XML 106 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Feb. 02, 2013
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Disclosures
Fair Value Measurements
The following table provides a summary of the carrying value and fair value of long-term debt as of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012:
     
 
February 2,
2013
 
January 28,
2012
 
(in millions)
Carrying Value
$
4,477

 
$
3,538

Fair Value (a)
5,023

 
3,849

________________
(a)
The estimated fair value of the Company’s publicly traded debt is based on reported transaction prices which are considered Level 2 inputs in accordance with ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure. The estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange.
The following table provides a summary of assets and liabilities measured in the consolidated financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis as of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012:
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
 
(in millions)
As of February 2, 2013
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
$
773

 
$

 
$

 
$
773

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cross-currency Cash Flow Hedges

 
59

 

 
59

Lease Guarantees

 

 
2

 
2

As of January 28, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
$
935

 
$

 
$

 
$
935

Interest Rate Designated Fair Value Hedges

 
14

 

 
14

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cross-currency Cash Flow Hedges

 
60

 

 
60

Lease Guarantees

 

 
4

 
4



The Company’s Level 2 fair value measurements are measured using market approach valuation techniques. The primary inputs to these techniques include benchmark interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, as applicable to the underlying instruments.
The Company’s Level 3 fair value measurements are measured using income approach valuation techniques. The primary inputs to these techniques include the guaranteed lease payments, discount rates, as well as the Company’s assessment of the risk of default on guaranteed leases.
Management believes that the carrying values of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of their short maturity.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the Company’s lease guarantees measured at fair value on a recurring basis using unobservable inputs (Level 3) for 2012 and 2011:
 
2012
 
2011
 
(in millions)
Beginning Balance
$
4

 
$
6

Change in Estimated Fair Value Reported in Earnings
(2
)
 
(2
)
Ending Balance
$
2

 
$
4


The Company’s lease guarantees include minimum rent and additional payments covering taxes, common area costs and certain other expenses and relate to leases that commenced prior to the disposition of certain businesses. The fair value of these lease guarantees is impacted by economic conditions, probability of rent obligation payments, period of obligation as well as the discount rate utilized. For additional information, see Note 17, “Commitments and Contingencies.”