ONE LIBERTY PROPERTIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a small reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "small reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No ý

As of June 30, 2013 (the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second quarter), the aggregate market value of all common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the price at which common equity was last sold on said date, was approximately $266.6 million.

As of March 10, 2014, the registrant had 15,870,172 shares of common stock outstanding.

Portions of the proxy statement for the 2014 annual meeting of stockholders of One Liberty Properties, Inc., to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than April 30, 2014, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Item No.		Page(s)
PART I
1.	Business	1
1A.	Risk Factors	8
1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	16
2.	Properties	18
3.	Legal Proceedings	23
4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	23
PART II
5.	Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	24
6.	Selected Financial Data	25
7.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	29
7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	40
8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	41
9.	Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	41
9A.	Controls and Procedures	41
9B.	Other Information	42
PART III
10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	42
11.	Executive Compensation	42
12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	43
13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	43
14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	43
PART IV
15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	44
Signatures	47

We are a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, also known as a REIT. We were incorporated in Maryland on December 20, 1982. We acquire, own and manage a geographically diversified portfolio of retail, industrial, flex, office, health and fitness, and other properties, a substantial portion of which are under long-term leases. Substantially all of our leases are "net leases" and ground leases under which the tenant is typically responsible for real estate taxes, insurance and ordinary maintenance and repairs. As of December 31, 2013, we own 104 properties (including two properties sold in February 2014 as described below) and participate in joint ventures that own five properties. These properties and the properties owned by our joint ventures are located in 29 states and have an aggregate of approximately 6.6 million square feet of space (including approximately 1.2 million square feet of space at properties owned by our joint ventures).

Our 2014 contractual rental income represents, after giving effect to any abatements, concessions or adjustments, the base rent payable to us in 2014 under leases in effect at December 31, 2013. Contractual rental income excludes approximately $1.1 million of straight-line rent, amortization of approximately $164,000 of intangibles and our share of the rental income payable to our joint ventures, which in 2014 will be approximately $1.5 million.

In the narrative portion of this report, information with respect to our consolidated joint ventures is generally described as if such ventures were our wholly owned subsidiaries and information with respect to unconsolidated joint ventures is generally separately described. Except as otherwise indicated, all references to joint ventures refer to unconsolidated joint ventures. Further, except as otherwise

indicated or the context otherwise requires, the property information set forth herein includes two properties located in Michigan with an aggregate of 202,000 square feet that were sold in February 2014 for an aggregate sales price of $5.5 million and excludes two properties acquired in January 2014 for an aggregate purchase price of $5.11 million. Finally, 2014 contractual rental income derived from multiple properties leased pursuant to a master lease is allocated among such properties based on management's estimate of the appropriate allocations.

We seek to acquire properties throughout the United States that have locations, demographics and other investment attributes that we believe to be attractive. We believe that long-term leases provide a predictable income stream over the term of the lease, making fluctuations in market rental rates and in real estate values less significant to achieving our overall investment objectives. Our goal is to acquire single-tenant properties that are subject to long-term net or ground leases that include periodic contractual rental increases or rent increases based on increases in the consumer price index. Periodic contractual rental increases provide reliable increases in future rent payments and rent increases based on the consumer price index provide protection against inflation. Historically, long-term leases have made it easier for us to obtain longer-term, fixed-rate mortgage financing with principal amortization, thereby moderating the interest rate risk associated with financing or refinancing our property portfolio by reducing the outstanding principal balance over time. We may, however, acquire a property that is subject to a short-term lease when we believe the property represents a good opportunity for recurring income and residual value. Although the acquisition of single-tenant properties subject to net and ground leases is the focus of our investment strategy, we will also consider investments in, among other things, (i) properties that can be re-positioned or re-developed, (ii) community shopping centers anchored by national or regional tenants and (iii) multi-tenant properties. We pay substantially all the operating expenses at community shopping centers, a significant portion of which is reimbursed by the tenants pursuant to their leases.

Generally, we hold the properties we acquire for an extended period of time. Our investment criteria are intended to identify properties from which increased asset value and overall return can be realized from an extended period of ownership. Although our investment criteria favor an extended period of ownership, we will dispose of a property if we regard the disposition of the property as an opportunity to realize the overall value of the property sooner or to avoid future risks by achieving a determinable return from the property.

We identify properties through the network of contacts of our senior management and our affiliates, which includes real estate brokers, private equity firms, banks and law firms. In addition, we attend industry conferences and engage in direct solicitations.

Our charter documents do not limit the number of properties in which we may invest, the amount or percentage of our assets that may be invested in any specific property or property type, or the concentration of investments in any region in the United States. We do not intend to acquire properties located outside of the United States. We will continue to form entities to acquire interests in real properties, either alone or with other investors, and we may acquire interests in joint ventures or other entities that own real property.

It is our policy, and the policy of our affiliated entities, that any investment opportunity presented to us or to any of our affiliated entities that involves primarily the acquisition of a net leased property, a ground lease or a community shopping center, will first be offered to us and may not be pursued by any of our affiliated entities unless we decline the opportunity.

In evaluating potential investments, we consider, among other criteria, the following:

Our business objective is to maintain and increase, over time, the cash available for distribution to our stockholders by:

As of December 31, 2013, the properties in our portfolio and owned by our joint ventures typically have the following attributes:

The following table sets forth information about the diversification of our tenants by industry sector as of December 31, 2013:

Most of our retail tenants (including franchisees of national chains) operate on a national basis and include, among others, Applebees, Barnes & Noble, Burlington Coat Factory, CarMax, CVS, Kohl's, Marshalls, Mens' Wearhouse, Office Depot, Party City, PetSmart, TGI Fridays, The Sports Authority, Urban Outfitters, Walgreens, Wendy's and Whole Foods and some of our tenants operate on a regional basis, including Haverty Furniture, Giant Food Stores and hhgregg.

Substantially all of our leases are net or ground leases (including the leases entered into by our joint ventures) under which the tenant, in addition to its rental obligation, typically is responsible for expenses attributable to the operation of the property, such as real estate taxes and assessments, water and sewer rents and other charges. The tenant is also generally responsible for maintaining the property and for restoration following a casualty or partial condemnation. The tenant is typically obligated to indemnify us for claims arising from the property and is responsible for maintaining insurance coverage for the property it leases and naming us an additional insured. Under some net leases, we are responsible for structural repairs, including foundation and slab, roof repair or replacement and restoration following a casualty event, and at several properties we are responsible for certain expenses related to the operation and maintenance of the property.

Our typical lease provides for contractual rent increases periodically throughout the term of the lease or for rent increases pursuant to a formula based on the consumer price index. Some of our leases provide for minimum rents supplemented by additional payments based on sales derived from the property subject to the lease. Such additional payments were not a material part of our 2013 rental revenues and are not expected to be a material part of our 2014 rental revenues.

Our policy has been to acquire properties that are subject to existing long-term leases or to enter into long-term leases with our tenants. Our leases generally provide the tenant with one or more renewal options.

The following table sets forth scheduled lease expirations of leases for our properties as of December 31, 2013:

Subsequent to December 31, 2013 and with respect to three leases expiring in 2014 representing in the aggregate $2.6 million or 4.9% of 2014 contractual rental income, we:

Our charter documents do not limit the level of debt we may incur. Our revolving credit facility matures on March 31, 2015 and, among other things, limits total debt that we may incur to 70% of the value of our properties (as determined pursuant to the credit agreement). We borrow funds on a secured and unsecured basis and intend to continue to do so in the future.

We also mortgage specific properties on a non-recourse basis, subject to the standard carve-outs described under "Item 2. Properties—Mortgage Debt", to enhance the return on our investment in a specific property. The proceeds of mortgage loans may be used for property acquisitions, investments in joint ventures or other entities that own real property, to reduce bank debt and for working capital purposes. The proceeds of our credit facility may be used to payoff existing mortgages, fund the acquisition of additional properties, and to a more limited extent, invest in joint ventures and for

working capital. Net proceeds received from the sale, financing or refinancing of properties are generally required to be used to repay amounts outstanding under our credit facility.

With respect to properties we acquire on a free and clear basis, we usually seek to obtain long-term fixed-rate mortgage financing, when available at acceptable terms, shortly after the acquisition of such property to avoid the risk of movement of interest rates and fluctuating supply and demand in the mortgage markets. We also will acquire a property that is subject to (and will assume) a fixed-rate mortgage. Substantially all of our mortgages provide for amortization of part of the principal balance during the term, thereby reducing the refinancing risk at maturity. Some of our properties may be financed on a cross-defaulted or cross-collateralized basis, and we may collateralize a single financing with more than one property.

After termination or expiration of any lease relating to any of our properties, we will seek to re-rent or sell such property in a manner that will maximize the return to us, considering, among other factors, the income potential and market value of such property. We acquire properties for long-term investment for income purposes and do not typically engage in the turnover of investments. We will consider the sale of a property if a sale appears advantageous in view of our investment objectives. If there is a substantial tax gain, we may seek to enter into a tax deferred transaction and reinvest the proceeds in another property. Cash realized from the sale of properties, net of required paydowns of our credit facility and of any distributions to stockholders, is available for general working capital purposes and the acquisition of additional properties.

As of December 31, 2013, we participated in five joint ventures that own an aggregate of five properties, with approximately 1.2 million rentable square feet of space. Four of the properties are retail properties and one is an industrial property. We own 50% of the equity interest in all of these joint ventures. At December 31, 2013, our investment in joint ventures was approximately $4.9 million.

Based on the leases in effect at December 31, 2013, we anticipate that our share of rental income payable to our joint ventures in 2014 will be approximately $1.5 million. The leases for two properties are expected to contribute 78.3% of the aggregate projected rental income payable to all of our joint ventures in 2014 and expire in 2021 and 2022.

We face competition for the acquisition of properties from a variety of investors, including domestic and foreign corporations and real estate companies, financial institutions, insurance companies, pension funds, investment funds, other REITs and individuals, some of which have significant advantages over us, including a larger, more diverse group of properties and greater financial and other resources than we have.

Seven employees, including Patrick J. Callan, Jr., our president and chief executive officer, Lawrence G. Ricketts, Jr., our executive vice president and chief operating officer, Justin Clair, our assistant vice-president and four others, devote all of their business time to our company. Our other executive, administrative, legal, accounting and clerical personnel share their services on a part-time basis with us and other affiliated entities that share our executive offices.

We entered into a compensation and services agreement with Majestic Property Management Corp., effective as of January 1, 2007. Majestic Property is wholly-owned by our vice chairman of the board and it provides compensation to certain of our executive officers. Pursuant to this agreement, we pay an annual fee to Majestic Property and Majestic Property assumed our obligations under a shared

services agreement, and provides us with the services of all affiliated executive, administrative, legal, accounting and clerical personnel that we use on a part time basis, as well as certain property management services, property acquisition, sales and leasing and mortgage brokerage services. The annual fees we pay to Majestic Property are negotiated each year by us and Majestic Property and are approved by our audit committee and independent directors.

In 2013, pursuant to the compensation and services agreement, we paid Majestic Property a fee of approximately $2.725 million and $175,000 for our share of all direct office expenses, including, among other expenses, rent, telephone, postage, computer services and internet usage. See Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements for information regarding equity awards to individuals performing services on our behalf.

We believe that the compensation and services agreement allows us to benefit from access to, and from the services of, a group of senior executives with significant knowledge and experience in the real estate industry and our company and its activities. If not for this agreement, we believe that a company of our size would not have access to the skills and expertise of these executives at the cost that we have incurred and will incur in the future. For a description of the background of our management, please see the information under the heading "Executive Officers" in Part I of this Annual Report.

Our Internet address is www.onelibertyproperties.com. On the Investor Information page of our web site, we post the following filings as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"): our annual report on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All such filings on our Investor Information Web page, which also includes Forms 3, 4 and 5 filed pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available to be viewed free of charge.

On the Corporate Governance page of our web site, we post the following charters and guidelines: Audit Committee Charter, Compensation Committee Charter, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, as amended and restated. All such documents on our Corporate Governance Web page are available to be viewed free of charge.

Information contained on our web site is not part of, and is not incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K or our other filings with the SEC. A copy of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and those items disclosed on our Investor Information Web page and our Corporate Governance Web page are available without charge upon written request to: One Liberty Properties, Inc., 60 Cutter Mill Road, Suite 303, Great Neck, New York 11021, Attention: Secretary.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K, together with other statements and information publicly disseminated by us, contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provision for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and include this statement for purposes of complying with these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words "may," "will," "could," "believe," "expect," "intend," "anticipate," "estimate," "project," or similar expressions or variations thereof. You should not rely on forward-looking statements since they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and

other factors which are, in some cases, beyond our control and which could materially affect actual results, performance or achievements. Factors which may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include, but are not limited to:

Any or all of our forward-looking statements in this report and in any other public statements we make may turn out to be incorrect. Actual results may differ from our forward-looking statements because of inaccurate assumptions we might make or because of the occurrence of known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Many factors mentioned in the discussion below will be important in determining future results. Consequently, no forward-looking statement can be guaranteed and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Actual future results may vary materially.

Except as may be required under the United States federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update our forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make in our reports that are filed with or furnished to the SEC.

Set forth below is a discussion of certain risks affecting our business. The categorization of risks set forth below is meant to help you better understand the risks facing our business and is not intended to limit your consideration of the possible effects of these risks to the listed categories. Any adverse effects arising from the realization of any of the risks discussed, including our financial condition and results of operation, may, and likely will, adversely affect many aspects of our business.

In addition to the other information contained or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, readers should carefully consider the following risk factors:

If we are unable to re-rent properties upon the expiration of our leases or if our tenants default, our rental income will be reduced and we would incur additional costs.

Substantially all of our revenues are derived from rental income paid by our tenants. From 2014 through 2016, leases with respect to 33 tenants that account for 18.3% of our 2013 rental income and

16.3% of our 2014 contractual rental income, expire. One tenant, whose lease expires in September 2015 (after giving effect to an extension entered into in January 2014), accounts for 3.4% of our 2013 rental income and 3.8% of 2014 contractual rental income. If our tenants, and in particular, our significant tenants, (i) do not renew their leases upon the expiration of same, (ii) default on their obligations or (iii) seek rent relief, lease renegotiation or other accommodations, our revenues could decline. At the same time, we would remain responsible for the payment of the mortgage obligations with respect to the related properties and would become responsible for the operating expenses related to these properties, including, among other things, real estate taxes, maintenance and insurance. In addition, we may incur expenses in enforcing our rights as landlord. Even if we find replacement tenants or renegotiate leases with current tenants, the terms of the new or renegotiated leases, including the cost of required renovations or concessions to tenants, or the expense of the reconfiguration of a single tenancy property for use by multiple tenants, may be less favorable than current lease terms and could reduce the amount of cash available to meet expenses and pay distributions.

Approximately 61.5% of our 2013 rental income and 57.3% of our 2014 contractual rental income is derived from tenants operating in the retail industry and the inability of those tenants to pay rent would significantly reduce our revenues.

Approximately 61.5% of our rental income for 2013 was derived from retail tenants and approximately 57.3% of our 2014 contractual rental income is expected to be derived from retail tenants, including 10.4% and 6.8%, from tenants engaged in retail furniture and office supply operations, respectively.

Difficult economic conditions could cause our retail tenants to fail to meet their lease obligations, including rental payments, which would have an adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition, including making it more difficult for us to satisfy our operating and debt service requirements, make capital expenditures and make distributions to our stockholders.

Approximately 29.0% of our 2013 rental income and 30.4% of our 2014 contractual rental income is derived from five tenants. The default, financial distress or failure of any of these tenants could significantly reduce our revenues.

Haverty Furniture, Office Depot, LA Fitness, Northern Tool and Ferguson Enterprises, account for approximately 9.5%, 6.7%, 6.3%, 1.7% and 4.8%, of our rental income for 2013, respectively, and account for approximately 8.6%, 6.8%, 5.4%, 5.0% and 4.6%, respectively, of our 2014 contractual rental income. The default, financial distress or bankruptcy of any of these tenants could cause interruptions in the receipt of, or the loss of, a significant amount of rental income and would require us to pay operating expenses (including real estate taxes) currently paid by the tenant. This could also result in the vacancy of the property or properties occupied by the defaulting tenant, which would significantly reduce our rental revenues and net income until the re-rental of the property or properties, and could decrease the ultimate sale value of the property.

Declines in the value of our properties could result in impairment charges.

If we are presented with indications of an impairment in the value of a particular property or group of properties, we will be required to evaluate any such property or properties. If we determine that any of our properties at which indicators of impairment exist have a value which is below the net book value of such property, we may be required to recognize an impairment charge for the difference between the fair value and the book value during the quarter in which we make such determination; such impairment charges may then increase in subsequent quarters. In addition, we may incur losses from time to time if we dispose of properties for sales prices that are less than our book value.

Competition that traditional retail tenants face from on-line retail sales could adversely affect our business.

Our retail tenants face increasing competition from online retailers. Online retailers may be able to provide customers with better pricing and the ease and comfort of shopping from their home or office. Internet sales have been obtaining an increasing percentage of retail sales over the past few years and this trend is expected to continue. The continued growth of online sales could decrease the need for traditional retail outlets and reduce retailers' space and property requirements. This could adversely impact our ability to rent space at our retail properties and increase competition for retail tenants thereby reducing the rent we would receive at these properties and adversely affecting our results of operations and financial condition.

If we are unable to refinance our mortgage loans at maturity, we may be forced to sell properties at disadvantageous terms, which would result in the loss of revenues and in a decline in the value of our portfolio.

We had, as of December 31, 2013, $278 million in mortgage debt outstanding, all of which is non-recourse (subject to standard carve-outs) and our ratio of mortgage debt to total assets was 48.6%. Our joint ventures had $17.8 million in total mortgage indebtedness (all of which is non-recourse, subject to standard carve-outs). The risks associated with our mortgage debt and the mortgage debt of our joint ventures include the risk that cash flow from properties securing the indebtedness and our available cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments will be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest.

Generally, only a small portion of the principal of our mortgage indebtedness will be repaid prior to maturity and we do not plan to retain sufficient cash to repay such indebtedness at maturity. Accordingly, to meet these obligations if they cannot be refinanced at maturity, we will have to use funds available under our credit facility, if any, and our available cash and cash equivalents to pay our mortgage debt or seek to raise funds through the financing of unencumbered properties, sale of properties or the issuance of additional equity. From 2014 through 2018, approximately $146.8 million of our mortgage debt matures—specifically, $36.2 million in 2014, $14.6 million in 2015, $32.7 million in 2016, $44.6 million in 2017 and $18.7 million in 2018. With respect to our joint ventures, approximately $17.8 million of mortgage debt matures from 2014 through 2018—specifically, $613,000 in 2014, $13.6 million in 2015, $94,000 in 2016, $101,000 in 2017 and $3.4 million in 2018. If we (or our joint ventures) are unsuccessful in refinancing or extending existing mortgage indebtedness or financing unencumbered properties, selling properties on favorable terms or raising additional equity, our cash flow (or the cash flow of a joint venture) will not be sufficient to repay all maturing mortgage debt when payments become due, and we (or a joint venture) may be forced to dispose of properties on disadvantageous terms or convey properties secured by mortgages to the mortgagees, which would lower our revenues and the value of our portfolio.

Additionally, we may find that the value of a property could be less than the mortgage secured by such property. In such instance, we may seek to renegotiate the terms of the mortgage, or to the extent that our loan is non-recourse and the terms of the mortgage cannot be satisfactorily renegotiated, forfeit the property by conveying it to the mortgagee and writing off our investment.

If our borrowings increase, the risk of default on our repayment obligations and our debt service requirements will also increase.

The terms of our revolving credit facility limit our ability to incur indebtedness, including limiting the total indebtedness that we may incur to an amount equal to 70% of the value (as defined in the credit agreement) of our properties. Increased leverage could result in increased risk of default on our payment obligations related to borrowings and in an increase in debt service requirements, which could

reduce our net income and the amount of cash available to meet expenses and to make distributions to our stockholders.

If a significant number of our tenants default or fail to renew expiring leases, or we take impairment charges against our properties, a breach of our revolving credit facility could occur.

Our revolving credit facility includes financial covenants that require us to maintain certain financial ratios and requirements. If our tenants default under their leases with us or fail to renew expiring leases, generally accepted accounting principles may require us to recognize impairment charges against our properties, and our financial position could be adversely affected causing us to be in breach of the financial covenants contained in our credit facility.

Failure to meet interest and other payment obligations under our revolving credit facility or a breach by us of the covenants to maintain the financial ratios would place us in default under our credit facility, and, if the banks called a default and required us to repay the full amount outstanding under the credit facility, we might be required to rapidly dispose of our properties, which could have an adverse impact on the amounts we receive on such disposition. If we are unable to dispose of our properties in a timely fashion to the satisfaction of the banks, the banks could foreclose on that portion of our collateral pledged to the banks, which could result in the disposition of our properties at below market values. The disposition of our properties at below our carrying value would adversely affect our net income, reduce our stockholders' equity and adversely affect our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.

Impairment charges against owned real estate may not be adequate to cover actual losses.

Impairment charges are based on an evaluation of known risks and economic factors. The determination of an appropriate level of impairment charges is an inherently difficult process and is based on numerous assumptions. The amount of impairment charges of real estate is susceptible to changes in economic, operating and other conditions that are largely beyond our control. Any impairment charges that we may take may not be adequate to cover actual losses and we may need to take additional impairment charges in the future. Actual losses and additional impairment charges in the future could materially affect our results of operations.

If credit markets tighten or interest rates increase, it may be more difficult for us to secure financing, which may limit our ability to finance or refinance our real estate properties, reduce the number of properties we can acquire, and adversely affect your investment.

Reduced access to credit markets or increases in interest rates may make it difficult for us to secure mortgage debt, limiting the mortgage debt available on properties we wish to acquire and possibly limiting the properties we can acquire. Even in the event that we are able to secure mortgage debt on, or otherwise finance our real estate properties, due to increased costs associated with securing financing and other factors beyond our control, we may be unable to refinance the entire outstanding loan balance or be subject to unfavorable terms (such as higher loan fees, interest rates and periodic payments) if we do refinance the loan balance. Either of these results could reduce income from those properties and reduce cash available for distribution, which may adversely affect the investment goals of our stockholders.

Certain of our net leases and our ground leases require us to pay property related expenses that are not the obligations of our tenants.

Under the terms of substantially all of our net leases, in addition to satisfying their rent obligations, our tenants are responsible for the payment of real estate taxes, insurance and ordinary maintenance and repairs. However, under the provisions of certain net and ground leases, we are

required to pay some expenses, such as the costs of environmental liabilities, roof and structural repairs, insurance, certain non-structural repairs and maintenance. If our properties incur significant expenses that must be paid by us under the terms of our leases, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected and the amount of cash available to meet expenses and to make distributions to holders of our common stock may be reduced.

Uninsured and underinsured losses may affect the revenues generated by, the value of, and the return from a property affected by a casualty or other claim.

Substantially all of our tenants obtain, for our benefit, comprehensive insurance covering our properties in amounts that are intended to be sufficient to provide for the replacement of the improvements at each property. However, the amount of insurance coverage maintained for any property may not be sufficient to pay the full replacement cost of the improvements at the property following a casualty event. In addition, the rent loss coverage under the policy may not extend for the full period of time that a tenant may be entitled to a rent abatement as a result of, or that may be required to complete restoration following, a casualty event. In addition, there are certain types of losses, such as those arising from earthquakes, floods, hurricanes and terrorist attacks, that may be uninsurable or that may not be economically insurable. Changes in zoning, building codes and ordinances, environmental considerations and other factors also may make it impossible or impracticable for us to use insurance proceeds to replace damaged or destroyed improvements at a property. If restoration is not or cannot be completed to the extent, or within the period of time, specified in certain of our leases, the tenant may have the right to terminate the lease. If any of these or similar events occur, it may reduce our revenues, the value of, or our return from, an affected property.

Our revenues and the value of our portfolio are affected by a number of factors that affect investments in real estate generally.

We are subject to the general risks of investing in real estate. These include adverse changes in economic conditions and local conditions such as changing demographics, retailing trends and traffic patterns, declines in the rental rates, changes in the supply and price of quality properties and the market supply and demand of competing properties, the impact of environmental laws, security concerns, prepayment penalties applicable under mortgage financings, changes in tax, zoning, building code, fire safety and other laws and regulations, the type of insurance coverage available in the market, and changes in the type, capacity and sophistication of building systems. Approximately 57.3% and 17.5% of our 2014 contractual rental income is expected to come from retail and industrial tenants, respectively, and we are vulnerable to economic declines that negatively impact these sectors of the economy, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

Our revenues and the value of our portfolio are affected by a number of factors that affect investments in leased real estate generally.

We are subject to the general risks of investing in leased real estate. These include the non-performance of lease obligations by tenants, leasehold improvements that will be costly or difficult to remove should it become necessary to re-rent the leased space for other uses, covenants in certain retail leases that limit the types of tenants to which available space can be rented (which may limit demand or reduce the rents realized on re-renting), rights of termination of leases due to events of casualty or condemnation affecting the leased space or the property or due to interruption of the tenant's quiet enjoyment of the leased premises, and obligations of a landlord to restore the leased premises or the property following events of casualty or condemnation. The occurrence of any of these events could adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

Real estate investments are relatively illiquid and their values may decline.

Real estate investments are relatively illiquid. Therefore, we will be limited in our ability to reconfigure our real estate portfolio in response to economic changes. We may encounter difficulty in disposing of properties when tenants vacate either at the expiration of the applicable lease or otherwise. If we decide to sell any of our properties, our ability to sell these properties and the prices we receive on their sale may be affected by many factors, including the number of potential buyers, the number of competing properties on the market and other market conditions, as well as whether the property is leased and if it is leased, the terms of the lease. As a result, we may be unable to sell our properties for an extended period of time without incurring a loss, which would adversely affect our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

The concentration of our properties in certain regions may make our revenues and the value of our portfolio vulnerable to adverse changes in local economic conditions.

The properties we own may be located in the same or a limited number of geographic regions. Approximately 34.6% of our 2013 rental income was, and approximately 32.7% of our 2014 contractual rental income will be, derived from properties located in New York, Texas and New Jersey. At December 31, 2013, approximately 50% of the net book value of our real estate investments was located in five states—Texas (13.1%), New Jersey (10.9%), South Carolina (10.9%), Pennsylvania (7.9%), and New York (7.0%). As a result, a decline in the economic conditions in these regions, or in regions where our properties may be concentrated in the future, may have an adverse effect on the rental and occupancy rates for, and the property values of, these properties, which could lead to a reduction in our rental income and in the results of operations.

We have been, and in the future will be, subject to significant competition and we may not be able to compete successfully for investments.

We have been, and in the future will be, subject to significant competition for attractive investment opportunities from other real estate investors, many of which have greater financial resources than us, including publicly-traded REITs, non-traded REITs, insurance companies, commercial and investment banking firms, private institutional funds, hedge funds, private equity funds and other investors. We may not be able to compete successfully for investments. If we pay higher prices for investments, our returns may be lower and the value of our assets may not increase or may decrease significantly below the amount we paid for such assets. If such events occur, we may experience lower returns on our investments.

We intend to pay quarterly dividends and to make distributions to our stockholders in amounts such that all or substantially all of our taxable income in each year is distributed. This, along with other factors, will enable us to qualify for the tax benefits accorded to a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. We have not established a minimum dividend payment level and our ability to pay dividends may be adversely affected by the risk factors described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. All distributions will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our earnings, our financial condition, maintenance of our REIT status and such other factors as our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time.

If we reduce our dividend, the market value of our common stock may decline.

The level of our common stock dividend is established by our board of directors from time to time based on a variety of factors, including our cash available for distribution, funds from operations and maintenance of our REIT status. Various factors could cause our board of directors to decrease our

dividend level, including insufficient income to cover our dividends, tenant defaults or bankruptcies resulting in a material reduction in our funds from operations or a material loss resulting from an adverse change in the value of one or more of our properties. If our board of directors determines to reduce our common stock dividend, the market value of our common stock could be adversely affected.

Our current and future investments in joint ventures could be adversely affected by the lack of sole decision making authority, reliance on joint venture partners' financial condition, and any dispute that may arise between our joint venture partners and us.

A number of properties in which we have an interest are owned through joint ventures. We may continue to acquire properties through joint ventures and/or contribute some of our properties to joint ventures. Investments in joint ventures may, under certain circumstances, involve risks not present when a third party is not involved, including the possibility that joint venture partners might file for bankruptcy protection, or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions. Further, joint venture partners may have conflicting business interests or goals, and as a result there is the potential risk of impasses on decisions, such as a sale. Any disputes that may arise between joint venture partners and us may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and prevent our officers and/or directors from focusing their time and effort on our business. Consequently, actions by or disputes with joint venture partners might result in subjecting properties owned by the joint venture to additional risk.

Compliance with environmental regulations and associated costs could adversely affect our results of operations and liquidity.

Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner or operator of real property may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product releases at the property and may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage and for investigation and cleanup costs incurred in connection with contamination. The cost of investigation, remediation or removal of hazardous or toxic substances may be substantial, and the presence of such substances, or the failure to properly remediate a property, may adversely affect our ability to sell or rent the property or to borrow money using the property as collateral. In connection with our ownership, operation and management of real properties, we may be considered an owner or operator of the properties and, therefore, potentially liable for removal or remediation costs, as well as certain other related costs, including governmental fines and liability for injuries to persons and property, not only with respect to properties we own now or may acquire, but also with respect to properties we have owned in the past.

We cannot provide any assurance that existing environmental studies with respect to any of our properties reveal all potential environmental liabilities, that any prior owner of a property did not create any material environmental condition not known to us, or that a material environmental condition does not otherwise exist, or may not exist in the future, as to any one or more of our properties. If a material environmental condition does in fact exist, or exists in the future, the remediation costs could have a material adverse impact upon our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, all public accommodations must meet Federal requirements for access and use by disabled persons. A determination that our properties do not comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act could result in liability for both governmental fines and damages. If we are required to make unanticipated major modifications to any of our properties to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, which are determined not to be the responsibility of our tenants, we could incur unanticipated expenses that could have an adverse impact upon our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

Our senior management and other key personnel are critical to our business and our future success depends on our ability to retain them.

We depend on the services of Matthew J. Gould, chairman of our Board of Directors, Fredric H. Gould, vice chairman of our Board of Directors, Patrick J. Callan, Jr., our president and chief executive officer, Lawrence G. Ricketts, Jr., our executive vice president and chief operating officer, and other members of our senior management to carry out our business and investment strategies. Only two of our senior officers, Messrs. Callan and Ricketts, devote all of their business time to us. The remainder of our senior management provide services to us on a part-time, as-needed basis. The loss of the services of any of our senior management or other key personnel, the inability or failure of the members of senior management providing services to us on a part-time basis to devote sufficient time or attention to our activities or our inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel in the future, could impair our ability to carry out our business and investment strategies.

From time to time we have entered into transactions with persons and entities affiliated with us and with certain of our officers and directors. Our policy for transactions with affiliates is to have these transactions approved by our audit committee and by a majority of our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors. We entered into a compensation and services agreement with Majestic Property effective as of January 1, 2007. Majestic Property is wholly-owned by the vice-chairman of our Board of Directors and it provides compensation to certain of our part-time senior executive officers. Pursuant to the compensation and services agreement, we pay an annual fee to Majestic Property and it assumes our obligations under a shared services agreement, and provide us with the services of all affiliated executive, administrative, legal, accounting and clerical personnel that we use on a part time basis, as well as certain property management services, property acquisition, sales and leasing and mortgage brokerage services. In 2013, pursuant to the compensation and services agreement, we paid Majestic Property a fee of $2,725,000 and an additional $175,000 for our share of all direct office expenses, including rent, telephone, postage, computer services, and internet usage. See Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements for information regarding equity awards to individuals performing services on our behalf.

The failure of any bank in which we deposit our funds could have an adverse impact on our financial condition.

We have diversified our cash and cash equivalents between several banking institutions in an attempt to minimize exposure to any one of these entities. However, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or "FDIC," only insures accounts in amounts up to $250,000 per depositor per insured bank. We currently have cash and cash equivalents deposited in certain financial institutions significantly in excess of federally insured levels. If any of the banking institutions in which we have deposited funds ultimately fails, we may lose our deposits over $250,000. The loss of our deposits may have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

Failure to qualify as a REIT would result in material adverse tax consequences and would significantly reduce cash available for distributions.

We operate so as to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of technical and complex legal provisions for which there are limited judicial and administrative interpretations. The determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control may affect our ability to qualify as a REIT. In addition, no assurance can be given that legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or

court decisions will not significantly change the tax laws with respect to qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of such qualification. If we fail to quality as a REIT, we will be subject to federal, certain additional state and local income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and would not be allowed a deduction in computing our taxable income for amounts distributed to stockholders. In addition, unless entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions, we would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification is lost. The additional tax would reduce significantly our net income and the cash available for distributions to stockholders.

We are subject to certain distribution requirements that may result in our having to borrow funds at unfavorable rates.

To obtain the favorable tax treatment associated with being a REIT, we generally are required, among other things, to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our ordinary taxable income (subject to certain adjustments) each year. To the extent that we satisfy these distribution requirements, but distribute less than 100% of our taxable income we will be subject to Federal corporate tax on our undistributed taxable income. In addition, in 2013 and 2012, we were subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount by which distributions paid by us in such year was less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of our capital gain net income and 100% of our undistributed income from prior years.

As a result of differences in timing between the receipt of income and the payment of expenses, and the inclusion of such income and the deduction of such expenses in arriving at taxable income, and the effect of nondeductible capital expenditures, the creation of reserves and the timing of required debt service (including amortization) payments, we may need to borrow funds in order to make the distributions necessary to retain the tax benefits associated with qualifying as a REIT, even if we believe that then prevailing market conditions are not generally favorable for such borrowings. Such borrowings could reduce our net income and the cash available for distributions to holders of our common stock.

Compliance with REIT requirements may hinder our ability to maximize profits.

In order to qualify as a REIT for Federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, our sources of income, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of our stock. We may also be required to make distributions to stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. Accordingly, compliance with REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.

In order to qualify as a REIT, we must also ensure that at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and real estate assets. Any investment in securities cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, no more than 5% of the value of our assets can consist of the securities of any one issuer, other than a qualified REIT security. If we fail to comply with these requirements, we must dispose of such portion of these securities in excess of these percentages within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter in order to avoid losing our REIT status and suffering adverse tax consequences. This requirement could cause us to dispose of assets for consideration that is less than their true value and could lead to an adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

Set forth below is a list of our executive officers whose terms expire at our 2014 annual board of directors' meeting. The business history of our officers, who are also directors, will be provided in our proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than April 30, 2014.

NAME		POSITION WITH THE COMPANY

Matthew J. Gould*	54	Chairman of the Board
Fredric H. Gould*	78	Vice Chairman of the Board
Patrick J. Callan, Jr.	51	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Lawrence G. Ricketts, Jr.	37	Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Jeffrey A. Gould*	48	Senior Vice President and Director
David W. Kalish***	66	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Mark H. Lundy**	51	Senior Vice President and Secretary
Israel Rosenzweig	66	Senior Vice President
Simeon Brinberg**	80	Senior Vice President
Karen Dunleavy	55	Vice President, Financial
Alysa Block	53	Treasurer
Richard M. Figueroa	46	Vice President and Assistant Secretary
Isaac Kalish***	38	Vice President and Assistant Treasurer
Justin Clair	31	Assistant Vice President

Lawrence G. Ricketts, Jr. Mr. Ricketts has been our Chief Operating Officer since 2008, Vice President from 1999 through 2006 and Executive Vice President since 2006.

David W. Kalish. Mr. Kalish has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since 1990 and as Senior Vice President, Finance of BRT Realty Trust since 1998. Since 1990, he has served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the managing general partner of Gould Investors L.P., a master limited partnership involved primarily in the ownership and operation of a diversified portfolio of real estate assets. Mr. Kalish is a certified public accountant.

Israel Rosenzweig. Mr. Rosenzweig has served as our Senior Vice President since 1997, as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of BRT Realty Trust since 2013, as Vice Chairman of its Board of Trustees from 2012 through 2013, and as its Senior Vice President from 1998 through 2012. He has been a Vice President of the managing general partner of Gould Investors since 1997.

Mark H. Lundy. Mr. Lundy has served as our Secretary since 1993, as our Vice President since 2000 and as our Senior Vice President since 2006. Mr. Lundy has been a Vice President of BRT Realty Trust from 1993 to 2006, its Senior Vice President since 2006, a Vice President of the managing general partner of Gould Investors from 1990 through 2012 and its President and Chief Operating Officer since 2013. He is an attorney admitted to practice in New York and the District of Columbia.

Simeon Brinberg. Mr. Brinberg has served as our Senior Vice President since 1989. He served as Secretary of BRT Realty Trust from 1983 through 2013, a Senior Vice President of BRT Realty Trust since 1988 and a Vice President of the managing general partner of Gould Investors since 1988. Mr. Brinberg is an attorney admitted to practice in New York.

Karen Dunleavy. Ms. Dunleavy has been our Vice President, Financial since 1994. She has served as Treasurer of the managing general partner of Gould Investors from 1986 through 2013. Ms. Dunleavy is a certified public accountant.

Alysa Block. Ms. Block has been our Treasurer since 2007, and served as Assistant Treasurer from 1997 to 2007. Ms. Block has also served as the Treasurer of BRT Realty Trust since 2008, and served as its Assistant Treasurer from 1997 to 2008.

Richard M. Figueroa. Mr. Figueroa has served as our Vice President and Assistant Secretary since 2001 and as Vice President and Assistant Secretary of BRT Realty Trust since 2002. He joined the managing general partner of Gould Investors in 1999, and serves as its Vice President. Mr. Figueroa is an attorney admitted to practice in New York.

Isaac Kalish. Mr. Kalish has served as our Vice President since 2013, Assistant Treasurer since 2007, as Assistant Treasurer of the managing general partner of Gould Investors from 2012 through 2013, as Treasurer from 2013, as Vice President of BRT Realty Trust since 2013, and as its Assistant Treasurer since 2009. Mr. Kalish is a certified public accountant.

Justin Clair. Mr. Clair has served as Assistant Vice President since 2010 and has been employed by us since 2006. His responsibilities include sourcing new acquisition opportunities, managing the portfolio, underwriting of investments and marketing.

As of December 31, 2013, we owned 104 properties with an aggregate net book value of $496.2 million and participated in joint ventures that own five properties. Our occupancy rate based on total rentable square footage was 99.6% and 98.4% as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The occupancy rate of our joint venture properties, based on total rentable square footage, was 100% as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.

The following table summarizes as of December 31, 2013 the specified information about the properties owned by us and our consolidated subsidiaries:

Location	Type of Property				2014 Contractual Rental Income per Square Foot

Fort Mill, SC	Industrial	5.0	%	701,595	$	3.79
Baltimore, MD	Industrial	4.6		367,000		6.72
Parsippany, NJ	Office	4.2		106,680		21.08
Royersford, PA(1)	Retail	3.9		194,600		10.66
Hauppauge, NY	Flex	3.8		149,870		13.61
Round Rock, TX	Assisted Living Facility	3.4		87,560		20.68
Greensboro, NC	Theater	2.7		61,213		23.41
W. Hartford, CT(2)	Retail	2.6		47,174		28.85
Cherry Hill, NJ(3)	Retail	2.6		112,630		12.40
Secaucus, NJ	Health & Fitness	2.3		44,863		27.63
Brooklyn, NY	Office	2.2		66,000		17.81
Knoxville, TN	Retail	2.2		35,330		32.84
El Paso, TX	Retail	2.2		110,179		10.66
Philadelphia, PA	Industrial	1.9		166,000		6.22
Fort Mill, SC	Flex	1.9		303,188		3.41

Location	Type of Property

Tucker, GA	Health & Fitness	1.7	58,800	15.46
Kansas City, MO	Retail	1.4	88,807	8.32
Hamilton, OH	Health & Fitness	1.4	38,000	19.25
Columbus, OH(4)	Retail	1.3	96,924	6.99
Indianapolis, IN	Industrial	1.3	125,622	5.35
Cedar Park, TX(4)	Retail	1.3	50,810	13.88
Lake Charles, LA(5)	Retail	1.2	54,229	11.76
Ronkonkoma, NY(6)	Flex	1.2	89,500	8.50
Ft. Myers, FL	Retail	1.1	29,993	20.17
Columbus, OH	Industrial	1.1	100,220	5.62
Houston, TX(7)	Retail	1.1	42,446	14.23
Chicago, IL(8)	Retail	1.1	23,939	24.62
Kennesaw, GA(8)	Retail	1.0	32,052	17.35
Saco, ME	Industrial	1.0	91,400	5.82
Naples, FL(8)	Retail	1.0	15,912	33.00
Clemmons, NC	Retail	1.0	96,725	5.40
Wichita, KS(4)	Retail	1.0	88,108	5.99
Morrow, GA	Retail	.9	50,400	8.96
Tyler, TX(4)	Retail	.9	72,000	6.36
Athens, GA(9)	Retail	.9	41,280	11.62
Greenwood Village, CO	Retail	.9	45,000	10.50
Champaign, IL(10)	Retail	.9	50,530	9.30
New Hyde Park, NY	Industrial	.9	38,000	12.05
Cary, NC(8)	Retail	.9	33,490	13.99
Onalaska, WI	Retail	.8	63,919	6.75
Fayetteville, GA(4)	Retail	.8	65,951	6.57
Niles, IL	Retail	.8	33,089	12.09
Houston, TX	Retail	.7	25,005	15.70
Selden, NY	Retail	.7	14,550	26.05
Deptford, NJ	Retail	.7	25,358	14.90
Eugene, OR(8)	Retail	.7	24,978	15.66
El Paso, TX(8)	Retail	.7	25,000	14.54
Duluth, GA(4)	Retail	.7	50,260	6.88
Lexington, KY(4)	Retail	.7	30,173	11.78
Virginia Beach, VA(4)	Retail	.7	58,937	6.44
Richmond, VA(4)	Retail	.7	38,788	9.93
Amarillo, TX(4)	Retail	.7	72,227	5.31
Newark, DE	Retail	.6	23,547	14.00
Durham, NC	Industrial	.6	46,181	14.00
Houston, TX	Retail	.6	20,087	15.50
Hyannis, MA	Retail	.6	9,750	30.07
Newport News, VA(4)	Retail	.6	49,865	6.69
Hauppauge, NY	Retail	.5	7,000	40.73
Gurnee, IL(4)	Retail	.5	22,768	12.21
Pinellas Park, FL	Industrial	.5	53,064	5.03
Crystal Lake, IL	Retail	.5	32,446	8.00
Somerville, MA	Retail	.5	12,054	23.23
Batavia, NY(8)	Retail	.5	23,483	12.10

Location	Type of Property

Carrollton, GA	Retail	.5		6,012	41.74
Cartersville, GA	Retail	.5		5,635	42.02
Bluffton, SC(4)	Retail	.5		35,011	7.47
Ann Arbor, MI	Retail	.4		7,945	27.47
Island Park, NY	Retail	.4		6,125	37.55
Bolingbrook, IL	Retail	.4		33,111	6.10
W. Hartford, CT(11)	Retail	.4		—	—
Cape Girardeau, MO	Retail	.4		13,502	14.71
Kennesaw, GA	Retail	.4		4,051	47.99
Miamisburg, OH	Industrial	.4		35,707	5.48
Lawrenceville, GA	Retail	.4		4,025	46.28
Everett, MA	Retail	.4		18,572	10.08
Myrtle Beach, SC	Retail	.4		6,734	29.39
Concord, NC	Retail	.4		4,749	38.99
Vicksburg, MS	Retail	.4		2,790	71.68
Richmond, VA	Retail	.4		9,367	23.86
Greensboro, NC	Retail	.4		6,655	33.43
Killeen, TX	Retail	.3		7,470	24.25
Marston Mills, MA	Retail	.3		8,775	18.00
Houston, TX	Retail	.3		12,000	14.00
Monroeville, PA	Retail	.3		6,051	23.00
Flowood, MS	Retail	.3		4,505	39.89
D'Iberville, MS	Retail	.3		2,650	63.68
Vicksburg, MS	Retail	.3		4,505	36.42
Bastrop, LA	Retail	.3		2,607	66.53
Monroe, LA	Retail	.3		2,756	62.93
Kentwood, LA	Retail	.3		2,578	65.46
Monroe, LA	Retail	.3		2,806	59.02
Gettysburg, PA	Retail	.3		2,944	44.94
West Palm Beach, FL	Industrial	.2		10,361	11.80
Lawrence, KS	Retail	.2		8,600	12.21
Palmyra, PA	Retail	.2		2,798	42.21
Reading, PA	Retail	.2		2,754	42.36
Hanover, PA	Retail	.2		2,702	47.79
Trexlertown, PA	Retail	.2		3,004	37.46
Reading, PA	Retail	.2		2,551	45.02
Seattle, WA	Retail	.2		3,038	21.40
Rosenberg, TX	Retail	.1		8,000	7.99
Grand Rapids, MI(12)	Health & Fitness	.1		72,000	.41
Grand Rapids, MI(12)	Health & Fitness	.1		130,000	.40
Melville, NY(13)	Industrial	—		51,351	—


		100	%	5,393,346

The following table summarizes the specified information about the properties owned by joint ventures in which we are a venture partner. We own a 50% economic interest in each joint venture:

As of December 31, 2013, the 104 properties owned by us are located in 28 states. The following table sets forth certain information, presented by state, related to our properties as of December 31, 2013:

State		2014 Contractual Rental Income

Texas	12	$	6,582,470	12.4	%	532,784
New York	9		5,484,821	10.3		445,879
New Jersey	4		5,236,040	10.0		289,531
South Carolina	4		4,150,166	7.8		1,046,528
Georgia	10		4,043,987	7.6		318,466
Pennsylvania	9		3,946,119	7.4		383,404
North Carolina	6		3,148,848	5.9		249,013
Maryland	1		2,466,630	4.6		367,000
Illinois	6		2,198,573	4.1		195,883
Ohio	4		2,167,850	4.1		270,851
Connecticut	2		1,561,013	2.9		47,174
Florida	4		1,519,120	2.9		109,330
Virginia	4		1,321,668	2.5		156,957
Louisiana	5		1,318,785	2.5		64,976
Tennessee	1		1,160,320	2.2		35,330
Other	23		6,749,596	12.8		880,240


	104	$	53,056,006	100	%	5,393,346

The following table sets forth certain information, presented by state, related to the properties owned by our joint ventures as of December 31, 2013:

The following table sets forth scheduled principal mortgage payments due for our properties as of December 31, 2013:

At December 31, 2013, our joint ventures had first mortgages on four properties with outstanding balances aggregating approximately $17.8 million, bearing interest at rates ranging from 5.81% to 6% with a weighted average interest rate of 5.86%. Substantially all of these mortgages contain prepayment penalties. The following table sets forth the scheduled principal mortgage payments due for properties owned by our joint ventures as of December 31, 2013, and assumes no payment is made on principal on any outstanding mortgage in advance of its due date:

The mortgages on our properties are generally non-recourse, subject to standard carve-outs. The term "standard carve-outs" refers to recourse items to an otherwise non-recourse mortgage and are customary to mortgage financing. While carve-outs vary from lender to lender and transaction to transaction, the carve-outs may include, among other things, voluntary bankruptcy filings, environmental liabilities, the sale, financing or encumbrance of the property in violation of loan documents, damage to property as a result of intentional misconduct or gross negligence, failure to pay valid taxes and other claims which could create liens on property and the conversion of security deposits, insurance proceeds or condemnation awards.

Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities.

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "OLP." The following table sets forth for the periods indicated, the high and low prices for our common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange and the per share distributions declared on our common stock.

As of March 12, 2014, there were approximately 332 holders of record of our common stock.

We qualify as a REIT for Federal income tax purposes. In order to maintain that status, we are required to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our annual ordinary taxable income. The amount and timing of future distributions will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon our financial condition, earnings, business plan, cash flow and other factors. We intend to make distributions in an amount at least equal to that necessary for us to maintain our status as a real estate investment trust for Federal income tax purposes.

The following graph compares the performance of our common stock with the Standard and Poor's 500 Index and a peer group index of publicly traded equity real estate investment trusts prepared by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts. As indicated, the graph assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2008 in our common stock and assumes the reinvestment of dividends.

We did not repurchase any shares of our outstanding common stock in October, November or December 2013.

The following table sets forth the selected consolidated statement of operations data for each of the periods indicated, all of which are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes. The selected financial data for each of 2013, 2012 and 2011 should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on

Form 10-K and in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," below, where this data is discussed in more detail.

	As of and for the Year Ended December 31, (Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

	2013		2012		2011		2010		2009
*OPERATING DATA*(1)
Rental income, net	$	50,979	$	43,793	$	40,784	$	36,715	$	35,174	(2)
Real estate acquisition costs		921		823		213		1,010		59
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures		651		1,368		914		992		1,085
Income from continuing operations		17,409		11,328		11,088		6,990		10,145
Income from discontinued operations		515		20,980		2,632		2,316		9,496
Net income attributable to One Liberty Properties, Inc.		17,875		32,320		13,724		9,306		19,641
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic		14,948		14,427		13,801		11,465		10,651
Diluted		15,048		14,527		13,851		11,510		10,812
Net income per common share—basic
Income from continuing operations	$	1.12	$	.77	$	.77	$	.61	$	.95
Income from discontinued operations		.03		1.41		.19		.20		.89


Net income	$	1.15	$	2.18	$	.96	$	.81	$	1.84




Net income per common share—diluted
Income from continuing operations	$	1.11	$	.76	$	.77	$	.61	$	.94
Income from discontinued operations		.03		1.40		.19		.20		.88


Net income	$	1.14	$	2.16	$	.96	$	.81	$	1.82




Cash distributions per share of common stock	$	1.42	$	1.34	$	1.32	$	1.23	$	.08
Stock distributions per share of common stock		—		—		—		—	$	.80
*BALANCE SHEET DATA*(1)
Real estate investments, net	$	496,187	$	405,161	$	370,617	$	360,779	$	300,227
Properties held for sale and related assets		5,177		5,364		22,481		33,829		38,468
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures		4,906		19,485		7,170		6,769		7,635
Cash and cash equivalents		16,631		14,577		12,668		7,732		28,036
Total assets		571,898		481,166		452,821		436,362		400,097
Mortgages payable		278,045		225,971		190,967		199,989		177,767
Mortgages payable—properties held for sale		—		—		6,970		7,058		4,162
Due under line of credit		23,250		—		20,000		36,200		27,000
Total liabilities		321,808		243,107		233,874		257,179		219,969
Total equity		250,090		238,059		218,947		179,183		180,128
*OTHER DATA*(3)(4)
Funds from operations	$	25,845	$	23,775	$	22,825	$	18,160	$	23,501
Funds from operations per common share:
Basic	$	1.68	$	1.60	$	1.61	$	1.58	$	2.21
Diluted	$	1.67	$	1.59	$	1.61	$	1.58	$	2.17
Adjusted funds from operations	$	24,663	$	22,577	$	21,430	$	17,030	$	22,293
Adjusted funds from operations per common share:
Basic	$	1.60	$	1.52	$	1.51	$	1.49	$	2.09
Diluted	$	1.59	$	1.51	$	1.51	$	1.48	$	2.06

We compute funds from operations, or FFO, in accordance with the "White Paper on Funds From Operations" issued by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT") and NAREIT's related guidance. FFO is defined in the White Paper as net income (computed in accordance with generally accepting accounting principles), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property, plus depreciation and amortization, plus impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will be calculated to reflect funds from operations on the same basis. In computing FFO, we do not add back to net income the amortization of costs in connection with our financing activities or depreciation of non-real estate assets. Since the NAREIT White Paper only provides guidelines for computing FFO, the computation of FFO may vary from one REIT to another. We compute adjusted funds from operations, or AFFO, by deducting from FFO our straight-line rent accruals and amortization of lease intangibles (including our share of our unconsolidated joint ventures).

We believe that FFO and AFFO are useful and standard supplemental measures of the operating performance for equity REITs and are used frequently by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in evaluating equity REITs, many of which present FFO and AFFO when reporting their operating results. FFO and AFFO are intended to exclude GAAP historical cost depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, which assures that the value of real estate assets diminish predictability over time. In fact, real estate values have historically risen and fallen with market conditions. As a result, we believe that FFO and AFFO provide a performance measure that when compared year over year, should reflect the impact to operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, interest costs and other matters without the inclusion of depreciation and amortization, providing a perspective that may not be necessarily apparent from net income. We also consider FFO and AFFO to be useful to us in evaluating potential property acquisitions.

FFO and AFFO do not represent net income or cash flows from operations as defined by GAAP. FFO and AFFO should not be considered to be an alternative to net income as a reliable measure of our operating performance; nor should FFO and AFFO be considered an alternative to cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities (as defined by GAAP) as measures of liquidity.

FFO and AFFO do not measure whether cash flow is sufficient to fund all of our cash needs, including principal amortization, capital improvements and distributions to stockholders. FFO and AFFO do not represent cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities as defined by GAAP.

Management recognizes that there are limitations in the use of FFO and AFFO. In evaluating our performance, management is careful to examine GAAP measures such as net income and cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities. Management also prepares and reviews the reconciliation of net income to FFO and AFFO.

The table below provides a reconciliation of net income in accordance with GAAP to FFO and AFFO for each of the indicated years (amounts in thousands):

	2013			2012			2011			2010			2009

Net income	$	17,875		$	32,320		$	13,724		$	9,306		$	19,641
Add: depreciation of properties		11,891			9,857			9,364			8,606			8,779
Add: our share of depreciation in unconsolidated joint ventures		517			849			595			537			545
Add: impairment charges		62			—			—			—			229
Add: amortization of deferred leasing costs		152			109			74			53			64
Add: our share of amortization of deferred leasing cost in unconsolidated joint ventures		8			82			—			—			—
Add: Federal excise tax relating to gain on sales		45			290			—			—			—
Deduct: gain on sales of real estate		—			(19,732	)		(932	)		(235	)		(5,757	)
Deduct: net gains on sales of real estate of unconsolidated joint ventures		(4,705	)		—			—			(107	)		—


Funds from operations		25,845			23,775			22,825			18,160			23,501
Deduct: straight line rent accruals and amortization of lease intangibles		(1,273	)		(1,352	)		(1,430	)		(1,129	)		(1,108	)
Deduct: our share of straight line rent accruals and amortization of lease intangibles of unconsolidated joint ventures		91			154			35			(1	)		(100	)


Adjusted funds from operations	$	24,663		$	22,577		$	21,430		$	17,030		$	22,293

The table below provides a reconciliation of net income per common share (on a diluted basis) in accordance with GAAP to FFO and AFFO:

	2013			2012			2011			2010			2009

Net income	$	1.14		$	2.16		$	.96		$	.81		$	1.82
Add: depreciation of properties		.78			.66			.66			.75			.81
Add: our share of depreciation in unconsolidated joint ventures		.03			.06			.05			.05			.05
Add: impairment charges		.01			—			—			—			.02
Add: amortization of deferred leasing costs		.01			.01			.01			—			—
Add: our share of amortization of deferred leasing cost in unconsolidated joint ventures		—			—			—			—			—
Add: Federal excise tax relating to gain on sales		—			.02			—			—			—
Deduct: gain on sales of real estate		—			(1.32	)		(.07	)		(.02	)		(.53	)
Deduct: net gains on sales of real estate of unconsolidated joint ventures		(.30	)		—			—			(.01	)		—


Funds from operations		1.67			1.59			1.61			1.58			2.17
Deduct: straight line rent accruals and amortization of lease intangibles		(.08	)		(.09	)		(.10	)		(.10	)		(.10	)
Deduct: our share of straight line rent accruals and amortization of lease intangibles of unconsolidated joint ventures		—			.01			—			—			(.01	)


Adjusted funds from operations	$	1.59		$	1.51		$	1.51		$	1.48		$	2.06

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

We are a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust. We acquire, own and manage a geographically diversified portfolio of retail, industrial, health and fitness, office, flex and other properties, a substantial portion of which are leased under long-term net leases. As of December 31, 2013, we own 104 properties (including two properties located in Michigan that were sold in February 2014) and our joint ventures own five properties. These 109 properties are located in 29 states.

We face a variety of risks and challenges in our business. As more fully described under Item 1A. Risk Factors, we, among other things, face the possibility we will not be able to acquire accretive properties on acceptable terms, lease our properties on terms favorable to us or at all, our tenants may not be able to pay their rental and other obligations and we may not be able to renew or relet, on acceptable terms, leases that are expiring.

We seek to manage the risk of our real property portfolio by diversifying among types of properties and industries, locations, tenants and scheduled lease expirations. As a result:

We monitor the risk of tenant non-payments through a variety of approaches tailored to the applicable situation. Generally, based on our assessment of the credit risk posed by our tenants, we monitor a tenant's financial condition through one or more of the following actions: reviewing tenant financial statements, obtaining other tenant related financial information, regular contact with tenant's representatives, tenant credit checks and regular management reviews of our tenants. In acquiring properties, we balance an evaluation of the terms of the leases and the credit of the existing tenants with a fundamental analysis of the real estate to be acquired, which analysis takes into account, among other things, the estimated value of the property, local demographics and the ability to re-rent or dispose of the property on favorable terms upon lease expiration or early termination.

In February 2014, contemporaneously with the expiration of the related leases, we sold two health and fitness facilities in Michigan. At December 31, 2013, we recorded the related impairment charge of $62,000.

Rental income, net. The increase is primarily due to rental income of $2.86 million earned from eleven properties acquired in 2012 and $3.3 million from eleven properties acquired in 2013. Real estate tax and expense reimbursements from tenants (primarily from seven properties acquired since February 2012) of $747,000 also contributed to the increase.

We estimate that the rental income in 2014 (calculated on a straight line basis and excluding tenant reimbursements) from the eleven properties we acquired in 2013 will be approximately $8.9 million.

Depreciation and amortization expense. Approximately $1.3 million and $880,000 of the increase is due to depreciation expense on the properties we acquired in 2013 and 2012, respectively. The balance of the increase is primarily due to depreciation on improvements to properties. We estimate that the expense in 2014 related to the eleven properties acquired in 2013 will be approximately $3.5 million.

General and administrative expenses. Contributing to the increase were increases of (i) $217,000 in non-cash compensation expense primarily related to the increase in the number of restricted stock

awards granted and the higher fair value of such awards at the time of grant and (ii) $145,000 in payroll and payroll related expenses due to higher compensation levels and an increase in medical insurance.

Federal excise and state taxes. State taxes were $210,000 in 2013 compared to $167,000 in 2012. We are subject to a Federal excise tax of 4% to the extent that the sum of (i) 85% of our ordinary taxable income, (ii) 95% of our capital gains and (iii) any undistributed taxable income from the prior year exceeds our distributions paid in such year. We incurred Federal excise tax of $45,000 in 2013 (net of an approximate $110,000 over-accrual for such tax in 2012) and $290,000 in 2012 because our calendar year distributions in the applicable year was less than the total of these amounts.

Real estate expenses. Contributing to the increase was the expense related to a property acquired in July 2013 and the inclusion, for a full year, of the expense related to a property acquired in November 2012.

The following table compares other income and expenses for the periods indicated:

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures. The decrease is attributable substantially to the following factors: (i) the sale in May 2013 of a property owned by us and another entity as tenants-in-common resulting in a decrease of $515,000, including a $148,000 mortgage prepayment penalty incurred as a result of the sale, and (ii) the inclusion in 2012 of our share of the net settlement entered into with a former tenant which accounted for $230,000 of the decrease.

Gain on disposition of real estate—unconsolidated joint venture. In May 2013, the property in which we held a tenant-in-common interest was sold and we recorded a gain of $2,807,000. There was no comparable gain in 2012.

Gain on sale—unconsolidated joint venture interest. In April 2013, we sold our 90% equity interest in our Plano, Texas unconsolidated joint venture and recorded a gain of $1,898,000. There was no comparable gain in 2012.

Other income. The 2012 results include a $199,000 recovery from an insurance claim. There was no comparable income in 2013.

Interest expense. The following table summarizes interest expense for the periods indicated:

The decrease is due to the $7.8 million decrease from $14.6 million in 2012 to $6.8 million in 2013 in the weighted average balance outstanding under our line of credit. The weighted average balance decreased due to repayments on the facility with proceeds from the sales and financing of several properties in 2012 and 2013 and from the sale of our common stock.

The following table reflects the interest rate on our mortgage debt and principal amount of outstanding mortgage debt, in each case on a weighted average basis:

The increase in mortgage interest expense is due to the increase in the weighted average amount of mortgage debt outstanding, partially offset by a decrease in the weighted average interest rate on outstanding mortgage debt. The increase in the weighted average balance outstanding is due to the incurrence of mortgage debt of $80 million in connection with properties acquired in 2012 and 2013 and the financing or refinancing of $22.9 million, net of refinanced amounts, in connection with properties acquired in prior years. The decrease in the weighted average interest rate is due to the financing (including financings effectuated in connection with acquisitions) or refinancing in 2012 and 2013 of $140.2 million of gross new mortgage debt with a weighted average interest rate of approximately 4.8%.

We estimate that the mortgage interest expense associated with the five properties acquired in 2013 with mortgage debt (including mortgage debt placed subsequent to the purchase), will be approximately $2.6 million in 2014. Interest expense for these five properties in 2013 was $993,000.

Amortization of deferred financing costs. The increase is due to $63,000 of amortization incurred in connection with financings on eight properties we acquired in 2013 and 2012 and $48,000 is due to additional costs relating to the amendment to our line of credit in August 2012.

Income from discontinued operations for 2013 includes the results of operations for two properties sold in February 2014 for which a $62,000 impairment charge was recorded. For 2012, income from discontinued operations includes the results of operations and the gain on sale of five of our properties sold in 2012, as well as the results of operations for the two properties sold in February 2014.

Rental income, net. The increase is attributable to rental revenues of $3.30 million earned from 17 properties acquired by us beginning March 2011 (of which $1.3 million is attributable to properties acquired in 2012), and $153,000 of real estate tax and expense reimbursements from tenants (primarily from properties we acquired since July 2011). Partially offsetting the increase was the net decrease of approximately $637,000 in rental revenue resulting from the contribution, on February 6, 2012, of a property located in Plano, TX, which we refer to as the Plano Property, to an unconsolidated joint venture.

Depreciation and amortization expense. The increase is substantially due to depreciation expense on the 17 properties we acquired beginning March 2011, partially offset by the decrease in depreciation resulting from the contribution of the Plano Property to an unconsolidated joint venture.

General and administrative expenses. Contributing to the increase were increases of approximately (i) $268,000 in payroll and payroll related expenses due to higher levels of compensation and to a lesser extent, additional employees and (ii) $214,000 in non-cash compensation expense related to restricted stock awards due to the increase in the number of awards granted, the higher fair value of such awards at the time of grant and changes in assumptions relating to restricted stock units.

Federal excise and state taxes. We incurred a Federal excise tax of $290,000. There was no corresponding Federal excise tax expense in the prior year.

Real estate expenses. The increase is attributable to the following factors: (i) approximately $620,000 is due to the net increase in expenses (including approximately $356,000 of real estate taxes) relating to properties we acquired since July 2011 and (ii) increases in other real estate expenses, none of which was individually material. Partially offsetting the increase was the inclusion, with respect to the Plano Property, of $12,000 of real estate taxes in 2012 compared to $260,000 in 2011.

Real estate acquisition costs. The increase is due to the increased acquisition activity and increased professional fees resulting from the complexity of certain of the acquisitions.

The following table compares other income and expenses for the periods indicated:

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures. The increase is due primarily to: (i) our approximate 36% share (i.e., $233,000) of the net proceeds from a settlement entered into in May 2012 with a former tenant; (ii) the inclusion during 2011 of our 50% share (i.e., $62,000) of real estate acquisition costs incurred in connection with the purchase of a property by a joint venture in March 2011; and (iii) our 90% share (i.e., $137,000) of the net operating income from the Plano Property. Partially offsetting the increase was the inclusion during 2012 of our share (i.e., $68,000) of real estate acquisition costs related to the Plano Property.

Gain on settlement of debt. This gain represents the satisfaction, at less than face value, of the $8.9 million mortgage payable related to the Plano Property. The $1.24 million gain is net of a $19,000 write off of the balance of related deferred mortgage costs.

Other income (loss). The results for 2012 include a $199,000 settlement with the carrier of a commercial crime insurance policy relating to our claim against our former president. The loss for 2011 includes an impairment charge recorded on marketable securities that had unrealized losses of $126,000 and that were sold in January 2012.

Interest expense. The following table summarizes interest expense for the periods indicated:

The decrease is due to the decrease, pursuant to amendments to our credit facility, which, among other things, reduced the annual interest rate from 6% to 5.5%, effective August 5, 2011, and from 5.5% to 4.75%, effective July 31, 2012, and, to a lesser extent, a decrease in the weighted average balance outstanding under our credit facility. The weighted average balance decreased due to repayments with financing proceeds from several properties and with a portion of the proceeds from the sale of three properties in June, September and October 2012, partially offset by borrowings for property acquisitions.

The following table reflects the interest rate on our mortgage debt and principal amount of outstanding mortgage debt, in each case on a weighted average basis:

The increase in mortgage interest expense is due to the increases in the weighted average amount of mortgage debt outstanding, partially offset by a decrease in the weighted average interest rate on outstanding mortgage debt. The decrease in the weighted average interest rate is principally due to the financing in 2011 and 2012 of $86 million of mortgage debt with a weighted average interest rate of approximately 4.9%.

Gain on sale of real estate. In February 2012, we contributed the Plano Property to an unconsolidated joint venture in exchange for a 90% interest therein, and our joint venture partner contributed $1.5 million for a 10% interest therein and we realized a gain of $319,000. In March 2013, our venture partner exercised its right to purchase our interest in the venture for $13.5 million.

Income from discontinued operations includes the income from operations and gain on sale of six of our properties, five of which were sold during 2012 and one of which was sold in 2011.

Our sources of liquidity and capital include cash flow from operations, cash and cash equivalents, borrowings under our revolving credit facility, refinancing existing mortgage loans, obtaining mortgage loans secured by our unencumbered properties, issuance of our equity securities and property sales. Our available liquidity at March 12, 2014 was approximately $69.4 million, including approximately $7.2 million of cash and cash equivalents (net of the credit facility's required $7.5 million deposit maintenance balance) and $62.2 million available under our revolving credit facility.

We expect to meet substantially all of our operating cash requirements (including dividend and mortgage amortization payments) from cash flow from operations. To the extent that cash flow from operations is not adequate to cover all of our operating needs, we will be required to use our available cash and cash equivalents or draw on our credit line (to the extent permitted) to satisfy operating requirements.

The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2013, information with respect to our mortgage debt (excluding mortgage debt of our unconsolidated joint ventures), that is payable from January 2014 through December 31, 2016:

At December 31, 2013, the Company's unconsolidated joint ventures had first mortgages on four properties with outstanding balances aggregating approximately $17.8 million, bearing interest at rates ranging from 5.81% to 6.0% (i.e., a 5.86% weighted average interest rate).

We intend to make debt amortization payments from operating cash flow and, though no assurance can be given that we will be successful in this regard, generally intend to refinance or extend the mortgage loans which mature in 2014 through 2016. We intend to repay the amounts not refinanced or extended from our existing funds and sources of funds, including our available cash and our credit line (to the extent available).

We continually seek to refinance existing mortgage loans on terms we deem acceptable, in order to generate additional liquidity. Additionally, in the normal course of our business, we sell properties

when we determine that it is in our best interests, which also generates additional liquidity. Further, since each of our encumbered properties is subject to a non-recourse mortgage (with standard carve-outs), if our in-house evaluation of the market value of such property is substantially less than the principal balance outstanding on the mortgage loan, we may determine to convey such property to the mortgagee in order to terminate our mortgage obligations, including payment of interest, principal and real estate taxes, with respect to such property.

Typically, we utilize funds from our credit facility to acquire a property and, thereafter secure long-term, fixed rate mortgage debt on such property. We apply the proceeds from the mortgage loan to repay borrowings under the credit facility, thus providing us with the ability to re-borrow under the credit facility for the acquisition of additional properties. As a result, in order to grow our business, it is important to have a credit facility in place. Additionally in connection with the acquisition of a number of larger properties during 2013, we arranged for contemporaneous mortgage financing covering a major portion of the applicable purchase price.

We can borrow up to $75 million pursuant to our revolving credit facility which is available to us for the acquisition of commercial real estate, repayment of mortgage debt, property improvements and general working capital purposes; provided, that if used for property improvements and working capital purposes, the amount outstanding for such purposes will not exceed the lesser of $15 million and 15% of the borrowing base and if used for working capital purposes, will not exceed $10 million. The facility matures on March 31, 2015 and bears interest at the greater of (i) 90 day LIBOR plus 3% and (ii) 4.75%. There is an unused facility fee of 0.25% per annum on the difference between the outstanding loan balance and $75 million. The credit facility requires the maintenance of $7.5 million in average deposit balances.

The terms of our revolving credit facility include certain restrictions and covenants which may limit, among other things, the incurrence of liens, and which require compliance with financial ratios relating to, among other things, the minimum amount of tangible net worth, the minimum amount of debt service coverage, the minimum amount of fixed charge coverage, the maximum amount of debt to value, the minimum level of net income, certain investment limitations and the minimum value of unencumbered properties and the number of such properties. Net proceeds received from the sale, financing or refinancing of properties are generally required to be used to repay amounts outstanding under our credit facility. At December 31, 2013, we were in compliance in all material respects with the covenants under this facility.

As of December 31, 2013, we had $278.0 million of mortgage debt outstanding (excluding mortgage indebtedness of our unconsolidated joint ventures), all of which is non-recourse (subject to standard carve-outs). We expect that mortgage interest and amortization payments (excluding repayments of principal at maturity) of approximately $60.0 million due through 2016 will be paid primarily from cash generated from our operations. We anticipate that debt obligations due through 2016 of approximately $61.8 million will be paid primarily from cash and cash equivalents and mortgage financings and refinancings. If we are unsuccessful in refinancing our existing indebtedness or financing our unencumbered properties, our cash flow, funds available under our credit facility and available cash, if any, may not be sufficient to repay all debt obligations when payments become due, and we may need to issue additional equity, obtain long or short-term debt, or dispose of properties on unfavorable terms.

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we distribute currently at least 90% of our ordinary taxable income to our stockholders (pursuant to Internal Revenue Procedures). It is our current intention to comply with these requirements and maintain our REIT status. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to corporate federal, state or local income taxes on taxable income we distribute currently (in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code and applicable regulations) to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal, state and local income taxes at regular corporate rates and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent tax years. Even if we qualify for federal taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state and local taxes on our income and to federal income taxes on our undistributed taxable income (i.e., taxable income not distributed in the amounts and in the time frames prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code and applicable regulations thereunder) and are subject to Federal excise taxes on our undistributed taxable income.

It is our intention to pay to our stockholders within the time periods prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code no less than 90%, and, if possible, 100% of our annual taxable income, including taxable gains from the sale of real estate and recognized gains on the sale of securities. It will continue to be our policy to make sufficient distributions to stockholders in order for us to maintain our REIT status under the Internal Revenue Code.

Our board of directors reviews the dividend policy regularly to determine if any changes to our dividend should be made.

Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain of our accounting policies are particularly important to an understanding of our financial position and results of operations and require the application of significant judgment by our management; as a result they are subject to a degree of uncertainty. These critical accounting policies include the following, discussed below.

The fair value of real estate acquired is allocated to acquired tangible assets, consisting of land and building, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases and other value of in-place leases based in each case on their fair values. The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property (which includes land and building) is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the "as-if-vacant" value is then allocated to land and building based on management's determination of relative fair values of these assets. We assess fair value of the lease intangibles based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount rates and available market information. The fair values associated with below-market rental renewal options are determined based on our experience and the relevant facts and circumstances that existed at the time of the acquisitions. The portion of the values of the leases associated with below-market renewal options that are likely to be exercised are amortized to rental income over the respective renewal periods. The allocation made by management may have a positive or negative effect on net income and may have an effect on the assets and liabilities on the balance sheet.

Our revenues, which are substantially derived from rental income, include rental income that our tenants pay in accordance with the terms of their respective leases reported on a straight line basis over the term of each lease. Since many of our leases provide for rental increases at specified intervals, straight line basis accounting requires us to record as an asset and include in revenues, unbilled rent receivables which we will only receive if the tenant makes all rent payments required through the expiration of the term of the lease. Accordingly, our management must determine, in its judgment, that the unbilled rent receivable applicable to each specific tenant is collectible. We review unbilled rent receivables on a quarterly basis and take into consideration the tenant's payment history and the financial condition of the tenant. In the event that the collectability of an unbilled rent receivable is in doubt, we are required to take a reserve against the receivable or a direct write off of the receivable, which has an adverse affect on net income for the year in which the reserve or direct write off is taken, and will decrease total assets and stockholders' equity.

We review our real estate portfolio on a quarterly basis to ascertain if there are any indicators of impairment to the carrying value of any of our real estate assets, including deferred costs and intangibles, in order to determine if there is any need for an impairment charge. In reviewing the portfolio, we examine the type of asset, the current financial statements or other available financial information of the tenant, the economic situation in the area in which the asset is located, the economic situation in the industry in which the tenant is involved and the timeliness of the payments made by the tenant under its lease, as well as any current correspondence that may have been had with the tenant, including property inspection reports. For each real estate asset owned for which indicators of impairment exist, if the undiscounted cash flow analysis yields an amount which is less than the asset's carrying amount, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the estimated fair value is less than the asset's carrying amount. The estimated fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow model of the expected future cash flows through the useful life of the property. Real estate assets that are expected to be disposed of are valued at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell on an individual asset basis. We generally do not obtain any independent appraisals in determining value but rely on our own analysis and valuations. Any impairment charge taken with respect to any part of our real estate portfolio will reduce our net income and reduce assets and stockholders' equity to the extent of the amount of any impairment charge, but it will not affect our cash flow or our distributions until such time as we dispose of the property.

Our primary market risk exposure is the effect of changes in interest rates on the interest cost of draws on our revolving variable rate credit facility and the effect of changes in the fair value of our interest rate swap agreements. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors beyond our control.

We utilize interest rate swaps to limit interest rate risk. These swaps are used for hedging purposes-not for speculation. We do not enter into interest rate swaps for trading purposes.

At December 31, 2013, we had 13 interest rate swap agreements outstanding (including one held by two of our unconsolidated joint ventures). The fair market value of the interest rate swaps is dependent upon existing market interest rates and swap spreads, which change over time. As of December 31, 2013, if there had been an increase of 100 basis points in forward interest rates, the fair market value of the interest rate swaps and net unrealized gain on derivative instruments would have increased by approximately $3.71 million. If there were a decrease of 100 basis points in forward interest rates, the fair market value of the interest rate swaps and net unrealized gain on derivative instruments would have decreased by approximately $3.70 million. These changes would not have any impact on our net income or cash.

Our mortgage debt, after giving effect to the interest rate swap agreements, bears interest at fixed rates and accordingly, the effect of changes in interest rates would not impact the amount of interest expense that we incur under these mortgages.

Our credit facility is a revolving variable rate facility which is sensitive to interest rates. Under current market conditions, we do not believe that our risk of material potential losses in future earnings, fair values and/or cash flows from near-term changes in market rates that we consider reasonably possible is material. We assessed the market risk for our revolving credit facility and believe that there is no foreseeable market risk because interest is charged at the greater of (i) 90 day LIBOR plus 3% and (ii) 4.75% per annum. At December 31, 2013, 90 day LIBOR plus 3% was approximately 3.25%; therefore, an increase or decrease of 100 basis points on this interest rate would not have any impact on our interest expense related to this facility.

The fair market value of our long-term debt is estimated based on discounting future cash flows at interest rates that our management believes reflect the risks associated with long term debt of similar risk and duration.

The following table sets forth our debt obligations by scheduled principal cash flow payments and maturity date, weighted average interest rates and estimated fair market value at December 31, 2013:

This information appears in Item 15(a) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and is incorporated into this Item 8 by reference thereto.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

A review and evaluation was performed by our management, including our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on that review and evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that our current disclosure controls and procedures, as designed and implemented, were effective. There have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect our internal controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation. There were no significant material weaknesses identified in the course of such review and evaluation and, therefore, we took no corrective measures.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, a company's principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by a company's board, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP, and includes those policies and procedures that:

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. In making this assessment, our management used criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992).

Based on its assessment, our management believes that, as of December 31, 2013, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, has issued an audit report on management's assessment of our internal control over financial reporting. This report appears on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

On January 21, 2014, we acquired for $2.97 million a 12,950 square foot property located in Greensboro, North Carolina that is operated as a retailer of wine and spirits.

On January 23, 2014, we acquired for $2.14 million a 12,820 square foot property located in Indianapolis, Indiana that is operated as a "Chuck E. Cheese" restaurant.

On February 25, 2014, we refinanced mortgage debt in principal amount of $16.26 million, maturing in May 2014 and with an annual interest rate of 5.76%. The new mortgage debt is in the principal amount of $19.75 million, has an annual interest rate of 4.75%, matures in 2024, is interest only for five years and amortizes on a 30 year schedule thereafter.

On March 4, 2014, we obtained mortgage debt of approximately $1.49 million, maturing in 2022, amortizing on a 25 year basis and with an annual interest rate of 5.16%.

On March 6, 2014, we obtained mortgage debt of $6.5 million, maturing in 2024, amortizing on a 25 year basis and with an annual interest rate of 4.51%.

Apart from certain information concerning our executive officers which is set forth in Part I of this Annual Report, additional information required by this Item 10 shall be included in our proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders, to be filed with the SEC not later than April 30, 2014, and is incorporated herein by reference.

The information concerning our executive compensation required by this Item 11 shall be included in our proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders, to be filed with the SEC not later than April 30, 2014, and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The information concerning our beneficial owners and management required by this Item 12 shall be included in our proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders, to be filed with the SEC not later than April 30, 2014 and is incorporated herein by reference.

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2013 about shares of our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under our 2012 Stock Incentive Plan:

The information concerning certain relationships, related transactions and director independence required by this Item 13 shall be included in our proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders, to be filed with the SEC not later than April 30, 2014 and is incorporated herein by reference.

The information concerning our principal accounting fees required by this Item 14 shall be included in our proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders, to be filed with the SEC not later than April 30, 2014, and is incorporated herein by reference.

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.


3.1		Articles of Amendment and Restatement of One Liberty Properties, Inc., dated July 20, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004).
3.2		Articles of Amendment to Restated Articles of Incorporation of One Liberty Properties, Inc. filed with the State of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland on June 17, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005).
3.3		Articles of Amendment to Restated Articles of Incorporation of One Liberty Properties, Inc. filed with the State of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland on June 21, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005).
3.4		By-Laws of One Liberty Properties, Inc., as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2007).
3.5		Amendment, effective as of June 12, 2012, to By-Laws of One Liberty Properties, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2012).
4.1	*	One Liberty Properties, Inc. 2009 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010).
4.2	*	One Liberty Properties, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012).


4.3		Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Registration Statement on Form S-2, Registration No. 333-86850, filed on April 24, 2002 and declared effective on May 24, 2002).
10.1		Seconded Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2010, by and among One Liberty Properties, Inc., Valley National Bank, Merchants Bank Division, Bank Leumi USA, Israel Discount Bank of New York and Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 10, 2011).
10.2		First Amendment dated as of January 6, 2011 to the Second Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2010, between VNB New York Corp. as assignee of Valley National Bank, Merchants Bank Division, Bank Leumi, USA, Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company, Israel Discount Bank of New York, and One Liberty Properties, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 10, 2011).
10.3		Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated as of August 5, 2011, between VNB New York Corp., Bank Leumi USA, Israel Discount Bank of New York, Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company and One Liberty Properties, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 15, 2011).
10.4		Third Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated as of July 31, 2012, between VNB New York Corp., Bank Leumi USA, Israel Discount Bank of New York, Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company and One Liberty Properties, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 2, 2012).
10.5	*	Compensation and Services Agreement effective as of January 1, 2007 between One Liberty Properties, Inc. and Majestic Property Management Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 14, 2007).
10.6	*	First Amendment to Compensation and Services Agreement effective as of April 1, 2012 between One Liberty Properties, Inc. and Majestic Property Management Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012).
10.7	*	Form of Performance Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 15, 2010).
10.8	*	Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for the 2009 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010).
10.9	*	Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for the 2012 Incentive Plan.
14.1		Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to One Liberty Properties, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 14, 2006).
21.1		Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23.1		Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
31.1		Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer
31.2		Certification of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The file number for all the exhibits incorporated by reference is 001-09279 other than exhibit 4.3 whose file number is 333-86850.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf of the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities indicated on the dates indicated.

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
One Liberty Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited One Liberty Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries' (the "Company") internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 Framework) (the COSO criteria). The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, One Liberty Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of One Liberty Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013 of the Company and our report dated March 17, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
One Liberty Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of One Liberty Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of One Liberty Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries at December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), One Liberty Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 Framework) and our report dated March 17, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

	December 31,

	2013		2012
ASSETS
Real estate investments, at cost
Land	$	153,529	$	136,727
Buildings and improvements		413,829		329,486


Total real estate investments, at cost		567,358		466,213
Less accumulated depreciation		71,171		61,052


Real estate investments, net		496,187		405,161
Properties held-for-sale		5,177		5,364
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures		4,906		19,485
Cash and cash equivalents		16,631		14,577
Unbilled rent receivable		13,743		12,629
Unamortized intangible lease assets		26,035		16,491
Escrow, deposits and other assets and receivables		5,690		3,741
Investment in BRT Realty Trust at market (related party)		262		241
Unamortized deferred financing costs		3,267		3,477


Total assets	$	571,898	$	481,166


LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities:
Mortgages payable	$	278,045		$	225,971
Line of credit		23,250			—
Dividends payable		5,806			5,252
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		7,790			6,584
Unamortized intangible lease liabilities		6,917			5,300


Total liabilities		321,808			243,107


Commitments and contingencies		—			—
Equity:
One Liberty Properties Inc. stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $1 par value; 12,500 shares authorized; none issued		—			—
Common stock, $1 par value; 25,000 shares authorized; 15,221 and 14,598 shares issued and outstanding		15,221			14,598
Paid-in capital		210,324			196,107
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(490	)		(1,578	)
Accumulated undistributed net income		23,877			28,001


Total One Liberty Properties, Inc. stockholders' equity		248,932			237,128
Non-controlling interests in joint ventures		1,158			931


Total equity		250,090			238,059


Total liabilities and equity	$	571,898		$	481,166

	Year Ended December 31,

	2013			2012			2011
Revenues:
Rental income, net	$	50,979		$	43,793		$	40,874


Operating expenses:
Depreciation and amortization		11,919			9,564			8,792
General and administrative (including $2,681, $2,681 and $2,687 to related parties)		7,801			7,317			6,849
Federal excise and state taxes		255			457			168
Real estate expenses (including $600 in each year to related party)		3,213			2,618			2,331
Leasehold rent		308			308			308
Real estate acquisition costs		921			823			213


Total operating expenses		24,417			21,087			18,661


Operating income		26,562			22,706			22,213
Other income and expenses:
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures		651			1,368			914
Gain on disposition of real estate—unconsolidated joint venture		2,807			—			—
Gain on sale—unconsolidated joint venture interest		1,898			—			—
Gain on settlement of debt		—			—			1,240
Other income (loss)		97			241			(35	)
Interest:
Expense		(13,716	)		(12,532	)		(12,429	)
Amortization of deferred financing costs		(890	)		(774	)		(815	)
Gain on sale of real estate		—			319			—


Income from continuing operations		17,409			11,328			11,088


Discontinued operations:
Income from operations		577			1,567			1,700
Impairment charge		(62	)		—			—
Net gain on sales		—			19,413			932


Income from discontinued operations		515			20,980			2,632


Net income		17,924			32,308			13,720
Less net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests		(49	)		12			4


Net income attributable to One Liberty Properties, Inc.	$	17,875		$	32,320		$	13,724




Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic		14,948			14,427			13,801




Diluted		15,048			14,527			13,851




Per common share attributable to common stockholders—basic:
Income from continuing operations	$	1.12		$	.77		$	.77
Income from discontinued operations		.03			1.41			.19


	$	1.15		$	2.18		$	.96




Per common share attributable to common stockholders—diluted:
Income from continuing operations	$	1.11		$	.76		$	.77
Income from discontinued operations		.03			1.40			.19


	$	1.14		$	2.16		$	.96

	Common Stock		Paid-in Capital			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Accumulated Undistributed Net Income			Non- Controlling Interests in Joint Ventures			Total

Balances, December 31, 2010	$	11,212	$	147,158		$	(156	)	$	20,969		$	—		$	179,183
Distributions—common stock Cash—$1.32 per share		—		—			—			(19,088	)		—			(19,088	)
Shares issued in public offering—net of offering costs of $282		2,700		37,869			—			—			—			40,569
Restricted stock vesting		46		(46	)		—			—			—			—
Shares issued through dividend reinvestment plan		255		3,496			—			—			—			3,751
Contribution from non-controlling interest partner		—		—			—			—			666			666
Compensation expense—restricted stock		—		1,009			—			—			—			1,009
Net income (loss)		—		—			—			13,724			(4	)		13,720
Other comprehensive (loss)		—		—			(863	)		—			—			(863	)


Balances, December 31, 2011		14,213		189,486			(1,019	)		15,605			662			218,947
Distributions—common stock Cash—$1.34 per share		—		—			—			(19,924	)		—			(19,924	)
Shares issued through equity offering program—net		121		2,010			—			—			—			2,131
Restricted stock vesting		49		(49	)		—			—			—			—
Shares issued through dividend reinvestment plan		215		3,437			—			—			—			3,652
Contributions from non-controlling interests		—		—			—			—			571			571
Distributions to non-controlling Interests		—		—			—			—			(290	)		(290	)
Compensation expense—restricted stock		—		1,223			—			—			—			1,223
Net income (loss)		—		—			—			32,320			(12	)		32,308
Other comprehensive (loss)		—		—			(559	)		—			—			(559	)


Balances, December 31, 2012		14,598		196,107			(1,578	)		28,001			931			238,059
Distributions—common stock Cash—$1.42 per share		—		—			—			(21,999	)		—			(21,999	)
Shares issued through equity offering program—net		363		8,802			—			—			—			9,165
Restricted stock vesting		50		(50	)		—			—			—			—
Shares issued through dividend reinvestment plan		210		4,025			—			—			—			4,235
Contributions from non-controlling interest		—		—			—			—			480			480
Distributions to non-controlling interests		—		—			—			—			(298	)		(298	)
Compensation expense—restricted stock		—		1,440			—			—			—			1,440
Net income		—		—			—			17,875			49			17,924
Other comprehensive income		—		—			1,088			—			(4	)		1,084


Balances, December 31, 2013	$	15,221	$	210,324		$	(490	)	$	23,877		$	1,158		$	250,090

	Year Ended December 31,

	2013			2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	17,924		$	32,308		$	13,720
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Gain on disposition of real estate held by unconsolidated joint venture		(2,807	)		—			—
Gain on sale—unconsolidated joint venture interest		(1,898	)		—			—
Gain on sales of real estate and other assets		(6	)		(19,741	)		(932	)
Gain on settlement of debt		—			—			(1,240	)
Increase in rental income from straight-lining of rent		(1,114	)		(1,354	)		(1,455	)
(Increase) decrease in rental income resulting from bad debt (recovery) expense, net		—			(117	)		467
(Increase) decrease in rental income from amortization of intangibles relating to leases		(160	)		2			26
Impairment charge on properties held-for-sale		62			—			—
Impairment charge on available-for-sale securities		—			—			126
Amortization of restricted stock expense		1,440			1,223			1,009
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures		(651	)		(1,368	)		(914	)
Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures		1,103			1,016			902
Depreciation and amortization		12,043			9,966			9,439
Amortization and write off of financing costs		891			800			850
Changes in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) in escrow, deposits, other assets and receivables		(1,653	)		(492	)		(395	)
Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities		1,763			71			33


Net cash provided by operating activities		26,937			22,314			21,636


Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of real estate		(107,579	)		(44,088	)		(25,668	)
Improvements to real estate		(2,867	)		(4,969	)		(3,746	)
Net proceeds from sale of real estate		—			36,062			11,544
Net proceeds from disposition of unconsolidated joint venture interest		13,444			—			—
Distributions of return of capital from unconsolidated joint ventures		5,495			145			95
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture		—			—			(669	)
Payment of leasing commissions		(200	)		(438	)		(183	)
Net proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities		19			373			—


Net cash used in investing activities		(91,688	)		(12,915	)		(18,627	)


Cash flows from financing activities:
Scheduled amortization payments of mortgages payable		(6,808	)		(5,533	)		(5,181	)
Repayment of mortgages payable		(4,708	)		(32,422	)		(15,302	)
Proceeds from mortgage financings		63,590			65,989			12,455
Proceeds from common stock offering, net		9,165			2,131			40,569
Proceeds from bank line of credit		32,500			14,550			28,500
Repayment on bank line of credit		(9,250	)		(34,550	)		(44,700	)
Issuance of shares through dividend reinvestment plan		4,235			3,652			3,751
Payment of financing costs		(656	)		(2,111	)		(741	)
Capital contributions from non-controlling interests		480			571			666
Distributions to non-controlling interests		(298	)		(290	)		—
Cash distributions to common stockholders		(21,445	)		(19,477	)		(18,090	)


Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		66,805			(7,490	)		1,927


Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		2,054			1,909			4,936
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		14,577			12,668			7,732


Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	16,631		$	14,577		$	12,668




Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for interest expense, net of capitalized interest of $9 and $35 in 2013 and 2012, respectively	$	13,744		$	13,088		$	13,363
Cash paid during the year for income taxes		78			68			70
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Contribution of property to unconsolidated joint venture	$	—		$	11,734		$	—
Settlement of mortgage debt		—			—			1,259
Purchase accounting allocations—intangible lease assets		11,624			6,641			2,387
Purchase accounting allocations—intangible lease liabilities		(2,210	)		(588	)		(614	)
Reclassification of 2010 prepaid tenant improvement allowance to building improvements		—			—			1,750

One Liberty Properties, Inc. ("OLP") was incorporated in 1982 in Maryland. OLP is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT"). OLP acquires, owns and manages a geographically diversified portfolio of retail, industrial, flex, office, health and fitness and other properties, a substantial portion of which are subject to long-term net leases. As of December 31, 2013, OLP owned 109 properties, including five properties owned by consolidated joint ventures and five properties owned by unconsolidated joint ventures. The 109 properties are located in 29 states.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of OLP, its wholly-owned subsidiaries and its investment in five joint ventures in which the Company, as defined, has a controlling interest. OLP and its subsidiaries are hereinafter referred to as the "Company". Material intercompany items and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, guidance for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity, or VIE, requires the performance of a qualitative rather than a quantitative analysis to determine the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Under this guidance, an entity would be required to consolidate a VIE if it has (i) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could be significant to the VIE.

The Company assesses the accounting treatment for each joint venture investment. This assessment includes a review of each joint venture or limited liability company agreement to determine the rights of each party and whether those rights are protective or participating. The agreements typically contain certain protective rights such as the requirement of partner approval to sell, finance or refinance the property and the payment of capital expenditures and operating expenditures outside of the approved budget or operating plan. In situations where the Company and its partner (i) approve the annual budget, (ii) approve certain expenditures, (iii) prepare or review and approve the joint venture's tax return before filing, and (iv) approve each lease at each property, the Company does not consolidate the joint venture as the Company considers these to be substantive participation rights that result in shared power over the activities that most significantly impact the performance of the joint venture.

With respect to the five consolidated joint ventures in which the Company has between an 85% and 95% interest, the Company has determined that (i) such ventures are not VIE's and (ii) the Company exercises substantial operating control and accordingly, such ventures are consolidated for financial statement purposes.

The Company accounts for its investments in five unconsolidated joint ventures under the equity method of accounting. All investments in these five joint ventures have sufficient equity at risk to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support and, as a group, the holders of the equity at risk have power through voting rights to direct the activities of these ventures. As a result, none of these five joint ventures are VIE's. In addition, although the Company is

the managing member, it does not exercise substantial operating control over these entities, and therefore the entities are not consolidated. These investments are recorded initially at cost, as investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, and subsequently adjusted for their share of equity in earnings, cash contributions and distributions. None of the joint venture debt is recourse to the Company, subject to customary carve-outs.

The Company has elected to follow the cumulative earnings approach when assessing, for the statement of cash flows, whether the distribution from the investee is a return of the investor's investment as compared to a return on its investment. The source of the cash generated by the investee to fund the distribution is not a factor in the analysis (that is, it does not matter whether the cash was generated through investee refinancing, sale of assets or operating results). Consequently, the investor only considers the relationship between the cash received from the investee to its equity in the undistributed earnings of the investee, on a cumulative basis, in assessing whether the distribution from the investee is a return on or return of its investment. Cash received from the unconsolidated entity is presumed to be a return on the investment to the extent that, on a cumulative basis, distributions received by the investor are less than its share of the equity in the undistributed earnings of the entity.

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Management believes that the estimates and assumptions that are most important to the portrayal of the Company's financial condition and results of operations, in that they require management's most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, form the basis of the accounting policies deemed to be most significant to the Company. These significant accounting policies relate to revenues and the value of the Company's real estate portfolio. Management believes its estimates and assumptions related to these significant accounting policies are appropriate under the circumstances; however, should future events or occurrences result in unanticipated consequences, there could be a material impact on the Company's future financial condition or results of operations.

Rental income includes the base rent that each tenant is required to pay in accordance with the terms of their respective leases reported on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. In order for management to determine, in its judgment, that the unbilled rent receivable applicable to each specific property is collectible, management reviews unbilled rent receivables on a quarterly basis and takes into consideration the tenant's payment history and financial condition. Some of the leases provide for additional contingent rental revenue in the form of percentage rents and increases based on the consumer price index. The percentage rents are based upon the level of sales achieved by the lessee and are recorded once the required sales levels are reached.

Substantially all of the Company's properties are subject to long-term net leases under which the tenant is typically responsible to pay for real estate taxes, insurance and ordinary maintenance and

repairs for the property directly to the vendor and the Company is not the primary obligor with respect to such items. As a result, the revenue and expenses relating to these properties is recorded on a net basis. For certain properties, the tenants, in addition to base rent, also pay the Company their pro rata share of real estate taxes and operating expenses. The income and expenses associated with these properties is recorded on a gross basis. During 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded additional rental income for the reimbursement of expenses in the amount of $1,694,000, $947,000 and $794,000, respectively.

Gains or losses on disposition of properties are recorded when the criteria under GAAP have been met.

The Company measures the fair value of financial instruments based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, a fair value hierarchy distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity and the reporting entity's own assumptions about market participant assumptions. In accordance with the fair value hierarchy, Level 1 assets/liabilities are valued based on quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets, Level 2 assets/liabilities are valued based on quoted prices in active markets for similar instruments, on quoted prices in less active or inactive markets, or on other "observable" market inputs and Level 3 assets/liabilities are valued based significantly on "unobservable" market inputs.

The Company allocates the purchase price of real estate among land, building, improvements and intangibles, such as the value of above, below and at-market leases and origination costs associated with in-place leases. The Company assesses the fair value of the lease intangibles and the assumed mortgage based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount rates and available market information. Such inputs are Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant. The value, as determined, is allocated to land, buildings and improvements based on management's determination.

In valuing an acquired property's intangibles, factors considered by management include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods, such as real estate taxes, insurance, other operating expenses, and estimates of lost rental revenue during the expected lease-up periods based on its evaluation of current market demand. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions, tenant improvements, legal and other related costs.

The values of acquired above-market and below-market leases are recorded based on the present values (using discount rates which reflect the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the differences between the contractual amounts to be received and management's estimate of market lease rates, measured over the terms of the respective leases that management deemed appropriate at the time of the acquisitions. Such valuations include a consideration of the non-cancellable terms of the respective leases as well as any applicable renewal period(s). The fair values associated with

below-market rental renewal options are determined based on the Company's experience and the relevant facts and circumstances that existed at the time of the acquisitions. The values of above-market leases are amortized to rental income over the terms of the respective non-cancellable lease periods. The portion of the values of below-market leases associated with the original non-cancellable lease terms are amortized to rental income over the terms of the respective non-cancellable lease periods. The portion of the values of the leases associated with below-market renewal options that are likely of exercise are amortized to rental income over the respective renewal periods. The value of other intangible assets (including leasing commissions and tenant improvements) is amortized to expense over the applicable terms of the respective leases. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration or not renewed, all unamortized amounts relating to that lease would be recognized in operations at that time. The estimated useful lives of intangible assets or liabilities generally range from one to 55 years.

The Company reviews its real estate portfolio on a quarterly basis to ascertain if there are any indicators of impairment to the value of any of its real estate assets, including deferred costs and intangibles, in order to determine if there is any need for an impairment charge. In reviewing the portfolio, the Company examines one or more of the following: the type of asset, the current financial statements or other available financial information of the tenant, the economic situation in the area in which the asset is located, the economic situation in the industry in which the tenant is involved, the timeliness of the payments made by the tenant under its lease, and any current communication with the tenant, including property inspection reports. For each real estate asset owned for which indicators of impairment exist, if the undiscounted cash flow analysis yields an amount which is less than the asset's carrying amount, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the estimated fair value is less than the asset's carrying amount. The estimated fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow model of the expected future cash flows through the useful life of the property. The analysis includes an estimate of the future cash flows that are expected to result from the real estate investment's use and eventual disposition. These cash flows consider factors such as expected future operating income, trends and prospects, the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. Real estate assets that are classified as held for sale are valued at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell on an individual asset basis.

Real estate investments include costs of development and redevelopment activities, and construction in progress. Capitalized costs, including interest and other carrying costs during the construction and/or renovation periods, are included in the cost of the related asset and charged to operations through depreciation over the asset's estimated useful life.

All highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased are considered to be cash equivalents. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents in high quality financial institutions.

Escrow, deposits and other assets and receivables include $1,453,000 and $1,104,000 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, of restricted cash relating to real estate taxes, insurance and other escrows.

The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its tenants to make required rent payments. If the financial condition of a specific tenant were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of its ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. At December 31, 2013, there was no balance in allowance for doubtful accounts. At December 31, 2012, the balance in allowance for doubtful accounts was $132,000, recorded as a reduction to accounts receivable.

The Company records bad debt expense as a reduction of rental income. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded bad debt expense of $56,000 and $486,000, respectively, in income from continuing operations and net recoveries of previously recognized bad debt expense of $173,000 and $19,000, respectively, in discontinued operations as a result of collections from one tenant. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company did not incur any bad debt expense.

Depreciation of buildings is computed on the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of 40 years. Depreciation of improvements is computed on the straight line method over the lesser of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful life of the improvements. Depreciation ceases when a property is deemed "held for sale". Leasehold interest and the related ground lease payments are amortized over the initial lease term of the leasehold position. Depreciation expense, including amortization of a leasehold position, lease origination costs, and capitalized lease commissions and excluding depreciation expense included in discontinued operations, amounted to $11,919,000, $9,564,000, and $8,792,000 for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Mortgage and credit line costs are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective debt obligations, which approximates the effective interest method. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, accumulated amortization of such costs was $3,908,000 and $3,096,000, respectively.

The Company has qualified as a real estate investment trust under the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Under these provisions, the Company will not be subject to federal income taxes on amounts distributed to stockholders providing it distributes at least 90% of its taxable income and meets certain other conditions. During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded accruals of Federal excise tax of $45,000 and $290,000, respectively, which are based on taxable income generated but not yet distributed.

For 2013, 27% of the distributions are treated as capital gain distributions, with the balance treated as ordinary income. For 2012, 73% of the distributions were treated as capital gain distributions, with the balance treated as ordinary income.

The Company follows a two-step approach for evaluating uncertain tax positions. Recognition (step one) occurs when an enterprise concludes that a tax position, based solely on its technical merits, is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination. Measurement (step two) determines the amount of benefit that more-likely-than-not will be realized upon settlement. Derecognition of a tax position that was previously recognized would occur when a company subsequently determines that a tax position no longer meets the more-likely-than-not threshold of being sustained. The use of a valuation allowance as a substitute for derecognition of tax positions is prohibited. The Company has not identified any uncertain tax positions requiring accrual.

The Company determines the classification of equity securities at the time of purchase and reassesses the classification at each reporting date. At December 31, 2013, all marketable securities have been classified as available-for-sale and recorded at fair value. The fair value of the Company's equity investment in publicly-traded companies is determined based upon the closing trading price of the securities as of the balance sheet date and unrealized gains and losses on these securities are recorded as a separate component of stockholders' equity. Unrealized losses that are determined to be other-than-temporary are recognized in earnings.

The Company's investment in 37,081 common shares of BRT Realty Trust ("BRT"), a related party of the Company, (accounting for less than 1% of the total voting power of BRT), was purchased at a cost of $132,000 and had a fair market value of $262,000 and $241,000 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the total cumulative net unrealized gains of $145,000 and $98,000, respectively, on all investments in equity securities is reported as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the stockholders' equity section.

Realized gains and losses are determined using the average cost method and are included in "Other income" on the income statement. During 2013, 2012 and 2011, sales proceeds and gross realized gains and losses on securities classified as available-for-sale were (amounts in thousands):

The Company maintains accounts at various financial institutions. While the Company attempts to limit any financial exposure, substantially all of its deposit balances exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses on such accounts.

Including the properties owned by our unconsolidated joint ventures, the Company's properties are located in 29 states. The following chart lists the states where the Company's properties contributed over 10% to the Company's rental income (amounts in thousands):

The Company owns eleven real estate investments that are located in six states and are net leased to Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc., a retail furniture company, pursuant to a master lease. The initial term of the net lease expires August 2022, with several renewal options. These real estate investments, which represented 9.5% of the depreciated book value of real estate investments at December 31, 2013, generated rental revenues of approximately $4,844,000 in each year or 9.5%, 11.1%, and 11.9%, of the Company's total revenues for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Basic earnings per share was determined by dividing net income allocable to common stockholders for each year by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each year. Net income is also allocated to the unvested restricted stock outstanding during each year, as the restricted stock is entitled to receive dividends and is therefore considered a participating security. Unvested restricted stock is not allocated net losses and/or any excess of dividends declared over net income; such amounts are allocated entirely to the common stockholders other than the holders of unvested restricted stock. The restricted stock units awarded under the Pay-for-Performance program described in Note 9 are excluded from the basic earnings per share calculation, as these units are not participating securities.

Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other rights exercisable for, or convertible into, common stock were exercised or converted or otherwise resulted in the issuance of common stock that shared in the earnings of the Company. For 2013, 2012 and 2011, the diluted weighted average number of common shares includes 100,000, 100,000 and 50,000 shares respectively, representing the diluted weighted average impact of 100,000 shares (of an aggregate of 200,000 shares) of common stock underlying the restricted stock units awarded pursuant to the Pay-For-Performance Program. These 100,000 shares may vest upon satisfaction of the total stockholder return metric. The number of shares that would be issued pursuant to this metric is based on the market price and dividends paid at the end of each quarterly period assuming the end of that quarterly period was the end of the vesting period The remaining 100,000 shares of common stock underlying the

restricted stock units awarded under the Pay-For-Performance Program are not included during 2013, 2012 and 2011, as they did not meet the return on capital performance metric during such years.

There were no options outstanding to purchase shares of common stock or other rights exercisable for, or convertible into, common stock in 2013, 2012 and 2011.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of earnings per share calculations (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Year Ended December 31,

	2013			2012		2011
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations	$	17,409		$	11,328	$	11,088
Less net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		(49	)		12		4
Less earnings allocated to unvested shares		(667	)		—		(460	)


Income from continuing operations available for common stockholders		16,693			11,340		10,632
Discontinued operations		515			20,980		2,632


Net income available for common stockholders, basic and diluted	$	17,208		$	32,320	$	13,264




Denominator for basic earnings per share:
—weighted average common shares		14,948			14,427		13,801
—weighted average unvested restricted stock shares		—			411		—


		14,948			14,838		13,801
Effect of diluted securities:
—restricted stock units awarded under Pay-for-Performance program		100			100		50


Denominator for diluted earnings per share
—weighted average shares		15,048			14,938		13,851




Earnings per common share, basic	$	1.15		$	2.18	$	.96




Earnings per common share, diluted	$	1.14		$	2.16	$	.96




Amounts attributable to One Liberty Properties, Inc. common stockholders, net of noncontrolling interests:
Income from continuing operations	$	17,360		$	11,340	$	11,092
Income from discontinued operations		515			20,980		2,632


Net income attributable to One Liberty Properties, Inc.	$	17,875		$	32,320	$	13,724

Substantially all of the Company's real estate assets, at acquisition, are comprised of real estate owned that is net leased to tenants on a long-term basis. Therefore, the Company operates predominantly in one industry segment.

The Company's objective in using derivatives, and in particular interest rate swaps, is to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. The Company does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.

The Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. In addition, the Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty's nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. These counterparties are generally the larger financial institutions engaged in providing a variety of financial services. These institutions generally face similar risks regarding adverse changes in market and economic conditions, including, but not limited to, fluctuations in interest rates, exchange rates, equity and commodity prices and credit spreads.

The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows are considered cash flow hedges. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is initially reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (outside of earnings) and subsequently reclassified to earnings in the period in which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion, if any, of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized directly in earnings. For derivatives not designated as cash flow hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivative are recognized directly in earnings in the period in which the change occurs, however; the Company's policy is to not enter into such transactions.

The fair value of restricted stock grants and restricted stock units, determined as of the date of grant, is amortized into general and administrative expense over the respective vesting period. The deferred compensation to be recognized as expense is net of certain forfeiture and performance assumptions which are re-evaluated quarterly.

Effective January 1, 2013, the Company adopted ASU No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which the FASB issued in February 2013. The standard requires an entity to present information about significant items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or as a separate disclosure in the notes to financial statements. The guidance was effective for calendar year-end public companies beginning in the first quarter of 2013 with application on a prospective basis. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's financial condition, results of operations or disclosures.

Certain amounts reported in previous consolidated financial statements have been reclassified in the accompanying consolidated financial statements to conform to the current year's presentation, primarily to reclassify the two properties that were sold in February 2014 to properties held-for-sale at December 31, 2012 and to reclassify the operations of these properties to discontinued operations for all years presented.

The following chart details the Company's real estate acquisitions during 2013 and 2012 (amounts in thousands):

Description of Property	Date Acquired	Contract Purchase Price		Terms of Payment(a)	Third Party Real Estate Acquisition Costs(b)

Kmart retail store, Clemmons, North Carolina(c)	March 22, 2013	$	4,640	All cash	$	119
Shutterfly flex facility, Fort Mill, South Carolina	July 1, 2013		15,500	Cash and $9,300 mortgage(d)		124
Texas Land & Cattle restaurant, Killeen, Texas	July 30, 2013		2,020	All cash		—	(e)
Hooters restaurant, Concord, North Carolina	August 1, 2013		2,469	All cash		15
TRISUN Health Care—assisted living facility, Round Rock, Texas	August 6, 2013		22,800	Cash and $15,275 mortgage(f)		321
Hooters restaurant, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina	September 3, 2013		2,635	All cash		33
Joe's Crab Shack restaurant, Ann Arbor, Michigan	September 12, 2013		2,980	All cash		31
FedEx Express facility, Indianapolis, Indiana	September 13, 2013		9,270	All cash		39
Northern Tool & Equipment distribution facility, Fort Mill, South Carolina	September 18, 2013		39,195	Cash and $27,300 mortgage(g)		91
TGIF restaurant, Greensboro, North Carolina	December 3, 2013		3,003	All cash		—	(e)
TGIF restaurant, Richmond, Virginia	December 3, 2013		3,017	All cash		—	(e)
Other(h)			—			148


Totals for 2013		$	107,529		$	921

Description of Property	Date Acquired	Contract Purchase Price		Terms of Payment(a)	Third Party Real Estate Acquisition Costs(b)

Urban Outfitters retail store, Lawrence, Kansas	February 7, 2012	$	1,230	All cash	$	21
Three Applebee's restaurants, Carrollton, Kennesaw and Cartersville, Georgia	March 12, 2012		8,568	All cash		84
Avalon Carpet Tile and Flooring, retail store and warehouse, Deptford, New Jersey(i)	April 24, 2012		2,200	Cash and $2,040 mortgage(j)		—	(i)
Applebee's restaurant, Lawrenceville, Georgia	May 17, 2012		2,340	All cash		19
FedEx Facility, Pinellas Park, Florida	October 11, 2012		2,810	All cash		28	(k)
Walgreens Pharmacy, Cape Girardeau, Missouri(l)	October 25, 2012		2,268	All cash		92
Shopping Center, Houston, Texas(m)	November 13, 2012		7,150	Cash and $5,100 mortgage(n)		206
LA Fitness Health Club, Secaucus, New Jersey	December 12, 2012		16,400	Cash and $10,000 mortgage(o)		341
FedEx Facility, Miamisburg, Ohio	December 26, 2012		1,650	All cash		6	(k)
Other(h)			—			26


Totals for 2012		$	44,616		$	823

The following chart provides the allocation of the purchase price for the Company's real estate acquisitions during 2013 and 2012 (amounts in thousands):

							Intangible Lease

					Building Improvements		Intangible Lease
Description of Property	Land		Building		Building Improvements		Asset			Liability			Total
Kmart retail store, Clemmons, North Carolina	$	2,496	$	2,553	$	653	$	425		$	(1,487	)	$	4,640
Shutterfly flex facility, Fort Mill, South Carolina		1,841		12,353		335		1,546			(575	)		15,500
Texas Land & Cattle restaurant, Killeen, Texas		1,263		739		64		—			—			2,066	(a)
Hooters restaurant, Concord, North Carolina		999		954		122		394			—			2,469
TRISUN Health Care—assisted living facility, Round Rock, Texas		1,678		16,577		93		4,452			—			22,800
Hooters restaurant, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina		1,102		1,090		71		372			—			2,635
Joe's Crab Shack restaurant, Ann Arbor, Michigan		1,098		1,338		122		422			—			2,980
FedEx Express facility, Indianapolis, Indiana		1,224		6,438		498		1,222			(112	)		9,270
Northern Tool & Equipment distribution facility, Fort Mill, South Carolina		1,804		31,635		2,014		3,742			—			39,195
TGIF restaurant, Greensboro, North Carolina		1,768		1,054		183		—			—			3,005	(a)
TGIF restaurant, Richmond, Virginia		1,678		1,184		157		—			—			3,019	(a)


Subtotals		16,951		75,915		4,312		12,575			(2,174	)		107,579
Other(b)		—		—		—		(951	)		(36	)		(987	)


Totals for 2013	$	16,951	$	75,915	$	4,312	$	11,624		$	(2,210	)	$	106,592

							Intangible Lease

					Building Improvements		Intangible Lease
Description of Property	Land		Building		Building Improvements		Asset		Liability			Total
Urban Outfitters retail store, Lawrence, Kansas	$	134	$	937	$	—	$	169	$	(10	)	$	1,230
Three Applebee's restaurants, Carrollton, Kennesaw and Cartersville, Georgia		2,284		3,439		281		2,564		—			8,568
Applebee's restaurant, Lawrenceville, Georgia		804		739		43		754		—			2,340
Avalon Carpet Tile and Flooring, retail store and warehouse, Deptford, New Jersey		556		1,605		129				—			2,290	(c)
FedEx Facility, Pinellas Park, Florida		1,231		1,607		62		94		(100	)		2,894	(d)
Walgreens Pharmacy, Cape Girardeau, Missouri		545		1,478		69		379		(203	)		2,268
Shopping Center, Houston, Texas		3,122		3,589		180		534		(275	)		7,150
LA Fitness Health Club, Secaucus, New Jersey		5,660		8,830		25		1,885		—			16,400
FedEx Facility, Miamisburg, Ohio		165		1,248		100		262		—			1,775	(d)


Totals for 2012	$	14,501	$	23,472	$	889	$	6,641	$	(588	)	$	44,915

All of the properties purchased in 2013 and 2012 are (i) currently 100% occupied, other than the Houston, Texas property which is 91% occupied and (ii) leased by a single tenant pursuant to a long term net lease, other than the Northern Tool property, which is jointly leased by two companies under common ownership and the Houston, Texas property, which has 17 tenant spaces.

As a result of the 2013 and 2012 purchases, the Company recorded intangible lease assets of $11,624,000 and $6,641,000, respectively, and intangible lease liabilities of $2,210,000 and $588,000, respectively, representing the value of the acquired leases and origination costs. As of December 31, 2013, the weighted average amortization period for the 2013 and 2012 acquisitions is 13.2 and 16.8 years for the intangible lease assets and 6.0 and 16.2 years for the intangible lease liabilities, respectively.

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, accumulated amortization of intangible lease assets was $7,054,000 and $4,974,000, respectively and accumulated amortization of intangible lease liabilities was $3,099,000 and $2,505,000, respectively.

The Company recognized a net increase (decrease) in rental revenue of $160,000, $(2,000) and $(26,000) for the amortization of the above/below market leases for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

For 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized amortization expense of $1,647,000, $1,006,000 and $844,000, respectively, relating to the amortization of the origination costs.

The unamortized balance of intangible lease assets as a result of acquired above market leases at December 31, 2013 will be deducted from rental income through 2032 as follows (amounts in thousands):

The unamortized balance of intangible lease liabilities as a result of acquired below market leases at December 31, 2013 will be added to rental income through 2055 as follows (amounts in thousands):

The unamortized balance of origination costs associated with in-place leases at December 31, 2013 will be charged to amortization expense through 2055 as follows (amounts in thousands):

The minimum future contractual rents (without taking into consideration straight-line rent or amortization of intangibles) to be received over the next five years and thereafter on the operating leases in effect at December 31, 2013 are as follows (amounts in thousands):

The rental properties owned at December 31, 2013 are leased under noncancellable operating leases with current expirations ranging from 2014 to 2033, with certain tenant renewal rights. Substantially all lease agreements are net lease arrangements which require the tenant to pay rent and substantially all the expenses of the leased property including maintenance, taxes, utilities and insurance. For certain properties, the tenants pay the Company, in addition to the contractual base rent, their pro rata share of real estate taxes and operating expenses. Certain lease agreements provide for periodic rental increases and others provide for increases based on the consumer price index.

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded unbilled rent receivables aggregating $13,743,000 and $12,629,000, respectively, representing rent reported on a straight-line basis in excess of rental payments required under the respective leases. The unbilled rent receivable is to be billed and received pursuant to the lease terms during the next 20 years.

During 2012, the Company wrote off $256,000 of unbilled "straight-line" rent receivable, relating to properties sold during such year.

Discontinued operations include two properties sold in February 2014 that are considered as held-for-sale at December 31, 2013, as well as a total of six properties sold in 2012 and 2011.

Real estate investments are classified as held-for-sale when management has determined that it has met the criteria established under GAAP. Real estate investments which are held for sale are not depreciated and their operations are included in a separate component of income on the consolidated statements of income under the caption Discontinued Operations.

During 2013, the Company entered into a contract to sell two properties located in Michigan which were sold on February 3, 2014 for a total sales price of $5,177,000, net of closing costs. The net book value of the two properties was $5,177,000 (after recording an impairment charge of $61,700,

representing the loss on sale of the properties) and $5,364,000 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and is included in properties held-for-sale on the accompanying balance sheets. The impairment charge is included in discontinued operations at December 31, 2013.

During 2012, the Company sold two properties located in Florida and leased to Office Depot, two properties located in New York and a property located in Texas. The total sales prices aggregated $36,062,000, net of closing costs, and the Company realized aggregate gains of $19,413,000 which is included in net gain on sales in discontinued operations in the results of operations for 2012.

During 2011, the Company sold a property, leased to Office Depot and located in California, for $11,544,000, net of closing costs, and realized a gain of approximately $932,000, which is included in net gain on sales in discontinued operations in the results of operations for 2011.

The following summarizes the components of income from discontinued operations (amounts in thousands):

NOTE 5—INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES AND SALES OF JOINT VENTURE PROPERTIES

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had investments in five and seven unconsolidated joint ventures, respectively, each of which owned and operated one property. The Company's equity investment in such unconsolidated joint ventures at such dates totaled $4,906,000 and $19,485,000, respectively. In addition to the $4,705,000 gain on sale of the two properties in 2013 described below, the Company recorded equity in earnings of $651,000, $1,368,000 and $914,000 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

In February 2012, the Company entered into a joint venture with an affiliate of Trammell Crow Company pursuant to which the Company contributed a property located in Plano, Texas to the joint venture in exchange for a 90% equity interest therein, and Trammell Crow contributed $1,500,000 in exchange for a 10% equity interest therein which resulted in a $319,000 gain to the Company. In February 2013, Trammell Crow exercised its right to purchase the Company's 90% equity interest in the unconsolidated joint venture for $13,500,000. The sale was completed in April 2013 and the Company recorded a gain of $1,898,000.

NOTE 5—INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES AND SALES OF JOINT VENTURE PROPERTIES (Continued)

In May 2013, a property located in Los Angeles, California and owned by the Company and another entity as tenants-in-common, accounted for as an unconsolidated joint venture, was sold for $25,000,000, of which our share was $12,500,000. The Company recorded a $2,807,000 gain on this sale in 2013 and incurred a $148,000 expense, representing its share of the related mortgage prepayment penalty. The Company received net proceeds of $4,630,000 from the sale transaction.

At December 31, 2013, there were 51 outstanding mortgages payable, all of which are secured by first liens on individual real estate investments with an aggregate carrying value of $459,760,000 before accumulated depreciation of $57,748,000. After giving effect to the interest rate swap agreements (see Note 7), the mortgage payments bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 3.13% to 8.80%, and mature between 2014 and 2037. The weighted average interest rate on all mortgage debt was 5.22% and 5.25% at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Scheduled principal repayments during the next five years and thereafter are as follows (amounts in thousands):

The Company has a $75,000,000 revolving credit facility with Manufacturer's & Trader's Trust Company, VNB New York Corp., Bank Leumi USA and Israel Discount Bank of New York. This facility matures March 31, 2015 and provides for an interest rate equal to the greater of (i) 90 day LIBOR plus 3% (3.25% at December 31, 2013), and (ii) 4.75% per annum, and an unused facility fee of .25% per annum. At December 31, 2013 and March 12, 2014, there were outstanding balances of $23,250,000 and $12,850,000, respectively, under the facility.

The credit facility includes certain restrictions and covenants which may limit, among other things, the incurrence of liens, and which require compliance with financial ratios relating to, among other things, minimum amount of tangible net worth, minimum amount of debt service coverage, minimum amount of fixed charge coverage, maximum amount of debt to value, minimum level of net income, certain investment limitations and minimum value of unencumbered properties and the number of such properties. The Company was in compliance with all covenants at December 31, 2013.

The facility is guaranteed by subsidiaries of the Company that own unencumbered properties and the Company pledged to the lenders the equity interests in the Company's subsidiaries and delivered to the lenders collateral mortgages with respect to certain unencumbered properties owned by the Company or its subsidiaries. The facility is available for the acquisition of commercial real estate, repayment of mortgage debt, property improvements and general working capital purposes; provided, that if used for property improvements and working capital purposes, the amount outstanding for such purposes will not exceed the lesser of $15 million and 15% of the borrowing base and if used for working capital purposes, will not exceed $10 million. Net proceeds received from the sale, financing or refinancing of properties are generally required to be used to repay amounts outstanding under the credit facility.

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, escrow, deposits and other assets and receivables, and accrued expenses and other liabilities are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis, but are considered to be recorded at amounts that approximate fair value.

At December 31, 2013, the $283,142,000 estimated fair value of the Company's mortgages payable is more than their carrying value by approximately $5,097,000 assuming a blended market interest rate of 5% based on the 9.0 year weighted average remaining term of the mortgages. At December 31, 2012, the $233,170,000 estimated fair value of the Company's mortgages payable is more than their carrying value by approximately $7,199,000 assuming a blended market interest rate of 4.8% based on the 9.2 year weighted average remaining term of the mortgages.

At December 31, 2013, the $23,250,000 carrying amount of the Company's line of credit approximates its fair value.

The fair values of the Company's mortgages payable and line of credit are estimated using unobservable inputs such as available market information and discounted cash flow analysis based on borrowing rates the Company believes it could obtain with similar terms and maturities. These fair value measurements fall within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair value. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

The fair value of the Company's available-for-sale securities and derivative financial instruments was determined using the following inputs (amounts in thousands):

The Company does not currently own any financial instruments that are classified as Level 3.

At December 31, 2013, the Company's available-for-sale securities were as follows: (i) a $262,000 investment in 37,081 shares of BRT Realty Trust and (ii) a $20,000 investment in other equity securities (included in other assets on the balance sheet). The aggregate cost of these securities was $138,000 and unrealized gains on such securities were $144,000. Such unrealized gains were included in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the balance sheet. Fair values are approximated on current market quotes from financial sources that track such securities.

During 2013 and 2012, the Company sold certain available-for-sale securities for gross proceeds of $19,000 and $373,000, respectively, and recognized gains of $6,000 and $9,000, respectively. At December 31, 2011, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $126,000 (net against "Other income (loss)" on the income statement) on the securities sold in 2012.

Fair values are approximated using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of the derivatives. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities.

Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with it use Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads, to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself

and its counterparty. As of December 31, 2013, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Company determined that its derivative valuation is classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

As of December 31, 2013, the Company had entered into twelve interest rate derivatives, all of which were interest rate swaps, related to twelve outstanding mortgage loans with an aggregate $69,173,000 notional amount and mature between 2014 and 2024 (weighted average maturity of 6.6 years). Such interest rate swaps, all of which were designated as cash flow hedges, converted Libor based variable rate mortgages to fixed annual rate mortgages with interest rates ranging from 3.55% to 6.50% (weighted average interest rate of 5.05%). The fair value of the Company's derivatives designated as hedging instruments in asset and liability positions reflected as other assets or other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets were $265,000 and $774,000, respectively, at December 31, 2013 and $0 and $1,470,000, respectively, at December 31, 2012.

Two of the Company's unconsolidated joint ventures, in which a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company is a 50% partner, had an interest rate derivative outstanding at December 31, 2013 with a notional amount of $3,798,000. The interest rate derivative, which was entered into in March 2011, has an interest rate of 5.81% and matures in April 2018.

The following table presents the effect of the Company's derivative financial instruments on the statement of income for the periods presented (amounts in thousands):

No gain or loss was recognized with respect to hedge ineffectiveness or to amounts excluded from effectiveness testing on the Company's cash flow hedges for the three years ended December 31, 2013. During the twelve months ending December 31, 2014, the Company estimates an additional $1,458,000 will be reclassified from other comprehensive income as an increase to interest expense.

The derivative agreements in effect at December 31, 2013 provide that if the wholly owned subsidiary of the Company which is a party to the agreement defaults or is capable of being declared in default on any of its indebtedness, then a default can be declared on such subsidiary's derivative obligation. In addition, the Company is a party to one of the derivative agreements and if the subsidiary defaults on the loan subject to such agreement and if there are swap breakage losses on

account of the derivative being terminated early, the Company could be held liable for interest rate swap breakage losses, if any.

As of December 31, 2013, the fair value of the derivatives in the liability position, including accrued interest and excluding any adjustments for nonperformance risk was approximately $817,000. In the unlikely event that the Company breaches any of the contractual provisions of the derivative contracts, it would be required to settle its obligations thereunder at their termination liability value of $817,000. Such amount is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities at December 31, 2013.

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, Gould Investors L.P. ("Gould"), a related party, owned 1,597,304 and 1,524,009 shares of the outstanding common stock of the Company or approximately 10.2% in each year. During 2013, Gould purchased 69,595 shares of the Company's stock through the Company's dividend reinvestment plan and 3,700 shares of the Company's stock in the open market. During 2012, Gould purchased 73,038 shares of the Company's stock through the Company's dividend reinvestment plan and 301 shares of the Company's stock in the open market.

Effective as of January 1, 2007, the Company entered into a compensation and services agreement with Majestic Property Management Corp. ("Majestic"), a company wholly-owned by the Company's Vice Chairman and in which certain of the Company's executive officers are officers and from which they receive compensation. Under the agreement, Majestic assumed the Company's obligations to make payments to Gould (and other affiliated entities) under a shared services agreement and agreed to provide to the Company the services of all affiliated executive, administrative, legal, accounting and clerical personnel that the Company had used prior to 2007 on an as needed, part time basis and for which the Company had reimbursed an allocated portion of the payroll expenses of such personnel in accordance with the shared services agreement. Commencing January 1, 2007, the Company no longer incurs any allocated expenses. Under the compensation and services agreement, Majestic (or its affiliates) continues to provide to the Company certain property management services (including construction supervisory services), property acquisition, sales and leasing services and mortgage brokerage services that it has provided to the Company prior to 2007, some of which were capitalized, deferred or reduced net sales proceeds in prior years. The Company does not incur any fees or expenses for such services except for the annual fees described below.

In consideration for providing to the Company the services described above, the Company paid Majestic an annual fee of $2,725,000 in each of 2013, 2012 and 2011, in equal monthly installments, of which $600,000 of property management costs is allocated annually to real estate expenses. Majestic credits against the fees due to it under the agreement any management or other fees received by it from any joint venture in which the Company is a joint venture partner (exclusive of fees that were paid by our joint venture partner on a property located in Los Angeles, California until its sale in May 2013). The agreement also provides for an additional payment to Majestic of $175,000 in 2013, 2012 and 2011 for the Company's share of all direct office expenses, such as rent, telephone, postage, computer services and internet usage, previously allocated to the Company under the shared services agreement. The annual payment the Company makes to Majestic is negotiated each year by the Company and Majestic, and is approved by the Company's independent directors.

Executive officers and others providing services under the compensation and services agreement also receive awards of shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units under the Company's stock incentive plans (described in Note 9). The costs of the plans charged to the Company's operations applicable to the executive officers and others providing services under the compensation and services agreement amounted to $867,000, $743,000 and $603,000 in 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.

In addition to its share of rent included in the $175,000 payment to Majestic, the Company leased additional space in the same building, and paid a subsidiary of Gould, an annual rent of $41,000 in each of 2013 and 2012, and $47,000 in 2011.

The Company also pays a fee of $250,000 and $100,000 per annum to the Company's chairman and vice-chairman, respectively.

Except for the $600,000 of real estate expenses described above, the fees paid under the compensation and services agreement, the chairman and vice-chairman fees and the rent expense are included in general and administrative expense in 2013, 2012 and 2011.

The Company's 2012 Incentive Plan, approved by the Company's stockholders in June 2012, permits the Company to grant, among other things, stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance share awards and any one or more of the foregoing to its employees, officers, directors and consultants. A maximum of 600,000 shares of the Company's common stock is authorized for issuance pursuant to this Plan, of which 112,650 have been issued and 50 have vested. An aggregate of 557,415 shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units are outstanding under the Company's 2003 and 2009 equity incentive plans (collectively, the "Prior Plans") and have not yet vested. No additional awards may be granted under the Prior Plans.

The restricted stock grants are charged to general and administrative expense over the respective vesting periods based on the market value of the common stock on the grant date. Substantially all restricted stock awards made to date provide for vesting upon the fifth anniversary of the date of grant and under certain circumstances may vest earlier. For accounting purposes, the restricted stock is not included in the shares shown as outstanding on the balance sheet until they vest; however dividends are paid on the unvested shares.

On September 14, 2010, the Board of Directors approved a Pay-For-Performance Program under the Company's 2009 Incentive Plan and awarded 200,000 performance share awards in the form of restricted stock units (the "Units"), half of which were awarded to full time employees of the Company. The other half were awarded to part time officers of the Company who are compensated through the compensation and services agreement, some of whom are also officers of Majestic Property Management Corp. The holders of Units are not entitled to dividends or to vote the underlying shares until the Units vest and shares are issued. Accordingly, for financial statement purposes, the shares underlying the Units are not included in the shares shown as outstanding on the balance sheet. If the defined performance criteria are satisfied in full at June 30, 2017, one share of the Company's common stock will vest and be issued for each Unit outstanding and a pro-rata portion of the Units will vest and

be issued if the performance criteria fall between defined ranges. In the event that the performance criteria are not satisfied in whole or in part at June 30, 2017, the unvested Units will be forfeited and no shares of the Company's common stock will be issued for those Units. For the awards which vest based on total stockholder return, a third party appraiser prepared a Monte Carlo simulation pricing model to determine the fair value. For the awards which vest based on return on capital, the fair value is based on the market value on the date of grant. Expense is not recognized on the Units which the Company does not expect to vest as a result of service conditions or the Company's performance expectations. The average per Unit grant price of the 200,000 units granted is $11.74. The total amount recorded as deferred compensation is $779,000 and is being charged to general and administrative expense over the approximate seven year vesting period. The deferred compensation expense to be recognized is net of certain forfeiture and performance assumptions (which are re-evaluated quarterly). No Units were forfeited or vested during 2013, 2012 and 2011.

As of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 there were no options outstanding under the Company's equity incentive plans.

The following is a summary of the activity of the equity incentive plans (excluding, except as otherwise noted, the 200,000 Units):

	Years Ended December 31,

	2013			2012			2011
Restricted share grants		112,650			109,450			74,040
Average per share grant price	$	21.59		$	16.77		$	16.19
Deferred compensation to be recognized over vesting period	$	2,432,000		$	1,835,000		$	1,199,000
Non-vested shares:
Non-vested beginning of period		407,460			348,385			320,940
Grants		112,650			109,450			74,040
Vested during period		(50,095	)		(49,325	)		(46,450	)
Forfeitures		—			(1,050	)		(145	)


Non-vested end of period		470,015			407,460			348,385




Average per share value of non-vested shares (based on grant price)	$	14.22		$	12.59		$	12.96




Value of shares vested during the year (based on grant price)	$	876,000		$	1,208,000		$	960,000




Average value of shares forfeited (based on grant price)	$	—		$	13.65		$	11.03

The total charge to operations for all incentive plans, including the 200,000 Units, is as follows:

As of December 31, 2013, there were approximately $4,219,000 of total compensation costs related to nonvested awards that have not yet been recognized, including $401,000 related to the Pay-for-Performance Program (net of forfeiture and performance assumptions which are re-evaluated quarterly). These compensation costs will be charged to general and administrative expense over the remaining respective vesting periods. The weighted average vesting period is approximately 2.6 years.

In 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company declared an aggregate $1.42, $1.34 and $1.32 per share in cash distributions, respectively.

The Company's Dividend Reinvestment Plan (the "Plan") provides stockholders with the opportunity to reinvest all, or a portion of, their cash dividends paid on the Company's common stock in additional shares of its common stock, at a discount of up to 5% from the market price. The discount is determined in the Company's sole discretion. The Company is currently offering up to a 5% discount from market. The Company issued 210,000, 215,000 and 255,000 common shares under the Plan during 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

On August 9, 2012, the Company entered into an equity offering sales agreement to sell shares of the Company's common stock from time to time with an aggregate sales price of up to $50,000,000, through an "at the market" equity offering program. During 2013, the Company sold 363,463 shares for proceeds of $9,227,800, net of commissions of $93,000, and incurred offering costs of $63,000. During 2012, the Company sold 120,844 shares for proceeds of $2,296,000, net of commissions of $23,000 and incurring offering costs of $165,000.

On February 11, 2011, the Company sold 2,700,000 shares of its common stock and received net proceeds of approximately $40,569,000. The proceeds were used to repay two mortgages in the aggregate amount of $7,700,000 having a weighted average interest rate of 7.9%, to reduce the amount outstanding under the line of credit by $26,200,000, to purchase a property in March 2011 for $2,325,000 and for general corporate purposes.

In June 2011, with a payment of $7,634,000, the Company paid off the $8,893,000 principal balance of the mortgage secured by a property previously leased to a tenant which vacated the property in June 2011 in the course of its liquidation after filing for bankruptcy protection in early 2011. The $1,240,000 gain on settlement of debt is net of a $19,000 write off of the remaining balance of related deferred mortgage costs. The property was tested for impairment in June 2011 and it was determined that no charge was required. As described in Note 5, the Company contributed this property to an

unconsolidated joint venture and then sold its equity interest in the venture for a gain of $1,898,000 in April 2013.

The Company maintains a non-contributory defined contribution pension plan covering eligible employees. Contributions by the Company are made through a money purchase plan, based upon a percent of the qualified employees' total salary (subject to the maximum amount allowed by law). Pension expense approximated $147,000, $128,000 and $119,000 for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The Company pays, with respect to one of its real estate properties, annual fixed leasehold rent of $296,875 through July 2014 with 25% increases every five years through March 3, 2020. The Company has the right to extend the lease for up to five 5-year and one seven month renewal options.

In the ordinary course of business the Company is party to various legal actions which management believes are routine in nature and incidental to the operation of the Company's business. Management believes that the outcome of the proceedings will not have a material adverse effect upon the Company's consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.

The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 1983. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% of its adjusted taxable income to its stockholders. It is management's current intention to adhere to these requirements and maintain the Company's REIT status. As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to corporate level federal, state and local income tax on taxable income it distributes currently to its stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to federal, state and local income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years. Even though the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company is subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property, and to federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed taxable income.

Reconciliation between Financial Statement Net Income and Federal Taxable Income:

The following unaudited table reconciles financial statement net income to federal taxable income for the years indicated (amounts in thousands):

The following unaudited table reconciles cash dividends paid with the dividends paid deduction for the years indicated (amounts in thousands):

Subsequent events have been evaluated and except as disclosed below and in Note 4 (Sales of Properties), there were no other events relative to our consolidated financial statements that require additional disclosure.

On January 15, 2014, 118,850 shares were issued as restricted share grants having an aggregate value of approximately $2,478,000 and will vest in January 2019.

On March 13, 2014, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $.37 per share on the Company's common stock, totaling $5,872,000. The quarterly dividend is payable on April 3, 2014 to stockholders of record on March 25, 2014.

	Quarter Ended

	Quarter Ended											Total For Year
2013	March 31			June 30			Sept. 30			Dec. 31		Total For Year
Rental revenues as previously reported	$	12,102		$	12,227		$	13,214		$	14,166	$	51,709
Revenues from discontinued operations(a)		(240	)		(246	)		(244	)		—		(730	)


Revenues	$	11,862		$	11,981		$	12,970		$	14,166	$	50,979




Income from continuing operations(b)	$	3,313		$	7,607		$	3,084		$	3,405	$	17,409
Income from discontinued operations(b)		136			145			144			90		515


Net income	$	3,449		$	7,752		$	3,228		$	3,495	$	17,924




Net income attributable to One Liberty Properties, Inc.	$	3,450		$	7,736		$	3,211		$	3,478	$	17,875




Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic:		14,672			14,844			15,093			15,178		14,948




Diluted:		14,772			14,944			15,193			15,278		15,048




Basic:
Income from continuing operations(b)	$	.21		$	.50		$	.19		$	.21	$	1.12	(c)
Income from discontinued operations(b)		.01			.01			.01			.01		.03	(c)


Net income	$	.22		$	.51		$	.20		$	.22	$	1.15




Diluted:
Income from continuing operations(b)	$	.21		$	.49		$	.19		$	.21	$	1.11	(c)
Income from discontinued operations(b)		.01			.01			.01			.01		.03	(c)


Net income	$	.22		$	.50		$	.20		$	.22	$	1.14

	Quarter Ended

	Quarter Ended												Total For Year
2012	March 31			June 30			Sept. 30			Dec. 31			Total For Year
Rental revenues as previously reported	$	10,758		$	11,102		$	11,333		$	11,557		$	44,750
Revenues from discontinued operations(d)		(237	)		(240	)		(240	)		(240	)		(957	)


Revenues	$	10,521		$	10,862		$	11,093		$	11,317		$	43,793




Income from continuing operations(e)	$	2,833		$	3,137		$	2,867		$	2,491		$	11,328
Income from discontinued operations(e)		393			2,617			15,553			2,417			20,980


Net income	$	3,226		$	5,754		$	18,420		$	4,908		$	32,308




Net income attributable to One Liberty Properties, Inc.	$	3,223		$	5,750		$	18,414		$	4,933		$	32,320




Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic:		14,289			14,378			14,443			14,596			14,427




Diluted:		14,389			14,478			14,543			14,696			14,527




Basic:
Income from continuing operations(e)	$	.19		$	.21		$	.19		$	.16		$	.77	(f)
Income from discontinued operations(e)		.03			.18			1.05			.17			1.41	(f)


Net income	$	.22		$	.39		$	1.24		$	.33		$	2.18




Diluted:
Income from continuing operations(e)	$	.19		$	.21		$	.19		$	.16		$	.76	(f)
Income from discontinued operations(e)		.02			.18			1.04			.17			1.40	(f)


Net income	$	.21		$	.39		$	1.23		$	.33		$	2.16

ONE LIBERTY PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Schedule III—Consolidated Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2013
(Amounts in Thousands)

								Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition		Gross Amount at Which Carried at December 31, 2013

				Initial Cost to Company						Gross Amount at Which Carried at December 31, 2013
						Building and Improvements						Building & Improvements				Accumulated Depreciation(1)		Date of Construction	Date Acquired
Type	Location	Encumbrances		Land		Building and Improvements		Improvements		Land		Building & Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation(1)		Date of Construction	Date Acquired
Flex	Hauppauge, NY	$	8,668	$	1,952	$	10,954	$	—	$	1,952	$	10,954	$	12,906	$	3,571	1982	2000
Flex	Ronkonkoma, NY		3,797		1,042		4,171		1,117		1,042		5,288		6,330		1,541	1986	2000
Flex	Fort Mill, SC		9,212		1,840		12,687		—		1,840		12,687		14,527		161	1992	2013
Health Clubs	Tucker, GA		5,083		807		3,027		3,126		807		6,153		6,960		1,603	1988	2002
Health Clubs	Grand Rapids, MI(5)		1,821		912		3,649		—		906		3,625		4,531		1,209	1972	2000
Health Clubs	Grand Rapids, MI(5)		953		513		2,053		—		507		2,029		2,536		680	1968	2000
Health Clubs	Secaucus, NJ		9,809		5,449		9,873		—		5,449		9,873		15,322		258	1986	2012
Health Clubs	Hamilton, OH		3,804		1,483		5,953		—		1,483		5,953		7,436		408	2008	2011
Industrial	West Palm Beach, FL		—		181		724		—		181		724		905		275	1973	1998
Industrial	Pinellas Park, FL		—		1,231		1,669		—		1,231		1,669		2,900		73	1995	2012
Industrial	Indianapolis, IN		—		1,224		6,935		—		1,224		6,935		8,159		68	1997	2013
Industrial	Baltimore, MD(2)		21,480		6,474		25,282		—		6,474		25,282		31,756		4,451	1960	2006
Industrial	Saco, ME		3,280		1,027		3,623		—		1,027		3,623		4,650		698	2001	2006
Industrial	Durham, NC		2,106		1,043		2,404		—		1,043		2,404		3,447		177	1991	2011
Industrial	Melville, NY		—		774		3,029		799		774		3,828		4,602		893	1982	2003
Industrial	New Hyde Park, NY		—		182		728		33		182		761		943		273	1960	1999
Industrial	Columbus, OH		—		435		1,703		—		435		1,703		2,138		564	1979	1995
Industrial	Miamisburg, OH		848		165		1,348		9		165		1,357		1,522		41	1987	2012
Industrial	Philadelphia, PA		5,626		1,981		7,668		—		1,981		7,668		9,649		1,701	1964	2005
Industrial	Fort Mill, SC		27,177		1,804		33,650		—		1,804		33,650		35,454		348	1997	2013
Office	Parsippany, NJ		13,836		6,055		23,300		1,826		6,055		25,126		31,181		5,130	1997	2005
Office	Brooklyn, NY		5,473		1,381		5,447		2,867		1,381		8,314		9,695		2,782	1973	1998
Retail	Denver, CO		2,963		780		3,248		413		780		3,661		4,441		1,506	1995	1996
Retail	West Hartford, CT		—		2,881		94		47		2,881		141		3,022		32	N/A	2010
Retail	West Hartford, CT		12,598		9,296		5,071		279		9,296		5,350		14,646		469	2005	2010
Retail	Newark, DE		1,999		935		3,643		10		935		3,653		4,588		945	1996	2003
Retail	Ft. Myers, FL		3,075		1,013		4,054		—		1,013		4,054		5,067		1,736	1995	1996
Retail	Naples, FL(3)		—		3,070		2,846		—		3,070		2,846		5,916		376	1992	2008
Retail	Athens, GA(3)		2,757		1,130		4,340		—		1,130		4,340		5,470		1,044	2003	2004
Retail	Atlanta, GA		1,531		803		3,211		—		803		3,211		4,014		1,395	1994	1996
Retail	Carrollton, GA		1,737		796		1,458		—		796		1,458		2,254		77	1996	2012
Retail	Cartersville, GA		1,642		786		1,346		—		786		1,346		2,132		76	1995	2012
Retail	Duluth, GA(4)		1,817		778		3,436		—		778		3,436		4,214		664	1987	2006
Retail	Fayetteville, GA(4)		2,278		976		4,308		—		976		4,308		5,284		830	1987	2006
Retail	Kennesaw, GA(3)		—		1,501		4,349		—		1,501		4,349		5,850		575	1995	2008

								Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition		Gross Amount at Which Carried at December 31, 2013

				Initial Cost to Company						Gross Amount at Which Carried at December 31, 2013
						Building and Improvements						Building & Improvements				Accumulated Depreciation(1)		Date of Construction	Date Acquired
Type	Location	Encumbrances		Land		Building and Improvements		Improvements		Land		Building & Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation(1)		Date of Construction	Date Acquired
Retail	Kennesaw, GA		1,346		702		916		—		702		916		1,618		51	1989	2012
Retail	Lawrenceville, GA		1,292		866		899		—		866		899		1,765		62	1988	2012
Retail	Bolingbrook, IL		—		834		1,887		—		834		1,887		2,721		133	2001	2011
Retail	Champaign, IL		1,857		791		3,165		274		791		3,439		4,230		1,203	1985	1999
Retail	Chicago, IL(3)		—		3,877		2,256		—		3,877		2,256		6,133		298	1994	2008
Retail	Crystal Lake, IL		1,978		615		1,899		—		615		1,899		2,514		144	1997	2011
Retail	Gurnee, IL		2,447		834		3,635		—		834		3,635		4,469		663	1994	2006
Retail	Niles, IL		3,315		843		3,485		—		843		3,485		4,328		231	1995	2011
Retail	Lawrence, KS		—		134		938		—		134		938		1,072		44	1915	2012
Retail	Wichita, KS(4)		2,774		1,189		5,248		—		1,189		5,248		6,437		1,011	1996	2006
Retail	Lexington, KY(4)		1,867		800		3,532		—		800		3,532		4,332		681	1999	2006
Retail	Bastrop, LA		1,013		378		1,465		—		378		1,465		1,843		261	1995	2006
Retail	Kentwood, LA		985		368		1,425		—		368		1,425		1,793		254	1995	2006
Retail	Lake Charles, LA(3)		—		1,167		4,669		378		1,167		5,047		6,214		1,348	1998	2002
Retail	Monroe, LA		1,013		378		1,465		—		378		1,465		1,843		262	1995	2006
Retail	Monroe, LA		967		361		1,399		—		361		1,399		1,760		250	1995	2006
Retail	Everett, MA		1,291		1,935		—		—		1,935		0		1,935		—	N/A	2008
Retail	Hyannis, MA		1,036		802		2,324		—		802		2,324		3,126		346	1998	2008
Retail	Marston Mills, MA		434		461		2,313		—		461		2,313		2,774		340	1998	2008
Retail	Somerville, MA		1,945		510		1,993		23		510		2,016		2,526		547	1993	2003
Retail	Ann Arbor, MI		1,490		1,098		1,460		—		1,098		1,460		2,558		14	1998	2013
Retail	Kansas City, MO		4,231		2,958		5,691		—		2,958		5,691		8,649		504	2004	2010
Retail	Cape Girardeau, MO		—		545		1,547		—		545		1,547		2,092		53	1994	2012
Retail	D'lberville, MS		985		368		1,425		—		368		1,425		1,793		254	1995	2006
Retail	Flowood, MS		1,049		392		1,517		—		392		1,517		1,909		269	1995	2006
Retail	Vicksburg, MS		958		358		1,385		—		358		1,385		1,743		245	1985	2006
Retail	Vicksburg, MS		1,168		436		1,689		—		436		1,689		2,125		301	1995	2006
Retail	Cary, NC(3)		—		1,129		3,736		—		1,129		3,736		4,865		494	1995	2008
Retail	Clemmons, NC		2,500		2,496		3,205		—		2,496		3,205		5,701		90	1993	2013
Retail	Concord, NC		—		999		1,076		—		999		1,076		2,075		12	2000	2013
Retail	Greensboro, NC		—		1,768		1,237		—		1,768		1,237		3,005		2	1983	2013
Retail	Cherry Hill, NJ		7,542		3,584		2,794		4,850		3,584		7,644		11,228		634	2000	2011
Retail	Deptford, NJ		1,970		572		1,779		705		572		2,484		3,056		150	1981	2012
Retail	Batavia, NY(3)		—		515		2,061		—		515		2,061		2,576		766	1998	1999
Retail	Hauppauge, NY		1,965		725		2,963		—		725		2,963		3,688		602	1992	2005
Retail	Island Park, NY		1,112		1,235		1,355		—		1,235		1,355		2,590		124	1947	2010
Retail	Selden, NY		3,264		572		2,287		150		572		2,437		3,009		888	1997	1999
Retail	Columbus, OH		—		1,445		5,431		350		1,445		5,781		7,226		2,330	1996	1997
Retail	Eugene, OR(3)		—		1,952		2,096		—		1,952		2,096		4,048		277	1994	2008
Retail	Gettysburg, PA		914		754		704		—		754		704		1,458		59	1991	2010
Retail	Hanover, PA		892		736		686		—		736		686		1,422		58	1992	2010

								Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition		Gross Amount at Which Carried at December 31, 2013

				Initial Cost to Company						Gross Amount at Which Carried at December 31, 2013
						Building and Improvements						Building & Improvements				Accumulated Depreciation(1)		Date of Construction	Date Acquired
Type	Location	Encumbrances		Land		Building and Improvements		Improvements		Land		Building & Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation(1)		Date of Construction	Date Acquired
Retail	Monroeville, PA		—		450		863		—		450		863		1,313		78	1994	2010
Retail	Palmyra, PA		816		650		650		—		650		650		1,300		56	1981	2010
Retail	Reading, PA		805		655		625		—		655		625		1,280		54	1981	2010
Retail	Reading, PA		793		618		643		—		618		643		1,261		57	1983	2010
Retail	Royersford, PA		16,261		19,538		3,150		404		19,538		3,554		23,092		314	2001	2010
Retail	Trexlertown, PA		777		800		439		—		800		439		1,239		37	1994	2010
Retail	Bluffton, SC(4)		1,374		589		2,600		—		589		2,600		3,189		500	1994	2006
Retail	Myrtle Beach, SC		—		1,102		1,161		—		1,102		1,161		2,263		11	1978	2013
Retail	Knoxville, TN		4,194		2,290		8,855		—		2,290		8,855		11,145		2,168	2003	2004
Retail	Amarillo, TX(4)		2,014		863		3,810		—		863		3,810		4,673		734	1996	2006
Retail	Austin, TX(4)		3,707		1,587		7,010		—		1,587		7,010		8,597		1,353	2001	2006
Retail	El Paso, TX		—		2,821		11,123		321		2,821		11,444		14,265		3,950	1974	2000
Retail	El Paso, TX(3)		—		1,035		2,700		—		1,035		2,700		3,735		357	1993	2008
Retail	Houston, TX		—		396		1,583		—		396		1,583		1,979		622	1997	1998
Retail	Houston, TX		2,750		1,962		1,540		30		1,962		1,570		3,532		138	2006	2010
Retail	Houston, TX		—		2,002		1,800		—		2,002		1,800		3,802		159	2009	2010
Retail	Killeen, TX		—		1,263		803		—		1,263		803		2,066		16	2007	2013
Retail	Rosenberg, TX		—		216		863		67		216		930		1,146		396	1994	1995
Retail	Tyler, TX(4)		2,408		1,031		4,554		—		1,031		4,554		5,585		879	2001	2006
Retail	Houston, TX		4,975		3,122		3,768		52		3,122		3,820		6,942		169	2001	2012
Retail	Newport News, VA(4)		1,753		751		3,316		—		751		3,316		4,067		639	1995	2006
Retail	Richmond, VA		—		1,678		1,341		—		1,678		1,341		3,019		2	1983	2013
Retail	Richmond, VA(4)		2,025		867		3,829		—		867		3,829		4,696		738	1979	2006
Retail	Virginia Beach, VA(4)		1,993		854		3,770		—		854		3,770		4,624		726	1995	2006
Retail	Seattle, WA		—		201		189		—		201		189		390		124	1986	1987
Retail	Onalaska, WI		—		753		3,099		—		753		3,099		3,852		707	1994	2004
Other	Greensboro, NC		5,231		—		8,328		—		0		8,328		8,328		5,033	1999	2004
Other	Round Rock, TX		15,199		1,678		16,670		—		1,678		16,670		18,348		158	2012	2013


TOTALS		$	278,045	$	154,954	$	401,400	$	18,130	$	154,942	$	419,482	$	574,424	$	73,060

Note 1—Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the buildings and improvements, which range from 3 to 40 years.

Note 2—Upon purchase of the property in December 2006, a $416,000 rental income reserve was posted by the seller for the Company's benefit, since the property was not producing sufficient rent at the time of acquisition. The Company recorded the receipt of this rental reserve as a reduction to land and building.

Note 3—These nine properties are retail office supply stores net leased to the same tenant, pursuant to separate leases. Five of these leases contain cross default provisions. They are located in eight states (Illinois, Louisiana, North Carolina, Texas, Georgia, Oregon, New York and Florida).

Note 4—These 11 properties are retail furniture stores covered by one master lease and one loan that is secured by cross—collateralized mortgages. They are located in six states (Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia).

Note 5—These two properties are held-for-sale at December 31, 2013. The Company recorded an impairment charge of $61,700 against these properties at December 31, 2013.

ONE LIBERTY PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Schedule III
Consolidated Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation


ý		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013
Or
o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


MARYLAND (State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		13-3147497 (I.R.S. employer Identification No.)
60 Cutter Mill Road, Great Neck, New York (Address of principal executive offices)		11021 (Zip Code)

Title of each class		Name of exchange on which registered

Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share		New York Stock Exchange


Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer ý		Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a small reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o

Year of Lease Expiration(1)			2014 Contractual Rental Income Under Expiring Leases

2014	11	669,274	$	3,639,171	6.9	%
2015	8	191,099		1,798,687	3.4
2016	14	358,042		3,156,162	6.0
2017	8	89,718		1,781,737	3.4
2018	18	397,147		5,924,158	11.1
2019	5	94,952		1,392,124	2.6
2020	7	181,108		4,305,178	8.1
2021	6	119,260		1,121,779	2.1
2022	8	1,154,724		8,730,507	16.5
2023 and thereafter	29	2,114,914		21,206,503	39.9


	114	5,370,238	$	53,056,006	100	%

Type of Property			2014 Contractual Rental Income

Retail—various	70	58	$	21,290,232	40.1	%
Industrial	9	12		9,283,651	17.5
Retail—furniture(1)	3	13		5,524,110	10.4
Flex	3	3		3,706,785	7.0
Retail—office supply(2)	2	9		3,623,175	6.8
Office	2	2		3,423,441	6.5
Health & fitness	3	5		2,961,524	5.6
Other	2	2		3,243,088	6.1


	94	104	$	53,056,006	100	%

Location	Type of Property				2014 Contractual Rental Income per Square Foot

Lincoln, NE	Retail	40.5	%	112,260	$	10.75
Milwaukee, WI	Industrial	37.8		927,685		1.21
Savannah, GA	Retail	12.3		45,973		7.95
Savannah, GA	Retail	8.3		101,550		2.44
Savannah, GA	Retail	1.1		7,959		4.30


		100	%	1,195,427

State		Our Share of Rent Payable in 2014 to Our Joint Ventures

Nebraska	1	$	603,594	112,260
Wisconsin	1		562,500	927,685
Georgia	3		323,645	155,482


	5	$	1,489,739	1,195,427

YEAR	PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS DUE (Dollars in Thousands)

2014	$	36,172	(1)
2015		14,643
2016		32,679
2017		44,595
2018		18,696
Thereafter		131,260


Total	$	278,045

	2013						2012

Quarter Ended	High		Low		Dividend Per Share(1)		High		Low		Dividend Per Share(1)
March 31	$	24.36	$	20.65	$	.35	$	19.44	$	16.25	$	.33
June 30		27.74		21.28		.35		19.99		16.87		.33
September 30		24.58		19.75		.35		20.36		18.15		.33
December 31		22.24		19.60		.37		20.88		17.52		.35

	December 31,

	2008		2009		2010		2011		2012		2013
OLP	$	100.00	$	106.20	$	217.68	$	233.92	$	308.44	$	326.32
S&P 500		100.00		126.46		145.50		148.58		172.35		228.17
FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs Index		100.00		127.99		163.78		177.35		209.38		214.55

	Year Ended December 31,

	Year Ended December 31,				Increase (Decrease)
(Dollars in thousands)	2013		2012		Increase (Decrease)		% Change
Rental income, net	$	50,979	$	43,793	$	7,186		16.4	%

(Dollars in thousands)	2014		2015		2016		Total

Amortization payments	$	7,535	$	7,189	$	7,001	$	21,725
Principal due at maturity		28,637		7,454		25,678		61,769


Total	$	36,172	$	14,643	$	32,679	$	83,494

	Payment due by period

(Dollars in thousands)	Total		Less than 1 Year		1 - 3 Years		4 - 5 Years		More than 5 Years
Contractual Obligations
Mortgages payable—interest and amortization(1)	$	193,898	$	22,258	$	37,751	$	30,197	$	103,692
Mortgages payable—balances due at maturity(1)		176,563		28,637		33,132		49,433		65,361
Credit facility(2)		23,250		—		23,250		—		—
Purchase obligations(3)		17,300		3,270		6,630		6,542		858


Total	$	411,011	$	54,165	$	100,763	$	86,172	$	169,911

	For the Year Ended December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	2014			2015			2016			2017			2018			Thereafter			Total			Fair Market Value
Fixed rate:
Long-term debt	$	36,172		$	14,643		$	32,679		$	44,594		$	18,696		$	131,261		$	278,045		$	283,142
Weighted average interest rate		5.38	%		5.29	%		5.24	%		5.16	%		5.17	%		5.18	%		5.22	%		5.0	%
Variable rate:
Long-term debt(1)		—		$	23,250			—			—			—			—			—			—

Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights			Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column(a))(3)

	(a)			(b)		(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)		200,000	(2)		—		487,350
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—			—		—


Total		200,000			—		487,350


—Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			F-1 through F-2
—Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets			F-3
Consolidated Statements of Income			F-4
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income			F-5
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity			F-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows			F-7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			F-8 through F-35


—Schedule III—Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation			F-36 through F-39


	32.1		Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer
	32.2		Certification of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	101.INS		XBRL Instance Document
	101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
	101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
	101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
	101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Label Linkbase Document
	101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document


	ONE LIBERTY PROPERTIES, INC.
March 17, 2014	By:	/s/ PATRICK J. CALLAN, JR. Patrick J. Callan, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer

Signature	Title	Date


/s/ MATTHEW J. GOULD Matthew J. Gould	Chairman of the Board of Directors	March 17, 2014
/s/ FREDRIC H. GOULD Fredric H. Gould	Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors	March 17, 2014
/s/ PATRICK J. CALLAN, JR. Patrick J. Callan, Jr.	President, Director and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)	March 17, 2014
/s/ JOSEPH A. AMATO Joseph A. Amato	Director	March 17, 2014
/s/ CHARLES BIEDERMAN Charles Biederman	Director	March 17, 2014
/s/ JAMES J. BURNS James J. Burns	Director	March 17, 2014
/s/ JOSEPH A. DELUCA Joseph A. DeLuca	Director	March 17, 2014
/s/ JEFFREY A. GOULD Jeffrey A. Gould	Director	March 17, 2014

Signature	Title	Date


/s/ LOUIS P. KAROL Louis P. Karol	Director	March 17, 2014
/s/ J. ROBERT LOVEJOY J. Robert Lovejoy	Director	March 17, 2014
/s/ EUGENE I. ZURIFF Eugene I. Zuriff	Director	March 17, 2014
/s/ DAVID W. KALISH David W. Kalish	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)	March 17, 2014
/s/ KAREN DUNLEAVY Karen Dunleavy	Vice President, Financial (Principal Accounting Officer)	March 17, 2014



Texas	13.0	%	10.8	%	12.8	%
New York	11.0		12.8		13.8
New Jersey	10.7		8.3		5.9
Pennsylvania	8.8		10.1		10.8


2014	$	2,167
2015		2,133
2016		2,013
2017		1,927
2018		1,808
Thereafter		11,807


Total	$	21,855


2014	$	53,056
2015		49,432
2016		47,505
2017		45,316
2018		42,900
Thereafter		233,512


Total	$	471,721

					Fair Value Measurements Using Fair Value Hierarchy on a Recurring Basis

	Year Ended December 31,		Carrying and Fair Value
	Year Ended December 31,		Carrying and Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2
Financial assets:
Available-for-sale securities:
Equity securities		2013	$	282	$	282	$	—
		2012		278		278		—
Derivative financial instruments:
Interest rate swaps		2013		265		—		265
		2012		—		—		—
Financial liabilities:
Derivative financial instruments:
Interest rate swaps		2013		774		—		774
		2012		1,470		—		1,470


Outstanding restricted stock grants	$	1,341,000	$	1,050,000	$	930,000
Outstanding restricted stock units		99,000		173,000		79,000


Total charge to operations	$	1,440,000	$	1,223,000	$	1,009,000

	2013 Estimate			2012 Actual		2011 Actual

Dividends paid	$	21,999		$	24,252	$	14,758
Dividend reinvestment plan(a)		230			256		153


		22,229			24,508		14,911
Less: Spillover dividends designated to previous year		(7,659	)		—		(1,448	)
Plus: Dividends designated from following year		7,103			7,659		—


Dividends paid deduction(b)	$	21,673		$	32,167	$	13,463