XML 62 R51.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Commitments and Contingencies (Details Narrative) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
May 27, 2016
Oct. 30, 2015
Jul. 17, 2014
Jun. 30, 2014
Apr. 25, 2014
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]          
Termination fee $ 3,000        
Expense reimbursement 750,000        
Merger And Reorganization [Member] | DS Healthcare Group, Inc [Member]          
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]          
Termination fee 3,000        
Expense reimbursement $ 750,000        
Putative Class Action [Member]          
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]          
Name of plantiff        

The Company's subsidiary, Radiancy, Inc. and Dolev Rafaeli, Radiancy's President.

Name of defendent  

Jan Mouzon and twelve other customers residing in ten different states

   

Jan Mouzon and twelve other customers

Domicile of litigation  

United States District Court for the Southern District of California

   

United States District Court for the District of Columbia

Description of allegation  

Alleges various violations of state business and consumer protection codes including false and misleading advertising, unfair trade practices, and breach of express and implied warranties.

The claims of the suit are virtually identical to the claims originally considered, and dismissed without prejudice, by the same Court. A companion suit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, raising the same claims on behalf of plaintiffs from New York and West Virginia against Radiancy and its President, Dr. Dolev Rafaeli. That New York case was removed to the D.C. Court and the cases were consolidated into one action.

 

The complaint seeks certification of the putative class, or, alternatively, certification as subclasses of plaintiffs residing in those specific states. The complaint also seeks an unspecified amount of monetary damages, pre-and post-judgment interest and attorneys' fees, expert witness fees and other costs.

Iinfringe Intellectual Property [Member]          
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]          
Name of plantiff      

The Company’s subsidiary, Radiancy, Inc.

 
Domicile of litigation      

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

 
Description of allegation      

The complaint seeks certification of the class, which consists of customers in the State of California who purchased the no!no! hair devices.