UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

OR

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                  to                  

Commission file number 0-10777

CENTRAL PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Hawaii	99-0212597
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)
220 South King Street, Honolulu, Hawaii	96813
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(808)544-0500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o  No x

As of July 31, 2006, the number of shares of common stock outstanding of the registrant was 30,487,077 shares.

CENTRAL PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Table of Contents

Part I - Financial Information
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)
	Consolidated Balance Sheets – June 30, 2006 and 2005, and December 31, 2005
	Consolidated Statements of Income - Three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income - Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – June 30, 2006 and 2005
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures
Part II - Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings
Item 1A.	Risk Factors
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity and Use of Proceeds
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Item 5.	Other Information
Item 6.	Exhibits

2

3

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Forward-Looking Statements

This document may contain forward-looking statements concerning projections of revenues, income, earnings per share, capital expenditures, dividends, capital structure, or other financial items, concerning plans and objectives of management for future operations, concerning future economic performance, or concerning any of the assumptions underlying or relating to any of the foregoing. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts, and generally include the words “believes”, “plans”, “intends”, “expects”, “anticipates” or words of similar meaning. While we believe that our forward-looking statements and the assumptions underlying them are reasonably based, such statements and assumptions are by their nature subject to risks and uncertainties, and thus could later prove to be inaccurate or incorrect. Accordingly, actual results could materially differ from projections for a variety of reasons, to include, but not be limited to:  the impact of local, national, and international economies and events on the company’s business and operations and on tourism, the military, and other major industries operating within our markets; the impact of legislation affecting the banking industry; the impact of competitive products, services, pricing, and other competitive forces; movements in interest rates; loan delinquency rates; and trading of the company’s stock. For further information on factors that could cause actual results to materially differ from projections, please see our publicly available Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including our Form 10-K for the last fiscal year. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which such statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Item 1.Financial Statements

4

CENTRAL PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

	June 30,			December 31,			June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2006			2005			2005
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	101,569		$	154,927		$	118,082
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks	1,177			9,813			1,312
Investment securities:
Held to maturity, at amortized cost (fair value of $66,903 at June 30, 2006, $70,651 at December 31, 2005, and $78,652 at June 30, 2005)	68,641			71,843			78,983
Available for sale, at fair value	825,682			853,442			969,800
Total investment securities	894,323			925,285			1,048,783
Loans held for sale	24,763			60,538			22,400
Loans	3,689,287			3,552,749			3,205,124
Less allowance for loan losses	52,914			52,936			51,657
Net loans	3,636,373			3,499,813			3,153,467
Premises and equipment	76,368			72,568			77,525
Accrued interest receivable	23,474			22,006			19,813
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries	11,362			12,417			12,369
Due from customers on acceptances	383			530			228
Goodwill	297,251			303,358			288,090
Core deposit premium	33,846			35,795			39,105
Mortgage servicing rights	11,873			11,820			3,470
Bank-owned life insurance	100,021			68,325			67,249
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	48,797			48,797			48,797
Other assets	29,232			13,147			18,091
Total assets	$	5,290,812		$	5,239,139		$	4,918,781
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing demand	$	673,784		$	730,952		$	663,133
Interest-bearing demand	410,296			442,879			429,553
Savings and money market	1,169,874			1,091,057			1,146,256
Time	1,410,206			1,377,356			1,267,210
Total deposits	3,664,160			3,642,244			3,506,152
Short-term borrowings	104,897			82,734			7,169
Long-term debt	742,907			749,258			675,524
Bank acceptances outstanding	383			530			228
Minority interest	13,143			13,157			12,781
Other liabilities	66,504			74,982			59,461
Total liabilities	4,591,994			4,562,905			4,261,315
Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, no par value, authorized 1,000,000 shares, none issued	—			—			—
Common stock, no par value, authorized 100,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 30,480,230 shares at June 30,, 2006, 30,436,862 shares at December 31, 2005, and 30,409,823 shares at June 30,, 2005	427,747			428,012			427,415
Surplus	49,723			46,432			45,848
Retained earnings	245,322			218,341			192,547
Deferred stock awards	—			(612		)	(299		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(23,974		)	(15,939		)	(8,045		)
Total shareholders’ equity	698,818			676,234			657,466
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	5,290,812		$	5,239,139		$	4,918,781

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5

CENTRAL PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2006			2005			2006			2005
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans	$	67,606		$	54,138		$	132,159		$	104,972
Interest and dividends on investment securities:
Taxable interest	8,947			7,948			17,510			15,397
Tax-exempt interest	1,277			1,630			2,595			2,635
Dividends	8			116			111			135
Interest on deposits in other banks	54			58			227			205
Interest on Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell	2			21			54			79
Dividends on Federal Home Loan Bank stock	—			—			—			272
Total interest income	77,894			63,911			152,656			123,695
Interest expense:
Interest on deposits	16,464			9,005			30,269			16,522
Interest on short-term borrowings	583			313			814			840
Interest on long-term debt	8,680			6,083			17,214			11,503
Total interest expense	25,727			15,401			48,297			28,865
Net interest income	52,167			48,510			104,359			94,830
Provision for loan losses	525			1,000			1,050			1,917
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	51,642			47,510			103,309			92,913
Other operating income:
Income from fiduciary activities	740			581			1,417			1,114
Service charges on deposit accounts	3,457			2,456			6,993			4,898
Other service charges and fees	3,153			3,028			6,204			5,804
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries	147			187			331			290
Fees on foreign exchange	212			188			394			406
Gains on sales of loans	1,451			991			4,040			1,422
Investment securities gains (losses)	(19		)	(63		)	(19		)	1,446
Income from bank-owned life insurance	785			515			1,709			1,148
Other	1,034			921			2,055			1,527
Total other operating income	10,960			8,804			23,124			18,055
Other operating expense:
Salaries and employee benefits	17,615			14,243			36,677			30,452
Net occupancy	2,301			2,289			4,575			5,044
Equipment	1,280			1,328			2,453			2,525
Amortization of core deposit premium	974			1,655			1,948			2,955
Communication expense	1,208			1,069			2,376			2,153
Legal and professional services	2,323			1,724			4,189			4,360
Computer software expense	647			840			1,240			1,668
Advertising expense	528			493			1,274			1,258
Other	4,582			5,073			10,505			9,208
Total other operating expense	31,458			28,714			65,237			59,623
Income before income taxes	31,144			27,600			61,196			51,345
Income taxes	10,706			9,698			21,419			16,238
Net income	$	20,438		$	17,902		$	39,777		$	35,107
Per share data:
Basic earnings per share	$	0.67		$	0.59		$	1.31		$	1.19
Diluted earnings per share	0.66			0.58			1.29			1.17
Cash dividends declared	0.21			0.19			0.42			0.35
Basic weighted average shares outstanding	30,466			30,364			30,453			29,501
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding	30,783			30,843			30,768			30,025

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

6

CENTRAL PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

												Accumulated
									Deferred			Other
	Common					Retained			Stock			Comprehensive
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	Stock			Surplus		Earnings			Awards			Loss			Total
Six months ended June 30, 2006
Balance at December 31, 2005	$	428,012		$	46,432	$	218,341		$	(612	)	$	(15,939	)	$	676,234
Net income	—			—		39,777			—			—			39,777
Net change in unrealized loss on investment securities, net of taxes of $5,410	—			—		—			—			(8,035		)	(8,035		)
Comprehensive income															31,742
Cash dividends ($0.42 per share)	—			—		(12,796		)	—			—			(12,796		)
538 shares of common stock purchased by  directors’ deferred compensation plan	(20		)	—		—			—			—			(20		)
32,958 shares of common stock issued in conjunction with stock option exercises	478			—		—			—			—			478
Share-based compensation expense	—			1,702		—			—			—			1,702
Tax benefit related to stock option exercises	—			664		—			—			—			664
Reclassification of share-based plans	(723		)	925		—			612			—			814
Balance at June 30, 2006	$	427,747		$	49,723	$	245,322		$	—		$	(23,974	)	$	698,818
Disclosure of reclassification amount:
Unrealized holding loss on investment securities during period, net of taxes of $5,399	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	(8,019	)	$	(8,019	)
Less reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income, net of taxes of $11	—			—		—			—			16			16
Net change in unrealized loss on investment securities	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	(8,035	)	$	(8,035	)
Six months ended June 30, 2005
Balance at December 31, 2004	$	360,550		$	45,848	$	167,801		$	(174	)	$	(6,163	)	$	567,862
Net income	—			—		35,107			—			—			35,107
Net change in unrealized loss on investment securities, net of taxes of $1,508	—			—		—			—			(1,882		)	(1,882		)
Comprehensive income															33,225
Cash dividends ($0.35 per share)	—			—		(10,292		)	—			—			(10,292		)
2,012,500 shares issued in conjunction with common stock offering	64,210			—		—			—			—			64,210
236,466 shares of common stock issued in conjunction with stock option exercises	2,580			—		—			—			—			2,580
1,181 shares of common stock purchased by directors’ deferred compensation plan	(43		)	—		—			—			—			(43		)
2,893 shares of common stock repurchased	(37		)	—		(69		)	—			—			(106		)
4,355 shares of deferred stock awards granted	155			—		—			(155		)	—			—
Amortization of deferred stock awards	—			—		—			30			—			30
Balance at June 30, 2005	$	427,415		$	45,848	$	192,547		$	(299	)	$	(8,045	)	$	657,466
Disclosure of reclassification amount:
Unrealized holding loss on investment securities during period, net of taxes of $1,197	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	(1,414	)	$	(1,414	)
Less reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income, net of taxes of $312	—			—		—			—			468			468
Net change in unrealized loss on investment securities	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	(1,882	)	$	(1,882	)

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

7

CENTRAL PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	Six months ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2006				2005
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	39,777			$	35,107
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses	1,050				1,917
Provision for depreciation and amortization	3,410				3,589
Amortization of intangible assets	3,098				3,529
Net amortization of deferred stock awards	-				31
Net amortization of investment securities	1,461				1,771
Share-based compensation	1,702				-
Net loss (gain) on investment securities	19				(1,446			)
Net gain on sale of loans	(4,040			)	(1,422			)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale	308,339				111,296
Originations of loans held for sale	(268,524			)	(114,538			)
Tax benefits from share-based compensation	(664			)	-
Deferred income tax expense	39				4,641
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries	(334			)	(289			)
Net change in other assets and other liabilities	(46,846			)	(19,899			)
Net cash provided by operating activities	38,487				24,287
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from maturities of and calls on investment securities held to maturity	3,045				21,826
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale	57				102,638
Proceeds from maturities of and calls on investment securities available for sale	221,169				390,935
Purchases of investment securities available for sale	(208,234			)	(717,077			)
Net loan originations	(136,846			)	(104,655			)
Purchases of premises and equipment	(7,211			)	(4,015			)
Distributions from unconsolidated subsidiaries	767				526
Contributions to unconsolidated subsidiaries	—				(1,579			)
Net cash used in investing activities	(127,253			)	(311,401			)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in deposits	21,916				179,126
Proceeds from long-term debt	50,000				100,000
Repayments of long-term debt	(55,653			)	(10,725			)
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings	22,163				(81,731			)
Cash dividends paid	(12,796			)	(10,292			)
Tax benefits from share-based compensation	664				—
Proceeds from common stock offering	—				64,210
Proceeds from stock option exercises	478				2,579
Repurchases of common stock	—				(106			)
Net cash provided by financing activities	26,772				243,061
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(61,994			)	(44,053			)
Cash and cash equivalents:
At beginning of period	164,740				163,447
At end of period	$		102,746		$		119,394
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	45,420			$	26,713
Income taxes	23,900				13,182
Cash received during the period for:
Income taxes	3,255				1,003
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and
financing activities:
Net change in common stock held by directors’ deferred compensation plan	$	20			$	43

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

8

CENTRAL PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

June 30, 2006 and 2005

1.Summary of Significant Accounting Principles

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Central Pacific Financial Corp. (“CPF” or the “Company”) and its majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company acquired Hawaii HomeLoans, Inc., now known as Central Pacific HomeLoans, Inc. (“CPHL”) on August 17, 2005, and the results of operations of CPHL are included in the consolidated financial statements from that  date.

The financial information included herein is unaudited. However, such information reflects all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments) that are, in the opinion of Management, necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim periods.

The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 may not be indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140” (“SFAS 155”). SFAS 155 amends the guidance in SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” and SFAS 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.”  SFAS 155 permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation, clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of SFAS 133, establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation, clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives and amends SFAS 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial instrument. SFAS 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired beginning January 1, 2007. The adoption of SFAS 155 is not expected to have a material impact

9

on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” (“SFAS 156”). SFAS 156 requires all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities to be initially measured at fair value and permits an entity to choose to either amortize servicing assets or servicing liabilities in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income or net servicing loss and assess servicing assets or servicing liabilities for impairment or increased obligation based on fair value at each reporting date, or measure servicing assets or servicing liabilities at fair value at each reporting date and report changes in fair value in earnings in the period in which the changes occur. SFAS 156 also permits a one-time reclassification of available-for-sale securities to trading securities by entities with recognized servicing rights, provided that the available-for-sale securities are identified as offsetting the entity’s exposure to changes in fair value of servicing assets or servicing liabilities that a servicer elects to subsequently measure at fair value, requires separate presentation of servicing assets and servicing liabilities subsequently measured at fair value and specifies additional disclosures for all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. SFAS 156 is effective as of the beginning of the entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The Company plans to adopt SFAS 156 on January 1, 2007, and does not expect such adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.” The interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Specifically, the pronouncement prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation also provides guidance on the related derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting for interim periods, disclosure and transition of uncertain tax positions. The interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is evaluating the impact of this new pronouncement on its consolidated financial statements.

2.Share-Based Compensation

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”). SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options and restricted stock awards, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their respective grant date fair values. The Company elected to use the modified prospective transition method as permitted by SFAS 123R. Under this transition method, compensation expense recognized by the Company beginning in 2006 includes (a) compensation expense for all share-based compensation awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” as adjusted for estimated forfeitures and (b) compensation expense for all share-based compensation awards granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair

10

value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. The Company recognizes compensation expense for all share-based payment awards on a straight-line basis over the respective requisite service period of the awards, which is generally the vesting period.

Prior to January 1, 2006, as permitted by SFAS 123, the Company accounted for its share-based payment plans in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations, whereby compensation expense was recorded on the date of grant only if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise price. Costs of restricted stock awards granted, determined to be the fair market value of the shares at the date of grant, have been recognized as compensation expense ratably over the respective vesting period.

The following table summarizes the effects of share-based compensation resulting from the application of SFAS No. 123R to options and awards granted under the Company’s equity incentive plans:

	Three months ended			Six months ended
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2006			June 30, 2006
Salaries and employee benefits	$	830		$	1,702
Income tax benefit	(333		)	(682		)
Net share-based compensation effect	$	497		$	1,020

In accordance with SFAS 123R, the Company is required to base initial share-based compensation expense on the estimated number of awards for which the requisite service and performance is expected to be rendered. Historically, and as permitted under SFAS 123R, the Company chose to record reductions in compensation expense in the periods the awards were forfeited. The cumulative effect of the change to an estimated number of awards for which the requisite service and performance is expected to be rendered resulted in a reduction of salary expense of $0.2 million in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Stock Option Plans

The Company has adopted stock option plans for the purpose of granting options to purchase the Company’s common stock to directors, officers and other key individuals. Option awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant; those option awards generally vest based on 3 or 5 years of continuous service and have 10-year contractual terms. Certain option and share awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control (as defined in the stock option plans below).

In February 1997, the Company adopted the 1997 Stock Option Plan (“1997 Plan”) basically as a continuance of the 1986 Stock Option Plan. In April 1997, the Company’s shareholders approved the 1997 Plan, which provided 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for grants to employees as qualified incentive stock options and to directors as nonqualified stock options.

11

In September 2004, the Company adopted and the Company’s shareholders approved the 2004 Stock Compensation Plan (“2004 Plan”) making available 1,989,224 shares for grants to employees and directors. Upon adoption of the 2004 Plan, all unissued shares from the 1997 Plan were frozen and no new options will be granted under the 1997 Plan. Optionees may exercise outstanding options granted pursuant to the 1997 Plan until the expiration of the respective options in accordance with the original terms of the 1997 Plan. To satisfy share issuances pursuant to the share-based compensation programs, the Company issues new shares from the 2004 Plan.

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant based on the following:

Valuation and amortization method—The Company estimates the fair value of stock options granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing formula and a single option award approach. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination activity within the valuation model; separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. This fair value is then amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards, which is generally the vesting period.

Expected life—The expected life of options represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding.

Expected volatility—Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock.

Risk-free interest rate—The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

Expected dividend—The expected dividend assumption is based on the Company’s current expectations about its anticipated dividend policy.

There were no grants of stock options for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.

As of June 30, 2006, the total compensation cost related to stock options granted to employees under the Company’s stock option plans but not yet recognized was approximately $4.3 million, net of estimated forfeitures. This cost will be amortized on a straight-line basis over a weighted-average period of 2.1 years and will be adjusted for subsequent changes in estimated forfeitures. There were no shares that vested during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. The total fair value of shares vested during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $0.6 million for each of the periods.

The following is a summary of option activity for the Company’s stock option plans:

12

					Weighted
			Weighted		Average	Aggregate
			Average		Remaining	Intrinsic
	Shares		Exercise Price		Contractual Term	Value
					(in years)	(in thousands)
Outstanding at January 1, 2006	1,289,645		$	23.50
Changes during the year:
Granted	—		—
Exercised	(32,958	)	14.51
Expired	(560	)	27.82
Forfeited	(27,048	)	35.10
Outstanding at June 30, 2006	1,229,079		23.48		6.4	$	16,603
Vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2006	1,200,416		23.24		6.6	16,511
Exercisable at June 30, 2006	692,089		16.98		4.8	13,845

The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying option awards and the quoted price of the Company’s common stock for the options that were in-the-money at June 30, 2006. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised under the Company’s stock option plans was $0.1 million and $0.7 million, respectively, determined as of the date of exercise. The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 was $1.2 million and $5.8 million, respectively, determined as of the date of exercise.

Restricted Stock Awards

Under the 1997 and 2004 Plans, the Company awarded restricted stock awards to its non-officer directors and certain senior management personnel. The awards typically vest over a three or five year period. Compensation expense is measured as the market price of the stock awards on the grant date, and is recognized over the specified vesting periods.

As of June 30, 2006, there was $0.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.8 years.

The table below presents the activity of restricted stock awards for the six months ended June 30, 2006.

13

			Weighted
			Average
			Grant Date
	Shares		Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2006	20,420		$	33.36
Changes during the year:
Granted	3,000		35.10
Vested	(900	)	14.50
Nonvested at June 30, 2006	22,520		34.35
Vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2006	22,520		34.35

Performance Shares and Stock Appreciation Rights

In 2005, the Company established a Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) that covers certain executive and senior management personnel. The LTIP is comprised of three components: performance shares, stock appreciation rights, and cash awards.

Performance shares are granted under the 2004 Plan and vest based on achieving both performance and service conditions. Performance conditions require achievement of stated goals including earnings per share, credit quality and efficiency ratio targets. The service condition requires employees to be employed continuously with the Company through March 15, 2008. The fair value of the grant to be recognized over this service period is determined based on the market value of the stock on the grant date, multiplied by the probability of the granted shares being earned. This requires the Company to assess the expectation over the performance period of the performance targets being achieved as well as to estimate expected pre-vested cancellations. To the extent that the actual achievement falls short of the originally determined expectation (probability), then there is no adjustment to reduce the remaining compensation cost to be recognized. If, on the other hand, the actual achievement exceeds the expected achievement, then compensation cost is adjusted for the reporting period and over the remaining service period to reflect the increased expected compensation cost.

As of June 30, 2006, there was $1.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to performance shares that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.7 years.

14

The table below presents activity of performance shares for the six months ended June 30, 2006:

			Weighted
			Average
			Grant Date
	Shares		Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2006	94,698		$	34.43
Changes during the year:
Granted	5,590		35.78
Forfeited	(16,713	)	33.57
Nonvested at June 30, 2006	83,575		34.70
Vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2006	68,826		34.52

Stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) are granted under the 2004 Plan. These SARs require the employee to achieve the same performance conditions as the performance shares described above as well as to satisfy service conditions that approximate 3 years from the date of grant. Upon exercise of the SAR, for each SAR exercised, the grantee shall be entitled to receive value equal to the difference between the market value of a share on the date of exercise minus the market value of a share on the date of grant. The Company shall pay the value owing to the grantee upon exercise in whole shares. No cash will be awarded upon exercise, and no fractional shares will be issued or delivered.

As the SARs plan is a stock-settled SAR, this plan is an equity-classified award under SFAS 123R. As such, the financial and income tax accounting for this type of award is identical to that of a nonqualified stock option plan. Therefore, the grant date fair value is determined at grant date using the same method as would be used for determining the fair value of a grant of a nonqualified stock option, which has historically been the Black-Scholes formula. Similar to the performance shares addressed above, the amount of compensation cost to be recognized is the fair value of the SAR grant adjusted based on expectations of achieving the performance requirements and also the expected pre-vested cancellations. Compensation costs arising from the SARs will be recognized ratably over the requisite service period.

As of June 30, 2006, there was $0.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to SARs that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.6 years.

The table below presents activity of SARs for the six months ended June 30, 2006:

15

					Weighted
			Weighted		Average
			Average		Remaining	Aggregate
			Exercise		Contractual Term	Intrinsic
	Shares		Price		(in years)	Value
						(in thousands)
Outstanding at January 1, 2006	34,685		$	1.72
Changes during the year:
Granted	30,330		10.78
Forfeited	(10,071	)	2.67
Outstanding at June 30, 2006	54,944		6.54		9.26	$	206
Vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2006	53,626		6.71		9.26	198
Exercisable at June 30, 2006	—		—		—	—

Pro Forma Disclosures

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and net income per share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to stock-based compensation during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005:

	Three months ended			Six months ended
	June 30,			June 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	2005			2005
Net income, as reported	$	17,902		$	35,107
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects	11			18
Deduct: Total stock compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects	(194		)	(384		)
Pro forma net income	$	17,719		$	34,741
Earnings per share:
Basic - as reported	$	0.59		$	1.19
Basic - pro forma	$	0.58		$	1.18
Diluted - as reported	$	0.58		$	1.17
Diluted - pro forma	$	0.57		$	1.16

For purposes of this pro forma disclosure, the value of the options was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing formula and amortized on a straight-line basis over the respective vesting periods of the awards, with forfeitures recognized as they occurred.

16

3.Earnings Per Share

The following table presents the information used to compute basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods indicated:

	Three months ended				Six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2006		2005		2006		2005
Basic earnings per share computation
Numerator:
Income available to common shareholders	$	20,438	$	17,902	$	39,777	$	35,107
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding	30,466		30,364		30,453		29,501
Basic earnings per share	$	0.67	$	0.59	$	1.31	$	1.19
Diluted earnings per share computation
Numerator:
Income available to common shareholders	$	20,438	$	17,902	$	39,777	$	35,107
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding	30,466		30,364		30,453		29,501
Dilutive impact of stock options and stock awards	317		479		315		524
	30,783		30,843		30,768		30,025
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.66	$	0.58	$	1.29	$	1.17

4.Merger with CB Bancshares, Inc.

The Company completed its merger with CBBI (the “Merger”) on September 15, 2004 (the “Effective Date”). At the Effective Date, CBBI had consolidated assets of $1.8 billion (including loans of $1.4 billion and investment securities of $324.8 million) and consolidated total liabilities of $1.7 billion (including total deposits of $1.4 billion and borrowings of $239.6 million).

Exit and Restructuring Costs

At the Effective Date, the Company recorded liabilities totaling $17.6 million for estimated costs to exit certain CBBI facilities and operations. These liabilities, net of tax, were included in the cost of the Merger, resulting in an increase in goodwill. Certain adjustments to the estimates have been recorded as adjustments to the cost of the Merger.

The Company closed nine CBBI branch offices in February 2005 and vacated the former CBBI headquarters, consolidated certain operational functions with the Company’s operations, and eliminated approximately 70 positions from the combined organization. These exit plans

17

were finalized and completed in the third quarter of 2005.

The following table sets forth information related to the exit costs accrued:

	Balance as of		Adjustments to					Balance as of
(Dollars in thousands)	December 31, 2005		estimates			Payments		June 30, 2006
Severance	$	63	$	-		$	58	$	5
Lease termination fees	9,310		(1,212		)	1,731		6,367
Asset write-offs	983		-			-		983
Contract termination fees	388		-			10		378
Total assets	$	10,744	$	(1,212	)	$	1,799	$	7,733

5.Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

At June 30, 2006, goodwill recorded in conjunction with the acquisitions of CBBI and CPHL totaled $297.3 million, of which $152.3 million was allocated to the Hawaii Market reporting segment and $145.0 million was allocated to the Commercial Real Estate reporting segment.

Other intangible assets included a core deposit premium of $33.8 million and $39.1 million and mortgage servicing rights of $11.9 million and $3.5 million at June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The gross carrying value and accumulated amortization related to the core deposit premium and mortgage servicing rights as of June 30, 2006 and 2005 are presented below:

	June 30, 2006				June 30, 2005
	Gross				Gross
	Carrying		Accumulated		Carrying		Accumulated
(Dollars in thousands)	Value		Amortization		Value		Amortization
Core deposit premium	$	44,642	$	10,796	$	44,642	$	5,537
Mortgage servicing rights	18,237		6,364		7,256		3,786

The following table presents changes in goodwill and other intangible assets for the periods presented:

18

	Three months ended June 30, 2006								Three months ended June 30, 2005
						Mortgage									Mortgage
			Core Deposit			Servicing						Core Deposit			Servicing
(Dollars in thousands)	Goodwill		Premium			Rights			Goodwill			Premium			Rights
Balance, beginning of period	$	295,403	$	34,821		$	11,918		$	289,848		$	40,761		$	3,650
Additions (deductions)	1,848		—			460			(1,758		)	—			73
Amortization	—		(975		)	(505		)	—			(1,656		)	(253		)
Balance, end of period	$	297,251	$	33,846		$	11,873		$	288,090		$	39,105		$	3,470

	Six months ended June 30, 2006									Six months ended June 30, 2005
							Mortgage								Mortgage
				Core Deposit			Servicing					Core Deposit			Servicing
(Dollars in thousands)	Goodwill			Premium			Rights			Goodwill		Premium			Rights
Balance, beginning of period	$	303,358		$	35,795		$	11,820		$	284,712	$	49,188		$	3,848
Additions (deductions)	(6,107		)	—			1,203			3,378		(7,127		)	176
Amortization	—			(1,949		)	(1,150		)	—		(2,956		)	(555		)
Balance, end of period	$	297,251		$	33,846		$	11,873		$	288,090	$	39,105		$	3,470

Goodwill at June 30, 2006 reflected a decrease of $6.1 million from the balance reported as of December 31, 2005 due to adjustments related to CBBI income tax contingencies and subleases of CBBI leased properties.

Amortization expense of core deposit premium totaled $1.0 million and $1.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, amortization expense totaled $1.7 million and $3.0 million, respectively. The Company estimates that amortization expense will be $3.9 million in 2006. In addition, amortization expense is estimated to be $2.7 million in 2007 and $2.5 million in each subsequent year through 2011.

Amortization expense of mortgage servicing rights totaled $0.5 million and $1.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, amortization expense of mortgage servicing rights totaled $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively. Based on mortgage servicing rights held as of June 30, 2006, the Company estimates that amortization expense will be $2.3 million in 2006. In addition, amortization expense is estimated to be $1.8 million in 2007, $1.5 million in 2008, $1.2 million in 2009, $1.0 million in 2010, and $0.8 million in 2011.

6.Loans

Loans, excluding loans held for sale, consisted of the following at the dates indicated:

19

	June 30,		December 31,		June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2006		2005		2005
Commercial, Financial and Agricultural	$	464,979	$	561,470	$	549,738
Real Estate:
Construction	885,666		681,554		490,825
Mortgage-Commercial	1,233,487		1,276,564		1,213,586
Mortgage-Residential	883,292		796,015		733,827
Consumer	187,783		207,455		194,501
Leases	48,855		45,394		36,203
	3,704,062		3,568,452		3,218,680
Unearned income	14,775		15,703		13,556
	$	3,689,287	$	3,552,749	$	3,205,124

7.Allowance for Loan Losses

The following table presents the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2006			2005			2006			2005
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance, beginning of period	$	53,057		$	51,623		$	52,936		$	50,703
Provision for loan and losses	525			1,000			1,050			1,917
Charge-offs	(1,249		)	(2,031		)	(2,333		)	(3,410		)
Recoveries	581			1,065			1,261			2,447
Net charge-offs	(668		)	(966		)	(1,072		)	(963		)
Balance, end of period	$	52,914		$	51,657		$	52,914		$	51,657

8Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes, is presented below:

	June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2006			2005
Unrealized holding losses on available-for-sale investment securities	$	(17,534	)	$	(1,981	)
Pension liability adjustments	(6,440		)	(6,064		)
Balance, end of period	$	(23,974	)	$	(8,045	)

20

9.Segment Information

The Company has three reportable segments: Commercial Real Estate, Hawaii Market, and Treasury. The segments reported are consistent with internal functional reporting lines. They are managed separately because each unit has different target markets, technological requirements, marketing strategies and specialized skills. The Commercial Real Estate segment includes construction and real estate development lending in Hawaii, California and Washington. The Hawaii Market segment includes retail branch offices, commercial lending, residential mortgage lending and servicing, indirect auto lending, trust services and retail brokerage services. A full range of deposit and loan products, and various other banking services are offered. The Treasury segment is responsible for managing the Company's investment securities portfolio and wholesale funding activities.

The All Others category includes activities such as electronic banking, data processing, and management of bank owned properties.

The accounting policies of the segments are consistent with the Company's accounting policies that are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The majority of the Company's net income is derived from net interest income. Accordingly, Management focuses primarily on net interest income, rather than gross interest income and expense amounts, in evaluating segment profitability. Intersegment net interest income (expense) was allocated to each segment based upon a funds transfer pricing process that assigns costs of funds to assets and earnings credits to liabilities based on market interest rates that reflect interest rate sensitivity and maturity characteristics. All administrative and overhead expenses are allocated to the segments at cost. Cash, investment securities, loans and their related balances are allocated to the segment responsible for acquisition and maintenance of those assets. Segment assets also include all premises and equipment used directly in segment operations.

Segment profits and assets are provided in the following table for the periods indicated.

21

	Commercial
(Dollars in thousands)	Real Estate			Hawaii Market		Treasury			All Others			Total
Three months ended June 30, 2006:
Net interest income	$	37,148		$	15,975	$	(956	)	$	—		$	52,167
Intersegment net interest income (expense)	(22,302		)	17,673		(1,064		)	5,693			—
Provision for loan losses	(2		)	527		—			—			525
Other operating income	147			8,808		1,396			609			10,960
Other operating expense	2,171			15,112		571			13,604			31,458
Administrative and overhead expense allocation	1,632			9,533		97			(11,262		)	—
Income taxes	4,145			5,842		825			(106		)	10,706
Net income (loss)	$	7,047		$	11,442	$	(2,117	)	$	4,066		$	20,438
Three months ended June 30, 2005:
Net interest income	$	26,542		$	20,155	$	1,813		$	—		$	48,510
Intersegment net interest income (expense)	(13,533		)	14,096		(4,976		)	4,413			—
Provision for loan losses	80			920		—			—			1,000
Other operating income	55			6,989		1,246			514			8,804
Other operating expense	1,691			12,798		480			13,745			28,714
Administrative and overhead expense allocation	1,525			8,038		166			(9,729		)	—
Income taxes	3,352			6,631		54			(339		)	9,698
Net income (loss)	$	6,416		$	12,853	$	(2,617	)	$	1,250		$	17,902
Six months ended June 30, 2006:
Net interest income	$	72,161		$	33,602	$	(1,404	)	$	—		$	104,359
Intersegment net interest income (expense)	(42,153		)	33,457		(2,552		)	11,248			—
Provision for loan losses	87			963		—			—			1,050
Other operating income	196			18,689		2,922			1,317			23,124
Other operating expense	4,319			30,657		1,080			29,181			65,237
Administrative and overhead expense allocation	3,710			20,991		259			(24,960		)	—
Income taxes	9,185			10,985		1,553			(304		)	21,419
Net income (loss)	$	12,903		$	22,152	$	(3,926	)	$	8,648		$	39,777
Six months ended June 30, 2005:
Net interest income	$	54,227		$	36,691	$	3,912		$	—		$	94,830
Intersegment net interest income (expense)	(26,473		)	28,312		(9,199		)	7,360			—
Provision for loan losses	206			1,711		—			—			1,917
Other operating income	73			13,077		3,472			1,433			18,055
Other operating expense	3,298			28,645		1,186			26,494			59,623
Administrative and overhead expense allocation	2,780			16,781		446			(20,007		)	—
Income taxes	6,942			10,070		448			(1,222		)	16,238
Net income (loss)	$	14,601		$	20,873	$	(3,895	)	$	3,528		$	35,107

22

At June 30, 2006:
Investment securities	$	—	$	—	$	894,323	$	—	$	894,323
Loans (including loans held for sale)	1,905,941		1,808,109		—		—		3,714,050
Goodwill	144,968		152,283		—		—		297,251
Other	7,909		101,415		235,656		40,208		385,188
Total assets	$	2,058,818	$	2,061,807	$	1,129,979	$	40,208	$	5,290,812
At December 31, 2005:
Investment securities	$	—	$	—	$	925,285	$	—	$	925,285
Loans (including loans held for sale)	1,798,741		1,814,546		—		—		3,613,287
Goodwill	147,986		155,372		—		—		303,358
Other	7,020		101,888		253,922		34,379		397,209
Total assets	$	1,953,747	$	2,071,806	$	1,179,207	$	34,379	$	5,239,139

10.Pension Plans

Central Pacific Bank (“CPB”) has a defined benefit retirement plan (the “Pension Plan”) which covers certain eligible employees. The plan was curtailed effective December 31, 2002, and accordingly, plan benefits were fixed as of that date.

The following table sets forth the components of net periodic benefit cost for the Pension Plan:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2006			2005			2006			2005
Interest cost	$	385		$	399		$	770		$	798
Expected return on plan assets	(505		)	(475		)	(1,010		)	(950		)
Recognized net loss	226			216			452			432
Net periodic cost	$	106		$	140		$	212		$	280

CPB also established Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans (“SERPs”), which provide certain officers of CPB with supplemental retirement benefits.

The following table sets forth the components of net periodic benefit cost for the SERPs:

23

	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2006			2005		2006			2005
Service cost	$	182		$	183	$	364		$	366
Interest cost	135			125		270			250
Amortization of unrecognized transition obligation	49			6		98			12
Recognized prior service cost	4			4		8			8
Recognized net gain	(12		)	—		(24		)	—
Net periodic cost	$	358		$	318	$	716		$	636

The Company disclosed in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005, that it expected to contribute $1.8 million to its Pension Plan and $0.2 million to its SERP in 2006. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company made contributions of $0.9 million to its Pension Plan and $0.1 million to its SERP, and presently anticipates that its total contributions for 2006 will not significantly vary from the previously reported expected contributions.

24

Item 2.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires that management make certain judgments and use certain estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported and disclosures made. Accounting estimates are deemed critical when a different estimate could have reasonably been used or where changes in the estimate are reasonably likely to occur from period to period and would materially impact our consolidated financial statements as of or for the periods presented. Management has discussed the development and selection of the critical accounting estimates noted below with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, and the Audit Committee has reviewed the accompanying disclosures.

Allowance for Loan Losses. We maintain the allowance for loan losses, or the Allowance, at an amount we expect to be sufficient to absorb probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio based on a projection of probable net loan charge-offs. For loans classified as impaired, an estimated impairment loss is calculated. To estimate net loan charge-offs on other loans, we evaluate the level and trend of nonperforming and potential problem loans and historical loss experience. We also consider other relevant economic conditions and borrower-specific risk characteristics, including current repayment patterns of our borrowers, the fair value of collateral securing specific loans, changes in our lending and underwriting standards and general economic factors, nationally and in the markets we serve. Estimated loss rates are determined by loan category and risk profile, and an overall required Allowance is calculated. Based on our estimate of the level of Allowance required, a provision for loan losses, or the Provision, is recorded to maintain the Allowance at an appropriate level. Since we cannot predict with certainty the amount of loan charge-offs that will be incurred, and because the eventual level of loan charge-offs are impacted by numerous conditions beyond our control, a range of loss estimates could reasonably have been used to determine the Allowance and Provision. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination processes, periodically review the Company's Allowance. Such agencies may require the Company to recognize additions to the Allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. We recorded goodwill and other intangible assets in connection with our acquisitions of CB Bancshares, Inc. and Hawaii HomeLoans, Inc., now known as Central Pacific HomeLoans, Inc. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, goodwill is not amortized but is to be reviewed at least annually for impairment, and when significant events occur or circumstances change which might cause an impairment of goodwill. An impairment loss is recorded when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the fair value of the goodwill. We perform an annual analysis of goodwill that involves the estimation of future cash flows and the fair value of reporting units to which goodwill is allocated. Our analysis indicated that there was no impairment of goodwill as of December 31, 2005. Since we cannot predict with certainty the future cash flows of individual reporting units, a range of possible cash flows could have reasonably been used. Had we used cash flow

25

assumptions that were materially lower than the estimates used, the analysis might have resulted in an impairment charge to earnings.

Other intangible assets include core deposit premiums and mortgage servicing rights, which are carried at the lower of amortized cost or fair value. Core deposit premiums are tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. For the three months ended June 30, 2006, we concluded that there were no events or changes in circumstances indicating that the carrying amount of the core deposit premium may not be recoverable. This conclusion was based on consideration of various factors including the level of market interest rates, legal factors, business climate and the performance of the deposits acquired relative to our expectations. Mortgage servicing rights are periodically assessed for impairment through an analysis that considers estimated future cash flows based on assumptions about loan prepayments, discount rates and various other factors. The assessment performed as of June 30, 2006 indicated no impairment of the value of mortgage servicing rights. Had we used assumptions that were materially different than those used in the analyses of core deposit premiums and mortgage servicing rights, those analyses might have resulted in an impairment charge to earnings.

Deferred Tax Assets. We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. Deferred taxes assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences and carryforwards. A valuation allowance may be required if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In determining whether a valuation allowance is necessary, we consider the level of taxable income in prior years, to the extent that carrybacks are permitted under current tax laws, as well as estimates of future taxable income and tax planning strategies that could be implemented to accelerate taxable income if necessary. If our estimates of future taxable income were materially overstated, or if our assumptions regarding the tax consequences of tax planning strategies were inaccurate, some or all of our deferred tax assets may not be realized, which would result in a charge to earnings.

Defined Benefit Retirement Plan. Defined benefit plan obligations and related assets of our defined benefit retirement plan are presented in Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2005 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. Plan assets, which consist primarily of marketable equity and debt securities, are typically valued using market quotations. Plan obligations and the annual pension expense are determined by independent actuaries through the use of a number of assumptions. Key assumptions in measuring the plan obligations include the discount rate and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. In determining the discount rate, we utilize a yield that reflects the top 50% of the universe of bonds, ranked in the order of the highest yield. Asset returns are based upon the anticipated average rate of earnings expected on the invested funds of the plans. At December 31, 2005, we used a weighted-average discount rate of 5.69% and an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 8.00%, which affected the amount of pension liability recorded as of year-end 2005 and the amount of pension expense to be recorded in 2006. For both the discount rate and the asset return rate, a range of estimates could reasonably have been used which would affect the amount of pension expense and pension liability recorded. A 0.25% change in the

26

discount rate assumption would impact 2006 pension expense by $41,000 and year-end 2005 pension liability by $722,000, while a 0.25% change in the asset return rate would impact 2006 pension expense by $64,000.

Financial Summary

Net income for the second quarter of 2006 totaled $20.4 million, or $0.66 per diluted share, compared to $17.9 million or $0.58 per diluted share reported in the second quarter of 2005. The year-over-year growth reflects higher net interest income and other operating income that more than doubled the increase in other operating expense.

Net income for the first six months of 2006 of $39.8 million increased by $4.7 million or 13.3% over the same period in 2005. Net income for the first quarter of 2006 included an after-tax charge of $1.3 million, or $0.04 per diluted share, in retirement expenses for a former senior executive, while 2005 results included nonrecurring merger-related expenses of $1.2 million after tax. Increases in net interest income of 10.0% and other operating income of 28.1% contributed to the stronger earnings in 2006.

The following table presents annualized returns on average assets, average shareholders' equity and average tangible equity and basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods indicated.

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
Return on average assets	1.57		%	1.49		%	1.53		%	1.48		%
Return on average shareholders’ equity	11.71		%	10.95		%	11.49		%	11.21		%
Net income to average tangible equity	22.17		%	22.12		%	22.19		%	23.81		%
Basic earnings per share	$	0.67		$	0.59		$	1.31		$	1.19
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.66		$	0.58		$	1.29		$	1.17

Material Trends

Hawaii’s economy is expected to enjoy continued growth in 2006; however, the growth is expected to be at a more measured pace than the past two years. The moderation in expected growth is primarily the result of capacity constraints as evidenced by the state’s low unemployment rate and high hotel occupancy rate.

Hawaii visitor arrivals in 2006 are expected to increase 2.8% over the record total of 7.4 million visitors set in 2005. Total visitor arrivals for the first five months of 2006 rose 2.0% over

27

the same period last year. (1)  Visitor arrivals are expected to strengthen as an increase in visitors from Japan is forecasted over Japan’s July-August peak travel season.(2)

Hawaii personal income is expected to increase 6.8% in 2006, following its 7.0% increase in 2005.(3)  The state’s unemployment rate, which in recent periods has remained consistently below the national unemployment rate, was 3.0% in May 2006, compared to 2.8% in May 2005.(4)

The Hawaii housing market continues to expand. However, unit sale growth rates have moderated and the listed inventory has increased over the past six months. In June 2006, the number of single-family home resales on Oahu decreased by 16.4% while the median sales price increased by a moderate 7.7% from a year ago. (5)

California’s economy has fully rebounded from the 2001 technology-related downturn. California is expected to enjoy continued moderate growth in 2006, but at a slower pace than in 2005.

California personal income is expected to increase 5.8% in 2006, following a 6.0% increase in 2005. (6)    Reflecting the continued growth in the economy, California’s unemployment rate has improved to 5.0% in May 2006 from 5.4% in May 2005.(7)

In May 2006, the number of single-family home resales in California decreased 21.1% while the median sales price increased 8.0% from a year ago. (8)

The Washington economy has also recovered from the 2001 technology-related downturn and is expected to post solid gains in 2006 and beyond.

Washington personal income is expected to increase 3.6% in 2006, following a 7.9% increase in 2005. (9)  Washington’s unemployment rate has improved to 5.1% in May 2006 from 5.6% in May 2005. (10)

During the first quarter of 2006, the number of Washington home resales declined 0.3% while the median sales price increased 17.1% from a year ago. (11)

(1) Hawaii State Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism.

(2) Ibid.

(3) Ibid.

(4) Hawaii State Department of Labor and Industrial Relations.

(5) Honolulu Board of Realtors.

(6) Los Angeles County Economic Development Corp.

(7) Bureau of Labor Statistics.

(8) California Association of Realtors.

(9) Washington State Economic and Revenue Forecast Council.

(10) Bureau of Labor Statistics

(11) Washington Center for Real Estate Research.

28

Our results of operations over the remainder of 2006 may be directly impacted by the ability of the economies in Hawaii, California, Washington and other markets we serve to achieve their expected growth. Loan demand, deposit growth, provision for loan losses, noninterest income and noninterest expense may be affected by changes in economic conditions. If the economic environment in Hawaii, California, Washington or other markets we serve were to suffer an adverse change, such as a material decline in the real estate market or a material external shock, our results of operations may be negatively impacted.

Results of Operations

Net Interest Income

A comparison of net interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 is set forth below.

Net interest income, when expressed as a percentage of average interest earning assets, is referred to as "net interest margin."

29

CENTRAL PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Average Balances, Interest Income & Expense, Yields and Rates (Taxable Equivalent)

	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2006						June 30, 2005
	Average		Average				Average		Average
	Balance		Yield/Rate		Interest		Balance		Yield/Rate		Interest
Assets:
Interest earning assets:
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks	$	5,419	3.99	%	$	54	$	8,989	2.58	%	$	58
Federal funds sold & securities purchased under agreements to resell	121		3.31	%	2		2,784		3.02	%	21
Investment securities (1) (2)	933,873		4.68	%	10,920		944,265		4.48	%	10,572
Loans, net of unearned income (3)	3,644,188		7.42	%	67,606		3,246,132		6.67	%	54,138
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	48,797		—		—		48,797		—		—
Total interest earning assets	4,632,398		6.79	%	78,582		4,250,967		6.10	%	64,789
Nonearning assets	580,707						559,788
Total assets	$	5,213,105					$	4,810,755
Liabilities & Shareholders’ Equity:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	423,497	0.14	%	$	143	$	427,918	0.16	%	$	173
Savings and money market deposits	1,141,923		1.41	%	4,018		1,124,634		0.62	%	1,748
Time deposits under $100,000	571,233		2.77	%	3,951		557,695		1.89	%	2,631
Time deposits $100,000 and over	857,086		3.90	%	8,352		678,545		2.63	%	4,453
Short-term borrowings	45,758		5.10	%	583		42,600		2.94	%	313
Long-term debt	746,837		4.65	%	8,680		626,670		3.88	%	6,083
Total interest-bearing liabilities	3,786,334		2.72	%	25,727		3,458,062		1.78	%	15,401
Noninterest-bearing deposits	646,817						621,206
Other liabilities	81,832						77,369
Shareholders’ equity	698,122						654,118
Total liabilities & shareholders' equity	$	5,213,105					$	4,810,755
Net interest income					$	52,855					$	49,388
Net interest margin			4.56	%					4.65	%

30

	Six Months Ended							Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2006							June 30, 2005
	Average			Average				Average		Average
	Balance			Yield/Rate		Interest		Balance		Yield/Rate		Interest
Assets:
Interest earning assets:
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks	$		11,151	4.07	%	$	227	$	17,998	2.28	%	$	205
Federal funds sold & securities purchased under agreements to resell	2,411			4.48	%	54		6,545		2.41	%	79
Investment securities (1) (2)	937,483			4.61	%	21,613		891,956		4.39	%	19,586
Loans, net of unearned income (3)	3,615,741			7.31	%	132,159		3,204,319		6.55	%	104,972
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	48,797			—		—		48,700		1.12	%	272
Total interest earning assets	4,615,583			6.68	%	154,053		4,169,518		6.00	%	125,114
Nonearning assets	583,951							585,089
Total assets	$	5,199,534						$	4,754,607
Liabilities & Shareholders’ Equity:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	427,157		0.14	%	$	292	$	428,476	0.20	%	$		422
Savings and money market deposits	1,108,706			1.21	%	6,698		1,127,036		0.56	%	3,157
Time deposits under $100,000	581,613			2.60	%	7,564		550,978		1.88	%	5,170
Time deposits $100,000 and over	848,228			3.71	%	15,715		644,142		2.41	%	7,773
Short-term borrowings	33,746			4.82	%	814		64,111		2.62	%	840
Long-term debt	763,689			4.51	%	17,214		605,425		3.80	%	11,503
Total interest-bearing liabilities	3,763,139			2.57	%	48,297		3,420,168		1.69	%	28,865
Noninterest-bearing deposits	657,047							612,502
Other liabilities	86,827							95,417
Shareholders' equity	692,521							626,520
Total liabilities & shareholders’ equity	$	5,199,534						$	4,754,607
Net interest income						$	105,756					$		96,249
Net interest margin				4.58	%					4.62	%

(1) At amortized cost.

(2) Includes taxable equivalent basis adjustment based upon a statutory rate of 35%.

(3) Includes nonaccrual loans.

For the second quarter of 2006, net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis totaled $52.9 million, increasing by 7.0% compared to the same period last year. Interest income for the second quarter of 2006 increased by $13.8 million or 21.3% reflecting a $13.5 million increase in interest and fees on loans on a $398.1 million or 12.3% increase in average loans. The average yield on loans increased to 7.42% during the quarter from 6.67% in the year-ago-period, reflecting the increase in market interest rates during the period. Interest expense for the second quarter increased by $10.3 million or 67.0% over 2005’s second quarter reflecting higher market interest rates on deposits and other borrowings. Average interest-bearing deposits increased by $204.9 million or 7.3%, and the average interest rate on those deposits increased by 91 basis

31

points to 2.20%, resulting in a $7.5 million increase in interest on deposits. Interest on long-term debt increased by $2.6 million on a $120.2 million increase in average balances and a 77 basis-point rise in average rate.

Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis totaled $105.8 million in the first half of 2006, increasing by $9.5 million or 9.9% over the comparable period in 2005. Interest income for the first half of 2006 increased by $28.9 million or 23.1%. Interest and fees on loans increased by $27.2 million on a 12.8% increase in average loans and a 76 basis-point increase in average yield. Interest income for the first half of 2006 also reflected the recognition of $662,000 in interest income on the payoff of two nonaccrual loans in the first quarter of 2006. Interest expense for the first half of 2006 increased by $19.4 million or 67.3% compared to the same period in 2005, reflecting the increase in market interest rates in 2005 and 2006. Interest expense on interest-bearing deposits increased by $13.7 million due to a 7.8% increase in average balances and an 84 basis-point increase in average rates. Interest expense on long-term debt increased by $5.7 million, reflecting a $158.3 million increase in average balance and a 71 basis-point increase in average rate.

The net interest margin was 4.56% and 4.58% for the second quarter and first half of 2006, respectively, compared to 4.65% and 4.62%, respectively, for the comparable 2005 periods. The decline in the net interest margin reflects a slight increase in the proportion of long-term debt relative to total interest-bearing liabilities and the shift of customer deposits from savings and money market accounts into higher-rate time deposits. We expect net interest margin in the range of 4.50% to 4.60% for the remainder of 2006, assuming we are able to achieve our growth targets and the current competitive pricing environment for loans and deposits does not change dramatically.

Nonperforming Assets

The following table sets forth nonperforming assets and accruing loans delinquent for 90 days or more at the dates indicated.

32

	June 30,			December 31,			June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2006			2005			2005
Nonaccrual loans:
Real estate:
Mortgage-commercial	$	4,569		$	4,223		$	4,673
Mortgage-residential	5,033			5,995			6,546
Commercial, financial and agricultural	397			2,333			4,868
Total nonaccrual loans	9,999			12,551			16,087
Other real estate	—			—			—
Total nonperforming assets	9,999			12,551			16,087
Loans delinquent for 90 days or more:
Real estate:
Construction	230			—			—
Mortgage-commercial	—			7,081			—
Mortgage-residential	647			297			—
Commercial, financial and agricultural	420			99			90
Consumer	251			427			433
Leases	—			2			3
Total loans delinquent for 90 days or more	1,548			7,906			526
Restructured loans still accruing interest:
Real estate:
Mortgage-commercial	695			418			423
Commercial, financial and agricultural	—			285			284
Total restructured loans still accruing interest	695			703			707
Total nonperforming assets, loans delinquent for 90 days or more and restructured loans still accruing interest	$	12,242		$	21,160		$	17,320
Total nonperforming assets as a percentage of loans and other real estate	0.27		%	0.35		%	0.50		%
Total nonperforming assets and loans delinquent for 90 days or more as a precentage of loans and other real estate	0.31		%	0.57		%	0.51		%
Total nonperforming assets, loans delinquent for 90 days or more and restructured loans still accruing interest as a percentage of loans and other real estate	0.33		%	0.59		%	0.54		%

Nonperforming assets, accruing loans delinquent for 90 days or more and restructured loans still accruing interest totaled $12.2 million at June 30, 2006, a decrease of 42.1% from the year-end balance of $21.2 million and 29.3% from the year-ago balance of $17.3 million. The decrease from year-end 2005 was primarily due to the payoff of a $1.8 million nonaccrual commercial loan and a $7.1 million delinquent commercial real estate loan in January 2006.

Nonaccrual loans totaled $10.0 million as of June 30, 2006. Nonaccrual commercial mortgages at June 30, 2006 included a $2.6 million loan secured by a commercial office building on Oahu and a $1.9 million loan secured by a commercial office building in Hilo on the island of

33

Hawaii. Nonaccrual residential mortgage loans included one loan for $4.8 million to a borrower who filed for bankruptcy protection in 2005. The $1.9 million commercial mortgage loan was paid in full in July 2006, and the remaining real estate mortgage loans are well secured and in the process of collection, with no loss anticipated at this time. We believe that the potential loss exposure on total nonaccrual loans has been adequately provided for in the allowance for loan and lease losses (the “Allowance”) as of June 30, 2006.

There was no other real estate at June 30, 2006 and 2005, and December 31, 2005.

Accruing loans delinquent 90 days or more at June 30, 2006 totaled $1.5 million, compared to $7.9 million at year-end 2005 and $0.5 million a year ago. As mentioned earlier, the decline from year-end 2005 was primarily due to the payoff of a $7.1 million commercial real estate loan in January 2006.

Restructured loans still accruing interest at June 30, 2006 represented six loans to a single borrower. All loans were current as of June 30, 2006 based upon their revised terms, and we are closely monitoring the borrower's financial condition.

As of June 30, 2006, there were 23 impaired loans to ten borrowers totaling $13.7 million, compared to 11 impaired loans to four borrowers totaling $7.8 million a year ago, and 11 loans to six borrowers totaling $18.9 million at year-end 2005. All impaired loans were comprised primarily of loans secured by commercial properties.

We continue to closely monitor loan delinquencies and impairments and to work with borrowers to resolve loan problems. Any deterioration in the economies of Hawaii, California or Washington may impact loan quality, and may result in increases in nonperforming assets, delinquencies and restructured loans.

Provision for Loan Losses

A discussion of our accounting policy regarding the Allowance is contained in the Critical Accounting Policies section of this report.

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the Allowance as of the dates and for the periods indicated.

34

	Three Months Ended June 30,							Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2006			2005				2006				2005
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance at beginning of period	$	53,057		$	51,623			$	52,936			$	50,703
Provision for loan and lease losses	525			1,000				1,050				1,917
Loan charge-offs:
Real estate:
Mortgage-residential	—			—				—				74
Commercial, financial and agruicultural	355			1,009				369				1,186
Consumer	877			1,022				1,946				2,150
Leases	17			—				18				—
Total loan charge-offs	1,249			2,031				2,333				3,410
Recoveries:
Real estate:
Mortgage-commercial	3			3				6				280
Mortgage-residential	21			327				42				367
Commercial, financial and agricultural	31			273				117				922
Consumer	526			462				1,093				878
Leases	—			—				3				—
Total recoveries	581			1,065				1,261				2,447
Net loan charge-offs	668			966				1,072				963
Balance at end of period	$	52,914		$		51,657		$		52,914		$		51,657
Annualized ratio of net loan charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans	0.07		%	0.12			%	0.06			%	0.06			%

The provision for loan and lease losses (the “Provision”) was $0.5 million and $1.1 million for the second quarter and first half of 2006, respectively, compared to $1.0 million and $1.9 million, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2005. The decrease in the Provision is reflective of the improvement in asset quality.

The Allowance, expressed as a percentage of total loans, was 1.43% at June 30, 2006 compared to 1.49% at year-end 2005 and 1.61% at June 30, 2005. We believe that the Allowance is adequate to cover the credit risks inherent in the loan portfolio. Any economic deterioration in the areas we serve could adversely affect the borrowers' ability to repay their loans or the value of collateral securing those loans and, consequently, the level of net loan charge-offs and Provision.

Net loan charge-offs totaled $0.7 million and $1.1 million for the second quarter and first half of 2006, compared to $1.0 million for both the second quarter and first half of last year. When expressed as an annualized percentage of average loans, net loan charge-offs were 0.07% and 0.06% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, compared to 0.12% and 0.06%, respectively, for the same periods in 2005.

35

Other Operating Income

Total other operating income of $11.0 million for the second quarter of 2006 increased by $2.2 million or 24.5% over the same period last year due largely to increases of $1.0 million or 40.8% in service charges on deposits and $0.5 million or 46.4% in gains on sales of loans. The increase in service charges on deposits was primarily due to an expansion of our overdraft program. For the first half of 2006, total other operating income of $23.1 million increased by $5.1 million or 28.1% over the same period last year. Service charges on deposits increased by $2.1 million, income from bank-owned life insurance increased by $0.6 million and gains on sales of loans increased by $2.6 million during the period, offset by a decline in investment securities gains of $1.5 million. The increase in gains on sales of loans reflects the increased residential mortgage lending activity attributed to the acquisition of Central Pacific HomeLoans, Inc. in the third quarter of 2005.

Other Operating Expense

Total other operating expense was $31.5 million for the second quarter of 2006, up $2.7 million or 9.6% over the same period in 2005. Salaries and employee benefits increased by $3.4 million due to the recognition of $1.0 million in stock option and stock award expense in connection with the implementation of SFAS 123R and salaries and employee benefits for Central Pacific HomeLoans, Inc. Core deposit premium amortization declined by $0.7 million based on the use of a declining amortization schedule, while legal and professional services increased by $0.6 million reflecting higher audit and consulting expenses.

For the first half of 2006, total other operating expense of $65.2 million increased by $5.6 million or 9.4% over the same period last year. Salaries and employee benefits increased by $6.2 million, including $2.2 million in retirement benefits paid to a former executive officer and $1.9 million in stock option and stock award expense. Amortization of core deposit premium declined by $1.0 million, while other expense increased by $1.3 million, due largely to interest accruing on various tax-related contingencies, offset by a $0.5 million partial refund of an FDIC assessment.

Income Taxes

The effective tax rate was 34.38% and 35.00% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, compared to 35.14% and 31.63%, respectively, for the same periods in 2005. In the second quarter of 2006, we recognized a $0.5 million tax benefit as a result of an Internal Revenue Service audit. In the first quarter of 2005, we recognized $1.8 million in state tax credits from investments in high-technology businesses in Hawaii. We expect the effective tax rate to approximate 36% for the remainder of 2006. Factors that may affect the effective tax rate for the 2006 include the level of tax-exempt income recognized, the amount of nondeductible expenses incurred, the amount of tax credits available to offset future taxable income.

Financial Condition

Total assets at June 30, 2006 grew to $5.29 billion, increasing by $51.7 million or 1.0% compared to year-end 2005 and by $372.0 million or 7.6% from a year ago.

36

Loans, net of unearned income, grew to $3.69 billion, increasing by $136.5 million or 3.8% over year-end 2005 and by $484.2 million or 15.1% compared to a year ago. The increase over year-end 2005 is attributable to commercial construction loans, which increased by approximately $200 million during the first half of 2006, and to commercial loans and residential mortgage loans, which each increased by approximately $100 million during the period. Our mainland loan production offices contributed approximately 90% of our total loan growth during the first half of 2006, while our Hawaii lending activity contributed 10% of our loan growth. During the first half of 2006, our Hawaii loan portfolio was adversely impacted by higher than expected loan prepayments and the payoff of $12.2 million in nonaccrual and delinquent loans. Based on current loan pipeline estimates, we expect loan origination activity to remain at or near current levels for the remainder of 2006.

Total deposits at June 30, 2006 were $3.66 billion, reflecting an increase of $21.9 million or 0.6% over year-end 2005 and $158.0 million or 4.5% compared to a year ago. Noninterest-bearing deposits decreased by $57.2 million or 7.8% in the first half of 2006, while interest-bearing deposits increased by $79.1 million or 2.7%. Compared to a year ago, noninterest-bearing deposits increased by $10.7 million or 1.6%, and interest-bearing deposits increased by $147.4 million or 5.2%. The fluctuation in noninterest-bearing deposits is attributable in part to seasonal fluctuations, particularly in commercial demand deposit accounts. To generate deposit growth in the competitive Hawaii market, we focus our sales efforts and marketing resources on our premier product, the Exceptional Checking and Savings accounts, which generated the increase in savings and money market balances during the period, supplemented by Free Checking and periodic certificate of deposit specials. We anticipate deposit growth in the range of 3% to 4% for 2006, with continued increases in rates reflective of the current competitive market and interest rate environment.

Capital Resources

Shareholders' equity was $698.8 million at June 30, 2006, compared to $676.2 million at year-end 2005 and $657.5 million a year ago. Book value per share at June 30, 2006 was $22.93, compared to $22.22 at year-end 2005 and $21.62 a year ago.

On April 26, 2006, the board of directors declared a second quarter cash dividend of $0.21 per share, an increase of 10.5% over the $0.19 per share dividend declared in the second quarter of 2005 and unchanged from the first quarter of 2006. For the first half of 2006, dividends declared totaled $0.42 per share, an increase of 20.0% over the $0.35 per share declared in the first half of 2005.

In April 2006, the board of directors approved a new stock repurchase program, authorizing the repurchase of up to 600,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions from time to time prior to April 30, 2007. The repurchase plan represents approximately 2% of the Company’s currently outstanding common stock. The new repurchase plan replaces the 2002 stock repurchase program. There were no repurchases of common stock in the first six months of 2006.

We have five statutory trusts:  CPB Capital Trust I, CPB Capital Trust II, CPB Statutory Trust III, CPB Capital Trust IV and CPB Statutory Trust V, which issued a total of $105.0

37

million in trust preferred securities. The statutory trusts are not consolidated in the consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2006. However, the Federal Reserve Board (the “FRB”) has determined that certain cumulative preferred securities, such as the trust preferred securities issued by the capital and statutory trusts, qualify as minority interest, and are included in the calculation of Tier 1 capital up to 25% of total risk-based capital with the excess includable as Tier 2 capital.

Our objective with respect to capital resources is to maintain a level of capital that will support sustained asset growth and anticipated risks. Furthermore, we seek to ensure that regulatory guidelines and industry standards for well-capitalized institutions are met.

Regulations on capital adequacy guidelines adopted by the FRB and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC") are as follows. An institution is required to maintain a minimum ratio of qualifying total capital to risk-adjusted assets of 8% and a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-adjusted assets of 4%. In addition to the risk-based guidelines, federal banking regulators require banking organizations to maintain a minimum amount of Tier 1 capital to total assets, referred to as the leverage ratio. For a banking organization rated in the highest of the five categories used by regulators to rate banking organizations, the minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets must be 3%. In addition to these uniform risk-based capital guidelines and leverage ratios that apply across the industry, the regulators have the discretion to set individual minimum capital requirements for specific institutions at rates significantly above the minimum guidelines and ratios.

The following table sets forth the Company’s capital ratios and capital adequacy requirements applicable as of the dates indicated.

					Minimum required
					for capital
	Actual				adequacy purposes				Excess
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
At June 30, 2006:
Leverage capital	$	515,777	10.60	%	$	194,722	4.00	%	$	321,055	6.60	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital	515,777		12.05		171,238		4.00		344,539		8.05
Total risk-based capital	569,323		13.30		342,475		8.00		226,848		5.30
At December 31, 2005:
Leverage capital	$	463,528	9.73	%	$	190,486	4.00	%	$	273,042	5.73	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital	463,528		10.36		178,984		4.00		284,544		6.36
Total risk-based capital	519,471		11.61		357,969		8.00		161,502		3.61

In addition, FDIC-insured institutions such as our principal banking subsidiary, Central Pacific Bank, must maintain leverage, Tier 1 and total risk-based capital ratios of at least 5%, 6% and 10%, respectively, to be considered "well capitalized" under the prompt corrective action provisions of the FDIC Improvement Act of 1991.

38

The following table sets forth Central Pacific Bank's capital ratios and capital requirements to be considered "well capitalized" as of the dates indicated.

					Minimum required
					to be
	Actual				well capitalized					Excess
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Ratio		Amount			Ratio		Amount			Ratio
At June 30, 2006:
Leverage capital	$	491,653	10.02	%	$		245,292	5.00	%	$	246,361		5.02	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital	491,653		11.52		255,986			6.00		235,667			5.52
Total risk-based capital	545,020		12.77		426,643			10.00		118,377			2.77
At December 31, 2005:
Leverage capital	$	423,544	8.98	%	$	235,886		5.00	%	$		187,658	3.98	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital	423,544		9.48		268,012			6.00		155,532			3.48
Total risk-based capital	479,391		10.73		446,687			10.00		32,704			0.73

Liquidity

Our objective in managing liquidity is to maintain a balance between sources and uses of funds in order to economically meet the cash requirements of customers for loans and deposit withdrawals and participate in lending and investment opportunities as they arise. We monitor our liquidity position in relation to trends of loan demand and deposit growth on a daily basis to assure maximum utilization, maintenance of an adequate level of readily marketable assets and access to short-term funding sources.

During the first half of 2006, loan growth exceeded deposit growth and was funded by a variety of sources, including cash and due from banks, proceeds from maturities of investment securities and increases in deposits and short-term borrowings.

We anticipate that loan demand will exceed deposit growth in the remaining half of 2006. Liquidity will be satisfied by secondary funding sources, primarily the Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle (“FHLB”). Central Pacific Bank is a member of, and maintained a $1.3 billion line of credit with, the FHLB as of June 30, 2006, of which $731.0 million was outstanding. We believe that the credit line is adequate based upon current loan pipeline estimates.

Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of loss in a financial instrument arising from adverse changes in market rates/prices such as interest rates, foreign currency rates, commodity prices and equity prices. Our primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk that occurs when rate-sensitive assets and rate-sensitive liabilities mature or reprice during different periods or in differing amounts. Asset/liability management attempts to coordinate our rate-sensitive assets and rate-sensitive liabilities to meet our financial objectives. The Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”) monitors interest rate risk through the use of interest rate sensitivity gap, net interest income and market value of portfolio equity simulation and rate shock analyses. Adverse interest rate risk

39

exposures are managed through the shortening or lengthening of the duration of assets and liabilities.

The primary analytical tool we use to measure and manage our interest rate risk is a simulation model that projects changes in net interest income (“NII”) as market interest rates change. Our ALCO policy requires that simulated changes in NII should be within certain specified ranges, or steps must be taken to reduce interest rate risk. The results of the model indicate that the mix of rate-sensitive assets and liabilities at June 30, 2006 would not result in a fluctuation of NII that would exceed the established policy limits.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report and pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the "Exchange Act"), the Company's Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness and design of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer concluded, as of the end of the period covered by this report, that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting information required to be disclosed by the Company, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms.

Changes in Internal Controls

 As of the end of the period covered by this report, there have been no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal  Proceedings

We are involved from time to time in various claims, disputes and other legal actions in the ordinary course of business. We believe that the resolution of such additional matters will not have an adverse material effect upon our financial position or results of operations when resolved.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes from Risk Factors as previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, filed with the SEC.

40

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Our Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Meeting”) was held on April 25, 2006 for the purpose of considering and voting upon the following matters:

•To elect five persons to the Board of Directors for a term of three years and to serve until their successors are elected and qualified;

•To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006;

•To transact such other business as may properly come before the Meeting and at any and all adjournments thereof.

The following table presents the names of directors elected at the Meeting, as well as the number of votes cast for each of the directors nominated. A total of 26,974,687 shares, or 88.6% of eligible shares were represented at the meeting.

Name	For	Withheld
Richard J. Blangiardi	26,389,399	585,288
Clayton K. Honbo	26,278,893	695,794
Paul J. Kosasa	21,293,082	5,681,605
Mike K. Sayama	26,522,436	452,251
Dwight L. Yoshimura	26,533,068	441,619

In addition to the above directors, the following directors will continue to serve on the Board of Directors until the expiration of their respective terms as indicated:

41

	Expiration of
Name	Term
Clint Arnoldus	2007
Christine H.H. Camp Friedman	2007
Dennis I. Hirota	2007
Ronald K. Migita	2007
Maurice H. Yamasato	2007
Earl E. Fry	2008
B. Jeannie Hedberg	2008
Duane K. Kurisu	2008
Colbert M. Matsumoto	2008
Crystal K. Rose	2008

The ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 was approved with a total of 26,333,053 votes cast for, 301,177 votes cast against, and 340,457 abstentions or nonvotes.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6.    Exhibits

Exhibit No.	Document
3.1	Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant (1)
3.2	Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (2)
4.1	Rights Agreement dated as of August 26, 1998 between Registrant and the Rights Agent (3)
10.1	License and Service Agreement dated July 30, 1997 by and between the Registrant and Fiserv Solutions, Inc. (4)
10.2	Split Dollar Life Insurance Plan (5)(15)
10.3	Central Pacific Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (6)(15)
10.4	The Registrant's 1997 Stock Option Plan, as amended (6)(15)
10.5	The Registrant’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (7)(15)
10.6	The Registrant’s 2004 Stock Compensation Plan (8)(15)
10.7	Supplemental Retirement Agreement dated February 28, 2002 by and between Central Pacific Bank and Naoaki Shibuya (9)(15)

42

Exhibit No.	Document
10.8	Supplemental Retirement Agreement dated June 28, 2002 by and between Central Pacific Bank and Joichi Saito (10)(15)
10.9	Employment Agreement, effective as of September 14, 2004, by and between the Registrant and Clinton L. Arnoldus (11)(15)
10.10	Employment Agreement, effective as of September 14, 2004, by and between the Registrant and Ronald K. Migita (11)(15)
10.11	Employment Agreement, effective as of September 14, 2004, by and between the Registrant and Neal K. Kanda (11)(15)
10.12	Employment Agreement, effective as of September 14, 2004, by and between the Registrant and Blenn A. Fujimoto (11)(15)
10.13	Employment Agreement, effective as of September 14, 2004, by and between the Registrant and Denis K. Isono (11)(15)
10.14	Employment Agreement, effective as of September 14, 2004, by and between the Registrant and Dean K. Hirata (12)(15)
10.15	Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (8)(15)
10.16	Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement for Blenn A. Fujimoto, effective July 1, 2005 (13)(15)
10.17	Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement for Dean K. Hirata, effective July 1, 2005 (13)(15)
10.18	Retirement Agreement of Neal K. Kanda dated February 22, 2006 (14) (15)
10.19	The Registrant’s Long-Term Executive Incentive Plan (15) (16)
14.1	The Registrant’s Code of Conduct and Ethics (17)
14.2	The Registrant’s Code of Conduct and Ethics for Senior Financial Officers (18)
23	Consent of KPMG LLP (19)
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *
32.1	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer in accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 **

43

Exhibit No.	Document
32.2	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer in accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 **

*   Filed herewith.

** Furnished herewith.

(1)Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2005.

(2)Filed as Exhibits 3.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2005.

(3)Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form 8-A, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 16, 1998.

(4)Filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 1999.

(5)Filed as Exhibit 10.16 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1991, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 1992.

(6)Filed as Exhibits 10.8 and 10.9 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 1997.

(7)Filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2001.

(8)Filed as Exhibits 10.8 and 10.20 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on March 16, 2005.

(9)Filed as Exhibit 10 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 10, 2002.

(10)Filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 2003.

(11)Filed as Exhibits 10.3, 10.4, 10.5, 10.7 and 10.8 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2004.

(12)Filed as Exhibit 10.9 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 13, 2004.

44

(13)Filed as Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 31, 2006.

(14)Filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2006.

(15)Denotes management contract or compensation plan or arrangement.

(16)Filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2006.

(17)Filed as Exhibit 14.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2006.

(18)Filed as Exhibit 14.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2006.

(19)Filed as Exhibit 23 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2006.

45

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		CENTRAL PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORP.
		(Registrant)
Date:	August 8, 2006	/s/ Clint Arnoldus
		Clint Arnoldus
		Chief Executive Officer and President
Date:	August 8, 2006	/s/ Dean K. Hirata
		Dean K. Hirata
		Vice Chairman and
		Chief Financial Officer

46

Central Pacific Financial Corp.

Exhibit Index

Exhibit No.	Description
31.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification of the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

47