XML 76 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurement
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Fair Value Measurement

NOTE 4: FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

Financial Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following table summarizes financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

 

     December 31, 2012      December 31, 2011  

(In Thousands)

   Level 1      Level 2     Level 3      Level 1      Level 2     Level 3  

Deferred Compensation Liability

   $ —         $ (9,518   $ —         $ —         $ (6,291   $ —     

 

The Company maintains a deferred compensation plan that allows for certain management, highly compensated employees and non-employee directors to defer the receipt of base compensation, incentive pay compensation and director fees until a later date based on the terms of the plans. The liability representing benefits accrued for plan participants is valued at the quoted market prices of the participants’ investment elections, which consist of equity and debt funds. As such, the Company has classified the deferred compensation liability as a Level 2 liability. Refer to Note 15 for additional information regarding the deferred compensation plan.

Non-Financial Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The following table summarizes assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:

 

     December 31, 2012      December 31, 2011  

(In Thousands)

   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Level 1      Level 2      Level 3  

Assets Held for Sale

   $ —         $ 11,104       $ —         $ —         $ 9,885       $ —     

Assets held for sale primarily represents real estate properties that consist mostly of parcels of land. The highest and best use of these assets is as real estate land parcels for development or real estate properties for use or lease; however, the Company has chosen not to develop these properties. In accordance with ASC Topic 360, Property, Plant and Equipment, assets held for sale are written down to fair value, and the adjustment is recorded in operating expenses. The Company estimated the fair values of these properties using the market values for similar properties.

Certain Financial Assets and Liabilities Not Measured at Fair Value

The following table summarizes the fair value of assets (liabilities) that are not measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets, but for which the fair value is disclosed:

 

     December 31, 2012      December 31, 2011  

(In Thousands)

   Level 1      Level 2     Level 3      Level 1      Level 2     Level 3  

Corporate Bonds 1

   $ —         $ 67,470      $ —         $ —         $ 81,594      $ —     

Perfect Home Bonds 2

     —           —          18,449         —           —          15,889   

Fixed-Rate Long Term Debt 3

     —           (127,261     —           —           (135,031     —     

 

1

The fair value of corporate bonds is determined through the use of model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.

2

The Perfect Home bonds were initially valued at cost. The Company periodically reviews the valuation utilizing company-specific transactions or deterioration in the company’s financial performance to determine if fair value adjustments are necessary.

3

The fair value of fixed-rate long term debt is estimated using the present value of underlying cash flows discounted at a current market yield for similar instruments. The carrying value and fair value of fixed-rate long term debt at December 31, 2012 was $125.0 million and $127.3 million, respectively, and $137.0 million and $135.0 million, respectively, at December 31, 2011.

 

Held-to-Maturity Securities

The Company classifies its investments in debt securities as held-to-maturity securities based on its intent and ability to hold these securities to maturity. Accordingly, the debt securities, which mature at various dates during 2013 and 2014, are recorded at amortized cost in the consolidated balance sheets. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, investments classified as held-to-maturity securities consisted of the following:

 

            Gross Unrealized        

(In Thousands)

   Amortized Cost      Gains      Losses     Fair Value  

2012

          

Corporate Bonds

   $ 67,412       $ 99       $ (41   $ 67,470   

Perfect Home Bonds

     18,449         —           —          18,449   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 85,861       $ 99       $ (41   $ 85,919   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

2011

          

Corporate Bonds

   $ 82,243       $ 15       $ (664   $ 81,594   

Perfect Home Bonds

     15,889         —           —          15,889   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 98,132       $ 15       $ (664   $ 97,483   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

The amortized cost and fair value of held-to-maturity securities by contractual maturity as of December 31, 2012 are as follows:

 

(In Thousands)

   Amortized Cost      Fair Value  

Due in one year or less

   $ 43,482       $ 43,547   

Due in years one through two

     42,379         42,372   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 85,861       $ 85,919   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Information pertaining to held-to-maturity securities with gross unrealized losses is as follows. All of the securities have been in a continuous loss position for less than 12 months.

 

     December 31, 2012     December 31, 2011  

(In Thousands)

   Fair Value      Gross  Unrealized
Losses
    Fair Value      Gross Unrealized
Losses
 

Corporate Bonds

   $ 22,785       $ (41   $ 72,315       $ (664

The unrealized losses relate principally to the increases in short-term market interest rates that occurred since the securities were purchased. As of December 31, 2012, 16 of the 38 securities are in an unrealized loss position and at December 31, 2011, 38 of the 44 securities were in an unrealized loss position. The fair value is expected to recover as the securities approach their maturity or if market yields for such investments decline. In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, management considers whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred. The Company has the intent and ability to hold the investments until their amortized cost basis is recovered on the maturity date. As a result of management’s analysis and review, no declines are deemed to be other than temporary.

The Company has estimated that the carrying value of its Perfect Home bonds approximates fair value and, therefore, no impairment is considered to have occurred as of December 31, 2012. While no impairment was noted during 2012, if profitability is delayed as a result of the significant start-up expenses associated with Perfect Home, there could be a change in the valuation of the Perfect Home bonds that may result in the recognition of an impairment loss in future periods.