EX-99

ROCSOP

Net investment income (loss) and net realized gain (loss) may differ for
financial statement and tax purposes. The character of dividends and
distributions made during the fiscal year from net investment income or net
realized gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal
income tax purposes. Also, due to timing of dividends and distributions, the
fiscal year in which amounts are distributed may differ from the fiscal year in
which the income or net realized gain was recorded by the Fund. Accordingly, the
following amounts have been reclassified for December 31, 2005. Net assets of
the Fund were unaffected by the reclassifications.

      REDUCTION TO                    INCREASE TO
      ACCUMULATED                     ACCUMULATED
      NET INVESTMENT            NET REALIZED LOSS
      LOSS                         ON INVESTMENTS
      -------------------------------------------
      $2,728,394                       $2,728,394

EX-99.77E LEGAL

LITIGATION

A consolidated amended complaint has been filed as putative derivative and class
actions against the Manager, OFS and the Distributor, as well as 51 of the
Oppenheimer funds (as "Nominal Defendants") including the Fund, 30 present and
former Directors or Trustees and 8 present and former officers of the funds.
This complaint, initially filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of New York on January 10, 2005 and amended on March 4, 2005,
consolidates into a single action and amends six individual previously-filed
putative derivative and class action complaints. Like those prior complaints,
the complaint alleges that the Manager charged excessive fees for distribution
and other costs, improperly used assets of the funds in the form of directed
brokerage commissions and 12b-1 fees to pay brokers to promote sales of the
funds, and failed to properly disclose the use of assets of the funds to make
those payments in violation of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Also, like those prior complaints, the
complaint further alleges that by permitting and/or participating in those
actions, the Directors/Trustees and the Officers breached their fiduciary duties
to shareholders of the funds under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and at
common law. The complaint seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages,
rescission of the funds' investment advisory agreements, an accounting of all
fees paid, and an award of attorneys' fees and litigation expenses.

      The defendants believe that the allegations contained in the Complaints
are without merit and that they have meritorious defenses against the claims
asserted. The defendants intend to defend these lawsuits vigorously and to
contest any claimed liability. The defendants believe that it is premature to
render any opinion as to the likelihood of an outcome unfavorable to them and
that no estimate can yet be made with any degree of certainty as to the amount
or range of any potential loss.

EX-23

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Oppenheimer Core Bond Fund:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of Oppenheimer
Core Bond Fund, a series of Oppenheimer Integrity Funds, (the "Fund"), as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2005, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), we considered its
internal control over financial reporting, including control activities for
safeguarding securities, as a basis for designing our auditing procedures for
the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to comply
with the requirements of Form N-SAR, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting. In fulfilling this
responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls. A company's internal control
over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Such internal control includes policies and procedures
that provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of a company's assets that could
have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting
may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A control deficiency exists when the design or operation of a control does not
allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. A significant
deficiency is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that
adversely affects the company's ability to initiate, authorize, record, process,
or report external financial data reliably in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a
misstatement of the company's annual or interim financial statements that is
more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected. A material weakness
is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that
results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the
annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.

Our consideration of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting was
for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph and would not
necessarily disclose all deficiencies in internal control that might be
significant deficiencies or material weaknesses under standards established by
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). However, we noted
no deficiencies in the Fund's internal control over financial reporting and its
operation, including controls for safeguarding securities, that we consider to
be a material weakness, as defined above, as of December 31, 2005.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of management and the
Board of Trustees of Oppenheimer Core Bond Fund and the Securities and Exchange
Commission and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than
these specified parties.



Deloitte & Touche LLP

Denver, Colorado
February 13, 2006