XML 69 R46.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2018
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Schedule of Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis

The following table presents the fair value of our financial instruments as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 that are (1) measured and reported at fair value in the Financial Statements on a recurring basis and (2) not measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the Financial Statements:

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

 

Carrying Amount

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Measured at fair value on recurring basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forward contracts (1)

 

$

(39

)

 

$

(39

)

 

$

-

 

 

$

(39

)

 

$

-

 

Not measured at fair value on recurring basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt and capital lease obligations (2)

 

 

(3,633

)

 

 

(3,287

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(3,197

)

 

 

(90

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2017

 

 

 

Carrying Amount

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Measured at fair value on recurring basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forward contracts (1)

 

$

2

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

-

 

Not measured at fair value on recurring basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt and capital lease obligations (2)

 

 

(542

)

 

 

(558

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(516

)

 

 

(42

)

(1)

The fair value of forward contracts is classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy and is valued using observable market parameters for similar instruments traded in active markets. Where quoted prices are not available, the income approach is used to value forward contracts. This approach discounts future cash flows based on current market expectations and credit risk.

(2)

Our debt instruments are generally valued using a market approach based on quoted prices for similar instruments traded in active markets and are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. Quoted prices were not available for the NO 105 construction financing, vendor equipment financing or capital leases. Therefore, these instruments were valued based on the present value of future cash flows discounted at estimated borrowing rates for similar debt instruments or on estimated prices based on current yields for debt issues of similar quality and terms and are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.