XML 32 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2017
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Reclassification, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Certain reclassifications have been made to the condensed consolidated financial statements of prior periods to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications do
not
affect net income or total shareholders’ equity as previously reported.
Finance, Loans and Leases Receivable, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Loans and Interest Income
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or pay-off are reported at their unpaid principal amount outstanding adjusted for any charge-offs and deferred fees or costs on originated loans. Interest income on loans is recognized using the interest method based on loan principal amounts outstanding during the period. Interest income also includes amortization and accretion of any premiums or discounts over the expected life of acquired loans at the time of purchase or business acquisition. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and amortized as yield adjustments over the contractual term of the loans.
 
The Company disaggregates certain disclosure information related to loans, the related allowance for loan losses, and credit quality measures by either portfolio segment or by loan class. The Company segregates its loan portfolio segments based on similar risk characteristics as follows: real estate loans, commercial loans, and consumer loans. Portfolio segments are further disaggregated into classes for certain required disclosures as follows:
 
Portfolio Segment
Class
   
Real estate loans
Real estate mortgage – construction and land development
Real estate mortgage – residential
Real estate mortgage – farmland and other commercial enterprises
Commercial loans
Commercial and industrial
Depository institutions
Agriculture production and other loans to farmers
States and political subdivisions
Other
Consumer loans
Secured
Unsecured
 
The Company has a loan policy in place that is amended and approved from time to time as needed to reflect current economic conditions and product offerings in its markets. The policy establishes written procedures concerning areas such as the lending authorities of loan officers, committee review and approval of certain credit requests, underwriting criteria, policy exceptions, appraisal requirements, and loan review. Credit is extended to borrowers based primarily on their ability to repay as demonstrated by income and cash flow analysis.
 
Loans secured by real estate make up the largest segment of the Company’s loan portfolio. If a borrower fails to repay a loan secured by real estate, the Company
may
liquidate the collateral in order to satisfy the amount owed. Determining the value of real estate is a key component to the lending process for real estate backed loans. If the fair value of real estate (less estimated cost to sell) securing a collateral dependent loan declines below the outstanding loan amount, the Company will write down the carrying value of the loan and thereby incur a loss. The Company uses independent
third
party state certified or licensed appraisers in accordance with its loan policy to mitigate risk when underwriting real estate loans. Cash flow analysis of the borrower, loan to value limits as adopted by loan policy, and other customary underwriting standards are also in place which are designed to maximize credit quality and mitigate risks associated with real estate lending.
 
Commercial loans are made to businesses and are secured mainly by assets such as inventory, accounts receivable, machinery, fixtures and equipment, or other business assets. Commercial lending involves significant risk, as loan repayments are more dependent on the successful operation or management of the business and its cash flows. Consumer lending includes loans to individuals mainly for personal autos, boats, or a variety of other personal uses and
may
be secured or unsecured. Loan repayment associated with consumer loans is highly dependent upon the borrower’s continuing financial stability, which is heavily influenced by local unemployment rates. The Company mitigates its risk exposure to each of its loan segments by analyzing the borrower’s repayment capacity, imposing restrictions on the amount it will loan compared to estimated collateral values, limiting the payback periods, and following other customary underwriting practices as adopted in its loan policy.
 
The accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when it is determined that the collection of interest or principal is doubtful, or when a default of interest or principal has existed for
90
days or more, unless such loan is well secured and in the process of collection. Past due status is based on the contractual terms of the loan. Interest accrued but
not
received for a loan placed on nonaccrual status is reversed against interest income. Cash payments received on nonaccrual loans generally are applied to principal until qualifying for return to accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured. The Company’s policy for placing a loan on nonaccrual status or subsequently returning a loan to accrual status does
not
differ based on its portfolio class or segment.
 
Commercial and real estate loans delinquent in excess of
120
days and consumer loans delinquent in excess of
180
days are charged off
,
unless the collateral securing the debt is of such value that any loss appears to be unlikely. In all cases, loans are charged off at an earlier date if classified as loss under the Company’s loan grading process or as a result of regulatory examination. The Company’s charge-off policy for impaired loans does
not
differ from the charge-off policy for loans outside the definition of impaired
.
Loans and Leases Receivable, Allowance for Loan Losses Policy [Policy Text Block]
Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses represents charges or credits made to earnings to maintain an allowance for loan losses at a level considered adequate to provide for probable incurred credit losses at the balance sheet date. The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance increased by the provision for loan losses and decreased by net charge-offs. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.
 
The Company estimates the adequacy of the allowance using a risk-rated methodology which is based on the Company’s past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio, adverse situations that
may
affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral securing loans, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions, and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires significant judgment and the use of estimates that
may
be susceptible to change.
 
The allowance for loan losses consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired. The general component covers non-impaired loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current risk factors. Allocations of the allowance
may
be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged off. Actual loan losses could differ significantly from the amounts estimated by management.
 
The general portion of the Company’s loan portfolio is segregated into portfolio segments having similar risk characteristics identified as follows: real estate loans, commercial loans, and consumer loans. Each of these portfolio segments is assigned a loss percentage based on their respective rolling historical loss rates, adjusted for the qualitative risk factors summarized below. During the
first
quarter of
2017,
the Company shortened the look-back period it uses to determine historical loss rates to the previous
twelve
quarters from
sixteen
quarters. The change in the look-back period is the result of the Company’s ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses. The shorter look-back period better reflects the Company’s loss estimates based on current market conditions. Shortening the look-back period increased the allowance for loan losses by
$49
thousand compared to the previous
sixteen
quarter look-back period
.
 
The qualitative risk factors used in the methodology are consistent with the guidance in the most recent Interagency Policy Statement on the Allowance for Loan Losses issued. Each factor is supported by a detailed analysis and is both measurable and supportable. Some factors include a minimum allocation in instances where loss levels are extremely low and it is determined to be prudent from a safety and soundness perspective. Qualitative risk factors that are used in the methodology include the following for each loan portfolio segment:
 
 
Delinquency trends
 
Trends in net charge-offs
 
Trends in loan volume
 
Lending philosophy risk
 
Management experience risk
 
Concentration of credit risk
 
Economic conditions risk
 
A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Loans for which the terms have been modified resulting in a concession, and for which the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, are considered troubled debt restructurings and classified as impaired. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are
not
classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.
 
The Company accounts for impaired loans in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic
310,
“Receivables
.
ASC Topic
310
requires that impaired loans be measured at the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, at the loan’s observable market price, or at the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Impaired loans
may
also be classified as nonaccrual. In many circumstances, however, the Company continues to accrue interest on an impaired loan. Cash receipts on accruing impaired loans are applied to the recorded investment in the loan, including any accrued interest receivable. Cash payments received on nonaccrual impaired loans generally are applied to principal until qualifying for return to accrual status
.
Loans that are part of a large group of smaller-balance homogeneous loans, such as residential mortgage
,
consumer, and smaller-balance commercial loans, are collectively evaluated for impairment. Troubled debt restructurings are measured at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s effective interest rate at inception, or at the fair value of collateral. The Company determines the amount of reserve for troubled debt restructurings that subsequently default in accordance with its accounting policy for the allowance for loan losses.
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Recently Issued
Accounting
Standards
In
May 2014,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
issued
Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
No.
2014
-
09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic
606
)
, and subsequently issued several amendments to the standard during
2015
and
2016.
The primary principle of ASU
No.
2014
-
09
is that entities should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU also requires disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers.
 
As amended,
ASU
No.
2014
-
09
is effective for the Company in annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2017,
including interim periods within that reporting period.
Earlier application is permitted, but only as of annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2016,
including interim reporting periods within those reporting periods. Entities are permitted to apply the amendments either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying this ASU recognized at the date of initial application. The Company
expects to adopt ASU
No.
2014
-
09
in the
first
quarter of
2018.
The Company is still assessing the impact this ASU will have on its
consolidated financial statements as well as the most appropriate transition method of application. Based on this evaluation to date, the Company has determined that the majority of its revenues earned are excluded from the scope of ASU
No.
2014
-
09.
The Company believes that for most revenue streams within the scope of ASU
No.
2014
-
09,
the amendments will
not
change the timing of when the revenue is recognized. The Company will continue to evaluate the impact the adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements, focusing on noninterest income sources within the scope of the ASU as well as the new disclosures required; however, the adoption of ASU
No.
2014
-
09
is
not
expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
In
February 2016,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2016
-
02,
“Leases (Topic
842
),”
to improve financial reporting about leasing transactions. This ASU will require organizations that lease assets (“lessees”) to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset on its balance sheet for all leases with terms of more than
twelve
months. A lease liability is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis and a right-of-use asset represents the lessee’s right to use, or control use of, a specified asset for the lease term. The amendments in this ASU simplify the accounting for sale and leaseback transactions primarily because lessees must recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. This ASU leaves the accounting for the organizations that own the assets leased to the lessee (“lessor”) largely unchanged except for targeted improvements to align it with the lessee accounting model and Topic
606,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
.
 
For public companies, ASU
No.
2016
-
02
is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2018,
including interim periods within those fiscal years. Lessees (for capital and operating leases) and lessors (for sales-type, direct financing, and operating leases) must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The modified retrospective approach would
not
require any transition accounting for leases that expired before the earliest comparative period presented. Lessees and lessors
may
not
apply a full retrospective transition approach. The Company has identified a project team to review its leases and to assess the impact of ASU
No.
2016
-
02
on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
 
In
June 2016,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2016
-
13,
Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic
326
): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments
,
to improve financial reporting by requiring timelier recording of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments held by financial institutions and other organizations.
The ASU requires an organization to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The ASU requires enhanced disclosures, including
qualitative and quantitative requirements
, which provide additional information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements.
Additionally, the ASU amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration.
 
ASU
No.
2016
-
13
is effective for the Company in annual and interim reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2019.
Although early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2018,
the Company does
not
plan to early adopt. The Company has been preserving certain historical loan information from its core processing system in anticipation of adopting the standard. The Company has identified a project team to assess the impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. The project team is in the process of identifying resources needed and has developed a timeline for implementing the standard
.
 
In
March 2017,
the FASB issued ASU
NO.
2017
-
07,
“Compensation
Retirement Benefits (Topic
715
): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost,”
which requires that employers offering benefit plans accounted for under Topic
715
report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component. If a separate line item or items are
not
used, the line item or items used in the income statement to present the other components of net benefit cost must be disclosed. This ASU is effective for the Company in annual and interim reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2017.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU
No.
2017
-
07
on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows upon adoption.
 
In
March 2017,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2017
-
08,
Receivables
Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs
(
Subt
opic
310
-
20
): P
remium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities
.”
This ASU shortens the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium and requires the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The ASU does
not
change the accounting for securities held at a discount; the discount will continue to be amortized to maturity. This ASU is effective for the Company in annual and interim reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2018,
with early adoption permitted
. Entities are required to apply the amendments on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption.
The Company is considering early adoption and is in the process of determining the impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows upon adoption.
 
Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies are
not
expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.