XML 102 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
NOTE F – GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The following table summarizes the changes in goodwill:
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
 
(in thousands)
Balance at beginning of year
$
535,518

 
$
534,862

 
$
534,385

Other goodwill additions, net
487

 
656

 
477

Balance at end of year
$
536,005

 
$
535,518

 
$
534,862



The Corporation did not complete any acquisitions during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009. The other goodwill additions were primarily due to additional purchase price incurred for prior acquisitions as a result of contingencies being met, offset by tax benefits realized on the exercises of stock options assumed in acquisitions.
The Corporation tests for impairment by first allocating its goodwill and other assets and liabilities, as necessary, to defined reporting units, generally represented as its subsidiary banks. After this allocation is completed, a two-step valuation process is applied, as required by FASB ASC Topic 805. In Step 1, each reporting unit’s fair value is determined based on three metrics: (1) a primary market approach, which measures fair value based on trading multiples of independent publicly traded financial institutions of comparable size and character to the reporting units, (2) a secondary market approach, which measures fair value based on acquisition multiples of publicly traded financial institutions of comparable size and character which were recently acquired, and (3) an income approach, which estimates fair value based on discounted cash flows. If the fair value of any reporting unit exceeds its adjusted net book value, no write-down of goodwill is necessary. If the fair value of any reporting unit is less than its adjusted net book value, a Step 2 valuation procedure is required to assess the proper carrying value of the goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The valuation procedures applied in a Step 2 valuation are similar to those that would be performed upon an acquisition, with the Step 1 fair value representing a hypothetical reporting unit purchase price.
Based on its 2011 annual goodwill impairment test, the Corporation determined that its The Bank and The Columbia Bank (Columbia) reporting units failed the Step 1 impairment test. As a result of the Step 1 test, The Bank’s adjusted net book value exceeded its fair value by approximately $82 million, or 31%, while Columbia’s adjusted net book value exceeded its fair value by approximately $84 million, or 28%. The Corporation determined that no goodwill impairment charges were necessary in 2011, as these Step 1 shortfalls were offset by the implied fair value adjustments of The Bank’s and Columbia’s assets and liabilities determined in the Step 2 valuation procedures. The goodwill allocated to The Bank and Columbia at December 31, 2011 was $97.4 million and $112.6 million, respectively.
All of the Corporation’s remaining reporting units passed the Step 1 goodwill impairment test, resulting in no goodwill impairment charges in 2011. Three reporting units, with total allocated goodwill of $77.6 million, had fair values that exceeded adjusted net book values by less than 5%. The remaining reporting units, with total allocated goodwill of $248.4 million, had fair values that exceeded net book values by approximately 18% in the aggregate.
Based on its 2010 annual goodwill impairment test, the Corporation determined that its The Bank and Columbia reporting units failed the Step 1 impairment test. As a result of the Step 1 test, The Bank’s adjusted net book value exceeded its fair value by approximately $64 million, or 24%, while Columbia’s adjusted net book value exceeded its fair value by approximately $78 million, or 26%. The Corporation determined that no goodwill impairment charges were necessary in 2010, as these Step 1 shortfalls were offset by the implied fair value adjustments of The Bank’s and Columbia’s assets and liabilities determined in the Step 2 valuation procedures.

Based on its 2009 annual goodwill impairment test, the Corporation determined that Columbia failed Step 1 of its impairment test, with its adjusted net book value exceeding fair value by approximately $37.0 million, or 14%. However, the Corporation determined that no goodwill impairment charge was necessary, as the Step 1 shortfall was offset by the implied fair value adjustments of Columbia’s assets and liabilities determined in the Step 2 valuation procedures.
The estimated fair values of the Corporation’s reporting units are subject to uncertainty, including future changes in the trading and acquisition multiples of comparable financial institutions and future operating results of reporting units which could differ significantly from the assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analysis under the income approach.
The following table summarizes intangible assets as of December 31:
 
2011
 
2010
 
Gross
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
 
Gross
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
 
(in thousands)
Amortizing:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Core deposit
$
50,279

 
$
(44,134
)
 
$
6,145

 
$
50,279

 
$
(40,475
)
 
$
9,804

Other
11,403

 
(10,607
)
 
796

 
11,878

 
(10,484
)
 
1,394

Total amortizing
61,682

 
(54,741
)
 
6,941

 
62,157

 
(50,959
)
 
11,198

Non-amortizing
1,263

 

 
1,263

 
1,263

 

 
1,263

 
$
62,945

 
$
(54,741
)
 
$
8,204

 
$
63,420

 
$
(50,959
)
 
$
12,461



Core deposit intangible assets are amortized using an accelerated method over the estimated remaining life of the acquired core deposits. As of December 31, 2011, these assets had a weighted average remaining life of approximately four years. Other amortizing intangible assets, consisting primarily of premiums paid on branch acquisitions in prior years that did not qualify for business combinations accounting under FASB ASC Topic 810, had a weighted average remaining life of three years. All other amortizing intangible assets had a weighted average remaining life of approximately five years. Amortization expense related to intangible assets totaled $4.3 million, $5.2 million and $5.7 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Amortization expense for the next five years is expected to be as follows (in thousands):
Year
 
2012
$
3,008

2013
2,240

2014
1,340

2015
310

2016
43