EX-23

                                                      2












             Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Trustees and Shareholders
Oppenheimer Integrity Fund:


In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of Oppenheimer
Core Bond Fund (the only portfolio constituting the Oppenheimer Integrity Fund)
(the Fund) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009, in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
we considered the Fund's internal control over financial reporting, including
controls over safeguarding securities, as a basis for designing our auditing
procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements
and to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting. In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expected
benefits and related costs of controls. A company's internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of
records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting
may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A deficiency in internal control over financial reporting exists when the design
or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal
course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect
misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a
combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such
that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the
Fund's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected
on a timely basis.

Our consideration of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting was
for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph and would not
necessarily disclose all deficiencies in internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). However, we noted no deficiencies in the Fund's
internal control over financial reporting and its operation, including controls
over safeguarding securities, that we consider to be a material weakness as
defined above as of December 31, 2009.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of management and the
Board of Trustees and Shareholders of Oppenheimer Integrity Fund and the
Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not intended to be and should not be
used by anyone other than these specified parties.





                                    KPMG LLP



Denver, Colorado
February 18, 2010

EX-99.77E LEGAL

                                N-SAR EXHIBIT 77E

Pending Litigation. Since 2009, a number of lawsuits have been filed in federal
courts against the Manager, the Distributor, and certain funds in the
Oppenheimer family of funds (the "Defendant Funds") advised by the Manager and
distributed by the Distributor - including the Fund. The lawsuits naming the
Fund as a defendant also name certain officers, trustees and former trustees of
the Fund. The plaintiffs seek class action status on behalf of purchasers of
shares of the Fund during a particular time period. The lawsuits against the
Fund raise claims under federal securities laws alleging that, among other
things, the disclosure documents of the Fund contained misrepresentations and
omissions, that the Fund's investment policies were not followed, and that the
Fund and the other defendants violated federal securities laws and regulations.
The plaintiffs seek unspecified damages, equitable relief and an award of
attorneys' fees and litigation expenses. Litigation against certain other
Oppenheimer funds is similar in nature. Additionally, in 2009, lawsuits were
filed in state court against the Manager, the Distributor and another subsidiary
of the Manager, on behalf of the New Mexico Education Plan Trust. These lawsuits
allege breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence and violation of
state securities laws, and seek compensatory damages, equitable relief and an
award of attorneys' fees and litigation expenses.

         Other lawsuits have been filed since 2008 in various state and federal
courts, by investors who made investments through an affiliate of the Manager,
against the Manager and certain of its affiliates. Those lawsuits related to the
alleged investment fraud perpetrated by Bernard Madoff and his firm ("Madoff")
and allege a variety of claims including breach of fiduciary duty, fraud,
negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, and violation of federal and
state securities laws and regulations, among others. They seek unspecified
damages, equitable relief, and an award of attorneys' fees and litigation
expenses. None of the suits have named the Distributor, any of the Oppenheimer
mutual funds or any of their independent Trustees or Directors. None of the
Oppenheimer funds invested in any funds or accounts managed by Madoff.

         The Manager believes that the lawsuits described above are without
legal merit and intends to defend them vigorously. The Fund's Board of Trustees
has also engaged counsel to defend the suits vigorously on behalf of the Fund,
the Fund's Board and the individual Trustees named in those suits. The Manager
believes that it is premature to render any opinion as to the likelihood of an
outcome unfavorable to it and that no estimate can be made with any degree of
certainty as to the amount or range of any potential loss. The Manager also
believes that these suits should not impair the ability of the Manager or the
Distributor to perform their respective duties to the Fund, and that the outcome
of all the suits together should not have any material effect on the operations
of any of the Oppenheimer Funds.

EX-99

Net investment income (loss) and net realized gain (loss) may differ for
financial statement and tax purposes. The character of dividends and
distributions made during the fiscal year from net investment income or net
realized gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal
income tax purposes. Also, due to timing of dividends and distributions, the
fiscal year in which amounts are distributed may differ from the fiscal year in
which the income or net realized gain was recorded by the Fund. Accordingly, the
following amounts have been reclassified for December 31, 2009. Net assets of
the Fund were unaffected by the reclassifications.





                                              Reduction               Reduction
                                         to Accumulated          to Accumulated
                Reduction to             Net Investment            Net Realized
             Paid-in Capital                       Loss     Loss on Investments
        -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                 $48,016,146                 $8,980,586             $39,035,560