8-K

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

July 31, 2017

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported)

RENASANT CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Mississippi	001-13253	64-0676974
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)	(Commission File Number)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

209 Troy Street, Tupelo, Mississippi 38804-4827

(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (662) 680-1001

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

[ ]	Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
[ ]	Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
[ ]	Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
[ ]	Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (17 CFR §230.405) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR §240.12b-2). Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Item 7.01.Regulation FD Disclosure.

Representatives of Renasant Corporation (“Renasant”) will be making presentations to investors during various conferences in the third quarter of 2017. A copy of the presentation materials is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 8-K and is incorporated herein solely for purposes of this Item 7.01.

In accordance with General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K, the information in this Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1, is being furnished and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

“Safe Harbor” Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

This communication contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Congress passed the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 in an effort to encourage companies to provide information about their anticipated future financial performance. This act provides a safe harbor for such disclosure, which protects a company from unwarranted litigation if actual results are different from management expectations. This communication reflects the current views and estimates of future economic circumstances, industry conditions, company performance, and financial results of the management of Renasant. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties which could cause Renasant’s actual results and experience to differ from the anticipated results and expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements, and such differences may be material. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Renasant does not assume any duty to update forward-looking statements, unless required by applicable law. Such forward-looking statements usually include words such as “expects,” “projects,” “proposes,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,” “strategy,” “plan,” “potential,” “possible” and other similar expressions. These statements are based upon the current beliefs and expectations of Renasant’s management and are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond Renasant's control. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change. Actual results may differ from those indicated or implied in the forward-looking statements and such differences may be material.

Important factors currently known to management that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include (1) Renasant’s ability to efficiently integrate acquisitions into its operations, retain the customers of these businesses and grow the acquired operations; (2) the effect of economic conditions and interest rates on a national, regional or international basis; (3) the timing of the implementation of changes in operations to achieve enhanced earnings or effect cost savings; (4) competitive pressures in the consumer finance, commercial finance, insurance, financial services, asset management, retail banking, mortgage lending and auto lending industries; (5) the financial resources of, and products available to, competitors; (6) changes in laws and regulations, including changes in accounting standards; (7) changes in policy by regulatory agencies; (8) changes in the securities and foreign exchange markets; (9) Renasant’s potential growth, including its entrance or expansion into new markets, and the need for sufficient capital to support that growth; (10) changes in the quality or composition of Renasant’s loan or investment portfolios, including adverse developments in borrower industries or in the repayment ability of individual borrowers; (11) an insufficient allowance for loan losses as a result of inaccurate assumptions; (12) general economic, market or business conditions; (13) changes in demand for loan products and financial services; (14) concentration of credit exposure; (15) changes or the lack of changes in interest rates, yield curves and interest rate spread relationships; and (16) other circumstances, many of which are beyond management’s control. Management undertakes no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results over time.

Item 9.01.    Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(d)    Exhibits.

Exhibit Number	Description of Exhibit
99.1	Investor conference presentation materials

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

	RENASANT CORPORATION
Date: July 31, 2017	By:	/s/ E. Robinson McGraw
		E. Robinson McGraw
		Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Description of Exhibit
99.1	Investor conference presentation materials

EX-99.1

Q3 2017 Investor Presentation

This presentation contains various “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 about Renasant Corporation (“Renasant”) that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Congress passed the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 in an effort to encourage companies to provide information about their anticipated future financial performance. This act provides a safe harbor for such disclosure, which protects a company from unwarranted litigation if actual results are different from management expectations. Forward-looking statements include information concerning our future financial performance, business strategy, projected plans and objectives. These statements are based upon the current beliefs and expectations of our management and are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward- looking statements are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change. Actual results may differ from those indicated or implied in the forward-looking statements, and such differences may be material. Statements preceded by, followed by or that otherwise include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “estimates,” “plans,” “may increase,” “may fluctuate,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “should,” “would,” and “could,” are generally forward-looking in nature and not historical facts. You should understand that the following important factors, in addition to those discussed elsewhere in this presentation as well as in reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements: (i) our ability to efficiently integrate acquisitions into our operations, retain the customers of these businesses and grow the acquired operations, including with respect to our recently-completed business combination between Renasant and Metropolitan BancGroup, Inc. discussed in more detail in this presentation; (ii) the timing of the implementation of changes in operations to achieve enhanced earnings or effect cost savings; (iii) competitive pressures in the consumer finance, commercial finance, insurance, financial services, asset management, retail banking, mortgage lending and auto lending industries; (iv) the financial resources of, and products available to, competitors; (v) changes in laws and regulations, including changes in accounting standards; (vi) changes in regulatory policy; (vii) changes in the securities and foreign exchange markets; (viii) our potential growth, including our entrance or expansion into new markets, and the need for sufficient capital to support that growth; (ix) changes in the quality or composition of our loan or investment portfolios, including adverse developments in borrower industries or in the repayment ability of individual borrowers; (x) an insufficient allowance for loan losses as a result of inaccurate assumptions; (xi) general market or business conditions; (xii) changes in demand for loan products and financial services; (xiii) concentration of credit exposure; (xiv) changes or the lack of changes in interest rates, yield curves and interest rate spread relationships; and (xv) other circumstances, many of which are beyond management’s control. Our management believes the forward-looking statements about us are reasonable. However, you should not place undue reliance on them. Any forward-looking statements in this presentation are not guarantees of future performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions, and actual results, developments and business decisions may differ from those contemplated by those forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will determine these results are beyond our ability to control or predict. We disclaim any duty to update any forward-looking statements, all of which are expressly qualified by the statements in this section.

More than 175 banking, lending, financial services and insurance offices 3 Western 28% Northern 23% Eastern 27% Central 22% Portfolio Loans* [CATEG ORY NAME] 46% Northern 12% Eastern 25% Central 17% Total Deposits* *As of June 30, 2017 GEORGIA ALABAMA MISSISSIPPI FLORIDA TENNESSEE Atlanta Montgomery Auburn Birmingham Jackson Albany Savannah Tupelo Huntsville Memphis Gainesville Ocala Nashville Knoxville Johnson City 55 59 65 10 10 95 75 75 75 20 20 40 65 24 40 16 59 75 RNST Branches (as of July 1, 2017) Mobile

4 Enhance Profitability Capitalize on Opportunities Focus on Risk Management Build Capital Ratios • Focus on highly-accretive acquisition opportunities • Leverage existing markets • Seek new markets • New lines of business • Selective balance sheet growth • Maintain dividend • Prudently manage capital • Enhance credit process, policies and personnel • Aggressively identify and manage problem credits • Board focus on Enterprise Risk Management • Superior returns • Revenue growth / Expense control • Net interest margin expansion / mitigate interest rate risk • Loan growth • Core deposit growth

Nashville Memphis TENNESSEE Tupelo Jackson MISSISSIPPI Birmingham Huntsville Montgomery Atlanta GEORGIA ALABAMA Source: SNL Financial 5 Financial Highlights Assets $3.59 Billion Gross Loans $2.28 Billion Deposits $2.69 Billion

6 De novo expansion:  Columbus, MS 2010 De novo expansion:  Montgomery, AL  Starkville, MS  Tuscaloosa, AL De novo expansion:  Maryville, TN  Jonesborough, TN FDIC-Assisted Transaction: Crescent Bank and Trust Jasper, GA Assets: $1.0 billion FDIC-Assisted Transaction: American Trust Bank Roswell, GA Assets: $145 million Trust Acquisition: RBC (USA) Trust Unit Birmingham, AL Assets: $680 million Whole Bank Transaction: First M&F Corporation Kosciusko, MS Assets: $1.5 billion 2011 2013 De novo expansion:  Bristol, TN  Johnson City, TN 2015 Whole Bank Transaction: Heritage Financial Group, Inc. Albany, GA Assets: $1.9 billion 2012 2016 Whole Bank Transaction: KeyWorth Bank Atlanta, GA Assets: $399 million 2017 Whole Bank Transaction: Metropolitan BancGroup, Inc. Ridgeland, MS Assets: $1.2 billion De novo expansion:  Mobile, AL

Over 175 banking, lending, financial services and insurance offices 7 Assets $8.9 billion Gross Loans $6.4 billion Deposits $7.2 billion Highlights* *As of June 30, 2017 GEORGIA ALABAMA MISSISSIPPI FLORIDA TENNESSEE Atlanta Montgomery Auburn Birmingham Jackson Albany Savannah Tupelo Huntsville Memphis Gainesville Ocala Nashville Knoxville Johnson City 55 59 65 10 10 95 75 75 75 20 20 40 65 24 40 16 59 75 RNST Branches (as of July 1, 2017) Mobile

Merger of Renasant Corporation and Metropolitan BancGroup, Inc. Completed July 1, 2017 8

(1) Based on RNST’s closing price of $38.77 as of January 17, 2017 (2) Based on RNST’s closing price of $43.74 as of June 30, 2017 (3) Aggregate value includes the value of options which were cashed out at closing (4) Transaction multiples on per share basis using financial data as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 Consideration Implied Price per Share Aggregate Transaction Value Transaction Multiples (4) Management and Board of Directors Closing  100% stock  Fixed exchange ratio of 0.6066x shares of RNST common stock for each share of Metropolitan common stock  $23.52 (1)  $26.89 (2)  $218 million (3)  Price / Tangible Book: 201.5%  Price / 2016 Earnings: 25.5x  Core Deposit Premium: 14.4%  Metropolitan’s CEO and other key executives maintained senior positions with RNST  One Metropolitan director was appointed to the Renasant board  Completed July 1, 2017 9

 Metropolitan BancGroup, Inc. is co-headquartered in Memphis, TN and Ridgeland, MS (Jackson, MS MSA)  Approximately 70% of loans in Tennessee; 30% of loans in Mississippi  8 banking offices in key metropolitan markets: • Memphis, TN (2) • Nashville, TN (2) • Jackson, MS (4)  Targeted focus on meeting the needs of small commercial, middle market and private clients  Organic growth strategy – “talent centric, branch lite” As of December 31, 2016 Total assets: $1.2 billion Efficiency Ratio: 67.8% Total deposits: $888 million ROAA: 0.69% TCE/TA: 7.54% ROAE: 8.11% $348 $411 $483 $564 $653 $743 $918 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1.4 $3.2 $3.1 $3.9 $5.2 $6.3 $7.1 $0.0 $2.0 4. $6.0 $8.0 Gross Loans ($mm) Net Income ($mm) 10

 Strategically Advantageous • Further enhances Renasant’s Memphis and Nashville, TN and Jackson, MS market presence • Complementary cultures and business model • Ability to leverage Metropolitan’s management experience in market • Ability to expand Metropolitan’s current relationships with more comprehensive services  Financially Attractive • Accretive to first full year earnings per share (excluding transaction costs; including completed common stock offering completed in December 2016) • Approximately 2.9% dilutive to tangible book value at closing with an earnback of less than 3.0 years • Estimated IRR exceeds internal rate of return guidelines • Realistic cost saving assumption based on market overlap and past acquisition experience (approximately 37.5% of non- interest expense) • Pro forma regulatory ratios remain above “well capitalized” guidelines • Transaction more than offsets the projected earnings impact of crossing the $10 billion threshold  Lower risk opportunity • Key management of Metropolitan to remain with Renasant • Extensive due diligence process completed • Conservative credit culture with solid asset quality • Manageable asset size and branch network • Complementary business lines that are easily integrated • Track record of 6 successfully integrated acquisitions over the last 9 years 11

GEORGIA ALABAMA TENNESSEE FLORIDA MISSISSIPPI Atlanta Montgomery Auburn Tupelo Huntsville Birmingham Jackson Albany Gainesville Ocala Memphis Nashville Knoxville Johnson City Savannah 55 59 65 10 10 95 75 75 75 20 20 40 65 24 40 16 59 75 12 Pro Forma Franchise RNST Branches Metropolitan Branches Olive Branch Collierville Horn Lake Germantown West Memphis Pleasant Hill MISSISSIPPI TENNESSEE Memphis Fisherville Bartlett Cayce Victoria 240 55 240 40 40 385 64 64 61 385 55 Nashville Gallatin Pegram Belle Meade Ashland City Rural Hill Mount Juliet Forest Hills Lakewood Goodlettsville Millersville Smyrna Franklin La Vergne Nolensville Brentwood 24 24 40 40 65 65 386 440 31E Jackson Clinton Pearl Ridgeland Guide Hazelhurst Hoodtown Crystal Springs Raymond Florence Utica Edwards Fannin 20 20 55 55 220 49 Sloan Memphis MSA Nashville MSA Jackson MSA Mobile

Assumptions • Loan Mark • Credit: Approximately 1.2% of gross loans • Cost Savings • Approximately 37.5% (75% realization rate in 2017; 100% in 2018 and thereafter) • Pre-Tax Merger Expenses • Approximately $22.6 million (1) • Core Deposit Intangible • 1.5%, 10 year amortization • Other purchase accounting marks are non- material • Revenue enhancements identified, none assumed in projections • Closed July 1, 2017 Attractive Returns • Immediately accretive to EPS (excluding transaction costs; including common stock offering completed in December 2016 and the projected impact of crossing $10 billion asset threshold) • Transaction more than offsets the projected earnings impact of crossing the $10 billion threshold • Approximately 2.9% dilutive to tangible book value per share at closing with an earnback period of less than 3.0 years • Estimated IRR in excess of our internal guidelines Pro Forma Capital • Pro forma capital ratios are expected to remain well in excess of “well capitalized” minimums at close • Pro forma TCE ratio of approximately 8.5% at close (1) Includes property lease and fixed asset costs of $9.7 million, employment-related costs of $5.3 million, professional fees of $4.1 million and IT and other costs of $3.5 million 13

14 Enhance Profitability Capitalize on Opportunities Focus on Risk Management Build Capital Ratios • Focus on highly-accretive acquisition opportunities • Leverage existing markets • Seek new markets • New lines of business • Selective balance sheet growth • Maintain dividend • Prudently manage capital • Enhance credit process, policies and personnel • Aggressively identify and manage problem credits • Board focus on Enterprise Risk Management • Superior returns • Revenue growth / Expense control • Net interest margin expansion / mitigate interest rate risk • Loan growth • Core deposit growth

• Managed deposit mix by emphasizing core deposit growth while allowing higher-priced, non-core deposits to erode • Significantly paid down high- cost borrowings • Restructured asset mix by redeploying excess cash levels into higher yielding investments and loans • Loan demand will drive deposit/funding growth going forward ($ in millions) 15 $0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 $9,000 $10,000 Total Assets Deposits

($ in millions) 2012 2013 2014 2015 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 Not Purchased $2,573 $2,886 $3,268 $3,830 $4,075 $4,292 $4,526 $4,714 $4,834 $5,059 Purchased Covered* $237 $182 $143 $93 $45 $42 $30 - - - Purchased Not Covered - $813 $577 $1,490 $1,453 $1,631 $1,549 $1,489 $1,402 $1,312 Total Loans $2,810 $3,881 $3,988 $5,413 $5,573 $5,965 $6,105 $6,203 $6,236 $6,371 • Loans not purchased increased $225M, or 19% (annualized), during 2Q17 • Company maintained strong pipelines throughout all markets which will continue to drive further loan growth  Loss-share agreements with FDIC were terminated in 4Q16 $0 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 Not Purchased Purchased Covered Purchased ($ in thousands) 16 *Covered loans are subject to loss-share agreements with FDIC

 At June 30, 2017, loans totaled $6.4B  79% Not Purchased  21% Purchased Const 7% Land Dev 4% 1-4 Family 29% Non Owner Occupied 26% Owner Occupied 19% C&I 13% Consumer 2% 17

18 Acquisition, Development & Construction (ADC) and Commercial Real Estate (CRE) C&D and CRE Loan Concentration Levels 82% 83% 87% 91% 82% 81% 66% 69% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 3Q 15 4Q 15 1Q 16 2Q 16 3Q 16 4Q 16 1Q 17 2Q 17 265% 258% 267% 277% 251% 231% 227% 230% 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 300% 3Q 15 4Q 15 1Q 16 2Q 16 3Q 16 4Q 16 1Q 17 2Q 17 ADC Loans as a Percentage of Risk Based Capital CRE Loans (Construction & Perm) as a Percentage of Risk Based Capital

DDA 9% Other Int Bearing Accts 26% Time Deposits 37% Borrowed Funds 28% 4Q 2008 Cost of Funds 2.81% $3.28B Non Interest DDA 22% Other Int Bearing Accts 53% Time Deposits 21% Borrowed Funds 4% 2Q 2017 $7.5B Cost of Funds .43% $0 $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,400,000 $1,600,000 $1,800,000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 Non Interest Bearing Demand Deposits ($ in thousands) • Non-interest bearing deposits represent 23% of deposits, up from 12% at year end 2008 • Less reliance on borrowed funds Borrowed funds as a percentage of funding sources declined from 28% at year end 2008 to 4% at the end of 2Q17 19

0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 2012 2013 2014 2015 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 Marg in Y ie ld /C os t Yield on Earning Assets Cost of Funds Margin ($ in thousands) 2012 2013 2014 2015 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 Net Interest Income $133,338 $157,133 $202,482 $72,351 $70,054 $77,157 $75,731 $78,049 $74,015 $79,603 Net Interest Margin 3.94% 3.96% 4.12% 4.33% 4.21% 4.29% 4.15% 4.24% 4.01% 4.27% Yield on Earning Assets 4.67% 4.53% 4.59% 4.65% 4.57% 4.66% 4.54% 4.66% 4.43% 4.68% Cost of Funds 0.72% 0.57% 0.47% 0.32% 0.37% 0.38% 0.40% 0.42% 0.43% 0.43% 20

23% 7% 36% 9% 16% 9% 2Q17 $34M* Svc Chgs Insurance Mtg Inc Wealth Mgmt Fees & Comm Other • Diversified sources of noninterest income Less reliant on NSF • Opportunities for growing Non Interest Income Expansion of Trust Division Wealth Management services into larger, metropolitan markets Expansions within our de novo operations Expansion of the Mortgage Division within new markets Fees derived from higher penetration and usage of debit cards and deposit charges *Non interest income excludes gains from securities transactions and gains from acquisitions 39% 6% 11% 5% 27% 12% 1Q08 $14M* Svc Chgs Insurance Mtg Inc Wealth Mgmt Fees & Comm Other $0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000 $45,000 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 Non Interest Income* ($ in thousands) 21

• Continued focus on managing noninterest expenses and improving efficiency • Provided resources for eight de novo expansions since 2011 • Fluctuations in mortgage loan expense driven by higher mortgage production • Incurred merger related expenses during 2011, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 22 40.00% 45.00% 50.00% 55.00% 60.00% 65.00% 70.00% 75.00% 80.00% 85.00% 90.00% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 1Q17 2Q17 Efficiency Ratio* Efficiency Ratio ex. Mortgage* *Excludes debt extinguishment penalties, amortization of intangibles, loss share termination charges and merger-related expenses from noninterest expense and profit (loss) on sales of securities and gains on acquisitions from noninterest income Note: Efficiency Ratio and Efficiency Ratio excluding Mortgage are Non-GAAP financial measures. See slides 38 and 39 for reconciliation of these Non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP.

23 Enhance Profitability Capitalize on Opportunities Focus on Risk Management Build Capital Ratios • Focus on highly-accretive acquisition opportunities • Leverage existing markets • Seek new markets • New lines of business • Selective balance sheet growth • Maintain dividend • Prudently manage capital • Enhance credit process, policies and personnel • Aggressively identify and manage problem credits • Board focus on Enterprise Risk Management • Superior returns • Revenue growth / Expense control • Net interest margin expansion / mitigate interest rate risk • Loan growth • Core deposit growth

 Not purchased NPAs approaching pre-credit cycle levels.  Loss-share agreements with FDIC were terminated in Q4 2016 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 2011 2012 2013 2014 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 Not Purchased Purchased Covered Purchased Not Covered As a percentage of total assets 24 Not Purchased Purchased Not Covered NPL’s $12.7M $14.1M ORE $4.3M $15.4M Total NPA’s $17.0M $29.5M

*Ratios exclude loans and assets purchased in connection with the recent acquisitions or loss-share transactions 0.00% 50.00% 100.00% 150.00% 200.00% 250.00% 300.00% 350.00% 400.00% $- $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 2012 2013 2014 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 ($)Provision for Loan Losses ($)Net Charge Offs Coverage Ratio* • Net charge-offs totaled .03% in Q2 2017 • Provision for loan losses totaled $1.75 million in Q2 2017 Allowance for Loan Losses as % of Non-Purchased Loans* 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 2.07% 1.98% 1.72% 1.65% 1.29% 1.29% 1.23% 1.17% 1.11% 1.05% 1.03% 1.01% 0.91% 0.89% 0.87% 25 ($ i n t h ou san d s)

$0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 2011 2012 2013 2014 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 NPLs 30-89 Days Strong Credit Quality Metrics NPLs and Early Stage Delinquencies (30-89 Days Past Due Loans)* • NPL’s to total loans were 0.25% as of June 30, 2017 26 *Ratios exclude loans and assets purchased in connection with recent acquisitions or loss-share transactions ($ i n t h ou san d s)

27 Enhance Profitability Capitalize on Opportunities Focus on Risk Management Build Capital Ratios • Focus on highly-accretive acquisition opportunities • Leverage existing markets • Seek new markets • New lines of business • Selective balance sheet growth • Maintain dividend • Prudently manage capital • Enhance credit process, policies and personnel • Aggressively identify and manage problem credits • Board focus on Enterprise Risk Management • Superior returns • Revenue growth / Expense control • Net interest margin expansion / mitigate interest rate risk • Loan growth • Core deposit growth

4.50% 5.50% 6.50% 7.50% 8.50% 9.50% 10.50% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 Tangible Common Equity Ratio* Renasant Capital 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 Tangible Common Equity* 7.35% 7.71% 6.64% 7.52% 7.54% 7.52% 7.80% 8.03% 9.00% 9.16% 9.31% Leverage 9.44% 9.86% 8.68% 9.53% 9.16% 9.19% 9.18% 9.38% 10.59% 10.39% 10.68% Tier 1 Risk Based 13.32% 12.74% 11.41% 12.45% 11.51% 11.38% 11.56% 11.57% 12.86% 12.93% 12.86% Total Risk Based 14.58% 14.00% 12.58% 13.54% 12.32% 12.17% 12.31% 13.84% 15.03% 15.11% 15.00% Tier 1 Common Equity N/A N/A N/A N/A 9.99% 9.88% 10.13% 10.16% 11.47% 11.69% 11.65% • Maintained dividend throughout economic downturn • Regulatory capital ratios are above the minimum for well-capitalized classification • Capital level positions the Company for future growth and geographic expansion • Did not participate in the TARP program • Raised $98.2M of subordinated notes in Q3 2016 • Raised $84.1M of common equity in Q4 2016 28 * Tangible Common Equity Ratio is a Non-GAAP financial measure. See slide 37 for reconciliation of this Non-GAAP financial measure to GAAP.

29 Dividends Per Share – Annual Payout $0.00 $0.10 $0.20 $0.30 $0.40 $0.50 $0.60 $0.70 $0.80 20 0 4 20 0 5 20 0 6 20 0 7 20 0 8 20 0 9 20 1 0 20 1 1 20 1 2 20 1 3 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 Consistent and Strong Dividend $0.00 $0.02 $0.04 $0.06 $0.08 $0.10 $0.12 $0.14 $0.16 $0.18 $0.20 1Q14 3Q14 1Q15 3Q15 1Q16 3Q16 1Q17 Dividends Per Share – Quarterly Payout

30  $8.9B franchise well positioned in attractive markets in the Southeast  Merger with Metropolitan BancGroup, Inc. added $1.2B in assets, $940M in deposits and $990M in loans  Strategic focus on expanding footprint • Acquisition • De Novo • New lines of business  Opportunity for further profitability improvement  Organic loan growth  Core deposit growth  Revenue growth  Declining credit costs  Strong capital position  Consistent dividend payment history GEORGIA ALABAMA MISSISSIPPI FLORIDA TENNESSEE Atlanta Montgomery Auburn Birmingham Jackson Albany Savannah Tupelo Huntsville Memphis Gainesville Ocala Nashville Knoxville Johnson City 55 59 65 10 10 95 75 75 75 20 20 40 65 24 40 16 59 75 RNST Branches (as of July 1, 2017) Mobile

Appendix 31

12.4% 0.3% 0.5% 1.5% 1.0% 17.3% 6.2% 7.1% 0.9% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% Ch am be rs Je ffe rs on Le e M ad iso n M on tg om er y M or ga n Sh elb y Ta lla de ga Tu sc al oo sa  Merger with Heritage Financial Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: HBOS), which closed on July 1, 2015, added approximately $90.0 million in loans, $141 million in deposits and 9 branches  Opened Commercial Loan Production Office and Mortgage Production Office in Mobile, AL in Q1 2017  Honda, Hyundai, Mercedes-Benz increasingly large presence  UAB Hospital, located in Birmingham, is the largest state government employer in Alabama with a workforce of approximately 18,000. Montgomery Huntsville Birmingham 32 Deposit Market Share by County – Top 5 Presence in 4 of 9 counties 3 5 4 2 Deposit Market Share Rank 16 17 10 14 14 Alabama Deposit Market Share Source: SNL Financial Green highlighting denotes top 5 deposit market share in respective county Deposit data as of 6/30/16 RNST Branches Deposits Market Rank Institution ($mm) Share Branches 1 Regions Financial Corp. $22,587 22.68 % 231 2 Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA 15,356 15.42 88 3 Wells Fargo & Co. 8,978 9.01 139 4 ServisFirst Bancshares Inc. 3,993 4.01 11 5 BB&T Corp. 3,991 4.01 86 6 Synovus Financial Corp. 3,967 3.98 38 7 Cadence Bancorp LLC 3,072 3.08 26 8 PNC Financial Services Group Inc. 2,967 2.98 69 9 Trustmark Corp. 1,326 1.33 38 10 Bryant Bank 1,198 1.20 14 16 Renasant Corp. 908 0.91 18 Mobile

Jacksonville Miami Tallahassee Tampa Orlando RNST Branches 10 10 95 Gainesville Ocala  Entered the Florida market through the acquisition of HBOS  Moved into FL with 8 full-services branches along I-75  Opened Mortgage Production Offices in Destin and Jacksonville Q1 2017  Florida has the fourth largest economy in the United States  The unemployment rate in Florida is 4.90%, with job growth of 1.71%. Future job growth over the next ten years is predicted to be 38.52%. 33 Deposit Market Share by County – Top 5 Presence in 0 of 3 counties Deposit Market Share Rank 10 Florida Deposit Market Share 6 11 Source: SNL Financial Deposit data as of 6/30/16 2.2% 2.5% 2.0% 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% Alachua Columbia Marion Deposits Market Rank Institution ($mm) Share Branches 1 Bank of America Corp. $102,957 19.18 % 573 2 Wells Fargo & Co. 79,086 14.73 648 3 SunTrust Banks Inc. 48,251 8.99 484 4 JPMorgan Chase & Co. 28,837 5.37 397 5 TIAA Board of Overseers 18,934 3.53 12 6 Regions Financial Corp. 18,817 3.51 347 7 BB&T Corp. 17,509 3.26 322 8 Citigroup Inc. 16,531 3.08 54 9 BankUnited Inc. 14,951 2.79 96 10 Raymond James Financial Inc. 14,241 2.65 1 129 Renasant Corp. 226 0.04 8 4

 Entered the North GA market through two FDIC loss-share transactions  12 full-service locations  Expanded services include mortgage and wealth management personnel  Grew GA presence by completing acquisition of Heritage Financial Group, Inc. ($1.9 billion in assets)  Added 20 full-service branches and 4 mortgage offices  Significantly ramps up our mortgage division  Enhanced GA presence by acquisition of KeyWorth Bank ($399 million in assets), which closed on April 1, 2016  Approximately $284 million in loans, $347 million in deposits, and 4 full-service branches  Company’s Small Business Administration, Middle Market Commercial and Asset Based Lending teams are headquartered in Atlanta, GA. 34 Deposit Market Share by County – Top 5 Presence in 10 of 22 counties 5 6 9 7 Deposit Market Share Rank 4 25 1 12 13 3 Georgia Deposit Market Share Source: SNL Financial Green highlighting denotes top 5 deposit market share in respective county Deposit data as of 6/30/16 4 11 15 22 2 16 2 4 13 Atlanta Savannah Albany 11.6% 7.2% 1.3% 12.4% 0.5% 4.9% 0.0% 20.7% 0.4% 21.4% 26.9% 2.2% 0.3% 0.9% 25.6% 10.8% 2.2% 0.0% 13.3% 9.1% 1.1% 15.4% 0.0% 8.0% 16.0% 24.0% 32.0% Ap plin g Bar tow Bib b Bul loc h Ch ath am Ch ero kee Cob b Coo k DeK alb Do ugh erty Eff ing ham For syt h Ful ton Gw inn ett Jeff Da vis Lee Low nde s Mu sco gee Pic ken s Tat tna ll Tro up Wo rth 4 2 20 RNST Branches Deposits Market Rank Institution ($mm) Share Branches 1 SunTrust Banks Inc. $49,481 19.94 % 243 2 Wells Fargo & Co. 35,245 14.21 278 3 Bank of America Corp. 32,878 13.25 172 4 Synchrony Financial 22,707 9.15 1 5 Synovus Financial Corp. 13,788 5.56 116 6 BB&T Corp. 12,369 4.99 157 7 Regions Financial Corp. 5,868 2.37 129 8 United Community Banks Inc. 5,348 2.16 70 9 Bank of the Ozarks Inc. 4,031 1.62 73 10 Royal Bank of Canada 3,434 1.38 2 18 Renasant Corp. 1,739 0.70 37 Macon

35 Deposit Market Share by County – Top 5 Presence in 24 of 27 counties 6 1  Entered the Columbus, MS market in November 2010 and opened an office in Starkville, home of Mississippi State University, during late Q3 ’11  City of Tupelo/Lee County – Recently completed a $12 million aquatic center and a $4 million expansion of the Elvis Presley Birthplace and Museum  City of Oxford – Construction of a new $300 million, 200+ bed hospital  MS markets continue to benefit from the investment of Yokohama Tire Corporation, Toyota and Nissan as well as their related suppliers  Merger with Metropolitan BancGroup, Inc., which closed July 1, 2017, improved market share in Madison, Rankin and Copiah Counties 5 2 4 2 3 4 3 Deposit Market Share Rank 2 3 4 1 5 5 1 4 5 1 4 2 7 3 3 2 2 10 Mississippi Deposit Market Share Source: SNL Financial Green highlighting denotes top 5 deposit market share in respective county Deposit data as of 6/30/16 RNST Branches Tupelo Jackson 6.5% 49.2% 8.6% 30.6% 5.0% 47.2% 23.0% 7.7% 16.8% 0.6% 11.8%10.9% 41.5% 9.0% 6.8% 25.4% 10.3% 4.4% 26.4% 9.3% 26.0%27.6% 4.4% 8.5%8.7% 28.3% 20.6% 0.0% 15.0% 30.0% 45.0% 60.0% Alc orn Atta la Boli var Cal hou n Chi cka saw Cho ctaw Cla y Des oto Gre nad a Hin ds Hol mes Lafa yett e Lee Low nde s Mad ison Mo nro e Mo ntg ome ry Nes hob a Okt ibbe ha Pan ola Pon toto c Pre ntis s Ran kin Tish om ingo Uni on Win ston Yal obu sha Deposits Market Rank Institution ($mm) Share Branches 1 Regions Financial Corp. $7,043 13.91 % 134 2 Trustmark Corp. 6,618 13.07 125 3 BancorpSouth Inc. 5,440 10.74 98 4 Hancock Holding Co. 3,029 5.98 40 5 Renasant Corp. 2,999 5.92 70 6 Community Bancshares of Mississippi Inc. 2,174 4.29 35 7 BancPlus Corp. 2,111 4.17 59 8 Citizens National Banc Corp. 1,095 2.16 26 9 Planters Holding Co. 899 1.78 19 10 BankFirst Capital Corp. 805 1.59 17

 Our Tennessee Operations  The Knoxville/Maryville MSA location opened in late Q2 ‘12  East Tennessee operations currently have 4 full-service branches, $264 million in loans and $112 million in deposits  New lending teams added in both Memphis and Nashville during 2013  New Healthcare Lending Group added in Nashville during 2015  Economic development and site selector magazine Business Facilities named Tennessee its 2014 “State of the Year” pointing to its emphasis on infrastructure and educations supportive to companies’ growth.  In 2013, Nashville ranked No. 5 on Forbes’ list of the Best Places for Business and Careers. 36 Deposit Market Share by County – Top 5 Presence in 1 of 8 counties Deposit Market Share Rank 3 11 15 13 17 9 Tennessee Deposit Market Share 12 22 Source: SNL Financial Green highlighting denotes top 5 deposit market share in respective county Deposit data as of 6/30/16  In 2015, Business Facilities’ 11Annual Rankings report named Nashville the number one city for Economic Growth Potential.  Nashville ranks third in the country based on the rate of growth of the gross metropolitan product, or GMP.  As of 2014, Memphis was the home of three Fortune 500 companies: FedEx (no. 63), International Paper (no. 107), and AutoZone (no. 306).  Merger with Metropolitan BancGroup, Inc., which closed July 1, 2017, improved market share in Williamson, Davidson and Shelby Counties Nashville Knoxville Memphis RNST Branches 40 2.4% 11.3% 1.1% 1.2% 0.6% 1.5% 2.5% 0.5% 0.0% 3.0% 6.0% 9.0% 12.0% Bl ou nt Cr oc ke tt Da vi ds on Sh elb y Su lli va n Su m ne r W as hi ng to n W ill iam so n Deposits Market Rank Institution ($mm) Share Branches 1 First Horizon National Corp. $19,774 14.29 % 152 2 Regions Financial Corp. 17,748 12.82 236 3 SunTrust Banks Inc. 13,436 9.71 138 4 Bank of America Corp. 10,929 7.90 57 5 Pinnacle Financial Partners Inc. 8,297 5.99 45 6 U.S. Bancorp 2,941 2.12 104 7 BB&T Corp. 2,419 1.75 49 8 Franklin Financial Network Inc. 2,365 1.71 14 9 FB Financial Corp 2,316 1.67 48 10 Wells Fargo & Co. 1,941 1.40 19 23 Renasant Corp. 835 0.60 15

37 Tangible Common Equity Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Disclosures

38 Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Disclosures Efficiency Ratio

39 Efficiency Ratio (Excluding Mortgage) Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Disclosures

E. Robinson McGraw Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Kevin D. Chapman Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 209 TROY STREET TUPELO, MS 38804-4827 PHONE: 1-800-680-1601 FACSIMILE: 1-662-680-1234 WWW.RENASANT.COM WWW.RENASANTBANK.COM 40