Commitments and Contingencies	6 Months Ended
Jun. 29, 2019
Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	Note 11. Commitments and Contingencies Merger – Rudolph Technologies, Inc. – On June 23, 2019, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Merger”) with Rudolph Technologies, Inc. (“Rudolph”) and PV Equipment Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Consummation of the merger is subject to certain closing conditions including regulatory approvals and shareholder approval from both the Company’s shareholders and those of Rudolph. Under the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger, at the effective time of the Merger, each outstanding share of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Rudolph will be converted into 0.8042 shares of common stock, par value $0.001, of the Company. At the effective time of the Merger, Rudolph’s common stockholders will own approximately 50%, and the Company’s common stockholders will own approximately 50%, of the outstanding shares of common stock of the combined company on a fully diluted basis. The Agreement and Plan of Merger, as well as other related documents were included in the Company’s Current Report of Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 24, 2019. Intellectual Property Indemnification Obligations – The Company will, from time to time, in the normal course of business, agree to indemnify certain customers, vendors or others against third party claims that the Company’s products, when used for their intended purpose(s), or the Company’s intellectual property, infringe the intellectual property rights of such third parties or other claims made against parties with whom it enters into contractual relationships. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount of liability under these indemnification obligations due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances that are likely to be involved in each particular claim. Historically, the Company has not made payments under these obligations and believes that the estimated fair value of these agreements is immaterial. Accordingly, no liabilities have been recorded for these obligations in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 29, 2019 and December 29, 2018. Legal Proceedings - From time to time, the Company is subject to various legal proceedings or claims arising in the ordinary course of business. On August 2, 2017, the Company was named as defendant in a complaint filed in New Hampshire Superior Court (“Complaint”). The Complaint, brought by Optical Solutions, Inc. (“OSI”), alleges claims arising from a purported exclusive purchase contract between OSI and the Company pertaining to certain product. On September 18, 2017, the Company removed the action to the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire. On September 25, 2017, the Company moved to transfer the Complaint to the District Court for the Northern District of California. On December 20, 2017, the Company filed its complaint against OSI in the California Superior Court for the County of Santa Clara alleging claims arising from OSI’s breach of certain purchase orders. The Company’s complaint was later removed by OSI to the Northern District of California. On May 29, 2018, the District Court of New Hampshire issued an order granting the Company’s motion to transfer OSI’s Complaint to the Northern District of California and denying the Company’s motion to dismiss the Complaint without prejudice. On June 14, 2018, OSI’s Complaint was consolidated with the Company’s complaint against OSI. On August 9, 2018, OSI filed an Amended Complaint. On September 19, 2018, the Company filed a motion to dismiss OSI’s Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim. The Company’s motion to dismiss was heard on February 28, 2019. On March 5, 2019 the Court granted the Company’s motion to dismiss with leave to amend. OSI filed a Second Amended Complaint on March 29, 2019. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint on May 31, 2019. A hearing on the Company’s motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint is scheduled for November 14, 2019. Trial has been set for May 16, 2022. The Company records a provision for a loss when it believes that it is both probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Based on current information, the Company believes it does not have any probable and reasonably estimable losses related to any current legal proceedings and claims. Although it is difficult to predict the outcome of legal proceedings, the Company believes that any liability that may ultimately arise from the resolution of these ordinary course matters will not have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition and results of operations.

Commitments and Contingencies

6 Months Ended

Jun. 29, 2019

Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Note 11. Commitments and Contingencies

Merger – Rudolph Technologies, Inc. – On June 23, 2019, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Merger”) with Rudolph Technologies, Inc. (“Rudolph”) and PV Equipment Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Consummation of the merger is subject to certain closing conditions including regulatory approvals and shareholder approval from both the Company’s shareholders and those of Rudolph. Under the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger, at the effective time of the Merger, each outstanding share of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Rudolph will be converted into 0.8042 shares of common stock, par value $0.001, of the Company. At the effective time of the Merger, Rudolph’s common stockholders will own approximately 50%, and the Company’s common stockholders will own approximately 50%, of the outstanding shares of common stock of the combined company on a fully diluted basis. The Agreement and Plan of Merger, as well as other related documents were included in the Company’s Current Report of Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 24, 2019.

Intellectual Property Indemnification Obligations – The Company will, from time to time, in the normal course of business, agree to indemnify certain customers, vendors or others against third party claims that the Company’s products, when used for their intended purpose(s), or the Company’s intellectual property, infringe the intellectual property rights of such third parties or other claims made against parties with whom it enters into contractual relationships. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount of liability under these indemnification obligations due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances that are likely to be involved in each particular claim. Historically, the Company has not made payments under these obligations and believes that the estimated fair value of these agreements is immaterial. Accordingly, no liabilities have been recorded for these obligations in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 29, 2019 and December 29, 2018.

Legal Proceedings - From time to time, the Company is subject to various legal proceedings or claims arising in the ordinary course of business.

On August 2, 2017, the Company was named as defendant in a complaint filed in New Hampshire Superior Court (“Complaint”). The Complaint, brought by Optical Solutions, Inc. (“OSI”), alleges claims arising from a purported exclusive purchase contract between OSI and the Company pertaining to certain product. On September 18, 2017, the Company removed the action to the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire. On September 25, 2017, the Company moved to transfer the Complaint to the District Court for the Northern District of California. On December 20, 2017, the Company filed its complaint against OSI in the California Superior Court for the County of Santa Clara alleging claims arising from OSI’s breach of certain purchase orders. The Company’s complaint was later removed by OSI to the Northern District of California. On May 29, 2018, the District Court of New Hampshire issued an order granting the Company’s motion to transfer OSI’s Complaint to the Northern District of California and denying the Company’s motion to dismiss the Complaint without prejudice. On June 14, 2018, OSI’s Complaint was consolidated with the Company’s complaint against OSI. On August 9, 2018, OSI filed an Amended Complaint. On September 19, 2018, the Company filed a motion to dismiss OSI’s Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim. The Company’s motion to dismiss was heard on February 28, 2019. On March 5, 2019 the Court granted the Company’s motion to dismiss with leave to amend.

OSI filed a Second Amended Complaint on March 29, 2019. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint on May 31, 2019. A hearing on the Company’s motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint is scheduled for November 14, 2019. Trial has been set for May 16, 2022.

The Company records a provision for a loss when it believes that it is both probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Based on current information, the Company believes it does not have any probable and reasonably estimable losses related to any current legal proceedings and claims. Although it is difficult to predict the outcome of legal proceedings, the Company believes that any liability that may ultimately arise from the resolution of these ordinary course matters will not have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition and results of operations.