10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

––––––––––––––––

Form 10-Q

––––––––––––––––

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017
OR
¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from _______ to _______

Commission File Number 1-13449

––––––––––––––––

QUANTUM CORPORATION

––––––––––––––––

Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	94-2665054 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
224 Airport Parkway, Suite 550, San Jose, California (Address of principal executive offices)	95110 (Zip Code)
(408) 944-4000 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

––––––––––––––––

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x  No ¨

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x  No ¨

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  ¨	Accelerated filer  x	Non-accelerated filer  ¨	Smaller reporting company  ¨
Emerging growth company o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨  No x

As of the close of business on August 4, 2017, there were 34,472,160 shares of Quantum Corporation’s common stock issued and outstanding.

QUANTUM CORPORATION

INDEX

		Page Number
	PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements:
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	4
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	15
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	23
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	24
	PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	24
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	25
Item 6.	Exhibits	39
	SIGNATURE	40
	EXHIBIT INDEX	41

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

QUANTUM CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except par value)

(Unaudited)

	June 30, 2017			March 31, 2017
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,661		$	12,958
Restricted cash	1,891			1,832
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $29 and $16, respectively	109,418			116,056
Manufacturing inventories	27,821			27,661
Service parts inventories	19,788			19,849
Other current assets	10,005			9,969
Total current assets	177,584			188,325
Long-term assets:
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation	10,455			11,186
Restricted cash	20,000			20,000
Other long-term assets	4,993			5,516
Total long-term assets	35,448			36,702
	$	213,032		$	225,027
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	45,007		$	41,611
Accrued warranty	3,161			3,263
Deferred revenue	79,996			84,683
Accrued restructuring charges	2,249			869
Convertible subordinated debt	62,926			62,827
Accrued compensation	22,186			24,104
Other accrued liabilities	13,309			12,998
Total current liabilities	228,834			230,355
Long-term liabilities:
Deferred revenue	36,697			37,642
Accrued restructuring charges	544			481
Long-term debt	60,219			65,028
Other long-term liabilities	4,736			7,520
Total long-term liabilities	102,196			110,671
Stockholders' deficit:
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; 34,101 and 34,063 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2017 and March 31, 2017, respectively	341			341
Capital in excess of par	475,357			473,850
Accumulated deficit	(596,969		)	(593,295		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income	3,273			3,105
Total stockholders’ deficit	(117,998		)	(115,999		)
	$	213,032		$	225,027

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

1

QUANTUM CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017			June 30, 2016
Product revenue	$	71,618		$	71,826
Service revenue	35,246			35,818
Royalty revenue	9,994			8,640
Total revenue	116,858			116,284
Cost of product revenue	50,949			50,132
Cost of service revenue	15,090			15,506
Total cost of revenue	66,039			65,638
Gross margin	50,819			50,646
Operating expenses:
Research and development	10,605			11,058
Sales and marketing	27,824			26,367
General and administrative	12,509			12,960
Restructuring charges	2,335			2,052
Total operating expenses	53,273			52,437
Loss from operations	(2,454		)	(1,791		)
Other income (expense)	98			155
Interest expense	(2,558		)	(1,507		)
Net loss before income tax provision (benefit)	(4,914		)	(3,143		)
Income tax provision (benefit)	(1,240		)	377
Net loss	$	(3,674	)	$	(3,520	)
Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.11	)
Weighted average shares:
Basic	34,084			33,292
Diluted	34,084			33,292

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

2

QUANTUM CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017			June 30, 2016
Net loss	$	(3,674	)	$	(3,520	)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes:
Foreign currency translation adjustments	155			(339		)
Net unrealized gain (loss)on revaluation of long-term intercompany balances	13			42
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	168			(297		)
Total comprehensive loss	$	(3,506	)	$	(3,817	)

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

QUANTUM CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017			June 30, 2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(3,674	)	$	(3,520	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation	1,268			1,383
Amortization and write off of debt issuance costs	427			168
Service parts lower of cost or market adjustment	1,257			1,337
Tax benefit from settlement	(1,656		)	—
Non-cash interest expense	277			—
Deferred income taxes	120			75
Share-based compensation	1,613			1,998
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net	6,638			15,426
Manufacturing inventories	(709		)	3,686
Service parts inventories	(1,034		)	(124		)
Accounts payable	3,318			(8,364		)
Accrued warranty	(102		)	14
Deferred revenue	(5,633		)	(4,426		)
Accrued restructuring charges	1,444			726
Accrued compensation	(2,047		)	580
Other assets and liabilities	(489		)	(3,798		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	1,018			5,161
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment	(123		)	(529		)
Return of capital from investments	278			—
Restricted cash	(2		)	(15		)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	153			(544		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings of long-term debt	71,800			3,000
Repayments of long-term debt	(77,175		)	(6,959		)
Payment of taxes due upon vesting of restricted stock	(111		)	(27		)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	5			—
Net cash used in financing activities	(5,481		)	(3,986		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	13			(5		)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	(4,297		)	626
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	12,958			33,870
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	8,661		$	34,496
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Purchases of property and equipment included in accounts payable	$	78		$	191

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

QUANTUM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1: BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Quantum Corporation (“Quantum”, the “Company”, “us” or “we”), founded in 1980 and reincorporated in Delaware in 1987, is a leading expert in scale-out storage, archive and data protection, providing solutions for capturing, sharing, managing and preserving digital assets over the entire data lifecycle. Our customers, ranging from small businesses to large/multi-national enterprises, trust us to address their most demanding data workflow challenges. Our end-to-end tiered storage solutions enable users to maximize the value of their data by making it accessible whenever and wherever needed, retaining it indefinitely and reducing total cost and complexity. We work closely with a broad network of distributors, value-added resellers (“VARs”), direct marketing resellers (“DMRs”), original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) and other suppliers to meet customers’ evolving needs. Our stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol QTM.

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Quantum and our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods shown. The results of operations for such periods are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full fiscal year. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2017 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date, but it does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. The accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on May 31, 2017.

On April 18, 2017, we effected a 1-for-8 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding common stock (the "Reverse Stock Split"). Our stock began to trade on a post-split basis on April 19, 2017. All share and per share data for comparative periods included within our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related footnotes have been adjusted to account for the effect of the Reverse Stock Split.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation - Stock compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”). ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. We adopted ASU 2016-09 in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 using multiple transition approaches in-line with the requirements. Our tax windfall benefits are reported in the statement of operations instead of equity to the extent we do not have an offsetting valuation allowance and such benefits are recorded within our deferred taxes.  There were no other changes based upon the new guidance. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not impact our statements of financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or financial statement disclosures.  

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330) (“ASU 2015-11”). ASU 2015-11 requires that an entity measure all inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value, except for inventory that is measured using last-in, first-out (LIFO) or the retail inventory method. We adopted ASU 2015-11 prospectively in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 and adoption did not impact our statements of financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or financial statement disclosures.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Topic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016-01”). ASU 2016-01 addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosures of financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 will become effective for us beginning April 1, 2018, or fiscal 2019. We must apply the provisions using a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet at the beginning of the year of adoption, or April 1, 2018. We are currently assessing what financial instruments are being impacted and the extent of the potential impact on our statements of financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and financial statement disclosures.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). ASU 2016-02 provides a new comprehensive model for lease accounting. Under ASU 2016-02, lessees and lessors should apply a “right-of-use” model in accounting for all leases and eliminate the concept of operating leases and off-balance sheet leases. ASU 2016-02 will become effective for us beginning April 1, 2019, or fiscal 2020. ASU 2016-02 requires a modified retrospective transition approach

5

with certain practical expedients available. We have identified all of our current leases subject to ASU 2016-02. We are in the process of evaluating these agreements to determine the impact on our statements of financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and financial statement disclosures.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 provides guidance on the following eight specific cash flow issues: 1) debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, 2) settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing, 3) contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, 4) proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, 5) proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies, 6) distributions received from equity method investees, 7) beneficial interests in securitization transactions and 8) separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. ASU 2016-15 transition requires the use of the retrospective method for all periods presented and will become effective for us beginning April 1, 2018, or fiscal 2019. We have evaluated the types of transactions impacted by ASU 2016-15 and at this time, and anticipate the only impact is related to the our debt extinguishment costs. As such, we do not anticipate the adoption of ASU 2016-15 will have a material impact on our statements of cash flows.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory (“ASU 2016-16”). ASU 2016-16 requires that an entity recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. ASU 2016-16 will become effective for us beginning April 1, 2018, or fiscal 2019. ASU 2016-16 requires the modified retrospective transition approach with a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings at the beginning of the period of adoption. We currently do not have any material intra-entity transfers of assets and therefore we do not anticipate that adoption will have a material impact on our statements of financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or financial statement disclosures.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”). ASU 2016-18 requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. ASU 2016-18 will become effective for us beginning April 1, 2018, or fiscal 2019. ASU 2016-18 is required to be applied retrospectively. Upon the adoption, amounts described as restricted cash will be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period amounts shown on the statements of cash flows.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting. The ASU provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. ASU 2017-09 will become effective for us beginning April 1, 2018, or fiscal 2019 and interim and interim periods within those years and is to be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. As we currently do not have a practice of modifying our stock based awards and have no plans to do so in the future, we do not anticipate adoption will have a material impact on our statements of financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or financial statement disclosures.

The FASB issued the following accounting standard updates related to its revenue convergence project:

• ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”) in May 2014. ASU 2014-09 requires entities to recognize revenue through the application of a five-step model, which includes identification of the contract, identification of the performance obligations, determination of the transaction price, allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations and recognition of revenue as the entity satisfies the performance obligations.

• ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net) (“ASU 2016-08”) in March 2016. ASU 2016-08 does not change the core principle of revenue recognition in Topic 606 but clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations.

• ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing (“ASU 2016-10”) in April 2016. ASU 2016-10 does not change the core principle of revenue recognition in Topic 606 but clarifies the implementation guidance on identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. ASU No. 2016-11, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of Accounting Standards Updates 2014-09 and 2014-16 Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 EITF Meeting (SEC Update) (“ASU 2016-11”) in May 2016. ASU 2016-11 rescinds SEC paragraphs pursuant to two SEC Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 EITF meeting. The SEC Staff is rescinding SEC Staff Observer comments that are codified in Topic 605 and Topic 932, effective upon adoption of Topic 606.

6

• ASU No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients in May 2016. ASU 2016-12 does not change the core principle of revenue recognition in Topic 606 but clarifies the implementation guidance on a few narrow areas and adds some practical expedients to the guidance.

These ASUs will become effective for us beginning April 1, 2018, or fiscal 2019. ASU 2014-09 and the related ASUs allow for

either a retrospective or a modified retrospective transition approach. The Company has elected to use a modified retrospective method. We have completed our initial assessment of the changes in our revenue recognition accounting policies for the new revenue standards. Our accounting for commission costs related to our service agreements will change from recognition in the period incurred to the deferral and recognition over the services are provided. Other costs such as warranty costs and our accounting for our rebate programs ("variable consideration") will not materially change. We have identified our performance obligations and have established the related standalone selling prices for the distinct goods and services underlying the obligations. We are currently configuring our system to meet our business requirements and upon completion, we will process the Company’s historical revenue transactions which will enable us to assess the overall impact of the adoption of Topic 606 on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and financial statement disclosures.

NOTE 2: FAIR VALUE

Our assets measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis may consist of money market funds, which are included in cash and cash equivalents in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and are valued using quoted market prices (level 1 fair value measurements) at the respective balance sheet dates. At June 30, 2017 and March 31, 2017, we had no cash in money market funds.

We did not record impairments to any non-financial assets in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 or fiscal 2017. We do not have any non-financial liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

Our financial liabilities were comprised primarily of convertible subordinated debt and long-term debt at June 30, 2017 and March 31, 2017. The carrying value and fair value of our convertible subordinated debt and long-term debt were as follows (in thousands):

	As of
	June 30, 2017				March 31, 2017
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
Convertible subordinated debt (1)	$	62,926	$	61,513	$	62,827	$	60,667
Long-term debt: (2)
Revolving credit agreement	11,888		13,372		16,852		18,490
Term loan agreement	48,331		49,930		48,176		50,026
Total long-term debt	$	60,219	$	63,302	$	65,028	$	68,516

⁽¹⁾ Fair value based on quoted market prices in less active markets (level 2).

⁽²⁾ Fair value based on outstanding borrowings and market interest rates (level 2).

7

NOTE 3: INVENTORIES

Manufacturing inventories and service parts inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):

	As of
	June 30, 2017		March 31, 2017
Manufacturing inventories:
Finished goods	$	14,924	$	15,070
Work in process	869		606
Materials and purchased parts	12,028		11,985
	$	27,821	$	27,661

	As of
	June 30, 2017		March 31, 2017
Service parts inventories:
Finished goods	$	14,628	$	14,851
Component parts	5,160		4,998
	$	19,788	$	19,849

NOTE 4: ACCRUED WARRANTY

The changes in the accrued warranty balance were (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017			June 30, 2016
Beginning balance	$	3,263		$	3,430
Additional warranties issued	1,412			1,998
Adjustments for warranties issued in prior fiscal years	(4		)	140
Settlements	(1,510		)	(2,124		)
Ending balance	$	3,161		$	3,444

We warrant our products against certain defects typically for a term of one to three years. A provision for estimated future costs and estimated returns for repair or replacement relating to warranty is recorded when products are shipped and revenue is recognized. Our estimate of future costs to satisfy warranty obligations is primarily based on historical trends and, if believed to be significantly different from historical trends, estimates of future failure rates and future costs of repair. Future costs of repair include materials consumed in the repair, labor and overhead amounts necessary to perform the repair. If we determine in a future period that either actual failure rates or actual costs of repair were to differ from our estimates, we record the impact of those differences in that future period.

NOTE 5: DEBT

Our debt consisted of the following (in thousands):

	As of
	June 30, 2017			March 31, 2017
Convertible subordinated debt:
4.50% convertible subordinated notes	$	63,090		$	63,090
Unamortized debt issuance costs	(164		)	(263		)
Convertible subordinated debt, net of unamortized debt issuance costs	$	62,926		$	62,827

8

	As of
	June 30, 2017			March 31, 2017
Long-term debt:
Revolving credit agreement	$	13,403		$	18,500
Term loan agreement	50,000			50,000
Unamortized discount and debt issuance costs	(3,184		)	(3,472		)
Long-term debt, net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs	$	60,219		$	65,028

Convertible Subordinated Debt

In the third quarter of fiscal 2013, we issued $70 million aggregate principal amount of 4.50% convertible subordinated notes (4.5% Notes) due November 15, 2017. These notes are convertible into shares of our common stock until November 14, 2017 at the option of the holders at a conversion rate of 75.896 shares per $1,000 principal amount, a conversion price of approximately $13.20 per share. The 4.50% notes require semi-annual interest payments paid on May 15 and November 15 of each year and have no early call provisions.

Long-term Debt

Our credit facility includes a revolving credit and security agreement entered into with PNC Bank, National Association (“revolving credit agreement”) and a term loan credit and security agreement entered into with TCW Asset Management Company LLC (“term loan agreement”).

Revolving credit agreement

Under the revolving credit agreement, we have the ability to borrow the lesser of $80 million or the amount of the monthly borrowing base, which is reduced by $1.0 million of the outstanding letters of credit. Our borrowing base is established monthly based on certain working capital asset balances. The revolving credit agreement also includes an uncommitted accordion in an amount up to $20 million. The revolving credit agreement matures on October 21, 2021. As of June 30, 2017, our excess availability under the revolving credit agreement was $39.6 million.

Borrowings under the revolving credit agreement bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at our option, either (a) the greatest of (i) the base rate, (ii) the Federal funds rate plus 0.50% and (iii) the LIBOR rate based upon an interest period of 1 month plus 1.0%, plus an applicable margin of 1.50%, or (b) the LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin of 2.50%. The base rate is defined in the revolving credit agreement. Additionally, we are required to pay a 0.375% commitment fee on undrawn amounts under the revolving credit agreement on a quarterly basis, which is recorded as interest expense in the period incurred. As of June 30, 2017, we had a $13.4 million outstanding balance on the revolving credit agreement at an interest rate of 5.75%.

Term loan agreement

The term loan agreement provides for $50 million of a senior secured term loan which was at the time we entered into the credit facility and $20 million of a senior secured delay draw term loan (“DDTL”). Borrowings under the DDTL are restricted to be used only to redeem our 4.50% convertible subordinated notes due November 15, 2017. The term loan agreement matures on October 21, 2021. The amount outstanding under the term loan is to be repaid on a quarterly basis in an amount equal to 1.25% of the original principal amount beginning on March 31, 2018, with any remaining principal balance due on the maturity of the term loan.

Borrowings under the term loan agreement bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at our option, either (a) the greatest of (i) 3.00%, (ii) the Federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (iii) the LIBOR rate based upon an interest period of 1 month plus 1.0% and (iv) the “prime rate” last quoted by the Wall Street Journal, plus a margin ranging from 6.00% to 7.25% based on the applicable senior net leverage ratio, or (b) the LIBOR rate plus 7.00% to 8.25% based on the applicable senior net leverage ratio. The senior net leverage ratio is defined in the term loan agreement. As of June 30, 2017, our interest rate on the term loan was 8.66%.

The revolving credit agreement and the term loan agreement are collateralized by a pledge of substantially all of our assets and

contain certain financial covenants and customary events of default for such securities. Financial covenants include a fixed

charge coverage ratio, senior net leverage ratio and total leverage ratio. Additionally, the revolving credit agreement includes

minimum liquidity requirements. There is a blanket lien on all of our assets under the revolving credit agreement and term loan

agreement. As of June 30, 2017, and during fiscal 2018, we were in compliance with all covenants.

9

Debt Maturities

A summary of the scheduled maturities of principal for our outstanding debt as of June 30, 2017 follows (in thousands):

	Debt Maturity Due by Period
	Less than 1 Year		1 Year		2 Years		3 Years		4 Years		More than 5 Years		Total
4.50% convertible subordinated notes	$	63,090	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	63,090
Long-term debt:
Revolving credit agreement	—		—		—		—		13,403		—		13,403
Term loan agreement	1,250		2,500		2,500		2,500		41,250		—		50,000
Total long-term debt	$	1,250	$	2,500	$	2,500	$	2,500	$	54,653	$	—	$	63,403
Total debt	$	64,340	$	2,500	$	2,500	$	2,500	$	54,653	$	—	$	126,493

NOTE 6: RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

Fiscal 2018 Restructuring Plan

During the first quarter of fiscal 2018, we approved a plan (“Fiscal 2018 Restructuring Plan”) to eliminate 49 positions in the U.S. and internationally to align our workforce within various functions of our business in order to meet the Company’s strategic plans. The costs associated with these actions consist of restructuring charges related to severance and benefits. We incurred $1.6 million of restructuring charges under this plan during the quarter, and as of June 30, 2017, we paid $0.5 million under this plan with the remaining amounts to be paid during the remainder of fiscal 2018.

Fiscal 2017 April Restructuring Plan

In April 2016, we approved a plan (“Fiscal 2017 April Restructuring Plan”) to eliminate 29 positions in the U.S. and internationally to reduce investments in various functions of our business to improve operational efficiencies. The costs associated with these actions consist of restructuring charges related to severance and benefits. These actions were completed by the second quarter of fiscal 2017. We incurred and paid $1.5 million of restructuring charges under this plan.

Fiscal 2016 Restructuring Plan

In November 2015, we approved a plan (“Fiscal 2016 Restructuring Plan”) to eliminate approximately 65 positions in the U.S. and internationally, primarily in research and development and sales and marketing functions, in order to improve our cost structure and align spending with continuing operations plans. These actions were completed by the first quarter of fiscal 2017, with the majority having occurred by December 31, 2015. The costs associated with these actions consist of restructuring charges related to severance and benefits. We incurred and paid $2.0 million of restructuring charges under this plan.

Summary of Restructuring Expense

The following summarizes the type of restructuring costs, included in operating expense, for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016 (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017		June 30, 2016
Severance and benefits	$	1,570	$	1,489
Facilities	756		563
Other	9		—
	$	2,335	$	2,052

Restructuring charges for the first three months of fiscal 2018 included $1.6 million of severance and benefits costs incurred as a result of the Fiscal 2018 Restructuring Plan. Additionally, we incurred $0.8 million of facilities restructuring charges in the first three months of fiscal 2018 due to a change in estimate of sublease timing and related expenses for our facilities previously used in manufacturing.

10

Restructuring charges for the first three months of fiscal 2017 were largely due to $1.5 million of severance and benefits costs incurred as a result of the Fiscal 2017 Restructuring Plan. Additionally, we incurred $0.6 million of restructuring charges related to facilities costs primarily due to a change in estimate of sublease timing for our facilities previously used in manufacturing.

Accrued Restructuring

The following tables show the activity and the estimated timing of future payouts for accrued restructuring (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Severance and Benefits			Facilities			Total
Balance as of March 31, 2017	$	130		$	1,220		$	1,350
Restructuring costs	1,570			—			1,570
Adjustment of prior estimates	—			756			756
Cash payments	(472		)	(411		)	(883		)
Balance as of June 30, 2017	$	1,228		$	1,565		$	2,793

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Severance and Benefits			Facilities			Total
Balance as of March 31, 2016	$	354		$	2,383		$	2,737
Restructuring costs	1,489			426			1,915
Adjustment of prior estimates	—			179			179
Cash payments	(1,029		)	(339		)	(1,368		)
Balance as of June 30, 2016	$	814		$	2,649		$	3,463

	As of June 30, 2017
	Severance and Benefits		Facilities		Total
Estimated timing of future payouts:
Next twelve months	$	1,228	$	1,022	$	2,250
July 2018 through June 2022	—		543		543
	$	1,228	$	1,565	$	2,793

Facility restructuring accruals will be paid in accordance with the respective facility lease terms and the above amounts are net of estimated sublease amounts.

NOTE 7: EQUITY

On April 18, 2017, we effected a 1-for-8 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding common stock (the "Reverse Stock Split"). Our stock began to trade on a post-split basis on April 19, 2017. Par value of the Company's common stock was unchanged as a result of the Reverse Stock Split, remaining at $0.01 per share, which resulted in reclassification of capital from par value to capital in excess of par value. All share and per share data for comparative periods included within our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related footnotes have been adjusted to account for the effect of the Reverse Stock

Split.

NOTE 8: STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS AND SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

During the first quarter of fiscal 2018, all restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and options to purchase our common stock outstanding under the Company's Stock Incentive Plans were adjusted to reflect the impact of the Reverse Stock Split. The Reverse Stock Split also reduced the number of shares of common stock issuable under the Company's 2012 Long Term

11

Incentive Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended. The per share exercise price of all outstanding awards was increased and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise or settlement of all outstanding awards was reduced proportionately to the reverse split ratio.

Share-Based Compensation

The following table summarizes share-based compensation (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017		June 30, 2016
Share-based compensation:
Cost of revenue	$	217	$	280
Research and development	286		403
Sales and marketing	520		612
General and administrative	590		703
	$	1,613	$	1,998
Share-based compensation by type of award:
Stock options	$	—	$	—
Restricted stock units	1,461		1,836
Stock purchase plan	152		162
	$	1,613	$	1,998

Restricted Stock Units

The fair value of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) granted is the intrinsic value as of the respective grant date. The weighted-average grant date fair values of RSUs granted during the first quarter of fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 were $7.82 and $3.84, respectively.

A summary of activity relating to our restricted stock units follows (shares in thousands):

	Shares		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
Nonvested at March 31, 2017	1,765		$	6.75
Granted	83		7.82
Vested	(52	)	5.66
Forfeited	(27	)	7.48
Nonvested at June 30, 2017	1,769		$	6.82

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, rights to purchase shares are typically granted during the second and fourth quarter of each fiscal year. No rights to purchase shares were granted in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 or fiscal 2017.

NOTE 9: INCOME TAXES

Income tax benefit for the first quarter of fiscal 2018 was $1.2 million as compared to an income tax provision of $0.4 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2017. The tax benefit for the first quarter of fiscal 2018 included the release of $1.7 million of an uncertain tax position liability upon the effective settlement with the German taxing authorities for tax audits of our German subsidiary.

12

Income tax provisions for each of these periods reflect expenses for foreign income taxes and state taxes. We have provided a full valuation allowance against our U.S. net deferred tax assets due to our history of net losses, difficulty in predicting future results and our conclusion that we cannot rely on projections of future taxable income to realize the deferred tax assets. Significant management judgment is required in determining our deferred tax assets and liabilities and valuation allowances for purposes of assessing our ability to realize any future benefit from our net deferred tax assets. We intend to maintain this valuation allowance until sufficient positive evidence exists to support a reversal or decrease in this allowance. Future income tax expense will be reduced to the extent that we have sufficient positive evidence to support a reversal of, or decrease in, our valuation allowance.

NOTE 10: NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

The following is the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017			June 30, 2016
Numerator:
Net loss	$	(3,674	)	$	(3,520	)
Denominator:
Weighted average shares:
Basic	34,084			33,292
Dilutive shares from stock plans	—			—
Dilutive shares from convertible subordinated notes	—			—
Diluted	34,084			33,292
Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.11	)

Dilutive and potentially dilutive common shares from the Stock Incentive Plans are determined by applying the treasury stock method to the assumed exercise of outstanding options and the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units. The dilutive impact related to our convertible subordinated notes is determined by applying the if-converted method, which includes adding the related weighted average shares to the denominator and the related interest expense to net income.

The computations of diluted net income (loss) per share for the periods presented exclude the following because the effect would have been anti-dilutive (in millions):

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017		June 30, 2016
Weighted average shares excluded:
4.50% convertible subordinated notes	4.8		5.3
Stock options	0.2		0.5
Unvested restricted stock units	1.5		1.4
Interest expense excluded:
4.50% convertible subordinated notes	$	0.8	$	0.9

NOTE 11: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Commitments to Purchase Inventory

We use contract manufacturers for our manufacturing operations. Under these arrangements, the contract manufacturer procures inventory to manufacture products based upon our forecast of customer demand. We have similar arrangements with certain other suppliers. We are responsible for the financial impact on the supplier or contract manufacturer of any reduction or product mix shift in the forecast relative to materials that the third party had already purchased under a prior forecast. Such a

13

variance in forecasted demand could require a cash payment for inventory in excess of current customer demand or for costs of excess or obsolete inventory. As of June 30, 2017, we had issued non-cancelable commitments for $42.0 million to purchase inventory from our contract manufacturers and suppliers.

Legal Proceedings

Crossroads

On February 18, 2014, Crossroads Systems, Inc. (“Crossroads”) filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Quantum in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, alleging infringement of U.S. patents 6,425,035 and 7,934,041. An amended complaint filed on April 15, 2014 also alleged infringement of U.S. patent 7,051,147. Crossroads asserts that we have incorporated Crossroads' patented technology into our StorNext QX and Q-Series lines of disk array products and into our Scalar libraries. Crossroads seeks unspecified monetary damages and injunctive relief. Crossroads has already dismissed all claims of infringement with respect to the StorNext QX and Q-Series products. In July and September of 2014, we filed for inter partes review of all three asserted Crossroads patents before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and a review has been initiated for all claims. On June 16, 2015, the U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas stayed the Crossroads trial proceedings pending resolution of the inter partes review proceedings. On January 29, 2016, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued decisions on the inter partes reviews for U.S. patents 6,425,035 and 7,051,147, ordering all claims of both patents to be unpatentable. On March 17, 2016, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued a decision on the inter partes review for U.S. patent 7,934,041, ordering all claims to be unpatentable. On March 31, 2016, Crossroads filed Notices of Appeal in each of the inter partes review decisions. On June 6, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB decision finding all claims of all patents to be unpatentable.  On July 6, 2017, Crossroads filed a petition for a rehearing en banc before the Federal Circuit. On August 8, 2017, the Federal Circuit denied Crossroads' petition. We believe the probability that this lawsuit will have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition is remote.

Realtime Data

On July, 22 2016, Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO(“Realtime Data”) filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Quantum in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alleging infringement of U.S. Patents Nos. 7,161,506, 7,378,992, 7,415,530, 8,643,513, 9,054,728, and 9,116,908. The lawsuit has been transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California for further proceedings. Realtime Data asserts that we have incorporated Realtime Data’s patented technology into our compression products and services. Realtime Data seeks unspecified monetary damages and other relief that the Court deems appropriate. On July 31, 3017, the District Court stayed proceedings in this litigation pending decision in Inter Partes Review proceedings currently before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and relating to the Realtime patents. We believe the probability that this lawsuit will have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition is remote.

14

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements in this report usually contain the words “will,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “believe,” “project” or similar expressions and variations or negatives of these words. All such forward-looking statements including, but not limited to, (1) our goals, strategy and expectations for future operating performance including our goals for 2018 and our strategies for achieving those goals; (2) our expectations and beliefs regarding the storage market and the other markets in which we compete; (3) our belief that our existing cash and capital resources will be sufficient to meet all currently planned expenditures, debt service and sustain our operations for at least the next 12 months; (4) our expectations regarding our ongoing efforts to control our cost structure; (5) our expectations regarding the outcome of any litigation in which we are involved; and (6) our business goals, objectives, key focuses, opportunities and prospects, are inherently uncertain as they are based on management’s expectations and assumptions concerning future events, and they are subject to numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, about which we speak only as of the date hereof. As a result, our actual results may differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained herein. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described herein include, but are not limited to those factors discussed under “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A. Our forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. We disclaim any obligation to update information in any forward-looking statement.

OVERVIEW

Quantum Corporation (“Quantum”, the “Company”, “us” or “we”), is a leading expert in scale-out storage, archive and data protection, providing solutions for capturing, sharing, managing and preserving digital assets over the entire data lifecycle. We believe our combination of expertise, innovation and platform independence enables us to solve scale-out storage and data protection challenges more easily, cost-effectively and securely than competitive offerings. We earn our revenue from the sale of products, systems and services through an array of channel partners and our sales force. Our products are sold under both the Quantum brand name and the names of various OEM customers. Our scale-out tiered storage solutions include StorNext software, StorNext appliances (which include StorNext disk storage and StorNext-related tape storage) and Lattus extended online storage systems. These products are designed to help customers manage large unstructured data sets in an information workflow, encompassing high-performance ingest, real-time collaboration, scalable processing, intelligent protection and high value monetization. Our data protection solutions include DXi deduplication backup systems and Scalar automated tape libraries that optimize backup and recovery, simplify management and lower cost. Our vmPRO virtual server backup and disaster recovery offerings protect virtual environments while minimizing the impact on servers and storage. In addition, we offer software for cloud backup and disaster recovery of physical and virtual servers. We have a full range of services and the global scale and scope to support our worldwide customer base.

Our goals for fiscal 2018 are driving profitable revenue growth and long-term shareholder value by capitalizing on new market opportunities, leveraging the strength of our technology, products and install base across scale-out tiered storage and data protection, continuing to expand our solutions portfolio and building new and enhanced channel and technology partnerships. In scale-out storage, we continue to focus on building our market presence beyond media and entertainment and expanding our presence in video surveillance, technical workflow and unstructured data archive use cases. Outside of scale-out storage, our strategy is to continue leveraging our technology leadership, our extensive customer base and our channel and technology partnerships to generate profits and cash from our offerings.

Results

We had total revenue of $116.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2018, a $0.6 million increase from the first quarter of fiscal 2017. The increase was primarily due to an increase in our branded revenue of $2.6 million, or 3%, an increase in royalty revenue of $1.4 million, or 16%, offset by a decrease in revenue from OEM sales of $3.3 million, or 33%, in each case, as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2017. Our gross margin percentage for the first quarter of fiscal 2018 was 43.5%, a decrease of 10 basis points from the first quarter of fiscal 2017 due to a shift in revenue mix. Higher margin service revenue decreased and lower margin products comprised a higher portion of our overall product revenue. In addition, we are experiencing overall pricing pressure in the storage market, which has resulted in increased discounting of our products.

15

Operating expenses increased $0.8 million, or 2%, from the first quarter of fiscal 2017 primarily due to increased sales and marketing costs from continued focus on sales and brand awareness. In addition, we had an increase in restructuring charges primarily due to higher severance charges incurred in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 from our Fiscal 2018 Restructuring Plan including an $0.8 million addition to the Fiscal 2016 Restructuring Plan.

Our operating results declined by $0.7 million to a loss from operations of $2.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2018.

We generated $1.0 million in cash from operations in the first three months of fiscal 2018 compared to $5.2 million of cash generated from operations in the first three months of fiscal 2017. The change was primarily due to $3.0 million in non-cash items, the largest of which were share-based compensation, depreciation, service parts lower of cost or market adjustment and income tax benefit from tax settlement, offset by a $1.3 million change in assets and liabilities.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Revenue

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2017		% of revenue		June 30, 2016		% of revenue		Change			% Change
Product revenue	$	71,618	61.2	%	$	71,826	61.8	%	$	(208	)	(0.3	)%
Service revenue	35,246		30.2	%	35,818		30.8	%	(572		)	(1.6	)%
Royalty revenue	9,994		8.6	%	8,640		7.4	%	1,354			15.7	%
Total revenue	$	116,858	100.0	%	$	116,284	100.0	%	$	574		0.5	%

We believe the changes in our product and service revenue continue to be driven by the changing storage environment, including increased market demand for scale-out tiered storage and changes in demand for data protection tape products. Revenue from scale-out tiered storage solutions and services increased $2.9 million, or 9%, from the first quarter of fiscal 2017 due to increased sales of our scale-out storage related media. Revenue from branded data protection products and services decreased $0.3 million from the first quarter of fiscal 2017 primarily due to decreased revenue from disk backup which was partially offset by increased revenue in tape automation systems and media. OEM product and service revenue, which primarily is comprised of data protection tape automation systems, decreased $3.3 million from the first quarter of fiscal 2017.

Product Revenue

Total product revenue, which includes sales of our hardware and software products sold through both our Quantum branded and OEM channels, decreased $0.2 millioninthe first quarter of fiscal 2018 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2017. Revenue from sales of branded products increased 5% and revenue from sales of products to OEM customers decreased 36% in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2017.

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2017		% of revenue		June 30, 2016		% of revenue		Change			% Change
Tape automation systems	$	23,582	20.2	%	$	21,438	18.4	%	$	2,144		10.0	%
Disk backup systems	6,678		5.7	%	13,483		11.6	%	(6,805		)	(50.5	)%
Devices and media	14,949		12.8	%	12,754		11.0	%	2,195			17.2	%
Scale-out tiered storage*	26,409		22.6	%	24,151		20.8	%	2,258			9.3	%
Total product revenue	$	71,618	61.3	%	$	71,826	61.8	%	$	(208	)	(0.3	)%
* Scale-out tiered storage was referred to as “scale-out storage solutions” in our previous filings.

Product revenue from tape automation systems increased in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2017 due to an increase in revenue from branded tape automation of $5.6 million, partially offset by a decrease of $3.5 million in revenue from OEM tape automation systems.

Revenue from disk backup systems decreased in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2017 primarily due to decreased sales of DXi 6900.

16

Product revenue from media and devices, which includes tape drives and removable hard drives, and non-royalty media sales increased during the first quarter of fiscal 2018 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2017 primarily due to higher sales of branded media.

Our scale-out tiered storage revenue increased during the first quarter of fiscal 2018 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2017 primarily due to increased sales of scale-out storage automation.

Service Revenue

Service revenue is primarily comprised of hardware service contracts, which are typically purchased by our customers to extend the warranty, to provide faster service response time, or both. Service revenue decreased during the first quarter of fiscal 2018 due to decreased service revenue from our data protection products, partially offset by increased revenue from branded service contracts for our scale-out tiered storage.

Royalty Revenue

Royalty revenue increased during the first quarter of fiscal 2018 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2017 primarily due to increased media royalties from LTO generation 7, partially offset by decreased media royalties from previous LTO generations.

Gross Margin

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2017		Gross margin %		June 30, 2016		Gross margin %		Change			Basis point change
Product gross margin	$	20,669	28.9	%	$	21,694	30.2	%	$	(1,025	)	(130	)
Service gross margin	20,156		57.2	%	20,312		56.7	%	(156		)	50
Royalty gross margin	9,994		100.0	%	8,640		100.0	%	1,354			—
Gross margin	$	50,819	43.5	%	$	50,646	43.6	%	$	173		(10	)

Product Margin

Product gross margin decreased 130 basis points during the first quarter of fiscal 2018 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2017 primarily due to a shift in revenue mix from higher margin products to lower margin products.

Service Margin

Service gross margin increased 50 basis points in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2017 primarily due to a decrease in third party maintenance expense.

Royalty Margin

Royalties do not have related cost of sales and have a 100% gross margin percentage. Therefore, royalty gross margin dollars vary directly with royalty revenue. Royalty revenue and therefore related gross margin dollars increased in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2017.

Research and Development Expenses

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2017		% of revenue		June 30, 2016		% of revenue		Change			% Change
Research and development	$	10,605	9.1	%	$	11,058	9.5	%	$	(453	)	(4.1	)%

The decrease in research and development expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2017 was primarily due to the cost reduction actions taken in fiscal 2017 the benefits of which carried over into the first quarter of fiscal 2018, the largest of which was in compensation and benefits from lower staffing levels.

17

Sales and Marketing Expenses

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2017		% of revenue		June 30, 2016		% of revenue		Change		% Change
Sales and marketing	$	27,824	23.8	%	$	26,367	22.7	%	$	1,457	5.5	%

The increase in sales and marketing expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2017 was primarily due to an increase of $1.7 million in compensation and benefits largely related to a realignment of certain employees from general and administrative to sales and marketing roles, and a $1.0 million increase in online advertising to expand brand marketing. These increases were partially offset by decreases in other marketing costs, the largest of which were marketing development funds of $0.4 million and direct marketing costs of $0.5 million.

General and Administrative Expenses

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2017		% of revenue		June 30, 2016		% of revenue		Change			% Change
General and administrative	$	12,509	10.7	%	$	12,960	11.1	%	$	(451	)	(3.5	)%

The decrease in general and administrative expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2017 was primarily due to the realignment of certain employees’ roles to sales and marketing impacting compensation and benefits costs in the first quarter of fiscal 2018, partially offset by $0.3 million in fees incurred for the Board of Directors’ transition. Board transition costs included fees related to the identification and appointment costs of new board members during the first quarter of fiscal 2018.

Restructuring Charges (Benefits)

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2017		% of revenue		June 30, 2016		% of revenue		Change		% Change
Restructuring charges (benefits)	$	2,335	2.0	%	$	2,052	1.8	%	$	283	13.8	%

For the first quarter of fiscal 2018, restructuring charges were primarily due to $1.6 million of severance and benefits costs incurred as a result of our Fiscal 2018 Restructuring Plan and $0.8 million of facilities restructuring charges due to a change in estimate of sublease timing and related expenses for our facilities included in the Fiscal 2016 Restructuring Plan.

For further information regarding our restructuring actions, refer to Note 6 “Restructuring Charges” of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other Income (Expense)

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2017		% of revenue		June 30, 2016		% of revenue		Change			% Change
Other income (expense)	$	98	0.1	%	$	155	0.1	%	$	(57	)	(36.8	)%

The decrease in other income and expense in the first quarter in fiscal 2018 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2017 was primarily due to net foreign exchange losses recognized from weakening of the U.S dollar against major currencies.

18

Interest Expense

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2017			% of revenue		June 30, 2016			% of revenue		Change			% Change
Interest expense	$	(2,558	)	2.2	%	$	(1,507	)	1.3	%	$	(1,051	)	69.7	%

The increase in interest expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2018 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2017 was primarily due to interest related to outstanding amounts under our credit facility which we entered into in the third quarter of fiscal 2017.

Income Taxes

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2017			% of pre-tax income		June 30, 2016		% of pre-tax loss		Change			% Change
Income tax provision (benefit)	$	(1,240	)	25.2	%	$	377	(12.0	)%	$	(1,617	)	(428.9	)%

The income tax provision for the first quarter of both fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 reflects expenses for foreign income taxes and state taxes. The income tax benefit for the first quarter of fiscal 2018 as compared to an income tax provision for the first quarter of fiscal 2017 was due to the release of $1.7 million of an uncertain tax position liability upon the effective settlement with the German taxing authorities of tax audits of our German subsidiary. We have provided a full valuation allowance against our U.S. net deferred tax assets due to our history of net losses, difficulty in predicting future results and our conclusion that we cannot rely on projections of future taxable income to realize the deferred tax assets.

Significant management judgment is required in determining our deferred tax assets and liabilities and valuation allowances for purposes of assessing our ability to realize any future benefit from our net deferred tax assets. We intend to maintain this valuation allowance until sufficient positive evidence exists to support a reversal or decrease in this allowance. Future income tax expense will be reduced to the extent that we have sufficient positive evidence to support a reversal of, or decrease in, our valuation allowance.

Share-based Compensation

The following table summarizes share-based compensation expense within our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017		June 30, 2016		Change			% Change
Cost of revenue	$	217	$	280	$	(63	)	(22.5	)%
Research and development	286		403		(117		)	(29.0	)%
Sales and marketing	520		612		(92		)	(15.0	)%
General and administrative	590		703		(113		)	(16.1	)%
	$	1,613	$	1,998	$	(385	)	(19.3	)%

The decrease in share-based compensation expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2017 was primarily due to a decrease of $0.4 million of restricted stock units resulting from a decrease in the number of restricted stock unit grants.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Capital Resources and Financial Condition

As of June 30, 2017, we had $8.7 million of cash and cash equivalents, which is comprised of cash deposits.

We continue to focus on improving our operating performance, including efforts to increase revenue and to control costs in order to improve margins, return to consistent profitability and generate positive cash flows from operating activities. We

19

believe that our existing cash balances, cash flow from operating activities, and available borrowing capacity will be sufficient to meet all currently planned expenditures, debt service and contractual and other obligations as they become due, and to sustain operations for at least the next 12 months. This belief is dependent upon our ability to achieve gross margin projections and to control operating expenses in order to provide positive cash flow from operating activities. Should we be unable to meet our gross margin or expense objectives, it would likely have a material negative effect on our liquidity and capital resources.

The following is a description of our existing capital resources including outstanding balances, funds available to borrow and primary repayment terms including interest rates. As of June 30, 2017, we had outstanding borrowings of $63.1 million in aggregate principal amount of the 4.50% notes, $50.0 million under the term loan and $13.4 million under the revolving credit agreement.

On October 21, 2016 (“closing date”), we entered into a credit facility which includes a revolving credit and security agreement entered into with PNC Bank, National Association (“revolving credit agreement”) and a term loan credit and security agreement entered into with TCW Asset Management Company LLC (“term loan agreement”).

Revolving credit agreement

Under the revolving credit agreement, we have the ability to borrow the lesser of $80 million or the amount of the monthly borrowing base, which is reduced by $1.0 million of the outstanding letters of credit. Our borrowing base is established monthly. The revolving credit agreement also includes an uncommitted accordion in an amount up to $20 million. The revolving credit agreement matures on October 21, 2021. As of June 30, 2017, our availability under the revolving credit agreement was $39.6 million.

Borrowings under the revolving credit agreement bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at our option, either (a) the greatest of (i) the base rate, (ii) the Federal funds rate plus 0.50% and (iii) the LIBOR rate based upon an interest period of 1 month plus 1.0%, plus an applicable margin of 1.50%, or (b) the LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin of 2.50%. The base rate is defined in the revolving credit agreement. Additionally, we are required to pay a 0.375% commitment fee on undrawn amounts under the revolving credit agreement on a quarterly basis, which is recorded as interest expense in the period incurred. As of June 30, 2017, the weighted average interest rate on our revolving credit agreement was 5.75% and we paid $0.2 million of interest during the first three months of fiscal 2018.

The terms of the revolving credit agreement also require us to establish minimum cash reserve balance of $20.0 million, which we have classified as long-term restricted cash. Up to $8.0 million of this amount is available to repay our 4.50% notes at maturity on November 15, 2017, subject to any amount so utilized being reestablished by April 1, 2018.

Term loan agreement

The term loan agreement provides for $50 million of a senior secured term loan which we drew on the closing date and $20 million of a senior secured delay draw term loan (“DDTL”). Borrowings under the DDTL are restricted to only be used to redeem our 4.50% convertible subordinated notes due November 15, 2017. The term loan agreement matures on October 21, 2021. The principal amount outstanding under the term loan is to be repaid on a quarterly basis in an amount equal to 1.25% of the original principal amount beginning on March 31, 2018, with any remaining principal balance due on the maturity of the term loan.

Borrowings under the term loan agreement bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at our option, either (a) the greatest of (i) 3.00%, (ii) the Federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (iii) the LIBOR rate based upon an interest period of 1 month plus 1.0% and (iv) the “prime rate” last quoted by the Wall Street Journal, plus a margin ranging from 6.00% to 7.25% based on the applicable senior net leverage ratio, or (b) the LIBOR rate plus 7.00% to 8.25% based on the applicable senior net leverage ratio. The senior net leverage ratio is defined in the term loan agreement. As of June 30, 2017, our interest rate on the term loan was 8.66% and we paid $1.1 million of interest during the first three months of fiscal 2018.

The revolving credit agreement and the term loan agreement contain certain financial covenants and customary events of default for such securities. Financial covenants include a fixed charge coverage ratio, senior net leverage ratio, total leverage ratio and a minimum cash reserve balance. Additionally, the revolving credit agreement includes a one time liquidity assessment requiring a minimum liquidity of not less than $27.0 million immediately following repayment of our 4.50% convertible subordinated notes. There is a blanket lien on all of our assets under the revolving credit agreement and term loan agreement. As of June 30, 2017, and during the first three months of fiscal 2018, we were in compliance with all covenants under the Revolving Credit Agreement and Term Loan Agreement and expect to remain in compliance for the next twelve months.

20

Convertible subordinated debt

In the third quarter of fiscal 2013, we issued $70 million aggregate principal amount of 4.50% convertible subordinated notes (the “4.50% Notes”) due November 15, 2017. These notes are convertible into shares of our common stock until November 14, 2017 at the option of the holders at a conversion rate of 75.896 shares per $1,000 principal amount, a conversion price of approximately $13.20 per share. The 4.50% Notes require semi-annual interest payments paid on May 15 and November 15 of each year and have no early call provisions. We paid $1.4 million of interest on the 4.50% notes in the first three months of fiscal 2018. We plan to pay off our 4.50% Notes using $20.0 million of proceeds from the DDTL, up to $8.0 million of accessible restricted cash, capacity under our credit facility, each as described above, and, as needed, available cash balances. Accordingly, our cash interest expense may increase following the repayment of the 4.50% Notes.

Generation of positive cash flow from operating activities has historically been, and will continue to be, an important source of cash to fund operating needs and meet our current and long-term obligations. We may choose to raise additional capital if strategically advantageous to the company. We can provide no assurance that such additional financing would be available to us on commercially acceptable terms or at all.

We have taken many actions in recent years and are continuing to take such actions to offset the negative impact of economic uncertainty and slow economic growth and their impact on the data protection and scale-out storage markets. We cannot provide assurance that the actions we have taken in the past or any actions we may take in the future will ensure a consistent, sustainable and sufficient level of cash flow from operating activities to fund, sustain or grow our business. Certain events that are beyond our control, including prevailing economic, competitive and industry conditions, as well as various legal and other disputes, may prevent us from achieving these financial objectives. Any inability to achieve consistent and sustainable cash flow from operating activities could result in:

(i) Restrictions on our ability to manage or fund our existing operations, which could result in a material and adverse effect on our future results of operations and financial condition.

(ii) Unwillingness on the part of the lenders to:

• Provide a waiver or amendment for any covenant violations we may experience in future periods, thereby triggering a default under, or termination of, the credit facility, or

• Approve any amendments to the credit facility we may seek to obtain in the future.

Any lack of renewal, waiver or amendment, if needed, could result in the revolving credit line becoming unavailable to us and any amounts outstanding on the revolving credit agreement and term loan agreement becoming immediately due and payable.

(iii) Further impairment of our financial flexibility, which could require us to raise additional funding in the capital markets sooner than we otherwise would, and on terms less favorable to us, if available at all.

In addition, the credit facility is collateralized by a pledge of all of our assets. If we were to default and were unable to obtain a waiver for such default, the lenders would have the right to foreclose on our assets in order to satisfy our obligations under these agreements.

Any of the above mentioned items, individually or in combination, could have a material and adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition, and our ability to pay back our debt obligations as they become due.

21

Cash Flows

Following is a summary of cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017			June 30, 2016
Net loss	$	(3,674	)	$	(3,520	)
Net cash provided by operating activities	1,018			5,161
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	153			(544		)
Net cash used in financing activities	$	(5,481	)	$	(3,986	)

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017

The $4.7 million difference between net income and net cash provided by operating activities during the three months ended June 30, 2017 was primarily due to $3.0 million in non-cash items, the largest of which were share-based compensation, depreciation, service parts lower of cost or market adjustment and income tax benefit from tax settlement, offset by a $1.3 million change in assets and liabilities, including a $5.6 million decrease in deferred revenue. The decrease in deferred revenue was largely due to a decrease in deferred service contracts, primarily driven by seasonality. The majority of our service contracts renew in our third and fourth fiscal quarters.

Cash provided by investing activities was due to purchases of property and equipment offset by a return of capital on an investment.

Cash used in financing activities was primarily due to $5.5 million of net repayments on the revolving credit agreement.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2016

The $9.0 million difference between net loss and net cash provided by operating activities during the three months ended June 30, 2016 was primarily due to a $15.4 million decrease in accounts receivable and $5.0 million in non-cash items, the largest of which were share-based compensation, depreciation and service parts lower of cost or market adjustment. These were partially offset by decreases of $8.4 million in accounts payable and $4.4 million in deferred revenue. The decrease in accounts receivable was primarily due to lower revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. The decrease in accounts payable was primarily due to the timing of invoice payments and decreased inventory purchases in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. The decrease in deferred revenue was largely due to a decrease in deferred service contracts revenue, primarily driven by seasonality. The majority of our service contracts renew in our third and fourth fiscal quarters.

Cash used in investing activities was primarily due to $0.5 million of property and equipment purchases. Equipment purchases were primarily for engineering equipment for additional IT infrastructure upgrades and equipment for product development.

Cash used in financing activities was primarily due to $4.0 million of net repayments of borrowings under our prior credit agreement with Wells Fargo, which was repaid in full in connection with our credit facility in October 2016.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

22

Commitments to Purchase Inventory

We use contract manufacturers for our manufacturing operations. Under these arrangements, the contract manufacturer procures inventory to manufacture products based upon our forecast of customer demand. We have similar arrangements with certain other suppliers. We are responsible for the financial impact on the supplier or contract manufacturer of any reduction or product mix shift in the forecast relative to materials that the third party had already purchased under a prior forecast. Such a variance in forecasted demand could require a cash payment for inventory in excess of current customer demand or for costs of excess or obsolete inventory. As of June 30, 2017, we issued non-cancelable commitments for $42.0 million to purchase inventory from our contract manufacturers and suppliers.

Contractual obligations

The table below summarizes our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2017 (in thousands):

	Payments Due by Period
	Less than 1 year			1 – 3 years			3 –5 years			More than 5 years		Total
Long-term debt	$	6,328		$	21,530		$	56,070		$	—	$	83,928
Convertible subordinated debt	64,155			—			—			—		64,155
Purchase obligations	42,027			—			—			—		42,027
Operating leases:
Lease payments	9,038			14,212			6,059			1,919		31,228
Sublease rental income	(1,514		)	(2,077		)	(573		)	—		(4,164		)
Total operating leases	7,524			12,135			5,486			1,919		27,064
Total contractual cash obligations	$	120,034		$	33,665		$	61,556		$	1,919	$	217,174

The contractual commitments shown above include $21.6 million in interest payments on our various debt obligations. 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND POLICIES

Our discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations are based on the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these statements requires us to make significant estimates and judgments about future uncertainties that affect reported assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. In the event that estimates or assumptions prove to be different from actual results, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current information. The accounting estimates requiring our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments because these matters are inherently uncertain are unchanged. These critical accounting estimates and policies have been disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2017 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on May 31, 2017.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

RISK

Interest Rate Risk

Changes in interest rates affect interest income earned on our cash equivalents. During the first three months of fiscal 2018, interest rates on these funds were under 1.0%, and we earned negligible amounts in interest income, thus a hypothetical 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would have an insignificant impact on interest income.

In addition, changes in interest rates affect interest expense on our borrowings under the revolving loan agreement and the term loan agreement. Under the term loan agreement and the revolving loan agreement, we had $50.0 million and $13.4 million outstanding borrowings at an interest rate of 8.66% and 5.75%, respectively, as of June 30, 2017. A hypothetical 100 basis point would result in an approximate $0.6 million change in our annual interest expense on our outstanding borrowings as of June 30, 2017.

23

Our convertible subordinated notes have a fixed interest rate, thus a hypothetical 100 basis point have no impact on our interest expense.

For a further description of our outstanding debt, see the section captioned “Liquidity and Capital Resources” in Part I, Item 2 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Foreign Exchange Risk

We conduct business in certain international markets, primarily in the European Union. Because we operate in international markets, we have exposure to different economic climates, political arenas, tax systems and regulations that could affect foreign exchange rates. Our primary exposure to foreign currency risk relates to transacting in foreign currency and recording the activity in U.S. dollars. Changes in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and these other currencies will result in transaction gains or losses, which we recognize in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

To the extent practicable, we minimize our foreign currency exposures by maintaining natural hedges between our assets and liabilities and revenues and expenses denominated in foreign currencies. We have entered into foreign currency option contracts in the past and we may enter into foreign exchange derivative contracts or other economic hedges in the future. Our goal in managing our foreign exchange risk is to reduce to the extent practicable our potential exposure to the changes that exchange rates might have on our earnings. We make a number of estimates in conducting hedging.  In the event those estimates differ significantly from actual results, we could experience greater volatility as a result of our hedges.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. We evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This control evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our CEO and our CFO. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC. Disclosure controls are also designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding the required disclosure. Based on the controls evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our disclosure controls were effective.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Crossroads

On February 18, 2014, Crossroads Systems, Inc. (“Crossroads”) filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Quantum in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, alleging infringement of U.S. patents 6,425,035 and 7,934,041. An amended complaint filed on April 15, 2014 also alleged infringement of U.S. patent 7,051,147. Crossroads asserts that we have incorporated Crossroads' patented technology into our StorNext QX and Q-Series lines of disk array products and into our Scalar libraries. Crossroads seeks unspecified monetary damages and injunctive relief. Crossroads has already dismissed all claims of infringement with respect to the StorNext QX and Q-Series products. In July and September of 2014, we filed for inter partes review of all three asserted Crossroads patents before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and a review has been initiated for all claims. On June 16, 2015, the U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas stayed the Crossroads trial proceedings pending resolution of the inter partes review proceedings. On January 29, 2016, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued decisions on the inter partes reviews for U.S. patents 6,425,035 and 7,051,147, ordering all claims of both patents to be unpatentable. On March 17, 2016, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued a decision on the inter partes review for U.S. patent 7,934,041, ordering all claims to be unpatentable. On March 31, 2016, Crossroads filed Notices of Appeal in each of the inter partes review decisions. On June 6, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB decision finding all claims of all patents to be unpatentable.  On July 6, 2017, Crossroads filed a petition for a rehearing en banc before the Federal Circuit. On August 8, 2017, the Federal Circuit denied Crossroads' petition. We believe the probability that this lawsuit will have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition is remote.

24

Realtime Data

On July, 22 2016, Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO(“Realtime Data”) filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Quantum in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alleging infringement of U.S. Patents Nos. 7,161,506, 7,378,992, 7,415,530, 8,643,513, 9,054,728, and 9,116,908. The lawsuit has been transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California for further proceedings. Realtime Data asserts that we have incorporated Realtime Data’s patented technology into our compression products and services. Realtime Data seeks unspecified monetary damages and other relief that the Court deems appropriate. On July 31, 3017, the District Court stayed proceedings in this litigation pending decision in Inter Partes Review proceedings currently before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and relating to the Realtime patents. We believe the probability that this lawsuit will have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition is remote.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE RISKS DESCRIBED BELOW, TOGETHER WITH ALL OF THE OTHER INFORMATION INCLUDED IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q. THE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES DESCRIBED BELOW ARE NOT THE ONLY ONES FACING QUANTUM. ADDITIONAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES NOT PRESENTLY KNOWN TO US OR THAT ARE CURRENTLY DEEMED IMMATERIAL MAY ALSO IMPAIR OUR BUSINESS AND OPERATIONS. THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q CONTAINS “FORWARD-LOOKING” STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. PLEASE SEE “MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS” FOR ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION OF THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS.

We derive significant revenue from products incorporating tape technology. Our future results of operations depend in part on continued market acceptance and use of products employing tape technology, and decreases in the market have materially and adversely impacted our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if we are unable to compete with new or alternative storage technologies, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

We currently derive significant revenue from products that incorporate some form of tape technology, and we expect to continue to derive significant revenue from these products in the next several years. As a result, our future results of operations depend in part on continued market acceptance and use of products employing tape technology. We believe that the storage environment is changing, including reduced demand for tape products. Decreased market acceptance or use of products employing tape technology has materially and adversely impacted our business, financial condition and results of operations and we expect that our revenues from tape products will continue to decline, which could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations in the future.

Disk products as well as various software solutions and alternative technologies continue to gain broader market acceptance. We expect that, over time, many of our tape customers will continue to migrate toward these products and solutions and that revenue from these products and solutions will generate a greater proportion of our revenue. While we are making targeted investments in software, disk backup systems and other alternative technologies, these markets are characterized by rapid innovation, evolving customer demands and strong competition, including competition with several companies who are also significant customers. If we are not successful in our efforts, we may not be able to retain customers or attract new customers and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

We have significant indebtedness, which imposes upon us debt service obligations, and our credit facility contains various operating and financial covenants that limit our discretion in the operation of our business. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flows from operations and overall results of operations to meet these debt obligations or remain in compliance with the covenants and fund our ongoing operations, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Our level of indebtedness presents significant risks to our business and investors, both in terms of the constraints that it places on our ability to operate our business and because of the possibility that we may not generate sufficient cash and results of operations to remain in compliance with our covenants and pay the principal and interest on our indebtedness as it becomes due. For further description of our outstanding debt, see the section captioned “Liquidity and Capital Resources” in Part I, Item 2 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

25

As a result of our indebtedness:

• Our ability to invest in the growth areas of our business is constrained by the financial covenants contained in our credit facility, which require us to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and liquidity levels;

• We must dedicate a portion of our cash flow from operations and other capital resources to debt service, thereby reducing our ability to fund working capital, capital expenditures, research and development and other cash requirements;

• Our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes and opportunities in the markets in which we compete may be limited, including our ability to engage in mergers and acquisitions activity, which may place us at a competitive disadvantage;

• We are subject to mandatory field audits and control of cash receipts by the lenders if we do not maintain liquidity above certain thresholds;

• We may be more vulnerable to adverse economic and industry conditions; and

• We may be unable to make payments on other indebtedness or obligations.

Our credit facility contains restrictive covenants that require us to comply with and maintain certain liquidity levels and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, as well as restrict our ability, subject to certain thresholds, to:

• Incur debt;

• Incur liens;

• Make acquisitions of businesses or entities or sell certain assets;

• Make investments, including loans, guarantees and advances;

• Engage in transactions with affiliates;

• Pay dividends or engage in stock repurchases; and

• Enter into certain restrictive agreements.

The recent weakness we have seen in the general storage and backup market, and the resulting underperformance of our data protection business, which is the primary driver of our overall cash flow and operating income, has placed increased pressure on our ability to meet our liquidity and fixed charge coverage ratio covenants. We have taken steps and are making changes to our business designed to ensure that our results of operations are sufficient to meet these covenants, but if we are not successful in implementing these changes or our results turn out to be lower than expected, we may violate a covenant, which could result in a default under our credit facility agreements.

Our ability to make scheduled payments of the principal of, to pay interest on or to refinance our indebtedness, including the convertible notes, or to make cash payments in connection with our convertible notes or our credit facility, as well as our ability to fund our ongoing operations and invest in our business depends on our ability to generate cash in the future. Our ability to generate cash depends on future performance, which is subject to economic, among other things, financial, competitive and other factors beyond our control. Further, as our indebtedness reaches maturity, we will be required to make large cash payments or adopt one or more alternatives, such as restructuring indebtedness or obtaining additional debt or equity financing on terms that may be onerous or highly dilutive. We plan to pay off our 4.50% Notes using our excess capacity under our credit facility as well as cash generated from operations. Accordingly, our cash interest expense may increase following the repayment of the notes and we will be required to repay all amounts as scheduled under the terms of the credit facility.

Our ability to restructure or refinance our indebtedness will depend on the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. We may be unable to incur additional debt or refinance our existing debt on acceptable terms, if at all.

Our credit facility is collateralized by a pledge of substantially all of our assets. If we were to default and were unable to obtain a waiver for such a default, the lenders would have a right to foreclose on our assets in order to satisfy our obligations under these agreements. Any such action on the part of the lenders against us could have a materially adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

26

We rely on indirect sales channels to market and sell our branded products. Therefore, the loss of or deterioration in our relationship with one or more of our resellers or distributors, or our inability to establish new indirect sales channels to drive growth of our branded revenue, especially for disk backup systems and scale-out tiered storage, could negatively affect our results of operations.

We sell the majority of our branded products to distributors such as Ingram Micro, Inc. and others, value-added resellers (“VARs”) and direct marketing resellers (“DMRs”) such as CDW Corporation, who in turn sell our products to end users. The success of these sales channels is hard to predict, particularly over time, and we have no purchase commitments or long-term orders from them that assure us of any baseline sales through these channels. Several of our resellers carry competing product lines that they may promote over our products. A reseller might not continue to purchase our products or market them effectively, and each reseller determines the type and amount of our products that it will purchase from us and the pricing of the products that it sells to end user customers. Establishing new indirect sales channels is an important part of our strategy to drive growth of our branded revenue and as our business shifts toward our branded products, these indirect sales channels will have increasing importance to our business.

As we introduce new products and solutions, our relationship with channel partners that historically have sold other products and solutions that now compete with our new offerings could be adversely impacted. For example, we introduced QXS hybrid storage beginning in fiscal 2016 causing us to more directly compete for primary storage sales with channel partners that sold other primary storage products.

Certain of our contracts with customers contain “most favored nation” pricing provisions mandating that we offer our products to these customers at the lowest price offered to other similarly situated customers. In addition, sales of our enterprise products, and the revenue associated with the on-site service of those products, are somewhat concentrated in specific customers, including government agencies and government-related companies. Any failure of such customers and agencies to continue purchasing products in the same quantities and in the same time frames as they have in the past could affect our results of operations. Our results of operations could be adversely affected by any number of factors including:

• A change in competitive strategy that adversely affects a reseller’s willingness or ability to distribute our products;

• The reduction, delay or cancellation of orders or the return of a significant amount of products;

• Our inability to gain traction in developing new indirect sales channels for our branded products;

• The loss of one or more of such distributors or resellers;

• Any financial difficulties of such distributors or resellers that result in their inability to pay amounts owed to us; or

• Changes in requirements or programs that allow our products to be sold by third parties to government customers.

If our products fail to meet our or our customers’ specifications for quality and reliability, we may face liability and reputational or financial harm which may adversely impact our results of operations and our competitive position may suffer.

Although we place great emphasis on product quality, we may from time to time experience problems with the performance of our products, which could result in one or more of the following:

• Increased costs related to fulfillment of our warranty obligations;

• The reduction, delay or cancellation of orders or the return of a significant amount of products;

• Focused failure analysis causing distraction of the sales, operations and management teams; or

• The loss of reputation in the market and customer goodwill.

These factors could cause our business, financial condition and results of operations to be materially and adversely affected.

In addition, we face potential liability for performance problems of our products because our end users employ our storage technologies for the storage and backup of important data and to satisfy regulatory requirements. Loss of this data could cost our customers significant amounts of money, directly and indirectly as a result of lost revenues, intellectual property, proprietary business information or other harm to their business. We could also potentially face claims for product liability from our customers if our products cause property damage or bodily injury. Although we maintain technology errors and omissions liability and general liability insurance, our insurance may not cover potential claims of these types or may not be adequate to indemnify us for all liability that may be imposed. Any imposition of liability or litigation costs that are not covered by insurance or is in excess of our insurance coverage could harm our business.

27

A large percentage of our sales are to a few customers, some of which are also competitors, and these customers generally have no minimum or long-term purchase commitments. The loss of, or a significant reduction in demand from, one or more key customers could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our sales have been and continue to be concentrated among a few customers because under our business model, we sell to OEMs, distributors, VARs and DMRs to reach end user customers. Furthermore, customers are not obligated to purchase any minimum product volume, and our relationships with customers are terminable at will. Revenue from OEM customers has decreased in recent years. If we experience further declines in revenue from OEM customers or any of our other large customers, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, certain of our large customers are also our competitors, and such customers could decide to reduce or terminate their purchases of our products for competitive reasons.

Some of our tape and disk products are incorporated into larger storage systems or solutions that are marketed and sold to end users by large OEM customers as well as VARs, channel partners and other distributors. Because of this, we have limited market access to these end users, limiting our ability to reach and influence their purchasing decisions. These market conditions further our reliance on these OEM and other large customers such as distributors and VARs. Thus if they were to significantly reduce, cancel or delay their orders with us, our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

A portion of our sales are to various agencies and departments of the U.S. federal government, and funding cuts to federal spending can adversely impact our revenue. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 implemented automatic spending cuts beginning March 1, 2013. Between October 1, 2013 and October 16, 2013, the U.S. government partial shutdown caused reductions, cancellations and delayed orders. Future spending cuts by the U.S. federal government or changes in its procurement processes or criteria could decrease revenue from sales to the federal government that could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

Our results of operations depend on a limited number of products and on new product introductions, which may not be successful, in which case our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

A limited number of products comprise a significant majority of our sales, and due to rapid technological change in the industry, our future results of operations depend on our ability to develop and successfully introduce new products. To compete effectively, we must continually improve existing products and introduce new ones. We have devoted and expect to continue to devote considerable management and financial resources to these efforts. We cannot provide assurance that:

• We will introduce new products in the time frame we are forecasting;

• We will not experience technical, quality, performance-related or other difficulties that could prevent or delay the introduction and market acceptance of new products;

• Our new products will achieve market acceptance and significant market share, or that the markets for these products will continue or grow as we have anticipated;

• Our new products will be successfully or timely qualified with our customers by meeting customer performance and quality specifications which must occur before customers will place large product orders; or

• We will achieve high volume production of these new products in a timely manner, if at all.

If we are not successful in timely completion of our new product qualifications and then ramping sales to our key customers, our revenue and results of operations could be adversely impacted. In addition, if the quality of our products is not acceptable to our customers, this could result in customer dissatisfaction, lost revenue and increased warranty and repair costs.

We continue to face risks related to economic uncertainty and slow economic growth.

Uncertainty about economic conditions poses a risk as businesses may further reduce or postpone spending in response to reduced budgets, tightening of credit markets, negative financial news and declines in income or asset values which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The slow economic growth in recent years along with periods of economic uncertainty in various countries around the world has had a material and adverse impact on our business and our financial condition.

In particular, we have experienced reduced demand for IT products and services overall and more specifically for products with tape technology in the data protection market. We continue to face risks related to economic conditions in Europe, including concerns about sovereign debt, and uncertainty related to the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union and related political matters, which could negatively impact the U.S. and global economies and adversely affect our financial results. In addition, as a result of market conditions or other factors our ability to access capital markets may be restricted, which could

28

have an impact on our ability to react to changing economic and business conditions and could also materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Competition may intensify in the data protection market as a result of competitors introducing products based on new technology standards and merger and acquisition activity, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our competitors in the data protection market for disk backup systems and virtual machine solutions are aggressively trying to advance and develop new technologies and products to compete against our technologies and products and we face the risk that customers could choose competitor products over ours. Competition in our markets is characterized by technological innovation and advancement. As a result of competition and new technology standards, our sales or gross margins could decline, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Technological developments and competition over the years in the tape automation market and in the storage market in general have resulted in decreased prices for tape automation products and product offerings. Pricing pressure is more pronounced in the tape automation market for entry-level products and less pronounced for enterprise products. Over time, the prices of our products and competitor products have decreased, but such products often incorporate new and/or different features and technologies than in prior years. We face risks that customers could choose competitor products over ours due to these features and technologies or due to pricing differences. We have managed pricing pressure by reducing production costs and/or adding features to increase value to maintain a certain level of gross margin for our tape automation systems. However, certain of our costs are fixed in the short term, so we may not be able to offset price decreases or reductions in demand sufficiently to maintain our profitability. In addition, if competition further intensifies, or if there is additional industry consolidation, our sales and gross margins for tape automation systems could decline, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Industry consolidation and competing technologies with device products, which include tape drives and removable hard drives, have resulted in decreased prices and increasingly commoditized device products. We have exited certain portions of the device market and as a result have realized decreased sales of devices. We face risk of reduced shipments of our devices beyond our plans and could have reduced margins on these products, which could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Additionally, the competitive landscape could change due to merger and acquisition activity in the data protection market. Such transactions may impact us in a number of ways. For instance, they could result in:

• Competitors consolidating, having greater resources and becoming more competitive with us;

• Companies that we have not historically competed against entering into one or more of our primary markets and increasing competition in such market(s);

• Customers that are also competitors becoming more competitive with us and/or reducing their purchase of our products; and

• Competitors acquiring our current suppliers or business partners and negatively impacting our business model.

These transactions also create uncertainty and disruption in the market because whether a pending transaction will be completed, the timing of such a transaction and its degree of impact are often unknown. Given these factors and others, such merger and acquisition activity may materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Competition in the scale-out storage market is intense and introduction by competitors of products based on new technology standards and market consolidation could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Competition in the scale-out storage market is characterized by technological innovation and advancement, including performance and scale features, and our competitors are aggressively trying to advance and develop new technologies and solutions. If we are unable to compete effectively in these markets and develop solutions that have features and technologies that our customers desire, including new technology standards, our sales from software solutions and appliances could decline, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

29

Additionally, the competitive landscape could change due to mergers and acquisitions among our competitors, customers and partners. Transactions such as these may impact us in a number of ways. For instance, they could result in:

• Competitors consolidating, having greater resources and becoming more competitive with us;

• Companies that we have not historically competed against entering into one or more of our primary markets and increasing competition in such market(s);

• Customers that are also competitors becoming more competitive with us and/or reducing their purchase of our products; and

• Competitors acquiring our current suppliers or business partners and negatively impacting our business model.

These transactions also create uncertainty and disruption in the market, because whether a pending transaction will be completed, the timing of such a transaction and its degree of impact are often unknown. Given these factors and others, such merger and acquisition activity may materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

A significant decline in our media royalty or branded software revenues could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our media royalties or branded software revenues are relatively profitable and can significantly impact total company profitability. We receive media royalty revenue based on tape media cartridges sold by various tape media manufacturers and resellers. Under our license agreements with these companies, each of the licensees determines the pricing and number of units of tape media cartridges that it sells. Our media royalty revenue varies depending on the level of sales of the various media cartridge offerings sold by the licensees and other factors, including:

• The size of the installed base of devices and similar products that use tape media cartridges;

• The performance of our strategic licensing partners, which sell tape media cartridges;

• The relative growth in units of newer device products, since the associated media cartridges for newer products typically sell at higher prices than the media cartridges associated with older products;

• The media consumption habits and rates of end users;

• The pattern of device retirements; and

• The level of channel inventories.

Our media royalties depend on royalty rates and the quantity of media consumed in the market. We do not control licensee sales of these tape media cartridges. Reduced royalty rates, or a reduced installed device base using tape media cartridges, would result in further reductions in our media royalty revenue and could reduce gross margins. This could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our branded software revenues are also dependent on many factors, including the success of competitive offerings, our ability to execute on our product roadmap and our effectiveness at marketing and selling our branded software solutions directly or through our channel partners. Disruptions to any one of these factors could reduce our branded software revenues, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Some of our products contain licensed, third-party technology that provides important product functionality and features. The loss or inability to obtain any such license could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Certain of our products contain technology licensed from third parties that provides important product functionality and features. We have contractual protections within our license agreements to help mitigate against the risks of incorporating this third-party technology into our products. However, there remains a risk that we may not have continued access to this technology, for instance, if the licensing company ceased to exist, either from bankruptcy, dissolution or purchase by a competitor. In some cases, we may seek to enforce our contractual protections via litigation against the licensing company itself, which may cause us to incur significant legal or other costs and may not be resolved in our favor. Other legal actions, such as intellectual property actions, brought against the licensing company could also impact our future access to the technology. We also have limited visibility or control of the technology roadmap at the licensing company and cannot ensure that the licensing company will advance the roadmap of the licensed technology in the manner best for Quantum. Any of these actions could negatively impact our technology licensing, thereby reducing the functionality and/or features of our products, and materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We also face the risk of not being able to quickly implement a replacement technology or otherwise mitigate the risks associated with not having access to this licensed technology, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

30

We have taken considerable steps towards reducing our cost structure and may take further cost reduction actions. The steps we have taken and may take in the future may not reduce our cost structure to a level appropriate in relation to our future sales and therefore, these anticipated cost reductions may be insufficient to result in consistent profitability.

In the last several years, we have recorded significant restructuring charges and made cash payments in order to reduce our cost of sales and operating expenses to respond to adverse economic and industry conditions, from strategic management decisions and to rationalize our operations following acquisitions. In each of the lst three fiscal years we implemented restructuring plans to eliminate certain positions in the U.S. and internationally. These restructuring plans may result in decreases to our revenues or adversely affect our ability to grow our business in the future. Workforce reductions may also adversely affect employee morale and our ability to retain our employees. We may take future steps to further reduce our operating costs, including future cost reduction steps or restructurings in response to strategic decisions, adverse changes in our business or industry or future acquisitions. We may be unable to reduce our cost of sales and operating expenses at a rate and to a level appropriate in relation to our future sales, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, our ability to achieve the anticipated cost savings and other benefits from these restructuring plans within the expected time frame is subject to many estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions are subject to significant economic, competitive and other uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control. If these estimates and assumptions are incorrect, if we experience delays, or if other unforeseen events occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

If we are unable to attract and retain skilled employees, our business could be materially and adversely impacted.

We may be subject to increased turnover in our employee base or the inability to fill open headcount requisitions due to competition, concerns about our operational performance, business culture or other factors. In addition, we may need to rely on the performance of employees whose skill sets are not sufficiently developed to fulfill their expected job responsibilities. Either of these situations could impair or delay our ability to realize operational and strategic objectives and cause increased expenses and lost sales opportunities.

Additionally, over the last several years, we made certain changes in our strategic direction focusing on key technology segments. As part of this change in focus, we reduced costs of revenue and other operating expenses. Executing on this new strategic direction as well as the ongoing efficiency initiatives across the company, such as our restructuring plans in the last three years, could adversely affect our ability to retain and hire key personnel and may result in reduced productivity by our employees. Further, our stock price has declined in recent years, reducing the retentive value of our equity compensation. If employees and potential employees do not view our equity compensation as valuable, we may have difficulty retaining or hiring key personnel.

The loss of the services of any of our key employees, the inability to attract or retain qualified talent in the future, or delays in hiring required talent, particularly sales and engineering talent, could delay the development and introduction of our products or services and/or negatively affect our ability to sell our products or services.

Third party intellectual property infringement claims could result in substantial liability and significant costs, and, as a result, our business, financial condition and result of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

From time to time, third parties allege our infringement of and need for a license under their patented or other proprietary technology, such as our current litigation with Crossroads Systems, Inc. and Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO described in Part II, Item 1 “Legal Proceedings.” While we currently believe the amount of ultimate liability, if any, with respect to any such actions will not materially affect our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity, the ultimate outcome of any license discussion or litigation is uncertain. Adverse resolution of any third party infringement claim could subject us to substantial liabilities and require us to refrain from manufacturing and selling certain products. In addition, the costs incurred in intellectual property litigation can be substantial, regardless of the outcome. As a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

We license certain of our software under "open source" licenses. Because of the characteristics of open source software licenses, it may be relatively easy for competitors, some of whom have greater resources than we have, to enter our markets and compete with us.

One of the characteristics of open source software is that the source code for our open source projects is publicly available, and anyone who obtains copies has a license under our intellectual property rights, which, depending on the license, may include our patents, to modify and redistribute the software and use it to compete in the marketplace. Such competition can develop without the degree of overhead and lead time required by traditional proprietary software companies. It is possible for competitors to use our open source project software to develop their own software, potentially reducing the demand for our solution and putting price pressure on our subscription offerings. We cannot guarantee that competitive pressure or the

31

availability of new open source software will not result in price reductions, reduced operating margins and loss of market share, any one of which could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In addition, we use our own open source project software in our proprietary products. As a result, there is a risk that we may inadvertently release as open source certain code that was intended to be kept as proprietary, that reveals confidential information regarding the inner workings of our proprietary products, or that could enable competitors to more readily reverse engineer or replicate aspects of our proprietary technology that we would otherwise protect as trade secrets. We may also accept contributions from third parties to our open source projects, and it may be difficult for us to accurately determine the origin of the contributions and whether their use, including in our proprietary products, infringes, misappropriates or violates third party intellectual property or other rights. The availability of certain of our own software in source code form may also enable others to detect and exploit security vulnerabilities in our products.

Our products may contain "open source" software and failure to comply with the terms of the open source license could have a material adverse effect on our competitive positions and financial results.

Certain products or technologies acquired or developed by us may include “open source” software. Open source software is typically licensed for use at no initial charge. Certain open source software licenses, however, require users of the open source software to license to others any software that is based on, incorporates or interacts with, the open source software under the terms of the open source license. Although we endeavor to comply fully with such requirements, third parties could claim that we are required to license larger portions of our software than we believe we are required to license under open source software licenses. If such claims were successful, they could adversely impact our competitive position and financial results by providing our competitors with access to sensitive information that may help them develop competitive products. In addition, our use of open source software may harm our business and subject us to intellectual property claims, litigation or proceedings in the future because:

• Open source license terms may be ambiguous and may subject us to unanticipated obligations regarding our products, technologies and intellectual property;

• Open source software generally cannot be protected under trade secret law; and

• It may be difficult for us to accurately determine the origin of the open source code and whether the open source software infringes, misappropriates or violates third party intellectual property or other rights.

As a result of our global manufacturing and sales operations, we are subject to a variety of risks related to our business outside of the U.S., any of which could, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our business.

A significant portion of our manufacturing and sales operations and supply chain occurs in countries other than the U.S. We also have sales outside the U.S. We utilize contract manufacturers to produce and fulfill orders for our products and have suppliers for various components, several of which have operations located in foreign countries including China, Hungary, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, Mexico, the Philippines and Thailand. Because of these operations, we are subject to a number of risks including:

• Reduced or limited protection of our intellectual property;

• Compliance with multiple and potentially conflicting regulatory requirements and practices;

• Commercial laws that favor local businesses;

• Exposure to economic fluctuations including inflationary risk and continuing sovereign debt risk;

• Shortages in component parts and raw materials;

• Import, export and trade regulation changes that could erode our profit margins or restrict our ability to transport our products;

• The burden and cost of complying with foreign and U.S. laws governing corporate conduct outside the U.S. including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the United Kingdom Bribery Act and other similar regulations;

• Adverse movement of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar (the currency in which our results are reported) and uncertain global economic conditions generally;

• Inflexible employee contracts and employment laws that may make it difficult to terminate or change the compensation structure for employees in some foreign countries in the event of business downturns;

• Recruiting employees in highly competitive markets and wage inflation in certain markets;

• Potential restrictions on the transfer of funds between countries;

• Political instability, military, social and infrastructure risks, especially in emerging or developing economies;

• Import and export duties and value-added taxes;

• Natural disasters, including earthquakes, flooding, typhoons and tsunamis; and

• Cultural differences that affect the way we do business.

Any or all of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business.

32

Our quarterly results of operations have fluctuated significantly, and past quarterly results of operations should not be used to predict future performance.

Our quarterly results of operations have fluctuated significantly in the past and could fluctuate significantly in the future. As a result, our quarterly results of operations should not be used to predict future performance. Quarterly results of operations could be materially and adversely affected by a number of factors, including, but not limited to:

• Fluctuations in IT spending as a result of economic conditions or fluctuations in U.S. federal government spending;

• Failure by our contract manufacturers to complete shipments in the last month of a quarter during which a substantial portion of our products are typically shipped;

• Changes in product and revenue mix;

• New product announcements by us or our competitors which may cause delays in purchasing;

• Customers canceling, reducing, deferring or rescheduling significant orders as a result of excess inventory levels, weak economic conditions or other factors;

• Seasonality, including customer fiscal year-ends and budget availability impacting customer demand for our products;

• Declines in large orders (defined as orders greater than $200,000);

• Declines in royalty or software revenues;

• Product development and ramp cycles and product performance or quality issues of ours or our competitors;

• Poor execution of and performance against expected sales and marketing plans and strategies;

• Reduced demand from our OEM or distribution, VAR, DMR and other large customers;

• Increased competition which may, among other things, increase pricing pressure or reduce sales;

• Restructuring actions or unexpected costs; and

• Foreign exchange fluctuations.

If we fail to meet our projected quarterly results, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

If we fail to protect our intellectual property or if others use our proprietary technology without authorization, our competitive position may suffer.

Our future success and ability to compete depends in part on our proprietary technology. We rely on a combination of copyright, patent, trademark and trade secrets laws and nondisclosure agreements to establish and protect our proprietary technology. However, we cannot provide assurance that patents will be issued with respect to pending or future patent applications that we have filed or plan to file or that our patents will be upheld as valid or will prevent the development of competitive products or that any actions we have taken will adequately protect our intellectual property rights. We generally enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, customers, potential customers, contract manufacturers and others as required, in which we strictly limit access to, and distribution of, our software and further limit the disclosure and use of our proprietary information.

Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain or use our products or technology. Enforcing our intellectual property rights can sometimes only be accomplished through the use of litigation. Our competitors may also independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to our technology. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the U.S.

33

Because we may order components from suppliers in advance of receipt of customer orders for our products that include these components, we could face a material inventory risk if we fail to accurately forecast demand for our products or manage production, which could have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows.

Although we use third parties to manufacture our products, in some cases we may retain the responsibility to purchase component inventory to support third party manufacturing activities, which presents a number of risks that could materially and adversely affect our financial condition. For instance, as part of our component planning, we may place orders with or pay certain suppliers for components in advance of receipt of customer orders. We may occasionally enter into negotiated orders with vendors early in the manufacturing process of our products to ensure that we have sufficient components for our products to meet anticipated customer demand. Because the design and manufacturing process for these components can be complicated, it is possible that we could experience a design or manufacturing flaw that could delay or even prevent the production of the components for which we previously committed to pay. We also face the risk of ordering too many components, or conversely, not enough components, since supply orders are generally based on forecasts of customer orders rather than actual customer orders. In addition, in some cases, we may make non-cancelable order commitments to our suppliers for work-in-progress, supplier’s finished goods, custom sub-assemblies, discontinued (end-of-life) components and Quantum-unique raw materials that are necessary to meet our lead times for finished goods. If we cannot change or be released from supply orders, we could incur costs from the purchase of unusable components, either due to a delay in the production of the components or other supplies or as a result of inaccurately predicting supply orders in advance of customer orders. These same risks exist with our third party contract manufacturing partners. Our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected if we incur increased costs or are unable to fulfill customer orders.

Our manufacturing, component production and service repair are outsourced to third party contract manufacturers, component suppliers and service providers. If we cannot obtain products, parts and services from these third parties in a cost effective and timely manner that meets our customers’ expectations, this could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Many aspects of our supply chain and operational results are dependent on the performance of third party business partners. We use third party contract manufacturers, service providers and/or product integrators in connection with our outsourced manufacturing model. We face a number of risks as a result of these relationships, including, among others:

• Sole source of product supply

In many cases, our business partner may be the sole source of supply for the products or parts they manufacture, or the services they provide, for us. Because we are relying on one supplier, we are at greater risk of experiencing shortages, reduced production capacity or other delays in customer deliveries that could result in customer dissatisfaction, lost sales and increased expenses, each of which could materially damage customer relationships and result in lost revenue.

• Cost and purchase commitments

We may not be able to control the costs for the products our business partners manufacture for us or the services they provide to us. They procure inventory to build our products based upon a forecast of customer demand that we provide. We could be responsible for the financial impact on the contract manufacturer, supplier or service provider of any reduction or product mix shift in the forecast relative to materials that they had already purchased under a prior forecast. Such a variance in forecasted demand could require us to pay them for finished goods in excess of current customer demand or for excess or obsolete inventory and generally incur higher costs. As a result, we could experience reduced gross margins and operating losses based on these purchase commitments. With respect to service providers, although we have contracts for most of our third party repair service vendors, the contract period may not be the same as the underlying service contract with our customer. In such cases, we face risks that the third party service provider may increase the cost of providing services over subsequent periods contracted with our customer.

• Financial condition and stability

Our third party business partners may suffer adverse financial or operational results or may be negatively impacted by global and local economic conditions. Therefore, we may face interruptions in the supply of product components or service as a result of financial or other volatility affecting our supply chain. We could suffer production downtime or increased costs to procure alternate products or services as a result of the possible inadequate financial condition of one or more of our business partners.

34

• Quality and supplier conduct

We have limited control over the quality of products and components produced and services provided by our supply chain and third party contract manufacturing and service business partners. Therefore, the quality of the products, parts or services may not be acceptable to our customers and could result in customer dissatisfaction, lost revenue and increased warranty costs. In addition, we have limited control over the manner in which our business partners conduct their business. Sub-tier suppliers selected by the primary third party could have process control issues or could select components with latent defects that manifest over a longer period of time. We may face negative consequences or publicity as a result of a third party’s failure to comply with applicable compliance, trade, environmental or employment regulations.

Any or all of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business. In the past we have successfully transitioned products or component supply from one supplier or manufacturing location to another without significant financial or operational impact, but there is no guarantee of our continued ability to do so.

If we do not successfully manage the changes that we have made and may continue to make to our infrastructure and management, our business could be disrupted, and that could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

Managing change is an important focus for us. In recent years, we have implemented several significant initiatives involving our sales and marketing, engineering and operations organizations, aimed at increasing our efficiency and better aligning these groups with our corporate strategy. In addition, we have reduced headcount to streamline and consolidate our supporting functions as appropriate in response to market or competitive conditions and following past acquisitions and have increased our reliance on certain third party business relationships. If we are unable to successfully manage the changes that we implement and detect and address issues as they arise, our business could be disrupted and our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely impacted.

Because we rely heavily on distributors and other resellers to market and sell our products, if one or more distributors were to experience a significant deterioration in its financial condition or its relationship with us, this could disrupt the distribution of our products and reduce our revenue, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We heavily utilize distributors and VARs to perform the functions necessary to market and sell our products in certain product and geographic segments. To fulfill this role, the distributor must maintain an acceptable level of financial stability, creditworthiness and the ability to successfully manage business relationships with the customers it serves directly. Under our distributor agreements with these companies, each of the distributors determines the type and amount of our products that it will purchase from us and the pricing of the products that it sells to its customers. If the distributor is unable to perform in an acceptable manner, we may be required to reduce the amount of sales of our product to the distributor or terminate the relationship. We may also incur financial losses for product returns from distributors or for the failure or refusal of distributors to pay obligations owed to us. Either scenario could result in fewer of our products being available to the affected market segments, reduced levels of customer satisfaction and/or increased expenses, which could in turn have a material and adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our stock price has been volatile and such volatility could increase based on the trading activity of our institutional investors. In addition, there are other factors and events that could affect the trading prices of our common stock.

A small number of institutional investors have owned a significant portion of our common stock at various times in recent years. If any or all of these investors were to decide to purchase significant additional shares or to sell significant amounts or all of the common shares they currently own, or if there is a perception that those sales may occur, that may cause our stock price to be more volatile. For example, there have been instances in the past where a shareholder with a significant equity position began to sell shares, putting downward pressure on our stock price for the duration of their selling activity. In these situations, selling pressure outweighed buying demand and our stock price declined. In some cases, this situation has occurred due to our stock price falling below institutional investors’ price thresholds and our volatility increasing beyond investors’ volatility parameters, causing even greater selling pressure.

35

Trading prices of our common stock may fluctuate in response to a number of events and factors, such as:

• General economic conditions;

• Changes in interest rates;

• Fluctuations in the stock market in general and market prices for technology companies in particular;

• Large or sudden purchases or sales of stock by existing or new investors, including activist investors;

• Quarterly variations in our results of operations;

• Failure to meet our expectations or the expectations of securities analysts and investors;

• Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements or any investigations or enforcement actions related to a potential failure to comply with applicable regulations;

• Significant changes in our brand or reputations;

• New products, services, innovations and strategic developments by our competitors or us, or business combinations and investments by our competitors or us;

• Changes in financial estimates by us or securities analysts and recommendations by securities analysts;

• Changes in our capital structure, including issuance of additional debt or equity to the public; and

• Strategic acquisitions.

Any of these events and factors may cause our stock price to rise or fall and may adversely affect our business and financing opportunities.

Our operation and design processes are subject to safety and environmental regulations which could lead to increased costs, or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to a variety of laws and regulations relating to, among other things, the use, storage, discharge and disposal of materials and substances used in our facilities as well as the safety of our employees and the public. Current regulations in the U.S. and various international jurisdictions restrict the use of certain potentially hazardous materials used in electronic products and components (including lead and some flame retardants), impose a “take back” obligation on manufacturers for the financing of the collection, recovery and disposal of electrical and electronic equipment and require extensive investigation into and disclosure regarding certain minerals used in our supply chain. We have implemented procedures and will likely continue to introduce new processes to comply with current and future safety and environmental legislation. However, measures taken now or in the future to comply with such legislation may adversely affect our costs or product sales by requiring us to acquire costly equipment or materials, redesign processes or to incur other significant expenses in adapting our supply chain, waste disposal and emission management processes. Furthermore, safety or environmental claims or our failure to comply with present or future regulations could result in the assessment of damages or imposition of fines against us or the suspension of affected operations, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to many laws and regulations, and violation of or changes in those requirements could materially and adversely affect our business.

We are subject to numerous U.S. and international laws and requirements regarding corporate conduct, fair competition, corruption prevention and import and export practices, including laws applicable to U.S. government contractors. In addition, the SEC has adopted disclosure rules related to the supply of certain minerals originating from the conflict zones of the Democratic Republic of Congo or adjoining countries, and we have incurred costs to comply with such regulations and may realize other costs relating to the sourcing and availability of minerals used in our products. While we maintain a rigorous corporate ethics and compliance program, we may be subject to increased regulatory scrutiny, significant monetary fines or penalties, suspension of business opportunities or loss of jurisdictional operating rights as a result of any failure to comply with those requirements. If we were to be subject to a compliance investigation, we may incur increased personnel and legal costs. Our supply and distribution models may be reliant upon the actions of our third party business partners and we may also be exposed to potential liability resulting from their violation of these or other compliance requirements. Further, our U.S. and international business models are based on currently applicable regulatory requirements and exceptions. Changes in those requirements or exceptions could necessitate changes to our business model. Any of these consequences could materially and adversely impact our business and results of operations.

A cybersecurity breach could adversely affect our ability to conduct our business, harm our reputation, expose us to significant liability or otherwise damage our financial results.

A cybersecurity breach could negatively affect our reputation as a trusted provider of scale-out storage, archive and data protection products by adversely affecting the market’s perception of the security or reliability of our products and services. Many of our customers and partners store sensitive data on our products, and a cybersecurity breach related to our products could harm our reputation and potentially expose us to significant liability.

36

We also maintain sensitive data related to our employees, strategic partners and customers, including intellectual property, proprietary business information and personally identifiable information on our own systems. We employ sophisticated security measures; however, we may face threats across our infrastructure including unauthorized access, security breaches and other system disruptions.

It is critical to our business that our employees’, strategic partners’ and customers’ sensitive information remains secure and that our customers perceive that this information is secure. A cybersecurity breach could result in unauthorized access to, loss of, or unauthorized disclosure of such information. A cybersecurity breach could expose us to litigation, indemnity obligations, government investigations and other possible liabilities. Additionally, a cyber-attack, whether actual or perceived, could result in negative publicity which could harm our reputation and reduce our customers’ confidence in the effectiveness of our solutions, which could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations. A breach of our security systems could also expose us to increased costs including remediation costs, disruption of operations or increased cybersecurity protection costs that may have a material adverse effect on our business. Although we maintain technology errors and omissions liability insurance, our insurance may not cover potential claims of these types or may not be adequate to indemnify us for inability that may be imposed. Any imposition or or liability or litigation costs that are not covered by insurance or in excess of our insurance coverage could harm our business.

Our actual or perceived failure to adequately protect personal data could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

A variety of state, national, foreign, and international laws and regulations apply to the collection, use, retention, protection, disclosure, transfer and other processing of personal data. These privacy- and data protection-related laws and regulations are evolving, with new or modified laws and regulations proposed and implemented frequently and existing laws and regulations subject to new or different interpretations. Compliance with these laws and regulations can be costly and can delay or impede the development of new products.

For example, we historically relied upon adherence to the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Safe Harbor Privacy Principles and compliance with the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Framework agreed to by the U.S. Department of Commerce and the EU. The U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Framework, which established means for legitimizing the transfer of personal data by U.S. companies from the European Economic Area, or EEA, to the U.S., was invalidated in October 2015 by a decision of the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”). In light of the ECJ’s decision, we have made certain changes to our personal data handling in an effort to cause our transfer and receipt of EEA residents’ personal data to be legitimized under applicable European law. In February 2016, U.S. and EU authorities reached agreement on new means for legitimizing personal data transfers from the EU to the U.S., the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield. We have self-certified our compliance with its requirements.  Additionally, the European Commission has adopted a general data protection regulation that, when effective in May 2018, will supersede current EU data protection legislation, impose more stringent EU data protection requirements and provide for greater penalties for noncompliance. Our actual or alleged failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations, or to protect personal data, could result in enforcement actions and significant penalties against us, which could result in negative publicity, increase our operating costs, subject us to claims or other remedies and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We must maintain appropriate levels of service parts inventories. If we do not have sufficient service parts inventories, we may experience increased levels of customer dissatisfaction. If we hold excessive service parts inventories, we may incur financial losses.

We maintain levels of service parts inventories to satisfy future warranty obligations and also to earn service revenue by providing enhanced and extended warranty and repair service during and beyond the warranty period. We estimate the required amount of service parts inventories based on historical usage and forecasts of future warranty and extended warranty requirements, including estimates of failure rates and costs to repair, and out of warranty revenue. Given the significant levels of judgment inherently involved in the process, we cannot provide assurance that we will be able to maintain appropriate levels of service parts inventories to satisfy customer needs and to avoid financial losses from excess service parts inventories. If we are unable to maintain appropriate levels of service parts inventories, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely impacted.

From time to time we have made acquisitions. The failure to successfully integrate future acquisitions could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

As a part of our business strategy, we have in the past and may make acquisitions in the future, subject to certain debt covenants. We may also make significant investments in complementary companies, products or technologies. If we fail to successfully integrate such acquisitions or significant investments, it could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Risks that we may face in our efforts to integrate any recent or future acquisitions include, among others:

• Failure to realize anticipated synergies from the acquisition;

37

• Difficulties in assimilating and retaining employees;

• Potential incompatibility of business cultures or resistance to change;

• Coordinating geographically separate organizations;

• Diversion of management’s attention from ongoing business concerns;

• Coordinating infrastructure operations in a rapid and efficient manner;

• The potential inability to maximize our financial and strategic position through the successful incorporation of acquired technology and rights into our products and services;

• Failure of acquired technology or products to provide anticipated revenue or margin contribution;

• Insufficient revenues to offset increased expenses associated with the acquisition;

• Costs and delays in implementing or integrating common systems and procedures;

• Reduction or loss of customer orders due to the potential for market confusion, hesitation and delay;

• Impairment of existing customer, supplier and strategic relationships of either company;

• Insufficient cash flows from operations to fund the working capital and investment requirements;

• Difficulties in entering markets in which we have no or limited direct prior experience and where competitors in such markets have stronger market positions;

• The possibility that we may not receive a favorable return on our investment, the original investment may become impaired, and/or we may incur losses from these investments;

• Dissatisfaction or performance problems with the acquired company;

• The assumption of risks of the acquired company that are difficult to quantify, such as litigation;

• The cost associated with the acquisition, including restructuring actions, which may require cash payments that, if large enough, could materially and adversely affect our liquidity; and

• Assumption of unknown liabilities or other unanticipated adverse events or circumstances.

Acquisitions present many risks, and we may not realize the financial and strategic goals that were contemplated at the time of any transaction. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to successfully integrate any business, products, technologies or personnel that we may acquire in the future, and our failure to do so could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If the future outcomes related to the estimates used in recording tax liabilities to various taxing authorities result in higher tax liabilities than estimated, then we would have to record tax charges, which could be material.

We have provided amounts and recorded liabilities for probable and estimable tax adjustments that may be proposed by various taxing authorities in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions. If events occur that indicate payments of these amounts will be less than estimated, then reversals of these liabilities would create tax benefits recognized in the periods when we determine the liabilities have reduced. Conversely, if events occur which indicate that payments of these amounts will be greater than estimated, then tax charges and additional liabilities would be recorded. In particular, various foreign jurisdictions could challenge the characterization or transfer pricing of certain intercompany transactions. In the event of an unfavorable outcome of such challenge, there exists the possibility of a material tax charge and adverse impact on the results of operations in the period in which the matter is resolved or an unfavorable outcome becomes probable and estimable.

Certain changes in stock ownership could result in a limitation on the amount of net operating loss and tax credit carryovers that can be utilized each year. Should we undergo such a change in stock ownership, it would severely limit the usage of these carryover tax attributes against future income, resulting in additional tax charges, which could be material.

We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, and an adverse change in foreign currency exchange rates relative to our position in such currencies could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We do not currently use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. We have used in the past, and may use in the future, foreign currency forward contracts and derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to foreign currency exchange rates. To the extent that we have assets or liabilities denominated in a foreign currency that are inadequately hedged or not hedged at all, we may be subject to foreign currency losses, which could be significant.

38

Our international operations can act as a natural hedge when both operating expenses and sales are denominated in local currencies. In these instances, although an unfavorable change in the exchange rate of a foreign currency against the U.S. dollar would result in lower sales when translated to U.S. dollars, operating expenses would also be lower in these circumstances. An increase in the rate at which a foreign currency is exchanged for U.S. dollars would require more of that particular foreign currency to equal a specified amount of U.S. dollars than before such rate increase. In such cases, and if we were to price our products and services in that particular foreign currency, we would receive fewer U.S. dollars than we would have received prior to such rate increase for the foreign currency. Likewise, if we were to price our products and services in U.S. dollars while competitors priced their products in a local currency, an increase in the relative strength of the U.S. dollar would result in our prices being uncompetitive in those markets. Such fluctuations in currency exchange rates could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company faces various risks associated with activist stockholders, including potential proxy contests or other opposition to our Board and our nominees for the Board.

On March 2, 2017, we entered into an agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with VIEX Capital Advisors, LLC, and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “VIEX”), which beneficially owns approximately 10.9% of our outstanding common stock.

As part of the settlement, the Company agreed to form a Search Committee and engaged a search firm to assist the Company in recruiting and appointing three highly qualified new, independent directors to replace three specified members of the Company’s Board which was completed in May 2017. The Company also agreed to hold its next annual meeting in August 2017.

The Settlement Agreement provides that VIEX will be subject to certain standstill provisions. Such provisions generally remain in effect until the completion of the next annual meeting. These provisions restrict VIEX’s ability to engage in certain proxy solicitations, make certain stockholder proposals, call meetings of stockholders or solicit consents from stockholders, obtain additional representation on the Board or seek to remove any of the Company’s directors.

Even if the Company complies with all of the terms of the Settlement Agreement, VIEX may pursue a proxy contest at future annual meetings. A proxy contest would require us to incur significant legal fees and proxy solicitation expenses and require significant time and attention by management and the Board. Further, any perceived uncertainties as to our future direction and control could result in the loss of potential business opportunities and may make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel and business partners, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Under certain circumstances arising out of or related to a proxy contest or threatened proxy contest or the nomination of directors by a stockholder, a change in the composition of the Board may result in a change of control under the severance and change of control agreements we have with our management. Pursuant to the severance and change in control agreements, certain severance payments may be triggered following a change of control, but only upon there being a qualifying termination that occurs within twelve months of any such change of control. Under certain circumstances arising out of or related to a proxy contest or threatened proxy contest or the nomination of directors by a stockholder, a change in the composition of the Board may also result in a change of control under certain contracts with third parties, including our directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, if we are unable to secure appropriate waivers or amendments to any such contracts. The occurrence of any of the foregoing events could adversely affect our business.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The Exhibit Index beginning on page 42 of this report sets forth a list of exhibits and is hereby incorporated by reference.

39

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

QUANTUM CORPORATION

/s/ FUAD AHMAD

Fuad Ahmad

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: August 9, 2017

40

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Exhibit Description
3.1	Certificate of Amendment to the Amended Articles of Incorporation of Quantum Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 18, 2017)
10.1	Offer letter, dated May 21, 2017, between registrant and Mr. Pinchev (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 1, 2017)*
10.2	Offer letter, dated May 1, 2017, between registrant and Mr. Rothman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2017)*
10.3	Offer letter, dated May 1, 2017, between registrant and Mr. Sanchez (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2017)*
10.4	Quantum Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 3, 2017.)*
31.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ‡
31.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ‡
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002 †
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002 †
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

‡       Filed herewith.

†       Furnished herewith.

* Indicates management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.

41

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a)

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jon W. Gacek, certify that:

1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Quantum Corporation;

2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 9, 2017

/s/ JON W. GACEK

Jon W. Gacek

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a)

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Fuad Ahmad, certify that:

1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Quantum Corporation;

2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 9, 2017

/s/ FUAD AHMAD

Fuad Ahmad

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jon W. Gacek, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Quantum Corporation, on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Quantum Corporation.

Date: August 9, 2017

QUANTUM CORPORATION

/s/ JON W. GACEK

Jon W. Gacek

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Fuad Ahmad, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Quantum Corporation, on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Quantum Corporation.

Date: August 9, 2017

QUANTUM CORPORATION

/s/ FUAD AHMAD

Fuad Ahmad

 Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

XML

Document and Entity Information - shares	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017	Aug. 04, 2017
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	QUANTUM CORP /DE/
Entity Central Index Key	0000709283
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--03-31
Entity Filer Category	Accelerated Filer
Trading Symbol	QTM
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Jun. 30, 2017
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2017
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		34,472,160

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2017	Mar. 31, 2017
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 8,661	$ 12,958
Restricted cash	1,891	1,832
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $29 and $16, respectively	109,418	116,056
Manufacturing inventories	27,821	27,661
Service parts inventories	19,788	19,849
Other current assets	10,005	9,969
Total current assets	177,584	188,325
Long-term assets:
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation	10,455	11,186
Restricted cash	20,000	20,000
Other long-term assets	4,993	5,516
Total long-term assets	35,448	36,702
Total Assets	213,032	225,027
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	45,007	41,611
Accrued warranty	3,161	3,263
Deferred revenue	79,996	84,683
Accrued restructuring charges	2,249	869
Convertible subordinated debt	62,926	62,827
Accrued compensation	22,186	24,104
Other accrued liabilities	13,309	12,998
Total current liabilities	228,834	230,355
Long-term liabilities:
Deferred revenue	36,697	37,642
Accrued restructuring charges	544	481
Long-term debt	60,219	65,028
Other long-term liabilities	4,736	7,520
Total long-term liabilities	102,196	110,671
Stockholders' deficit:
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; 34,101 and 34,063 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2017 and March 31, 2017, respectively	341	341
Capital in excess of par	475,357	473,850
Accumulated deficit	(596,969)	(593,295)
Accumulated other comprehensive income	3,273	3,105
Total stockholders’ deficit	(117,998)	(115,999)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	$ 213,032	$ 225,027

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical) - USD ($) shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2017	Mar. 31, 2017
Statement of Financial Position [Abstract]
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$ 29	$ 16
Common stock, par value (usd per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized	1,000,000	1,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	34,101	34,063
Common stock, shares outstanding	34,101	34,063

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS - USD ($) shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Income Statement [Abstract]
Product revenue	$ 71,618	$ 71,826
Service revenue	35,246	35,818
Royalty revenue	9,994	8,640
Total revenue	116,858	116,284
Cost of product revenue	50,949	50,132
Cost of service revenue	15,090	15,506
Total cost of revenue	66,039	65,638
Gross margin	50,819	50,646
Operating expenses:
Research and development	10,605	11,058
Sales and marketing	27,824	26,367
General and administrative	12,509	12,960
Restructuring charges	2,335	2,052
Total operating expenses	53,273	52,437
Loss from operations	(2,454)	(1,791)
Other income (expense)	98	155
Interest expense	(2,558)	(1,507)
Net loss before income tax provision (benefit)	(4,914)	(3,143)
Income tax provision (benefit)	(1,240)	377
Net loss	$ (3,674)	$ (3,520)
Basic and diluted net loss per share (usd per share)	$ (0.11)	$ (0.11)
Weighted average shares:
Basic (shares)	34,084	33,292
Diluted (shares)	34,084	33,292

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Statement of Comprehensive Income [Abstract]
Net loss	$ (3,674)	$ (3,520)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes:
Foreign currency translation adjustments	155	(339)
Net unrealized gain (loss) on revaluation of long-term intercompany balances	13	42
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	168	(297)
Total comprehensive loss	$ (3,506)	$ (3,817)

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$ (3,674)	$ (3,520)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation	1,268	1,383
Amortization and write off of debt issuance costs	427	168
Service parts lower of cost or market adjustment	1,257	1,337
Tax benefit from settlement	(1,656)	0
Non-cash interest expense	277	0
Deferred income taxes	120	75
Share-based compensation	1,613	1,998
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net	6,638	15,426
Manufacturing inventories	(709)	3,686
Service parts inventories	(1,034)	(124)
Accounts payable	3,318	(8,364)
Accrued warranty	(102)	14
Deferred revenue	(5,633)	(4,426)
Accrued restructuring charges	1,444	726
Accrued compensation	(2,047)	580
Other assets and liabilities	(489)	(3,798)
Net cash provided by operating activities	1,018	5,161
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment	(123)	(529)
Return of capital from investments	278	0
Restricted cash	(2)	(15)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	153	(544)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings of long-term debt	71,800	3,000
Repayments of long-term debt	(77,175)	(6,959)
Payment of taxes due upon vesting of restricted stock	(111)	(27)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	5	0
Net cash used in financing activities	(5,481)	(3,986)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	13	(5)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	(4,297)	626
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	12,958	33,870
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	8,661	34,496
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Purchases of property and equipment included in accounts payable	$ 78	$ 191

XML

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2017

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Quantum Corporation (“Quantum”, the “Company”, “us” or “we”), founded in 1980 and reincorporated in Delaware in 1987, is a leading expert in scale-out storage, archive and data protection, providing solutions for capturing, sharing, managing and preserving digital assets over the entire data lifecycle. Our customers, ranging from small businesses to large/multi-national enterprises, trust us to address their most demanding data workflow challenges. Our end-to-end tiered storage solutions enable users to maximize the value of their data by making it accessible whenever and wherever needed, retaining it indefinitely and reducing total cost and complexity. We work closely with a broad network of distributors, value-added resellers (“VARs”), direct marketing resellers (“DMRs”), original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) and other suppliers to meet customers’ evolving needs. Our stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol QTM.

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Quantum and our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods shown. The results of operations for such periods are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full fiscal year. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2017 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date, but it does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. The accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on May 31, 2017.

On April 18, 2017, we effected a 1-for-8 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding common stock (the "Reverse Stock Split"). Our stock began to trade on a post-split basis on April 19, 2017. All share and per share data for comparative periods included within our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related footnotes have been adjusted to account for the effect of the Reverse Stock Split.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation - Stock compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”). ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. We adopted ASU 2016-09 in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 using multiple transition approaches in-line with the requirements. Our tax windfall benefits are reported in the statement of operations instead of equity to the extent we do not have an offsetting valuation allowance and such benefits are recorded within our deferred taxes.  There were no other changes based upon the new guidance. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not impact our statements of financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or financial statement disclosures.  

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330) (“ASU 2015-11”). ASU 2015-11 requires that an entity measure all inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value, except for inventory that is measured using last-in, first-out (LIFO) or the retail inventory method. We adopted ASU 2015-11 prospectively in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 and adoption did not impact our statements of financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or financial statement disclosures.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Topic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016-01”). ASU 2016-01 addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosures of financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 will become effective for us beginning April 1, 2018, or fiscal 2019. We must apply the provisions using a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet at the beginning of the year of adoption, or April 1, 2018. We are currently assessing what financial instruments are being impacted and the extent of the potential impact on our statements of financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and financial statement disclosures.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). ASU 2016-02 provides a new comprehensive model for lease accounting. Under ASU 2016-02, lessees and lessors should apply a “right-of-use” model in accounting for all leases and eliminate the concept of operating leases and off-balance sheet leases. ASU 2016-02 will become effective for us beginning April 1, 2019, or fiscal 2020. ASU 2016-02 requires a modified retrospective transition approach with certain practical expedients available. We have identified all of our current leases subject to ASU 2016-02. We are in the process of evaluating these agreements to determine the impact on our statements of financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and financial statement disclosures.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 provides guidance on the following eight specific cash flow issues: 1) debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, 2) settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing, 3) contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, 4) proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, 5) proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies, 6) distributions received from equity method investees, 7) beneficial interests in securitization transactions and 8) separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. ASU 2016-15 transition requires the use of the retrospective method for all periods presented and will become effective for us beginning April 1, 2018, or fiscal 2019. We have evaluated the types of transactions impacted by ASU 2016-15 and at this time, and anticipate the only impact is related to the our debt extinguishment costs. As such, we do not anticipate the adoption of ASU 2016-15 will have a material impact on our statements of cash flows.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory (“ASU 2016-16”). ASU 2016-16 requires that an entity recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. ASU 2016-16 will become effective for us beginning April 1, 2018, or fiscal 2019. ASU 2016-16 requires the modified retrospective transition approach with a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings at the beginning of the period of adoption. We currently do not have any material intra-entity transfers of assets and therefore we do not anticipate that adoption will have a material impact on our statements of financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or financial statement disclosures.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”). ASU 2016-18 requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. ASU 2016-18 will become effective for us beginning April 1, 2018, or fiscal 2019. ASU 2016-18 is required to be applied retrospectively. Upon the adoption, amounts described as restricted cash will be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period amounts shown on the statements of cash flows.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting. The ASU provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. ASU 2017-09 will become effective for us beginning April 1, 2018, or fiscal 2019 and interim and interim periods within those years and is to be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. As we currently do not have a practice of modifying our stock based awards and have no plans to do so in the future, we do not anticipate adoption will have a material impact on our statements of financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or financial statement disclosures.

The FASB issued the following accounting standard updates related to its revenue convergence project:

• ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”) in May 2014. ASU 2014-09 requires entities to recognize revenue through the application of a five-step model, which includes identification of the contract, identification of the performance obligations, determination of the transaction price, allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations and recognition of revenue as the entity satisfies the performance obligations.

• ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net) (“ASU 2016-08”) in March 2016. ASU 2016-08 does not change the core principle of revenue recognition in Topic 606 but clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations.

• ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing (“ASU 2016-10”) in April 2016. ASU 2016-10 does not change the core principle of revenue recognition in Topic 606 but clarifies the implementation guidance on identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. ASU No. 2016-11, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of Accounting Standards Updates 2014-09 and 2014-16 Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 EITF Meeting (SEC Update) (“ASU 2016-11”) in May 2016. ASU 2016-11 rescinds SEC paragraphs pursuant to two SEC Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 EITF meeting. The SEC Staff is rescinding SEC Staff Observer comments that are codified in Topic 605 and Topic 932, effective upon adoption of Topic 606.

• ASU No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients in May 2016. ASU 2016-12 does not change the core principle of revenue recognition in Topic 606 but clarifies the implementation guidance on a few narrow areas and adds some practical expedients to the guidance.

These ASUs will become effective for us beginning April 1, 2018, or fiscal 2019. ASU 2014-09 and the related ASUs allow for

either a retrospective or a modified retrospective transition approach. The Company has elected to use a modified retrospective method. We have completed our initial assessment of the changes in our revenue recognition accounting policies for the new revenue standards. Our accounting for commission costs related to our service agreements will change from recognition in the period incurred to the deferral and recognition over the services are provided. Other costs such as warranty costs and our accounting for our rebate programs ("variable consideration") will not materially change. We have identified our performance obligations and have established the related standalone selling prices for the distinct goods and services underlying the obligations. We are currently configuring our system to meet our business requirements and upon completion, we will process the Company’s historical revenue transactions which will enable us to assess the overall impact of the adoption of Topic 606 on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and financial statement disclosures.

XML

FAIR VALUE

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2017

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

FAIR VALUE

FAIR VALUE

Our assets measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis may consist of money market funds, which are included in cash and cash equivalents in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and are valued using quoted market prices (level 1 fair value measurements) at the respective balance sheet dates. At June 30, 2017 and March 31, 2017, we had no cash in money market funds.

We did not record impairments to any non-financial assets in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 or fiscal 2017. We do not have any non-financial liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

Our financial liabilities were comprised primarily of convertible subordinated debt and long-term debt at June 30, 2017 and March 31, 2017. The carrying value and fair value of our convertible subordinated debt and long-term debt were as follows (in thousands):

	As of
	June 30, 2017				March 31, 2017
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
Convertible subordinated debt (1)	$	62,926	$	61,513	$	62,827	$	60,667
Long-term debt: (2)
Revolving credit agreement	11,888		13,372		16,852		18,490
Term loan agreement	48,331		49,930		48,176		50,026
Total long-term debt	$	60,219	$	63,302	$	65,028	$	68,516

⁽¹⁾ Fair value based on quoted market prices in less active markets (level 2).

⁽²⁾ Fair value based on outstanding borrowings and market interest rates (level 2).

XML

INVENTORIES

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2017

Inventory Disclosure [Abstract]

INVENTORIES

INVENTORIES

Manufacturing inventories and service parts inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):

	As of
	June 30, 2017		March 31, 2017
Manufacturing inventories:
Finished goods	$	14,924	$	15,070
Work in process	869		606
Materials and purchased parts	12,028		11,985
	$	27,821	$	27,661

	As of
	June 30, 2017		March 31, 2017
Service parts inventories:
Finished goods	$	14,628	$	14,851
Component parts	5,160		4,998
	$	19,788	$	19,849

XML

ACCRUED WARRANTY

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2017

Product Warranties Disclosures [Abstract]

ACCRUED WARRANTY

ACCRUED WARRANTY

The changes in the accrued warranty balance were (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017			June 30, 2016
Beginning balance	$	3,263		$	3,430
Additional warranties issued	1,412			1,998
Adjustments for warranties issued in prior fiscal years	(4		)	140
Settlements	(1,510		)	(2,124		)
Ending balance	$	3,161		$	3,444

We warrant our products against certain defects typically for a term of one to three years. A provision for estimated future costs and estimated returns for repair or replacement relating to warranty is recorded when products are shipped and revenue is recognized. Our estimate of future costs to satisfy warranty obligations is primarily based on historical trends and, if believed to be significantly different from historical trends, estimates of future failure rates and future costs of repair. Future costs of repair include materials consumed in the repair, labor and overhead amounts necessary to perform the repair. If we determine in a future period that either actual failure rates or actual costs of repair were to differ from our estimates, we record the impact of those differences in that future period.

XML

DEBT

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2017

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

DEBT

DEBT

Our debt consisted of the following (in thousands):

	As of
	June 30, 2017			March 31, 2017
Convertible subordinated debt:
4.50% convertible subordinated notes	$	63,090		$	63,090
Unamortized debt issuance costs	(164		)	(263		)
Convertible subordinated debt, net of unamortized debt issuance costs	$	62,926		$	62,827

	As of
	June 30, 2017			March 31, 2017
Long-term debt:
Revolving credit agreement	$	13,403		$	18,500
Term loan agreement	50,000			50,000
Unamortized discount and debt issuance costs	(3,184		)	(3,472		)
Long-term debt, net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs	$	60,219		$	65,028

Convertible Subordinated Debt

In the third quarter of fiscal 2013, we issued $70 million aggregate principal amount of 4.50% convertible subordinated notes (4.5% Notes) due November 15, 2017. These notes are convertible into shares of our common stock until November 14, 2017 at the option of the holders at a conversion rate of 75.896 shares per $1,000 principal amount, a conversion price of approximately $13.20 per share. The 4.50% notes require semi-annual interest payments paid on May 15 and November 15 of each year and have no early call provisions.

Long-term Debt

Our credit facility includes a revolving credit and security agreement entered into with PNC Bank, National Association (“revolving credit agreement”) and a term loan credit and security agreement entered into with TCW Asset Management Company LLC (“term loan agreement”).

Revolving credit agreement

Under the revolving credit agreement, we have the ability to borrow the lesser of $80 million or the amount of the monthly borrowing base, which is reduced by $1.0 million of the outstanding letters of credit. Our borrowing base is established monthly based on certain working capital asset balances. The revolving credit agreement also includes an uncommitted accordion in an amount up to $20 million. The revolving credit agreement matures on October 21, 2021. As of June 30, 2017, our excess availability under the revolving credit agreement was $39.6 million.

Borrowings under the revolving credit agreement bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at our option, either (a) the greatest of (i) the base rate, (ii) the Federal funds rate plus 0.50% and (iii) the LIBOR rate based upon an interest period of 1 month plus 1.0%, plus an applicable margin of 1.50%, or (b) the LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin of 2.50%. The base rate is defined in the revolving credit agreement. Additionally, we are required to pay a 0.375% commitment fee on undrawn amounts under the revolving credit agreement on a quarterly basis, which is recorded as interest expense in the period incurred. As of June 30, 2017, we had a $13.4 million outstanding balance on the revolving credit agreement at an interest rate of 5.75%.

Term loan agreement

The term loan agreement provides for $50 million of a senior secured term loan which was at the time we entered into the credit facility and $20 million of a senior secured delay draw term loan (“DDTL”). Borrowings under the DDTL are restricted to be used only to redeem our 4.50% convertible subordinated notes due November 15, 2017. The term loan agreement matures on October 21, 2021. The amount outstanding under the term loan is to be repaid on a quarterly basis in an amount equal to 1.25% of the original principal amount beginning on March 31, 2018, with any remaining principal balance due on the maturity of the term loan.

Borrowings under the term loan agreement bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at our option, either (a) the greatest of (i) 3.00%, (ii) the Federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (iii) the LIBOR rate based upon an interest period of 1 month plus 1.0% and (iv) the “prime rate” last quoted by the Wall Street Journal, plus a margin ranging from 6.00% to 7.25% based on the applicable senior net leverage ratio, or (b) the LIBOR rate plus 7.00% to 8.25% based on the applicable senior net leverage ratio. The senior net leverage ratio is defined in the term loan agreement. As of June 30, 2017, our interest rate on the term loan was 8.66%.

The revolving credit agreement and the term loan agreement are collateralized by a pledge of substantially all of our assets and

contain certain financial covenants and customary events of default for such securities. Financial covenants include a fixed

charge coverage ratio, senior net leverage ratio and total leverage ratio. Additionally, the revolving credit agreement includes

minimum liquidity requirements. There is a blanket lien on all of our assets under the revolving credit agreement and term loan

agreement. As of June 30, 2017, and during fiscal 2018, we were in compliance with all covenants.

Debt Maturities

A summary of the scheduled maturities of principal for our outstanding debt as of June 30, 2017 follows (in thousands):

	Debt Maturity Due by Period
	Less than 1 Year		1 Year		2 Years		3 Years		4 Years		More than 5 Years		Total
4.50% convertible subordinated notes	$	63,090	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	63,090
Long-term debt:
Revolving credit agreement	—		—		—		—		13,403		—		13,403
Term loan agreement	1,250		2,500		2,500		2,500		41,250		—		50,000
Total long-term debt	$	1,250	$	2,500	$	2,500	$	2,500	$	54,653	$	—	$	63,403
Total debt	$	64,340	$	2,500	$	2,500	$	2,500	$	54,653	$	—	$	126,493

XML

RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2017

Restructuring and Related Activities [Abstract]

RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

Fiscal 2018 Restructuring Plan

During the first quarter of fiscal 2018, we approved a plan (“Fiscal 2018 Restructuring Plan”) to eliminate 49 positions in the U.S. and internationally to align our workforce within various functions of our business in order to meet the Company’s strategic plans. The costs associated with these actions consist of restructuring charges related to severance and benefits. We incurred $1.6 million of restructuring charges under this plan during the quarter, and as of June 30, 2017, we paid $0.5 million under this plan with the remaining amounts to be paid during the remainder of fiscal 2018.

Fiscal 2017 April Restructuring Plan

In April 2016, we approved a plan (“Fiscal 2017 April Restructuring Plan”) to eliminate 29 positions in the U.S. and internationally to reduce investments in various functions of our business to improve operational efficiencies. The costs associated with these actions consist of restructuring charges related to severance and benefits. These actions were completed by the second quarter of fiscal 2017. We incurred and paid $1.5 million of restructuring charges under this plan.

Fiscal 2016 Restructuring Plan

In November 2015, we approved a plan (“Fiscal 2016 Restructuring Plan”) to eliminate approximately 65 positions in the U.S. and internationally, primarily in research and development and sales and marketing functions, in order to improve our cost structure and align spending with continuing operations plans. These actions were completed by the first quarter of fiscal 2017, with the majority having occurred by December 31, 2015. The costs associated with these actions consist of restructuring charges related to severance and benefits. We incurred and paid $2.0 million of restructuring charges under this plan.

Summary of Restructuring Expense

The following summarizes the type of restructuring costs, included in operating expense, for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016 (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017		June 30, 2016
Severance and benefits	$	1,570	$	1,489
Facilities	756		563
Other	9		—
	$	2,335	$	2,052

Restructuring charges for the first three months of fiscal 2018 included $1.6 million of severance and benefits costs incurred as a result of the Fiscal 2018 Restructuring Plan. Additionally, we incurred $0.8 million of facilities restructuring charges in the first three months of fiscal 2018 due to a change in estimate of sublease timing and related expenses for our facilities previously used in manufacturing.

Restructuring charges for the first three months of fiscal 2017 were largely due to $1.5 million of severance and benefits costs incurred as a result of the Fiscal 2017 Restructuring Plan. Additionally, we incurred $0.6 million of restructuring charges related to facilities costs primarily due to a change in estimate of sublease timing for our facilities previously used in manufacturing.

Accrued Restructuring

The following tables show the activity and the estimated timing of future payouts for accrued restructuring (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Severance and Benefits			Facilities			Total
Balance as of March 31, 2017	$	130		$	1,220		$	1,350
Restructuring costs	1,570			—			1,570
Adjustment of prior estimates	—			756			756
Cash payments	(472		)	(411		)	(883		)
Balance as of June 30, 2017	$	1,228		$	1,565		$	2,793

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Severance and Benefits			Facilities			Total
Balance as of March 31, 2016	$	354		$	2,383		$	2,737
Restructuring costs	1,489			426			1,915
Adjustment of prior estimates	—			179			179
Cash payments	(1,029		)	(339		)	(1,368		)
Balance as of June 30, 2016	$	814		$	2,649		$	3,463

	As of June 30, 2017
	Severance and Benefits		Facilities		Total
Estimated timing of future payouts:
Next twelve months	$	1,228	$	1,022	$	2,250
July 2018 through June 2022	—		543		543
	$	1,228	$	1,565	$	2,793

Facility restructuring accruals will be paid in accordance with the respective facility lease terms and the above amounts are net of estimated sublease amounts.

XML

EQUITY

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2017

Equity [Abstract]

EQUITY

EQUITY

On April 18, 2017, we effected a 1-for-8 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding common stock (the "Reverse Stock Split"). Our stock began to trade on a post-split basis on April 19, 2017. Par value of the Company's common stock was unchanged as a result of the Reverse Stock Split, remaining at $0.01 per share, which resulted in reclassification of capital from par value to capital in excess of par value. All share and per share data for comparative periods included within our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related footnotes have been adjusted to account for the effect of the Reverse Stock

Split.

XML

STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS AND SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2017

Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Abstract]

STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS AND SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS AND SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

During the first quarter of fiscal 2018, all restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and options to purchase our common stock outstanding under the Company's Stock Incentive Plans were adjusted to reflect the impact of the Reverse Stock Split. The Reverse Stock Split also reduced the number of shares of common stock issuable under the Company's 2012 Long Term Incentive Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended. The per share exercise price of all outstanding awards was increased and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise or settlement of all outstanding awards was reduced proportionately to the reverse split ratio.

Share-Based Compensation

The following table summarizes share-based compensation (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017		June 30, 2016
Share-based compensation:
Cost of revenue	$	217	$	280
Research and development	286		403
Sales and marketing	520		612
General and administrative	590		703
	$	1,613	$	1,998
Share-based compensation by type of award:
Stock options	$	—	$	—
Restricted stock units	1,461		1,836
Stock purchase plan	152		162
	$	1,613	$	1,998

Restricted Stock Units

The fair value of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) granted is the intrinsic value as of the respective grant date. The weighted-average grant date fair values of RSUs granted during the first quarter of fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 were $7.82 and $3.84, respectively.

A summary of activity relating to our restricted stock units follows (shares in thousands):

	Shares		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
Nonvested at March 31, 2017	1,765		$	6.75
Granted	83		7.82
Vested	(52	)	5.66
Forfeited	(27	)	7.48
Nonvested at June 30, 2017	1,769		$	6.82

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, rights to purchase shares are typically granted during the second and fourth quarter of each fiscal year. No rights to purchase shares were granted in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 or fiscal 2017.

XML

INCOME TAXES

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2017

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

INCOME TAXES

INCOME TAXES

Income tax benefit for the first quarter of fiscal 2018 was $1.2 million as compared to an income tax provision of $0.4 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2017. The tax benefit for the first quarter of fiscal 2018 included the release of $1.7 million of an uncertain tax position liability upon the effective settlement with the German taxing authorities for tax audits of our German subsidiary.

Income tax provisions for each of these periods reflect expenses for foreign income taxes and state taxes. We have provided a full valuation allowance against our U.S. net deferred tax assets due to our history of net losses, difficulty in predicting future results and our conclusion that we cannot rely on projections of future taxable income to realize the deferred tax assets. Significant management judgment is required in determining our deferred tax assets and liabilities and valuation allowances for purposes of assessing our ability to realize any future benefit from our net deferred tax assets. We intend to maintain this valuation allowance until sufficient positive evidence exists to support a reversal or decrease in this allowance. Future income tax expense will be reduced to the extent that we have sufficient positive evidence to support a reversal of, or decrease in, our valuation allowance.

XML

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2017

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

The following is the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017			June 30, 2016
Numerator:
Net loss	$	(3,674	)	$	(3,520	)
Denominator:
Weighted average shares:
Basic	34,084			33,292
Dilutive shares from stock plans	—			—
Dilutive shares from convertible subordinated notes	—			—
Diluted	34,084			33,292
Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.11	)

Dilutive and potentially dilutive common shares from the Stock Incentive Plans are determined by applying the treasury stock method to the assumed exercise of outstanding options and the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units. The dilutive impact related to our convertible subordinated notes is determined by applying the if-converted method, which includes adding the related weighted average shares to the denominator and the related interest expense to net income.

The computations of diluted net income (loss) per share for the periods presented exclude the following because the effect would have been anti-dilutive (in millions):

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017		June 30, 2016
Weighted average shares excluded:
4.50% convertible subordinated notes	4.8		5.3
Stock options	0.2		0.5
Unvested restricted stock units	1.5		1.4
Interest expense excluded:
4.50% convertible subordinated notes	$	0.8	$	0.9

XML

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2017

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Commitments to Purchase Inventory

We use contract manufacturers for our manufacturing operations. Under these arrangements, the contract manufacturer procures inventory to manufacture products based upon our forecast of customer demand. We have similar arrangements with certain other suppliers. We are responsible for the financial impact on the supplier or contract manufacturer of any reduction or product mix shift in the forecast relative to materials that the third party had already purchased under a prior forecast. Such a variance in forecasted demand could require a cash payment for inventory in excess of current customer demand or for costs of excess or obsolete inventory. As of June 30, 2017, we had issued non-cancelable commitments for $42.0 million to purchase inventory from our contract manufacturers and suppliers.

Legal Proceedings

Crossroads

On February 18, 2014, Crossroads Systems, Inc. (“Crossroads”) filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Quantum in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, alleging infringement of U.S. patents 6,425,035 and 7,934,041. An amended complaint filed on April 15, 2014 also alleged infringement of U.S. patent 7,051,147. Crossroads asserts that we have incorporated Crossroads' patented technology into our StorNext QX and Q-Series lines of disk array products and into our Scalar libraries. Crossroads seeks unspecified monetary damages and injunctive relief. Crossroads has already dismissed all claims of infringement with respect to the StorNext QX and Q-Series products. In July and September of 2014, we filed for inter partes review of all three asserted Crossroads patents before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and a review has been initiated for all claims. On June 16, 2015, the U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas stayed the Crossroads trial proceedings pending resolution of the inter partes review proceedings. On January 29, 2016, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued decisions on the inter partes reviews for U.S. patents 6,425,035 and 7,051,147, ordering all claims of both patents to be unpatentable. On March 17, 2016, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued a decision on the inter partes review for U.S. patent 7,934,041, ordering all claims to be unpatentable. On March 31, 2016, Crossroads filed Notices of Appeal in each of the inter partes review decisions. On June 6, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB decision finding all claims of all patents to be unpatentable.  On July 6, 2017, Crossroads filed a petition for a rehearing en banc before the Federal Circuit. On August 8, 2017, the Federal Circuit denied Crossroads' petition. We believe the probability that this lawsuit will have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition is remote.

Realtime Data

On July, 22 2016, Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO(“Realtime Data”) filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Quantum in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alleging infringement of U.S. Patents Nos. 7,161,506, 7,378,992, 7,415,530, 8,643,513, 9,054,728, and 9,116,908. The lawsuit has been transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California for further proceedings. Realtime Data asserts that we have incorporated Realtime Data’s patented technology into our compression products and services. Realtime Data seeks unspecified monetary damages and other relief that the Court deems appropriate. On July 31, 3017, the District Court stayed proceedings in this litigation pending decision in Inter Partes Review proceedings currently before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and relating to the Realtime patents. We believe the probability that this lawsuit will have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition is remote.

XML

BASIS OF PRESENTATION (Policies)

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2017

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements and Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation - Stock compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”). ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. We adopted ASU 2016-09 in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 using multiple transition approaches in-line with the requirements. Our tax windfall benefits are reported in the statement of operations instead of equity to the extent we do not have an offsetting valuation allowance and such benefits are recorded within our deferred taxes.  There were no other changes based upon the new guidance. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not impact our statements of financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or financial statement disclosures.  

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330) (“ASU 2015-11”). ASU 2015-11 requires that an entity measure all inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value, except for inventory that is measured using last-in, first-out (LIFO) or the retail inventory method. We adopted ASU 2015-11 prospectively in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 and adoption did not impact our statements of financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or financial statement disclosures.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Topic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016-01”). ASU 2016-01 addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosures of financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 will become effective for us beginning April 1, 2018, or fiscal 2019. We must apply the provisions using a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet at the beginning of the year of adoption, or April 1, 2018. We are currently assessing what financial instruments are being impacted and the extent of the potential impact on our statements of financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and financial statement disclosures.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). ASU 2016-02 provides a new comprehensive model for lease accounting. Under ASU 2016-02, lessees and lessors should apply a “right-of-use” model in accounting for all leases and eliminate the concept of operating leases and off-balance sheet leases. ASU 2016-02 will become effective for us beginning April 1, 2019, or fiscal 2020. ASU 2016-02 requires a modified retrospective transition approach with certain practical expedients available. We have identified all of our current leases subject to ASU 2016-02. We are in the process of evaluating these agreements to determine the impact on our statements of financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and financial statement disclosures.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 provides guidance on the following eight specific cash flow issues: 1) debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, 2) settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing, 3) contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, 4) proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, 5) proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies, 6) distributions received from equity method investees, 7) beneficial interests in securitization transactions and 8) separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. ASU 2016-15 transition requires the use of the retrospective method for all periods presented and will become effective for us beginning April 1, 2018, or fiscal 2019. We have evaluated the types of transactions impacted by ASU 2016-15 and at this time, and anticipate the only impact is related to the our debt extinguishment costs. As such, we do not anticipate the adoption of ASU 2016-15 will have a material impact on our statements of cash flows.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory (“ASU 2016-16”). ASU 2016-16 requires that an entity recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. ASU 2016-16 will become effective for us beginning April 1, 2018, or fiscal 2019. ASU 2016-16 requires the modified retrospective transition approach with a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings at the beginning of the period of adoption. We currently do not have any material intra-entity transfers of assets and therefore we do not anticipate that adoption will have a material impact on our statements of financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or financial statement disclosures.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”). ASU 2016-18 requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. ASU 2016-18 will become effective for us beginning April 1, 2018, or fiscal 2019. ASU 2016-18 is required to be applied retrospectively. Upon the adoption, amounts described as restricted cash will be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period amounts shown on the statements of cash flows.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting. The ASU provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. ASU 2017-09 will become effective for us beginning April 1, 2018, or fiscal 2019 and interim and interim periods within those years and is to be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. As we currently do not have a practice of modifying our stock based awards and have no plans to do so in the future, we do not anticipate adoption will have a material impact on our statements of financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or financial statement disclosures.

The FASB issued the following accounting standard updates related to its revenue convergence project:

• ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”) in May 2014. ASU 2014-09 requires entities to recognize revenue through the application of a five-step model, which includes identification of the contract, identification of the performance obligations, determination of the transaction price, allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations and recognition of revenue as the entity satisfies the performance obligations.

• ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net) (“ASU 2016-08”) in March 2016. ASU 2016-08 does not change the core principle of revenue recognition in Topic 606 but clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations.

• ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing (“ASU 2016-10”) in April 2016. ASU 2016-10 does not change the core principle of revenue recognition in Topic 606 but clarifies the implementation guidance on identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. ASU No. 2016-11, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of Accounting Standards Updates 2014-09 and 2014-16 Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 EITF Meeting (SEC Update) (“ASU 2016-11”) in May 2016. ASU 2016-11 rescinds SEC paragraphs pursuant to two SEC Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 EITF meeting. The SEC Staff is rescinding SEC Staff Observer comments that are codified in Topic 605 and Topic 932, effective upon adoption of Topic 606.

• ASU No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients in May 2016. ASU 2016-12 does not change the core principle of revenue recognition in Topic 606 but clarifies the implementation guidance on a few narrow areas and adds some practical expedients to the guidance.

These ASUs will become effective for us beginning April 1, 2018, or fiscal 2019. ASU 2014-09 and the related ASUs allow for

either a retrospective or a modified retrospective transition approach. The Company has elected to use a modified retrospective method. We have completed our initial assessment of the changes in our revenue recognition accounting policies for the new revenue standards. Our accounting for commission costs related to our service agreements will change from recognition in the period incurred to the deferral and recognition over the services are provided. Other costs such as warranty costs and our accounting for our rebate programs ("variable consideration") will not materially change. We have identified our performance obligations and have established the related standalone selling prices for the distinct goods and services underlying the obligations. We are currently configuring our system to meet our business requirements and upon completion, we will process the Company’s historical revenue transactions which will enable us to assess the overall impact of the adoption of Topic 606 on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and financial statement disclosures.

XML

FAIR VALUE (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2017

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Schedule of carrying value and fair value of financial liabilities

The carrying value and fair value of our convertible subordinated debt and long-term debt were as follows (in thousands):

	As of
	June 30, 2017				March 31, 2017
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
Convertible subordinated debt (1)	$	62,926	$	61,513	$	62,827	$	60,667
Long-term debt: (2)
Revolving credit agreement	11,888		13,372		16,852		18,490
Term loan agreement	48,331		49,930		48,176		50,026
Total long-term debt	$	60,219	$	63,302	$	65,028	$	68,516

⁽¹⁾ Fair value based on quoted market prices in less active markets (level 2).

⁽²⁾ Fair value based on outstanding borrowings and market interest rates (level 2).

XML

INVENTORIES (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2017

Inventory Disclosure [Abstract]

Schedule of manufacturing inventories and service parts inventories

Manufacturing inventories and service parts inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):

	As of
	June 30, 2017		March 31, 2017
Manufacturing inventories:
Finished goods	$	14,924	$	15,070
Work in process	869		606
Materials and purchased parts	12,028		11,985
	$	27,821	$	27,661

	As of
	June 30, 2017		March 31, 2017
Service parts inventories:
Finished goods	$	14,628	$	14,851
Component parts	5,160		4,998
	$	19,788	$	19,849

XML

ACCRUED WARRANTY (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2017

Product Warranties Disclosures [Abstract]

Schedule of changes in the accrued warranty balance

The changes in the accrued warranty balance were (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017			June 30, 2016
Beginning balance	$	3,263		$	3,430
Additional warranties issued	1,412			1,998
Adjustments for warranties issued in prior fiscal years	(4		)	140
Settlements	(1,510		)	(2,124		)
Ending balance	$	3,161		$	3,444

XML

DEBT (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2017

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Schedule of Debt

Our debt consisted of the following (in thousands):

	As of
	June 30, 2017			March 31, 2017
Convertible subordinated debt:
4.50% convertible subordinated notes	$	63,090		$	63,090
Unamortized debt issuance costs	(164		)	(263		)
Convertible subordinated debt, net of unamortized debt issuance costs	$	62,926		$	62,827

	As of
	June 30, 2017			March 31, 2017
Long-term debt:
Revolving credit agreement	$	13,403		$	18,500
Term loan agreement	50,000			50,000
Unamortized discount and debt issuance costs	(3,184		)	(3,472		)
Long-term debt, net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs	$	60,219		$	65,028

Schedule of Maturities of Debt

A summary of the scheduled maturities of principal for our outstanding debt as of June 30, 2017 follows (in thousands):

	Debt Maturity Due by Period
	Less than 1 Year		1 Year		2 Years		3 Years		4 Years		More than 5 Years		Total
4.50% convertible subordinated notes	$	63,090	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	63,090
Long-term debt:
Revolving credit agreement	—		—		—		—		13,403		—		13,403
Term loan agreement	1,250		2,500		2,500		2,500		41,250		—		50,000
Total long-term debt	$	1,250	$	2,500	$	2,500	$	2,500	$	54,653	$	—	$	63,403
Total debt	$	64,340	$	2,500	$	2,500	$	2,500	$	54,653	$	—	$	126,493

XML

RESTRUCTURING CHARGES (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2017

Restructuring and Related Activities [Abstract]

Types of restructuring expense

The following summarizes the type of restructuring costs, included in operating expense, for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016 (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017		June 30, 2016
Severance and benefits	$	1,570	$	1,489
Facilities	756		563
Other	9		—
	$	2,335	$	2,052

Activity for accrued restructuring charges

The following tables show the activity and the estimated timing of future payouts for accrued restructuring (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Severance and Benefits			Facilities			Total
Balance as of March 31, 2017	$	130		$	1,220		$	1,350
Restructuring costs	1,570			—			1,570
Adjustment of prior estimates	—			756			756
Cash payments	(472		)	(411		)	(883		)
Balance as of June 30, 2017	$	1,228		$	1,565		$	2,793

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Severance and Benefits			Facilities			Total
Balance as of March 31, 2016	$	354		$	2,383		$	2,737
Restructuring costs	1,489			426			1,915
Adjustment of prior estimates	—			179			179
Cash payments	(1,029		)	(339		)	(1,368		)
Balance as of June 30, 2016	$	814		$	2,649		$	3,463

Estimated timing of future payouts for accrued restructuring charges

	As of June 30, 2017
	Severance and Benefits		Facilities		Total
Estimated timing of future payouts:
Next twelve months	$	1,228	$	1,022	$	2,250
July 2018 through June 2022	—		543		543
	$	1,228	$	1,565	$	2,793

XML

STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS AND SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2017

Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Abstract]

Summary of share-based compensation

The following table summarizes share-based compensation (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017		June 30, 2016
Share-based compensation:
Cost of revenue	$	217	$	280
Research and development	286		403
Sales and marketing	520		612
General and administrative	590		703
	$	1,613	$	1,998
Share-based compensation by type of award:
Stock options	$	—	$	—
Restricted stock units	1,461		1,836
Stock purchase plan	152		162
	$	1,613	$	1,998

Summary of activity relating to restricted stock units

A summary of activity relating to our restricted stock units follows (shares in thousands):

	Shares		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
Nonvested at March 31, 2017	1,765		$	6.75
Granted	83		7.82
Vested	(52	)	5.66
Forfeited	(27	)	7.48
Nonvested at June 30, 2017	1,769		$	6.82

XML

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2017

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share

The following is the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017			June 30, 2016
Numerator:
Net loss	$	(3,674	)	$	(3,520	)
Denominator:
Weighted average shares:
Basic	34,084			33,292
Dilutive shares from stock plans	—			—
Dilutive shares from convertible subordinated notes	—			—
Diluted	34,084			33,292
Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.11	)

Schedule of antidilutive securities excluded from computation of diluted net income (loss) per share

The computations of diluted net income (loss) per share for the periods presented exclude the following because the effect would have been anti-dilutive (in millions):

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017		June 30, 2016
Weighted average shares excluded:
4.50% convertible subordinated notes	4.8		5.3
Stock options	0.2		0.5
Unvested restricted stock units	1.5		1.4
Interest expense excluded:
4.50% convertible subordinated notes	$	0.8	$	0.9

XML

BASIS OF PRESENTATION (Details)	Apr. 18, 2017
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]
Reverse stock split, ratio	0.125000

XML

FAIR VALUE - Schedule of Carrying Value and Fair Value of Financial Liabilities (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2017	Mar. 31, 2017
Carrying Value
Fair Value Inputs, Liabilities, Quantitative Information [Line Items]
Total long-term debt	$ 60,219	$ 65,028
Level 2 fair value measurements | Fair Value
Fair Value Inputs, Liabilities, Quantitative Information [Line Items]
Total long-term debt	63,302	68,516
Convertible subordinated debt | Carrying Value
Fair Value Inputs, Liabilities, Quantitative Information [Line Items]
Total long-term debt	62,926	62,827
Convertible subordinated debt | Level 2 fair value measurements | Fair Value
Fair Value Inputs, Liabilities, Quantitative Information [Line Items]
Total long-term debt	61,513	60,667
Credit agreement | Carrying Value | Revolving credit agreement | Revolving credit agreement
Fair Value Inputs, Liabilities, Quantitative Information [Line Items]
Total long-term debt	11,888	16,852
Credit agreement | Level 2 fair value measurements | Fair Value | Revolving credit agreement | Revolving credit agreement
Fair Value Inputs, Liabilities, Quantitative Information [Line Items]
Total long-term debt	13,372	18,490
Term loan agreement | Carrying Value
Fair Value Inputs, Liabilities, Quantitative Information [Line Items]
Total long-term debt	48,331	48,176
Term loan agreement | Level 2 fair value measurements | Fair Value
Fair Value Inputs, Liabilities, Quantitative Information [Line Items]
Total long-term debt	$ 49,930	$ 50,026

XML

INVENTORIES - Schedule of Manufacturing Inventories (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2017	Mar. 31, 2017
Manufacturing inventories:
Finished goods	$ 14,924	$ 15,070
Work in process	869	606
Materials and purchased parts	12,028	11,985
Total manufacturing inventories	$ 27,821	$ 27,661

XML

INVENTORIES - Schedule of Service Parts Inventories (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2017	Mar. 31, 2017
Service parts inventories:
Finished goods	$ 14,628	$ 14,851
Component parts	5,160	4,998
Total service parts inventories	$ 19,788	$ 19,849

XML

ACCRUED WARRANTY (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Movement in Standard Product Warranty Accrual [Roll Forward]
Beginning balance	$ 3,263	$ 3,430
Additional warranties issued	1,412	1,998
Adjustments for warranties issued in prior fiscal years	(4)	140
Settlements	(1,510)	(2,124)
Ending balance	$ 3,161	$ 3,444
Minimum
Product Warranty Liability [Line Items]
Product warranty term (in years)	1 year
Maximum
Product Warranty Liability [Line Items]
Product warranty term (in years)	3 years

XML

DEBT - Schedule of Debt (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2017	Mar. 31, 2017
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Unamortized discount and debt issuance costs	$ (3,184)	$ (3,472)
Long-term debt	126,493
Long-term debt, net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs	60,219	65,028
Revolving credit agreement
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term debt	13,403
Convertible subordinated debt
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
4.50% convertible subordinated notes	63,090	63,090
Unamortized discount and debt issuance costs	(164)	(263)
Convertible subordinated debt, net of unamortized debt issuance costs	62,926	62,827
Credit agreement | Revolving credit agreement | Revolving credit agreement
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term debt	13,403	18,500
Term loan agreement
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term debt	$ 50,000	$ 50,000

XML

DEBT - Narrative (Details)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2012 USD ($) $ / shares	Mar. 31, 2017 USD ($)
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Aggregate principal amount	$ 126,493,000
Outstanding letters of credit	60,219,000		$ 65,028,000
Credit agreement | Letter of credit
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Outstanding letters of credit	1,000,000
Revolving Credit Agreement with PNC
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Aggregate principal amount	$ 13,403,000
Commitment fee percentage on unused capacity (percent)	0.375%
Revolving Credit Agreement with PNC | Federal funds rate
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Variable interest rate	0.50%
Revolving Credit Agreement with PNC | One month LIBOR
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Variable interest rate	1.00%
Revolving Credit Agreement with PNC | One Month LIBOR margin | Minimum
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Variable interest rate	1.50%
Revolving Credit Agreement with PNC | One Month LIBOR margin | Maximum
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Variable interest rate	2.50%
Revolving Credit Agreement with PNC | Credit agreement
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Available uncommitted accordion	$ 20,000,000
Excess availability under revolving credit agreement	39,600,000
Revolving Credit Agreement with PNC | Credit agreement | Revolving credit agreement
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Aggregate principal amount	13,403,000		$ 18,500,000
Borrowing capacity	$ 80,000,000
Line of credit at an interest rate	5.75%
Term loan agreement
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Aggregate principal amount	$ 50,000,000
DDTL	$ 20,000,000
Interest rate during the period (percent)	8.66%
Term loan agreement | Federal funds rate
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Variable interest rate	0.50%
Term loan agreement | One month LIBOR
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Variable interest rate	1.00%
Term loan agreement | Base rate
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Variable interest rate	3.00%
Term loan agreement | Prime rate quoted by the Wall Street Journal | Minimum
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Variable interest rate	6.00%
Term loan agreement | Prime rate quoted by the Wall Street Journal | Maximum
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Variable interest rate	7.25%
Term loan agreement | LIBOR rate plus senior net leverage ratio | Minimum
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Variable interest rate	7.00%
Term loan agreement | LIBOR rate plus senior net leverage ratio | Maximum
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Variable interest rate	8.25%
Term loan agreement | Secured secured term loan
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Aggregate principal amount	$ 50,000,000
4.50% convertible subordinated notes
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Aggregate principal amount	$ 63,090,000	$ 70,000,000
Stated interest rate	4.50%	4.50%
Conversion ratio		75.896
Conversion ratio applied per principal amount		$ 1,000
Conversion price (usd per share) | $ / shares		$ 13.20
Quarterly repayment of original principal balance (percent)	1.25%

XML

DEBT - Schedule of Maturities of Debt (Details) - USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2017	Dec. 31, 2012
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Less than 1 Year	$ 64,340,000
1 Year	2,500,000
2 Years	2,500,000
3 Years	2,500,000
4 Years	54,653,000
More than 5 Years	0
Carrying Value	126,493,000
4.50% convertible subordinated notes
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Less than 1 Year	63,090,000
1 Year	0
2 Years	0
3 Years	0
4 Years	0
More than 5 Years	0
Carrying Value	$ 63,090,000	$ 70,000,000
Stated interest rate	4.50%	4.50%
Revolving credit agreement
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Less than 1 Year	$ 0
1 Year	0
2 Years	0
3 Years	0
4 Years	13,403,000
More than 5 Years	0
Carrying Value	13,403,000
Term loan agreement
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Less than 1 Year	1,250,000
1 Year	2,500,000
2 Years	2,500,000
3 Years	2,500,000
4 Years	41,250,000
More than 5 Years	0
Carrying Value	50,000,000
Total long-term debt
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Less than 1 Year	1,250,000
1 Year	2,500,000
2 Years	2,500,000
3 Years	2,500,000
4 Years	54,653,000
More than 5 Years	0
Carrying Value	$ 63,403,000

XML

RESTRUCTURING CHARGES - Narrative (Details) $ in Thousands	1 Months Ended		2 Months Ended	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2016 position	Nov. 30, 2015 position	Dec. 31, 2015 USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2017 USD ($) position	Jun. 30, 2016 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($)
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Payments for Restructuring				$ 883	$ 1,368
Restructuring costs				2,335	2,052
Severance and Benefits
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Payments for Restructuring				472	1,029
Restructuring costs				1,570	1,489
Facilities
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Payments for Restructuring				411	339
Restructuring costs				$ 756	563
Fiscal 2018 Restructuring Plan
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Positions eliminated (positions) | position				49
Payments for Restructuring				$ 500
Restructuring costs				1,600
Fiscal 2018 Restructuring Plan | Severance and Benefits
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Restructuring costs				1,600
Fiscal 2017 April Restructuring Plan
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Positions eliminated (positions) | position	29
Payments for Restructuring						$ 1,500
Fiscal 2016 Restructuring Plan
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Positions eliminated (positions) | position		65
Restructuring costs			$ 2,000
Fiscal 2016 Restructuring Plan | Severance and Benefits
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Restructuring costs					1,500
Fiscal 2016 Restructuring Plan | Facilities
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Restructuring costs				$ 800	$ 600

XML

RESTRUCTURING CHARGES - Summary of Restructuring Expense (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Restructuring costs	$ 2,335	$ 2,052
Severance and Benefits
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Restructuring costs	1,570	1,489
Facilities
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Restructuring costs	756	563
Other Restructuring [Member]
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Restructuring costs	$ 9	$ 0

XML

RESTRUCTURING CHARGES - Accrued Restructuring (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Restructuring Reserve [Roll Forward]
Balance as of March 31, 2017	$ 1,350	$ 2,737
Restructuring costs	1,570	1,915
Adjustment of prior estimates	756	179
Cash payments	(883)	(1,368)
Balance as of June 30, 2017	2,793	3,463
Severance and Benefits
Restructuring Reserve [Roll Forward]
Balance as of March 31, 2017	130	354
Restructuring costs	1,570	1,489
Adjustment of prior estimates	0	0
Cash payments	(472)	(1,029)
Balance as of June 30, 2017	1,228	814
Facilities
Restructuring Reserve [Roll Forward]
Balance as of March 31, 2017	1,220	2,383
Restructuring costs	0	426
Adjustment of prior estimates	756	179
Cash payments	(411)	(339)
Balance as of June 30, 2017	$ 1,565	$ 2,649

XML

RESTRUCTURING CHARGES - Estimated Timing of Future Payouts (Details) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017 USD ($)
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Estimated timing of future payouts	$ 2,793
Next twelve months
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Estimated timing of future payouts	2,250
July 2018 through June 2022
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Estimated timing of future payouts	543
Severance and Benefits
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Estimated timing of future payouts	1,228
Severance and Benefits | Next twelve months
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Estimated timing of future payouts	1,228
Severance and Benefits | July 2018 through June 2022
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Estimated timing of future payouts	0
Facilities
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Estimated timing of future payouts	1,565
Facilities | Next twelve months
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Estimated timing of future payouts	1,022
Facilities | July 2018 through June 2022
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Estimated timing of future payouts	$ 543

XML

EQUITY (Details)	Apr. 18, 2017	Jun. 30, 2017 $ / shares	Apr. 19, 2017 $ / shares	Mar. 31, 2017 $ / shares
Equity [Abstract]
Reverse stock split, ratio	0.125000
Common stock, par value (usd per share)		$ 0.01	$ 0.01	$ 0.01

XML

STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS AND SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION - Summary of Share-based Compensation (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Share-based compensation expense
Share-based compensation	$ 1,613	$ 1,998
Stock options
Share-based compensation expense
Share-based compensation	0	0
Restricted stock units
Share-based compensation expense
Share-based compensation	1,461	1,836
Stock purchase plan
Share-based compensation expense
Share-based compensation	152	162
Cost of revenue
Share-based compensation expense
Share-based compensation	217	280
Research and development
Share-based compensation expense
Share-based compensation	286	403
Sales and marketing
Share-based compensation expense
Share-based compensation	520	612
General and administrative
Share-based compensation expense
Share-based compensation	$ 590	$ 703

XML

STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS AND SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION - Narrative (Details) - $ / shares	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Restricted stock units
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Weighted-average grant date fair values of RSUs granted (usd per share)	$ 7.82	$ 3.84

XML

STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS AND SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION - Summary of Activity Relating to Restricted Stock Units (Details) - Restricted stock units - $ / shares shares in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Shares
Nonvested, beginning balance (shares)	1,765
Granted (shares)	83
Vested (shares)	(52)
Forfeited (shares)	(27)
Nonvested, ending balance (shares)	1,769
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
Nonvested, beginning balance (usd per share)	$ 6.75
Granted (usd per share)	7.82	$ 3.84
Vested (usd per share)	5.66
Forfeited (usd per share)	7.48
Nonvested, ending balance (usd per share)	$ 6.82

XML

INCOME TAXES (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Income tax provision (benefit)	$ 1,240	$ (377)
Tax liability related to an settlement	$ 1,700

XML

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE - Computation of Net Income (Loss) Per Share (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Numerator:
Net loss	$ (3,674)	$ (3,520)
Weighted average shares:
Basic (shares)	34,084	33,292
Dilutive shares from stock plans (shares)	0	0
Dilutive shares from convertible subordinated notes (shares)	0	0
Diluted (shares)	34,084	33,292
Basic and diluted net loss per share (usd per share)	$ (0.11)	$ (0.11)

XML

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE - Anti-dilutive shares excluded from the computations of diluted net income (loss) (Details) - USD ($) shares in Millions, $ in Millions	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2012
Stock options
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Weighted average shares excluded (shares)	0.2	0.5
Unvested restricted stock units
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Weighted average shares excluded (shares)	1.5	1.4
4.50% convertible subordinated notes
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Weighted average shares excluded (shares)	4.8	5.3
Interest expense excluded	$ 0.8	$ 0.9
Stated interest rate	4.50%		4.50%

XML

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Details) $ in Millions	Jun. 30, 2017 USD ($)
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Remaining purchase commitments	$ 42.0