Our unfunded commitments at June 30, 2013 included private equity investments of $171 million.

We issue standby letters of credit and have risk participations in standby letters of credit issued by other financial institutions, in each case to support obligations of our customers to third parties, such as insurance requirements and the facilitation of transactions involving capital markets product execution. Net outstanding standby letters of credit and internal credit ratings were as follows:

Table 127: Net Outstanding Standby Letters of Credit

		June 30			December 31
Dollars in billions		2013			2012
Net outstanding standby letters of credit (a)		$	10.9		$	11.5
Internal credit ratings (as a percentage of portfolio):
	Pass (b)		96	%		95	%
	Below pass (c)		4	%		5	%
(a)	The amounts above exclude participations in standby letters of credit of $3.2 billion to other financial institutions as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The amounts above also include $6.8 billion and $7.5 billion which support remarketing programs at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
(b)	Indicates that expected risk of loss is currently low.
(c)	Indicates a higher degree of risk of default.

If the customer fails to meet its financial or performance obligation to the third party under the terms of the contract or there is a need to support a remarketing program, then upon the request of the guaranteed party, subject to the terms of the letter of credit, we would be obligated to make payment to them. The standby letters of credit outstanding on June 30, 2013 had terms ranging from less than 1 year to 7 years.

As of June 30, 2013, assets of $2.4 billion secured certain specifically identified standby letters of credit. In addition, a portion of the remaining standby letters of credit issued on behalf of specific customers is also secured by collateral or guarantees that secure the customers' other obligations to us. The carrying amount of the liability for our obligations related to standby letters of credit and participations in standby letters of credit was $215 million at June 30, 2013.

We enter into standby bond purchase agreements to support municipal bond obligations. At June 30, 2013, the aggregate of our commitments under these facilities was $556 million. We also enter into certain other liquidity facilities to support individual pools of receivables acquired by commercial paper conduits. At June 30, 2013, our total commitments under these facilities were $145 million.

We are a party to numerous acquisition or divestiture agreements under which we have purchased or sold, or agreed to purchase or sell, various types of assets. These agreements can cover the purchase or sale of entire businesses, loan portfolios, branch banks, partial interests in companies, or other types of assets.

These agreements generally include indemnification provisions under which we indemnify the third parties to these agreements against a variety of risks to the indemnified parties as a result of the transaction in question. When PNC is the seller, the indemnification provisions will generally also provide the buyer with protection relating to the quality of the assets we are selling and the extent of any liabilities being assumed by the buyer. Due to the nature of these indemnification provisions, we cannot quantify the total potential exposure to us resulting from them.

We provide indemnification in connection with securities offering transactions in which we are involved. When we are the issuer of the securities, we provide indemnification to the underwriters or placement agents analogous to the indemnification provided to the purchasers of businesses from us, as described above. When we are an underwriter or placement agent, we provide a limited indemnification to the issuer related to our actions in connection with the offering and, if there are other underwriters, indemnification to the other underwriters intended to result in an appropriate sharing of the risk of participating in the offering. Due to the nature of these indemnification provisions, we cannot quantify the total potential exposure to us resulting from them.

In the ordinary course of business, we enter into certain types of agreements that include provisions for indemnifying third parties. We also enter into certain types of agreements, including leases, assignments of leases, and subleases, in which we agree to indemnify third parties for acts by our agents, assignees and/or sublessees, and employees. We also enter into contracts for the delivery of technology service in which we indemnify the other party against claims of patent and copyright infringement by third parties. Due to the nature of these indemnification provisions, we cannot calculate our aggregate potential exposure under them.

In the ordinary course of business, we enter into contracts with third parties under which the third parties provide services on behalf of PNC. In many of these contracts, we agree to indemnify the third party service provider under certain circumstances. The terms of the indemnity vary from contract to contract and the amount of the indemnification liability, if any, cannot be determined.

We are a general or limited partner in certain asset management and investment limited partnerships, many of which contain indemnification provisions that would require us to make payments in excess of our remaining unfunded commitments. While in certain of these partnerships the maximum liability to us is limited to the sum of our unfunded commitments and partnership distributions received by us, in the others the indemnification liability is unlimited. As a result, we cannot determine our aggregate potential exposure for these indemnifications.

In some cases, indemnification obligations of the types described above arise under arrangements entered into by predecessor companies for which we become responsible as a result of the acquisition.

Pursuant to their bylaws, PNC and its subsidiaries provide indemnification to directors, officers and, in some cases, employees and agents against certain liabilities incurred as a result of their service on behalf of or at the request of PNC and its subsidiaries. PNC and its subsidiaries also advance on behalf of covered individuals costs incurred in connection with certain claims or proceedings, subject to written undertakings by each such individual to repay all amounts advanced if it is ultimately determined that the individual is not entitled to indemnification. We generally are responsible for similar indemnifications and advancement obligations that companies we acquire had to their officers, directors and sometimes employees and agents at the time of acquisition. We advanced such costs on behalf of several such individuals with respect to pending litigation or investigations during the first six months of 2013. It is not possible for us to determine the aggregate potential exposure resulting from the obligation to provide this indemnity or to advance such costs.

Our payment services business issues and acquires credit and debit card transactions through Visa U.S.A. Inc. card association or its affiliates (Visa). Our 2012 Form 10-K has additional information regarding the October 2007 Visa restructuring, our involvement with judgment and loss sharing agreements with Visa and certain other banks, and the status of pending interchange litigation. This information was updated in Note 23 Legal Proceedings in our 2012 Form 10-K and in Note 17 Legal Proceedings in this Report. Additionally, we continue to have an obligation to indemnify Visa for judgments and settlements for the remaining specified litigation.

As discussed in Note 3 Loan Sale and Servicing Activities and Variable Interest Entities, PNC has sold commercial mortgage, residential mortgage and home equity loans directly or indirectly through securitization and loan sale transactions in which we have continuing involvement. One form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets.

We originate, close and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to FNMA under FNMA's Delegated Underwriting and Servicing (DUS) program. We participated in a similar program with the FHLMC.

Under these programs, we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $12.7 billion and $12.8 billion, respectively. The potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $3.9 billion at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

We maintain a reserve for estimated losses based upon our exposure. The reserve for losses under these programs totaled $37 million and $43 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, and is included in Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. The comparable reserve as of June 30, 2012 was $48 million. If payment is required under these programs, we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred, although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses. Our exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the Corporate & Institutional Banking segment.

While residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis, we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors. These loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where PNC is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements. For additional information on loan sales see Note 3 Loan Sale and Servicing Activities and Variable Interest Entities. Our historical exposure and activity associated with Agency securitization repurchase obligations has primarily been related to transactions with FNMA and FHLMC, as indemnification and repurchase losses associated with FHA and VA-insured and uninsured loans pooled in GNMA securitizations historically have been minimal. Repurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the Residential Mortgage Banking segment.

PNC's repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by National City prior to our acquisition of National City. PNC is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business, and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of loans sold in these transactions. Repurchase activity associated with brokered home equity loans/lines is reported in the Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio segment.

Indemnification and repurchase liabilities are initially recognized when loans are sold to investors and are subsequently evaluated by management. Initial recognition and subsequent adjustments to the indemnification and repurchase liability for the sold residential mortgage portfolio are recognized in Residential mortgage revenue on the Consolidated Income Statement. Since PNC is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business, only subsequent adjustments are recognized to the home equity loans/lines indemnification and repurchase liability. These adjustments are recognized in Other noninterest income on the Consolidated Income Statement.

Management's subsequent evaluation of these indemnification and repurchase liabilities is based upon trends in indemnification and repurchase requests, actual loss experience, risks in the underlying serviced loan portfolios, and current economic conditions. As part of its evaluation, management considers estimated loss projections over the life of the subject loan portfolio. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the total indemnification and repurchase liability for estimated losses on indemnification and repurchase claims totaled $547 million and $672 million, respectively, and was included in Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. An analysis of the changes in this liability during the first six months of 2013 and 2012 follows:

Table 129: Analysis of Indemnification and Repurchase Liability for Asserted Claims and Unasserted Claims

		2013						2012
				Home						Home
				Equity						Equity
		Residential		Loans/				Residential		Loans/
In millions		Mortgages (a)		Lines (b)		Total		Mortgages (a)		Lines (b)		Total
January 1		$	614	$	58	$	672	$	83	$	47	$	130
Reserve adjustments, net			4		(3)		1		32		12		44
RBC Bank (USA) acquisition									26				26
Losses - loan repurchases and settlements			(96)		(30)		(126)		(40)		(8)		(48)
March 31		$	522	$	25	$	547	$	101	$	51	$	152
Reserve adjustments, net			73		1		74		438		15		453
Losses - loan repurchases and settlements			(72)		(2)		(74)		(77)		(5)		(82)
June 30		$	523	$	24	$	547	$	462	$	61	$	523
(a)	Repurchase obligation associated with sold loan portfolios of $114.4 billion and $115.7 billion at June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively.
(b)	Repurchase obligation associated with sold loan portfolios of $3.8 billion and $4.4 billion at June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively. PNC is no longer engaged in
	the brokered home equity business, which was acquired with National City.

Management believes our indemnification and repurchase liabilities appropriately reflect the estimated probable losses on indemnification and repurchase claims for all loans sold and outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and 2012. In making these estimates, we consider the losses that we expect to incur over the life of the sold loans. While management seeks to obtain all relevant information in estimating the indemnification and repurchase liability, the estimation process is inherently uncertain and imprecise and, accordingly, it is reasonably possible that future indemnification and repurchase losses could be more or less than our established liability. Factors that could affect our estimate include the volume of valid claims driven by investor strategies and behavior, our ability to successfully negotiate claims with investors, housing prices and other economic conditions. At June 30, 2013, we estimate that it is reasonably possible that we could incur additional losses in excess of our accrued indemnification and repurchase liability of up to approximately $355 million for our portfolio of residential mortgage loans sold. At June 30, 2013, the reasonably possible loss above our accrual for our portfolio of home equity loans/lines sold was not material. This estimate of potential additional losses in excess of our liability is based on assumed higher repurchase claims and lower claim rescissions than our current assumptions.

We have two wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiaries which provide reinsurance to third-party insurers related to insurance sold to our customers. These subsidiaries enter into various types of reinsurance agreements with third-party insurers where the subsidiary assumes the risk of loss through either an excess of loss or quota share agreement up to 100% reinsurance. In excess of loss agreements, these subsidiaries assume the risk of loss for an excess layer of coverage up to specified limits, once a defined first loss percentage is met. In quota share agreements, the subsidiaries and third-party insurers share the responsibility for payment of all claims.

These subsidiaries provide reinsurance for accidental death & dismemberment, credit life, accident & health, lender placed hazard and borrower and lender paid mortgage insurance with an aggregate maximum exposure up to the specified limits for all reinsurance contracts as follows:

Table 130: Reinsurance Agreements Exposure (a)
		June 30				December 31
In millions		2013				2012
Accidental Death & Dismemberment			$	1,973			$	2,049
Credit Life, Accident & Health				674				795
Lender Placed Hazard (b)				2,901				2,774
Borrower and Lender Paid Mortgage Insurance				183				228
Maximum Exposure			$	5,731			$	5,846

Percentage of reinsurance agreements:
Excess of Loss - Mortgage Insurance				3	%			3	%
Quota Share				97	%			97	%

Maximum Exposure to Quota Share Agreements with 100% Reinsurance			$	673			$	794
(a)	Reinsurance agreements exposure balances represent estimates based on availability of financial information from insurance carriers.
(b)	Through the purchase of catastrophe reinsurance connected to the Lender Placed Hazard Exposure, should a catastrophic event occur, PNC will benefit from this
	reinsurance. No credit for the catastrophe reinsurance protection is applied to the aggregate exposure figure.

There were no changes to the terms of existing agreements, nor were any new relationships entered into or existing relationships exited.

There is a reasonable possibility that losses could be more than or less than the amount reserved due to ongoing uncertainty in various economic, social and other factors that could impact the frequency and severity of claims covered by these reinsurance agreements. At June 30, 2013, the reasonably possible loss above our accrual was not material.

We enter into repurchase and resale agreements where we transfer investment securities to/from a third party with the agreement to repurchase/resell those investment securities at a future date for a specified price. Repurchase and resale agreements are treated as collateralized financing transactions for accounting purposes and are generally carried at the amounts at which the securities will be subsequently reacquired or resold, including accrued interest. Our policy is to take possession of securities purchased under agreements to resell. We monitor the market value of securities to be repurchased and resold and additional collateral may be obtained where considered appropriate to protect against credit exposure.

Repurchase and resale agreements are typically entered into with counterparties under industry standard master netting agreements which provide for the right to setoff amounts owed one another with respect to multiple repurchase and resale agreements under such master netting agreement (referred to as netting arrangements) and liquidate the purchased or borrowed securities in the event of counterparty default. In order for an arrangement to be eligible for netting under GAAP (ASC 210-20), we must obtain the requisite assurance that the offsetting rights included in the master netting agreement would be legally enforceable in the event of bankruptcy, insolvency, or a similar proceeding of such third party. Enforceability is evidenced by obtaining a legal opinion that supports, with sufficient confidence, the enforceability of the master netting agreement in bankruptcy.

In accordance with the disclosure requirements of ASU 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, Table 132: Resale and Repurchase Agreements Offsetting shows the amounts owed under resale and repurchase agreements and the securities collateral associated with those agreements where a legal opinion supporting the enforceability of the offsetting rights has been obtained. We do not present resale and repurchase agreements entered into with the same counterparty under a legally enforceable master netting agreement on a net basis on our Consolidated Balance Sheet or within Table 132: Resale and Repurchase Agreements Offsetting. The amounts reported in Table 132 exclude the fair value adjustment on the structured resale agreements of $14 million and $19 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, that we have elected to account for at fair value. Refer to Note 9 Fair Value for additional information regarding the structured resale agreements at fair value.

For further discussion on ASU 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities and the impact of other instruments entered into under master netting arrangements, see Note 1 under Recent Accounting Pronouncements in the March 31, 2013 Form 10-Q. Refer to Note 13 Financial Derivatives for additional information related to offsetting of financial derivatives.

Table 132: Resale and Repurchase Agreements Offsetting

Amounts

Securities

Offset

Collateral

Gross

on the

Net

Held Under

Resale

Consolidated

Resale

Master Netting

Net

In millions

Agreements

Balance Sheet

Agreements (a) (b)

Agreements (c)

Amounts (b)

Resale Agreements

June 30, 2013

1,089

999

December 31, 2012

975

884

Amounts

Securities

Offset

Collateral

Gross

on the

Net

Pledged Under

Repurchase

Consolidated

Repurchase

Master Netting

Net

In millions

Agreements

Balance Sheet

Agreements (d) (e)

Agreements (c)

Amounts (e)

Repurchase Agreements

June 30, 2013

3,237

2,355

882

December 31, 2012

3,215

2,168

1,047

(a)

Represents the resale agreement amount included in Federal funds sold and resale agreements on our Consolidated Balance Sheet and the related accrued interest income in the amount of $1 million at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, which is included in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(b)

These amounts include certain long term resale agreements of $89 million at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, which are fully collateralized but do not have the benefits of a netting opinion and therefore might be subject to a stay in insolvency proceedings and therefore are not eligible under ASC 210-20 for netting.

(c)

In accordance with the requirements of ASU 2011-11, represents the fair value of securities collateral purchased or sold, up to the amount owed under the agreement, for agreements supported by a legally enforceable master netting agreement.

(d)

Represents the repurchase agreement amount included in Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements on our Consolidated Balance Sheet and the related accrued interest expense in the amount of less than $1 million at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, which is included in Other Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(e)

These amounts include overnight repurchase agreements of $832 million and $997 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, entered into with municipalities, pension plans, and certain trusts and insurance companies as well as certain long term repurchase agreements of $50 million at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, which are fully collateralized but do not have the benefits of a netting opinion and therefore might be subject to a stay in insolvency proceedings and therefore are not eligible under ASC 210-20 for netting.