XML 98 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
12 Months Ended
Dec. 29, 2012
Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

(14)     Fair Value of Financial Instruments


We account for instruments recorded at fair value under the established fair value framework.  The framework also applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.


The fair value hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements is as follows:


Level 1:  Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.


Level 2:  Quoted prices, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, that are observable for the assets or liabilities, either directly or indirectly.


Level 3:  Inputs that are unobservable for the assets or liabilities.


As of December 29, 2012, we are not a party to any financial instruments that would be subject to a fair value measurement.


Other Financial Assets and Liabilities  


 Financial assets with carrying values approximating fair value include cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable.  Financial liabilities with carrying values approximating fair value include accounts payable and outstanding checks.  The carrying value of these financial assets and liabilities approximates fair value due to their short maturities.


The fair value of notes receivable approximates the carrying value at December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011.  Substantially all notes receivable are based on floating interest rates which adjust to changes in market rates.


The estimated fair value of our long-term debt, including current maturities, was $356.3 million and $276.3 million at December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, utilizing discounted cash flows.  The fair value is based on interest rates that are currently available to us for issuance of debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.


Non-Financial Assets


During fiscal 2012 we recognized goodwill impairments totaling $166.6 million.  In addition to these impairments of goodwill, we recorded impairment charges of $13.1 million, $0.6 million and $0.9 million in fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  We utilize a discounted cash flow model and market approach that incorporates unobservable level 3 inputs to test for goodwill and long-lived asset impairments.