SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.      )

Filed by the Registrant x

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o  Preliminary Proxy Statement	o  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x  Definitive Proxy Statement
o  Definitive Additional Materials
o  Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-11(c) or § 240.14a-12

Nashua Corporation

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x No fee required.

o $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii), or 14a-6(i)(1), or 14a-6(i)(2) or Item 22(a)(2) of Schedule 14A.

o $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 14a-6(i)(3).

o     Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

          (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

          (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

          (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

          (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

          (5) Total fee paid:

o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

          (1) Amount Previously Paid:

          (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

          (3) Filing Party:

          (4) Date Filed:

NASHUA CORPORATION

11 Trafalgar Square, Suite 201

Nashua, New Hampshire 03063

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held on May 4, 2005

To the Stockholders of Nashua Corporation:

      NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Nashua Corporation (the “Company”) will be held at the Company’s offices at 11 Trafalgar Square, Suite 201, Nashua, New Hampshire, on Wednesday, May 4, 2005 at 8:00 a.m., local time, for the following purposes:

1.	To elect six directors for terms of one year each.
2.	To act upon any other matters as may properly be brought before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

      The Board of Directors has no knowledge of any other business to be transacted at the meeting.

      The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on March 16, 2005, as the record date for determining the stockholders having the right to notice of and to vote at the meeting.

      The Company’s Summary Annual Report and Form 10-K, which includes financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, accompany this notice of meeting and the enclosed proxy statement.

By order of the Board of Directors,

Robert S. Amrein

Vice President, General

Counsel and Clerk/ Secretary

Nashua, New Hampshire

March 25, 2005

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please complete, date, and sign

the enclosed proxy and mail it promptly in the enclosed envelope.

No postage is required if mailed in the United States.

PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
Voting and Solicitation
	Record Date and Voting of Proxy		1
	Quorum and Votes Required		1
	Proxy Solicitation Costs		2
Proposal 1 — Election of Directors			2
	General		2
	Nominees for Directors		2
	Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors		4
	Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee		5
	Leadership and Compensation Committee		5
	Governance and Nominating Committee		5
	Director Candidates		6
	Communications from Stockholders and Other Interested Parties		6
	Corporate Governance Framework		7
	Compensation of Directors		7
	Certain Business Relationships of Directors and Executive Officers		7
Ownership of Securities			8
	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners		8
	Security Ownership of Management		10
	Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance		11
	Equity Compensation Plan Information		11
Executive Compensation and Other Information			12
	Summary of Cash and Certain Other Information		12
	Stock Options		13
	Pension Plan		14
	Executive Severance Agreements		14
	Executive and Management Incentive Plans		15
	Leadership and Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation		15
	Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation		18
Report of the Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee			18
Independent Auditors			18
	Independent Auditors Fees and Services		19
	Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee’s Preapproval Policies and Procedures		19
Stock Performance Graph			20
Submission of Stockholder Proposals — 2006 Annual Meeting			20
Form 10-K and Householding			21
Other Matters			21
Appendix A — Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee Charter			A-1

i

NASHUA CORPORATION

11 Trafalgar Square, Suite 201

Nashua, New Hampshire 03063

PROXY STATEMENT

2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

       This Proxy Statement is furnished to the stockholders of Nashua Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (“Nashua” or the “Company”) in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Company’s Board of Directors for use at the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Wednesday, May 4, 2005, at 8:00 a.m., local time, at the Company’s offices at 11 Trafalgar Square, Suite 201, Nashua, New Hampshire 03063, and at any adjournments of that meeting. The notice of meeting, this proxy statement, the enclosed proxy and the Company’s Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2004 are being mailed to stockholders on or about March 29, 2005.

      At the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the stockholders of the Company are being asked to consider and vote upon the election of six directors for a term of one year each.

Record Date and Voting of Proxy

      The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on March 16, 2005 as the record date for determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. At the close of business on the record date, there were 6,219,734 shares of Nashua’s common stock outstanding. Each share entitles the record holder to one vote on each of the matters to be voted upon at the meeting.

      All proxies will be voted in accordance with the instructions of the stockholder, and if no choice is specified, the proxies will be voted “for” the election of the directors. Any proxy may be revoked by a stockholder at any time before its exercise by delivery of a written revocation to the Clerk/ Secretary of the Company. Attendance at the meeting will not itself constitute revocation of a proxy unless the stockholder affirmatively revokes the proxy.

Quorum and Votes Required

      The holders of a majority of the shares of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the annual meeting shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the annual meeting. Shares of the Company’s common stock present in person or represented by proxy, including shares that abstain or do not vote with respect to one or more of the matters presented at the annual meeting, will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists at the annual meeting.

      The affirmative vote of the holders of a plurality of the shares voting on the matter is required for the election of directors.

      Shares held by stockholders who abstain from voting as to a particular matter, and shares held in “street name” by brokers or nominees who indicate on their proxies that they do not have discretionary authority to vote such shares as to a particular matter, will not be counted as shares voted in favor of such matter and will not be counted as shares voting on such a matter. Under rules of the New York Stock Exchange, brokers who hold shares in street name for customers are prohibited from giving a proxy to vote such shares without specific instructions from such customers for “non-discretionary” or “non-routine” proposals. Accordingly, abstentions and “broker non-votes” will have no effect on the voting on the election of directors because the matter requires the affirmative vote of a plurality of the shares voting on that matter.

Proxy Solicitation Costs

      The cost of solicitation of proxies will be borne by Nashua. In addition to solicitations by mail, certain directors, officers and employees of Nashua may solicit proxies in person or by use of other communication media. Nashua will reimburse banks, brokerage firms and others for forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners of Nashua common stock. Nashua has also engaged Georgeson Shareholder to assist in the solicitation of proxies and has agreed to pay $7,500 and out-of-pocket expenses for such efforts.

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

General

      The Company’s Board of Directors has fixed the number of directors to be elected at the annual meeting at six, and proposes the election of the individuals listed below as directors of the Company. Each current director of the Company has been nominated for reelection. The Company’s directors are elected annually by the stockholders and hold office until successors are elected and qualified or until death, resignation or removal. Any vacancies and newly created directorships resulting from an increase in the authorized number of directors may be filled until the next annual meeting of stockholders by the majority of directors then in office.

      The persons named in the enclosed proxy will vote to elect each of the director nominees listed below, unless the proxy is marked otherwise. Each director nominee will be elected to hold office until the annual meeting of stockholders held in 2006 and until his successor is elected and qualified. Each of the nominees has indicated his willingness to serve as a director if elected; however, if any nominee becomes unable to serve, the persons named as proxies may, in their discretion, vote for another nominee. The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unable to serve if elected.

      There are no family relationships among the director nominees and executive officers of the Company.

      For each nominee for director, there follows information given by each concerning his principal occupation, business experience for at least the past five years, the names of other publicly held companies of which he serves as a director, his age and the length of service as a director of the Company.

Nominees for Director:

Andrew B. Albert Age 59 Director since 2000	Mr. Albert has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Nashua since December 2000, President since April 2000 and a director since May 2000. He also served as Chief Operating Officer of Nashua from April 2000 to December 2000. Prior to joining Nashua, Mr. Albert served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Rittenhouse Paper Company.
L. Scott Barnard Age 62 Director since 2003	Mr. Barnard is the owner and Managing Senior Partner of Programmix, LLC, a sales and marketing firm he founded in 2001. From 1968 to 2000, Mr. Barnard was with Champion International Corporation, where he held positions of increasing responsibility, including Executive Vice President, Sales and Distribution, and President of Champion Export Corporation, a forest products company.
Avrum Gray Age 69 Director since 2000	Mr. Gray has served as Chairman of G-Bar Limited Partnership, an independent options trading firm, since 1981. He was Chairman of Lynch Systems, Inc., a glass press supplier, from 1995 through 2001. Mr. Gray is a director of Lynch Corporation, SL Industries, Inc. and Material Science Corporation.

2

George R. Mrkonic, Jr. Age 52 Director since 2000	Mr. Mrkonic served as Vice Chairman of Borders Group, Inc., a retailer of books and music, from December 1994 until his retirement in January 2002. He was President of Borders Group, Inc. from December 1994 until January 1997. Mr. Mrkonic is a director of Syntel, Inc., Guitar Center, Inc. and Brinker International, Inc.
James F. Orr III Age 62 Director since 1989	Mr. Orr has served as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Rockefeller Foundation, a philanthropic organization, since 2001. From May 2000 through December 31, 2001, Mr. Orr served as President and Chief Executive Officer of United Asset Management Corporation, an investment management firm. Mr. Orr served as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of UNUM Corporation, an insurance company, from 1988 until his retirement in November 1999. Mr. Orr is a director of The Stride Rite Corporation and Mellon Financial Corporation.
Mark E. Schwarz Age 44 Director since 2001	Mr. Schwarz is the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Portfolio Manager of Newcastle Capital Management, L.P., a private investment management firm he founded in 1992, and is the general partner of Newcastle Partners, L.P. Mr. Schwarz is also Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hallmark Financial Services, Inc., Chairman of Bell Industries, Inc., Chairman of New Century Equity Holdings Corp., Chairman of Pizza Inn, Inc. and a director of SL Industries, Inc. and Web Financial Corporation.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE.

3

Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors

      The Board of Directors is responsible for supervision of the overall affairs of the Company. To assist it in carrying out its duties, the Board has delegated certain authority to several committees. In 2004, the Board of Directors held five regular meetings, three special meetings and acted by unanimous written consent once. Each of the directors attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and committees on which he then served in 2004. The Company’s Corporate Governance Framework states that, effective February 2005, directors have a responsibility to ensure proper representation at annual meetings of stockholders. Two directors attended the 2004 annual meeting of stockholders.

      The Board has established the position of Lead Director, who acts as Chairman of the Board in the Chairman’s absence, chairs the Governance and Nominating Committee and leads all activities related to Chief Executive Officer performance and succession. Mr. Orr is the Board’s current Lead Director and presides at executive sessions of non-management directors.

      The Company has three standing committees of the Board of Directors: the Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee, the Leadership and Compensation Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee. Each of these committees operates under a written charter approved by the Board of Directors. A copy of each charter, as well as our Corporate Governance Framework and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, is available under the “Investor Relations” section of the Company’s website at www.nashua.com. We intend to disclose any amendments to, or waivers from, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on our website at www.nashua.com. Also, a copy of the charter of the Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A. The current members of the committees of the Board of Directors are as follows:

Audit/Finance and	Leadership and	Governance and
Investment Committee	Compensation Committee	Nominating Committee
Avrum Gray, Chairman	George R. Mrkonic, Jr., Chairman	James F. Orr III, Chairman
L. Scott Barnard	L. Scott Barnard	Avrum Gray
James F. Orr III	Avrum Gray	George R. Mrkonic, Jr.
	Mark E. Schwarz

      The Board has determined that all of the members of each of the Board’s three standing committees are independent as defined under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, including, in the case of all members of the Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee, the additional independence requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act.

      Under NYSE rules, a director of the Company will only qualify as “independent” if the Board of Directors affirmatively determines that he or she has no material relationship with the Company (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company). The Board of Directors has established a framework to assist it in determining whether a director has a material relationship with the Company. Under this framework, a director is not considered to have a material relationship with the Company if he or she is independent under Section 303A.02(b) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual and he or she:

•  is an executive officer of another company that does business with the Company, if the annual sales to, or purchases from, the Company are equal to or less than two percent or $1 million, whichever is greater, of the annual revenues of the company he or she serves as an executive officer;

•  is an executive officer of another company which is indebted to the Company, or to which the Company is indebted, if the total amount of either company’s indebtedness to the other is less than five percent of the total consolidated assets of the company he or she serves as an executive officer; or

4

•  serves as an officer, director or trustee of a tax exempt organization if the Company’s discretionary charitable contributions to the organization are less than the greater of $1 million, or 2% of that organization’s consolidated gross revenues.

In addition, ownership of a significant amount of the Company’s stock, by itself, does not constitute a material relationship.

      For relationships not covered by the guidelines set forth above, the determination of whether a material relationship exists is made by the other members of the Board of Directors who are independent.

      The Board of Directors has determined that none of L. Scott Barnard, Avrum Gray, George R. Mrkonic, Jr., James F. Orr III or Mark E. Schwarz has a material relationship with the Company and that each of these directors is “independent” as determined under Section 303A.02(b) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. In addition, in the case of all members of the Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee, the additional independence requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act have been met.

Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee

      The Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee is responsible for overseeing the Company’s financial reporting process. In doing so, the committee reviews the independent public auditor’s reports and audit findings, the scope and plans for future audit programs, annual and quarterly financial statements, accounting, financial and internal controls of the Company, information systems, risk management activities and compliance programs, prepares the audit committee report, meets independently with the Company’s internal auditing staff, independent auditors and management, oversees the Company’s internal audit function and establishes and maintains the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, disclosure controls and procedures and code of business conduct and ethics. The Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee appoints, evaluates, retains and sets the compensation of the independent public auditors and reviews their procedures for ensuring their independence with respect to the services performed for the Company. The committee establishes policies regarding hiring employees from the independent auditor and procedures for the receipt and retention of accounting related complaints and concerns. The Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee is also responsible for supervising policies and decisions relating to financing and major cash management, pension fund and capital investment decisions. The Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee is composed of outside directors who are not officers or employees of the Company. The Board has determined that Mr. Gray is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 401(h) of Regulation S-K of the Exchange Act. In addition, the Board has determined that each member of the Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee has sufficient knowledge in financial and auditing matters to serve on the Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee. No current member of the Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee serves on the audit committees of more than two other public companies. The Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee held seven meetings in 2004.

Leadership and Compensation Committee

      The Leadership and Compensation Committee is responsible for annually reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to Chief Executive Officer compensation, reviewing and approving the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, reviewing executive salaries, overseeing and administering any bonus, incentive compensation and stock option plans and reviewing, approving and recommending the Board of Directors to approve the salaries and other benefits of our executive officers and directors. The Leadership and Compensation Committee held five meetings in 2004.

Governance and Nominating Committee

      The Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for identifying individuals qualified to become Board members, recommending to the Board the persons to be nominated by the Board for election as directors at the annual meeting of stockholders, developing and recommending to the Board a set of corporate governance principles, overseeing the evaluation of the Board and of the Company’s senior

5

management and making recommendations regarding management succession planning. The Governance and Nominating Committee held one meeting in 2004. Stockholders wishing to recommend director candidates for consideration by the committee may do so by writing to the Clerk/ Secretary of the Company, giving the recommended candidate’s name, biographical data and qualifications.

Director Candidates

      The process followed by the Governance and Nominating Committee to identify and evaluate director candidates includes requests to Board members and others for recommendations, meetings from time to time to evaluate biographical information and background material relating to potential candidates and interviews of selected candidates by members of the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board of Directors. The Governance and Nominating Committee is authorized to retain advisers and consultants and to compensate them for their services. The Governance and Nominating Committee did not retain such advisers or consultants during fiscal 2004.

      In considering whether to recommend any particular candidate for inclusion in the Board’s slate of recommended director nominees, the Governance and Nominating Committee will apply the criteria set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Framework. These criteria include the candidate’s integrity, business acumen, knowledge of the Company’s business and industry, experience, diligence, conflicts of interest and the ability to act in the interests of all stockholders. The Governance and Nominating Committee does not assign specific weights to particular criteria and no particular criterion is a prerequisite for each prospective nominee. The Company believes that the backgrounds and qualifications of its directors, considered as a group, should provide a composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that will allow the Board of Directors to fulfill its responsibilities.

      Stockholders may recommend individuals to the Governance and Nominating Committee for consideration as potential director candidates by submitting their names, together with appropriate biographical information and background materials and a statement as to whether the stockholder or group of stockholders making the recommendation has beneficially owned more than 5% of the Company’s common stock for at least a year as of the date such recommendation is made, to the Governance and Nominating Committee, c/o Clerk/ Secretary, Nashua Corporation, 11 Trafalgar Square, Suite 201, Nashua, New Hampshire 03063. Assuming that appropriate biographical and background material has been provided on a timely basis, the Governance and Nominating Committee will evaluate stockholder-recommended candidates by following substantially the same process, and applying substantially the same criteria, as it follows for candidates submitted by others. If the Board of Directors determines to nominate a stockholder-recommended candidate and recommends his or her election as a director by the stockholders, his or her name will be included in the Company’s proxy card for the stockholder meeting at which his or her election is recommended. Stockholders also have the right under the Company’s bylaws to directly nominate director candidates, without any action or recommendation on the part of the Governance and Nominating Committee or the Board of Directors, by following the procedures set forth under “Submission of Stockholder Proposals”.

Communications from Stockholders and Other Interested Parties

      The Board of Directors will give appropriate attention to written communications on issues that are submitted by stockholders and other interested parties, and will respond if and as appropriate. The Chairman of the Board of Directors, or Lead Director, or otherwise the Chairman of the Governance and Nominating Committee will, subject to any required assistance or advice from legal counsel, (1) be primarily responsible for monitoring communications from stockholders and other interested parties and (2) provide copies or summaries of such communications to the other directors as he or she considers appropriate.

      Communications will be forwarded to all directors if they relate to substantive matters and include suggestions or comments that the Chairman of the Board of Directors or Chairman of the Governance and Nominating Committee considers to be important for the directors to know. In general, communications

6

relating to corporate governance and long-term corporate strategy are more likely to be forwarded than communications relating to personal grievances and matters as to which the Company tends to receive repetitive or duplicative communications.

      Stockholders and other interested parties who wish to send communications on any topic to the Board of Directors should address such communications to the Governance and Nominating Committee, c/o Clerk/ Secretary, Nashua Corporation, 11 Trafalgar Square, Suite 201, Nashua, New Hampshire 03063.

Corporate Governance Framework

      The Board of Directors has long believed that good corporate governance is important to ensure that the Company is managed for the long-term benefit of stockholders. During the past year, the Board of Directors has continued to review its governance practices in light of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, new SEC rules and regulations and the new listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.

      The Board has adopted a Corporate Governance Framework to assist the Board in the exercise of its duties and responsibilities and to serve the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. A copy of the Corporate Governance Framework can be found on Nashua’s website, www.nashua.com, under the “Investor Relations/ Corporate Governance” section.

Compensation of Directors

      Directors who are Company employees receive no additional or special compensation for serving as directors. Each non-employee director receives an annual retainer of $60,000 payable in quarterly installments. The Company also pays non-employee directors $1,000 in cash plus expenses for each Board meeting or Board committee meeting they attend.

      Each non-employee director also receives an annual stock option award to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock having an exercise price equal to the fair market value of such shares on the date of award under the provisions of the Company’s stock plans. However, in 2004, each non-employee director, other than Mr. Barnard, received $43,750 in cash as payment in lieu of 10,000 stock options that were issuable to each director in 2003 and 2004 but were not issued because the shares were not available under our stock plans. Mr. Barnard received 10,000 stock options in 2004.

      The Company’s Lead Director receives an additional $7,500 in cash, the Chairman of the Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee receives an additional $2,500 in cash, and the Chairman of the Leadership and Compensation Committee receives an additional $1,500 in cash.

Certain Business Relationships of Directors and Executive Officers

      During 2004, the Company paid $247,159 under a certain lease for facilities to entities partially owned by either a family partnership of which the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Albert, and his family have total interest, or by Mr. Albert.

7

OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

      The following table sets forth certain information as of March 16, 2005 with respect to the beneficial ownership of shares of the Company’s common stock by each person known to Nashua to own beneficially more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding common stock:

		Amount and		Percent of
		Nature of Beneficial		Common Stock
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner		Ownership(1)		Outstanding(2)
Gabelli Funds, LLC/ GAMCO Investors, Inc./ Gabelli
	Advisers, Inc./ MJG Associates, Inc.(3)		1,541,000		24.8	%
	One Corporate Center, Rye, NY 10580
Newcastle Partners, L.P./ Newcastle Capital Group, L.L.C./
	Newcastle Capital Management, L.P./ Mark E. Schwarz(4)		507,200		8.2	%
	300 Crescent Court, Suite 1110, Dallas, TX 75201
Bank of America Corporation/ Fleet National Bank/
	Columbia Management Group, Inc./ Columbia Management
	Advisors, Inc.(5)		500,406		8.0	%
	100 North Tryon Street, Floor 25, Bank of America Corporate
	Center, Charlotte, NC 28255
Franklin Resources, Inc./ Charles B. Johnson/ Rupert H.
	Johnson, Jr./ Franklin Advisory Services, LLC(6)		475,000		7.6	%
	One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, CA 94403
Steel Partners II, L.P./ Steel Partners, L.L.C./ Warren G.
	Lichtenstein(7)		430,447		6.9	%
	590 Madison Avenue, 32nd Floor, New York, NY 10022
Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc.(8)			393,000		6.3	%
	1299 Ocean Avenue, 11th Floor, Santa Monica, CA 90401

(1)	The number of shares beneficially owned is determined under rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which an individual or group has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares which an individual or group has the right to acquire within 60 days of March 16, 2005 through the conversion of any convertible note or the exercise of any stock option, warrant or other right. The inclusion herein of such shares, however, does not constitute an admission that the named stockholder is a direct or indirect beneficial owner of such shares. Unless otherwise indicated, each person or group named in the table has sole voting or investment power (or shares power with his or her spouse) with respect to all shares of capital stock listed as owned by such person or entity.
(2)	Percentage of beneficial ownership is based on 6,219,734 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 16, 2005.
(3)	Information is based on a Schedule 13D (Amendment No. 34) dated December 2, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Gabelli Funds, LLC is reported to beneficially own 453,500 shares for which it has sole voting power and sole dispositive power. GAMCO Investors, Inc. is reported to own 1,029,000 shares, for which it has sole voting power as to 955,000 shares and sole dispositive power as to 1,029,000 shares. Gabelli Advisers, Inc. is reported to own 43,500 shares for which it has sole voting power and sole dispositive power. MJG Associates, Inc. is reported to own 15,000 shares for which it has sole voting power and sole dispositive power.
(4)	Information is based on a Schedule 13D (Amendment No. 1) dated August 15, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Newcastle Partners, L.P. is reported to beneficially own 507,200 shares for which it has sole voting power and sole dispositive power. Newcastle Capital Management, L.P., as the general partner of Newcastle Partners, L.P. and Newcastle Capital Group,

8

	L.L.C., as the general partner of Newcastle Capital Management, L.P., and Mark Schwarz, as the managing member of Newcastle Capital Group, L.L.C., may each be deemed to beneficially own the 507,200 shares beneficially owned by Newcastle Partners, L.P. The share information in the table above does not reflect 4,802 shares owned directly by Mark Schwarz and 7,700 shares Mr. Schwarz has a right to acquire through stock options which are exercisable within 60 days of March 16, 2005.
(5)	Information is based on a Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 8) dated February 11, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Bank of America Corporation is reported to beneficially own 500,406 shares for which it has shared voting power as to 484,406 shares and shared dispositive power as to 500,406 shares. Fleet National Bank is reported to beneficially own 500,406 shares for which it has sole voting power as to 98,106 shares, shared voting power as to 386,300 shares, sole dispositive power as to 107,206 shares, and shared dispositive power as to 393,200 shares. Columbia Management Group, Inc. is reported to beneficially own 392,800 shares for which it has shared voting power as to 386,300 shares and shared dispositive power as to 392,800 shares. Columbia Management Advisors, Inc. is reported to beneficially own 392,800 shares for which it has sole voting power as to 386,300 shares and sole dispositive power as to 392,800 shares.
(6)	Information is based on a Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 6) dated February 6, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Schedule 13G was filed on behalf of Franklin Resources, Inc., a parent holding company; Charles B. Johnson, a principal stockholder of the parent holding company; Rupert H. Johnson, a principal stockholder of the parent holding company; and Franklin Advisory Services, LLC, an investment adviser, all of which disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares. The shares are reported to be beneficially owned by one or more open or closed-end investment companies or other managed accounts which are advised by direct and indirect investment advisory subsidiaries of Franklin Resources, Inc. Franklin Advisory Services, LLC is reported to have sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to such shares.
(7)	Information is based on a Schedule 13D dated August 6, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Steel Partners II is reported to beneficially own 430,447 shares for which it has sole voting and sole dispositive power. Steel Partners L.L.C., as the general partner of Steel Partners II and Warren Lichtenstein, as the sole executive officer and managing member of Steel Partners L.L.C., may each be deemed to beneficially own the 430,447 shares beneficially owned by Steel Partners II.
(8)	Information is based on a Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 7) dated February 9, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc., an investment advisor, furnishes investment advice to four investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and serves as investment manager to certain other commingled group trusts and separate accounts (the “Funds”). In its role as investment advisor or manager, Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc. possesses investment and/or voting power over the securities of Nashua that are owned by the Funds. Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc. disclaims beneficial ownership of such securities.

9

Security Ownership of Management

      The following table sets forth certain information as of March 16, 2005, with respect to the beneficial ownership of shares of the Company’s common stock by (1) the directors and director nominees of Nashua, (2) Nashua’s chief executive officer and the executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table below, and (3) the directors and executive officers of Nashua as a group:

	Amount and Nature of			Percent of Common
Name	Beneficial Ownership(1)			Stock Outstanding(2)
Margaret S. Adams		40,000	(3)(4)		*
Andrew B. Albert		340,887	(3)(4)(5)		5.5	%
L. Scott Barnard		10,000	(4)		*
Donna J. DiGiovine		55,500	(4)		*
Avrum Gray		56,369	(4)(6)		*
George R. Mrkonic, Jr.		28,702	(4)		*
James F. Orr III		40,830	(4)		*
Thomas R. Pagel		63,109	(3)(4)(5)		1.0	%
John L. Patenaude		112,257	(3)(4)(5)		1.8	%
Mark E. Schwarz		519,702	(4)(7)		8.4	%
Directors and Executive Officers as a group (12 persons)		1,302,991	(4)(5)(8)		20.9	%

* Less than 1% of outstanding shares of common stock.

(1)	Information as to the interests of the respective director nominees has been furnished in part by them. The number of shares beneficially owned is determined under rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which an individual or group has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares which an individual or group has the right to acquire within 60 days of March 16, 2005 through the conversion of any convertible note or the exercise of any stock option, warrant or other right. The inclusion herein of such shares, however, does not constitute an admission that the named stockholder is a direct or indirect beneficial owner of such shares. Unless otherwise indicated, each person or group named in the table has sole voting or investment power (or shares power with his or her spouse) with respect to all shares of capital stock listed as owned by such person or entity.
(2)	Percentage of beneficial ownership is based on 6,219,734 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 16, 2005.
(3)	Includes shares of restricted stock which will vest upon achievement of certain target average closing prices of Nashua’s common stock over the 40-consecutive trading day period which ends on the third anniversary of the date of grant (“40-day average closing price”) — Ms. Adams, 30,000 shares; Mr. Albert, 54,000 shares; Mr. Pagel, 26,000 shares; and Mr. Patenaude, 26,000 shares. The terms of the restricted stock provide that 33% of such shares shall vest if the 40-day average closing price of at least $13.00 but less than $14.00 is achieved, 66% of such shares shall vest if the 40-day average closing price of at least $14.00 but less than $15.00 is achieved, and 100% of such shares shall vest if the 40-day average closing price of $15.00 or greater is achieved. The restricted shares vest upon a change in control if the share price at the date of a change in control exceeds $13.00. Shares of restricted stock are forfeited if the specified closing prices of the Company’s common stock are not met.
(4)	Includes shares that may be acquired through stock options which are exercisable within 60 days of March 16, 2005: Ms. Adams, 10,000 shares; Mr. Albert, 106,000 shares; Mr. Barnard, 10,000 shares; Ms. DiGiovine, 54,000 shares; Mr. Gray, 12,700 shares; Mr. Mrkonic, 12,700 shares; Mr. Orr, 17,700 shares; Mr. Pagel, 35,000 shares; Mr. Patenaude, 74,500 shares; Mr. Schwarz, 7,700 shares; and all directors and executive officers as a group, 373,900 shares.

10

(5)	Includes shares held in trust under the Company’s Employees’ Savings Plan under which participating employees have voting power as to the shares in their account. As of March 16, 2005, 5,887 shares are held in trust for Mr. Albert’s account; 10,007 shares are held in trust for Mr. Patenaude’s account; 2,109 shares are held in trust for Mr. Pagel’s account; and 20,038 shares are held in trust for the accounts of all directors and executive officers as a group. No director other than Mr. Albert participates in the Employees’ Savings Plan.
(6)	Includes 14,000 shares held by GF Limited Partnership in which Mr. Gray is a general partner and 10,667 shares held by AVG Limited Partnership in which Mr. Gray is a general partner. Mr. Gray disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. Also includes 11,000 shares held by JYG Limited Partnership in which Mr. Gray’s spouse is a general partner. Mr. Gray disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.
(7)	Includes 507,200 shares beneficially owned by Newcastle Partners, L.P., Newcastle Capital Group, L.L.C., Newcastle Capital Management, L.P. and Mark E. Schwarz. Newcastle Capital Management, L.P. is the general partner of Newcastle Partners, L.P. Newcastle Capital Group, L.L.C. is the general partner of Newcastle Capital Management, L.P., and Mark Schwarz is the managing member of Newcastle Capital Group, L.L.C.
(8)	Includes 136,000 shares of restricted stock.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

      Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange. The Company assists its directors and executive officers in complying with these filing requirements. Directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders are required by Securities and Exchange Commission regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based on a review of the copies of reports furnished to the Company and written representations from the Company’s directors and executive officers, the Company believes that during 2004 its directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders have complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

      The following table provides information about the securities authorized for issuance under the Company’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2004:

			Number of Securities
			Remaining Available for
	Number of Securities to be	Weighted-Average	Future Issuance Under Equity
	Issued Upon Exercise of	Exercise Price of	Compensation Plans
	Outstanding Options,	Outstanding Options,	(Excluding Securities Reflected
	Warrants and Rights	Warrants and Rights	in Column (a))(1)
Plan Category	(a)	(b)	(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(2)	582,225	$7.04	27,793(3)

(1)

In addition to being available for future issuance upon the exercise of stock options that may be granted after December 31, 2004, 10,343 shares under the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan may instead be issued in the form of restricted stock or director compensation, and 3,450 shares under the 1999 Shareholder Value Plan may instead be issued in the form of restricted stock or other stock-based awards including the grant of shares based upon certain conditions, the grant of securities convertible into common stock and the grant of stock appreciation rights. Awards may no longer be granted under the 1987 Stock Option Plan.

(2)

Includes the 1987 Stock Option Plan, the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, the 1999 Shareholder Value Plan and the 2004 Value Creation Incentive Plan.

11

(3)  Includes 14,000 shares that are available for the grant of restricted stock under the 2004 Value Creation Incentive Plan.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION

Summary of Cash and Certain Other Information

      The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the annual and long-term compensation, for the last three fiscal years, of Nashua’s chief executive officer and each of the four other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2004:

Summary Compensation Table

												Long-Term
												Compensation
												Awards
				Annual Compensation
												Restricted			Securities
									Other Annual			Stock			Underlying		All Other
Name and Principal Position		Year		Salary($)		Bonus($)			Compensation($)			Awards($)(1)			Options(#)		Compensation($)(2)
Andrew B. Albert			2004		450,000		209,650			—			486,000	(3)		—		27,632
	Chairman, President		2003		399,616		—			—			—			—		339,210
	and Chief Executive Officer		2002		350,000		35,551			—			—			30,000		7,822
John L. Patenaude			2004		215,000		104,958			—			234,000	(3)		—		18,800
	Vice President-Finance, Chief		2003		210,000		—			—			—			—		6,999
	Financial Officer and Treasurer		2002		195,000		19,802			—			—			—		6,438
Thomas R. Pagel			2004		205,000		116,030			16,831	(4)		234,000	(3)		—		6,427
	Vice President		2003		199,923		—			14,244	(5)		—			—		6,621
	President, Label Products Division		2002		189,269		46,089			27,301	(6)		—			—		6,096
Donna J. DiGiovine			2004		205,000		153,049	(7)		—			—			—		11,186
	Vice President		2003		191,116		—			—			—			—		6,390
	President, Toner Products Division		2002		175,000		25,062			—			—			—		5,861
	President, Coated Paper Division
Margaret S. Adams			2004		205,000		38,130			—			270,000	(3)		—		6,427
	Vice President, Chief Information		2003		191,115		—			—			—			—		6,575
	Officer; President, Converted		2002		163,654		16,250			—			—			—		5,859
	Paper Division

(1)	Market value of restricted shares on the date of grant.
(2)	The amounts listed in the category of “All Other Compensation” consist of Company contributions to the Employees’ Savings Plan and life insurance income. In 2004, these amounts were:

(a)	as to the Employees’ Savings Plan — Mr. Albert, $6,500; Mr. Patenaude, $6,448; Mr. Pagel, $6,148; Ms. DiGiovine, $6,500; and Ms. Adams, $6,148.
(b)	as to life insurance income — Mr. Albert, $1,032; Mr. Patenaude, $852; Mr. Pagel, $279; Ms. DiGiovine, $186; and Ms. Adams, $279.

The amounts listed in the category “All Other Compensation” for Mr. Albert, Mr. Patenaude and Ms. DiGiovine in 2004 also includes the following cash payments in exchange for the surrender of all their rights under the Nashua Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan: Mr. Albert, $20,100; Mr. Patenaude, $11,500; and Ms. DiGiovine, $4,500.

(3)  Consists of shares of restricted stock granted when the price of Nashua shares was $9.00: Mr. Albert, 54,000 shares; Mr. Patenaude, 26,000 shares; Mr. Pagel, 26,000 shares; and Ms. Adams, 30,000 shares. The restricted stock will vest upon achievement of certain target average closing prices of Nashua’s common stock over the 40-consecutive trading day period which ends on the third anniversary of the date of grant (“40-day average closing price”). The terms of the restricted stock provide that 33% of such shares shall vest if the 40-day average closing price of at least $13.00 but

12

less than $14.00 is achieved, 66% of such shares shall vest if the 40-day average closing price of at least $14.00 but less than $15.00 is achieved, and 100% of such shares shall vest if the 40-day average closing price of $15.00 or greater is achieved. The restricted shares vest upon a change in control if the share price at the date of a change in control exceeds $13.00. Shares of restricted stock are forfeited if the 40-day average closing price of the Company’s common stock does not meet the specified targets.

As of December 31, 2004, the market value of the restricted stock (based on the closing price of $11.36 on the New York Stock Exchange of the Company’s common stock on such date) was: as to Mr. Albert, $613,440; as to Mr. Patenaude, $295,360; as to Mr. Pagel, $295,360; and as to Ms. Adams, $340,800.

(4)	Includes interest payments of $9,631 on deferred compensation, and an automobile allowance of $7,200.
(5)	Includes interest payments of $7,044 on deferred compensation, and an automobile allowance of $7,200.
(6)	Includes interest payments of $14,806 on deferred compensation, an automobile allowance of $7,200, a payment of $3,788 as part of Mr. Pagel’s relocation package, and a tax equalization payment of $1,507.
(7)	In 2001, the Company adopted a retention plan to assist in retaining the services of key employees in its Toner Products division. Ms. DiGiovine, who is the president of the Company’s Toner Products division, was eligible for a retention bonus of up to one-year’s annual salary if she remained employed by the Company through December 2003. The amount of Ms. DiGiovine’s retention bonus accrued over the three year retention period, with one-third of her annual salary accruing for each year during which she remained employed by the Company and during which the Toner Products division met certain business objectives. In March 2004, Ms. DiGiovine was paid a retention bonus under the retention plan of $115,013.

Stock Options

      There were no stock options or stock appreciation rights granted to the executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table in 2004, and no stock options were exercised by the executive officers in 2004.

      The following table sets forth information regarding the number and value of unexercised options to purchase the Company’s common stock held by the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table at the end of 2004. There were no stock appreciation rights outstanding at the end of 2004.

Option Values at December 31, 2004

	Number of
	Securities Underlying				Value of Unexercised,
	Unexercised Options				In-The-Money, Options
	at December 31, 2004				at December 31, 2004(1)
Name	Exercisable		Unexercisable		Exercisable		Unexercisable
Andrew B. Albert		106,000		—	$	681,400	$	0
John L. Patenaude		77,000		—	$	387,025	$	0
Thomas R. Pagel		35,000		—	$	231,900	$	0
Donna J. DiGiovine		54,000		—	$	260,350	$	0
Margaret S. Adams		10,000		—	$	56,600	$	0

(1)  Option values are based on the difference between the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange of the Company’s common stock of $11.36 per share on December 31, 2004 and the exercise price of the options.

13

Pension Plan

      The Company provides retirement benefits to its salaried employees, including the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table except for Mr. Pagel and Ms. Adams, under the Nashua Corporation Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees (the “Nashua Retirement Plan”), which is a qualified retirement plan under the Internal Revenue Code. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 limits pensions that may be paid under plans qualified under the Internal Revenue Code. Pension amounts exceeding this limit may be paid outside of qualified plans. Nashua has an unfunded Supplemental Excess Retirement Benefit Plan (“SERP”) that provides for additional retirement benefits to certain of its employees, including Mr. Albert, Mr. Patenaude and Ms. DiGiovine.

      Benefits under the Nashua Retirement Plan and the SERP were frozen as of December 31, 2002, and all employees ceased accruing additional retirement benefits under the plans on that date. The Nashua Retirement Plan will continue to require Company contributions for benefits accrued prior to December 31, 2002. In 2004, Mr. Albert, Mr. Patenaude and Ms. DiGiovine surrendered all their rights and benefits under the SERP in exchange for a single lump-sum cash payment.

      The following table sets forth the annual benefits payable at normal retirement age (65) under the Nashua Retirement Plan to Mr. Albert, Mr. Patenaude and Ms. DiGiovine. Benefits under the Nashua Retirement Plan last for the life of the employee.

Name	Amount
Andrew B. Albert	$	5,904
John L. Patenaude	$	26,676
Donna J. DiGiovine	$	10,752

      Compensation covered by the Nashua Retirement Plan and the SERP generally refers to total annual cash compensation, including salary and bonus, but excluding certain items such as the value of stock option awards and employer allocations to the Company’s Employees’ Savings Plan. For purposes of the Nashua Retirement Plan and the SERP, the five year average compensation is equal to the average annual salary and bonus over the preceding five years of employment prior to December 31, 2002, the date on which the plans were frozen. As of December 31, 2002, the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table had the following years of service credited under the Nashua Retirement Plan and the SERP: Mr. Albert, 2 years; Mr. Patenaude, 10 years; and Ms. DiGiovine, 5 years. As noted above, the Nashua Retirement Plan and the SERP were frozen on December 31, 2002. As a result, average compensation and years of service will no longer increase, and no additional benefits under the plan will be earned after that date.

      Benefits as shown above are available for participants whose pensions start after reaching age 65. Participants who have five or more years of service are eligible to receive pensions after reaching age 60 and participants who have ten or more years of service are eligible to receive pensions after reaching age 55, but payments are reduced 4.2% per year for each year that a recipient starts receiving benefits earlier than at age 65. Benefits under the Nashua Retirement Plan and the SERP are computed on the basis of a straight life annuity. These benefits are not subject to any deduction for Social Security or other offset.

Executive Severance Agreements

      The Company has entered into change of control and severance agreements with Mr. Albert, Mr. Patenaude, Mr. Pagel and Ms. Adams in order to ensure their continued service to Nashua in the event of a change of control of Nashua. These agreements provide that if, within one year after a change of control of Nashua, Nashua terminates the executive’s employment without cause or the executive terminates his/her employment for good reason, in each case as defined in the agreement, Mr. Albert would be entitled to receive severance pay equal to two times the sum of his annual salary and bonus plus certain benefits; Mr. Patenaude would be entitled to receive severance pay equal to one and a half times the sum of his annual salary and bonus plus certain benefits; and Mr. Pagel and Ms. Adams would be

14

entitled to receive severance pay equal to one times the sum of their annual salary and bonus plus certain benefits. The value of this compensation totals an estimated $1,331,380 for Mr. Albert; $505,037 for Mr. Patenaude; $343,522 for Mr. Pagel; and $269,625 for Ms. Adams. If their employment is terminated by the Company apart from the circumstances above for reasons other than misconduct, the executives would receive one year’s salary and certain other benefits. The value of this compensation and benefits totals an estimated $454,548 for Mr. Albert, $230,300 for Mr. Patenaude, $221,538 for Mr. Pagel, and $225,068 for Ms. Adams.

      The Company has entered into a change of control and severance agreement with Ms. DiGiovine to ensure her continued service in the event of a change of control of Nashua or certain other corporate transactions involving Nashua. The agreement provides that if, within one year after a change of control of Nashua, Nashua terminates Ms. DiGiovine’s employment without cause or Ms. DiGiovine terminates her employment for good reason, in each case as defined in the agreement, Ms. DiGiovine would be entitled to receive severance pay equal to the sum of her accrued but unpaid base salary and vacation pay, plus a multiple of the sum of her annual salary and annual bonus. The multiple of Ms. DiGiovine’s annual salary and bonus used to calculate the severance payment is initially three and will decrease to 1.5 in equal monthly amounts over the twelve-month period following the date of the agreement. The value of this compensation as of March 5, 2005 totals an estimated maximum of $708,623. If Nashua terminates Ms. DiGiovine’s employment without cause prior to a change of control of Nashua or more than one year after a change of control, Ms. DiGiovine would be entitled to receive salary continuation and certain benefits for a period of one year. The value of this compensation and benefits totals an estimated $222,250.

      In addition, Ms. DiGiovine will be entitled to receive specified transaction bonus payments upon the consummation of certain corporate transactions involving Nashua. The maximum aggregate transaction bonus payments that Ms. DiGiovine is entitled to receive is $800,000. If a change of control occurs prior to the consummation of the specified corporate transactions, Ms. DiGiovine will be entitled to a change of control bonus of up to a maximum of $496,000 based on the fair market value, per share, of the consideration received by Nashua’s stockholders in connection with the change of control. Additionally, the amount of the change of control bonus, if any, will be reduced by the amount of any transaction bonus payment previously paid to Ms. DiGiovine. No bonus will be paid to Ms. DiGiovine if the fair market value, per share, of the consideration received by Nashua’s stockholders in connection with a change of control is less than $13.00.

Executive and Management Incentive Plans

      The Board of Directors has adopted a Management Incentive Plan and the 2004 Value Creation Incentive Plan. Together, these plans provide a framework within which to accomplish the following goals:

•  To attract and retain the best possible executive and management talent;

•  To permit executives and management of the Company to share in its profits;

•  To promote the success of the Company; and

•  To link executive and management rewards closely to Company performance.

      Participants in the Management Incentive Plan, which may include, but are not limited to the Company’s Corporate Staff and Division Officers, non-officer General Managers, and key functional Directors and Managers, will have the opportunity to earn an annual variable bonus. Bonus payments, consisting of cash awards, will be based on the performance of the Company, and, where appropriate, a specific business unit, measured against pre-established performance objectives.

      The Leadership and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors administers the Management Incentive Plan and the 2004 Value Creation Incentive Plan.

Leadership and Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation

      The Leadership and Compensation Committee is composed of non-employee directors and is charged with the responsibility of evaluating and setting the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, reviewing

15

executive salaries, administering any bonus, incentive compensation and stock option plans, and approving or recommending the Board to approve the salaries and other benefits of the executive officers. The Committee administers the Company’s Management Incentive Plan and the Company’s stock option and stock incentive plans, including the 2004 Value Creation Incentive Plan. Each year the Committee reviews the base salary of the Chief Executive Officer in conjunction with the Governance and Nominating Committee’s review of the performance of the Chief Executive Officer. The Committee also reviews the performance and the salary levels of other executive officers, including the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table, and makes decisions regarding the above plans.

Committee Objectives and Compensation Philosophy

      The Committee’s objectives are to:

•  attract and retain the best possible executive and management talent;

•  to permit executives and management of the Company to share in its profits;

•  to promote the success of the Company; and

•  to link executive and management rewards closely to Company performance.

      Our compensation philosophy seeks to relate compensation with our financial performance and business objectives. We reward individual performance of our senior executives and tie a significant portion of total executive compensation to the annual and long-term performance of the Company.

Executive Compensation

      The Committee’s compensation policies applicable to the Company’s executive officers during 2004 consists of three principal elements discussed below: base salary, cash incentive compensation and equity based compensation.

Base Salary and Cash Incentive Compensation

      The Committee annually reviews and determines base salaries of the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives. The Committee believes that base salaries should be at competitive levels so as to attract and retain well-qualified executives. The Committee has reviewed the compensation of the Company’s executive officers, including those executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table, and has concluded that the salaries for the executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table are competitive with the salaries for similar positions included in the survey data reviewed by the Committee.

      The Committee believes that incentive compensation paid in cash should be awarded to support company objectives based on company, group, division and personal performance during the preceding year. The Company’s Management Incentive Plan provides that cash awards may be granted each year by the Committee based on corporate, segment, division and personal performance. For the individuals who served as Chief Executive Officer and principal corporate staff officers, award targets for 2004 were based on the Company’s pretax operating income budget, total Company revenues and profitability objectives. For the Vice Presidents in charge of operating units, award targets were based on the respective unit’s pretax operating income budget and profitability objectives. Bonuses in the amount of $593,662 were awarded to senior management for fiscal year 2004.

Equity Based Compensation

      The Committee believes that long-term equity-based compensation should be awarded to provide incentive to executives to create value for stockholders and give the executives a substantive ownership interest in the Company’s success. The Committee’s policy has been to award performance-based restricted stock and stock option grants in order to more closely align the interests of management with those of stockholders and to attract and retain executives during a period when the Company has been undergoing significant operational changes. There were no stock options or stock appreciation rights

16

granted to the executive officers in 2004, and no stock options were exercised by the executive officers in 2004.

      The Committee believes that the creation of stockholder value depends, in large part, upon the Company’s ability to maintain a competitive position in attracting and retaining key personnel. Traditionally, the Company used equity incentives, such as stock options and restricted stock awards to attract and retain key personnel. However, the availability of equity incentives has been limited for the Company because only a small number of shares are available for future awards under the Company’s two active equity incentive plans, the 1999 Shareholder Value Plan and the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, and proposals to increase the number of shares available under the 1999 Shareholder Value Plan submitted to stockholders at the Company’s 2002 and 2003 annual meetings of stockholders were not approved. However, as part of its commitment to promote stockholder value, the Company and stockholders adopted the 2004 Value Creation Incentive Plan. Senior management was granted an aggregate of 136,000 shares of restricted common stock pursuant to the 2004 Value Creation Incentive Plan in fiscal 2004.

Chief Executive Officer Compensation

      Mr. Albert, in his capacity as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, is eligible to participate in the same executive compensation program available to our other senior executives. The Committee evaluates the Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of the Company’s corporate goals and objectives.

      The Committee has considered a number of factors including survey data, the size and performance of the Company, shareholder return, past practice at the Company, the value of similar incentive awards to chief executive officers at comparable companies, each Committee member’s own individual experiences in compensation matters and the inter-relationship of salary to cash incentive compensation and long-term equity-based compensation and the awards given to the Chief Executive Officer in past years. Mr. Albert’s annual base salary for fiscal 2004 was $450,000. Mr. Albert was awarded an annual bonus of $209,650 for fiscal year 2004 based upon achievement of target performance goals defined by the Committee. Additionally, Mr. Albert was granted 54,000 shares of restricted common stock pursuant to the 2004 Value Creation Incentive Plan. The Committee believes Mr. Albert’s compensation and stock award to be in line with salaries of chief executive officers in similar peer groups.

      Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, generally disallows a tax deduction for certain compensation in excess of $1 million paid to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the four other most highly compensated executive officers. Certain compensation, including qualified performance-based compensation, will not be subject to the deduction limit if certain requirements are met. The Committee reviews the potential effect of Section 162(m) periodically and generally seeks to structure the long-term incentive compensation granted to its executive officers in a manner that is intended to avoid disallowance of deductions under Section 162(m). Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that compensation attributable to awards granted under the Company’s 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, 1999 Shareholder Value Plan or 2004 Value Creation Incentive Plan will be treated as qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m). In addition, the Committee reserves the right to use its judgment to authorize compensation payments that may be subject to the limit when the Committee believes such payments are appropriate and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, after taking into consideration changing business conditions and the performance of its employees.

Leadership and Compensation Committee

          George R. Mrkonic, Jr., Chairman

          L. Scott Barnard

          Avrum Gray

          Mark E. Schwarz

17

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

      The Leadership and Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. George R. Mrkonic, Jr., L. Scott Barnard, Avrum Gray and Mark E. Schwarz. No interlocking relationship has existed between members of the Leadership and Compensation Committee and the board of directors or compensation committee of any other company.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT/ FINANCE AND INVESTMENT COMMITTEE

      The Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee consists of the following three members of the Company’s Board of Directors: Avrum Gray, Chairman, L. Scott Barnard and James F. Orr III. In addition, Mark E. Schwarz served as a member of the Committee from January 1, 2004 to March 1, 2004. The Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors, a copy of which is attached as Appendix A to this proxy statement. The current members of the Committee are independent directors, as defined by the rules of the New York Stock Exchange.

      The Committee reviewed the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 and discussed these financial statements with the Company’s management. The Committee also reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements and the matters required by Statement on Auditing Standards 61 (Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, AU§380) with Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent auditors.

      The Company’s independent auditors also provided the Committee with the written disclosures and the letter required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees). In addition, the Committee discussed with the independent auditors the matters disclosed in this letter and their independence from the Company. The Committee also considered whether the independent auditors’ provision of certain other, non-audit related services to the Company is compatible with maintaining their independence.

      Based on its discussions with management and the independent auditors, and its review of the representations and information provided by management and the independent auditors, the Committee recommended to the Company’s Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee

          Avrum Gray, Chairman

          L. Scott Barnard

          James F. Orr III

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      Ernst & Young LLP were the Company’s independent auditors for the year 2004. Representatives from Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the annual meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

18

Independent Auditors Fees and Services

      The following table sets forth the fees for professional audit services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP billed to us for the fiscal years 2004 and 2003 for audit services and billed to us for the fiscal years 2004 and 2003 for other services.

	Fiscal Year 2004		Fiscal Year 2003
Audit Fees(1)	$	505,000	$	480,000
Audit Related Fees(2)		55,000		26,000
Tax Fees(3)		7,000		26,000
All Other Fees(4)		70,000		29,000
Total	$	637,000	$	561,000

(1)	Audit fees consist of fees for professional services rendered for the audit of our consolidated financial statements and review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports and services that are normally provided by Ernst & Young LLP in connection with statutory and regulatory filing requirements.
(2)	Audit-related fees consist of fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit and the review of our financial statements which are not reported under Audit Fees. These services relate to due diligence in connection with acquisitions, accounting consultations and audits of employee benefit plans.
(3)	For 2004, tax fees consist of fees for tax planning. For 2003, tax fees consist of fees for tax planning in the amount of $6,000 and for tax return review in the amount of $20,000.
(4)	All other fees consist of fees for compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

      All engagements for services by Ernst & Young LLP or other independent accountants are subject to prior approval by the Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee; however, de minimis non-audit services may instead be approved in accordance with applicable SEC rules. The prior approval of the Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee was obtained for all services provided by Ernst & Young LLP in 2004.

Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee’s Preapproval Policies and Procedures

      During fiscal 2004, the Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee adopted policies and procedures for the preapproval of audit and non-audit services for the purpose of maintaining the independence of our independent auditors. This policy generally provides that the Company will not engage its independent auditor to render audit or non-audit services unless the services are specifically approved in advance by the Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee or the engagement is entered into pursuant to one of the preapproval procedures described below.

      From time to time, the Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee may preapprove specified types of services that are expected to be provided to the Company by its independent auditor during the next 12 months. Any such preapproval is detailed as to the particular service or type of services to be provided and is also generally subject to a maximum dollar amount.

      During fiscal 2004, no services were provided by Ernst & Young LLP or any other accounting firm other than in accordance with the preapproval policies and procedures described above.

19

STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH

      Set forth below is a line graph comparing the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total stockholder return on the Company’s common stock against the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Index and a composite peer group for the five years commencing December 31, 1999 and ending December 31, 2004. A peer group comparison is used because the Company offers a diverse mix of products and services and does not believe that a single industry or line-of-business index provides an adequate measure for comparison to the Company as a whole.

      The Company’s products and services include thermal papers, thermosensitive and pressure sensitive labels, and specialty papers, as well as toners and developers. In constructing a composite peer group, the Company selected published indices to represent various products. The indices are: for thermal papers, thermosensitive and pressure sensitive labels and specialty papers — the S&P Paper and Forest Products Index, and for toners and developers – the S&P Office Services & Supplies Index. The Company then weighted the two indices in proportion to the 2004 revenues of Nashua’s products and services represented by the respective indices.

	1999		2000		2001		2002		2003		2004
Nashua Corporation		100.00		59.20		78.27		117.07		113.33		151.47
S&P 500 Index		100.00		90.90		80.09		62.39		80.29		89.02
Composite Peer Group		100.00		81.12		83.82		72.57		98.45		108.50

SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS — 2006 ANNUAL MEETING

      Any stockholder proposal which is to be included in the proxy materials for the 2006 annual meeting must be received by Nashua on or before November 29, 2005. Such proposals should be directed to Nashua Corporation, 11 Trafalgar Square, Suite 201, Nashua, New Hampshire 03063, Attention: Clerk/ Secretary.

      In addition, our by-laws require that we be given advance notice of stockholder nominations for election to the Board of Directors and of other matters which stockholders wish to present for action at an annual meeting of stockholders, other than matters included in our proxy statement in accordance with SEC Rule 14a-8. The required notice must be in writing and received by our corporate clerk/secretary at our principal executive offices not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the annual meeting of

20

stockholders. However, in the event that less than 70 days’ prior disclosure of the date of the meeting is first given or made (whether by public disclosure or written notice to stockholders), notice by the stockholder to be timely must be received by our corporate clerk/secretary at our principal executive offices no later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which such disclosure of the date of the meeting was made. The date of our 2006 annual meeting of stockholders has not yet been established, but assuming it is held on May 4, 2006, in order to comply with the time periods set forth in our by-laws, appropriate notice for the 2006 annual meeting would need to be provided to our corporate clerk/secretary no earlier than February 3, 2006 and no later than March 3, 2006.

FORM 10-K AND HOUSEHOLDING

      A copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, will be furnished without charge to any stockholder upon written request to Nashua. Please address all such requests to Nashua Corporation, 11 Trafalgar Square, Suite 201, Nashua, New Hampshire, Attention: Clerk/ Secretary.

      Some banks, brokers and other nominee record holders may be participating in the practice of “householding” proxy statements and annual reports. This means that only one copy of our proxy statement and annual report may have been sent to multiple stockholders in your household. We will promptly deliver a separate copy of the document to you if you write or call our corporate Clerk/ Secretary at the following address or phone number: Nashua Corporation, 11 Trafalgar Square, Suite 201, Nashua, New Hampshire 03063, Attention: Clerk/ Secretary, telephone number (603)880-2323. If you want to receive separate copies of the annual report and proxy statement in the future, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one copy for your household, you should contact your bank, broker, or other nominee record holder, or you may contact us at the above address and phone number.

OTHER MATTERS

      The Board of Directors knows of no other matters to be brought before the annual meeting. However, if other matters do properly come before the meeting or any adjournments thereof, the persons named in the proxies will vote upon such matters in accordance with their best judgment.

Robert S. Amrein

Vice President, General

Counsel and Clerk/ Secretary

Nashua, New Hampshire

March 25, 2005

21

Appendix A

NASHUA CORPORATION

AUDIT/ FINANCE AND INVESTMENT COMMITTEE CHARTER

(Revised February 9, 2005)

A. Purpose

      The purpose of the Audit/ Finance and Investment Committee (the “Audit Committee”) is to assist the Board of Directors’ oversight of:

•  the integrity of the Company’s financial statements;

•  the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;

•  the independent auditor’s qualifications and independence; and

•  the performance of the Company’s internal audit function and independent auditors;

and to prepare an audit committee report as required by the SEC to be included in the Company’s annual proxy statement.

B. Structure and Membership

      1. Number. The Audit Committee shall consist of at least three members of the Board of Directors.

      2. Independence. Except as otherwise permitted by the applicable rules of the New York Stock Exchange, each member of the Audit Committee shall be “independent” as defined by such rules and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Exchange Act.

      3. Financial Literacy. Each member of the Audit Committee must be financially literate, as such qualification is interpreted by the Company’s Board of Directors in its business judgment, or must become financially literate within a reasonable period of time after his or her appointment to the Audit Committee. At least one member of the Audit Committee must have accounting or related financial management expertise, as the Board of Directors interprets such qualification in its business judgment. Unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors (in which case disclosure of such determination shall be made in the Company’s annual report filed with the SEC), at least one member of the Audit Committee shall be an “audit committee financial expert” (as defined by applicable SEC rules).

      4. Chair. Unless the Board of Directors elects a Chair of the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee shall elect a Chair by majority vote.

      5. Compensation. The compensation of Audit Committee members shall be as determined by the Board of Directors. No member of the Audit Committee may receive, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the Company or any of its subsidiaries, other than fees paid in his or her capacity as a member of the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board.

      6. Selection and Removal. Members of the Audit Committee shall be appointed by the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee. Unless otherwise determined by the Board (in which case disclosure of such determination shall be made in the Company’s annual proxy statement), no member of the Audit Committee may serve on the audit committee of more than two other public companies. The Board of Directors may remove members of the Audit Committee from such committee, with or without cause.

A-1

C. Authority and Responsibilities

General

      The Audit Committee shall discharge its responsibilities, and shall assess the information provided by the Company’s management and the independent auditor, in accordance with its business judgment. Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the Company’s financial statements for the appropriateness of the accounting principles and reporting policies that are used by the Company and for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The independent auditors are responsible for auditing the Company’s financial statements and the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and for reviewing the Company’s unaudited interim financial statements. The authority and responsibilities set forth in this Charter do not reflect or create any duty or obligation of the Audit Committee to plan or conduct any audit, to determine or certify that the Company’s financial statements are complete, accurate, fairly presented, or in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or applicable law, or to guarantee the independent auditor’s reports.

Oversight of Independent Auditors

      1. Selection. The Audit Committee shall be directly responsible for appointing, evaluating, retaining and, when necessary, terminating the engagement of the independent auditor. The Audit Committee may, in its discretion, seek stockholder ratification of the independent auditor it appoints.

      2. Independence. At least annually, the Audit Committee shall assess the independent auditor’s independence. In connection with this assessment, the Audit Committee shall obtain and review a report by the independent auditor describing all relationships between the independent auditor and the Company, including the disclosures required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1. The Audit Committee shall engage in an active dialogue with the independent auditor concerning any disclosed relationships or services that might impact the objectivity and independence of the auditor.

      3. Quality-Control Report. At least annually, the Audit Committee shall obtain and review a report by the independent auditor describing:

•  the firm’s internal quality control procedures;

•  any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality-control review, or peer review, of the firm, or by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities, within the preceding five years, respecting one or more independent audits carried out by the firm, and any steps taken to deal with any such issues.

      4. Compensation. The Audit Committee shall be directly responsible for setting the compensation of the independent auditor. The Audit Committee is empowered, without further action by the Board of Directors, to cause the Company to pay the compensation of the independent auditor established by the Audit Committee.

      5. Preapproval of Services. The Audit Committee shall preapprove all audit services to be provided to the Company, whether provided by the principal auditor or other firms, and all other services (review, attest and non-audit) to be provided to the Company by the independent auditor; provided, however, that de minimis non-audit services may instead be approved in accordance with applicable NYSE and SEC rules.

      6. Oversight. The independent auditor shall report directly to the Audit Committee, and the Audit Committee shall be directly responsible for oversight of the work of the independent auditor, including resolution of disagreements between Company management and the independent auditor regarding

A-2

financial reporting. In connection with its oversight role, the Audit Committee shall, from time to time as appropriate:

•  receive and consider the reports required to be made by the independent auditor regarding:

•  critical accounting policies and practices;

•  alternative treatments within generally accepted accounting principles for policies and practices related to material items that have been discussed with Company management, including ramifications of the use of such alternative disclosures and treatments, and the treatment preferred by the independent auditor; and

•  other material written communications between the independent auditor and Company management.

•  review with the independent auditor:

•  any audit problems or difficulties the independent auditor encountered in the course of the audit work and management’s response, including any restrictions on the scope of the independent auditor’s activities or on access to requested information and any significant disagreements with management;

•  major issues as to the adequacy of the Company’s internal controls and any special audit steps adopted in light of material control deficiencies;

•  analyses prepared by management and/or the independent auditor setting forth significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of the financial statements, including analyses of the effects of alternative GAAP methods on the financial statements; and

•  the effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives, as well as off balance sheet structures, on the financial statements of the Company.

Review of Audited Financial Statements

      7. Review and Discussion of Audited Financial Statements. The Audit Committee shall meet to review and discuss with the Company’s management and independent auditor the Company’s audited financial statements, including reviewing the Company’s specific disclosures under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and the matters about which Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, AU §380) requires discussion.

      8. Recommendation to Board Regarding Financial Statements. The Audit Committee shall consider whether it will recommend to the Board of Directors that the Company’s audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

      9. Audit Committee Report. The Audit Committee shall prepare an annual committee report for inclusion where necessary in the proxy statement of the Company relating to its annual meeting of security holders.

Review of Other Financial Disclosures

      10. Independent Auditor Review of Interim Financial Statements. The Audit Committee shall direct the independent auditor to use its best efforts to perform all reviews of interim financial information prior to disclosure by the Company of such information and to discuss promptly with the Audit Committee and the Chief Financial Officer any matters identified in connection with the auditor’s review of interim financial information which are required to be discussed by applicable auditing standards. The Audit Committee shall direct management to advise the Audit Committee in the event that the Company

A-3

proposes to disclose interim financial information prior to completion of the independent auditor’s review of interim financial information.

      11. Earnings Release and Other Financial Information. The Audit Committee shall discuss generally the type and presentation of information to be disclosed in the Company’s earnings press releases, as well as financial information and earnings guidance provided to analysts, rating agencies and others.

      12. Quarterly Financial Statements. The Audit Committee shall meet to review and discuss with the Company’s management and independent auditor the Company’s quarterly financial statements, including reviewing the Company’s specific disclosures under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

      13. Other Disclosures and Filings. The Audit Committee shall review and consider such other disclosures and/or filings as it deems appropriate or as requested by the Board of Directors.

Controls and Procedures

      14. Oversight. The Audit Committee shall coordinate the Board of Directors’ oversight of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and the Company’s code of business conduct and ethics. The Audit Committee shall receive and review the reports of the CEO and CFO required by Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act.

      15. Internal Audit Function. The Audit Committee shall coordinate the Board of Directors’ oversight of the performance of the Company’s internal audit function.

      16. Risk Management. The Audit Committee shall discuss the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including guidelines and policies to govern the process by which the Company’s exposure to risk is handled.

      17. Hiring Policies. The Audit Committee shall establish policies regarding the hiring of employees or former employees of the Company’s independent auditors.

      18. Procedures for Complaints. The Audit Committee shall establish procedures for (i) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters; and (ii) the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of the Company of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.

      19. Evaluation of Financial Management. The Audit Committee shall coordinate with the Leadership and Compensation Committee the evaluation of the Company’s financial management personnel.

      20. Additional Powers. The Audit Committee shall have such other duties as may be delegated from time to time by the Board of Directors.

D. Procedures and Administration

      1. Meetings. The Audit Committee shall meet as often as it deems necessary in order to perform its responsibilities. The Audit Committee may also act by unanimous written consent in lieu of a meeting. The Audit Committee shall periodically meet separately with: (i) the independent auditor; (ii) Company management and (iii) the Company’s internal auditors. The Audit Committee shall keep such records of its meetings as it shall deem appropriate.

      2. Subcommittees. The Audit Committee may form and delegate authority to one or more subcommittees (including a subcommittee consisting of a single member), as it deems appropriate from time to time under the circumstances. Any decision of a subcommittee to preapprove audit, review, attest or non-audit services shall be presented to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

      3. Reports to Board. The Audit Committee shall report regularly to the Board of Directors.

A-4

      4. Charter. At least annually, the Audit Committee shall review and reassess the adequacy of this Charter and recommend any proposed changes to the Board of Directors for approval.

      5. Written Affirmation to NYSE. On an annual basis, no later than one month after the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and after each change in the composition of the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee shall direct the Company to prepare and provide to the NYSE such written confirmations regarding membership and operation of the Audit Committee as the NYSE rules require.

      6. Independent Advisors. The Audit Committee shall have the authority, without further action by the Board of Directors, to engage such independent legal, accounting and other advisors as it deems necessary or appropriate to carry out its responsibilities. Such independent advisors may be the regular advisors to the Company. The Audit Committee is empowered, without further action by the Board of Directors, to cause the Company to pay the compensation of such advisors as established by the Audit Committee.

      7. Investigations. The Audit Committee shall have the authority to conduct or authorize investigations into any matters within the scope of its responsibilities as it shall deem appropriate, including the authority to request any officer, employee or advisor of the Company to meet with the Audit Committee or any advisors engaged by the Audit Committee.

      8. Funding. The Audit Committee is empowered, without further action by the Board of Directors, to cause the Company to pay the ordinary administrative expenses of the Audit Committee that are necessary or appropriate in carrying out its duties.

      9. Annual Self-Evaluation. At least annually, the Audit Committee shall evaluate its own performance.

A-5

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF

NASHUA CORPORATION

May 4, 2005

Please date, sign and mail
your proxy card in the
envelope provided as soon
as possible.

ê Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided. ê

n

 
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR PROPOSAL 1.
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HEREx

1. Election of Directors:

		NOMINEES: ¡ Andrew B. Albert ¡ L. Scott Barnard ¡ Avrum Gray ¡ George R. Mrkonic, Jr. ¡ James F. Orr III ¡ Mark E. Schwarz
o	FOR ALL NOMINEES
o	WITHHOLD AUTHORITY FOR ALL NOMINEES
o	FOR ALL EXCEPT (See Instructions below)

INSTRUCTION:  To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “FOR ALL EXCEPT” and fill in the circle next to each nominee you wish to withhold, as shown here:l

To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method. o

PLEASE FILL IN DATE, SIGN AND MAIL THIS PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED POSTPAID RETURN ENVELOPE.

Signature of Stockholder Date: Signature of Stockholder Date:

NOTE:  Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.

PROXY

NASHUA CORPORATION

PROXY for Annual Meeting of Stockholders — May 4, 2005

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned, revoking all prior proxies, hereby appoints ROBERT S. AMREIN and JOHN L. PATENAUDE, and each of them, with full power of substitution, as proxies to represent and vote as designated hereon, all shares of common stock of Nashua Corporation (the “Company”) which the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held at the Company’s offices at 11 Trafalgar Square, Suite 201, Nashua, New Hampshire, on May 4, 2005 at 8:00 a.m. (local time) and at any adjournment thereof. The following matter is being proposed by the Company.

Unless a contrary direction is indicated, this Proxy will be voted FOR all nominees listed in Proposal 1, as more specifically set forth in the Proxy Statement. If specific instructions are indicated, this Proxy will be voted in accordance therewith.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all nominees named in Proposal 1.

In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting, or any adjournment thereof.

(CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE)