-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, HL8gM4GMFfKlr91tH/YDVb2oZ7+a6mWs/FfnkqAYx8imX2QDdr+QI7hBojzWj/5c huCw1BtIGlhuMn+bUDuPSQ== 0000310303-98-000029.txt : 19981116 0000310303-98-000029.hdr.sgml : 19981116 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000310303-98-000029 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10QSB PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 2 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19980930 FILED AS OF DATE: 19981113 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: ANGELES PARTNERS XI CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000702986 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: REAL ESTATE [6500] IRS NUMBER: 953788040 STATE OF INCORPORATION: CA FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10QSB SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-11766 FILM NUMBER: 98749263 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 1873 SOUTH BELLAIRE STREET 17TH FLOOR CITY: DENVER STATE: CO ZIP: 80222 BUSINESS PHONE: 3037578101 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 1873 SOUTH BELLAIRE STREET 17TH FLOOR CITY: DENVER STATE: CO ZIP: 80222 10QSB 1 FORM 10-QSB--QUARTERLY OR TRANSITIONAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 QUARTERLY OR TRANSITIONAL REPORT U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-QSB (Mark One) [X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 1998 [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from .........to......... Commission file number 0-11766 ANGELES PARTNERS XI (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter) California 95-3788040 (State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 55 Beattie Place, Post Office Box 1089 Greenville, South Carolina 29602 (Address of principal executive offices) (864) 239-1000 (Issuer's telephone number) Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS a) ANGELES PARTNERS XI CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (Unaudited) (in thousands, except unit data) September 30, 1998 Assets Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,114 Receivables and deposits 999 Other assets 375 Investment in, and advances of $164 to, Joint Venture 257 Investment property: Land $ 3,998 Buildings and related personal property 25,582 29,580 Less accumulated depreciation (18,270) 11,310 $ 14,055 Liabilities and Partners' Deficit Liabilities Accounts payable $ 133 Due to affiliates 10 Tenant security deposit liabilities 565 Other liabilities 453 Notes payable 31,269 Partners' Deficit General partners $ (499) Limited partners (39,637 units issued and outstanding) (17,876) (18,375) $ 14,055 See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements b) ANGELES PARTNERS XI CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited) (in thousands, except unit data) Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended September 30, September 30, 1998 1997 1998 1997 Revenues: Rental income $ 1,814 $ 1,741 $ 5,367 $ 5,138 Other income 136 88 321 221 Casualty gain -- -- 346 -- Total revenues 1,950 1,829 6,034 5,359 Expenses: Operating 676 679 1,858 1,920 General and administrative 43 46 140 128 Depreciation 374 383 1,122 1,133 Interest 726 728 2,180 2,181 Property taxes 204 212 606 571 Total expenses 2,023 2,048 5,906 5,933 Equity in income of Joint Venture 29 70 55 102 Net income (loss) $ (44) $ (149) $ 183 $ (472) Net income (loss) allocated to $ -- $ (1) $ 2 $ (5) general partners (1%) Net income (loss) allocated to (44) (148) 181 (467) limited partners (99%) Net income (loss) $ (44) $ (149) $ 183 $ (472) Net income (loss) per limited partnership unit $ (1.11) $ (3.73) $ 4.57 $(11.78) See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements c) ANGELES PARTNERS XI CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' DEFICIT (Unaudited) (in thousands, except unit data) Limited Partnership General Limited Units Partners Partners Total Original capital contributions 40,000 $ 30 $ 40,000 $ 40,030 Partners' deficit at December 31, 1997 39,637 $ (501) $(18,057) $(18,558) Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 -- 2 181 183 Partners' deficit at September 30, 1998 39,637 $ (499) $(17,876) $(18,375) See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements d) ANGELES PARTNERS XI CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) (in thousands) Nine Months Ended September 30, 1998 1997 Cash flows from operating activities: Net income (loss) $ 183 $ (472) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: Equity in income of Joint Venture (55) (102) Depreciation 1,122 1,133 Amortization of loan costs 85 94 Casualty gain (346) -- Change in accounts: Receivables and deposits (67) 3 Other assets 12 (42) Accounts payable 61 (539) Tenant security deposit liabilities 24 47 Due to affiliates (460) (28) Other liabilities 20 85 Net cash provided by operating activities 579 179 Cash flows from investing activities: Property improvements and replacements (438) (350) Advances to Joint Venture -- (7) Insurance proceeds received related to casualty 230 -- Net cash used in investing activities (208) (357) Cash flows from financing activities: Loan costs -- (12) Payment on mortgage notes payable (3) (2) Net cash used in financing activities (3) (14) Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 368 (192) Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 746 662 Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $1,114 $ 470 Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Cash paid for interest $2,096 $1,924 Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity: At September 30, 1998, in connection with a fire at Fox Run Apartments, accounts payable was adjusted by approximately $43,000 and receivables and deposits were adjusted by approximately $297,000 for non-cash activity. See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements e) ANGELES PARTNERS XI NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) NOTE A - BASIS OF PRESENTATION The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Angeles Partners XI (the "Partnership") have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-QSB and Item 310(b) of Regulation S-B. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of Angeles Realty Corporation II (the "Managing General Partner"), all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 1998, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 1998. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997. Certain reclassifications have been made to the 1997 information to conform to the 1998 presentation. PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION The Partnership's financial statements include the accounts of Fox Run AP XI, L.P., and Fox Run GP, L.P., of which the Partnership owns 99% limited partnership interests. The Partnership may remove the General Partner of Fox Run AP XI, L.P. and Fox Run GP, L.P.; therefore, these partnerships are deemed controlled and therefore, consolidated by the Partnership. All interpartnership balances have been eliminated. NOTE B - TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATED PARTIES The Partnership has no employees and is dependent on the Managing General Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all partnership activities. The Partnership's partnership greement provides for certain payments to affiliates for services and as reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership. The following payments were made to the Managing General Partner and its affiliates during the nine months ended September 30, 1998 and 1997: Nine Months Ended September 30, 1998 1997 (in thousands) Property management fees (included in operating expenses) $281 $261 Reimbursement for services of affiliates, including approximately $10,000 and $10,000 of construction services reimbursements for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 and September 30, 1997, respectively (included in investment properties, general and administrative, and operating expenses) 107 102 Due to affiliates 10 470 The decrease in due to affiliates relates to the payment of amounts owing to affiliates of the Managing General Partner for reimbursement of expenses in prior years. The amounts had been previously accrued by the Partnership due to the Partnership's liquidity problems in previous years. The Managing General Partner postponed payment of the amounts until the Partnership's cash flow position improved. In the third quarter of 1998, the Managing General Partner determined that the Partnership had sufficient liquid assets to meet its current operational needs and to provide the necessary maintenance and improvements to its investment property in the near term. As a result, the amount due to affiliates of approximately $460,000 was paid. For the period from January 1, 1997, to August 31, 1997, the Partnership insured its properties under a master policy through an agency affiliated with the Managing General Partner with an insurer unaffiliated with the Managing General Partner. An affiliate of the Managing General Partner acquired, in the acquisition of a business, certain financial obligations from an insurance agency which was later acquired by the agent who placed the master policy. The agent assumed the financial obligations to the affiliate of the Managing General Partner which receives payments on these obligations from the agent. The amount of the Partnership's insurance premiums accruing to the benefit of the affiliate of the Managing General Partner by virtue of the agent's obligations was not significant. Angeles Mortgage Investment Trust ("AMIT"), a real estate investment trust, provides financing (the "AMIT Loan") to the Princeton Meadows Golf Course Joint Venture ("Joint Venture"), (see "Note C" below). The AMIT Loan had a principal balance of $1,567,000 at September 30, 1998, accrues interest at a rate of 12.5% per annum and matures on September 1, 2000, at which time the outstanding principal and any unpaid interest is due. Interest expense on the debt secured by the Joint Venture was approximately $147,000 for each of the nine months ended September 30, 1998 and 1997, respectively. Accrued interest was $18,000 at September 30, 1998. Pursuant to a series of transactions, affiliates of the Managing General Partner acquired ownership interests in AMIT. On September 17, 1998, AMIT was merged with and into Insignia Properties Trust ("IPT"), the entity which controls the Managing General Partner. As a result, IPT became the holder of the AMIT Loan. The Partnership may make advances to the Joint Venture as deemed appropriate by the Managing General Partner. These advances do not bear interest and do not have stated terms of repayment. At September 30, 1998, the amount of advances receivable from the Joint Venture was approximately $2,400. On August 12, 1998, an affiliate of the Managing General Partner (the "Purchaser") commenced a tender offer for limited partnership interests in the Partnership. The Purchaser offered to purchase up to 18,000 of the outstanding units of limited partnership interest in the Partnership at $150 per Unit, net to the seller in cash. The expiration date for the tender offers has been extended to November 16, 1998. NOTE C - INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURE The Partnership owns a 41.1% interest in the Princeton Meadows Golf Course Joint Venture. The Partnership accounts for its interest in the Joint Venture using the equity method of accounting. Condensed balance sheet information of the Joint Venture at September 30, 1998, is as follows (in thousands): Assets Cash $ 357 Other assets 268 Investment property, net 2,039 Total $ 2,664 Liabilities and Partners' Capital Note payable to AMIT $ 1,567 Other liabilities 852 Partners' capital 245 Total $ 2,664 The condensed statements of operations of the Joint Venture are summarized as follows: Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended September 30, September 30, 1998 1997 1998 1997 (in thousands) (in thousands) Revenues $ 575 $ 620 $ 1,319 $ 1,361 Costs and expenses (490) (449) (1,171) (1,113) Net income $ 85 $ 171 $ 148 $ 248 The Partnership realized equity income of approximately $55,000 and $102,000 in the Joint Venture for the nine months ended September 30, 1998, and 1997, respectively. The Princeton Meadows Golf Course property had an underground fuel storage tank that was removed in 1992. This fuel storage tank caused contamination to the area. Management installed monitoring wells in the area where the tank was formerly buried. Some samples from these wells indicated lead and phosphorous readings that were higher than the range prescribed by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP"). The Joint Venture notified the DEP of the findings when they were first discovered. However, the DEP did not give any directives as to corrective action until late 1995. In November 1995, representatives of the Joint Venture and the DEP met and developed a plan of action to clean-up the contamination site at Princeton Meadows Golf Course. The Joint Venture has engaged an engineering firm to conduct consulting and compliance work and a second firm to perform the field work necessary for the clean-up. Field work is in process with skimmers having been installed at three test wells on the site. These skimmers are in place to detect any residual fuel that may still be in the ground. The expected completion date of field work should be sometime in 1999. The Joint Venture originally recorded a liability of $199,000 for the costs of the clean-up. Subsequently, in 1997, the Joint Venture recorded an additional liability of approximately $45,000 as an adjustment to estimated costs remaining to complete the clean-up. At September 30, 1998, the balance in the liability for clean-up costs is $54,000. Funds from the property will be used to cover this excess. Representatives of the Joint Venture have entered into negotiations with a potential buyer for the Princeton Meadows Golf Course. However, the contract for the sale has not been finalized and Joint Venture Representatives cannot assure that the sale will be consummated. NOTE D - TRANSFER OF CONTROL; SUBSEQUENT EVENT On October 1, 1998, Insignia Financial Group, Inc. completed its merger with and into Apartment Investment and Management Company ("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust, with AIMCO being the surviving corporation (the "Insignia Merger"). As a result of the Insignia Merger, AIMCO acquired control of the Managing General Partner. In addition, AIMCO also acquired approximately 51% of the outstanding common shares of beneficial interest of IPT. Also, effective October 1, 1998 IPT and AIMCO entered into an Agreement and plan of Merger pursuant to which IPT is to be merged with and into AIMCO or a subsidiary of AIMCO (the "IPT Merger"). The IPT Merger requires the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding IPT Shares. AIMCO has agreed to vote all of the IPT Shares owned by it in favor of the IPT Merger and has granted an irrevocable limited proxy to unaffiliated representatives of IPT to vote the IPT Shares acquired by AIMCO and its subsidiaries in favor of the IPT Merger. As a result of AIMCO's ownership and its agreement, the vote of no other holder of IPT is required to approve the merger. The Managing General Partner does not believe that this transaction will have a material effect on the affairs and operations of the Partnership. NOTE E - CASUALTY In October, 1997, there was a fire at Fox Run Apartments that completely destroyed the clubhouse and office. The undepreciated value of the clubhouse and office was written off and netted with the proceeds received in 1997, resulting in no gain or loss recognized in 1997. Total insurance proceeds have now been received and are estimated to cover the cost of replacement of the assets. A casualty gain of approximately $346,000 resulting from the receipt of these insurance proceeds was recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 1998. ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION The Partnership's investment property consists of one apartment complex. The following table sets forth the average occupancy of the property for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 and 1997: Average Occupancy 1998 1997 Fox Run Apartments Plainsboro, New Jersey 96% 96% The Partnership incurred a net loss of approximately $44,000 and net income of $183,000, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 1998, as compared to net losses of approximately $149,000 and $472,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 1997. These increases in net income is due to an increase in rental income, other income and the recognition of a casualty gain for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 combined with a decrease in operating expense partially offset by a decrease in the equity in the income of the joint venture in Princeton Meadows Golf Course. Fox Run Apartments' increased rental income is the result of an increase in average rental rates for the nine months ended September 30, 1998, versus the nine months ended September 30, 1997. In addition, the increase in other income is primarily the result of increased revenues from laundry facilities and increased lease cancellation fees. While total expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 remained relatively consistent with the nine months ended September 30, 1997, operating expense decreased primarily due to a decrease in maintenance expense at Fox Run Apartments. This can be attributed to the fact that much of the maintenance work is currently being done less expensively by in-house personnel rather than outside contractors. Also, less interior painting was done at Fox Run Apartments during the period ended September 30, 1998 as compared to the period ended September 30, 1997 due to fewer tenants vacating their units. The decrease in operating expenses was partially offset by an increase in tax expense due to an increase in tax rates at Fox Run Apartments. In October 1997, there was a fire at Fox Run Apartments that completely destroyed the clubhouse and office. The undepreciated value of the clubhouse and office was written off and netted with the proceeds received in 1997, resulting in no gain or loss recognized in 1997. Total insurance proceeds have now been received and are estimated to cover the cost of replacement of the assets. A casualty gain of approximately $346,000 resulting from the receipt of these insurance proceeds was recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 1998. The Partnership has a 41.1% investment in the Princeton Meadows Golf Course Joint Venture. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 1998, the Partnership realized equity in income of the Joint Venture of approximately $29,000 and $55,000, respectively, as compared to equity in income of the Joint Venture of approximately $70,000 and $102,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 1997. Representatives of the Joint Venture have entered into negotiations with a potential buyer for the Princeton Meadows Golf Course. However, the contract for the sale has not been finalized and Joint Venture Representatives cannot assure that the sale will be consummated. Included in operating expense for the nine months ended September 30, 1998, is approximately $41,000 of major repairs and maintenance mainly comprised of major landscaping and window covering replacements. For the nine months ended September 30, 1997, included in operating expense is approximately $32,000 of major repairs and maintenance mainly comprised of construction oversight costs relating to repairs ongoing at Fox Run Apartments during 1997, window covering replacements, and swimming pool repairs. As part of the ongoing business plan of the Partnership, the Managing General Partner monitors the rental market environment at its investment property to assess the feasibility of increasing rent, maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and protecting the Partnership from increases in expense. As part of this plan, the Managing General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from the burden of inflation-related increases in expenses by increasing rents and maintaining a high overall occupancy level. However, due to changing market conditions, which can result in the use of rental concessions and rental reductions to offset softening market conditions, there is no guarantee that the Managing General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan. At September 30, 1998, the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $1,114,000 as compared to approximately $470,000 at September 30, 1997. Cash and cash equivalents increased by approximately $368,000 and decreased by approximately $192,000 for the nine month periods ended September 30, 1998 and 1997, respectively. Net cash provided by operating activities increased for the nine months ended September 30, 1998, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 1997, due to an increase in net income, as previously explained, along with an increase in accounts payable, offset by a decrease is due to affiliates. Payment of utility expenses, loan costs, past due insurance premiums, and deferred liabilities from a casualty, all accrued for at December 31, 1996, contributed to the large decrease in accounts payable for the nine months ended September 30, 1997. The decrease in due to affiliates relates to the payment of amounts owing to affiliates of the Managing General Partner for reimbursement of expenses in prior years. The amounts had been previously accrued by the Partnership due to the its liquidity problems in previous years. The Managing General Partner postponed payment of the amounts until the Partnership's cash flow position improved. In the third quarter of 1998, the Managing General Partner determined that the Partnership had sufficient liquid assets to meet its current operational needs and to provide the necessary maintenance and improvements to its investment property in the near term. As a result, the amount due to affiliates of approximately $460,000 was paid. Net cash used in investing activities decreased primarily due to insurance proceeds received as a result of the casualties at Fox Run Apartments (see Note E). This is partially offset by an increase in cash used for property improvements during the nine months ended September 30, 1998 resulting from construction in progress payments for the replacement of assets damaged by the casualties. The decrease in cash used in financing activities is due to loan costs incurred in 1997 relating to the refinancing of the indebtedness at Fox Run Apartments in December 1996. The sufficiency of existing liquid assets to meet future liquidity and capital expenditure requirements is directly related to the level of capital expenditures required at the property to adequately maintain the physical assets and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with federal, state and local legal and regulatory requirements. Such assets are currently thought to be sufficient for any near-term needs of the Partnership. The Managing General Partner is currently assessing the need for capital improvements at the Partnership's property. To the extent that additional capital improvements are required, the Partnership's distributable cash flow, if any, may be adversely affected. The mortgage indebtedness of approximately $31,269,000 matures January 2002 with a balloon payment due at maturity totaling approximately $29,960,000. The Managing General Partner will attempt to refinance such indebtedness or sell the property prior to such maturity date. If the property cannot be refinanced or sold for a sufficient amount, the Partnership will risk losing the property through foreclosure. There were no cash distributions during the nine months ended September 30, 1998, or September 30, 1997. Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of net cash generated from operations, refinancings, a property sale and the availability of cash reserves. The Partnership's distribution policy will be reviewed on a quarterly basis. There can be no assurance, however, that the Partnership will generate sufficient funds from operations to permit distributions to its partners in 1998 or subsequent periods. Transfer of Control; Subsequent Event On October 1, 1998, Insignia Financial Group, Inc. completed its merger with and into Apartment Investment and Management Company ("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust, with AIMCO being the surviving corporation (the "Insignia Merger"). As a result of the Insignia Merger, AIMCO acquired control of the Managing General Partner. In addition, AIMCO also acquired approximately 51% of the outstanding common shares of beneficial interest of Insignia Properties Trust ("IPT"), the entity which controls the Managing General Partner. Also, effective October 1, 1998 IPT and AIMCO entered into an Agreement and plan of Merger pursuant to which IPT is to be merged with and into AIMCO or a subsidiary of AIMCO (the "IPT Merger"). The IPT Merger requires the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding IPT Shares. AIMCO has agreed to vote all of the IPT Shares owned by it in favor of the IPT Merger and has granted an irrevocable limited proxy to unaffiliated representatives of IPT to vote the IPT Shares acquired by AIMCO and its subsidiaries in favor of the IPT Merger. As a result of AIMCO's ownership and its agreement, the vote of no other holder of IPT is required to approve the merger. The Managing General Partner does not believe that this transaction will have a material effect on the affairs and operations of the Partnership. Year 2000 General Description of the Year 2000 Issue and the Nature and Effects of the Year 2000 on Information Technology (IT) and Non-IT Systems The Year 2000 Issue is the result of computer programs being written using two digits rather than four to define the applicable year. The Partnership is dependent upon the Managing General Partner and its affiliates for management and administrative services ("Managing Agent"). Any computer programs or hardware that have date-sensitive software or embedded chips may recognize a date using "00" as the year 1900 rather than the year 2000. This could result in a system failure or miscalculations causing disruptions of operations, including, among other things, a temporary inability to process transactions, send invoices, or engage in similar normal business activities. The Managing Agent has determined that it will be required to modify or replace significant portions of its software and certain hardware so that those systems will properly utilize dates beyond December 31, 1999. The Managing Agent presently believes that with modifications or replacements of existing software and certain hardware, the Year 2000 Issue can be mitigated. However, if such modifications and replacements are not made, or are not completed timely, the Year 2000 Issue could have a material impact on the operations of the Managing Agent and the Partnership. Status of Progress in Becoming Year 2000 Compliant The Managing Agent's plan to resolve the Year 2000 Issue involves the following four phases: assessment, remediation, testing and implementation. To date, the Managing Agent has fully completed its assessment of all information systems that could be significantly affected by the Year 2000, and has begun the remediation, testing and implementation phase on both hardware and software systems. Assessments are continuing in regards to embedded systems in operating equipment. The Managing Agent anticipates having all phases complete by June 1, 1999. In addition to the areas the Partnership is relying on the Managing Agent to verify compliance with, the Partnership has certain operating equipment, primarily at the property sites, which needed to be evaluated for Year 2000 compliance. The focus of the Managing General Partner was to the security systems, elevators, heating-ventilation-air-conditioning systems, telephone systems and switches, and sprinkler systems. The Managing General Partner is currently engaged in the identification of all non-compliant operational systems, and is in the process of estimating the costs associated with any potential modifications or replacements needed to such systems in order for them to be Year 2000 compliant. It is not expected that such costs would have a material adverse affect upon the operations of the Partnership. Risk Associated with the Year 2000 The Managing General Partner believes that the Managing Agent has an effective program in place to resolve the Year 2000 issue in a timely manner and has appropriate contingency plans in place for critical applications that could affect the Partnership's operations. To date, the Managing General Partner is not aware of any external agent with a Year 2000 issue that would materially impact the Partnership's results of operations, liquidity or capital resources. However, the Managing General Partner has no means of ensuring that external agents will be Year 2000 compliant. The Managing General Partner does not believe that the inability of external agents to complete their Year 2000 resolution process in a timely manner will have a material impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Partnership. However, the effect of non-compliance by external agents is not readily determinable. Other Certain items discussed in this quarterly report may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Reform Act") and as such may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Partnership to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward- looking statements. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this quarterly report. The Partnership expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in the Partnership's expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. PART II - OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the Partnership commenced an action entitled ROSALIE NUANES, ET AL. V. INSIGNIA FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., ET AL. in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Mateo. The plaintiffs named as defendants, among others, the Partnership, the Managing General Partner and several of their affiliated partnerships and corporate entities. The complaint purports to assert claims on behalf of a class of limited partners and derivatively on behalf of a number of limited partnerships (including the Partnership) which are named as nominal defendants, challenging the acquisition by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") and entities which were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia ("Insignia Affiliates") of interests in certain general partner entities, past tender offers by Insignia Affiliates to acquire limited partnership units, the management of partnerships by Insignia Affiliates as well as a recently announced agreement between Insignia and Apartment Investment and Management Company. The complaint seeks monetary damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership. On June 25, 1998, the Managing General Partner filed a motion seeking dismissal of the action. In lieu of responding to the motion, the plaintiffs have filed an amended complaint. The Managing General Partner has filed demurrers to the amended complaint which are schedule to be heard on January 8, 1999. The Managing General Partner believes this action to be without merit, and intends to vigorously defend it. On July 30, 1998, certain entities claiming to own limited partnership interests in certain limited partnerships whose general partners were, at the time, affiliates of Insignia filed a complaint entitled EVEREST PROPERTIES, LLC. V. INSIGNIA FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., ET AL. in the Superior Court of the State of California, county of Los Angeles. The action involves 44 real estate limited partnership (including the Partnership) in which the plaintiffs allegedly own interests and which Insignia Affiliates allegedly manage or control (the "Subject Partnerships"). The complaint names as defendants Insignia, several Insignia Affiliates alleged to be managing partners of the Subject Partnerships, the Partnership and the Managing General Partner. Plaintiffs allege that they have requested from, but have been denied by each of the Subject Partnerships, lists of their respective limited partners for the purpose of making tender offers to purchase up to 4.9% of the limited partner units of each of the Subject Partnerships. The complaint also alleges that certain of the defendants made tender offers to purchase limited partner units in many of the Subject Partnerships, with the alleged result that plaintiffs have been deprived of the benefits they would have realized from ownership of the additional units. The plaintiffs assert eleven causes of action, including breach of contract, unfair business practices, and violations of the partnership statutes of the states in which the Subject Partnerships are organized. Plaintiffs seek compensatory, punitive and treble damages. The Managing General Partner filed an answer to the complaint on September 15, 1998. The Managing General Partner believes the claims to be without merit and intends to defend the action vigorously. The Registrant is unaware of any other pending or outstanding litigation that is not of a routine nature. The Managing General Partner of the Registrant believes that all such pending or outstanding litigation will be resolved without a material adverse effect upon the business, financial condition, or operations of the Partnership. ITEM 2. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K a) Exhibits: Exhibit 27 is filed as an exhibit to this report. b) Reports on Form 8-K: None filed during the nine months ended September 30, 1998. SIGNATURES In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. ANGELES PARTNERS XI By: Angeles Realty Corporation II Managing General Partner By: /s/Patrick Foye Patrick Foye Executive Vice President By: /s/ Timothy R. Garrick Timothy R. Garrick Vice President - Accounting (Duly Authorized Officer) Date: November 13, 1998 EX-27 2
5 This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles Partners XI 1998 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing. 0000702986 ANGELES PARTNERS XI 1,000 9-MOS DEC-31-1998 SEP-30-1998 1,114 0 999 0 0 0 29,580 18,270 14,055 0 31,269 0 0 0 (18,375) 14,055 0 6,034 0 0 5,906 0 2,180 0 0 0 0 0 0 183 4.57 0 Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. Multiplier is 1.
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----