XML 99 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Note B - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
12 Months Ended
Mar. 29, 2015
Notes to Financial Statements  
Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]
NOTE B - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
The following significant accounting policies have been applied in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements:
 
1.     Principles of Consolidation
 
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
 
2.     Fiscal Year
 
The Company’s fiscal year ends on the last Sunday in March, which results in a 52 or 53-week reporting period. The results of operations and cash flows for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2015 contained 52 weeks. The results of operations and cash flows for the fiscal years ended March 30, 2014 contained 52 weeks and March 31, 2013 contained 53 weeks.
 
3.     Reclassifications
 
As of March 29, 2015, Nathan’s has adopted a new income statement format that it believes will better present its results of operations. The Company concluded that it was appropriate to separately present its non-operating revenue and expenses. Accordingly, interest expense, impairment charge-long-term investment, insurance gain, interest income and other income, net, have been removed from total revenues and total costs and expenses. These prior year balances have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.
 
4.     Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Significant estimates made by management in preparing the consolidated financial statements include revenue recognition, the allowance for doubtful accounts, valuation of stock-based compensation, accounting for income taxes, and the valuation of goodwill, intangible assets and other long-lived assets.
 
5.     Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents amounted to
$1,754 and
$330 at March 29, 2015 and March 30, 2014, respectively. Substantially all of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents are in excess of government insurance.
 
6.     
Inventories
 
Inventories, which are stated at the lower of cost or market value, consist primarily of food items and supplies. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method.
 
7.     Marketable Securities
 
The Company determines the appropriate classification of securities at the time of purchase and reassesses the appropriateness of the classification at each reporting date. At March 29, 2015 and March 30, 2014, all marketable securities held by the Company have been classified as available-for-sale and, as a result, are stated at fair value, based upon quoted market prices for similar assets as determined in active markets or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable for substantially the full-term of the asset, with unrealized gains and losses included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Realized gains and losses on the sale of securities are determined on a specific identification basis. Interest income is recorded when it is earned and deemed realizable by the Company.
 
8.     Property and Equipment
 
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Major improvements are capitalized and minor replacements, maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation and amortization are calculated on the straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the estimated useful life or the lease term of the related asset. The estimated useful lives are as follows:
 
Building and improvements (years)
   5  25
Machinery, equipment, furniture and fixtures (years)
   3  15
Leasehold improvements (years)
   5  20
 
9.     Goodwill and Intangible Assets
 
Goodwill and intangible assets consist of (i) goodwill of $95 resulting from the acquisition of Nathan’s in 1987; and (ii) trademarks, trade names and other intellectual property of $1,353 in connection with Arthur Treacher’s.    
 
The Company’s goodwill and intangible assets are deemed to have indefinite lives and, accordingly, are not amortized, but are evaluated for impairment at least annually, but more often whenever changes in facts and circumstances occur which may indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. As of March 29, 2015 and March 30, 2014, the Company performed its required annual impairment test of goodwill and intangible assets and has determined no impairment is deemed to exist.
 
10.      Long-lived Assets
 
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Impairment is measured by comparing the carrying value of the long-lived assets to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from use of the assets and their ultimate disposition. In instances where impairment is determined to exist, the Company writes down the asset to its fair value based on the present value of estimated future cash flows.
 
Impairment losses are recorded on long-lived assets on a restaurant-by-restaurant basis whenever impairment factors are determined to be present. The Company considers a history of restaurant operating losses to be its primary indicator of potential impairment for individual restaurant locations. As a result of Hurricane Sandy, our Coney Island restaurant sustained significant damage which resulted in the write-off of $449 related to destroyed property (Note M.4). The restaurant was fully repaired and re-opened on May 20, 2013. No long-lived assets were deemed impaired during the fiscal years ended March 29, 2015, March 30, 2014 and March 31, 2013.
 
11.     Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price).
 
The fair value hierarchy, as outlined in the applicable accounting guidance, is based on inputs to valuation techniques that are used to measure fair value that are either observable or unobservable.  Observable inputs reflect assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on market data obtained from independent sources while unobservable inputs reflect a reporting entity’s pricing based upon their own market assumptions. 
 
The fair value hierarchy consists of the following three levels:
 
 
Level 1 - inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for an identical asset or liability in an active market
 
 
Level 2 - inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for a similar asset or liability in an active market or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability
 
 
Level 3 - inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement of the asset or liability
 
The use of observable market inputs (quoted market prices) when measuring fair value and, specifically, the use of Level 1 quoted prices to measure fair value are required whenever possible. The determination of where an asset or liability falls in the hierarchy requires significant judgment. The Company evaluates its hierarchy disclosures quarterly and based on various factors, it is possible that an asset or liability may be classified differently from year to year.
 
The following table presents assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 29, 2015 and March 30, 2014 based upon the valuation hierarchy:
 
 
March 29, 2015
 
Level 1
 
 
Level 2
 
 
Level 3
 
 
Carrying Value
 
Marketable securities
 
$
-
 
 
$
7,091
 
 
$
-
 
 
$
7,091
 
                                 
Total assets at fair value
 
$
-
 
 
$
7,091
 
 
$
-
 
 
$
7,091
 
 
 
March 30, 2014
 
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Carrying Value
 
Marketable securities
  $ -     $ 11,187     $ -     $ 11,187  
                                 
Total assets at fair value
  $ -     $ 11,187     $ -     $ 11,187  
 
Nathan’s marketable securities, which consist primarily of municipal bonds, are not actively traded. The valuation of such bonds is based upon quoted market prices for similar bonds currently trading in an active market or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable for substantially the full term of the asset.
 
The Company’s long-term debt had a carrying value of $135,000 as of March 29, 2015 and a fair value of $141,835 as of March 29, 2015. The Company estimates the fair value of its long-term debt based upon review of observable pricing in secondary markets as of the last trading day of the fiscal period. Accordingly, the Company classifies its long-term debt as Level 2.
 
The carrying amounts of cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term maturity of the instruments.
 
The majority of the Company’s non-financial assets and liabilities are not required to be carried at fair value on a recurring basis. However, the Company is required on a non-recurring basis to use fair value measurements when analyzing asset impairment as it relates to goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets and long-lived assets. The Company utilized the income approach (Level 3 inputs) which utilized cash flow forecasts for future income and were discounted to present value in performing its annual impairment testing of intangible assets.
 
12.      
Start-up Costs
 
Pre-opening and similar restaurant costs are expensed as incurred.
 
13.      Revenue Recognition - Branded Product Program
 
The Company recognizes sales from the Branded Product Program and certain products sold from the Branded Menu Program upon delivery to Nathan’s customers via third party common carrier. Rebates provided to customers are classified as a reduction to sales.
 
14.      Revenue Recognition - Company-owned Restaurants
 
Sales by Company-owned restaurants, which are typically paid in cash or credit card by the customer, are recognized at the point of sale. Sales are presented net of sales tax.
 
15.      Revenue Recognition - Franchising Operations
 
In connection with its franchising operations, the Company receives initial franchise fees, area development fees, royalties, and in certain cases, revenue from sub-leasing restaurant properties to franchisees.
 
Franchise and area development fees, which are typically received prior to completion of the revenue recognition process, are initially recorded as deferred revenue. Initial franchise fees, which are non-refundable, are recognized as income when substantially all services to be performed by Nathan’s and conditions relating to the sale of the franchise have been performed or satisfied, which generally occurs when the franchised restaurant commences operations.
 
The following services are typically provided by the Company prior to the opening of a franchised restaurant:
 
 
o
Approval of all site selections to be developed.
 
o
Provision of architectural plans suitable for restaurants to be developed.
 
o
Assistance in establishing building design specifications, reviewing construction compliance and equipping the restaurant.
 
o
Provision of appropriate menus to coordinate with the restaurant design and location to be developed.
 
o
Provision of management training for the new franchisee and selected staff.
 
o
Assistance with the initial operations of restaurants being developed.
 
At March 29, 2015 and March 30, 2014,
$278
and $234, respectively, of deferred franchise fees are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. For the fiscal years ended March 29, 2015, March 30, 2014 and March 31, 2013, the Company earned franchise fees of $1,043, $863, and $852, respectively, from new unit openings, transfers, co-branding and forfeitures.
 
Development fees are non-refundable and the related agreements require the franchisee to open a specified number of restaurants in the development area within a specified time period or the agreements may be canceled by the Company. Revenue from development agreements is deferred and shall be recognized, with an appropriate provision for estimated uncollectible amounts, when all material services or conditions to the sale have been substantially performed by the franchisor.
If substantial obligations under the development agreement are not dependent on the number of individual franchise locations to be opened, substantial performance shall be determined using the same criteria applicable to an individual franchise, which is generally the opening of the first location pursuant to the development agreement. If substantial performance is dependent on the number of locations, then the development fee is deferred and recognized ratably over the term of the agreement, as restaurants in the development area commence operations on a pro rata basis to the minimum number of restaurants required to be open, or at the time the development agreement is effectively canceled. At March 29, 2015 and March 30, 2014,
$214 and $200, respectively, of deferred development fee revenue is included in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
 
The following is a summary of franchise openings and closings for the Nathan’s franchise restaurant system for the fiscal years ended March 29, 2015, March 30, 2014 and March 31, 2013:
 
 
 
March
29
,
   
March 30,
   
March 31,
 
 
 
201
5
   
2014
   
2013
 
                         
Franchised restaurants operating at the beginning of the period
 
 
324
      303       299  
                         
New franchised restaurants opened during the period
 
 
36
      56       40  
                         
Franchised restaurants closed during the period
 
 
(64
)
    (35 )     (36 )
                         
Franchised restaurants operating at the end of the period
 
 
296
      324       303  
 
The Company recognizes franchise royalties on a monthly basis, which are generally based upon a percentage of sales made by the Company’s franchisees, when they are earned and deemed collectible. The Company recognizes royalty revenue from its Branded Menu Program directly from the sale of Nathan’s products by its primary distributor or directly from the manufacturers.
 
Franchise fees and royalties that are not deemed to be collectible are not recognized as revenue until paid by the franchisee or until collectibility is deemed to be reasonably assured.
 
Revenue from sub-leasing properties is recognized in income as the revenue is earned and deemed collectible. Sub-lease rental income is presented net of associated lease costs in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings.
 
16.     Revenue Recognition – License Royalties
 
The Company earns revenue from royalties on the licensing of the use of its intellectual property in connection with certain products produced and sold by outside vendors. The use of the Company’s intellectual property must be approved by the Company prior to each specific application to ensure proper quality and a consistent image. Revenue from license royalties is recognized on a monthly basis when it is earned and deemed collectible.
 
17.      Business Concentrations and Geographical Information
 
The Company’s accounts receivable consist principally of receivables from franchisees for royalties and advertising contributions, from sales under the Branded Product Program, and from royalties from retail licensees. At March 29, 2015, three Branded Product customers represented 20%, 17% and 10%, of accounts receivable. At March 30, 2014, three Branded Product customers represented 23%, 13% and 11%, of accounts receivable. At March 31, 2013, one retail licensee and three Branded Product customers each represented 18%, 16%, 11% and 10%, respectively, of accounts receivable. One Branded Products customer accounted for 17%, 17% and 12% of total revenue for the years ended March 29, 2015, March 30, 2014 and March 31, 2013, respectively. One retail licensee accounted for 17% of total revenue for the year ended March 29, 2015.
 
The Company’s primary supplier of hot dogs represented
83%,
75% and
82% of product purchases for the fiscal years ended March 29, 2015, March 30, 2014 and March 31, 2013, respectively. The Company’s distributor of products to its Company-owned restaurants represented
5%,
5% and 7% of product purchases for the fiscal years ended March 29, 2015, March 30, 2014 and March 31, 2013, respectively.
 
The Company’s revenues for the fiscal years ended March 29, 2015, March 30, 2014 and March 31, 2013 were derived from the following geographic areas:
 
 
 
March 29,
2015
 
 
March 30, 2014
   
March 31, 2013
 
                         
Domestic (United States)
 
$
95,682
 
  $ 76,221     $ 68,025  
Non-domestic
 
 
3,430
 
    3,531       3,044  
 
 
$
99,112
 
  $ 79,752     $ 71,069  
 
 
The Company’s sales for the fiscal years ended March 29, 2015, March 30, 2014 and March 31, 2013 were derived from the following:
 
 
 
March 29,
2015
 
 
March 30, 2014
   
March 31, 2013
 
                         
Branded Products
 
$
58,948
 
  $ 51,877     $ 43,214  
Company-owned restaurants
 
 
15,874
 
    13,231       13,403  
Other
 
 
698
 
    413       39  
 
 
$
75,520
 
  $ 65,521     $ 56,656  
 
18.     Advertising
 
The Company administers an advertising fund on behalf of its franchisees to coordinate the marketing efforts of the Company. Under this arrangement, the Company collects and disburses fees paid by manufacturers, franchisees and Company-owned stores for national and regional advertising, promotional and public relations programs. Contributions to the advertising fund are based on specified percentages of net sales, generally ranging up to 2%. Company-owned store advertising expense, which is expensed as incurred, was $175, $147 and $144, for the fiscal years ended March 29, 2015, March 30, 2014 and March 31, 2013, respectively, and have been included within restaurant operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings.
 
19.     Stock-Based Compensation          
 
At March 29, 2015, the Company had one stock-based compensation plan in effect which is more fully described in Note L.
 
The cost of all share-based payments, including grants of restricted stock and stock options, is recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values measured at the grant date, or the date of any later modification, over the requisite service period. The Company recognizes compensation cost for unvested stock awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite vesting period.
 
 
20.     Classification of Operating Expenses
 
Cost of sales consists of the following:
 
 
o
The cost of food and other products sold by Company-operated restaurants, through the Branded Product Program and through other distribution channels.
 
o
The cost of labor and associated costs of in-store restaurant management and crew.
 
o
The cost of paper products used in Company-operated restaurants.
 
o
Other direct costs such as fulfillment, commissions, freight and samples.
 
Restaurant operating expenses consist of the following:
 
 
o
Occupancy costs of Company-operated restaurants.
 
o
Utility costs of Company-operated restaurants.
 
o
Repair and maintenance expenses of Company-operated restaurant facilities.
 
o
Marketing and advertising expenses done locally and contributions to advertising funds for Company-operated restaurants.
 
o
Insurance costs directly related to Company-operated restaurants.
 
21.     Income Taxes
 
The Company’s current provision for income taxes is based upon its estimated taxable income in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates, after considering the impact on taxable income of temporary differences resulting from different treatment of items for tax and financial reporting purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and any operating loss or tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income in those periods in which temporary differences become deductible. Should management determine that it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets would be established in the period such determination was made.
 
Uncertain Tax Positions
 
The Company has recorded liabilities for underpayment of income taxes and related interest and penalties for uncertain tax positions based on the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. The Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Nathan’s recognizes accrued interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits as part of the income tax provision.
 
2
2
.
   
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements
   
     
 
In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new accounting guidance changing the criteria for reporting discontinued operations. The revised definition of a discontinued operation includes those components of an entity or a group of components of an entity representing a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. The guidance eliminates the current requirement to assess continuing cash flow and continuing involvement with the disposal group. The revised definition also includes a business or nonprofit activity that, on acquisition, meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale. A disposal meeting the new definition is required to be reported as discontinued operations when the component of an entity or group of components of an entity meets the held for sale criteria, is actually disposed of by sales, or is disposed of through means other than a sale. The guidance is effective for Nathan’s for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014 and interim periods within those years, which for Nathan’s will be the first quarter of fiscal 2016 beginning on March 30, 2015. Early adoption is permitted for disposals that have not been previously reported in the financial statements. Nathan’s does not expect the adoption of this new guidance to have a material impact on its results of operations or financial position.
 
In May 2014, the FASB issued a new accounting standard that attempts to establish a uniform basis for recording revenue to virtually all industries’ financial statements, under U.S. GAAP. The revenue standard’s core principle is built on the contract between a vendor and a customer for the provision of goods and services. It attempts to depict the exchange of rights and obligations between the parties in the pattern of revenue recognition based on the consideration to which the vendor is entitled. In order to accomplish this objective, companies must evaluate the following five basic steps: (i) identify the contract with the customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. There are three basic transition methods that are available – full retrospective, retrospective with certain practical expedients, and a cumulative effect approach. Under the third alternative, an entity would apply the new revenue standard only to contracts that are incomplete under legacy U.S. GAAP at the date of initial application and recognize the cumulative effect of the new standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. Prior years would not be restated and additional disclosures would be required to enable users of the financial statements to understand the impact of adopting the new standard in the current year compared to prior years that are presented under legacy U.S. GAAP. Early adoption is prohibited under U.S. GAAP. Public companies must apply the new standard for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods therein, which for Nathan’s will be its first quarter of fiscal 2018, beginning on March 27, 2017.
 
On April 29, 2015, the FASB issued a proposal to defer the standard's effective date until 2018. On May 12, 2015, the FASB issued a second proposed update to the standard clarifying the distinction between revenue from licenses of intellectual property that represent a promise to deliver a good or service over time versus a promise to be satisfied at a point in time. The Company continues to monitor these proposals and currently expects to use the modified retrospective method, recognizing a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings when adopted, and is currently evaluating the impact of this new accounting standard on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
 
In August 2014, the FASB issued new guidance that requires management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. If such conditions exist, management will be required to include disclosures enabling users to understand those conditions and management’s plans to alleviate or mitigate those conditions. This new standard is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 16, 2016. This standard will take effect in Nathan’s fourth quarter of our fiscal year ending March 26, 2017.
 
In January 2015, the FASB issued new guidance to simplify the income statement presentation requirements by eliminating the seldom-used concept of extraordinary items. Extraordinary items are events and transactions that are distinguished by their unusual nature and by the infrequency of their occurrence. Eliminating the extraordinary classification simplifies the income statement presentation by no longer segregating such extraordinary items from the ordinary results of operations and separately stating the amount, net of tax along with the effect on earnings per share. This new standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods therein, which for Nathan’s would be its first quarter of fiscal 2017 beginning March 28, 2016. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. Nathan’s expects to early adopt this standard in the first quarter of our fiscal year ending March 27, 2016 that begins on March 30, 2015. Nathan’s does not expect the adoption of this new guidance to have a material impact on its results of operations or financial position.
 
In April 2015, the FASB issued new guidance to simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs. Under the new standard, debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability shall be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction to the carrying value of the debt and not as an asset. The amendment is effective for public entities with fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those periods and will be applied retroactively.  Early adoption of the amendment is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. Nathan’s has early adopted this new standard in its financial statements beginning with the period ended March 29, 2015. The adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on its results of operations or financial position.
 
The Company does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting standards, when adopted, will have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.