10-K

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from                      to                     

Commission File No. 1-13941

AARON RENTS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

GEORGIA	58-0687630
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

309 E. PACES FERRY ROAD, N.E.
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
(Address of principal executive offices) 30305-2377
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (404) 231-0011

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

	NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE
TITLE OF EACH CLASS	ON WHICH REGISTERED
Common Stock, $.50 Par Value	New York Stock Exchange
Class A Common Stock, $.50 Par Value	New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE

     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No o

     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer þ     Accelerated Filer o     Non-accelerated Filer o 

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No þ

     Aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2006, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, based on the closing sale prices of the registrant’s common shares as reported by the New York Stock Exchange on such date: $1,228,585,285. See Item 12.

     The number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of February 22, 2007 was as follows:

	SHARES OUTSTANDING AS OF
TITLE OF EACH CLASS	FEBRUARY 22, 2007
Common Stock, $.50 Par Value	45,767,886
Class A Common Stock, $.50 Par Value	8,396,233

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

     Portions of the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2006 are incorporated by reference into Part II of this Form 10-K.

     Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2007 annual meeting of shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

 EX-13 PORTIONS OF THE ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2006

 EX-21 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

 EX-23 CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP

 EX-31.(A) SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CEO

 EX-31.(B) SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CFO

 EX-32.(A) SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CEO

 EX-32.(B) SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CFO

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

     Certain oral and written statements made by Aaron Rents, Inc. about future events and expectations, including statements in this annual report on Form 10-K, are “forward-looking statements.” For those statements we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are based on management’s current beliefs, assumptions and expectations regarding our future economic performance, taking into account the information currently available to them. Generally, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “project,” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, which generally are not historical in nature. All statements which address operating performance, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future, including growth in store openings, franchises awarded, market share and statements expressing general optimism about future operating results, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the company’s historical experience and the company’s present expectations or projections. Factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements include changes in general economic conditions, competition, pricing, customer demand and those factors discussed in Item 1A, “Risk Factors.” We qualify any forward-looking statements entirely by these cautionary factors.

     Given these uncertainties and that such statements speak only as of the date made, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

PART I.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

General

     Aaron Rents, Inc. is a leading specialty retailer of consumer electronics, computers, residential and office furniture, household appliances and accessories. We engage in the lease ownership, rental and retail sale of a wide variety of products such as widescreen, LCD and plasma televisions, computers, living room, dining room and bedroom furniture, washers, dryers and refrigerators. We carry well-known brands such as JVC^®, Mitsubishi^®, Philips^®, RCA^®, Sony^®, Dell^®, Hewlett-Packard^®, La-Z-Boy^®, Simmons^®, Frigidaire^®, General Electric^® and Maytag^®. Our major operating divisions are the Aaron’s Sales & Lease Ownership division, the Aaron’s Corporate Furnishings division, and the MacTavish Furniture Industries division, which supplies nearly one-half of the furniture and related accessories leased and sold in our stores. Our strategic focus is on expanding our higher growth sales and lease ownership business through opening new company-operated stores, expanding our franchise program, and making selective acquisitions.

     As of December 31, 2006, we had 1,286 sales and lease ownership stores, comprised of 845 company-operated stores in 36 states and 441 independently-owned franchised stores in 47 states and Canada. We have added 582 company-operated and 248 franchised sales and lease ownership stores since the beginning of 2001. In addition, we operate our Aaron’s Corporate Furnishings division, which rents residential and office furniture through 59 company-operated stores in 16 states as of December 31, 2006.

     We have a long history of revenue growth and profitability. Total revenues increased to $1.327 billion in 2006 from $640.7 million in 2002, representing a 20.0% compound annual growth rate. Our total net earnings increased to $78.6 million in 2006 from $27.4 million in 2002, representing a 30.1% compound annual growth rate. Total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006 were $1.327 billion, an increase of $201.1 million, or 17.9%, over 2005.

     Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, R. Charles Loudermilk, Sr., established Aaron Rents in 1955, and we were incorporated under the laws of Georgia in 1962. Our principal business address is 309 E. Paces Ferry Road, Atlanta, Georgia, 30305-2377, and our telephone number is (404) 231-0011.

     We own or have rights to various trademarks and trade names used in our business.

     Aaron’s Sales & Lease Ownership. Our sales and lease ownership division focuses on providing durable household goods to lower to middle income consumers who have limited or no access to traditional credit sources such as bank financing, installment credit or credit cards. Our sales and lease ownership program enables these customers to obtain quality-of-life enhancing merchandise that they might otherwise not be able to afford, without incurring additional debt or long-term obligations.

     Our strategic focus is to expand our Aaron’s sales and lease ownership division by opening company-operated stores, expanding our franchise program and making selective acquisitions. Revenues from our sales and lease ownership division increased to $1.201 billion in 2006 from $519.0 million in 2002, representing a 23.3% compound annual growth rate, and accounted for 90.5% of our total 2006 revenues of $1.327 billion.

     We franchise our sales and lease ownership stores in select markets where we have no immediate plans to enter. Our franchise program:

• allows us to grow more quickly;

• enables us to achieve economies of scale in purchasing, distribution, manufacturing and advertising for our sales and lease ownership stores;

• increases exposure to our brand; and

• provides additional revenues from franchise fees and royalties.

     Aaron’s Corporate Furnishings. Our corporate furnishings division rents and sells new and rental return merchandise to individuals and businesses, with a focus on renting residential and office furniture to business customers. We have been in the corporate furnishings business (referred to in the industry as “rent-to-rent”) for over 50 years and believe we are the second largest corporate furnishings rental company in the United States.

     Business customers, who represent an increasing portion of rental customers, rent residential furniture in order to provide furnishings for relocated employees or those on temporary assignment. Business customers also enter into rental agreements for office furniture to meet seasonal, temporary or start-up needs.

     MacTavish Furniture Industries. Aaron Rents is the only major furniture rental company in the United States that manufactures its own furniture. We operate seven furniture plants, five bedding facilities and one lamp manufacturing facility. By manufacturing our own specially designed residential and office furniture, we believe we enjoy an advantage over our competitors. Manufacturing enables us to control the quality, cost, delivery, styling, durability and quantity of our furniture products.

Industry Overview

The Rent-to-Own Industry

     The rent-to-own industry offers customers an alternative to traditional methods of obtaining electronics, computers, home furnishings and appliances. In a typical rent-to-own transaction, the customer has the option to acquire merchandise over a fixed term, usually 12 to 24 months, normally by making weekly rental payments. The customer may cancel the agreement at any time by returning the merchandise to the store, with no further rental obligation. If the customer rents the item to the full term, he obtains ownership of the item, though he can choose to buy it at any time.

     The rent-to-own concept is particularly popular with consumers who cannot pay the full purchase price for merchandise at once or who lack the credit to qualify under conventional financing programs. Rent-to-own is also popular with consumers who, despite good credit, do not wish to incur additional debt, have only a temporary need for the merchandise or want to try out a particular brand or model before buying it.

     We believe that the decline in the number of furniture stores and the limited number of retailers that focus on credit installment sales to lower and middle income consumers has created a market opportunity for our unique sales and lease ownership concept. The traditional retail consumer durable goods market is much larger than the rental market, leaving substantial potential for growth for our sales and lease ownership division. We believe that the segment of the population targeted by our sales and lease ownership division comprises approximately 50% of all households in the United States and that the needs of these consumers are generally underserved.

Aaron’s Sales & Lease Ownership versus Traditional Rent-to-Own

     We believe that our sales and lease ownership model is unique. By providing customers with the option either to lease merchandise with the opportunity to obtain ownership or to purchase merchandise outright, we blend elements of rent-to-own and traditional retailing. We enable cash or credit-constrained customers to obtain quality-of-life enhancing merchandise that they otherwise might not be able to afford without incurring additional debt or long-term obligations. In addition to these core customers, our concept is also

popular with consumers who have only a temporary need for the merchandise or want to try out a particular brand or model before purchase. We believe our sales and lease ownership program is a more effective method of retailing our merchandise to lower to middle income consumers than a typical rent-to-own business or the more traditional method of credit installment sales.

     Our sales and lease ownership model is also distinctive from a typical rent-to-own business in that we encourage our customers to obtain ownership of their rental merchandise. Based on industry data, we believe that more of the initial renters of our merchandise (over 45%) obtain ownership versus rent-to-own businesses in general (approximately 25%). We believe our sales and lease ownership model offers the following unique characteristics versus traditional rent-to-own stores:

• Lower total cost—our agreement terms typically provide a lower cost of ownership to the customer.

• Wider merchandise selection—we generally offer a larger selection of higher-quality merchandise.

• Larger store layout—our stores are typically 9,000 square feet, nearly twice the size of typical rent-to-own stores.

• Fewer payments— our typical plan offers semi-monthly or monthly payments versus the industry standard of weekly payments. Our agreements also usually provide for a shorter term until the customer obtains ownership.

• Flexible payment methods—we offer our customers the opportunity to pay by cash, check, credit card or debit card, compared with the more common cash payment method at rent-to-own stores. We receive approximately 50% of our payment volume (in dollars) from customers by check, credit card or debit card.

     We believe our sales and lease ownership model also has attractive features in common with traditional retailers. Among these features are store size, merchandise selection and the latest product offerings, such as “state-of-the-art” electronics and computers. As technology has advanced and home furnishings and appliances have evolved, we have strived to offer our customers the latest product developments at affordable prices. Although the categories of products we offer have remained substantially the same over the years, we have experienced a percentage increase in revenues from electronics and computers in our sales and lease ownership division as compared to total revenues.

     In addition, our sales and lease ownership stores offer an up-front “cash and carry” purchase option on select merchandise at prices that are competitive with discount and traditional retailers. However, unlike transactions with most traditional retailers, where the customer is committed to purchase the merchandise, our sales and lease ownership transactions are not credit installment contracts, and the customer may elect to terminate the transaction after a short initial rental period.

The Rent-to-Rent Industry

     The demand for rental products is believed to be related to the mobility of the population, which relies upon rented merchandise to meet temporary needs. The industry is highly competitive and has consolidated, with only a handful of companies accounting for a substantial share of the market.

     The rent-to-rent industry serves both individual and business customers who generally have immediate, temporary needs for residential or office furniture but who usually do not seek to own the merchandise. Residential furniture and accessories are rented to:

• individuals seeking to rent furnishings for their own homes and apartments;

• apartment complex managers seeking to provide furnished apartments; and

• third party companies that provide interim housing for their corporate clients.

     Office furniture is rented by customers ranging from small businesses and professionals, who are in need of office furnishings but need to conserve capital, to large corporations with temporary or seasonal needs.

     In the typical rent-to-rent transaction, the customer agrees to rent one or more items for a minimum of three months, a term which may be extended by the customer on a month-to-month basis. Although many rental agreements give the customer the option of purchasing the rented item, most customers do not enter into the transaction with the desire to own the rented merchandise.

Operating Strategies

     Our operating strategies are focused on differentiation from our competitors and improved efficiencies. We strive to:

• Differentiate our Aaron’s Sales & Lease Ownership concept — We believe that the success of our sales and lease ownership operation is attributable to our distinctive approach to the business that sets us apart from our rent-to-own and credit retail competitors. We have pioneered innovative approaches to meeting changing customer needs that differ from our competitors’, such as offering lease ownership agreements which result in a lower “all-in” price, larger and more attractive store showrooms, a wider selection of higher-quality merchandise and up-front cash and carry purchase options on select merchandise at prices that are competitive with traditional retailers. Most sales and lease ownership customers make their payments in person, and we use these frequent visits to strengthen customer relationships and make these customers feel welcome in our stores.

• Offer high levels of customer service and satisfaction — We foster good relationships with our customers to attract recurring business and encourage them to rent merchandise for the full agreement term by providing high levels of service and satisfaction. We demonstrate our commitment to superior customer service by providing customers quick delivery of rented merchandise, in many cases by same or next day delivery, and repair service at no charge to the customer. We have also established an employee training program called Aaron’s University, which is a 30-course curriculum designed to enhance the customer relations skills of both company-operated and franchised store managers.

• Promote our vendors and the Aaron’sä brand name — Our marketing programs target the prime customer base for our products, such as our brand name “Dream Products” merchandise, which we advertise through our “Drive Dreams Home” sponsorship of NASCAR championship racing. Sponsorship of other sporting events, such as arena football, NBA basketball, major league baseball and various college sports, also reaches this market. We typically distribute mass mailings of promotional material outlining specific products every two weeks, with the goal of reaching households within a specified radius of each store at least 24 times per year. We currently mail over 20 million flyers monthly to consumers in areas served by our stores. We also utilize local television and radio advertising in concentrated geographic markets and for special promotions.

• Manage merchandise through our manufacturing and distribution capabilities — We believe that our manufacturing operations and network of 16 fulfillment centers at December 31, 2006 give us a strategic advantage over our competitors. Manufacturing enables us to control the quality, cost, delivery, styling, durability and quantity of a substantial portion of our furniture merchandise, and provides us a reliable source of furniture. Our distribution system allows us to deliver merchandise promptly to our stores in order to meet customer demand quickly and manage inventory levels more effectively.

• Utilize proprietary management information systems — We use proprietary computerized information systems to pursue systematically collections and manage merchandise returns and to match inventory with demand. Each of our stores, including franchised sales and lease ownership stores, is linked by computer directly to our corporate headquarters, which enables us to monitor the performance of each store on a daily basis. Our separate systems are tailored to meet the distinct needs of our sales and lease ownership and corporate furnishings operations.

Growth Strategies

     We seek to increase our revenues and profitability through the execution of our growth strategies, which are to:

• Open additional company-operated sales and lease ownership stores — We plan to open sales and lease ownership stores in existing and select new geographic markets. Additional stores help us to realize economies of scale in purchasing, marketing and distribution. We opened 78 company-operated stores in 2006. We estimate that we will add approximately 250 stores in 2007, a combination of company-operated and franchised stores.

• Increase our sales and lease ownership franchises — We believe that our franchise program allows us to grow more quickly and increase our brand exposure in new markets. In addition, the combination of company-operated and franchised stores creates a larger store base that enhances the economies of scale in purchasing, distribution, manufacturing and advertising for our sales and lease ownership stores. Franchise fees and royalties represent a growing source of company revenues.

• Increase revenues and net earnings from existing sales and lease ownership stores — We experienced same store revenue growth (revenues earned in stores open for the entirety of both periods) from our company-operated sales and lease ownership stores of 11.6% in 2004, 8.3% in 2005 and 7.2% in 2006. We calculate same store revenue growth by comparing revenues from comparable periods for all stores open during the entirety of those periods, excluding stores that received rental agreements from other acquired, closed or merged stores. We expect revenues and net earnings of our sales and lease ownership division to continue to grow as the large number of stores we have opened in the past few years increase their customer bases.

• Seek selective acquisitions in both new and existing sales and lease ownership markets — We will continue to explore acquisitions of other rent-to-own operations and select company franchisees. In 2006, we acquired the rental agreements, merchandise and assets of 40 sales and lease ownership locations. Some of these locations were subsequently merged with existing locations, resulting in 40 new stores from acquisitions. We will also seek to convert existing independent rental operators to convert their stores to Aaron’s Sales and Lease Ownership franchised stores.

Operations

Sales and Lease Ownership

     We established our Aaron’s Sales & Lease Ownership operation in 1987. At December 31, 2006, we had 845 company-operated sales and lease ownership stores in 47 states and Canada.

     We have developed a distinctive concept for our sales and lease ownership stores with specific merchandising, store layout, pricing, and agreement terms for our target customer market. We believe that these features create a store and a sales and lease ownership concept significantly different from the operations of rent-to-own stores, our traditional corporate furnishings (rent-to-rent) business, and the operations of consumer electronics and home furnishings retailers who finance merchandise.

     The typical Aaron’s Sales & Lease Ownership store layout is a combination showroom and warehouse of 8,000 to 10,000 square feet, with an average of approximately 9,000 total square feet. In selecting locations for new sales and lease ownership stores, we generally look for sites in well-maintained strip shopping centers with good access, which are strategically located in established working class neighborhoods and communities. We also build to suit or occupy stand alone stores in certain markets. Many of our stores are placed near existing competitors’ stores. Each sales and lease ownership store usually maintains at least two trucks and crews for pickups and deliveries and generally offers same or next day delivery for addresses located within ten miles of the store. We emphasize a broad selection of brand name electronics, computers and appliances, and offer customers a wide selection of furniture, including furniture manufactured by our MacTavish Furniture Industries division. Our sales and lease ownership stores also offer lawn tractors and jewelry.

     We believe that our sales and lease ownership stores offer lower merchandise prices than similar items offered by traditional rent-to-own operators, and substantially equivalent to the “all-in” contract price of similar items offered by retailers who finance merchandise. Approximately 78% of our sales and lease ownership agreements are monthly and approximately 22% are semi-monthly as compared to the industry standard of weekly agreements, and our agreements usually provide for a shorter term leading to customer ownership. Customers can have the item serviced free of charge or replaced at any time during the rental agreement. We re-rent or sell merchandise that customers return to us prior to the expiration of their agreements. We also offer, for select merchandise, an up-front cash and carry purchase option at prices that are competitive with discount and traditional retailers.

     During the later part of 2004, we opened two experimental stores under the RIMCO name that lease automobile tires and rims to customers under sales and lease ownership agreements. Although the products offered are different, these stores are managed, monitored and operated similar to our other sales and lease ownership stores. At December 31, 2006, we had 17 RIMCO stores open and expect to expand this business during 2007 by opening additional company-operated stores as well as several franchised stores.

Sales and Lease Ownership Franchise Program

     We began franchising Aaron’s Sales & Lease Ownership stores in select markets in 1992 and have continued to attract franchisees. Our franchised stores do not compete with company-operated stores, nor do we anticipate any such competition, as we mainly award franchises in markets where we have no operations and no current plans to enter. As of December 31, 2006, we had 441 franchised stores open and area development agreements with franchisees to open 233 stores in the future. We believe that our relations with our franchisees are generally good.

     Franchisees are approved on the basis of the applicant’s business background and financial resources. We generally seek franchisees who will enter into area development agreements for several stores, although many franchisees currently operate a single store. Most franchisees are involved in the day-to-day operations of the stores.

     We enter into franchise agreements with our franchisees to govern the opening and operation of franchised stores. Under our current standard agreement, we require the franchisee to pay a franchise fee from $15,000 to $50,000 per store depending upon market size. Agreements are for a term of ten years, with one ten-year renewal option, and franchisees are obligated to remit to us royalty payments of 5% or 6% of the franchisee’s weekly cash collections. The royalty payments increased from 5% to 6% for all franchise agreements entered into or renewed after December 31, 2002.

     We assist each franchisee in selecting the proper site for each store. Because of the importance of location to the Aaron’s Sales & Lease Ownership concept, one of our pre-opening directors visits the intended market and helps guide the franchisee through the selection process. Once a site is selected, we help in designing the floor plan, including the proper layout of the showroom and warehouse. In addition, we provide assistance in assuring that the design and decor of the showroom is consistent with our requirements. We also lease the exterior signage to the franchisee and assist with placing pre-opening advertising, ordering initial inventory and obtaining delivery vehicles.

     We have an arrangement with several banks to provide financing to qualifying franchisees to assist with establishing and operating their stores. An inventory financing plan to provide franchisees with the capital to purchase inventory is the primary component of the financing program. For qualified established franchisees, we have arranged in some cases for these institutions to provide a revolving credit line to allow franchisees the flexibility to expand. We guarantee amounts outstanding under the franchisee financing programs.

     All franchisees are required to complete a comprehensive training program and to operate their franchised sales and lease ownership stores in compliance with our policies, standards and specifications,

including such matters as decor, rental agreement terms, hours of operation, pricing and merchandise. Franchisees in general are not required to purchase their rental merchandise from our fulfillment centers, although most do so in order to take advantage of company sponsored financing, bulk purchasing discounts and favorable delivery terms. Several franchisees also purchase their rental furniture directly from our MacTavish Furniture Industries division.

     We conduct a financial audit of our franchised stores every six to 12 months and also conduct regular operational audits — generally visiting each franchised store almost as often as we visit our company-operated stores. In addition, our proprietary management information system links each franchised store to corporate headquarters.

Corporate Furnishings

     We have been in the rent-to-rent business for over 50 years and believe we are the second largest corporate furnishings rental company in the United States. Our corporate furnishings business accounted for approximately 10% of our total revenues in 2006. We rent new and rental return merchandise to both individuals and businesses, with a growing focus on renting residential and office furniture to business customers. As of December 31, 2006, we operated 59 corporate furnishings stores in 16 states.

     Our typical corporate furnishings store layout consists of a combination showroom and warehouse comprising about 19,000 square feet. Each residential showroom features attractive displays of living room, dining room and bedroom furniture in a number of styles, fabrics, materials and colors. Office rental showrooms feature lines of desks, chairs, conference tables, credenzas, sofas and accessories. We believe that locating a warehouse next to each showroom permits store managers to exercise greater control over inventory, merchandise condition, and pickup and deliveries, resulting in more efficient and consistent service for the customer.

     Items held for rent, whether new or rental return, are available for purchase and lease purchase at all corporate furnishings stores. Each corporate furnishings store generally offers next day delivery for addresses located within 50 miles of the store and maintains at least one truck and a crew for pickups and deliveries. We believe that our ability to obtain and deliver furniture and equipment to customers quickly and efficiently gives us an advantage over general furniture retailers who often require several weeks to effect delivery.

     We generally sell rental return merchandise at stores at or above its book value, that is, cost less depreciation, plus selling expenses, at a price which is usually lower than the price for comparable new merchandise. Most merchandise held for sale in stores may also be acquired through a lease purchase option. Because new merchandise is sold at the same location as rental return merchandise, we have the opportunity to sell both new and rental return merchandise to customers who may have been attracted to the store by the advertising and price appeal of rental return merchandise. The ability to sell new and rental return merchandise at the same location allows for more efficient use of facilities and personnel and minimizes overhead.

Furniture Manufacturing

     Our MacTavish Furniture Industries division has manufactured furniture for our stores since 1971. The division has seven furniture manufacturing plants, five bedding manufacturing facilities, and one lamp manufacturing facilities, totaling approximately 817,000 square feet in the aggregate, that supply nearly one-half of our furniture and accessories. We believe our manufacturing plants have the capacity to meet our needs for the foreseeable future.

     Our MacTavish Furniture Industries division manufactures:

• upholstered living-room furniture, including contemporary sofas, sofa beds, chairs and modular sofa and ottoman collections in a variety of natural and synthetic fabrics;

• bedding, including standard sizes of mattresses and box springs;

• office furniture, including desks, credenzas, conference tables, bookcases and chairs; and

• designer lamps, tables and accessories, which we also manufacture for select retailers.

     MacTavish has designed special features for the furniture it manufactures that we believe reduce production costs, enhance product durability, and improve the shipping process relative to furniture purchased from third parties. These features include:

• standardization of components;

• reduction of parts and features susceptible to wear or damage;

• more resilient foam;

• durable, soil-resistant fabrics and sturdy frames for longer life and higher residual value; and

• devices that allow sofas to stand on end for easier and more efficient transport.

     MacTavish also manufactures replacement covers of all styles and fabrics of its upholstered furniture for use in reconditioning rental return furniture.

     The principal raw materials we use in furniture manufacturing are fabric, foam, fiber, wire-innerspring assemblies, plywood and hardwood. All of these materials are purchased in the open market from unaffiliated sources. We are not dependent on any single supplier, and none of the raw materials we use are in short supply.

Marketing and Advertising

     In our sales and lease ownership operations, we rely heavily on national and local television advertising, direct mail, and direct delivery of promotional materials. We focus our national television advertising on a variety of commercials. All of the television commercials feature name brand merchandise including HDTV wide screen televisions, computers, stainless steel refrigerators, washers and dryers, and lawn tractors.

     We have garnered significant value from our sports marketing initiatives. We advertise and sponsor motorsports at various levels and collegiate and professional sports, such as NBA, WWE, AFL, SEC and ACC football and basketball and major league baseball, among others.

     Our premier event partnership continues to be the Aaron’s Dream Weekend at Talladega Superspeedway consisting of the Aaron’s 499 NASCAR Nextel Cup Series Race and the Aaron’s 312 NASCAR Busch Series Race. Both races are broadcast live on ABC/ESPN television and are among the most watched NASCAR events.

     We have continued our sponsorship of Michael Waltrip Racing with David Reutimann driving the #99 Aaron’s Dream Machine in the Busch Series, and an Aaron’s Lucky Dog truck in the Craftsman Truck Series, and a #99 Aaron’s Dream Machine in the Hooters Pro Cup Series.

     In addition, we sponsor the Arena Football League, which is broadcast nationally on ABC/ESPN and regionally on Fox Sports Net and the Outdoor Life Network. This sponsorship includes uniform patches on all visiting teams’ jerseys, arena signage and local promotions throughout the country. National in-store sweepstakes for a trip for two to the ArenaBowl in New Orleans helps drive these arena football fans into Aaron’s locations around the country. Fans also vote online for their favorite dancer for the Aaron’s AFL Dream Team, who performs annually at the Aaron’s Talladega Dream Weekend and at the Arena Bowl.

     These sports partnerships are integrated into advertising, promotional and marketing initiatives, which we believe significantly boosts the company’s brand awareness and customer loyalty.

     Aaron’s in-house advertising and promotions department distributes over 20 million direct circulars each month which highlight featured merchandise and demonstrate the cost advantage to consumers of sales and lease ownership rather than rent-to-own.

     We market our corporate furnishings operations with print-based marketing programs targeting corporate customers. In addition, the division has a national accounts program that develops strategic partnerships to service clients’ nationwide needs. As an example, the corporate furnishings division has developed an alliance with a larger trailer company to handle all of the short term furnishings for trailers used at NASCAR races and has been a sponsor in the Tour de Georgia professional cycling racing program. We also rely on the use of brochures, newspapers, radio, television, direct mail, trade publications, yellow pages, and the internet (http://www.aaronrents.com; www.aaronrentsfurniture.com; www.shopaarons.com, which information is not incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K) to reach customers. In addition to advertising specific vendor products, we believe this advertising increases Aaron Rents’ brand recognition.

Store Operations

Management. Our Aaron’s Sales & Lease Ownership division has nine regional vice presidents who are primarily responsible for monitoring individual store performance and inventory levels within the respective regions. Our corporate furnishings division is organized geographically into two regions, each supervised by a vice president. Presidents manage the sales and lease ownership and corporate furnishings divisions.

     Stores are directly supervised by 79 sales and lease ownership regional managers and six corporate furnishings regional managers. At the individual store level, the store manager is primarily responsible for:

• customer and credit relations;

• deliveries and pickups;

• warehouse and inventory management; and

• certain marketing efforts.

     Store managers are also responsible for inspecting rental return furniture to determine whether it should be sold as is, rented again as is, repaired and sold, or reconditioned for additional rental. A significant portion of the store manager’s compensation is dependent upon store revenues and profits.

     Executive management directs and coordinates:

• purchasing;

• financial planning and control;

• franchise operations;

• manufacturing;

• employee training;

• new store site selection and construction for company-operated stores;

• long range and strategic planning;

• organizational issues; and

• acquisitions.

     Our internal audit department conducts periodic operational audits of every store, including audits of company-operated sales and lease ownership stores several times each year, and semi-annual audits of corporate furnishings stores and franchised sales and lease ownership stores. Our business philosophy has always emphasized safeguarding of company assets, strict cost containment and fiscal controls. Executive and store level management monitor expenses to contain costs. We pay all invoices from company headquarters in order to enhance fiscal accountability. We believe that careful attention to the safeguarding of rental merchandise, our most significant asset, as well as expense side of our operations has enabled us to maintain financial stability and profitability.

Management Information Systems. We use computer-based management information systems to facilitate cash collections, merchandise returns and inventory monitoring. Through the use of proprietary software developed in-house, each of our stores is linked by computer directly to corporate headquarters, which enables us to monitor the performance of each store on a daily basis. At the store level, the store manager is better able to track merchandise on the showroom floor and in the warehouse to minimize delivery times, assist with product purchasing, and match customer needs with available inventory. Different systems are used to run the sales and lease ownership and corporate furnishings operations due to the significant differences in the businesses.

Rental Agreement Approval, Renewal and Collection. One of the keys to the success of our sales and lease ownership operation is timely cash collections. Individual store managers use our computerized information system on a daily basis to track cash collections. They contact customers within a few days of when their lease payments are due in order to encourage customers to keep their agreement current and in force, rather than having to return the merchandise for non-payment, and to renew their agreements for an additional period. Careful attention to cash collections is particularly important in the sales and lease ownership operations, where the customer typically has the option to cancel the agreement at any time and each payment is considered a renewal of the agreement rather than a collection of a receivable.

     We generally perform no formal credit check with respect to sales and lease ownership customers, other than to verify employment or other reliable sources of income and personal references supplied by the customer. Each corporate furnishings store performs a credit check on most of its residential and business customers. All of our agreements for residential and office merchandise require payments in advance, and the merchandise normally is repossessed if a payment is significantly in arrears.

     Net bad debt losses from corporate furnishings rentals as a percentage of corporate furnishings rental revenues were approximately 0.6%, 1.1%, and 1.4%, for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. We do not extend credit to sales and lease ownership customers. For the same periods, net company-wide merchandise shrinkage as a percentage of combined rental revenues was 2.1%, 2.6%, and 2.2%, respectively. We believe that our collection and repossession policies comply with applicable legal requirements, and we discipline any employee that we discover deviating from such policies.

Customer Service. We believe that customer service is one of the most important elements in the success of our sales and lease ownership and corporate furnishings businesses. Customer satisfaction is critical because the customer typically has the option of returning the rented merchandise at any time. Our goal is to make our customers feel positive about Aaron Rents and our products from the moment they enter our showrooms. Items are serviced at no charge to the customer, and quick, free delivery is available in many cases. In order to increase rentals at existing stores, we foster relationships with existing customers to attract recurring business, and many new rental and lease ownership agreements are attributable to repeat customers.

     Because of the importance of customer service, we believe that a prerequisite for successful operations and growth is skilled, effective employees who value our customers and project a genuine desire to serve customers’ needs. Our Aaron’s Sales & Lease Ownership division has 41 training facilities where store managers and employees learn and review all areas of our operations, with a heavy emphasis on customer service. We also have a training program we call Aaron’s University designed to provide a uniform customer service experience regardless of the store location, whether company-operated or franchised. Standardizing operating procedures throughout our system is a primary focus of Aaron’s University. We have a 30-course curriculum for sales and lease ownership managers. The corporate furnishings division’s sales and management training programs have similar training conducted at our Atlanta headquarters. Approximately once a month we distribute a DVD entitled “Inside Aaron’s.” These DVDs are intended to communicate a wide variety of topics of interest to our store personnel regarding current company initiatives. Our policy of promoting from within boosts employee retention and underscores our commitment to customer service and other business philosophies, allowing us to realize greater benefits from our employee training programs.

Purchasing and Distribution

     Our product mix is determined by store managers in consultation with regional managers and regional vice presidents, based on an analysis of customer demands.

     The following table shows the percentage of sales and lease ownership division revenues for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 attributable to different merchandise categories:

	Percentage of
Merchandise Category	2006 Revenues
Electronics		33	%
Appliances		15	%
Furniture		33	%
Computers		15	%
Other		4	%

     In our corporate furnishings division, furniture is the primary merchandise category, accounting for approximately 94% of corporate furnishings revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006.

     We purchase the majority of our merchandise directly from manufacturers, with the balance from local distributors. One of our largest suppliers is our own MacTavish Furniture Industries division, which supplies nearly one-half of the furniture we rent or sell. We have no long-term agreements for the purchase of merchandise and believe that our relationships with suppliers are good.

     Sales and lease ownership operations utilize fulfillment centers, which are on average approximately 86,000 square feet, to control merchandise. All company-operated sales and lease ownership stores receive merchandise directly from our 16 fulfillment centers together totaling approximately 1,457,000 square feet. Most of our stores are within a 250-mile radius of a fulfillment center, facilitating timely shipment of supplies to the stores and fast delivery of orders to customers.

     Corporate furnishings stores receive merchandise directly from vendors who ship to the stores’ attached warehouses. Sales and lease ownership stores typically have smaller warehouses with less merchandise storage space than our corporate furnishings stores. Vendors normally ship directly to our fulfillment centers, which in turn ship merchandise to our stores.

     We realize freight savings from truckload discounts and more efficient distribution of merchandise by using fulfillment centers. We use our own tractor-trailers, local delivery trucks, and various contract carriers to make weekly deliveries to individual stores.

Competition

     Aaron Rents’ businesses are highly competitive. We compete in the rent-to-own and credit retail markets. Our largest competitor in the rent-to-own market is Rent-A-Center, Inc. We also compete in the rent-to-rent market with national and local companies and, to a lesser extent, with apartment owners who purchase or provide furniture for rental to tenants. Cort Business Services Corporation is our largest rent-to-rent competitor.

     Although definitive industry statistics are not available, we believe that Aaron Rents is one of the largest furniture rental companies in the United States. We also believe that we generally have a favorable competitive position in that industry because of our manufacturing capabilities, prompt delivery, competitive pricing, brand recognition and commitment to customer service.

Government Regulation

     Our operations are extensively regulated by and subject to the requirements of various federal and state laws and regulations. In general such laws regulate applications for leases, late fees, other finance rates, the form of disclosure statements, the substance and sequence of required disclosures, the content of advertising materials, and certain collection procedures. Violations of certain provisions of these laws may result in penalties ranging from nominal amounts up to and including forfeiture of fees and other amounts due on leases. We do not believe that the various laws and regulations have had or will have a material adverse effect on our operations. However, we are unable to predict the nature or effect on our operations or earnings of unknown future legislation, regulations and judicial decisions or future interpretations of existing and future legislation or regulations relating to our operations, and there can be no assurance that future laws, decisions or interpretations will not have a material adverse effect on our operations and earnings.

     A summary of certain of the state and federal laws under which we operate follows. This summary does not purport to be a complete summary of the laws referred to below or of all the laws regulating our operations.

     Currently, 47 states, including the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, specifically regulate rent-to-own transactions, including states in which we currently operate Aaron’s Sales & Lease Ownership stores. Most of state rental purchase laws require rent-to-own companies to disclose to their customers the total number of payments, total amount and timing of all payments to acquire ownership of any item, any other charges that may be imposed, and miscellaneous other items. The more restrictive state rental purchase laws limit the total amount that a customer may be charged for an item, or regulate the amount of deemed “interest” that rent-to-own companies may charge on rent-to-own transactions, generally defining “interest” as rental fees paid in excess of the “retail” price of the goods. Our long-established policy in all states is to disclose the terms of our rental purchase transactions as a matter of good business ethics and customer service. We believe we are in material compliance with the various state rental purchase laws.

     At the present time, no federal law specifically regulates the rent-to-own industry. Federal legislation to regulate the industry has been proposed from time to time. We cannot predict whether any such legislation will be enacted and what the impact of such legislation would be on us. Although we are unable to predict the results of any regulatory initiatives, we do not believe that existing and proposed regulations will have a material adverse impact on our sales and lease ownership or other operations.

     We have introduced a form of consumer lease as an alternative to our typical rental purchase agreement in a number of states. The consumer lease differs from a rental purchase agreement in that it has an initial lease term in excess of four months. Generally, state laws that govern the rent-to-own industry only apply to lease agreements with an initial term of four months or less. The consumer lease is governed by federal and state laws and regulations other than the state rental purchase laws. The federal regulations applicable to the consumer lease require certain disclosures similar to the rent-to-own regulations, but are generally less restrictive as to pricing and other charges. We believe we are in material compliance with all laws applicable to our consumer leasing program.

     Our sales and lease ownership franchise program is subject to Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) regulation and various state laws regulating the offer and sale of franchises. Several state laws also regulate substantive aspects of the franchisor-franchisee relationship. The FTC requires us to furnish to prospective franchisees a franchise offering circular containing prescribed information. A number of states in which we might consider franchising also regulate the sale of franchises and require registration of the franchise offering circular with state authorities. We believe we are in material compliance with all applicable franchise laws in those states in which we do business and with laws in Canada.

Employees

     At December 31, 2006, Aaron Rents had approximately 8,400 employees. None of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement, and we believe that our relations with our employees are good.

Information on Segments and Geographic Areas

     We currently only operate in the United States and Canada. Information on our four reportable segments—sales and lease ownership, corporate furnishings, franchise and manufacturing—is set forth in Note K to our Consolidated Financial Statements. See Item 8 of Part II.

Available Information

     We make available free of charge on or through our Internet website our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Our Internet address is www.aaronrents.com.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

          Aaron Rents’ business is subject to certain risks and uncertainties, some of which are set forth below.

Our growth strategy depends considerably on opening new company-operated stores. Our ability to expand our store base is influenced by factors beyond our control, which may impair our growth strategy and impede our revenue growth.

     Opening new company-operated stores is an important part of our growth strategy. Our ability to continue opening new stores is affected by, among other things:

• the substantial outlay of financial resources required to open new stores and initially operate them, and the availability of capital sources to finance new openings and initial operation;

• competition in existing and new markets;

• consumer demand, tastes and spending patterns in new markets that differ from those in our existing markets;

• difficulties associated with hiring, training and retaining additional skilled personnel, including store managers;

• challenges in adapting our distribution and other operational and management systems to an expanded network of stores; and

• our ability to identify suitable new store sites and to negotiate acceptable leases for these sites.

     If we cannot address these challenges successfully, we may not be able to expand our business or increase our revenues at the rates we currently contemplate.

If we cannot manage the costs of opening new stores, our profitability may suffer.

     Since the beginning of 2005, we added a net of 229 company-operated sales and lease ownership stores. Opening large numbers of new stores requires significant start-up expenses, and new stores are often not profitable until their second year of operation. Consequently, opening many stores over a short period can materially decrease our net earnings for a time. This effect is sometimes called “new store drag.” During 2006, we estimate that start-up expenses for new stores reduced our pre-tax earnings by approximately $7 million, or $.14 per diluted share. We cannot be certain that we will be able to fully recover these significant costs in the future.

We may not be able to attract qualified franchisees, which may slow the growth of our business.

     Our growth strategy depends significantly upon our franchisees developing new franchised sales and lease ownership stores. We generally seek franchisees who meet our stringent business background and financial criteria, and who are willing to enter into area development agreements for several stores. A number of factors, however, could inhibit our ability to find qualified franchisees, including general economic downturns or legislative or litigation developments that make the rent-to-own industry less attractive to potential franchisees. These developments could also adversely affect our franchisees’ ability to obtain adequate capital to develop and operate new stores on time, or at all. Our inability to find qualified franchisees could slow our growth.

     Qualified franchisees who conform to our standards and requirements are also important to the overall success of our business. Our franchisees, however, are independent contractors and not employees, and consequently we cannot and do not control them to the same extent as our company-operated stores. Our franchisees may fail in key areas, which could in turn slow our growth, reduce our franchise revenues, or damage our image and reputation.

If we are unable to integrate acquired businesses successfully and realize anticipated economic, operational, and other benefits in a timely manner, our profitability may decrease.

     We frequently acquire other sales and lease ownership businesses. We acquired the rental agreements, merchandise and assets of 40 stores through acquisitions in 2006. If we are unable to integrate businesses we acquire successfully, we may incur substantial cost and delays in increasing our customer base. In addition, the failure to integrate acquisitions successfully may divert management’s attention from Aaron Rents’ existing business. Integration of an acquired business may be more difficult when we acquire a business in an unfamiliar market, or a business with a different management philosophy or operating style.

Our competitors could impede our ability to attract new customers, or cause current customers to cease doing business with us.

     The industries in which we compete are highly competitive. In the sales and lease ownership market, our competitors include national, regional and local operators of rent-to-own stores and credit retailers. We compete in the rent-to-rent market with national and local companies and, to a lesser extent, with apartment owners who purchase or provide furniture for rental to tenants. Some of our competitors have significantly greater financial and operating resources, and greater name recognition in certain markets, than we have. Greater financial resources may allow our competitors to grow faster than us, including through acquisitions. This in turn may enable them to enter new markets before we can, which may decrease our opportunities in those markets. Greater name recognition, or better public perception of a competitor’s reputation, may help them divert market share away from us, even in our established markets.

     In addition, new competitors may emerge. Current and potential competitors may establish financial or strategic relationships among themselves or with third parties. Accordingly, it is possible that new competitors or alliances among competitors could emerge and rapidly acquire significant market share.

If our independent franchisees fail to meet their debt service payments or other obligations under outstanding loans guaranteed by us as part of a franchise loan program, amounts that the lenders participating in the program could require us to pay to satisfy these obligations could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

     We have guaranteed the borrowings of certain franchisees under a franchise loan program with several banks with a maximum commitment amount of $125.0 million, and we also guarantee franchisee borrowings under certain other debt facilities. In the event these franchisees are unable to meet their debt service payments or otherwise experience an event of default, we would be unconditionally liable for a portion of the outstanding balance of the franchisees’ debt obligations, which at December 31, 2006 was $111.6 million. Of this amount, approximately $81.3 million represents franchisee borrowings outstanding under the franchise loan program and approximately $30.3 million represents franchisee borrowings that we guarantee under other debt facilities. Although we have had no significant losses associated with the franchisee loan and guaranty program since its inception, and we believe that any losses associated with any defaults would be mitigated through recovery of rental merchandise and other assets, we cannot guarantee that there will be no significant losses in the future or that we will be able to adequately mitigate any such losses. If we fail to adequately mitigate any such future losses, our business and financial condition could be materially adversely impacted.

Any loss of the services of our key executives, or our inability to attract and retain qualified managers, could have a material adverse impact on our operations.

     We believe that we have benefited substantially from Mr. Loudermilk, Sr.’s leadership and that the loss of his services at any time in the near future could adversely affect our business and operations. We also depend on the continued services of the rest of our management team, including key executives. The loss of these individuals without adequate replacement could also adversely affect our business. Although

we have employment agreements with some of our key executives, they are generally terminable on short notice and we do not carry key man life insurance on any of our officers.

     Additionally, we need a growing number of qualified managers to operate our stores successfully. The inability to attract and retain qualified individuals, or a significant increase in costs to do so, would materially adversely affect our operations.

Because our corporate furnishings division depends on business customers, slowdowns in corporate spending may decrease our revenues.

     Our corporate furnishings division depends on business customers for a significant percentage of its rental revenues. Because businesses are likely to curb spending during economic downturns, the revenues of our corporate furnishings business may be adversely affected during these periods. We cannot be certain that revenues from our corporate furnishings division will increase in the future.

You should not rely on our same store revenues as an indication of our future results of operations because they fluctuate significantly.

     Our historical same store revenue growth figures have fluctuated significantly from quarter to quarter. For example, we experienced same store revenue growth of 8.3% in 2005 and 7.2% for 2006. We calculate same store revenue growth by comparing revenues for comparable periods for all stores open during the entirety of those periods. Even though we achieved significant same store revenue growth in the past, we may not be able to increase same store revenues in the future. A number of factors have historically affected, and will continue to affect, our same store revenues, including:

• changes in competition;

• general economic conditions;

• new product introductions;

• consumer trends;

• changes in our merchandise mix;

• the impact of our new stores on our existing stores, including potential decreases in existing stores’ revenues as a result of opening new stores;

• timing of promotional events; and

• our ability to execute our business strategy effectively.

     Changes in our quarterly and annual same store revenues could cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly.

Our operations are regulated by and subject to the requirements of various federal and state laws and regulations. These laws and regulations, as the same may be amended or supplemented or interpreted by the courts from time to time, could expose us to significant compliance costs or burdens or force us to change our business practices in a manner that may be materially adverse to our operations, prospects or financial condition.

     Currently 47 states, including the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, specifically regulate rent-to-own transactions, including states in which we currently operate Aaron’s Sales & Lease Ownership stores. At the present time, no federal law specifically regulates the rent-to-own industry, although federal legislation to regulate the industry has been proposed from time to time. Any adverse changes in existing laws, or the passage of new adverse legislation by states or the federal government could materially increase both our costs of complying with laws and the risk that we could be sued or be subject to government sanctions if we are not in compliance. In addition, new burdensome legislation might force us to change our business model, and might reduce the economic potential of our sales and lease ownership operations.

     Most of the states that regulate rent-to-own transactions have enacted disclosure laws which require rent-to-own companies to disclose to their customers the total number of payments, total amount and timing of all payments to acquire ownership of any item, any other charges that may be imposed by them and miscellaneous other items. The more restrictive state rental purchase laws limit the total amount that a customer may be charged for an item, or regulate the amount of deemed “interest” that rent-to-own companies may charge on rent-to-own transactions, generally defining “interest” as rental fees paid in excess of the “retail” price of the goods. We cannot guarantee that the federal government or states will not enact additional or different legislation that would be disadvantageous or otherwise materially adverse to us.

     In addition to the risk of lawsuits related to the laws that regulate rent-to-own and consumer lease transactions, we could be subject to lawsuits alleging violations of state laws and regulations and consumer tort law, including fraud and consumer protection laws because of the consumer-oriented nature of the rent-to-own industry. A large judgment could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, an adverse outcome from a lawsuit, even one against one of our competitors, could result in changes in the way we and others in the industry do business, possibly leading to significant costs or decreased revenues or profitability.

We are subject to laws that regulate franchisor-franchisee relationships. Our ability to develop new franchised stores and enforce our rights against franchisees may be adversely affected by these laws, which could impair our growth strategy and cause our franchise revenues to decline.

     As a franchisor, we are subject to both regulation by the Federal Trade Commission and state laws regulating the offer and sale of franchises. Because we plan to expand our business in part by selling more franchises, our failure to obtain or maintain approvals to sell franchises could significantly impair our growth strategy. In addition, our failure to comply with franchise regulations could cause us to lose franchise fees and ongoing royalty revenues. Moreover, state laws that regulate substantive aspects of our relationships with franchisees may limit our ability to terminate or otherwise resolve conflicts with our franchisees.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

     None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

     We lease space for substantially all of our store and warehouse operations under operating leases expiring at various times through 2021. Most of the leases contain renewal options for additional periods ranging from one to 15 years at rental rates generally adjusted on the basis of the consumer price index or other factors.

     The following table sets forth certain information regarding our furniture manufacturing plants, lamp and accessory manufacturing facility, bedding facilities, and fulfillment centers:

LOCATION	PRIMARY USE	SQUARE FT.
Cairo, Georgia	Furniture Manufacturing		300,000
Cairo, Georgia	Furniture Manufacturing		147,000
Coolidge, Georgia	Furniture Manufacturing		81,000
Coolidge, Georgia	Furniture Manufacturing		48,000
Coolidge, Georgia	Furniture Manufacturing		41,000
Coolidge, Georgia	Furniture Manufacturing		10,000
Duluth, Georgia	Furniture Manufacturing		23,000
Tampa, Florida	Lamp and Accessory Manufacturing		50,000

LOCATION	PRIMARY USE	SQUARE FT.
Lewisburg, Pennsylvania	Bedding Facility		25,000
Buford, Georgia	Bedding Facility		32,000
Sugarland, Texas	Bedding Facility		20,000
Orlando, Florida	Bedding Facility		16,000
Indianapolis, Indiana	Bedding Facility		24,000
Auburndale, Florida	Sales & Lease Ownership Fulfillment Center		77,000
Baltimore, Maryland	Sales & Lease Ownership Fulfillment Center		95,000
Columbus, Ohio	Sales & Lease Ownership Fulfillment Center		92,000
Dallas, Texas	Sales & Lease Ownership Fulfillment Center		89,000
Duluth, Georgia	Sales & Lease Ownership Fulfillment Center		97,000
Sugarland, Texas	Sales & Lease Ownership Fulfillment Center		104,000
Winston-Salem, North Carolina	Sales & Lease Ownership Fulfillment Center		83,000
Blythewood, South Carolina	Sales & Lease Ownership Fulfillment Center		77,000
Madison, Tennessee	Sales & Lease Ownership Fulfillment Center		38,000
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma	Sales & Lease Ownership Fulfillment Center		90,000
Phoenix, Arizona	Sales & Lease Ownership Fulfillment Center		96,000
Magnolia, Mississippi	Sales & Lease Ownership Fulfillment Center		125,000
Plainfield, Indiana	Sales & Lease Ownership Fulfillment Center		98,000
Portland, Oregon	Sales & Lease Ownership Fulfillment Center		98,000
California, Rancho Cucamongo	Sales & Lease Ownership Fulfillment Center		96,000
Westfield, Massachusetts	Sales & Lease Ownership Fulfillment Center		102,000

     Our executive and administrative offices occupy approximately 42,000 square feet in an 11-story, 87,000 square-foot office building that we own in Atlanta. We lease most of the remaining space to third parties under leases with remaining terms averaging three years. We lease a two-story building with over 50,000 square feet in Kennesaw, Georgia for additional administrative functions. We believe that all of our facilities are well maintained and adequate for their current and reasonably foreseeable uses.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

     From time to time, we are party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company is not currently a party to any other legal proceeding the result of which it believes could have a material adverse impact upon its business, financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

     None.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

(a)	The information presented under the caption “Common Stock Market Prices & Dividends” in the Company’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2006 is incorporated herein by reference. The market quotations stated herein reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commissions and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
	Information concerning the Company’s equity compensation plans is set forth in Item 12 of Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(b)	Not applicable.

(c) The Company made no repurchases of its Common Stock or Class A Common Stock during the fourth quarter of 2006. As of December 31, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to 2,670,502 common shares pursuant to repurchase authority publicly announced from time-to-time.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

     The information presented under the caption “Selected Financial Information” in the Company’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2006 is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     The information presented under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Company’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2006 is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

     The information presented under the captions “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Market Risk” and “Note D: Credit Facilities” in the Company’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2006 is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

     The information presented under the captions “Consolidated Balance Sheets,” “Consolidated Statements of Earnings,” “Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity,” “Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows,” “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,” and the reports entitled “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the Consolidated Financial Statements” and “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” in the Company’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2006 is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

     None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

     Disclosure Controls and Procedures. An evaluation of Aaron Rents’ disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, was carried out by management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

     No system of controls, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the system of controls are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that the system of controls has operated effectively in all cases. Our disclosure controls and procedures however are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the objectives of disclosure controls and procedures are met.

     Based on management’s evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the date of the evaluation to provide reasonable assurance that the objectives of disclosure controls and procedures are met.

     Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in Aaron Rents’ internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, during the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter of 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

     Management’s report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, including its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of that date, is included under the caption “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” in the Company’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2006, and is incorporated herein by reference. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm has issued a report titled “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” that also appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

     None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

     The information contained in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement, which the Company will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after December 31, 2006, with respect to: the identity, background and Section 16 filings of directors and executive officers of the Company; the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and the Committee’s “audit committee financial expert”; the Company’s procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to the Board of Directors; and the Company’s code of ethics applicable to its chief executive, financial, and accounting officers is incorporated herein by reference to this item.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

     The information contained in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement, which the Company will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after December 31, 2006, with respect to director and executive compensation, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee Report, is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

     The information contained in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement, which the Company will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after December 31, 2006, with respect to the ownership of common stock by certain beneficial owners and management, and with respect to the Company’s compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance, are incorporated herein by reference to this item.

     For purposes of determining the aggregate market value of the Company’s voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates, shares held by all directors and executive officers of the Company have been excluded. The exclusion of such shares is not intended to, and shall not, constitute a determination as to which persons or entities may be “affiliates” of the Company as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

     The information contained in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement, which the Company will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after December 31, 2006, with respect to related party transactions and director independence, is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

     The information contained under the heading “Audit Matters” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement, which the Company will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after December 31, 2006, is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

A) 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     The following financial statements and notes thereto of Aaron Rents, Inc. and Subsidiaries, and the related Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm are incorporated in Item 8 by reference from the Company’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

Consolidated Balance Sheets—December 31, 2006 and 2005

Consolidated Statements of Earnings—Years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity—Years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the Consolidated Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

     2. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

     All schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.

3. EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT
NO.			DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
	3	(a)	Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, filed as Exhibit 3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1996 (the “March 31, 1996 10-Q”), which exhibit is by this reference incorporated herein.
	3	(b)	Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company, filed as Exhibit 3(b) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, which exhibit is by this reference incorporated herein.
	3	(c)	Amendment No. 1 dated May 8, 2003 to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, filed as Exhibit 3(c) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, which exhibit is by this reference incorporated herein.
	3	(d)	Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, filed as Exhibits 4(d) and 4(e) to the Company’s Registration Statement Form S-3, file number 333-133913, pertaining to the 2006 public offering of common stock, which exhibit is by this reference incorporated herein.
	4		See Exhibits 3 (a) through 3 (d).
	10	(a)	Aaron Rents, Inc. 1996 Stock Option and Incentive Award Plan, filed as Exhibit 4(a) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998 (the “March 31, 1998 10-Q”), which exhibit is incorporated by this reference. *
	10	(b)	Aaron Rents, Inc. Employees Retirement Plan and Trust, filed as Exhibit 4(a) to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, file number 33-62538, filed with the Commission on May 12, 1993, which exhibit is by this reference incorporated herein. *
	10	(c)	Aaron Rents, Inc. 1990 Stock Option Plan, filed as Exhibit 4(a) to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, file number 33-62536, filed with the Commission on May 12, 1993, which exhibit is by this reference incorporated herein. *
	10	(d)	Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated January 6, 1995, filed as Exhibit 10(a) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 1994 (the “December 31, 1994 10-Q”), which exhibit is by this reference incorporated herein.
	10	(e)	Third Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated September 30, 1996, filed as Exhibit 10 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996, which exhibit is by reference incorporated herein.
	10	(f)	Fifth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated December 17, 1997, filed as Exhibit 10(a) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 (the “1997 10-K”), which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
	10	(g)	Letter Agreements dated December 30, 1997 between SunTrust Bank, Atlanta and the Company, and letter agreements dated December 30, 1997 between First Chicago NBD and the Company regarding Interest Rate Swap Transactions, filed as Exhibit 10(b) to the Company’s 1997 10-K, which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
	10	(h)	Loan Facility Agreement and Guaranty by and among Aaron Rents, Inc., SunTrust Bank, Atlanta, as Servicer and each of the Participants Party Hereto, Dated January 20, 1998, filed as Exhibit 10(a) to the Company’s March 31, 1998 10-Q, which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
	10	(i)	Amendment Number One to Loan Facility Agreement and Guaranty dated as of March 13, 1998, filed as Exhibit 10(b) to the Company’s March 31, 1998 10-Q, which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
	10	(j)	Amended and Restated Loan Facility Agreement and Guaranty and related Servicing Agreement dated as of November 3, 1999, filed as Exhibit 10(j) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 (the “1999 10-K”), which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.

EXHIBIT
NO.			DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
	10	(k)	Amended and Restated Loan Facility Agreement and Guaranty dated as of June 20, 2000, filed as Exhibit 10(k) to the Company’s Annual Report of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 (the “2000 10-K”), which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
	10	(l)	Loan Facility Agreement and Guaranty by and among Aaron Rents, Inc. and SouthTrust Bank dated August 31, 2000, filed as Exhibit 10(l) to the Company’s 2000 10-K, which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
	10	(m)	Loan Agreement between Fort Bend County Industrial Development Corporation and Aaron Rents, Inc. relating to the Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (Aaron Rents, Inc. Project), Series 2000 dated October 1, 2000, filed as Exhibit 10(m) to the Company’s 2000 10-K, which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
	10	(n)	Letter of Credit and Reimbursement Agreement between Aaron Rents, Inc. and First Union National Bank dated as of October 1, 2000, filed as Exhibit 10(n) to the Company’s 2000 10-K, which is incorporated by this reference.
	10	(o)	Term Loan Agreement among Aaron Rents, Inc. Puerto Rico as borrower, Aaron Rents, Inc. as Guarantor and SunTrust Bank as Administrative Agent dated November 21, 2000, filed as Exhibit 10(o) to the Company’s 2000 10-K, which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
	10	(p)	Revolving Credit Agreement among Aaron Rents, Inc. as borrower, Aaron Rents, Inc. Puerto Rico as co-borrower and SunTrust Bank as Administrative Agent dated March 30, 2001 filed as Exhibit 10(a) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001 (the “March 31, 2001 10-Q”), which is incorporated by this reference.
	10	(q)	Loan Facility Agreement and Guaranty by and among Aaron Rents, Inc. and SunTrust Bank and each of the Participants Party Hereto dated March 30, 2001 filed as Exhibit 10(b) to the Company’s March 31, 2001 10-Q, which is incorporated by this reference.
	10	(r)	Aaron Rents, Inc. 2001 Stock Option and Incentive Award Plan, filed as Exhibit 4(a) to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, file number 333-76026, filed with the Commission on December 28, 2001 which exhibit is by this reference incorporated herein. *
	10	(s)	Amended and Restated Master Agreement by and among Aaron Rents, Inc., SunTrust Bank and SouthTrust Bank, dated October 31, 2001 filed as Exhibit 10(s) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
	10	(t)	Note Purchase Agreement between Aaron Rents, Inc. and certain other obligors and the purchasers dated as of August 15, 2002 and Form of Senior Note filed as exhibit 10(t) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, which is incorporated by this reference.
	10	(u)	Amendment Number Two to the Revolving Credit Agreement among Aaron Rents, Inc. as borrower, Aaron Rents, Inc. Puerto Rico as co-borrower and SunTrust Bank as Administrative Agent dated April 30, 2003 filed as Exhibit 10(u) to the Company’s Quarterly Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the “March 31, 2003 10-Q”), which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
	10	(v)	Amendment Number Two to the Loan Facility Agreement and Guaranty by and among Aaron Rents, Inc. and SunTrust Bank and each of the Participants Party Hereto dated April 30, 2003 filed as Exhibit 10(v) to the Company’s March 31, 2003 10-Q, which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
	10	(w)	Amendment Number One to the Servicing Agreement by and between Aaron Rents, Inc. (“Sponsor”), and SunTrust Bank (the “Servicer”) dated April 30, 2003 filed as Exhibit 10(w) to the Company’s March 31, 2003 10-Q, which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
	10	(x)	Third Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement by and among Aaron Rents, Inc., Aaron Rents, Inc. Puerto Rico, the several banks and other financial institutions from time to time party thereto, SunTrust Bank, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, dated January 27, 2004 filed as Exhibit 10(x) to the Company’s Quarterly Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the “March 31, 2004 10-Q”), which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.

EXHIBIT
NO.			DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
	10	(y)	Third Amendment to Loan Facility and Guaranty by and among Aaron Rents, Inc., the several banks and other financial institutions from time to time party thereto, and SunTrust Bank dated January 27, 2004 filed as Exhibit 10(y) to the Company’s March 31, 2004 10-Q, which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
	10	(z)	Revolving Credit Agreement by and among Aaron Rents, Inc as borrower, Aaron Rents, Inc. Puerto Rico, as co-borrower and SunTrust Bank as Agent and each of the Lenders Party Thereto dated May 28, 2004 filed as exhibit 10(a) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.
10(aa)			Loan Facility Agreement and Guaranty by and among Aaron Rents, Inc. and SunTrust Bank as Servicer and each of the Participants Party Thereto dated May 28, 2004 filed as exhibit 10(b) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.
10(bb)			First Amendment to the Aaron Rents, Inc. 2001 Stock Option and Incentive Award Plan, filed as Exhibit 4(b) to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, file number 333-123426, filed with the Commission on March 18, 2005 which exhibit is by this reference incorporated herein. *
10(cc)			Note Purchase Agreement between Aaron Rents, Inc. and certain other obligors and the purchasers dated as of July 27, 2005 and Form of Senior Note filed as Exhibit 10(ee) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on August 2, 2005, which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
10(dd)			First Amendment and Waiver Agreement made as of May 28, 2004 to Note Purchase Agreement between Aaron Rents, Inc. and certain other obligors and the purchasers dated as of August 15, 2002 filed as Exhibit 10(ff) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on August 2, 2005, which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
10(ee)			Second Amendment made as of July 27, 2005 to Note Purchase Agreement between Aaron Rents, Inc. and certain other obligors and the purchasers dated as of August 15, 2002 filed as Exhibit 10(gg) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on August 2, 2005, which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
10(ff)			First Amendment made and entered into as of July 27, 2005 to Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of May 28, 2004 by and among Aaron Rents, Inc. and certain co-borrowers, the several banks and other financial institutions from time to time party thereto and SunTrust Bank as administrative agent filed as Exhibit 10(hh) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on August 2, 2005, which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
10(gg)			Third Amendment made and entered into as of July 27, 2005 to Loan Facility Agreement and Guaranty dated as of May 28, 2004 by and among Aaron Rents, Inc. as sponsor, SunTrust Bank and each of the other lending institutions party thereto as participants, and SunTrust Bank as servicer filed as Exhibit 10(ii) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on August 2, 2005, which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
10(hh)			First Amendment dated as of July 27, 2005 to Amended and Restated Master Agreement and Amended and Restated Lease Agreement dated as October 31, 2001, as amended, among Aaron Rents, Inc. as lessee, SunTrust Banks, Inc. as lessor, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as lender, and SunTrust Bank as lease participant and agent filed as Exhibit 10(jj) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on August 2, 2005, which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
10(ii)			Third Amendment made and entered into as of July 27, 2005 to Loan Facility Agreement and Guaranty dated as of May 28, 2004 by and among Aaron Rents, Inc. as sponsor, SunTrust Bank and each of the other lending institutions party thereto as participants, and SunTrust Bank as servicer (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(ii) to the 8/2/05 Form 8-K).
10(jj)			First Amendment dated as of July 27, 2005 to Amended and Restated Master Agreement and Amended and Restated Lease Agreement dated as October 31, 2001, as amended, among Aaron Rents, Inc. as lessee, SunTrust Banks, Inc. as lessor, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as lender, and SunTrust Bank as lease participant and agent (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(jj) to the 8/2/05 Form 8-K).

EXHIBIT
NO.			DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
10(kk)			First Omnibus Amendment dated as of August 21, 2002, but effective as of October 31, 2001 to the Amended and Restated Master Agreement and Amended and Restated Lease Agreement dated as October 31, 2001, as amended, among Aaron Rents, Inc. as lessee, SunTrust Banks, Inc. as lessor, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as lender, and SunTrust Bank as lease participant and agent filed as Exhibit 10(kk) to the Company’s September 30, 2005 10-Q, which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
10(ll)			First Amendment made and entered into as of September 27, 2004 to Loan Facility Agreement and Guaranty dated as of May 28, 2004 by and among Aaron Rents, Inc. as sponsor, SunTrust Bank and each of the other lending institutions party thereto as participants, and SunTrust Bank as servicer filed as Exhibit 10(ll) to the Company’s September 30, 2005 10-Q, which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
10(mm)			Second Amendment made and entered into as of May 27, 2005 to Loan Facility Agreement and Guaranty dated as of May 28, 2004 by and among Aaron Rents, Inc. as sponsor, SunTrust Bank and each of the other lending institutions party thereto as participants, and SunTrust Bank as servicer filed as Exhibit 10(mm) to the Company’s September 30, 2005 10-Q, which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
10(nn)			Fourth Amendment made and entered into as of February 27, 2006 to Loan Facility Agreement and Guaranty dated as of May 28, 2004 by and among Aaron Rents, Inc. as sponsor, SunTrust Bank and each of the other lending institutions party thereto as participants, and SunTrust Bank as servicer, which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
10(oo)			Second Amendment made and entered into as of February 27, 2006 to Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of May 28, 2004 by and among Aaron Rents, Inc. and certain co-borrowers, the several banks and other financial institutions from time to time party thereto and SunTrust Bank as administrative agent, which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
10(pp)			Consent Agreement made and entered into as of April 7, 2006 by and among Aaron Rents, Inc. as sponsor, SunTrust Bank and each of the other lending institutions party thereto as participants, and SunTrust Bank as servicer to form one or more Canadian Subsidiaries in one or more Canadian provinces, which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
10(qq)			Consent Agreement made and entered into as of April 7, 2006 by and among Aaron Rents, Inc. and certain co-borrowers, the several banks and other financial institutions from time to time party thereto and SunTrust Bank as administrative agent to form one or more Canadian Subsidiaries in one or more Canadian provinces, which exhibit is incorporated by this reference.
10(rr)			Amendment to Option and Award Agreement under the Aaron Rents, Inc. 2001 Stock Option and Incentive Award Plan, filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on December 22, 2006, which exhibit is incorporated by this reference, which exhibit is by this reference incorporated herein. *
	13		Portions of the Aaron Rents, Inc. Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2006. With the exception of information expressly incorporated herein by direct reference thereto, the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2006 is not deemed to be filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
	21		Subsidiaries of the Registrant, filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
	23		Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
	31	(a)	Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
	31	(b)	Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
	32	(a)	Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32	(b)	Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement

(B) EXHIBITS

     The exhibits listed in Item 15(a) (3) are included elsewhere in this Report.

(C) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES

     The financial statements listed in Item 15(a)(1) are included in Exhibit 13 to this Report.

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 27th day of February 2007.

AARON RENTS, INC.
By:	/s/ GILBERT L. DANIELSON
	Gilbert L. Danielson
	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 27th day of February 2007.

SIGNATURE	TITLE
/s/ R. CHARLES LOUDERMILK, SR. R. Charles Loudermilk, Sr.	Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chairman of the Board of Directors
/s/ ROBERT C. LOUDERMILK, JR. Robert C. Loudermilk, Jr.	President, Chief Operating Officer and Director
/s/ GILBERT L. DANIELSON Gilbert L. Danielson	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ ROBERT P. SINCLAIR, JR. Robert P. Sinclair, Jr.	Vice President, Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ WILLIAM K. BUTLER William K. Butler	President, Aaron’s Sales & Lease Ownership and Director
/s/ RONALD W. ALLEN Ronald W. Allen	Director
/s/ LEO BENATAR Leo Benatar	Director
/s/ EARL DOLIVE Earl Dolive	Director

SIGNATURE	TITLE
/s/ DAVID L. KOLB David L. Kolb	Director
/s/ JOHN C. PORTMAN John C. Portman	Director
/s/ RAY M. ROBINSON Ray M. Robinson	Director
/s/ JOHN SCHUERHOLZ John Schuerholz	Director

EX-13

Exhibit 13

SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Year Ended		Year Ended		Year Ended		Year Ended		Year Ended
(Dollar Amounts in Thousands,	December 31,		December 31,		December 31,		December 31,		December 31,
Except Per Share)	2006		2005		2004		2003		2002
OPERATING RESULTS
Revenues:
Rentals and Fees	$	992,791	$	845,162	$	694,293	$	553,773	$	459,179
Retail Sales		62,319		58,366		56,259		68,786		72,698
Non-Retail Sales		224,489		185,622		160,774		120,355		88,969
Franchise Royalties and Fees		33,626		29,781		25,253		19,347		16,663
Other		13,367		6,574		9,901		4,536		3,179
		1,326,592		1,125,505		946,480		766,797		640,688
Costs and Expenses:
Retail Cost of Sales		41,262		39,054		39,380		50,913		53,856
Non-Retail Cost of Sales		207,217		172,807		149,207		111,714		82,407
Operating Expenses		579,565		507,158		414,518		344,884		293,346
Depreciation of Rental Merchandise		364,109		305,630		253,456		195,661		162,660
Interest		9,729		8,519		5,413		5,782		4,767
		1,201,882		1,033,168		861,974		708,954		597,036
Earnings Before Income Taxes		124,710		92,337		84,506		57,843		43,652
Income Taxes		46,075		34,344		31,890		21,417		16,212
Net Earnings	$	78,635	$	57,993	$	52,616	$	36,426	$	27,440
Earnings Per Share	$	1.50	$	1.16	$	1.06	$	.74	$	.58
Earnings Per Share Assuming Dilution		1.47		1.14		1.04		.73		.57
Dividends Per Share:
Common	$	.057	$	.054	$	.039	$	.022	$	.018
Class A		.057		.054		.039		.022		.018
FINANCIAL POSITION
Rental Merchandise, Net	$	612,149	$	550,932	$	425,567	$	343,013	$	317,287
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net		170,294		133,759		111,118		99,584		87,094
Total Assets		979,606		858,515		700,288		559,884		487,468
Interest-Bearing Debt		129,974		211,873		116,655		79,570		73,265
Shareholders’ Equity		607,015		434,471		375,178		320,186		280,545
AT YEAR END
Stores Open:
Company-Operated		904		806		674		560		482
Franchised		441		392		357		287		232
Rental Agreements in Effect		773,000		697,000		582,000		464,800		369,000
Number of Employees		8,400		7,600		6,400		5,400		4,800

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

Aaron Rents, Inc. is a leading specialty retailer of consumer electronics, computers, residential and office furniture, household appliances and accessories. Our major operating divisions are the Aaron’s Sales & Lease Ownership Division, the Aaron’s Corporate Furnishings Division, and the MacTavish Furniture Industries Division, which manufactures and supplies nearly one-half of the furniture and related accessories rented and sold in our stores. Our sales and lease ownership division represents the fastest growing segment of our business, accounting for 90%, 89%, and 88% of our total revenues in 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

Aaron Rents has demonstrated strong revenue growth over the last three years. Total revenues have increased from $946.5 million in 2004 to $1.327 billion in 2006, representing a compound annual growth rate of 18.4%. Total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006 were $1.327 billion, an increase of $201.1 million, or 17.9%, over the prior year.

Most of our growth comes from the opening of new sales and lease ownership stores and increases in same store revenues from previously opened stores. We estimate that we will add approximately 250 stores in 2007, a combination of company-operated and franchised stores. We opened 78 company-operated sales and lease ownership stores in 2006. We spend on average approximately $600,000 in the first year of operation of a new store, which includes purchases of rental merchandise, investments in leasehold improvements and financing first year start-up costs. Our new sales and lease ownership stores typically achieve revenues of approximately $1.1 million in their third year of operation. Our comparable stores open more than three years normally achieve approximately $1.4 million in unit revenues, which we believe represents a higher unit sales volume than the typical rent-to-own store. Most of our stores are cash flow positive in the second year of operations following their opening.

We also use our franchise program to help us expand our sales and lease ownership concept more quickly and into more areas than we otherwise would by opening only company-operated stores. Our franchisees opened 75 stores in 2006. We purchased 28 franchised stores during 2006. Franchise royalties and other related fees represent a growing source of high margin revenue for us, accounting for approximately $33.6 million of revenues in 2006, up from $25.3 million in 2004, representing a compounded annual growth rate of 15.4%.

Key Components of Income

In this management’s discussion and analysis section, we review the Company’s consolidated results including the five components of our revenues (rentals and fees, retail sales, non-retail sales, franchise royalties and fees, and other revenues), costs of sales and expenses (of which depreciation of rental merchandise is a significant part). We also review the results of our sales and lease ownership and corporate furnishings divisions.

Revenues. We separate our total revenues into five components: rentals and fees, retail sales, non-retail sales, franchise royalties and fees, and other revenues. Rentals and fees includes all revenues derived from rental agreements from our sales and lease ownership and corporate furnishings stores, including agreements that result in our customers acquiring ownership at the end of the term. Retail sales represent sales of both new and rental return merchandise from our sales and lease ownership and corporate furnishings stores. Non-retail sales mainly represent merchandise sales to our sales and lease ownership division franchisees. Franchise royalties and fees represent fees from the sale of franchise rights and royalty payments from franchisees, as well as other related income from our franchised stores. Other revenues include, at times, income from the sale of equity investments held in third parties, gains on asset dispositions and other miscellaneous revenues.

Cost of Sales. We separate our cost of sales into two components: retail and non-retail. Retail cost of sales represents the original or depreciated cost of merchandise sold through our company-operated stores. Non-retail cost of sales primarily represents the cost of merchandise sold to our franchisees.

Depreciation of Rental Merchandise. Depreciation of rental merchandise reflects the expense associated with depreciating merchandise held for rent and rented to customers by our company-operated sales and lease ownership and corporate furnishings stores.

Critical Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition

Rental revenues are recognized in the month they are due on the accrual basis of accounting. For internal management reporting purposes, rental revenues from the sales and lease ownership division are recognized as revenue in the month the cash is collected. On a monthly basis, we record an accrual for rental revenues due but not yet received, net of allowances, and a deferral of revenue for rental payments received prior to the month due. Our revenue recognition accounting policy matches the rental revenue with the corresponding costs, mainly depreciation, associated with the rental merchandise. At the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, we had a revenue deferral representing cash collected in advance of being due or otherwise earned totaling $24.1 million and $20.3 million, respectively, and an accrued revenue receivable net of allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical collection rates of $5.0 million and $4.8 million, respectively. Revenues from the sale of merchandise to franchisees are recognized at the time of receipt of the merchandise by the franchisee and revenues from such sales to other customers are recognized at the time of shipment.

Rental Merchandise

Our sales and lease ownership division depreciates merchandise over the agreement period, generally 12 to 24 months when rented, and 36 months when not rented, to 0% salvage value. Our corporate furnishings division depreciates merchandise over its estimated useful life, which ranges from six months to 60 months, net of salvage value, which ranges from 0% to 60%. Sales and lease ownership merchandise is generally depreciated at a faster rate than our corporate furnishings merchandise. As sales and lease ownership revenues continue to comprise an increasing percentage of total revenues, we expect rental merchandise depreciation to increase at a correspondingly faster rate.

Our policies require weekly rental merchandise counts by store managers and write-offs for unsalable, damaged, or missing merchandise inventories. Full physical inventories are generally taken at our fulfillment and manufacturing facilities on a quarterly basis with appropriate provisions made for missing, damaged and unsalable merchandise. In addition, we monitor rental merchandise levels and mix by division, store and fulfillment center, as well as the average age of merchandise on hand. If unsalable rental merchandise cannot be returned to vendors, its carrying value is adjusted to net realizable value or written off. All rental merchandise is available for rental and sale.

Effective September 30, 2004, we began recording rental merchandise carrying value adjustments on the allowance method, which estimates the merchandise losses incurred but not yet identified by management as of the end of the accounting period. Previously, we accounted for merchandise inventory adjustments using the direct write-off method, which recognized merchandise losses only after they were specifically identified. This adoption of the allowance method had the effect of increasing expenses in the third quarter of 2004 for a one-time adjustment of $2.5 million to establish a rental merchandise allowance reserve on our balance sheet. We expect rental merchandise adjustments in the future under this new method to be materially consistent with the prior years’ adjustments under the direct write-off method. The 2005 rental merchandise adjustments include write-offs of merchandise in the third quarter that resulted from losses associated with Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. These hurricane related write-offs were $2.8 million, net of insurance proceeds. Rental merchandise adjustments, including the effect of the establishment of the reserve mentioned above, totaled $20.8 million, $21.8 million, and $18.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

Leases and Closed Store Reserves

The majority of our company-operated stores are operated from leased facilities under operating lease agreements. The substantial majority of these leases are for periods that do not exceed five years. Leasehold improvements related to these leases are generally amortized over periods that do not exceed the lesser of the lease term or five years. While a majority of our leases do not require escalating payments, for the leases which do contain such provisions we record the related lease expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Finally, we do not generally obtain significant amounts of lease incentives or allowances from landlords. The total amount of incentives and allowances received in 2006, 2005, and 2004 totaled $1.5 million, $1.5 million, and $1.3 million, respectively. Such amounts are recognized ratably over the lease term.

From time to time, we close or consolidate stores. Our primary cost associated with closing or consolidating stores is the future lease payments and related commitments. We record an estimate of the future obligation related to closed or consolidated stores based upon the present value of the future lease payments and related commitments, net of estimated sublease income which we base upon historical experience. For the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, our reserve for closed or consolidated stores was $693,000 and $1.3 million, respectively. If our estimates related to sublease income are not correct, our actual liability may be more or less than the liability recorded at December 31, 2006.

Insurance Programs

Aaron Rents maintains insurance contracts to fund workers compensation and group health insurance claims. Using actuarial analysis and projections, we estimate the liabilities associated with open and incurred but not reported workers compensation claims. This analysis is based upon an assessment of the likely outcome or historical experience, net of any stop loss or other supplementary coverages. We also calculate the projected outstanding plan liability for our group health insurance program. Our workers compensation insurance claims and group health insurance balance was a $656,000 prepaid and a $3.1 million liability at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

If we resolve existing workers compensation claims for amounts that are in excess of our current estimates and within policy stop loss limits, we will be required to pay additional amounts beyond those accrued at December 31, 2006. Additionally, if the actual group health insurance liability exceeds our projections, we will be required to pay additional amounts beyond those accrued at December 31, 2006.

The assumptions and conditions described above reflect management’s best assumptions and estimates, but these items involve inherent uncertainties as described above, which may or may not be controllable by management. As a result, the accounting for such items could result in different amounts if management used different assumptions or if different conditions occur in future periods.

Same Store Revenues

We refer to changes in same store revenues as a key performance indicator. For the year ended December 31, 2006, we calculated the change in this amount by comparing revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006 to revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005 for all stores open for the entire 24-month period ended December 31, 2006, excluding stores that received rental agreements from other acquired, closed, or merged stores. For the year ended December 31, 2005 we calculated the change in this amount by comparing revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005 to revenues for the year ended December 31, 2004 for all stores open for the entire 24-month period ended December 31, 2005, excluding stores that received rental agreements from other acquired, closed, or merged stores.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2006 Versus Year Ended December 31, 2005

The following table shows key selected financial data for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the changes in dollars and as a percentage to 2006 from 2005.

	Year Ended December 31,				Increase in Dollars		% Increase to 2006
(In Thousands)	2006		2005		to 2006 from 2005		from 2005
REVENUES:
Rentals and Fees	$	992,791	$	845,162	$	147,629		17.5	%
Retail Sales		62,319		58,366		3,953		6.8
Non-Retail Sales		224,489		185,622		38,867		20.9
Franchise Royalties and Fees		33,626		29,781		3,845		12.9
Other		13,367		6,574		6,793		103.3
		1,326,592		1,125,505		201,087		17.9
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Retail Cost of Sales		41,262		39,054		2,208		5.7
Non-Retail Cost of Sales		207,217		172,807		34,410		19.9
Operating Expenses		579,565		507,158		72,407		14.3
Depreciation of Rental Merchandise		364,109		305,630		58,479		19.1
Interest		9,729		8,519		1,210		14.2
		1,201,882		1,033,168		168,714		16.3
EARNINGS BEFORE INCOME TAXES		124,710		92,337		32,373		35.1
INCOME TAXES		46,075		34,344		11,731		34.2
NET EARNINGS	$	78,635	$	57,993	$	20,642		35.6	%

Revenues

The 17.9% increase in total revenues, to $1.327 billion in 2006 from $1.126 billion in 2005, was due mainly to a $147.6 million, or 17.5%, increase in rentals and fees revenues, plus a $38.9 million increase in non-retail sales. The $147.6 million increase in rentals and fees revenues was attributable to a $142.4 million increase from our sales and lease ownership division, which had a 7.2% increase in same store revenues during the 24 month period ended December 31, 2006 and added 229 company-operated stores since the beginning of 2005. The growth in our sales and lease ownership division was augmented by a $5.5 million increase in revenues in our corporate furnishings division. Additionally, included in other revenues in 2006 was a $7.2 million gain from the sale of the assets of our 12 stores located in Puerto Rico and three additional stores located in the continental United States. We received $16.0 million in cash proceeds and disposed of goodwill of $1.0 million in conjunction with these sales.

The 6.8% increase in revenues from retail sales, to $62.3 million in 2006 from $58.4 million in 2005, was primarily due to an increase of $3.7 million in the sales and lease ownership division as a result of the increased demand and growing store base described above. Retail sales represents sales of both new and returned rental merchandise.

The 20.9% increase in non-retail sales (which mainly represents merchandise sold to our franchisees), to $224.5 million in 2006 from $185.6 million in 2005, was due to the growth of our franchise operations and our distribution network. The total number of franchised sales and lease ownership stores at December 31, 2006 was 441, reflecting a net addition of 84 stores since the beginning of 2005.

The 12.9% increase in franchise royalties and fees, to $33.6 million in 2006 from $29.8 million in 2005, primarily reflects an increase in royalty income from franchisees, increasing 17.7% to $25.4 million in 2006 compared to $21.6 million in 2005. The increase in royalty income from franchisees was partially offset by decreased franchise and financing fee revenues. Revenues increased in this area primarily due to the previously mentioned growth of franchised stores and an increase in certain royalty rates.

The 103.3% increase in other revenues, to $13.4 million in 2006 from $6.6 million in 2005, is primarily attributable to a $7.2 million gain from the sale of the assets of our 12 stores located in Puerto Rico and three additional stores in the continental United States. In addition, included in other income in 2005 is $934,000 of proceeds from business interruption insurance associated with the operations of hurricane-affected areas and a $565,000 gain in 2005 on the sale of our holdings of Rent-Way, Inc. common stock.

With respect to our major operating units, revenues for our sales and lease ownership division increased 19.5%, to $1.201 billion for 2006 from $1.005 billion for 2005. This increase was attributable to the addition of stores and same store revenue growth described above. The 4.7% increase in corporate furnishings division revenues, to $123.0 million for 2006 from $117.5 million for 2005, is primarily the result of improving economic and business conditions.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales from retail sales increased 5.7% to $41.3 million in 2006 compared to $39.1 million in 2005, with retail cost of sales as a percentage of retail sales remaining comparable between the periods.

Cost of sales from non-retail sales increased 19.9%, to $207.2 million in 2006 from $172.8 million in 2005, and as a percentage of non-retail sales, decreased slightly to 92.3% from 93.1%.

Expenses

Operating expenses in 2006 increased $72.4 million to $579.6 million from $507.2 million in 2005, a 14.3% increase. As a percentage of total revenues, operating expenses were 43.7% in 2006 and 45.1% in 2005. Operating expenses decreased as a percentage of total revenues in 2006 mainly due to the maturing of new company-operated sales and lease ownership stores and the 7.2% increase in same store revenues previously mentioned. Additionally, operating expenses in 2005 included $2.5 million in expenses, net of $1.9 million of insurance recoveries, related to losses due to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

Depreciation of rental merchandise increased $58.5 million to $364.1 million in 2006 from $305.6 million during the comparable period in 2005, a 19.1% increase. As a percentage of total rentals and fees, depreciation of rental merchandise increased to 36.7% from 36.2% from year to year. The increase as a percentage of rentals and fees was primarily due to increased depreciation expense associated with an increase in 90 day same as cash sales and the early payout of lease ownership agreements in our sales and lease ownership division and, to a lesser extent, a greater percentage of our rentals and fees revenues coming from our sales and lease ownership division, which depreciates its rental merchandise at a faster rate than our corporate furnishings division.

Interest expense increased to $9.7 million in 2006 compared with $8.5 million in 2005, a 14.2% increase. The increase in interest expense as a percentage of total revenues was primarily due to higher debt levels during part of 2006 and, to a lesser extent, higher interest rates in 2006. Debt levels at December 31, 2006 decreased significantly as a result of debt payments made with the proceeds of the Company’s 2006 stock offering.

Income tax expense increased $11.7 million to $46.1 million in 2006 compared with $34.3 million in 2005, representing a 34.2% increase. Aaron Rents’ effective tax rate was 36.9% in 2006 compared with 37.2% in 2005.

Net Earnings

Net earnings increased $20.6 million to $78.6 million in 2006 compared with $58.0 million in 2005, representing a 35.6% increase. As a percentage of total revenues, net earnings were 5.9% and 5.2% in 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase in net earnings was primarily the result of the maturing of new company-operated sales and lease ownership stores added over the past several years, contributing to a 7.2% increase in same store revenues, and a 12.9%

increase in franchise royalties and fees. Additionally, included in other revenues in 2006 was a $7.2 million gain from the sale of the assets of our 12 stores located in Puerto Rico and three additional stores in the continental United States. Also included in the 2005 results are increased expenses and losses due to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

Year Ended December 31, 2005 Versus Year Ended December 31, 2004

The following table shows key selected financial data for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the changes in dollars and as a percentage to 2005 from 2004.

					Increase /
					(Decrease) in			% Increase /
	Year Ended December 31,				Dollars to 2005			(Decrease) to 2005
	2005		2004		from 2004			from 2004
(In Thousands)
REVENUES:
Rentals and Fees	$	845,162	$	694,293	$	150,869			21.7	%
Retail Sales		58,366		56,259		2,107			3.7
Non-Retail Sales		185,622		160,774		24,848			15.5
Franchise Royalties and Fees		29,781		25,253		4,528			17.9
Other		6,574		9,901		(3,327	)		(33.6	)
		1,125,505		946,480		179,025			18.9
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Retail Cost of Sales		39,054		39,380		(326	)		(0.8	)
Non-Retail Cost of Sales		172,807		149,207		23,600			15.8
Operating Expenses		507,158		414,518		92,640			22.3
Depreciation of Rental Merchandise		305,630		253,456		52,174			20.6
Interest		8,519		5,413		3,106			57.4
		1,033,168		861,974		171,194			19.9
EARNINGS BEFORE INCOME TAXES		92,337		84,506		7,831			9.3
INCOME TAXES		34,344		31,890		2,454			7.7
NET EARNINGS	$	57,993	$	52,616	$	5,377			10.2	%

Revenues

The 18.9% increase in total revenues, to $1.126 billion in 2005 from $946.5 million in 2004, is primarily attributable to continued growth in our sales and lease ownership division, from both the opening and acquisition of new company-operated stores and improvement in same store revenues. Revenues for our sales and lease ownership division, including sales to franchisees, increased $173.7 million to $1.005 billion in 2005 compared with $831.1 million in 2004, a 20.9% increase. This increase was attributable to an 8.3% increase in same store revenues and the addition of 248 company-operated sales and lease ownership stores since the beginning of 2004.

The 21.7% increase in rentals and fees revenues, to $845.2 million in 2005 from $694.3 million in 2004, was attributable to a $143.1 million increase from our sales and lease ownership division related to the growth in same store revenues and the increase in the number of stores described above. Rental revenues in our corporate furnishings division increased $7.7 million, or 10.1%, to $83.7 million in 2005 from $76.0 million in 2004 as a result of generally improved economic conditions.

The 3.7% increase in revenues from retail sales, to $58.4 million in 2005 from $56.3 million in 2004, was primarily due to a $1.5 million increase from our corporate furnishings division as a result of generally improved economic conditions.

The 15.5% increase in non-retail sales in 2005 reflects the significant growth of our franchise operations. The total number of franchised stores at December 31, 2005 was 392, reflecting a net addition of 105 since the beginning of 2004.

Franchise royalties and fees increased to $29.8 million in 2005 from $25.3 million in 2004, a 17.9% improvement. The increase primarily reflects an increase in royalty income from franchisees, increasing $3.8 million to $21.6 million in 2005 compared to $17.8 million in 2004, with increased franchise and financing fee revenues comprising the majority of the remainder. Revenue increased in this area primarily due to the previously mentioned growth of stores and an increase in certain royalty rates.

The 33.6% decrease in other revenues, to $6.6 million in 2005 from $9.9 million in 2004, is primarily attributable to recognition of a $5.5 million gain in 2004 on the sale of our holdings of Rainbow Rentals, Inc. common stock in connection with that company’s merger with Rent-A-Center, Inc., partially offset by the recognition of a $565,000 gain in 2005 on the sale of our holdings of Rent-Way, Inc. common stock. In addition, included in other income in 2005 is $934,000 of proceeds from business interruption insurance associated with the operations of hurricane-affected areas.

With respect to our major operating units, revenues for our sales and lease ownership division increased 20.9%, to $1.005 billion for 2005 from $831.1 million for 2004. This increase was attributable to the addition of stores and same store revenue growth described above. The 8.3% increase in corporate furnishings division revenues, to $117.5 million for 2005 from $108.5 million for 2004, is primarily the result of economic and business conditions.

Cost of Sales

Retail cost of sales decreased 0.8%, to $39.1 million in 2005 from $39.4 million in 2004, with retail cost of sales as a percentage of retail sales decreasing to 66.9% in 2005 from 70.0% in 2004, primarily due to higher margins on certain retail sales in our sales and lease ownership division.

Cost of sales from non-retail sales increased to $172.8 million in 2005 from $149.2 million in 2004, a 15.8% increase, following the increase in non-retail sales described above, with the margin on non-retail sales remaining comparable between the periods.

Expenses

Operating expenses increased 22.3% to $507.2 million in 2005 from $414.5 million in 2004. The increase was due primarily to the growth of our sales and lease ownership division described above. Operating expenses for the year also included the write-off of $4.4 million of rental merchandise and property destroyed or severely damaged by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, of which approximately $1.9 million was covered by insurance proceeds. The net pre-tax expense recorded for the year for these damages was $2.5 million. As a percentage of revenues, operating expenses increased to 45.1% in 2005 compared to 43.8% in 2004.

The 20.6% increase in depreciation of rental merchandise, to $305.6 million in 2005 from $253.5 million in 2004, was driven by the growth of our sales and lease ownership division described above. As a percentage of total rentals and fees, depreciation of rental merchandise decreased slightly to 36.2% in 2005 from 36.5% in 2004.

Interest expense increased 57.4% to $8.5 million in 2005 from $5.4 million in 2004, primarily as a result of higher debt levels, which increased by 82.6% at December 31, 2005, compared to December 31, 2004, coupled with increasing rates on our revolving credit facility, partially offset by a shift of our borrowings to a new private placement financing in 2005 which had lower rates.

The reduction in the effective tax rate to 37.2% in 2005 compared to 37.7% in 2004 is due to lower state income taxes, including adjustments resulting from favorable state income allocations in connection with the Company’s filing of its 2004 tax return. The tax provision reflects the year-to-date effect of such adjustments.

Net Earnings

Net earnings increased to $58.0 million in 2005 from $52.6 million in 2004, a 10.2% improvement. The increase was primarily due to the maturation of new company-operated sales and lease ownership stores added over the past several years contributing to an 8.3% increase in same store revenues, and a 17.9% increase in franchise fees, royalty income,

and other related franchise income. As a percentage of total revenues, net earnings decreased to 5.2% in 2005 from 5.6% in 2004 primarily related to increased expenses in 2005 and merchandise losses due to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, as well as a $3.4 million after-tax gain in 2004 on the sale of Rainbow Rentals, Inc. common stock.

Balance Sheet

Cash. The Company’s cash balance increased to $8.8 million at December 31, 2006 from $7.0 million at December 31, 2005. Fluctuations in our cash balances are the result of timing differences between when our stores deposit cash and when that cash is available for application against borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit facility. For additional information, refer to the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section below.

Rental Merchandise. The increase of $61.2 million in rental merchandise, net of accumulated depreciation, to $612.1 million at December 31, 2006 from $550.9 million at December 31, 2005, is primarily the result of a net increase of 98 company-operated stores since December 31, 2005 and the continued revenue growth of existing company-operated stores.

Property, Plant and Equipment. The increase of $36.5 million in property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, to $170.3 million at December 31, 2006 from $133.8 million at December 31, 2005, is primarily the result of a net increase of 98 company-operated stores since December 31, 2005.

Goodwill and Other Intangibles. The $14.4 million increase in goodwill and other intangibles, to $115.4 million on December 31, 2006 from $101.1 million on December 31, 2005, is the result of a series of acquisitions of sales and lease ownership businesses, net of amortization of certain finite-life intangible assets. The aggregate purchase price for these asset acquisitions totaled $32.4 million, with the principal tangible assets acquired consisting of rental merchandise and certain fixtures and equipment. Additionally, during 2006 we sold the assets of 12 stores located in Puerto Rico and reduced goodwill by $1.0 million in conjunction with this sale.

Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets. Prepaid expenses and other assets increased $6.5 million to $29.4 million at December 31, 2006 from $23.0 million at December 31, 2005 primarily as a result of an increase in prepaid workers compensation insurance.

Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses. The increase of $8.2 million in accounts payable and accrued expenses, to $121.0 million at December 31, 2006 from $112.8 million at December 31, 2005, is primarily the result of an increase in current income taxes payable.

Deferred Income Taxes Payable. The increase of $18.5 million in deferred income taxes payable to $93.7 million at December 31, 2006 from $75.2 million at December 31, 2005 is primarily the result of accelerated rental merchandise depreciation deductions for tax purposes.

Credit Facilities and Senior Notes. The $81.9 million decrease in the amounts we owe under our credit facilities to $130.0 million on December 31, 2006 from $211.9 million on December 31, 2005, reflects net payments under our revolving credit facility during 2006 with cash generated from operations and our 2006 stock offering. Additionally, we made a $10.0 million repayment on our senior unsecured notes in the third quarter of 2006.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General

Cash flows generated from and (used by) operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 were $75.0 million and $(6.5) million, respectively. Our primary capital requirements consist of buying rental merchandise for both sales and lease ownership and corporate furnishings stores. As Aaron Rents continues to grow, the need for additional rental merchandise will continue to be our major capital requirement. Other capital requirements include purchases of property, plant and equipment and expenditures for acquisitions. These capital requirements historically have been financed through:

• cash flow from operations;

• bank credit;

• trade credit with vendors;

• proceeds from the sale of rental return merchandise;

• private debt offerings; and

• stock offerings.

In May 2006, we completed an underwritten public offering of 3.45 million newly-issued shares of our common stock for net proceeds, after the underwriting discount and expenses, of approximately $84.0 million. We used the proceeds to repay borrowings under our revolving credit facility. The Company’s Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and controlling shareholder sold an additional 1,150,000 shares in the offering.

At December 31, 2006, $15.6 million was outstanding under our revolving credit agreement. The credit facilities balance decreased by $81.9 million in 2006 primarily as a result of net payments made under our credit facility during the period with cash generated from operations and proceeds from the stock offering in the second quarter of 2006. We renegotiated our revolving credit agreement on February 27, 2006, extending the life of the agreement until May 28, 2008 and increasing the total available credit to $140.0 million. We have $30.0 million currently outstanding in aggregate principal amount of 6.88% senior unsecured notes due August 2009, the first principal repayments for which were due and paid in 2005 in the aggregate amount of $10.0 million, with annual $10.0 million repayments due until August 2009. Additionally, we have $60.0 million currently outstanding in aggregate principal amount of 5.03% senior unsecured notes due July 2012, principal repayments for which are first required in 2008.

Our revolving credit agreement, senior unsecured notes, and the former construction and lease facility and franchisee loan program discussed below, contain financial covenants which, among other things, forbid us from exceeding certain debt to equity levels and require us to maintain minimum fixed charge coverage ratios. If we fail to comply with these covenants, we will be in default under these agreements, and all amounts would become due immediately. We were in compliance with all of these covenants at December 31, 2006.

On February 27, 2007, we amended the franchise loan facility and guaranty to increase the maximum commitment amount from $115.0 million to $125.0 million.

We purchase our common shares in the market from time to time as authorized by our board of directors. As of December 31, 2006, Aaron Rents was authorized by its board of directors to purchase up to an additional 2,670,502 common shares under previously approved resolutions.

We have a consistent history of paying dividends, having paid dividends for 20 consecutive years. A $.013 per share dividend on Common Stock and Class A Common Stock was paid in January 2005, April 2005, and July 2005. Our board of directors increased the dividend for the third quarter of 2005 to $.014 per share from the previous quarterly dividend of $.013 per share. The payment for the third quarter of 2005 was distributed in October 2005 for a total fiscal year cash outlay of $2.6 million. A $.014 per share dividend on Common Stock and Class A Common Stock was paid in January 2006, April 2006, July 2006, and October 2006 for a total cash outlay of $2.9 million in 2006. Our board of directors increased the dividend 7.1% for the fourth quarter of 2006 on November 7, 2006 to $.015 per share from the previous quarterly dividend of $.014 per share. The payment for the fourth quarter was paid in January 2007. Total cash outlay for dividends was $2.9 million and $2.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Subject to sufficient operating profits, any future capital needs and other contingencies, we currently expect to continue our policy of paying dividends.

If we achieve our expected level of growth in our operations, we anticipate we will supplement our expected cash flows from operations, existing credit facilities, vendor credit, and proceeds from the sale of rental return merchandise by expanding our existing credit facilities, by securing additional debt financing, or by seeking other sources of capital to ensure we will be able to fund our capital and liquidity needs for at least the next 24 months. We believe we can secure these additional sources of capital in the ordinary course of business.

Commitments

Construction and Lease Facility. On October 31, 2006, our $25 million construction and lease facility expired. On October 30, 2006, we purchased the 21 properties financed by this facility for approximately $25.3 million, retained

ownership of eight properties and entered into sale-leaseback transactions for the remaining 13 properties with an unrelated third party. No gain or loss was recognized on this transaction.

Income Taxes. During 2006, we made $14.3 million in income tax payments. During 2007, we anticipate that we will make cash payments for income taxes approximating $40 million. The Company has benefited in the past from the additional first-year or “bonus” depreciation allowance under U.S. federal income tax law, which generally allowed us to accelerate the depreciation on rental merchandise we acquired after September 10, 2001 and placed in service prior to January 1, 2005. The Company is currently receiving benefits from bonus depreciation related to its operations in the Gulf Opportunities Zone. We anticipate having to make increased future tax payments on our income as a result of expected profitability and the reversal of the accelerated depreciation deductions that were taken in prior periods.

Leases. We lease warehouse and retail store space for substantially all of our operations under operating leases expiring at various times through 2021. Most of the leases contain renewal options for additional periods ranging from one to 15 years or provide for options to purchase the related property at predetermined purchase prices that do not represent bargain purchase options. We also lease transportation and computer equipment under operating leases expiring during the next five years. We expect that most leases will be renewed or replaced by other leases in the normal course of business.

We have 22 capital leases, 21 of which are with a limited liability company (“LLC”) whose managers and owners are 14 Aaron Rents’ executive officers and its controlling shareholder, with no individual, including the controlling shareholder, owning more than 10.53% of the LLC. Eleven of these related party leases relate to properties purchased from Aaron Rents in October and November 2004 by the LLC for a total purchase price of $6.8 million. This LLC is leasing back these properties to Aaron Rents for a 15-year term, with a five-year renewal at Aaron Rents’ option, at an aggregate annual rental of $883,000. Another ten of these related party leases relate to properties purchased from Aaron Rents in December 2002 by the LLC for a total purchase price of approximately $5.0 million. This LLC is leasing back these properties to Aaron Rents for a 15-year term at an aggregate annual rental of $572,000.

During 2006, a property sold by Aaron Rents to a second LLC controlled by the Company’s major shareholder for $6.3 million in April 2002 and leased back to Aaron Rents for a 15-year term at an annual rental of $681,000 was sold to an unrelated third party. We entered into a new capital lease with the unrelated third party. No gain or loss was recognized on this transaction.

We finance a portion of our store expansion through sale-leaseback transactions. The properties are sold at net book value and the resulting leases qualify and are accounted for as operating leases. We do not have any retained or contingent interests in the stores nor do we provide any guarantees, other than a corporate level guarantee of lease payments, in connection with the sale-leasebacks. The operating leases that resulted from these transactions are included in the table below.

Franchise Loan Guaranty. We have guaranteed the borrowings of certain independent franchisees under a franchise loan program with several banks and we also guarantee franchisee borrowings under certain other debt facilities. At December 31, 2006, the portion that the Company might be obligated to repay in the event franchisees defaulted was $111.6 million. Of this amount, approximately $81.3 million represents franchisee borrowings outstanding under the franchisee loan program and approximately $30.3 million represents franchisee borrowings that we guarantee under other debt facilities. However, due to franchisee borrowing limits, we believe any losses associated with any defaults would be mitigated through recovery of rental merchandise and other assets. Since its inception in 1994, we have had no significant losses associated with the franchisee loan and guaranty program. The Company believes the likelihood of any significant amounts being funded in connection with these commitments to be remote.

We have no long-term commitments to purchase merchandise. See Note F to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. The following table shows our approximate contractual obligations, including interest, and commitments to make future payments as of December 31, 2006:

			Period Less		Period 2-3		Period 4-5		Period Over
(In Thousands)	Total		Than 1 Year		Years		Years		5 Years
Credit Facilities, Excluding Capital Leases	$	109,856	$	10,923	$	59,623	$	24,009	$	15,301
Capital Leases		20,118		984		2,272		2,697		14,165
Operating Leases		269,916		73,970		99,716		40,811		55,419
Total Contractual Cash Obligations	$	399,890	$	85,877	$	161,611	$	67,517	$	84,885

The following table shows the Company’s approximate commercial commitments as of December 31, 2006:

	Total
	Amounts		Period Less		Period 2-3		Period 4-5		Period Over
(In Thousands)	Committed		Than 1 Year		Years		Years		5 Years
Guaranteed Borrowings of Franchisees	$	111,587	$	111,587	$	—	$	—	$	—

Purchase orders or contracts for the purchase of rental merchandise and other goods and services are not included in the table above. We are not able to determine the aggregate amount of such purchase orders that represent contractual obligations, as purchase orders may represent authorizations to purchase rather than binding agreements. Our purchase orders are based on our current distribution needs and are fulfilled by our vendors within short time horizons. We do not have significant agreements for the purchase of rental merchandise or other goods specifying minimum quantities or set prices that exceed our expected requirements for three months.

Market Risk

From time-to-time, we manage our exposure to changes in short-term interest rates, particularly to reduce the impact on floating-rate borrowings, by entering into interest rate swap agreements. These swap agreements involve the receipt of amounts by us when floating rates exceed the fixed rates and the payment of amounts by us to the counterparties when fixed rates exceed the floating rates in the agreements over their term. We accrue the differential we may pay or receive as interest rates change, and recognize it as an adjustment to the floating rate interest expense related to our debt. The counterparties to these contracts are high credit quality commercial banks, which we believe largely minimize the risk of counterparty default.

At December 31, 2006 and 2005 we did not have any swap agreements.

We do not use any market risk sensitive instruments to hedge commodity, foreign currency, or risks other than interest rate risk, and hold no market risk sensitive instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation 48, Accounting for Income Tax Uncertainties (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 defines the threshold for recognizing the benefits of tax return positions in the financial statements as “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the taxing authority. The recently issued literature also provides guidance on the derecognition, measurement and classification of income tax uncertainties, along with any related interest and penalties. FIN 48 also includes guidance concerning accounting for income tax uncertainties in interim periods and increases the level of disclosures associated with any recorded income tax uncertainties. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The differences between the amounts recognized in the statements of financial position prior to the adoption of FIN 48 and the amounts reported after adoption will be accounted for as a cumulative-effect adjustment recorded to the beginning balance of retained earnings. We are currently evaluating the impact of FIN 48 on our financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 establishes a framework for measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities which is intended to provide increased consistency in how fair value determinations are made under various existing accounting standards which permit, or in some cases require, estimates of fair value market value. SFAS 157 also expands financial statement disclosure requirements about

the use of fair value measurements, including the effect of such measures on earnings. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those years. We are currently evaluating the impact of this Statement on our financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an Amendment of SFAS No. 115 (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits an entity to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact of this Statement on our financial statements.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

AARON RENTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	December 31,			December 31,
	2006			2005
	(In Thousands, Except Share Data)
ASSETS:
Cash	$	8,807		$	6,973
Accounts Receivable (net of allowances of $3,037 in 2006 and $2,742 in 2005)		43,495			42,812
Rental Merchandise		925,534			811,335
Less: Accumulated Depreciation		(313,385	)		(260,403	)
		612,149			550,932
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net		170,294			133,759
Goodwill and Other Intangibles, Net		115,436			101,085
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets		29,425			22,954
Total Assets	$	979,606		$	858,515
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses	$	121,018		$	112,817
Dividends Payable		811			699
Deferred Income Taxes Payable		93,687			75,197
Customer Deposits and Advance Payments		27,101			23,458
Credit Facilities		129,974			211,873
Total Liabilities		372,591			424,044
Commitments & Contingencies
Shareholders’ Equity:
Common Stock, Par Value $.50 Per Share; Authorized: 100,000,000 Shares; Shares Issued: 48,439,602 and 44,989,602 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively		24,220			22,495
Class A Common Stock, Par Value $.50 Per Share; Authorized: 25,000,000 Shares; Shares Issued: 12,063,856 at December 31, 2006 and 2005		6,032			6,032
Additional Paid-in Capital		183,966			92,852
Retained Earnings		424,991			349,377
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss		—			(14	)
		639,209			470,742
Less: Treasury Shares at Cost,
Common Stock, 2,696,781 and 3,358,521 Shares at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively		(16,290	)		(20,367	)
Class A Common Stock, 3,667,623 Shares at December 31, 2006 and 2005		(15,904	)		(15,904	)
Total Shareholders’ Equity		607,015			434,471
Total Liabilities & Shareholders’ Equity	$	979,606		$	858,515

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

AARON RENTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

	Year Ended		Year Ended		Year Ended
	December 31,		December 31,		December 31,
	2006		2005		2004
	(In Thousands, Except Per Share)
REVENUES:
Rentals and Fees	$	992,791	$	845,162	$	694,293
Retail Sales		62,319		58,366		56,259
Non-Retail Sales		224,489		185,622		160,774
Franchise Royalties and Fees		33,626		29,781		25,253
Other		13,367		6,574		9,901
		1,326,592		1,125,505		946,480
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Retail Cost of Sales		41,262		39,054		39,380
Non-Retail Cost of Sales		207,217		172,807		149,207
Operating Expenses		579,565		507,158		414,518
Depreciation of Rental Merchandise		364,109		305,630		253,456
Interest		9,729		8,519		5,413
		1,201,882		1,033,168		861,974
EARNINGS BEFORE INCOME TAXES		124,710		92,337		84,506
INCOME TAXES		46,075		34,344		31,890
NET EARNINGS	$	78,635	$	57,993	$	52,616
EARNINGS PER SHARE	$	1.50	$	1.16	$	1.06
EARNINGS PER SHARE ASSUMING DILUTION	$	1.47	$	1.14	$	1.04

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

AARON RENTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

																	Accumulated Other
																	Comprehensive (Loss) Income
																	Derivatives
	Treasury Stock						Common Stock				Additional			Retained			Designated as			Marketable
(In Thousands, Except Per Share)	Shares			Amount			Common		Class A		Paid-in Capital			Earnings			Hedges			Securities
Balance, January 1, 2004		(7,891	)	$	(40,061	)	$	14,997	$	4,021	$	88,305		$	252,924		$	(941	)	$	941
Dividends, $.039 per share															(1,954	)
Stock Dividend								7,498		2,011		(80	)		(9,509	)
Reissued Shares		598			2,142							2,807
Net Earnings															52,616
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net of Income Taxes of $119																		662			(1,201	)
Balance, December 31, 2004		(7,293	)		(37,919	)		22,495		6,032		91,032			294,077			(279	)		(260	)
Dividends, $.054 per share															(2,693	)
Reissued Shares		267			1,648							1,820
Net Earnings															57,993
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net of Income Taxes of $284																		279			246
Balance, December 31, 2005		(7,026	)		(36,271	)		22,495		6,032		92,852			349,377			—			(14	)
Dividends, $.057 Per share															(3,021	)
Stock-Based Compensation												3,671
Reissued Shares		662			4,077							5,169
Stock Offering								1,725				82,274
Net Earnings															78,635
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net of Income Taxes of $8																					14
Balance, December 31, 2006		(6,364	)	$	(32,194	)	$	24,220	$	6,032	$	183,966		$	424,991		$	—		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

AARON RENTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Year Ended			Year Ended			Year Ended
	December 31,			December 31,			December 31,
	2006			2005			2004
	(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Earnings	$	78,635		$	57,993		$	52,616
Depreciation and Amortization		395,581			333,131			277,187
Additions to Rental Merchandise		(681,716	)		(647,657	)		(528,255	)
Book Value of Rental Merchandise Sold or Disposed		263,092			233,861			206,589
Change in Deferred Income Taxes		18,490			(20,261	)		39,919
Gain on Marketable Securities		—			(579	)		(5,481	)
Loss on Sale of Property, Plant, and Equipment		128			148			84
Gain on Asset Dispositions		(7,246	)		—			—
Change in Income Tax Receivable, Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets		(805	)		18,553			(20,023	)
Change in Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses		8,381			17,025			4,118
Change in Accounts Receivable		(683	)		(10,076	)		(1,858	)
Excess Tax Benefits From Stock-Based Compensation		(3,855	)		—			—
Other Changes, Net		4,959			11,375			9,842
Cash Provided by (Used by) Operating Activities		74,961			(6,487	)		34,738
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to Property, Plant and Equipment		(95,482	)		(61,449	)		(37,723	)
Contracts and Other Assets Acquired		(32,397	)		(47,907	)		(40,822	)
Proceeds from Sale of Marketable Securities		—			6,993			7,592
Investment in Marketable Securities		—			—			(6,436	)
Proceeds from Asset Dispositions		16,005			1,182			2,325
Proceeds from Sale of Property, Plant, and Equipment		31,281			14,000			4,760
Cash Used by Investing Activities		(80,593	)		(87,181	)		(70,304	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from Sale of Senior Notes		—			60,000			—
Proceeds from Credit Facilities		302,587			450,854			287,307
Repayments on Credit Facilities		(384,814	)		(415,636	)		(250,222	)
Proceeds from Stock Offering		83,999			—			—
Dividends Paid		(2,909	)		(2,641	)		(2,042	)
Excess Tax Benefits From Stock-Based Compensation		3,855			—			—
Issuance of Stock Under Stock Option Plans		4,748			2,199			1,701
Cash Provided by Financing Activities		7,466			94,776			36,744
Increase in Cash		1,834			1,108			1,178
Cash at Beginning of Year		6,973			5,865			4,687
Cash at End of Year	$	8,807		$	6,973		$	5,865
Cash Paid During the Year:
Interest	$	10,000		$	8,395		$	5,361
Income Taxes		14,273			51,228			16,783

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Note A: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.

Basis of Presentation — The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Aaron Rents, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in these financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Generally, actual experience has been consistent with management’s prior estimates and assumptions. Management does not believe these estimates or assumptions will change significantly in the future absent unsurfaced or unforeseen events.

In May 2006, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 3.45 million newly-issued shares of common stock for net proceeds, after the underwriting discount and expenses, of approximately $84.0 million. The Company used the proceeds to repay borrowings under the revolving credit facility. The Company’s Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and controlling shareholder sold an additional 1,150,000 shares in the offering.

On July 12, 2004, the Company announced a 3-for-2 stock split effected in the form of a 50% stock dividend on both Common Stock and Class A Common Stock. New shares were distributed on August 16, 2004 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on August 2, 2004. All share and per share information has been restated for all periods presented to reflect this stock dividend.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods to conform to the current period presentation. In previous years certain franchise other income was included in other income and has been reclassified to franchise royalties and fees.

Line of Business — The Company is engaged in the business of renting and selling residential and office furniture, consumer electronics, appliances, computers, and other merchandise throughout the U.S. and Canada. The Company manufactures furniture principally for its sales and lease ownership and corporate furnishings operations.

Rental Merchandise — The Company’s rental merchandise consists primarily of residential and office furniture, consumer electronics, appliances, computers, and other merchandise and is recorded at cost. The sales and lease ownership division depreciates merchandise over the rental agreement period, generally 12 to 24 months when on rent and 36 months when not on rent, to a 0% salvage value. The corporate furnishings division depreciates merchandise over its estimated useful life, which ranges from six months to 60 months, net of its salvage value, which ranges from 0% to 60% of historical cost. The Company’s policies require weekly rental merchandise counts by store managers, which include write-offs for unsalable, damaged, or missing merchandise inventories. Full physical inventories are generally taken at the fulfillment and manufacturing facilities on a quarterly basis, and appropriate provisions are made for missing, damaged and unsalable merchandise. In addition, the Company monitors rental merchandise levels and mix by division, store, and fulfillment center, as well as the average age of merchandise on hand. If unsalable rental merchandise cannot be returned to vendors, it is adjusted to its net realizable value or written off.

All rental merchandise is available for rental or sale. On a monthly basis, all damaged, lost or unsalable merchandise identified is written off. Effective September 30, 2004, the Company began recording rental merchandise adjustments on the allowance method. In connection with the adoption of this method, a one-time adjustment of $2.5 million was recorded to establish a rental merchandise allowance reserve. Rental merchandise adjustments in the future under this new method are expected to be materially consistent with the prior year’s adjustments under the direct-write off method. The 2005 rental merchandise adjustments include write-offs of merchandise in the third quarter that resulted from losses associated with Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. These hurricane related write-offs were $2.8 million, net of insurance proceeds. Rental merchandise write-offs, including the effect of the establishment of the reserve mentioned above, totaled $20.8 million, $21.8 million, and $18.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, and are included in operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings.

Property, Plant and Equipment — The Company records property, plant, and equipment at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, which are from eight to 40 years for buildings and improvements and from one to five years for other depreciable property and equipment. Gains and losses related to dispositions and retirements are recognized as incurred. Maintenance and repairs are also expensed as incurred; renewals and betterments are capitalized. Depreciation expense, included in

operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings, for property, plant, and equipment was $29.1 million, $25.6 million, and $22.2 million during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

Goodwill and Other Intangibles — Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in connection with business acquisitions. The Company accounts for goodwill and other intangible assets in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142). SFAS No. 142 requires that entities assess the fair value of the net assets underlying all acquisition-related goodwill on a reporting unit basis. When the fair value is less than the related carrying value, entities are required to reduce the carrying value of goodwill. The approach to evaluating the recoverability of goodwill as outlined in SFAS No. 142 requires the use of valuation techniques using estimates and assumptions about projected future operating results and other variables. The Company has elected to perform this annual evaluation on September 30. More frequent evaluations will be completed if indicators of impairment become evident. The impairment approach required by SFAS No. 142 may have the effect of increasing the volatility of the Company’s earnings if goodwill impairment occurs at a future date. Other intangibles represent the value of customer relationships acquired in connection with business acquisitions as well as acquired franchise development rights, recorded at fair value as determined by the Company. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the net intangibles other than goodwill were $3.4 million and $3.6 million, respectively. The customer relationship intangible is amortized on a straight-line basis over a two-year useful life while acquired franchise development rights are amortized over the unexpired life of the franchisee’s ten year area development agreement. Amortization expense on intangibles, included in operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings, was $2.4 million, $2.0 million, and $1.6 million during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

Impairment — The Company assesses its long-lived assets other than goodwill for impairment whenever facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be fully recoverable. To analyze recoverability, the Company projects undiscounted net future cash flows over the remaining life of such assets. If these projected cash flows were less than the carrying amount, an impairment would be recognized, resulting in a write-down of assets with a corresponding charge to earnings. Impairment losses, if any, are measured based upon the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the assets.

Investments in Marketable Securities — At times, the Company holds certain marketable equity securities and has designated these securities as available-for-sale. The fair value of these securities was $59,000 as of December 31, 2005. This amount is included in prepaid expenses and other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. In May of 2004, the Company sold its holdings in Rainbow Rentals, Inc. with a cost basis of $2.1 million for cash proceeds of $7.6 million in connection with Rent-A-Center, Inc.’s acquisition of Rainbow Rentals, Inc. The Company recognized an after-tax gain of $3.4 million on this transaction. In May and June of 2005, the Company sold its holdings in Rent-Way, Inc. with a cost basis of $6.4 million for cash proceeds of $7.0 million. The Company recognized an after-tax gain of $355,000 on this transaction. In connection with this gain recognition, $355,000 and $3.4 million was transferred from unrealized gains within accumulated other comprehensive income to net income on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Deferred Income Taxes are provided for temporary differences between the amounts of assets and liabilities for financial and tax reporting purposes. Such temporary differences arise principally from the use of accelerated depreciation methods on rental merchandise for tax purposes.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments — The carrying amounts reflected in the consolidated balance sheets for cash, accounts receivable, bank and other debt approximate their respective fair values. The fair value of the liability for interest rate swap agreements, included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, was $346,000 at December 31, 2004, based upon quotes from financial institutions. At December 31, 2004 the carrying amount for variable rate debt approximates fair market value since the interest rates on these instruments are reset periodically to current market rates. At December 31, 2006 and 2005 the Company did not have any swap agreements.

At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the fair market value of fixed rate long-term debt was $88.9 million and $113.9 million, respectively, based on quoted prices for similar instruments.

Revenue Recognition — Rental revenues are recognized as revenue in the month they are due. Rental payments received prior to the month due are recorded as deferred rental revenue. Until all payments are received under sales and lease ownership agreements, the Company maintains ownership of the rental merchandise. Revenues from the sale of merchandise to franchisees are recognized at the time of receipt of the merchandise by the franchisee, and revenues from such sales to other customers are recognized at the time of shipment, at which time title and risk of ownership are transferred to the customer. Please refer to Note I for discussion of recognition of other franchise related revenues.

Cost of Sales — Included in cost of sales is the net book value of merchandise sold, primarily using specific identification in the sales and lease ownership division and first-in, first-out in the corporate furnishings division. It is not practicable to allocate operating expenses between selling and rental operations.

Shipping and Handling Costs — The Company classifies shipping and handling costs as operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings and these costs totaled $45.0 million in 2006, $40.5 million in 2005, and $31.1 million in 2004.

Advertising — The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising costs are recorded as expense the first time an advertisement appears. Such costs aggregated to $28.3 million in 2006, $27.1 million in 2005, and $22.4 million in 2004. In addition, certain advertising expenses were offset by cooperative advertising consideration received from vendors, substantially all of which represents reimbursement of specific, identifiable, and incremental costs incurred in selling those vendors’ products. The prepaid advertising asset was $2.0 million and $3.4 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation — The Company has stock-based employee compensation plans, which are more fully described in Note H below. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for awards granted under those plans following the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), Share-Based Payments (“SFAS 123R”), using the modified prospective application method. Under this transition method, compensation expense recognized in the year ended December 31, 2006 includes the applicable amounts of compensation expense of all stock-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested, as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“SFAS 123”), and previously presented in the pro forma footnote disclosures.

The Company has in the past granted stock options for a fixed number of shares to employees primarily with an exercise price equal to the fair value of the shares at the date of grant and, accordingly, recognized no compensation expense for these stock option grants. The Company did not grant any stock options in 2006. The Company also has granted stock options for a fixed number of shares to certain key executives with an exercise price below the fair value of the shares at the date of grant (“Key Executive grants”). Compensation expense for Key Executive grants is recognized over the three-year vesting period of the options for the difference between the exercise price and the fair value of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant times the number of options granted. Income tax benefits resulting from stock option exercises credited to additional paid-in capital totaled $5.2 million, $1.9 million, and $3.2 million in 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

The Company amended the Key Executive grants in 2006 and raised the exercise price of each of the stock options to the fair market value of the common stock on the original grant date, adjusted for a 3-for-2 stock dividend that occurred on August 2, 2004 in the case of those stock options with an original grant date that preceded the stock dividend date. The amendment also provides that, in order to compensate the grantees for the increase in the exercise price of the stock options, the full original discounted amount will be paid in cash on the applicable 2007 vesting date.

Under the modified prospective application method, results for prior periods have not been restated to reflect the effects of implementing SFAS 123R. For purposes of pro forma disclosures under SFAS 123 as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure—an amendment of FASB Statement 123, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the options’ vesting period. The following table illustrates the effect on net earnings and earnings per share if the fair value based method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards for the following periods:

	Year Ended			Year Ended
	December 31,			December 31,
(In Thousands, Except Per Share)	2005			2004
Net Earnings before effect of Key Executive grants	$	58,522		$	52,854
Expense effect of Key Executive grants recognized		(529	)		(238	)
Net earnings as reported		57,993			52,616
Stock-based Employee Compensation Cost, Net of Tax — Pro Forma		(1,996	)		(1,687	)
Pro forma net earnings	$	55,997		$	50,929
Earnings per share:
Basic — as reported	$	1.16		$	1.06
Basic — pro forma	$	1.12		$	1.03
Diluted — as reported	$	1.14		$	1.04
Diluted — pro forma	$	1.10		$	1.01

Insurance Reserves — Estimated insurance reserves are accrued primarily for group health and workers compensation benefits provided to the Company’s employees. Estimates for these insurance reserves are made based on actual reported but unpaid claims and actuarial analyses of the projected claims run off for both reported and incurred but not reported claims.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — From time to time, the Company uses interest rate swap agreements to synthetically manage the interest rate characteristics of a portion of its outstanding debt and to limit the Company’s exposure to rising interest rates. The Company designates at inception that interest rate swap agreements hedge risks associated with future variable interest payments and monitors each swap agreement to determine if it remains an effective hedge. The effectiveness of the derivative as a hedge is based on a high correlation between changes in the value of the underlying hedged item and the derivative instrument. The Company records amounts to be received or paid as a result of interest swap agreements as an adjustment to interest expense. Generally, the Company’s interest rate swaps are designated as cash flow hedges. The Company does not enter into derivatives for speculative or trading purposes. At December 31, 2006 and 2005 the Company did not have any swap agreements.

Comprehensive Income — For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, comprehensive income totaled $78.6 million, $58.0 million, and $52.1 million, respectively.

New Accounting Pronouncements — In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation 48, Accounting for Income Tax Uncertainties (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 defines the threshold for recognizing the benefits of tax return positions in the financial statements as “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the taxing authority. The recently issued literature also provides guidance on the derecognition, measurement and classification of income tax uncertainties, along with any related interest and penalties. FIN 48 also includes guidance concerning accounting for income tax uncertainties in interim periods and increases the level of disclosures associated with any recorded income tax uncertainties. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The differences between the amounts recognized in the statements of financial position prior to the adoption of FIN 48 and the amounts reported after adoption will be accounted for as a cumulative-effect adjustment recorded to the beginning balance of retained earnings. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of FIN 48 on its financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 establishes a framework for measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities which is intended to provide increased consistency in how fair value determinations are made under various existing accounting standards which permit, or in some cases require, estimates of fair value market value. SFAS 157 also expands financial statement disclosure requirements about the use of fair value measurements, including the effect of such measures on earnings. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this Statement on its financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issues SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an Amendment of SFAS No. 115 (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits an entity to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS is effective for financial statements

issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this Statement on its financial statements.

Note B: Earnings Per Share

Earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of Common Stock and Class A Common Stock outstanding during the year, which were approximately 52,545,000 shares in 2006, 49,846,000 shares in 2005, and 49,602,000 shares in 2004. The computation of earnings per share assuming dilution includes the dilutive effect of stock options and awards. Such stock options and awards had the effect of increasing the weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution by approximately 832,000 in 2006, 959,000 in 2005, and 973,000 in 2004.

Note C: Property, Plant and Equipment

Following is a summary of the Company’s property, plant, and equipment at December 31:

(In Thousands)	2006			2005
Land	$	26,195		$	15,934
Buildings and Improvements		57,373			46,805
Leasehold Improvements and Signs		79,543			72,842
Fixtures and Equipment		54,148			45,343
Assets Under Capital Lease:
with Related Parties		9,534			15,734
with Unrelated Parties		10,564			1,475
Construction in Progress		10,719			6,449
		248,076			204,582
Less: Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization		(77,782	)		(70,823	)
	$	170,294		$	133,759

Note D: Credit Facilities

Following is a summary of the Company’s credit facilities at December 31:

(In Thousands)	2006		2005
Bank Debt	$	15,612	$	91,336
Senior Unsecured Notes		90,000		100,000
Capital Lease Obligation:
with Related Parties		10,095		16,141
with Unrelated Parties		10,022		1,066
Other Debt		4,245		3,330
	$	129,974	$	211,873

Bank Debt — The Company has a revolving credit agreement with several banks providing for unsecured borrowings up to $140.0 million. Amounts borrowed bear interest at the lower of the lender’s prime rate or LIBOR plus 87.5 basis points. The pricing under the working capital line is based upon overnight bank borrowing rates. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, an aggregate of $15.6 million (bearing interest at 6.22%) and $81.3 million (bearing interest at 5.35%) was outstanding under the revolving credit agreement. The Company pays a .20% commitment fee on unused balances. The weighted average interest rate on borrowings under the revolving credit agreement (before giving effect to interest rate swaps in 2004) was 5.97% in 2006, 4.42% in 2005, and 2.72% in 2004. The revolving credit agreement expires May 28, 2008.

The revolving credit agreement contains financial covenants which, among other things, forbid the Company from exceeding certain debt to equity levels and require the maintenance of minimum fixed charge coverage ratios. If the Company fails to comply with these covenants, the Company will be in default under these agreements, and all amounts would become due immediately. The Company was in compliance with all of these covenants at December 31, 2006.

At December 31, 2006, $96.5 million of retained earnings was available for dividend payments and stock repurchases under the debt restrictions, and the Company was in compliance with all covenants.

On December 18, 2005 the Company entered into an $18.0 million demand note as a means of temporary financing and at December 31, 2005 $10.0 million was outstanding at a rate of LIBOR plus 100 basis points.

Senior Unsecured Notes — On August 14, 2002, the Company sold $50.0 million in aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes in a private placement to a consortium of insurance companies. The unsecured notes bear interest at a rate of 6.88% per year and mature August 13, 2009. Quarterly interest only payments at an annual rate of 6.88% are due for the first two years followed by annual $10,000,000 principal repayments plus interest for the five years thereafter. The notes were amended in July 2005 as a result of entry into a note purchase agreement for an additional $60.0 million in senior unsecured notes to the purchasers in a private placement. The agreement was amended for the purpose of permitting the new issuance of the notes and amending the negative covenants in the revolving credit agreement.

On July 27, 2005, the Company entered into a note purchase agreement with a consortium of insurance companies. Pursuant to this agreement, the Company and its two subsidiaries as co-obligors issued $60.0 million in senior unsecured notes to the purchasers in a private placement. The notes bear interest at a rate of 5.03% per year and mature on July 27, 2012. Interest only payments are due quarterly for the first two years, followed by annual $12 million principal repayments plus interest for the five years thereafter. The $50.0 million note purchase agreement, of which $30.0 million is outstanding as of December 31, 2006, contains financial maintenance covenants, negative covenants regarding the Company’s other indebtedness, its guarantees and investments, and other customary covenants substantially similar to the covenants in the Company’s note purchase agreement, revolving credit facility, and its former construction and lease facility, as modified by the amendments described herein.

Capital Leases with Related Parties — In October and November 2004, the Company sold eleven properties, including leasehold improvements, to a limited liability company (“LLC”) controlled by a group of Company executives, including the Company’s Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and controlling shareholder. The LLC obtained borrowings collateralized by the land and buildings totaling $6.8 million. The Company occupies the land and buildings collateralizing the borrowings under a 15-year term lease, with a five-year renewal at the Company’s option, at an aggregate annual rental of $883,000. The transaction has been accounted for as a financing in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The rate of interest implicit in the leases is approximately 9.7%. Accordingly, the land and buildings, associated depreciation expense, and lease obligations are recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. No gain or loss was recognized in this transaction.

In December 2002, the Company sold ten properties, including leasehold improvements, to the LLC. The LLC obtained borrowings collateralized by the land and buildings totaling $5.0 million. The Company occupies the land and buildings collateralizing the borrowings under a 15-year term lease at an aggregate annual rental of approximately $572,000. The transaction has been accounted for as a financing in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The rate of interest implicit in the leases is approximately 11.1%. Accordingly, the land and buildings, associated depreciation expense, and lease obligations are recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. No gain or loss was recognized in this transaction.

During 2006, a property sold by Aaron Rents to a second LLC controlled by the Company’s major shareholder for $6.3 million in April 2002 and leased back to Aaron Rents for a 15-year term at an annual rental of $681,000 was sold to an unrelated third party. The Company entered into a new capital lease with the unrelated third party. No gain or loss was recognized on this transaction.

Leases — The Company finances a portion of store expansion through sale-leaseback transactions. The properties are sold at net book value and the resulting leases qualify and are accounted for as operating leases. The Company does not have any retained or contingent interests in the stores nor does the Company provide any guarantees, other than a corporate level guarantee of lease payments, in connection with the sale-leasebacks.

Other Debt — Other debt at December 31, 2006 and 2005 includes $3.3 million of industrial development corporation revenue bonds. The average weighted borrowing rate on these bonds in 2006 was 3.60%. No principal payments are due on the bonds until maturity in 2015.

Future maturities under the Company’s Credit Facilities are as follows:

(In Thousands)
2007	$	11,907
2008		38,716
2009		23,178
2010		13,274
2011		13,433
Thereafter		29,466

Note E: Income Taxes

Following is a summary of the Company’s income tax expense for the years ended December 31:

(In Thousands)	2006		2005			2004
Current Income Tax Expense (Benefit):
Federal	$	25,453	$	50,064		$	(7,720	)
State		2,132		4,541			(309	)
		27,585		54,605			(8,029	)
Deferred Income Tax (Benefit) Expense:
Federal		16,524		(17,751	)		35,967
State		1,966		(2,510	)		3,952
		18,490		(20,261	)		39,919
	$	46,075	$	34,344		$	31,890

Significant components of the Company’s deferred income tax liabilities and assets at December 31 are as follows:

(In Thousands)	2006		2005
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
Rental Merchandise and Property, Plant and Equipment	$	99,813	$	81,388
Other, Net		10,273		6,543
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities		110,086		87,931
Deferred Tax Assets:
Accrued Liabilities		5,053		4,915
Advance Payments		8,959		7,556
Other, Net		2,387		3,256
Total Deferred Tax Assets		16,399		15,727
Less Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance		—		(2,993	)
Net Deferred Tax Assets		16,399		12,734
Net Deferred Tax Liabilities	$	93,687	$	75,197

The Company’s effective tax rate differs from the statutory U.S. Federal income tax rate for the years ended December 31 as follows:

	2006			2005			2004
Statutory Rate		35.0	%		35.0	%		35.0	%
Increases in U.S. Federal Taxes
Resulting From:
State Income Taxes, Net of Federal Income Tax Benefit		2.1			2.2			2.8
Other, Net		(.2	)		—			(.1	)
Effective Tax Rate		36.9	%		37.2	%		37.7	%

Note F: Commitments

The Company leases warehouse and retail store space for substantially all of its operations under operating leases expiring at various times through 2021. The Company also leases certain properties under capital leases that are more fully described in Note D. Most of the leases contain renewal options for additional periods ranging from one to 15 years or provide for options to purchase the related property at predetermined purchase prices that do not represent bargain purchase options. In addition, certain properties occupied under operating leases contain normal purchase options. The Company also leases transportation and computer equipment under operating leases expiring during the next five years. Management expects that most leases will be renewed or replaced by other leases in the normal course of business.

Future minimum rental payments required under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 2006, are as follows: $74.0 million in 2007; $58.4 million in 2008; $41.3 million in 2009; $25.7 million in 2010; $15.2 million in 2011; and $55.4 million thereafter.

The Company has guaranteed certain debt obligations of some of the franchisees amounting to $111.6 million and $100.6 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Of this amount, approximately $81.3 million represents franchise borrowings outstanding under the franchise loan program and approximately $30.3 million represents franchise borrowings under other debt facilities at December 31, 2006. The Company receives guarantee fees based on such franchisees’ outstanding debt obligations, which it recognizes as the guarantee obligation is satisfied. The Company has recourse rights to the assets securing the debt obligations. As a result, the Company has never incurred any, nor does management expect to incur any, significant losses under these guarantees. See Note N for subsequent event disclosures.

Rental expense was $72.0 million in 2006, $59.9 million in 2005, and $50.3 million in 2004.

The Company maintains a 401(k) savings plan for all full-time employees with at least one year of service with the Company and who meet certain eligibility requirements. The plan allows employees to contribute up to 10% of their annual compensation with 50% matching by the Company on the first 4% of compensation. The Company’s expense related to the plan was $791,000 in 2006, $676,000 in 2005, and $506,000 in 2004.

Note G: Shareholders’ Equity

The Company held 6,364,404 common shares in its treasury and was authorized to purchase an additional 2,670,502 shares at December 31, 2006. The Company’s articles of incorporation provide that no cash dividends may be paid on the Class A Common Stock unless equal or higher dividends are paid on the Common Stock.

If the number of the Class A Common Stock (voting) falls below 10% of the total number of outstanding shares of the Company, the Common Stock (non-voting) automatically converts into Class A Common Stock. The Common Stock may convert to Class A Common Stock in certain other limited situations whereby a national securities exchange rule might cause the Board of Directors to issue a resolution requiring such conversion. Management considers the likelihood of any conversion to be remote at the present time.

The Company has 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized. The shares are issuable in series with terms for each series fixed by the Board and such issuance is subject to approval by the Board of Directors. No preferred shares have been issued.

Note H: Stock Options

Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock awards granted following the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R, using the modified prospective application method. Under this transition method, compensation expense recognized in the year ended December 31, 2006 includes the applicable amounts of compensation expense of all stock-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested, as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“SFAS 123”), and previously presented in the pro forma footnote disclosures.

The Company estimates the fair value for the options granted on the grant date using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s Common Stock over the most recent period generally commensurate with the expected estimated life of each respective grant. The expected lives of options are based on the Company’s historical share option exercise experience. Forfeiture assumptions are based on the Company’s historical forfeiture experience. The Company believes that the historical experience method is the best estimate of future exercise and forfeiture patterns currently available. The risk-free interest rates are determined using the implied yield currently available for zero-coupon U.S. government issues with a remaining term equal to the expected life of the options. The expected dividend yields are based on the approved annual dividend rate in effect and current market price of the underlying Common Stock at the time of grant. No assumption for a future dividend rate increase has been included unless there is an approved plan to increase the dividend in the near term.

For the pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share, the Company recognizes compensation expense over the explicit service period up to the date of actual retirement. Upon adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company is required to recognize compensation expense over a period to the date the employee first becomes eligible for retirement for awards granted or modified after the adoption of SFAS 123R.

The results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 include $3.5 million in compensation expense related to unvested grants as of January 1, 2006. At December 31, 2006, there was $1.8 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock options which is expected to be recognized over a period of 1.75 years. SFAS 123R requires that the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation expense be reported as financing cash flows, rather than as operating cash flow as required under prior guidance. Excess tax benefits of $3.9 million were accordingly included in cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2006. The related net tax benefit from the exercise of stock options in the year ended December 31, 2006 was $4.7 million.

Under the Company’s stock option plans, options granted to date become exercisable after a period of three years and unexercised options lapse ten years after the date of the grant. Options are subject to forfeiture upon termination of service. Under the plans, 712,000 of the Company’s shares are reserved for future grants at December 31, 2006. The weighted average fair value of options granted was $8.09 and $5.18 in 2005 and 2004, respectively. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for 2005 and 2004, respectively: risk-free interest rates of 3.86% and 3.16%; a dividend yield of .25% and .28%; a volatility factor of the expected market price of the Company’s Common Stock of .43 and .43; weighted average assumptions of forfeiture rates of 5.85% and 9.87%; and weighted average expected lives of the option of five and four years. The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised was $12.7 million, $3.7 million, and $8.6 million in 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. The total fair value of options vested was $4.9 million, $1.2 million, and $675,000 in 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. The Company did not grant any stock options in 2006.

The Company amended the Key Executive grants in 2006 and raised the exercise price of each of the stock options to the fair market value of the common stock on the original grant date, adjusted for a 3-for-2 stock dividend that occurred on August 2, 2004 in the case of those stock options with an original grant date that preceded the stock dividend date. The amendment also provides that, in order to compensate the grantees for the increase in the exercise price of the stock options, the full original discounted amount will be paid in cash on the applicable 2007 vesting date.

Shares of restricted stock may be granted to employees and directors and typically vest over approximately three years. Restricted stock grants may be subject to one or more objective employment, performance or other forfeiture conditions as established at the time of grant. Any shares of restricted stock that are forfeited will again become available for issuance. Compensation cost for restricted stock is equal to the fair market value of the shares at the date of the award and is amortized to compensation expense over the vesting period. Total compensation expense related to restricted stock was $277,000 in 2006.

The following table summarizes information about restricted stock activity:

	Restricted Stock			Weighted Average
	(In Thousands)			Grant Price
Outstanding at January 1, 2006		—			—
Granted		244			25.40
Vested		—			—
Forfeited		(2	)		25.40
Outstanding at December 31, 2006		242			25.40

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2006:

	Options Outstanding						Options Exercisable
			Weighted Average
			Remaining
Range of Exercise	Number Outstanding		Contractual Life		Weighted Average		Number Exercisable		Weighted Average
Prices	December 31, 2006		(in years)		Exercise Price		December 31, 2006		Exercise Price
$  4.38-10.00		1,039,511		3.63	$	6.93		1,039,511	$	6.93
10.01-15.00		376,750		6.72		14.37		376,750		14.37
15.01-20.00		203,250		7.11		17.37		83,250		15.35
20.01-24.94		704,396		7.80		22.24		2,000		21.84
$  4.38-24.94		2,323,907		5.70	$	13.69		1,501,511	$	9.28

The table below summarizes option activity for the periods indicated in the Company’s stock option plans:

						Weighted	Aggregate Intrinsic
	Options					Average Remaining	Value (in			Weighted Average
	(In Thousands)			Weighted Average		Contractual Term	Thousands)			Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2006		3,026		$	11.73		$	46,726		$	4.01
Granted		—			—			—			—
Exercised		(660	)		6.76			(12,743	)		2.22
Forfeited		(42	)		19.32			(809	)		8.19
Outstanding at December 31, 2006		2,324			13.69	5.70 years		31,811			6.58
Exercisable at December 31, 2006		1,502		$	9.28	4.57 years	$	13,936		$	4.89

The weighted average fair value of unvested options was $7.83 as of January 1, 2006 and $9.65 as of December 31, 2006. The weighted average fair value of options that vested during 2006 was $7.23.

Note I: Franchising of Aaron’s Sales and Lease Ownership Stores

The Company franchises Aaron’s Sales and Lease Ownership stores. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, 674 and 664 franchises had been granted, respectively. Franchisees typically pay a non-refundable initial franchise fee from $15,000 to $50,000 depending upon market size and an ongoing royalty of either 5% or 6% of gross revenues. Franchise fees and area development fees are generated from the sale of rights to develop, own and operate Aaron’s Sales and Lease Ownership stores. These fees are recognized as income when substantially all of the Company’s obligations per location are satisfied, generally at the date of the store opening. Franchise fees and area development fees received before the substantial completion of the Company’s obligations are deferred. Substantially all of the amounts reported as non-retail sales and non-retail cost of sales in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings relate to the sale of rental merchandise to franchisees.

Franchise agreement fee revenue was $3.1 million, $3.0 million, and $3.3 million and royalty revenue was $25.4 million, $21.6 million, and $17.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Deferred franchise and area development agreement fees, included in customer deposits and advance payments in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, was $4.3 million and $5.2 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Franchised Aaron’s Sales and Lease Ownership store activity is summarized as follows:

	2006			2005			2004
Franchised stores open at January 1,		392			357			287
Opened		75			71			79
Added through acquisition		0			0			12
Purchased from the Company		3			0			0
Purchased by the Company		(28	)		(35	)		(19	)
Closed		(1	)		(1	)		(2	)
Franchised stores open at December 31,		441			392			357

Company-operated Aaron’s Sales and Lease Ownership store activity is summarized as follows:

	2006			2005			2004
Company-operated stores open at January 1,		748			616			500
Opened		78			82			68
Added through acquisition		40			56			61
Closed, sold or merged		(21	)		(6	)		(13	)
Company-operated stores open at December 31,		845			748			616

In 2006, the Company acquired the rental contracts, merchandise, and other related assets of 40 stores, including 28 franchised stores, and merged certain acquired stores into existing stores, resulting in a net gain of 37 stores. In 2005, the Company acquired the rental contracts, merchandise, and other related assets of 96 stores, including 35 franchised stores, and merged certain acquired stores into existing stores, resulting in a net gain of 56 stores. In 2004, the Company acquired the rental contracts, merchandise, and other related assets of 85 stores, including 19 franchised stores, and merged certain acquired stores into existing stores, resulting in a net gain of 61 stores.

Note J: Acquisitions and Dispositions

During 2006, the Company acquired the rental contracts, merchandise, and other related assets of 40 sales and lease ownership stores for an aggregate purchase price of $32.4 million. Fair value of acquired tangible assets included $13.3 million for rental merchandise, $1.5 million for fixed assets, and $154,000 for other assets. Fair value of liabilities assumed approximated $65,000. The excess cost over the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired in 2006, representing goodwill was $15.5 million. The fair value of acquired separately identifiable intangible assets included $1.4 million for customer lists and $885,000 for acquired franchise development rights. The estimated amortization of these customer lists and acquired franchise development rights in future years approximates $857,000, $582,000, $115,000, $112,000, and $106,000 for 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011, respectively. The purchase price allocations for certain acquisitions during December 2006 are preliminary pending finalization of the Company’s assessment of the fair values of tangible assets acquired.

During 2005, the Company acquired the rental contracts, merchandise, and other related assets of 96 sales and lease ownership stores for an aggregate purchase price of $46.6 million. Fair value of acquired tangible assets included $16.8 million for rental merchandise, $1.5 million for fixed assets, and $1.4 million for other assets. Fair value of liabilities assumed approximated $.4 million. The excess cost over the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired in 2005, representing goodwill was $24.7 million. The fair value of acquired separately identifiable intangible assets included $2.6 million for customer lists and $.4 million for acquired franchise development rights. The estimated amortization of these customer lists and acquired franchise development rights in future years approximates $1.8 million, $912,000, $82,000, $60,000, and $52,000 for 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010, respectively.

The results of operations of the acquired businesses are included in the Company’s results of operations from their dates of acquisition. The effect of these acquisitions on the 2006, 2005 and 2004 consolidated financial statements was not significant.

The Company sold three, five, and two of its sales and lease ownership locations to franchisees in 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. The effect of these sales on the consolidated financial statements was not significant. The Company

also sold the assets of 12 of its sales and lease ownership locations in Puerto Rico to an unrelated third party in the second quarter of 2006. The Company received $16.0 million in cash proceeds, recognized a $7.2 million gain, and disposed of goodwill of $1.0 million in conjunction with the 2006 sales.

Note K: Segments

Description of Products and Services of Reportable Segments

Aaron Rents, Inc. has four reportable segments: sales and lease ownership, corporate furnishings (formerly known as rent-to-rent), franchise, and manufacturing. The sales and lease ownership division offers electronics, residential furniture, appliances, and computers to consumers primarily on a monthly payment basis with no credit requirements. The corporate furnishings division rents and sells residential and office furniture to businesses and consumers who meet certain minimum credit requirements. The Company’s franchise operation sells and supports franchisees of its sales and lease ownership concept. The manufacturing division manufactures upholstered furniture, office furniture, lamps and accessories, and bedding predominantly for use by the other divisions.

Earnings before income taxes for each reportable segment are generally determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States with the following adjustments:

• A predetermined amount of each reportable segment’s revenues is charged to the reportable segment as an allocation of corporate overhead. This allocation was approximately 2.3% in 2006, 2005, and 2004.

• Accruals related to store closures are not recorded on the reportable segments’ financial statements, but are rather maintained and controlled by corporate headquarters.

• The capitalization and amortization of manufacturing variances are recorded on the consolidated financial statements as part of Cash to Accrual and Other Adjustments and are not allocated to the segment that holds the related rental merchandise.

• Advertising expense in the sales and lease ownership division is estimated at the beginning of each year and then allocated to the division ratably over time for management reporting purposes. For financial reporting purposes, advertising expense is recognized when the related advertising activities occur. The difference between these two methods is reflected as part of the Cash to Accrual and Other Adjustments line below.

• Sales and lease ownership rental merchandise write-offs are recorded using the direct write-off method for management reporting purposes and using the allowance method for financial reporting purposes. The difference between these two methods is reflected as part of the Cash to Accrual and Other Adjustments line below.

• Interest on borrowings is estimated at the beginning of each year. Interest is then allocated to operating segments based on relative total assets.

• Sales and lease ownership revenues are reported on the cash basis for management reporting purposes.

Revenues in the “Other” category are primarily from leasing space to unrelated third parties in the corporate headquarters building and revenues from several minor unrelated activities. The pre-tax losses in the “Other” category are the net result of the activity mentioned above, net of the portion of corporate overhead not allocated to the reportable segments for management purposes, and the $565,000 and $5.5 million gains recognized on the sale of marketable securities in 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Measurement of Segment Profit or Loss and Segment Assets

The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on revenue growth and pre-tax profit or loss from operations. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies except that the sales and lease ownership division revenues and certain other items are presented on a cash basis. Intersegment sales are completed at internally negotiated amounts ensuring competitiveness with outside vendors. Since the intersegment profit and loss affect inventory valuation, depreciation and cost of goods sold are adjusted when intersegment profit is eliminated in consolidation.

Factors Used by Management to Identify the Reportable Segments

The Company’s reportable segments are business units that service different customer profiles using distinct payment arrangements. The reportable segments are each managed separately because of differences in both customer base and

infrastructure.

Information on segments and a reconciliation to earnings before income taxes are as follows:

	Year Ended			Year Ended			Year Ended
	December 31,			December 31,			December 31,
(In Thousands)	2006			2005			2004
Revenues From External Customers:
Sales and Lease Ownership	$	1,167,073		$	975,026		$	804,723
Corporate Furnishings		122,965			117,476			108,453
Franchise		33,626			29,781			25,253
Other		5,791			5,411			10,185
Manufacturing		78,458			83,803			70,440
Elimination of Intersegment Revenues		(78,221	)		(83,509	)		(70,884	)
Cash to Accrual Adjustments		(3,100	)		(2,483	)		(1,690	)
Total Revenues from External Customers	$	1,326,592		$	1,125,505		$	946,480
Earnings Before Income Taxes:
Sales and Lease Ownership	$	97,611		$	63,317		$	56,578
Corporate Furnishings		12,824			10,802			8,842
Franchise		23,949			22,143			18,374
Other		(5,808	)		(585	)		2,118
Manufacturing		(1,740	)		1,280			(175	)
Earnings Before Income Taxes for Reportable Segments		126,836			96,957			85,737
Elimination of Intersegment (Profit) Loss		1,777			(1,103	)		178
Cash to Accrual and Other Adjustments		(3,903	)		(3,517	)		(1,409	)
Total Earnings Before Income Taxes	$	124,710		$	92,337		$	84,506
Assets:
Sales and Lease Ownership	$	779,278		$	669,376		$	524,492
Corporate Furnishings		111,134			91,536			83,478
Franchise		25,619			26,902			23,495
Other		30,999			46,355			50,452
Manufacturing		32,576			24,346			18,371
Total Assets	$	979,606		$	858,515		$	700,288
Depreciation and Amortization:
Sales and Lease Ownership	$	370,004		$	309,022		$	255,606
Corporate Furnishings		22,229			20,376			19,213
Franchise		561			924			722
Other		1,454			1,373			711
Manufacturing		1,333			1,436			935
Total Depreciation and Amortization	$	395,581		$	333,131		$	277,187
Interest Expense:
Sales and Lease Ownership	$	8,234		$	7,326		$	5,197
Corporate Furnishings		1,400			1,382			1,044
Franchise		47			93			96
Other		48			(282	)		(924	)
Total Interest Expense	$	9,729		$	8,519		$	5,413

Note L — Related Party Transactions

The Company leases certain properties under capital leases with certain related parties that are more fully described in Note D above.

As part of its extensive marketing program, the Company has sponsored professional driver Michael Waltrip’s Aaron’s Dream Machine in the NASCAR Busch Series. The sons of the president of the Company’s sales and lease ownership division were paid by Mr. Waltrip’s company as drivers and raced in 2006 Aaron’s sponsored cars full time in the USAR Hooters Pro Cup Series. The amount paid in 2006 by the Company for the sponsorship of Michael Waltrip attributable to the USAR Hooters Pro Cup Series was $983,000, adjusted by credits in the amount of $434,000 for changes from the 2005 racing season. Motor sports sponsorships and promotions have been an integral part of the Company’s marketing programs for a number of years.

Note M: Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)

(In Thousands, Except Per Share)	First Quarter		Second Quarter		Third Quarter		Fourth Quarter
Year Ended December 31, 2006
Revenues	$	347,287	$	321,727	$	317,709	$	339,869
Gross Profit *		171,965		163,588		162,839		168,619
Earnings Before Taxes		34,631		31,690		27,625		30,764
Net Earnings		21,561		20,650		17,383		19,041
Earnings Per Share		.43		.40		.32		.35
Earnings Per Share Assuming Dilution		.42		.39		.32		.35
Year Ended December 31, 2005
Revenues	$	279,348	$	271,338	$	278,667	$	296,152
Gross Profit *		142,260		139,797		142,287		147,315
Earnings Before Taxes		29,618		25,644		13,506		23,569
Net Earnings		18,422		16,120		8,843		14,608
Earnings Per Share		.37		.32		.18		.29
Earnings Per Share Assuming Dilution		.36		.32		.17		.29

* Gross profit is the sum of rentals and fees, retail sales, and non-retail sales less retail cost of sales, non-retail cost of sales, and depreciation of rental merchandise.

Note N — Subsequent Event (Unaudited)

On February 27, 2007, the Company amended the franchise loan facility and guaranty to increase the maximum commitment amount from $115.0 million to $125.0 million.

Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management of Aaron Rents, Inc. (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, the risk.

The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006. In making this assessment, the Company’s management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.

Based on our assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2006, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm has issued an audit report on our assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. This report appears on the following page.

February 27, 2007

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Aaron Rents, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Aaron Rents, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Aaron Rents, Inc. and Subsidiaries at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note A and H to the consolidated financial statements, in 2006 the Company changed its method of accounting for share-based compensation as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share Based Payments”.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Aaron Rents, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 27, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP  

Atlanta, Georgia
February 27, 2007

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Aaron Rents, Inc.

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting that Aaron Rents, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Aaron Rents, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies
and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that Aaron Rents, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Aaron Rents, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as December 31, 2006, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Aaron Rents, Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2006, and the related consolidated statement of earnings, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006 of Aaron Rents, Inc. and our report dated February 27, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP  

Atlanta, Georgia
February 27, 2007

EX-21

EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

NAME	STATE OR COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION
Aaron Investment Company	Delaware
Aaron Rents, Inc. Puerto Rico	Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Aaron Rents Canada, ULC	Canada

EX-23

Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Aaron Rents, Inc. of our report dated February 27, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Aaron Rents, Inc., included in the 2006 Annual Report to Shareholders of Aaron Rents, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

(1)	Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-9206) pertaining to the Aaron Rents, Inc. Retirement Plan and Trust
(2)	Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-62538) pertaining to the Aaron Rents, Inc. Retirement Plan and Trust
(3)	Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-33363) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option and Incentive Award Plan
(4)	Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-76026) pertaining to the 2001 Stock Option and Incentive Award Plan
(5)	Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-123426) pertaining to the 2001 Stock Option and Incentive Award Plan
(6)	Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-48985) pertaining to the 1998 public offering of common stock
(7)	Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-88392) pertaining to the 2002 public offering of common stock
(8)	Registration Statement (Form S-3ASR No. 333-133913) pertaining to the 2006 public offering of common stock

of our report dated February 27, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Aaron Rents, Inc. included herein by reference, our report dated February 27, 2007, with respect to Aaron Rents, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Aaron Rents, Inc., included herein.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP  

Atlanta, Georgia
February 27, 2007

EX-31.(A)

EXHIBIT 31(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

     I, R. Charles Loudermilk, Sr., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Aaron Rents, Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
b)	designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and
d)	disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 27, 2007	/s/ R. Charles Loudermilk, Sr.
	R. Charles Loudermilk, Sr.
	Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.(B)

EXHIBIT 31(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

     I, Gilbert L. Danielson, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Aaron Rents, Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
b)	designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and
d)	disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 27, 2007	/s/ Gilbert L. Danielson
	Gilbert L. Danielson
	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.(A)

EXHIBIT 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Annual Report of Aaron Rents, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, R. Charles Loudermilk, Sr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 27, 2007	/s/ R. Charles Loudermilk, Sr.
	R. Charles Loudermilk, Sr.
	Chief Executive Officer

EX-32.(B)

EXHIBIT 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Annual Report of Aaron Rents, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gilbert L. Danielson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 27, 2007	/s/ Gilbert L. Danielson
	Gilbert L. Danielson
	Chief Financial Officer