XML 23 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Note 6. Derivative Financial Instruments
3 Months Ended
Jul. 30, 2011
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Text Block]
6.  DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

We have entered into aluminum swap contracts to partially mitigate our exposure to changes in the cost of aluminum cans through April 2012.  The financial instruments are designated and accounted for as a cash flow hedge.  Accordingly, gains or losses attributable to the effective portion of the cash flow hedge are reported in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”) and reclassified into earnings through cost of sales in the period in which the hedged transaction affects earnings.  The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of our cash flow hedge was immaterial.  The following summarizes the gains (losses) recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and AOCI relative to the cash flow hedge for the three months ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010:

   
(In thousands)
 
   
Three Months Ended
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
Recognized in AOCI:
           
   Loss before income taxes
  $ (588 )   $ (1,185 )
   Less income tax benefit
    (219 )     (422 )
   Net
  $ (369 )   $ (763 )
Reclassified from AOCI to cost of sales:
               
   Gain (loss) before income taxes
  $ 1,143     $ (623 )
   Less income tax provision (benefit)
     407        (222 )
   Net
  $ 736     $ (401 )
Net change to AOCI
  $ (1,105 )   $ (362 )

As of July 30, 2011, the notional amount of our outstanding aluminum swap contracts was $19,715,000 and, assuming no change in the commodity prices, $2,540,000 of unrealized net gain (before tax) will be reclassified from AOCI and recognized in earnings over the next twelve months.  See Notes 1 and 7.

As of July 30, 2011 and April 30, 2011, the fair value of the derivative asset was $2,540,000 and $4,271,000, respectively, which was included in Prepaid and other assets.  Such valuation does not entail a significant amount of judgment and the inputs that are significant to the fair value measurement are Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy as they are observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.