Note 5 - Derivative Financial Instruments

9 Months Ended

Jan. 28, 2017

Notes to Financial Statements

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Text Block]

5

. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

From time to time, we enter into aluminum swap contracts to partially mitigate our exposure to changes in the cost of aluminum cans. Such financial instruments are designated and accounted for as a cash flow hedge. Accordingly, gains or losses attributable to the effective portion of the cash flow hedge are reported in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (“AOCI”) and reclassified into earnings through cost of sales in the period in which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of our cash flow hedge was immaterial. The following summarizes the gains (losses) recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income and AOCI relative to cash flow hedges for the

three

and

nine

months ended

January

28,

2017

and

January

30,

2016:

	(In thousands)
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Recognized in AOCI:
Gain (loss) before income taxes	$	176		$	620		$	(21	)	$	(6,444	)
Less income tax provision (benefit)		65			230			(8	)		(2,391	)
Net	$	111		$	390		$	(13	)	$	(4,053	)
Reclassified from AOCI to cost of sales:
Loss before income taxes	$	(651	)	$	(2,171	)	$	(2,844	)	$	(6,008	)
Less income tax benefit		(242	)		(806	)		(1,056	)		(2,229	)
Net	$	(409	)	$	(1,365	)	$	(1,788	)	$	(3,779	)
Net change to AOCI	$	520		$	1,755		$	1,775		$	(274	)

As of

January

28,

2017,

the notional amount of our outstanding aluminum swap contracts was

$2.4

million and, assuming no change in the commodity prices,

$336,000

of unrealized gain before tax will be reclassified from AOCI and recognized in earnings over the next

twelve

months. See Note

1.

As of

January

28,

2017,

the fair value of the derivative asset was

$336,000,

which was included in prepaid and other assets. At

April

30,

2016,

the fair value of the derivative liability was

$2.5

million, which was included in accrued liabilities. Such valuation does not entail a significant amount of judgment and the inputs that are significant to the fair value measurement are Level

2

as defined by the fair value hierarchy as they are observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.