Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. In determining fair value, the accounting standards establish a three level hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value, as follows:


•	Level 1 – inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.


•	Level 2 – inputs are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities.


•	Level 3 – inputs are unobservable and reflect our own assumptions.

Non-Financial Assets Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis

We review the carrying amounts of property and equipment and intangibles such as reacquired franchise rights and transferable liquor licenses semi-annually or when events or circumstances indicate that the fair value may not exceed the carrying amount. We record an impairment charge for the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value. During the thirty-nine week period ended March 28, 2018, based on our second quarter semi-annual review, we impaired long-lived assets with carrying values of $2.3 million, primarily related to one underperforming Maggiano’s restaurant and one underperforming Chili’s restaurant which will continue to operate. We determined the leasehold improvements associated with the impaired restaurants had a fair value of $0.3 million, based on Level 3 fair value measurements, resulting in an impairment charge of $2.0 million. During the first quarter of fiscal 2018, we impaired long-lived assets and reacquired franchise rights with carrying values of $6.0 million and $1.2 million, respectively, primarily related to nine underperforming Chili’s restaurants located in Alberta, Canada which were identified for closure by management. We determined the leasehold improvements and other assets associated with these restaurants had no fair value, based on Level 3 fair value measurements, resulting in an impairment charge of $7.2 million. The restaurant assets were assigned a zero fair value as the decision to close the restaurants in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 will result in substantially all of the assets reverting to the landlords. During the thirty-nine week period ended March 29, 2017, long-lived assets and reacquired franchise rights with carrying values of $1.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively, primarily related to six underperforming restaurants, were determined to have a total fair value of $0.2 million resulting in an impairment charge of $1.9 million.

We determine the fair value of transferable liquor licenses based on prices in the open market for licenses in the same or similar jurisdictions. Based on our semi-annual review, during the second quarter of fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017, we determined there was no impairment.

We review the carrying amounts of goodwill annually or when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the carrying amount is not recoverable, we record an impairment charge for the excess of the carrying amount over the implied fair value of the goodwill. We determined that there was no impairment of goodwill during our annual test in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 as the fair value of our reporting units were substantially in excess of their carrying values. No indicators of impairment were identified through the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2018.

All impairment charges were included in Other gains and charges in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the periods presented. Please see Note 4 - Other Gains and Charges for more information.

Other Financial Instruments

Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, a long-term note receivable and long-term debt. The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their carrying amounts because of the short maturity of these items.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2018, we received an $18.0 million long-term note as consideration related to the sale of our equity interest in the Chili’s joint venture in Mexico. We determined the fair value of this note based on an internally developed analysis relying on Level 3 inputs. This analysis was based on a credit rating we assigned to the counterparty and comparable interest rates associated with similar debt instruments observed in the market. As a result of this analysis, we determined the fair value of this note was approximately $16.0 million and recorded this fair value as its initial carrying value. The current portion of the note represents the cash payments to be received over the next 12 months and is included within Accounts receivable, net, while the long-term portion of the note is included within Other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The carrying amount of debt outstanding related to our revolving credit facility approximates fair value as the interest rate on this instrument approximates current market rates (Level 2). The fair values of the 2.60% notes, 3.88% notes and 5.00% notes are based on quoted market prices and are considered Level 2 fair value measurements.

The carrying amounts, which are net of unamortized debt issuance costs and discounts, and fair values of the 2.60% notes, 3.88% notes and 5.00% notes are as follows (in thousands):



	March 28, 2018				June 28, 2017
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
2.60% Notes	$	249,928	$	249,800	$	249,495	$	250,480
3.88% Notes	298,178		285,480		297,912		286,077
5.00% Notes	344,983		342,300		344,405		347,956