XML 51 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 16, 2012
Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

Note 6 – Fair Value Measurements


We account for instruments recorded at fair value under the established fair value framework.  The framework also applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.  


The fair value hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements is as follows:


Level 1:  Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.


Level 2:  Quoted prices, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, which are observable for the assets or liabilities, either directly or indirectly.


Level 3:  Inputs that are unobservable for the assets or liabilities.


As of June 16, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we are not a party to any financial instruments that would be subject to a fair value measurement. 


Other Financial Assets and Liabilities 


 Financial assets with carrying values approximating fair value include cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable.  Financial liabilities with carrying values approximating fair value include accounts payable and outstanding checks. The carrying value of these financial assets and liabilities approximates fair value due to their short maturities.


The fair value of notes receivable approximates the carrying value at June 16, 2012 and December 31, 2011.  Substantially all notes receivable are based on floating interest rates which adjust to changes in market rates.


Long-term debt, which includes the current maturities of long-term debt, at June 16, 2012, had a carrying value and fair value of $337.4 million and $336.8 million, respectively, and at December 31, 2011, had a carrying value and fair value of $279.1 million and $276.3 million, respectively. The fair value is based on interest rates that are currently available to us for issuance of debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.


During the second quarter of 2012, we recorded a goodwill impairment of $132.0 million as compared to $0.3 million in asset impairments during the second quarter of 2011.  For year-to-date 2012 and 2011, asset impairments were $132.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively.  We utilize a discounted cash flow model that incorporates unobservable level 3 inputs to test for long-lived asset impairment.