XML 35 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Fair Value of Financial Instruments [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Note 9 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company utilizes the fair value provisions of ASC Topic 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.  ASC Topic 820 describes a fair value hierarchy based upon three levels of input, which are:

Level 1 − quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (observable)
Level 2 − inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable market data for essentially the full term of the asset or liability (observable)
Level 3 − unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, but are significant to determining the fair value of the asset or liability (unobservable)

The Company's held to maturity investments consist of certificates of deposit with maturity dates beyond three months.  The carrying amounts of the certificates of deposit were considered representative of their respective fair values.

The Company's interest rate swap agreement is valued at the amount the Company would have expected to pay to terminate the agreement.  The fair value determination was based upon the present value of expected future cash flows using the LIBOR rate, plus an applicable interest rate spread, a technique classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy described above.  At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the fair market value of the Company's interest rate swap included a cumulative unrealized loss of $4,000 and $26,000, respectively, which were recorded as components of interest expense within the consolidated statements of operations and as components of accrued expenses within the consolidated balance sheets.