XML 31 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.0.814
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, and Financial Instruments
9 Months Ended
Sep. 26, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, and Financial Instruments
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, and Financial Instruments
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The standard assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability and establishes that the fair value of an asset or liability shall be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
The Company determines the fair values of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy established in FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, Fair Value Measurement, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The classification of a financial asset or liability within the hierarchy is based upon the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into the following three levels that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Such unobservable inputs include an estimated discount rate used in the Company’s discounted present value analysis of future cash flows, which reflects the Company’s estimate of debt with similar terms in the current credit markets. As there is currently minimal activity in such markets, the actual rate could be materially different.
 
The following tables present the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis, excluding accrued interest components, categorized in accordance with the fair value hierarchy (in thousands), as of the following dates:
 
 
September 26, 2015
 
December 27, 2014
 
Fair Value Measurements Using Input Types
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using Input Types
 
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Money market funds
$
642

 
$

 
$

 
$
642

 
$
610

 
$

 
$

 
$
610

   Commercial paper

 
6,434

 

 
6,434

 

 

 

 

Total cash equivalents
642

 
6,434

 

 
7,076

 
610

 

 

 
610

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Marketable securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   U.S. Treasury, U.S. Government and U.S. Government agency debt securities

 
21,684

 

 
21,684

 
2,497

 
20,537

 

 
23,034

   Commercial paper, municipal securities and corporate debt securities

 
21,381

 

 
21,381

 

 
26,252

 

 
26,252

Total marketable securities

 
43,065

 

 
43,065

 
2,497

 
46,789

 

 
49,286

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Total(1)
$
642

 
$
49,499

 
$

 
$
50,141

 
$
3,107

 
$
46,789

 
$

 
$
49,896

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent consideration payable
$

 
$

 
$
1,920

 
$
1,920

 
$

 
$

 
$
2,397

 
$
2,397


(1) Excludes $34.5 million and $34.1 million held in operating accounts as of September 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014, respectively.
The fair values of the marketable securities that are classified as Level 1 in the table above were derived from quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the Company has the ability to access. The fair value of marketable securities that are classified as Level 2 in the table above were derived from non-binding market consensus prices that were corroborated by observable market data, quoted market prices for similar instruments, or pricing models, such as discounted cash flow techniques with all significant inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data. There were no transfers of instruments between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 during the financial periods presented.

Changes in Level 3 liabilities (in thousands)
 
Fair value at December 27, 2014
$
2,397

Payments made to Zygo Corporation
(614
)
Change in fair value included in earnings
137

Fair value at September 26, 2015
$
1,920


As of September 26, 2015, the Company had liabilities of $1.9 million resulting from the acquisition of certain assets from Zygo Corporation (“Zygo”), which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, with changes in fair value recorded in other income (expense), net. Of the $1.9 million of Zygo liabilities at September 26, 2015, $1.2 million was a current liability and $0.7 million was a long-term liability. As of December 27, 2014, the liabilities totaled $2.4 million of which $1.4 million was a current liability and $1.0 million was a long-term liability. The fair values of these liabilities were determined using Level 3 inputs applying a discounted cash flow model incorporating assumptions that market participants would use in their estimates of fair value. Some of these assumptions included estimates for discount rate, and timing and the amount of cash flows.
Derivatives
The Company uses foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate variability in gains and losses generated from the re-measurement of certain monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. These derivatives are carried at fair value with changes recorded in other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations. Changes in the fair value of these derivatives are largely offset by re-measurement of the underlying assets and liabilities. The derivatives have maturities of approximately 30 days.
The loss on settlement of forward foreign currency contracts included in the three and nine months ended September 26, 2015, was $0.3 million, respectively, and is included in other income (expense), net, in the consolidated statements of operations. There were no forward foreign currency contracts entered into in fiscal 2014.
The following table summarizes the Company’s outstanding derivative instruments on a gross basis as of September 26, 2015:
 
 
 
Notional Principal
 
 
 
(in millions)
Undesignated Hedges:
 
 
Forward Foreign Currency Contracts
$
25.1