XML 59 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Accounting Policies, by Policy (Policies)
12 Months Ended
Mar. 30, 2014
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Principles of Consolidation


The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Fiscal Period, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Fiscal Year


The Company’s fiscal year ends on the last Sunday in March, which results in a 52 or 53-week reporting period. The results of operations and cash flows for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2014 contained 52 weeks. The results of operations and cash flows for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2013 contained 53 weeks and March 28, 2012 contained 52 weeks.

Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Use of Estimates


The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.


Significant estimates made by management in preparing the consolidated financial statements include revenue recognition, the allowance for doubtful accounts, valuation of stock-based compensation, accounting for income taxes, and the valuation of goodwill, intangible assets and other long-lived assets.

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Cash and Cash Equivalents


The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents amounted to $330 and $172 at March 30, 2014 and March 31, 2013, respectively. Substantially all of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents are in excess of government insurance.


Restricted cash, at March 31, 2013, represents amount held on deposit to secure Nathan’s obligation related to its litigation accrual (Note L.).

Inventory, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Inventories


Inventories, which are stated at the lower of cost or market value, consist primarily of food items and supplies. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method.

Marketable Securities, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Marketable Securities


The Company determines the appropriate classification of securities at the time of purchase and reassesses the appropriateness of the classification at each reporting date. At March 30, 2014 and March 31, 2013, all marketable securities held by the Company have been classified as available-for-sale and, as a result, are stated at fair value, based upon quoted market prices for similar assets as determined in active markets or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable for substantially the full-term of the asset, with unrealized gains and losses included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Realized gains and losses on the sale of securities are determined on a specific identification basis. Interest income is recorded when it is earned and deemed realizable by the Company.

Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Property and Equipment


Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Major improvements are capitalized and minor replacements, maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation and amortization are calculated on the straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the estimated useful life or the lease term of the related asset. The estimated useful lives are as follows:


Building and improvements (in years)

    5- 25  

Machinery, equipment, furniture and fixtures (in years)

    3- 15  

Leasehold improvements (in years)

    5- 20  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Goodwill and Intangible Assets


Goodwill and intangible assets consist of (i) goodwill of $95 resulting from the acquisition of Nathan’s in 1987; and (ii) trademarks, trade names and other intellectual property of $1,353 in connection with Arthur Treacher’s.


The Company’s goodwill and intangible assets are deemed to have indefinite lives and, accordingly, are not amortized, but are evaluated for impairment at least annually, but more often whenever changes in facts and circumstances occur which may indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. As of March 30, 2014 and March 31, 2013, the Company performed its required annual impairment test of goodwill and intangible assets and has determined no impairment is deemed to exist.

Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Long-lived Assets


Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Impairment is measured by comparing the carrying value of the long-lived assets to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from use of the assets and their ultimate disposition. In instances where impairment is determined to exist, the Company writes down the asset to its fair value based on the present value of estimated future cash flows.


Impairment losses are recorded on long-lived assets on a restaurant-by-restaurant basis whenever impairment factors are determined to be present. The Company considers a history of restaurant operating losses to be its primary indicator of potential impairment for individual restaurant locations. As a result of Hurricane Sandy, our Coney Island restaurant sustained significant damage which resulted in the write-off of $449 related to destroyed property (Note L.4). The restaurant was fully repaired and re-opened on May 20, 2013. No long-lived assets were deemed impaired during the fiscal years ended March 30, 2014, March 31, 2013 and March 25, 2012.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Fair Value of Financial Instruments


Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price).


The fair value hierarchy, as outlined in the applicable accounting guidance, is based on inputs to valuation techniques that are used to measure fair value that are either observable or unobservable.  Observable inputs reflect assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on market data obtained from independent sources while unobservable inputs reflect a reporting entity’s pricing based upon their own market assumptions. 


The fair value hierarchy consists of the following three levels:


 

Level 1 - inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for an identical asset or liability in an active market


 

Level 2 - inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for a similar asset or liability in an active market or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability


 

Level 3 - inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement of the asset or liability


The use of observable market inputs (quoted market prices) when measuring fair value and, specifically, the use of Level 1 quoted prices to measure fair value are required whenever possible. The determination of where an asset or liability falls in the hierarchy requires significant judgment. The Company evaluates its hierarchy disclosures quarterly and based on various factors, it is possible that an asset or liability may be classified differently from year to year.


The following table presents assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 30, 2014 and March 31, 2013 based upon the valuation hierarchy:


March 30, 2014

 

Level 1

   

Level 2

   

Level 3

   

Carrying Value

 

Marketable securities

  $ -     $ 11,187     $ -     $ 11,187  

Total assets at fair value

  $ -     $ 11,187     $ -     $ 11,187  

March 31, 2013

 

Level 1

   

Level 2

   

Level 3

   

Carrying

Value

 

Marketable securities

  $ -     $ 12,307     $ -     $ 12,307  

Total assets at fair value

  $ -     $ 12,307     $ -     $ 12,307  

Nathan’s marketable securities, which consist primarily of municipal bonds, are not actively traded. The valuation of such bonds is based upon quoted market prices for similar bonds currently trading in an active market or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable for substantially the full term of the asset.


The carrying amounts of cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term maturity of the instruments.


The majority of the Company’s non-financial assets and liabilities are not required to be carried at fair value on a recurring basis. However, the Company is required on a non-recurring basis to use fair value measurements when analyzing asset impairment as it relates to goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets and long-lived assets. The Company utilized the income approach (Level 3 inputs) which utilized cash flow forecasts for future income and were discounted to present value in performing its annual impairment testing of intangible assets.

Start-up Activities, Cost Policy [Policy Text Block]

Start-up Costs


Pre-opening and similar restaurant costs are expensed as incurred.

Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Revenue Recognition - Branded Product Program


The Company recognizes sales from the Branded Product Program and certain products sold from the Branded Menu Program upon delivery to Nathan’s customers via third party common carrier. Rebates provided to customers are classified as a reduction to sales.


   13.      Revenue Recognition - Company-owned Restaurants


Sales by Company-owned restaurants, which are typically paid in cash or credit card by the customer, are recognized at the point of sale. Sales are presented net of sales tax.


    14.     Revenue Recognition - Franchising Operations


In connection with its franchising operations, the Company receives initial franchise fees, area development fees, royalties, and in certain cases, revenue from sub-leasing restaurant properties to franchisees.


Franchise and area development fees, which are typically received prior to completion of the revenue recognition process, are initially recorded as deferred revenue. Initial franchise fees, which are non-refundable, are recognized as income when substantially all services to be performed by Nathan’s and conditions relating to the sale of the franchise have been performed or satisfied, which generally occurs when the franchised restaurant commences operations.


The following services are typically provided by the Company prior to the opening of a franchised restaurant:


 

o

Approval of all site selections to be developed.


 

o

Provision of architectural plans suitable for restaurants to be developed.


 

o

Assistance in establishing building design specifications, reviewing construction compliance and equipping the restaurant.


 

o

Provision of appropriate menus to coordinate with the restaurant design and location to be developed.


 

o

Provision of management training for the new franchisee and selected staff.


 

o

Assistance with the initial operations of restaurants being developed.


At March 30, 2014 and March 31, 2013, $234 and $278, respectively, of deferred franchise fees are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. For the fiscal years ended March 30, 2014, March 31, 2013 and March 25, 2012, the Company earned franchise fees of $863, $852, and $920, respectively, from new unit openings, transfers, co-branding and forfeitures.


Development fees are nonrefundable and the related agreements require the franchisee to open a specified number of restaurants in the development area within a specified time period or the agreements may be canceled by the Company. Revenue from development agreements is deferred and shall be recognized, with an appropriate provision for estimated uncollectable amounts, when all material services or conditions to the sale have been substantially performed by the franchisor.


If substantial obligations under the development agreement are not dependent on the number of individual franchise locations to be opened, substantial performance shall be determined using the same criteria applicable to an individual franchise, which is generally the opening of the first location pursuant to the development agreement. If substantial performance is dependent on the number of locations, then the development fee is deferred and recognized ratably over the term of the agreement, as restaurants in the development area commence operations on a pro rata basis to the minimum number of restaurants required to be open, or at the time the development agreement is effectively canceled. At March 30, 2014 and March 31, 2013, $200 and $401, respectively, of deferred development fee revenue is included in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.


The following is a summary of franchise openings and closings for the Nathan’s franchise restaurant system for the fiscal years ended March 30, 2014, March 31, 2013 and March 25, 2012:


 
 

March 30,

2014

   

March 31

,2013

   

March 25,

2012

 
                         

Franchised restaurants operating at the beginning of the period

    303       299       264  
                         

New franchised restaurants opened during the period

    56       40       67  
                         

Franchised restaurants closed during the period

    (35 )     (36 )     (32 )
                         

Franchised restaurants operating at the end of the period

    324       303       299  

The Company recognizes franchise royalties on a monthly basis, which are generally based upon a percentage of sales made by the Company’s franchisees, when they are earned and deemed collectible. The Company recognizes royalty revenue from its Branded Menu Program directly from the sale of Nathan’s products by its primary distributor or directly from the manufacturers.


Franchise fees and royalties that are not deemed to be collectible are not recognized as revenue until paid by the franchisee or until collectibility is deemed to be reasonably assured.


Revenue from sub-leasing properties is recognized in income as the revenue is earned and deemed collectible. Sub-lease rental income is presented net of associated lease costs in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings.


15. Revenue Recognition – License Royalties


The Company earns revenue from royalties on the licensing of the use of its intellectual property in connection with certain products produced and sold by outside vendors. The use of the Company’s intellectual property must be approved by the Company prior to each specific application to ensure proper quality and a consistent image. Revenue from license royalties is recognized on a monthly basis when it is earned and deemed collectible.

Concentration Risk, Credit Risk, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Business Concentrations and Geographical Information


The Company’s accounts receivable consist principally of receivables from franchisees for royalties and advertising contributions, from sales under the Branded Product Program, and from royalties from retail licensees. At March 30, 2014, three Branded Product customers represented 23%, 13% and 11%, of accounts receivable. At March 31, 2013, one retail licensee and three Branded Product customers each represented 18%, 16%, 11% and 10%, respectively, of accounts receivable. One Branded Products customer accounted for 17% and 12% of total revenue for the years ended March 30, 2014 and March 31, 2013, respectively. No franchisee, retail licensee or Branded Product customer accounted for 10% or more of total revenues during the fiscal year ended March 25, 2012.


The Company’s primary supplier of hot dogs represented 75%, 82% and 79% of product purchases for the fiscal years ended March 30, 2014, March 31, 2013 and March 25, 2012, respectively. The Company’s distributor of products to its Company-owned restaurants represented 5%, 7% and 8% of product purchases for the fiscal years ended March 30, 2014, March 31, 2013 and March 25, 2012, respectively.


The Company’s revenues for the fiscal years ended March 30, 2014, March 31, 2013 and March 25, 2012 were derived from the following geographic areas:


   

March 30,

2014

   

March 31,

2013

   

March 25,

2012

 
                         

Domestic (United States)

  $ 79,396     $ 68,499     $ 64,534  

Non-domestic

    3,531       3,044       1,688  
    $ 82,927     $ 71,543     $ 66,222  

The Company’s sales for the fiscal years ended March 30, 2014, March 31, 2013 and March 25, 2012 were derived from the following:


   

March 30,

2014

   

March 31,

2013

   

March 25,

2012

 
                         

Branded Products

  $ 51,877     $ 43,214     $ 38,506  

Company-owned restaurants

    13,231       13,403       13,209  

Other

    413       39       654  
    $ 65,521     $ 56,656     $ 52,369  
Advertising Costs, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Advertising


The Company administers an advertising fund on behalf of its franchisees to coordinate the marketing efforts of the Company. Under this arrangement, the Company collects and disburses fees paid by manufacturers, franchisees and Company-owned stores for national and regional advertising, promotional and public relations programs. Contributions to the advertising fund are based on specified percentages of net sales, generally ranging up to 2%. Company-owned store advertising expense, which is expensed as incurred, was $147, $144, and $227, for the fiscal years ended March 30, 2014, March 31, 2013 and March 25, 2012, respectively, and have been included within restaurant operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings.

Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block]

Stock-Based Compensation          


At March 30, 2014, the Company had one stock-based compensation plan in effect which is more fully described in Note K.


The cost of all share-based payments, including grants of restricted stock and stock options, is recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values measured at the grant date, or the date of any later modification, over the requisite service period. The Company recognizes compensation cost for unvested stock awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite vesting period.

Cost of Sales, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Classification of Operating Expenses


Cost of sales consists of the following:


 

o

The cost of food and other products sold by Company-operated restaurants, through the Branded Product Program and through other distribution channels.


 

o

The cost of labor and associated costs of in-store restaurant management and crew.


 

o

The cost of paper products used in Company-operated restaurants.


 

o

Other direct costs such as fulfillment, commissions, freight and samples.


Restaurant operating expenses consist of the following:


 

o

Occupancy costs of Company-operated restaurants.


 

o

Utility costs of Company-operated restaurants.


 

o

Repair and maintenance expenses of Company-operated restaurant facilities.


 

o

Marketing and advertising expenses done locally and contributions to advertising funds for Company-operated restaurants.


 

o

Insurance costs directly related to Company-operated restaurants.

Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Income Taxes


The Company’s current provision for income taxes is based upon its estimated taxable income in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates, after considering the impact on taxable income of temporary differences resulting from different treatment of items for tax and financial reporting purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and any operating loss or tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income in those periods in which temporary differences become deductible. Should management determine that it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets would be established in the period such determination was made.


Uncertain Tax Positions


The Company has recorded liabilities for underpayment of income taxes and related interest and penalties for uncertain tax positions based on the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. The Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Nathan’s recognizes accrued interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits as part of the income tax provision.

Reclassification, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Reclassifications


Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform with current year presentation.

New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements        


In April 2014, the FASB issued new accounting guidance changing the criteria for reporting discontinued operations. The revised definition of a discontinued operation includes those components of an entity or a group of components of an entity representing a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. The guidance eliminates the current requirement to assess continuing cash flow and continuing involvement with the disposal group. The revised definition also includes a business or nonprofit activity that, on acquisition, meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale. A disposal meeting the new definition is required to be reported as discontinued operations when the component of an entity or group of components of an entity meets the held for sale criteria, is actually disposed of by sales, or is disposed of through means other than a sale. The guidance is effective for Nathan’s for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014 and interim periods within those years, which for Nathan’s will be the first quarter fiscal 2016 beginning March 30, 2015. Early adoption is permitted for disposals that have not been previously reported in the financial statements. Nathan’s does not expect the adoption of this new guidance to have a material impact on the results of operations or financial position.


In July 2012, the FASB issued new accounting guidance on testing indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. The new guidance provides the entity with the option to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived asset is less than its carrying value. If it is not, then no further analysis is required otherwise then the previously required quantitative testing is required. Nathan’s adopted the new guidance beginning with its first quarter of fiscal 2014. The adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on the results of operations or financial position.


The Company does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting standards, when adopted, will have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.