XML 151 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Note 11 - Commitments, Guarantees, and Contingent Liabilities
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
Disclosure Text Block Supplement [Abstract]  
Commitments Contingencies and Guarantees [Text Block]

11. COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES, AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES


Credit Commitments and Guarantees


In the normal course of business, the Company enters into a variety of financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of its customers and to conduct lending activities, including commitments to extend credit and standby and commercial letters of credit. These instruments involve elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.


Contractual or Notional Amounts of Financial Instruments


(Dollar amounts in thousands)


   

June 30,
2013

     

December 31,
2012

   

Commitments to extend credit:

                       

Commercial and industrial

  $   790,927       $   737,973    

Commercial real estate

      196,987           168,105    

Residential construction

      14,089           18,986    

Home equity lines

      261,962           258,156    

Credit card lines

      26,804           25,459    

Overdraft protection program (1)

      174,681           176,328    

All other commitments

      103,890           105,344    

Total commitments

  $   1,569,340       $   1,490,351    

Letters of credit:

                       

Commercial real estate

  $   43,635       $   52,145    

Residential construction

      5,694           5,696    

All other

      58,412           57,996    

Total letters of credit

  $   107,741       $   115,837    

Unamortized fees associated with letters of credit (2)(3)

  $   559       $   740    

Remaining weighted-average term, in months

      10.26           13.20    

Remaining lives, in years

    0.1 to 11.1       0.1 to 11.6  

Recourse on assets sold:

                       

Unpaid principal balance of assets sold

  $   126,901       $   50,110    

Carrying value of recourse obligation (2)

      129           55    

   

Advance Dated

 
   

May 17,
2012

   

October 3,
2012

 

Forward committed advances with FHLB:

               

Amount of advance

  $ 200,000     $ 50,000  

Interest rate

    2.05 %     1.77 %

Expected settlement date

 

May 19, 2014

   

October 3, 2014

 

Maturity date

 

May 20, 2019

   

October 3, 2019

 

 

(1)

Federal regulations regarding electronic fund transfers require customers to affirmatively consent to the institution’s overdraft service for automated teller machine and one-time debit card transactions before overdraft fees may be assessed on the account. Customers are provided a specific line for the amount they may overdraw.


 

(2)

Included in other liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.


 

(3)

The Company amortizes these amounts into income over the commitment period.


Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend funds to a customer, subject to contractual terms and covenants. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses, variable interest rates, and fee requirements, when applicable. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash flow requirements.


In the event of a customer’s non-performance, the Company’s credit loss exposure is equal to the contractual amount of the commitments. The credit risk is essentially the same as extending loans to customers. The Company uses the same credit policies for credit commitments and its loans and minimizes exposure to credit loss through various collateral requirements.


Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit generally are contingent on the failure of the customer to perform according to the terms of the contract with the third party and are often issued in favor of a municipality where construction is taking place to ensure the borrower adequately completes the construction.


The maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under standby letters of credit arrangements are equal to the contractual amount of the commitment. If a commitment is funded, the Company may seek recourse through the liquidation of the underlying collateral including real estate, production plants and property, marketable securities, or receipt of cash.


As a result of the sale of certain 1-4 family mortgage loans, the Company is contractually obligated to repurchase any non-performing loans or loans that do not meet underwriting requirements at recorded value. In accordance with the sales agreements, there is no limitation on the maximum potential future payments or expiration of the Company’s recourse obligation. No loans were required to be repurchased during the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2013 or 2012.


During 2012, the Company entered into two forward commitments with the FHLB to take advantage of low interest rates for future funding. The advances have prepayment features allowing the Company to prepay the advances below par if the prepayment calculations indicate a discount.


Legal Proceedings


In 2011, the Bank was named in a purported class action lawsuit filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois on behalf of certain of the Bank’s customers who incurred overdraft fees. The lawsuit is based on the Bank’s practices relating to debit card transactions, and alleges that these practices resulted in customers being assessed excessive overdraft fees. The plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount of damages and other relief, including restitution. No class has been certified. The Bank filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint and, on January 23, 2013, the Circuit Court entered an order granting the Bank’s motion and dismissed the complaint with prejudice. The plaintiffs have appealed the Circuit Court’s ruling, and the appeal is currently pending with the Appellate Court of Illinois. The Company continues to believe that the Bank has meritorious defenses to the claims made by the plaintiffs.


There are certain other legal proceedings pending against the Company and its subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not believe that liabilities, individually or in the aggregate, arising from any legal proceedings, if any, would have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of June 30, 2013.