-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, I/F3SddLK9mRUrvo7X43sm4R+cHw6sK0AZ7iiZ4XNI4y1jLcwtppw3XsLHnYBP9m uH4XRx9FPM2jOe37Z9y0jQ== 0001144204-10-067173.txt : 20101217 0001144204-10-067173.hdr.sgml : 20101217 20101217165806 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001144204-10-067173 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 8-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 2 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20101217 ITEM INFORMATION: Other Events ITEM INFORMATION: Financial Statements and Exhibits FILED AS OF DATE: 20101217 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20101217 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: NATHANS FAMOUS INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000069733 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: RETAIL-EATING PLACES [5812] IRS NUMBER: 113166443 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 0329 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 8-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-03189 FILM NUMBER: 101260486 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 1400 OLD COUNTRY RD STREET 2: STE 400 CITY: WESTBURY STATE: NY ZIP: 11590 BUSINESS PHONE: 5163388500 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 1400 OLD COUNTRY RD STREET 2: STE 400 CITY: WESTBURY STATE: NY ZIP: 11590 8-K 1 v205961_8-k.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):  December 17, 2010
 
NATHAN'S FAMOUS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware
1-3189
11-3166443
(State or other jurisdiction
(Commission
(IRS Employer
of incorporation)
File Number)
Identification No.)

 
One Jericho Plaza, Jericho, New York
11753
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)


Registrant's telephone number, including area code
(516) 338-8500
 
N/A
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)

 
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

o
Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
o
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
o
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
o
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-14(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
 

 
Item 8.01
Other Events.
 
On December 17, 2010, Nathan’s Famous, Inc. issued a press release regarding a court ruling received in connection with its pending litigation against its licensee, SMG, Inc., in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois.

As previously reported, Nathan’s has been engaged in litigation with SMG regarding the License Agreement between them.  The main issue in the case is whether Nathan’s is entitled to terminate the License Agreement early.  On December 17, 2010, the Court ruled that Nathan’s is not entitled to do so.  The License Agreement is scheduled to terminate on March 1, 2014.

The other issue in the litigation relates to claims made by SMG regarding the manner in which Nathan’s profited from the sale of its proprietary seasonings to SMG.  As previously reported, the Court granted SMG’s motion for summary judgment on this issue on October 13, 2010.  At that time, Nathan’s announced that it estimated the damages relating to the seasoning claim to be between $2.9 Million and $6 Million, and that because it was unable to determine the actual amount of damages until the hearing on damages occurred, Nathan’s recorded a litigation accrual in the amount of $2.9 Million before tax as part of its results for its second quarter ended September 26, 2010.  Based on today’s ruling by the Court, Nathan’s estimates the amount of seasoning damages will be approximately $4.9 Million before tax.  Accordingly, Nathan’s expects to record an additional litigation accrual of approximately $2 Million in its third quarter ending December 26, 2010.

Although the Court issued its ruling on December 17, 2010, Nathan’s does not expect final judgment to be entered by the Court until January 19, 2011.

Nathan’s is currently evaluating its legal alternatives, including an appeal of the Court’s ruling.

Nathan’s has issued a press release with respect to the foregoing. A copy of the press release is filed as Exhibit 99.1 hereto.
 

Item 9.01
Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(d) 
Exhibits.

The following exhibits are filed herewith:


Exhibit No.
Description
   
99.1
Press release dated December 17, 2010
 



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


 
NATHAN'S FAMOUS, INC.
 
       
       
 
By:
/s/ Ronald G DeVos
 
 
Ronald DeVos
 
 
Vice-President Finance
 
 
and Chief Financial Officer
 
 
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 


Dated:  December 17, 2010





 

EX-99.1 2 v205961_ex99-1.htm
Exhibit 99.1

                             
 
FOR:   NATHAN’S FAMOUS, INC.
     
COMPANY    Ronald G. DeVos, Vice President – Finance and CFO
CONTACT:    (516) 338-8500 ext. 229

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


NATHAN’S FAMOUS, INC.
REPORTS COURT RULING

JERICHO, NY, December 17, 2010 – Nathan’s Famous, Inc. (NASDAQ:NATH) today reported that it received a ruling in the pending litigation between it and its licensee, SMG, Inc., in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois.

As previously reported, Nathan’s has been engaged in litigation with SMG regarding the License Agreement between them.  The main issue in the case is whether Nathan’s is entitled to terminate the License Agreement early.  On December 17, 2010, the Court ruled that Nathan’s is not entitled to do so.  The License Agreement is scheduled to terminate on March 1, 2014.

The other issue in the litigation relates to claims made by SMG regarding the manner in which Nathan’s profited from the sale of its proprietary seasonings to SMG.  As previously reported, the Court granted SMG’s motion for summary judgment on this issue on October 13, 2010.  At that time, Nathan’s announced that it estimated the damages relating to the seasoning claim to be between $2.9 Million and $6 Million, and that because it was unable to determine the actual amount of damages until the hearing on damages occurred, Nathan’s recorded a litigation accrual in the amount of $2.9 Million before tax as part of its results for its second quarter ended September 26, 2010.  Based on today’s ruling by the Court, Nathan’s estimates the amount of seasoning damages will be approximately $4.9 Million before tax.  Accordingly, Nathan’s expects to record an additional litigation accrual of approximately $2 Million in its third quarter ending December 26, 2010.

Although the Court issued its ruling on December 17, 2010, Nathan’s does not expect final judgment to be entered by the Court until January 19, 2011.

Nathan’s is currently evaluating its legal alternatives, including an appeal of the Court’s ruling.

About Nathan’s Famous

Nathan’s products are currently distributed in 50 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, The Cayman Islands and four foreign countries through its restaurant system, foodservice sales programs and retail licensing activities.  The Nathan’s restaurant system currently consists of 257 units, comprised of 252 franchised or licensed units and five company-owned units (including one seasonal unit).  For additional information about Nathan’s, please visit our website at www.nathansfamous.com.

 
 

 
Except for historical information contained in this news release, the matters discussed are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.  Words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, which are based on the current belief of the Company’s management, as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to the Company’s management.  Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are the following: the outcome of any appeals of the Court’s decision, the timing of any cash payment due under the judgment, and the tax impact of the judgment; the effect of business and economic conditions; the impact of competitive products and pricing; the ability to obtain an adequate supply of beef and other food products at competitive prices; capacity; the regulatory and trade environment; and the risk factors reported from time to time in the Company’s SEC reports.  The Company does not undertake any obligation to update such forward-looking statements.

 
 

 
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----