XML 51 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.2.0.727
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTE 10—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The following is a summary of our available-for-sale securities measured at fair value:

 

 

June 30, 2015

 

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Mutual funds(1)

$

756

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

756

 

 

$

-

 

Commercial paper

 

300

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

300

 

 

 

-

 

Total

$

1,056

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

1,056

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Mutual funds(1)

$

2,216

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

2,216

 

 

$

-

 

Commercial paper

 

1,699

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,699

 

 

 

-

 

Total

$

3,915

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

3,915

 

 

$

-

 

(1)

Various U.S. equities and other investments managed under mutual funds

Our Level 2 investments consist primarily of commercial paper, asset-backed commercial paper notes backed by a pool of mortgage-backed securities and mutual funds. The fair value of our Level 2 investments was determined using a market approach that is based on quoted prices and other information for similar or identical instruments.

Other Financial Instruments

We used the following methods and assumptions in estimating our fair value disclosures for our other financial instruments:

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents. The carrying amounts that we have reported in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents approximate their fair values and are classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy.

Short-term and long-term debt. The fair value of debt instruments is classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy and is valued using a market approach based on quoted prices for similar instruments traded in active markets. Where quoted prices are not available, the income approach is used to value these instruments based on the present value of future cash flows discounted at estimated borrowing rates for similar debt instruments or on estimated prices based on current yields for debt issues of similar quality and terms.

Forward contracts. The fair value of forward contracts is classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy and is valued using observable market parameters for similar instruments traded in active markets. Where quoted prices are not available, the income approach is used to value forward contracts, which discounts future cash flows based on current market expectations and credit risk.

The estimated fair values of certain of our financial instruments are as follows:

 

 

 

June 30, 2015

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

 

Carrying

Amount

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Carrying

Amount

 

 

Fair Value

 

Balance Sheet Instruments

 

(In thousands)

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

576,575

 

 

$

576,575

 

 

$

665,309

 

 

$

665,309

 

Restricted cash and cash equivalents

 

 

194,427

 

 

 

194,427

 

 

 

187,585

 

 

 

187,585

 

Investments

 

 

1,056

 

 

 

1,056

 

 

 

3,915

 

 

 

3,915

 

Debt

 

 

(854,162

)

 

 

(840,183

)

 

 

(864,469

)

 

 

(737,980

)

Forward contracts

 

 

(45,453

)

 

 

(45,453

)

 

 

(46,912

)

 

 

(46,912

)

 

Non-financial Instruments

In accordance with ASC 360-10, Property, Plant and Equipment, one of our vessels, the DB101, which was held and used in our ASA segment, was written down to a fair value of $13.6 million, resulting in a non-cash impairment charge of $4.2 million in the first quarter of 2015, which related to our plan to decommission this vessel in the second quarter of 2015. In the second quarter of 2015, we disposed of the asset and recognized an additional loss of $3.3 million.

In the second quarter of 2015, we abandoned a marine pipelay welding system project and recognized a $6.6 million non-cash impairment charge, which equaled the carrying value of that asset.

In June 2014, we cancelled a pipelay system originally intended for the CSV 108, which resulted in a $10.7 million improvement to the cancellation cost estimate included in the $37.8 million of vessel-impairment charges recognized during the year ended December 31, 2013.