XML 21 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Credit Quality Indicators:
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2012
Credit Quality Indicators: [Abstract]  
Credit Quality Indicators:

Credit Quality Indicators:

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company establishes a risk rating at origination for all commercial loan and commercial real estate relationships. For relationships over $300 thousand management monitors the loans on an ongoing basis for any changes in the borrower’s ability to service their debt. Management also affirms the risk ratings for the loans and leases in their respective portfolios on an annual basis. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

 

Special Mention. Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management's close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution's credit position at some future date. Special mention assets are not adversely classified and do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.

Substandard. Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. Substandard loans are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful. Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be pass rated loans. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans is as follows:

 

                                                 

(In Thousands of Dollars)

March 31, 2012

  Pass     Special
Mention
    Sub-standard     Doubtful     Not Rated     Total  

Commercial real estate

                                               

Owner occupied

  $ 80,445     $ 4,570     $ 12,349     $ 46     $ 0     $ 97,410  

Non-owner occupied

    76,708       3,781       8,418       0       0       88,907  

Other

    17,895       299       1,988       0       0       20,182  

Commercial

    66,982       6,110       2,989       179       0       76,260  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $ 242,030     $ 14,760     $ 25,744     $ 225     $ 0     $ 282,759  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

                                                 

(In Thousands of Dollars)

December 31, 2011

  Pass     Special
Mention
    Sub-standard     Doubtful     Not
Rated
    Total  

Commercial real estate

                                               

Owner occupied

  $ 80,770     $ 6,359     $ 13,201     $ 51     $ 0     $ 100,381  

Non-owner occupied

    68,806       2,575       8,942       0       0       80,323  

Other

    14,491       301       2,545       0       0       17,337  

Commercial

    65,198       5,963       3,454       260       0       74,875  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $ 229,265     $ 15,198     $ 28,142     $ 311     $ 0     $ 272,916  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Company considers the performance of the loan portfolio and its impact on the allowance for loan losses. For residential, consumer and indirect loan classes, the Company also evaluates credit quality based on the aging status of the loan, which was previously presented, and by payment activity. The following table presents the recorded investment in residential, consumer and indirect auto loans based on payment activity as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Nonperforming loans are loans past due 90 days and still accruing interest and nonaccrual loans.

 

                                         
    Residential Real Estate     Consumer  

(In Thousands of Dollars)

March 31, 2012

  1-4 Family
Residential
    Home
Equity Lines
of Credit
    Indirect     Direct     Other  

Performing

  $ 137,896     $ 21,161     $ 117,466     $ 11,285     $ 1,306  

Nonperforming

    4,390       291       47       16       10  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $ 142,286     $ 21,452     $ 117,513     $ 11,301     $ 1,316  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

                                         
    Residential Real Estate     Consumer  

(In Thousands of Dollars)

December 31, 2011

  1-4 Family
Residential
    Home
Equity Lines
of Credit
    Indirect     Direct     Other  

Performing

  $ 140,070     $ 21,644     $ 118,617     $ 11,583     $ 1,518  

Nonperforming

    4,018       299       126       13       2  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $ 145,088     $ 21,943     $ 118,743     $ 11,596     $ 1,520