United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
| þ | Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016
| ¨ | Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from ___________________ to __________________.
Commission file number 001-15070
RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
| Delaware | 52-1253406 | |
| (State of Incorporation) | (IRS Employer I.D. Number) |
15245 Shady Grove Road
Suite 470
Rockville, Maryland 20850
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(301) 208-9191
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. (Check one):
| Large accelerated filer ¨ | Accelerated filer ¨ | |
| Non-accelerated filer ¨ | Smaller reporting company þ | |
| (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ
106,787,151 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, were outstanding as of November 11, 2016.
RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
Form 10-Q
Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2016
Index
2
Part I – Financial Information
Item 1. Condensed Financial Statements
RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
Condensed Balance Sheets
| September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | |||||||
| (Unaudited) | (See Note 1) | |||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||
| Current assets | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,061,374 | $ | 317,627 | ||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 126,619 | 24,300 | ||||||
| Total current assets | 1,187,993 | 341,927 | ||||||
| Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $91,288 and $88,794 | 8,051 | 10,544 | ||||||
| Other assets | 5,752 | 5,752 | ||||||
| Total assets | $ | 1,201,796 | $ | 358,223 | ||||
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT | ||||||||
| Current liabilities | ||||||||
| Accounts payable | $ | 91,127 | $ | 141,130 | ||||
| Unearned revenue | 50,824 | - | ||||||
| Accrued expenses | 239,770 | 217,911 | ||||||
| Total current liabilities | 381,721 | 359,041 | ||||||
| Long-Term liabilities | ||||||||
| Unearned revenue | 1,543,050 | 1,379,388 | ||||||
| Convertible promisory note | 300,000 | 300,000 | ||||||
| Convertible promisory notes, net of derivative liability | 481,061 | 388,854 | ||||||
| Fair value of derivative liabilities | 5,037,837 | 4,673,336 | ||||||
| Total liabilities | 7,743,669 | 7,100,619 | ||||||
| Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
| Stockholders' deficit | ||||||||
| Preferred stock, $.001 par value per share, 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued | - | - | ||||||
| Common stock, par value $.001 per share, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 106,787,151 and 101,640,092 issued and outstanding | 106,787 | 101,640 | ||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | 98,619,105 | 98,230,802 | ||||||
| Accumulated deficit | (105,267,765 | ) | (105,074,838 | ) | ||||
| Total stockholders' deficit | (6,541,873 | ) | (6,742,396 | ) | ||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit | $ | 1,201,796 | $ | 358,223 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
3
RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
Condensed Statements of Operations
| Three Months ended September 30, | Nine Months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
| (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 12,706 | $ | 5,510 | $ | 80,602 | $ | 50,510 | ||||||||
| Operating expenses | ||||||||||||||||
| Research and development | 50,061 | 48,714 | 213,387 | 162,485 | ||||||||||||
| General and administrative | 341,224 | 341,772 | 1,195,862 | 1,214,572 | ||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 391,285 | 390,486 | 1,409,249 | 1,377,057 | ||||||||||||
| Loss from operations | (378,579 | ) | (384,976 | ) | (1,328,647 | ) | (1,326,547 | ) | ||||||||
| Interest and other income | - | - | - | 101 | ||||||||||||
| Interest expense | (43,577 | ) | (43,576 | ) | (129,779 | ) | (129,307 | ) | ||||||||
| Change in fair value of derivative liabilities | 1,283,833 | (701,000 | ) | 1,265,499 | (3,154,500 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 861,677 | $ | (1,129,552 | ) | $ | (192,927 | ) | $ | (4,610,253 | ) | |||||
| Basic net income (loss) per common share | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | |||||
| Diluted net income (loss) per common share | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | |||||
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic | 106,787,151 | 101,640,092 | 103,405,871 | 101,489,792 | ||||||||||||
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - diluted | 127,489,808 | 101,640,092 | 103,405,871 | 101,489,792 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
4
RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
| For the nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | |||||||
| (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||
| Operating activities: | ||||||||
| Net loss | $ | (192,927 | ) | $ | (4,610,253 | ) | ||
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 2,494 | 2,571 | ||||||
| Share-based compensation | 289,220 | 183,207 | ||||||
| Shares issued as compensation to non-employees | - | 8,100 | ||||||
| Offering costs allocated to derivative liabilites | 214,229 | - | ||||||
| Non-cash interest expense | 92,207 | 91,872 | ||||||
| Change in fair value of derivative liabilities | (1,265,499 | ) | 3,154,500 | |||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
| Unearned revenue | 214,486 | 989,490 | ||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | (102,319 | ) | 52,138 | |||||
| Accounts payable | (50,003 | ) | (70,300 | ) | ||||
| Accrued expenses | 21,859 | 15,424 | ||||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | (776,253 | ) | (183,251 | ) | ||||
| Investing activities: | ||||||||
| Purchase of property and equipment | - | (1,077 | ) | |||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | - | (1,077 | ) | |||||
| Financing activities: | ||||||||
| Proceeds from sale of common stock and issuance of warrants net of offering costs | 1,520,000 | - | ||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | 1,520,000 | - | ||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 743,747 | (184,328 | ) | |||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 317,627 | 844,043 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 1,061,374 | $ | 659,715 | ||||
| Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Operating and Financing Activities | ||||||||
| Cashless exercise of warrants | $ | - | $ | 294 | ||||
| Fair value of warrants issued to placement agent | $ | 83,799 | $ | - | ||||
| Fair value of derivative liabilities | $ | 1,630,000 | $ | - | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
5
RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (Unaudited)
| 1. | organization, business overview and basis of presentation |
Organization and Nature of Operations.
RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (“RegeneRx”, the “Company”, “We”, “Us”, “Our”), a Delaware corporation, was incorporated in 1982. We are focused on the discovery and development of novel molecules to accelerate tissue and organ repair. Our operations are confined to one business segment: the development and marketing of product candidates based on Thymosin Beta 4 (“Tβ4”), an amino acid peptide.
Management Plans.
On June 27, 2016, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Sabby Healthcare Master Fund, Ltd., and Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund, Ltd. (collectively, “Sabby”) pursuant to which we agreed to sell, and the purchasers agreed to purchase, an aggregate of 5,147,059 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 5,147,059 shares of common stock, which we refer to as the 2016 Offering (see note 8). We received approximately $1,520,000 in net proceeds from the 2016 Offering. We believe our current cash on hand will fund our planned operations into the 4th quarter of 2017.
In May 2016, we announced the top line data from the Phase 2/3 clinical trial in patients with dry eye syndrome (“DES”), sponsored by our U.S. joint venture, ReGenTree, LLC. Although the co-primary endpoints were not met, ReGenTree demonstrated RGN-259’s protective efficacy in improving signs and symptom of DES, which are in line with certain results observed in the previous Phase 2a trial. Importantly, ReGenTree identified what we believe to be approvable sign and symptom endpoints, which had high statistical significance. The FDA approved ReGenTree’s Phase 3 protocol for DES in late summer and we initiated a second Phase 3 trial that has begun enrolling approxiamtely 500 patients.
On January 28, 2015, we announced that we had entered into a Joint Venture Agreement (the “Joint Venture Agreement”) with GtreeBNT Co., Ltd., a Korean pharma company (“GtreeBNT”) and shareholder of the Company. The Joint Venture Agreement provides for the creation of an entity, ReGenTree, LLC (“ReGenTree”), jointly owned by us and GtreeBNT, that will commercialize RGN-259 for treatment of dry eye and neurotrophic keratopathy, an orphan indication in the United States. GtreeBNT is responsible for funding all product development and commercialization efforts, and holds a majority interest of ReGenTree that varies depending on development milestones achieved and eventual commercialization path, if successful.
RegeneRx’s initial ownership interest in ReGenTree was 49% and was reduced to 42% after the clinical study report was filed for the Phase 2/3 dry eye clinical trial. Based on when, and if, certain additional development milestones are achieved in the U.S. with RGN-259, our equity ownership in ReGenTree may be incrementally reduced to between 42% and 25%, with 25% being our final equity ownership upon approval of an NDA for Dry Eye Syndrome in the U.S. In addition, we retain a single digit to low double-digit royalty on commercial sales as described below. In the event the ReGenTree entity is acquired or there is a change of control that occurs following achievement of an NDA, RegeneRx shall be entitled to a minimum of 40% of proceeds paid or payable and will forgo any future royalties. RegeneRx holds one of three board seats ReGenTree’s board and certain major decisions and transactions within ReGenTree, such as commercialization strategy, mergers, and acquisitions, require RegeneRx’s board designee’s consent.
In conjunction with the Joint Venture Agreement, we also entered into a royalty-bearing license agreement (the “License Agreement”) with ReGenTree pursuant to which we granted to ReGenTree the right to develop and exclusively commercialize RGN-259 in the United States. We received a total of $1 million in two tranches under the terms of the License Agreement. The first tranche of $500,000 was received in March 2015 and a second in the amount of $500,000 was received in September 2015. On April 6, 2016, we received $250,000 from ReGenTree and executed an amendment to the license agreement on April 28, 2016. Under the amendment the territorial rights were expanded to include Canada and we are also entitled to royalties as a percentage of net sales ranging from the single digits to the low-double digits based on the medical indications approved and whether the Joint Venture commercializes products directly or through a third party.
6
In September 2015, ReGenTree began a Phase 2/3 clinical trial in patients with DES and a Phase 3 clinical trial in patients with neurotrophic keratopathy (“NK”), both in the U.S. In January 2016, the DES trial completed enrollment of all patients in the trial. The last patient received the last treatment in February. Results from the DES trial were released in early May 2016.
The trial, which enrolled 317 subjects, tested two doses of RGN-259 eye drops containing 0.05% and 0.1% concentrations of the Tβ4 four times daily for 28 days vs. placebo. On Day 29, the day after the 28th and final day of dosing, patients were subject to the Controlled Adverse Environment (“CAE”) challenge. Co-primary endpoints were total corneal fluorescein staining score change on the 29th day pre-CAE and post-CAE (sign) and total ocular discomfort score change on the 29th day pre-CAE and post-CAE (symptom). Although the co-primary endpoints were not met, we demonstrated RGN-259’s protective efficacy in improving signs and symptoms of DES in sub-groups of patients, which is in line with the results observed in the previous Phase 2a trial. Importantly, we identified approvable sign and symptom endpoints, which were met with statistical significance and have been designated as the primary endpoints of our current Phase 3 trial.
RGN-259 was safe and well-tolerated and comfortable for the patients with no irritation upon instillation. There were no significant drug-related adverse events for both concentrations. The safety profile is consistent with that observed in the previous Phase 2a trial.
The NK trial, a smaller study in an orphan population, has enrolled eleven patients thus far, and has three additional patients being screened with a goal of forty-six. Of the eight original clinical sites for the study, six are enrolling patients, one has yet to receive IRB approval to begin enrolling patients, and one was unable to consummate a clinical contract with ReGenTree. ReGenTree is adding four additional sites and has retained a specialized recruitment center to accelerate patient enrollment.
Currently, we have active partnerships in three major territories: the U.S., China and Pan Asia. Our partners have been moving forward and making progress in each territory. In each case, the cost of development is being borne by our partners with no financial obligation for RegeneRx.
Lee's Pharmaceutical Ltd. (“Lee’s”), RegeneRx's licensee in China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan, previously received notice from China's FDA (“CFDA”) declining its investigational new drug (“IND”) application for a Phase 2b dry eye clinical trial because the API (active pharmaceutical ingredient or Tß4) was manufactured outside of China. The API was manufactured in the U.S. and provided to Lee's by RegeneRx pursuant to a license agreement to develop RGN-259 ophthalmic eye drops in the licensed territory. However, this year, the CFDA modified its manufacturing regulations and will now allow Chinese companies to utilize API manufactured outside of China for Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials. We have not been informed of a projected starting date for Phase 2 trials but expect it sometime in mid-2017.
GtreeBNT, RegeneRx's licensee in Korea, Australia, Japan and a number of other countries in Asia, filed an IND with the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety to conduct a Phase 2/3 study with RGN-259 in patients with dry eye syndrome and in July 2015 received approval to conduct the trial. GtreeBNT has recently informed us that it believes marketing approval in the U.S. will allow expedited marketing in Korea, possibly without the need for a clinical trial.
We still have significant clinical assets to develop, primarily RGN-352 (injectable formulation of Tß4 for cardiac and CNS disorders) in the U.S., Pan Asia, and Europe, and RGN-259 in the EU. Regarding the EU, our goal is to wait until the results are obtained from the current ophthalmic clinical trials before licensing or developing RGN-259 in that territory. If successful, this should allow us to obtain a higher value for the asset at that time. However, we intend to continue to develop RGN-352, either by obtaining grants to fund a Phase 2a clinical trial in the cardiovascular or central nervous system fields or finding a suitable partner with the resources and capabilities to develop it as we have with RGN-259.
7
We anticipate incurring additional losses in the future as we continue to explore the potential clinical benefits of Tß4-based product candidates over multiple indications. We have entered into a series of strategic partnerships under licensing and joint venture agreements where our partners are responsible for advancing development of our product candidates with multiple clinical trials started in 2015 and an additional Phase 3 trial that began in Q3 2016. We will need additional funds to continue operations during the fourth quarter of 2017 as well as substantial additional funds in order to significantly advance development of our unlicensed programs. Accordingly, we will continue to evaluate opportunities to raise additional capital by exploring various alternatives, including, without limitation, a public or private placement of our securities, debt financing, corporate collaboration and licensing arrangements, or the sale of our company or certain of our intellectual property rights.
These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern. This basis of accounting contemplates the recovery of our assets and the satisfaction of our liabilities in the normal course of business.
Although we intend to continue to seek additional financing or additional strategic partners, we may not be able to complete a financing or corporate transaction, either on favorable terms or at all. If we are unable to complete a financing or strategic transaction, we may not be able to continue as a going concern after our funds have been exhausted, and we could be required to significantly curtail or cease operations, file for bankruptcy or liquidate and dissolve. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain any sources of funding. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be forced to take any such actions.
In addition to our current operational requirements, we continually refine our operating strategy and evaluate alternative clinical uses of Tß4. However, substantial additional resources will be needed before we will be able to achieve sustained profitability. Consequently, we continually evaluate alternative sources of financing such as the sharing of development costs through strategic collaboration agreements. There can be no assurance that our financing efforts will be successful and, if we are not able to obtain sufficient levels of financing, we would delay certain clinical and/or research activities and our financial condition would be materially and adversely affected. Even if we are able to obtain sufficient funding, other factors including competition, dependence on third parties, uncertainty regarding patents, protection of proprietary rights, manufacturing of peptides, and technology obsolescence could have a significant impact on us and our operations.
To achieve profitability, we, and/or a partner, must successfully conduct pre-clinical studies and clinical trials, obtain required regulatory approvals and successfully manufacture and market those pharmaceuticals we wish to commercialize. The time required to reach profitability is highly uncertain, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve sustained profitability, if at all.
Basis of Presentation.
The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for each period presented. These statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and with the rules and regulations of the SEC, for interim financial statements. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP. The accounting policies underlying our unaudited interim financial statements are consistent with those underlying our audited annual financial statements. These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited annual financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, and related notes thereto, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Annual Report”).
The accompanying December 31, 2015 financial information was derived from our audited financial statements included in the Annual Report. Operating results for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016 or any other future period.
8
References in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to “authoritative guidance” are to the Accounting Standards Codification issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”).
Use of Estimates.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Critical accounting policies involved in applying our accounting policies are those that require management to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate was made and those for which different estimates reasonably could have been used for the current period. Critical accounting estimates are also those which are reasonably likely to change from period to period, and would have a material impact on the presentation of our financial condition, changes in financial condition or results of operations. Our most critical accounting estimates relate to accounting policies for fair value measurements in connection with derivative liabilities, clinical trial accruals and share-based arrangements. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Convertible Notes with Detachable Warrants.
In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 470-20, Debt with Conversion and Other Options, the proceeds received from convertible notes are allocated between the convertible notes and the detachable warrants based on the relative fair value of the convertible notes without the warrants and the relative fair value of the warrants. The portion of the proceeds allocated to the warrants is recognized as additional paid-in capital and a debt discount. The debt discount related to warrants is accreted into interest expense through maturity of the notes.
Derivative Financial Instruments.
Derivative financial instruments consist of financial instruments or other contracts that contain a notional amount and one or more underlying variables (e.g., interest rate, security price or other variable), which require no initial net investment and permit net settlement. Derivative financial instruments may be free-standing or embedded in other financial instruments. Further, derivative financial instruments are initially, and subsequently, measured at fair value and recorded as liabilities or, in rare instances, assets.
We do not use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to cash-flow, market or foreign-currency risks. However, hawse have issued financial instruments including warrants that are either (i) not afforded equity classification, (ii) embody risks not clearly and closely related to host contracts, or (iii) may be net-cash settled by the counterparty. In certain instances, these instruments are required to be carried as derivative liabilities, at fair value, in our financial statements. In other instances these instruments are classified as equity instruments in our financial statements.
The fair value of derivatives is estimated using either the Black-Scholes option pricing model or a Monte Carlo simulation model depending on facts pertaining to the derivative liability. Both option pricing models utilize a series of inputs and assumptions to arrive at a fair value at the date of inception and each reporting period. Some of the key assumptions include the likelihood of future financing, stock price volatility and discount rates. Estimating fair values of derivative financial instruments requires the development of significant and subjective estimates that may, and are likely to, change over the duration of the instrument with related changes in internal and external market factors. In addition, option-based techniques are highly volatile and sensitive to changes in the trading market price of our common stock, which has a high-historical volatility. Since derivative financial instruments are initially and subsequently carried at fair values, our operating results reflect the volatility in these estimates and assumption changes in each reporting period.
9
Revenue Recognition.
We recognize revenue in accordance with the authoritative guidance for revenue recognition. We recognize revenue when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery (or passage of title) has occurred or services have been rendered, (iii) the seller's price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. We also comply with the authoritative guidance for revenue recognition regarding arrangements with multiple deliverables. Multiple-element arrangements are analyzed to determine whether the deliverables, which may include a license together with performance obligations such as providing a clinical supply of product and steering committee services, can be separated or whether they must be accounted for as a single unit of accounting. Revenue associated with licensing agreements consists of non-refundable upfront license fees and milestone payments. Non-refundable upfront license fees received under license agreements, whereby continued performance or future obligations are considered inconsequential to the relevant license technology, are recognized as revenue upon delivery of the technology.
Whenever we determine that an arrangement should be accounted for as a single unit of accounting, we must determine the period over which the performance obligations will be performed and revenue will be recognized. Revenue will be recognized using either a relative performance or straight-line method. We recognize revenue using the relative performance method provided that the we can reasonably estimate the level of effort required to complete our performance obligations under an arrangement and such performance obligations are provided on a best-efforts basis. Revenue recognized is limited to the lesser of the cumulative amount of payments received or the cumulative amount of revenue earned, as determined using the relative performance method, as of each reporting period.
If we cannot reasonably estimate the level of effort required to complete our performance obligations under an arrangement, the performance obligations are provided on a best-efforts basis and we can reasonably estimate when the performance obligation ceases or the remaining obligations become inconsequential and perfunctory, then the total payments under the arrangement, excluding royalties and payments contingent upon achievement of substantive milestones, would be recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the period we expect to complete our performance obligations. Revenue is limited to the lesser of the cumulative amount of payments received or the cumulative amount of revenue earned, as determined using the straight-line basis, as of the period ending date.
If we cannot reasonably estimate when our performance obligation either ceases or becomes inconsequential and perfunctory, then revenue is deferred until we can reasonably estimate when the performance obligation ceases or becomes inconsequential. Revenue is then recognized over the remaining estimated period of performance.
We recognize consideration that is contingent upon the achievement of a milestone in its entirety as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved only if the milestone is substantive in its entirety. A milestone is considered substantive when it meets all of the following criteria:
| · | The consideration is commensurate with either the entity's performance to achieve the milestone or the enhancement of the value of the delivered item(s) as a result of a specific outcome resulting from the entity's performance to achieve the milestone; |
| · | The consideration relates solely to past performance; and |
| · | The consideration is reasonable relative to all of the deliverables and payment terms within the arrangement. |
A milestone is defined as an event (i) that can only be achieved based in whole or in part on either the entity's performance or on the occurrence of a specific outcome resulting from the entity's performance, (ii) for which there is substantive uncertainty at the date the arrangement is entered into that the event will be achieved and (iii) that would result in additional payments being due to us.
10
Amounts received prior to satisfying the above revenue recognition criteria are recorded as deferred revenue in our accompanying condensed balance sheets.
Variable Interest Entities.
We have determined that the Joint Venture is a “variable interest entity”, since the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the Joint Venture to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. Further, because of GtreeBNT’s majority equity stake in the Joint Venture, voting control, control of the board of directors, and substantive management rights, and given that we do not have the power to direct the Joint Venture’s activities that most significantly impact its economic performance, we have determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of the Joint Venture and, therefore, is not required to consolidate the Joint Venture. We report our equity stake in the Joint Venture using the equity method of accounting because, while it does not control the Joint Venture, we can exert significant influence over the Joint Venture’s activities by virtue of its board representation.
Because we are not obligated to fund the Joint Venture, and has not provided any financial support and has no commitment to provide financial support in the future to the Joint Venture, the carrying value of its investment in the Joint Venture is zero. As a result, we are not recognizing our share (49%) of the Joint Venture’s operating losses and will not recognize any such losses until the Joint Venture produces net income (as opposed to net losses) and at that point we will reduce its share of the Joint Venture’s net income by its share of previously suspended net losses. As of September 30, 2016, because it has not provided any financial support, we have has no financial exposure as a result of its variable interest in the Joint Venture.
Research and Development.
Research and development (“R&D”) costs are expensed as incurred and include all of the wholly-allocable costs associated with our various clinical programs passed through to us by our outsourced vendors. Those costs include: manufacturing Tβ4; formulation of Tβ4 into the various product candidates; stability for both Tβ4 and the various formulations; pre-clinical toxicology; safety and pharmacokinetic studies; clinical trial management; medical oversight; laboratory evaluations; statistical data analysis; regulatory compliance; quality assurance; and other related activities. R&D includes cash and non-cash compensation, payroll taxes, travel and other miscellaneous costs of our internal R&D personnel, part-time hourly employees and external consultants dedicated to R&D efforts. R&D also includes an allocation of our common infrastructure costs for office space and communications.
Cost of Preclinical Studies and Clinical Trials.
We accrue estimated costs for preclinical studies based on estimates of work performed. We estimate expenses incurred for clinical trials that are in process based on patient enrollment and based on clinical data collection and management. Costs based on clinical data collection and management are recognized based on estimates of unbilled goods and services received in the reporting period. We monitor the progress of the trials and their related activities and adjust the accruals accordingly. Adjustments to accruals are charged to expense in the period in which the facts that give rise to the adjustments become known. In the event of early termination of a clinical trial, we would accrue an amount based on estimates of the remaining non-cancelable obligations associated with winding down the clinical trial.
11
Recent Accounting Pronouncements.
In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern. The new standard requires management to evaluate on a regular basis whether any conditions or events have arisen that could raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The guidance 1) provides a definition for the term “substantial doubt,” 2) requires an evaluation every reporting period, interim periods included, 3) provides principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans to alleviate the substantial doubt, 4) requires certain disclosures if the substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of management’s plans, 5) requires an express statement, as well as other disclosures, if the substantial doubt is not alleviated, and 6) requires an assessment period of one year from the date the financial statements are issued. The standard is effective for reporting year ending December 31, 2016 and early adoption is not permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that this new accounting pronouncement will have on its financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which provides guidance for revenue recognition for contracts, superseding the previous revenue recognition requirements, along with most existing industry-specific guidance. The guidance requires an entity to review contracts in five steps: 1) identify the contract, 2) identify performance obligations, 3) determine the transaction price, 4) allocate the transaction price, and 5) recognize revenue. The new standard will result in enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue arising from contracts with customers. In July 2015, the FASB delayed the effective date of this standard by one year. The new standard will be effective for the Company’s reporting year beginning on January 1, 2018, and early adoption of the standard as of January 1, 2017 is permitted. In March 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to clarify the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. In April 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to clarify the identification of performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. In May 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to clarify guidance in certain areas and add some practical expedients to the guidance. The amendments in these 2016 updates do not change the core principle of the previously issued guidance in May 2014. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that this new accounting pronouncement will have on its financial statements.
In November 2015, the FASB issued new guidance on the balance sheet classification of deferred taxes. To simplify presentation, the new guidance requires that all deferred tax assets and liabilities, along with any related valuation allowance, be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. The accounting standard is effective for public business entities for annual reporting periods (including interim reporting periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our financial statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The accounting standard primarily affects the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. In addition, it includes a clarification related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. The accounting guidance is effective for annual reporting periods (including interim periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for the provision to record fair value changes for financial liabilities under the fair value option resulting from instrument-specific credit risk in other comprehensive income. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the pronouncement will have on its financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which supersedes ASC Topic 840, Leases, and creates a new topic, ASC Topic 842, Leases. ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize a lease liability and a lease asset for all leases, including operating leases, with a term greater than 12 months on its balance sheet. ASU 2016-02 also expands the required quantitative and qualitative disclosures surrounding leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. We have determined that the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will currently have no significant impact on its financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-07, Equity Method and Joint Ventures, which affects all entities that have an investment that becomes qualified for the equity method of accounting as a result of an increase in the level of ownership or degree of influence. ASU 2016-07 is effective for us beginning on January 1, 2017, early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect this ASU will have on its financial statements.
12
In March 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update which simplified several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods. We are currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of this ASU will have on its financial statements.
| 2. | Net Income (loss) per Common Share |
Basic net income (loss) per common share for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, is based on the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the periods. Diluted income (loss) per share is based on the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period in which a loss is incurred. In periods where there is net income, diluted income per share is based on the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding plus dilutive securities with a purchase or conversion price below the per share price of our common stock on the last day of the reporting period. The potentially dilutive securities include 27,103,956 shares and 22,556,951 shares in 2016 and 2015, respectively, reserved for the conversion of convertible debt or exercise of outstanding options and warrants. For the three month period ended September 30, 2016, 20,702,657 dilutive securities related to convertible debt, options and warrants were included in the diluted earnings per share calculation.
| 3. | Stock-Based Compensation |
We measure stock-based compensation expense based on the grant date fair value of the awards, which is then recognized over the period which service is required to be provided. We estimate the value of our stock option awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and amortize that cost over the expected term of the grant. We recognized $66,358 and $45,209 in stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 and $289,220 and $183,207 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. We expect to recognize the compensation cost related to non-vested options as of September 30, 2016 of $464,760 over the weighted average remaining recognition period of 1.1 years.
We used the following forward-looking range of assumptions to value the 940,000 stock options granted to employees, consultants and directors during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and the 1,635,000 stock options granted to employees, consultants and directors during the nine months ended September 30, 2015:
| 2016 | 2015 | |||||||
| Dividend yield | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||
| Risk-free rate of return | 1.41 | % | 1.53-1.63 | % | ||||
| Expected life in years | 4.5 - 7 | 4.5 - 4.75 | ||||||
| Volatility | 87-95 | % | 92-94 | % | ||||
| Forfeiture rate | 2.6 | % | 2.6 | % | ||||
| 4. | Income Taxes |
As of September 30, 2016, there have been no material changes to our uncertain tax positions disclosures as provided in Note 9 of the Annual Report. The tax returns for all years in the Company’s major tax jurisdictions were not settled as of January 1, 2016; no changes in settled tax years have occurred through September 30, 2016. Due to the existence of tax attribute carryforwards (which are currently offset by a full valuation allowance), the Company treats all years’ tax positions as unsettled due to the taxing authorities’ ability to modify these attributes.
13
| 5. | Fair Value Measurements |
The authoritative guidance for fair value measurements defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or the most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact, and (iv) willing to transact. The guidance describes a fair value hierarchy based on the levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value which are the following:
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs.
As of September 30, 2016 and 2015, our only qualifying assets that required measurement under the foregoing fair value hierarchy were money market funds included in Cash and Cash Equivalents valued at $1,061,000 and $660,000, respectively, using Level 1 inputs. Our September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 balance sheets reflect qualifying liabilities resulting from the price protection provision in the convertible promissory notes issued in March, July and September of 2013 and January 2014 (see Note 6). Our September 30, 2016 balance sheet also reflects qualifying liabilities related to the issuance of common stock and warrants in our 2016 Offering. Certain price protection anti-dilution features of the Securities Purchase Agreement and Warrants were determined to be embedded derivatives. An independent valuation expert calculated the fair value of the embedded derivatives using a complex, customized Monte Carlo simulation model suitable to value path dependent American options. We evaluated the derivative liability embedded in the series of convertible notes to determine if an adjustment to the carrying value of the liability was required at September 30, 2016 using the following assumptions.
| 2016 Offering | 2016 Offering | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| March 2013 | July 2013 | Sept 2013 | Jan 2014 | Warrants | Shares | |||||||||||||||||||
| Dividend yield | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||
| Risk-free rate of return | 0.59 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.75 | % | 1.14 | % | 1.14 | % | ||||||||||||
| Expected life in years | 1.5 | 1.75 | 1.95 | 2.25 | 5.25 | 0.84 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Volatility | 87.6 | % | 86.1 | % | 82.9 | % | 81.2 | % | 80.0 | % | 80.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Given the conditions surrounding the trading of the Company’s equity securities, the Company values its derivative instruments related to embedded conversion features from the issuance of convertible debentures in accordance with the Level 3 guidelines. For the 3 month period ended September 30, 2016, the following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances for financial instruments that are recognized at fair value in these financial statements.
14
| Balance at | Balance at | |||||||||||||||
| June 30, | New | Change in | September 30, | |||||||||||||
| 2016 | Issuances | Fair Values | 2016 | |||||||||||||
| Level 3 - | ||||||||||||||||
| Derivative liabilities from: | ||||||||||||||||
| Conversion features | ||||||||||||||||
| March 2013 | $ | 1,500,000 | $ | - | $ | (300,000 | ) | $ | 1,200,000 | |||||||
| July 2013 | 666,667 | - | (133,333 | ) | 533,334 | |||||||||||
| September 2013 | 2,140,000 | - | (428,000 | ) | 1,712,000 | |||||||||||
| January 2014 | 385,003 | - | (82,500 | ) | 302,503 | |||||||||||
| Anti-dilution Protection | ||||||||||||||||
| 2016 Offering shares | 60,000 | - | 40,000 | 100,000 | ||||||||||||
| 2016 Offering warrants | 1,570,000 | - | (380,000 | ) | 1,190,000 | |||||||||||
| Derivative instruments | $ | 6,321,670 | $ | - | $ | (1,283,833 | ) | $ | 5,037,837 | |||||||
| 6. | Convertible Notes |
2012 Convertible Note
On October 19, 2012 we completed a private placement of convertible notes (the “2012 Notes”) raising an aggregate of $300,000 in gross proceeds. The 2012 Notes were originally to mature after twenty-four (24) months from issuance. In order to conserve the Company’s capital, in October 2014 the Investors agreed to extend the maturity date to October 19, 2017, all other terms were unchanged. The 2012 Notes bear interest at a rate of five percent (5%) per annum and are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of fifteen cents ($0.15) per share (subject to adjustment as described in the 2012 Notes) at any time prior to repayment, at the election of the Investors. In the aggregate, the 2012 Notes are convertible into up to 2,000,000 shares of our common stock excluding interest.
At any time prior to maturity of the 2012 Notes, with the consent of the holders of a majority in interest of the 2012 Notes, we may prepay the outstanding principal amount of the 2012 Notes plus unpaid accrued interest without penalty. Upon the commission of any act of bankruptcy by the Company, the execution by the Company of a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, the filing by or against the Company of a petition in bankruptcy or any petition for relief under the federal bankruptcy act or the continuation of such petition without dismissal for a period of ninety (90) days or more, or the appointment of a receiver or trustee to take possession of the property or assets of the Company, the outstanding principal and all accrued interest on the 2012 Notes will accelerate and automatically become immediately due and payable.
In connection with the issuance of the 2012 Notes we also issued warrants to each note holder. The warrants are exercisable for an aggregate of 400,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of fifteen cents ($0.15) per share for a period of five years. The relative fair value of the warrants issued is $27,097, calculated using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model value of $0.07 with an expected and contractual life of 5 years, an assumed volatility of 74.36%, and a risk-free interest rate of 0.77%. The warrants were recorded as additional paid-in capital and a discount on the 2012 Notes of $27,097. Non-cash interest expense related to the debt discount during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 totaled $3,782 and $11,258, respectively.
The investors, and the principal amount of their respective 2012 Notes and number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of their respective warrants, are as set forth below:
15
| Investor | Note Principal | Warrants | ||||||
| Sinaf S.A. | $ | 200,000 | 266,667 | |||||
| Joseph C. McNay | $ | 50,000 | 66,667 | |||||
| Allan L. Goldstein | $ | 35,000 | 46,666 | |||||
| J.J. Finkelstein | $ | 15,000 | 20,000 | |||||
Sinaf S. A. is a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Aptafin S.p.A., or Aptafin. Aptafin is owned directly by Paolo Cavazza and members of his family, who directly and indirectly own 38% of Sigma-Tau, our largest stockholder. The other Investors are members of our Board of Directors including Mr. Finkelstein who serves as our CEO and also the Chairman of our Board of Directors and Dr. Goldstein who also serves as our Chief Scientific Advisor.
In the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company amended the existing October 2012 convertible debt agreement with the lenders, solely to extend the due date of the principal and accrued unpaid interest until October 19, 2017. No other terms of the original debt were amended or modified, and the lenders did not reduce the borrowed amount or change the interest rate of the debt. The Company considered the restructuring a troubled debt restructuring as a result of the Company’s financial condition. At the date of the amendment, all existing debt discounts and deferred financing fees were fully amortized and the amendment did not involve any additional fees paid to the lender or third parties; as such there was no gain recognized as a result of the amendment.
2013 Convertible Notes
On March 29, 2013, we completed a private placement of convertible notes (the “March 2013 Notes”) raising an aggregate of $225,000 in gross proceeds. The March 2013 Notes bear interest at a rate of five percent (5%) per annum, mature sixty (60) months after their date of issuance and are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of six cents ($0.06) per share (subject to adjustment as described in the March 2013 Notes) at any time prior to repayment, at the election of the investor. In the aggregate, the March 2013 Notes are initially convertible into up to 3,750,000 shares of our common stock.
At any time prior to maturity of the March 2013 Notes, with the consent of the holders of a majority in interest of the March 2013 Notes, we may prepay the outstanding principal amount of the March 2013 Notes plus unpaid accrued interest without penalty. Upon the commission of any act of bankruptcy by the Company, the execution by the Company of a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, the filing by or against the Company of a petition in bankruptcy or any petition for relief under the Federal bankruptcy act or the continuation of such petition without dismissal for a period of ninety (90) days or more, or the appointment of a receiver or trustee to take possession of the property or assets of the Company, the outstanding principal and all accrued interest on the March 2013 Notes will accelerate and automatically become immediately due and payable.
The investors in the offering included two directors of the Company, Dr. Goldstein and Joseph C. McNay, an outside director. The principal amounts of their respective March 2013 Notes are as set forth below:
| Investor | Note Principal | |||
| Joseph C. McNay | $ | 50,000 | ||
| Allan L. Goldstein | $ | 25,000 | ||
The Company has evaluated the terms of the March 2013 Notes which contain a down round provision under which the conversion price could be decreased as a result of future equity offerings, as defined in the March 2013 Notes. The adjustment would reduce the conversion price of the March 2013 Notes to be equivalent to that of the newly issued stock or stock-related instruments. As a result, the Company concluded that the conversion feature represented an embedded conversion feature for accounting purposes and should be recognized as a derivative liability, requiring a mark-to-market adjustment at the end of each reporting period until the related March 2013 Notes have been settled. The bifurcated liability of $225,000 was recorded on the date of issuance which resulted in a residual debt value of $0. The discount related to the embedded feature will be accreted back to debt through the maturity of the March 2013 Notes.
16
On July 5, 2013, we completed a private placement of convertible notes (the “July 2013 Notes”) raising an aggregate of $100,000 in gross proceeds. The July 2013 Notes bear interest at a rate of five percent (5%) per annum, mature sixty (60) months after their date of issuance and are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of six cents ($0.06) per share (subject to adjustment as described in the July 2013 Notes) at any time prior to repayment, at the election of the investor. In the aggregate, the July 2013 Notes are initially convertible into up to 1,666,667 shares of our common stock.
At any time prior to maturity of the July 2013 Notes, with the consent of the holders of a majority in interest of the July 2013 Notes, we may prepay the outstanding principal amount of the July 2013 Notes plus unpaid accrued interest without penalty. Upon the commission of any act of bankruptcy by the Company, the execution by the Company of a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, the filing by or against the Company of a petition in bankruptcy or any petition for relief under the Federal bankruptcy act or the continuation of such petition without dismissal for a period of ninety (90) days or more, or the appointment of a receiver or trustee to take possession of the property or assets of the Company, the outstanding principal and all accrued interest on the July 2013 Notes will accelerate and automatically become immediately due and payable.
The investors in the offering included four directors of the Company, Mr. Finkelstein, Dr. Goldstein, Mr. McNay and L. Thompson Bowles, an outside director. The principal amounts of their respective July 2013 Notes are as set forth below:
| Investor | Note Principal | |||
| Joseph C. McNay | $ | 50,000 | ||
| Allan L. Goldstein | $ | 10,000 | ||
| J.J. Finkelstein | $ | 5,000 | ||
| L. Thompson Bowles | $ | 5,000 | ||
The Company has evaluated the terms of the July 2013 Notes which contain a down round provision under which the conversion price could be decreased as a result of future equity offerings, as defined in the July 2013 Notes. The adjustment would reduce the conversion price of the July 2013 Notes to be equivalent to that of the newly issued stock or stock-related instruments. As a result, the Company concluded that the conversion feature represented an embedded conversion feature for accounting purposes and should be recognized as a derivative liability, requiring a mark-to-market adjustment at the end of each reporting period until the related July 2013 Notes have been settled. The bifurcated liability of $66,667 was recorded on the date of issuance which resulted in a residual debt value of $33,333. The discount related to the embedded feature will be accreted back to debt through the maturity of the notes.
On September 11, 2013, we completed a private placement of convertible notes raising an aggregate of $321,000 in gross proceeds (the “September 2013 Notes”). The September 2013 Notes bear interest at a rate of five percent (5%) per annum, mature sixty (60) months after their date of issuance and are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of six cents ($0.06) per share (subject to adjustment as described in the September 2013 Notes) at any time prior to repayment, at the election of the investor. In the aggregate, the September 2013 Notes are initially convertible into up to 5,350,000 shares of our common stock.
At any time prior to maturity of the September 2013 Notes, with the consent of the holders of a majority in interest of the September 2013 Notes, we may prepay the outstanding principal amount of the September 2013 Notes plus unpaid accrued interest without penalty. Upon the commission of any act of bankruptcy by the Company, the execution by the Company of a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, the filing by or against the Company of a petition in bankruptcy or any petition for relief under the federal bankruptcy act or the continuation of such petition without dismissal for a period of ninety (90) days or more, or the appointment of a receiver or trustee to take possession of the property or assets of the Company, the outstanding principal and all accrued interest on the September 2013 Notes will accelerate and automatically become immediately due and payable.
17
The investors in the offering included an affiliate and four directors of the Company. The principal amounts of the affiliate and directors respective September 2013 Notes are as set forth below:
| Investor | Note Principal | |||
| SINAF S.A. | $ | 150,000 | ||
| Joseph C. McNay | $ | 100,000 | ||
| Allan L. Goldstein | $ | 11,000 | ||
| L. Thompson Bowles | $ | 5,000 | ||
| R. Don Elsey | $ | 5,000 | ||
The Company has evaluated the terms of the September 2013 Notes which contain a down round provision under which the conversion price could be decreased as a result of future equity offerings, as defined in the September 2013 Notes. The adjustment would reduce the conversion price of the September 2013 Notes to be equivalent to that of the newly issued stock or stock-related instruments. As a result, the Company concluded that the conversion feature represented an embedded conversion feature for accounting purposes and should be recognized as a derivative liability, requiring a mark-to-market adjustment at the end of each reporting period until the related September 2013 Notes have been settled. The bifurcated liability of $267,500 was recorded on the date of issuance which resulted in a residual debt value of $53,500. The discount related to the embedded feature will be accreted back to debt through the maturity of the September 2013 Notes.
2014 Convertible Notes
On January 7, 2014, we completed a private placement of convertible notes raising an aggregate of $55,000 in gross proceeds (the “January 2014 Notes”). The January 2014 Notes will pay interest at a rate of 5% per annum, mature 60 months after their date of issuance and are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $0.06 per share (subject to adjustment as described in the January 2014 Notes) at any time prior to repayment, at the election of the investor. In the aggregate, the Notes are initially convertible into up to 916,667 shares of our common stock.
At any time prior to maturity of the January 2014 Notes, with the consent of the holders of a majority in interest of the January 2014 Notes, we may prepay the outstanding principal amount of the January 2014 Notes plus unpaid accrued interest without penalty. Upon the commission of any act of bankruptcy by the Company, the execution by the Company of a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, the filing by or against the Company of a petition in bankruptcy or any petition for relief under the federal bankruptcy act or the continuation of such petition without dismissal for a period of 90 days or more, or the appointment of a receiver or trustee to take possession of the property or assets of the Company, the outstanding principal and all accrued interest on the January 2014 Notes will accelerate and automatically become immediately due and payable.
The investors in the offering included three directors of the Company. The principal amounts of their respective Notes are as set forth below:
| Investor | Note Principal | |||
| Joseph C. McNay | $ | 25,000 | ||
| Allan L. Goldstein | $ | 10,000 | ||
| L. Thompson Bowles | $ | 5,000 | ||
The Company has evaluated the terms of the January 2014 Notes which contain a down round provision under which the conversion price could be decreased as a result of future equity offerings, as defined in the January 2014 Notes. The adjustment would reduce the conversion price of the January 2014 Notes to be equivalent to that of the newly issued stock or stock-related instruments. As a result, the Company concluded that the conversion feature represented an embedded conversion feature for accounting purposes and should be recognized as a derivative liability, requiring a mark-to-market adjustment at the end of each reporting period until the related January 2014 Notes have been settled. The bifurcated liability of $55,000 was recorded on the date of issuance which resulted in a residual debt value of $0. The discount related to the embedded feature will be accreted back to debt through the maturity of the January 2014 Notes.
18
The Company recorded interest expense and discount accretion as set forth below:
| For the three months ended | For the nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
| September 30, 2016 | September 30, 2015 | September 30, 2016 | September 30, 2015 | |||||||||||||
| 2012 Notes | $ | 3,782 | $ | 3,778 | $ | 11,258 | $ | 11,482 | ||||||||
| March 2013 Notes | 14,178 | 14,178 | 42,226 | 42,072 | ||||||||||||
| July 2013 Notes | 4,621 | 4,624 | 13,763 | 13,712 | ||||||||||||
| September 2013 Notes | 17,530 | 17,530 | 52,210 | 52,020 | ||||||||||||
| January 2014 Notes | 3,466 | 3,466 | 10,322 | 10,021 | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 43,577 | $ | 43,576 | $ | 129,779 | $ | 129,307 | ||||||||
The fair value of the derivative liability is as follows:
| September 30, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | |||||||
| March 2013 Notes | $ | 1,200,000 | $ | 1,500,000 | ||||
| July 2013 Notes | 533,334 | 666,667 | ||||||
| September 2013 Notes | 1,712,000 | 2,140,000 | ||||||
| January 2014 Notes | 302,503 | 366,669 | ||||||
| Warrant liability | 1,190,000 | - | ||||||
| Rights liability | 100,000 | - | ||||||
| Total fair value of derivative liability | $ | 5,037,837 | $ | 4,673,336 | ||||
19
The change in fair value of derivative liability is as follows:
| For the three months ended | For the nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
| September 30, 2016 | September 30, 2015 | September 30, 2016 | September 30, 2015 | |||||||||||||
| March 2013 Notes | $ | (300,000 | ) | $ | 225,000 | $ | (300,000 | ) | $ | 1,012,500 | ||||||
| July 2013 Notes | (133,333 | ) | 100,000 | (133,333 | ) | 450,000 | ||||||||||
| September 2013 Notes | (428,000 | ) | 321,000 | (428,000 | ) | 1,444,500 | ||||||||||
| January 2014 Notes | (82,500 | ) | 55,000 | (64,166 | ) | 247,500 | ||||||||||
| Warrant liability | (380,000 | ) | - | (380,000 | ) | - | ||||||||||
| Rights liability | 40,000 | - | 40,000 | - | ||||||||||||
| Total change in fair value of derivative | $ | (1,283,833 | ) | $ | 701,000 | $ | (1,265,499 | ) | $ | 3,154,500 | ||||||
| 7. | License agreement |
Joint Venture Agreement with GtreeBNT
On January 28, 2015, the Company entered into the Joint Venture Agreement with GtreeBNT, a shareholder in the Company. The Joint Venture Agreement provides for the creation of the Joint Venture, jointly owned by the Company and GtreeBNT, which is commercializing RGN-259 for treatment of dry eye and neurotrophic keratopathy in the United States and Canada.
GtreeBNT is solely responsible for funding all the product development and commercialization efforts of the Joint Venture. GtreeBNT made an initial contribution of $3 million in cash and received an initial equity stake of 51%. RegeneRx’s ownership interest in ReGenTree was reduced to 42% when the Clinical Study Report was filed for the Phase 2/3 dry eye clinical trial. Based on when, and if, certain additional development milestones are achieved in the U.S. with RGN-259, our equity ownership may be incrementally reduced to between 42% and 25%, with 25% being the final equity ownership upon approval of an NDA for DES in the U.S. In addition to our equity ownership, RegeneRx retains a royalty on net sales that varies between single and low double digits, depending on whether commercial sales are made by ReGenTree or a licensee. In the event ReGenTree is acquired or there is a change of control that occurs following achievement of an NDA, RegeneRx shall be entitled to a minimum of 40% of all proceeds paid or payable and will forgo any future royalties. The Company is not required or otherwise obligated to provide financial support to the Joint Venture.
The Joint Venture is responsible for executing all development and commercialization activities under the License Agreement, which activities will be directed by a joint development committee comprised of representatives of the Company and GtreeBNT. The License Agreement has a term that extends to the later of the expiration of the last patent covered by the License Agreement or 25 years from the first commercial sale under the License Agreement. The License Agreement may be earlier terminated if the Joint Venture fails to meet certain commercialization milestones, if either party breaches the License Agreement and fails to cure such breach, as a result of government action that limits the ability of the Joint Venture to commercialize the product, as a result of a challenge to a licensed patent, following termination of the license between the Company and certain agencies of the United States federal government, or upon the bankruptcy of either party.
20
Under the License Agreement, the Company received $1.0 million in up-front payments and is entitled to receive royalties on the Joint Venture’s future sales of products. On April 6, 2016, we received $250,000 from ReGenTree and executed an amendment to the license agreement on April 28, 2016. Under the amendment the territorial rights were expanded to include Canada. The Company is accounting for the License Agreement with the Joint Venture as a revenue arrangement. The Company has determined that the deliverables within the License Agreement, including a delivered element (providing the license) and an undelivered element (participation on the joint development committee), do not have stand-alone value and, as such, are treated as a single unit of accounting. As a result, the Company is recognizing the up-front milestone payments as revenue ratably over the anticipated life of the joint development committee, or 25 years. The joint development committee commenced activities as of April 1, 2015 therefore the Company has begun recognizing the revenue for the license fee. Revenue will be recognized for future royalty payments as they are earned.
| 8. | 2016 Offering |
On June 27, 2016, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Sabby (“SPA”) pursuant to which we agreed to sell, and the purchasers agreed to purchase, an aggregate of 5,147,059 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 5,147,059 shares of common stock, which we refer to as the 2016 Offering, and in conjunction with the closing of such transaction we issued warrants to purchase 257,353 shares of common stock to our placement agent.
The SPA contains customary representations, warranties and covenants by the Company and the purchasers. In addition, the SPA provides that each purchaser has a right, subject to certain exceptions described in the agreement, to participate in future issuances of equity and debt securities by us for a period of 12 months following the effective date of this registration statement, and certain price protections that provide for the grant of additional shares of common stock if we sell shares for less than $0.34 per share (the purchase price in the 2016 Offering) during such 12-month period. Moreover, we agreed, subject to certain exceptions, not to sell or announce the sale of our securities for five months from the effective date of this registration statement.
The Company evaluated various features of the SPA and Warrant Agreements issued in the offering. The SPA includes certain embedded features that have to be evaluated under the guidance in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, including a “right” to receive additional shares of common shares for no further consideration, and is a form of non-standard “down-round” anti-dilution protection. The “right” was determined to be a “stand alone” derivative and also is considered an “embedded derivative”, the “right” was required to be bifurcated from the host instrument and accounted for as a mark-to-market derivative liability until it lapses.
The investor warrants contain “non-standard” adjustments (down-round anti-dilution protection) for 12 months following issuance. The Company determined that the warrants contain certain embedded features that have to be evaluated under the guidance in ASC 815 and determined that they are also “embedded derivatives” that require bifurcation and are to be accounted for as a mark-to-market derivative liability until it lapses.
In connection with the offering, the Company incurred approximately $230,000 of direct and incremental issuance costs. The portion of these costs allocated to liability-classified derivative financial instruments, approximately $214,000, was expensed in the quarter ended June 30, 2016 and is reflected under General and administrative expense in the accompanying statements of operations. The remainder of the costs was allocated to the equity-classified common stock and recognized as a direct charge to additional paid in capital.
The Company has concluded the following accounting treatment for the various instruments and embedded features:
| · | Common stock – equity classified |
| · | Placement agent warrants – equity classified |
21
| · | Investor warrants – derivative liability |
| · | Right - derivative liability |
The Company allocated the total proceeds from the 2016 Offering as follows:
| Investor warrants - based on fair value relative to the fair value of the “right | $ | 1,570,000 | ||
| “Right” - based on fair value relative to the fair value of the investor warrants | 60,000 | |||
| Common stock and placement agent warrants – residual value (par and APIC) | 120,000 | |||
| $ | 1,750,000 |
An independent valuation expert calculated the fair value of the embedded derivatives using a complex, customized Monte Carlo simulation model suitable to value path dependent American options. The model uses the risk neutral methodology adapted to value corporate securities. This model utilized subjective and theoretical assumptions that can materially affect fair values from period to period.
| ITEM 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including this Part I., Item 2., “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” contains forward-looking statements regarding us and our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the words “project,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend,” “should,” “would,” “could,” “will,” “may” or other similar expressions. In addition, any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance, our clinical development programs and schedules, our future capital resources and funding requirements, our expectations regarding future licenses of our technology, our anticipated growth and trends in our business and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. We cannot guarantee that we will achieve the plans, intentions or expectations expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements. There are a number of important factors that could cause actual results, levels of activity, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements we make, including those described under “Risk Factors” set forth below in Part II., Item 1A. In addition, any forward-looking statements we make in this document speak only as of the date of this report, and we do not intend to update any such forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after that date.
Business Overview
We are a biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of a novel therapeutic peptide, Thymosin beta 4, or Tß4, for tissue and organ protection, repair, and regeneration. We have formulated Tß4 into three distinct product candidates in clinical development:
· RGN-259, a preservative-free topical eye drop for regeneration of corneal tissues damaged by injury, disease or other pathology
· RGN-352, an injectable formulation to treat cardiovascular diseases, central and peripheral nervous system diseases, and other medical indications that may be treated by systemic administration; and
· RGN-137, a topical gel for dermal wounds and reduction of scar tissue.
We are continuing strategic partnership discussions with biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies regarding the further clinical development of all of our product candidates.
22
In addition to our three pharmaceutical product candidates, we are also evaluating the potential use of peptide fragments and derivatives of Tß4 for cosmeceutical and other personal care uses. These fragments are select amino acid sequences, and variations thereof, within the Tß4 molecule that have demonstrated activity in several in vitro preclinical research studies that we have sponsored. We believe the biological activities of these fragments may be useful, for example, in developing novel cosmeceutical products for the anti-aging market. Our strategy is to collaborate with another company to develop cosmeceutical formulations based on these peptides.
Current Clinical Status
On January 28, 2015, we announced that we had entered into a Joint Venture Agreement (the “Joint Venture Agreement”) with GtreeBNT Co., Ltd., a Korean pharmaceutical company (“GtreeBNT”) and shareholder of the Company. The Joint Venture Agreement provides for the creation of an entity, ReGenTree, LLC (the “Joint Venture” or “ReGenTree”), jointly owned by us and GtreeBNT, that will commercialize RGN-259 for treatment of dry eye and neurotrophic keratopathy, an orphan indication in the United States. GtreeBNT will be responsible for funding all product development and commercialization efforts, and holds a majority interest of ReGenTree that varies depending on development milestones achieved and eventual commercialization path, if successful. In conjunction with the Joint Venture Agreement, we also entered into a royalty-bearing license agreement (the “License Agreement”) with ReGenTree pursuant to which we granted to ReGenTree the right to develop and exclusively commercialize RGN-259 in the United States. We received a total of $1 million in two tranches under the terms of the License Agreement. The first tranche of $500,000 was received in March 2015 and a second in the amount of $500,000, was received in September 2015. On April 6, 2016, we received $250,000 from ReGenTree and executed an amendment to the license agreement on April 28, 2016. Under the amendment, the territorial rights were expanded to include Canada. We are also entitled to royalties as a percentage of net sales ranging from the single digits to the low-double digits based on the medical indications approved and whether the Joint Venture commercializes products directly or through a third party. RegeneRx possesses one of three board seats of ReGenTree and certain major decisions and transactions within ReGenTree, such as commercialization strategy, mergers, and acquisitions, require RegeneRx’s board designee’s consent.
Our initial ownership interest in ReGenTree was 49% and has been reduced to 42% after filing of the final clinical study report with the FDA for the Phase 2/3 trial for Dry Eye Syndrome completed earlier in 2016. Based on when, and if, ReGenTree achieves certain additional development milestones in the U.S. with RGN-259, our equity ownership may be incrementally reduced to between 42% and 25%, with 25% being the final equity ownership upon FDA approval of an NDA for Dry Eye Syndrome in the U.S. In addition to our equity ownership, RegeneRx retains a royalty on net sales that varies between single and low double digits, depending on whether commercial sales are made by ReGenTree or a licensee. In the event ReGenTree is acquired, or a change of control occurs following achievement of an NDA, RegeneRx shall be entitled to a minimum of 40% of all proceeds paid or payable and will forgo any future royalties.
In September 2015, ReGenTree began a Phase 2/3 clinical trial in patients with dry eye syndrome (“DES”) and a Phase 3 clinical trial in patients with neurotrophic keratopathy (“NK”), both in the U.S. In May 2016, we reported the results of the 317-patient Phase 2/3 trial. In the trial, RGN-259 demonstrated statistically significant improvements in both signs and symptoms of dry eye with 0.05% and 0.1% RGN-259 compared to placebo in a dose dependent manner during a 28-day dosing period. While the primary outcome measures were not met, several key related pre-specified endpoints and subgroups of patients with more severe dry eye showed statistically significant treatment effects. These results confirm the findings from the previous Phase 2 trial providing clear direction for the clinical regulatory pathway and remaining registration trials for RGN-259.
The NK trial, a smaller study in an orphan population, has enrolled eleven patients thus far, and has three additional patients being screened, with a goal of forty-six. Of the eight original clinical sites for the study, six are enrolling patients, one has yet to receive IRB approval to begin enrolling patients, and one was unable to consummate a clinical contract with ReGenTree. ReGenTree is adding four additional sites and has retained a specialized recruitment center to accelerate patient enrollment.
23
Currently, we have active partnerships in three major territories: the U.S., China and Pan Asia. Our partners have been moving forward and making progress in each territory. In each case, the cost of development is being borne by our partners with no financial obligation for RegeneRx. We still have significant clinical assets to develop, primarily RGN-352 (injectable formulation of Tß4 for cardiac and CNS disorders) in the U.S., Pan Asia, and Europe, and RGN-259 in the EU. Our goal is to wait until the results are obtained from the current ophthalmic clinical trials before moving into the EU with RGN-259. If successful, this should allow us to obtain a higher value for the asset at that time. However, we intend to continue to develop RGN-352, our injectable systemic product candidate for cardiac and central nervous system indications, either by obtaining grants to fund a Phase 2a clinical trial in the cardiovascular or central nervous system fields or finding a suitable partner with the resources and capabilities to develop it as we have with RGN-259.
We anticipate incurring additional operating losses in the future as we continue to explore the potential clinical benefits of Tß4-based product candidates over multiple indications. To fund further development and clinical trials we have entered into a series of strategic partnerships under licensing and joint venture agreements (see Note 7) where our partners are responsible for advancing development of our product candidates with multiple clinical trials.
We will need additional funds to continue operations beyond the fourth quarter of 2017 and will require substantial capital if we wish to internally advance development of our unlicensed programs. Accordingly, we will continue to evaluate opportunities to raise additional capital and are in the process of exploring various alternatives, including, without limitation, a public or private placement of our securities, debt financing, corporate collaboration and licensing arrangements, government grants, or the sale of our company or certain of our intellectual property rights.
Development of Product Candidates
RGN-259
RGN-259 is our proprietary preservative-free eye drop formulation of Thymosin beta 4. In September 2011, we completed a Phase 2a exploratory clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of RGN-259 in 72 patients with moderate dry eye syndrome. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either RGN-259 or placebo in this double-masked, placebo-controlled trial. All patients received either RGN-259 (0.1% concentration) or placebo, twice daily for 30 days. Various signs and symptoms of dry eye, such as the degree of ocular surface damage, ocular itching, burning and grittiness, among others, were graded periodically during and following the treatment period. The trial was conducted by Ora Inc., an ophthalmic contract research organization that specializes in dry eye research and clinical trials, and utilized Ora’s Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE®) chamber, which is a model that exacerbates and standardizes signs and symptoms in the dry eye patient.
In November 2011, we reported preliminary safety and efficacy results from the trial. RGN-259 was deemed safe and well-tolerated, with no observed drug-related adverse events.
The co-primary outcome measures evaluated in the trial were inferior corneal fluorescein staining and decreased ocular discomfort on day 29, 24 hours after CAE® challenge. Various secondary outcome efficacy measures were also evaluated in the trial. These outcome measures were based on the best available animal data at the time but without the benefit of any actual human clinical experience in dry eye. While the study did not meet statistical significance for reducing inferior corneal fluorescein staining, it did show a positive trend in this exploratory trial. RGN-259 did, however, show a statistically significant efficacy result in the other co-primary endpoint of decreased ocular discomfort and also demonstrated statistical significance in several secondary endpoints such as reduction of central corneal and superior corneal staining, important signs in dry eye patients and approvable endpoints by the FDA.
Key outcome measures were as follows:
| · | Patients receiving RGN-259 experienced a 325% greater reduction from baseline in central corneal fluorescein staining compared to placebo at the 24 hour recovery period (p = 0.0075). Reduction of fluorescein staining is indicative of a reduction in ocular surface damage of the central cornea; |
| · | Patients receiving RGN-259 experienced a 257% greater reduction from baseline in exacerbation of superior corneal fluorescein staining in the CAE® chamber as compared to the placebo (p = 0.0210); and |
24
| · | Patients receiving RGN-259 experienced a 27.3% greater reduction in exacerbation of ocular discomfort at day 28 during a 75-minute challenge in the CAE chamber compared to the placebo group (p = 0.0244). Reduction indicates that RGN-259 can slow progression of ocular symptoms in patients with dry eye syndrome. |
| · | Other CAE®-related findings, such as peripheral (combination of the average of superior and inferior) corneal staining reduction, were observed having statistical significance, while others had positive trends after treatment with RGN-259. These observations are in line with the known biological properties and mechanisms of action of RGN-259 reported in various nonclinical studies. |
With respect to inferior corneal fluorescein staining, we did see a positive trend toward improvement, at day 28 during exposure to adverse conditions in the CAE® chamber in patients receiving RGN-259 compared to placebo, although this improvement was not deemed to be statistically significant (p = 0.0968).
In June 2012, we reported preliminary results from a double-masked, vehicle-controlled, physician-sponsored Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating RGN-259 for the treatment of nine patients (18 eyes) with severe dry eye. RGN-259 was observed to be safe and well-tolerated and met key efficacy objectives with statistically significant sign and symptom improvements, compared to vehicle control, at various time intervals, including 28 days post-treatment.
In the trial, nine patients with severe dry eye (18 eyes) were treated with RGN-259 or vehicle control six times daily over a period of 28 days. They were evaluated upon entering the study after a two-week washout period, at weekly intervals during the treatment phase, at the end of the 28-day treatment period, and at a follow-up visit 28 days after treatment. Statistically significant differences in sign and symptom assessments, such as ocular discomfort and corneal fluorescein staining, were seen at various time points throughout the study. Of particular note were the differences between RGN-259 and vehicle control 28 days post-treatment, or the follow-up period. The RGN-259-treated group had a 35.1% reduction of ocular discomfort (symptom) compared to vehicle control (p = 0.0141), and a 59.1% reduction of total corneal fluorescein staining (sign) compared to vehicle control (p = 0.0108) at 28 days after treatment showing that the repair was sustained long after treatment cessation.
Consistent with the reduction of ocular discomfort and fluorescein staining at the 28-day follow-up visit, other improvements seen in the RGN-259-treated patients included tear film breakup time and increased tear volume production. Likewise, these improvements were seen at other time points in the study. These results were recently published in an appropriate medical journal.
Strategic Partnerships
Lee’s Pharmaceuticals. In July 2012, we entered into a License Agreement with Lee’s Pharmaceutical (HK) Limited (“Lee’s”), headquartered in Hong Kong, for the license of Thymosin Beta 4 in any pharmaceutical form, including our RGN-259, RGN-352 and RGN-137 product candidates, in China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan. Lee’s previously filed an investigational new drug application IND with the Chinese FDA to conduct a Phase 2, randomized, double-masked, dose-response clinical trial with RGN-259 in China for dry-eye syndrome. Lee's subsequently informed us that it received notice from China's FDA (CFDA) declining its investigational new drug (IND) application for a Phase 2b dry eye clinical trial because the API (active pharmaceutical ingredient or Tß4) was manufactured outside of China. The API was manufactured in the U.S. and provided to Lee's by RegeneRx pursuant to a license agreement to develop RGN-259 ophthalmic eye drops in the licensed territory. However, this year, we were informed by Lee’s that the CFDA modified its manufacturing regulations and will now allow Chinese companies to utilize API manufactured outside of China for Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials. We have not been informed of a projected starting date for Phase 2 trials but expect it to be sometime in mid-2017.
25
GtreeBNT. In March 2014, we entered into a License Agreement with GtreeBNT for the license of RGN-259. GtreeBNT licensed certain development and commercialization rights for RGN-259, in Asia (excluding China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan). GtreeBNT is currently our second largest shareholder. GtreeBNT filed an IND with the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety to conduct a Phase 2/3 study with RGN-259 in patients with dry eye syndrome and in July 2015 received approval to conduct the trial. GtreeBNT has recently informed us that it believes marketing approval in the U.S. will allow expedited marketing in Korea, possibly without the need for a clinical trial.
U.S. Joint Venture (ReGenTree, LLC). On January 28, 2015, we announced that we entered into a Joint Venture Agreement (the “Joint Venture Agreement”) with GtreeBNT. The Joint Venture Agreement provides for the creation of an entity (the “Joint Venture” or “ReGenTree”), owned by us and GtreeBNT, that will commercialize RGN-259 for treatment of dry eye and neurotrophic keratopathy in the United States. GtreeBNT is responsible for funding product development and commercialization efforts and holds a majority interest of ReGenTree. RegeneRx possesses one of three board seats and certain major decisions and transactions within ReGenTree, such as commercialization strategy, mergers, and acquisitions, require RegeneRx’s board designee’s consent. In conjunction with the Joint Venture Agreement, we also entered into a royalty-bearing license agreement (the “License Agreement”) with ReGenTree pursuant to which we granted to ReGenTree the right to develop and exclusively commercialize RGN-259 in the United States. On April 6, 2016 we received $250,000 from ReGenTree and executed an amendment to the license agreement on April 28, 2016. Under the amendment the territorial rights were expanded to include Canada.
Our initial ownership interest in ReGenTree was 49% and has been reduced to 42% after filing of the final clinical study report with the FDA for the Phase 2/3 trial for Dry Eye Syndrome completed earlier in 2016. Based on when, and if, ReGenTree achieves certain additional development milestones in the U.S. with RGN-259, our equity ownership may be incrementally reduced to between 42% and 25%, with 25% being the final equity ownership upon FDA approval of an NDA for Dry Eye Syndrome in the U.S. In addition to our equity ownership, RegeneRx retains a royalty on net sales that varies between single and low double digits, depending on whether commercial sales are made by ReGenTree or a licensee. In the event the ReGenTree entity is acquired or there is a change of control that occurs following achievement of an NDA, RegeneRx shall be entitled to a minimum of 40% of all proceeds paid or payable and will forgo any future royalties.
In September 2015, ReGenTree began a multi-centered, randomized, double-masked Phase 2/3 clinical trial in patients with dry eye syndrome (“DES”) and a multi-centered, randomized, double-masked Phase 3 clinical trial in patients with neurotrophic keratopathy (“NK”), both in the U.S. The DES trial has completed full enrollment, treatment and follow-up of all patients. Data from the DES trial was released in early May.
The study, which enrolled 317 subjects, tested two doses of RGN-259 eye drops containing 0.05% and 0.1% concentrations of the Tβ4 four times daily for 28 days vs. placebo. On Day 29, following the 28th day of dosing, patients were subject to the Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE) challenge. Co-primary endpoints were total corneal fluorescein staining score change on Day 29 day pre-CAE and post-CAE (sign) and total ocular discomfort score change on Day 29 pre-CAE and post-CAE (symptom). Although the co-primary endpoints were not met, we demonstrated RGN-259’s protective efficacy in improving signs and symptoms of dry eye syndrome in specific patient populations, which is in line with the results observed in the previous Phase 2a trial. Importantly, we identified approvable sign and symptom endpoints, which were met with statistical significance. RGN-259 was safe and well-tolerated and comfortable for the patients with no irritation upon instillation. There were no significant drug-related adverse events for both concentrations. The safety profile is consistent with that observed in the previous Phase 2a trial, which had a twice daily instillation regimen. The FDA approved ReGenTree’s Phase 3 protocol for DES in late summer and we initiated a second Phase 3 trial that has begun enrolling approximately 500 patients
The NK trial, a smaller study in an orphan population, has enrolled eleven patients thus far, and has three additional patients being screened, with a goal of forty-six. Of the eight original clinical sites for the study, six are enrolling patients, one has yet to receive IRB approval to begin enrolling patients, and one was unable to consummate a clinical contract with ReGenTree. ReGenTree is adding four additional sites and has retained a specialized recruitment center to accelerate patient enrollment.
26
GtreeBNT has developed the CMC (chemistry, manufacturing and controls) dossier required for Phase 3 clinical trials and commercialization in the U.S. and in Korea. This comprehensive and critical effort ensures that final drug product manufacturing, packaging, stability, purity, reproducibility, etc., meets regulatory guidelines and product specifications. The product of this activity is the current product format being utilized in the U.S. trials being conducted by ReGenTree and will also be utilized in the planned clinical activity to be conducted by GtreeBNT under the RGN-259 license agreement for Pan Asia.
RGN-352
During 2009, we completed a Phase 1a and Phase 1b clinical trial evaluating the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of the intravenous administration of RGN-352 in 60 healthy subjects (40 in each group, 20 of whom participated in both Phases). Based on the results of these Phase 1 trials and extensive preclinical efficacy data published in peer-reviewed journals, in the second half of 2010, we began start-up activities for a Phase 2 study to evaluate RGN-352 (Tß4 Injectable Solution) in patients who had suffered an AMI. We had planned to begin enrolling patients in this clinical trial in the second quarter of 2011. However, in March 2011, we were notified by the FDA that the trial was placed on clinical hold as a result of our contract manufacturer’s alleged failure to comply with the current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) regulations. We have since learned that the manufacturer has closed its manufacturing facility and filed for bankruptcy protection. The FDA prohibited us from using any of the active drug or placebo formulated by this manufacturer in human trials; consequently, we must have study drug (RGN-352 and RGN-352 placebo) manufactured by a new cGMP-compliant manufacturer in the event we seek to move forward with this trial. While we have identified a qualified manufacturer for RGN-352, we have elected to postpone activities on this trial until the requisite funding or a partner is secured.
In addition to the potential application of RGN-352 for the treatment of cardiovascular disease, preclinical research published in the scientific journals Neuroscience and the Journal of Neurosurgery, among others, indicates that RGN-352 may also prove useful for patients with multiple sclerosis, or MS, as well as patients suffering a stroke, traumatic brain injury, peripheral neuropathy, or spinal cord injury. In these preclinical studies, the administration of Tß4 resulted in regeneration of neuronal tissue by promoting remyelination of axons and stimulating oligodendrogenesis, resulting in improvement of neurological functional activity. In 2012, researchers studying Tß4 under a material transfer agreement (MTA) found that Tß4 had beneficial effects in animal models of peripheral neuropathy, one of the major complications of diabetes. This research was published in the journal of Neurobiology of Disease in 2012 and appears to corroborate previous findings using Tß4 for repair of central nervous system disorders. We are discussing possible partnership opportunities with companies interested in developing RGN-352 for this indication.
Based on our Phase 1 data and the preclinical research discussed above, we are evaluating various opportunities for government funding for a Phase 2a clinical trial to show proof-of-concept in each case while also talking with prospective strategic partners with the interest, capabilities and resources to further develop product candidate in these fields.
RGN-137
Clinical Development — Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB). In 2005, we began enrolling patients in a Phase 2 clinical trial designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of RGN-137 for the treatment of patients with EB. EB is a genetic disease of approximately 10 gene mutations that results in fragile skin and other epithelial structures (e.g., cornea and GI tract) that can blister spontaneously or separate at the slightest trauma or friction, creating a wound that at times does not heal or heals poorly. In severe cases, recurrent blistering and tissue loss may be life threatening. EB has been designated as an “orphan” indication by the FDA’s Office of Orphan Drugs. A portion of this trial was funded by a grant of $681,000 received from the FDA. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response trial, nine U.S. clinical sites evaluated the safety, tolerability, and wound healing effectiveness of three different concentrations of RGN-137 compared to placebo. RGN-137 was applied topically to the skin, once daily for up to 56 consecutive days. We completed enrollment of 30 out of the original target of 36 patients and closed the Phase 2 trial in late 2011 as the availability of eligible patients had been exhausted. We submitted the final report to the FDA in 2014.
27
Clinical Development — Pressure Ulcers. In late 2005, we began enrolling patients in a Phase 2 clinical trial designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of RGN-137 for the treatment of patients with chronic pressure ulcers, commonly known as bedsores. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response trial, 15 clinical sites in the United States enrolled a total of 72 patients to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and wound healing effectiveness of three different concentrations of RGN-137 compared to placebo. RGN-137 was applied topically to patients’ ulcers, once daily for up to 84 consecutive days. Patients in the trial were between 19 and 85 years old and had at least one stable Stage III or IV pressure ulcer with a surface area between 5 and 70 cm2. Stage III and IV pressure ulcers are full thickness wounds that penetrate through the skin and muscle, sometimes completely to the bone.
In January 2009, we reported final data from this trial. RGN-137 was well-tolerated at all three dose levels studied, with no dose-limiting adverse events, which achieved the primary objective of the study. As for efficacy, all Tß4 doses performed similarly compared to placebo, with no statistically significant efficacy results. However, patients treated with the middle dose showed a 17% improvement of wound healing, which was the highest rate among the three active doses evaluated. The improvement in ulcer healing in this middle dose group following nine weeks of treatment was equal to the improvement in patients treated with placebo after 12 weeks of treatment. A follow-on evaluation, reported at the 3rd International Symposium on the Thymosins in Health and Disease in March 2012, showed that for those pressure ulcer patients’ wounds that healed, RGN-137 mid dose (0.02% Tβ4 gel product) accelerated wound closure with a median time to healing of 22 days as compared to 57 days for the placebo. Although those results are clinically significant, they were not statistically significant.
Clinical Development — Venous Stasis Ulcers. In mid-2006 we began enrolling patients in a Phase 2 clinical trial designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of RGN-137 for the treatment of patients with venous stasis ulcers. Venous stasis ulcers are a common type of chronic wound that develops on the ankle or lower leg in patients with chronic vascular disease. In these patients blood flow in the lower extremities is impaired leading to venous hypertension, edema (swelling) and mild redness and scaling of the skin that gradually progresses to ulceration. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study, 8 European sites in Italy (N=5) and Poland (N=3) make up the 72 patients randomized to receive three different concentrations of RGN-137 or placebo. RGN-137 or placebo was applied topically to patients’ ulcers once daily for consecutive days. A patient’s ulcer size and ulcer stability for enrollment were between 3 and 30 cm2 and at least 6 weeks in duration, respectively.
In 2009, we reported final data from that trial. All doses of RGN-137 were well tolerated. More patients achieved healing in the RGN-137 mid dose (0.03% Tβ4 gel product) than in any other dose group. The mid dose showed both an increased incidence of wound healing and a faster healing time compared to placebo. The mid dose decreased the median time to healing by 45% among those wounds that completely healed. A follow-on evaluation, reported at the 3rd International Symposium on the Thymosins in Health and Disease in March 2012, showed that for those venous stasis ulcer patients’ wounds greater than 3 cm2 that healed, the RGN-137 mid dose (0.03% Tβ4 gel product) accelerated wound closure with a median time to healing of 49 days as compared to 78 days for the placebo. Those results were both clinically and statistically significant.
GtreeBNT. In March 2014, we entered into a License Agreement with GtreeBNT to license certain development and commercialization rights for RGN-137 in the U.S.
Our Strategy
We seek to maximize the value of our product candidates by advancing their clinical development and then identifying suitable partners for further development, regulatory approval, and marketing. We intend to engage in strategic partnerships with companies with clinical development and commercialization strengths in desired pharmaceutical therapeutic fields. We are actively seeking partners with suitable infrastructure, expertise and a long-term initiative in our medical fields of interest. To that end, we have entered several important licensing and joint venture agreements with pharmaceutical companies to develop our product candidates.
28
Our initial ownership interest in ReGenTree was 49% and has been reduced to 42% upon filing of the final clinical study report with the FDA for the Phase 2b trial for Dry Eye Syndrome completed earlier in 2016. Based on when, and if, ReGenTree achieves certain additional development milestones in the U.S. with RGN-259, our equity ownership may be incrementally reduced to between 42% and 25%, with 25% being the final equity ownership upon FDA approval of an NDA for Dry Eye Syndrome in the U.S. In addition to our equity ownership, RegeneRx retains a royalty on net sales that varies between single and low double digits, depending on whether commercial sales are made by ReGenTree or a licensee. In the event the ReGenTree entity is acquired or there is a change of control that occurs following achievement of an NDA, RegeneRx shall be entitled to a minimum of 40% of all proceeds paid or payable and will forgo any future royalties.
The Joint Venture with GtreeBNT follows two previous transactions with GtreeBNT signed in March 2014 when we had entered into License Agreements for the license of our RGN-259 and RGN-137 product candidates. GtreeBNT licensed the development and commercialization rights for RGN-259 in Asia (excluding China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan) while also licensing the development and commercialization rights for RGN-137 in the U.S.
We have entered into a License Agreement with Lee’s Pharmaceutical (HK) Limited, headquartered in Hong Kong, for the license of Thymosin Beta 4 in any pharmaceutical form, including our RGN-259, RGN-352 and RGN-137 product candidates, in China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan. Lee’s is an affiliate of Sigma-Tau, which collectively with its affiliates is our largest stockholder.
We previously entered into a strategic partnership with Defiante Farmaceutica S.A., (“Defiante”), formerly a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sigma-Tau Group, a leading international pharmaceutical company, which collectively comprise our largest shareholder, or Sigma-Tau, for development and marketing of RGN-137 and RGN-352 for specified indications in Europe and other contiguous countries. Defiante merged with Sigma-Tau Industrie Farmaceutiche Riunite S.p.A. in 2013 and Sigma-Tau recently merged with Alfa Wasserman S.p.A., an Italian pharmaceutical company. Currently, there is no ongoing development of our products by Alfa Wasserman.
Financial Operations Overview
We have never generated product revenues, and we do not expect to generate product revenues until the FDA approves one of our product candidates, if ever, and we, or a partner or licensee, begin marketing and selling it. Subject to the availability of financing, we expect to invest increasingly significant amounts in the furtherance of our current clinical stage programs and may add additional nonclinical studies and new clinical trials as we explore the potential of our current product candidates in target indications and explore the potential use of our Tß4-based product candidates in rare disease and orphan indications. As we expand our clinical development initiatives, we expect to incur substantial and increasing losses. Accordingly, we will need to generate significant product revenues in order to ultimately achieve and then maintain profitability. Also, we expect that we will need to raise substantial additional capital in order to meet product development requirements. We cannot assure investors that such capital will be available when needed, on acceptable terms, or at all.
Most of our expenditures to date have been for research and development, or R&D, activities and general and administrative, or G&A, activities. R&D costs include all of the wholly-allocable costs associated with our various clinical programs passed through to us by our outsourced vendors. Those costs include manufacturing Tß4 and peptide fragments, formulation of Tß4 into our product candidates, stability studies for both Tß4, and the various formulations, preclinical toxicology, safety and pharmacokinetic studies, clinical trial management, medical oversight, laboratory evaluations, statistical data analysis, regulatory compliance, quality assurance and other related activities. R&D includes cash and non-cash compensation, payroll taxes, travel and other miscellaneous costs of our internal R&D personnel, three persons in total, who are dedicated on a part-time hourly basis to R&D efforts. R&D also includes an allocation of our common infrastructure costs for office space and communications. We expense our R&D costs as they are incurred.
29
R&D expenditures are subject to the risks and uncertainties associated with clinical trials and the FDA review and approval process. As a result, these expenses could exceed our expectations, possibly materially. We are uncertain as to what we will incur in future research and development costs for our clinical studies, as these amounts are subject to, management's continuing assessment of the economics of each individual research and development project and the internal competition for project funding.
G&A costs include outside professional fees for legal, business development, audit and accounting services. G&A also includes cash and non-cash compensation, travel and other miscellaneous costs of our internal G&A personnel, two in total, who are wholly dedicated to G&A efforts. G&A also includes an allocation of our common infrastructure costs for office space and communications. Our G&A expenses also include costs to maintain our intellectual property portfolio. Historically we have expanded our patent prosecution activities and in some cases, we have filed patent applications for non-critical strategic purposes intended to prevent others from filing similar patent claims. We continue to closely monitor our patent applications in the United States, Europe and other countries with the advice of outside legal counsel to determine if they will continue to provide strategic benefits. In cases where we believe the benefit has been realized or it becomes unnecessary due to the issuance of other patents, or for other reasons that will not affect the strength of our intellectual property portfolio, we have and will continue to abandon these patent applications in order to reduce our costs of continued prosecution or maintenance.
Critical Accounting Policies
In Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, which was filed with the SEC on April 11, 2016, which we refer to as the Annual Report, we included a discussion of the most significant accounting policies and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements. There has been no material change in the policies and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements since the filing of our Annual Report.
Results of Operations
Comparison of the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015
Revenues. For the three months ended September 30, 2016, we recorded revenue in the amount of $12,706 which reflects the amortization of the upfront license fees over the life of the ReGenTree License Agreement and related amendments of 25 years. For the three months ended September 30, 2015, we recorded revenue in the amount of $5,510 which reflects the amortization of the upfront license fee over the life of the ReGenTree License Agreement of 25 years. The increase in revenue for the 2016 period reflects the amortization of the two $500,000 payment we received under the original joint venture license agreement as well as the $250,000 payment we received for the expansion of the territorial rights to include Canada.
R&D Expenses. For the three months ended September 30, 2016, our R&D expenses were aligned with the same period of 2015 increasing by approximately $1,000, or 3%, to $50,000 from $49,000 for the same period in 2015. Changes between the 2016 and 2015 periods are reflected in License fees (decrease of $4,000), insurance (decrease of $2,000) and R&D consulting (decrease of $3,000) offset by an increase in stock option compensation (increase of $10,000). We expect our R&D expenses will remain at low levels unless we decide to reinitiate internal R&D efforts for our unpartnered programs.
G&A Expenses. For the three months ended September 30, 2016, our G&A expenses were also aligned with the expenses of the same period in 2015, decreased by approximately $1,000, or less than 1%, to $341,000, from $342,000 for the same period in 2015. Changes between the 2016 and 2015 periods are increases in professional services ($8,000) and insurance ($5,000) offset by decreases in travel & related of ($7,000) and investor relation services of ($6,000). We believe that our G&A expenses will remain at current levels as we wait for data from the upcoming clinical trials being conducted by our partners. If we enter into additional partnerships or other business transactions we will incur additional legal and transaction related expenses.
30
Net Loss. Our Statement of Operations reflects net income of $861,677 for the quarter ended September 30, 2016, as opposed to a net loss of $1,129,552 recorded in the quarter ended September 30, 2015. In the 2016 period, the income resulted primarily from our evaluation of the derivative liability associated with the conversion feature of the debt instruments issued by the Company from March 2013 through January 2014 as well as the value of the investor rights associated with the 2016 Offering. The value of the conversion features of the notes and the investor rights are indexed to the share price of our common stock and increases as our share price increases and decreases as our share price decreases. The share price of our common stock decreased from $0.46 on June 30, 2016 to $0.38 on September 30, 2016, which resulted in a decrease in the fair value of our convertible debt derivative component and the 2016 Offering investor rights and resulted in the recording of an unrealized gain of approximately $1,284,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2016. In the prior year period the share price of our common stock increased from $0.36 on June 30, 2015 to $0.42 on September 30, 2015, which resulted in an increase in the fair value of our convertible debt derivative component and the recording increase in fair value of $701,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2015.
Comparison of the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015
Revenues. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we recorded revenue in the amount of $80,602, which reflects the amortization of the upfront license fee over the life of the ReGenTree license agreement of 25 years. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we recorded revenue in the amount of $50,510, $40,000 of this revenue related to the sale of unformulated Tß4 to GtreeBNT for use in their product development work in Korea. There were no associated costs with this transaction as the cost of Tß4 had been expensed in a prior period. We also recorded revenue in the amount of $10,510 which reflects the amortization of the upfront license fee over the life of the ReGenTree license agreement of 25 years. The increase in revenue for the 2016 period reflects the amortization of the two $500,000 payment we received under the original joint venture license agreement as well as the $250,000 payment we received for the expansion of the territorial rights to include Canada.
R&D Expenses. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, our R&D expenses increased by approximately $51,000, or 31% to $213,000 from $162,000 for the same period in 2015. The increase is attributable to the level of stock option compensation recognized in the nine month period which represents a $75,000 increase versus the prior year period. This was partially offset by decreases from 2015 insurance (decrease of $10,000), R&D consulting (decrease of $10,000) and License fees (decrease of $4,000). We expect our R&D expenses will remain at low levels unless we decide to reinitiate internal R&D efforts for our unpartnered programs.
G&A Expenses. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, our G&A expenses decreased by approximately $19,000, or 2%, to $1,196,000 from $1,215,000 for the same period in 2015. Decreases are reflected in professional services ($243,000) and travel and related ($31,000) and personnel ($3,000). These decreases were partially offset by increases in insurance ($17,000), miscellaneous ($4,000), stock option expense ($31,000) and offering expenses related to our 2016 Offering of approximately ($214,000). The significant decrease in professional services reflects the absence of the legal costs incurred in association with completing the ReGenTree joint venture agreement in 2015. We believe that our G&A expenses, net of offering expenses, will remain at current levels as we wait for data from the upcoming clinical trials being conducted by our partners. If we enter into additional partnerships or other business transactions we will incur additional legal and transaction related expenses.
Net Loss. We incurred a net loss of $192,927 for the nine months ended September 30. 2016, a decrease from the net loss of $4,610,253 recorded in the nine months ended September, 2015. The 2016 net loss reflects the change in the value of the conversion feature related to the derivative liability related to our convertible debt as well as the reduction of the value of the investor rights associated with the 2016 Offering. The total decrease in the value of the derivative liabilities for the nine month period ending September 30, 2016 was $1,265,499. For the same period in 2015 a significant portion of the net loss resulted from an increase in the value of the derivative liabilities pursuant to our evaluation of the derivative liability associated with the conversion feature of the debt instruments issued by the Company from March 2013 through January 2014. The value of this conversion feature is indexed to the share price of our common stock and increases as our share price increases and decreases as our share price decreases. The share price of our common stock decreased from $0.44 on December 31, 2015 to $0.38 on September 30, 2016, which resulted in a decrease in the fair value of our derivative liabilities and the recording of an unrealized gain of $1,265,499 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. In the prior year period the share price of our common stock increased from $0.14 on December 31, 2014 to $0.42 on September 30, 2015, which resulted in an increase in the fair value of our convertible debt derivative component and the recording of an unrealized loss of $3,154,500 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.
31
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
We have not commercialized any of our product candidates to date and have incurred significant losses since inception. In addition, we have primarily financed our operations through the equity or issuance of debt including the sale of a series of convertible promissory notes through private placements with accredited investors and the March and August 2014 private placements of common stock with GtreeBNT as well as our entry into the ReGenTree joint venture in early 2015. The report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 contained an explanatory paragraph regarding our ability to continue as a going concern based upon our history of net losses and dependence on future financing in order to meet our planned operating activities.
We had cash and cash equivalents of $1,061,374 at September 30, 2016. This amount primarily reflects the net proceeds of our 2016 Offering of approximately $1,520,000. Our current cash and cash equivalents should fund our planned operations into the fourth quarter of 2017. This estimate also does not include receipt of any funds from grants, new partnerships or the raising of additional capital if the market climate warrants. Additionally, we intend to continue to pursue additional partnering activities, particularly for RGN-352, our injectable systemic product candidate for cardiac and central nervous system indications.
Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015
Net cash used in operating activities was approximately $776,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to approximately $183,000 used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. In June 2016 we received net proceeds of approximately $1,520,000 from our 2016 Offering. In 2015 we received $500,000 which was classified as unearned revenue from ReGenTree pursuant to the license agreement with ReGenTree, our joint venture, which served to reduce the net cash used in operations.
Future Funding Requirements
The expenditures that will be necessary to execute our business plan are subject to numerous uncertainties that may adversely affect our liquidity and capital resources. Currently, RegeneRx has active partnerships in three major territories: the U.S., China and Pan Asia. Our partners have been moving forward and making progress in each territory. In each case, the cost of development is being borne by our partners with no financial obligation for RegeneRx. Patient accrual, treatment, and follow-up for ophthalmic trials are, in general, relatively fast, as opposed to most other clinical efforts, top line data from the U.S. dry eye trial was released in early May and data from the NK study toward the end of 2016 or possibly later.
We still have significant clinical assets to develop, primarily RGN-352 (injectable formulation of Tß4 for cardiac and CNS disorders) in the U.S., Pan Asia, and Europe, and RGN-259 in the EU. Our goal is to wait until the results are obtained from the current ophthalmic clinical trials before moving into the EU with RGN-259. If successful, this should allow us to obtain a higher value for the asset at that time. However, we intend to continue to develop RGN-352, either by obtaining grants to fund a Phase 2a clinical trial in the cardiovascular or central nervous system fields or finding a suitable partner with the resources and capabilities to develop it as we have with RGN-259.
32
Our current capital resources are only sufficient to fund operations into the fourth quarter of 2017. A sale of common stock and warrants, a convertible instrument or additional partnering of licensed rights are possible sources of operating capital in the future.
In addition, the length of time required for clinical trials varies substantially according to the type, complexity, novelty and intended use of a product candidate. Some of the factors that could impact our liquidity and capital needs include, but are not limited to:
| · | the progress of our clinical trials; |
| · | the progress of our research activities; |
| · | the number and scope of our research programs; |
| · | the progress of our preclinical development activities; |
| · | the costs involved in preparing, filing, prosecuting, maintaining, enforcing and defending patent and other intellectual property claims; |
| · | the costs related to development and manufacture of preclinical, clinical and validation lots for regulatory purposes and commercialization of drug supply associated with our product candidates; |
| · | our ability to enter into corporate collaborations and the terms and success of these collaborations; |
| · | the costs and timing of regulatory approvals; and |
| · | the costs of establishing manufacturing, sales and distribution capabilities. |
Moreover, the duration and the cost of clinical trials may vary significantly over the life of a project as a result of differences arising during the clinical trial protocol, including, among others, the following:
| · | the number of patients that ultimately participate in the trial; |
| · | the duration of patient follow-up that seems appropriate in view of the results; |
| · | the number of clinical sites included in the trials; and |
| · | the length of time required to enroll suitable patient subjects. |
Also, we test our product candidates in numerous preclinical studies to identify indications for which they may be efficacious. We may conduct multiple clinical trials to cover a variety of indications for each product candidate. As we obtain results from trials, we may elect to discontinue clinical trials for certain product candidates or for certain indications in order to focus our resources on more promising product candidates or indications.
Our proprietary product candidates have not yet achieved FDA regulatory approval, which is required before we can market them as therapeutic products. In order to proceed to subsequent clinical trial stages and to ultimately achieve regulatory approval, the FDA must conclude that our clinical data establish safety and efficacy. Historically, the results from preclinical studies and early clinical trials have often not been predictive of results obtained in later clinical trials. A number of new drugs and biologics have shown promising results in clinical trials, but subsequently failed to establish sufficient safety and efficacy data to obtain necessary regulatory approvals.
In June 2014, we consolidated our office space and amended our lease agreement for the reduced space. The new lease commitment is for 36 months and our rental payments for this period will be approximately $4,500 per month.
33
Sources of Liquidity
We have not commercialized any of our product candidates to date and have primarily financed our operations through the issuance of common stock and common stock warrants in private and public financings in addition to a series of five convertible debt placements from October 2012 to January 2014. Most recently, on June 27, 2016, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Sabby Healthcare Master Fund, Ltd., and Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund, Ltd., pursuant to which we agreed to sell, and the purchasers agreed to purchase, an aggregate of 5,147,059 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 5,147,059 shares of common stock, which we refer to as the 2016 Offering. We received approximately $1,520,000 in net proceeds from the 2016 Offering and have resources to fund our planned operations into the fourth quarter of 2017. We believe our current capital resources will fund our operations into the fourth quarter of 2017. On January 28, 2015, we announced that we had entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with GtreeBNT, a shareholder of the Company. The Joint Venture Agreement provides for the creation of an entity, ReGenTree, LLC, jointly owned by us and GtreeBNT, which will commercialize RGN-259 for treatment of dry eye and neurotrophic keratopathy, an orphan indication in the United States. On April 28, 2016 the license agreement with ReGenTree was amended to expand the territory to include Canada. GtreeBNT is responsible for funding all product development and commercialization efforts.
RegeneRx’s initial ownership interest in ReGenTree was 49% and has been reduced to 42% when the clinical study report was filed with the FDA for the Phase 3 dry eye clinical trial. Based on when, and if, certain additional development milestones are achieved in the U.S. with RGN-259, our equity ownership may be incrementally reduced to between 42% and 25%, with 25% being the final equity ownership upon approval of an NDA for Dry Eye Syndrome in the U.S. In conjunction with the Joint Venture Agreement, we also entered into a royalty-bearing license agreement (the “License Agreement”) with ReGenTree pursuant to which we granted to ReGenTree the right to develop and exclusively commercialize RGN-259 in the United States. We received a total of $1,000,000 in two tranches under the terms of the License Agreement. The first tranche of $500,000 was received in March 2015 and a second in the amount of $500,000 was received in September 2015. On April 6, 2016, we received $250,000 from ReGenTree and executed an amendment to the license agreement on April 28, 2016. Under the amendment the territorial rights were expanded to include Canada.
We are also entitled to royalties as a percentage of net sales ranging from the single digits to the low-double digits based on the medical indications approved and whether the Joint Venture commercializes products directly or through a third party. In the event the ReGenTree entity is acquired or there is a change of control that occurs following achievement of an NDA, RegeneRx shall be entitled to a minimum of 40% of all proceeds paid or payable and will forgo any future royalties. RegeneRx possesses one of three board seats and certain major decisions and transactions within ReGenTree, such as commercialization strategy, mergers, and acquisitions, require RegeneRx’s board designee’s consent. Additionally, we intend to continue to pursue additional partnering activities, particularly for RGN-352, our injectable systemic product candidate for cardiac and central nervous system indications.
Licensing Agreements
As noted above, we have entered into two strategic agreements with GtreeBNT. GtreeBNT licensed the development and commercialization rights for RGN-259, in Asia (excluding China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan) while also licensing the development and commercialization rights for RGN-137 in the U.S. In January 2015,we entered into a joint venture and licensing agreement with GtreeBNT that will commercialize RGN-259 for treatment of dry eye and neurotrophic keratitis in the United States, as well as any other indications within the field of ophthalmology. The license agreements provide for the opportunity for us to receive milestone payments upon specified commercial events and royalty payments in connection with any commercial sales of the licensed products in the respective territories. However, there are no assurances that we will be able to attain any such milestones or generate any such royalty payments under the agreements.
We have a license agreement with Sigma-Tau/Alfa Wassermann that provides the opportunity for us to receive milestone payments upon specified events and royalty payments in connection with commercial sales of Tß4 for certain medical indications in Europe. However, we have not received any milestone payments to date, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to attain such milestones and generate any such payments under the agreement.
34
We also have entered into a license agreement with Lee’s Pharmaceuticals that provides for the opportunity for us to receive milestone payments upon specified events and royalty payments in connection with any commercial sales of Tß4-based products in China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan. However, there are no assurances that we will be able to attain any such milestones or generate any such royalty payments under the agreement.
Government Grants
We have pursued, and continue to pursue, government funding for both RGN-259 and RGN-352. We are not currently receiving funding under a Government Grant.
Other Financing Sources
Other potential sources of outside capital include entering into additional strategic business relationships, additional issuances of equity securities or debt financing or other similar financial instruments, and the exercise of our outstanding warrants. If we raise additional capital through a strategic business relationship, we may have to give up valuable rights to our intellectual property. If we raise funds by selling additional shares of our common stock or securities convertible into our common stock, the ownership interest of our existing stockholders may be significantly diluted. In addition, if additional funds are raised through the issuance of preferred stock or debt securities, these securities are likely to have rights, preferences and privileges senior to our common stock and may involve significant fees, interest expense, restrictive covenants and the granting of security interests in our assets.
Our failure to successfully address liquidity requirements could have a materially negative impact on our business, including the possibility of surrendering our rights to some technologies or product opportunities, delaying our clinical trials, or ceasing operations. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional capital in sufficient amounts, on acceptable terms, or at all.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as such term is defined in Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Our cash equivalents, which are generally comprised of Federally-insured bank deposits, are subject to default, changes in credit rating and changes in market value. These investments are also subject to interest rate risk and will decrease in value if market interest rates increase. As of September 30, 2016, these cash equivalents were approximately $1,061,000. Due to the short-term nature of these investments, if market interest rates differed by 10% from their levels as of September 30, 2016, the change in fair value of our financial instruments would not have been material.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our President and Chief Executive Officer, in his capacity as our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of September 30, 2016. Based upon this evaluation, management has concluded that, as of September 30, 2016, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified under applicable rules of the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
35
b) Changes in Internal Controls
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended September 30, 2016 that have materially affected, or which are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
| Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
None.
| Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
Set forth below and elsewhere in this report and in other documents we file with the SEC are risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this report. The descriptions below include any material changes to and supersede the description of the risk factors affecting our business previously disclosed in “Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors” of the Annual Report.
Risks Related to Our Liquidity and Need for Financing
We will need substantial additional capital for the continued development of product candidates through marketing approval and for our longer-term future operations.
We anticipate that substantial new capital resources will be required to continue our longer-term product development efforts, including any and all follow-on trials that will result from our current clinical programs beyond those currently contemplated, and to scale up manufacturing processes for our product candidates. However, the actual amount of funds that we will need will be determined by many factors, some of which are beyond our control. These factors include, without limitation:
| · | the scope of our, or our partners’, clinical trials, which is significantly influenced by the quality of clinical data achieved as trials are completed and the requirements established by regulatory authorities; |
| · | the speed with which we, or our partners, complete our clinical trials, which depends on our ability to attract and enroll qualifying patients and the quality of the work performed by our clinical investigators and contract research organizations chosen to conduct the studies; |
| · | the time required to prosecute, enforce and defend our intellectual property rights, which depends on evolving legal regimes and infringement claims that may arise between us and third parties; |
| · | the ability to manufacture at scales sufficient to supply commercial quantities of any of our product candidates that receive regulatory approval, which may require levels of effort not currently anticipated; and |
| · | the successful commercialization of our product candidates, which will depend on our, or our partners’, ability to either create or partner with an effective commercialization organization and which could be delayed or prevented by the emergence of equal or more effective therapies. |
36
Emerging biotechnology companies like us may raise capital through corporate collaborations and by licensing intellectual property rights to other biotechnology or pharmaceutical enterprises. We intend to pursue this strategy, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to enter into additional license agreements with respect to our intellectual property or product development programs on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. There are substantial challenges and risks that will make it difficult to successfully implement any of these alternatives. If we are successful in raising additional capital through such a license or collaboration, we may have to give up valuable rights to our intellectual property. In addition, the business priorities of a strategic partner may change over time, which creates the possibility that the interests of the strategic partner in developing our technology may diminish and could have a potentially material negative impact on the value of our interest in the licensed intellectual property or product candidates.
Further, if we raise additional funds by selling shares of our common stock or securities convertible into our common stock the ownership interest of our existing stockholders may be significantly diluted. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of preferred stock or debt securities, these securities are likely to have rights, preferences and privileges senior to our common stock and may involve significant fees, interest expense, restrictive covenants or the granting of security interests in our assets.
Our failure to successfully address our long-term liquidity requirements would have a material negative impact on our business, including the possibility of surrendering our rights to some technologies or product opportunities, delaying our clinical trials or ceasing our operations. At this time we estimate that our existing capital resources will fund operations into the fourth quarter of 2017.
We have incurred losses since inception and expect to incur significant losses in the foreseeable future and may never become profitable.
We have not commercialized any product candidates to date and incurred net operating losses every year since our inception in 1982. We believe these losses will continue for the foreseeable future, and may increase, as we pursue our product development efforts related to Tß4. As of September 30, 2016, our accumulated deficit totaled approximately $105 million.
As we expand our research and development efforts and seek to obtain regulatory approval of our product candidates to make them commercially viable, we anticipate substantial and increasing operating losses. Our ability to generate revenues and to become profitable will depend largely on our ability, alone or through the efforts of third-party licensees and collaborators, to efficiently and successfully complete the development of our product candidates, obtain necessary regulatory approvals for commercialization, scale-up commercial quantity manufacturing capabilities either internally or through third-party suppliers, and market our product candidates. There can be no assurance that we will achieve any of these objectives or that we will ever become profitable or be able to maintain profitability. Even if we do achieve profitability, we cannot predict the level of such profitability. If we sustain losses over an extended period of time and are not otherwise able to raise necessary funds to continue our development efforts and maintain our operations, we may be forced to cease operations.
Our common stock is quoted on the over-the-counter market, which subjects us to the SEC’s penny stock rules and may decrease the liquidity of our common stock.
Our common stock is traded over-the-counter on the OTC Bulletin Board. Over-the-counter markets are generally considered to be less efficient than, and not as broad as, a stock exchange. There may be a limited market for our stock now that it is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, trading in our stock may become more difficult and our share price could decrease. Specifically, you may not be able to resell your shares of common stock at or above the price you paid for such shares or at all.
In addition, our ability to raise additional capital may be impaired because of the less liquid nature of the over-the-counter markets. While we cannot guarantee that we would be able to complete an equity financing on acceptable terms, or at all, we believe that dilution from any equity financing while our shares are quoted on an over-the-counter market would likely be substantially greater than if we were to complete a financing while our common stock is traded on a national securities exchange. Further, we are unable to use short-form registration statements on Form S-3 for the registration of our securities, which could impair our ability to raise additional capital as needed.
37
Our common stock is also subject to penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell our common stock. The SEC generally defines “penny stock” as an equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. The ability of broker-dealers to sell our common stock and the ability of our stockholders to sell their shares in the secondary market will be limited and, as a result, the market liquidity for our common stock will likely be adversely affected. We cannot assure you that trading in our securities will not be subject to these or other regulations in the future.
The report of our independent registered public accounting firm contains explanatory language that substantial doubt exists about our ability to continue as a going concern.
The report of our independent registered public accounting firm on our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 contains explanatory language that substantial doubt exists about our ability to continue as a going concern, without raising additional capital. As described in this report, we completed the sale of common stock and warrants to institutional investors and received net proceeds of approximately $1,520,000 and we estimate that our existing capital resources will fund our operations into the fourth quarter of 2017.
Risks Related to Our Business and Operations
Our planned Phase 2 clinical trial of RGN-352 was placed on clinical hold by the FDA in March 2011 due to non-compliance of cGMP regulations by a contract manufacturer and we are unsure when, if ever, we will be able to resume this trial.
In the second half of 2010, we implemented the development plans for our Phase 2 clinical trial to evaluate RGN-352 in patients who have suffered an acute myocardial infarction, or AMI. We had planned to begin enrolling patients near the end of the first quarter of 2011. However, in March 2011, we were notified by the FDA that the trial was placed on clinical hold as a result of our contract manufacturer’s alleged failure to comply with current Good Manufacturing Practice (“cGMP”) regulations. The FDA has prohibited us from using any of the active drug or placebo manufactured by this manufacturer in human trials, which will require us to identify a cGMP-compliant manufacturer and to have new material produced in the event that we seek to resume this trial. We have also learned that the contract manufacturer has closed its manufacturing facility and has filed for bankruptcy protection. Significant preparatory time and procedures will be required before any new suitable manufacturer would be able to manufacture RGN-352 for the AMI trial. Since we are unable to estimate the length of time that the trial will be on clinical hold, we have elected to cease activities on this trial until the FDA clinical hold is resolved and the requisite funding might be secured. Consequently, there can be no assurance that we will be able to timely initiate trial activities or complete this trial, if at all.
All of our drug candidates are based on a single compound.
Our current primary business focus is the development of Tß4, and its analogues, derivatives and fragments, for the regeneration and accelerated repair of damaged tissue from non-healing dermal and corneal wounds, cardiac injury, central/peripheral nervous system diseases and other conditions, as well as an improvement in various functions, such as, but not limited to, cardiac and neurological. Unlike many pharmaceutical companies that have a number of unique chemical entities in development, we are dependent on a single molecule, formulated for different routes of administration and different clinical indications, for our potential commercial success. As a result, any common safety or efficacy concerns for Tß4-based products that cross formulations would have a much greater impact on our business prospects than if our product pipeline were more diversified.
38
We may never be able to commercialize our product candidates.
Although Tß4 has shown biological activity in in vitro studies and in vivo animal models and while we observed clinical activity and efficacious outcomes in our recent RGN-259 Phase 2a trial and earlier Phase 2 dermal trials, we cannot assure you that our product candidates will exhibit activity or importance in humans in large-scale trials. Our drug candidates are still in research and development, and we do not expect them to be commercially available for the foreseeable future, if at all. Only a small number of research and development programs ultimately result in commercially successful drugs. Potential products that appear to be promising at early stages of development may not reach the market for a number of reasons. These include the possibility that the potential products may:
| · | be found ineffective or cause harmful side effects during preclinical studies or clinical trials; |
| · | fail to receive necessary regulatory approvals; |
| · | be precluded from commercialization by proprietary rights of third parties; |
| · | be difficult to manufacture on a large scale; or |
| · | be uneconomical or otherwise fail to achieve market acceptance. |
If any of these potential problems occurs, we may never successfully market Tß4-based products.
We are subject to intense government regulation, and we may not receive regulatory approvals for our drug candidates.
Our product candidates will require regulatory approvals prior to sale. In particular, therapeutic agents are subject to stringent approval processes, prior to commercial marketing, by the FDA and by comparable agencies in most foreign countries. The process of obtaining FDA and corresponding foreign approvals is costly and time-consuming, and we cannot assure you that such approvals will be granted. Also, the regulations we are subject to change frequently and such changes could cause delays in the development of our product candidates.
Three of our drug candidates are currently in the clinical development stage, and we cannot be certain that we, or our partners, will successfully complete the clinical trials necessary to receive regulatory product approvals. The regulatory approval process is lengthy, unpredictable and expensive. To obtain regulatory approvals in the United States, we or a partner must ultimately demonstrate to the satisfaction of the FDA that our product candidates are sufficiently safe and effective for their proposed administration to humans. Many factors, known and unknown, can adversely impact clinical trials and the ability to evaluate a product candidate’s safety and efficacy, including:
| · | the FDA or other health regulatory authorities, or institutional review boards, or IRBs, do not approve a clinical trial protocol or place a clinical trial on hold; |
| · | suitable patients do not enroll in a clinical trial in sufficient numbers or at the expected rate, for reasons such as the size of the patient population, the proximity of patients to clinical sites, the eligibility criteria for the trial, the perceptions of investigators and patients regarding safety, and the availability of other treatment options; |
| · | clinical trial data is adversely affected by trial conduct or patient withdrawal prior to completion of the trial; |
| · | there may be competition with ongoing clinical trials and scheduling conflicts with participating clinicians; |
| · | patients experience serious adverse events, including adverse side effects of our drug candidates, for a variety of reasons that may or may not be related to our product candidates, including the advanced stage of their disease and other medical problems; |
| · | patients in the placebo or untreated control group exhibit greater than expected improvements or fewer than expected adverse events; |
| · | third-party clinical investigators do not perform the clinical trials on the anticipated schedule or consistent with the clinical trial protocol and good clinical practices, or other third-party organizations do not perform data collection and analysis in a timely or accurate manner; |
39
| · | service providers, collaborators or co-sponsors do not adequately perform their obligations in relation to the clinical trial or cause the trial to be delayed or terminated; |
| · | we are unable to obtain a sufficient supply of manufactured clinical trial materials; |
| · | regulatory inspections of manufacturing facilities, which may, among other things, require us or a co-sponsor to undertake corrective action or suspend the clinical trials, such as the clinical hold with respect to our Phase 2 clinical trial of RGN-352; |
| · | the interim results of the clinical trial are inconclusive or negative; |
| · | the clinical trial, although approved and completed, generates data that is not considered by the FDA or others to be clinically relevant or sufficient to demonstrate safety and efficacy; and |
| · | changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions affect the conduct of the clinical trial or the interpretation of its results. |
There can be no assurance that our, or our partners’, clinical trials will in fact demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the FDA and others, that our product candidates are sufficiently safe or effective. The FDA or we may also restrict or suspend our clinical trials at any time if it is believed that subjects participating in the trials are being exposed to unacceptable health risks.
Clinical trials for product candidates such as ours are often conducted with patients who have more advanced forms of a particular condition or other unrelated conditions. For example, in clinical trials for our product candidate RGN-137, we have studied patients who are not only suffering from chronic epidermal wounds but who are also older and much more likely to have other serious adverse conditions. During the course of treatment with our product candidates, patients could die or suffer other adverse events for reasons that may or may not be related to the drug candidate being tested. Further, and as a consequence that all of our drug candidates are based on Tß4, crossover risk exists such that a patient in one trial may be adversely impacted by one drug candidate, and that adverse event may have implications for our other trials and other drug candidates. However, even if unrelated to our product candidates, such adverse events can nevertheless negatively impact our clinical trials, and our business prospects would suffer.
These factors, many of which may be outside of our control, may have a negative impact on our business by making it difficult to advance product candidates or by reducing or eliminating their potential or perceived value. As a consequence, we may need to perform more or larger clinical trials than planned. Further, if we are forced to contribute greater financial and clinical resources to a study, valuable resources will be diverted from other areas of our business. If we fail to complete or if we experience material delays in completing our clinical trials as currently planned, or we otherwise fail to commence or complete, or experience delays in, any of our other present or planned clinical trials, including as a result of the actions of third parties upon which we rely for these functions, our ability to conduct our business as currently planned could materially suffer.
We may not successfully establish and maintain development and testing relationships with third-party service providers and collaborators, which could adversely affect our ability to develop our product candidates.
We have only limited resources, experience with and capacity to conduct requisite testing and clinical trials of our drug candidates. As a result, we rely and expect to continue to rely on third-party service providers and collaborators, including corporate partners, licensors and contract research organizations, or CROs, to perform a number of activities relating to the development of our drug candidates, including the design and conduct of clinical trials, and potentially the obtaining of regulatory approvals. For example, we currently rely on several third-party contractors to manufacture and formulate Tß4 into the product candidates used in our clinical trials, develop assays to assess Tß4’s effectiveness in complex biological systems, recruit clinical investigators and sites to participate in our trials, manage the clinical trial process and collect, evaluate and report clinical results.
40
We may not be able to maintain or expand our current arrangements with these third parties or maintain such relationships on favorable terms. Our agreements with these third parties may also contain provisions that restrict our ability to develop and test our product candidates or that give third parties rights to control aspects of our product development and clinical programs. In addition, conflicts may arise with our collaborators, such as conflicts concerning the interpretation of clinical data, the achievement of milestones, the interpretation of financial provisions or the ownership of intellectual property developed during the collaboration. If any conflicts arise with our existing or future collaborators, they may act in their self-interest, which may be adverse to our best interests. Any failure to maintain our collaborative agreements and any conflicts with our collaborators could delay or prevent us from developing our product candidates. We and our collaborators may fail to develop products covered by our present and future collaborations if, among other things:
| · | we or our partners do not achieve our objectives under our collaboration agreements; |
| · | we or our partners are unable to obtain patent protection for the products or proprietary technologies we develop in our partnerships; |
| · | we are unable to manage multiple simultaneous product development partnerships; |
| · | our partners become competitors of ours or enter into agreements with our competitors; |
| · | we or our partners encounter regulatory hurdles that prevent commercialization of our product candidates; or |
| · | we develop products and processes or enter into additional partnerships that conflict with the business objectives of our other partners. |
We also have less control over the timing and other aspects of our clinical trials than if we conducted the monitoring and supervision entirely on our own. Third parties may not perform their responsibilities for our clinical trials on our anticipated schedule or consistent with a clinical trial protocol or applicable regulations. We, and our partners, also rely on clinical research organizations to perform much of our data management and analysis. They may not provide these services as required or in a timely manner. If any of these parties do not meet deadlines or follow proper procedures, including procedures required by law, the preclinical studies and clinical trials may take longer than expected, may be delayed or may be terminated, which would have a materially negative impact on our product development efforts. If we were forced to find a replacement entity to perform any of our preclinical studies or clinical trials, we may not be able to find a suitable entity on favorable terms or at all. Even if we were able to find a replacement, resulting delays in the tests or trials may result in significant additional expenditures and delays in obtaining regulatory approval for drug candidates, which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and business prospects.
GtreeBNT Co., Ltd. has limited drug development experience.
In March 2014 we completed two licensing agreements for the development and commercialization of RGN-259 and RGN-137 in certain territories, with GtreeBNT, headquartered outside of Seoul, Korea. In January 2015 we entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with GtreeBNT and entered into a license agreement with the Joint Venture, pursuant to which granted to the Joint Venture the right to develop and exclusively commercialize RGN-259 in the United States and Canada as amended in April 2016. Although we will share control of the Joint Venture with GtreeBNT, GtreeBNT will have greater control over the Joint Venture than we will meaning that GtreeBNT will have significant control over the commercialization of RGN-259.
Historically, GtreeBNT’s business focus has been in the IT software industry in Korea with strong IP positions addressing specific software tools and apps such as optimized multimedia software for smart phones. GtreeBNT made a strategic decision in November 2013 to expand into the biopharmaceutical business through selected strategic alliances with biopharmaceutical companies in the U.S. and EU. The collaboration with RegeneRx is the first strategic investment in this initiative. While GtreeBNT has hired executives and staff with significant pharmaceutical experience, the company has no internal drug development experience. As a result, GtreeBNT may face more and different challenges in the development of these product candidates than would more established pharmaceutical companies.
41
We are subject to intense competition from companies with greater resources and more mature products, which may result in our competitors developing or commercializing products before or more successfully than we do.
We are engaged in a business that is highly competitive. Research and development activities for the development of drugs to treat indications within our focus are being sponsored or conducted by private and public research institutions and by major pharmaceutical companies located in the United States and a number of foreign countries. Most of these companies and institutions have financial and human resources that are substantially greater than our own and they have extensive experience in conducting research and development activities and clinical trials and in obtaining the regulatory approvals necessary to market pharmaceutical products that we do not have. As a result, they may develop competing products more rapidly that are safer, more effective, or have fewer side effects, or are less expensive, or they may develop and commercialize products that render our product candidates non-competitive or obsolete.
With respect to our product candidate RGN-259, there are also numerous ophthalmic companies developing drugs for corneal wound healing and other front-of-the-eye diseases and injuries, including dry eye syndrome. Amniotic membranes have been successfully used to treat corneal wounds in certain cases, as have topical steroids and antibacterial agents. Most specialty ophthalmic companies have a number of products on the market that could compete with RGN-259. There are numerous antibiotics to treat eye infections to promote corneal wound healing and many eye lubrication products that are soothing to the eye and help eye healing, many of which are sold without prescriptions. Companies also market steroids to treat certain conditions within our area of interest. Allergan, Inc. markets Restasis™, Ophthalmic Emulsion, which was the only commercially available and FDA-approved eye drop to treat dry eye. Shire PLC recently received FDA approval to market Lifitegrast for the treatment of dry eye and will be launching the product in the U.S. Restasis, and other products, have been approved for marketing in certain other countries where we have licensed RGN-259.
We have initially targeted our product candidate RGN-352 for cardiovascular indications. Most large pharmaceutical companies and many smaller biomedical companies are vigorously pursuing the development of therapeutics to treat patients after heart attacks and for other cardiovascular indications.
With respect to our product candidate RGN-137 for wound healing, Johnson & Johnson has previously marketed Regranex™ for this purpose in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Other companies, such as Novartis, are developing and marketing artificial skins, which we believe could also compete with RGN-137. Moreover, wound healing is a large and highly fragmented marketplace attracting many companies, large and small, to develop products for treating acute and chronic wounds, including, for example, honey-based ointments, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and low frequency cavitational ultrasound.
We are also developing potential cosmeceutical products, which are loosely defined as products that bridge the gap between cosmetics and pharmaceuticals, for example, by improving skin texture and reducing the appearance of aging. This industry is intensely competitive, with potential competitors ranging from large multinational companies to very small specialty companies. New cosmeceutical products often have a short product life and are frequently replaced with newer products developed to address the latest trends in appearance and fashion. We may not be able to adapt to changes in the industry as quickly as larger and more experienced cosmeceutical companies. Further, larger cosmetics companies have the financial and marketing resources to effectively compete with smaller companies like us in order to sell products aimed at larger markets.
Even if approved for marketing, our technologies and product candidates are unproven and they may fail to gain market acceptance.
Our product candidates, all of which are based on the molecule Tß4, are new and unproven and there is no guarantee that health care providers or patients will be interested in our product candidates, even if they are approved for use. If any of our product candidates are approved by the FDA, our success will depend in part on our ability to demonstrate sufficient clinical benefits, reliability, safety, and cost effectiveness of our, or our partners’, product candidates relative to other approaches, as well as on our ability to continue to develop our product candidates to respond to competitive and technological changes. If the market does not accept our product candidates, when and if we are able to commercialize them, then we may never become profitable. Factors that could delay, inhibit or prevent market acceptance of our product candidates may include:
| · | the timing and receipt of marketing approvals; |
42
| · | the safety and efficacy of the products; |
| · | the emergence of equivalent or superior products; |
| · | the cost-effectiveness of the products; and |
| · | ineffective marketing. |
It is difficult to predict the future growth of our business, if any, and the size of the market for our product candidates because the markets are continually evolving. There can be no assurance that our product candidates will prove superior to products that may currently be available or may become available in the future or that our research and development activities will result in any commercially profitable products.
We have no marketing experience, sales force or distribution capabilities. If our product candidates are approved, and we are unable to recruit key personnel to perform these functions, we may not be able to commercialize them successfully.
Although we do not currently have any marketable products, our ability to produce revenues ultimately depends on our, or our partners’, ability to sell our product candidates if and when they are approved by the FDA and other regulatory authorities. We currently have no experience in marketing or selling pharmaceutical products, and we do not have a marketing and sales staff or distribution capabilities. Developing a marketing and sales force is also time-consuming and could delay the launch of new products or expansion of existing product sales. In addition, we will compete with many companies that currently have extensive and well-funded marketing and sales operations. If we fail to establish successful marketing and sales capabilities or fail to enter into successful marketing arrangements with third parties, our ability to generate revenues will suffer.
If we enter markets outside the United States our business will be subject to political, economic, legal and social risks in those markets, which could adversely affect our business.
There are significant regulatory and legal barriers to entering markets outside the United States that must be overcome if we, or our partners, seek regulatory approval to market our product candidates in countries other than the United States. We would be subject to the burden of complying with a wide variety of national and local laws, including multiple and possibly overlapping and conflicting laws. We also may experience difficulties adapting to new cultures, business customs and legal systems. Any sales and operations outside the United States would be subject to political, economic and social uncertainties including, among others:
| · | changes and limits in import and export controls; |
| · | increases in custom duties and tariffs; |
| · | changes in currency exchange rates; |
| · | economic and political instability; |
| · | changes in government regulations and laws; |
| · | absence in some jurisdictions of effective laws to protect our intellectual property rights; and |
| · | currency transfer and other restrictions and regulations that may limit our ability to sell certain product candidates or repatriate profits to the United States. |
Any changes related to these and other factors could adversely affect our business if and to the extent we enter markets outside the United States. Additionally, we have entered into license agreements with Sigma-Tau S.p.A, Lee’s Pharmaceutical Limited and GtreeBNT Co, Ltd. for the development of certain of our product candidates in international markets. As a result, these development activities will be subject to compliance in all respects with local laws and regulations and may be subject to many of the risks described above.
43
Governmental and third-party payors may subject any product candidates we develop to sales and pharmaceutical pricing controls that could limit our product revenues and delay profitability.
The successful commercialization of our product candidates, if they are approved by the FDA, will likely depend on our ability to obtain reimbursement for the cost of the product and treatment. Government authorities, private health insurers and other organizations, such as health maintenance organizations, are increasingly seeking to lower the prices charged for medical products and services. Also, the trend toward managed health care in the United States, the growth of healthcare maintenance organizations, and recently enacted legislation reforming healthcare and proposals to reform government insurance programs could have a significant influence on the purchase of healthcare services and products, resulting in lower prices and reducing demand for our product candidates. The cost containment measures that healthcare providers are instituting and any healthcare reform could reduce our ability to sell our product candidates and may have a material adverse effect on our operations. We cannot assure you that reimbursement in the United States or foreign countries will be available for any of our product candidates, and that any reimbursement granted will be maintained, or that limits on reimbursement available from third-party payors will not reduce the demand for, or the price of, our product candidates. The lack or inadequacy of third-party reimbursements for our product candidates would decrease the potential profitability of our operations. We cannot forecast what additional legislation or regulation relating to the healthcare industry or third-party coverage and reimbursement may be enacted in the future, or what effect the legislation or regulation would have on our business.
We have no manufacturing or formulation capabilities and are dependent upon third-party suppliers to provide us with our product candidates. If these suppliers do not manufacture our product candidates in sufficient quantities, at acceptable quality levels and at acceptable cost, or if we are unable to identify suitable replacement suppliers if needed, our clinical development efforts could be delayed, prevented or impaired.
We do not own or operate manufacturing facilities and have little experience in manufacturing pharmaceutical products. We currently rely, and expect to continue to rely, primarily on peptide manufacturers to supply us with Tß4 for further formulation into our product candidates. We have historically engaged three separate smaller drug formulation contractors for the formulation of clinical grade product candidates, one for each of our three product candidates in clinical development, although, as described in this report, the contractor we engaged to formulate and vial RGN-352 has filed for bankruptcy and closed its manufacturing facility, and our clinical trial involving RGN-352 has been placed on clinical hold. We currently do not have an alternative source of supply for either Tß4 or the individual drug candidates. If these suppliers, together or individually, are not able to supply us with either Tß4 or individual product candidates on a timely basis, in sufficient quantities, at acceptable levels of quality and at a competitive price, or if we are unable to identify a replacement manufacturer to perform these functions on acceptable terms as needed, our development programs could be seriously jeopardized.
The clinical hold on our RGN-352 trial will require us to have new material manufactured by a cGMP-compliant manufacturer in the event that we seek to resume this trial. Significant preparatory time and procedures will be required before any new manufacturer would be able to manufacture RGN-352 for the AMI trial, due to the time required for revalidation of processes and assays related to such production that were already in place with the original manufacturer. Since we are unable to estimate the length of time that the trial will be on clinical hold, we have elected to cease activities on this trial until the FDA clinical hold is resolved and the requisite funding might be secured.
Other risks of relying solely on single suppliers for each of our product candidates include:
| · | the possibility that our other manufacturers, and any new manufacturer that we, or our partners, may identify for RGN-352, may not be able to ensure quality and compliance with regulations relating to the manufacture of pharmaceuticals; |
| · | their manufacturing capacity may not be sufficient or available to produce the required quantities of our product candidates based on our planned clinical development schedule, if at all; |
| · | they may not have access to the capital necessary to expand their manufacturing facilities in response to our needs; |
| · | commissioning replacement suppliers would be difficult and time-consuming; |
| · | individual suppliers may have used substantial proprietary know-how relating to the manufacture of our product candidates and, in the event we must find a replacement or supplemental supplier, our ability to transfer this know-how to the new supplier could be an expensive and/or time-consuming process; |
| · | an individual supplier may experience events, such as a fire or natural disaster, that force it to stop or curtail production for an extended period; |
44
| · | an individual supplier could encounter significant increases in labor, capital or other costs that would make it difficult for them to produce our products cost-effectively; or |
| · | an individual supplier may not be able to obtain the raw materials or validated drug containers in sufficient quantities, at acceptable costs or in sufficient time to complete the manufacture, formulation and delivery of our product candidates. |
Our suppliers may use hazardous and biological materials in their businesses. Any claims relating to improper handling, storage or disposal of these materials could be time-consuming and costly to us, and we are not insured against such claims.
Our product candidates and processes involve the controlled storage, use and disposal by our suppliers of certain hazardous and biological materials and waste products. We and our suppliers and other collaborators are subject to federal, state and local regulations governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of materials and waste products. Even if we and these suppliers and collaborators comply with the standards prescribed by law and regulation, the risk of accidental contamination or injury from hazardous materials cannot be completely eliminated. In the event of an accident, we could be held liable for any damages that result, and we do not carry insurance for this type of claim. We may also incur significant costs to comply with current or future environmental laws and regulations.
We face the risk of product liability claims, which could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
We, or our partners, may be subject to product liability claims as a result of our testing, manufacturing, and marketing of drugs. In addition, the use of our product candidates, when and if developed and sold, will expose us to the risk of product liability claims. Product liability may result from harm to patients using our product candidates, such as a complication that was either not communicated as a potential side effect or was more extreme than anticipated. We require all patients enrolled in our clinical trials to sign consents, which explain various risks involved with participating in the trial. However, patient consents provide only a limited level of protection, and it may be alleged that the consent did not address or did not adequately address a risk that the patient suffered. Additionally, we will generally be required to indemnify our clinical product manufacturers, clinical trial centers, medical professionals and other parties conducting related activities in connection with losses they may incur through their involvement in the clinical trials.
Our ability to reduce our liability exposure for human clinical trials and commercial sales, if any, of Tß4 is dependent in part on our ability to obtain sufficient product liability insurance or to collaborate with third parties that have adequate insurance. Although we intend to obtain and maintain product liability insurance coverage if we gain approval to market any of our product candidates, we cannot guarantee that product liability insurance will continue to be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all, or that its coverage will be sufficient to cover all claims against us. A product liability claim, even one without merit or for which we have substantial coverage, could result in significant legal defense costs, thereby potentially exposing us to expenses significantly in excess of our revenues, as well as harm to our reputation and distraction of our management.
If any of our key employees discontinue their services with us, our efforts to develop our business may be delayed.
We are highly dependent on the principal members of our management team. The loss of our chairman and Chief Scientific Officer, Allan Goldstein, or chief executive officer, J.J. Finkelstein could prevent or significantly delay the achievement of our goals. We cannot assure you that Dr. Goldstein or Mr. Finkelstein, or any other key employees or consultants, will not elect to terminate their employment or consulting arrangements. In addition, we do not maintain a key man life insurance policy with respect to any of our management personnel. In the future, we anticipate that we will also need to add additional management and other personnel. Competition for qualified personnel in our industry is intense, and our success will depend in part on our ability to attract and retain highly skilled personnel. We cannot assure you that our efforts to attract or retain such personnel will be successful.
45
Mauro Bove, a member of our Board, was also a director and officer of entities affiliated with Sigma-Tau and is a director of Lee’s Pharmaceuticals, relationships which could give rise to a conflict of interest for Mr. Bove.
Mauro Bove is a member of our Board of Directors, and, until March 31, 2014, was a director and officer of entities affiliated with Sigma-Tau, which collectively make up our largest stockholder group. At this time Mr. Bove remains engaged with Sigma-Tau as a consultant. Sigma-Tau has subsequently merged into Alfa Wassermann, S.p.A., an Italian pharmaceutical company. Sigma-Tau/Alfa Wassermann previously provided us with significant funding and is also our strategic partner in Europe with respect to the development of certain of our drug candidates. We have issued shares of common stock, convertible promissory notes and common stock warrants to Sigma-Tau and its affiliates in several private placement financing transactions, including as recently as September 2013. We have licensed certain rights to our product candidates generally for the treatment of dermal and internal wounds to Sigma-Tau/Alfa Wassermann. Under the license agreement, upon the completion of a Phase 2 clinical trial of either of these product candidates that yields positive results in terms of clinical efficacy and safety, Sigma-Tau/Alfa Wassermann is obligated to either make a $5 million milestone payment to us or to initiate and fund a pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial of the product candidate. In 2009, we completed two Phase 2 clinical trials of RGN-137, but these trials were not sufficient to trigger the milestone obligation. There can be no assurance that we will ever receive this payment or be able to initiate a pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial of RGN-137 that would be funded by Sigma-Tau/Alfa Wassermann. As a result of Mr. Bove’s relationship with Sigma-Tau/Alfa Wassermann, there could be a conflict of interest between Sigma-Tau/Alfa Wasserman and our other stockholders with respect to these and other agreements and circumstances that may require the exercise of the Board’s discretion with respect to Sigma-Tau/Alfa Wassermann. Any decision in the best interests of Sigma-Tau/Alfa Wassermann may not be in the best interest of our other stockholders.
Additionally, Mr. Bove is a non-executive director of Lee’s Pharmaceuticals, in which affiliates of Sigma-Tau have a significant equity interest. In July 2012, we entered into a license agreement for Tß4 in any pharmaceutical form, including our RGN-259, RGN-352 and RGN-137 product candidates for development in China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan. There can be no assurance that we will ever receive any further payments from Lee’s under the agreement. As a result of Mr. Bove’s relationship with Lee’s and Sigma-Tau, Mr. Bove may have interests that are different from our other stockholders in connection with these and other agreements and circumstances that may require the exercise of the Board’s discretion with respect to Lee’s or Sigma-Tau. These conflicts could result in decisions that are not in the best interest of our other stockholders.
Risks Related To Our Intellectual Property
We are partially reliant on our license from the National Institutes of Health for the rights to Tß4, and any loss of these rights could adversely affect our business.
We have received an exclusive worldwide license to intellectual property discovered at the National Institutes of Health, or NIH, pertaining to the use of Tß4 in wound healing and tissue repair. The intellectual property rights from this license, along with independent patent applications we have filed, as well as patents and patent applications under licenses we acquired, form the basis for our current commercial development focus with Tß4. The NIH license terminates upon the last to expire of the patent applications that are filed, or any patents that may issue from such applications, in connection with the license. This license requires us to pay a minimum annual royalty to the NIH, regardless of the success of our product development efforts, plus certain other royalties upon the sale of products created by the intellectual property granted under the license. In 2013 we amended certain provisions of the exclusive license; we were permitted to credit amounts paid to prosecute or maintain the licensed patent rights during the 2013 calendar year against the 2013 minimum annual royalty of $25,000. Beginning in 2014 the minimum annual royalty is $2,000. While to date we believe that we have complied with all requirements to maintain the license, the loss of this license could have an adverse effect on our business and business prospects.
46
We may not be able to maintain broad patent protection for our product candidates, which could limit the commercial potential of our product candidates.
Our success will depend in part on our ability to obtain, defend and enforce patents, both in the United States and abroad. We have attempted to create a substantial intellectual property portfolio, submitting patent applications for various compositions of matter, methods of use and fragments and derivatives of Tß4. As described elsewhere in this report, we currently do not have adequate financial resources to fund our ongoing business activities substantially beyond 12 months without additional funding. As a result of our current financial condition, we continuously evaluate our issued patents and patent applications and may decide to limit their therapeutic and/or geographic coverage in an effort to enhance our ability to focus on certain medical conditions and countries within our financial constraints. As a result, we may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights in indications and/or territories that we otherwise would, and, therefore, our ability to commercialize Tß4, if at all, could be substantially limited, which could have a material adverse impact on our future results of operations.
If we, or our partners, are not able to maintain adequate patent protection for our product candidates, we may be unable to prevent our competitors from using our technology or technology that we license.
Our success will depend in substantial part on our, or our partners’, abilities to obtain, defend and enforce patents, maintain trade secrets and operate without infringing upon the proprietary rights of others, both in the United States and abroad. Pursuant to an exclusive worldwide license from the NIH, we have exclusive rights to use Tß4 in the treatment of non-healing wounds. While patents covering our use of Tß4 have issued in some countries, we cannot guarantee whether or when corresponding patents will be issued, or the scope of any patents that may be issued, in other countries. We have attempted to create a substantial intellectual property portfolio, submitting patent applications for various compositions of matter, methods of use and fragments and derivatives of Tß4. We have also in-licensed other intellectual property rights from third parties that could be subject to the same risks as our own patents. If any of these patent applications do not issue, or do not issue in certain countries, or are not enforceable, the ability to commercialize Tß4 in various medical indications could be substantially limited or eliminated.
In addition, the patent positions of the products being developed by us and our collaborators involve complex legal and factual uncertainties. As a result, we cannot assure you that any patent applications filed by us, or by others under which we have rights, will result in patents being issued in the United States or foreign countries. In addition, there can be no assurance that any patents will be issued from any pending or future patent applications of ours or our partners, that the scope of any patent protection will be sufficient to provide us with competitive advantages, that any patents obtained by us or our partners will be held valid if subsequently challenged or that others will not claim rights in or ownership of the patents and other proprietary rights we or our partners may hold. Unauthorized parties may try to copy aspects of our product candidates and technologies or obtain and use information we consider proprietary. Policing the unauthorized use of our proprietary rights is difficult. We cannot guarantee that no harm or threat will be made to our or our partners’ intellectual property. In addition, changes in, or different interpretations of, patent laws in the United States and other countries may also adversely affect the scope of our patent protection and our competitive situation.
Due to the significant time lag between the filing of patent applications and the publication of such patents, we cannot be certain that our licensors were the first to file the patent applications we license or, even if they were the first to file, also were the first to invent, particularly with regards to patent rights in the United States. In addition, a number of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and research and academic institutions have developed technologies, filed patent applications or received patents on various technologies that may be related to our product candidates. Some of these technologies, applications or patents may conflict with our or our licensors’ technologies or patent applications. A conflict could limit the scope of the patents, if any, that we or our licensors may be able to obtain or result in denial of our or our licensors’ patent applications. If patents that cover our activities are issued to other companies, we may not be able to develop or obtain alternative technology.
47
Additionally, there is certain subject matter that is patentable in the United States but not generally patentable outside of the United States. Differences in what constitutes patentable subject matter in various countries may limit the protection we can obtain outside of the United States. For example, methods of treating humans are not patentable in many countries outside of the United States. These and other issues may prevent us from obtaining patent protection outside of the United States, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Changes to U.S. patent laws could materially reduce any value our patent portfolio may have.
The value of our patents depends in part on their duration. A shorter period of patent protection could lessen the value of our rights under any patents that may be obtained and may decrease revenues derived from its patents. For example, the U.S. patent laws were previously amended to change the term of patent protection from 17 years following patent issuance to 20 years from the earliest effective filing date of the application. Because the time from filing to issuance of biotechnology applications may be more than three years depending on the subject matter, a 20-year patent term from the filing date may result in substantially shorter patent protection. Future changes to patent laws could shorten our period of patent exclusivity and may decrease the revenues that we might derive from the patents and the value of our patent portfolio.
We, or our partners, may not have adequate protection for our unpatented proprietary information, which could adversely affect our competitive position.
In addition to our patents, we, and our partners, also rely on trade secrets, know-how, continuing technological innovations and licensing opportunities to develop and maintain our competitive position. However, others may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets or disclose our technology. To protect our trade secrets, we may enter into confidentiality agreements with employees, consultants and potential collaborators. However, we may not have such agreements in place with all such parties and, where we do, these agreements may not provide meaningful protection of our trade secrets or adequate remedies in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of such information. Also, our trade secrets or know-how may become known through other means or be independently discovered by our competitors. Any of these events could prevent us from developing or commercializing our product candidates.
We may be subject to claims that we or our employees have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of former employers.
As is commonplace in the biotechnology industry, we employ now, and may hire in the future, individuals who were previously employed at other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including competitors or potential competitors. Although there are no claims currently pending against us, we may be subject to claims that we or certain employees have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of former employers. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and would be a significant distraction to management.
Risks Related To Our Securities
Our common stock price is volatile, our stock is highly illiquid, and any investment in our securities could decline substantially in value.
For the period from January 1, 2015 through November 11, 2016 the closing price of our common stock has ranged from $0.13 to $0.75, with an average daily trading volume of approximately 66,000 shares. In light of our small size and limited resources, as well as the uncertainties and risks that can affect our business and industry, our stock price is expected to continue to be highly volatile and can be subject to substantial drops, with or even in the absence of news affecting our business. The following factors, in addition to the other risk factors described in this report, and the potentially low volume of trades in our common stock since it is not listed on a national securities exchange, may have a significant impact on the market price of our common stock, some of which are beyond our control:
48
| · | results of pre-clinical studies and clinical trials; |
| · | commercial success of approved products; |
| · | corporate partnerships; |
| · | technological innovations by us or competitors; |
| · | changes in laws and government regulations both in the U.S. and overseas; |
| · | changes in key personnel at our company; |
| · | developments concerning proprietary rights, including patents and litigation matters; |
| · | public perception relating to the commercial value or safety of any of our product candidates; |
| · | other issuances of our common stock, or securities convertible into or exercisable for our common stock, causing dilution; |
| · | anticipated or unanticipated changes in our financial performance; |
| · | general trends related to the biopharmaceutical and biotechnological industries; and |
| · | general conditions in the stock market. |
The stock market in general has recently experienced relatively large price and volume fluctuations. In particular, the market prices of securities of smaller biotechnology companies have experienced dramatic fluctuations that often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating results of these companies. Continued market fluctuations could result in extreme volatility in the price of our common stock, which could cause a decline in its value. You should also be aware that price volatility may be worse if the trading volume of the common stock remains limited or declines.
Our principal stockholders have significant voting power and may take actions that may not be in the best interests of our other stockholders.
Our officers, directors and principal stockholders together control approximately 49.8% of our outstanding common stock. Included in this group is Sigma-Tau (recently merged with Alfa Wasserman S.p.A.) and its affiliates, which together hold outstanding shares representing approximately 28.1% of our outstanding common stock and GtreeBNT which owns approximately 18.3% of our outstanding common stock. These stockholders also hold options, warrants, convertible promissory notes and stock purchase rights that provide them with the right to acquire significantly more shares of common stock. Accordingly, if these stockholders acted together they could control the outcome of all stockholder votes. This concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control and might adversely affect the market price of our common stock, and therefore may not be in the best interest of our other stockholders.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports or publish unfavorable research about our business, the price of our common stock and other securities and their trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock and other securities will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. We do not currently have and may never obtain research coverage by securities and industry analysts. If securities or industry analysts do not commence or maintain coverage of us, the trading price for our common stock and other securities would be negatively affected. In the event we obtain securities or industry analyst coverage, if one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades our securities, the price of our securities would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases to cover us or fails to publish regular reports on us, interest in the purchase of our securities could decrease, which could cause the price of our common stock and other securities and their trading volume to decline.
49
The exercise of options and warrants, conversion of convertible promissory notes, and other issuances of shares of common stock or securities convertible into common stock will dilute your interest.
As of September 30, 2016, there were outstanding options to purchase an aggregate of 7,616,211 shares of our common stock under our 2000 and 2010 incentive equity plans at exercise prices ranging from $0.14 per share to $2.50 per share and outstanding warrants to purchase 5,804,412 shares of our common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $0.48 per share. In addition to the outstanding options and warrants we have also issued five series of convertible promissory notes which are presently convertible into an aggregate of 13,683,333 shares of our common stock. In October 2012, we sold convertible promissory notes totaling $300,000 that are convertible into 2,000,000 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.15 per share. In October 2014 the maturity date of these notes was extended for an additional three years. In 2013, we sold three additional series of convertible promissory notes, which notes totaled $646,000 and are initially convertible into 10,766,667 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.06 per share. In January 2014, we sold a fifth series of convertible promissory notes, which notes totaled $55,000 and are initially convertible into 916,667 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.06 per share. The notes issued in 2013 and January 2014 contain down round provisions under which the conversion prices of these notes could be decreased as a result of future equity offerings below the conversion price of the notes. The exercise of options and warrants or note conversions at prices below the market price of our common stock could adversely affect the price of shares of our common stock. Additional dilution may result from the issuance of shares of our capital stock in connection with collaborations or manufacturing arrangements or in connection with other financing efforts.
Any issuance of our common stock that is not made solely to then-existing stockholders proportionate to their interests, such as in the case of a stock dividend or stock split, will result in dilution to each stockholder by reducing his, her or its percentage ownership of the total outstanding shares. Moreover, if we issue options or warrants to purchase our common stock in the future and those options or warrants are exercised or we issue restricted stock, stockholders may experience further dilution. Holders of shares of our common stock have no preemptive rights that entitle them to purchase their pro rata share of any offering of shares of any class or series.
In addition, most of the outstanding warrants to purchase shares of our common stock have an exercise price above the current market price for our common stock. As a result, these warrants may not be exercised prior to their expiration, in which case we would not realize any proceeds from their exercise.
Our certificate of incorporation and Delaware law contain provisions that could discourage or prevent a takeover or other change in control, even if such a transaction would be beneficial to our stockholders, which could affect our stock price adversely and prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.
Our certificate of incorporation provides our Board with the power to issue shares of preferred stock without stockholder approval. In addition, we are subject to the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Subject to specified exceptions, this section provides that a corporation may not engage in any business combination with any interested stockholder, as defined in that statute, during the three-year period following the time that such stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. This provision could also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of our company. The foregoing factors could reduce the price that investors or an acquirer might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.
50
We may become involved in securities class action litigation that could divert management’s attention and harm our business and our insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover all costs and damages.
The stock market has from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market prices for the common stock of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. These broad market fluctuations may cause the market price of our common stock to decline. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a particular company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been brought against that company. We may become involved in this type of litigation in the future. Litigation often is expensive and diverts management’s attention and resources, which could hurt our business, operating results and financial condition.
| Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None
| Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None.
| Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures |
Not applicable.
| Item 5. | Other Information |
None.
51
| Item 6. | Exhibits |
| Exhibit No. |
Description of Exhibit | |
| 10.1 | Amendment No. 2, dated as of April 28, 2016, to the License Agreement between the Company and ReGenTree, LLC, dated January 28, 2015, which is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-15070) (filed August 22, 2016). | |
| 10.2 | Amendment No. 2, dated as of April May 11, 2016, to Joint Venture Agreement between the Company and GtreeBNT Co., Ltd. dated January 28, 2015, which is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-15070) (filed August 22, 2016). | |
| 10.3 | Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 27, 2016, by and among the Company and the Purchasers identified therein, which is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-15070) (filed July 1, 2016). | |
| 10.4 | Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 27, 2016, by and among the Company and the Purchasers identified therein, which is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-15070) (filed July 1, 2016). | |
| 31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* | |
| 31.2 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.** | |
| 101 | The following materials from the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Balance Sheets at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015; (ii) Condensed Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015; (iii) Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015; and (iv) Notes to Condensed financial statements. | |
| * | Filed herewith. |
| ** | Furnished herewith. |
52
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. | ||
| (Registrant) | ||
| Date: November 14, 2016 | /s/J.J. Finkelstein | |
| J.J. Finkelstein | ||
| President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
| (On Behalf of the Registrant) |
53
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, J.J. Finkelstein certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.; |
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the condensed financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
| 4. | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
| (a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
| (b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of condensed financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
| (c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; |
| (d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
| 5. | The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| (a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
| (b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: November 14, 2016
| /s/J.J. Finkelstein | |
| J.J. Finkelstein | |
| President and Chief Executive Officer | |
| (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2016 (the “Report”), I, J.J. Finkelstein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Report. |
This certification accompanies this Report to which it relates, shall not be deemed “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Date: November 14, 2016
| /s/J.J. Finkelstein | |
| J.J. Finkelstein | |
| President and Chief Executive Officer | |
| (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
Document And Entity Information - shares |
9 Months Ended | |
|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2016 |
Nov. 11, 2016 |
|
| Document Information [Line Items] | ||
| Document Type | 10-Q | |
| Amendment Flag | false | |
| Document Period End Date | Sep. 30, 2016 | |
| Document Fiscal Year Focus | 2016 | |
| Document Fiscal Period Focus | Q3 | |
| Entity Registrant Name | REGENERX BIOPHARMACEUTICALS INC | |
| Entity Central Index Key | 0000707511 | |
| Current Fiscal Year End Date | --12-31 | |
| Entity Filer Category | Smaller Reporting Company | |
| Trading Symbol | RGRX | |
| Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding | 106,787,151 |
Condensed Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) - USD ($) |
Sep. 30, 2016 |
Dec. 31, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Property and equipment, accumulated depreciation (in dollars) | $ 91,288 | $ 88,794 |
| Preferred stock, par value (in dollars per share) | $ 0.001 | $ 0.001 |
| Preferred stock, shares authorized | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Preferred stock, shares issued | 0 | 0 |
| Common stock, par value (in dollars per share) | $ 0.001 | $ 0.001 |
| Common stock, shares authorized | 200,000,000 | 200,000,000 |
| Common stock, shares issued | 106,787,151 | 101,640,092 |
| Common stock, shares, outstanding | 106,787,151 | 101,640,092 |
Condensed Statements of Operations - USD ($) |
3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2016 |
Sep. 30, 2015 |
Sep. 30, 2016 |
Sep. 30, 2015 |
|
| Revenues | $ 12,706 | $ 5,510 | $ 80,602 | $ 50,510 |
| Operating expenses | ||||
| Research and development | 50,061 | 48,714 | 213,387 | 162,485 |
| General and administrative | 341,224 | 341,772 | 1,195,862 | 1,214,572 |
| Total operating expenses | 391,285 | 390,486 | 1,409,249 | 1,377,057 |
| Loss from operations | (378,579) | (384,976) | (1,328,647) | (1,326,547) |
| Interest and other income | 0 | 0 | 0 | 101 |
| Interest expense | (43,577) | (43,576) | (129,779) | (129,307) |
| Change in fair value of derivative liabilities | 1,283,833 | (701,000) | 1,265,499 | (3,154,500) |
| Net income (loss) | $ 861,677 | $ (1,129,552) | $ (192,927) | $ (4,610,253) |
| Basic net income (loss) per common share | $ 0.01 | $ (0.01) | $ (0.00) | $ (0.05) |
| Diluted net income (loss) per common share | $ 0.01 | $ (0.01) | $ (0.00) | $ (0.05) |
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic | 106,787,151 | 101,640,092 | 103,405,871 | 101,489,792 |
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - diluted | 127,489,808 | 101,640,092 | 103,405,871 | 101,489,792 |
ORGANIZATION, BUSINESS OVERVIEW AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION |
9 Months Ended | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2016 | ||||||||||||||
| Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
| Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements Disclosure [Text Block] |
Organization and Nature of Operations. RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (“RegeneRx”, the “Company”, “We”, “Us”, “Our”), a Delaware corporation, was incorporated in 1982. We are focused on the discovery and development of novel molecules to accelerate tissue and organ repair. Our operations are confined to one business segment: the development and marketing of product candidates based on Thymosin Beta 4 (“Tβ4”), an amino acid peptide. Management Plans. On June 27, 2016, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Sabby Healthcare Master Fund, Ltd., and Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund, Ltd. (collectively, “Sabby”) pursuant to which we agreed to sell, and the purchasers agreed to purchase, an aggregate of 5,147,059 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 5,147,059 shares of common stock, which we refer to as the 2016 Offering (see note 8). We received approximately $1,520,000 in net proceeds from the 2016 Offering. We believe our current cash on hand will fund our planned operations into the 4th quarter of 2017. In May 2016, we announced the top line data from the Phase 2/3 clinical trial in patients with dry eye syndrome (“DES”), sponsored by our U.S. joint venture, ReGenTree, LLC. Although the co-primary endpoints were not met, ReGenTree demonstrated RGN-259’s protective efficacy in improving signs and symptom of DES, which are in line with certain results observed in the previous Phase 2a trial. Importantly, ReGenTree identified what we believe to be approvable sign and symptom endpoints, which had high statistical significance. The FDA approved ReGenTree’s Phase 3 protocol for DES in late summer and we initiated a second Phase 3 trial that has begun enrolling approxiamtely 500 patients. On January 28, 2015, we announced that we had entered into a Joint Venture Agreement (the “Joint Venture Agreement”) with GtreeBNT Co., Ltd., a Korean pharma company (“GtreeBNT”) and shareholder of the Company. The Joint Venture Agreement provides for the creation of an entity, ReGenTree, LLC (“ReGenTree”), jointly owned by us and GtreeBNT, that will commercialize RGN-259 for treatment of dry eye and neurotrophic keratopathy, an orphan indication in the United States. GtreeBNT is responsible for funding all product development and commercialization efforts, and holds a majority interest of ReGenTree that varies depending on development milestones achieved and eventual commercialization path, if successful. RegeneRx’s initial ownership interest in ReGenTree was 49% and was reduced to 42% after the clinical study report was filed for the Phase 2/3 dry eye clinical trial. Based on when, and if, certain additional development milestones are achieved in the U.S. with RGN-259, our equity ownership in ReGenTree may be incrementally reduced to between 42% and 25%, with 25% being our final equity ownership upon approval of an NDA for Dry Eye Syndrome in the U.S. In addition, we retain a single digit to low double-digit royalty on commercial sales as described below. In the event the ReGenTree entity is acquired or there is a change of control that occurs following achievement of an NDA, RegeneRx shall be entitled to a minimum of 40% of proceeds paid or payable and will forgo any future royalties. RegeneRx holds one of three board seats ReGenTree’s board and certain major decisions and transactions within ReGenTree, such as commercialization strategy, mergers, and acquisitions, require RegeneRx’s board designee’s consent. In conjunction with the Joint Venture Agreement, we also entered into a royalty-bearing license agreement (the “License Agreement”) with ReGenTree pursuant to which we granted to ReGenTree the right to develop and exclusively commercialize RGN-259 in the United States. We received a total of $1 million in two tranches under the terms of the License Agreement. The first tranche of $500,000 was received in March 2015 and a second in the amount of $500,000 was received in September 2015. On April 6, 2016, we received $250,000 from ReGenTree and executed an amendment to the license agreement on April 28, 2016. Under the amendment the territorial rights were expanded to include Canada and we are also entitled to royalties as a percentage of net sales ranging from the single digits to the low-double digits based on the medical indications approved and whether the Joint Venture commercializes products directly or through a third party. In September 2015, ReGenTree began a Phase 2/3 clinical trial in patients with DES and a Phase 3 clinical trial in patients with neurotrophic keratopathy (“NK”), both in the U.S. In January 2016, the DES trial completed enrollment of all patients in the trial. The last patient received the last treatment in February. Results from the DES trial were released in early May 2016. The trial, which enrolled 317 subjects, tested two doses of RGN-259 eye drops containing 0.05% and 0.1% concentrations of the Tβ4 four times daily for 28 days vs. placebo. On Day 29, the day after the 28th and final day of dosing, patients were subject to the Controlled Adverse Environment (“CAE”) challenge. Co-primary endpoints were total corneal fluorescein staining score change on the 29th day pre-CAE and post-CAE (sign) and total ocular discomfort score change on the 29th day pre-CAE and post-CAE (symptom). Although the co-primary endpoints were not met, we demonstrated RGN-259’s protective efficacy in improving signs and symptoms of DES in sub-groups of patients, which is in line with the results observed in the previous Phase 2a trial. Importantly, we identified approvable sign and symptom endpoints, which were met with statistical significance and have been designated as the primary endpoints of our current Phase 3 trial. RGN-259 was safe and well-tolerated and comfortable for the patients with no irritation upon instillation. There were no significant drug-related adverse events for both concentrations. The safety profile is consistent with that observed in the previous Phase 2a trial. The NK trial, a smaller study in an orphan population, has enrolled eleven patients thus far, and has three additional patients being screened with a goal of forty-six. Of the eight original clinical sites for the study, six are enrolling patients, one has yet to receive IRB approval to begin enrolling patients, and one was unable to consummate a clinical contract with ReGenTree. ReGenTree is adding four additional sites and has retained a specialized recruitment center to accelerate patient enrollment. Currently, we have active partnerships in three major territories: the U.S., China and Pan Asia. Our partners have been moving forward and making progress in each territory. In each case, the cost of development is being borne by our partners with no financial obligation for RegeneRx. Lee's Pharmaceutical Ltd. (“Lee’s”), RegeneRx's licensee in China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan, previously received notice from China's FDA (“CFDA”) declining its investigational new drug (“IND”) application for a Phase 2b dry eye clinical trial because the API (active pharmaceutical ingredient or Tß4) was manufactured outside of China. The API was manufactured in the U.S. and provided to Lee's by RegeneRx pursuant to a license agreement to develop RGN-259 ophthalmic eye drops in the licensed territory. However, this year, the CFDA modified its manufacturing regulations and will now allow Chinese companies to utilize API manufactured outside of China for Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials. We have not been informed of a projected starting date for Phase 2 trials but expect it sometime in mid-2017. GtreeBNT, RegeneRx's licensee in Korea, Australia, Japan and a number of other countries in Asia, filed an IND with the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety to conduct a Phase 2/3 study with RGN-259 in patients with dry eye syndrome and in July 2015 received approval to conduct the trial. GtreeBNT has recently informed us that it believes marketing approval in the U.S. will allow expedited marketing in Korea, possibly without the need for a clinical trial. We still have significant clinical assets to develop, primarily RGN-352 (injectable formulation of Tß4 for cardiac and CNS disorders) in the U.S., Pan Asia, and Europe, and RGN-259 in the EU. Regarding the EU, our goal is to wait until the results are obtained from the current ophthalmic clinical trials before licensing or developing RGN-259 in that territory. If successful, this should allow us to obtain a higher value for the asset at that time. However, we intend to continue to develop RGN-352, either by obtaining grants to fund a Phase 2a clinical trial in the cardiovascular or central nervous system fields or finding a suitable partner with the resources and capabilities to develop it as we have with RGN-259. We anticipate incurring additional losses in the future as we continue to explore the potential clinical benefits of Tß4-based product candidates over multiple indications. We have entered into a series of strategic partnerships under licensing and joint venture agreements where our partners are responsible for advancing development of our product candidates with multiple clinical trials started in 2015 and an additional Phase 3 trial that began in Q3 2016. We will need additional funds to continue operations during the fourth quarter of 2017 as well as substantial additional funds in order to significantly advance development of our unlicensed programs. Accordingly, we will continue to evaluate opportunities to raise additional capital by exploring various alternatives, including, without limitation, a public or private placement of our securities, debt financing, corporate collaboration and licensing arrangements, or the sale of our company or certain of our intellectual property rights. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern. This basis of accounting contemplates the recovery of our assets and the satisfaction of our liabilities in the normal course of business. Although we intend to continue to seek additional financing or additional strategic partners, we may not be able to complete a financing or corporate transaction, either on favorable terms or at all. If we are unable to complete a financing or strategic transaction, we may not be able to continue as a going concern after our funds have been exhausted, and we could be required to significantly curtail or cease operations, file for bankruptcy or liquidate and dissolve. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain any sources of funding. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be forced to take any such actions. In addition to our current operational requirements, we continually refine our operating strategy and evaluate alternative clinical uses of Tß4. However, substantial additional resources will be needed before we will be able to achieve sustained profitability. Consequently, we continually evaluate alternative sources of financing such as the sharing of development costs through strategic collaboration agreements. There can be no assurance that our financing efforts will be successful and, if we are not able to obtain sufficient levels of financing, we would delay certain clinical and/or research activities and our financial condition would be materially and adversely affected. Even if we are able to obtain sufficient funding, other factors including competition, dependence on third parties, uncertainty regarding patents, protection of proprietary rights, manufacturing of peptides, and technology obsolescence could have a significant impact on us and our operations. To achieve profitability, we, and/or a partner, must successfully conduct pre-clinical studies and clinical trials, obtain required regulatory approvals and successfully manufacture and market those pharmaceuticals we wish to commercialize. The time required to reach profitability is highly uncertain, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve sustained profitability, if at all. Basis of Presentation. The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for each period presented. These statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and with the rules and regulations of the SEC, for interim financial statements. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP. The accounting policies underlying our unaudited interim financial statements are consistent with those underlying our audited annual financial statements. These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited annual financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, and related notes thereto, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Annual Report”). The accompanying December 31, 2015 financial information was derived from our audited financial statements included in the Annual Report. Operating results for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016 or any other future period. References in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to “authoritative guidance” are to the Accounting Standards Codification issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Critical accounting policies involved in applying our accounting policies are those that require management to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate was made and those for which different estimates reasonably could have been used for the current period. Critical accounting estimates are also those which are reasonably likely to change from period to period, and would have a material impact on the presentation of our financial condition, changes in financial condition or results of operations. Our most critical accounting estimates relate to accounting policies for fair value measurements in connection with derivative liabilities, clinical trial accruals and share-based arrangements. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Convertible Notes with Detachable Warrants. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 470-20, Debt with Conversion and Other Options, the proceeds received from convertible notes are allocated between the convertible notes and the detachable warrants based on the relative fair value of the convertible notes without the warrants and the relative fair value of the warrants. The portion of the proceeds allocated to the warrants is recognized as additional paid-in capital and a debt discount. The debt discount related to warrants is accreted into interest expense through maturity of the notes. Derivative Financial Instruments. Derivative financial instruments consist of financial instruments or other contracts that contain a notional amount and one or more underlying variables (e.g., interest rate, security price or other variable), which require no initial net investment and permit net settlement. Derivative financial instruments may be free-standing or embedded in other financial instruments. Further, derivative financial instruments are initially, and subsequently, measured at fair value and recorded as liabilities or, in rare instances, assets. We do not use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to cash-flow, market or foreign-currency risks. However, hawse have issued financial instruments including warrants that are either (i) not afforded equity classification, (ii) embody risks not clearly and closely related to host contracts, or (iii) may be net-cash settled by the counterparty. In certain instances, these instruments are required to be carried as derivative liabilities, at fair value, in our financial statements. In other instances these instruments are classified as equity instruments in our financial statements. The fair value of derivatives is estimated using either the Black-Scholes option pricing model or a Monte Carlo simulation model depending on facts pertaining to the derivative liability. Both option pricing models utilize a series of inputs and assumptions to arrive at a fair value at the date of inception and each reporting period. Some of the key assumptions include the likelihood of future financing, stock price volatility and discount rates. Estimating fair values of derivative financial instruments requires the development of significant and subjective estimates that may, and are likely to, change over the duration of the instrument with related changes in internal and external market factors. In addition, option-based techniques are highly volatile and sensitive to changes in the trading market price of our common stock, which has a high-historical volatility. Since derivative financial instruments are initially and subsequently carried at fair values, our operating results reflect the volatility in these estimates and assumption changes in each reporting period. Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue in accordance with the authoritative guidance for revenue recognition. We recognize revenue when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery (or passage of title) has occurred or services have been rendered, (iii) the seller's price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. We also comply with the authoritative guidance for revenue recognition regarding arrangements with multiple deliverables. Multiple-element arrangements are analyzed to determine whether the deliverables, which may include a license together with performance obligations such as providing a clinical supply of product and steering committee services, can be separated or whether they must be accounted for as a single unit of accounting. Revenue associated with licensing agreements consists of non-refundable upfront license fees and milestone payments. Non-refundable upfront license fees received under license agreements, whereby continued performance or future obligations are considered inconsequential to the relevant license technology, are recognized as revenue upon delivery of the technology. Whenever we determine that an arrangement should be accounted for as a single unit of accounting, we must determine the period over which the performance obligations will be performed and revenue will be recognized. Revenue will be recognized using either a relative performance or straight-line method. We recognize revenue using the relative performance method provided that the we can reasonably estimate the level of effort required to complete our performance obligations under an arrangement and such performance obligations are provided on a best-efforts basis. Revenue recognized is limited to the lesser of the cumulative amount of payments received or the cumulative amount of revenue earned, as determined using the relative performance method, as of each reporting period. If we cannot reasonably estimate the level of effort required to complete our performance obligations under an arrangement, the performance obligations are provided on a best-efforts basis and we can reasonably estimate when the performance obligation ceases or the remaining obligations become inconsequential and perfunctory, then the total payments under the arrangement, excluding royalties and payments contingent upon achievement of substantive milestones, would be recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the period we expect to complete our performance obligations. Revenue is limited to the lesser of the cumulative amount of payments received or the cumulative amount of revenue earned, as determined using the straight-line basis, as of the period ending date. If we cannot reasonably estimate when our performance obligation either ceases or becomes inconsequential and perfunctory, then revenue is deferred until we can reasonably estimate when the performance obligation ceases or becomes inconsequential. Revenue is then recognized over the remaining estimated period of performance. We recognize consideration that is contingent upon the achievement of a milestone in its entirety as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved only if the milestone is substantive in its entirety. A milestone is considered substantive when it meets all of the following criteria:
A milestone is defined as an event (i) that can only be achieved based in whole or in part on either the entity's performance or on the occurrence of a specific outcome resulting from the entity's performance, (ii) for which there is substantive uncertainty at the date the arrangement is entered into that the event will be achieved and (iii) that would result in additional payments being due to us. Amounts received prior to satisfying the above revenue recognition criteria are recorded as deferred revenue in our accompanying condensed balance sheets. Variable Interest Entities. We have determined that the Joint Venture is a “variable interest entity”, since the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the Joint Venture to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. Further, because of GtreeBNT’s majority equity stake in the Joint Venture, voting control, control of the board of directors, and substantive management rights, and given that we do not have the power to direct the Joint Venture’s activities that most significantly impact its economic performance, we have determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of the Joint Venture and, therefore, is not required to consolidate the Joint Venture. We report our equity stake in the Joint Venture using the equity method of accounting because, while it does not control the Joint Venture, we can exert significant influence over the Joint Venture’s activities by virtue of its board representation. Because we are not obligated to fund the Joint Venture, and has not provided any financial support and has no commitment to provide financial support in the future to the Joint Venture, the carrying value of its investment in the Joint Venture is zero. As a result, we are not recognizing our share (49%) of the Joint Venture’s operating losses and will not recognize any such losses until the Joint Venture produces net income (as opposed to net losses) and at that point we will reduce its share of the Joint Venture’s net income by its share of previously suspended net losses. As of September 30, 2016, because it has not provided any financial support, we have has no financial exposure as a result of its variable interest in the Joint Venture. Research and Development. Research and development (“R&D”) costs are expensed as incurred and include all of the wholly-allocable costs associated with our various clinical programs passed through to us by our outsourced vendors. Those costs include: manufacturing Tβ4; formulation of Tβ4 into the various product candidates; stability for both Tβ4 and the various formulations; pre-clinical toxicology; safety and pharmacokinetic studies; clinical trial management; medical oversight; laboratory evaluations; statistical data analysis; regulatory compliance; quality assurance; and other related activities. R&D includes cash and non-cash compensation, payroll taxes, travel and other miscellaneous costs of our internal R&D personnel, part-time hourly employees and external consultants dedicated to R&D efforts. R&D also includes an allocation of our common infrastructure costs for office space and communications. Cost of Preclinical Studies and Clinical Trials. We accrue estimated costs for preclinical studies based on estimates of work performed. We estimate expenses incurred for clinical trials that are in process based on patient enrollment and based on clinical data collection and management. Costs based on clinical data collection and management are recognized based on estimates of unbilled goods and services received in the reporting period. We monitor the progress of the trials and their related activities and adjust the accruals accordingly. Adjustments to accruals are charged to expense in the period in which the facts that give rise to the adjustments become known. In the event of early termination of a clinical trial, we would accrue an amount based on estimates of the remaining non-cancelable obligations associated with winding down the clinical trial. Recent Accounting Pronouncements. In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern. The new standard requires management to evaluate on a regular basis whether any conditions or events have arisen that could raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The guidance 1) provides a definition for the term “substantial doubt,” 2) requires an evaluation every reporting period, interim periods included, 3) provides principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans to alleviate the substantial doubt, 4) requires certain disclosures if the substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of management’s plans, 5) requires an express statement, as well as other disclosures, if the substantial doubt is not alleviated, and 6) requires an assessment period of one year from the date the financial statements are issued. The standard is effective for reporting year ending December 31, 2016 and early adoption is not permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that this new accounting pronouncement will have on its financial statements. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which provides guidance for revenue recognition for contracts, superseding the previous revenue recognition requirements, along with most existing industry-specific guidance. The guidance requires an entity to review contracts in five steps: 1) identify the contract, 2) identify performance obligations, 3) determine the transaction price, 4) allocate the transaction price, and 5) recognize revenue. The new standard will result in enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue arising from contracts with customers. In July 2015, the FASB delayed the effective date of this standard by one year. The new standard will be effective for the Company’s reporting year beginning on January 1, 2018, and early adoption of the standard as of January 1, 2017 is permitted. In March 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to clarify the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. In April 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to clarify the identification of performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. In May 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to clarify guidance in certain areas and add some practical expedients to the guidance. The amendments in these 2016 updates do not change the core principle of the previously issued guidance in May 2014. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that this new accounting pronouncement will have on its financial statements. In November 2015, the FASB issued new guidance on the balance sheet classification of deferred taxes. To simplify presentation, the new guidance requires that all deferred tax assets and liabilities, along with any related valuation allowance, be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. The accounting standard is effective for public business entities for annual reporting periods (including interim reporting periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our financial statements. In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The accounting standard primarily affects the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. In addition, it includes a clarification related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. The accounting guidance is effective for annual reporting periods (including interim periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for the provision to record fair value changes for financial liabilities under the fair value option resulting from instrument-specific credit risk in other comprehensive income. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the pronouncement will have on its financial statements. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which supersedes ASC Topic 840, Leases, and creates a new topic, ASC Topic 842, Leases. ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize a lease liability and a lease asset for all leases, including operating leases, with a term greater than 12 months on its balance sheet. ASU 2016-02 also expands the required quantitative and qualitative disclosures surrounding leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. We have determined that the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will currently have no significant impact on its financial statements. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-07, Equity Method and Joint Ventures, which affects all entities that have an investment that becomes qualified for the equity method of accounting as a result of an increase in the level of ownership or degree of influence. ASU 2016-07 is effective for us beginning on January 1, 2017, early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect this ASU will have on its financial statements. In March 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update which simplified several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods. We are currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of this ASU will have on its financial statements. |
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE |
9 Months Ended | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2016 | ||||
| Earnings Per Share [Abstract] | ||||
| Earnings Per Share [Text Block] |
Basic net income (loss) per common share for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, is based on the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the periods. Diluted income (loss) per share is based on the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period in which a loss is incurred. In periods where there is net income, diluted income per share is based on the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding plus dilutive securities with a purchase or conversion price below the per share price of our common stock on the last day of the reporting period. The potentially dilutive securities include 27,103,956 shares and 22,556,951 shares in 2016 and 2015, respectively, reserved for the conversion of convertible debt or exercise of outstanding options and warrants. For the three month period ended September 30, 2016, 20,702,657 dilutive securities related to convertible debt, options and warrants were included in the diluted earnings per share calculation. |
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION |
9 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Text Block] |
We measure stock-based compensation expense based on the grant date fair value of the awards, which is then recognized over the period which service is required to be provided. We estimate the value of our stock option awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and amortize that cost over the expected term of the grant. We recognized $66,358 and $45,209 in stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 and $289,220 and $183,207 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. We expect to recognize the compensation cost related to non-vested options as of September 30, 2016 of $464,760 over the weighted average remaining recognition period of 1.1 years. We used the following forward-looking range of assumptions to value the 940,000 stock options granted to employees, consultants and directors during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and the 1,635,000 stock options granted to employees, consultants and directors during the nine months ended September 30, 2015:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INCOME TAXES |
9 Months Ended | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2016 | ||||
| Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract] | ||||
| Income Tax Disclosure [Text Block] |
As of September 30, 2016, there have been no material changes to our uncertain tax positions disclosures as provided in Note 9 of the Annual Report. The tax returns for all years in the Company’s major tax jurisdictions were not settled as of January 1, 2016; no changes in settled tax years have occurred through September 30, 2016. Due to the existence of tax attribute carryforwards (which are currently offset by a full valuation allowance), the Company treats all years’ tax positions as unsettled due to the taxing authorities’ ability to modify these attributes. |
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS |
9 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block] |
The authoritative guidance for fair value measurements defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or the most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact, and (iv) willing to transact. The guidance describes a fair value hierarchy based on the levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value which are the following: Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. Level 3 — Unobservable inputs. As of September 30, 2016 and 2015, our only qualifying assets that required measurement under the foregoing fair value hierarchy were money market funds included in Cash and Cash Equivalents valued at $1,061,000 and $660,000, respectively, using Level 1 inputs. Our September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 balance sheets reflect qualifying liabilities resulting from the price protection provision in the convertible promissory notes issued in March, July and September of 2013 and January 2014 (see Note 6). Our September 30, 2016 balance sheet also reflects qualifying liabilities related to the issuance of common stock and warrants in our 2016 Offering. Certain price protection anti-dilution features of the Securities Purchase Agreement and Warrants were determined to be embedded derivatives. An independent valuation expert calculated the fair value of the embedded derivatives using a complex, customized Monte Carlo simulation model suitable to value path dependent American options. We evaluated the derivative liability embedded in the series of convertible notes to determine if an adjustment to the carrying value of the liability was required at September 30, 2016 using the following assumptions.
Given the conditions surrounding the trading of the Company’s equity securities, the Company values its derivative instruments related to embedded conversion features from the issuance of convertible debentures in accordance with the Level 3 guidelines. For the 3 month period ended September 30, 2016, the following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances for financial instruments that are recognized at fair value in these financial statements.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CONVERTIBLE NOTES |
9 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt Disclosure [Abstract] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt Disclosure [Text Block] |
2012 Convertible Note On October 19, 2012 we completed a private placement of convertible notes (the “2012 Notes”) raising an aggregate of $300,000 in gross proceeds. The 2012 Notes were originally to mature after twenty-four (24) months from issuance. In order to conserve the Company’s capital, in October 2014 the Investors agreed to extend the maturity date to October 19, 2017, all other terms were unchanged. The 2012 Notes bear interest at a rate of five percent (5%) per annum and are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of fifteen cents ($0.15) per share (subject to adjustment as described in the 2012 Notes) at any time prior to repayment, at the election of the Investors. In the aggregate, the 2012 Notes are convertible into up to 2,000,000 shares of our common stock excluding interest. At any time prior to maturity of the 2012 Notes, with the consent of the holders of a majority in interest of the 2012 Notes, we may prepay the outstanding principal amount of the 2012 Notes plus unpaid accrued interest without penalty. Upon the commission of any act of bankruptcy by the Company, the execution by the Company of a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, the filing by or against the Company of a petition in bankruptcy or any petition for relief under the federal bankruptcy act or the continuation of such petition without dismissal for a period of ninety (90) days or more, or the appointment of a receiver or trustee to take possession of the property or assets of the Company, the outstanding principal and all accrued interest on the 2012 Notes will accelerate and automatically become immediately due and payable. In connection with the issuance of the 2012 Notes we also issued warrants to each note holder. The warrants are exercisable for an aggregate of 400,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of fifteen cents ($0.15) per share for a period of five years. The relative fair value of the warrants issued is $27,097, calculated using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model value of $0.07 with an expected and contractual life of 5 years, an assumed volatility of 74.36%, and a risk-free interest rate of 0.77%. The warrants were recorded as additional paid-in capital and a discount on the 2012 Notes of $27,097. Non-cash interest expense related to the debt discount during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 totaled $3,782 and $11,258, respectively. The investors, and the principal amount of their respective 2012 Notes and number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of their respective warrants, are as set forth below:
Sinaf S. A. is a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Aptafin S.p.A., or Aptafin. Aptafin is owned directly by Paolo Cavazza and members of his family, who directly and indirectly own 38% of Sigma-Tau, our largest stockholder. The other Investors are members of our Board of Directors including Mr. Finkelstein who serves as our CEO and also the Chairman of our Board of Directors and Dr. Goldstein who also serves as our Chief Scientific Advisor. In the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company amended the existing October 2012 convertible debt agreement with the lenders, solely to extend the due date of the principal and accrued unpaid interest until October 19, 2017. No other terms of the original debt were amended or modified, and the lenders did not reduce the borrowed amount or change the interest rate of the debt. The Company considered the restructuring a troubled debt restructuring as a result of the Company’s financial condition. At the date of the amendment, all existing debt discounts and deferred financing fees were fully amortized and the amendment did not involve any additional fees paid to the lender or third parties; as such there was no gain recognized as a result of the amendment. 2013 Convertible Notes On March 29, 2013, we completed a private placement of convertible notes (the “March 2013 Notes”) raising an aggregate of $225,000 in gross proceeds. The March 2013 Notes bear interest at a rate of five percent (5%) per annum, mature sixty (60) months after their date of issuance and are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of six cents ($0.06) per share (subject to adjustment as described in the March 2013 Notes) at any time prior to repayment, at the election of the investor. In the aggregate, the March 2013 Notes are initially convertible into up to 3,750,000 shares of our common stock. At any time prior to maturity of the March 2013 Notes, with the consent of the holders of a majority in interest of the March 2013 Notes, we may prepay the outstanding principal amount of the March 2013 Notes plus unpaid accrued interest without penalty. Upon the commission of any act of bankruptcy by the Company, the execution by the Company of a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, the filing by or against the Company of a petition in bankruptcy or any petition for relief under the Federal bankruptcy act or the continuation of such petition without dismissal for a period of ninety (90) days or more, or the appointment of a receiver or trustee to take possession of the property or assets of the Company, the outstanding principal and all accrued interest on the March 2013 Notes will accelerate and automatically become immediately due and payable. The investors in the offering included two directors of the Company, Dr. Goldstein and Joseph C. McNay, an outside director. The principal amounts of their respective March 2013 Notes are as set forth below:
The Company has evaluated the terms of the March 2013 Notes which contain a down round provision under which the conversion price could be decreased as a result of future equity offerings, as defined in the March 2013 Notes. The adjustment would reduce the conversion price of the March 2013 Notes to be equivalent to that of the newly issued stock or stock-related instruments. As a result, the Company concluded that the conversion feature represented an embedded conversion feature for accounting purposes and should be recognized as a derivative liability, requiring a mark-to-market adjustment at the end of each reporting period until the related March 2013 Notes have been settled. The bifurcated liability of $225,000 was recorded on the date of issuance which resulted in a residual debt value of $0. The discount related to the embedded feature will be accreted back to debt through the maturity of the March 2013 Notes. On July 5, 2013, we completed a private placement of convertible notes (the “July 2013 Notes”) raising an aggregate of $100,000 in gross proceeds. The July 2013 Notes bear interest at a rate of five percent (5%) per annum, mature sixty (60) months after their date of issuance and are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of six cents ($0.06) per share (subject to adjustment as described in the July 2013 Notes) at any time prior to repayment, at the election of the investor. In the aggregate, the July 2013 Notes are initially convertible into up to 1,666,667 shares of our common stock. At any time prior to maturity of the July 2013 Notes, with the consent of the holders of a majority in interest of the July 2013 Notes, we may prepay the outstanding principal amount of the July 2013 Notes plus unpaid accrued interest without penalty. Upon the commission of any act of bankruptcy by the Company, the execution by the Company of a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, the filing by or against the Company of a petition in bankruptcy or any petition for relief under the Federal bankruptcy act or the continuation of such petition without dismissal for a period of ninety (90) days or more, or the appointment of a receiver or trustee to take possession of the property or assets of the Company, the outstanding principal and all accrued interest on the July 2013 Notes will accelerate and automatically become immediately due and payable. The investors in the offering included four directors of the Company, Mr. Finkelstein, Dr. Goldstein, Mr. McNay and L. Thompson Bowles, an outside director. The principal amounts of their respective July 2013 Notes are as set forth below:
The Company has evaluated the terms of the July 2013 Notes which contain a down round provision under which the conversion price could be decreased as a result of future equity offerings, as defined in the July 2013 Notes. The adjustment would reduce the conversion price of the July 2013 Notes to be equivalent to that of the newly issued stock or stock-related instruments. As a result, the Company concluded that the conversion feature represented an embedded conversion feature for accounting purposes and should be recognized as a derivative liability, requiring a mark-to-market adjustment at the end of each reporting period until the related July 2013 Notes have been settled. The bifurcated liability of $66,667 was recorded on the date of issuance which resulted in a residual debt value of $33,333. The discount related to the embedded feature will be accreted back to debt through the maturity of the notes. On September 11, 2013, we completed a private placement of convertible notes raising an aggregate of $321,000 in gross proceeds (the “September 2013 Notes”). The September 2013 Notes bear interest at a rate of five percent (5%) per annum, mature sixty (60) months after their date of issuance and are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of six cents ($0.06) per share (subject to adjustment as described in the September 2013 Notes) at any time prior to repayment, at the election of the investor. In the aggregate, the September 2013 Notes are initially convertible into up to 5,350,000 shares of our common stock. At any time prior to maturity of the September 2013 Notes, with the consent of the holders of a majority in interest of the September 2013 Notes, we may prepay the outstanding principal amount of the September 2013 Notes plus unpaid accrued interest without penalty. Upon the commission of any act of bankruptcy by the Company, the execution by the Company of a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, the filing by or against the Company of a petition in bankruptcy or any petition for relief under the federal bankruptcy act or the continuation of such petition without dismissal for a period of ninety (90) days or more, or the appointment of a receiver or trustee to take possession of the property or assets of the Company, the outstanding principal and all accrued interest on the September 2013 Notes will accelerate and automatically become immediately due and payable. The investors in the offering included an affiliate and four directors of the Company. The principal amounts of the affiliate and directors respective September 2013 Notes are as set forth below:
The Company has evaluated the terms of the September 2013 Notes which contain a down round provision under which the conversion price could be decreased as a result of future equity offerings, as defined in the September 2013 Notes. The adjustment would reduce the conversion price of the September 2013 Notes to be equivalent to that of the newly issued stock or stock-related instruments. As a result, the Company concluded that the conversion feature represented an embedded conversion feature for accounting purposes and should be recognized as a derivative liability, requiring a mark-to-market adjustment at the end of each reporting period until the related September 2013 Notes have been settled. The bifurcated liability of $267,500 was recorded on the date of issuance which resulted in a residual debt value of $53,500. The discount related to the embedded feature will be accreted back to debt through the maturity of the September 2013 Notes. 2014 Convertible Notes On January 7, 2014, we completed a private placement of convertible notes raising an aggregate of $55,000 in gross proceeds (the “January 2014 Notes”). The January 2014 Notes will pay interest at a rate of 5% per annum, mature 60 months after their date of issuance and are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $0.06 per share (subject to adjustment as described in the January 2014 Notes) at any time prior to repayment, at the election of the investor. In the aggregate, the Notes are initially convertible into up to 916,667 shares of our common stock. At any time prior to maturity of the January 2014 Notes, with the consent of the holders of a majority in interest of the January 2014 Notes, we may prepay the outstanding principal amount of the January 2014 Notes plus unpaid accrued interest without penalty. Upon the commission of any act of bankruptcy by the Company, the execution by the Company of a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, the filing by or against the Company of a petition in bankruptcy or any petition for relief under the federal bankruptcy act or the continuation of such petition without dismissal for a period of 90 days or more, or the appointment of a receiver or trustee to take possession of the property or assets of the Company, the outstanding principal and all accrued interest on the January 2014 Notes will accelerate and automatically become immediately due and payable. The investors in the offering included three directors of the Company. The principal amounts of their respective Notes are as set forth below:
The Company has evaluated the terms of the January 2014 Notes which contain a down round provision under which the conversion price could be decreased as a result of future equity offerings, as defined in the January 2014 Notes. The adjustment would reduce the conversion price of the January 2014 Notes to be equivalent to that of the newly issued stock or stock-related instruments. As a result, the Company concluded that the conversion feature represented an embedded conversion feature for accounting purposes and should be recognized as a derivative liability, requiring a mark-to-market adjustment at the end of each reporting period until the related January 2014 Notes have been settled. The bifurcated liability of $55,000 was recorded on the date of issuance which resulted in a residual debt value of $0. The discount related to the embedded feature will be accreted back to debt through the maturity of the January 2014 Notes. The Company recorded interest expense and discount accretion as set forth below:
The fair value of the derivative liability is as follows:
The change in fair value of derivative liability is as follows:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LICENSE AGREEMENT |
9 Months Ended | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2016 | ||||
| License Agreement [Abstract] | ||||
| License Agreement [Text Block] |
Joint Venture Agreement with GtreeBNT On January 28, 2015, the Company entered into the Joint Venture Agreement with GtreeBNT, a shareholder in the Company. The Joint Venture Agreement provides for the creation of the Joint Venture, jointly owned by the Company and GtreeBNT, which is commercializing RGN-259 for treatment of dry eye and neurotrophic keratopathy in the United States and Canada. GtreeBNT is solely responsible for funding all the product development and commercialization efforts of the Joint Venture. GtreeBNT made an initial contribution of $3 million in cash and received an initial equity stake of 51%. RegeneRx’s ownership interest in ReGenTree was reduced to 42% when the Clinical Study Report was filed for the Phase 2/3 dry eye clinical trial. Based on when, and if, certain additional development milestones are achieved in the U.S. with RGN-259, our equity ownership may be incrementally reduced to between 42% and 25%, with 25% being the final equity ownership upon approval of an NDA for DES in the U.S. In addition to our equity ownership, RegeneRx retains a royalty on net sales that varies between single and low double digits, depending on whether commercial sales are made by ReGenTree or a licensee. In the event ReGenTree is acquired or there is a change of control that occurs following achievement of an NDA, RegeneRx shall be entitled to a minimum of 40% of all proceeds paid or payable and will forgo any future royalties. The Company is not required or otherwise obligated to provide financial support to the Joint Venture. The Joint Venture is responsible for executing all development and commercialization activities under the License Agreement, which activities will be directed by a joint development committee comprised of representatives of the Company and GtreeBNT. The License Agreement has a term that extends to the later of the expiration of the last patent covered by the License Agreement or 25 years from the first commercial sale under the License Agreement. The License Agreement may be earlier terminated if the Joint Venture fails to meet certain commercialization milestones, if either party breaches the License Agreement and fails to cure such breach, as a result of government action that limits the ability of the Joint Venture to commercialize the product, as a result of a challenge to a licensed patent, following termination of the license between the Company and certain agencies of the United States federal government, or upon the bankruptcy of either party. Under the License Agreement, the Company received $1.0 million in up-front payments and is entitled to receive royalties on the Joint Venture’s future sales of products. On April 6, 2016, we received $250,000 from ReGenTree and executed an amendment to the license agreement on April 28, 2016. Under the amendment the territorial rights were expanded to include Canada. The Company is accounting for the License Agreement with the Joint Venture as a revenue arrangement. The Company has determined that the deliverables within the License Agreement, including a delivered element (providing the license) and an undelivered element (participation on the joint development committee), do not have stand-alone value and, as such, are treated as a single unit of accounting. As a result, the Company is recognizing the up-front milestone payments as revenue ratably over the anticipated life of the joint development committee, or 25 years. The joint development committee commenced activities as of April 1, 2015 therefore the Company has begun recognizing the revenue for the license fee. Revenue will be recognized for future royalty payments as they are earned. |
2016 OFFERING |
9 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sale of Stock 2016 Offering [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sale of Stock 2016 Offering Disclosure [Text Block] |
On June 27, 2016, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Sabby (“SPA”) pursuant to which we agreed to sell, and the purchasers agreed to purchase, an aggregate of 5,147,059 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 5,147,059 shares of common stock, which we refer to as the 2016 Offering, and in conjunction with the closing of such transaction we issued warrants to purchase 257,353 shares of common stock to our placement agent. The SPA contains customary representations, warranties and covenants by the Company and the purchasers. In addition, the SPA provides that each purchaser has a right, subject to certain exceptions described in the agreement, to participate in future issuances of equity and debt securities by us for a period of 12 months following the effective date of this registration statement, and certain price protections that provide for the grant of additional shares of common stock if we sell shares for less than $0.34 per share (the purchase price in the 2016 Offering) during such 12-month period. Moreover, we agreed, subject to certain exceptions, not to sell or announce the sale of our securities for five months from the effective date of this registration statement. The Company evaluated various features of the SPA and Warrant Agreements issued in the offering. The SPA includes certain embedded features that have to be evaluated under the guidance in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, including a “right” to receive additional shares of common shares for no further consideration, and is a form of non-standard “down-round” anti-dilution protection. The “right” was determined to be a “stand alone” derivative and also is considered an “embedded derivative”, the “right” was required to be bifurcated from the host instrument and accounted for as a mark-to-market derivative liability until it lapses. The investor warrants contain “non-standard” adjustments (down-round anti-dilution protection) for 12 months following issuance. The Company determined that the warrants contain certain embedded features that have to be evaluated under the guidance in ASC 815 and determined that they are also “embedded derivatives” that require bifurcation and are to be accounted for as a mark-to-market derivative liability until it lapses. In connection with the offering, the Company incurred approximately $230,000 of direct and incremental issuance costs. The portion of these costs allocated to liability-classified derivative financial instruments, approximately $214,000, was expensed in the quarter ended June 30, 2016 and is reflected under General and administrative expense in the accompanying statements of operations. The remainder of the costs was allocated to the equity-classified common stock and recognized as a direct charge to additional paid in capital. The Company has concluded the following accounting treatment for the various instruments and embedded features:
The Company allocated the total proceeds from the 2016 Offering as follows:
An independent valuation expert calculated the fair value of the embedded derivatives using a complex, customized Monte Carlo simulation model suitable to value path dependent American options. The model uses the risk neutral methodology adapted to value corporate securities. This model utilized subjective and theoretical assumptions that can materially affect fair values from period to period. |
ORGANIZATION, BUSINESS OVERVIEW AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION (Policies) |
9 Months Ended | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2016 | |||||||||||
| Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |||||||||||
| Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Basis of Presentation. The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for each period presented. These statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and with the rules and regulations of the SEC, for interim financial statements. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP. The accounting policies underlying our unaudited interim financial statements are consistent with those underlying our audited annual financial statements. These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited annual financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, and related notes thereto, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Annual Report”). The accompanying December 31, 2015 financial information was derived from our audited financial statements included in the Annual Report. Operating results for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016 or any other future period. References in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to “authoritative guidance” are to the Accounting Standards Codification issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). |
||||||||||
| Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Critical accounting policies involved in applying our accounting policies are those that require management to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate was made and those for which different estimates reasonably could have been used for the current period. Critical accounting estimates are also those which are reasonably likely to change from period to period, and would have a material impact on the presentation of our financial condition, changes in financial condition or results of operations. Our most critical accounting estimates relate to accounting policies for fair value measurements in connection with derivative liabilities, clinical trial accruals and share-based arrangements. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
||||||||||
| Convertible Notes with Detachable Warrants [Policy Text Block] | Convertible Notes with Detachable Warrants. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 470-20, Debt with Conversion and Other Options, the proceeds received from convertible notes are allocated between the convertible notes and the detachable warrants based on the relative fair value of the convertible notes without the warrants and the relative fair value of the warrants. The portion of the proceeds allocated to the warrants is recognized as additional paid-in capital and a debt discount. The debt discount related to warrants is accreted into interest expense through maturity of the notes. |
||||||||||
| Derivatives, Reporting of Derivative Activity [Policy Text Block] | Derivative Financial Instruments. Derivative financial instruments consist of financial instruments or other contracts that contain a notional amount and one or more underlying variables (e.g., interest rate, security price or other variable), which require no initial net investment and permit net settlement. Derivative financial instruments may be free-standing or embedded in other financial instruments. Further, derivative financial instruments are initially, and subsequently, measured at fair value and recorded as liabilities or, in rare instances, assets. We do not use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to cash-flow, market or foreign-currency risks. However, hawse have issued financial instruments including warrants that are either (i) not afforded equity classification, (ii) embody risks not clearly and closely related to host contracts, or (iii) may be net-cash settled by the counterparty. In certain instances, these instruments are required to be carried as derivative liabilities, at fair value, in our financial statements. In other instances these instruments are classified as equity instruments in our financial statements. The fair value of derivatives is estimated using either the Black-Scholes option pricing model or a Monte Carlo simulation model depending on facts pertaining to the derivative liability. Both option pricing models utilize a series of inputs and assumptions to arrive at a fair value at the date of inception and each reporting period. Some of the key assumptions include the likelihood of future financing, stock price volatility and discount rates. Estimating fair values of derivative financial instruments requires the development of significant and subjective estimates that may, and are likely to, change over the duration of the instrument with related changes in internal and external market factors. In addition, option-based techniques are highly volatile and sensitive to changes in the trading market price of our common stock, which has a high-historical volatility. Since derivative financial instruments are initially and subsequently carried at fair values, our operating results reflect the volatility in these estimates and assumption changes in each reporting period. |
||||||||||
| Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue in accordance with the authoritative guidance for revenue recognition. We recognize revenue when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery (or passage of title) has occurred or services have been rendered, (iii) the seller's price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. We also comply with the authoritative guidance for revenue recognition regarding arrangements with multiple deliverables. Multiple-element arrangements are analyzed to determine whether the deliverables, which may include a license together with performance obligations such as providing a clinical supply of product and steering committee services, can be separated or whether they must be accounted for as a single unit of accounting. Revenue associated with licensing agreements consists of non-refundable upfront license fees and milestone payments. Non-refundable upfront license fees received under license agreements, whereby continued performance or future obligations are considered inconsequential to the relevant license technology, are recognized as revenue upon delivery of the technology. Whenever we determine that an arrangement should be accounted for as a single unit of accounting, we must determine the period over which the performance obligations will be performed and revenue will be recognized. Revenue will be recognized using either a relative performance or straight-line method. We recognize revenue using the relative performance method provided that the we can reasonably estimate the level of effort required to complete our performance obligations under an arrangement and such performance obligations are provided on a best-efforts basis. Revenue recognized is limited to the lesser of the cumulative amount of payments received or the cumulative amount of revenue earned, as determined using the relative performance method, as of each reporting period. If we cannot reasonably estimate the level of effort required to complete our performance obligations under an arrangement, the performance obligations are provided on a best-efforts basis and we can reasonably estimate when the performance obligation ceases or the remaining obligations become inconsequential and perfunctory, then the total payments under the arrangement, excluding royalties and payments contingent upon achievement of substantive milestones, would be recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the period we expect to complete our performance obligations. Revenue is limited to the lesser of the cumulative amount of payments received or the cumulative amount of revenue earned, as determined using the straight-line basis, as of the period ending date. If we cannot reasonably estimate when our performance obligation either ceases or becomes inconsequential and perfunctory, then revenue is deferred until we can reasonably estimate when the performance obligation ceases or becomes inconsequential. Revenue is then recognized over the remaining estimated period of performance. We recognize consideration that is contingent upon the achievement of a milestone in its entirety as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved only if the milestone is substantive in its entirety. A milestone is considered substantive when it meets all of the following criteria:
A milestone is defined as an event (i) that can only be achieved based in whole or in part on either the entity's performance or on the occurrence of a specific outcome resulting from the entity's performance, (ii) for which there is substantive uncertainty at the date the arrangement is entered into that the event will be achieved and (iii) that would result in additional payments being due to us. Amounts received prior to satisfying the above revenue recognition criteria are recorded as deferred revenue in our accompanying condensed balance sheets. |
||||||||||
| Consolidation, Variable Interest Entity, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Variable Interest Entities. We have determined that the Joint Venture is a “variable interest entity”, since the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the Joint Venture to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. Further, because of GtreeBNT’s majority equity stake in the Joint Venture, voting control, control of the board of directors, and substantive management rights, and given that we do not have the power to direct the Joint Venture’s activities that most significantly impact its economic performance, we have determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of the Joint Venture and, therefore, is not required to consolidate the Joint Venture. We report our equity stake in the Joint Venture using the equity method of accounting because, while it does not control the Joint Venture, we can exert significant influence over the Joint Venture’s activities by virtue of its board representation. Because we are not obligated to fund the Joint Venture, and has not provided any financial support and has no commitment to provide financial support in the future to the Joint Venture, the carrying value of its investment in the Joint Venture is zero. As a result, we are not recognizing our share (49%) of the Joint Venture’s operating losses and will not recognize any such losses until the Joint Venture produces net income (as opposed to net losses) and at that point we will reduce its share of the Joint Venture’s net income by its share of previously suspended net losses. As of September 30, 2016, because it has not provided any financial support, we have has no financial exposure as a result of its variable interest in the Joint Venture. |
||||||||||
| Research and Development Expense, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Research and Development. Research and development (“R&D”) costs are expensed as incurred and include all of the wholly-allocable costs associated with our various clinical programs passed through to us by our outsourced vendors. Those costs include: manufacturing Tβ4; formulation of Tβ4 into the various product candidates; stability for both Tβ4 and the various formulations; pre-clinical toxicology; safety and pharmacokinetic studies; clinical trial management; medical oversight; laboratory evaluations; statistical data analysis; regulatory compliance; quality assurance; and other related activities. R&D includes cash and non-cash compensation, payroll taxes, travel and other miscellaneous costs of our internal R&D personnel, part-time hourly employees and external consultants dedicated to R&D efforts. R&D also includes an allocation of our common infrastructure costs for office space and communications. |
||||||||||
| Preclinical Studies and Clinical Trials [Policy Text Block] | Cost of Preclinical Studies and Clinical Trials. We accrue estimated costs for preclinical studies based on estimates of work performed. We estimate expenses incurred for clinical trials that are in process based on patient enrollment and based on clinical data collection and management. Costs based on clinical data collection and management are recognized based on estimates of unbilled goods and services received in the reporting period. We monitor the progress of the trials and their related activities and adjust the accruals accordingly. Adjustments to accruals are charged to expense in the period in which the facts that give rise to the adjustments become known. In the event of early termination of a clinical trial, we would accrue an amount based on estimates of the remaining non-cancelable obligations associated with winding down the clinical trial. |
||||||||||
| New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Recent Accounting Pronouncements. In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern. The new standard requires management to evaluate on a regular basis whether any conditions or events have arisen that could raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The guidance 1) provides a definition for the term “substantial doubt,” 2) requires an evaluation every reporting period, interim periods included, 3) provides principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans to alleviate the substantial doubt, 4) requires certain disclosures if the substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of management’s plans, 5) requires an express statement, as well as other disclosures, if the substantial doubt is not alleviated, and 6) requires an assessment period of one year from the date the financial statements are issued. The standard is effective for reporting year ending December 31, 2016 and early adoption is not permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that this new accounting pronouncement will have on its financial statements. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which provides guidance for revenue recognition for contracts, superseding the previous revenue recognition requirements, along with most existing industry-specific guidance. The guidance requires an entity to review contracts in five steps: 1) identify the contract, 2) identify performance obligations, 3) determine the transaction price, 4) allocate the transaction price, and 5) recognize revenue. The new standard will result in enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue arising from contracts with customers. In July 2015, the FASB delayed the effective date of this standard by one year. The new standard will be effective for the Company’s reporting year beginning on January 1, 2018, and early adoption of the standard as of January 1, 2017 is permitted. In March 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to clarify the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. In April 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to clarify the identification of performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. In May 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to clarify guidance in certain areas and add some practical expedients to the guidance. The amendments in these 2016 updates do not change the core principle of the previously issued guidance in May 2014. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that this new accounting pronouncement will have on its financial statements. In November 2015, the FASB issued new guidance on the balance sheet classification of deferred taxes. To simplify presentation, the new guidance requires that all deferred tax assets and liabilities, along with any related valuation allowance, be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. The accounting standard is effective for public business entities for annual reporting periods (including interim reporting periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our financial statements. In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The accounting standard primarily affects the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. In addition, it includes a clarification related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. The accounting guidance is effective for annual reporting periods (including interim periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for the provision to record fair value changes for financial liabilities under the fair value option resulting from instrument-specific credit risk in other comprehensive income. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the pronouncement will have on its financial statements. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which supersedes ASC Topic 840, Leases, and creates a new topic, ASC Topic 842, Leases. ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize a lease liability and a lease asset for all leases, including operating leases, with a term greater than 12 months on its balance sheet. ASU 2016-02 also expands the required quantitative and qualitative disclosures surrounding leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. We have determined that the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will currently have no significant impact on its financial statements. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-07, Equity Method and Joint Ventures, which affects all entities that have an investment that becomes qualified for the equity method of accounting as a result of an increase in the level of ownership or degree of influence. ASU 2016-07 is effective for us beginning on January 1, 2017, early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect this ASU will have on its financial statements. In March 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update which simplified several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods. We are currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of this ASU will have on its financial statements. |
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Tables) |
9 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Schedule of Share-based Payment Award, Stock Options, Valuation Assumptions [Table Text Block] | We used the following forward-looking range of assumptions to value the 940,000 stock options granted to employees, consultants and directors during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and the 1,635,000 stock options granted to employees, consultants and directors during the nine months ended September 30, 2015:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Tables) |
9 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair Value Measurements, Recurring and Nonrecurring, Valuation Techniques [Table Text Block] | We evaluated the derivative liability embedded in the series of convertible notes to determine if an adjustment to the carrying value of the liability was required at September 30, 2016 using the following assumptions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair Value Measurement Derivative Liabilities Disclosure [Table Text Block] | For the 3 month period ended September 30, 2016, the following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances for financial instruments that are recognized at fair value in these financial statements.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CONVERTIBLE NOTES (Tables) |
9 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt Disclosure [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Convertible Debt [Table Text Block] | The investors, and the principal amount of their respective 2012 Notes and number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of their respective warrants, are as set forth below:
The investors in the offering included two directors of the Company, Dr. Goldstein and Joseph C. McNay, an outside director. The principal amounts of their respective March 2013 Notes are as set forth below:
The investors in the offering included four directors of the Company, Mr. Finkelstein, Dr. Goldstein, Mr. McNay and L. Thompson Bowles, an outside director. The principal amounts of their respective July 2013 Notes are as set forth below:
The investors in the offering included an affiliate and four directors of the Company. The principal amounts of the affiliate and directors respective September 2013 Notes are as set forth below:
The investors in the offering included three directors of the Company. The principal amounts of their respective Notes are as set forth below:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest Income and Interest Expense Disclosure [Table Text Block] | The Company recorded interest expense and discount accretion as set forth below:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Schedule of Derivative Liabilities at Fair Value [Table Text Block] | The fair value of the derivative liability is as follows:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Schedule Of Change In Fair Value Of The Derivative Liability [Table Text Block] | The change in fair value of derivative liability is as follows:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 OFFERING (Tables) |
9 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sale of Stock 2016 Offering [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sale of Stock 2016 Offering Disclosure [Table Text Block] | The Company allocated the total proceeds from the 2016 Offering as follows:
|
ORGANIZATION, BUSINESS OVERVIEW AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION (Details Textual) - USD ($) |
1 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr. 06, 2016 |
Jun. 30, 2016 |
Sep. 30, 2015 |
Mar. 31, 2015 |
Jan. 28, 2015 |
Sep. 30, 2016 |
|
| ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS [Line Items] | ||||||
| Accrued Fees and Other Revenue Receivable | $ 1,000,000 | |||||
| First Tranche Amount Receivable After Enrollment Of First Patient In Ophthalmic Trial | $ 500,000 | |||||
| Second Tranche Amount Receivable After Enrollment Of The First Patient In An Ophthalmic Trial | $ 500,000 | |||||
| Percentage Of Joint Venture Operating Loss Used In Share Calculation | 49.00% | 49.00% | ||||
| Description of Equity Ownership Interest | RegeneRxs initial ownership interest in ReGenTree was 49% and was reduced to 42% after the clinical study report was filed for the Phase 2/3 dry eye clinical trial. Based on when, and if, certain additional development milestones are achieved in the U.S. with RGN-259, our equity ownership in ReGenTree may be incrementally reduced to between 42% and 25%, with 25% being our final equity ownership upon approval of an NDA for Dry Eye Syndrome in the U.S. In addition, we retain a single digit to low double-digit royalty on commercial sales as described below. In the event the ReGenTree entity is acquired or there is a change of control that occurs following achievement of an NDA, RegeneRx shall be entitled to a minimum of 40% of proceeds paid or payable and will forgo any future royalties. RegeneRx holds one of three board seats ReGenTrees board and certain major decisions and transactions within ReGenTree, such as commercialization strategy, mergers, and acquisitions, require RegeneRxs board designees consent. | |||||
| Sale of Stock 2016 Offering [Member] | ||||||
| ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS [Line Items] | ||||||
| Warrants to purchase common stock, Shares | 5,147,059 | |||||
| Stock Issued During Period, Shares, New Issues | 5,147,059 | |||||
| Stock Issued During Period, Value, New Issues | $ 1,520,000 | |||||
| ReGen Tree [Member] | ||||||
| ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS [Line Items] | ||||||
| Proceeds from Royalties Received | $ 250,000 | |||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE - (Details Textual) - shares |
3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2016 |
Sep. 30, 2016 |
Sep. 30, 2015 |
|
| Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items] | |||
| Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share, Amount | 20,702,657 | 27,103,956 | 22,556,951 |
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Details) |
9 Months Ended | |
|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2016 |
Sep. 30, 2015 |
|
| Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items] | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Risk-free rate of return | 1.41% | |
| Forfeiture rate | 2.60% | 2.60% |
| Minimum [Member] | ||
| Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items] | ||
| Risk-free rate of return | 1.53% | |
| Expected life in years | 4 years 6 months | 4 years 6 months |
| Volatility | 87.00% | 92.00% |
| Maximum [Member] | ||
| Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items] | ||
| Risk-free rate of return | 1.63% | |
| Expected life in years | 7 years | 4 years 9 months |
| Volatility | 95.00% | 94.00% |
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Details Textual) - USD ($) |
3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2016 |
Sep. 30, 2015 |
Sep. 30, 2016 |
Sep. 30, 2015 |
|
| Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items] | ||||
| Allocated Share-based Compensation Expense, Total | $ 66,358 | $ 45,209 | $ 289,220 | $ 183,207 |
| Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Nonvested Awards, Compensation Not yet Recognized, Stock Options | $ 464,760 | $ 464,760 | ||
| Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Nonvested Awards, Compensation Cost Not yet Recognized, Period for Recognition | 1 year 1 month 6 days | |||
| Employees Consultants And Directors [Member] | ||||
| Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items] | ||||
| Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Grants in Period, Gross | 940,000 | 1,635,000 | ||
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Details Textual) - USD ($) |
Sep. 30, 2016 |
Sep. 30, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | ||
| Cash and Cash Equivalents, Fair Value Disclosure | $ 1,061,000 | $ 660,000 |
CONVERTIBLE NOTES (Details 1) - USD ($) |
3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2016 |
Sep. 30, 2015 |
Sep. 30, 2016 |
Sep. 30, 2015 |
|
| Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||||
| Total interest expense | $ 43,577 | $ 43,576 | $ 129,779 | $ 129,307 |
| Notes 2012 [Member] | ||||
| Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||||
| Total interest expense | 3,782 | 3,778 | 11,258 | 11,482 |
| March 2013 Notes [Member] | ||||
| Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||||
| Total interest expense | 14,178 | 14,178 | 42,226 | 42,072 |
| July 2013 Notes [Member] | ||||
| Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||||
| Total interest expense | 4,621 | 4,624 | 13,763 | 13,712 |
| September 2013 Notes [Member] | ||||
| Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||||
| Total interest expense | 17,530 | 17,530 | 52,210 | 52,020 |
| January 2014 Notes [Member] | ||||
| Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||||
| Total interest expense | $ 3,466 | $ 3,466 | $ 10,322 | $ 10,021 |
CONVERTIBLE NOTES (Details 2) - USD ($) |
Sep. 30, 2016 |
Dec. 31, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||
| Total Fair value of derivative liability | $ 5,037,837 | $ 4,673,336 |
| Warrant [Member] | ||
| Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||
| Total Fair value of derivative liability | 1,190,000 | 0 |
| Rights [Member] | ||
| Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||
| Total Fair value of derivative liability | 100,000 | 0 |
| March 2013 Notes [Member] | ||
| Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||
| Total Fair value of derivative liability | 1,200,000 | 1,500,000 |
| July 2013 Notes [Member] | ||
| Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||
| Total Fair value of derivative liability | 533,334 | 666,667 |
| September 2013 Notes [Member] | ||
| Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||
| Total Fair value of derivative liability | 1,712,000 | 2,140,000 |
| January 2014 Notes [Member] | ||
| Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||
| Total Fair value of derivative liability | $ 302,503 | $ 366,669 |
CONVERTIBLE NOTES (Details 3) - USD ($) |
3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2016 |
Sep. 30, 2015 |
Sep. 30, 2016 |
Sep. 30, 2015 |
|
| Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||||
| Change in fair value of derivative | $ (1,283,833) | $ 701,000 | $ (1,265,499) | $ 3,154,500 |
| Rights [Member] | ||||
| Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||||
| Change in fair value of derivative | 40,000 | 0 | 40,000 | 0 |
| Warrant [Member] | ||||
| Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||||
| Change in fair value of derivative | (380,000) | 0 | (380,000) | 0 |
| March 2013 Notes [Member] | ||||
| Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||||
| Change in fair value of derivative | (300,000) | 225,000 | (300,000) | 1,012,500 |
| July 2013 Notes [Member] | ||||
| Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||||
| Change in fair value of derivative | (133,333) | 100,000 | (133,333) | 450,000 |
| September 2013 Notes [Member] | ||||
| Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||||
| Change in fair value of derivative | (428,000) | 321,000 | (428,000) | 1,444,500 |
| January 2014 Notes [Member] | ||||
| Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||||
| Change in fair value of derivative | $ (82,500) | $ 55,000 | $ (64,166) | $ 247,500 |
LICENSE AGREEMENT (Details Textual) - USD ($) |
1 Months Ended | |
|---|---|---|
Apr. 06, 2016 |
Jan. 28, 2015 |
|
| License Agreement [Line Items] | ||
| Initial Contribution Received In Related To Joint Venture | $ 3,000,000 | |
| Initial Equity Stake | 51.00% | |
| Proceeds from License Fees Received | $ 1,000,000 | |
| ReGen Tree [Member] | ||
| License Agreement [Line Items] | ||
| Proceeds from Royalties Received | $ 250,000 |
2016 OFFERING (Details) |
9 Months Ended |
|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2016
USD ($)
| |
| Sale of Stock 2016 Offering [Line Items] | |
| Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock | $ 1,750,000 |
| Warrant [Member] | |
| Sale of Stock 2016 Offering [Line Items] | |
| Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock | 1,570,000 |
| Rights [Member] | |
| Sale of Stock 2016 Offering [Line Items] | |
| Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock | 60,000 |
| Common Stock And Placement Agent Warrants [Member] | |
| Sale of Stock 2016 Offering [Line Items] | |
| Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock | $ 120,000 |
2016 OFFERING (Details Textual) - USD ($) |
1 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | |
|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2016 |
Jun. 30, 2016 |
Jun. 27, 2016 |
|
| Stock Issuance Costs | $ 230,000 | ||
| General and Administrative Expense [Member] | |||
| Stock Issuance Costs | $ 214,000 | ||
| Sale of Stock 2016 Offering [Member] | |||
| Warrants to purchase common stock, Shares | 5,147,059 | ||
| Stock Issued During Period, Shares, New Issues | 5,147,059 | ||
| Sale of Stock, Price Per Share | $ 0.34 | ||
| Placement Agent [Member] | Sale of Stock 2016 Offering [Member] | |||
| Warrants to purchase common stock, Shares | 257,353 |