Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2016

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Principles of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Quality Systems, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. HealthFusion is included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. Hospital Solutions Division is included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements through the date of disposition. See Note 5 for additional details.

Business Segments

Business Segments. The Company has prepared operating segment information based on the manner in which management disaggregates the Company’s operations for making internal operating decisions. See Note 15.

Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation. Beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2016, we presented certain components of revenue within the consolidated statements of comprehensive income in a format intended to group like-kind products and services and disaggregate the other services category of revenue, which has continued to comprise a larger percentage of total revenue. More specifically, the primary changes to the presentation of revenue included:


•	Revenue from software-as-a-service (SaaS), hosting services, and other software related subscriptions are now aggregated into a new software related subscription services category of revenue. Previously, revenue from software related subscriptions services was reported within the other services category of revenue.


•	Revenue from annual software licenses that was also previously reported within the other services category of revenue is now reported within the software license and hardware category of revenue.


•	Revenue from all other services, including implementation, training, and consulting, are now aggregated into a single professional services category of revenue that excludes software related subscription services and annual software licenses, as noted above.

Each of the corresponding components of cost of revenue has also been revised in a manner that is consistent with the new presentation of revenue described above.

For informational and comparability purposes, we have recast our previously reported consolidated statements of comprehensive income to provide historical information on a basis consistent with the new reporting format of revenue and cost of revenue. The reclassification of revenue and cost of revenue within the consolidated statements of comprehensive income has no impact on previously reported net income or earnings per share and no impact on the previously reported consolidated balance sheets, statements of stockholders' equity, and statements of cash flow.

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

References to amounts in the consolidated financial statement sections are in thousands, except shares and per share data, unless otherwise specified.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition. We generate revenue from sales of licensing rights and subscriptions to our software products, hardware and third party software products, support and maintenance services, revenue cycle management and related services ("RCM"), electronic data interchange and data services (“EDI”), and professional services, such as implementation, training, and consulting performed for clients who use our products.

We generally recognize revenue provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, fees are considered fixed or determinable, delivery of the product or service has occurred, and collection is considered probable. Revenue from the delivered elements (generally software licenses) are generally recognized upon physical or electronic delivery. In certain transactions where collection is not considered probable, the revenue is deferred until collection occurs. If the fee is not fixed or determinable, then the revenue recognized in each period (subject to application of other revenue recognition criteria) will be the lesser of the aggregate amounts due and payable or the amount of the arrangement fee that would have been recognized if the fees were being recognized using the residual method. We assess whether fees are considered fixed or determinable at the inception of the arrangement and negotiated fees generally are based on a specific volume of products to be delivered and not subject to change based on variable pricing mechanisms, such as the number of units copied or distributed or the expected number of users.

A typical system sale may contain multiple elements, but most often includes software licenses, maintenance and support, implementation and training. Revenue on arrangements involving multiple elements is generally allocated to each element using the residual method when evidence of fair value only exists for the undelivered elements. The fair value of an element is based on vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”), which is based on the price charged when the same element is sold separately. We generally establish VSOE for the related undelivered elements based on the bell-shaped curve method. VSOE is established on maintenance for our largest clients based on stated renewal rates only if the rate is determined to be substantive and falls within our customary pricing practices. VSOE calculations are updated and reviewed on a quarterly or annual basis, depending on the nature of the product or service.

Under the residual method, we defer revenue related to the undelivered elements based on VSOE of fair value of each undelivered element and allocate the remainder of the contract price, net of all discounts, to the delivered elements. If VSOE of fair value of any undelivered element does not exist, all revenue is deferred until VSOE of fair value of the undelivered element is established or the element has been delivered.

Revenue related to arrangements that include hosting services is recognized in accordance to the revenue recognition criteria described above only if the client has the contractual right to take possession of the software at any time without incurring a significant penalty, and it is feasible for the client to either host the software on its own equipment or through another third party. Otherwise, the arrangement is accounted for as a service contract in which the entire arrangement is deferred and recognized over the period that the hosting services are being provided.

From time to time, we offer future purchase discounts on our products and services as part of our arrangements. Such discounts that are incremental to the range of discounts reflected in the pricing of the other elements of the arrangement, that are incremental to the range of discounts typically given in comparable transactions, and that are significant, are assessed as an additional element of the arrangement. Revenue deferred related to future purchase options are not recognized until either the client exercises the discount offer or the offer expires.

Revenue from professional services, including implementation, training, and consulting services, are generally recognized as the corresponding services are performed. Revenue from software related subscription services and support and maintenance revenue are recognized ratably over the contractual service period. Revenue from EDI and data services and other transaction processing services are recognized at the time the services are provided to clients. Revenue from RCM and related services is derived from services fees for ongoing billing, collections, and other related services, and are generally calculated as a percentage of total client collections. We recognize RCM and related services revenue at the time collections are made by the client as the services fees are not fixed or determinable until such time.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents generally consist of cash, money market funds and short-term U.S. Treasury securities with maturities of 90 days or less at the time of purchase. We had cash deposits held at U.S. banks and financial institutions at March 31, 2016 of which $26,017 was in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limit of $250 per owner. Our cash deposits are exposed to credit loss for amounts in excess of insured limits in the event of nonperformance by the institutions; however, we do not anticipate nonperformance by these institutions.

Any money market funds in which we hold a portion of our excess cash invest in only very high grade commercial and governmental instruments, and therefore bear low market risk.

Restricted Cash

Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents. Restricted cash and cash equivalents consist of cash that is being held by the Company acting as an agent for the disbursement of certain state social and care services programs. We record an offsetting liability when we initially receive such cash from the programs. We relieve both restricted cash and cash equivalents and the related liability when amounts are disbursed. We earn an administrative fee based on a percentage of the funds disbursed on behalf of the government social and care service programs.

Marketable Securities

Marketable Securities. Marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale and are recorded at fair value, based on quoted market rates when observable or valuation analysis when appropriate. Unrealized gains and losses, are included in shareholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses on investments are included in other income (expense).

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

. We maintain reserves for potential sales returns and uncollectible accounts receivable. In aggregate, such reserves reduce our gross accounts receivable to estimated net realizable value.

Our standard contracts generally do not contain provisions for clients to return products or services. However, we historically have accepted sales returns under certain circumstances. Accordingly, we estimate sales return reserves, including reserves for returns and other credits, based upon the rate of historical returns by revenue type in relation to the corresponding gross revenues and recognize revenue, net of an allowance for sales returns. If we are unable to estimate the returns, revenue recognition may be delayed until the rights of return period lapses, provided also, that all other criteria for revenue recognition have been met. If we experience changes in practices related to sales returns or changes in actual return rates that deviate from the historical data on which our reserves had been established, our revenues may be adversely affected.

Allowances for doubtful accounts and other uncollectible accounts receivable related to estimated losses resulting from our clients’ inability to make required payments are established based on our historical experience of bad debt expense and the aging of our accounts receivable balances, net of deferred revenue and specifically reserved accounts. Specific reserves are based on our estimate of the probability of collection for certain troubled accounts. Accounts are written off as uncollectible only after we have expended extensive collection efforts.

Our allowances for doubtful accounts are based on our assessment of the collectibility of client accounts. We regularly review the adequacy of these allowances by considering internal factors such as historical experience, credit quality and age of the client receivable balances as well as external factors such as economic conditions that may affect a client’s ability to pay and review of major third-party credit-rating agencies, as needed.

Inventories

Inventory. Inventory consists of hardware for specific client orders and spare parts and are valued at lower of cost (first-in, first-out) and net realizable value. Our provision for inventory obsolescence reduces our inventory to net realizable value.

Equipment and Improvements

Equipment and Improvements. Equipment and improvements are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Repair and maintenance costs that do not improve service potential or extend economic life are expensed as incurred. Depreciation and amortization of equipment and improvements are recorded over the estimated useful lives of the assets, or the related lease terms if shorter, by the straight-line method. Useful lives generally have the following ranges:



l	Computer equipment	3-5 years
l	Furniture and fixtures	3-7 years
l	Leasehold improvements	lesser of lease term or estimated useful life of asset

Software Development Costs

. Software development costs, consisting primarily of employee salaries and benefits, incurred in the research and development of new software products and enhancements to existing software products for external sale are expensed as incurred, and reported as net research and development costs in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income, until technological feasibility has been established. After technological feasibility is established, additional external-sale software development costs are capitalized. Amortization of capitalized software is recorded using the greater of the ratio of current revenues to the total of current and expected revenues of the related product or the straight-line method over the estimated economic life of the related product, which is typically three years. We perform ongoing assessments of the net realizable value of such capitalized software costs. If a determination is made that capitalized amounts are not recoverable based on the projected undiscounted cash flows to be generated from the applicable software, any excess unamortized capitalized software costs are written off. In addition to the assessment of net realizable value, we routinely review the remaining estimated lives of our capitalized software costs and record adjustments, if deemed necessary. The total of capitalized software costs incurred in the development of products for external sale are reported as capitalized software costs within our consolidated balance sheets.

We also incur costs to develop software applications for our internal-use and costs for the development of Software as a Service ("SaaS") based products sold to our clients. The development costs of our SaaS-based products are considered internal-use for accounting purposes. Our internal-use capitalized costs are stated at cost and amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which is typically three to seven years. Application development stage costs generally include costs associated with internal-use software configuration, coding, installation and testing. Costs related to the preliminary

project stage and post-implementation activities are expensed as incurred. Costs of significant upgrades and enhancements that result in additional functionality are also capitalized, whereas costs incurred for maintenance and minor upgrades and enhancements are expensed as incurred. Capitalized software costs for developing SaaS-based products are reported as capitalized software costs within our consolidated balance sheets and capitalized software costs for developing our internal-use software applications are reported as equipment and improvements within our consolidated balance sheets.

For the year ended March 31, 2016, we determined that our previously capitalized software costs related to our NextGen Now development project was not recoverable and recorded a $32,238 non-cash impairment charge. Refer to Note 8 for additional information.

Business Combinations

Business Combinations. In accordance with the accounting for business combinations, we allocate the purchase price of the acquired business to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The fair values of acquired assets and liabilities assumed represent our best estimate of fair value. The estimated fair value of the acquired tangible and intangible assets and liabilities assumed were determined using multiple valuation approaches depending on the type and nature of tangible or intangible asset acquired, including but not limited to the income approach, the excess earnings method and the relief from royalty method approach. The purchase price allocation methodology contains uncertainties as it requires us make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities, including, but not limited to, intangible assets, goodwill, deferred revenue, and contingent consideration liabilities. We estimate the fair value of the contingent consideration liabilities based on the probability of achieving certain business, strategic, or financial milestones and our projection of expected results, as needed. Unanticipated events or circumstances may occur which could affect the accuracy of our fair value estimates, including assumptions regarding industry economic factors and business strategies. Any adjustments to fair value subsequent to the measurement period are reflected in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

Goodwill

Goodwill. Goodwill acquired in a business combination is measured as the excess of the purchase price, or consideration transferred, over the net acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. Goodwill is not amortized as it has been determined to have an indefinite useful life.

We test goodwill for impairment annually during our first fiscal quarter, referred to as the annual test date. Based on our assessment, we have determined that there was no impairment to our goodwill as of June 30, 2015. We will also test for impairment between annual test dates if an event occurs or circumstances change that would indicate the carrying amount may be impaired. Impairment testing for goodwill is performed at a reporting-unit level, which is defined as an operating segment or one level below an operating segment (referred to as a component). A component of an operating segment is a reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component.

As part of our annual goodwill impairment test, we first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If we conclude that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we conduct a two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. The first step of the impairment test involves comparing the fair values of the applicable reporting units with their carrying values. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds the reporting unit's fair value, we perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test. The second step of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the implied fair value of the affected reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying value of that goodwill. The amount by which the carrying value of the goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, if any, is recognized as an impairment loss.

During the years ended March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015, we did not identify any events or circumstances that would require an interim goodwill impairment test.

Intangible Assets

Intangible Assets. Intangible assets consist of customer relationships, trade names and contracts, and software technology. These intangible assets are recorded at fair value and are reported net of accumulated amortization. We currently amortize the intangible assets over periods ranging from 7 months to 10 years using a method that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset are consumed. We assess the recoverability of intangible assets at least annually or whenever adverse events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. If the future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the related assets are less than the carrying value of such assets, impairment is deemed to have occurred and a loss is recognized to reduce the carrying value of the intangible assets to fair value, which is determined by discounting estimated future cash flows. In addition to the impairment assessment, we routinely review the remaining estimated lives of our intangible assets and record adjustments, if deemed necessary.

We determined that there was no impairment to our intangible assets as of March 31, 2016

Long-Lived Assets

Long-Lived Assets. We assess the recoverability of long-lived assets at least annually or whenever adverse events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. If the future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the related assets are less than the carrying value of such assets, impairment is deemed to have occurred and a loss is recognized to reduce the carrying value of the long-lived assets to fair value, which is determined by discounting estimated future cash flows. In addition to the impairment assessment, we routinely review the remaining estimated lives of our long-lived assets and record adjustments, if deemed necessary.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes. Income taxes are provided based on current taxable income and the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the basis of assets and liabilities for financial and tax reporting. The deferred income tax assets and liabilities represent the future state and federal tax return consequences of those differences, which will either be taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. Deferred income taxes are also recognized for operating losses that are available to offset future taxable income and tax credits that are available to offset future income taxes. At each reporting period, we assess the realizable value of deferred tax assets based on, among other things, estimates of future taxable income and adjusts the related valuation allowance as necessary. We make a number of assumptions and estimates in determining the appropriate amount of expense to record for income taxes. The assumptions and estimates consider the taxing jurisdiction in which we operate as well as current tax regulations. Accruals are established for estimates of tax effects for certain transactions and future projected profitability based on our interpretation of existing facts and circumstances.

Advertising Costs

Advertising Costs. Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. We do not have any direct-response advertising. Advertising costs, which include trade shows and conventions, were approximately $7,890, $7,079 and $5,600 for the years ended March 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and were included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

Earnings Per Share

Earnings per Share. We provide a dual presentation of “basic” and “diluted” earnings per share (“EPS”). Shares below are in thousands.



	Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
	2016		2015		2014
Earnings per share — Basic:
Net income	$	5,657	$	27,332	$	15,680
Weighted-average shares outstanding — Basic	60,635		60,259		59,918
Net income per common share — Basic	$	0.09	$	0.45	$	0.26

Earnings per share — Diluted:
Net income	$	5,657	$	27,332	$	15,680

Weighted-average shares outstanding	60,635		60,259		59,918
Effect of potentially dilutive securities	598		590		216
Weighted-average shares outstanding — Diluted	61,233		60,849		60,134
Net income per common share — Diluted	$	0.09	$	0.45	$	0.26

The computation of diluted net income per share does not include 1,926, 1,656 and 1,355 options for the years ended March 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, because their inclusion would have an anti-dilutive effect on net income per share.

Share-Based Compensation

Share-Based Compensation. We estimate the fair value of stock options on the date of grant using the Black Scholes option-pricing model based on required inputs, including expected term, volatility, risk-free rate, and expected dividend yield. Expected term is estimated based upon the historical exercise behavior and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding and therefore the proportion of awards that is expected to vest. Volatility is estimated by using the weighted-average historical volatility of our common stock, which approximates expected volatility. The risk-free rate is the implied yield available on the U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with remaining terms equal to the expected term. The expected dividend yield is the average dividend rate during a period equal to the expected term of the option. The fair value vest is recognized ratably as expense over the requisite service period in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

Share-based compensation is adjusted on a monthly basis for changes to estimated forfeitures based on a review of historical forfeiture activity. To the extent that actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from the estimate, share-based compensation expense is adjusted accordingly. The effect of the forfeiture adjustments for years ended March 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was not significant.

Share-based compensation expense associated with restricted performance shares with market conditions under our executive compensations plans is based on the grant date fair value measured at the underlying closing share price on the date of grant using a Monte Carlo-based valuation model.

See Note 13 for additional details regarding our share-based awards.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), which requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates. We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and recording revenue and expenses during the period.

New Accounting Standards

Accounting Standards. Recent accounting pronouncements implemented during the current year or requiring implementation in future periods are discussed below or in the notes, where applicable.

In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting" ("ASU 2016-09"). ASU 2016-09 simplifies the accounting for and reporting on share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The amendments in this update are to be applied differently upon adoption with certain amendments being applied prospectively, retrospectively and under a modified retrospective transition method. We are currently in the process of evaluating the potential impact of adoption of this updated authoritative guidance on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”), which is intended to improve financial reporting about leasing transactions. The new guidance will require entities that lease assets to recognize on their balance sheets the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases and to disclose key information about the leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. ASU 2016-02 is effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. We are currently in the process of evaluating the potential impact of adoption of this updated authoritative guidance on our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes ("ASU 2015-17"). ASU 2015-17 simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes by eliminating the separate classification of deferred income tax liabilities and assets into current and noncurrent amounts in the consolidated balance sheet. The amendments in the update require that all deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in the consolidated balance sheet. The amendments in this update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein and may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively to all periods presented. Early adoption is permitted. We elected to early adopt this standard in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 on a retrospective basis. Prior periods have been retrospectively adjusted. The retrospective adoption of ASU 2015-17 resulted in the reclassification of our consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2015, for presentation purposes only, in which $24,080 of current deferred tax assets were reclassed to noncurrent deferred tax assets.

In September 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-16, Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments ("ASU 2015-16"), which eliminates the requirement to restate prior period financial statements for measurement period adjustments following a business combination. The new guidance requires that the cumulative impact of a measurement period adjustment (including the impact on prior periods) be recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustment is identified. ASU 2015-16 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and early adoption is permitted. This guidance is effective for us for the quarter ending March 31, 2016. The adoption of this new standard did not have material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory ("ASU 2015-11"), which replaces the concept of subsequently measuring inventory at 'lower of cost or market' with that of 'lower of cost and net realizable value'. The guidance only applies to inventories for which cost is determined by methods other than last-in first-out (LIFO) and the retail inventory method (RIM). ASU 2015-11 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. This guidance is effective for us for fiscal year ending March 31, 2018. We do not expect the adoption of this new standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-05, Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Arrangement ("ASU 2015-05"), which requires a customer to determine whether a cloud computing arrangement contains a software license that should be accounted for as internal-use software or as a service contract. ASU 2015-05 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. Upon adoption, an entity has the option to apply the provisions of ASU 2015-05 either prospectively to all arrangements entered into or materially modified, or retrospectively. We do not expect the adoption of this new standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs ("ASU 2015-03"), which requires debt issuance costs to be presented as a deduction from the corresponding debt liability, which is consistent with the presentation of debt discounts or premiums. Given that ASU 2015-03 did not provide direct, authoritative guidance related to accounting for debt issuance costs associated with line-of-credit arrangements, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-15, Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements ("ASU 2015-15") in August 2015. ASU 2015-15 states that the SEC staff would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. The new guidance should be applied retrospectively and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. We elected to early adopt this standard in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 and have recorded debt issuance costs related to our revolving credit agreement within other assets on the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2016.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern ("ASU 2014-15"), which incorporates and expands upon certain principles that currently exist in U.S. auditing standards. ASU 2014-15 provides guidance regarding management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. The new standard requires management to perform interim and annual evaluations and sets forth principles for considering the mitigating effect of management's plans. The standard mandates certain disclosures when conditions give rise to substantial doubt about a company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year from the financial statement issuance date. ASU 2014-15 is effective for annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2016, and all annual and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. ASU 2014-15 is effective for us for fiscal year ending March 31, 2017. We do not expect the adoption of this new standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB, along with the International Accounting Standards Board, issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("ASU 2014-09"), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. ASU 2014-09 provides enhancements to the quality and consistency of how revenue is reported while also improving comparability in the financial statements of companies reporting using International Financial Reporting Standards and GAAP. The core principle of this updated guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new standard also requires additional disclosure about revenue and provides improved guidance for multiple element arrangements. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period, based on the July 2015 decision and issuance of Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-14, Deferral of Effective Date ("ASU 2015-14") by the FASB to delay the effective date by one year. Companies are permitted to adopt this new guidance following either a full retrospective or modified retrospective approach. ASU 2014-09 is effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. We are currently in the process of evaluating the potential impact of implementation of this updated authoritative guidance on our consolidated financial statements.

We do not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting standards, if adopted, would have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.