Contingent Liabilities	9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Contingent Liabilities	CONTINGENT LIABILITIES On April 16, 2013, First Merchants was named in a class action lawsuit in Delaware County Circuit Court challenging First Merchant's checking account practices associated with the assessment of overdraft fees. The plaintiff sought damages and other relief, including restitution and injunctive relief. First Merchants removed the case from state court to federal district court. First Merchants then filed a motion to stay the federal action pending arbitration. The motion was recently granted by the court and the action was stayed. To the extent the plaintiff desires to further pursue the matter, the plaintiff must do so through a separate arbitration proceeding. If arbitration is pursued, First Merchants believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims brought by the plaintiff. On July 30, 2013, a purported shareholder of CFS Bancorp, Inc. filed a putative class action lawsuit captioned Jay Orlando v. CFS Bancorp, Inc., et al., No. 2:13-CV-00261 in U.S. District Court in the Northern District of Indiana against CFS Bancorp, Inc., its board of directors and First Merchants. The complaint generally alleged various claims of federal securities law violations and that the directors of CFS Bancorp, Inc. breached their fiduciary duties by providing materially inadequate disclosures and material disclosure omissions with respect to the proposed merger of CFS Bancorp, Inc. into First Merchants. The plaintiff seeks (1) class certification, (2) to enjoin the merger or, in the event the merger is completed before entry of a final judgment, to rescind the merger or be awarded an unspecified amount of rescissory damages, (3) compensatory damages in an unspecified amount, and (4) costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees. At this early stage of the litigation, it is not possible to assess the probability of a material adverse outcome or reasonably estimate any potential financial impact of the lawsuit on First Merchants. The defendants believe the claims against them are without merit and intend to contest the matter vigorously. On October 15, 2013, the plaintiff dismissed First Merchants as a defendant in the action without prejudice.

CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

On April 16, 2013, First Merchants was named in a class action lawsuit in Delaware County Circuit Court challenging First Merchant's checking account practices associated with the assessment of overdraft fees. The plaintiff sought damages and other relief, including restitution and injunctive relief. First Merchants removed the case from state court to federal district court. First Merchants then filed a motion to stay the federal action pending arbitration. The motion was recently granted by the court and the action was stayed. To the extent the plaintiff desires to further pursue the matter, the plaintiff must do so through a separate arbitration proceeding. If arbitration is pursued, First Merchants believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims brought by the plaintiff.

On July 30, 2013, a purported shareholder of CFS Bancorp, Inc. filed a putative class action lawsuit captioned Jay Orlando v. CFS Bancorp, Inc., et al., No. 2:13-CV-00261 in U.S. District Court in the Northern District of Indiana against CFS Bancorp, Inc., its board of directors and First Merchants. The complaint generally alleged various claims of federal securities law violations and that the directors of CFS Bancorp, Inc. breached their fiduciary duties by providing materially inadequate disclosures and material disclosure omissions with respect to the proposed merger of CFS Bancorp, Inc. into First Merchants. The plaintiff seeks (1) class certification, (2) to enjoin the merger or, in the event the merger is completed before entry of a final judgment, to rescind the merger or be awarded an unspecified amount of rescissory damages, (3) compensatory damages in an unspecified amount, and (4) costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees. At this early stage of the litigation, it is not possible to assess the probability of a material adverse outcome or reasonably estimate any potential financial impact of the lawsuit on First Merchants. The defendants believe the claims against them are without merit and intend to contest the matter vigorously. On October 15, 2013, the plaintiff dismissed First Merchants as a defendant in the action without prejudice.