XML 24 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2020
Asset Quality [Abstract]  
Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses

Loan Portfolio
Our loan portfolio consists of two portfolio segments – Commercial and Consumer. Each of these segments comprises multiple loan classes. Classes are characterized by similarities in risk attributes and the manner in which we monitor and assess credit risk.
Commercial
 
Consumer
 
• Commercial and industrial
 
• Home equity
• Commercial real estate
 
• Residential real estate
• Equipment lease financing
 
• Automobile
 
 
• Credit card
 
 
• Education
 
 
• Other consumer
 
 
 
See Note 1 Accounting Policies for additional information on our loan related policies.

Credit Quality
We closely monitor economic conditions and loan performance trends to manage and evaluate our exposure to credit risk within the loan portfolio based on our defined loan classes. In doing so, we use several credit quality indicators, including trends in delinquency rates, nonperforming status, analysis of PD and LGD ratings, updated credit scores, and originated and updated LTV ratios.

The measurement of delinquency status is based on the contractual terms of each loan. Loans that are 30 days or more past due in terms of payment are considered delinquent. With the adoption of the CECL standard, accruing loans past due as of September 30, 2020 include PCD loans, while amounts as of December 31, 2019 excluded purchased impaired loans. See Note 1 Accounting Policies for additional information related to the adoption of this standard, including the discontinuation of purchased impaired loan accounting.

The following table presents the composition and delinquency status of our loan portfolio at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. Pursuant to the interagency guidance issued in April 2020 and in connection with the credit reporting rules from the CARES Act, the September 30, 2020 delinquency status of loans modified due to COVID-19 related hardships aligns with the rules set forth for banks to report delinquency status to the credit agencies. These rules require that COVID-19 related loan modifications be reported as follows:
if current at the time of modification, the loan remains current throughout the modification period,
if delinquent at the time of modification and the borrower was not made current as part of the modification, the loan maintains its reported delinquent status during the modification period, or
if delinquent at the time of modification and the borrower was made current as part of the modification or became current during the modification period, the loan is reported as current.

As a result, certain loans modified due to COVID-19 related hardships are not being reported as past due as of September 30, 2020 based on the contractual terms of the loan, even where borrowers may not be making payments on their loans during the modification period. Loan modifications due to COVID-19 related hardships that permanently reduce either the contractual interest rate or the principal balance of a loan do not qualify for TDR relief under the CARES Act or the interagency guidance.
Table 44: Analysis of Loan Portfolio
 
Accruing
 
 
 
 
 
Dollars in millions
Current or Less
Than 30 Days
Past Due

30-59
Days
Past Due

60-89
Days
Past Due

90 Days
Or More
Past Due

Total
Past
Due (c)

 
Nonperforming
Loans

Fair Value
Option
Nonaccrual
Loans (d)

Total Loans
(e)(f)

 
September 30, 2020 (a) (b)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial and industrial
$
136,381

$
56

$
37

$
36

$
129

  
$
677

 
$
137,187

 
Commercial real estate
28,799

6

6

 
12

  
217

 
29,028

 
Equipment lease financing
6,447

7

4

 
11

  
21

 
6,479

 
Total commercial
171,627

69

47

36

152

  
915

 
172,694

 
Consumer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Home equity
23,774

48

22

 
70

  
639

$
56

24,539

 
Residential real estate
21,503

188

80

269

537

(c) 
339

507

22,886

 
Automobile
14,646

116

32

12

160

  
171

 
14,977

 
Credit card
6,153

44

33

60

137

  
13

 
6,303

 
Education
2,905

57

26

63

146

(c)
 
 
3,051

 
Other consumer
4,785

17

11

8

36

 
8

 
4,829

 
Total consumer
73,766

470

204

412

1,086

  
1,170

563

76,585

 
Total
$
245,393

$
539

$
251

$
448

$
1,238

  
$
2,085

$
563

$
249,279

 
Percentage of total loans
98.43
%
.22
%
.10
%
.18
%
.50
%
 
.84
%
.23
%
100.00
%
 
(a)
Amounts in table represent loans held for investment and do not include any associated valuation allowance.
(b)
The accrued interest associated with our loan portfolio at September 30, 2020 totaled $.7 billion and is included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(c)
Past due loan amounts include government insured or guaranteed Residential real estate loans and Education loans totaling $.4 billion and $.1 billion, respectively, at September 30, 2020.
(d)
Consumer loans accounted for under the fair value option for which we do not expect to collect substantially all principal and interest are subject to nonaccrual accounting and classification upon meeting any of our nonaccrual policies. Given that these loans are not accounted for at amortized cost, these loans have been excluded from the nonperforming loan population.
(e)
Net of unearned income, unamortized deferred fees and costs on originated loans, and premiums or discounts on purchased loans totaling $1.4 billion at September 30, 2020.
(f)
Collateral dependent loans totaled $1.2 billion at September 30, 2020. The majority of these loans are within the Home equity and Residential real estate loan classes and are secured by consumer real estate.

 
Accruing
 
  
  
  
  
 
Dollars in millions
Current or Less
Than 30 Days
Past Due

30-59 Days
Past Due

60-89 Days
Past Due

90 Days
Or More
Past Due

Total Past
Due (h)

 
Nonperforming
Loans

Fair Value
Option
Nonaccrual
Loans (i)

Purchased
Impaired
Loans

Total
Loans (j)

 
December 31, 2019 (g)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial and industrial
$
124,695

$
102

$
30

$
85

$
217

 
$
425

 
 
$
125,337

 
Commercial real estate
28,061

4

1

 
5

 
44

 
 
28,110

 
Equipment lease financing
7,069

49

5

 
54

 
32

 
 
7,155

 
Total commercial
159,825

155

36

85

276

 
501

 
 
160,602

 
Consumer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Home equity
23,791

58

24

 
82

 
669

 
$
543

25,085

 
Residential real estate
19,640

140

69

315

524

(h) 
315

$
166

1,176

21,821

 
Automobile
16,376

178

47

18

243

 
135

 
 
16,754

 
Credit card
7,133

60

37

67

164

 
11

 
 
7,308

 
Education
3,156

55

34

91

180

(h) 
 
 
 
3,336

 
Other consumer
4,898

15

11

9

35

 
4

 
 
4,937

 
Total consumer
74,994

506

222

500

1,228

 
1,134

166

1,719

79,241

 
Total
$
234,819

$
661

$
258

$
585

$
1,504

 
$
1,635

$
166

$
1,719

$
239,843

 
Percentage of total loans
97.90
%
.28
%
.11
%
.24
%
.63
%
 
.68
%
.07
%
.72
%
100.00
%
 
(g)
Amounts in table represent recorded investment and exclude loans held for sale. Recorded investment does not include any associated valuation allowance.
(h)
Past due loan amounts exclude purchased impaired loans, even if contractually past due (or if we do not expect to receive payment in full based on the original contractual terms), as we accreted interest income over the expected life of the loans. Past due loan amounts include government insured or guaranteed Residential real estate loans totaling $.4 billion and Education loans totaling $.2 billion at December 31, 2019.
(i)
Consumer loans accounted for under the fair value option for which we do not expect to collect substantially all principal and interest are subject to nonaccrual accounting and classification upon meeting any of our nonaccrual policies. Given that these loans are not accounted for at amortized cost, these loans have been excluded from the nonperforming loan population.
(j)
Net of unearned income, unamortized deferred fees and costs on originated loans, and premiums or discounts on purchased loans totaling $1.1 billion at December 31, 2019.
At September 30, 2020, we pledged $30.5 billion of commercial loans to the Federal Reserve Bank and $68.9 billion of residential real estate and other loans to the Federal Home Loan Bank as collateral for the ability to borrow, if necessary. The comparable amounts at December 31, 2019 were $16.9 billion and $68.0 billion, respectively. Amounts pledged reflect the unpaid principal balances.

Nonperforming Assets
Nonperforming assets include nonperforming loans and leases, OREO and foreclosed assets. Nonperforming loans are those loans accounted for at amortized cost whose credit quality has deteriorated to the extent that full collection of contractual principal and interest is not probable. Interest income is not recognized on these loans. Loans accounted for under the fair value option are reported as performing loans, however, when nonaccrual criteria is met interest income is not recognized on these loans. Additionally, certain government insured or guaranteed loans for which we expect to collect substantially all principal and interest are not reported as nonperforming loans and continue to accrue interest.

With the adoption of the CECL standard, nonperforming loans as of September 30, 2020 include PCD loans. Amounts as of December 31, 2019 excluded purchased impaired loans as we were accreting interest income over the expected life of the loans. See Note 1 Accounting Policies for additional information related to the adoption of this standard and our nonperforming loan and lease policies.
The following table presents our nonperforming assets as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.
Table 45: Nonperforming Assets
Dollars in millions
 
September 30
2020

 
December 31
2019

 
Nonperforming loans
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
$
915

 
$
501

 
Consumer (a)
 
1,170

 
1,134

 
Total nonperforming loans (b)
 
2,085

 
1,635

 
OREO and foreclosed assets
 
67

 
117

 
Total nonperforming assets
 
$
2,152

 
$
1,752

 
Nonperforming loans to total loans
 
.84
%
 
.68
%
 
Nonperforming assets to total loans, OREO and foreclosed assets
 
.86
%
 
.73
%
 
Nonperforming assets to total assets
 
.47
%
 
.43
%
 
(a)
Excludes most unsecured consumer loans and lines of credit, which are charged off after 120 to 180 days past due and are not placed on nonperforming status.
(b)
Nonperforming loans for which there is no related ALLL totaled $.6 billion at September 30, 2020, and is primarily comprised of loans with a valuation that exceeds the amortized cost basis.

Nonperforming loans also include certain loans whose terms have been restructured in a manner that grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, these loans are considered TDRs. See Note 1 Accounting Policies and the TDR section of this Note 4 for additional information on TDRs.

Total nonperforming loans in Table 45 include TDRs of $.8 billion and $.9 billion at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. TDRs that are performing, including consumer credit card TDR loans, totaled $.8 billion at both September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 and are excluded from nonperforming loans.

Additional Credit Quality Indicators by Loan Class
Commercial and Industrial
For commercial and industrial loans, we monitor the performance of the borrower in a disciplined and regular manner based upon the level of credit risk inherent in the loan. To evaluate the level of credit risk, we assign an internal risk rating reflecting the borrower’s PD and LGD. This two-dimensional credit risk rating methodology provides granularity in the risk monitoring process. These ratings are reviewed and updated, generally at least once per year. For small balance homogeneous pools of commercial and industrial loans and leases, we apply scoring techniques to assist in determining the PD. The combination of the PD and LGD ratings assigned to commercial and industrial loans, capturing both the combination of expectations of default and loss severity in the event of default, reflects credit quality characteristics as of the reporting date and are used as inputs into our loss forecasting process.
Based upon the amount of the lending arrangement and our risk rating assessment, we follow a formal schedule of written periodic reviews. Quarterly, we conduct formal reviews of a market’s or business unit’s loan portfolio, focusing on those loans which we perceive to be of higher risk, based upon PDs and LGDs, or loans for which credit quality is weakening. If circumstances warrant, it is our practice to review any customer obligation and its level of credit risk more frequently. We attempt to proactively manage our loans by using various procedures that are customized to the risk of a given loan, including ongoing outreach, contact, and assessment of obligor financial conditions, collateral inspection and appraisal.

Commercial Real Estate
We manage credit risk associated with our commercial real estate projects and commercial mortgages similar to commercial and industrial loans by evaluating PD and LGD. Risks associated with commercial real estate projects and commercial mortgage activities tend to be correlated to the loan structure and collateral location, project progress and business environment. As a result, these attributes are also monitored and utilized in assessing credit risk.
As with the commercial and industrial loan class, a formal schedule of periodic reviews is also performed to assess market/geographic risk and business unit/industry risk. Often as a result of these overviews, more in-depth reviews and increased scrutiny are placed on areas of higher risk, such as adverse changes in risk ratings, deteriorating operating trends, and/or areas that concern management. These reviews are designed to assess risk and facilitate actions to mitigate such risks.
Equipment Lease Financing
We manage credit risk associated with our equipment lease financing loan class similar to commercial and industrial loans by analyzing PD and LGD.

Based upon the dollar amount of the lease and the level of credit risk, we follow a formal schedule of periodic reviews. Generally, this occurs quarterly, although we have established practices to review such credit risk more frequently if circumstances warrant. Our review process entails analysis of the following factors: equipment value/residual value, exposure levels, jurisdiction risk, industry risk, guarantor requirements, and regulatory compliance as applicable.
Table 46: Commercial Credit Quality Indicators (a)
 
Term Loans by Origination Year
 
 
 
September 30, 2020 - In millions
2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

Prior

Revolving Loans

Revolving Loans Converted to Term

Total
Loans

Commercial and industrial
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pass Rated
$
30,385

$
14,778

$
9,241

$
6,474

$
4,531

$
7,916

$
56,000

$
55

$
129,380

Criticized
331

721

725

382

217

531

4,881

19

7,807

Total commercial and industrial
30,716

15,499

9,966

6,856

4,748

8,447

60,881

74

137,187

Commercial real estate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pass Rated
3,226

6,552

3,625

3,384

2,622

7,574

164

 
27,147

Criticized
194

139

53

305

340

753

97

 
1,881

Total commercial real estate
3,420

6,691

3,678

3,689

2,962

8,327

261


29,028

Equipment lease financing
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pass Rated
1,048

1,258

1,043

826

494

1,454

 
 
6,123

Criticized
61

95

95

46

26

33

 
 
356

Total equipment lease financing
1,109

1,353

1,138

872

520

1,487


 
6,479

Total commercial
$
35,245

$
23,543

$
14,782

$
11,417

$
8,230

$
18,261

$
61,142

$
74

$
172,694

December 31, 2019 - In millions
 
Pass Rated

 
Criticized

 
Total Loans

 
Commercial and industrial
 
$
119,761

 
$
5,576

 
$
125,337

 
Commercial real estate
 
27,424

 
686

 
28,110

 
Equipment lease financing
 
6,891

 
264

 
7,155

 
Total commercial
 
$
154,076

 
$
6,526

 
$
160,602

 
(a)
Loans in our commercial portfolio are classified as Pass Rated or Criticized based on the regulatory definitions, which are driven by the PD and LGD ratings that we assign. The Criticized classification includes loans that were rated special mention, substandard or doubtful as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

Home Equity and Residential Real Estate
We use several credit quality indicators, including delinquency information, nonperforming loan information, updated credit scores, originated and updated LTV ratios, to monitor and manage credit risk within the home equity and residential real estate loan classes. A summary of credit quality indicators follows:
Delinquency/Delinquency Rates: We monitor trending of delinquency/delinquency rates for home equity and residential real estate loans. See Table 44 for additional information.
Nonperforming Loans: We monitor trending of nonperforming loans for home equity and residential real estate loans. See Table 44 for additional information.
Credit Scores: We use a national third-party provider to update FICO credit scores for home equity and residential real estate loans at least quarterly. The updated scores are incorporated into a series of credit management reports, which are utilized to monitor the risk in the loan classes.
LTV (inclusive of combined loan-to-value (CLTV) for first and subordinate lien positions): At least annually, we update the property values of real estate collateral and calculate an updated LTV ratio. For open-end credit lines secured by real estate in regions experiencing significant declines in property values, more frequent valuations may occur. We examine LTV migration and stratify LTV into categories to monitor the risk in the loan classes.
We use a combination of original LTV and updated LTV for internal risk management and reporting purposes (e.g., line management, loss mitigation strategies). In addition to the fact that estimated property values by their nature are estimates, given certain data limitations, it is important to note that updated LTVs may be based upon management’s assumptions (i.e., if an updated LTV is not provided by the third-party service provider, HPI changes will be incorporated in arriving at management’s estimate of updated LTV).
Updated LTV is estimated using modeled property values. The related estimates and inputs are based upon an approach that uses a combination of third-party automated valuation models, broker price opinions, HPI indices, property location, internal and external balance information, origination data and management assumptions. We generally utilize origination lien balances provided by a third-party, where applicable, which do not include an amortization assumption when calculating updated LTV. Accordingly, the results of the calculations do not represent actual appraised loan level collateral or updated LTV based upon lien balances held by others, and as such, are necessarily imprecise and subject to change as we refine our methodology.
The following table presents credit quality indicators for the home equity and residential real estate loan classes.
Table 47: Home Equity and Residential Real Estate Credit Quality Indicators
 
Term Loans by Origination Year
 
 
 
September 30, 2020 - In millions
2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

Prior

Revolving Loans

Revolving Loans Converted to Term

Total Loans

Home equity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current estimated LTV ratios
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
.
Greater than or equal to 100%
$
5

$
41

$
18

$
17

$
10

$
100

$
605

$
309

$
1,105

Greater than or equal to 90% to less than 100%
29

95

21

15

8

69

687

226

1,150

Less than 90%
2,609

2,121

621

889

750

4,225

7,941

3,128

22,284

Total home equity
$
2,643

$
2,257

$
660

$
921

$
768

$
4,394

$
9,233

$
3,663

$
24,539

Updated FICO scores
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Greater than 660
$
2,580

$
2,156

$
605

$
867

$
725

$
3,955

$
8,818

$
2,846

$
22,552

Less than or equal to 660
62

101

54

53

42

429

402

732

1,875

No FICO score available
1

 
1

1

1

10

13

85

112

Total home equity
$
2,643

$
2,257

$
660

$
921

$
768

$
4,394

$
9,233

$
3,663

$
24,539

Residential real estate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current estimated LTV ratios
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Greater than or equal to 100%
 
$
34

$
33

$
49

$
49

$
189

 
 
$
354

Greater than or equal to 90% to less than 100%
$
15

69

32

54

37

114

 
 
321

Less than 90%
6,174

4,757

1,329

2,153

2,254

4,693

 
 
21,360

Government insured or guaranteed loans
5

23

23

34

49

717

 
 
851

Total residential real estate
$
6,194

$
4,883

$
1,417

$
2,290

$
2,389

$
5,713

 
 
$
22,886

Updated FICO scores
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Greater than 660
$
6,151

$
4,813

$
1,362

$
2,215

$
2,272

$
4,295

 
 
$
21,108

Less than or equal to 660
36

45

30

37

62

567

 
 
777

No FICO score available
2

2

2

4

6

134

 
 
150

Government insured or guaranteed loans
5

23

23

34

49

717

 
 
851

Total residential real estate
$
6,194

$
4,883

$
1,417

$
2,290

$
2,389

$
5,713

 
 
$
22,886


 
Home equity
Residential real estate

December 31, 2019 - In millions
Current estimated LTV ratios
 
 
Greater than or equal to 100%
$
1,243

$
333

Greater than or equal to 90% to less than 100%
1,047

340

Less than 90%
22,068

19,305

No LTV ratio available
184

83

Government insured or guaranteed loans
 
584

Purchased impaired loans
543

1,176

Total loans
$
25,085

$
21,821

Updated FICO Scores
 
 
Greater than 660
$
22,245

$
19,341

Less than or equal to 660
2,019

569

No FICO score available
278

151

Government insured or guaranteed loans
 
584

Purchased impaired loans
543

1,176

Total loans
$
25,085

$
21,821



Automobile, Credit Card, Education and Other Consumer
We monitor a variety of credit quality information in the management of these consumer loan classes. For all loan types, we generally use a combination of internal loan parameters as well as an updated FICO score. We use FICO scores as a primary credit quality indicator for automobile and credit card loans, as well as non-government guaranteed or non-insured education loans and other secured and unsecured lines and loans. Internal credit metrics, such as delinquency status, are heavily relied upon as credit quality indicators for government guaranteed or insured education loans and consumer loans to high net worth individuals, as internal credit metrics are more relevant than FICO scores for these types of loans.

Along with the monitoring of delinquency trends and losses for each class, FICO credit score updates are obtained at least quarterly along with a variety of credit bureau attributes. Loans with high FICO scores tend to have a lower likelihood of loss. Conversely, loans with low FICO scores tend to have a higher likelihood of loss.
The following table presents credit quality indicators for the automobile, credit card, education and other consumer loan classes.

Table 48: Credit Quality Indicators for Automobile, Credit Card, Education and Other Consumer Loan Classes
 
Term Loans by Origination Year
 
 
 
September 30, 2020 - In millions
2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

Prior

Revolving Loans

Revolving Loans Converted to Term

Total Loans

Automobile
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FICO score greater than 719
$
2,184

$
3,573

$
1,663

$
916

$
496

$
141

 
 
$
8,973

650 to 719
630

1,642

929

403

162

53

 
 
3,819

620 to 649
90

365

213

83

31

12

 
 
794

Less than 620
75

532

474

202

78

30

 
 
1,391

Total automobile
$
2,979

$
6,112

$
3,279

$
1,604

$
767

$
236

 
 
$
14,977

Credit card
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FICO score greater than 719
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
3,309

$
13

$
3,322

650 to 719
 
 
 
 
 
 
2,033

31

2,064

620 to 649
 
 
 
 
 
 
348

13

361

Less than 620
 
 
 
 
 
 
419

40

459

No FICO score available or required (a)
 
 
 
 
 
 
94

3

97

Total credit card
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
6,203

$
100

$
6,303

Education
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FICO score greater than 719
$
17

$
88

$
117

$
89

$
73

$
651

 
 
$
1,035

650 to 719
6

10

14

9

7

102

 
 
148

620 to 649
 
1

2

1

1

15

 
 
20

Less than 620
 
 
1

1

1

16

 
 
19

No FICO score available or required (a)
11

10

7

5

1

1

 
 
35

Total loans using FICO credit metric
34

109

141

105

83

785

 
 
1,257

Other internal credit metrics
30

58

 
 
 
1,706

 
 
1,794

Total education
$
64

$
167

$
141

$
105

$
83

$
2,491

 
 
$
3,051

Other consumer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FICO score greater than 719
$
338

$
487

$
164

$
50

$
14

$
69

$
209

$
1

$
1,332

650 to 719
129

273

112

25

6

19

138

1

703

620 to 649
12

42

18

4

1

4

22

 
103

Less than 620
9

38

25

7

2

7

32

1

121

Total loans using FICO credit metric
488

840

319

86

23

99

401

3

2,259

Other internal credit metrics
63

41

40

28

61

77

2,246

14

2,570

Total other consumer
$
551

$
881

$
359

$
114

$
84

$
176

$
2,647

$
17

$
4,829

 
 
 
 
December 31, 2019 - In millions
 
Automobile
Credit Card
Education
Other Consumer
FICO score greater than 719
 
$
9,232

$
3,867

$
1,139

$
1,421

650 to 719
 
4,577

2,326

197

843

620 to 649
 
1,001

419

25

132

Less than 620
 
1,603

544

27

143

No FICO score available or required (a)
 
341

152

15

27

Total loans using FICO credit metric
 
16,754

7,308

1,403

2,566

Consumer loans using other internal credit metrics
 
 
 
1,933

2,371

Total loans
 
$
16,754

$
7,308

$
3,336

$
4,937

Weighted-average updated FICO score (b)
 
726

724

773

727

(a)
Loans with no FICO score available or required generally refers to new accounts issued to borrowers with limited credit history, accounts for which we cannot obtain an updated FICO score (e.g., recent profile changes), cards issued with a business name and/or cards secured by collateral. Management proactively assesses the risk and size of this loan category and, when necessary, takes actions to mitigate the credit risk.
(b)
Weighted-average updated FICO score excludes accounts with no FICO score available or required.

Troubled Debt Restructurings (TDRs)
A TDR is a loan whose terms have been restructured in a manner that grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty. Loans that have been restructured for COVID-19 related hardships and meet certain criteria under the CARES Act are not categorized as TDRs. See Note 1 Accounting Policies for additional information related to TDRs.

Table 49 quantifies the number of loans that were classified as TDRs as well as the change in the loans’ balance as a result of becoming a TDR during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019. Additionally, the table provides information about the types of TDR concessions. See Note 3 Asset Quality in our 2019 Form 10-K for additional details on these TDR concessions.
Table 49: Financial Impact and TDRs by Concession Type
 
 
 
Pre-TDR
Amortized Cost Basis (b)

 
Post-TDR Amortized Cost Basis (c)
 
During the three months ended September 30, 2020 (a)
Dollars in millions
Number
of Loans
 
 
Principal
Forgiveness

 
Rate
Reduction

 
Other

 
Total

 
Commercial
 
16

 
$
95

 
 
 
$
10

 
$
69

 
$
79

 
Consumer
 
2,769

 
46

 
 
 
26

 
14

 
40

 
Total TDRs
 
2,785

 
$
141

 

 
$
36

 
$
83

 
$
119

 
During the nine months ended September 30, 2020 (a)
Dollars in millions
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
58

 
$
304

 
$
39

 
$
10

 
$
231

 
$
280

 
Consumer
 
9,925

 
139

 


 
67

 
59

 
126

 
Total TDRs
 
9,983

 
$
443

 
$
39

 
$
77

 
$
290

 
$
406

 

(a) Impact of partial charge-offs at TDR date are included in this table.
(b) Represents the amortized cost basis of the loans as of the quarter end prior to TDR designation.
(c) Represents the amortized cost basis of the TDRs as of the end of the quarter in which the TDR occurs.
 
 
 
Pre-TDR
Recorded
Investment (e)

 
Post-TDR Recorded Investment (f)
 
During the three months ended September 30, 2019 (d)
Dollars in millions
Number
of Loans
 
 
Principal
Forgiveness
 
Rate
Reduction

 
Other

 
Total

 
Commercial

21

 
$
97

 
 
 
 
 
$
72

 
$
72

 
Consumer
 
3,656

 
45

 
 
 
$
24

 
19

 
43

 
Total TDRs
 
3,677

 
$
142

 

 
$
24

 
$
91

 
$
115

 
During the nine months ended September 30, 2019 (d)
Dollars in millions
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
58

 
$
233

 

 
$
1

 
$
208

 
$
209

 
Consumer
 
11,009

 
131

 

 
72

 
51

 
123

 
Total TDRs
 
11,067

 
$
364

 

 
$
73

 
$
259

 
$
332

 
(d) Impact of partial charge-offs at TDR date are included in this table.
(e) Represents the recorded investment of the loans as of the quarter end prior to TDR designation, and excludes immaterial amounts of accrued interest receivable.
(f) Represents the recorded investment of the TDRs as of the end of the quarter in which the TDR occurs, and excludes immaterial amounts of accrued interest receivable.

After a loan is determined to be a TDR, we continue to track its performance under its most recent restructured terms. We consider a TDR to have subsequently defaulted when it becomes 60 days past due after the most recent date the loan was restructured. The following table provides a summary of TDRs that subsequently defaulted during the periods presented and were classified as
TDRs during the applicable 12-month period preceding September 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019.

Table 50: Subsequently Defaulted TDRs
In millions
 
2020

 
2019

Three months ended September 30
 
$
26

 
$
42

Nine months ended September 30
 
$
46

 
$
68


Allowance for Credit Losses
We maintain the ACL related to loans at levels that we believe to be appropriate to absorb expected credit losses in the portfolios as of the balance sheet date. See Note 1 Accounting Policies for a discussion of the methodologies used to determine this allowance. A rollforward of the ACL related to loans follows.
Table 51: Rollforward of Allowance for Credit Losses (a)
 
Three months ended September 30, 2020
 
 
Nine months ended September 30, 2020
In millions
Commercial

Consumer

Total

 
 
Commercial

Consumer

Total

Allowance for loan and lease losses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Beginning balance
$
3,380

$
2,548

$
5,928

 
 
$
1,812

$
930

$
2,742

Adoption of ASU 2016-13 (b)
 
 


 
 
(304
)
767

463

Beginning balance, adjusted
3,380

2,548

5,928

 
 
1,508

1,697

3,205

Charge-offs
(64
)
(183
)
(247
)
 
 
(269
)
(596
)
(865
)
Recoveries
26

66

92

 
 
65

197

262

Net (charge-offs)
(38
)
(117
)
(155
)
 
 
(204
)
(399
)
(603
)
Provision for (recapture of) credit losses
185

(208
)
(23
)
 
 
2,224

925

3,149

Other
1

 
1

 
 
 
 


Ending balance
$
3,528

$
2,223

$
5,751

 
 
$
3,528

$
2,223

$
5,751

Allowance for unfunded lending related commitments (c)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Beginning balance
$
548

$
114

$
662

 
 
$
316

$
2

$
318

Adoption of ASU 2016-13 (b)






 
 
53

126

179

Beginning balance, adjusted
548

114

662

 
 
369

128

497

Provision for (recapture of) credit losses
34

(7
)
27

 
 
213

(21
)
192

Ending balance
$
582

$
107

$
689

 
 
$
582

$
107

$
689

Allowance for credit losses at September 30
$
4,110

$
2,330

$
6,440

 
 
$
4,110

$
2,330

$
6,440

(a)
Excludes allowances for investment securities and other financial assets, which together totaled $98 million at September 30, 2020.
(b)
Represents the impact of adopting ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses on January 1, 2020 and our transition from an incurred loss methodology for our reserves to an expected credit loss methodology.
(c)
See Note 9 Commitments for additional information about the underlying commitments related to this allowance.
The following presents an analysis of changes impacting the ACL related to loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2020.

Table 52: Analysis of Changes in the Allowance for Credit Losses (a)
In millions
chart-8470b7f46d6e595aa14.jpg(a) Excludes allowances for investment securities and other financial assets, which together totaled $98 million at September 30, 2020.
(b) Portfolio changes primarily represents the impact of increases/decreases in loan balances, age and mix due to new originations/purchases, as well as credit quality and net charge-off activity.
(c) Economic and qualitative factors primarily represent our evaluation and determination of an economic forecast applied to our loan portfolio, as well as updates to qualitative factor adjustments.

The $2.7 billion increase in the ACL since January 1, 2020 was driven by the following factors in the commercial and consumer portfolios:
Commercial reserves increased $2.2 billion attributable to the significantly adverse economic impact of the pandemic and its resulting effects on credit quality and loan growth.
Consumer reserves increased $.5 billion primarily reflecting the significantly adverse economic impact of the pandemic.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
Prior to January 1, 2020, we maintained our ALLL at levels we believed to be appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses incurred in the portfolios as of the balance sheet date. We used the two main portfolio segments - Commercial and Consumer, and developed and documented the ALLL under separate methodologies for each of these portfolio segments. See Note 1 Accounting Policies in our 2019 Form 10-K for a description of the accounting policies for ALLL.
A rollforward of the ALLL and associated loan data follows:

Table 53: Rollforward of Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Associated Loan Data
At or for the nine months ended September 30, 2019
Dollars in millions
Commercial

Consumer

Total

Allowance for loan and lease losses
 
 
 
January 1, 2019
$
1,663

$
966

$
2,629

Charge-offs
(138
)
(545
)
(683
)
Recoveries
59

191

250

Net (charge-offs)
(79
)
(354
)
(433
)
Provision for credit losses
247

305

552

Net decrease in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters
    of credit
(20
)
1

(19
)
Other


9

9

September 30, 2019
$
1,811

$
927

$
2,738

TDRs individually evaluated for impairment
$
34

$
95

$
129

Other loans individually evaluated for impairment
47



47

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
1,730

554

2,284

Purchased impaired loans


278

278

September 30, 2019
$
1,811

$
927

$
2,738

Loan portfolio
 
 
 
TDRs individually evaluated for impairment
$
420

$
1,343

$
1,763

Other loans individually evaluated for impairment
265



265

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
159,503

73,298

232,801

Fair value option loans (a)


754

754

Purchased impaired loans


1,794

1,794

September 30, 2019
$
160,188

$
77,189

$
237,377

(a) Loans accounted for under the fair value option were not evaluated for impairment as these loans are accounted for at fair value. Accordingly, there was no allowance recorded on those loans.