XML 77 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.0.814
Investments
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Investments [Abstract]  
Investments

Note 9 — Investments

 

Total Realized Investment Gains and Losses

 

The following realized gains and losses on investments exclude amounts required to adjust future policy benefits for the run-off settlement annuity business:

 

 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 September 30, September 30,
(In millions)20152014 20152014
Fixed maturities$ (57)$ 2 $ (38)$ 14
Equity securities  28  (3)   42  14
Commercial mortgage loans  -  (2)   2  (6)
Other investments, including derivatives  39  26   98  108
Realized investment gains before income taxes   10  23   104  130
Less income taxes   3  8   36  45
Net realized investment gains$ 7$ 15 $ 68$ 85

Included in these realized investment gains (losses) were pre-tax asset write-downs as follows:

 

 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 September 30, September 30,
(In millions)20152014 20152014
Other than temporary impairments on debt securities:         
Credit-related $ (3)$ - $ (4)$ -
Other(1)  (55)  (9)   (69)  (10)
Total other than temporary impairments on debt securities  (58)  (9)   (73)  (10)
Other credit-related (2)  (1)  (1)   (12)  (16)
Total$ (59)$ (10) $ (85)$ (26)
          
(1) Reflects other-than-temporary declines in fair values due to increases in market yields (widening of credit spreads) for certain below investment grade fixed maturities when there is an increased probability of sales activity prior to recovery of amortized cost.
(2) Other credit-related losses include other-than-temporary declines in fair values of equity securities, increases in valuation reserves on commercial mortgage loans and asset write-downs related to investments in real estate entities.

Sales information for available-for-sale fixed maturities and equity securities was as follows:

 

 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 September 30, September 30,
(In millions)20152014 20152014
Proceeds from sales$ 275$ 344 $ 1,452$ 854
Gross gains on sales$ 31$ 13 $ 82$ 38
Gross losses on sales$ 3$ 4 $ 7$ 5

Fixed Maturities and Equity Securities

 

The amortized cost and fair value by contractual maturity periods for fixed maturities were as follows at September 30, 2015:

 

  Amortized Fair
(In millions) Cost Value
Due in one year or less$ 1,120$ 1,127
Due after one year through five years  5,697  6,018
Due after five years through ten years  6,744  6,993
Due after ten years  3,354  4,014
Mortgage and other asset-backed securities  551  595
Total$ 17,466$ 18,747

Actual maturities of these securities could differ from their contractual maturities used in the table above. This could occur because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations, with or without penalties.

 

Gross unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on fixed maturities by type of issuer is shown below.

    Gross Gross  
    Unrealized Unrealized  
  Amortized Appre- Depre- Fair
  Cost ciation ciation Value
(In millions)September 30, 2015
Federal government and agency$ 553$ 308$ -$ 861
State and local government  1,569  151  (3)  1,717
Foreign government  1,815  140  (5)  1,950
Corporate  12,978  772  (126)  13,624
Mortgage-backed  54  2  (1)  55
Other asset-backed  497  47  (4)  540
Total$ 17,466$ 1,420$ (139)$ 18,747
         
(In millions)December 31, 2014
Federal government and agency$ 608$ 346$ -$ 954
State and local government  1,682  176  (2)  1,856
Foreign government  1,824  121  (5)  1,940
Corporate  12,517  1,014  (33)  13,498
Mortgage-backed  83  3  (1)  85
Other asset-backed  564  87  (1)  650
Total$ 17,278$ 1,747$ (42)$ 18,983

The above table includes investments with a fair value of $2.8 billion supporting the Company's run-off settlement annuity business, with gross unrealized appreciation of $614 million and gross unrealized depreciation of $22 million at September 30, 2015. Such unrealized amounts are reported in future policy benefit liabilities rather than accumulated other comprehensive income. At December 31, 2014, investments supporting this business had a fair value of $3.1 billion, gross unrealized appreciation of $758 million and gross unrealized depreciation of $2 million.

 

Review of declines in fair value. Management reviews fixed maturities with a decline in fair value from cost for impairment based on criteria that include:

 

  • length of time and severity of decline;

  • financial health and specific near term prospects of the issuer;
  • changes in the regulatory, economic or general market environment of the issuer's industry or geographic region; and
  • the Company's intent to sell or the likelihood of a required sale prior to recovery.

 

The table below summarizes fixed maturities with a decline in fair value from amortized cost as of September 30, 2015 if an impairment loss is not indicated based on the criteria listed above. These fixed maturities are primarily corporate securities with a decline in fair value that reflects an increase in market yields since purchase.

 

 September 30, 2015
        
 Fair Amortized UnrealizedNumber
(Dollars in millions)ValueCostDepreciationof Issues
Fixed maturities:       
One year or less:       
Investment grade$ 2,233$ 2,312$ (79) 417
Below investment grade$ 479$ 509$ (30) 224
More than one year:       
Investment grade$ 157$ 169$ (12) 60
Below investment grade$ 105$ 123$ (18) 34

There were no available for sale equity securities with a significant unrealized loss reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income at September 30, 2015. Equity securities also include hybrid investments consisting of preferred stock with call features that are carried at fair value with changes in fair value reported in other realized investment gains (losses) and dividends reported in net investment income. As of September 30, 2015, fair values of these securities were $60 million and amortized cost was $70 million. As of December 31, 2014, fair values of these securities were $57 million and amortized cost was $69 million.

 

Commercial Mortgage Loans

 

Mortgage loans held by the Company are made exclusively to commercial borrowers and are diversified by property type, location and borrower. Loans are generally issued at a fixed rate of interest and are secured by high quality, primarily completed and substantially leased operating properties.

 

Credit quality. The Company regularly evaluates and monitors credit risk, beginning with the initial underwriting of a mortgage loan and continuing throughout the investment holding period. Mortgage origination professionals employ an internal credit quality rating system designed to evaluate the relative risk of the transaction at origination that is then updated each year as part of the annual portfolio loan review. The Company evaluates and monitors credit quality on an ongoing basis, classifying each loan as a loan in good standing, potential problem loan or problem loan.

 

Quality ratings are based on our evaluation of a number of key inputs related to the loan, including real estate market-related factors such as rental rates and vacancies, and property-specific inputs such as growth rate assumptions and lease rollover statistics. However, the two most significant contributors to the credit quality rating are the debt service coverage and loan-to-value ratios. The debt service coverage ratio measures the amount of property cash flow available to meet annual interest and principal payments on debt, with a ratio below 1.0 indicating that there is not enough cash flow to cover the required loan payments. The loan-to-value ratio, commonly expressed as a percentage, compares the amount of the loan to the fair value of the underlying property collateralizing the loan.

 

The following tables summarize the credit risk profile of the Company's commercial mortgage loan portfolio based on loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios, as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

(In millions)   September 30, 2015    
  Debt Service Coverage Ratio  
  1.30x or 1.20x to 1.10x to 1.00x to Less than  
Loan-to-Value Ratios Greater 1.29x 1.19x 1.09x 1.00x Total
Below 50%$ 468$ 2$ -$ 67$ -$ 537
50% to 59%  677  -  -  24  -  701
60% to 69%  533  15  -  19  -  567
70% to 79%  -  -  -  30  36  66
80% to 89%  -  -  -  -  -  -
90% to 100%  41  -  -  -  103  144
Total$ 1,719$ 17$ -$ 140$ 139$ 2,015
             
(In millions)    December 31, 2014     
  Debt Service Coverage Ratio  
  1.30x or 1.20x to 1.10x to 1.00x to Less than  
Loan-to-Value Ratios Greater 1.29x 1.19x 1.09x 1.00x Total
Below 50%$ 340$ 17$ -$ 6$ -$ 363
50% to 59%  681  38  -  -  -  719
60% to 69%  394  -  15  -  60  469
70% to 79%  68  36  33  -  80  217
80% to 89%  6  41  -  -  58  105
90% to 100%  -  -  55  -  153  208
Total$ 1,489$ 132$ 103$ 6$ 351$ 2,081

The Company's annual in-depth review of its commercial mortgage loan investments is the primary mechanism for identifying emerging risks in the portfolio. The most recent review was completed by the Company's investment professionals in the second quarter of 2015 and included an analysis of each underlying property's most recent annual financial statements, rent rolls, operating plans, budgets, a physical inspection of the property and other pertinent factors. Based on historical results, current leases, lease expirations and rental conditions in each market, the Company estimates the current year and future stabilized property income and fair value, and categorizes the investments as loans in good standing, potential problem loans or problem loans. Based on property valuations and cash flows estimated as part of this review, and considering updates for loans where material changes were subsequently identified, the portfolio's average loan-to-value ratio improved to 55% at September 30, 2015 from 63% at December 31, 2014. The portfolio's average debt service coverage ratio was estimated to be 1.85 at September 30, 2015, an improvement from 1.66 at December 31, 2014.

The Company will reevaluate a loan's credit quality between annual reviews if new property information is received or an event such as delinquency or a borrower's request for restructure causes management to believe that the Company's estimate of financial performance, fair value or the risk profile of the underlying property has been affected.

 

       Potential problem mortgage loans are considered current (no payment is more than 59 days past due), but exhibit certain characteristics that increase the likelihood of future default. The characteristics management considers include, but are not limited to, the deterioration of debt service coverage below 1.0, estimated loan-to-value ratios increasing to 100% or more, downgrade in quality rating and requests from the borrower for restructuring. In addition, loans are considered potential problems if principal or interest payments are past due by more than 30 but less than 60 days. Problem mortgage loans are either in default by 60 days or more or have been restructured as to terms, which could include concessions on interest rate, principal payment or maturity date. The Company monitors each problem and potential problem mortgage loan on an ongoing basis, and updates the loan categorization and quality rating when warranted.

 

       Problem and potential problem mortgage loans, net of valuation reserves, totaled $104 million at September 30, 2015 and $208 million at December 31, 2014.

 

Impaired commercial mortgage loans. A commercial mortgage loan is considered impaired when it is probable that the Company will not collect all amounts due according to the terms of the original loan agreement. These loans are included in either problem or potential problem loans. The Company monitors credit risk and assesses the impairment of loans individually and on a consistent basis for all loans in the portfolio. Impaired loans are carried at the lower of unpaid principal balance or the fair value of the underlying real estate. Certain commercial mortgage loans without valuation reserves are considered impaired because the Company will not collect all interest due according to the terms of the original agreements; however, the Company expects to recover the unpaid principal because it is less than the fair value of the underlying real estate.

 

The carrying value of the Company's impaired commercial mortgage loans and related valuation reserves were as follows:

 

(In millions) September 30, 2015 December 31, 2014
  Gross  Reserves Net  Gross  Reserves Net
Impaired commercial mortgage loans with valuation reserves$ 83$ (10)$ 73 $ 147$ (12)$ 135
Impaired commercial mortgage loans with no valuation reserves  31  -  31   31  -  31
Total $ 114$ (10)$ 104 $ 178$ (12)$ 166

The average recorded investment in impaired loans was $129 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and $149 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Because of the risk profile of the underlying investment, the Company recognizes interest income on problem mortgage loans only when payment is actually received. Interest income that would have been reflected in net income if interest on non-accrual commercial mortgage loans had been received in accordance with the original terms was not significant for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 or 2014. Interest income on impaired commercial mortgage loans was not significant for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 or 2014.

 

Changes in valuation reserves for commercial mortgage loans were not material for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.

Short-term investments and cash equivalents

 

Short-term investments and cash equivalents include corporate securities of $1.2 billion, federal government securities of $129 million and money market funds of $42 million as of September 30, 2015. The Company's short-term investments and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2014 included corporate securities of $509 million, federal government securities of $274 million and money market funds of $33 million.