ||
Other | 74,663 | 76,071 | ||
TOTAL | 1,239,017 | 1,235,922 | ||
Commitments and Contingencies | ||||
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||
Preferred stock without sinking fund | 80,381 | 50,381 | ||
Common stock, no par value, authorized 12,000,000 | ||||
shares in 2005 and 15,000,000 shares in 2004; | ||||
issued and outstanding 8,666,357 shares in 2005 and 2004 | 199,326 | 199,326 | ||
Capital stock expense and other | (719) | (59) | ||
Retained earnings | 350,005 | 338,164 | ||
TOTAL | 628,993 | 587,812 | ||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | $2,065,207 | $2,036,186 | ||
See Notes to Respective Financial Statements. |
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC. | ||||||||
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS | ||||||||
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Increase/ | |||||||
Description | 2005 | 2004 | (Decrease) | % | ||||
(Dollars In Millions) | ||||||||
Electric Operating Revenues: | ||||||||
Residential | $ 99 | $ 102 | ($ 3) | (3) | ||||
Commercial | 91 | 92 | (1) | (1) | ||||
Industrial | 46 | 49 | (3) | (6) | ||||
Governmental | 9 | 9 | - - | - - | ||||
Total retail | 245 | 252 | (7) | (3) | ||||
Sales for resale | ||||||||
Associated companies | 12 | 8 | 4 | 50 | ||||
Non-associated companies | 8 | 8 | - - | - - | ||||
Other | 23 | 22 | 1 | 5 | ||||
Total | $ 288 | $ 290 | ($ 2) | (1) | ||||
Billed Electric Energy | ||||||||
Sales (GWh): | ||||||||
Residential | 1,060 | 1,074 | (14) | (1) | ||||
Commercial | 1,057 | 1,060 | (3) | - - | ||||
Industrial | 708 | 746 | (38) | (5) | ||||
Governmental | 94 | 91 | 3 | 3 | ||||
Total retail | 2,919 | 2,971 | (52) | (2) | ||||
Sales for resale | ||||||||
Associated companies | 104 | 65 | 39 | 60 | ||||
Non-associated companies | 109 | 101 | 8 | 8 | ||||
Total | 3,132 | 3,137 | (5) | - - | ||||
Six Months Ended | Increase/ | |||||||
Description | 2005 | 2004 | (Decrease) | % | ||||
(Dollars In Millions) | ||||||||
Electric Operating Revenues: | ||||||||
Residential | $ 195 | $ 196 | ($ 1) | (1) | ||||
Commercial | 176 | 173 | 3 | 2 | ||||
Industrial | 90 | 91 | (1) | (1) | ||||
Governmental | 18 | 17 | 1 | 6 | ||||
Total retail | 479 | 477 | 2 | - - | ||||
Sales for resale | ||||||||
Associated companies | 18 | 11 | 7 | 64 | ||||
Non-associated companies | 17 | 13 | 4 | 31 | ||||
Other | 25 | 25 | - - | - - | ||||
Total | $ 539 | $ 526 | $ 13 | 2 | ||||
Billed Electric Energy | ||||||||
Sales (GWh): | ||||||||
Residential | 2,256 | 2,299 | (43) | (2) | ||||
Commercial | 2,078 | 2,064 | 14 | 1 | ||||
Industrial | 1,400 | 1,422 | (22) | (2) | ||||
Governmental | 186 | 182 | 4 | 2 | ||||
Total retail | 5,920 | 5,967 | (47) | (1) | ||||
Sales for resale | ||||||||
Associated companies | 121 | 78 | 43 | 55 | ||||
Non-associated companies | 177 | 167 | 10 | 6 | ||||
Total | 6,218 | 6,212 | 6 | - - | ||||
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC.
MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of Operations
Net Income
Second Quarter 2005 Compared to Second Quarter 2004
Net income decreased $3.9 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses and higher depreciation and amortization expenses.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Net income decreased $5.3 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses and higher depreciation and amortization expenses.
Net Revenue
Second Quarter 2005 Compared to Second Quarter 2004
Net revenue, which is Entergy New Orleans' measure of gross margin, consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related, and purchased power expenses and 2) other regulatory charges. Net revenue was relatively unchanged comparing the second quarter of 2005 to the second quarter of 2004.
Amount |
||
(In Millions) |
||
2004 net revenue |
$67.2 |
|
Miscellaneous items |
0.6 |
|
2005 net revenue |
$67.8 |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Net revenue, which is Entergy New Orleans' measure of gross margin, consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related, and purchased power expenses and 2) other regulatory charges. Following is an analysis of the changes in net revenue comparing the six months ended June 30, 2005 to the six months ended June 30, 2004.
Amount |
||
(In Millions) |
||
2004 net revenue |
$120.8 |
|
Volume/weather |
(2.3) |
|
Price applied to unbilled electric sales |
(2.3) |
|
Rate refund provisions |
4.0 |
|
Other |
(0.2) |
|
2005 net revenue |
$120.0 |
The volume/weather variance is due to a decrease in electricity usage in the service territory primarily during the unbilled sales period. See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K and Note 1 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues.
The price applied to unbilled electric sales variance is due to a decrease in the fuel cost component of the price applied to unbilled sales. See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K and Note 1 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues.
The rate refund provisions variance is due to provisions recorded in the first quarter of 2004 primarily as a result of a resolution adopted by the City Council in February 2004.
Gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses
Gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $24.3 million in gross wholesale revenue as a result of increased sales to affiliates. The increase is due to increased generation resulting in more energy available for resale.
Fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in electricity generated in addition to an increase in the price of natural gas.
Other Income Statement Variances
Second Quarter 2005 Compared to Second Quarter 2004
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to the following:
Depreciation and amortization expense increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to the following:
Depreciation and amortization expense increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service.
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rates for the second quarters of 2005 and 2004 were 41.9% and 38.9%, respectively. The effective income tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were 40.4% and 38.6%, respectively. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the periods presented versus the federal statutory rate of 35.0% are primarily due to state income taxes and book and tax differences related to utility plant items.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
Cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
$7,954 |
|
$4,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
(4,481) |
|
20,014 |
|
Investing activities |
|
(23,119) |
|
(22,258) |
|
Financing activities |
|
27,704 |
|
(1,524) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
104 |
|
(3,768) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$8,058 |
|
$901 |
Operating Activities
Operating activities used $4.5 million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to providing $20.0 million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2004 primarily due to a pension fund contribution of $12.0 million made in April 2005, money pool activity, and an income tax refund of $5.0 million received in the first quarter of 2004. Money pool activity used $6.3 million of Entergy New Orleans' operating cash flow for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to providing $3.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004.
Entergy New Orleans' receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In Thousands) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$7,758 |
|
$1,413 |
|
($1,805) |
|
$1,783 |
See Note 4 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.
Financing Activities
Financing activities provided $27.7 million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to using $1.5 million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2004 primarily because in June 2005, Entergy New Orleans issued $30 million of 4.98% Series First Mortgage Bonds due July 2010. The proceeds were used to retire, at maturity, $30 million of 8.125% Series First Mortgage Bonds due July 2005.
Uses and Sources of Capital
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy New Orleans' uses and sources of capital.
In July 2005, Entergy Louisiana and Entergy New Orleans renewed their 364-day credit facilities with the same lender through May 2006. Entergy New Orleans increased the amount of its credit facility to $15 million, the same amount as Entergy Louisiana's facility. Either company can borrow up to the full amount on its respective facility, but at no time can the combined amount of outstanding borrowings on the two facilities exceed $15 million. There were no borrowings outstanding on either facility as of June 30, 2005. In July 2005, Entergy New Orleans granted the lender a security interest in its customer accounts receivables to secure its borrowings under this facility. Under the terms of the security agreement, Entergy New Orleans has the option to withdraw the security interest at any time.
Significant Factors and Known Trends
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Significant Factors and Known Trends" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation, federal regulation and proceedings, market and credit risks, environmental risks, and litigation risks. Following are updates to the information presented in the Form 10-K.
State and Local Rate Regulation
In April 2005, Entergy New Orleans made its annual scheduled formula rate plan filings with the City Council. The filings show that a decrease of $0.2 million in electric revenues is warranted and an increase of $3.9 million in gas revenues is warranted. The prescribed period for review by the City Council's Advisors and other parties has now commenced, and rate adjustments, if any, could be implemented as soon as September 2005.
In May 2005, Entergy New Orleans filed with the City Council a request for continuation of the formula rate plan and generation performance-based rate plan for an additional three years. The filing requests a target equity component of the capital structure of 45%, an increase from the current target of 42%.
Federal Regulation
System Agreement Litigation
On June 1, 2005, the FERC issued a decision in the System Agreement litigation. The domestic utility companies historically have engaged in the coordinated planning, construction, and operation of generating and bulk transmission facilities under the terms of the System Agreement, which has been approved by the FERC. The System Agreement litigation proceedings are described in the Form 10-K.
The FERC decision concluded, among other things, that:
The FERC's June 2005 order would reallocate production costs of the domestic utility companies whose relative total production costs expressed as a percentage of Entergy System average production costs are outside an upper or lower bandwidth. This would be accomplished by payments from domestic utility companies whose production costs are below Entergy System average production costs to domestic utility companies whose production costs are above Entergy System average production costs. An assessment of the potential effects of the FERC's June 2005 order requires assumptions regarding the future total production cost of each domestic utility company, which assumptions include the mix of solid fuel and gas-fired generation available to each company and the costs of natural gas and purchased power. Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States are more dependent upon gas-fired generation than Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Mississippi, or Entergy New Orleans. Of these, Entergy Arkansas is the l east dependent upon gas-fired generation. Therefore, increases in natural gas prices likely will increase the amount by which Entergy Arkansas' total production costs are below the average production costs of the domestic utility companies. Considerable uncertainty exists regarding future gas prices. Annual average Henry Hub gas prices have varied significantly over recent years, ranging from $1.72/mmBtu to $5.85/mmBtu for the 1995-2004 period, and averaging $3.43/mmBtu during the ten-year period 1995-2004 and $4.58/mmBtu during the five-year period 2000-2004. Recent market conditions have resulted in gas prices that have averaged $5.85/mmBtu for the twelve months ended December 2004. During the 12 month period July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2005 forward gas contracts for each of the next four years based on daily NYMEX close averaged $6.68/mmBtu (2006), $6.25/mmBtu (2007), $5.88/mmBtu (2008) and $5.58/mmBtu (2009). If the FERC's June 2005 order becomes final and if these gas prices occur as assumed, the following potential annual production cost reallocations among the domestic utility companies could result during the 2007-2010 period:
Range of Annual Payments |
Average Annual |
||
(In Millions) |
|||
Entergy Arkansas |
$143 to $210 |
$166 |
|
Entergy Gulf States |
($134) to ($87) |
($113) |
|
Entergy Louisiana |
($71) to ($10) |
($38) |
|
Entergy Mississippi |
($28) to $0 |
($11) |
|
Entergy New Orleans |
($10) to $0 |
($4) |
If natural gas prices deviate by $1/mmBtu up or down, it is expected that Entergy Arkansas' annual payments will change in the same direction by approximately $60 to $70 million.
Various pending motions for rehearing and clarification of the FERC's June 2005 order were filed by parties to the proceeding, including the LPSC, the APSC, the MPSC, and the City Council, and by Entergy Services, Inc., on behalf of the domestic utility companies. Among other things, the LPSC's motion urged the FERC to "clarify" that the FERC's order requires the payments and receipts, to the extent any are required, to be made in 2006 based on production costs incurred in 2004 and 2005. Entergy does not believe that this request for "clarification" is consistent with the FERC order and submitted a response urging the FERC to reject this interpretation and instead find that the annual remedy order by the FERC would be evaluated based on calendar year 2006 production costs, with the first potential payments/receipts, if any were required, made in 2007.
Management believes that any changes in the allocation of production costs resulting from the FERC's June 2005 order and related retail proceedings should result in similar rate changes for retail customers. The timing of recovery of these costs in rates could be the subject of additional proceedings before Entergy's retail regulators. Although the outcome and timing of the FERC and other proceedings cannot be predicted at this time, Entergy New Orleans does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these proceedings will have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
See the Form 10-K for discussion of the City Council resolution directing Entergy New Orleans and Entergy Louisiana to notify the City Council and obtain prior approval for any action that would materially modify, amend, or terminate the System Agreement for one or more of the domestic utility companies, and the state court decision dismissing the City Council's claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The City Council has appealed that decision to the Louisiana Court of Appeal for the Fourth Circuit.
Transmission
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the petition for declaratory order that Entergy filed with the FERC in January 2005 regarding Entergy's Independent Coordinator of Transmission (ICT) proposal. On March 22, 2005, the FERC issued a declaratory order concluding that: (1) because the Southwest Power Pool (SPP) was the only entity identified as potentially being selected as the ICT and because the SPP is already a "public utility" there was no need to rule on the question of whether the functions of the ICT, alone, would serve to make the ICT a "public utility;" (2) Entergy will continue to be the "transmission provider" for transmission service across its system and that "the presence of SPP as the ICT will not change the existing balance of jurisdiction between [the FERC] and Entergy's retail regulators;" and (3) the FERC "is prepared to grant Entergy's proposed transmission pricing proposal on a two-year experimental basis, subject to certain enhancement and monitoring and reportin g conditions." The enhancements referred to by the FERC involve more fully specifying the responsibilities and duties of the ICT, including defining the ICT's role in the preparation of various transmission expansion plans and the performance of studies related to the granting of transmission or interconnection service. Before Entergy's ICT proposal can be implemented, however, Entergy is required to submit further filings with the FERC regarding the modifications and clarifications to the ICT proposal.
On April 8, 2005 several intervenors filed an Emergency Request for Clarification and Request for Expedited Commission Action seeking to have the FERC: (1) clarify the ICT's role in administering the Available Flowgate Capacity (AFC) methodology; (2) clarify the ICT's role in developing the transmission base plan; (3) clarify what the FERC meant when it required Entergy to provide firm transmission rights to customers that pay for supplemental transmission upgrades; and (4) clarify and confirm following Entergy's filing that the FERC will assess SPP's status as being independent of Entergy.
On April 21, 2005 Entergy filed a request for clarification or rehearing of the FERC's March 22 declaratory order requesting that the FERC clarify the respective role of Entergy and the ICT in developing the inputs or criteria used to create the base plan and in preparing certain studies regarding system expansion. The request for clarification further requests that the FERC clarify that the initial two-year period will commence with the actual start date of ICT operations. In the event that the FERC denies Entergy's request for clarification, then Entergy will seek rehearing on these issues. However, in its request, Entergy requested that FERC not rule on these issues at this time but, instead, that the FERC wait to evaluate these issues until such time as Entergy has filed the more detailed tariff sheets and protocols in its subsequent filing to implement the ICT. Separately, Entergy submitted a letter advising the FERC that it intended to submit on or about May 27, 2005 the filing t o implement the ICT proposal. A joint request for rehearing of the ICT declaratory order was also filed by the City Council, the LPSC, and the MPSC in which the retail regulators expressed their concerns that the findings reached in the declaratory order may result in an expansion of authority of the ICT "that is unnecessary to achieve the [FERC's] goals and is very likely to result in significant increases in the start-up and operational costs of the ICT." The retail regulators request that the FERC not act on their request for rehearing until Entergy has submitted its filing to implement the ICT. The intervenors filed a separate request for rehearing on April 21, 2005 urging the FERC to impose additional conditions on the approval of the ICT and also re-urging the FERC to reject the pricing proposal contained in the ICT proposal.
On May 12, 2005 the FERC issued an order clarifying certain aspects of its March 22 order. In the May 12 order, the FERC indicated that (1) Entergy is to work with the ICT and Entergy's stakeholders to develop procedures by which the ICT will calculate AFCs; (2) Entergy must specifically define the transmission rights that a customer that pays for supplemental upgrades will receive for such payments; (3) the FERC will review the ICT's contract to ensure that the ICT can perform its functions in an independent manner even if SPP is chosen as the ICT; and (4) the initial two-year period will start once the ICT becomes operational.
On May 27, 2005, the domestic utility companies filed the enhanced ICT proposal with the FERC. Entergy believes that the filing is consistent with the FERC guidance received in both the FERC's March 22 and May 12 orders on the ICT. Among other things, the enhanced ICT filing states that the ICT will (1) grant or deny transmission service on the domestic utility companies' transmission system; (2) administer the domestic utility companies' OASIS node for purposes of processing and evaluating transmission service requests and ensuring compliance with the domestic utility companies' obligation to post transmission-related information; (3) develop a base plan for the domestic utility companies' transmission system that will result in the ICT making the determination on whether something should be rolled into the domestic utility companies' transmission rates or directly assigned to the customer requesting or causing an upgrade to be constructed; (4) serve as the reliability coordinator for t he Entergy transmission system; and (5) oversee the operation of the weekly procurement process. The enhanced ICT proposal clarifies the rights that customers receive when they fund a supplemental upgrade and also contains a detailed methodology describing the process by which the ICT will evaluate interconnection-related investments already made on the Entergy System for purposes of determining the future allocation of the uncredited portion of these investments.
On June 3, 2005 a group of generators filed with the FERC a request that the FERC schedule a technical conference on the enhanced ICT proposal in order for Entergy to provide additional information on the enhanced ICT proposal. In response, a stakeholder meeting was held in New Orleans on June 30, 2005. Interventions and comments on the filing are due by August 5, 2005.
In addition, as discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States have filed an application with the LPSC requesting that the LPSC find that the ICT proposal is a prudent and appropriate course of action. An LPSC hearing on the ICT proposal is currently scheduled for August 2005, however certain intervenors have recently requested that the hearing be delayed until mid-September 2005.
Available Flowgate Capacity Proceedings
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of proceedings at the FERC involving Entergy's Available Flowgate Capacity (AFC) methodology. On March 22, 2005, the FERC issued an order contemporaneously with the ICT declaratory order discussed above that holds the AFC hearing in abeyance pending action on Entergy's upcoming ICT filing. The order holding the hearing in abeyance further indicated that it would cancel the hearing when the ICT begins to perform its functions. On April 8, 2005 several intervenors filed Emergency Motions for Interim Relief and Expedited Commission Action requesting that, during the interim period before the implementation of the ICT, the FERC (1) institute an audit process to examine and modify Entergy's current AFC process; and (2) require SPP to become involved in the AFC stakeholder process and order certain modifications to Entergy's stakeholder process. The audit process being proposed by the intervenors would not involve an independent auditor, but instead wou ld be an investigation performed by a representative from the intervenors, Entergy, and possibly SPP. On April 25, 2005, Entergy filed its response to the emergency motion urging the FERC to reject the intervenors' request for the "audit" because the type of investigation proposed by the intervenors would be neither independent nor fair and would only distract from the implementation of the ICT. Instead, Entergy has proposed that the ICT conduct an independent review of the AFC process and procedures as part of its transition to assuming the identified ICT responsibilities, including the calculation of the AFCs. Entergy further indicated that it would welcome SPP's participation in the current stakeholder process. On April 21, 2005, the intervenors filed a separate request for rehearing arguing that the FERC must allow the AFC hearing to proceed in parallel with the establishment of the ICT. See "Transmission" above for further discussion of AFC.
Federal Legislation
In late July 2005 the U.S. Congress passed broad new energy legislation, the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The legislation contains electricity provisions that, among other things:
The President is expected to sign the Energy Policy Act in August 2005. The Energy Power Act requires several rulemakings by the FERC and other government agencies in order to implement its provisions. Therefore, it will be some time before a full assessment of its effect on Entergy and the energy industry can be completed.
Critical Accounting Estimates
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy New Orleans' accounting for unbilled revenue and pension and other retirement costs.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In the first quarter 2005, FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143" (FIN 47). FIN 47 requires companies to recognize at fair value a liability for a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred, which is generally upon an asset's acquisition, construction, development, or through its normal operation. A conditional asset retirement obligation is generally a legal obligation to incur costs to remove an asset or part of an asset, such as an obligation to comply with environmental regulations and requirements. The obligation is conditional because there is currently no legal requirement to retire or remove the facility that the affected asset is a part of. FIN 47 requires that uncertainty about the timing or method of settlement of a conditional asset retirement obligation be factored into the measurement of the liability when sufficient information becomes available. FIN 47 wi ll be effective for Entergy no later than December 31, 2005. Entergy does not believe that the adoption of FIN 47 will be material to its financial position or results of operations because it estimates that any conditional asset retirement obligations required to be recognized under FIN 47 would be offset by a regulatory asset because of the expected recovery of these future costs in rates.
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. | ||||||||
INCOME STATEMENTS | ||||||||
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||
(In Thousands) | (In Thousands) | |||||||
OPERATING REVENUES | ||||||||
Domestic electric | $158,799 | $159,221 | $289,971 | $271,797 | ||||
Natural gas | 31,128 | 27,116 | 91,223 | 84,307 | ||||
TOTAL | 189,927 | 186,337 | 381,194 | 356,104 | ||||
OPERATING EXPENSES | ||||||||
Operation and Maintenance: | ||||||||
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and | ||||||||
gas purchased for resale | 54,843 | 53,078 | 135,939 | 109,589 | ||||
Purchased power | 66,001 | 65,398 | 122,783 | 124,317 | ||||
Other operation and maintenance | 30,143 | 27,235 | 50,990 | 48,551 | ||||
Taxes other than income taxes | 10,693 | 10,069 | 21,373 | 20,064 | ||||
Depreciation and amortization | 9,059 | 6,969 | 17,145 | 13,800 | ||||
Other regulatory charges - net | 1,254 | 708 | 2,509 | 1,416 | ||||
TOTAL | 171,993 | 163,457 | 350,739 | 317,737 | ||||
OPERATING INCOME | 17,934 | 22,880 | 30,455 | 38,367 | ||||
OTHER INCOME | ||||||||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | 246 | 197 | 528 | 415 | ||||
Interest and dividend income | 308 | 157 | 526 | 327 | ||||
Miscellaneous - net | (254) | 1,106 | (377) | 812 | ||||
TOTAL | 300 | 1,460 | 677 | 1,554 | ||||
INTEREST AND OTHER CHARGES | ||||||||
Interest on long-term debt | 3,518 | 3,844 | 7,004 | 7,710 | ||||
Other interest - net | 484 | 539 | 868 | 955 | ||||
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction | (185) | (190) | (417) | (412) | ||||
TOTAL | 3,817 | 4,193 | 7,455 | 8,253 | ||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | 14,417 | 20,147 | 23,677 | 31,668 | ||||
Income taxes | 6,043 | 7,828 | 9,567 | 12,235 | ||||
NET INCOME | 8,374 | 12,319 | 14,110 | 19,433 | ||||
Preferred dividend requirements and other | 241 | 241 | 482 | 482 | ||||
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO | ||||||||
COMMON STOCK | $8,133 | $12,078 | $13,628 | $18,951 | ||||
See Notes to Respective Financial Statements. | ||||||||
(Page left blank intentionally)
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. | ||||
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | ||||
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||
(Unaudited) | ||||
2005 | 2004 | |||
(In Thousands) | ||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||
Net income | $14,110 | $19,433 | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities: | ||||
Other regulatory charges - net | 2,509 | 1,416 | ||
Depreciation and amortization | 17,145 | 13,800 | ||
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits | 3,407 | 19,510 | ||
Changes in working capital: | ||||
Receivables | (2,215) | (2,936) | ||
Fuel inventory | 4,181 | 5,580 | ||
Accounts payable | (13,223) | (16,799) | ||
Taxes accrued | 6,045 | (1,637) | ||
Interest accrued | (403) | (413) | ||
Deferred fuel costs | (20,837) | (9,802) | ||
Other working capital accounts | (5,334) | 6,138 | ||
Provision for estimated losses and reserves | (317) | (269) | ||
Changes in pension liability | (9,955) | 850 | ||
Changes in other regulatory assets | 3,936 | 698 | ||
Other | (3,530) | (15,555) | ||
Net cash flow provided by (used in) operating activities | (4,481) | 20,014 | ||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||
Construction expenditures | (23,647) | (23,279) | ||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | 528 | 415 | ||
Changes in other temporary investments - net | - - | 606 | ||
Net cash flow used in investing activities | (23,119) | (22,258) | ||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt | 29,791 | - - | ||
Retirement of long-term debt | (5) | - - | ||
Dividends paid: | ||||
Common stock | (1,600) | (800) | ||
Preferred stock | (482) | (724) | ||
Net cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities | 27,704 | (1,524) | ||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 104 | (3,768) | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 7,954 | 4,669 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $8,058 | $901 | ||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | ||||
Cash paid/(received) during the period for: | ||||
Interest - net of amount capitalized | $7,882 | $8,782 | ||
Income taxes | - - | ($5,010) | ||
See Notes to Respective Financial Statements. | ||||
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. | ||||
BALANCE SHEETS | ||||
ASSETS | ||||
June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 | ||||
(Unaudited) | ||||
2005 | 2004 | |||
(In Thousands) | ||||
CURRENT ASSETS | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents: | ||||
Cash | $1,640 | $2,998 | ||
Temporary cash investments - at cost, | ||||
which approximates market | 6,418 | 4,956 | ||
Total cash and cash equivalents | 8,058 | 7,954 | ||
Accounts receivable: | ||||
Customer | 40,156 | 47,356 | ||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | (3,444) | (3,492) | ||
Associated companies | 9,355 | 12,223 | ||
Other | 5,691 | 7,329 | ||
Accrued unbilled revenues | 38,721 | 24,848 | ||
Total accounts receivable | 90,479 | 88,264 | ||
Deferred fuel costs | 23,396 | 2,559 | ||
Fuel inventory - at average cost | - - | 4,181 | ||
Materials and supplies - at average cost | 9,468 | 9,150 | ||
Prepayments and other | 8,685 | 3,467 | ||
TOTAL | 140,086 | 115,575 | ||
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS | ||||
Investment in affiliates - at equity | 3,259 | 3,259 | ||
UTILITY PLANT | ||||
Electric | 717,279 | 699,072 | ||
Natural gas | 192,759 | 183,728 | ||
Construction work in progress | 25,315 | 33,273 | ||
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT | 935,353 | 916,073 | ||
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization | 448,562 | 435,519 | ||
UTILITY PLANT - NET | 486,791 | 480,554 | ||
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS | ||||
Regulatory assets: | ||||
Other regulatory assets | 37,101 | 40,354 | ||
Long term receivables | 1,812 | 2,492 | ||
Other | 21,629 | 20,540 | ||
TOTAL | 60,542 | 63,386 | ||
TOTAL ASSETS | $690,678 | $662,774 | ||
See Notes to Respective Financial Statements. | ||||
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. | ||||
BALANCE SHEETS | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||
June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 | ||||
(Unaudited) | ||||
2005 | 2004 | |||
(In Thousands) | ||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||
Currently maturing long-term debt | $30,000 | $30,000 | ||
Accounts payable: | ||||
Associated companies | 30,807 | 30,563 | ||
Other | 30,682 | 44,149 | ||
Customer deposits | 18,005 | 17,187 | ||
Taxes accrued | 2,219 | 2,592 | ||
Accumulated deferred income taxes | 7,546 | 1,906 | ||
Interest accrued | 4,354 | 4,757 | ||
Energy Efficiency Program provision | 6,776 | 6,611 | ||
Other | 2,696 | 3,477 | ||
TOTAL | 133,085 | 141,242 | ||
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued | 52,582 | 47,062 | ||
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits | 3,782 | 3,997 | ||
SFAS 109 regulatory liability - net | 45,300 | 46,406 | ||
Accumulated provisions | 9,006 | 9,323 | ||
Pension liability | 26,890 | 36,845 | ||
Long-term debt | 229,910 | 199,902 | ||
Other | 3,853 | 3,755 | ||
TOTAL | 371,323 | 347,290 | ||
Commitments and Contingencies | ||||
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||
Preferred stock without sinking fund | 19,780 | 19,780 | ||
Common stock, $4 par value, authorized 10,000,000 | ||||
shares; issued and outstanding 8,435,900 shares in 2005 | ||||
and 2004 | 33,744 | 33,744 | ||
Paid-in capital | 36,294 | 36,294 | ||
Retained earnings | 96,452 | 84,424 | ||
TOTAL | 186,270 | 174,242 | ||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | $690,678 | $662,774 | ||
See Notes to Respective Financial Statements. | ||||
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. | ||||||||
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS | ||||||||
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Increase/ | |||||||
Description | 2005 | 2004 | (Decrease) | % | ||||
(Dollars In Millions) | ||||||||
Electric Operating Revenues: | ||||||||
Residential | $38 | $41 | ($3) | (7) | ||||
Commercial | 40 | 42 | (2) | (5) | ||||
Industrial | 9 | 8 | 1 | 13 | ||||
Governmental | 17 | 18 | (1) | (6) | ||||
Total retail | 104 | 109 | (5) | (5) | ||||
Sales for resale | ||||||||
Associated companies | 35 | 30 | 5 | 17 | ||||
Other | 20 | 20 | - | - - | ||||
Total | $159 | $159 | $ - | - - | ||||
Billed Electric Energy | ||||||||
Sales (GWh): | ||||||||
Residential | 447 | 450 | (3) | (1) | ||||
Commercial | 552 | 545 | 7 | 1 | ||||
Industrial | 162 | 138 | 24 | 17 | ||||
Governmental | 243 | 245 | (2) | (1) | ||||
Total retail | 1,404 | 1,378 | 26 | 2 | ||||
Sales for resale | ||||||||
Associated companies | 400 | 390 | 10 | 3 | ||||
Non-associated companies | 6 | 5 | 1 | 20 | ||||
Total | 1,810 | 1,773 | 37 | 2 | ||||
Six Months Ended | Increase/ | |||||||
Description | 2005 | 2004 | (Decrease) | % | ||||
(Dollars In Millions) | ||||||||
Electric Operating Revenues: | ||||||||
Residential | $67 | $71 | ($4) | (6) | ||||
Commercial | 74 | 76 | (2) | (3) | ||||
Industrial | 16 | 14 | 2 | 14 | ||||
Governmental | 29 | 31 | (2) | (6) | ||||
Total retail | 186 | 192 | (6) | (3) | ||||
Sales for resale | ||||||||
Associated companies | 81 | 57 | 24 | 42 | ||||
Non-associated companies | 1 | 1 | - | - - | ||||
Other | 22 | 22 | - | - - | ||||
Total | $290 | $272 | $18 | 7 | ||||
Billed Electric Energy | ||||||||
Sales (GWh): | ||||||||
Residential | 847 | 867 | (20) | (2) | ||||
Commercial | 1,071 | 1,070 | 1 | - - | ||||
Industrial | 306 | 250 | 56 | 22 | ||||
Governmental | 468 | 470 | (2) | - - | ||||
Total retail | 2,692 | 2,657 | 35 | 1 | ||||
Sales for resale | ||||||||
Associated companies | 1,006 | 750 | 256 | 34 | ||||
Non-associated companies | 10 | 15 | (5) | (33) | ||||
Total | 3,708 | 3,422 | 286 | 8 | ||||
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of Operations
System Energy's principal asset consists of a 90% ownership and leasehold interest in Grand Gulf. The capacity and energy from its 90% interest is sold under the Unit Power Sales Agreement to its only four customers, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans. System Energy's operating revenues are derived from the allocation of the capacity, energy, and related costs associated with its 90% interest in Grand Gulf pursuant to the Unit Power Sales Agreement. Payments under the Unit Power Sales Agreement are System Energy's only source of operating revenues. Net income remained relatively unchanged for the second quarter, increasing $0.4 million, and increased slightly by $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to the same respective periods in 2004. The increase for the six months ended is primarily due to higher interest income earned on temporary cash investments.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
Cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
$216,355 |
|
$52,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
18,468 |
|
98,371 |
|
Investing activities |
|
(18,035) |
|
(24,944) |
|
Financing activities |
|
(81,590) |
|
(69,943) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(81,157) |
|
3,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$135,198 |
|
$56,020 |
Operating Activities
Cash flow from operations decreased $79.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004 primarily due to money pool activity. Money pool activity used $101.8 million of System Energy's operating cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and used $29.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. System Energy's receivables from the money pool were as follows:
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In Thousands) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$163,416 |
|
$61,592 |
|
$48,082 |
|
$19,064 |
See Note 4 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.
Investing Activities
The decrease of $6.9 million in net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004 was primarily due to a decrease of $14.0 million in construction expenditures resulting from the reclassification of inventory items to capital in 2004. The decrease was partially offset by the maturity of $6.5 million of other temporary investments, which provided cash in 2004.
Financing Activities
The increase of $11.6 million in net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004 was primarily due to an increase of $22.4 million in the January 2005 principal payment made on the Grand Gulf sale-leaseback compared to the January 2004 principal payment. The increase was partially offset by $13.2 million in bond refunding premiums and costs paid in 2004 related to System Energy refunding the bonds in May 2004 associated with its Grand Gulf Lease Obligation.
Uses and Sources of Capital
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of System Energy's uses and sources of capital.
Significant Factors and Known Trends
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Significant Factors and Known Trends" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of market risks, nuclear matters, litigation risks, and environmental risks.
Federal Legislation
In late July 2005 the U.S. Congress passed broad new energy legislation, the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The legislation contains electricity provisions that, among other things:
The President is expected to sign the Energy Policy Act in August 2005. The Energy Power Act requires several rulemakings by the FERC and other government agencies in order to implement its provisions. Therefore, it will be some time before a full assessment of its effect on Entergy and the energy industry can be completed.
Critical Accounting Estimates
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in System Energy's accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs and pension and other retirement benefits.
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. | ||||||||
INCOME STATEMENTS | ||||||||
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||
(In Thousands) | (In Thousands) | |||||||
OPERATING REVENUES | ||||||||
Domestic electric | $126,364 | $132,720 | $251,154 | $259,888 | ||||
OPERATING EXPENSES | ||||||||
Operation and Maintenance: | ||||||||
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and | ||||||||
gas purchased for resale | 10,139 | 10,278 | 19,858 | 17,524 | ||||
Nuclear refueling outage expenses | 3,026 | 2,891 | 6,019 | 6,518 | ||||
Other operation and maintenance | 27,346 | 23,127 | 50,482 | 44,638 | ||||
Decommissioning | 6,240 | 5,805 | 12,368 | 11,505 | ||||
Taxes other than income taxes | 6,322 | 6,211 | 12,371 | 12,156 | ||||
Depreciation and amortization | 24,158 | 25,829 | 50,702 | 52,370 | ||||
Other regulatory credits - net | (4,126) | (1,006) | (8,511) | (2,175) | ||||
TOTAL | 73,105 | 73,135 | 143,289 | 142,536 | ||||
OPERATING INCOME | 53,259 | 59,585 | 107,865 | 117,352 | ||||
OTHER INCOME | ||||||||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | 321 | 453 | 627 | 867 | ||||
Interest and dividend income | 3,672 | 1,569 | 6,517 | 2,925 | ||||
Miscellaneous - net | (108) | (151) | (221) | (372) | ||||
TOTAL | 3,885 | 1,871 | 6,923 | 3,420 | ||||
INTEREST AND OTHER CHARGES | ||||||||
Interest on long-term debt | 12,812 | 15,949 | 25,668 | 31,189 | ||||
Other interest - net | 6 | 146 | 8 | 356 | ||||
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction | (102) | (146) | (199) | (281) | ||||
TOTAL | 12,716 | 15,949 | 25,477 | 31,264 | ||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | 44,428 | 45,507 | 89,311 | 89,508 | ||||
Income taxes | 18,503 | 19,975 | 37,154 | 39,309 | ||||
NET INCOME | $25,925 | $25,532 | $52,157 | $50,199 | ||||
See Notes to Respective Financial Statements. | ||||||||
(Page left blank intentionally)
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. | ||||
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | ||||
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||
(Unaudited) | ||||
2005 | 2004 | |||
(In Thousands) | ||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||
Net income | $52,157 | $50,199 | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities: | ||||
Other regulatory credits - net | (8,511) | (2,175) | ||
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning | 63,070 | 63,875 | ||
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits | (12,140) | (166,003) | ||
Changes in working capital: | ||||
Receivables | (95,645) | (18,986) | ||
Accounts payable | (4,750) | (6,032) | ||
Taxes accrued | 28,065 | 194,383 | ||
Interest accrued | (27,831) | (17,109) | ||
Other working capital accounts | 153 | (3,605) | ||
Provision for estimated losses and reserves | 50 | (1,886) | ||
Changes in other regulatory assets | (9,080) | 11,319 | ||
Other | 32,930 | (5,609) | ||
Net cash flow provided by operating activities | 18,468 | 98,371 | ||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||
Construction expenditures | (7,982) | (22,011) | ||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | 627 | 867 | ||
Nuclear fuel purchases | - - | (45,460) | ||
Proceeds from sale/leaseback of nuclear fuel | - - | 45,640 | ||
Decommissioning trust contributions and realized | ||||
change in trust assets | (10,680) | (10,462) | ||
Changes in other temporary investments - net | - - | 6,482 | ||
Net cash flow used in investing activities | (18,035) | (24,944) | ||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||
Retirement of long-term debt | (28,790) | (6,348) | ||
Other financing activities | - - | (13,195) | ||
Dividends paid: | ||||
Common stock | (52,800) | (50,400) | ||
Net cash flow used in financing activities | (81,590) | (69,943) | ||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (81,157) | 3,484 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 216,355 | 52,536 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $135,198 | $56,020 | ||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | ||||
Cash paid during the period for: | ||||
Interest - net of amount capitalized | $50,605 | $46,318 | ||
Income taxes | $14,522 | - | ||
See Notes to Respective Financial Statements. | ||||
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. | ||||||
BALANCE SHEETS | ||||||
ASSETS | ||||||
June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 | ||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||
CURRENT ASSETS | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents: | ||||||
Cash | $10 | $399 | ||||
Temporary cash investments - at cost, | ||||||
which approximates market | 135,188 | 215,956 | ||||
Total cash and cash equivalents | 135,198 | 216,355 | ||||
Accounts receivable: | ||||||
Associated companies | 208,818 | 111,588 | ||||
Other | 2,148 | 3,733 | ||||
Total accounts receivable | 210,966 | 115,321 | ||||
Materials and supplies - at average cost | 55,591 | 53,427 | ||||
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs | 3,982 | 9,510 | ||||
Prepayments and other | 4,378 | 1,007 | ||||
TOTAL | 410,115 | 395,620 | ||||
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS | ||||||
Decommissioning trust funds | 220,696 | 205,083 | ||||
UTILITY PLANT | ||||||
Electric | 3,238,587 | 3,232,314 | ||||
Property under capital lease | 469,993 | 469,993 | ||||
Construction work in progress | 29,345 | 28,743 | ||||
Nuclear fuel under capital lease | 51,265 | 65,572 | ||||
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT | 3,789,190 | 3,796,622 | ||||
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization | 1,834,908 | 1,780,450 | ||||
UTILITY PLANT - NET | 1,954,282 | 2,016,172 | ||||
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS | ||||||
Regulatory assets: | ||||||
SFAS 109 regulatory asset - net | 95,081 | 96,047 | ||||
Other regulatory assets | 307,354 | 296,305 | ||||
Other | 19,223 | 19,578 | ||||
TOTAL | 421,658 | 411,930 | ||||
TOTAL ASSETS | $3,006,751 | $3,028,805 | ||||
See Notes to Respective Financial Statements. | ||||||
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. | ||||||
BALANCE SHEETS | ||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY | ||||||
June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 | ||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||||
Currently maturing long-term debt | $22,989 | $25,266 | ||||
Accounts payable: | ||||||
Associated companies | 3,071 | 3,880 | ||||
Other | 17,110 | 21,051 | ||||
Taxes accrued | 113,840 | 46,468 | ||||
Accumulated deferred income taxes | 1,330 | 3,477 | ||||
Interest accrued | 15,167 | 42,998 | ||||
Obligations under capital leases | 27,716 | 27,716 | ||||
Other | 1,781 | 1,621 | ||||
TOTAL | 203,004 | 172,477 | ||||
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||||
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued | 367,694 | 421,466 | ||||
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits | 73,874 | 75,612 | ||||
Obligations under capital leases | 23,548 | 37,855 | ||||
Other regulatory liabilities | 246,722 | 210,863 | ||||
Decommissioning | 348,261 | 335,893 | ||||
Accumulated provisions | 2,428 | 2,378 | ||||
Long-term debt | 823,123 | 849,593 | ||||
Other | 24,156 | 28,084 | ||||
TOTAL | 1,909,806 | 1,961,744 | ||||
Commitments and Contingencies | ||||||
SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY | ||||||
Common stock, no par value, authorized 1,000,000 shares; | ||||||
issued and outstanding 789,350 shares in 2005 and 2004 | 789,350 | 789,350 | ||||
Retained earnings | 104,591 | 105,234 | ||||
TOTAL | 893,941 | 894,584 | ||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY | $3,006,751 | $3,028,805 | ||||
See Notes to Respective Financial Statements. | ||||||
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, ENTERGY GULF STATES, ENTERGY LOUISIANA, ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, AND SYSTEM ENERGY
NOTES TO RESPECTIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Nuclear Insurance (Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and System Energy)
See Note 8 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on nuclear liability and property and replacement power insurance associated with Entergy Arkansas', Entergy Gulf States', Entergy Louisiana's, and System Energy's nuclear power plants.
Nuclear Decommissioning and Other Retirement Costs (Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy)
See Note 8 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on nuclear decommissioning costs. In the second quarter of 2005, Entergy Louisiana recorded a revision to its estimated decommissioning cost liability in accordance with a new decommissioning cost study for Waterford 3 that reflected an expected life extension for the plant. The revised estimate resulted in a $153.6 million reduction in its decommissioning liability, along with a $49.2 million reduction in utility plant and a $104.4 million reduction in the related regulatory asset.
Income Taxes (Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and System Energy)
See Note 8 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding certain material income tax audit matters involving the domestic utility companies and System Energy. Following is an update to that disclosure.
Mark to Market of Certain Power Contracts
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in 2001, Entergy Louisiana changed its method of accounting for income tax purposes related to its wholesale electric power contracts. The most significant of these is the contract to purchase power from the Vidalia hydroelectric project. On audit of Entergy Louisiana's 2001 tax return, the IRS made an adjustment reducing the amount of the deduction associated with this method change. The adjustment had no material impact on Entergy Louisiana's earnings and required no additional cash payment of 2001 income tax. The Vidalia contract method change has resulted in cumulative cash flow benefits of approximately $790 million through June 30, 2005. This benefit is expected to reverse in the years 2005 through 2031. The tax accounting election has had no effect on book income tax expense. The timing of the reversal of this benefit depends on several variables, including the price of power.
CashPoint Bankruptcy
(Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans)See Note 8 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding the bankruptcy of CashPoint, which managed a network of payment agents for the domestic utility companies.
City Franchise Ordinances (Entergy New Orleans)
Entergy New Orleans provides electric and gas service in the City of New Orleans pursuant to franchise ordinances. These ordinances contain a continuing option for the City of New Orleans to purchase Entergy New Orleans' electric and gas utility properties.
Employment Litigation (Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and System Energy)
Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and System Energy are defendants in numerous lawsuits filed by former employees asserting that they were wrongfully terminated and/or discriminated against on the basis of age, race, sex, or other protected characteristics. The defendant companies deny any liability to the plaintiffs.
Asbestos and Hazardous Material Litigation (Entergy Gulf States, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans)
Numerous lawsuits have been filed in federal and state courts in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi primarily by contractor employees in the 1950-1980 timeframe against Entergy Gulf States, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Mississippi as premises owners of power plants, for damages caused by alleged exposure to asbestos or other hazardous material. Many other defendants are named in these lawsuits as well. Presently, there are approximately 480 lawsuits involving approximately 10,000 claims. Management believes that adequate provisions have been established to cover any exposure. Additionally, negotiations continue with insurers to recover more reimbursement, while new coverage is being secured to minimize anticipated future potential exposures. Management believes that loss exposure has been and will continue to be handled successfully so that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not be material, in the aggregate, to the financial po sition or results of operation of the domestic utility companies involved in these lawsuits.
NOTE 2. RATE AND REGULATORY MATTERS
Retail Rate Proceedings
See Note 2 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding retail rate proceedings involving the domestic utility companies. The following are updates to the Form 10-K.
Global Settlement (Entergy Gulf States and Entergy Louisiana)
In March 2005, the LPSC approved a settlement proposal to resolve various dockets covering a range of issues for Entergy Gulf States and Entergy Louisiana. The settlement resulted in credits totaling $76 million for retail electricity customers in Entergy Gulf States' Louisiana service territory and credits totaling $14 million for retail electricity customers of Entergy Louisiana. The settlement dismissed Entergy Gulf States' fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth annual earnings reviews, Entergy Gulf States' ninth post-merger earnings review and revenue requirement analysis, the continuation of a fuel review for Entergy Gulf States, dockets established to consider issues concerning power purchases for Entergy Gulf States and Entergy Louisiana for the summers of 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004, all prudence issues associated with decisions made through May 2005 related to the nuclear plant uprates at issue in these cases, and an LPSC docket concerning retail issues arising under the S ystem Agreement. The settlement does not include the System Agreement case at FERC. In addition, Entergy Gulf States agreed not to seek recovery from customers of $2 million of excess refund amounts associated with the fourth through the eighth annual earnings reviews and Entergy Louisiana agreed to forgo recovery of $3.5 million of deferred 2003 capacity costs associated with certain power purchase agreements. The credits were issued in connection with April 2005 billings. Entergy Gulf States and Entergy Louisiana reserved for the approximate refund amounts.
The settlement includes the establishment of a three-year formula rate plan for Entergy Gulf States that, among other provisions, establishes an ROE mid-point of 10.65% for the initial three-year term of the plan and permits Entergy Gulf States to recover incremental capacity costs outside of a traditional base rate proceeding. Under the formula rate plan, over- and under-earnings outside an allowed range of 9.9% to 11.4% will be allocated 60% to customers and 40% to Entergy Gulf States. In addition, there is the potential to extend the formula rate plan beyond the initial three-year effective period by mutual agreement of the LPSC and Entergy Gulf States. Under the settlement, there was no change to Entergy Gulf States' retail rates at that time.
Retail Rates - Electric
(Entergy Louisiana)
Entergy Louisiana made a rate filing with the LPSC requesting a base rate increase in January 2004. In March 2005, the LPSC staff and Entergy Louisiana filed a proposed settlement that included an annual base rate increase of approximately $18.3 million which was implemented, subject to refund, effective with May 2005 billings. In May 2005, the LPSC approved a modified settlement which, among other things, reduces depreciation and decommissioning expense due to assuming a life extension of Waterford 3 and results in no change in rates. Subsequently, in June 2005, Entergy Louisiana made a revised compliance filing with the LPSC supporting a revised depreciation rate for Waterford 3, which reflects the removal of interim additions, and a rate increase from the purchase of the Perryville power plant, which results in a net $0.8 million annual rate reduction. Entergy Louisiana reduced rates effective with the first billing cycle in June 2005 and expects to refund excess revenue coll ected during May 2005, including interest, in the third quarter of 2005.
The May 2005 rate settlement includes the adoption of a three-year formula rate plan, the terms of which include an ROE mid-point of 10.25% for the initial three-year term of the plan and permit Entergy Louisiana to recover incremental capacity costs outside of a traditional base rate proceeding. Under the formula rate plan, over- and under-earnings outside an allowed regulatory range of 9.45% to 11.05% will be allocated 60% to customers and 40% to Entergy Louisiana. The initial formula rate plan filing will be in May 2006 based on a 2005 test year with rates effective September 2006. In addition, there is the potential to extend the formula rate plan beyond the initial three-year effective period by mutual agreement of the LPSC and Entergy Louisiana.
(Entergy Gulf States)
In June 2005, Entergy Gulf States made its formula rate plan filing with the LPSC for the test year ending December 31, 2004. The filing shows a net revenue deficiency of $2.58 million indicating that no refund liability exists. The filing also indicates that a prospective rate increase of $23.8 million is required in order for Entergy Gulf States to earn the authorized ROE mid-point of 10.65%. Subject to the consideration of comments expected to be filed by the LPSC staff and intervenors in the third quarter 2005, rate changes associated with the formula rate plan are scheduled to take effect with the first billing cycle in October 2005. Any disputed issues will be subject to further investigation by the LPSC, with any resolution of such issues being made effective October 2005.
Retail Rates - Gas (Entergy Gulf States)
In July 2004, Entergy Gulf States filed with the LPSC an application for a change in its rates and charges seeking an increase of $9.1 million in gas base rates in order to allow Entergy Gulf States an opportunity to earn a fair and reasonable rate of return. In June 2005, the LPSC unanimously approved Entergy Gulf States' proposed settlement that includes a $5.8 million gas base rate increase effective the first billing cycle of July 2005 and a rate stabilization plan with an ROE mid-point of 10.5%.
Filings with the PUCT (Entergy Gulf States)
Filings with the City Council (Entergy New Orleans)
In April 2005, Entergy New Orleans made its annual scheduled formula rate plan filings with the City Council. The filings show that a decrease of $0.2 million in electric revenues is warranted and an increase of $3.9 million in gas revenues is warranted. The prescribed period for review by the City Council's Advisors and other parties has now commenced, and rate adjustments, if any, could be implemented as soon as September 2005.
In May 2005, Entergy New Orleans filed with the City Council a request for continuation of the formula rate plan and generation performance-based rate plan for an additional three years. The filing requests a target equity component of the capital structure of 45%, an increase from the current target of 42%.
Deferred Fuel Costs
See Note 2 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding fuel proceedings involving the domestic utility companies. The following are updates to the Form 10-K.
(Entergy Arkansas)
In March 2005, Entergy Arkansas filed with the APSC its energy cost recovery rider for the period April 2005 through March 2006. The filed energy cost rate, which accounts for 15 percent of a typical residential customer's bill using 1,000 kWh per month, increased 31 percent primarily attributable to a true-up adjustment for an under-recovery balance of $11.2 million and a nuclear refueling adjustment resulting from outages scheduled in 2005 at ANO 1 and 2.
(Entergy Gulf States)
In March 2004, Entergy Gulf States filed with the PUCT a fuel reconciliation case covering the period September 2000 through August 2003. Entergy Gulf States is reconciling $1.43 billion of fuel and purchased power costs on a Texas retail basis. This amount includes $8.6 million of under-recovered costs that Entergy Gulf States is asking to reconcile and roll into its fuel over/under-recovery balance to be addressed in the next appropriate fuel proceeding. This case involves imputed capacity and River Bend payment issues similar to those decided adversely in a January 2001 proceeding that is now on appeal. On January 31, 2005, the ALJ issued a Proposal for Decision that recommended disallowing $10.7 million (excluding interest) related to these two issues. In April 2005, the PUCT issued an order reversing in part the ALJ's Proposal for Decision and allowing Entergy Gulf States to recover a part of its request related to the imputed capacity and River Bend payment issues. The PUCT 's order reduced the disallowance in the case to $8.3 million. Both Entergy Gulf States and certain cities served by Entergy Gulf States filed motions for rehearing on these issues which were denied by the PUCT. Entergy Gulf States and certain Cities filed appeals to the Travis County District Court. The appeals are pending. Any disallowance will be netted against Entergy Gulf States' under-recovered costs and will be included in its deferred fuel costs balance.
In January 2001, Entergy Gulf States filed with the PUCT a fuel reconciliation case covering the period from March 1999 through August 2000. Entergy Gulf States was reconciling approximately $583 million of fuel and purchased power costs. As part of this filing, Entergy Gulf States requested authority to collect $28 million, plus interest, of under-recovered fuel and purchased power costs. In August 2002, the PUCT reduced Entergy Gulf States' request to approximately $6.3 million, including interest through July 31, 2002. Approximately $4.7 million of the total reduction to the requested surcharge relates to nuclear fuel costs that the PUCT deferred ruling on at that time. In October 2002, Entergy Gulf States appealed the PUCT's final order in Texas District Court. In its appeal, Entergy Gulf States is challenging the PUCT's disallowance of approximately $4.2 million related to imputed capacity costs and its disallowance related to costs for energy delivered from the 30% non-regu lated share of River Bend. The case was argued before the Travis County Texas District Court in August 2003 and the Travis County District Court judge affirmed the PUCT's order. In October 2003, Entergy Gulf States appealed this decision to the Court of Appeals. Oral argument before the appellate court occurred in September 2004 and in May 2005, the appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision affirming the PUCT's disallowance. Entergy Gulf States has filed a motion for rehearing with the appellate court in this case.
In January 2003, the LPSC authorized its staff to initiate a proceeding to audit the fuel adjustment clause filings of Entergy Gulf States and its affiliates pursuant to a November 1997 LPSC general order. The audit will include a review of the reasonableness of charges flowed by Entergy Gulf States through its fuel adjustment clause in Louisiana for the period January 1, 1995 through December 31, 2002. Discovery is underway, but a detailed procedural schedule extending beyond the discovery stage has not yet been established, and the LPSC staff has not yet issued its audit report. In June 2005, the LPSC expanded the audit to include the years through 2004.
(Entergy Louisiana)
In August 2000, the LPSC authorized its staff to initiate a proceeding to audit the fuel adjustment clause filings of Entergy Louisiana pursuant to a November 1997 LPSC general order. The time period that is the subject of the audit is January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2001. In September 2003, the LPSC staff issued its audit report and recommended a disallowance with regard to one item. The issue relates to the alleged failure to uprate Waterford 3 in a timely manner, a claim that also has been raised in the summer 2001, 2002, and 2003 purchased power proceedings. The settlement approved by the LPSC in March 2005, discussed above, resolves the uprate imprudence disallowance and is no longer at issue in this proceeding. Subsequent to the issuance of the audit report, the scope of this docket was expanded to include a review of annual reports on fuel and purchased power transactions with affiliates and a prudence review of transmission planning issues. Also, in July 2005, t he LPSC expanded the audit to include the years 2002 through 2004. A procedural schedule has been established and LPSC staff and intervenor testimony is due in November 2005.
(Entergy Mississippi)
In January 2005, the MPSC approved a change in Entergy Mississippi's energy cost recovery rider. Entergy Mississippi's fuel over-recoveries for the third quarter of 2004 of $21.3 million will be deferred from the first quarter 2005 energy cost recovery rider adjustment calculation. The deferred amount of $21.3 million plus carrying charges is being refunded through the energy cost recovery rider in the second and third quarters of 2005 at a rate of 45% and 55%, respectively.
(Entergy New Orleans)
As discussed in Note 2 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements in the Form 10-K, the City Council passed resolutions implementing a package of measures developed by Entergy New Orleans and the Council Advisors to protect customers from potential gas price spikes during the 2004 - 2005 winter heating season including the deferral of collection of up to $6.2 million of gas costs associated with a cap on the purchased gas adjustment in November and December 2004 and in the event that the average residential customer's gas bill were to exceed a threshold level. The deferrals of $1.7 million resulting from these caps will receive accelerated recovery over a seven-month period that began in April 2005.
In November 2004, the City Council directed Entergy New Orleans to confer with the City Council Advisors regarding possible modification of the current gas cost collection mechanism in order to address concerns regarding its fluctuations particularly during the winter heating season. In June 2005, Entergy New Orleans filed a new purchased gas adjustment tariff with the City Council. If approved by the City Council, the tariff would be effective in the fourth quarter of 2005.
Fuel Adjustment Clause Litigation
See Note 2 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the complaint filed by a group of ratepayers with the City Council alleging that Entergy New Orleans and certain affiliates engaged in fuel procurement and power purchasing practices and included certain costs in its fuel adjustment charges that could have resulted in its customers being overcharged by more than $100 million over a period of years. On May 26, 2005, the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans affirmed the City Council resolution that resulted in a refund to customers of $11.3 million, including interest, during the months of June through September 2004, finding no support for the plaintiff's claim that the refund amount should be higher. In June 2005, the plaintiffs appealed the Civil District Court decision to the Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal.
Electric Industry Restructuring and the Continued Application of SFAS 71
Previous developments and information related to electric industry restructuring are presented in Note 2 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements in the Form 10-K.
Louisiana (Entergy Gulf States and Entergy Louisiana)
In November 2001, the LPSC decided not to move forward with retail open access for any customers at this time. The LPSC instead directed its staff to hold collaborative group meetings concerning open access from time to time, and to have the LPSC staff monitor developments in neighboring states and to report to the LPSC regarding the progress of retail access developments in those states. In September 2004, in response to a study performed by the Louisiana State University Center for Energy Studies that evaluated a limited industrial-only retail choice program, the LPSC asked the LPSC staff to solicit comments and obtain information from utilities, customers, and other interested parties concerning the potential costs and benefits of a limited choice program, the impact of such a program on other customers, as well as issues such as
stranded costs and transmission service. Comments from interested parties were file d with the LPSC in January 2005. A technical conference was held in April 2005 and in May 2005 interested parties filed reply comments to arguments made at the technical conference. Entergy stated that it believes that there is no new information or credible evidence that would justify altering the LPSC's previous conclusion that retail access is not in the public interest.Texas (Entergy Gulf States)
See Note 2 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the status of retail open access in Entergy Gulf States' Texas service territory and Entergy Gulf States' independent organization request.
In June 2005, a Texas law was enacted which provides that:
NOTE 3. LINES OF CREDIT, RELATED SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS, AND LONG-TERM DEBT
The short-term borrowings of the domestic utility companies and System Energy are limited to amounts authorized by the SEC. The current limits authorized are effective through November 30, 2007. In addition to borrowing from commercial banks, the domestic utility companies and System Energy are authorized to borrow from Entergy's money pool. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the domestic utility companies' dependence on external short-term borrowings. Borrowings from the money pool and external borrowings combined may not exceed the SEC authorized limits. The following are the short-term borrowings from the money pool and the SEC-authorized limits for short-term borrowings for the domestic utility companies and System Energy as of June 30, 2005:
|
|
Authorized |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
(In Millions) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Entergy Arkansas |
|
$235 |
|
- |
Entergy Gulf States |
|
$340 |
|
$149.4 |
Entergy Louisiana |
|
$225 |
|
$110.7 |
Entergy Mississippi |
|
$160 |
|
- |
Entergy New Orleans |
|
$100 |
|
- |
System Energy |
|
$140 |
|
- |
Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans each have 364-day credit facilities available as follows:
|
|
Amount of |
Amount Drawn as of |
|||
Entergy Arkansas |
|
April 2006 |
|
$85 million (a) |
|
- |
Entergy Louisiana |
|
April 2006 |
|
$85 million (a) |
|
- |
Entergy Louisiana |
|
May 2006 |
|
$15 million (b) |
|
- |
Entergy Mississippi |
|
May 2006 |
|
$25 million |
|
- |
Entergy New Orleans |
|
May 2006 |
$15 million (b) |
- |
(a) |
The combined amount borrowed by Entergy Arkansas and Entergy Louisiana under these facilities at any one time cannot exceed $85 million. |
(b) |
The combined amount borrowed by Entergy Louisiana and Entergy New Orleans under these facilities at any one time cannot exceed $15 million. |
The 364-day credit facilities have variable interest rates and the average commitment fee is 0.13%. The $85 million Entergy Arkansas and Entergy Louisiana credit facilities each require the respective company to maintain total shareholders' equity of at least 25% of its total assets. In July 2005, Entergy New Orleans granted the lender a security interest in its customer accounts receivables to secure its borrowings under its facility. Under the terms of the security agreement, Entergy New Orleans has the option to withdraw the security interest at any time.
The following long-term debt has been issued by the domestic utility companies and System Energy in 2005:
|
Issue Date |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
Mortgage Bonds: |
|
|
|
5.66% Series due February 2025 - Entergy Arkansas |
January 2005 |
|
$175,000 |
6.18% Series due March 2035 - Entergy Gulf States |
February 2005 |
$85,000 |
|
5.70% Series due June 2015 - Entergy Gulf States |
May 2005 |
$200,000 |
|
4.50% Series due June 2010 - Entergy Arkansas |
May 2005 |
|
$100,000 |
4.67% Series due June 2010 - Entergy Louisiana |
May 2005 |
|
$55,000 |
4.98% Series due July 2010 - Entergy New Orleans |
June 2005 |
|
$30,000 |
Issuances after balance sheet date: |
|||
5.12% Series due August 2010 - Entergy Gulf States |
July 2005 |
$100,000 |
|
Other Long-Term Debt: | |||
5.00% Series due January 2021, Independence County - Arkansas (Entergy Arkansas) |
|
$45,000 |
The following long-term debt was retired by the domestic utility companies and System Energy thus far in 2005:
Retirement Date |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Mortgage Bonds: |
|
|
|
7.00% Series due October 2023 - Entergy Arkansas |
February 2005 |
$175,000 |
|
Retirements after balance sheet date: | |||
6.125% Series due July 2005 - Entergy Arkansas |
July 2005 |
$100,000 |
|
8.125% Series due July 2005 - Entergy New Orleans |
July 2005 |
$30,000 |
|
6.77% Series due August 2005 - Entergy Gulf States |
August 2005 |
$98,000 |
|
Other Long-Term Debt: | |||
Grand Gulf Lease Obligation payment, (System Energy) |
N/A |
$28,790 |
|
8.75% Junior Subordinated
Deferrable Interest Debentures due 2046 (Entergy Gulf States) |
|
|
|
6.25% Series due January
2021, Independence County - Arkansas (Entergy Arkansas) |
|
|
|
9.0% Series due May 2015,
West Feliciana Parish - Louisiana (Entergy Gulf States) |
|
|
|
7.5% Series due May 2015,
West Feliciana Parish - Louisiana (Entergy Gulf States) |
|
|
|
7.7% Series due December
2014, West Feliciana Parish - Louisiana (Entergy Gulf States) |
|
|
Entergy Arkansas used the proceeds from the March 2005 issuance to redeem, prior to maturity, $45 million of 6.25% Series of Independence County bonds in April 2005. The issuance and retirement do not appear on the cash flow statement because the proceeds were placed in a trust and never held as cash by Entergy Arkansas.
In June 2005, Entergy Louisiana purchased its $55 million of 4.9% Series St. Charles Parish bonds from the holders, pursuant to a mandatory tender provision, and has not remarketed the bonds at this time.
Tax Exempt Bond Audit (Entergy Louisiana)
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is auditing certain Tax Exempt Bonds (Bonds) issued by St. Charles Parish, State of Louisiana (the Issuer). The Bonds were issued to finance previously unfinanced acquisition costs expended by Entergy Louisiana to acquire certain radioactive solid waste disposal facilities (the Facilities) at the Waterford Steam Electric Generating Station. In March and April 2005, the IRS issued proposed adverse determinations that the Issuer's 7.0% Series bonds due 2022, 7.5% Series bonds due 2021, and 7.05% Series bonds due 2022 are not tax exempt. The stated basis for these determinations was that radioactive waste did not constitute "solid waste" within the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and therefore the Facilities did not qualify as solid waste disposal facilities. The Issuer has requested administrative appeals of the proposed adverse determinations with respect to the Bonds to the IRS Office of Appeals. The Issuer and Entergy Louisiana intend to continue to contest vigorously these matters. The three series of Bonds are the only series of bonds issued by the Issuer for the benefit of Entergy Louisiana that are the subject of audits by the IRS.
NOTE 4. PREFERRED STOCK
(Entergy Mississippi)
In June 2005, Entergy Mississippi issued 1,200,000 shares of $25 par value 6.25% Series Preferred Stock, all of which are outstanding as of June 30, 2005. The dividends are cumulative and will be payable quarterly beginning November 1, 2005. The preferred stock is redeemable on or after July 1, 2010, at Entergy Mississippi's option, at the call price of $25 per share. The proceeds from this issuance were used in the third quarter of 2005 to redeem all $20 million of Entergy Mississippi's $100 par value 8.36% Series Preferred Stock and all $10 million of Entergy Mississippi's $100 par value 7.44% Series Preferred Stock.
NOTE 5. RETIREMENT AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
Components of Net Pension Cost
The domestic utility companies' and System Energy's pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for the second quarters of 2005 and 2004, included the following components:
|
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
System |
2005 |
|
Arkansas |
|
Gulf States |
|
Louisiana |
|
Mississippi |
|
New Orleans |
|
Energy |
|
|
(In Thousands) |
||||||||||
Service cost - benefits earned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
during the period |
|
$3,329 |
|
$2,704 |
|
$1,957 |
|
$1,005 |
|
$436 |
|
$944 |
Interest cost on projected |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
benefit obligation |
|
9,115 |
|
7,235 |
|
5,525 |
|
2,998 |
|
1,148 |
|
1,413 |
Expected return on assets |
|
(9,009) |
|
(9,709) |
|
(6,666) |
|
(3,566) |
|
(731) |
|
(1,324) |
Amortization of transition asset |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(69) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
415 |
|
378 |
|
163 |
|
128 |
|
57 |
|
17 |
Amortization of loss |
|
1,613 |
|
1,213 |
|
730 |
|
527 |
|
151 |
|
229 |
Net pension cost |
|
$5,463 |
|
$1,821 |
|
$1,709 |
|
$1,092 |
|
$1,061 |
|
$1,210 |
|
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
System |
2004 |
|
Arkansas |
|
Gulf States |
|
Louisiana |
|
Mississippi |
|
New Orleans |
|
Energy |
|
|
(In Thousands) |
||||||||||
Service cost - benefits earned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
during the period |
|
$2,923 |
|
$2,416 |
|
$1,715 |
|
$946 |
|
$424 |
|
$824 |
Interest cost on projected |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
benefit obligation |
|
8,616 |
|
7,108 |
|
5,178 |
|
2,890 |
|
1,041 |
|
1,231 |
Expected return on assets |
|
(9,288) |
|
(9,931) |
|
(6,937) |
|
(3,694) |
|
(625) |
|
(1,053) |
Amortization of transition asset |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(79) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
417 |
|
465 |
|
189 |
|
141 |
|
57 |
|
18 |
Amortization of loss |
|
762 |
|
32 |
|
82 |
|
132 |
|
151 |
|
193 |
Net pension cost |
|
$3,430 |
|
$90 |
|
$227 |
|
$415 |
|
$1,048 |
|
$1,134 |
The domestic utility companies' and System Energy's pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, included the following components:
|
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
System |
2005 |
|
Arkansas |
|
Gulf States |
|
Louisiana |
|
Mississippi |
|
New Orleans |
|
Energy |
|
|
(In Thousands) |
||||||||||
Service cost - benefits earned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
during the period |
|
$6,658 |
|
$5,408 |
|
$3,914 |
|
$2,010 |
|
$872 |
|
$1,888 |
Interest cost on projected |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
benefit obligation |
|
18,230 |
|
14,470 |
|
11,050 |
|
5,996 |
|
2,296 |
|
2,826 |
Expected return on assets |
|
(18,018) |
|
(19,418) |
|
(13,332) |
|
(7,132) |
|
(1,462) |
|
(2,648) |
Amortization of transition asset |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(138) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
830 |
|
756 |
|
326 |
|
256 |
|
114 |
|
34 |
Amortization of loss |
|
3,226 |
|
2,426 |
|
1,460 |
|
1,054 |
|
302 |
|
458 |
Net pension cost |
|
$10,926 |
|
$3,642 |
|
$3,418 |
|
$2,184 |
|
$2,122 |
|
$2,420 |
|
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
System |
2004 |
|
Arkansas |
|
Gulf States |
|
Louisiana |
|
Mississippi |
|
New Orleans |
|
Energy |
|
|
(In Thousands) |
||||||||||
Service cost - benefits earned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
during the period |
|
$5,926 |
|
$4,870 |
|
$3,440 |
|
$1,900 |
|
$850 |
|
$1,670 |
Interest cost on projected |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
benefit obligation |
|
17,232 |
|
14,218 |
|
10,362 |
|
5,782 |
|
2,082 |
|
2,464 |
Expected return on assets |
|
(18,534) |
|
(19,822) |
|
(13,732) |
|
(7,384) |
|
(1,552) |
|
(2,088) |
Amortization of transition asset |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(160) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
834 |
|
930 |
|
378 |
|
282 |
|
114 |
|
36 |
Amortization of loss |
|
1,632 |
|
674 |
|
376 |
|
414 |
|
208 |
|
304 |
Net pension cost |
|
$7,090 |
|
$870 |
|
$824 |
|
$994 |
|
$1,702 |
|
$2,226 |
Components of Net Other Postretirement Benefit Cost
The domestic utility companies' and System Energy's other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts capitalized, for the second quarters of 2005 and 2004, included the following components:
|
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
System |
2005 |
|
Arkansas |
|
Gulf States |
|
Louisiana |
|
Mississippi |
|
New Orleans |
|
Energy |
|
|
(In Thousands) |
||||||||||
Service cost - benefits earned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
during the period |
|
$1,157 |
|
$1,634 |
|
$689 |
|
$363 |
|
$192 |
|
$415 |
Interest cost on APBO |
|
2,589 |
|
2,924 |
|
1,673 |
|
833 |
|
789 |
|
394 |
Expected return on assets |
|
(1,637) |
|
(1,366) |
|
- |
|
(669) |
|
(579) |
|
(387) |
Amortization of transition obligation |
|
205 |
|
947 |
|
95 |
|
88 |
|
435 |
|
4 |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
(173) |
|
- |
|
18 |
|
(46) |
|
10 |
|
(139) |
Amortization of loss |
|
1,276 |
|
770 |
|
691 |
|
471 |
|
211 |
|
146 |
Net other postretirement benefit cost |
|
$3,417 |
|
$4,909 |
|
$3,166 |
|
$1,040 |
|
$1,058 |
|
$433 |
|
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
System |
2004 |
|
Arkansas |
|
Gulf States |
|
Louisiana |
|
Mississippi |
|
New Orleans |
|
Energy |
|
|
(In Thousands) |
||||||||||
Service cost - benefits earned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
during the period |
|
$827 |
|
$1,415 |
|
$614 |
|
$245 |
|
$178 |
|
$341 |
Interest cost on APBO |
|
2,394 |
|
2,871 |
|
1,644 |
|
703 |
|
810 |
|
371 |
Expected return on assets |
|
(1,529) |
|
(1,256) |
|
- |
|
(631) |
|
(558) |
|
(316) |
Amortization of transition obligation |
|
(132) |
|
1,147 |
|
300 |
|
(43) |
|
529 |
|
4 |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
63 |
|
- |
|
56 |
|
26 |
|
20 |
|
(83) |
Amortization of loss |
|
1,112 |
|
514 |
|
457 |
|
349 |
|
99 |
|
99 |
Net other postretirement benefit cost |
|
$2,735 |
|
$4,691 |
|
$3,071 |
|
$649 |
|
$1,078 |
|
$416 |
The domestic utility companies' and System Energy's other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts capitalized, for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, included the following components:
|
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
System |
2005 |
|
Arkansas |
|
Gulf States |
|
Louisiana |
|
Mississippi |
|
New Orleans |
|
Energy |
|
|
(In Thousands) |
||||||||||
Service cost - benefits earned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
during the period |
|
$2,314 |
|
$3,268 |
|
$1,378 |
|
$726 |
|
$384 |
|
$830 |
Interest cost on APBO |
|
5,178 |
|
5,848 |
|
3,346 |
|
1,666 |
|
1,578 |
|
788 |
Expected return on assets |
|
(3,274) |
|
(2,732) |
|
- |
|
(1,338) |
|
(1,158) |
|
(774) |
Amortization of transition obligation |
|
410 |
|
1,894 |
|
190 |
|
176 |
|
870 |
|
8 |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
(346) |
|
- |
|
36 |
|
(92) |
|
20 |
|
(278) |
Amortization of loss |
|
2,552 |
|
1,540 |
|
1,382 |
|
942 |
|
422 |
|
292 |
Net other postretirement benefit cost |
|
$6,834 |
|
$9,818 |
|
$6,332 |
|
$2,080 |
|
$2,116 |
|
$866 |
|
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
System |
2004 |
|
Arkansas |
|
Gulf States |
|
Louisiana |
|
Mississippi |
|
New Orleans |
|
Energy |
|
|
(In Thousands) |
||||||||||
Service cost - benefits earned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
during the period |
|
$2,459 |
|
$2,944 |
|
$1,333 |
|
$721 |
|
$382 |
|
$729 |
Interest cost on APBO |
|
5,227 |
|
5,812 |
|
3,344 |
|
1,581 |
|
1,637 |
|
759 |
Expected return on assets |
|
(3,131) |
|
(2,491) |
|
- |
|
(1,284) |
|
(1,124) |
|
(626) |
Amortization of transition obligation |
|
477 |
|
2,295 |
|
600 |
|
211 |
|
1,058 |
|
7 |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
63 |
|
- |
|
56 |
|
26 |
|
20 |
|
(175) |
Amortization of loss |
|
2,185 |
|
1,163 |
|
1,020 |
|
697 |
|
256 |
|
231 |
Net other postretirement benefit cost |
|
$7,280 |
|
$9,723 |
|
$6,353 |
|
$1,952 |
|
$2,229 |
|
$925 |
Employer Contributions
The domestic utility companies and System Energy expect to contribute the following to pension plans in 2005:
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
System |
|
|
|
Arkansas |
|
Gulf States |
|
Louisiana |
|
Mississippi |
|
New Orleans |
|
Energy |
|
|
(In Thousands) |
||||||||||
Expected 2005 pension contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revised expected 2005 pension contributions |
|
$13,802 |
$21,893 |
- |
$3,416 |
$21,281 |
$12,305 |
|||||
Pension contributions made through July 2005 |
|
$4,003 |
$14,818 |
- |
$1,025 |
$14,404 |
$7,694 |
|||||
Remaining estimated pension contributions to be made in 2005 |
|
$9,799 |
$7,075 |
- |
$2,391 |
$6,877 |
$4,611 |
Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (Medicare Act)
Based on actuarial analysis, the estimated impact of future Medicare subsidies reduced the December 31, 2004 Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation (APBO), the second quarter 2005 and 2004 other postretirement benefit cost, and the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 other postretirement benefit cost for the domestic utility companies and System Energy as follows:
|
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
Entergy |
|
System |
|
|
Arkansas |
|
Gulf States |
|
Louisiana |
|
Mississippi |
|
New Orleans |
|
Energy |
|
|
(In Thousands) |
||||||||||
Reduction in 12/31/2004 APBO |
|
($35,928) |
|
($31,846) |
|
($20,085) |
|
($12,227) |
|
($9,742) |
|
($4,982) |
Reduction in second quarter 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other postretirement benefit cost |
|
($1,446) |
|
($1,269) |
|
($790) |
|
($476) |
|
($350) |
|
($245) |
Reduction in second quarter 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other postretirement benefit cost |
|
($777) |
|
($821) |
|
($605) |
|
($250) |
|
($261) |
|
($161) |
Reduction in six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction in six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For further information on the Medicare Act refer to Note 10 to the domestic utility companies and System Energy's financial statements in the Form 10-K.
__________________________________
In the opinion of the management of Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and System Energy, the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals and reclassification of previously reported amounts to conform to current classifications) necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. The business of the domestic utility companies and System Energy is subject to seasonal fluctuations, however, with the peak periods occurring during the third quarter. The results for the interim periods presented should not be used as a basis for estimating results of operations for a full year.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of June 30, 2005, evaluations were performed under the supervision and with the participation of Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and System Energy Resources (individually "Registrant" and collectively the "Registrants") management, including their respective Chief Executive Officers (CEO) and Chief Financial Officers (CFO). The evaluations assessed the effectiveness of the Registrants' disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the evaluations, each CEO and CFO has concluded that, as to the Registrant or Registrants for which they serve as CEO or CFO, the Registrants' disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by each Registrant in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and f orms.
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
See "PART I, Item 1, Litigation" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of legal proceedings affecting Entergy. Following is an update to that discussion.
Entergy New Orleans Fuel Clause Lawsuit
See "Entergy New Orleans Fuel Clause Lawsuit" in Part I, Item 1 of the Form 10-K for a discussion of the complaint filed with the City Council by a group of ratepayers alleging that Entergy New Orleans and certain affiliates engaged in fuel procurement and power purchasing practices and included certain costs in its fuel adjustment charges that could have resulted in its customers being overcharged by more than $100 million over a period of years. On May 26, 2005, the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans affirmed the City Council resolution that resulted in a refund to customers of $11.3 million, including interest, during the months of June through September 2004, finding no support for the plaintiff's claim that the refund amount should be higher. In June 2005, the plaintiffs appealed the Civil District Court decision to the Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal.
Entergy New Orleans Rate of Return Lawsuit
See "Entergy New Orleans Rate of Return Lawsuit" in Part I, Item 1 of the Form 10-K for a discussion of the hearing set before the City Council regarding the effect of the provision of the 1922 Ordinance in setting lawful rates. The hearing concluded in June 2005.
Texas Power Price Lawsuit
See "Texas Power Price Lawsuit" in Part I, Item 1 of the Form 10-K for a discussion of the lawsuit filed in the district court of Chambers County, Texas by Texas residents on behalf of a purported class apparently of the Texas retail customers of Entergy Gulf States who were billed and paid for electric power from January 1, 1994 to the present. The plaintiff's appeal of the district court's dismissal of the lawsuit has been briefed and oral arguments are expected to be heard by the Court of Appeals this year.
Entergy Louisiana Formula Ratemaking Plan Lawsuit
See "Entergy Louisiana Formula Ratemaking Plan Lawsuit" in Part I, Item 1 of the Form 10-K for a discussion of the complaint filed against Entergy Louisiana and the LPSC in state court in East Baton Rouge Parish on behalf of a group of Entergy Louisiana ratepayers. This case has been abandoned by operation of law.
Fiber Optic Cable Litigation
See "Fiber Optic Cable Litigation" in Part I, Item 1 of the Form 10-K for a discussion of the litigation filed by several property owners in state court in St. James Parish, Louisiana against Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Services, Entergy Technology Holding Company (ETHC), and Entergy Technology Company (ETC) purportedly on behalf of all property owners in Louisiana who have conveyed easements to the defendants. The Louisiana Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal has denied Entergy's appeal of the trial court's order certifying a class. Entergy is seeking appellate review before the Louisiana Supreme Court.
With respect to the separate lawsuits filed by several property owners against Entergy Corporation, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy Services, ETHC, and ETC in state court in various counties in Mississippi alleging that Entergy Mississippi installed fiber optic cable across their properties without obtaining appropriate easements, plaintiffs in some of the lawsuits have agreed to dismiss the lawsuits based on evidence that there was no fiber optic cable running across their property.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (1)
Period |
|
Total Number of |
|
Average Price Paid |
|
Total Number of |
|
Maximum $ Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/01/2005-4/30/2005 |
|
1,082,100 |
|
$71.56 |
|
1,082,100 |
|
$668,580,091 |
5/01/2005-5/31/2005 |
|
2,039,400 |
|
$72.14 |
|
2,039,400 |
|
$531,610,303 |
6/01/2005-6/30/2005 |
|
432,900 |
|
$75.36 |
|
432,900 |
|
$520,169,627 |
Total |
|
3,554,400 |
|
$72.35 |
|
3,554,400 |
|
|
(1) |
In accordance with Entergy's stock-based compensation plans, Entergy periodically grants stock options to its employees, which may be exercised to obtain shares of Entergy's common stock. According to the plans, these shares can be newly issued shares, treasury stock, or shares purchased on the open market. See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the stock-based compensation plans. Entergy's management has been authorized to repurchase on the open market shares up to an amount sufficient to fund the exercise of grants under the plans, and this authorization does not have an expiration date. In August 2004, Entergy announced a program under which Entergy Corporation will repurchase up to $1.5 billion of its common stock. The program extends through the end of 2006. This repurchase program is incremental to the existing authority to repurchase shares to fund the exercise of employee stock options. The amount of rep urchases under the program may vary as a result of material changes in business results or capital spending, or as a result of material new investment opportunities. |
(2) |
Maximum amount of shares that may yet be repurchased relates only to the $1.5 billion plan and does not include an estimate of the amount of shares that may be purchased to fund the exercise of grants under the stock-based compensation plans. |
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Election of Board of Directors
Entergy Corporation
The annual meeting of stockholders of Entergy Corporation was held on May 13, 2005. The following matters were voted on and received the specified number of votes for, abstentions, votes withheld (against), and broker non-votes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maureen S. Bateman |
|
189,249,148 |
|
2,266,155 |
W. Frank Blount |
|
185,747,483 |
|
5,767,820 |
Simon D. deBree |
|
189,220,546 |
|
2,294,757 |
Claiborne P. Deming |
|
189,372,818 |
|
2,142,485 |
Alexis M. Herman |
|
189,015,162 |
|
2,500,141 |
Donald C. Hintz |
|
187,510,762 |
|
4,004,541 |
J. Wayne Leonard |
|
187,755,699 |
|
3,759,604 |
Robert v.d. Luft |
|
187,644,635 |
|
3,870,668 |
Kathleen A. Murphy |
|
189,219,495 |
|
2,295,808 |
James R. Nichols |
|
187,612,722 |
|
3,902,581 |
William A. Percy, II |
|
189,167,248 |
|
2,348,055 |
Dennis H. Reilley* |
|
189,064,868 |
|
2,450,435 |
Steven V. Wilkinson |
|
189,221,507 |
|
2,293,796 |
* Mr. Reilley resigned from the Board effective May 20, 2005.
Entergy Arkansas
A consent in lieu of a meeting of common stockholders was executed on May 27, 2005. The consent was signed on behalf of Entergy Corporation, the holder of all issued and outstanding shares of common stock. The common stockholder, by such consent, elected the following individuals to serve as directors constituting the Board of Directors of Entergy Arkansas: Hugh T. McDonald, Chairman, Leo P. Denault, Mark Savoff, and Richard J. Smith.
Entergy Gulf States
A consent in lieu of a meeting of common stockholders was executed on May 27, 2005. The consent was signed on behalf of Entergy Corporation, the holder of all issued and outstanding shares of common stock. The common stockholder, by such consent, elected the following individuals to serve as directors constituting the Board of Directors of Entergy Gulf States: Joseph F. Domino, Chairman, E. Renae Conley, Leo P. Denault, Mark Savoff, and Richard J. Smith.
Entergy Louisiana
A consent in lieu of a meeting of common stockholders was executed on May 27, 2005. The consent was signed on behalf of Entergy Corporation, the holder of all issued and outstanding shares of common stock. The common stockholder, by such consent, elected the following individuals to serve as directors constituting the Board of Directors of Entergy Louisiana: E. Renae Conley, Chairman, Leo P. Denault, Mark Savoff, and Richard J. Smith.
Entergy Mississippi
A consent in lieu of a meeting of common stockholders was executed on May 27, 2005. The consent was signed on behalf of Entergy Corporation, the holder of all issued and outstanding shares of common stock. The common stockholder, by such consent, elected the following individuals to serve as directors constituting the Board of Directors of Entergy Mississippi: Carolyn C. Shanks, Chairman, Leo P. Denault, Mark Savoff, and Richard J. Smith.
Entergy New Orleans
A consent in lieu of a meeting of common stockholders was executed on May 27, 2005. The consent was signed on behalf of Entergy Corporation, the holder of all issued and outstanding shares of common stock. The common stockholder, by such consent, elected the following individuals to serve as directors constituting the Board of Directors of Entergy New Orleans: Daniel F. Packer, Chairman, Leo P. Denault, Mark Savoff, and Richard J. Smith.
System Energy
A consent in lieu of a meeting of common stockholders was executed on May 27, 2005. The consent was signed on behalf of Entergy Corporation, the holder of all issued and outstanding shares of common stock. The common stockholder, by such consent, elected the following individuals to serve as directors constituting the Board of Directors of System Energy: Gary J. Taylor, Chairman, Steven C. McNeal, and Leo P. Denault.
Item 5. Other Information
Property and Other Generation Resources
See "Part I, Item 1" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the affiliate purchased power agreements (PPAs) filed by Entergy with the FERC. On June 30, 2005, the FERC ALJ issued an initial decision finding, among other things, that the PPAs are just and reasonable and not unduly discriminatory, except for the Entergy Arkansas retained share of Grand Gulf portion (19MW) of the Entergy Arkansas 110MW PPAs with Entergy Louisiana and Entergy New Orleans. The ALJ therefore removed the 19MW attributable to the Entergy Arkansas retained share from the PPA with Entergy Louisiana. Because the City Council desired to keep the retained share in the PPA with Entergy New Orleans, the ALJ did not remove the 19MW from that PPA. There is no deadline with respect to when a final decision will be issued by the FERC.
On June 28, 2005, a proposed recommendation was issued by an LPSC ALJ regarding the River Bend PPA between Entergy Gulf States and Entergy Louisiana and the PPA between Entergy Arkansas and Entergy Louisiana for capacity from a portion of Entergy Arkansas' coal and nuclear fueled base load resources (EAI WBL). The ALJ found that once certain transmission issues are resolved, Entergy Louisiana should be encouraged to acquire as much of the 30% share of River Bend as Entergy Gulf States receives authorization to make available. The ALJ further found that the River Bend PPA offers the lowest cost when compared to proposals submitted in response to the Entergy Fall 2002 and Spring 2003 requests for proposal for supply side resources, that it should be dispatchable by the Entergy System, and that it provides Entergy Louisiana with a diverse solid fuel resource that should offer price stability during a time of rising gas prices. Entergy believes that the transmission issues have been resolved. With respect to the EAI WBL, the LPSC ALJ found that because there are no transmission issues with respect to this contract and because the pricing of the PPA is to be at the revised MSS-4 price (except for the Grand Gulf related portion of the PPA, which would be priced at $46) the PPA is attractive to ratepayers. The LPSC ALJ also determined that the FERC is the regulatory body with jurisdiction to determine whether a right of first refusal to the underlying EAI WBL resources exists under the System Agreement and that if the FERC were to determine that such a right of first refusal does exist, the LPSC may want to direct Entergy Louisiana to exercise that right. In a June 30, 2005 decision, the presiding FERC ALJ determined that such a right of first refusal does not exist. A final decision from the LPSC is expected in the late third quarter or fourth quarter of 2005.
Federal Regulation
FERC Audits
See "FERC Audits" in Part I, Item 1 in the Form 10-K for a discussion of audits and reviews initiated by the FERC. The FERC is currently reviewing certain wholesale sales and purchases involving EPMC that occurred during the 1998-2001 time period and similar transactions that Entergy-Koch Trading may have undertaken. EPMC was an Entergy subsidiary engaged in non-regulated wholesale marketing and trading activities prior to the formation of Entergy-Koch. Entergy is working with the FERC investigation staff to provide information regarding these transactions.
Other Customer-initiated Proceedings at the FERC
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the complaint filed with the FERC in February 2005 by ExxonMobil Chemical Company and ExxonMobil Refining & Supply Company (ExxonMobil) against Entergy Services and the domestic utility companies. On April 18, 2005, the FERC (1) rejected as unfounded ExxonMobil's allegation concerning the netting of its station power needs; and (2) set for hearing the question of whether the facility upgrades and related charges are subject to FERC jurisdiction and, if so, when they became subject to FERC jurisdiction, whether the monthly facility charge violated FERC pricing policy, and whether any refunds are appropriate. The FERC then held the hearing in abeyance in order to provide the parties an opportunity to settle their dispute before hearing procedures commence. Settlement discussions are underway.
On January 24, 2005 Cottonwood Energy Company, L.P., an independent generator, filed with the FERC a rate schedule for reactive power that proposes to impose on Entergy Gulf States a rate for reactive supply service allegedly supplied by Cottonwood's electric generating facility. Cottonwood has proposed a fixed monthly charge ($3.4 million annually), which according to Cottonwood represents its revenue requirement for reactive power service. Entergy believes that independent generators should only be compensated for reactive power to the extent that they have an affirmative and continual obligation to provide reactive power support beyond their power factor range when directed to do so by the transmission provider, and is opposing Cottonwood's rate schedule. On March 23, 2005, the FERC accepted Cottonwood's proposed reactive power rate schedule for filing effective on February 1, 2005, subject to refund, and established hearing and settlement judge procedures. A hearing in this p roceeding is currently scheduled to commence in January 2006, with an ALJ initial decision scheduled to be issued by April 2006. A similar filing was made by Union Power Partners in May 2005 requesting $4.15 million annually. On July 15, 2005, the FERC accepted Union Power Partners' proposed reactive power rate schedule for filing, effective May 18, subject to refund and established hearing and settlement judge procedures. In the event that Cottonwood and UPP are successful, Entergy anticipates that other merchant plants located on Entergy's transmission system may request similar compensation.
Environmental Regulation
See "PART I, Item 1, Clean Air Act and Subsequent Amendments, Hazardous Air Pollutants" in the Form 10-K for information related to the hazardous air pollutant emissions reduction programs. In March 2005, the EPA issued a rule to permanently cap and reduce mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants. The Clean Air Mercury Rule establishes "standards of performance" limiting mercury emissions from new and existing coal-fired power plants and creates a market-based cap-and-trade program that will reduce nationwide utility emissions of mercury in two distinct phases. The first phase cap is 38 tons beginning in 2010. The rule has been challenged in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Unless the rule is stayed, however, the compliance deadlines remain in effect. The rule is also being challenged by various members of the U.S. Senate through a process called the Congressional Review Act. Entergy will continue to monitor these d evelopments.
Entergy owns units that will be subject to the mercury emissions regulations and is studying compliance options in order to determine the best control alternative. Entergy estimates that any necessary capital expenditures for its coal facilities will occur through 2009 and will be approximately $26 million, including $15.4 million at Entergy Arkansas, $4.9 million at Entergy Gulf States, and $5.3 million at Entergy Mississippi. Ongoing operating costs will increase beginning in 2010.
See "PART I, Item 1, Clean Air Act and Subsequent Amendments, Interstate Air Transport" in the Form 10-K for information related to SO2 and NOX emissions reduction programs. In March 2005, the EPA finalized the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), which will reduce SO2 and NOX emissions from electric generation plants in order to improve air quality in 29 eastern states. The rule will require a combination of capital investment to install pollution control equipment and increased operating costs. Entergy's capital investment and annual operation and maintenance allowance purchase costs will depend on the economic assessment of NOX and SO2 allowance markets, the cost of control technologies, and unit usage. Entergy estimates that the capital expenditures for its Fossil generation fleet will occur through 2009 and will be approximately $90 million, including $2.9 million at Entergy Arkansas, $17 million at E ntergy Gulf States, $36.1 million at Entergy Louisiana, $6.2 million at Entergy Mississippi, and $27.4 million at Entergy New Orleans.
The capital financial impact could be offset by emission markets which allow for purchases or use of allocated credits; however, the allocation of the emission allowances and the set up of the market will determine the ultimate cost to Entergy. Entergy believes that the allocation is unfairly skewed towards states with relatively higher emissions by the use of a fuel-adjustment factor in the final rule that was not included in the draft rule. Entergy will continue to study the final rule's impact to its generation fleet and will work to ensure that all states are treated fairly in the allocation of emission credits. Entergy has filed a Petition for Reconsideration with the EPA and a Petition for Review in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit concerning the final rule's use of fuel-adjustment factors.
Election of Directors
On July 29, 2005, the Board elected two new members, Gary W. Edwards and Stuart L. Levenick. There is no arrangement or understanding between either of the newly-elected directors and any person pursuant to which each was selected as a director.
Earnings Ratios (Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and System Energy)
The domestic utility companies and System Energy have calculated ratios of earnings to fixed charges and ratios of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred dividends pursuant to Item 503 of Regulation S-K of the SEC as follows:
Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|||||||||||
Twelve Months Ended |
|||||||||||
December 31, |
June 30, |
||||||||||
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
||||||
Entergy Arkansas |
3.01 |
3.29 |
2.79 |
3.17 |
3.37 |
3.64 |
|||||
Entergy Gulf States |
2.60 |
2.36 |
2.49 |
1.51 |
3.04 |
2.82 |
|||||
Entergy Louisiana |
3.33 |
2.76 |
3.14 |
3.93 |
3.60 |
3.80 |
|||||
Entergy Mississippi |
2.33 |
2.14 |
2.48 |
3.06 |
3.41 |
3.34 |
|||||
Entergy New Orleans |
2.66 |
(a) |
(b) |
1.73 |
3.60 |
3.28 |
|||||
System Energy |
2.41 |
2.12 |
3.25 |
3.66 |
3.95 |
4.25 |
Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges |
|||||||||||
Twelve Months Ended |
|||||||||||
December 31, |
June 30, |
||||||||||
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
||||||
Entergy Arkansas |
2.70 |
2.99 |
2.53 |
2.79 |
2.98 |
3.22 |
|||||
Entergy Gulf States |
2.39 |
2.21 |
2.40 |
1.45 |
2.90 |
2.69 |
|||||
Entergy Louisiana |
2.93 |
2.51 |
2.86 |
3.46 |
3.16 |
3.34 |
|||||
Entergy Mississippi |
2.09 |
1.96 |
2.27 |
2.77 |
3.07 |
3.00 |
|||||
Entergy New Orleans |
2.43 |
(a) |
(b) |
1.59 |
3.31 |
2.99 |
(a) |
Earnings for the twelve months ended December 31, 2001, for Entergy New Orleans were not adequate to cover fixed charges and combined fixed charges and preferred dividends by $6.6 million and $9.5 million, respectively. |
(b) |
Earnings for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002, for Entergy New Orleans were not adequate to cover fixed charges and combined fixed charges and preferred dividends by $0.7 million and $3.4 million, respectively. |
Item 6. Exhibits *
** |
4(a) |
Sixtieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 1, 2005, to Entergy Louisiana's Mortgage and Deed of Trust, dated as of April 1, 1944 (A-3(d) to Rule 24 Certificate dated May 18, 2005 in 70-10086). |
** |
4(b) |
Seventieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 1, 2005, to Entergy Gulf States' Indenture of Mortgage, dated as of September 1, 1926 (A-3(iv) to Rule 24 Certificate dated June 2, 2005 in 70-10158). |
4(c) |
Sixty-fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 1, 2005, to Entergy Arkansas' Mortgage and Deed of Trust, dated as of October 1, 1944. |
|
4(d) |
Credit Agreement, dated as of May 25, 2005, among Entergy Corporation, the Banks (Citibank, N.A., ABN AMRO Bank N.V., BNP Paribas, J. P. Morgan Chase Bank, The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, Barclays Bank PLC, Calyon New York Branch, KeyBank National Association, Morgan Stanley Bank, The Bank of New York, Wachovia Bank, N.A., Credit Suisse First Boston (Cayman Islands Branch), Lehman Brothers Bank (FSB), Regions Bank, Societe Generale, Union Bank of California, N.A., Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG (New York Branch), Mellon Bank, N.A., KBC Bank N.V., Mizuho Corporate Bank Limited, West LB AG, New York Branch, and UFJ Bank Limited, Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and LC Issuing Bank, and ABN AMRO Bank, N.V., as LC Issuing Bank. |
|
4(e) |
Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 1, 2005, to Entergy New Orleans' Mortgage and Deed of Trust, dated as of May 1, 1987. |
|
4(f) |
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2005, among Entergy Corporation, as Borrower, Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch, as Bank, and Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent. |
|
4(g) |
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2005, among Entergy Corporation, as Borrower, Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch, as Bank, and Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent. |
|
** |
4(h) |
Seventy-first Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 1, 2005, to Entergy Gulf States' Indenture of Mortgage, dated as of September 1, 1926 (A-3(v) to Rule 24 Certificate dated July 21, 2005 in 70-10158). |
31(a) - |
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Corporation. |
|
31(b) - |
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Corporation. |
|
31(c) - |
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Arkansas. |
|
31(d) - |
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Gulf States. |
|
31(e) - |
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Gulf States and Entergy Louisiana. |
|
31(f) - |
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Mississippi. |
|
31(g) - |
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy New Orleans. |
|
31(h) - |
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for System Energy. |
|
31(i) - |
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans. |
|
31(j) - |
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for System Energy. |
|
32(a) - |
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Corporation. |
|
32(b) - |
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Corporation. |
|
32(c) - |
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Arkansas. |
|
32(d) - |
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Gulf States. |
|
32(e) - |
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Gulf States and Entergy Louisiana. |
|
32(f) - |
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Mississippi. |
|
32(g) - |
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy New Orleans. |
|
32(h) - |
Section 1350 Certification for System Energy. |
|
32(i) - |
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans. |
|
32(j) - |
Section 1350 Certification for System Energy. |
|
99(a) - |
Entergy Arkansas' Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends, as defined. |
|
99(b) - |
Entergy Gulf States' Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends, as defined. |
|
99(c) - |
Entergy Louisiana's Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends, as defined. |
|
99(d) - |
Entergy Mississippi's Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends, as defined. |
|
99(e) - |
Entergy New Orleans' Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends, as defined. |
|
99(f) - |
System Energy's Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges, as defined. |
___________________________
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, Entergy Corporation agrees to furnish to the Commission upon request any instrument with respect to long-term debt that is not registered or listed herein as an Exhibit because the total amount of securities authorized under such agreement does not exceed ten percent of the total assets of Entergy Corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
* |
Reference is made to a duplicate list of exhibits being filed as a part of this report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, which list, prepared in accordance with Item 102 of Regulation S-T of the SEC, immediately precedes the exhibits being filed with this report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. |
** |
Incorporated herein by reference as indicated. |
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. The signature for each undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company or its subsidiaries.
ENTERGY CORPORATION |
/s/ Nathan E. Langston Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (For each Registrant and for each as Principal Accounting Officer) |
Date: August 4, 2005
Exhibit 4(c)
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC.
TO
DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS
(successor to Guaranty Trust Company of New York)
AND
STANLEY BURG
(successor to Henry A. Theis)
AND
(as to property, real or personal, situated or being in Missouri)
THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
(successor to Marvin A. Mueller)
As Trustees under Entergy Arkansas, Inc.'s Mortgage and Deed of Trust,
Dated as of October 1, 1944
___________________________
SIXTY-FIFTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE
Providing among other things for
First Mortgage Bonds, 4.50% Series due June 1, 2010 (Seventy-second Series)
__________________________
Dated as of May 1, 2005
SIXTY-FIFTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE
INDENTURE, dated as of May 1, 2005, between ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC., a corporation of the State of Arkansas, whose post office address is 425 West Capitol, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (hereinafter sometimes called the "Company"), and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS (successor to Guaranty Trust Company of New York), a New York banking corporation, whose post office address is 60 Wall Street, MS NYC 60-2710, New York, New York 10005 (hereinafter sometimes called the "Corporate Trustee"), and STANLEY BURG (successor to Henry A. Theis) (hereinafter sometimes called the "Co-Trustee"), and (as to property, real or personal, situated or being in Missouri) THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (successor to Marvin A. Mueller), whose mailing address is 10161 Centurion Parkway, Jacksonville, Florida 32256 (said The Bank of New York Trust Company, National Association being hereinafter sometimes called the "Missouri Co-Trustee" and th e Corporate Trustee, the Co-Trustee and the Missouri Co-Trustee being hereinafter together sometimes called the "Trustees"), as Trustees under the Mortgage and Deed of Trust, dated as of October 1, 1944 (hereinafter sometimes called the "Mortgage"), which Mortgage was executed and delivered by the Company to secure the payment of bonds issued or to be issued under and in accordance with the provisions of the Mortgage, reference to which Mortgage is hereby made, this indenture (hereinafter called the "Sixty-fifth Supplemental Indenture") being supplemental thereto.
WHEREAS, the Mortgage was appropriately filed or recorded in various official records in the States of Arkansas, Missouri, Tennessee and Wyoming; and
WHEREAS, an instrument, dated as of July 7, 1949, was executed by the Company appointing Herbert E. Twyeffort as Co-Trustee in succession to Henry A. Theis (resigned) under the Mortgage, and by Herbert E. Twyeffort accepting said appointment, and said instrument was appropriately filed or recorded in various official records in the States of Arkansas, Missouri, Tennessee and Wyoming; and
WHEREAS, an instrument, dated as of March 1, 1960, was executed by the Company appointing Grainger S. Greene as Co-Trustee in succession to Herbert E. Twyeffort (resigned) under the Mortgage, and by Grainger S. Greene accepting said appointment, and said instrument was appropriately filed or recorded in various official records in the States of Arkansas, Missouri, Tennessee and Wyoming; and
WHEREAS, by the Twenty-first Supplemental Indenture mentioned below, the Company, among other things, appointed John W. Flaherty as Co-Trustee in succession to Grainger S. Greene (resigned) under the Mortgage, and John W. Flaherty accepted said appointment; and
WHEREAS, by the Thirty-third Supplemental Indenture mentioned below, the Company, among other things, appointed Marvin A. Mueller as Missouri Co-Trustee under the Mortgage, and Marvin A. Mueller accepted said appointment; and
WHEREAS, by the Thirty-fifth Supplemental Indenture mentioned below, the Company, among other things, appointed The Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis as Missouri Co-Trustee in succession to Marvin A. Mueller (resigned) under the Mortgage, and The Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis accepted said appointment; and
WHEREAS, an instrument, dated as of September 1, 1994, was executed by the Company appointing Bankers Trust Company as Trustee, and Stanley Burg as Co-Trustee, in succession to Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York (resigned) and John W. Flaherty (resigned), respectively, under the Mortgage and Bankers Trust Company and Stanley Burg accepted said appointments, and said instrument was appropriately filed or recorded in various official records in the States of Arkansas, Missouri, Tennessee and Wyoming; and
WHEREAS, by the Fifty-fifth Supplemental Indenture mentioned below, the Company, among other things, appointed Peter D. Van Cleve as Missouri Co-Trustee in succession to The Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis (resigned) under the Mortgage, and Peter D. Van Cleve accepted said appointment; and
WHEREAS, by an instrument, dated as of May 31, 2000, the Company appointed BNY Trust Company of Missouri as Missouri Co-Trustee in succession to Peter D. Van Cleve (resigned) under the Mortgage, and BNY Trust Company of Missouri accepted said appointment, and said instrument was appropriately filed or recorded in various official records in the State of Missouri; and
WHEREAS, by an instrument, dated as of April 15, 2002, filed with the Banking Department of the State of New York, Bankers Trust Company, Trustee, effected a corporate name change pursuant to which, effective such date, it is known as Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas; and
WHEREAS, by an instrument dated November 1, 2004, filed with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency in Colorado, BNY Trust Company of Missouri merged into BNY Missouri Interim Trust Company, National Association, and by an instrument dated November 1, 2004, filed with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency in Colorado, BNY Missouri Interim Trust Company, National Association, merged into The Bank of New York Trust Company, National Association; and
WHEREAS, by the Sixty-third Supplemental Indenture mentioned below, the Company, the Corporate Trustee, Stanley Burg as Co-Trustee, and The Bank of New York Trust Company, National Association, as Missouri Co-Trustee, appointed Jeffrey Schroeder to serve as Missouri Co-Trustee under the Mortgage, and Jeffrey Schroeder accepted such appointment; and
WHEREAS, by an instrument effective as of February 28, 2005, Jeffrey Schroeder resigned as a Missouri Co-Trustee; and
WHEREAS, by the Mortgage the Company covenanted that it would execute and deliver such supplemental indenture or indentures and such further instruments and do such further acts as might be necessary or proper to carry out more effectually the purposes of the Mortgage and to make subject to the lien of the Mortgage any property thereafter acquired and intended to be subject to the lien thereof; and
WHEREAS, the Company executed and delivered to the Trustees the following supplemental indentures:
Designation |
Dated as of |
First Supplemental Indenture |
July 1, 1947 |
Second Supplemental Indenture |
August 1, 1948 |
Third Supplemental Indenture |
October 1, 1949 |
Fourth Supplemental Indenture |
June 1, 1950 |
Fifth Supplemental Indenture |
October 1, 1951 |
Sixth Supplemental Indenture |
September 1, 1952 |
Seventh Supplemental Indenture |
June 1, 1953 |
Eighth Supplemental Indenture |
August 1, 1954 |
Ninth Supplemental Indenture |
April 1, 1955 |
Tenth Supplemental Indenture |
December 1, 1959 |
Eleventh Supplemental Indenture |
May 1, 1961 |
Twelfth Supplemental Indenture |
February 1, 1963 |
Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture |
April 1, 1965 |
Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture |
March 1, 1966 |
Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture |
March 1, 1967 |
Sixteenth Supplemental Indenture |
April 1, 1968 |
Seventeenth Supplemental Indenture |
June 1, 1968 |
Eighteenth Supplemental Indenture |
December 1, 1969 |
Nineteenth Supplemental Indenture |
August 1, 1970 |
Twentieth Supplemental Indenture |
March 1, 1971 |
Twenty-first Supplemental Indenture |
August 1, 1971 |
Twenty-second Supplemental Indenture |
April 1, 1972 |
Twenty-third Supplemental Indenture |
December 1, 1972 |
Twenty-fourth Supplemental Indenture |
June 1, 1973 |
Twenty-fifth Supplemental Indenture |
December 1, 1973 |
Twenty-sixth Supplemental Indenture |
June 1, 1974 |
Twenty-seventh Supplemental Indenture |
November 1, 1974 |
Twenty-eighth Supplemental Indenture |
July 1, 1975 |
Twenty-ninth Supplemental Indenture |
December 1, 1977 |
Thirtieth Supplemental Indenture |
July 1, 1978 |
Thirty-first Supplemental Indenture |
February 1, 1979 |
Thirty-second Supplemental Indenture |
December 1, 1980 |
Thirty-third Supplemental Indenture |
January 1, 1981 |
Thirty-fourth Supplemental Indenture |
August 1, 1981 |
Thirty-fifth Supplemental Indenture |
February 1, 1982 |
Thirty-sixth Supplemental Indenture |
December 1, 1982 |
Thirty-seventh Supplemental Indenture |
February 1, 1983 |
Thirty-eighth Supplemental Indenture |
December 1, 1984 |
Thirty-ninth Supplemental Indenture |
December 1, 1985 |
Fortieth Supplemental Indenture |
July 1, 1986 |
Forty-first Supplemental Indenture |
July 1, 1989 |
Forty-second Supplemental Indenture |
February 1, 1990 |
Forty-third Supplemental Indenture |
October 1, 1990 |
Forty-fourth Supplemental Indenture |
November 1, 1990 |
Forty-fifth Supplemental Indenture |
January 1, 1991 |
Forty-sixth Supplemental Indenture |
August 1, 1992 |
Forty-seventh Supplemental Indenture |
November 1, 1992 |
Forty-eighth Supplemental Indenture |
June 15, 1993 |
Forty-ninth Supplemental Indenture |
August 1, 1993 |
Fiftieth Supplemental Indenture |
October 1, 1993 |
Fifty-first Supplemental Indenture |
October 1, 1993 |
Fifty-second Supplemental Indenture |
June 15, 1994 |
Fifty-third Supplemental Indenture |
March 1, 1996 |
Fifty-fourth Supplemental Indenture |
March 1, 1997 |
Fifty-fifth Supplemental Indenture |
March 1, 2000 |
Fifty-sixth Supplemental Indenture |
July 1, 2001 |
Fifty-seventh Supplemental Indenture |
March 1, 2002 |
Fifty-eighth Supplemental Indenture |
November 1, 2002 |
Fifty-ninth Supplemental Indenture |
May 1, 2003 |
Sixtieth Supplemental Indenture |
June 1, 2003 |
Sixty-first Supplemental Indenture |
June 15, 2003 |
Sixty-second Supplemental Indenture |
October 1, 2004 |
Sixty-third Supplemental Indenture |
January 1, 2005 |
Sixty-fourth Supplemental Indenture |
March 1, 2005 |
which supplemental indentures were appropriately filed or recorded in various official records in the States of Arkansas, Missouri, Tennessee and Wyoming, as applicable; and
WHEREAS, in addition to the property described in the Mortgage, as heretofore supplemented, the Company has acquired certain other property, rights and interests in property; and
WHEREAS, the Company has heretofore issued, in accordance with the provisions of the Mortgage, as supplemented, the following series of First Mortgage Bonds:
Series |
Principal |
Principal |
3 1/8% Series due 1974 |
$30,000,000 |
None |
2 7/8% Series due 1977 |
11,000,000 |
None |
3 1/8% Series due 1978 |
7,500,000 |
None |
2 7/8% Series due 1979 |
8,700,000 |
None |
2 7/8% Series due 1980 |
6,000,000 |
None |
3 5/8% Series due 1981 |
8,000,000 |
None |
3 1/2% Series due 1982 |
15,000,000 |
None |
4 1/4% Series due 1983 |
18,000,000 |
None |
3 1/4% Series due 1984 |
7,500,000 |
None |
3 3/8% Series due 1985 |
18,000,000 |
None |
5 5/8% Series due 1989 |
15,000,000 |
None |
4 7/8% Series due 1991 |
12,000,000 |
None |
4 3/8% Series due 1993 |
15,000,000 |
None |
4 5/8% Series due 1995 |
25,000,000 |
None |
5 3/4% Series due 1996 |
25,000,000 |
None |
5 7/8% Series due 1997 |
30,000,000 |
None |
7 3/8% Series due 1998 |
15,000,000 |
None |
9 1/4% Series due 1999 |
25,000,000 |
None |
9 5/8% Series due 2000 |
25,000,000 |
None |
7 5/8% Series due 2001 |
30,000,000 |
None |
8 % Series due August 1, 2001 |
30,000,000 |
None |
7 3/4% Series due 2002 |
35,000,000 |
None |
7 1/2% Series due December 1, 2002 |
15,000,000 |
None |
8 % Series due 2003 |
40,000,000 |
None |
8 1/8% Series due December 1, 2003 |
40,000,000 |
None |
10 1/2% Series due 2004 |
40,000,000 |
None |
9 1/4% Series due November 1, 1981 |
60,000,000 |
None |
10 1/8% Series due July 1, 2005 |
40,000,000 |
None |
9 1/8% Series due December 1, 2007 |
75,000,000 |
None |
9 7/8% Series due July 1, 2008 |
75,000,000 |
None |
10 1/4% Series due February 1, 2009 |
60,000,000 |
None |
16 1/8% Series due December 1, 1986 |
70,000,000 |
None |
4 1/2% Series due September 1, 1983 |
1,202,000 |
None |
5 1/2% Series due January 1, 1988 |
598,310 |
None |
5 5/8% Series due May 1, 1990 |
1,400,000 |
None |
6 1/4% Series due December 1, 1996 |
3,560,000 |
None |
9 3/4% Series due September 1, 2000 |
4,600,000 |
None |
8 3/4% Series due March 1, 1998 |
9,800,000 |
None |
17 3/8% Series due August 1, 1988 |
75,000,000 |
None |
16 1/2% Series due February 1, 1991 |
80,000,000 |
None |
13 3/8% Series due December 1, 2012 |
75,000,000 |
None |
13 1/4% Series due February 1, 2013 |
25,000,000 |
None |
14 1/8% Series due December 1, 2014 |
100,000,000 |
None |
Pollution Control Series A |
128,800,000 |
None |
10 1/4% Series due July 1, 2016 |
50,000,000 |
None |
9 3/4% Series due July 1, 2019 |
75,000,000 |
None |
10% Series due February 1, 2020 |
150,000,000 |
None |
10 3/8% Series due October 1, 2020 |
175,000,000 |
None |
Solid Waste Disposal Series A |
21,066,667 |
None |
Solid Waste Disposal Series B |
28,440,000 |
None |
7 1/2% Series due August 1, 2007 |
100,000,000 |
None |
7.90% Series due November 1, 2002 |
25,000,000 |
None |
8.70% Series due November 1, 2022 |
25,000,000 |
None |
Pollution Control Series B |
46,875,000 |
46,875,000 |
6.65% Series due August 1, 2005 |
115,000,000 |
None |
6 % Series due October 1, 2003 |
155,000,000 |
None |
7 % Series due October 1, 2023 |
175,000,000 |
None |
Pollution Control Series C |
20,319,000 |
20,319,000 |
Pollution Control Series D |
9,586,400 |
9,586,400 |
8 3/4% Series due March 1, 2026 |
85,000,000 |
None |
7% Series due March 1, 2002 |
85,000,000 |
None |
7.72 % Series due March 1, 2003 |
100,000,000 |
None |
6 1/8 % Series due July 1, 2005 |
100,000,000 |
100,000,000 |
6.70% Series due April 1, 2032 |
100,000,000 |
100,000,000 |
6.00% Series due November 1, 2032 |
100,000,000 |
100,000,000 |
5.40% Series due May 1, 2018 |
150,000,000 |
150,000,000 |
5.90% Series due June 1, 2033 |
100,000,000 |
100,000,000 |
5% Series due July 1, 2018 |
115,000,000 |
115,000,000 |
6.38% Series due November 1, 2034 |
60,000,000 |
60,000,000 |
5.66% Series due February 1, 2025 |
175,000,000 |
175,000,000 |
5% Pollution Control Series E |
45,000,000 |
45,000,000 |
which bonds are also hereinafter sometimes called bonds of the First through Seventy-first Series, respectively; and
WHEREAS, Section 8 of the Mortgage provides that the form of each series of bonds (other than the First Series) issued thereunder and of the coupons to be attached to coupon bonds of such series shall be established by Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company and that the form of such series, as established by said Board of Directors, shall specify the descriptive title of the bonds and various other terms thereof, and may also contain such provisions not inconsistent with the provisions of the Mortgage as the Board of Directors may, in its discretion, cause to be inserted therein expressing or referring to the terms and conditions upon which such bonds are to be issued and/or secured under the Mortgage; and
WHEREAS, Section 120 of the Mortgage provides, among other things, that any power, privilege or right expressly or impliedly reserved to or in any way conferred upon the Company by any provision of the Mortgage, whether such power, privilege or right is in any way restricted or is unrestricted, may be in whole or in part waived or surrendered or subjected to any restriction if at the time unrestricted or to additional restriction if already restricted, and the Company may enter into any further covenants, limitations or restrictions for the benefit of any one or more series of bonds issued thereunder, or the Company may cure any ambiguity contained therein or in any supplemental indenture, or may establish the terms and provisions of any series of bonds other than said First Series, by an instrument in writing executed and acknowledged by the Company in such manner as would be necessary to entitle a conveyance of real estate to record in all of the states in which any property at the time subject to the lien of the Mortgage shall be situated; and
WHEREAS, the Company now desires to create a new series of bonds, hereinafter referred to as bonds of the Seventy-second Series, unless the context otherwise requires, and (pursuant to the provisions of Section 120 of the Mortgage) to add to its covenants and agreements contained in the Mortgage, as heretofore supplemented, certain other covenants and agreements to be observed by it and to alter and amend in certain respects the covenants and provisions contained in the Mortgage, as heretofore supplemented; and
WHEREAS, the execution and delivery by the Company of this Sixty-fifth Supplemental Indenture, and the terms of the bonds of the Seventy-second Series, have been duly authorized by the Board of Directors of the Company by appropriate Resolutions of said Board of Directors.
NOW, THEREFORE, THIS INDENTURE WITNESSETH:
That the Company, in consideration of the premises and of One Dollar to it duly paid by the Trustees at or before the ensealing and delivery of these presents, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, and in further evidence of assurance of the estate, title and rights of the Trustees and in order further to secure the payment of both the principal of and interest and premium, if any, on the bonds from time to time issued under the Mortgage, according to their tenor and effect and the performance of all the provisions of the Mortgage (including any instruments supplemental thereto and any modifications made as in the Mortgage provided) and of said bonds, hereby grants, bargains, sells, releases, conveys, assigns, transfers, mortgages, hypothecates, affects, pledges, sets over and confirms (subject, however, to Excepted Encumbrances as defined in Section 6 of the Mortgage) unto The Bank of New York Trust Company, National Association (as to property, real or personal, situated or being i n Missouri) and Stanley Burg (but, as to property, real or personal, situated or being in Missouri, only to the extent of his legal capacity to hold the same for the purposes hereof) and (to the extent of its legal capacity to hold the same for the purposes hereof) to Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustees under the Mortgage, and to their successor or successors in said trust, and to them and their successors and assigns forever, all property, real, personal or mixed, of any kind or nature acquired by the Company after the date of the execution and delivery of the Mortgage (except any herein or in the Mortgage, as heretofore supplemented, expressly excepted), now owned or, subject to the provisions of Section 87 of the Mortgage, hereafter acquired by the Company (by purchase, consolidation, merger, donation, construction, erection or in any other way) and wheresoever situated, including (without in anywise limiting or impairing by the enumeration of the same the scope and intent of the foregoing o r of any general description contained in this Sixty-fifth Supplemental Indenture) all lands, power sites, flowage rights, water rights, water locations, water appropriations, ditches, flumes, reservoirs, reservoir sites, canals, raceways, dams, dam sites, aqueducts, and all other rights or means for appropriating, conveying, storing and supplying water; all rights of way and roads; all plants for the generation of electricity by steam, water and/or other power; all power houses, gas plants, street lighting systems, standards and other equipment incidental thereto; all street and interurban railway and transportation lines and systems, terminal systems and facilities; all bridges, culverts, tracks, railways, sidings, spurs, wyes, roadbeds, trestles and viaducts; all overground and underground trolleys and feeder wires; all telephone, radio and television systems, air-conditioning systems and equipment incidental thereto, water works, water systems, steam heat and hot water plants, substations, lines, service and supply systems, ice or refrigeration plants and equipment, offices, buildings and other structures and the equipment thereof, all machinery, engines, boilers, dynamos, electric, gas and other machines, regulators, meters, transformers, generators, motors, electrical, gas and mechanical appliances, conduits, cables, water, steam heat, gas or other pipes, gas mains and pipes, service pipes, fittings, valves and connections, pole and transmission lines, wires, cables, tools, implements, apparatus, furniture and chattels; all municipal and other franchises, consents or permits; all lines for the transmission and distribution of electric current, gas, steam heat or water for any purpose including towers, poles, wires, cables, pipes, conduits, ducts and all apparatus for use in connection therewith; all real estate, lands, easements, servitudes, licenses, permits, franchises, privileges, rights of way and other rights in or relating to real estate or the occupancy of the same and (except as herein or in the M ortgage, as heretofore supplemented, expressly excepted) all the right, title and interest of the Company in and to all other property of any kind or nature appertaining to and/or used and/or occupied and/or enjoyed in connection with any property hereinbefore or in the Mortgage, as heretofore supplemented, described.
TOGETHER WITH all and singular the tenements, hereditaments, prescriptions, servitudes and appurtenances belonging or in anywise appertaining to the aforesaid property or any part thereof, with the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders and (subject to the provisions of Section 57 of the Mortgage) the tolls, rents, revenues, issues, earnings, income, product and profits thereof and all the estate, right, title and interest and claim whatsoever, at law as well as in equity, which the Company now has or may hereafter acquire in and to the aforesaid property and franchises and every part and parcel thereof.
IT IS HEREBY AGREED by the Company that, subject to the provisions of Section 87 of the Mortgage, all the property, rights and franchises acquired by the Company (by purchase, consolidation, merger, donation, construction, erection or in any other way) after the date hereof, except any herein or in the Mortgage, as heretofore supplemented, expressly excepted, shall be and are as fully granted and conveyed hereby and by the Mortgage and as fully embraced within the lien hereof and the lien of the Mortgage, as heretofore supplemented, as if such property, rights and franchises were now owned by the Company and were specifically described herein or in the Mortgage and conveyed hereby or thereby.
PROVIDED THAT the following are not and are not intended to be now or hereafter granted, bargained, sold, released, conveyed, assigned, transferred, mortgaged, hypothecated, affected, pledged, set over or confirmed hereunder and are hereby expressly excepted from the lien and operation of this Sixty-fifth Supplemental Indenture and from the lien and operation of the Mortgage, as heretofore supplemented, viz: (1) cash, shares of stock, bonds, notes and other obligations and other securities not hereafter specifically pledged, paid, deposited, delivered or held under the Mortgage or covenanted so to be; (2) merchandise, equipment, materials or supplies held for the purpose of sale in the usual course of business or for the purpose of repairing or replacing (in whole or in part) any street cars, rolling stock, trolley coaches, motor coaches, buses, automobiles or other vehicles or aircraft, and fuel, oil and similar materials and supplies consumable in the operation of any properties of the C ompany; street cars, rolling stock, trolley coaches, motor coaches, buses, automobiles and other vehicles and all aircraft; (3) bills, notes and accounts receivable, judgments, demands and choses in action, and all contracts, leases and operating agreements not specifically pledged under the Mortgage, as heretofore supplemented, or covenanted so to be; the Company's contractual rights or other interest in or with respect to tires not owned by the Company; (4) the last day of the term of any lease or leasehold which may hereafter become subject to the lien of the Mortgage; (5) electric energy, gas, ice, and other materials or products generated, manufactured, produced or purchased by the Company for sale, distribution or use in the ordinary course of its business; all timber, minerals, mineral rights and royalties; (6) the Company's franchise to be a corporation; (7) the properties heretofore sold or in the process of being sold by the Company and heretofore released from the Mortgage and Deed of Trust dated as of October 1, 1926 from Arkansas Power & Light Company to Guaranty Trust Company of New York, trustee, and specifically described in a release instrument executed by Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as trustee, dated October 13, 1938, which release has heretofore been delivered by the said trustee to the Company and recorded by the Company in the office of the Recorder for Garland County, Arkansas, in Record Book 227, Page 1, all of said properties being located in Garland County, Arkansas; and (8) any property heretofore released pursuant to any provisions of the Mortgage and not heretofore disposed of by the Company; provided, however, that the property and rights expressly excepted from the lien and operation of the Mortgage, as heretofore supplemented, and this Sixty-fifth Supplemental Indenture in the above subdivisions (2) and (3) shall (to the extent permitted by law) cease to be so excepted in the event and as of the date that any or all of the Trustees or a receiver or trustee shall enter upon and take possession of the Mortgaged and Pledged Property in the manner provided in Article XIII of the Mortgage by reason of the occurrence of a Default as defined in Section 65 thereof.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD all such properties, real, personal and mixed, granted, bargained, sold, released, conveyed, assigned, transferred, mortgaged, hypothecated, affected, pledged, set over or confirmed by the Company as aforesaid, or intended so to be, unto The Bank of New York Trust Company, National Association (as to property, real or personal, situated or being in Missouri), and unto Stanley Burg (but, as to property, real or personal, situated or being in Missouri, only to the extent of his legal capacity to hold the same for the purposes hereof) and (to the extent of its legal capacity to hold the same for the purposes hereof) unto Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustees, and their successors and assigns forever.
IN TRUST NEVERTHELESS, for the same purposes and upon the same terms, trusts and conditions and subject to and with the same provisos and covenants as are set forth in the Mortgage, as heretofore supplemented, this Sixty-fifth Supplemental Indenture being supplemental to the Mortgage.
AND IT IS HEREBY COVENANTED by the Company that all the terms, conditions, provisos, covenants and provisions contained in the Mortgage, as heretofore supplemented, shall affect and apply to the property hereinbefore described and conveyed and to the estate, rights, obligations and duties of the Company and Trustees and the beneficiaries of the trust with respect to said property, and to the Trustees and their successors in the trust in the same manner and with the same effect as if said property had been owned by the Company at the time of the execution of the Mortgage, and had been specifically and at length described in and conveyed to said Trustees, by the Mortgage as a part of the property therein stated to be conveyed.
The Company further covenants and agrees to and with the Trustees and their successors in said trust under the Mortgage, as follows:
ARTICLE I
SEVENTY-SECOND SERIES OF BONDS
SECTIION I. There shall be a series of bonds designated "4.50% Series due June 1, 2010" (herein sometimes called the "Seventy-second Series"), each of which shall also bear the descriptive title "First Mortgage Bond", and the form thereof, which shall be established by Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company, shall contain suitable provisions with respect to the matters hereinafter in this Section specified. Bonds of the Seventy-second Series (which shall be initially issued in the aggregate principal amount of $100,000,000) shall mature on June 1, 2010, shall be issued as fully registered bonds in the denomination of One Thousand Dollars and, at the option of the Company, in any multiple or multiples of One Thousand Dollars (the exercise of such option to be evidenced by the execution and delivery thereof), shall bear interest at the rate of 4.50% per annum, the first interest payment to be made on December 1, 2005, for the period from M ay 26, 2005 to December 1, 2005 with subsequent interest payments payable semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 of each year (each an "Interest Payment Date"), shall be dated as in Section 10 of the Mortgage provided, and the principal of and interest on each said bond shall be payable at the office or agency of the Company in the Borough of Manhattan, The City of New York, in such coin or currency of the United States of America as at the time of payment is legal tender for public and private debts.
Interest on the bonds of the Seventy-second Series will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months. In any case where any Interest Payment Date, redemption date or maturity of any bond of the Seventy-second Series shall not be a Business Day, then payment of interest or principal need not be made on such date, but may be made on the next succeeding Business Day, with the same force and effect, and in the same amount, as if made on the corresponding Interest Payment Date or redemption date, or at maturity, as the case may be, and, if such payment is made or duly provided for on such Business Day, no interest shall accrue on the amount so payable for the period from and after such Interest Payment Date, redemption date or maturity, as the case may be, to such Business Day. "Business Day" means any day, other than a Saturday or a Sunday, or a day on which banking institutions in The City of New York are authorized or required by law or executive order to rem ain closed or a day on which the corporate trust office of the Corporate Trustee is closed for business.
So long as all of the bonds of the Seventy-second Series are held by The Depository Trust Company or its nominee, or a successor thereof, the record date for the payment of interest on the bonds of the Seventy-second Series shall be the Business Day immediately preceding the corresponding Interest Payment Date; provided, however, that the record date for the payment of interest which is paid after such Interest Payment Date, shall be the Business Day immediately preceding the date on which such interest is paid. Interest on the bonds of the Seventy-second Series shall be paid to the Person in whose name such bonds of the Seventy-second Series are registered at the close of business on the record date for the corresponding Interest Payment Date.
(I) Form of Bonds of the Seventy-second Series.
The Bonds of the Seventy-second Series, and the Corporate Trustee's authentication certificate to be executed on the Bonds of the Seventy-second Series, shall be in substantially the following forms, respectively:
[FORM OF FACE OF BOND OF THE SEVENTY-SECOND SERIES]
[depository legend]
Unless this Certificate is presented by an authorized representative of The Depository Trust Company, a New York corporation ("DTC"), to the Company or its agent for registration of transfer, exchange, or payment, and any certificate issued is registered in the name of Cede & Co. or in such other name as is requested by an authorized representative of DTC (and any payment is made to Cede & Co. or to such other entity as is requested by an authorized representative of DTC), ANY TRANSFER, PLEDGE, OR OTHER USE HEREOF FOR VALUE OR OTHERWISE BY OR TO ANY PERSON IS WRONGFUL inasmuch as the registered owner hereof, Cede & Co., has an interest herein.
(TEMPORARY REGISTERED BOND)
No. TR-1
$100,000,000 CUSIP 29364D AM 2
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC.
FIRST MORTGAGE BOND, 4.50% SERIES
DUE JUNE 1, 2010
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC., a corporation of the State of Arkansas (hereinafter called the Company), for value received, hereby promises to pay to CEDE & CO. or registered assigns, on June 1, 2010 at the office or agency of the Company in the Borough of Manhattan, The City of New York,
ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS
in such coin or currency of the United States of America as at the time of payment is legal tender for public and private debts, and to pay to the registered owner hereof interest thereon from May 26, 2005, if the date of this bond is prior to December 1, 2005, or if the date of this bond is on or after December 1, 2005, from the June 1 or December 1 next preceding the date of this bond to which interest has been paid (unless the date hereof is an interest payment date to which interest has been paid, in which case from the date hereof), at the rate of 4.50% per annum in like coin or currency at said office or agency on June 1 and December 1 of each year, commencing December 1, 2005, until the principal of this bond shall have become due and payable, and to pay interest on any overdue principal and (to the extent that payment of such interest is enforceable under the applicable law) on any overdue installment of interest at the rate of 6% per annum. So long as this bond is held by The Dep ository Trust Company or its nominee, or a successor thereof, the record date for the payment of interest hereon shall be the Business Day (as defined in the Sixty-fifth Supplemental Indenture referred to below) immediately preceding the date on which interest is due; provided, however, that the record date for the payment of interest which is paid after the date on which such interest is due, shall be the Business Day immediately preceding the date on which such interest is paid. Interest hereon shall be paid to the Person in whose name this bond is registered at the close of business on the record date for the payment of such interest. If any interest payment date for this bond falls on a day that is not a Business Day, the payment of interest will be made on the next succeeding Business Day, and no interest on such payment shall accrue for the period from and after such interest payment date. If the maturity date or any redemption date of this bond falls on a day that is not a Business Day, the payment of principal and interest (to the extent payable with respect to the principal being redeemed if on a redemption date) will be made on the next succeeding Business Day, and no interest on such payment shall accrue for the period from and after the maturity date or such redemption date.
This bond is a temporary bond and is one of an issue of bonds of the Company issuable in series and is one of a series known as its First Mortgage Bonds, 4.50% Series due June 1, 2010, all bonds of all series issued and to be issued under and equally secured (except insofar as any sinking or other fund, established in accordance with the provisions of the Mortgage hereinafter mentioned, may afford additional security for the bonds of any particular series) by a Mortgage and Deed of Trust (herein, together with any indenture supplemental thereto, including the Sixty-fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 1, 2005, called the Mortgage), dated as of October 1, 1944, executed by the Company to Guaranty Trust Company of New York (Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, successor) and Henry A. Theis (Stanley Burg, successor) and, as to property, real or personal, situated or being in Missouri, Marvin A. Mueller (The Bank of New York Trust Company, National Association, successor), as Trustees . Reference is made to the Mortgage for a description of the property mortgaged and pledged, the nature and extent of the security, the rights of the holders of the bonds and of the Trustees in respect thereof, the duties and immunities of the Trustees and the terms and conditions upon which the bonds are and are to be secured and the circumstances under which additional bonds may be issued. With the consent of the Company and to the extent permitted by and as provided in the Mortgage, the rights and obligations of the Company and/or the rights of the holders of the bonds and/or coupons and/or the terms and provisions of the Mortgage may be modified or altered by such affirmative vote or votes of the holders of bonds then outstanding as are specified in the Mortgage.
The principal hereof may be declared or may become due prior to the maturity date hereinbefore named on the conditions, in the manner and at the time set forth in the Mortgage, upon the occurrence of a default as in the Mortgage provided.
In the manner prescribed in the Mortgage, this bond is transferable by the registered owner hereof in person, or by his duly authorized attorney, at the office or agency of the Company in the Borough of Manhattan, The City of New York, upon surrender and cancellation of this bond, together with a written instrument of transfer duly executed by the registered owner or by his duly authorized attorney, and thereupon a new fully registered temporary or definitive bond of the same series for a like principal amount will be issued to the transferee in exchange herefor as provided in the Mortgage. The Company and the Trustees may deem and treat the person in whose name this bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes and neither the Company nor the Trustees shall be affected by any notice to the contrary.
In the manner prescribed in the Mortgage, any bonds of this series, upon surrender thereof for cancellation at the office or agency of the Company in the Borough of Manhattan, The City of New York, are exchangeable for a like aggregate principal amount of bonds of the same series of other authorized denominations.
In the manner prescribed in the Mortgage, this temporary bond is exchangeable at the office or agency of the Company in the Borough of Manhattan, The City of New York, without charge, for a definitive bond or bonds of the same series of a like aggregate principal amount when such definitive bonds are prepared and ready for delivery.
As provided in the Mortgage, the Company shall not be required to make transfers or exchanges of bonds of any series for a period of ten days next preceding any interest payment date for bonds of said series, or next preceding any designation of bonds of said series to be redeemed, and the Company shall not be required to make transfers or exchanges of any bonds designated in whole or in part for redemption.
The bonds of this series are subject to redemption as provided in the Sixty-fifth Supplemental Indenture.
No recourse shall be had for the payment of the principal of or interest on this bond against any incorporator or any past, present or future subscriber to the capital stock, stockholder, officer or director of the Company or of any predecessor or successor corporation, as such, either directly or through the Company or any predecessor or successor corporation, under any rule of law, statute or constitution or by the enforcement of any assessment or otherwise, all such liability of incorporators, subscribers, stockholders, officers and directors being released by the holder or owner hereof by the acceptance of this bond and being likewise waived and released by the terms of the Mortgage.
This bond shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of New York.
This bond shall not become obligatory until Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, the Corporate Trustee under the Mortgage, or its successor thereunder, shall have signed the form of authentication certificate endorsed hereon.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. has caused this bond to be signed in its corporate name by its President or one of its Vice Presidents by his signature or a facsimile thereof, and its corporate seal to be impressed or imprinted hereon and attested by its Secretary or one of its Assistant Secretaries, by his signature or a facsimile thereof, on May 26, 2005.
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC.
By_____________________________
Steven C. McNeal
Vice President and Treasurer
Attest:
___________________________
Christopher T. Screen
Assistant Secretary
CORPORATE TRUSTEE'S AUTHENTICATION CERTIFICATE
This bond is one of the bonds, of the series herein designated, described or provided for in the within-mentioned Mortgage.
DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS,
as Corporate Trustee
By ___________________________
Authorized Officer
(II) The bonds of the Seventy-second Series shall be redeemable at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, on not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days notice prior to the date fixed for redemption, at any time prior to maturity of the bonds of the Seventy-second Series, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (a) 100% of the principal amount of such bonds of the Seventy-second Series being redeemed and (b) as determined by the Independent Investment Banker, the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on such bonds of the Seventy-second Series being redeemed (excluding the portion of any such interest accrued to the redemption date), discounted (for purposes of determining such present values) to such redemption date on a semi-annual basis (assuming a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) at the Adjusted Treasury Rate plus 0.25%, plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest thereon to such redemption date.
As used herein, the following defined terms shall have the respective meanings specified unless the context clearly requires otherwise:
The term "Adjusted Treasury Rate" shall mean, with respect to any redemption date:
(1) the yield, under the heading which represents the average for the immediately preceding week, appearing in the most recently published statistical release designated "H.15(519)" or any successor publication which is published weekly by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and which establishes yields on actively traded United States Treasury securities adjusted to constant maturity under the caption "Treasury Constant Maturities," for the maturity corresponding to the Comparable Treasury Issue (if no maturity is within three months before or after June 1, 2010, yields for the two published maturities most closely corresponding to the Comparable Treasury Issue shall be determined and the Adjusted Treasury Rate shall be interpolated or extrapolated from such yields on a straight line basis, rounding to the nearest month); or
(2) if such release (or any successor release) is not published during the week preceding the calculation date for the Adjusted Treasury Rate or does not contain such yields, the rate per annum equal to the semi-annual equivalent yield to maturity of the Comparable Treasury Issue, calculated using a price for the Comparable Treasury Issue (expressed as a percentage of its principal amount) equal to the Comparable Treasury Price for such redemption date.
The Adjusted Treasury Rate shall be calculated on the third Business Day preceding the redemption date.
The term "Comparable Treasury Issue" shall mean the United States Treasury security selected by the Independent Investment Banker as having a maturity comparable to June 1, 2010 that would be utilized, at the time of selection and in accordance with customary financial practice, in pricing new issues of corporate debt securities of comparable maturity to June 1, 2010.
The term "Comparable Treasury Price" shall mean, with respect to any redemption date, (i) the average of five Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations for such redemption date after excluding the highest and lowest such Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations or (ii) if the Independent Investment Banker obtains fewer than five such Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations, the average of all such Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations.
The term "Independent Investment Banker" shall mean one of the Reference Treasury Dealers that the Company appoints to act as the Independent Investment Banker from time to time, or, if any of such firms is unwilling or unable to select the Comparable Treasury Issue, an independent investment banking institution of national standing appointed by the Company.
The term "Reference Treasury Dealer" shall mean (i) BNY Capital Markets, Inc. and KeyBanc Capital Markets, a Division of McDonald Investments Inc. and their respective successors; provided, however, that if any of the foregoing shall cease to be a primary U.S. Government securities dealer in New York City (a "Primary Treasury Dealer"), the Company shall substitute therefor another Primary Treasury Dealer, and (ii) any other Primary Treasury Dealer selected by the Independent Investment Banker after consultation with the Company.
The term "Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations" shall mean, with respect to each Reference Treasury Dealer and any redemption date, the average, as determined by the Independent Investment Banker, of the bid and asked prices for the Comparable Treasury Issue (expressed in each case as a percentage of its principal amount) quoted in writing to the Independent Investment Banker at 5:00 p.m. on the third Business Day preceding such redemption date.
(III) At the option of the registered owner, any bonds of the Seventy-second Series, upon surrender thereof for cancellation at the office or agency of the Company in the Borough of Manhattan, The City of New York, shall be exchangeable for a like aggregate principal amount of bonds of the same series of other authorized denominations.
Bonds of the Seventy-second Series shall be transferable, upon the surrender thereof for cancellation, together with a written instrument of transfer in form approved by the registrar duly executed by the registered owner or by his duly authorized attorney, at the office or agency of the Company in the Borough of Manhattan, The City of New York.
Upon any exchange or transfer of bonds of the Seventy-second Series, the Company may make a charge therefor sufficient to reimburse it for any tax or taxes or other governmental charge, as provided in Section 12 of the Mortgage, but the Company hereby waives any right to make a charge in addition thereto for any exchange or transfer of bonds of said Series.
Upon the delivery of this Sixty-fifth Supplemental Indenture and upon compliance with the applicable provisions of the Mortgage, as heretofore supplemented, there shall be an initial issue of bonds of the Seventy-second Series for the aggregate principal amount of $100,000,000.
ARTICLE II
DIVIDEND COVENANT
SECTION 2. The Company covenants that, so long as any of the bonds of the Seventy-second Series are Outstanding, it will not declare any dividends on its Common Stock (other than (a) a dividend payable solely in shares of its Common Stock, or (b) a dividend payable in cash in cases where, concurrently with the payment of such dividend, an amount in cash equal to such dividend is received by the Company as a capital contribution or as the proceeds of the issue and sale of shares of its Common Stock) or make any distribution on outstanding shares of its Common Stock or purchase or otherwise acquire for value any outstanding shares of its Common Stock (otherwise than in exchange for or out of the proceeds from the sale of other shares of its Common Stock) if, after such dividend, distribution, purchase or acquisition, the aggregate amount of such dividends, distributions, purchases and acquisitions paid or made subsequent to April 30, 2005 (other than any dividend declare d by the Company on or before April 30, 2005) exceeds (without giving effect to (i) any of such dividends, distributions, purchases or acquisitions, or (ii) any net transfers from retained earnings to stated capital accounts) the sum of (a) the aggregate amount credited subsequent to April 30, 2005 to retained earnings, (b) $350,000,000 and (c) such additional amount as shall be authorized or approved, upon application by the Company, by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or by any successor commission thereto, under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935.
For the purposes of this Section 2 the aggregate amount credited subsequent to April 30, 2005 to retained earnings shall be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and practices after making provision for dividends upon any preferred stock of the Company, accumulated subsequent to such date, but in such determination there shall not be considered charges to retained earnings applicable to the period prior to April 30, 2005, including, but not limited to, charges to retained earnings for write-offs or write-downs of book values of assets owned by the Company on April 30, 2005.
ARTICLE III
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
SECTION 3. The holders of the bonds of the Seventy-second Series shall be deemed to have consented and agreed that the Company may, but shall not be obligated to, fix a record date for the purpose of determining the holders of the bonds of the Seventy-second Series entitled to consent to any amendment or supplement to the Mortgage or the waiver of any provision thereof or any act to be performed thereunder. If a record date is fixed, those persons who were holders at such record date (or their duly designated proxies), and only those persons, shall be entitled to consent to such amendment, supplement or waiver or to revoke any consent previously given, whether or not such persons continue to be holders after such record date. No such consent shall be valid or effective for more than 90 days after such record date.
SECTION 4. Subject to the amendments provided for in this Sixty-fifth Supplemental Indenture, the terms defined in the Mortgage and the First through Sixty-fourth Supplemental Indentures shall, for all purposes of this Sixty-fifth Supplemental Indenture, have the meanings specified in the Mortgage and the First through Sixty-fourth Supplemental Indentures.
SECTION 5. The Trustees hereby accept the trusts herein declared, provided, created or supplemented and agree to perform the same upon the terms and conditions herein and in the Mortgage and in the First through Sixty-fourth Supplemental Indentures set forth and upon the following terms and conditions:
The Trustees shall not be responsible in any manner whatsoever for or in respect of the validity or sufficiency of this Sixty-fifth Supplemental Indenture or for or in respect of the recitals contained herein, all of which recitals are made by the Company solely. In general each and every term and condition contained in Article XVII of the Mortgage, as heretofore amended, shall apply to and form part of this Sixty-fifth Supplemental Indenture with the same force and effect as if the same were herein set forth in full with such omissions, variations and insertions, if any, as may be appropriate to make the same conform to the provisions of this Sixty-fifth Supplemental Indenture.
SECTION 6. Whenever in this Sixty-fifth Supplemental Indenture either of the parties hereto is named or referred to, this shall, subject to the provisions of Articles XVI and XVII of the Mortgage, as heretofore amended, be deemed to include the successors and assigns of such party, and all the covenants and agreements in this Sixty-fifth Supplemental Indenture contained by or on behalf of the Company, or by or on behalf of the Trustees, or any of them, shall, subject as aforesaid, bind and inure to the respective benefits of the respective successors and assigns of such parties, whether so expressed or not.
SECTION 7. Nothing in this Sixty-fifth Supplemental Indenture, expressed or implied, is intended, or shall be construed, to confer upon, or give to, any person, firm or corporation, other than the parties hereto and the holders of the bonds and coupons Outstanding under the Mortgage, any right, remedy or claim under or by reason of this Sixty-fifth Supplemental Indenture or any covenant, condition, stipulation, promise or agreement hereof, and all the covenants, conditions, stipulations, promises or agreements in this Sixty-fifth Supplemental Indenture contained by or on behalf of the Company shall be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the parties hereto, and of the holders of the bonds and of the coupons Outstanding under the Mortgage.
SECTION 8. This Sixty-fifth Supplemental Indenture shall be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument.
SECTION 9. This Sixty-fifth Supplemental Indenture shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of New York.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. has caused its corporate name to be hereunto affixed, and this instrument to be signed and sealed by its President or one of its Vice Presidents, and its corporate seal to be attested by its Secretary or one of its Assistant Secretaries for and in its behalf, and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS has caused its corporate name to be hereunto affixed, and this instrument to be signed and sealed by, one of its Vice Presidents or one of its Assistant Vice Presidents, and its corporate seal to be attested by one of its Associates for and in its behalf, and STANLEY BURG has hereunto set his hand and affixed his seal, and THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION has caused its corporate name to be hereunto affixed, and this instrument to be signed and sealed by one of its Vice Presidents or one of its Assistant Vice Presidents, and its corporate seal to be attested by one of its Assistant Secretaries or one of its Assistant Treasurers or one of its Assistant Vice Presidents for and in its behalf, as of the day and year first above written.
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC.
By: /s/ Steven C. McNeal
Steven C. McNeal
Vice President and Treasurer
Attest:
/s/ Christopher T. Screen
Christopher T. Screen
Assistant Secretary
Executed, sealed and delivered by
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC.
in the presence of:
/s/ Christina M. Edwards
Christina M. Edwards
/s/ Shannon K. Ryerson
Shannon K. Ryerson
DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS,
As Corporate Trustee
By: /s/ Susan Johnson
Susan Johnson
Vice President
Attest:
/s/ Irina Golovashchuk
Irina Golovashchuk
Associate
STANLEY BURG,
As Co-Trustee
/s/ Stanley Burg_________________[L.S.]
Executed, sealed and delivered by
DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS and STANLEY BURG
in the presence of:
/s/ Yana Kalachikova
Yana Kalachikova
/s/ Victor Carneiro
Victor Carneiro
THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST
COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
As Co-Trustee as to property, real or
personal, situated or being in Missouri
By: /s/ Cynthia M. Moore
Cynthia M. Moore
Vice President
Attest:
/s/ Elizabeth Dean
Elizabeth Dean
Vice President
Executed, sealed and delivered by
THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
in the presence of:
/s/ Robert D. Smith
Robert D. Smith
/s/ Paula Starr
Paula Starr
STATE OF LOUISIANA )
) SS.:
PARISH OF ORLEANS )
On this 24th day of May, 2005, before me, Jennifer Favalora, a Notary Public duly commissioned, qualified and acting within and for said Parish and State, appeared in person the within named Steven C. McNeal and Christopher T. Screen, to me personally well known, who stated that they were the Vice President and Treasurer and Assistant Secretary, respectively, of ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC., a corporation, and were duly authorized in their respective capacities to execute the foregoing instrument for and in the name and behalf of said corporation, and further stated and acknowledged that they had so signed, executed and delivered said foregoing instrument for the consideration, uses and purposes therein mentioned and set forth.
On the 24th day of May, 2005, before me personally came Steven C. McNeal, to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at 7903 Winner's Circle, Mandeville, Louisiana 70448; that he is the Vice President and Treasurer of ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC., one of the corporations described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation, and that he signed his name thereto by like order.
On the 24th day of May, 2005, before me appeared Christopher T. Screen, to me personally known, who, being by me duly sworn, did say that he is the Assistant Secretary of ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC., and that the seal affixed to the foregoing instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors, and he acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal at my office in said Parish and State the day and year last above written.
/s/ Jennifer Favalora
Jennifer Favalora
Notary Public
Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana
My Commission is Issued For Life
Notary Identification Number 57639
STATE OF New York )
) SS.:
COUNTY OF New York )
On this 24th day of May, 2005, before me, Boris Treyger, a Notary Public duly commissioned, qualified and acting within and for said County and State, appeared Susan Johnson and Irina Golovashchuk, to me personally well known, who stated that they were a Vice President and an Associate, respectively, of DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, a corporation, and were duly authorized in their respective capacities to execute the foregoing instrument for and in the name and behalf of said corporation; and further stated and acknowledged that they had so signed, executed and delivered said foregoing instrument for the consideration, uses and purposes therein mentioned and set forth.
On the 24th day of May, 2005, before me personally came Susan Johnson, to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that she resides at 153 E 46th Stree, Brooklyn, NY 11203; that she is a Vice President of DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, one of the corporations described in and which executed the above instrument; that she knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by authority of the Board of Directors of said corporation, and that she signed her name thereto by like authority.
On the 24th day of May, 2005, before me appeared Irina Golovashchuk, to me personally known, who, being by me duly sworn, did say that she is an Associate of DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, and that the seal affixed to the foregoing instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors, and she acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal at my office in said County and State the day and year last above written.
Boris Treyger
Notary Public, State of New York
No 01TR6016003
/s/ Boris Treyger
Qualified in Kings County
Commission Expires 12/30,2006
STATE OF New York )
) SS.:
COUNTY OF New York )
On this 24th day of May, 2005, before me, Boris Treyger, the undersigned, personally appeared, STANLEY BURG, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same for the purposes therein contained.
On the 24th day of May, 2005, before me personally appeared STANLEY BURG, to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same as his free act and deed.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.
Boris Treyger
Notary Public, State of New York
No 01TR6016003
/s/ Boris Treyger
Qualified in Kings County
Commission Expires 12/30, 2006
STATE OF FLORIDA )
) SS.:
COUNTY OF DUVAL )
On this 24TH day of May, 2005, before me, Lillie C. Mariano, a Notary Public duly commissioned, qualified and acting within and for said county and state, appeared Cynthia M. Moore and Elizabeth Dean, to me personally known, who stated that they were a Vice President and Vice President, respectively, of THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a National Association, and were duly authorized in their respective capacities to execute the foregoing instrument for and in the name and on behalf of said Company; and further stated that they had so signed, executed and delivered the same for the consideration, uses and purposes therein mentioned and set forth.
On the 24th day of May, 2005, before me personally appeared Robert D. Smith, to me personally known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resided in Jacksonville, Florida; that he is an Assistant Treasurer of THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, one of the companies described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seal of said National Association; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such seal; that it was so affixed by authority of its Board of Directors, and that he signed his name thereto by like authority.
On the 24th day of May, 2005, before me appeared Paula Starr, to me personally known, who, being by me duly sworn, did say that she is an Assistant Treasurer of THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, and that the seal affixed to the foregoing instrument is the seal of said National Association, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said National Association by authority of its Board of Directors, and she acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said entity.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal at my office in said County and State the day and year last above written.
/s/ Lillie C. Mariano
Lillie C. Mariano
Notary Public, State of Florida
Qualified in Duval County
Commission Expires 09/29/08
Lillie C. Mariano
My Commission DD348019
Expires September 29, 2008
Exhibit 4(e)
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC.
to
THE BANK OF NEW YORK
(successor to Harris Trust Company of New York and Bank of Montreal Trust Company)
And
STEPHEN J. GIURLANDO
(successor to Mark F. McLaughlin and Z. George Klodnicki)
As Trustees under the Mortgage and Deed of Trust,
dated as of May 1, 1987 of Entergy New Orleans, Inc.
FOURTEENTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE
Providing among other things for
First Mortgage Bonds,
4.98% Series due July 1, 2010
(Eighteenth Series)
Dated as of June 1, 2005
FOURTEENTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE, dated as of June 1, 2005, between ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC., a corporation of the State of Louisiana, whose post office address is 1600 Perdido Street, Building 505, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112 (the "Company") and THE BANK OF NEW YORK (successor to Harris Trust Company of New York and Bank of Montreal Trust Company), a New York banking corporation, whose principal corporate trust office is located at 101 Barclay Street, Floor 21 West, New York, New York 10286 and STEPHEN J. GIURLANDO (successor to Mark F. McLaughlin and Z. George Klodnicki), whose address is 63 Euclid Avenue, Massapequa, New York 11758, as trustees under the Mortgage and Deed of Trust, dated as of May 1, 1987, executed and delivered by the Company (herein called the "Original Indenture"; the Original Indenture and any and all indentures and instruments supplemental thereto being herein called the "Indenture");
WHEREAS, the Original Indenture has been duly recorded and filed as required in the State of Louisiana simultaneously with the recording and filing of the First Supplemental Indenture thereto, dated as of May 1, 1987, between the Company and BANK OF MONTREAL TRUST COMPANY (The Bank of New York, successor) and Z. GEORGE KLODNICKI (Stephen J. Giurlando, successor), as trustees (herein called the "First Supplemental Indenture"); and
WHEREAS, the Original Indenture was recorded in various Parishes in the State of Louisiana; and
WHEREAS, the Company executed and delivered to the Trustees (such term and all other defined terms used herein and not defined herein having the respective definitions to which reference is made in Article I below) its Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 1, 1988, its Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 1, 1993, its Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 1, 1993, its Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 1, 1995, its Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 1, 1996, its Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 1, 1998 (the "Seventh Supplemental Indenture"), its Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 1, 2000 (the "Eighth Supplemental Indenture"), its Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 1, 2001, its Tenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 1, 2002, its Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 1, 2003, its Twelfth Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 1, 2004, and its Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 15, 2004 (the "Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture"), each as a supplement to the Original Indenture, which Supplemental Indentures have been duly recorded in various Parishes in the State of Louisiana, which Parishes are the same Parishes in which this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture is to be recorded; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of March 18, 1999, Harris Trust Company of New York merged into Bank of Montreal Trust Company, Trustee under the Indenture, and effective July 1, 1999, the combined entity changed its name to Harris Trust Company of New York, and, by virtue of Section 9.03 of the Original Indenture, Harris Trust Company of New York became successor Trustee under the Indenture, without execution of any paper or the performance of any further act on the part of any other parties to the Indenture; and
WHEREAS, effective July 15, 2000, Harris Trust Company of New York and Mark F. McLaughlin resigned as Trustee and Co-Trustee, respectively, under the Indenture, and by the Eighth Supplemental Indenture, the Company appointed The Bank of New York and Stephen J. Giurlando as successor Trustee and successor Co-Trustee, respectively, effective July 15, 2000, and The Bank of New York and Stephen J. Giurlando accepted said respective appointments; and
WHEREAS, the Company has heretofore issued, in accordance with the provisions of the Indenture, the following series of bonds:
Series |
Principal Amount Issued |
Principal Amount Outstanding |
||
10.95% Series due May 1, 1997 |
$75,000,000 |
None |
||
13.20% Series due February 1, 1991 |
1,400,000 |
None |
||
13.60% Series due February 1, 1993 |
29,400,000 |
None |
||
13.90% Series due February 1, 1995 |
9,200,000 |
None |
||
7% Series due March 1, 2003 |
25,000,000 |
None |
||
8% Series due March 1, 2023 |
45,000,000 |
None |
||
7.55% Series due September 1, 2023 |
30,000,000 |
None |
||
8.67% Series due April 1, 2005 |
30,000,000 |
None |
||
8% Series due March 1, 2006 |
40,000,000 |
None |
||
7% Series due July 15, 2008 |
30,000,000 |
None |
||
8.125% Series due July 15, 2005 |
30,000,000 |
30,000,000 |
||
6.65% Series due March 1, 2004 |
30,000,000 |
None |
||
6.75% Series due October 15, 2017 |
25,000,000 |
25,000,000 |
||
3.875% Series due August 1, 2008 |
30,000,000 |
30,000,000 |
||
5.25% Series due August 1, 2013 |
70,000,000 |
70,000,000 |
||
5.65% Series due September 1, 2029 |
40,000,000 |
40,000,000 |
||
5.60% Series due September 1, 2024 |
35,000,000 |
35,000,000 |
; and
WHEREAS, Section 19.04 of the Original Indenture provides, among other things, that any power, privilege or right expressly or impliedly reserved to or in any way conferred upon the Company by any provision of the Indenture, whether such power, privilege or right is in any way restricted or is unrestricted, may be in whole or in part waived or surrendered or subjected to any restriction if at the time unrestricted, or to additional restriction if already restricted, and the Company may enter into any further covenants, limitations, restrictions or provisions for the benefit of any one or more series of bonds issued thereunder, or the Company may establish the terms and provisions of any series of bonds by an instrument in writing executed and acknowledged by the Company in such manner as would be necessary to entitle a conveyance of real estate to be recorded in all of the states in which any property at the time subject to the Lien of the Indenture shall be situated; and
WHEREAS, the Company desires to create a new series of bonds under the Indenture and to add to its covenants and agreements contained in the Indenture certain other covenants and agreements to be observed by it; and
WHEREAS, all things necessary to make this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture a valid, binding and legal instrument have been performed, and the issue of said series of bonds, subject to the terms of the Indenture, has been in all respects duly authorized;
NOW, THEREFORE, THIS FOURTEENTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE WITNESSETH: That ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC., in consideration of the premises and of Ten Dollars ($10) to it duly paid by the Trustee at or before the ensealing and delivery of these presents, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, and in order to secure the payment of both the principal of and interest and premium, if any, on the bonds from time to time issued under the Indenture, according to their tenor and effect and the performance of all provisions of the Indenture (including any modification made as in the Indenture provided) and of said bonds, hath granted, bargained, sold, released, conveyed, assigned, transferred, mortgaged, hypothecated, affected, pledged, set over and confirmed and granted a security interest in, and by these presents doth grant, bargain, sell, release, convey, assign, transfer, mortgage, hypothecate, affect, pledge, set over and confirm and grant a security interest in (subject, however, to Excepted En cumbrances as defined in Section 1.06 of the Original Indenture), unto STEPHEN J. GIURLANDO and (to the extent of its legal capacity to hold the same for the purpose hereof) to THE BANK OF NEW YORK, as Trustees under the Indenture, and to their successor or successors in said trust, and to said Trustees and their successors and assigns forever (1) all rights, legal and equitable, of the Company (whether in accordance with Paragraph 32 of that certain Resolution No. R-86-112, adopted by the Council of the City of New Orleans on March 20, 1986 and accepted by the Company on March 25, 1986, as superseded by Resolution No. R-91-157, effective October 4, 1991, or pursuant to other regulatory authorization or by operation of law or otherwise), in the event of the purchase and acquisition by the City of New Orleans (or any other governmental authority or instrumentality or designee thereof) of properties and assets of the Company, to recover and receive payment and compensation from the City (or from such other gov ernmental authority or instrumentality or designee thereof or any other person) of an amount equal to the aggregate uncollected balance of (A) the deferrals of Grand Gulf 1 Costs (as defined in the Original Indenture) and the deferred carrying charges accrued thereon that have accumulated prior to the City or such other entity providing official notice to the Company of the City's or such other entity's intent to effect such purchase and acquisition and (B) if and to the extent that the City or such other entity and the Company agree that the City or such other entity is liable for all or a portion of the aggregate uncollected balance of such deferrals accumulating thereafter or a court of final resort so holds, such deferrals that have accumulated subsequent to such notice (said rights of the Company, together with the proceeds and products thereof, being defined in the Original Indenture as the "Municipalization Interest"); and (2) all properties of the Company, real, personal and mixed, of the k ind or nature described or mentioned in the Original Indenture; and (3) all properties of the Company specifically described in Article VI hereof and all other properties of the Company, real, personal and mixed, of the kind or nature specifically mentioned in the Original Indenture or of any other kind or nature acquired by the Company on or after the date of the execution and delivery of the Original Indenture (except any herein or in the Original Indenture, as heretofore supplemented, expressly excepted), now owned or, subject to the provisions of Section 15.03 of the Original Indenture, hereafter acquired by the Company (by purchase, consolidation, merger, donation, construction, erection or in any other way) and wheresoever situated, including (without in anywise limiting or impairing by the enumeration of the same, the scope and intent of the foregoing or of any general description contained herein or in the Original Indenture, as heretofore supplemented), all real estate, lands, easements, servitudes, licenses, permits, franchises, privileges, rights of way and other rights in or relating to real estate or the occupancy of the same; all power sites, flowage rights, water rights, water locations, water appropriations, ditches, flumes, reservoirs, reservoir sites, canals, raceways, waterways, dams, dam sites, aqueducts, and all other rights or means for appropriating, conveying, storing and supplying water; all rights of way and roads; all plants for the generation of electricity by steam, water and/or other power; all power houses, gas plants, street lighting systems, standards and other equipment incidental thereto; all telephone, radio and television systems, air-conditioning systems, and equipment incidental thereto, water wheels, water works, water systems, steam heat and hot water plants, substations, electric, gas and water lines, service and supply systems, bridges, culverts, tracks, ice or refrigeration plants and equipment, offices, buildings and other structures and the equipment thereof; all ma chinery, engines, boilers, dynamos, turbines, electric, gas and other machines, prime movers, regulators, meters, transformers, generators (including, but not limited to, engine driven generators and turbogenerator units), motors, electrical, gas and mechanical appliances, conduits, cables, water, steam heat, gas or other pipes, gas mains and pipes, service pipes, fittings, valves and connections, pole and transmission lines, towers, overhead conductors and devices, underground conduits, underground conductors and devices, wires, cables, tools, implements, apparatus, storage battery equipment, and all other fixtures and presently; all municipal and other franchises, consents or permits; all lines for the transmission and distribution of electric current, gas, steam heat or water for any purpose including towers, poles, wires, cables, pipes, conduits, ducts and all apparatus for use in connection therewith and (except as herein or in the Original Indenture, as heretofore supplemented, expressly excepted) all the rights, title and interest of the Company in and to all other property of any kind or nature appertaining to and/or used and/or occupied and/or enjoyed in connection with any property herein or in the Original Indenture, as heretofore supplemented, described.
TOGETHER WITH all and singular the tenements, hereditaments, prescriptions, servitudes and appurtenances belonging or in anywise appertaining to the aforesaid property or any part thereof, with the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders and (subject to the provisions of Section 11.01 of the Original Indenture) the tolls, rents, revenues, issues, earnings, income, product and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title and interest and claim whatsoever, at law as well as in equity, which the Company now has or may hereafter acquire in and to the aforesaid property, rights and franchises and every part and parcel thereof.
IT IS HEREBY AGREED by the Company that, subject to the provisions of Section 15.03 of the Original Indenture, all the property, rights and franchises acquired by the Company (by purchase, consolidation, merger, donation, construction, erection or in any other way) after the date hereof, except any herein or in the Original Indenture, as heretofore supplemented, expressly excepted, shall be and are as fully granted and conveyed hereby and as fully embraced within the Lien of the Original Indenture and the Lien hereof as if such property, rights and franchises were now owned by the Company and were specifically described herein and granted and conveyed hereby.
PROVIDED that, except as provided herein and in the Original Indenture with respect to the Municipalization Interest, the following are not and are not intended to be now or hereafter granted, bargained, sold, released, conveyed, assigned, transferred, mortgaged, hypothecated, affected, pledged, set over or confirmed hereunder, nor is a security interest therein hereby or by the Original Indenture, as heretofore supplemented, granted or intended to be granted, and the same are hereby expressly excepted from the Lien of the Indenture and the operation of this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture, viz.: (1) cash, shares of stock, bonds, notes and other obligations and other securities not heretofore or hereafter specifically pledged, paid, deposited, delivered or held hereunder or covenanted so to be; (2) merchandise, equipment, apparatus, materials or supplies held for the purpose of sale or other disposition in the usual course of business or for the purpose of repairing or replacing (in who le or part) any rolling stock, buses, motor coaches, automobiles and other vehicles or aircraft or boats, ships, or other vessels and any fuel, oil and similar materials and supplies consumable in the operation of any of the properties of the Company; rolling stock, buses, motor coaches, automobiles and other vehicles and all aircraft; boats, ships and other vessels; all timber, minerals, mineral rights and royalties; (3) bills, notes and other instruments and accounts receivable, judgments, demands, general intangibles and chooses in action, and all contracts, leases and operating agreements not specifically pledged hereunder or under the Original Indenture or covenanted so to be; (4) the last day of the term of any lease or leasehold which may hereafter become subject to the Lien of the Indenture; (5) electric energy, gas, water, steam, ice, and other materials or products generated, manufactured, produced or purchased by the Company for sale, distribution or use in the ordinary course of its business; (6) any natural gas wells or natural gas leases or natural gas transportation lines or other works or property used primarily and principally in the production of natural gas or its transportation, primarily for the purpose of sale to natural gas customers or to a natural gas distribution or pipeline company, up to the point of connection with any distribution system; and (7) the Company's franchise to be a corporation; provided, however, that the property and rights expressly excepted from the Lien and operation of the Indenture in the above subdivisions (2) and (3) shall (to the extent permitted by law) cease to be so excepted in the event and as of the date that either or both of the Trustees or a receiver or trustee shall enter upon and take possession of the Mortgaged and Pledged Property in the manner provided in Article XII of the Original Indenture by reason of the occurrence of a Default.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD all such properties, real, personal and mixed, granted, bargained, sold, released, conveyed, assigned, transferred, mortgaged, hypothecated, affected, pledged, set over or confirmed or in which a security interest has been granted by the Company as aforesaid, or intended so to be (subject, however, to Excepted Encumbrances as defined in Section 1.06 of the Original Indenture), unto STEPHEN J. GIURLANDO and (to the extent of its legal capacity to hold the same for the purposes hereof) to THE BANK OF NEW YORK, and their successors and assigns forever.
IN TRUST NEVERTHELESS, for the same purposes and upon the same terms, trusts and conditions and subject to and with the same provisos and covenants as are set forth in the Original Indenture, as heretofore supplemented, this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture being supplemental thereto.
AND IT IS HEREBY COVENANTED by the Company that all the terms, conditions, provisos, covenants and provisions contained in the Original Indenture, as heretofore supplemented, shall affect and apply to the property hereinbefore and hereinafter described and conveyed and to the estate, rights, obligations and duties of the Company and the Trustees and the beneficiaries of the trust with respect to said property, and to the Trustees and their successors as Trustees of said property in the same manner and with the same effect as if said property had been owned by the Company at the time of the execution of the Original Indenture and had been specifically and at length described in and conveyed to said Trustees by the Original Indenture as a part of the property therein stated to be conveyed.
The Company further covenants and agrees to and with the Trustees and their successor or successors in said trust under the Indenture, as follows:
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS AND RULES OF CONSTRUCTION
Section 1.01 Terms From the Original Indenture and First through Thirteenth Supplemental Indentures. Except as set forth in Section 1.02 below, all defined terms used in this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture and not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Original Indenture or the First through the Thirteenth Supplemental Indentures, as the case may be.
Section 1.02 Certain Defined Terms. As used in this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture, the following defined terms shall have the respective meanings specified unless the context clearly requires otherwise:
The term "Adjusted Treasury Rate" shall mean, with respect to any redemption date:
(1) the yield, under the heading which represents the average for the immediately preceding week, appearing in the most recently published statistical release designated "H.15(519)" or any successor publication which is published weekly by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and which establishes yields on actively traded United States Treasury securities adjusted to constant maturity under the caption "Treasury Constant Maturities," for the maturity corresponding to the Comparable Treasury Issue (if no maturity is within three months before or after July 1, 2006, yields for the two published maturities most closely corresponding to the Comparable Treasury Issue shall be determined and the Adjusted Treasury Rate shall be interpolated or extrapolated from such yields on a straight line basis, rounding to the nearest month); or
(2) if such release (or any successor release) is not published during the week preceding the calculation date for the Adjusted Treasury Rate or does not contain such yields, the rate per annum equal to the semi-annual equivalent yield to maturity of the Comparable Treasury Issue, calculated using a price for the Comparable Treasury Issue (expressed as a percentage of its principal amount) equal to the Comparable Treasury Price for such redemption date.
The Adjusted Treasury Rate shall be calculated on the third Business Day preceding the redemption date.
The term "Bonds of the Eighteenth Series" shall have the meaning specified in Section 2.01.
The term "Business Day" shall mean any day other than a Saturday or a Sunday or a day on which banking institutions in The City of New York are authorized or required by law or executive order to remain closed or a day on which the Corporate Trust Office of the Trustee is closed for business.
The term "Comparable Treasury Issue" shall mean the United States Treasury security selected by the Independent Investment Banker as having a maturity comparable to July 1, 2006 that would be utilized, at the time of selection and in accordance with customary financial practice, in pricing new issues of corporate debt securities of comparable maturity to July 1, 2006.
The term "Comparable Treasury Price" shall mean, with respect to any redemption date, (i) the average of five Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations for such redemption date after excluding the highest and lowest such Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations or (ii) if the Independent Investment Banker obtains fewer than five such Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations, the average of all such Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations.
The term "Independent Investment Banker" shall mean one of the Reference Treasury Dealers that the Company appoints to act as the Independent Investment Banker from time to time, or, if any of such firms is unwilling or unable to select the Comparable Treasury Issue, an independent investment banking institution of national standing appointed by the Company.
The term "Reference Treasury Dealer" shall mean (i) Lehman Brothers Inc. and its successors; provided, however, that if any of the foregoing shall cease to be a primary U.S. Government securities dealer in New York City (a "Primary Treasury Dealer"), the Company shall substitute therefor another Primary Treasury Dealer, and (ii) any other Primary Treasury Dealer selected by the Independent Investment Banker after consultation with the Company.
The term "Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations" shall mean, with respect to each Reference Treasury Dealer and any redemption date, the average, as determined by the Independent Investment Banker, of the bid and asked prices for the Comparable Treasury Issue (expressed in each case as a percentage of its principal amount) quoted in writing to the Independent Investment Banker at 5:00 p.m. on the third Business Day preceding such redemption date.
Section 1.03 References are to Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture. Unless the context otherwise requires, all references herein to "Articles", "Sections" and other subdivisions refer to the corresponding Articles, Sections and other subdivisions of this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture, and the words "herein", "hereof", "hereby", "hereunder" and words of similar import refer to this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture as a whole and not to any particular Article, Section or other subdivision hereof or to the Original Indenture or any other supplemental indenture thereto.
Section 1.04. Number and Gender. Unless the context otherwise requires, defined terms in the singular include the plural, and in the plural include the singular. The use of a word of any gender shall include all genders.
ARTICLE II
THE Eighteenth SERIES
Section 2.01 Bonds of the Eighteenth Series. Pursuant to Section 2.01 of the Original Indenture, there shall be a series of bonds designated 4.98% Series due July 1, 2010 (herein sometimes referred to as the "Bonds of the Eighteenth Series"), each of which shall also bear the descriptive title "First Mortgage Bond". The form of Bonds of the Eighteenth Series shall be substantially in the form of Exhibit A hereto. Bonds of the Eighteenth Series (which shall be issued in the aggregate principal amount of $30,000,000) shall mature on July 1, 2010 and shall be issued only as fully registered bonds in denominations of One Thousand Dollars and, at the option of the Company, in any multiple or multiples thereof (the exercise of such option to be evidenced by the execution and delivery thereof). Bonds of the Eighteenth Series shall bear interest at the rate of four and ninety eight hundredths percent (4.98%) per annum (except as hereinafter provided), payable semi-annually on January 1 and July 1 o f each year, and at maturity or earlier redemption, the first interest payment to be made on January 1, 2006 for the period from the date of original issuance of the Bonds of the Eighteenth Series to January 1, 2006; the principal and interest on each said bond to be payable at the office or agency of the Company in the Borough of Manhattan, The City of New York, New York, payable in such coin or currency of the United States of America as at the time of payment is legal tender for public and private debts. Interest on Bonds of the Eighteenth Series may at the option of the Company be paid by check mailed to the registered owners thereof. Overdue principal and (to the extent permitted by law) overdue interest in respect of Bonds of the Eighteenth Series shall bear interest (before and after judgment) at the rate of five and ninety eight hundredths percent (5.98%) per annum. Interest on the Bonds of the Eighteenth Series shall be computed on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. Interest on Bonds of the Eighteenth Series in respect of a portion of a month shall be calculated based on the actual number of days elapsed. In any case where any interest payment date, redemption date or maturity of any Bond of the Eighteenth Series shall not be a Business Day, then payment of interest or principal need not be made on such date, but may be made on the next succeeding Business Day, with the same force and effect, and in the same amount, as if made on the corresponding interest payment date or redemption date, or at maturity, as the case may be, and, if such payment is made or duly provided for on such Business Day, no interest shall accrue on the amounts so payable for the period from and after such interest payment date, redemption date or maturity, as the case may be, to such Business Day.
The Company reserves the right to establish at any time, by Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company, a form of coupon bond, and of appurtenant coupons, for the Eighteenth Series and to provide for exchangeability of such coupon bonds with the bonds of said Series issued hereunder in fully registered form and to make all appropriate provisions for such purpose.
Section 2.02 Redemption of Bonds of the Eighteenth Series. (a) Bonds of the Eighteenth Series shall be redeemable at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, upon notice mailed to each registered owner at his last address appearing on the registry books not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days prior to the date fixed for redemption, (i) at any time prior to July 1, 2006, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (A) 101% of the principal amount of such Bonds of the Eighteenth Series to be redeemed and (B) as determined by the Independent Investment Banker, the sum of (x) the present value of the payment on July 1, 2006 of the principal amount of such Bonds of the Eighteenth Series to be redeemed plus (y) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of interest on such Bonds of the Eighteenth Series to be redeemed to July 1, 2006 (excluding the portion of any such interest accrued to such redemption date), discounted (for purposes of determining such present values) to the redem ption date on a semi-annual basis (assuming a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) at the Adjusted Treasury Rate plus 0.20%, and (b) at any time on or after July 1, 2006, prior to maturity of the Bonds of the Eighteenth Series, at a redemption price equal to 101% of the principal amount of such Bonds of the Eighteenth Series to be redeemed, plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date.
(b) Bonds of the Eighteenth Series shall also be redeemable, at the option of the holders thereof, as provided in Section 3.04 of the First Supplemental Indenture, as heretofore and hereby amended.
(c) Bonds of the Eighteenth Series shall also be redeemable as follows:
Should all or substantially all of the Mortgaged and Pledged Property be taken by the City of New Orleans or any instrumentality or designee thereof by the exercise of the power of eminent domain or taken by the exercise by the City of New Orleans or any instrumentality or designee thereof of the right to purchase or otherwise acquire the same, or should such Mortgaged and Pledged Property be voluntarily sold, transferred or otherwise conveyed to the City of New Orleans or such instrumentality or designee thereof, then, in any such event, the Company shall, upon the consummation of such taking, sale, transfer or other conveyance (in any case whether or not the Lien of the Indenture is released with respect to such Mortgaged and Pledged Property), immediately request the Trustee to take, and upon receipt of such request the Trustee shall take, all requisite action to prepare (in consultation with the Company) and to mail written notice thereof to each registered holder of any Outstanding Bo nd of the Eighteenth Series, at his last address appearing upon the registry books, such notice (hereinafter referred to in this Section 2.02(c) as the "Trustee's Special Notice"), to state that it is given pursuant to this Section 2.02(c) of this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture and that the holder of any Bond or Bonds of the Eighteenth Series then Outstanding shall have the right to require the Company to redeem such Bond or Bonds of the Eighteenth Series, in whole or in part, on the terms and subject to the conditions hereinafter in this Section 2.02(c) set forth.
Upon the mailing of the Trustee's Special Notice, the holder of any Bonds of the Eighteenth Series then Outstanding may, within forty-five (45) days from the date of the Trustee's Special Notice, give the Trustee written notice of such holder's intent to have his Bond or Bonds of the Eighteenth Series redeemed by the Company on the sixtieth (60th) day following the date of the Trustee's Special Notice, upon delivery and surrender of such Bond or Bonds of the Eighteenth Series accompanied by such documentation as the Trustee or the Company may require. Unless on or prior to the forty-fifth (45th) day following the date of the Trustee's Special Notice, such holder shall have, by further written notice to the Trustee, withdrawn or revoked such written notice of intent to have his Bond or Bonds of the Eighteenth Series so redeemed, the Company shall, on the sixtieth (60th) day following the date of the Trustee's Special Notice, redeem any such Bond or Bonds of the Eighteenth Series that are properly delivered and surrendered for that purpose at the special redemption price of 101% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date.
Section 2.03 Transfer and Exchange. At the option of the registered owner, any Bonds of the Eighteenth Series, upon surrender thereof for cancellation at the office or agency of the Company in the Borough of Manhattan, The City of New York, New York, shall be exchangeable for a like aggregate principal amount of bonds of the same series of other authorized denominations.
Bonds of the Eighteenth Series shall be transferable, upon the surrender thereof for cancellation, together with a written instrument of transfer in form approved by the registrar duly executed by the registered owner or by his duly authorized attorney, at the office or agency of the Company in the Borough of Manhattan, The City of New York, New York.
Upon any such exchange or transfer of Bonds of the Eighteenth Series, the Company may make a charge therefor sufficient to reimburse it for any tax or taxes or other governmental charge, as provided in Section 2.05 of the Original Indenture, but the Company hereby waives any right to make a charge in addition thereto for any such exchange or transfer of Bonds of the Eighteenth Series.
Section 2.04. Dating of Bonds and Interest Payments. (a) Each Bond of the Eighteenth Series shall be dated as of the date of authentication and shall bear interest from the last preceding interest payment date to which interest shall have been paid (unless the date of such bond is an interest payment date to which interest is paid, in which case from the date of such bond); provided that each Bond of the Eighteenth Series dated prior to January 1, 2006 shall bear interest from the date of original issuance thereof; and provided, further, that if any Bond of the Eighteenth Series shall be authenticated and delivered upon a transfer of, or in exchange for or in lieu of, any other Bond or Bonds of the Eighteenth Series upon which interest is in default, it shall be dated so that such bond shall bear interest from the last preceding date to which interest shall have been paid on the bond or bonds in respect of which such bond shall have been delivered or fro m its date of original issuance, if no interest shall have been paid on the Bonds of the Eighteenth Series.
(b) Notwithstanding the foregoing, Bonds of the Eighteenth Series shall be dated so that the person in whose name any Bond of the Eighteenth Series is registered at the close of business on the Business Day immediately preceding an interest payment date shall be entitled to receive the interest payable on the interest payment date notwithstanding the cancellation of such bond upon any transfer or exchange thereof subsequent to such close of business and prior to such interest payment date, except if, and to the extent that, the Company shall default in the payment of interest due on such interest payment date, in which case such defaulted interest shall be paid to the persons in whose names Outstanding Bonds of the Eighteenth Series are registered at the close of business on the Business Day immediately preceding the date of payment of such defaulted interest. Any Bond of the Eighteenth Series issued upon any transfer or exchange subsequent to such close of business and prior to such in terest payment date shall bear interest from such interest payment date. In the event there shall be more than one registered owner of Bonds of the Eighteenth Series, then the Company shall not be required to make transfers or exchanges of bonds of said series for a period of fifteen (15) days immediately preceding any interest payment date of said series.
ARTICLE III
OTHER PROVISIONS FOR RETIREMENT OF BONDS
Section 3.01 Exchange or Redemption upon Merger or Consolidation. The second sentence of subsection (a) of Section 3.04 of the First Supplemental Indenture, as amended and restated by the Seventh Supplemental Indenture, and as subsequently amended, is hereby further amended to insert the following words immediately after the words "the Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture":
", shall (as to the New LP&L Bonds being exchanged for the Bonds of the Eighteenth Series) be subject to redemption at the option of the Company on terms similar to those provided in the Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture,"
Section 3.02 Redemption Price upon Merger or Consolidation. The redemption price for any Bonds of the Eighteenth Series redeemed pursuant to subsection (b) of Section 3.04 of the First Supplemental Indenture, as amended and restated by the Seventh Supplemental Indenture, and as subsequently amended, shall be equal to the principal amount of the Bonds of the Eighteenth Series to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date.
ARTICLE IV
COVENANTS
Section 4.01 Maintenance of Paying Agency. So long as any Bonds of the Eighteenth Series are Outstanding, the Company covenants that the office or agency of the Company in the Borough of Manhattan, The City of New York, New York, where the principal of or interest on any bonds of the Eighteenth Series shall be payable, shall also be an office or agency where any such bonds may be transferred or exchanged and where notices, presentations or demands to or upon the Company in respect of such bonds or in respect of the Indenture may be given or made.
Section 4.02 Further Assurances. From time to time whenever reasonably requested by the Trustee or the holders of a majority in principal amount of Bonds of the Eighteenth Series then Outstanding, the Company will make, execute and deliver or cause to be made, executed and delivered any and all such further and other instruments and assurances as may be reasonably necessary or proper to carry out the intention of or to facilitate the performance of the terms of the Indenture or to secure the rights and remedies of the holders of such bonds.
Section 4.03 Limitation on Restricted Payments. (a) So long as any Bonds of the Eighteenth Series are Outstanding, the Company covenants that it will not declare any dividends on its common stock (other than (1) a dividend payable solely in shares of its common stock or (2) a dividend payable in cash in cases where, concurrently with the payment of such dividend, an amount in cash equal to such dividend is received by the Company as a capital contribution or as the proceeds of the issue and sale of shares of its common stock) or make any distribution on outstanding shares of its common stock or purchase or otherwise acquire for value any outstanding shares of its common stock (otherwise than in exchange for or out of the proceeds from the sale of other shares of its common stock) unless after such dividend, distribution, purchase or acquisition, the aggregate amount of such dividends, distributions, purchases and acquisitions paid or made subsequent to May 31, 2005 (other than any dividend declared by the Compan y on or before May 31, 2005) does not exceed (without giving effect to (1) any such dividends, distributions, purchases or acquisitions or (2) any net transfers from earned surplus to stated capital accounts) the sum of (A) the aggregate amount credited subsequent to May 31, 2005, to earned surplus, (B) $150,000,000 and (C) such additional amounts as shall be authorized or approved, upon application by the Company and, after notice, by the SEC under the Holding Company Act.
For the purpose of this Section 4.03, the aggregate amount credited subsequent to May 31, 2005, to earned surplus shall be determined in accordance with applicable generally accepted accounting principles and practices (or, if in the opinion of the Company's independent public accountants (delivered to the Trustee) there is an absence of any such generally accepted accounting principles and practices as to the determination in question, then in accordance with sound accounting practices) and after making provision for dividends upon any preferred stock of the Company accumulated subsequent to such date, and in addition there shall be deducted from earned surplus all amounts (without duplication) of losses, write-offs, write-downs or amortization of property, whether extraordinary or otherwise, recorded in and applicable to a period or periods subsequent to May 31, 2005.
ARTICLE V
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
Section 5.01 Acceptance of Trusts. The Trustees hereby accept the trusts herein declared, provided, created or supplemented and agree to perform the same upon the terms and conditions herein and in the Original Indenture, as heretofore supplemented, set forth and upon the following terms and conditions:
The Trustees shall not be responsible in any manner whatsoever for or in respect of the validity or sufficiency of this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture or for or in respect of the recitals contained herein, all of which recitals are solely made by the Company. In general, each and every term and condition contained in Article XVI of the Original Indenture shall apply to and form part of this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture with the same force and effect as if the same were herein set forth in full with such omissions, variations and insertions, if any, as may be appropriate to make the same conform to the provisions of this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture.
Section 5.02 Effect of Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture under Louisiana Law. It is the intention and it is hereby agreed that so far as concerns that portion of the Mortgaged and Pledged Property situated within the State of Louisiana, the general language of conveyance contained in this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture is intended and shall be construed as words of hypothecation and not of conveyance, and that so far as the said Louisiana property is concerned, this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture shall be considered as an act of mortgage and pledge and granting of a security interest under the laws of the State of Louisiana, and the Trustees herein named are named as mortgagee and pledge and secured parties in trust for the benefit of themselves and of all present and future holders of bonds issued under the Indenture and any coupons thereto issued hereunder, and are irrevocably appointed special agents and representatives of the holders of such bonds and coupons and vested with full power in their behalf t o effect and enforce the mortgage and pledge and a security interest hereby constituted for their benefit, or otherwise to act as herein provided for.
Section 5.03
Record Date. The holders of the Bonds of the Eighteenth Series shall be deemed to have consented and agreed that the Company may, but shall not be obligated to, fix a record date for the purpose of determining the holders of the Bonds of the Eighteenth Series entitled to consent, if any such consent is required, to any amendment or supplement to the Indenture or the waiver of any provision thereof or any act to be performed thereunder. If a record date is fixed, those persons who were holders of the Bonds of the Eighteenth Series at such record date (or their duly designated proxies), and only those persons, shall be entitled to consent to such amendment, supplement or waiver or to revoke any consent previously given, whether or not such persons continue to be holders of the Bonds of the Eighteenth Series after such record date. No such consent shall be valid or effective for more than 90 days after such record date.
Section 5.04 Titles. The titles of the several Articles and Sections of this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture shall not be deemed to be any part hereof.
Section 5.05 Counterparts. This Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument.
Section 5.06 Governing Law. The laws of the State of New York shall govern this Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture and the Bonds of the Eighteenth Series, except to the extent that the validity or perfection of the Lien of the Indenture, or remedies thereunder, are governed by the laws of a jurisdiction other than the State of New York.
ARTICLE VI
SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
PARAGRAPH ONE
The Electric Generating Plants, Plant Sites and Stations of the Company, including all electric works, power houses, buildings, pipelines and structures owned by the Company and all land of the Company on which the same are situated and all of the Company's lands, together with the buildings and improvements thereon, and all rights, ways, servitudes, prescriptions, and easements, rights-of-way, permits, privileges, licenses, poles, wires, machinery, implements, switchyards, electric lines, equipment and appurtenances, forming a part of said plants, sites or stations, or any of them, or used or enjoyed, or capable of being used or enjoyed in conjunction with any of said power plants, sites, stations, lands and property.
PARAGRAPH TWO
The Electric Substations, Switching Stations, Microwave installations and UHF-VHF installations of the Company, and the Sites therefor, including all buildings, structures, towers, poles, all equipment, appliances and devices for transforming, converting, switching, transmitting and distributing electric energy, and for communications, and the lands of the Company on which the same are situated, and all of the Company's lands, rights, ways, servitudes, prescriptions, easements, rights-of-way, machinery, equipment, appliances, devices, licenses and appurtenances forming a part of said substations, switching stations, microwave installations or UHF-VHF installations, or any of them, or used or enjoyed or capable of being used or enjoyed in conjunction with any of them.
PARAGRAPH THREE
All and singular the Miscellaneous Lands and Real Estate or Rights and Interests therein of the Company, and buildings and improvements thereon, now owned, or, subject to the provisions of Section 15.03 of the Original Indenture, hereafter acquired during the existence of this trust.
PARAGRAPH FOUR
The Electric Transmission Lines of the Company, including the structures, towers, poles, wires, cables, switch racks, conductors, transformers, insulators, pipes, conduits, electric submarine cables, and all appliances, devices and equipment used or useful in connection with said transmission lines and systems, and all other property, real, personal or mixed, forming a part thereof or appertaining thereto, together with all rights-of-way, easements, prescriptions, servitudes, permits, privileges, licenses, consents, immunities and rights for or relating to the construction, maintenance or operation thereof, through, over, across, under or upon any public streets or highways or other lands, public or private.
PARAGRAPH FIVE
The Electric Distribution Lines and Systems of the Company, including the structures, towers, poles, wires, insulators and appurtenances, appliances, conductors, conduits, cables, transformers, meters, regulator stations and regulators, accessories, devices and equipment and all of the Company's other property, real, personal or mixed, forming a part of or used, occupied or enjoyed in connection with or in anywise appertaining to said distribution lines and systems, together with all of the Company's rights-of-way, easements, permits, prescriptions, privileges, municipal or other franchises, licenses, consents, immunities and rights for or relating to the construction, maintenance or operation thereof, through, over, across, under, or upon any public streets or highways or other lands or property, public or private.
PARAGRAPH SIX
The Gas Distributing Systems of the Company, whether now owned or, subject to the provisions of Section 15.03 of the Original Indenture, hereafter acquired, including gas regulator stations, gas main crossings, odorizing equipment, gas metering stations, shops, service buildings, office buildings, expansion tanks, conduits, gas mains and pipes, mechanical storage sheds, boilers, service pipes, fittings, city gates, pipelines, booster stations, reducer stations, valves, valve platforms, connections, meters and all appurtenances, appliances, devices and equipment and all the Company's other property, real, personal or mixed forming a part of or used, occupied or enjoyed in connection with or in anywise appertaining to said distributing systems, or any of them, together with all of the Company's rights-of-way, easements, prescriptions, servitudes, privileges, immunities, permits and franchises, licenses, consents and rights for or relating to the construction, maintenance or operation thereo f, in, on, through, across or under any public streets or highways or other lands or property, public or private.
PARAGRAPH SEVEN
All of the franchises, privileges, permits, grants and consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of electric and gas systems in, on and under streets, alleys, highways, roads, public grounds and rights-of-way and all rights incident thereto which were granted by the governing and regulatory bodies of the City of New Orleans, State of Louisiana.
Also all other franchises, privileges, permits, grants and consents owned or hereafter acquired by the Company for the construction, operation and maintenance of electric and gas systems in, on or under the streets, alleys, highways, roads, and public grounds, areas and rights-of-way and/or for the supply and sale of electricity or natural gas and all rights incident thereto, subject, however, to the provisions of Section 15.03 of the Original Indenture.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. has caused its corporate name to be hereunto affixed, and this instrument to be signed and sealed by its President or one of its Vice Presidents, and its corporate seal to be attested by its Secretary or one of its Assistant Secretaries for and on its behalf, and THE BANK OF NEW YORK has caused its corporate name to be hereunto affixed, and this instrument to be signed and sealed by one of its Vice Presidents or Assistant Vice Presidents and its corporate seal to be attested by one of its Vice Presidents, Assistant Vice Presidents, Assistant Treasurers or Assistant Secretaries for and on its behalf, and STEPHEN J. GIURLANDO has hereunto set his hand, all as of the day and year first above written.
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC.
By:/s/ Steven C. McNeal
Steven C. McNeal
Vice President and Treasurer
Attest:
/s/ Christopher T. Screen
Christopher T. Screen
Assistant Secretary
Executed, sealed and delivered by
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC.
in the presence of:
/s/ Shannon K. Ryerson
Shannon K. Ryerson
/s/ Christina Edwards
Christina Edwards
THE BANK OF NEW YORK
As Trustee
By: /s/ Robert A. Massimillo
Attest:
/s/ Kisha Holder
Vice President
/s/ Stephen J. Giurlando
STEPHEN J. GIURLANDO,
As Co-Trustee
Executed, sealed and delivered by
THE BANK OF NEW YORK and
STEPHEN J. GIURLANDO
in the presence of:
/s/ Ada L. Li
/s/ Eunice Kim
STATE OF LOUISIANA )
) SS.:
PARISH OF ORLEANS )
On this 17th day of June, 2005, before me appeared Steven C. McNeal, to me personally known, who, being duly sworn, did say that he is the Vice President and Treasurer of ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC., and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation and that the foregoing instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors, and said Steven C. McNeal acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation.
On the 17th day of June, 2005, before me personally came Steven C. McNeal, to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at 8043 Winners Circle, Mandeville, Louisiana 70448; that he is the Vice President and Treasurer of ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC., one of the parties described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation, and that he signed his name thereto by like order.
/s/ Jennifer B. Favalora
Jennifer B. Favalora
Notary Public (ID # 57639)
Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana Commission Issued for Life
STATE OF NEW YORK
} ss.:
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
On this 10th day of June, 2005, before me appeared Robert a. massimillo to me personally known, who, being by me duly sworn, did say that he is a Vice President of THE BANK OF NEW YORK, and that the seal affixed to the above instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors, and said ROBERT A. MASSIMILLO acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation.
On the 10th day of June, 2005, before me personally came ROBERT A. MASSIMILLO , to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at 87 Brandis Avenue, Staten Island, New York 10312; that he is a Vice President of THE BANK OF NEW YORK, one of the corporations described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal, that it was so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation, and that he signed his name thereto by like order.
/s/ William J. Cassels
Notary Public, State of New York
No. 01CA5027729
Qualified in Bronx County
Commission Expires May 18, 2006
STATE OF NEW YORK
} ss.:
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
On this 10th day of June, 2005, before me appeared STEPHEN J. GIURLANDO, to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same as his free act and deed.
On the 10th day of June, 2005, before me personally came STEPHEN J. GIURLANDO, to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same.
/s/ William J. Cassels
Notary Public, State of New York
No. 01CA5027729
Qualified in Bronx County
Commission Expires May 18, 2006
EXHIBIT A
[FORM OF BOND OF THE EIGHTEENTH SERIES]
[(See legend at the end of this bond for
restrictions on transferability and change of form)]
FIRST MORTGAGE BOND,
4.98% Series due July 1, 2010
CUSIP No. 29364P AL 7
No. R- 1 $30,000,000
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC., a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Louisiana (the "Company"), for value received, hereby promises to pay to Cede & Co. or registered assigns, at the office or agency of the Company in The City of New York, New York, the principal sum of Thirty Million Dollars ($30,000,000) on July 1, 2010, in such coin or currency of the United States of America as at the time of payment is legal tender for public and private debts, and to pay in like manner to the registered owner hereof interest thereon from the date of original issuance hereof, if the date of this bond is prior to January 1, 2006, or, if the date of this bond is on or after January 1, 2006, from the January 1 or July 1 immediately preceding the date of this bond to which interest has been paid (unless the date hereof is an interest payment date to which interest has been paid, in which case from the date hereof), at the rate of four and ninety-eight hundredth s percent (4.98%) per annum in like coin or currency on January 1 and July 1, commencing January 1, 2006, and at maturity or earlier redemption until the principal of this bond shall have become due and been duly paid or provided for, and to pay interest (before and after judgment) on any overdue principal, premium, if any, and (to the extent permitted by law) on any overdue interest at the rate of five and ninety-eight hundredths percent (5.98%) per annum. Interest on this bond shall be computed on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. Interest on this bond in respect of a portion of a month shall be calculated based on the actual number of days elapsed.
The interest so payable on any interest payment date will, subject to certain exceptions provided in the Mortgage hereinafter referred to, be paid to the person in whose name this bond is registered at the close of business on the Business Day immediately preceding such interest payment date. At the option of the Company, interest may be paid by check mailed on or prior to such interest payment date to the address of the person entitled thereto as such address shall appear on the register of the Company.
This bond shall not become obligatory until The Bank of New York, the Trustee under the Mortgage, or its successor thereunder, shall have signed the form of authentication certificate endorsed hereon.
This bond is one of a series of bonds of the Company issuable in series and is one of a duly authorized series of First Mortgage Bonds, 4.98% Series due July 1, 2010 (herein called bonds of the Eighteenth Series), all bonds of all series issued under and equally secured by a Mortgage and Deed of Trust (herein, together with any indenture supplemental thereto, including the Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 1, 2005, called the Mortgage), dated as of May 1, 1987, duly executed by the Company to Bank of Montreal Trust Company (The Bank of New York, successor) and Z. George Klodnicki (Stephen J. Giurlando, successor), as Trustees. Reference is made to the Mortgage for a description of the mortgaged and pledged property, assets and rights, the nature and extent of the lien and security, the respective rights, limitations of rights, covenants, obligations, duties and immunities thereunder of the Company, the holders of bonds and the Trustees and the terms and conditions upon wh ich the bonds are, and are to be, secured, the circumstances under which additional bonds may be issued and the definition of certain terms herein used, to all of which, by its acceptance of this bond, the holder of this bond agrees.
The principal hereof may be declared or may become due prior to the maturity date hereinbefore named on the conditions, in the manner and at the time set forth in the Mortgage, upon the occurrence of a Default as in the Mortgage provided. The Mortgage provides that in certain circumstances and upon certain conditions, such a declaration and its consequences or certain past defaults and the consequences thereof may be waived by such affirmative vote of holders of bonds as is specified in the Mortgage.
The Mortgage contains provisions permitting the Company and the Trustee to execute supplemental indentures amending the Mortgage for certain specified purposes without the consent of holders of bonds. With the consent of the Company and to the extent permitted by and as provided in the Mortgage, the rights and obligations of the Company and/or the rights of the holders of the bonds of the Eighteenth Series and/or the terms and provisions of the Mortgage may be modified or altered by such affirmative vote or votes of the holders of bonds then Outstanding as are specified in the Mortgage.
Any consent or waiver by the holder of this bond (unless effectively revoked as provided in the Mortgage) shall be conclusive and binding upon such holder and upon all future holders of this bond and of any bonds issued in exchange or substitution herefor, irrespective of whether or not any notation of such consent or waiver is made upon this bond or such other bond.
No reference herein to the Mortgage and no provision of this bond or of the Mortgage shall alter or impair the obligation of the Company, which is absolute and unconditional, to pay the principal of (and premium, if any) and interest on this bond in the manner, at the respective times, at the rate and in the currency herein prescribed.
The bonds are issuable as registered bonds without coupons in the denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof. At the office or agency to be maintained by the Company in The City of New York, New York, and in the manner and subject to the provisions of the Mortgage, bonds may be exchanged for a like aggregate principal amount of bonds of other authorized denominations, without payment of any charge other than a sum sufficient to reimburse the Company for any tax or other governmental charge incident thereto. This bond is transferable as prescribed in the Mortgage by the registered owner hereof in person, or by his duly authorized attorney, at the office or agency of the Company in The City of New York, New York, upon surrender of this bond, and upon payment, if the Company shall require it, of the transfer charges provided for in the Mortgage, and, thereupon, a new fully registered bond of the same series for a like principal amount will be issued to the transferee in exchange hereof as provided in the Mortgage. The Company and the Trustees may deem and treat the person in whose name this bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the Company nor the Trustees shall be affected by any notice to the contrary.
This bond is redeemable at the option of the Company under certain circumstances in the manner and at such redemption price as is provided in the Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture. This bond is also redeemable at the option of the owner upon the events, in the manner, and at such redemption prices as are specified in the Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture. This bond is also mandatorily redeemable under certain circumstances in the manner and at such redemption price as is provided in the Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture.
No recourse shall be had for the payment of the principal of or interest on this bond against any incorporator or any past, present or future subscriber to the capital stock, stockholder, officer or director of the Company or of any predecessor or successor corporation, as such, either directly or through the Company or any predecessor or successor corporation, under any rule of law, statute or constitution or by the enforcement of any assessment or otherwise, all such liability of incorporators, subscribers, stockholders, officers and directors being released by the holder or owner hereof by the acceptance of this bond and being likewise waived and released by the terms of the Mortgage.
As provided in the Mortgage, this bond shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Entergy New Orleans, Inc. has caused this bond to be signed in its corporate name by its Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President or one of its Vice Presidents by his or her signature or a facsimile thereof, and its corporate seal to be impressed or imprinted hereon and attested by its Secretary or one of its Assistant Secretaries by his or her signature or a facsimile thereof.
Dated: June 22, 2005
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC.
By:
Name: Steven C. McNeal
Title: Vice President and Treasurer
Attest:
Name:
Christopher T. Screen
Assistant Secretary
TRUSTEE'S AUTHENTICATION CERTIFICATE
This bond is one of the bonds, of the series herein designated, described or provided for in the within-mentioned mortgage.
THE BANK OF NEW YORK,
as Trustee,
By:
Authorized Signatory
LEGEND
Unless and until this bond is exchanged in whole or in part for certificated bonds registered in the names of the various beneficial holders hereof as then certified to the Trustee by The Depository Trust Company or its successor (the "Depositary"), this bond may not be transferred except as a whole by the Depositary to a nominee of the Depositary or by a nominee of the Depositary to the Depositary or another nominee of the Depositary or by the Depositary or any such nominee to a successor Depositary or a nominee of such successor Depositary.
Unless this certificate is presented by an authorized representative of the Depositary to the Company or its agent for registration of transfer, exchange or payment, and any certificate to be issued is registered in the name of Cede & Co., or such other name as requested by an authorized representative of the Depositary, and any amount payable thereunder is made payable to Cede & Co., or such other name, ANY TRANSFER, PLEDGE OR OTHER USE HEREOF FOR VALUE OR OTHERWISE BY OR TO ANY PERSON IS WRONGFUL since the registered owner hereof, Cede & Co., has an interest herein.
This bond may be exchanged for certificated bonds registered in the names of the various beneficial owners hereof if (a) the Depositary is at any time unwilling or unable to continue as depositary and a successor depositary is not appointed by the Company within 90 days or (b) the Company elects to issue certificated bonds to beneficial owners (as certified to the Company by the Depositary).
Exhibit 4(f)
U.S. $35,000,000
AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT
Dated as of June 30, 2005
Among
ENTERGY CORPORATION
as Borrower
THE BANKS NAMED HEREIN
as Banks
BAYERISCHE HYPO- UND VEREINSBANK AG, NEW YORK BRANCH
as Administrative Agent
BAYERISCHE HYPO- UND VEREINSBANK AG, NEW YORK BRANCH
as Arranger
AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT
Dated as of June 30, 2005
ENTERGY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the "Borrower"), the banks (the "Banks") listed on the signature pages hereof and Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch ("HypoVereinsbank"), as administrative agent (the "Administrative Agent") for the Lenders hereunder, agree with reference to the following facts:
RECITALS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties hereto covenant and agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS AND ACCOUNTING TERMS
SECTION 1.01. Certain Defined Terms.
As used in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings (such meanings to be equally applicable to both the singular and plural forms of the terms defined):
"Advance" means an advance by a Lender to the Borrower as part of a Borrowing and refers to a Base Rate Advance or a Eurodollar Rate Advance, each of which shall be a "Type" of Advance.
"Affiliate" means, as to any Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person or is a director or officer of such Person.
"Agreement"
means this Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, as amended, supplemented or modified from time to time."Applicable Lending Office" means, with respect to each Lender, such Lender's Eurodollar Lending Office.
"Applicable Margin" means 185 basis points per annum for any Eurodollar Rate Advance.
"Approved Fund" means, with respect to any Lender that is a fund that invests in bank loans, any other fund that invests in commercial loans and is managed or advised by the same investment advisor as such Lender or by an Affiliate of such investment advisor.
"Assignment and Acceptance" means an assignment and acceptance entered into by a Lender and an assignee of that Lender, and accepted by the Administrative Agent, in substantially the form of Exhibit B hereto.
"Available Commitment" means, as to any Lender at any time of determination, an amount equal to the excess of (a) such Lender's Commitment over (b) the aggregate principal amount of such Lender's Advances then outstanding.
"Base Rate" means, for any period, a fluctuating interest rate per annum at all times equal to the higher of:
"Base Rate Advance" means an Advance that bears interest as provided in Section 2.05(a).
"Borrowing" means a borrowing consisting of simultaneous Advances of the same Type made by each of the Lenders pursuant to Section 2.01 or Converted pursuant to Section 2.07 or 2.08.
"Business Day" means a day of the year on which banks are not required or authorized to close in New York City and, if the applicable Business Day relates to any Eurodollar Rate Advances, on which dealings are carried on in the London interbank market.
"Capitalization" means, as of any date of determination, with respect to the Borrower and its subsidiaries determined on a consolidated basis, an amount equal to the sum of (i) the total principal amount of all Debt of the Borrower and its subsidiaries outstanding on such date, (ii) Consolidated Net Worth as of such date and (iii) to the extent not otherwise included in Capitalization, all preferred stock and other preferred securities of the Borrower and its subsidiaries, including preferred securities issued by any subsidiary trust, outstanding on such date.
"Commitment" has the meaning specified in Section 2.01.
"Commitment Period" means the period beginning on (and including) November 24, 2003 and ending on December 1, 2003.
"Common Equity" shall mean the stock, shares or other ownership interests in the issuer thereof howsoever evidenced (including, without limitation, limited liability company membership interests) that has ordinary voting power for the election of directors, managers or trustees (or other persons performing similar functions) of the issuer, as applicable, provided that Preferred Equity, even if it has such ordinary voting power, shall not be Common Equity.
"Consolidated Net Worth" means the sum of the capital stock (excluding treasury stock and capital stock subscribed for and unissued) and surplus (including earned surplus, capital surplus and the balance of the current profit and loss account not transferred to surplus) accounts of the Borrower and its subsidiaries appearing on a consolidated balance sheet of the Borrower and its subsidiaries prepared as of the date of determination in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistent with those applied in the preparation of the financial statements referred to in Section 4.01(e), after eliminating all intercompany transactions and all amounts properly attributable to minority interests, if any, in the stock and surplus of subsidiaries.
"Convert", "Conversion" and "Converted" each refers to a conversion of Advances of one Type into Advances of another Type or the selection of a new, or the renewal of the same, Interest Period for Eurodollar Rate Advances pursuant to Section 2.07 or 2.08.
"Debt" of any Person means (without duplication) all liabilities, obligations and indebtedness (whether contingent or otherwise) of such Person (i) for borrowed money or evidenced by bonds, debentures, notes, or other similar instruments, (ii) to pay the deferred purchase price of property or services (other than such obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business on customary trade terms, provided that such obligations are not more than 30 days past due), (iii) as lessee under leases which shall have been or should be, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, recorded as capital leases, (iv) under reimbursement agreements or similar agreements with respect to the issuance of letters of credit (other than obligations in respect of letters of credit opened to provide for the payment of goods or services purchased in the ordinary course of business), (v) under any Guaranty Obligations and (vi) liabilities in r espect of unfunded vested benefits under plans covered by Title IV of ERISA.
"Domestic Regulated Utility Subsidiary" means a direct or indirect domestic subsidiary of the Borrower engaged in generation, transmission or distribution of electricity or the transmission or distribution of natural gas that is regulated as to rates on a cost of service basis by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (or successor agency) or a state or local governmental body.
"Effective Date" means June 30, 2005.
"Eligible Assignee" means a Person (a) (i) that is (A) a commercial bank organized under the laws of the United States, or any State thereof, and having total assets in excess of $500,000,000; (B) a commercial bank organized under the laws of any other country which is a member of the OECD, or a political subdivision of any such country, and having total assets in excess of $500,000,000, provided that such bank is acting through a branch or agency located in the United States or another country which is also a member of OECD; or (C) a Lender, a financial institution Affiliate of any Lender or an Approved Fund of any Lender immediately prior to an assignment and (ii) whose long-term public senior debt securities are rated at least "BBB-" by S&P or at least "Baa3" by Moody's; or (b) that is approved by the Borrower (whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld) and the Administrative Agent.
"Entergy Arkansas"
means Entergy Arkansas, Inc., an Arkansas corporation, or its successors and permitted assigns."Entergy Gulf States"
means Entergy Gulf States, Inc., a Texas corporation, or its successors and permitted assigns."Entergy Louisiana"
means Entergy Louisiana, Inc., a Louisiana corporation, or its successors and permitted assigns."Entergy Mississippi"
means Entergy Mississippi, Inc., a Mississippi corporation, or its successors and permitted assigns."Entergy New Orleans"
means Entergy New Orleans, Inc., a Louisiana corporation, or its successors and permitted assigns."Environmental Laws" means any federal, state or local laws, ordinances or codes, rules, orders, or regulations relating to pollution or protection of the environment, including, without limitation, laws relating to hazardous substances, laws relating to reclamation of land and waterways and laws relating to emissions, discharges, releases or threatened releases of pollutants, contaminants, chemicals, or industrial, toxic or hazardous substances or wastes into the environment (including, without limitation, ambient air, surface water, ground water, land surface or subsurface strata) or otherwise relating to the manufacture, processing, distribution, use, treatment, storage, disposal, transport or handling of pollution, contaminants, chemicals, or industrial, toxic or hazardous substances or wastes.
"ERISA" means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended from time to time, and the regulations promulgated and rulings issued thereunder, each as amended and modified from time to time.
"ERISA Affiliate" of a Person or entity means any trade or business (whether or not incorporated) that is a member of a group of which such Person or entity is a member and that is under common control with such Person or entity within the meaning of Section 414 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and the regulations promulgated and rulings issued thereunder, each as amended or modified from time to time.
"ERISA Plan" means an employee benefit plan maintained for employees of any Person or any ERISA Affiliate of such Person subject to Title IV of ERISA.
"ERISA Termination Event" means (i) a Reportable Event described in Section 4043 of ERISA and the regulations issued thereunder (other than a Reportable Event not subject to the provision for 30-day notice to PBGC), or (ii) the withdrawal of the Borrower or any of its ERISA Affiliates from an ERISA Plan during a plan year in which the Borrower or any of its ERISA Affiliates was a "substantial employer" as defined in Section 4001(a)(2) of ERISA, or (iii) the filing of a notice of intent to terminate an ERISA Plan or the treatment of an ERISA Plan amendment as a termination under Section 4041 of ERISA, or (iv) the institution of proceedings to terminate an ERISA Plan by the PBGC or to appoint a trustee to administer any ERISA Plan, or (v) any other event or condition that would constitute grounds under Section 4042 of ERISA for the termination of, or the appointment of a trustee to administer any ERISA Plan.
"Eurocurrency Liabilities" has the meaning assigned to that term in Regulation D of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, as in effect from time to time.
"Eurodollar Lending Office" means, with respect to any Lender, the office of such Lender specified as its "Eurodollar Lending Office" opposite its name on Schedule I hereto or in the Assignment and Acceptance pursuant to which it became a Lender, or such other office of such Lender as such Lender may from time to time specify to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent.
"Eurodollar Rate" means, for the Interest Period for each Eurodollar Rate Advance made as part of the same Borrowing, an interest rate per annum equal to the average (rounded upward to the nearest whole multiple of 1/16 of 1% per annum, if such average is not such a multiple) of the rate per annum at which deposits in U.S. dollars are offered by the principal office of the Reference Bank in London, England, to prime banks in the London interbank market at 11:00 A.M. (London time) two Business Days before the first day of such Interest Period in an amount substantially equal to such Reference Bank's Eurodollar Rate Advance made as part of such Borrowing and for a period equal to such Interest Period. The Eurodollar Rate for the Interest Period for each Eurodollar Rate Advance made as part of the same Borrowing shall be determined by the Administrative Agent on the basis of applicable rates furnished to and received by the Administrative Age nt from the Reference Bank two Business Days before the first day of such Interest Period, subject, however, to the provisions of Section 2.07.
"Eurodollar Rate Advance" means an Advance that bears interest as provided in Section 2.05(b).
"Eurodollar Rate Reserve Percentage" of any Lender for the Interest Period for any Eurodollar Rate Advance means the reserve percentage applicable during such Interest Period (or if more than one such percentage shall be so applicable, the daily average of such percentages for those days in such Interest Period during which any such percentage shall be so applicable) under regulations issued from time to time by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (or any successor) for determining the maximum reserve requirement (including, without limitation, any emergency, supplemental or other marginal reserve requirement) for such Lender with respect to liabilities or assets consisting of or including Eurocurrency Liabilities having a term equal to such Interest Period.
"Events of Default" has the meaning specified in Section 6.01.
"Existing Credit Agreement" means the Credit Agreement, dated as of November 24, 2003, among the Borrower, the banks named therein and Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent, as heretofore amended.
"Federal Funds Rate" means, for any period, a fluctuating interest rate per annum equal for each day during such period to the weighted average of the rates on overnight Federal funds transactions with members of the Federal Reserve System arranged by Federal funds brokers, as published for such day (or, if such day is not a Business Day, for the next preceding Business Day) by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or, if such rate is not so published for any day which is a Business Day, the average of the quotations for such day on such transactions received by the Administrative Agent from three Federal funds brokers of recognized standing selected by it.
"Granting Lender" has the meaning specified in Section 8.07(i).
"Guaranty Obligations" means (i) direct or indirect guaranties in respect of, and obligations to purchase or otherwise acquire, or otherwise to assure a creditor against loss in respect of, Debt of any Person and (ii) other guaranty or similar obligations in respect of the financial obligations of others, including, without limitation, Support Obligations.
"Indemnified Person" has the meaning specified in Section 8.04(c).
"Interest Period" means, for each Advance made as part of the same Borrowing, the period commencing on the date of such Advance or the date of the Conversion of any Advance into such an Advance and ending on the last day of the period selected by the Borrower pursuant to the provisions below and, thereafter, each subsequent period commencing on the last day of the immediately preceding Interest Period and ending on the last day of the period selected by the Borrower pursuant to the provisions below, unless such advance is converted into another Interest Period pursuant to Section 2.08. The duration of each such Interest Period shall be 1, 2, 3 or 6 months, or 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 years (or any other period agreed upon by the Borrower and the Lenders) as the Borrower may, upon notice received by the Administrative Agent not later than 11:00 A.M. (New York City time) on the third Business Day prior to the first day of such Interest Period, select; provided, however, that:
"Junior Subordinated Debentures"
means any junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures issued by any Significant Subsidiary or Entergy New Orleans from time to time."Lenders" means the Banks listed on the signature pages hereof and each Person that shall become a party hereto pursuant to Section 8.07.
"Lien" means, with respect to any asset, any mortgage, lien, pledge, charge, security interest or encumbrance of any kind in respect of such asset. For the purposes of this Agreement, a Person or any of its subsidiaries shall be deemed to own, subject to a Lien, any asset that it has acquired or holds subject to the interest of a vendor or lessor under any conditional sale agreement, capital lease or other title retention agreement relating to such asset.
"Majority Lenders" means at any time Lenders to which are owed more than 50% of the then aggregate unpaid principal amount of the Advances, or, if no such principal amount is then outstanding, Lenders having more than 50% of the Commitments (without giving effect to any termination in whole of the Commitments pursuant to Section 6.02), provided, that for purposes hereof, neither the Borrower, nor any of its Affiliates, if a Lender, shall be included in (i) the Lenders holding such amount of the Advances or having such amount of the Commitments or (ii) determining the aggregate unpaid principal amount of the Advances or the total Commitments.
"Maturity Date" means November 24, 2008.
"Moody's" means Moody's Investors Service, Inc. or any successor thereto.
"Multiemployer Plan" means a "multiemployer plan" as defined in Section 4001(a)(3) of ERISA to which the Borrower or any ERISA Affiliate is making or accruing an obligation to make contributions, or has within any of the preceding three plan years made or accrued an obligation to make contributions.
"Net Available Cash" from a Stock Disposition means cash payments received therefrom net of all legal, title and recording tax expenses, commissions and other fees and expenses incurred, and all federal, state and local taxes required to be paid or accrued as a liability under generally accepted accounting principles, as a result of such Stock Disposition.
"Non-Recourse Debt" means any Debt of any subsidiary of the Borrower that does not constitute Debt of the Borrower, any Significant Subsidiary or Entergy New Orleans.
"Notice of Borrowing" has the meaning specified in Section 2.02(a).
"Notice of Conversion" has the meaning specified in Section 2.08(a).
"OECD" means the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
"Other Taxes" has the meaning specified in Section 2.13(b).
"PBGC" means the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation and any entity succeeding to any or all of its functions under ERISA.
"Person" means an individual, partnership, corporation (including a business trust), joint stock company, trust, unincorporated association, joint venture or other entity, or a government or any political subdivision or agency thereof.
"Preferred Equity" shall mean any stock, shares or other ownership interests in the issuer thereof howsoever evidenced (including, without limitation, limited liability company membership interests), whether with or without voting rights, that is entitled to dividends or distributions prior to the payment of dividends or distributions with respect to Common Equity.
"Prepayment Event" means the occurrence of any event or the existence of any condition under any agreement or instrument relating to any Debt of a Significant Subsidiary that is outstanding in a principal amount in excess of $50,000,000 in the aggregate, which occurrence or event results in the declaration of such Debt being due and payable, or required to be prepaid (other than by a regularly scheduled required prepayment), prior to the stated maturity thereof.
"Reference Bank" means HypoVereinsbank.
"Register" has the meaning specified in Section 8.07(c).
"Reportable Event" has the meaning assigned to that term in Title IV of ERISA.
"S&P" means Standard & Poor's Ratings Services, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., or any successor thereto.
"SEC" means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
"SEC Order" has the meaning specified in Section 3.01(a)(iii).
"Senior Debt Rating" means, as to any Person, the rating assigned by Moody's or S&P to the senior secured long-term debt of such Person.
"SERI" means Systems Energy Resources, Inc., an Arkansas corporation, or its successors and permitted assigns.
"Significant Subsidiary" means Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, SERI and any other Domestic Regulated Utility Subsidiary of the Borrower: (i) the total assets (after intercompany eliminations) of which exceed 5% of the total assets of the Borrower and its subsidiaries or (ii) the net worth of which exceeds 5% of the Consolidated Net Worth of the Borrower and its subsidiaries, in each case as shown on the most recent audited consolidated balance sheet of the Borrower and its subsidiaries. In no event shall "Significant Subsidiary" include any Domestic Regulated Utility Subsidiary that as of March 31, 2005, (i) had total assets (after intercompany eliminations) that were 5% or less of the total assets of the Borrower and its subsidiaries as of such date or (ii) had a net worth that was 5% or less of the Consolidated Net Worth of the Borrower and its subsidiaries as of such date.
"SPC" has the meaning specified in Section 8.07(i).
"Stock Disposition" means, with respect to any Person, the issuance, sale, lease, transfer, conveyance or other disposition of (whether in one transaction or in a series of transactions) any Common Equity (or stock or other instruments convertible into Common Equity) of such Person.
"Support Obligations" means any financial obligation, contingent or otherwise, of any Person guaranteeing or otherwise supporting any Debt or other obligation of any other Person in any manner, whether directly or indirectly, and including, without limitation, any obligation of such Person, direct or indirect, (i) to purchase or pay (or advance or supply funds for the purchase or payment of) such Debt or to purchase (or to advance or supply funds for the purchase of) any security for the payment of such Debt, (ii) to purchase property, securities or services for the purpose of assuring the owner of such Debt of the payment of such Debt, (iii) to maintain working capital, equity capital, available cash or other financial statement condition of the primary obligor so as to enable the primary obligor to pay such Debt, (iv) to provide equity capital under or in respect of equity subscription arrangements so as to assure any Person with respect to the payment of such Debt or the performance of such obligation, or (v) to provide financial support for the performance of, or to arrange for the performance of, any non-monetary obligations or non-funded debt payment obligations (including, without limitation, guaranties of payments under power purchase or other similar arrangements) of the primary obligor.
"Taxes" has the meaning specified in Section 2.13(a).
SECTION 1.02. Computation of Time Periods.
In this Agreement in the computation of periods of time from a specified date to a later specified date, the word "from" means "from and including" and the words "to" and "until" each means "to but excluding".
SECTION 1.03. Accounting Terms.
All accounting terms not specifically defined herein shall be construed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistent with those applied in the preparation of the financial statements referred to in Section 4.01(e) hereof.
ARTICLE II
AMOUNTS AND TERMS OF THE ADVANCES
SECTION 2.01. The Advances.
Each Lender severally agrees, on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, to have made one Eurodollar Rate Advance to the Borrower on any Business Day during the Commitment Period in an amount not to exceed the amount set opposite such Lender's name on Schedule II hereto or, if such Lender has entered into any Assignment and Acceptance, set forth for such Lender in the Register maintained by the Administrative Agent pursuant to Section 8.07(c) (such Lender's "Commitment"). At no time may the principal amount outstanding hereunder exceed the aggregate amount of the Commitments; provided further that, the aggregate amount of the Commitments shall not exceed $35,000,000.
SECTION 2.02. Making the Advances.
SECTION 2.03. Intentionally Omitted.
SECTION 2.04. Repayment of Advances, Etc.
The Borrower shall repay the principal amount of each Advance made by each Lender and Converted from time to time on the Maturity Date.
SECTION 2.05. Interest on Advances.
The Borrower shall pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Advance made by each Lender from the date of such Advance until such principal amount shall be paid in full, at the following rates per annum:
SECTION 2.06. Additional Interest on Eurodollar Rate Advances.
The Borrower shall pay to each Lender, so long as such Lender shall be required under regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to maintain reserves with respect to liabilities or assets consisting of or including Eurocurrency Liabilities, additional interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Eurodollar Rate Advance of such Lender, from the date of such Advance until such principal amount is paid in full, at an interest rate per annum equal at all times to the remainder obtained by subtracting (i) the Eurodollar Rate for the Interest Period for such Advance from (ii) the rate obtained by dividing such Eurodollar Rate by a percentage equal to 100% minus the Eurodollar Rate Reserve Percentage of such Lender for such Interest Period, payable on each date on which interest is payable on such Advance. Such additional interest shall be determined by such Lender and notified to the Borrower through the Administrative Agent, and such determi nation shall be conclusive and binding for all purposes, absent manifest error.
SECTION 2.07. Interest Rate Determination.
SECTION 2.08. Conversion of Advances.
SECTION 2.09. Prepayments.
If the Borrower at any time prepays any Advance, then the Borrower shall give notice to the Administrative Agent prior to 11:00 A.M. (New York City time) at least two Business Days' prior to the date of prepayment, stating the proposed date and aggregate principal amount of the prepayment, and if such notice is given the Borrower shall, prepay the outstanding principal amounts of the Advances, together with accrued interest to the date of such prepayment on the principal amount prepaid and, if such prepayment is prior to November 24, 2007 such other amounts pursuant to Section 8.04(b); provided, however, that (i) partial prepayment shall not be permitted, and (ii) in the case of any such prepayment of a Eurodollar Rate Advance, the Borrower shall be obligated to reimburse the Lenders in respect thereof pursuant to Section 8.04(b) on the date of such prepayment. Amounts so prepaid under this Section 2.09 may not be reborrowed.
SECTION 2.10. Increased Costs.
SECTION 2.11. Illegality.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, if any Lender shall notify the Administrative Agent that the introduction of, any change in or any change in the interpretation of any law or regulation makes it unlawful, or any central bank or other governmental authority asserts that it is unlawful, for any Lender or its Eurodollar Lending Office to perform its obligations hereunder to make Eurodollar Rate Advances or to fund or maintain Eurodollar Rate Advances hereunder, (i) the obligation of the Lenders to make, or to Convert Advances into, Eurodollar Rate Advances shall be suspended until the Administrative Agent shall notify the Borrower and the Lenders that the circumstances causing such suspension no longer exist and (ii) the Borrower shall forthwith prepay in full all Eurodollar Rate Advances of all Lenders then outstanding, together with interest accrued thereon, unless the Borrower, within five Business Days of notice from the Administrative Agent, Conver ts all Eurodollar Rate Advances of all Lenders then outstanding into Advances of another Type in accordance with Section 2.08.
SECTION 2.12. Payments and Computations.
SECTION 2.13. Taxes.
SECTION 2.14. Sharing of Payments, Etc.
If any Lender shall obtain any payment (whether voluntary, involuntary, through the exercise of any right of set-off, or otherwise) on account of the Advances made by it (other than pursuant to Section 2.02(c), 2.06, 2.10, 2.13 or 8.04(b)) in excess of its ratable share of payments on account of the Advances obtained by all the Lenders, such Lender shall forthwith purchase from the other Lenders such participations in the Advances made by them as shall be necessary to cause such purchasing Lender to share the excess payment ratably with each of them, provided, however, that if all or any portion of such excess payment is thereafter recovered from such purchasing Lender, such purchase from each Lender shall be rescinded and such Lender shall repay to the purchasing Lender the purchase price to the extent of such recovery together with an amount equal to such Lender's ratable share (according to the proportion of (i) the amount of such Lender's required repaym ent to (ii) the total amount so recovered from the purchasing Lender) of any interest or other amount paid or payable by the purchasing Lender in respect of the total amount so recovered. The Borrower agrees that any Lender so purchasing a participation from another Lender pursuant to this Section 2.14 may, to the fullest extent permitted by law, exercise all its rights of payment (including the right of set-off) with respect to such participation as fully as if such Lender were the direct creditor of the Borrower in the amount of such participation.
SECTION 2.15. Noteless Agreement; Evidence of Indebtedness.
ARTICLE III
CONDITIONS OF LENDING
SECTION 3.01. Conditions Precedent to Effective Date.
This Agreement shall become effective on and as of the Effective Date, subject to the satisfaction on or prior thereto of the following conditions precedent:
.
SECTION 3.02. Conditions Precedent to Each Borrowing.
The obligation of each Lender to make an Advance on the occasion of each Borrowing (including the initial Borrowing) shall be subject to the further conditions precedent that on the date of such Borrowing:
ARTICLE IV
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
SECTION 4.01. Representations and Warranties of the Borrower.
The Borrower represents and warrants as follows:
ARTICLE V
COVENANTS OF THE BORROWER
SECTION 5.01. Affirmative Covenants.
So long as any amount payable by the Borrower hereunder shall remain unpaid or any Lender shall have any Commitment hereunder, the Borrower will, unless the Majority Lenders shall otherwise consent in writing:
(d) SEC Order. Maintain the SEC Order in full force and effect through its termination date and comply with all terms and conditions thereof until all amounts outstanding under this Agreement shall have been repaid or paid (as the case may be) and the Maturity Date has occurred.
SECTION 5.02. Negative Covenants.
So long as any amount payable by the Borrower hereunder shall remain unpaid or any Lender shall have any Commitment hereunder, the Borrower will not, without the written consent of the Majority Lenders:
ARTICLE VI
EVENTS OF DEFAULT AND REMEDIES
Each of the following events shall constitute an "Event of Default" hereunder:
If any Prepayment Event or Event of Default shall occur and be continuing, then, and in any such event, the Administrative Agent (i) shall at the request, or may with the consent, of the Majority Lenders, by notice to the Borrower, declare the obligation of each Lender to make Advances to be terminated, whereupon the same shall forthwith terminate, and (ii) shall at the request, or may with the consent, of the Majority Lenders, by notice to the Borrower, declare the Advances, all interest thereon and all other amounts payable under this Agreement to be forthwith due and payable, whereupon the Advances, all such interest and all such amounts shall become and be forthwith due and payable, without presentment, demand, protest or further notice of any kind, all of which are hereby expressly waived by the Borrower; provided, however, that in the event of an actual or deemed entry of an order for relief with respect to the Borrower, any Significant Subsidiary or E ntergy New Orleans under the Federal Bankruptcy Code, (A) the obligation of each Lender to make Advances shall automatically be terminated and (B) the Advances, all such interest and all such amounts shall automatically become and be due and payable, without presentment, demand, protest or any notice of any kind, all of which are hereby expressly waived by the Borrower.
ARTICLE VII
THE AGENT
Each Lender hereby appoints and authorizes the Administrative Agent to take such action as agent on its behalf and to exercise such powers under this Agreement as are delegated to the Administrative Agent by the terms hereof, together with such powers as are reasonably incidental thereto. As to any matters not expressly provided for by this Agreement (including, without limitation, enforcement or collection of the Advances), the Administrative Agent shall not be required to exercise any discretion or take any action, but shall be required to act or to refrain from acting (and shall be fully protected in so acting or refraining from acting) upon the instructions of the Majority Lenders, and such instructions shall be binding upon all Lenders; provided, however, that the Administrative Agent shall not be required to take any action which exposes the Administrative Agent to personal liability or which is contrary to this Agreement or applicable law. The Administrative Agent agrees to give to each Lender prompt notice of each notice given to it by the Borrower pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
Neither the Administrative Agent nor any of its directors, officers, agents or employees shall be liable for any action taken or omitted to be taken by it or them under or in connection with this Agreement, except for its or their own gross negligence or willful misconduct. Without limitation of the generality of the foregoing, the Administrative Agent: (i) may consult with legal counsel (including counsel for the Borrower), independent public accountants and other experts selected by it and shall not be liable for any action taken or omitted to be taken in good faith by it in accordance with the advice of such counsel, accountants or experts; (ii) makes no warranty or representation to any Lender and shall not be responsible to any Lender for any statements, warranties or representations (whether written or oral) made in or in connection with this Agreement; (iii) shall not have any duty to ascertain or to inquire as to the performance or observance of any of the terms, covenants or conditions of this Agreement on the part of the Borrower or to inspect the property (including the books and records) of the Borrower; (iv) shall not be responsible to any Lender for the due execution, legality, validity, enforceability, genuineness, sufficiency or value of, or the perfection or priority of any lien or security interest created or purported to be created under or in connection with, this Agreement or any other instrument or document furnished pursuant hereto; and (v) shall incur no liability under or in respect of this Agreement by acting upon any notice, consent, certificate or other instrument or writing (which may be by telecopier, telegram, cable or telex) believed by it to be genuine and signed or sent by the proper party or parties.
With respect to its Commitment and the Advances made by it, HypoVereinsbank shall have the same rights and powers under this Agreement as any other Lender and may exercise the same as though it were not the Administrative Agent; and the term "Lender" or "Lenders" shall, unless otherwise expressly indicated, include HypoVereinsbank in its individual capacity. HypoVereinsbank and its affiliates may accept deposits from, lend money to, act as trustee under indentures of, and generally engage in any kind of business with, the Borrower, any of its subsidiaries and any Person who may do business with or own securities of the Borrower or any such subsidiary, all as if HypoVereinsbank were not the Administrative Agent and without any duty to account therefor to the Lenders.
Each Lender acknowledges that it has, independently and without reliance upon the Administrative Agent or any other Lender and based on the financial statements referred to in Section 4.01(e) and such other documents and information as it has deemed appropriate, made its own credit analysis and decision to enter into this Agreement. Each Lender also acknowledges that it will, independently and without reliance upon the Administrative Agent or any other Lender and based on such documents and information as it shall deem appropriate at the time, continue to make its own credit decisions in taking or not taking action under this Agreement.
The Lenders agree to indemnify the Administrative Agent (to the extent not reimbursed by the Borrower), ratably according to the respective principal amounts of the Advances then outstanding to each of them (or if no Advances are at the time outstanding, ratably according to the respective amounts of their Commitments), from and against any and all liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, penalties, actions, judgments, suits, costs, expenses or disbursements of any kind or nature whatsoever which may be imposed on, incurred by, or asserted against the Administrative Agent in any way relating to or arising out of this Agreement or any action taken or omitted by the Administrative Agent under this Agreement, provided that no Lender shall be liable for any portion of such liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, penalties, actions, judgments, suits, costs, expenses or disbursements resulting from the Administrative Agent's gross negligence or willful misconduct. Without li mitation of the foregoing, each Lender agrees to reimburse the Administrative Agent promptly upon demand for its ratable share of any out-of-pocket expenses (including reasonable counsel fees) incurred by the Administrative Agent in connection with the preparation, execution, delivery, administration, modification, amendment or enforcement (whether through negotiations, legal proceedings or otherwise) of, or legal advice in respect of rights or responsibilities under, this Agreement, to the extent that such expenses are reimbursable by the Borrower but for which the Administrative Agent is not reimbursed by the Borrower.
The Administrative Agent may resign at any time by giving written notice thereof to the Lenders and the Borrower and may be removed at any time with or without cause by the Majority Lenders. Upon any such resignation or removal, the Majority Lenders shall have the right to appoint a successor Administrative Agent, which, for so long as no Prepayment Event or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, shall be a Lender and shall be approved by the Borrower (with such approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed). If no successor Administrative Agent shall have been so appointed by the Majority Lenders and approved by the Borrower, and shall have accepted such appointment, within 30 days after the retiring Administrative Agent's giving of notice of resignation or the Majority Lenders' removal of the retiring Administrative Agent, then the retiring Administrative Agent may, on behalf of the Lenders, appoint a successor Administrative Agent, which shall be a commercial b ank organized under the laws of the United States or of any other country that is a member of the OECD having a combined capital and surplus of at least $50,000,000. Upon the acceptance of any appointment as Administrative Agent hereunder by a successor Administrative Agent, such successor Administrative Agent shall thereupon succeed to and become vested with all the rights, powers, privileges and duties of the retiring Administrative Agent, and the retiring Administrative Agent shall be discharged from its duties and obligations under this Agreement. After any retiring Administrative Agent's resignation or removal hereunder as Administrative Agent, the provisions of this Article VII shall inure to its benefit as to any actions taken or omitted to be taken by it while it was Administrative Agent under this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if no Prepayment Event or Event of Default, and no event that with the giving of notice or the passage of time, or both, would constitute a Prepayment Event or an Event of Default, shall have occurred and be continuing, then no successor Administrative Agent shall be appointed under this Section 7.06 without the prior written consent of the Borrower, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.
ARTICLE VIII
MISCELLANEOUS
No amendment or waiver of any provision of this Agreement, nor consent to any departure by the Borrower therefrom, shall in any event be effective unless the same shall be in writing and signed by the Majority Lenders, and then such waiver or consent shall be effective only in the specific instance and for the specific purpose for which given; provided, however, that no amendment, waiver or consent shall, unless in writing and signed by all the Lenders (other than any Lender that is the Borrower or an Affiliate of the Borrower), do any of the following: (a) waive any of the conditions specified in Section 3.01 or 3.02, (b) increase the Commitments of the Lenders or subject the Lenders to any additional obligations, (c) reduce the principal of, or interest on, the Advances or any other amounts payable hereunder, (d) postpone any date fixed for any payment of principal of, or interest on, the Advances or other amounts payable hereunder, (e) change the percentage of the Commitments or of the aggregate unpaid principal amount of the Advances, or the number of Lenders that shall be required for the Lenders or any of them to take any action hereunder or (f) amend this Section 8.01; and provided further, that no amendment, waiver or consent shall, unless in writing and signed by the Administrative Agent in addition to the Lenders required above to take such action, affect the rights or duties of the Administrative Agent under this Agreement, and provided further, that this Agreement may be amended and restated without the consent of any Lender or the Administrative Agent if, upon giving effect to such amendment and restatement, such Lender or the Administrative Agent, as the case may be, shall no longer be a party to this Agreement (as so amended and restated) or have any Commitment or other obligation hereunder and shall have been paid in full all amounts payable hereunder to such Lender or the Administrative Agent, as the case may be .
All notices and other communications provided for hereunder shall be in writing (including telecopier, telegraphic, telex or cable communication) and mailed, telecopied, telegraphed, telexed, cabled or delivered, if to the Borrower, at its address at 639 Loyola Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70113, Attention: Treasurer; if to any Bank, at its Eurodollar Lending Office specified opposite its name on Schedule I hereto; if to any other Lender, at its Eurodollar Lending Office specified in the Assignment and Acceptance pursuant to which it became a Lender; and if to the Administrative Agent, at its address at 150 E. 42 Street, New York, NY 10017, Attention: Loan Operations, Tina Chung/Mariana Mucenica (Telephone: (212) 672-5688/5811, Facsimile: (212) 672-5691) or, as to each party, at such other address as shall be designated by such party in a written notice to the other parties. All such notices and communications shall, when mailed, telecopied, telegraphed, telexed or cabled, be effective when deposited in the mails, telecopied, delivered to the telegraph company, confirmed by telex answerback or delivered to the cable company, respectively, except that notices and communications to the Administrative Agent pursuant to Article II or VII shall not be effective until received by the Administrative Agent. Except as otherwise provided in Section 5.01(c), notices and other communications given by the Borrower to the Administrative Agent shall be deemed given to the Lenders.
SECTION 8.03. No Waiver; Remedies;
No failure on the part of any Lender or the Administrative Agent to exercise, and no delay in exercising, any right hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof; nor shall any single or partial exercise of any such right preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right. The remedies herein provided are cumulative and not exclusive of any remedies provided by law.
[1.85% * (Principal Amount) * (Actual Days / 360)] / [(1 + (Interest Rate) ^ (Actual Days /(2* 360))]
where
(i) Principal Amount is the aggregate principal amount of all Advances outstanding on the prepayment date
Any Lender making a demand pursuant to this Section 8.04(b) shall provide the Borrower with a written certification of the amounts required to be paid to such Lender, showing in reasonable detail the basis for the Lender's determination of such amounts; provided, however, that no Lender shall be required to disclose any confidential or proprietary information in any certification provided pursuant hereto, and the failure of any Lender to provide such certification shall not affect the obligations of the Borrower hereunder.
(c) The Borrower hereby agrees to indemnify and hold each Lender, the Administrative Agent and their respective Affiliates and their respective officers, directors, employees and professional advisors (each, an "Indemnified Person") harmless from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, liabilities, costs or expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees and expenses, whether or not such Indemnified Person is named as a party to any proceeding or is otherwise subjected to judicial or legal process arising from any such proceeding) that any of them may incur or which may be claimed against any of them by any Person or entity by reason of or in connection with the execution, delivery or performance of this Agreement or any transaction contemplated hereby, or the use by the Borrower or any of its subsidiaries of the proceeds of any Advance, except that no Indemnified Person shall be entitled to any indemnification hereunder to the extent that such claims, damages, losses, liabilities, costs or expenses are finally determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to have resulted from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of such Indemnified Person. The Borrower's obligations under this Section 8.04(c) shall survive the repayment of all amounts owing to the Lenders and the Administrative Agent under this Agreement and the termination of the Commitments. If and to the extent that the obligations of the Borrower under this Section 8.04(c) are unenforceable for any reason, the Borrower agrees to make the maximum contribution to the payment and satisfaction thereof which is permissible under applicable law. The Borrower also agrees not to assert any claim against any Lender, any of such Lender's affiliates, or any of their respective directors, officers, employees, attorneys and agents, on any theory of liability, for special, indirect, consequential or punitive damages arising out of or otherwise relating to this Agreement, any of the transact ions contemplated herein or the actual or proposed use of the proceeds of the Advances.
Upon (i) the occurrence and during the continuance of any Prepayment Event or Event of Default and (ii) the making of the request or the granting of the consent specified by Section 6.02 to authorize the Administrative Agent to declare the Advances due and payable pursuant to the provisions of Section 6.02, each Lender is hereby authorized at any time and from time to time, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to set off and apply any and all deposits (general or special, time or demand, provisional or final) at any time held and other indebtedness at any time owing by such Lender to or for the credit or the account of the Borrower against any and all of the obligations of the Borrower now or hereafter existing under this Agreement, whether or not such Lender shall have made any demand under this Agreement and although such obligations may be unmatured. Each Lender agrees promptly to notify the Borrower after any such set-off and application made by such Lender, provided that the failure to give such notice shall not affect the validity of such set-off and application. The rights of each Lender under this Section 8.05 are in addition to other rights and remedies (including, without limitation, other rights of set-off) which such Lender may have.
This Agreement shall become effective when it shall have been executed by the Borrower, the Lenders and the Administrative Agent and thereafter shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Borrower, the Administrative Agent and each Lender and their respective successors and assigns, except that the Borrower shall not have the right to assign its rights hereunder or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the Lenders.
THIS AGREEMENT AND ANY NOTE ISSUED PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.15 SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
SECTION 8.09. Consent to Jurisdiction; Waiver of Jury Trial.
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.
[The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized, as of the date first above written.
ENTERGY CORPORATION
By
Steven C. McNeal
Vice President and Treasurer
BAYERISCHE HYPO- UND VEREINSBANK AG, NEW YORK BRANCH
as Administrative Agent
By
Name:
Title:
By
Name:
Title:
BANKS
BAYERISCHE HYPO- UND VEREINSBANK AG, NEW YORK BRANCH
By
Name:
Title:
By
Name:
Title:
SCHEDULE I
ENTERGY CORPORATION
U.S. $35,000,000 Credit Agreement
Name of Bank |
Payment |
Eurodollar |
|
Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch, as |
Fedwire: #9; Federal Reserve Bank of New York ABA No.: 026 008 808 Swift: HYVEUS 33 |
Bayerische Hypo- und |
SCHEDULE II
COMMITMENT SCHEDULE
Name of Lender |
Commitment Amount |
Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch |
$35,000,000 |
Total Commitment: |
$35,000,000 |
EXHIBIT A-1
FORM OF NOTICE OF BORROWING
Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch
as Administrative Agent
for the Lenders parties
to the Credit Agreement
referred to below
150 E. 42 Street
New York, New York 10017
[Date]
Attention: Bank Loan Syndications
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The undersigned, Entergy Corporation, refers to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2005 (the "Credit Agreement", the terms defined therein being used herein as therein defined), among the undersigned, certain Lenders parties thereto and Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent for said Lenders, and hereby gives you notice, irrevocably, pursuant to Section 2.02 of the Credit Agreement that the undersigned hereby requests a Borrowing under the Credit Agreement, and in that connection sets forth below the information relating to such Borrowing (the "Proposed Borrowing") as required by Section 2.02(a) of the Credit Agreement:
The undersigned hereby certifies that the following statements are true on the date hereof, and will be true on the date of the Proposed Borrowing:
Very truly yours,
ENTERGY CORPORATION
By
Name:
Title:
___________________________
1 Delete for Base Rate Advances.
EXHIBIT A-2
FORM OF NOTICE OF CONVERSION
Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch
as Administrative Agent
for the Lenders parties
to the Credit Agreement
referred to below
150 E. 42 Street
New York, New York 10017
[Date]
Attention: Bank Loan Syndications
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The undersigned, Entergy Corporation, refers to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2005 (the "Credit Agreement", the terms defined therein being used herein as therein defined), among the undersigned, certain Lenders party thereto and Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent for said Lenders, and hereby gives you notice, irrevocably, pursuant to Section 2.08 of the Credit Agreement, that the undersigned hereby requests a Conversion under the Credit Agreement, and in that connection sets forth below the information relating to such Conversion (the "Proposed Conversion") as required by Section 2.08 of the Credit Agreement:
The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the following statements are true on the date hereof, and will be true on the date of the Proposed Conversion:
Very truly yours,
ENTERGY CORPORATION
By
Name:
Title:
___________________________
2 Delete for Base Rate Advances
EXHIBIT B
FORM OF ASSIGNMENT AND ACCEPTANCE
Dated ___________, 20__
Reference is made to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2005 (as amended, modified or supplemented from time to time, the "Credit Agreement"), among Entergy Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Borrower"), the Lenders (as defined in the Credit Agreement) and Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent for the Lenders (the "Administrative Agent"). Terms defined in the Credit Agreement are used herein with the same meaning.
____________ (the "Assignor") and ___________ (the "Assignee") agree as follows:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Assignment and Acceptance to be executed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized, as of the date first above written, such execution being made on Schedule 1 hereto.
[NAME OF ASSIGNOR]
By
Name:
Title:
[NAME OF ASSIGNEE]
By__________________________
Name:
Title:
_________________________
1 If the Assignee is organized under the laws of a jurisdiction outside
the United States.
Eurodollar Lending Office:
[Address]
Accepted this ___ day
of ___________, 20__
BAYERISCHE HYPO- UND VEREINSBANK AG, NEW YORK BRANCH
as Administrative Agent
By
Name:
Title:
By
Name:
Title:
Schedule 1
to
Assignment and Acceptance
Dated __________, 20__
Section (a) |
|
Percentage Interest: |
% |
Section (b) |
|
Assignee's Commitment: |
$ |
Aggregate Outstanding Principal |
|
Amount of Advances owing |
$ |
Section (c) |
|
Effective Date1: |
_________, 20__ |
_________________________
1 This date should be no earllier than the date of acceptance by the
Administrative Agent.
EXHIBIT C
FORM OF OPINION OF
COUNSEL FOR THE BORROWER
[Date]
To each of the Lenders parties to the
Credit Agreement referred to below,
and to Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch
as Administrative Agent
Entergy Corporation
Ladies and Gentlemen:
I have acted as counsel to Entergy Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Borrower"), in connection with the preparation, execution and delivery of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2005, by and among the Borrower, the Banks parties thereto and Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent for the Lenders thereunder. This opinion is furnished to you at the request of the Borrower pursuant to Section 3.01(a)(v) of the Credit Agreement. Unless otherwise defined herein or unless the context otherwise requires, terms defined in the Credit Agreement are used herein as therein defined.
In such capacity, I have examined:
I have also examined such other corporate records of the Borrower, certificates of public officials and of officers of the Borrower, and agreements, instruments and other documents, as I have deemed necessary as a basis for the opinions expressed below.
In my examination, I have assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the legal capacity of natural persons, the authenticity of all documents submitted to me as originals, and the conformity with the originals of all documents submitted to me as copies. In making my examination of documents and instruments executed or to be executed by persons other than the Borrower, I have assumed that each such other person had the requisite power and authority to enter into and perform fully its obligations thereunder, the due authorization by each such other person for the execution, delivery and performance thereof and the due execution and delivery thereof by or on behalf of such person of each such document and instrument. In the case of any such person that is not a natural person, I have also assumed, insofar as it is relevant to the opinions set forth below, that each such other person is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction in which it was c reated, and is duly qualified and in good standing in each other jurisdiction where the failure to be so qualified could reasonably be expected to have a material effect upon its ability to execute, deliver and/or perform its obligations under any such document or instrument. I have further assumed that each document, instrument, agreement, record and certificate reviewed by me for purposes of rendering the opinions expressed below has not been amended by any oral agreement, conduct or course of dealing between the parties thereto.
As to questions of fact material to the opinions expressed herein, I have relied upon certificates and representations of officers of the Borrower (including but not limited to those contained in the Credit Agreement and certificates delivered upon the execution and delivery of the Credit Agreement) and of appropriate public officials, without independent verification of such matters except as otherwise described herein.
Whenever my opinions herein with respect to the existence or absence of facts are stated to be to my knowledge or awareness, it is intended to signify that no information has come to my attention or the attention of other counsel working under my direction in connection with the preparation of this opinion letter that would give me or them actual knowledge of the existence or absence of such facts. However, except to the extent expressly set forth herein, neither I nor they have undertaken any independent investigation to determine the existence or absence of such facts, and no inference as to my or their knowledge of the existence or absence of such facts should be assumed.
On the basis of the foregoing, having regard for such legal consideration as I deem relevant, and subject to the other limitations and qualifications contained in this letter, I am of the opinion that:
My opinions above are subject to the following qualifications:
Notwithstanding the qualifications set forth above, I have no actual knowledge of any matter within the scope of said qualifications that would cause me to change the opinions set forth in this letter.
I am licensed to practice law only in the State of Louisiana and, except as otherwise provided herein, my role as counsel to the Borrower is limited to matters involving the laws of the State of Louisiana and the federal laws of the United States of America. Except to the extent otherwise expressly set forth herein, and except with respect to matters governed by the General Corporation Law of Delaware, I render no opinion on the laws of any other jurisdiction or any subdivision thereof, and have made no independent investigation into any such laws except as specifically provided herein.
My opinions are expressed as of the date hereof, and I do not assume any obligation to update or supplement my opinions to reflect any fact or circumstance that hereafter comes to my attention, or any change in law that hereafter occurs.
This opinion letter is being provided exclusively to and for the benefit of the addressees hereof. It is not to be furnished to or relied upon by any other party for any other purpose, without prior express written authorization from me, except that (A) Thelen Reid & Priest LLP may rely hereon in connection with their opinion to you of even date herewith on behalf of the Borrower as to matters of New York law; and (B) any addressee of this letter may deliver a copy hereof to any person that becomes a Lender under the Credit Agreement after the date hereof, and such person may rely on this opinion as if it had been addressed and delivered to it on the date hereof as an original Bank that was a party to the Credit Agreement.
Very truly yours,
Denise C. Redmann
Assistant General Counsel
[DATE]
To each of the Lenders parties to the
Credit Agreement referred to below,
and to Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch
as Administrative Agent
Denise C. Redmann, Esq.
Entergy Services, Inc.
639 Loyola Avenue
New Orleans, Louisiana 70113
Entergy Corporation
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have acted as special New York counsel to Entergy Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Borrower"), in connection with the preparation, execution and delivery of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2005 (the "Credit Agreement"), among the Borrower, the Banks parties thereto and Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent for the Lenders thereunder. This opinion is being furnished to you at the request of the Borrower pursuant to Section 3.01(a)(v) of the Credit Agreement. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Credit Agreement.
In this connection, we have examined and are familiar with originals or copies, certified or otherwise identified to our satisfaction, of (i) counterparts of the Credit Agreement executed by the Borrower; (ii) the Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, and the By-Laws of the Borrower; (iii) a certificate of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, dated June [ ], 2005, attesting to the continued corporate existence and good standing of the Borrower in that state; (iv) a certificate of the Secretary of State of the State of Louisiana, dated June [ ], 2005, attesting that the Borrower is a foreign corporation duly qualified to conduct business in that state; (v) a copy of the Order, dated April 3, 2001, of the Securities and Exchange Commission (File No. 70-9749) under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended; (vi) the other documents furnished by the Borrower to the Administrative Agent pursuant to Section 3.01(a) of the Credit Agreement; and (vii) such other documents and corporate records as we have deemed necessary or appropriate for the opinions expressed herein.
In our examination, we have assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the legal capacity of natural persons, the authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals and the conformity with original documents of all documents submitted to us as certified or photostatic copies. With respect to the Borrower and each of the other parties to the Credit Agreement, we have assumed (i) that those parties are duly organized and have the power and capacity to execute, deliver and perform all obligations under such documents, and (ii) the due authorization, execution and delivery of such documents by those parties. Regarding documents executed by parties other than the Borrower, we have assumed the validity and binding effect of such documents upon those parties.
We have also assumed that all required regulatory approvals have been obtained and compliance with said approvals.
As to any facts that we did not independently establish or verify, we have relied without independent investigation upon statements, representations and certificates of officers of the Borrower, and, as to the matters addressed therein, upon certificates or communications from public officials.
Based upon the foregoing, and subject to the qualifications hereinafter expressed, it is our opinion that the Credit Agreement constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of the Borrower, enforceable against the Borrower in accordance with its terms.
Our opinion is subject to the following qualifications:
(a) The enforceability of the Borrower's obligations under the Credit Agreement is subject to the effect of any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent conveyance, reorganization, moratorium or similar law affecting creditors' rights generally.
(b) The enforceability of the Borrower's obligations under the Credit Agreement is subject to the effect of general principles of equity, including (without limitation) concepts of materiality, reasonableness, good faith and fair dealing (regardless of whether considered in a proceeding in equity or at law). Such principles of equity are of general application, and, in applying such principles, a court, among other things, might not allow a contracting party to exercise remedies in respect of a default deemed immaterial, or might decline to order an obligor to perform covenants.
(c) We note further that, in addition to the application of equitable principles described above, courts have imposed an obligation on contracting parties to act reasonably and in good faith in the exercise of their contractual rights and remedies, and may also apply public policy considerations in limiting the right of parties seeking to obtain indemnification under circumstances where the conduct of such parties is determined to have constituted negligence.
(d) We express no opinion herein as to (i) Section 8.05 of the Credit Agreement, (ii) the enforceability of provisions purporting to grant to a party conclusive rights of determination, (iii) the availability of specific performance or other equitable remedies, (iv) the enforceability of rights to indemnity under federal or state securities laws, or (v) the enforceability of waivers by parties of their respective rights and remedies under law.
This opinion is limited to the laws of the State of New York. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, we express no opinion as to the effect of the law of any jurisdiction other than the State of New York wherein any Lender may be located or wherein enforcement of the Credit Agreement may be sought that limits the rate of interest legally chargeable or collectible.
This opinion is rendered solely for your benefit and, except as stated in the following sentences of this paragraph, may not be relied upon by any other party, nor may copies be delivered to any other Person, without our prior written consent. We are aware that Denise C. Redmann, Esq. will rely upon this opinion in rendering her opinion, dated as of the date hereof, to the Lenders and the Administrative Agent, and we hereby authorize such reliance. The Lenders and the Administrative Agent are hereby authorized to deliver a copy of this opinion to any Person that becomes a Lender under the Credit Agreement after the date hereof, and any such Person may rely upon this opinion as if it had been addressed and delivered to it on the date hereof as an original Bank that was a party to the Credit Agreement.
This opinion is limited to laws currently in effect on the date hereof and to the facts as they currently exist. We assume no obligation to revise, supplement or otherwise update this opinion.
Very truly yours,
THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP
Exhibit 4(g)
U.S. $60,000,000
AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT
Dated as of June 30, 2005
Among
ENTERGY CORPORATION
as Borrower
THE BANKS NAMED HEREIN
as Banks
BAYERISCHE HYPO- UND VEREINSBANK AG, NEW YORK BRANCH
as Administrative Agent
BAYERISCHE HYPO- UND VEREINSBANK AG, NEW YORK BRANCH
as Arranger
AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT
Dated as of June 30, 2005
ENTERGY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the "Borrower"), the banks (the "Banks") listed on the signature pages hereof and Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch ("HypoVereinsbank"), as administrative agent (the "Administrative Agent") for the Lenders hereunder, agree with reference to the following facts:
RECITALS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties hereto covenant and agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS AND ACCOUNTING TERMS
SECTION 1.01. Certain Defined Terms.
As used in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings (such meanings to be equally applicable to both the singular and plural forms of the terms defined):
"Advance" means an advance by a Lender to the Borrower as part of a Borrowing and refers to a Base Rate Advance or a Eurodollar Rate Advance, each of which shall be a "Type" of Advance.
"Affiliate" means, as to any Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person or is a director or officer of such Person.
"Agreement"
means this Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, as amended, supplemented or modified from time to time."Applicable Lending Office" means, with respect to each Lender, such Lender's Domestic Lending Office in the case of a Base Rate Advance and such Lender's Eurodollar Lending Office in the case of a Eurodollar Rate Advance.
"Applicable Margin" means, (i) for any Base Rate Advance, the Base Rate Margin interest rate per annum set forth below in the columns identified as Level 1, Level 2, Level 3, Level 4, Level 5 and Level 6, and (ii) for any Eurodollar Rate Advance, the Eurodollar Margin interest rate per annum set forth below in the columns identified as Level 1, Level 2, Level 3, Level 4, Level 5 and Level 6, in each case, determined by reference to the Relevant Ratings.
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | Level 6 | |
|
Relevant Ratings at least A+ or A1 |
Relevant Ratings Less than Level 1 but at least A or A2 |
Relevant Ratings Less than Level 2 but at least A- or A3 |
Relevant Ratings Less than Level 3 but at least BBB+ or Baa1 |
Relevant Ratings Less than Level 4 but at least BBB or Baa2 |
Relevant Ratings below BBB* and Baa2* |
Interest Rate Per Annum | ||||||
Eurodollar Margin | 0.400% | 0.500% | 0.600% | 0.750% | 0.875% | 1.125% |
Base Rate Margin | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.500% |
*or unrated
Any change in the Applicable Margin will be effective as of the date on which S&P or Moody's, as the case may be, announces the applicable change in any Senior Debt Rating.
"Approved Fund" means, with respect to any Lender that is a fund that invests in bank loans, any other fund that invests in commercial loans and is managed or advised by the same investment advisor as such Lender or by an Affiliate of such investment advisor.
"Assignment and Acceptance" means an assignment and acceptance entered into by a Lender and an assignee of that Lender, and accepted by the Administrative Agent, in substantially the form of Exhibit B hereto.
"Available Commitment" means, as to any Lender at any time of determination, an amount equal to the excess of (a) such Lender's Commitment over (b) the aggregate principal amount of such Lender's Advances then outstanding.
"Base Rate" means, for any period, a fluctuating interest rate per annum at all times equal to the higher of:
"Base Rate Advance" means an Advance that bears interest as provided in Section 2.05(a).
"Borrowing" means a borrowing consisting of simultaneous Advances of the same Type made by each of the Lenders pursuant to Section 2.01 or Converted pursuant to Section 2.07 or 2.08.
"Business Day" means a day of the year on which banks are not required or authorized to close in New York City and, if the applicable Business Day relates to any Eurodollar Rate Advances, on which dealings are carried on in the London interbank market.
"Capitalization" means, as of any date of determination, with respect to the Borrower and its subsidiaries determined on a consolidated basis, an amount equal to the sum of (i) the total principal amount of all Debt of the Borrower and its subsidiaries outstanding on such date, (ii) Consolidated Net Worth as of such date and (iii) to the extent not otherwise included in Capitalization, all preferred stock and other preferred securities of the Borrower and its subsidiaries, including preferred securities issued by any subsidiary trust, outstanding on such date.
"Commitment" has the meaning specified in Section 2.01.
"Common Equity" shall mean the stock, shares or other ownership interests in the issuer thereof howsoever evidenced (including, without limitation, limited liability company membership interests) that has ordinary voting power for the election of directors, managers or trustees (or other persons performing similar functions) of the issuer, as applicable, provided that Preferred Equity, even if it has such ordinary voting power, shall not be Common Equity.
"Consolidated Net Worth" means the sum of the capital stock (excluding treasury stock and capital stock subscribed for and unissued) and surplus (including earned surplus, capital surplus and the balance of the current profit and loss account not transferred to surplus) accounts of the Borrower and its subsidiaries appearing on a consolidated balance sheet of the Borrower and its subsidiaries prepared as of the date of determination in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistent with those applied in the preparation of the financial statements referred to in Section 4.01(e), after eliminating all intercompany transactions and all amounts properly attributable to minority interests, if any, in the stock and surplus of subsidiaries.
"Convert", "Conversion" and "Converted" each refers to a conversion of Advances of one Type into Advances of another Type or the selection of a new, or the renewal of the same, Interest Period for Eurodollar Rate Advances pursuant to Section 2.07 or 2.08.
"Debt" of any Person means (without duplication) all liabilities, obligations and indebtedness (whether contingent or otherwise) of such Person (i) for borrowed money or evidenced by bonds, debentures, notes, or other similar instruments, (ii) to pay the deferred purchase price of property or services (other than such obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business on customary trade terms, provided that such obligations are not more than 30 days past due), (iii) as lessee under leases which shall have been or should be, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, recorded as capital leases, (iv) under reimbursement agreements or similar agreements with respect to the issuance of letters of credit (other than obligations in respect of letters of credit opened to provide for the payment of goods or services purchased in the ordinary course of business), (v) under any Guaranty Obligations and (vi) liabilities in r espect of unfunded vested benefits under plans covered by Title IV of ERISA.
"Domestic Lending Office" means, with respect to any Lender, the office of such Lender specified as its "Domestic Lending Office" opposite its name on Schedule I hereto or in the Assignment and Acceptance pursuant to which it became a Lender, or such other office of such Lender as such Lender may from time to time specify to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent.
"Domestic Regulated Utility Subsidiary" means a direct or indirect domestic subsidiary of the Borrower engaged in generation, transmission or distribution of electricity or the transmission or distribution of natural gas that is regulated as to rates on a cost of service basis by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (or successor agency) or a state or local governmental body.
"Effective Date" means June [30], 2005.
"Eligible Assignee" means a Person (a) (i) that is (A) a commercial bank organized under the laws of the United States, or any State thereof, and having total assets in excess of $500,000,000; (B) a commercial bank organized under the laws of any other country which is a member of the OECD, or a political subdivision of any such country, and having total assets in excess of $500,000,000, provided that such bank is acting through a branch or agency located in the United States or another country which is also a member of OECD; or (C) a Lender, a financial institution Affiliate of any Lender or an Approved Fund of any Lender immediately prior to an assignment and (ii) whose long-term public senior debt securities are rated at least "BBB-" by S&P or at least "Baa3" by Moody's; or (b) that is approved by the Borrower (whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld) and the Administrative Agent.
"Entergy Arkansas"
means Entergy Arkansas, Inc., an Arkansas corporation, or its successors and permitted assigns."Entergy Gulf States"
means Entergy Gulf States, Inc., a Texas corporation, or its successors and permitted assigns."Entergy Louisiana"
means Entergy Louisiana, Inc., a Louisiana corporation, or its successors and permitted assigns."Entergy Mississippi"
means Entergy Mississippi, Inc., a Mississippi corporation, or its successors and permitted assigns."Entergy New Orleans"
means Entergy New Orleans, Inc., a Louisiana corporation, or its successors and permitted assigns."Environmental Laws" means any federal, state or local laws, ordinances or codes, rules, orders, or regulations relating to pollution or protection of the environment, including, without limitation, laws relating to hazardous substances, laws relating to reclamation of land and waterways and laws relating to emissions, discharges, releases or threatened releases of pollutants, contaminants, chemicals, or industrial, toxic or hazardous substances or wastes into the environment (including, without limitation, ambient air, surface water, ground water, land surface or subsurface strata) or otherwise relating to the manufacture, processing, distribution, use, treatment, storage, disposal, transport or handling of pollution, contaminants, chemicals, or industrial, toxic or hazardous substances or wastes.
"ERISA" means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended from time to time, and the regulations promulgated and rulings issued thereunder, each as amended and modified from time to time.
"ERISA Affiliate" of a Person or entity means any trade or business (whether or not incorporated) that is a member of a group of which such Person or entity is a member and that is under common control with such Person or entity within the meaning of Section 414 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and the regulations promulgated and rulings issued thereunder, each as amended or modified from time to time.
"ERISA Plan" means an employee benefit plan maintained for employees of any Person or any ERISA Affiliate of such Person subject to Title IV of ERISA.
"ERISA Termination Event" means (i) a Reportable Event described in Section 4043 of ERISA and the regulations issued thereunder (other than a Reportable Event not subject to the provision for 30-day notice to PBGC), or (ii) the withdrawal of the Borrower or any of its ERISA Affiliates from an ERISA Plan during a plan year in which the Borrower or any of its ERISA Affiliates was a "substantial employer" as defined in Section 4001(a)(2) of ERISA, or (iii) the filing of a notice of intent to terminate an ERISA Plan or the treatment of an ERISA Plan amendment as a termination under Section 4041 of ERISA, or (iv) the institution of proceedings to terminate an ERISA Plan by the PBGC or to appoint a trustee to administer any ERISA Plan, or (v) any other event or condition that would constitute grounds under Section 4042 of ERISA for the termination of, or the appointment of a trustee to administer any ERISA Plan.
"Eurocurrency Liabilities" has the meaning assigned to that term in Regulation D of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, as in effect from time to time.
"Eurodollar Lending Office" means, with respect to any Lender, the office of such Lender specified as its "Eurodollar Lending Office" opposite its name on Schedule I hereto or in the Assignment and Acceptance pursuant to which it became a Lender (or, if no such office is specified, its Domestic Lending Office), or such other office of such Lender as such Lender may from time to time specify to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent.
"Eurodollar Rate" means, for the Interest Period for each Eurodollar Rate Advance made as part of the same Borrowing, an interest rate per annum equal to the average (rounded upward to the nearest whole multiple of 1/16 of 1% per annum, if such average is not such a multiple) of the rate per annum at which deposits in U.S. dollars are offered by the principal office of the Reference Bank in London, England, to prime banks in the London interbank market at 11:00 A.M. (London time) two Business Days before the first day of such Interest Period in an amount substantially equal to such Reference Bank's Eurodollar Rate Advance made as part of such Borrowing and for a period equal to such Interest Period. The Eurodollar Rate for the Interest Period for each Eurodollar Rate Advance made as part of the same Borrowing shall be determined by the Administrative Agent on the basis of applicable rates furnished to and received by the Administrative Age nt from the Reference Bank two Business Days before the first day of such Interest Period, subject, however, to the provisions of Section 2.07.
"Eurodollar Rate Advance" means an Advance that bears interest as provided in Section 2.05(b).
"Eurodollar Rate Reserve Percentage" of any Lender for the Interest Period for any Eurodollar Rate Advance means the reserve percentage applicable during such Interest Period (or if more than one such percentage shall be so applicable, the daily average of such percentages for those days in such Interest Period during which any such percentage shall be so applicable) under regulations issued from time to time by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (or any successor) for determining the maximum reserve requirement (including, without limitation, any emergency, supplemental or other marginal reserve requirement) for such Lender with respect to liabilities or assets consisting of or including Eurocurrency Liabilities having a term equal to such Interest Period.
"Events of Default" has the meaning specified in Section 6.01.
"Existing Credit Agreement" means the Credit Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2002, as amended by the First Amendment, dated as of June 6, 2003, among the Borrower, the banks named therein and Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent.
"Federal Funds Rate" means, for any period, a fluctuating interest rate per annum equal for each day during such period to the weighted average of the rates on overnight Federal funds transactions with members of the Federal Reserve System arranged by Federal funds brokers, as published for such day (or, if such day is not a Business Day, for the next preceding Business Day) by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or, if such rate is not so published for any day which is a Business Day, the average of the quotations for such day on such transactions received by the Administrative Agent from three Federal funds brokers of recognized standing selected by it.
"Fee Letter" means that certain letter agreement, dated as of June [ ], 2005, between the Borrower and the Administrative Agent.
"Granting Lender" has the meaning specified in Section 8.07(i).
"Guaranty Obligations" means (i) direct or indirect guaranties in respect of, and obligations to purchase or otherwise acquire, or otherwise to assure a creditor against loss in respect of, Debt of any Person and (ii) other guaranty or similar obligations in respect of the financial obligations of others, including, without limitation, Support Obligations.
"Interest Period" means, for each Advance made as part of the same Borrowing, the period commencing on the date of such Advance or the date of the Conversion of any Advance into such an Advance and ending on the last day of the period selected by the Borrower pursuant to the provisions below and, thereafter, each subsequent period commencing on the last day of the immediately preceding Interest Period and ending on the last day of the period selected by the Borrower pursuant to the provisions below. The duration of each such Interest Period shall be 1, 2, 3 or 6 months (or any period of less than one month that ends on the Maturity Date) in the case of a Eurodollar Rate Advance, as the Borrower may, upon notice received by the Administrative Agent not later than 11:00 A.M. (New York City time) on the third Business Day prior to the first day of such Interest Period, select; provided, however, that:
"Junior Subordinated Debentures"
means any junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures issued by any Significant Subsidiary or Entergy New Orleans from time to time."Lenders" means the Banks listed on the signature pages hereof and each Person that shall become a party hereto pursuant to Section 8.07.
"Lien" means, with respect to any asset, any mortgage, lien, pledge, charge, security interest or encumbrance of any kind in respect of such asset. For the purposes of this Agreement, a Person or any of its subsidiaries shall be deemed to own, subject to a Lien, any asset that it has acquired or holds subject to the interest of a vendor or lessor under any conditional sale agreement, capital lease or other title retention agreement relating to such asset.
"Majority Lenders" means at any time Lenders to which are owed more than 50% of the then aggregate unpaid principal amount of the Advances, or, if no such principal amount is then outstanding, Lenders having more than 50% of the Commitments (without giving effect to any termination in whole of the Commitments pursuant to Section 6.02), provided, that for purposes hereof, neither the Borrower, nor any of its Affiliates, if a Lender, shall be included in (i) the Lenders holding such amount of the Advances or having such amount of the Commitments or (ii) determining the aggregate unpaid principal amount of the Advances or the total Commitments.
"Maturity Date" means June 30 , 2010.
"Moody's" means Moody's Investors Service, Inc. or any successor thereto.
"Multiemployer Plan" means a "multiemployer plan" as defined in Section 4001(a)(3) of ERISA to which the Borrower or any ERISA Affiliate is making or accruing an obligation to make contributions, or has within any of the preceding three plan years made or accrued an obligation to make contributions.
"Net Available Cash" from a Stock Disposition means cash payments received therefrom net of all legal, title and recording tax expenses, commissions and other fees and expenses incurred, and all federal, state and local taxes required to be paid or accrued as a liability under generally accepted accounting principles, as a result of such Stock Disposition.
"Non-Recourse Debt"
means any Debt of any subsidiary of the Borrower that does not constitute Debt of the Borrower, any Significant Subsidiary or Entergy New Orleans."Notice of Borrowing" has the meaning specified in Section 2.02(a).
Notice of Conversion" has the meaning specified in Section 2.08(a).
"OECD" means the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
"PBGC" means the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation and any entity succeeding to any or all of its functions under ERISA.
"Person" means an individual, partnership, corporation (including a business trust), joint stock company, trust, unincorporated association, joint venture or other entity, or a government or any political subdivision or agency thereof.
"Preferred Equity" shall mean any stock, shares or other ownership interests in the issuer thereof howsoever evidenced (including, without limitation, limited liability company membership interests), whether with or without voting rights, that is entitled to dividends or distributions prior to the payment of dividends or distributions with respect to Common Equity.
"Prepayment Event" means the occurrence of any event or the existence of any condition under any agreement or instrument relating to any Debt of a Significant Subsidiary that is outstanding in a principal amount in excess of $50,000,000 in the aggregate, which occurrence or event results in the declaration of such Debt being due and payable, or required to be prepaid (other than by a regularly scheduled required prepayment), prior to the stated maturity thereof.
"Reference Bank" means HypoVereinsbank.
"Register" has the meaning specified in Section 8.07(c).
"Relevant Ratings" means the Senior Debt Ratings of Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, Entergy Louisiana or Entergy Mississippi assigned by Moody's and S&P that constitute the second lowest Senior Debt Ratings of all such Persons assigned by Moody's and S&P.
"Reportable Event" has the meaning assigned to that term in Title IV of ERISA.
"S&P" means Standard & Poor's Ratings Services, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., or any successor thereto.
"SEC" means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
"SEC Order" has the meaning specified in Section 3.01(a)(iii).
"Senior Debt Rating" means, as to any Person, the rating assigned by Moody's or S&P to the senior secured long-term debt of such Person.
"SERI" means Systems Energy Resources, Inc., an Arkansas corporation, or its successors and permitted assigns.
"Significant Subsidiary" means Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, SERI and any other Domestic Regulated Utility Subsidiary of the Borrower: (i) the total assets (after intercompany eliminations) of which exceed 5% of the total assets of the Borrower and its subsidiaries or (ii) the net worth of which exceeds 5% of the Consolidated Net Worth of the Borrower and its subsidiaries, in each case as shown on the most recent audited consolidated balance sheet of the Borrower and its subsidiaries. In no event shall "Significant Subsidiary" include any Domestic Regulated Utility Subsidiary that as of March 31, 2005, (i) had total assets (after intercompany eliminations) that were 5% or less of the total assets of the Borrower and its subsidiaries as of such date or (ii) had a net worth that was 5% or less of the Consolidated Net Worth of the Borrower and its subsidiaries as of such date.
"SPC" has the meaning specified in Section 8.07(i).
"Stock Disposition" means, with respect to any Person, the issuance, sale, lease, transfer, conveyance or other disposition of (whether in one transaction or in a series of transactions) any Common Equity (or stock or other instruments convertible into Common Equity) of such Person.
"Support Obligations" means any financial obligation, contingent or otherwise, of any Person guaranteeing or otherwise supporting any Debt or other obligation of any other Person in any manner, whether directly or indirectly, and including, without limitation, any obligation of such Person, direct or indirect, (i) to purchase or pay (or advance or supply funds for the purchase or payment of) such Debt or to purchase (or to advance or supply funds for the purchase of) any security for the payment of such Debt, (ii) to purchase property, securities or services for the purpose of assuring the owner of such Debt of the payment of such Debt, (iii) to maintain working capital, equity capital, available cash or other financial statement condition of the primary obligor so as to enable the primary obligor to pay such Debt, (iv) to provide equity capital under or in respect of equity subscription arrangements so as to assure any Person with respect to the payment of such Debt or the performance of such obligation, or (v) to provide financial support for the performance of, or to arrange for the performance of, any non-monetary obligations or non-funded debt payment obligations (including, without limitation, guaranties of payments under power purchase or other similar arrangements) of the primary obligor.
SECTION 1.02. Computation of Time Periods.
In this Agreement in the computation of periods of time from a specified date to a later specified date, the word "from" means "from and including" and the words "to" and "until" each means "to but excluding".
SECTION 1.03. Accounting Terms.
All accounting terms not specifically defined herein shall be construed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistent with those applied in the preparation of the financial statements referred to in Section 4.01(e) hereof.
ARTICLE II
AMOUNTS AND TERMS OF THE ADVANCES
SECTION 2.01. The Advances.
Each Lender severally agrees, on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, to make Advances to the Borrower on the Effective Date in an aggregate amount not to exceed at any time outstanding the amount set opposite such Lender's name on Schedule II hereto or, if such Lender has entered into any Assignment and Acceptance, set forth for such Lender in the Register maintained by the Administrative Agent pursuant to Section 8.07(c) (such Lender's "Commitment"). Each Borrowing shall be in an amount not less than $5,000,000 or an integral multiple of $1,000,000 in excess thereof and shall consist of Advances of the same Type and, in the case of Eurodollar Rate Advances, having the same Interest Period made or Converted on the same day by the Lenders ratably according to their respective Commitments. At no time may the principal amount outstanding hereunder exceed the aggregate amount of the Commitments; provided further that, the aggregate amo unt of the Commitments shall not exceed $60,000,000.
SECTION 2.02. Making the Advances.
SECTION 2.03. Intentionally Omitted
SECTION 2.04. Repayment of Advances, Etc.
The Borrower shall repay the principal amount of each Advance made by each Lender and Converted from time to time on the Maturity Date.
SECTION 2.05. Interest on Advances.
The Borrower shall pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Advance made by each Lender from the date of such Advance until such principal amount shall be paid in full, at the following rates per annum:
SECTION 2.06. Additional Interest on Eurodollar Rate Advances.
The Borrower shall pay to each Lender, so long as such Lender shall be required under regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to maintain reserves with respect to liabilities or assets consisting of or including Eurocurrency Liabilities, additional interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Eurodollar Rate Advance of such Lender, from the date of such Advance until such principal amount is paid in full, at an interest rate per annum equal at all times to the remainder obtained by subtracting (i) the Eurodollar Rate for the Interest Period for such Advance from (ii) the rate obtained by dividing such Eurodollar Rate by a percentage equal to 100% minus the Eurodollar Rate Reserve Percentage of such Lender for such Interest Period, payable on each date on which interest is payable on such Advance. Such additional interest shall be determined by such Lender and notified to the Borrower through the Administrative Agent, and such determi nation shall be conclusive and binding for all purposes, absent manifest error.
SECTION 2.07. Interest Rate Determination.
SECTION 2.08. Conversion of Advances.
SECTION 2.09. Prepayments.
The Borrower may, upon notice received by the Administrative Agent prior to 11:00 A.M. (New York City time) on any Business Day, with respect to Base Rate Advances, and upon at least two Business Days' notice to the Administrative Agent, with respect to Eurodollar Rate Advances, stating the proposed date and aggregate principal amount of the prepayment, and if such notice is given the Borrower shall, prepay the outstanding principal amounts of the Advances made as part of the same Borrowing in whole or ratably in part, together with accrued interest to the date of such prepayment on the principal amount prepaid; provided, however, that (i) each partial prepayment shall be in an aggregate principal amount not less than $1,000,000 or any integral multiple of $100,000 in excess thereof, (ii) in the case of any such prepayment of a Eurodollar Rate Advance, the Borrower shall be obligated to reimburse the Lenders in respect thereof pursuant to Section 8.04(b ) on the date of such prepayment, and (iii) in the case of any partial prepayment of the outstanding principal amount of the Advances, the aggregate principal amount of the Advances outstanding after giving effect to any such prepayment shall not be less than $10,000,000.00. Amounts so prepaid under this Section 2.09 may not be reborrowed.
SECTION 2.10. Increased Costs.
SECTION 2.11. Illegality.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, if any Lender shall notify the Administrative Agent that the introduction of, any change in or any change in the interpretation of any law or regulation makes it unlawful, or any central bank or other governmental authority asserts that it is unlawful, for any Lender or its Eurodollar Lending Office to perform its obligations hereunder to make Eurodollar Rate Advances or to fund or maintain Eurodollar Rate Advances hereunder, (i) the obligation of the Lenders to make, or to Convert Advances into, Eurodollar Rate Advances shall be suspended until the Administrative Agent shall notify the Borrower and the Lenders that the circumstances causing such suspension no longer exist and (ii) the Borrower shall forthwith prepay in full all Eurodollar Rate Advances of all Lenders then outstanding, together with interest accrued thereon, unless the Borrower, within five Business Days of notice from the Administrative Agent, Conver ts all Eurodollar Rate Advances of all Lenders then outstanding into Advances of another Type in accordance with Section 2.08.
SECTION 2.12. Payments and Computations.
SECTION 2.13. Taxes.
SECTION 2.14. Sharing of Payments, Etc.
If any Lender shall obtain any payment (whether voluntary, involuntary, through the exercise of any right of set-off, or otherwise) on account of the Advances made by it (other than pursuant to Section 2.02(c), 2.06, 2.10, 2.13 or 8.04(b)) in excess of its ratable share of payments on account of the Advances obtained by all the Lenders, such Lender shall forthwith purchase from the other Lenders such participations in the Advances made by them as shall be necessary to cause such purchasing Lender to share the excess payment ratably with each of them, provided, however, that if all or any portion of such excess payment is thereafter recovered from such purchasing Lender, such purchase from each Lender shall be rescinded and such Lender shall repay to the purchasing Lender the purchase price to the extent of such recovery together with an amount equal to such Lender's ratable share (according to the proportion of (i) the amount of such Lender's required repaym ent to (ii) the total amount so recovered from the purchasing Lender) of any interest or other amount paid or payable by the purchasing Lender in respect of the total amount so recovered. The Borrower agrees that any Lender so purchasing a participation from another Lender pursuant to this Section 2.14 may, to the fullest extent permitted by law, exercise all its rights of payment (including the right of set-off) with respect to such participation as fully as if such Lender were the direct creditor of the Borrower in the amount of such participation.
SECTION 2.15. Noteless Agreement; Evidence of Indebtedness.
ARTICLE III
CONDITIONS OF LENDING
SECTION 3.01. Conditions Precedent to Effective Date.
This Agreement shall become effective on and as of the Effective Date, subject to the satisfaction on or prior thereto of the following conditions precedent:
b. The Administrative Agent shall have received the fees payable pursuant to the Fee Letter.
c. The costs and expenses of the Administrative Agent's counsel in connection with the preparation of this Agreement, and invoiced prior to the Effective Date, shall have been paid by the Borrower.
d. All Advances under, and all breakage costs, if any, associated with the termination of Eurodollar Rate Advances under, the Existing Credit Agreement shall have been repaid or paid, as the case may be.
SECTION 3.02. Conditions Precedent to Each Borrowing.
The obligation of each Lender to make an Advance on the occasion of each Borrowing (including the initial Borrowing) shall be subject to the further conditions precedent that on the date of such Borrowing:
ARTICLE IV
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
SECTION 4.01. Representations and Warranties of the Borrower.
The Borrower represents and warrants as follows:
ARTICLE V
COVENANTS OF THE BORROWER
SECTION 5.01. Affirmative Covenants.
So long as any amount payable by the Borrower hereunder shall remain unpaid or any Lender shall have any Commitment hereunder, the Borrower will, unless the Majority Lenders shall otherwise consent in writing:
(d) SEC Order. Maintain the SEC Order in full force and effect through its termination date and comply with all terms and conditions thereof until all amounts outstanding under this Agreement shall have been repaid or paid (as the case may be) and the Maturity Date has occurred.
SECTION 5.02. Negative Covenants.
So long as any amount payable by the Borrower hereunder shall remain unpaid or any Lender shall have any Commitment hereunder, the Borrower will not, without the written consent of the Majority Lenders:
ARTICLE VI
EVENTS OF DEFAULT AND REMEDIES
SECTION 6.02. Events of Default.
Each of the following events shall constitute an "Event of Default" hereunder:
SECTION 6.02. Remedies.
If any Prepayment Event or Event of Default shall occur and be continuing, then, and in any such event, the Administrative Agent (i) shall at the request, or may with the consent, of the Majority Lenders, by notice to the Borrower, declare the obligation of each Lender to make Advances to be terminated, whereupon the same shall forthwith terminate, and (ii) shall at the request, or may with the consent, of the Majority Lenders, by notice to the Borrower, declare the Advances, all interest thereon and all other amounts payable under this Agreement to be forthwith due and payable, whereupon the Advances, all such interest and all such amounts shall become and be forthwith due and payable, without presentment, demand, protest or further notice of any kind, all of which are hereby expressly waived by the Borrower; provided, however, that in the event of an actual or deemed entry of an order for relief with respect to the Borrower, any Significant Subsidiary or Entergy New Orleans under the Federal Bankruptcy Code, (A) the obligation of each Lender to make Advances shall automatically be terminated and (B) the Advances, all such interest and all such amounts shall automatically become and be due and payable, without presentment, demand, protest or any notice of any kind, all of which are hereby expressly waived by the Borrower.
ARTICLE VII
THE AGENT
SECTION 7.01. Authorization and Action.
Each Lender hereby appoints and authorizes the Administrative Agent to take such action as agent on its behalf and to exercise such powers under this Agreement as are delegated to the Administrative Agent by the terms hereof, together with such powers as are reasonably incidental thereto. As to any matters not expressly provided for by this Agreement (including, without limitation, enforcement or collection of the Advances), the Administrative Agent shall not be required to exercise any discretion or take any action, but shall be required to act or to refrain from acting (and shall be fully protected in so acting or refraining from acting) upon the instructions of the Majority Lenders, and such instructions shall be binding upon all Lenders; provided, however, that the Administrative Agent shall not be required to take any action which exposes the Administrative Agent to personal liability or which is contrary to this Agreement or applicable law. The Administrative Agen t agrees to give to each Lender prompt notice of each notice given to it by the Borrower pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
SECTION 7.02. Administrative Agent's Reliance, Etc.
Neither the Administrative Agent nor any of its directors, officers, agents or employees shall be liable for any action taken or omitted to be taken by it or them under or in connection with this Agreement, except for its or their own gross negligence or willful misconduct. Without limitation of the generality of the foregoing, the Administrative Agent: (i) may consult with legal counsel (including counsel for the Borrower), independent public accountants and other experts selected by it and shall not be liable for any action taken or omitted to be taken in good faith by it in accordance with the advice of such counsel, accountants or experts; (ii) makes no warranty or representation to any Lender and shall not be responsible to any Lender for any statements, warranties or representations (whether written or oral) made in or in connection with this Agreement; (iii) shall not have any duty to ascertain or to inquire as to the performance or observance of any of the terms, covenants or conditions of this Agreement on the part of the Borrower or to inspect the property (including the books and records) of the Borrower; (iv) shall not be responsible to any Lender for the due execution, legality, validity, enforceability, genuineness, sufficiency or value of, or the perfection or priority of any lien or security interest created or purported to be created under or in connection with, this Agreement or any other instrument or document furnished pursuant hereto; and (v) shall incur no liability under or in respect of this Agreement by acting upon any notice, consent, certificate or other instrument or writing (which may be by telecopier, telegram, cable or telex) believed by it to be genuine and signed or sent by the proper party or parties.
SECTION 7.03. HypoVereinsbank and Affiliates.
With respect to its Commitment and the Advances made by it, HypoVereinsbank shall have the same rights and powers under this Agreement as any other Lender and may exercise the same as though it were not the Administrative Agent; and the term "Lender" or "Lenders" shall, unless otherwise expressly indicated, include HypoVereinsbank in its individual capacity. HypoVereinsbank and its affiliates may accept deposits from, lend money to, act as trustee under indentures of, and generally engage in any kind of business with, the Borrower, any of its subsidiaries and any Person who may do business with or own securities of the Borrower or any such subsidiary, all as if HypoVereinsbank were not the Administrative Agent and without any duty to account therefor to the Lenders.
SECTION 7.04. Lender Credit Decision.
Each Lender acknowledges that it has, independently and without reliance upon the Administrative Agent or any other Lender and based on the financial statements referred to in Section 4.01(e) and such other documents and information as it has deemed appropriate, made its own credit analysis and decision to enter into this Agreement. Each Lender also acknowledges that it will, independently and without reliance upon the Administrative Agent or any other Lender and based on such documents and information as it shall deem appropriate at the time, continue to make its own credit decisions in taking or not taking action under this Agreement.
SECTION 7.05. Indemnification.
The Lenders agree to indemnify the Administrative Agent (to the extent not reimbursed by the Borrower), ratably according to the respective principal amounts of the Advances then outstanding to each of them (or if no Advances are at the time outstanding, ratably according to the respective amounts of their Commitments), from and against any and all liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, penalties, actions, judgments, suits, costs, expenses or disbursements of any kind or nature whatsoever which may be imposed on, incurred by, or asserted against the Administrative Agent in any way relating to or arising out of this Agreement or any action taken or omitted by the Administrative Agent under this Agreement, provided that no Lender shall be liable for any portion of such liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, penalties, actions, judgments, suits, costs, expenses or disbursements resulting from the Administrative Agent's gross negligence or willful misconduct. Without li mitation of the foregoing, each Lender agrees to reimburse the Administrative Agent promptly upon demand for its ratable share of any out-of-pocket expenses (including reasonable counsel fees) incurred by the Administrative Agent in connection with the preparation, execution, delivery, administration, modification, amendment or enforcement (whether through negotiations, legal proceedings or otherwise) of, or legal advice in respect of rights or responsibilities under, this Agreement, to the extent that such expenses are reimbursable by the Borrower but for which the Administrative Agent is not reimbursed by the Borrower.
SECTION 7.06. Successor Administrative Agent.
The Administrative Agent may resign at any time by giving written notice thereof to the Lenders and the Borrower and may be removed at any time with or without cause by the Majority Lenders. Upon any such resignation or removal, the Majority Lenders shall have the right to appoint a successor Administrative Agent, which, for so long as no Prepayment Event or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, shall be a Lender and shall be approved by the Borrower (with such approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed). If no successor Administrative Agent shall have been so appointed by the Majority Lenders and approved by the Borrower, and shall have accepted such appointment, within 30 days after the retiring Administrative Agent's giving of notice of resignation or the Majority Lenders' removal of the retiring Administrative Agent, then the retiring Administrative Agent may, on behalf of the Lenders, appoint a successor Administrative Agent, which shall be a commercial b ank organized under the laws of the United States or of any other country that is a member of the OECD having a combined capital and surplus of at least $50,000,000. Upon the acceptance of any appointment as Administrative Agent hereunder by a successor Administrative Agent, such successor Administrative Agent shall thereupon succeed to and become vested with all the rights, powers, privileges and duties of the retiring Administrative Agent, and the retiring Administrative Agent shall be discharged from its duties and obligations under this Agreement. After any retiring Administrative Agent's resignation or removal hereunder as Administrative Agent, the provisions of this Article VII shall inure to its benefit as to any actions taken or omitted to be taken by it while it was Administrative Agent under this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if no Prepayment Event or Event of Default, and no event that with the giving of notice or the passage of time, or both, would constitute a Prepayment Event or an Event of Default, shall have occurred and be continuing, then no successor Administrative Agent shall be appointed under this Section 7.06 without the prior written consent of the Borrower, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.
ARTICLE VIII
MISCELLANEOUS
SECTION 8.01. Amendments, Etc.
No amendment or waiver of any provision of this Agreement, nor consent to any departure by the Borrower therefrom, shall in any event be effective unless the same shall be in writing and signed by the Majority Lenders, and then such waiver or consent shall be effective only in the specific instance and for the specific purpose for which given; provided, however, that no amendment, waiver or consent shall, unless in writing and signed by all the Lenders (other than any Lender that is the Borrower or an Affiliate of the Borrower), do any of the following: (a) waive any of the conditions specified in Section 3.01 or 3.02, (b) increase the Commitments of the Lenders or subject the Lenders to any additional obligations, (c) reduce the principal of, or interest on, the Advances or any fees or other amounts payable hereunder, (d) postpone any date fixed for any payment of principal of or interest on, the Advances or any fees or other amounts payable hereunder, (e) change the percentage of the Commitments or of the aggregate unpaid principal amount of the Advances, or the number of Lenders that shall be required for the Lenders or any of them to take any action hereunder or (f) amend this Section 8.01; and provided further, that no amendment, waiver or consent shall, unless in writing and signed by the Administrative Agent in addition to the Lenders required above to take such action, affect the rights or duties of the Administrative Agent under this Agreement, and provided further, that this Agreement may be amended and restated without the consent of any Lender or the Administrative Agent if, upon giving effect to such amendment and restatement, such Lender or the Administrative Agent, as the case may be, shall no longer be a party to this Agreement (as so amended and restated) or have any Commitment or other obligation hereunder and shall have been paid in full all amounts payable hereunder to such Lender or the Administrative Agent, as the case may be.
SECTION 8.02. Notices, Etc.
All notices and other communications provided for hereunder shall be in writing (including telecopier, telegraphic, telex or cable communication) and mailed, telecopied, telegraphed, telexed, cabled or delivered, if to the Borrower, at its address at 639 Loyola Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70113, Attention: Treasurer; if to any Bank, at its Domestic Lending Office specified opposite its name on Schedule I hereto; if to any other Lender, at its Domestic Lending Office specified in the Assignment and Acceptance pursuant to which it became a Lender; and if to the Administrative Agent, at its address at 150 E. 42 Street, New York, NY 10017, Attention: Loan Operations, Tina Chung/Mariana Mucenica (Telephone: (212) 672-5688/5811, Facsimile: (212) 672-5691) or, as to each party, at such other address as shall be designated by such party in a written notice to the other parties. All such notices and communications shall, when mailed, telecopied, telegraphed, telexed or cabled, be effective whe n deposited in the mails, telecopied, delivered to the telegraph company, confirmed by telex answerback or delivered to the cable company, respectively, except that notices and communications to the Administrative Agent pursuant to Article II or VII shall not be effective until received by the Administrative Agent. Except as otherwise provided in Section 5.01(c), notices and other communications given by the Borrower to the Administrative Agent shall be deemed given to the Lenders.
SECTION 8.03. No Waiver; Remedies.
No failure on the part of any Lender or the Administrative Agent to exercise, and no delay in exercising, any right hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof; nor shall any single or partial exercise of any such right preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right. The remedies herein provided are cumulative and not exclusive of any remedies provided by law.
SECTION 8.04. Costs and Expenses; Indemnification.
SECTION 8.05. Right of Set-off.
Upon (i) the occurrence and during the continuance of any Prepayment Event or Event of Default and (ii) the making of the request or the granting of the consent specified by Section 6.02 to authorize the Administrative Agent to declare the Advances due and payable pursuant to the provisions of Section 6.02, each Lender is hereby authorized at any time and from time to time, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to set off and apply any and all deposits (general or special, time or demand, provisional or final) at any time held and other indebtedness at any time owing by such Lender to or for the credit or the account of the Borrower against any and all of the obligations of the Borrower now or hereafter existing under this Agreement, whether or not such Lender shall have made any demand under this Agreement and although such obligations may be unmatured. Each Lender agrees promptly to notify the Borrower after any such set-off and application made by such Lender, provided that the failure to give such notice shall not affect the validity of such set-off and application. The rights of each Lender under this Section 8.05 are in addition to other rights and remedies (including, without limitation, other rights of set-off) which such Lender may have.
SECTION 8.06. Binding Effect.
This Agreement shall become effective when it shall have been executed by the Borrower, the Lenders and the Administrative Agent and thereafter shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Borrower, the Administrative Agent and each Lender and their respective successors and assigns, except that the Borrower shall not have the right to assign its rights hereunder or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the Lenders.
SECTION 8.07. Assignments and Participations.
SECTION 8.08. Governing Law.
THIS AGREEMENT AND ANY NOTE ISSUED PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.15 SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
SECTION 8.09. Consent to Jurisdiction; Waiver of Jury Trial.
SECTION 8.10. Execution in Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.
[The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized, as of the date first above written.
ENTERGY CORPORATION
By
Steven C. McNeal
Vice President and Treasurer
BAYERISCHE HYPO- UND VEREINSBANK AG,
NEW YORK BRANCH
as Administrative Agent
By
Name: William W. Hunter
Title: Director
By
Name:
Title:
BANKS
BAYERISCHE HYPO- UND VEREINSBANK AG,
NEW YORK BRANCH
By
Name: William W. Hunter
Title: Director
By
Name:
Title:
SCHEDULE I
ENTERGY CORPORATION
U.S. $60,000,000 Credit Agreement
Name of Bank |
Payment |
Domestic |
Eurodollar |
Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch, as |
Fedwire: #9; Federal Reserve Bank of New York ABA No.: 026 008 808 Swift: HYVEUS 33 |
Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, |
Bayerische Hypo- und |
SCHEDULE II
COMMITMENT SCHEDULE
Name of Lender |
Commitment Amount |
Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch |
$60,000,000 |
Total Commitment: |
$60,000,000 |
EXHIBIT A-1
FORM OF NOTICE OF BORROWING
Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch
as Administrative Agent
for the Lenders parties
to the Credit Agreement
referred to below
150 East 42 Street
New York, New York 10017
[Date]
Attention: Bank Loan Syndications
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The undersigned, Entergy Corporation, refers to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2005 (the "Credit Agreement", the terms defined therein being used herein as therein defined), among the undersigned, certain Lenders parties thereto and Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent for said Lenders, and hereby gives you notice, irrevocably, pursuant to Section 2.02 of the Credit Agreement that the undersigned hereby requests a Borrowing under the Credit Agreement, and in that connection sets forth below the information relating to such Borrowing (the "Proposed Borrowing") as required by Section 2.02(a) of the Credit Agreement:
The undersigned hereby certifies that the following statements are true on the date hereof, and will be true on the date of the Proposed Borrowing:
Very truly yours,
ENTERGY CORPORATION
By
Name:
Title:
______________________
1 Delete for Base Rate Advances.
EXHIBIT A-2
FORM OF NOTICE OF CONVERSION
Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch
as Administrative Agent
for the Lenders parties
to the Credit Agreement
referred to below
150 East 42 Street
New York, New York 10017
[Date]
Attention: Bank Loan Syndications
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The undersigned, Entergy Corporation, refers to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2005 (the "Credit Agreement", the terms defined therein being used herein as therein defined), among the undersigned, certain Lenders party thereto and Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent for said Lenders, and hereby gives you notice, irrevocably, pursuant to Section 2.08 of the Credit Agreement, that the undersigned hereby requests a Conversion under the Credit Agreement, and in that connection sets forth below the information relating to such Conversion (the "Proposed Conversion") as required by Section 2.08 of the Credit Agreement:
The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the following statements are true on the date hereof, and will be true on the date of the Proposed Conversion:
Very truly yours,
ENTERGY CORPORATION
By
Name:
Title:
________________________
2 Delete for Base Rate Advances
EXHIBIT B
FORM OF ASSIGNMENT AND ACCEPTANCE
Dated ___________, 20__
Reference is made to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2005 (as amended, modified or supplemented from time to time, the "Credit Agreement"), among Entergy Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Borrower"), the Lenders (as defined in the Credit Agreement) and Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent for the Lenders (the "Administrative Agent"). Terms defined in the Credit Agreement are used herein with the same meaning.
____________ (the "Assignor") and ___________ (the "Assignee") agree as follows:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Assignment and Acceptance to be executed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized, as of the date first above written, such execution being made on Schedule 1 hereto.
[NAME OF ASSIGNOR]
By
Name:
Title:
[NAME OF ASSIGNEE]
By
Name:
Title:
Domestic Lending Office (and
address for notices):
[Address]
_______________________
1 If the Assignee is organized under the laws of a jurisdiction outside
the United States.
Eurodollar Lending Office:
[Address]
Accepted this ___ day
of ___________, 20__
BAYERISCHE HYPO- UND VEREINSBANK AG, NEW YORK BRANCH
as Administrative Agent
By
Name:
Title:
By
Name:
Title:
Schedule 1
to
Assignment and Acceptance
Dated __________, 20__
Section (a) |
|
Percentage Interest: |
% |
Section (b) |
|
Assignee's Commitment: |
$ |
Aggregate Outstanding Principal |
|
Amount of Advances owing |
$ |
Section (c) |
|
Effective Date1: |
_________, 20__ |
__________________
1 This date should be no earlier than the date of acceptance by
the Administrative Agent.
EXHIBIT C
FORM OF OPINION OF
COUNSEL FOR THE BORROWER
[Date]
To each of the Lenders parties to the
Credit Agreement referred to below,
and to Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch
as Administrative Agent
Entergy Corporation
Ladies and Gentlemen:
I have acted as counsel to Entergy Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Borrower"), in connection with the preparation, execution and delivery of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2005, by and among the Borrower, the Banks parties thereto and Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent for the Lenders thereunder. This opinion is furnished to you at the request of the Borrower pursuant to Section 3.01(a)(v) of the Credit Agreement. Unless otherwise defined herein or unless the context otherwise requires, terms defined in the Credit Agreement are used herein as therein defined.
In such capacity, I have examined:
I have also examined such other corporate records of the Borrower, certificates of public officials and of officers of the Borrower, and agreements, instruments and other documents, as I have deemed necessary as a basis for the opinions expressed below.
In my examination, I have assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the legal capacity of natural persons, the authenticity of all documents submitted to me as originals, and the conformity with the originals of all documents submitted to me as copies. In making my examination of documents and instruments executed or to be executed by persons other than the Borrower, I have assumed that each such other person had the requisite power and authority to enter into and perform fully its obligations thereunder, the due authorization by each such other person for the execution, delivery and performance thereof and the due execution and delivery thereof by or on behalf of such person of each such document and instrument. In the case of any such person that is not a natural person, I have also assumed, insofar as it is relevant to the opinions set forth below, that each such other person is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction in which it was c reated, and is duly qualified and in good standing in each other jurisdiction where the failure to be so qualified could reasonably be expected to have a material effect upon its ability to execute, deliver and/or perform its obligations under any such document or instrument. I have further assumed that each document, instrument, agreement, record and certificate reviewed by me for purposes of rendering the opinions expressed below has not been amended by any oral agreement, conduct or course of dealing between the parties thereto.
As to questions of fact material to the opinions expressed herein, I have relied upon certificates and representations of officers of the Borrower (including but not limited to those contained in the Credit Agreement and certificates delivered upon the execution and delivery of the Credit Agreement) and of appropriate public officials, without independent verification of such matters except as otherwise described herein.
Whenever my opinions herein with respect to the existence or absence of facts are stated to be to my knowledge or awareness, it is intended to signify that no information has come to my attention or the attention of other counsel working under my direction in connection with the preparation of this opinion letter that would give me or them actual knowledge of the existence or absence of such facts. However, except to the extent expressly set forth herein, neither I nor they have undertaken any independent investigation to determine the existence or absence of such facts, and no inference as to my or their knowledge of the existence or absence of such facts should be assumed.
On the basis of the foregoing, having regard for such legal consideration as I deem relevant, and subject to the other limitations and qualifications contained in this letter, I am of the opinion that:
My opinions above are subject to the following qualifications:
Notwithstanding the qualifications set forth above, I have no actual knowledge of any matter within the scope of said qualifications that would cause me to change the opinions set forth in this letter.
I am licensed to practice law only in the State of Louisiana and, except as otherwise provided herein, my role as counsel to the Borrower is limited to matters involving the laws of the State of Louisiana and the federal laws of the United States of America. Except to the extent otherwise expressly set forth herein, and except with respect to matters governed by the General Corporation Law of Delaware, I render no opinion on the laws of any other jurisdiction or any subdivision thereof, and have made no independent investigation into any such laws except as specifically provided herein.
My opinions are expressed as of the date hereof, and I do not assume any obligation to update or supplement my opinions to reflect any fact or circumstance that hereafter comes to my attention, or any change in law that hereafter occurs.
This opinion letter is being provided exclusively to and for the benefit of the addressees hereof. It is not to be furnished to or relied upon by any other party for any other purpose, without prior express written authorization from me, except that (A) Thelen Reid & Priest LLP may rely hereon in connection with their opinion to you of even date herewith on behalf of the Borrower as to matters of New York law; and (B) any addressee of this letter may deliver a copy hereof to any person that becomes a Lender under the Credit Agreement after the date hereof, and such person may rely on this opinion as if it had been addressed and delivered to it on the date hereof as an original Bank that was a party to the Credit Agreement.
Very truly yours,
Denise C. Redmann
Assistant General Counsel
EXHIBIT D
OPINION OF SPECIAL NEW YORK
COUNSEL TO THE BORROWER
[DATE]
To each of the Lenders parties to the
Credit Agreement referred to below,
and to Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch
as Administrative Agent
Denise C. Redmann, Esq.
Entergy Services, Inc.
639 Loyola Avenue
New Orleans, Louisiana 70113
Entergy Corporation
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have acted as special New York counsel to Entergy Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Borrower"), in connection with the preparation, execution and delivery of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2005 (the "Credit Agreement"), among the Borrower, the Banks parties thereto and Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent for the Lenders thereunder. This opinion is being furnished to you at the request of the Borrower pursuant to Section 3.01(a)(v) of the Credit Agreement. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Credit Agreement.
In this connection, we have examined and are familiar with originals or copies, certified or otherwise identified to our satisfaction, of (i) counterparts of the Credit Agreement executed by the Borrower; (ii) the Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, and the By-Laws of the Borrower; (iii) a certificate of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, dated June [ ], 2005, attesting to the continued corporate existence and good standing of the Borrower in that state; (iv) a certificate of the Secretary of State of the State of Louisiana, dated June [ ], 2005, attesting that the Borrower is a foreign corporation duly qualified to conduct business in that state; (v) a copy of the Order, dated June 30, 2004, of the Securities and Exchange Commission (File No. 70-10202) under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended; (vi) the other documents furnished by the Borrower to the Administrative Agent pursuant to Section 3.01(a) of the Credit Agreement; and (vii) such other documents and corporate records as we have deemed necessary or appropriate for the opinions expressed herein.
In our examination, we have assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the legal capacity of natural persons, the authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals and the conformity with original documents of all documents submitted to us as certified or photostatic copies. With respect to the Borrower and each of the other parties to the Credit Agreement, we have assumed (i) that those parties are duly organized and have the power and capacity to execute, deliver and perform all obligations under such documents, and (ii) the due authorization, execution and delivery of such documents by those parties. Regarding documents executed by parties other than the Borrower, we have assumed the validity and binding effect of such documents upon those parties.
We have also assumed that all required regulatory approvals have been obtained and compliance with said approvals.
As to any facts that we did not independently establish or verify, we have relied without independent investigation upon statements, representations and certificates of officers of the Borrower, and, as to the matters addressed therein, upon certificates or communications from public officials.
Based upon the foregoing, and subject to the qualifications hereinafter expressed, it is our opinion that the Credit Agreement constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of the Borrower, enforceable against the Borrower in accordance with its terms.
Our opinion is subject to the following qualifications:
(a) The enforceability of the Borrower's obligations under the Credit Agreement is subject to the effect of any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent conveyance, reorganization, moratorium or similar law affecting creditors' rights generally.
(b) The enforceability of the Borrower's obligations under the Credit Agreement is subject to the effect of general principles of equity, including (without limitation) concepts of materiality, reasonableness, good faith and fair dealing (regardless of whether considered in a proceeding in equity or at law). Such principles of equity are of general application, and, in applying such principles, a court, among other things, might not allow a contracting party to exercise remedies in respect of a default deemed immaterial, or might decline to order an obligor to perform covenants.
(c) We note further that, in addition to the application of equitable principles described above, courts have imposed an obligation on contracting parties to act reasonably and in good faith in the exercise of their contractual rights and remedies, and may also apply public policy considerations in limiting the right of parties seeking to obtain indemnification under circumstances where the conduct of such parties is determined to have constituted negligence.
(d) We express no opinion herein as to (i) Section 8.05 of the Credit Agreement, (ii) the enforceability of provisions purporting to grant to a party conclusive rights of determination, (iii) the availability of specific performance or other equitable remedies, (iv) the enforceability of rights to indemnity under federal or state securities laws, or (v) the enforceability of waivers by parties of their respective rights and remedies under law.
This opinion is limited to the laws of the State of New York. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, we express no opinion as to the effect of the law of any jurisdiction other than the State of New York wherein any Lender may be located or wherein enforcement of the Credit Agreement may be sought that limits the rate of interest legally chargeable or collectible.
This opinion is rendered solely for your benefit and, except as stated in the following sentences of this paragraph, may not be relied upon by any other party, nor may copies be delivered to any other Person, without our prior written consent. We are aware that Denise C. Redmann, Esq. will rely upon this opinion in rendering her opinion, dated as of the date hereof, to the Lenders and the Administrative Agent, and we hereby authorize such reliance. The Lenders and the Administrative Agent are hereby authorized to deliver a copy of this opinion to any Person that becomes a Lender under the Credit Agreement after the date hereof, and any such Person may rely upon this opinion as if it had been addressed and delivered to it on the date hereof as an original Bank that was a party to the Credit Agreement.
This opinion is limited to laws currently in effect on the date hereof and to the facts as they currently exist. We assume no obligation to revise, supplement or otherwise update this opinion.
Very truly yours,
THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP
Exhibit 31(a)
CERTIFICATIONS
I, J. Wayne Leonard, certify that: |
|
1. |
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Entergy Corporation; |
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
5. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
/s/ J. Wayne Leonard Chief Executive Officer of Entergy Corporation |
Date: August 4, 2005
Exhibit 31(b)
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Leo P. Denault, certify that: |
|
1. |
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Entergy Corporation; |
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
5. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
/s/ Leo P. Denault Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Entergy Corporation |
Date: August 4, 2005
Exhibit 31(c)
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Hugh T. McDonald, certify that: |
|
1. |
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Entergy Arkansas, Inc.; |
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
5. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
/s/ Hugh T. McDonald Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Entergy Arkansas, Inc. |
Date: August 4, 2005
Exhibit 31(d)
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Joseph F. Domino, certify that: |
|
1. |
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Entergy Gulf States, Inc.; |
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. |
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
5. |
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
/s/ Joseph F. Domino Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer-Texas of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. |
Date: August 4, 2005
Exhibit 31(e)
CERTIFICATIONS
I, E. Renae Conley, certify that: |
|
1. |
I have reviewed these quarterly reports on Form 10-Q of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. and Entergy Louisiana, Inc.; |
2. |
Based on my knowledge, these reports do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by these reports; |
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in these reports, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for, the periods presented in these reports; |
4. |
The registrants' other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrants and have: |
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrants, including their consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which these reports are being prepared; |
|
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants' disclosure controls and procedures and presented in these reports our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by these reports based on such evaluation; and |
|
d) Disclosed in these reports any change in the registrants' internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants' most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants' internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
5. |
The registrants' other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants' auditors and the audit committee of the registrants' board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants' ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants' internal control over financial reporting. |
/s/ E. Renae Conley Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Entergy Louisiana, Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer-Louisiana of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. |
Date: August 4, 2005
Exhibit 31(f)
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Carolyn C. Shanks, certify that: |
|
1. |
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Entergy Mississippi, Inc.; |
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
5. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
/s/ Carolyn C. Shanks Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Entergy Mississippi, Inc. |
Date: August 4, 2005
Exhibit 31(g)
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Daniel F. Packer, certify that: |
|
1. |
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Entergy New Orleans, Inc.; |
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
5. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
/s/ Daniel F. Packer Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Entergy New Orleans, Inc. |
Date: August 4, 2005
Exhibit 31(h)
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Gary J. Taylor, certify that: |
|
1. |
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of System Energy Resources, Inc.; |
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
5. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
/s/ Gary J. Taylor Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of System Energy Resources, Inc. |
Date: August 4, 2005
Exhibit 31(i)
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Jay A. Lewis, certify that: |
|
1. |
I have reviewed these quarterly reports on Form 10-Q of Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States, Inc., Entergy Louisiana, Inc., Entergy Mississippi, Inc., and Entergy New Orleans, Inc.; |
2. |
Based on my knowledge, these reports do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by these reports; |
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in these reports, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for, the periods presented in these reports; |
4. |
The registrants' other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrants and have: |
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrants, including their consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which these reports are being prepared; |
|
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants' disclosure controls and procedures and presented in these reports our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by these reports based on such evaluation; and |
|
d) Disclosed in these reports any change in the registrants' internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants' most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants' internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
5. |
The registrants' other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants' auditors and the audit committee of the registrants' board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants' ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants' internal control over financial reporting. |
/s/ Jay A. Lewis Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States, Inc., Entergy Louisiana, Inc., Entergy Mississippi, Inc., and Entergy New Orleans, Inc. |
Date: August 4, 2005
Exhibit 31(j)
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Theodore H. Bunting, Jr., certify that: |
|
1. |
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of System Energy Resources, Inc.; |
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
5. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
/s/ Theodore H. Bunting, Jr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of System Energy Resources, Inc. |
Date: August 4, 2005
Exhibit 32(a)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, J. Wayne Leonard, Chief Executive Officer of Entergy Corporation (the "Company"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) |
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
(2) |
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report. |
/s/ J. Wayne Leonard Chief Executive Officer of Entergy Corporation |
Date: August 4, 2005
Exhibit 32(b)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Leo P. Denault, Chief Financial Officer of Entergy Corporation (the "Company"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) |
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
(2) |
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report. |
/s/ Leo P. Denault Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Entergy Corporation |
Date: August 4, 2005
Exhibit 32(c)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I,
Hugh T. McDonald, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Entergy Arkansas, Inc. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) |
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
(2) |
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report. |
__/s/ Hugh T. McDonald Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer |
Date: August 4, 2005
Exhibit 32(d)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I,
Joseph F. Domino, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer-Texas of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) |
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
(2) |
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report. |
___/s/ Joseph F. Domino Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer-Texas of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. |
Date: August 4, 2005
Exhibit 32(e)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, E. Renae Conley, President and Chief Executive Officer-Louisiana of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. and Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Entergy Louisiana, Inc. (the "Companies"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) |
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of each of the Companies for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
(2) |
The information contained in each Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of each respective Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in each Report. |
___/s/ E. Renae Conley President and Chief Executive Officer-Louisiana of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. and Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Entergy Louisiana, Inc. |
Date: August 4, 2005
Exhibit 32(f)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I,
Carolyn C. Shanks, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Entergy Mississippi, Inc. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) |
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
(2) |
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report. |
__/s/ Carolyn C. Shanks Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Entergy Mississippi, Inc. |
Date: August 4, 2005
Exhibit 32(g)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I,
Daniel F. Packer, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Entergy New Orleans, Inc. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) |
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
(2) |
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report. |
___/s/ Daniel F. Packer Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Entergy New Orleans, Inc. |
Date: August 4, 2005
Exhibit 32(h)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Gary J. Taylor, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of System Energy Resources, Inc. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) |
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
(2) |
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report. |
___/s/ Gary J. Taylor Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of System Energy Resources, Inc. |
Date: August 4, 2005
Exhibit 32(i)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Jay A. Lewis, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States, Inc., Entergy Louisiana, Inc., Entergy Mississippi, Inc., and Entergy New Orleans, Inc. (the "Companies"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) |
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of each of the Companies for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
(2) |
The information contained in each Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of each respective Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in each Report. |
_/s/ Jay A. Lewis Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States, Inc., Entergy Louisiana, Inc., Entergy Mississippi, Inc., and Entergy New Orleans, Inc. |
Date: August 4, 2005
Exhibit 32(j)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Theodore H. Bunting, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of System Energy Resources, Inc. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) |
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
(2) |
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report. |
___/s/ Theodore H. Bunting, Jr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of System Energy Resources, Inc. |
Date: August 4, 2005
Exhibit 99(a) | ||||||
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. | ||||||
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and | ||||||
Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends | ||||||
Twelve Months Ended | ||||||
December 31, | June 30, | |||||
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | |
Total Interest Charges | $101,600 | $109,523 | $103,210 | $91,221 | $84,430 | $85,838 |
Interest applicable to rentals | 16,449 | 14,563 | 12,762 | 15,425 | 13,171 | 12,224 |
Total fixed charges, as defined | 118,049 | 124,086 | 115,972 | 106,646 | 97,601 | 98,062 |
Preferred dividends, as defined (a) | 13,479 | 12,348 | 11,869 | 14,274 | 12,646 | 12,632 |
Combined fixed charges and preferred dividends, as defined | $131,528 | $136,434 | $127,841 | $120,920 | $110,247 | $110,694 |
Earnings as defined: | ||||||
Net Income | $137,047 | $178,185 | $135,643 | $126,009 | $142,210 | $159,879 |
Add: | ||||||
Provision for income taxes: | ||||||
Total | 100,512 | 105,933 | 71,404 | 105,296 | 89,064 | 98,895 |
Fixed charges as above | 118,049 | 124,086 | 115,972 | 106,646 | 97,601 | 98,062 |
Total earnings, as defined | $355,608 | $408,204 | $323,019 | $337,951 | $328,875 | $356,836 |
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges, as defined | 3.01 | 3.29 | 2.79 | 3.17 | 3.37 | 3.64 |
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and | ||||||
preferred dividends, as defined | 2.70 | 2.99 | 2.53 | 2.79 | 2.98 | 3.22 |
- ------------------------ | ||||||
(a) "Preferred dividends," as defined by SEC regulation S-K, are computed by dividing the preferred dividend requirement by one hundred percent (100%) minus the income tax rate. | ||||||
Exhibit 99(b) | ||||||
Entergy Gulf States, Inc. | ||||||
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and | ||||||
Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends | ||||||
Twelve Months Ended | ||||||
December 31, | June 30, | |||||
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | |
Fixed charges, as defined: | ||||||
Total Interest charges | $158,949 | $174,368 | $144,840 | $157,343 | $133,598 | $127,159 |
Interest applicable to rentals | 18,307 | 18,520 | 16,483 | 16,694 | 13,707 | 9,826 |
Total fixed charges, as defined | 177,256 | 192,888 | 161,323 | 174,037 | 147,305 | 136,985 |
Preferred dividends, as defined (a) | 15,742 | 13,017 | 6,190 | 6,845 | 6,991 | 6,618 |
Combined fixed charges and preferred dividends, as defined | $192,998 | $205,905 | $167,513 | $180,882 | $154,296 | $143,603 |
Earnings as defined: | ||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before extraordinary items and | ||||||
the cumulative effect of accounting changes | $180,343 | $179,444 | $174,078 | $63,895 | $192,264 | $162,581 |
Add: | ||||||
Income Taxes | 103,603 | 82,038 | 65,997 | 24,249 | 108,288 | 87,263 |
Fixed charges as above | 177,256 | 192,888 | 161,323 | 174,037 | 147,305 | 136,985 |
Total earnings, as defined (b) | $461,202 | $454,370 | $401,398 | $262,181 | $447,857 | $386,829 |
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges, as defined | 2.60 | 2.36 | 2.49 | 1.51 | 3.04 | 2.82 |
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and | ||||||
preferred dividends, as defined | 2.39 | 2.21 | 2.40 | 1.45 | 2.90 | 2.69 |
(a) "Preferred dividends," as defined by SEC regulation S-K, are computed by dividing the preferred dividend requirement by one hundred percent (100%) minus the income tax rate. |
Exhibit 99(c) | ||||||
Entergy Louisiana, Inc. | ||||||
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and | ||||||
Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends | ||||||
Twelve Months Ended | ||||||
December 31, | June 30, | |||||
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | |
Fixed charges, as defined: | ||||||
Total Interest | $111,743 | $116,076 | $100,667 | $76,756 | $74,141 | $77,261 |
Interest applicable to rentals | 6,458 | 7,951 | 6,496 | 6,359 | 5,595 | 4,336 |
Total fixed charges, as defined | 118,201 | 124,027 | $107,163 | $83,115 | $79,736 | $81,597 |
Preferred dividends, as defined (a) | 16,102 | 12,374 | 10,647 | $11,189 | $10,899 | $11,057 |
Combined fixed charges and preferred dividends, as defined | $134,303 | $136,401 | $117,810 | $94,304 | $90,635 | $92,654 |
Earnings as defined: | ||||||
Net Income | $162,679 | $132,550 | $144,709 | $146,154 | $127,495 | $138,504 |
Add: | ||||||
Provision for income taxes: | ||||||
Total Taxes | 112,645 | 86,287 | 84,765 | 97,408 | 79,475 | 89,809 |
Fixed charges as above | 118,201 | 124,027 | 107,163 | 83,115 | 79,736 | 81,597 |
Total earnings, as defined | $393,525 | $342,864 | $336,637 | $326,677 | $286,706 | $309,910 |
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges, as defined | 3.33 | 2.76 | 3.14 | 3.93 | 3.60 | 3.80 |
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and | ||||||
preferred dividends, as defined | 2.93 | 2.51 | 2.86 | 3.46 | 3.16 | 3.34 |
- ------------------------ | ||||||
(a) "Preferred dividends," as defined by SEC regulation S-K, are computed by dividing the preferred dividend requirement by one hundred percent (100%) minus the income tax rate. |
Exhibit 99(d) | ||||||
Entergy Mississippi, Inc. | ||||||
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and | ||||||
Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends | ||||||
Twelve Months Ended | ||||||
December 31, | June 30, | |||||
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | |
Fixed charges, as defined: | ||||||
Total Interest | $44,877 | $50,991 | $45,464 | $47,464 | $44,637 | $42,839 |
Interest applicable to rentals | 1,596 | 1,849 | 1,916 | 1,880 | 1,162 | 783 |
Total fixed charges, as defined | 46,473 | 52,840 | $47,380 | $49,344 | $45,799 | $43,622 |
Preferred dividends, as defined (a) | 5,347 | 4,674 | 4,490 | 5,099 | 5,067 | 4,997 |
Combined fixed charges and preferred dividends, as defined | $51,820 | $57,514 | $51,870 | $54,443 | $50,866 | $48,619 |
Earnings as defined: | ||||||
Net Income | $38,973 | $39,620 | $52,408 | $67,058 | $73,497 | $68,992 |
Add: | ||||||
Provision for income taxes: | ||||||
Total income taxes | 22,868 | 20,464 | 17,846 | 34,431 | 37,040 | 33,163 |
Fixed charges as above | 46,473 | 52,840 | 47,380 | 49,344 | 45,799 | 43,622 |
Total earnings, as defined | $108,314 | $112,924 | $117,634 | $150,833 | $156,336 | $145,777 |
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges, as defined | 2.33 | 2.14 | 2.48 | 3.06 | 3.41 | 3.34 |
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and | ||||||
preferred dividends, as defined | 2.09 | 1.96 | 2.27 | 2.77 | 3.07 | 3.00 |
- ------------------------ | ||||||
(a) "Preferred dividends," as defined by SEC regulation S-K, are computed by dividing the preferred dividend requirement by one hundred percent (100%) minus the income tax rate. |
Exhibit 99(e) | ||||||
Entergy New Orleans, Inc. | ||||||
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and | ||||||
Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends | ||||||
Twelve Months Ended | ||||||
December 31, | June 30, | |||||
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | |
Fixed charges, as defined: | ||||||
Total Interest | $15,891 | $19,661 | $27,950 | $17,786 | $16,610 | $15,817 |
Interest applicable to rentals | 1,008 | 977 | 1,043 | 910 | 644 | 422 |
Total fixed charges, as defined | 16,899 | 20,638 | 28,993 | 18,696 | 17,254 | 16,239 |
Preferred dividends, as defined (a) | 1,643 | 2,898 | 2,736 | 1,686 | 1,545 | 1,569 |
Combined fixed charges and preferred dividends, as defined | $18,542 | $23,536 | $31,729 | $20,382 | $18,799 | $17,808 |
Earnings as defined: | ||||||
Net Income | $16,518 | ($2,195) | ($230) | $7,859 | $28,072 | 22,749 |
Add: | ||||||
Provision for income taxes: | ||||||
Total | 11,597 | (4,396) | (422) | 5,875 | 16,868 | 14,200 |
Fixed charges as above | 16,899 | 20,638 | 28,993 | 18,696 | 17,254 | 16,239 |
Total earnings, as defined | $45,014 | $14,047 | $28,341 | $32,430 | $62,194 | $53,188 |
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges, as defined | 2.66 | 0.68 | 0.98 | 1.73 | 3.60 | 3.28 |
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and | ||||||
preferred dividends, as defined | 2.43 | 0.60 | 0.89 | 1.59 | 3.31 | 2.99 |
- ------------------------ | ||||||
(a) "Preferred dividends," as defined by SEC regulation S-K, are computed by dividing the preferred dividend requirement by one hundred percent (100%) minus the income tax rate. | ||||||
(b) For Entergy New Orleans, earnings for the twelve months ended December 31, 2001 were not adequate to cover fixed charges and combined fixed charges and preferred dividends by $6.6 million and $9.5 million, respectively. | ||||||
(c) For Entergy New Orleans, earnings for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002 were not adequate to cover combined fixed charges and preferred dividends by $0.7 million and $3.4 million, respectively. |
Exhibit 99(f) | ||||||
System Energy Resources, Inc. | ||||||
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and | ||||||
Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges | ||||||
Twelve Months Ended | ||||||
December 31, | June 30, | |||||
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | |
Fixed charges, as defined: | ||||||
Total Interest | $118,519 | $138,018 | $76,639 | $64,620 | $58,928 | $53,059 |
Interest applicable to rentals | 5,753 | 4,458 | 3,250 | 3,793 | 3,426 | 3,500 |
Total fixed charges, as defined | $124,272 | $142,476 | $79,889 | $68,413 | $62,354 | $56,559 |
Earnings as defined: | ||||||
Net Income | $93,745 | $116,355 | $103,352 | $106,003 | $105,948 | 107,906 |
Add: | ||||||
Provision for income taxes: | ||||||
Total | 81,263 | 43,761 | 76,177 | 75,845 | 78,013 | 75,858 |
Fixed charges as above | 124,272 | 142,476 | 79,889 | 68,413 | 62,354 | 56,559 |
Total earnings, as defined | $299,280 | $302,592 | $259,418 | $250,261 | $246,315 | $240,323 |
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges, as defined | 2.41 | 2.12 | 3.25 | 3.66 | 3.95 | 4.25 |