XML 33 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.21.2
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
12 Months Ended
Apr. 30, 2021
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

We consider all short-term investments readily convertible to cash, without notice or penalty, with an initial maturity of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents.

Restricted cash

Restricted Cash

 

Under the terms of an operating lease related to one of our facilities (Note 4), we are required to maintain a letter of credit as collateral. Accordingly, at April 30, 2021 and 2020, restricted cash of $0.4 million was pledged as collateral under the letter of credit.

 

The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the Consolidated Balance Sheets that sum to the total of the same amounts shown in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands):

 

   As of April 30, 
   2021   2020   2019 
Cash and cash equivalents  $169,915   $36,262   $32,351 
Restricted cash   350    350    1,150 
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash  $170,265   $36,612   $33,501 

Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition

 

On May 1, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), and its subsequent updates (“ASC 606”), to all contracts that had not been completed as of May 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method. The cumulative effect of adopting ASC 606 resulted in a one-time adjustment of $2.7 million to the opening balance of accumulated deficit as of May 1, 2018 which is reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2019.

 

Under ASC 606, we recognize revenue when we transfer promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To determine revenue recognition for contracts with customers, we perform the following five steps: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) we satisfy a performance obligation.

 

Revenue recognized from services provided under our customer contracts are disaggregated into manufacturing and process development revenue streams.

 

Manufacturing revenue

 

Manufacturing revenue generally represents revenue from the manufacturing of customer products recognized over time utilizing an input method that compares the cost of cumulative work-in-process to date to the most current estimates for the entire cost of the performance obligation. Under a manufacturing contract, a quantity of manufacturing runs are ordered at a specified scale, where the product is manufactured according to the customer’s specifications and typically includes only one performance obligation. Each manufacturing run represents a distinct service that is sold separately and has stand-alone value to the customer. The products are manufactured exclusively for a specific customer and have no alternative use. The customer retains control of its product during the entire manufacturing process and can make changes to the process or specifications at its request. Under these agreements, we are entitled to consideration for progress to date that includes an element of profit margin.

 

Process development revenue

 

Process development revenue generally represents revenue from services associated with the custom development of a manufacturing process and analytical methods for a customer’s product. Process development revenue is recognized over time utilizing an input method that compares the cost of cumulative work-in-process to date to the most current estimates for the entire cost of the performance obligation. Under a process development contract, the customer owns the product details and process, which has no alternative use. These process development projects are customized to each customer to meet its specifications and typically includes only one performance obligation. Each process represents a distinct service that is sold separately and has stand-alone value to the customer. The customer also retains control of its product as the product is being created or enhanced by our services and can make changes to its process or specifications upon request. Under these agreements, we are entitled to consideration for progress to date that includes an element of profit margin.

 

The following table summarizes our manufacturing and process development revenue streams (in thousands):

 

   Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 
   2021   2020   2019 
Manufacturing revenues  $83,678   $52,046   $43,432 
Process development revenues   12,190    7,656    10,171 
  Total revenues  $95,868   $59,702   $53,603 

 

The timing of revenue recognition, billings and cash collections results in billed accounts receivable, contract assets (unbilled receivables), and contract liabilities (customer deposits and deferred revenue). Contract assets are recorded when our right to consideration is conditioned on something other than the passage of time. Contract assets are reclassified to accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheet when our rights become unconditional. Contract liabilities represent customer deposits and deferred revenue billed and/or received in advance of our fulfillment of performance obligations. Contract liabilities convert to revenue as we perform our obligations under the contract.

 

During the fiscal years ended April 30, 2021 and 2020, we recognized revenue of $27.3 million and $13.6 million, respectively, for which the contract liability was recorded in a prior period.

 

The transaction price for services provided under our customer contracts generally reflects our best estimates of the amount of consideration to which we are entitled in exchange for providing goods and services to our customers. In determining the transaction price, we considered the different sources of variable consideration including, but not limited to, discounts, credits, refunds, price concessions or other similar items. We have included in the transaction price some or all of an amount of variable consideration, utilizing the most likely method, only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved. The actual amount of consideration ultimately received may differ.

 

Management may be required to exercise judgement in estimating revenue to be recognized. Judgement is required in identifying performance obligations, estimating the transaction price, estimating the stand-alone selling prices of identified performance obligations, and estimating the progress towards the satisfaction of performance obligations. If actual results in the future vary from our estimates, the estimates will be adjusted, which will affect revenues in the period that such variances become known.

 

Changes in estimates for variable consideration resulted in an increase in revenues of $1.1 million for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2021 and a decrease in revenues of $1.5 million for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2020. There were no material adjustments in estimates for variable consideration for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2019.

 

We apply the practical expedient available under ASC 606 that permits us not to disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for contracts with an original expected length of one year or less. As of April 30, 2021, we do not have any unsatisfied performance obligations for contracts greater than one year.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts Receivable

 

Accounts receivable generally represent amounts billed services provided under our customer contracts and are recorded at the invoiced amount net of an allowance for doubtful accounts, if necessary. We apply judgment in assessing the ultimate realization of our receivables and we estimate an allowance for doubtful accounts based on various factors, such as the aging of our receivables, historical experience, and the financial condition of our customers. Based on our analysis of our accounts receivable balances as of April 30, 2021 and 2020, we determined no allowance for doubtful accounts was necessary.

Concentrations of Credit Risk and Customer Base

Concentrations of Credit Risk and Customer Base

 

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to a significant concentration of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and contract assets. We maintain our cash balances primarily with two major commercial banks and our deposits held with each bank exceed the amount of government insurance limits provided on our deposits. We are exposed to credit risk in the event of default by the major commercial banks holding our cash balances to the extent of the cash amounts recorded on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets exceed the amount of government insurance limits provided on our deposits.

 

Our accounts receivable from amounts billed for services provided under customer contracts are derived from a small customer base. Most contracts require up-front payments and installment payments during the service period. We perform periodic evaluations of the financial condition of our customers and generally do not require collateral, but we can terminate any contract if a material default occurs. At April 30, 2021 and 2020, approximately 98% of our accounts receivable were due from six customers. Our contract assets are reclassified to accounts receivable when our rights to consideration become unconditional. At April 30, 2021 and 2020, approximately 97% and 96%, respectively, of our contract assets were attributable to six customers.

 

Our revenues are derived from a small customer base. Historically, these customers have not entered into long-term contracts because their need for drug supply depends on a variety of factors, including a product’s stage of development, the timing of regulatory filings and approvals, the product needs of their collaborators, if applicable, their financial resources and the market demand with respect to a commercial product.

 

The table below identifies each of our customers that accounted for 10% or more of our total revenues during any of the fiscal years ended April 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019:

 

Customer  Geographic Location   2021   2020   2019 
                 
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.   U.S.    51%    28%    30% 
Gilead Sciences, Inc.   U.S.    16    24     
IGM Biosciences, Inc.   U.S.    *    11    * 
Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.   U.S.    *    11    * 
Coherus BioSciences, Inc.   U.S.    *    10    13 
ADC Therapeutics America Inc.   U.S.    *    *    21 

______________

*         Represents a percentage less than 10% of our total revenues.

 

We attribute revenue to the individual countries where the customer is headquartered. Revenues derived from U.S. based customers were approximately 100%, 99% and 95% for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Leases

Leases

 

On May 1, 2019, we adopted ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), and its related amendments (codified as “ASC 842”), which requires lessees to recognize right-of-use assets and corresponding lease liabilities for all leases with a lease term greater than one year. We adopted ASC 842 using the modified retrospective approach. Accordingly, results for reporting periods after May 1, 2019 are presented in accordance with ASC 842, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with our historical accounting under ASC 840.

 

We determine if an arrangement is or contains a lease at inception. Our operating leases with a term greater than one year are included in operating lease right-of-use (ROU) assets, operating lease liabilities and operating lease liabilities, less current portion in our consolidated balance sheets. ROU assets represent our right to use an underlying asset during the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date, based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. In determining the net present value of lease payments, we use our incremental borrowing rate which represents an estimated rate of interest that we would have to pay to borrow equivalent funds on a collateralized basis at the lease commencement date.

 

Our operating leases may include options to extend the lease which are included in the lease term when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise a renewal option. Operating lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term. We have elected not to apply the recognition requirements of ASC 842 for short-term leases. We have also elected the practical expedient to not separate lease components from non-lease components.

Inventory

Inventory

 

Inventory consists of raw materials inventory and is valued at the lower of cost, determined by the first-in, first-out method, or net realizable value. We periodically review raw materials inventory for potential impairment and adjust inventory to its net realizable value based on the estimate of future use and reduce the carrying value of inventory as deemed necessary.

Property and Equipment, net

Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment is recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related asset, which are generally as follows:

 

Description   Estimated Useful Life
Leasehold improvements   Shorter of estimated useful life or lease term
Laboratory and manufacturing equipment   5 – 10 years
Computer equipment and software   3 – 5 years
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment   5 – 10 years

 

Construction-in-progress, which represents direct costs related to the construction of various equipment and leasehold improvements primarily associated with our manufacturing facilities, is not depreciated until the asset is completed and placed into service. No interest was incurred or capitalized as construction-in-progress as of April 30, 2021 and 2020. All of our property and equipment are located in the U.S. Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):

 

   April 30, 
   2021   2020 
Leasehold improvements  $23,000   $21,130 
Laboratory and manufacturing equipment   20,793    15,033 
Computer equipment and software   5,541    5,334 
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment   843    685 
Construction-in-progress   8,372    2,564 
Total property and equipment, gross   58,549    44,746 
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization   (21,094)   (17,641)
Total property and equipment, net  $37,455   $27,105 

 

Depreciation and amortization expense for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019 was $3.5 million, $3.1 million and $2.7 million, respectively.

Capitalized Software Implementation Costs

Capitalized Software Implementation Costs

 

We capitalize certain implementation costs incurred under a cloud computing hosting arrangement. Costs incurred during the application development stage related to the implementation of the hosting arrangement are capitalized and included within other assets on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Amortization of capitalized implementation costs is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the associated hosting arrangement when it is ready of its intended use. Costs related to preliminary project activities and post-implementation activities are expensed as incurred. As of April 30, 2021, we had capitalized software implementation costs of $0.9 million. We did not have any capitalized implementation software costs as of April 30, 2020.

Impairment

Impairment

 

Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment in accordance with authoritative guidance for impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. Long-lived assets are reviewed for events or changes in circumstances that indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. If such events or changes in circumstances arise, we compare the carrying amount of the long-lived assets to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the long-lived assets. If the long-lived assets are determined to be impaired, any excess of the carrying value of the long-lived assets over its estimated fair value is recognized as an impairment loss. For the fiscal years ended April 30, 2021 and 2020, there were no indicators of impairment of the value of our long-lived assets and no cumulative impairment losses were recognized as of April 30, 2021.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The carrying amounts in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and note payable approximate their fair values due to their short-term maturities.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurements

 

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into the following hierarchy:

 

·Level 1 – Observable inputs, such as unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
·Level 2 – Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as assets or liabilities whose values are based on quoted market prices in markets where trading occurs infrequently or whose values are based on quoted prices of instruments with similar attributes in active markets.
·Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and significant to the overall fair value measurement of the assets or liabilities; therefore requiring the company to develop its own valuation techniques and assumptions.

 

As of April 30, 2021 and 2020, we do not have any Level 2 or Level 3 financial assets or liabilities and our cash equivalents of $158.8 million and $27.6 million, respectively, are invested in money market funds with two major commercial banks, are carried at fair value based on quoted market prices for identical securities (Level 1 inputs). In addition, the outstanding principal amount of our convertible senior notes of $143.8 million approximates its estimated fair value at April 30, 2021 given the short period of time between the issuance of such notes in March 2021 (Note 3) and our fiscal year ended April 30, 2021. We had no convertible senior notes outstanding as of April 30, 2020.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-Based Compensation

 

We account for stock options, restricted stock units and other stock-based awards granted under our equity compensation plans in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation. The estimated fair value of stock options granted to employees in exchange for services is measured at the grant date, using a fair value based method, such as a Black-Scholes option valuation model, and is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods. The fair value of restricted stock units is measured at the grant date based on the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant and is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the period of vesting. Forfeitures are recognized as a reduction of stock-based compensation expense as they occur. As of April 30, 2021 and 2020, there were no outstanding stock-based awards with market or performance conditions.

Debt Discount and Issuance Costs

Debt Discount and Issuance Costs

 

Debt discount and issuance costs related to convertible senior notes are recorded as deductions that net against the principal value of the debt and are amortized to interest expense over the contractual term of the debt using the effective interest method (Note 3).

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

 

We utilize the liability method of accounting for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). Under the liability method, deferred taxes are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is provided for the amount of deferred tax assets that, based on available evidence, are not expected to be realized (Note 7). In addition, we recognize the impact of an uncertain tax position only when it is more likely than not the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. We are required to file federal and state income tax returns in various jurisdictions. The preparation of these returns requires us to interpret the applicable tax laws in effect in such jurisdictions, which could affect the amount paid by us.

 

The income tax benefit recognized in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the year ended April 30, 2019 resulted from the “Intraperiod Tax Allocation” rules under ASC 740, which requires the allocation of an entity’s total annual income tax provision among continuing operations and, in our case, discontinued operations. Accordingly, a tax benefit was recorded in continuing operations with an offsetting tax expense recorded in discontinued operations (Note 11).

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

Comprehensive income (loss) is the change in equity during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Comprehensive income (loss) is equal to our net income (loss) for all periods presented.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

 

In August 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement (“ASU 2018-13”), which eliminates, adds and modifies certain disclosure requirements of fair value measurements. Entities will no longer be required to disclose the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, but public companies will be required to disclose the range and weighted average used to develop significant unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2018-13 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2019. We adopted ASU 2018-13 on May 1, 2020 and the adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, Intangibles-Goodwill and other Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract (“ASU 2018-15”). The new guidance aligns the requirement for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirement for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use-software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license). ASU 2018-15 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2019. We adopted ASU 2018-15 on May 1, 2020 on a prospective basis. Accordingly, we capitalize certain implementation costs incurred in a cloud computing arrangement that is a service contract and are included in other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Such capitalized costs will be amortized over the term of the hosting arrangement, commencing when the capitalized asset is ready for its intended use. Costs related to preliminary project activities and post-implementation activities are expensed as incurred.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

 

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses of Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”). The standard changes the methodology for measuring credit losses on financial instruments and the timing of when such losses are recorded. As a smaller reporting company as defined by the SEC, ASU 2016-13 and its subsequent updates are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, which will be our fiscal year 2024 beginning May 1, 2023; however, early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the timing and impact the adoption of this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASU 2019-12”), which simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions and improving consistent application in certain areas of Topic 740. ASU 2019-12 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2020, which will be our fiscal year 2022 beginning May 1, 2021. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

 

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-06, Debt with Conversion and other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity (“ASU 2020-06”). The amendments in this ASU will eliminate the beneficial conversion and cash conversion accounting models for convertible instruments, as well as, amend the accounting for certain contracts in an entity’s own equity that are currently accounted for as derivatives because of specific settlement provisions. The ASU will also modify how particular convertible instruments and certain contracts that may be settled in cash or shares impact the diluted earnings per share calculation. As a smaller reporting company as defined by the SEC, ASU 2020-06 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2023, which will be our fiscal year 2025 beginning May 1, 2024. Early adoption is permitted, but no earlier than fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. We are currently planning to early adopt ASU 2020-06 during the first quarter of our fiscal year 2022 using the modified retrospective method, and based on our preliminary analysis, we expect we will reclass the carrying amount of the bifurcated equity component, or debt discount, to the carrying amount of our convertible senior notes (Note 3). In addition, upon adoption, we expect to no longer be required to amortize debt discount to interest expense over the contractual term of our convertible senior notes.